User login
News and Views that Matter to Pediatricians
The leading independent newspaper covering news and commentary in pediatrics.
Motor function restored in three men after complete paralysis from spinal cord injury
(SCI), new research shows.
The study demonstrated that an epidural electrical stimulation (EES) system developed specifically for spinal cord injuries enabled three men with complete paralysis to stand, walk, cycle, swim, and move their torso within 1 day.
“Thanks to this technology, we have been able to target individuals with the most serious spinal cord injury, meaning those with clinically complete spinal cord injury, with no sensation and no movement in the legs,” Grégoire Courtine, PhD, professor of neuroscience and neurotechnology at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, University Hospital Lausanne (Switzerland), and the University of Lausanne, told reporters attending a press briefing.
The study was published online Feb. 7, 2022, in Nature Medicine.
More rapid, precise, effective
SCIs involve severed connections between the brain and extremities. To compensate for these lost connections, researchers have investigated stem cell therapy, brain-machine interfaces, and powered exoskeletons.
However, these approaches aren’t yet ready for prime time.
In the meantime, researchers discovered even patients with a “complete” injury may have low-functioning connections and started investigating epidural stimulators designed to treat chronic pain. Recent studies – including three published in 2018 – showed promise for these pain-related stimulators in patients with incomplete SCI.
But using such “repurposed” technology meant the electrode array was relatively narrow and short, “so we could not target all the regions of the spinal cord involving control of leg and trunk movements,” said Dr. Courtine. With the newer technology “we are much more precise, effective, and more rapid in delivering therapy.”
To develop this new approach, the researchers designed a paddle lead with an arrangement of electrodes that targets sacral, lumbar, and low-thoracic dorsal roots involved in leg and trunk movements. They also established a personalized computational framework that allows for optimal surgical placement of this paddle lead.
In addition, they developed software that renders the configuration of individualized activity–dependent stimulation programs rapid, simple, and predictable.
They tested these neurotechnologies in three men with complete sensorimotor paralysis as part of an ongoing clinical trial. The participants, aged 29, 32, and 41 years, suffered an SCI from a motor bike accident 3, 9, and 1 year before enrollment.
All three patients exhibited complete sensorimotor paralysis. They were unable to take any step, and muscles remained quiescent during these attempts.
A neurosurgeon implanted electrodes along the spinal cord of study subjects. Wires from these electrodes were connected to a neurostimulator implanted under the skin in the abdomen.
The men can select different activity-based programs from a tablet that sends signals to the implanted device.
Personalized approach
Within a single day of the surgery, the participants were able to stand, walk, cycle, swim, and control trunk movements.
“It was not perfect at the very beginning, but they could train very early on to have a more fluid gait,” said study investigator neurosurgeon Joceylyne Bloch, MD, associate professor, University of Lausanne and University Hospital Lausanne.
At this stage, not all paralyzed patients are eligible for the procedure. Dr. Bloch explained that at least 6 cm of healthy spinal cord under the lesion is needed to implant the electrodes.
“There’s a huge variability of spinal cord anatomy between individuals. That’s why it’s important to study each person individually and to have individual models in order to be precise.”
Researchers envision having “a library of electrode arrays,” added Dr. Courtine. With preoperative imaging of the individual’s spinal cord, “the neurosurgeon can select the more appropriate electrode array for that specific patient.”
Dr. Courtine noted recovery of sensation with the system differs from one individual to another. One study participant, Michel Roccati, now 30, told the briefing he feels a contraction in his muscle during the stimulation.
Currently, only individuals whose injury is more than a year old are included in the study to ensure patients have “a stable lesion” and reached “a plateau of recovery,” said Dr. Bloch. However, animal models show intervening earlier might boost the benefits.
A patient’s age can influence the outcome, as younger patients are likely in better condition and more motivated than older patients, said Dr. Bloch. However, she noted patients closing in on 50 years have responded well to the therapy.
Such stimulation systems may prove useful in treating conditions typically associated with SCI, such as hypertension and bladder control, and perhaps also in patients with Parkinson’s disease, said Dr. Courtine.
The researchers plan to conduct another study that will include a next-generation pulse generator with features that make the stimulation even more effective and user friendly. A voice recognition system could eventually be connected to the system.
“The next step is a minicomputer that you implant in the body that communicates in real time with an external iPhone,” said Dr. Courtine.
ONWARD Medical, which developed the technology, has received a breakthrough device designation from the Food and Drug Administration. The company is in discussions with the FDA to carry out a clinical trial of the device in the United States.
A ‘huge step forward’
Peter J. Grahn, PhD, assistant professor, department of physical medicine and rehabilitation and department of neurologic surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., an author of one of the 2018 studies, said this technology “is a huge step forward” and “really pushes the field.”
Compared with the device used in his study that’s designed to treat neuropathic pain, this new system “is much more capable of dynamic stimulation,” said Dr. Grahn. “You can tailor the stimulation based on which area of the spinal cord you want to target during a specific function.”
There has been “a lot of hope and hype” recently around stem cells and biological molecules that were supposed to be “magic pills” to cure spinal cord dysfunction, said Dr. Grahn. “I don’t think this is one of those.”
However, he questioned the researchers’ use of the word “walking.”
“They say independent stepping or walking is restored on day 1, but the graphs show day 1 function is having over 60% of their body weight supported when they’re taking these steps,” he said.
In addition, the “big question” is how this technology can “be distilled down” into an approach “applicable across rehabilitation centers,” said Dr. Grahn.
The study was supported by numerous organizations, including ONWARD Medical. Dr. Courtine and Dr. Bloch hold various patents in relation with the present work. Dr. Courtine is a consultant with ONWARD Medical, and he and Dr. Bloch are shareholders of ONWARD Medical, a company with direct relationships with the presented work. Dr. Grahn reported no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
(SCI), new research shows.
The study demonstrated that an epidural electrical stimulation (EES) system developed specifically for spinal cord injuries enabled three men with complete paralysis to stand, walk, cycle, swim, and move their torso within 1 day.
“Thanks to this technology, we have been able to target individuals with the most serious spinal cord injury, meaning those with clinically complete spinal cord injury, with no sensation and no movement in the legs,” Grégoire Courtine, PhD, professor of neuroscience and neurotechnology at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, University Hospital Lausanne (Switzerland), and the University of Lausanne, told reporters attending a press briefing.
The study was published online Feb. 7, 2022, in Nature Medicine.
More rapid, precise, effective
SCIs involve severed connections between the brain and extremities. To compensate for these lost connections, researchers have investigated stem cell therapy, brain-machine interfaces, and powered exoskeletons.
However, these approaches aren’t yet ready for prime time.
In the meantime, researchers discovered even patients with a “complete” injury may have low-functioning connections and started investigating epidural stimulators designed to treat chronic pain. Recent studies – including three published in 2018 – showed promise for these pain-related stimulators in patients with incomplete SCI.
But using such “repurposed” technology meant the electrode array was relatively narrow and short, “so we could not target all the regions of the spinal cord involving control of leg and trunk movements,” said Dr. Courtine. With the newer technology “we are much more precise, effective, and more rapid in delivering therapy.”
To develop this new approach, the researchers designed a paddle lead with an arrangement of electrodes that targets sacral, lumbar, and low-thoracic dorsal roots involved in leg and trunk movements. They also established a personalized computational framework that allows for optimal surgical placement of this paddle lead.
In addition, they developed software that renders the configuration of individualized activity–dependent stimulation programs rapid, simple, and predictable.
They tested these neurotechnologies in three men with complete sensorimotor paralysis as part of an ongoing clinical trial. The participants, aged 29, 32, and 41 years, suffered an SCI from a motor bike accident 3, 9, and 1 year before enrollment.
All three patients exhibited complete sensorimotor paralysis. They were unable to take any step, and muscles remained quiescent during these attempts.
A neurosurgeon implanted electrodes along the spinal cord of study subjects. Wires from these electrodes were connected to a neurostimulator implanted under the skin in the abdomen.
The men can select different activity-based programs from a tablet that sends signals to the implanted device.
Personalized approach
Within a single day of the surgery, the participants were able to stand, walk, cycle, swim, and control trunk movements.
“It was not perfect at the very beginning, but they could train very early on to have a more fluid gait,” said study investigator neurosurgeon Joceylyne Bloch, MD, associate professor, University of Lausanne and University Hospital Lausanne.
At this stage, not all paralyzed patients are eligible for the procedure. Dr. Bloch explained that at least 6 cm of healthy spinal cord under the lesion is needed to implant the electrodes.
“There’s a huge variability of spinal cord anatomy between individuals. That’s why it’s important to study each person individually and to have individual models in order to be precise.”
Researchers envision having “a library of electrode arrays,” added Dr. Courtine. With preoperative imaging of the individual’s spinal cord, “the neurosurgeon can select the more appropriate electrode array for that specific patient.”
Dr. Courtine noted recovery of sensation with the system differs from one individual to another. One study participant, Michel Roccati, now 30, told the briefing he feels a contraction in his muscle during the stimulation.
Currently, only individuals whose injury is more than a year old are included in the study to ensure patients have “a stable lesion” and reached “a plateau of recovery,” said Dr. Bloch. However, animal models show intervening earlier might boost the benefits.
A patient’s age can influence the outcome, as younger patients are likely in better condition and more motivated than older patients, said Dr. Bloch. However, she noted patients closing in on 50 years have responded well to the therapy.
Such stimulation systems may prove useful in treating conditions typically associated with SCI, such as hypertension and bladder control, and perhaps also in patients with Parkinson’s disease, said Dr. Courtine.
The researchers plan to conduct another study that will include a next-generation pulse generator with features that make the stimulation even more effective and user friendly. A voice recognition system could eventually be connected to the system.
“The next step is a minicomputer that you implant in the body that communicates in real time with an external iPhone,” said Dr. Courtine.
ONWARD Medical, which developed the technology, has received a breakthrough device designation from the Food and Drug Administration. The company is in discussions with the FDA to carry out a clinical trial of the device in the United States.
A ‘huge step forward’
Peter J. Grahn, PhD, assistant professor, department of physical medicine and rehabilitation and department of neurologic surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., an author of one of the 2018 studies, said this technology “is a huge step forward” and “really pushes the field.”
Compared with the device used in his study that’s designed to treat neuropathic pain, this new system “is much more capable of dynamic stimulation,” said Dr. Grahn. “You can tailor the stimulation based on which area of the spinal cord you want to target during a specific function.”
There has been “a lot of hope and hype” recently around stem cells and biological molecules that were supposed to be “magic pills” to cure spinal cord dysfunction, said Dr. Grahn. “I don’t think this is one of those.”
However, he questioned the researchers’ use of the word “walking.”
“They say independent stepping or walking is restored on day 1, but the graphs show day 1 function is having over 60% of their body weight supported when they’re taking these steps,” he said.
In addition, the “big question” is how this technology can “be distilled down” into an approach “applicable across rehabilitation centers,” said Dr. Grahn.
The study was supported by numerous organizations, including ONWARD Medical. Dr. Courtine and Dr. Bloch hold various patents in relation with the present work. Dr. Courtine is a consultant with ONWARD Medical, and he and Dr. Bloch are shareholders of ONWARD Medical, a company with direct relationships with the presented work. Dr. Grahn reported no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
(SCI), new research shows.
The study demonstrated that an epidural electrical stimulation (EES) system developed specifically for spinal cord injuries enabled three men with complete paralysis to stand, walk, cycle, swim, and move their torso within 1 day.
“Thanks to this technology, we have been able to target individuals with the most serious spinal cord injury, meaning those with clinically complete spinal cord injury, with no sensation and no movement in the legs,” Grégoire Courtine, PhD, professor of neuroscience and neurotechnology at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, University Hospital Lausanne (Switzerland), and the University of Lausanne, told reporters attending a press briefing.
The study was published online Feb. 7, 2022, in Nature Medicine.
More rapid, precise, effective
SCIs involve severed connections between the brain and extremities. To compensate for these lost connections, researchers have investigated stem cell therapy, brain-machine interfaces, and powered exoskeletons.
However, these approaches aren’t yet ready for prime time.
In the meantime, researchers discovered even patients with a “complete” injury may have low-functioning connections and started investigating epidural stimulators designed to treat chronic pain. Recent studies – including three published in 2018 – showed promise for these pain-related stimulators in patients with incomplete SCI.
But using such “repurposed” technology meant the electrode array was relatively narrow and short, “so we could not target all the regions of the spinal cord involving control of leg and trunk movements,” said Dr. Courtine. With the newer technology “we are much more precise, effective, and more rapid in delivering therapy.”
To develop this new approach, the researchers designed a paddle lead with an arrangement of electrodes that targets sacral, lumbar, and low-thoracic dorsal roots involved in leg and trunk movements. They also established a personalized computational framework that allows for optimal surgical placement of this paddle lead.
In addition, they developed software that renders the configuration of individualized activity–dependent stimulation programs rapid, simple, and predictable.
They tested these neurotechnologies in three men with complete sensorimotor paralysis as part of an ongoing clinical trial. The participants, aged 29, 32, and 41 years, suffered an SCI from a motor bike accident 3, 9, and 1 year before enrollment.
All three patients exhibited complete sensorimotor paralysis. They were unable to take any step, and muscles remained quiescent during these attempts.
A neurosurgeon implanted electrodes along the spinal cord of study subjects. Wires from these electrodes were connected to a neurostimulator implanted under the skin in the abdomen.
The men can select different activity-based programs from a tablet that sends signals to the implanted device.
Personalized approach
Within a single day of the surgery, the participants were able to stand, walk, cycle, swim, and control trunk movements.
“It was not perfect at the very beginning, but they could train very early on to have a more fluid gait,” said study investigator neurosurgeon Joceylyne Bloch, MD, associate professor, University of Lausanne and University Hospital Lausanne.
At this stage, not all paralyzed patients are eligible for the procedure. Dr. Bloch explained that at least 6 cm of healthy spinal cord under the lesion is needed to implant the electrodes.
“There’s a huge variability of spinal cord anatomy between individuals. That’s why it’s important to study each person individually and to have individual models in order to be precise.”
Researchers envision having “a library of electrode arrays,” added Dr. Courtine. With preoperative imaging of the individual’s spinal cord, “the neurosurgeon can select the more appropriate electrode array for that specific patient.”
Dr. Courtine noted recovery of sensation with the system differs from one individual to another. One study participant, Michel Roccati, now 30, told the briefing he feels a contraction in his muscle during the stimulation.
Currently, only individuals whose injury is more than a year old are included in the study to ensure patients have “a stable lesion” and reached “a plateau of recovery,” said Dr. Bloch. However, animal models show intervening earlier might boost the benefits.
A patient’s age can influence the outcome, as younger patients are likely in better condition and more motivated than older patients, said Dr. Bloch. However, she noted patients closing in on 50 years have responded well to the therapy.
Such stimulation systems may prove useful in treating conditions typically associated with SCI, such as hypertension and bladder control, and perhaps also in patients with Parkinson’s disease, said Dr. Courtine.
The researchers plan to conduct another study that will include a next-generation pulse generator with features that make the stimulation even more effective and user friendly. A voice recognition system could eventually be connected to the system.
“The next step is a minicomputer that you implant in the body that communicates in real time with an external iPhone,” said Dr. Courtine.
ONWARD Medical, which developed the technology, has received a breakthrough device designation from the Food and Drug Administration. The company is in discussions with the FDA to carry out a clinical trial of the device in the United States.
A ‘huge step forward’
Peter J. Grahn, PhD, assistant professor, department of physical medicine and rehabilitation and department of neurologic surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., an author of one of the 2018 studies, said this technology “is a huge step forward” and “really pushes the field.”
Compared with the device used in his study that’s designed to treat neuropathic pain, this new system “is much more capable of dynamic stimulation,” said Dr. Grahn. “You can tailor the stimulation based on which area of the spinal cord you want to target during a specific function.”
There has been “a lot of hope and hype” recently around stem cells and biological molecules that were supposed to be “magic pills” to cure spinal cord dysfunction, said Dr. Grahn. “I don’t think this is one of those.”
However, he questioned the researchers’ use of the word “walking.”
“They say independent stepping or walking is restored on day 1, but the graphs show day 1 function is having over 60% of their body weight supported when they’re taking these steps,” he said.
In addition, the “big question” is how this technology can “be distilled down” into an approach “applicable across rehabilitation centers,” said Dr. Grahn.
The study was supported by numerous organizations, including ONWARD Medical. Dr. Courtine and Dr. Bloch hold various patents in relation with the present work. Dr. Courtine is a consultant with ONWARD Medical, and he and Dr. Bloch are shareholders of ONWARD Medical, a company with direct relationships with the presented work. Dr. Grahn reported no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
FROM NATURE MEDICINE
FDA approves first-ever drug for cold agglutinin disease
A new drug has become the first and only treatment for people with cold agglutinin disease (CAD) that is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
CAD is a rare autoimmune hemolytic anemia, affecting about 5,000 people in the United States. It is caused by antibodies binding to the surface of red blood cells, which starts a process that causes the body’s immune system to mistakenly attack healthy red blood cells and cause their rupture (hemolysis). This can lead to severe anemia, which is often treated by blood transfusions.
“For people living with cold agglutinin disease, it is as if their body’s immune system is waging a war on itself. The relentless destruction of healthy red blood cells is a daily, silent reality for people with CAD. For the first time, we have a treatment that targets complement-mediated hemolysis, which is the underlying cause of the red blood cell destruction in many CAD patients,” commented Catherine Broome, MD, associate professor of medicine at Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, in a company press release.
Dr. Broome was the principal investigator in the CARDINAL study, which was the basis for the new approval. In this pivotal study, patients treated with sutimlimab had an improvement in anemia as measured by hemoglobin (Hgb) and bilirubin levels, she commented in the company statement.
The CARDINAL study was a 26-week open-label, single-arm phase 3 study conducted in 24 patients with CAD who had recent history of blood transfusion.
The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite defined as the proportion of patients who achieved normalization of Hgb level greater than or equal to 12 g/dL or demonstrated an increase from baseline in Hgb level greater than or equal to 2 g/dL at the treatment assessment time point (mean value from weeks 23, 25, and 26) and no blood transfusion from weeks 5 through 26.
More than half of the patients (13 of 24, 54%) met the composite primary endpoint criteria, with 17 of 24 (71%) patients remaining transfusion-free after week 5. Most patients (22 of 24, 92%) did not use other CAD-related treatments.
For the secondary measures on disease process, patients enrolled in the trial experienced a mean increase in Hgb level of 2.29 g/dL at week 3 and 3.18 g/dL at the 26-week treatment assessment time points (increasing from the mean baseline level of 8.6 g/dL). In addition, there was a mean reduction in bilirubin levels (n = 14) of -2.23 mg/dL from a mean baseline level of 3.23 mg/dL.
The most common adverse reactions occurring in 10% or more of patients were respiratory tract infection, viral infection, diarrhea, dyspepsia, cough, arthralgia, arthritis, and peripheral edema. Serious adverse reactions were reported in 3 of 24 (13%) patients, and these included streptococcal sepsis and staphylococcal wound infection (n = 1), arthralgia (n = 1), and respiratory tract infection (n = 1).
None of the adverse reactions led to discontinuation of the drug, the company noted. Dosage interruptions due to an adverse reaction occurred in 4 of 24 (17%) patients who received the drug.
The recommended dose is based on body weight (6,500 mg for people 39-75 kg and 7,500 mg for people greater than 75 kg). The drug is administered intravenously weekly for the first 2 weeks with administration every 2 weeks thereafter.
Full prescribing information is available here.
The product is a humanized monoclonal antibody that is designed to selectively target and inhibit C1s in the classical complement pathway, which is part of the innate immune system. By blocking C1s, Enjaymo inhibits the activation of the complement cascade in the immune system and inhibits C1-activated hemolysis in CAD to prevent the abnormal destruction of healthy red blood cells. Enjaymo does not inhibit the lectin and alternative pathways, the company noted.
In the U.S., Enjaymo received FDA breakthrough therapy and orphan drug designation, as well as priority review. The product is awaiting approval in Europe and Japan.
Sanofi says the product is expected to be available in the United States in the coming weeks, with a list price, or wholesale acquisition cost, of $1,800 per vial. Actual costs to patients are generally anticipated to be lower, as the list price does not reflect insurance coverage, copay support, or financial assistance from patient support programs. The company offers support for eligible patients on 1-833-223-2428.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
A new drug has become the first and only treatment for people with cold agglutinin disease (CAD) that is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
CAD is a rare autoimmune hemolytic anemia, affecting about 5,000 people in the United States. It is caused by antibodies binding to the surface of red blood cells, which starts a process that causes the body’s immune system to mistakenly attack healthy red blood cells and cause their rupture (hemolysis). This can lead to severe anemia, which is often treated by blood transfusions.
“For people living with cold agglutinin disease, it is as if their body’s immune system is waging a war on itself. The relentless destruction of healthy red blood cells is a daily, silent reality for people with CAD. For the first time, we have a treatment that targets complement-mediated hemolysis, which is the underlying cause of the red blood cell destruction in many CAD patients,” commented Catherine Broome, MD, associate professor of medicine at Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, in a company press release.
Dr. Broome was the principal investigator in the CARDINAL study, which was the basis for the new approval. In this pivotal study, patients treated with sutimlimab had an improvement in anemia as measured by hemoglobin (Hgb) and bilirubin levels, she commented in the company statement.
The CARDINAL study was a 26-week open-label, single-arm phase 3 study conducted in 24 patients with CAD who had recent history of blood transfusion.
The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite defined as the proportion of patients who achieved normalization of Hgb level greater than or equal to 12 g/dL or demonstrated an increase from baseline in Hgb level greater than or equal to 2 g/dL at the treatment assessment time point (mean value from weeks 23, 25, and 26) and no blood transfusion from weeks 5 through 26.
More than half of the patients (13 of 24, 54%) met the composite primary endpoint criteria, with 17 of 24 (71%) patients remaining transfusion-free after week 5. Most patients (22 of 24, 92%) did not use other CAD-related treatments.
For the secondary measures on disease process, patients enrolled in the trial experienced a mean increase in Hgb level of 2.29 g/dL at week 3 and 3.18 g/dL at the 26-week treatment assessment time points (increasing from the mean baseline level of 8.6 g/dL). In addition, there was a mean reduction in bilirubin levels (n = 14) of -2.23 mg/dL from a mean baseline level of 3.23 mg/dL.
The most common adverse reactions occurring in 10% or more of patients were respiratory tract infection, viral infection, diarrhea, dyspepsia, cough, arthralgia, arthritis, and peripheral edema. Serious adverse reactions were reported in 3 of 24 (13%) patients, and these included streptococcal sepsis and staphylococcal wound infection (n = 1), arthralgia (n = 1), and respiratory tract infection (n = 1).
None of the adverse reactions led to discontinuation of the drug, the company noted. Dosage interruptions due to an adverse reaction occurred in 4 of 24 (17%) patients who received the drug.
The recommended dose is based on body weight (6,500 mg for people 39-75 kg and 7,500 mg for people greater than 75 kg). The drug is administered intravenously weekly for the first 2 weeks with administration every 2 weeks thereafter.
Full prescribing information is available here.
The product is a humanized monoclonal antibody that is designed to selectively target and inhibit C1s in the classical complement pathway, which is part of the innate immune system. By blocking C1s, Enjaymo inhibits the activation of the complement cascade in the immune system and inhibits C1-activated hemolysis in CAD to prevent the abnormal destruction of healthy red blood cells. Enjaymo does not inhibit the lectin and alternative pathways, the company noted.
In the U.S., Enjaymo received FDA breakthrough therapy and orphan drug designation, as well as priority review. The product is awaiting approval in Europe and Japan.
Sanofi says the product is expected to be available in the United States in the coming weeks, with a list price, or wholesale acquisition cost, of $1,800 per vial. Actual costs to patients are generally anticipated to be lower, as the list price does not reflect insurance coverage, copay support, or financial assistance from patient support programs. The company offers support for eligible patients on 1-833-223-2428.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
A new drug has become the first and only treatment for people with cold agglutinin disease (CAD) that is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
CAD is a rare autoimmune hemolytic anemia, affecting about 5,000 people in the United States. It is caused by antibodies binding to the surface of red blood cells, which starts a process that causes the body’s immune system to mistakenly attack healthy red blood cells and cause their rupture (hemolysis). This can lead to severe anemia, which is often treated by blood transfusions.
“For people living with cold agglutinin disease, it is as if their body’s immune system is waging a war on itself. The relentless destruction of healthy red blood cells is a daily, silent reality for people with CAD. For the first time, we have a treatment that targets complement-mediated hemolysis, which is the underlying cause of the red blood cell destruction in many CAD patients,” commented Catherine Broome, MD, associate professor of medicine at Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, in a company press release.
Dr. Broome was the principal investigator in the CARDINAL study, which was the basis for the new approval. In this pivotal study, patients treated with sutimlimab had an improvement in anemia as measured by hemoglobin (Hgb) and bilirubin levels, she commented in the company statement.
The CARDINAL study was a 26-week open-label, single-arm phase 3 study conducted in 24 patients with CAD who had recent history of blood transfusion.
The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite defined as the proportion of patients who achieved normalization of Hgb level greater than or equal to 12 g/dL or demonstrated an increase from baseline in Hgb level greater than or equal to 2 g/dL at the treatment assessment time point (mean value from weeks 23, 25, and 26) and no blood transfusion from weeks 5 through 26.
More than half of the patients (13 of 24, 54%) met the composite primary endpoint criteria, with 17 of 24 (71%) patients remaining transfusion-free after week 5. Most patients (22 of 24, 92%) did not use other CAD-related treatments.
For the secondary measures on disease process, patients enrolled in the trial experienced a mean increase in Hgb level of 2.29 g/dL at week 3 and 3.18 g/dL at the 26-week treatment assessment time points (increasing from the mean baseline level of 8.6 g/dL). In addition, there was a mean reduction in bilirubin levels (n = 14) of -2.23 mg/dL from a mean baseline level of 3.23 mg/dL.
The most common adverse reactions occurring in 10% or more of patients were respiratory tract infection, viral infection, diarrhea, dyspepsia, cough, arthralgia, arthritis, and peripheral edema. Serious adverse reactions were reported in 3 of 24 (13%) patients, and these included streptococcal sepsis and staphylococcal wound infection (n = 1), arthralgia (n = 1), and respiratory tract infection (n = 1).
None of the adverse reactions led to discontinuation of the drug, the company noted. Dosage interruptions due to an adverse reaction occurred in 4 of 24 (17%) patients who received the drug.
The recommended dose is based on body weight (6,500 mg for people 39-75 kg and 7,500 mg for people greater than 75 kg). The drug is administered intravenously weekly for the first 2 weeks with administration every 2 weeks thereafter.
Full prescribing information is available here.
The product is a humanized monoclonal antibody that is designed to selectively target and inhibit C1s in the classical complement pathway, which is part of the innate immune system. By blocking C1s, Enjaymo inhibits the activation of the complement cascade in the immune system and inhibits C1-activated hemolysis in CAD to prevent the abnormal destruction of healthy red blood cells. Enjaymo does not inhibit the lectin and alternative pathways, the company noted.
In the U.S., Enjaymo received FDA breakthrough therapy and orphan drug designation, as well as priority review. The product is awaiting approval in Europe and Japan.
Sanofi says the product is expected to be available in the United States in the coming weeks, with a list price, or wholesale acquisition cost, of $1,800 per vial. Actual costs to patients are generally anticipated to be lower, as the list price does not reflect insurance coverage, copay support, or financial assistance from patient support programs. The company offers support for eligible patients on 1-833-223-2428.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Infant bronchiolitis subtype may predict asthma risk
Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of infant hospitalizations in the United States and Europe, and almost one-third of these patients go on to develop asthma later in childhood.
But a multinational team of researchers has presented evidence that could avoid that outcome. They identified four different subtypes of bronchiolitis along with a decision tree that can determine which infants are most likely to develop asthma as they get older.
Reporting in the journal eClinical Medicine, Michimasa Fujiogi, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard University, Boston, and colleagues analyzed three multicenter prospective cohort studies that included a combined 3,081 infants hospitalized with severe bronchiolitis.
“This study added a base for the early identification of high-risk patients during early infancy,” Dr. Fujiogi said in an interview. “Using the prediction rule of this study, it is possible to identify groups at high risk of asthma during a critical period of airway development – early infancy.”
The researchers identified four clinically distinct and reproducible profiles of infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis:
- A: characterized by a history of breathing problems and eczema, rhinovirus infection, and low prevalence of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection.
- B: characterized by the classic symptoms of wheezing and cough at presentation, a low prevalence of previous breathing problems and rhinovirus infection, and a high likelihood of RSV infection.
- C: the most severe group, characterized by inadequate oral intake, severe retraction at presentation, and longer hospital stays.
- D: the least ill group, with little history of breathing problems but inadequate oral intake with no or mild retraction.
Infants with profile A had the highest risk for developing asthma – more than 250% greater than with typical bronchiolitis. They were also older and were more likely to have parents who had asthma – and none had solo-RSV infection. In the overall analysis, the risk for developing asthma by age 6 or 7 was 23%.
The researchers stated that the decision tree accurately predicts the high-risk profile with high degrees of sensitivity and specificity. The decision tree used four predictors that together defined infants with profile A: RSV infection status, previous breathing problems, eczema, and parental asthma.
“Our data would facilitate the development of profile-specific prevention strategies for asthma – for example, modification of host response, prophylaxis for severe viral infection – by identifying asthma risk groups early in infancy,” Dr. Fujiogi said.
The study received funding from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Fujiogi and coauthors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of infant hospitalizations in the United States and Europe, and almost one-third of these patients go on to develop asthma later in childhood.
But a multinational team of researchers has presented evidence that could avoid that outcome. They identified four different subtypes of bronchiolitis along with a decision tree that can determine which infants are most likely to develop asthma as they get older.
Reporting in the journal eClinical Medicine, Michimasa Fujiogi, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard University, Boston, and colleagues analyzed three multicenter prospective cohort studies that included a combined 3,081 infants hospitalized with severe bronchiolitis.
“This study added a base for the early identification of high-risk patients during early infancy,” Dr. Fujiogi said in an interview. “Using the prediction rule of this study, it is possible to identify groups at high risk of asthma during a critical period of airway development – early infancy.”
The researchers identified four clinically distinct and reproducible profiles of infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis:
- A: characterized by a history of breathing problems and eczema, rhinovirus infection, and low prevalence of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection.
- B: characterized by the classic symptoms of wheezing and cough at presentation, a low prevalence of previous breathing problems and rhinovirus infection, and a high likelihood of RSV infection.
- C: the most severe group, characterized by inadequate oral intake, severe retraction at presentation, and longer hospital stays.
- D: the least ill group, with little history of breathing problems but inadequate oral intake with no or mild retraction.
Infants with profile A had the highest risk for developing asthma – more than 250% greater than with typical bronchiolitis. They were also older and were more likely to have parents who had asthma – and none had solo-RSV infection. In the overall analysis, the risk for developing asthma by age 6 or 7 was 23%.
The researchers stated that the decision tree accurately predicts the high-risk profile with high degrees of sensitivity and specificity. The decision tree used four predictors that together defined infants with profile A: RSV infection status, previous breathing problems, eczema, and parental asthma.
“Our data would facilitate the development of profile-specific prevention strategies for asthma – for example, modification of host response, prophylaxis for severe viral infection – by identifying asthma risk groups early in infancy,” Dr. Fujiogi said.
The study received funding from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Fujiogi and coauthors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of infant hospitalizations in the United States and Europe, and almost one-third of these patients go on to develop asthma later in childhood.
But a multinational team of researchers has presented evidence that could avoid that outcome. They identified four different subtypes of bronchiolitis along with a decision tree that can determine which infants are most likely to develop asthma as they get older.
Reporting in the journal eClinical Medicine, Michimasa Fujiogi, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard University, Boston, and colleagues analyzed three multicenter prospective cohort studies that included a combined 3,081 infants hospitalized with severe bronchiolitis.
“This study added a base for the early identification of high-risk patients during early infancy,” Dr. Fujiogi said in an interview. “Using the prediction rule of this study, it is possible to identify groups at high risk of asthma during a critical period of airway development – early infancy.”
The researchers identified four clinically distinct and reproducible profiles of infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis:
- A: characterized by a history of breathing problems and eczema, rhinovirus infection, and low prevalence of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection.
- B: characterized by the classic symptoms of wheezing and cough at presentation, a low prevalence of previous breathing problems and rhinovirus infection, and a high likelihood of RSV infection.
- C: the most severe group, characterized by inadequate oral intake, severe retraction at presentation, and longer hospital stays.
- D: the least ill group, with little history of breathing problems but inadequate oral intake with no or mild retraction.
Infants with profile A had the highest risk for developing asthma – more than 250% greater than with typical bronchiolitis. They were also older and were more likely to have parents who had asthma – and none had solo-RSV infection. In the overall analysis, the risk for developing asthma by age 6 or 7 was 23%.
The researchers stated that the decision tree accurately predicts the high-risk profile with high degrees of sensitivity and specificity. The decision tree used four predictors that together defined infants with profile A: RSV infection status, previous breathing problems, eczema, and parental asthma.
“Our data would facilitate the development of profile-specific prevention strategies for asthma – for example, modification of host response, prophylaxis for severe viral infection – by identifying asthma risk groups early in infancy,” Dr. Fujiogi said.
The study received funding from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Fujiogi and coauthors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Questions about optimal dosing of isotretinoin persist, expert says
Although the to this day, according to Diane M. Thiboutot, MD.
These include, what is the ideal daily dose of isotretinoin? What is the ideal cumulative dose of isotretinoin to minimize relapse of acne? What is the ideal duration of isotretinoin therapy? How do you define relapse?
“Initially, it was recommended as 1–mg/kg per day dosing,” Dr. Thiboutot, professor of dermatology at Penn State University, Hershey, said during the Orlando Dermatology Aesthetic and Clinical Conference. “As time went on and we became familiar with flares that some patients can have on that dose, it was recommended to start treatment at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg per day. Then there were trends for low dosing, intermittent dosing, and some of the more recent medical literature is talking about high dosing.”
Clinical studies
A multicenter study of 150 patients published in 1984 found that rates of relapse (retreatment needed) were 42% of patients of patients treated with 0.1 mg/kg daily, 20% in patients treated with 0.5 mg/kg daily, and 10% in patients treated with 1.0 mg/kg daily.
In a later study, researchers who followed 299 patients for 5 years post isotretinoin treatment found that there were more relapses in the 0.5-mg/kg group versus those treated with 1.0 mg/kg. Factors that contributed to the need for more treatment courses included lower-dose regimens (0.1 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg), having severe acne, being a female over the age of 25 at the onset of therapy, and having a prolonged history of acne.
More recently, investigators who conducted a single-center study of 1,453 patients treated with isotretinoin defined relapse as the need for a second course of isotretinoin. “They found that neither daily nor cumulative dosages influenced relapse of acne vulgaris in patients treated with varying doses of isotretinoin as long as treatment was continued for 2 or more months after the acne had completely resolved,” said Dr. Thiboutot, a past president of the American Acne and Rosacea Society.
“The current evidence underpinning the 120-150 mg/kg cumulative threshold–dosing regimen is equivocal and is based on two low-grade studies,” she noted. “Cumulative doses required for clearance appear lower for acne of mild to moderate severity and higher for more severe acne. Future investigations should use clinically relevant endpoints as end of treatment criteria and define treatment success in acne accurately.”
Other studies have looked at whether higher doses of isotretinoin could reduce treatment failures in patients with acne, Dr. Thiboutot said. In a retrospective chart review of 102 patients with acne who had been treated with isotretinoin for at least 4 consecutive months and followed for over a year, 45.1% required further treatment and 15.7% received a second course of isotretinoin. Cumulative dose (mg/kg), follow-up period, duration of treatment, and daily dose during the last month of treatment were not significantly different between those who relapsed and those who did not relapse.
However, “while the cumulative dose of isotretinoin did not significantly impact acne relapse, patients who received a higher cumulative dose were less likely to require a second course of treatment,” the authors wrote, adding that “female patients had a higher risk of needing retrial regardless of their cumulative dose.” They commented that “prescribing a higher dose per weight may result in less severe acne recurrences and the need for further isotretinoin therapy.”
Another study evaluated 116 patients who were treated to clearance with dosing at the discretion of the provider and defined relapse as subsequent treatment with an oral or topical agent. In the lower-dose treatment (less than 220 mg/kg; mean of 170 mg/kg) group, the relapse rate was 47.4%, compared with 26.9% in the higher-dose (greater than 220 mg/kg) group (P = .03). Cheilitis and xerosis during treatment was reported in nearly all patients in both treatment groups, but retinoid dermatitis was significantly more common among those in the higher-dose group (53.8% vs. 31.6%; P = .02). There were no significant differences in other adverse events between the two groups.
According to Dr. Thiboutot, variables to consider in selection of a daily dose include the presence of intense inflammation, cysts, nodules, potential difference in side-effect profiles with ethnicity, and an individual’s degree of side effects and their level of comfort. “What are some of the concerns with higher doses? Those of us who have treated a lot of acne patients have had the unfortunate occurrence where you start someone on isotretinoin and their acne explodes, as do their cysts and nodules. Once that happens it’s a bad situation and it takes you a while to get past it.”
Acne fulminans
Dr. Thiboutot was part of a panel of experts who assembled guidelines on the classification, management, and prevention of acne fulminans, published in 2017. “Acne fulminans can be induced by isotretinoin or it can occur on its own. If you have someone who has a lot of inflammation, a lot of cysts and nodules, it’s probably best to start them on a lower dose with or without prednisone,” she said.
Age at treatment is another variable that can affect the duration of response to isotretinoin. “If the patient is very young when they need isotretinoin, it’s highly likely that they will need it again,” Dr. Thiboutot said. “Also, adult females often need a repeat dose of isotretinoin. The cumulative dose is important, and the presence of truncal acne is a factor affecting duration of response. Truncal acne takes longer to clear, and it oftentimes needs a longer treatment course.”
Data from the iPledge database indicate that 37% of 10- to 11-year-olds needed a repeat course of isotretinoin, “and as you get older, the need for retreatment is less,” she said.
High-dose versus low-dose isotretinoin
A slow, low-dose approach to the use of isotretinoin in practice can minimize side effects and cystic flares, according to Dr. Thiboutot. “The cons are that you could have a longer treatment duration, you might need more patient visits, and it creates more prolonged drug exposure in patients who can become pregnant,” she said.
“The pros of a high-dose strategy include a shorter treatment duration and potential costs savings. The cons are that there is an increased risk of side effects and a risk of cystic flare. It seems that the general agreement is to treat until clearance and then treat for another 2 months. A clear definition of acne relapse is needed as well as prospective studies to optimize dosing.”
Dr. Thiboutot disclosed that she is a consultant Galderma and Novartis. She has also performed clinical trials for Galderma, Cassiopea, and Foamix.
Commentary by Robert Sidbury, MD, MPH
Isotretinoin has been around for a long time – 40-plus years, to be exact. Despite this cumulative experience, ideal dosing and duration remain uncertain. Many providers have evolved from a “one size fits all” approach (for example, 1 mg/kg of body weight per day for 4-6 months) to a more tailored and nuanced strategy. Dr. Thiboutot validates the need to individualize therapy and helps identify patients at higher risk for relapse. Younger patients are at greater risk for repeat courses of isotretinoin – Dr. Thiboutot cites a study showing 37% of 10- to 11-year-olds required a second course of isotretinoin. This could simply be a proxy for severity, which also augurs a more protracted course. Adult women and those with truncal acne also trend toward longer courses. Knowing these risk factors will help practitioners counsel proper expectations, tailor treatment courses, and thread the always challenging isotretinoin needle: Should one dose “low and slow” and court a longer risk window, or higher and faster, sometimes leading to a dryer disaster?
Dr. Sidbury is chief of dermatology at Seattle Children's Hospital and professor, department of pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle. He is a site principal investigator for dupilumab trials, for which the hospital has a contract with Regeneron.
This article was updated 6/10/22.
Although the to this day, according to Diane M. Thiboutot, MD.
These include, what is the ideal daily dose of isotretinoin? What is the ideal cumulative dose of isotretinoin to minimize relapse of acne? What is the ideal duration of isotretinoin therapy? How do you define relapse?
“Initially, it was recommended as 1–mg/kg per day dosing,” Dr. Thiboutot, professor of dermatology at Penn State University, Hershey, said during the Orlando Dermatology Aesthetic and Clinical Conference. “As time went on and we became familiar with flares that some patients can have on that dose, it was recommended to start treatment at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg per day. Then there were trends for low dosing, intermittent dosing, and some of the more recent medical literature is talking about high dosing.”
Clinical studies
A multicenter study of 150 patients published in 1984 found that rates of relapse (retreatment needed) were 42% of patients of patients treated with 0.1 mg/kg daily, 20% in patients treated with 0.5 mg/kg daily, and 10% in patients treated with 1.0 mg/kg daily.
In a later study, researchers who followed 299 patients for 5 years post isotretinoin treatment found that there were more relapses in the 0.5-mg/kg group versus those treated with 1.0 mg/kg. Factors that contributed to the need for more treatment courses included lower-dose regimens (0.1 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg), having severe acne, being a female over the age of 25 at the onset of therapy, and having a prolonged history of acne.
More recently, investigators who conducted a single-center study of 1,453 patients treated with isotretinoin defined relapse as the need for a second course of isotretinoin. “They found that neither daily nor cumulative dosages influenced relapse of acne vulgaris in patients treated with varying doses of isotretinoin as long as treatment was continued for 2 or more months after the acne had completely resolved,” said Dr. Thiboutot, a past president of the American Acne and Rosacea Society.
“The current evidence underpinning the 120-150 mg/kg cumulative threshold–dosing regimen is equivocal and is based on two low-grade studies,” she noted. “Cumulative doses required for clearance appear lower for acne of mild to moderate severity and higher for more severe acne. Future investigations should use clinically relevant endpoints as end of treatment criteria and define treatment success in acne accurately.”
Other studies have looked at whether higher doses of isotretinoin could reduce treatment failures in patients with acne, Dr. Thiboutot said. In a retrospective chart review of 102 patients with acne who had been treated with isotretinoin for at least 4 consecutive months and followed for over a year, 45.1% required further treatment and 15.7% received a second course of isotretinoin. Cumulative dose (mg/kg), follow-up period, duration of treatment, and daily dose during the last month of treatment were not significantly different between those who relapsed and those who did not relapse.
However, “while the cumulative dose of isotretinoin did not significantly impact acne relapse, patients who received a higher cumulative dose were less likely to require a second course of treatment,” the authors wrote, adding that “female patients had a higher risk of needing retrial regardless of their cumulative dose.” They commented that “prescribing a higher dose per weight may result in less severe acne recurrences and the need for further isotretinoin therapy.”
Another study evaluated 116 patients who were treated to clearance with dosing at the discretion of the provider and defined relapse as subsequent treatment with an oral or topical agent. In the lower-dose treatment (less than 220 mg/kg; mean of 170 mg/kg) group, the relapse rate was 47.4%, compared with 26.9% in the higher-dose (greater than 220 mg/kg) group (P = .03). Cheilitis and xerosis during treatment was reported in nearly all patients in both treatment groups, but retinoid dermatitis was significantly more common among those in the higher-dose group (53.8% vs. 31.6%; P = .02). There were no significant differences in other adverse events between the two groups.
According to Dr. Thiboutot, variables to consider in selection of a daily dose include the presence of intense inflammation, cysts, nodules, potential difference in side-effect profiles with ethnicity, and an individual’s degree of side effects and their level of comfort. “What are some of the concerns with higher doses? Those of us who have treated a lot of acne patients have had the unfortunate occurrence where you start someone on isotretinoin and their acne explodes, as do their cysts and nodules. Once that happens it’s a bad situation and it takes you a while to get past it.”
Acne fulminans
Dr. Thiboutot was part of a panel of experts who assembled guidelines on the classification, management, and prevention of acne fulminans, published in 2017. “Acne fulminans can be induced by isotretinoin or it can occur on its own. If you have someone who has a lot of inflammation, a lot of cysts and nodules, it’s probably best to start them on a lower dose with or without prednisone,” she said.
Age at treatment is another variable that can affect the duration of response to isotretinoin. “If the patient is very young when they need isotretinoin, it’s highly likely that they will need it again,” Dr. Thiboutot said. “Also, adult females often need a repeat dose of isotretinoin. The cumulative dose is important, and the presence of truncal acne is a factor affecting duration of response. Truncal acne takes longer to clear, and it oftentimes needs a longer treatment course.”
Data from the iPledge database indicate that 37% of 10- to 11-year-olds needed a repeat course of isotretinoin, “and as you get older, the need for retreatment is less,” she said.
High-dose versus low-dose isotretinoin
A slow, low-dose approach to the use of isotretinoin in practice can minimize side effects and cystic flares, according to Dr. Thiboutot. “The cons are that you could have a longer treatment duration, you might need more patient visits, and it creates more prolonged drug exposure in patients who can become pregnant,” she said.
“The pros of a high-dose strategy include a shorter treatment duration and potential costs savings. The cons are that there is an increased risk of side effects and a risk of cystic flare. It seems that the general agreement is to treat until clearance and then treat for another 2 months. A clear definition of acne relapse is needed as well as prospective studies to optimize dosing.”
Dr. Thiboutot disclosed that she is a consultant Galderma and Novartis. She has also performed clinical trials for Galderma, Cassiopea, and Foamix.
Commentary by Robert Sidbury, MD, MPH
Isotretinoin has been around for a long time – 40-plus years, to be exact. Despite this cumulative experience, ideal dosing and duration remain uncertain. Many providers have evolved from a “one size fits all” approach (for example, 1 mg/kg of body weight per day for 4-6 months) to a more tailored and nuanced strategy. Dr. Thiboutot validates the need to individualize therapy and helps identify patients at higher risk for relapse. Younger patients are at greater risk for repeat courses of isotretinoin – Dr. Thiboutot cites a study showing 37% of 10- to 11-year-olds required a second course of isotretinoin. This could simply be a proxy for severity, which also augurs a more protracted course. Adult women and those with truncal acne also trend toward longer courses. Knowing these risk factors will help practitioners counsel proper expectations, tailor treatment courses, and thread the always challenging isotretinoin needle: Should one dose “low and slow” and court a longer risk window, or higher and faster, sometimes leading to a dryer disaster?
Dr. Sidbury is chief of dermatology at Seattle Children's Hospital and professor, department of pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle. He is a site principal investigator for dupilumab trials, for which the hospital has a contract with Regeneron.
This article was updated 6/10/22.
Although the to this day, according to Diane M. Thiboutot, MD.
These include, what is the ideal daily dose of isotretinoin? What is the ideal cumulative dose of isotretinoin to minimize relapse of acne? What is the ideal duration of isotretinoin therapy? How do you define relapse?
“Initially, it was recommended as 1–mg/kg per day dosing,” Dr. Thiboutot, professor of dermatology at Penn State University, Hershey, said during the Orlando Dermatology Aesthetic and Clinical Conference. “As time went on and we became familiar with flares that some patients can have on that dose, it was recommended to start treatment at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg per day. Then there were trends for low dosing, intermittent dosing, and some of the more recent medical literature is talking about high dosing.”
Clinical studies
A multicenter study of 150 patients published in 1984 found that rates of relapse (retreatment needed) were 42% of patients of patients treated with 0.1 mg/kg daily, 20% in patients treated with 0.5 mg/kg daily, and 10% in patients treated with 1.0 mg/kg daily.
In a later study, researchers who followed 299 patients for 5 years post isotretinoin treatment found that there were more relapses in the 0.5-mg/kg group versus those treated with 1.0 mg/kg. Factors that contributed to the need for more treatment courses included lower-dose regimens (0.1 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg), having severe acne, being a female over the age of 25 at the onset of therapy, and having a prolonged history of acne.
More recently, investigators who conducted a single-center study of 1,453 patients treated with isotretinoin defined relapse as the need for a second course of isotretinoin. “They found that neither daily nor cumulative dosages influenced relapse of acne vulgaris in patients treated with varying doses of isotretinoin as long as treatment was continued for 2 or more months after the acne had completely resolved,” said Dr. Thiboutot, a past president of the American Acne and Rosacea Society.
“The current evidence underpinning the 120-150 mg/kg cumulative threshold–dosing regimen is equivocal and is based on two low-grade studies,” she noted. “Cumulative doses required for clearance appear lower for acne of mild to moderate severity and higher for more severe acne. Future investigations should use clinically relevant endpoints as end of treatment criteria and define treatment success in acne accurately.”
Other studies have looked at whether higher doses of isotretinoin could reduce treatment failures in patients with acne, Dr. Thiboutot said. In a retrospective chart review of 102 patients with acne who had been treated with isotretinoin for at least 4 consecutive months and followed for over a year, 45.1% required further treatment and 15.7% received a second course of isotretinoin. Cumulative dose (mg/kg), follow-up period, duration of treatment, and daily dose during the last month of treatment were not significantly different between those who relapsed and those who did not relapse.
However, “while the cumulative dose of isotretinoin did not significantly impact acne relapse, patients who received a higher cumulative dose were less likely to require a second course of treatment,” the authors wrote, adding that “female patients had a higher risk of needing retrial regardless of their cumulative dose.” They commented that “prescribing a higher dose per weight may result in less severe acne recurrences and the need for further isotretinoin therapy.”
Another study evaluated 116 patients who were treated to clearance with dosing at the discretion of the provider and defined relapse as subsequent treatment with an oral or topical agent. In the lower-dose treatment (less than 220 mg/kg; mean of 170 mg/kg) group, the relapse rate was 47.4%, compared with 26.9% in the higher-dose (greater than 220 mg/kg) group (P = .03). Cheilitis and xerosis during treatment was reported in nearly all patients in both treatment groups, but retinoid dermatitis was significantly more common among those in the higher-dose group (53.8% vs. 31.6%; P = .02). There were no significant differences in other adverse events between the two groups.
According to Dr. Thiboutot, variables to consider in selection of a daily dose include the presence of intense inflammation, cysts, nodules, potential difference in side-effect profiles with ethnicity, and an individual’s degree of side effects and their level of comfort. “What are some of the concerns with higher doses? Those of us who have treated a lot of acne patients have had the unfortunate occurrence where you start someone on isotretinoin and their acne explodes, as do their cysts and nodules. Once that happens it’s a bad situation and it takes you a while to get past it.”
Acne fulminans
Dr. Thiboutot was part of a panel of experts who assembled guidelines on the classification, management, and prevention of acne fulminans, published in 2017. “Acne fulminans can be induced by isotretinoin or it can occur on its own. If you have someone who has a lot of inflammation, a lot of cysts and nodules, it’s probably best to start them on a lower dose with or without prednisone,” she said.
Age at treatment is another variable that can affect the duration of response to isotretinoin. “If the patient is very young when they need isotretinoin, it’s highly likely that they will need it again,” Dr. Thiboutot said. “Also, adult females often need a repeat dose of isotretinoin. The cumulative dose is important, and the presence of truncal acne is a factor affecting duration of response. Truncal acne takes longer to clear, and it oftentimes needs a longer treatment course.”
Data from the iPledge database indicate that 37% of 10- to 11-year-olds needed a repeat course of isotretinoin, “and as you get older, the need for retreatment is less,” she said.
High-dose versus low-dose isotretinoin
A slow, low-dose approach to the use of isotretinoin in practice can minimize side effects and cystic flares, according to Dr. Thiboutot. “The cons are that you could have a longer treatment duration, you might need more patient visits, and it creates more prolonged drug exposure in patients who can become pregnant,” she said.
“The pros of a high-dose strategy include a shorter treatment duration and potential costs savings. The cons are that there is an increased risk of side effects and a risk of cystic flare. It seems that the general agreement is to treat until clearance and then treat for another 2 months. A clear definition of acne relapse is needed as well as prospective studies to optimize dosing.”
Dr. Thiboutot disclosed that she is a consultant Galderma and Novartis. She has also performed clinical trials for Galderma, Cassiopea, and Foamix.
Commentary by Robert Sidbury, MD, MPH
Isotretinoin has been around for a long time – 40-plus years, to be exact. Despite this cumulative experience, ideal dosing and duration remain uncertain. Many providers have evolved from a “one size fits all” approach (for example, 1 mg/kg of body weight per day for 4-6 months) to a more tailored and nuanced strategy. Dr. Thiboutot validates the need to individualize therapy and helps identify patients at higher risk for relapse. Younger patients are at greater risk for repeat courses of isotretinoin – Dr. Thiboutot cites a study showing 37% of 10- to 11-year-olds required a second course of isotretinoin. This could simply be a proxy for severity, which also augurs a more protracted course. Adult women and those with truncal acne also trend toward longer courses. Knowing these risk factors will help practitioners counsel proper expectations, tailor treatment courses, and thread the always challenging isotretinoin needle: Should one dose “low and slow” and court a longer risk window, or higher and faster, sometimes leading to a dryer disaster?
Dr. Sidbury is chief of dermatology at Seattle Children's Hospital and professor, department of pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle. He is a site principal investigator for dupilumab trials, for which the hospital has a contract with Regeneron.
This article was updated 6/10/22.
FROM ODAC 2022
Mosquito nets do prevent malaria, longitudinal study confirms
It seems obvious that increased use of mosquito bed nets in sub-Saharan Africa would decrease the incidence of malaria, but a lingering question remained:
Malaria from Plasmodium falciparum infection exacts a significant toll in sub-Saharan Africa. According to the World Health Organization, there were about 228 million cases and 602,000 deaths from malaria in 2020 alone. About 80% of those deaths were in children less than 5 years old. In some areas, as many as 5% of children die from malaria by age 5.
Efforts to reduce the burden of malaria have been ongoing for decades. In the 1990s, insecticide-treated nets were shown to reduce illness and deaths from malaria in children.
As a result, the use of bed nets has grown significantly. In 2000, only 5% of households in sub-Saharan Africa had a net in the house. By 2020, that number had risen to 65%. From 2004 to 2019 about 1.9 billion nets were distributed in this region. The nets are estimated to have prevented more than 663 million malaria cases between 2000 and 2015.
As described in the NEJM report, public health researchers conducted a 22-year prospective longitudinal cohort study in rural southern Tanzania following 6,706 children born between 1998 and 2000. Initially, home visits were made every 4 months from May 1998 to April 2003. Remarkably, in 2019, they were able to verify the status of fully 89% of those people by reaching out to families and community/village leaders.
Günther Fink, PhD, associate professor of epidemiology and household economics, University of Basel (Switzerland), explained the approach and primary findings to this news organization. The analysis looked at three main groups – children whose parents said they always slept under treated nets, those who slept protected most of the time, and those who spent less than half the time under bed nets. The hazard ratio for death was 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.72) for the first two groups, compared with the least protected. The corresponding hazard ratio between age 5 and adulthood was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.58-1.49).
The findings confirmed what they had suspected. Dr. Fink summarized simply, “If you always slept under a net, you did much better than if you never slept under the net. If you slept [under a net] more than half of the time, it was much better than if you slept [under a net] less than half the time.” So the more time children slept under bed nets, the less likely they were to acquire malaria. Dr. Fink stressed that the findings showing protective efficacy persisted into adulthood. “It seems just having a healthier early life actually makes you more resilient against other future infections.”
One of the theoretical concerns was that using nets would delay developing functional immunity and that there might be an increase in mortality seen later. This study showed that did not happen.
An accompanying commentary noted that there was some potential that families receiving nets were better off than those that didn’t but concluded that such confounding had been accounted for in other analyses.
Mark Wilson, ScD, professor emeritus of epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, concurred. He told this news organization that the study was “very well designed,” and the researchers “did a fantastic job” in tracking patients 20 years later.
“This is astounding!” he added. “It’s very rare to find this amount of follow-up.”
Dr. Fink’s conclusion? “Bed nets protect you in the short run, and being protected in the short run is also beneficial in the long run. There is no evidence that protecting kids in early childhood is weakening them in any way. So we should keep doing this.”
Dr. Fink and Dr. Wilson report no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
It seems obvious that increased use of mosquito bed nets in sub-Saharan Africa would decrease the incidence of malaria, but a lingering question remained:
Malaria from Plasmodium falciparum infection exacts a significant toll in sub-Saharan Africa. According to the World Health Organization, there were about 228 million cases and 602,000 deaths from malaria in 2020 alone. About 80% of those deaths were in children less than 5 years old. In some areas, as many as 5% of children die from malaria by age 5.
Efforts to reduce the burden of malaria have been ongoing for decades. In the 1990s, insecticide-treated nets were shown to reduce illness and deaths from malaria in children.
As a result, the use of bed nets has grown significantly. In 2000, only 5% of households in sub-Saharan Africa had a net in the house. By 2020, that number had risen to 65%. From 2004 to 2019 about 1.9 billion nets were distributed in this region. The nets are estimated to have prevented more than 663 million malaria cases between 2000 and 2015.
As described in the NEJM report, public health researchers conducted a 22-year prospective longitudinal cohort study in rural southern Tanzania following 6,706 children born between 1998 and 2000. Initially, home visits were made every 4 months from May 1998 to April 2003. Remarkably, in 2019, they were able to verify the status of fully 89% of those people by reaching out to families and community/village leaders.
Günther Fink, PhD, associate professor of epidemiology and household economics, University of Basel (Switzerland), explained the approach and primary findings to this news organization. The analysis looked at three main groups – children whose parents said they always slept under treated nets, those who slept protected most of the time, and those who spent less than half the time under bed nets. The hazard ratio for death was 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.72) for the first two groups, compared with the least protected. The corresponding hazard ratio between age 5 and adulthood was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.58-1.49).
The findings confirmed what they had suspected. Dr. Fink summarized simply, “If you always slept under a net, you did much better than if you never slept under the net. If you slept [under a net] more than half of the time, it was much better than if you slept [under a net] less than half the time.” So the more time children slept under bed nets, the less likely they were to acquire malaria. Dr. Fink stressed that the findings showing protective efficacy persisted into adulthood. “It seems just having a healthier early life actually makes you more resilient against other future infections.”
One of the theoretical concerns was that using nets would delay developing functional immunity and that there might be an increase in mortality seen later. This study showed that did not happen.
An accompanying commentary noted that there was some potential that families receiving nets were better off than those that didn’t but concluded that such confounding had been accounted for in other analyses.
Mark Wilson, ScD, professor emeritus of epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, concurred. He told this news organization that the study was “very well designed,” and the researchers “did a fantastic job” in tracking patients 20 years later.
“This is astounding!” he added. “It’s very rare to find this amount of follow-up.”
Dr. Fink’s conclusion? “Bed nets protect you in the short run, and being protected in the short run is also beneficial in the long run. There is no evidence that protecting kids in early childhood is weakening them in any way. So we should keep doing this.”
Dr. Fink and Dr. Wilson report no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
It seems obvious that increased use of mosquito bed nets in sub-Saharan Africa would decrease the incidence of malaria, but a lingering question remained:
Malaria from Plasmodium falciparum infection exacts a significant toll in sub-Saharan Africa. According to the World Health Organization, there were about 228 million cases and 602,000 deaths from malaria in 2020 alone. About 80% of those deaths were in children less than 5 years old. In some areas, as many as 5% of children die from malaria by age 5.
Efforts to reduce the burden of malaria have been ongoing for decades. In the 1990s, insecticide-treated nets were shown to reduce illness and deaths from malaria in children.
As a result, the use of bed nets has grown significantly. In 2000, only 5% of households in sub-Saharan Africa had a net in the house. By 2020, that number had risen to 65%. From 2004 to 2019 about 1.9 billion nets were distributed in this region. The nets are estimated to have prevented more than 663 million malaria cases between 2000 and 2015.
As described in the NEJM report, public health researchers conducted a 22-year prospective longitudinal cohort study in rural southern Tanzania following 6,706 children born between 1998 and 2000. Initially, home visits were made every 4 months from May 1998 to April 2003. Remarkably, in 2019, they were able to verify the status of fully 89% of those people by reaching out to families and community/village leaders.
Günther Fink, PhD, associate professor of epidemiology and household economics, University of Basel (Switzerland), explained the approach and primary findings to this news organization. The analysis looked at three main groups – children whose parents said they always slept under treated nets, those who slept protected most of the time, and those who spent less than half the time under bed nets. The hazard ratio for death was 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.72) for the first two groups, compared with the least protected. The corresponding hazard ratio between age 5 and adulthood was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.58-1.49).
The findings confirmed what they had suspected. Dr. Fink summarized simply, “If you always slept under a net, you did much better than if you never slept under the net. If you slept [under a net] more than half of the time, it was much better than if you slept [under a net] less than half the time.” So the more time children slept under bed nets, the less likely they were to acquire malaria. Dr. Fink stressed that the findings showing protective efficacy persisted into adulthood. “It seems just having a healthier early life actually makes you more resilient against other future infections.”
One of the theoretical concerns was that using nets would delay developing functional immunity and that there might be an increase in mortality seen later. This study showed that did not happen.
An accompanying commentary noted that there was some potential that families receiving nets were better off than those that didn’t but concluded that such confounding had been accounted for in other analyses.
Mark Wilson, ScD, professor emeritus of epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, concurred. He told this news organization that the study was “very well designed,” and the researchers “did a fantastic job” in tracking patients 20 years later.
“This is astounding!” he added. “It’s very rare to find this amount of follow-up.”
Dr. Fink’s conclusion? “Bed nets protect you in the short run, and being protected in the short run is also beneficial in the long run. There is no evidence that protecting kids in early childhood is weakening them in any way. So we should keep doing this.”
Dr. Fink and Dr. Wilson report no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
FROM NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Boosted Americans 97 times less likely to die of COVID-19 than unvaccinated
according to a new update from the CDC.
In addition, fully vaccinated Americans — meaning those with up to two doses, but no booster — are 14 times less likely to die from COVID-19 than unvaccinated people.
“These data confirm that vaccination and boosting continues to protect against severe illness and hospitalization, even during the Omicron surge,” Rochelle Walensky, MD, director of the CDC, said during a briefing by the White House COVID-19 Response Team.
“If you are not up to date on your COVID-19 vaccinations, you have not optimized your protection against severe disease and death, and you should get vaccinated and boosted if you are eligible,” she said.
Dr. Walensky presented the latest numbers on Feb. 2 based on reports from 25 jurisdictions in early December. The number of average weekly deaths for those who were unvaccinated was 9.7 per 100,000 people, as compared with 0.7 of those who were vaccinated and 0.1 of those who had received a booster.
“The data are really stunningly obvious why a booster is really very important,” Anthony Fauci, MD, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said during the briefing.
Dr. Fauci also encouraged vaccination for those who are pregnant and couples who may want to conceive in the near feature. He highlighted two recent studies that found vaccination in either partner didn’t affect fertility, including in vitro fertilization.
Meanwhile, fertility fell temporarily among men who were infected with the coronavirus. Couples were 18% less likely to conceive if the male partner had contracted the coronavirus within 60 days before a menstrual cycle.
“New data adds to previous studies that indicate that COVID-19 vaccination does not negatively impact fertility,” Dr. Fauci said. “Vaccination is recommended for people who are trying to get pregnant now or might become pregnant in the future, as well as their partners.”
About 80% of eligible Americans have received at least one vaccine dose, and 68% are fully vaccinated, according to the latest CDC data. About 51% of those who are eligible for a booster dose have received one.
The FDA could authorize the Pfizer vaccine for children under age 5 later this month. When that happens, about 18 million children will qualify for a shot, Jeff Zients, coordinator of the White House COVID-19 Response Team, said during the briefing. The Biden administration is already working on distribution plans for the shot for young kids, he added.
“We’ll be ready to start getting shots in arms soon after FDA and CDC make their decisions,” he said.
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
according to a new update from the CDC.
In addition, fully vaccinated Americans — meaning those with up to two doses, but no booster — are 14 times less likely to die from COVID-19 than unvaccinated people.
“These data confirm that vaccination and boosting continues to protect against severe illness and hospitalization, even during the Omicron surge,” Rochelle Walensky, MD, director of the CDC, said during a briefing by the White House COVID-19 Response Team.
“If you are not up to date on your COVID-19 vaccinations, you have not optimized your protection against severe disease and death, and you should get vaccinated and boosted if you are eligible,” she said.
Dr. Walensky presented the latest numbers on Feb. 2 based on reports from 25 jurisdictions in early December. The number of average weekly deaths for those who were unvaccinated was 9.7 per 100,000 people, as compared with 0.7 of those who were vaccinated and 0.1 of those who had received a booster.
“The data are really stunningly obvious why a booster is really very important,” Anthony Fauci, MD, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said during the briefing.
Dr. Fauci also encouraged vaccination for those who are pregnant and couples who may want to conceive in the near feature. He highlighted two recent studies that found vaccination in either partner didn’t affect fertility, including in vitro fertilization.
Meanwhile, fertility fell temporarily among men who were infected with the coronavirus. Couples were 18% less likely to conceive if the male partner had contracted the coronavirus within 60 days before a menstrual cycle.
“New data adds to previous studies that indicate that COVID-19 vaccination does not negatively impact fertility,” Dr. Fauci said. “Vaccination is recommended for people who are trying to get pregnant now or might become pregnant in the future, as well as their partners.”
About 80% of eligible Americans have received at least one vaccine dose, and 68% are fully vaccinated, according to the latest CDC data. About 51% of those who are eligible for a booster dose have received one.
The FDA could authorize the Pfizer vaccine for children under age 5 later this month. When that happens, about 18 million children will qualify for a shot, Jeff Zients, coordinator of the White House COVID-19 Response Team, said during the briefing. The Biden administration is already working on distribution plans for the shot for young kids, he added.
“We’ll be ready to start getting shots in arms soon after FDA and CDC make their decisions,” he said.
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
according to a new update from the CDC.
In addition, fully vaccinated Americans — meaning those with up to two doses, but no booster — are 14 times less likely to die from COVID-19 than unvaccinated people.
“These data confirm that vaccination and boosting continues to protect against severe illness and hospitalization, even during the Omicron surge,” Rochelle Walensky, MD, director of the CDC, said during a briefing by the White House COVID-19 Response Team.
“If you are not up to date on your COVID-19 vaccinations, you have not optimized your protection against severe disease and death, and you should get vaccinated and boosted if you are eligible,” she said.
Dr. Walensky presented the latest numbers on Feb. 2 based on reports from 25 jurisdictions in early December. The number of average weekly deaths for those who were unvaccinated was 9.7 per 100,000 people, as compared with 0.7 of those who were vaccinated and 0.1 of those who had received a booster.
“The data are really stunningly obvious why a booster is really very important,” Anthony Fauci, MD, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said during the briefing.
Dr. Fauci also encouraged vaccination for those who are pregnant and couples who may want to conceive in the near feature. He highlighted two recent studies that found vaccination in either partner didn’t affect fertility, including in vitro fertilization.
Meanwhile, fertility fell temporarily among men who were infected with the coronavirus. Couples were 18% less likely to conceive if the male partner had contracted the coronavirus within 60 days before a menstrual cycle.
“New data adds to previous studies that indicate that COVID-19 vaccination does not negatively impact fertility,” Dr. Fauci said. “Vaccination is recommended for people who are trying to get pregnant now or might become pregnant in the future, as well as their partners.”
About 80% of eligible Americans have received at least one vaccine dose, and 68% are fully vaccinated, according to the latest CDC data. About 51% of those who are eligible for a booster dose have received one.
The FDA could authorize the Pfizer vaccine for children under age 5 later this month. When that happens, about 18 million children will qualify for a shot, Jeff Zients, coordinator of the White House COVID-19 Response Team, said during the briefing. The Biden administration is already working on distribution plans for the shot for young kids, he added.
“We’ll be ready to start getting shots in arms soon after FDA and CDC make their decisions,” he said.
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
Lifestyle likely responsible for obesity in children, not mother’s BMI
Lifestyle is more likely to affect a child’s body mass index than the weight of their mother before and during pregnancy say researchers who have found that a mother’s high BMI before and during pregnancy is not a major cause of high BMI in their offspring – indicating that childhood and teen obesity is more likely to be a result of lifestyle factors.
According to UK Government figures 9.9% of reception age children (age 4-5) are obese, with a further 13.1% overweight. At age 10-11 (year 6), 21.0% are obese and 14.1% overweight.
Research from the Centre for Longitudinal Studies (CLS) at the UCL Social Research Institute, published in December 2020, showed that one in five (21%) young people were obese at age 17, and a further one in seven (14%) were overweight.
Nature or nurture
Greater maternal BMI before or during pregnancy is known to be associated with higher BMI throughout childhood, but exactly how much a mother’s weight before or during pregnancy contributes to childhood obesity, or whether it is lifestyle and environmental factors that are responsible, remains unclear.
To investigate this question researchers from the University of Bristol (England) and Imperial College London used data from the “Children of the 90s” (also known as the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children), and data from the “Born in Bradford” longitudinal study.
For their study, published in BMC Medicine, researchers used Mendelian randomisation, measuring variation in genes to determine the effect of an exposure on an outcome, along with polygenic risk scores, to investigate if associations between before and during early pregnancy BMI, and a child’s BMI from birth to adolescence, are causal.
They looked at birth weight and BMI at age 1 and 4 years in both “Children of the 90s” and “Born in Bradford” participants, and then also BMI at age 10 and 15 years in just the Children of the 90s participants.
Since the effects being explored may differ by ethnicity the authors reported that they limited analyses to two ethnic groups – White European and South Asian.
Interventions targeting everyone needed
The researchers found that there was a moderate causal effect between maternal BMI and the birth weight of children, however they said they “found no strong evidence for a causal effect of maternal BMI on offspring adiposity beyond birth”.
Tom Bond, MSc, senior research associate at the University of Bristol, explained: “We found that if women are heavier at the start of pregnancy this isn’t a strong cause of their children being heavier as teenagers.”
The authors wrote that their results suggested that “higher maternal pre-/early-pregnancy BMI is not a key driver of higher adiposity in the next generation,” something that Mr. Bond said was “important to know”.
The authors concluded that their findings “support interventions that target the whole population for reducing overweight and obesity, rather than a specific focus on women of reproductive age”.
Mr. Bond pointed out that “it isn’t enough to just focus on women entering pregnancy.” However, “there is good evidence that maternal obesity causes other health problems for mothers and babies, so prospective mothers should still be encouraged and supported to maintain a healthy weight.”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape UK.
Lifestyle is more likely to affect a child’s body mass index than the weight of their mother before and during pregnancy say researchers who have found that a mother’s high BMI before and during pregnancy is not a major cause of high BMI in their offspring – indicating that childhood and teen obesity is more likely to be a result of lifestyle factors.
According to UK Government figures 9.9% of reception age children (age 4-5) are obese, with a further 13.1% overweight. At age 10-11 (year 6), 21.0% are obese and 14.1% overweight.
Research from the Centre for Longitudinal Studies (CLS) at the UCL Social Research Institute, published in December 2020, showed that one in five (21%) young people were obese at age 17, and a further one in seven (14%) were overweight.
Nature or nurture
Greater maternal BMI before or during pregnancy is known to be associated with higher BMI throughout childhood, but exactly how much a mother’s weight before or during pregnancy contributes to childhood obesity, or whether it is lifestyle and environmental factors that are responsible, remains unclear.
To investigate this question researchers from the University of Bristol (England) and Imperial College London used data from the “Children of the 90s” (also known as the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children), and data from the “Born in Bradford” longitudinal study.
For their study, published in BMC Medicine, researchers used Mendelian randomisation, measuring variation in genes to determine the effect of an exposure on an outcome, along with polygenic risk scores, to investigate if associations between before and during early pregnancy BMI, and a child’s BMI from birth to adolescence, are causal.
They looked at birth weight and BMI at age 1 and 4 years in both “Children of the 90s” and “Born in Bradford” participants, and then also BMI at age 10 and 15 years in just the Children of the 90s participants.
Since the effects being explored may differ by ethnicity the authors reported that they limited analyses to two ethnic groups – White European and South Asian.
Interventions targeting everyone needed
The researchers found that there was a moderate causal effect between maternal BMI and the birth weight of children, however they said they “found no strong evidence for a causal effect of maternal BMI on offspring adiposity beyond birth”.
Tom Bond, MSc, senior research associate at the University of Bristol, explained: “We found that if women are heavier at the start of pregnancy this isn’t a strong cause of their children being heavier as teenagers.”
The authors wrote that their results suggested that “higher maternal pre-/early-pregnancy BMI is not a key driver of higher adiposity in the next generation,” something that Mr. Bond said was “important to know”.
The authors concluded that their findings “support interventions that target the whole population for reducing overweight and obesity, rather than a specific focus on women of reproductive age”.
Mr. Bond pointed out that “it isn’t enough to just focus on women entering pregnancy.” However, “there is good evidence that maternal obesity causes other health problems for mothers and babies, so prospective mothers should still be encouraged and supported to maintain a healthy weight.”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape UK.
Lifestyle is more likely to affect a child’s body mass index than the weight of their mother before and during pregnancy say researchers who have found that a mother’s high BMI before and during pregnancy is not a major cause of high BMI in their offspring – indicating that childhood and teen obesity is more likely to be a result of lifestyle factors.
According to UK Government figures 9.9% of reception age children (age 4-5) are obese, with a further 13.1% overweight. At age 10-11 (year 6), 21.0% are obese and 14.1% overweight.
Research from the Centre for Longitudinal Studies (CLS) at the UCL Social Research Institute, published in December 2020, showed that one in five (21%) young people were obese at age 17, and a further one in seven (14%) were overweight.
Nature or nurture
Greater maternal BMI before or during pregnancy is known to be associated with higher BMI throughout childhood, but exactly how much a mother’s weight before or during pregnancy contributes to childhood obesity, or whether it is lifestyle and environmental factors that are responsible, remains unclear.
To investigate this question researchers from the University of Bristol (England) and Imperial College London used data from the “Children of the 90s” (also known as the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children), and data from the “Born in Bradford” longitudinal study.
For their study, published in BMC Medicine, researchers used Mendelian randomisation, measuring variation in genes to determine the effect of an exposure on an outcome, along with polygenic risk scores, to investigate if associations between before and during early pregnancy BMI, and a child’s BMI from birth to adolescence, are causal.
They looked at birth weight and BMI at age 1 and 4 years in both “Children of the 90s” and “Born in Bradford” participants, and then also BMI at age 10 and 15 years in just the Children of the 90s participants.
Since the effects being explored may differ by ethnicity the authors reported that they limited analyses to two ethnic groups – White European and South Asian.
Interventions targeting everyone needed
The researchers found that there was a moderate causal effect between maternal BMI and the birth weight of children, however they said they “found no strong evidence for a causal effect of maternal BMI on offspring adiposity beyond birth”.
Tom Bond, MSc, senior research associate at the University of Bristol, explained: “We found that if women are heavier at the start of pregnancy this isn’t a strong cause of their children being heavier as teenagers.”
The authors wrote that their results suggested that “higher maternal pre-/early-pregnancy BMI is not a key driver of higher adiposity in the next generation,” something that Mr. Bond said was “important to know”.
The authors concluded that their findings “support interventions that target the whole population for reducing overweight and obesity, rather than a specific focus on women of reproductive age”.
Mr. Bond pointed out that “it isn’t enough to just focus on women entering pregnancy.” However, “there is good evidence that maternal obesity causes other health problems for mothers and babies, so prospective mothers should still be encouraged and supported to maintain a healthy weight.”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape UK.
FROM BMC MEDICINE
A test for cannabis-caused impairment
You have a 16-year-old patient who has been doing poorly in school. He has withdrawn from his social group and quit the sports in which he excelled. He admits to using marijuana “maybe once or twice a week.” But you and his parents suspect that it is much more often and contributing to the change in his behavior and school performance.
They would prefer he not use marijuana at all but could maybe be comfortable with some arrangement in which their son could demonstrate that his usage was indeed limited to once or twice on the weekends. They ask for your help with crafting a contract that might include “some urine or blood test” that would allow them to be sure their son was adhering to the contract.
You explain to them that there are hazards associated with setting up contracts such as the one they are proposing. One revolving around the issue of trust. Another being that he may be addicted to the point that a compromise that includes scaling back his usage is unlikely to succeed. And, finally, you tell them that because of marijuana’s pharmacokinetics, their son’s urine tests will always be positive and not reflective of the how much he is using or whether he is intoxicated.
Scenarios similar to this are increasingly common for those of us living in states that have legalized recreational cannabis use. The absence of a laboratory test that can determine when a person is impaired by marijuana has made life difficult for law enforcement officers accustomed to relying on breath and blood tests for alcohol to confirm their suspicion that a driver is under the influence.
In addition, because marijuana is still detectable days after it is used, many well-paying jobs go unfilled when potential applicants are hesitant to submit to a required drug test. The quirky pharmacokinetics of cannabis are well-known to the recreational users and they see no reason to risk failing a urine test regardless of how good the job may be.
This lack of a reliable indicator of cannabis intoxication has not gone unnoticed, and in a recent study published in the journal Neuropharmacology, researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston report some hopeful results using fNIRS brain scanning. The investigators observed an increase in the level of oxygenated hemoglobin concentration (HbO), which is a type of neural activity signature, in the prefrontal cortex region of the volunteers who reported being impaired.
While a brain scan may sound like an unwieldy tool to use on roadside sobriety stops, the researchers report that portable scanners – some using skull cap sensors – could be easily adapted for use by law enforcement in the field. This technology also could be used by employers on the job site to test truck drivers and heavy machine operators at the beginning of each shift, thereby allaying the fears of responsible cannabis users.
This technology might be helpful to you in advising the parents of the 16-year-old you suspect of heavy usage. It would certainly help in confirming the suspicion that he is using more often than he claims. However, the contract the parents propose still may not work. If this young man demonstrates on multiple attempts that his word can’t be trusted, technology isn’t going to be the answer.
Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.” Other than a Littman stethoscope he accepted as a first-year medical student in 1966, Dr. Wilkoff reports having nothing to disclose. Email him at [email protected].
You have a 16-year-old patient who has been doing poorly in school. He has withdrawn from his social group and quit the sports in which he excelled. He admits to using marijuana “maybe once or twice a week.” But you and his parents suspect that it is much more often and contributing to the change in his behavior and school performance.
They would prefer he not use marijuana at all but could maybe be comfortable with some arrangement in which their son could demonstrate that his usage was indeed limited to once or twice on the weekends. They ask for your help with crafting a contract that might include “some urine or blood test” that would allow them to be sure their son was adhering to the contract.
You explain to them that there are hazards associated with setting up contracts such as the one they are proposing. One revolving around the issue of trust. Another being that he may be addicted to the point that a compromise that includes scaling back his usage is unlikely to succeed. And, finally, you tell them that because of marijuana’s pharmacokinetics, their son’s urine tests will always be positive and not reflective of the how much he is using or whether he is intoxicated.
Scenarios similar to this are increasingly common for those of us living in states that have legalized recreational cannabis use. The absence of a laboratory test that can determine when a person is impaired by marijuana has made life difficult for law enforcement officers accustomed to relying on breath and blood tests for alcohol to confirm their suspicion that a driver is under the influence.
In addition, because marijuana is still detectable days after it is used, many well-paying jobs go unfilled when potential applicants are hesitant to submit to a required drug test. The quirky pharmacokinetics of cannabis are well-known to the recreational users and they see no reason to risk failing a urine test regardless of how good the job may be.
This lack of a reliable indicator of cannabis intoxication has not gone unnoticed, and in a recent study published in the journal Neuropharmacology, researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston report some hopeful results using fNIRS brain scanning. The investigators observed an increase in the level of oxygenated hemoglobin concentration (HbO), which is a type of neural activity signature, in the prefrontal cortex region of the volunteers who reported being impaired.
While a brain scan may sound like an unwieldy tool to use on roadside sobriety stops, the researchers report that portable scanners – some using skull cap sensors – could be easily adapted for use by law enforcement in the field. This technology also could be used by employers on the job site to test truck drivers and heavy machine operators at the beginning of each shift, thereby allaying the fears of responsible cannabis users.
This technology might be helpful to you in advising the parents of the 16-year-old you suspect of heavy usage. It would certainly help in confirming the suspicion that he is using more often than he claims. However, the contract the parents propose still may not work. If this young man demonstrates on multiple attempts that his word can’t be trusted, technology isn’t going to be the answer.
Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.” Other than a Littman stethoscope he accepted as a first-year medical student in 1966, Dr. Wilkoff reports having nothing to disclose. Email him at [email protected].
You have a 16-year-old patient who has been doing poorly in school. He has withdrawn from his social group and quit the sports in which he excelled. He admits to using marijuana “maybe once or twice a week.” But you and his parents suspect that it is much more often and contributing to the change in his behavior and school performance.
They would prefer he not use marijuana at all but could maybe be comfortable with some arrangement in which their son could demonstrate that his usage was indeed limited to once or twice on the weekends. They ask for your help with crafting a contract that might include “some urine or blood test” that would allow them to be sure their son was adhering to the contract.
You explain to them that there are hazards associated with setting up contracts such as the one they are proposing. One revolving around the issue of trust. Another being that he may be addicted to the point that a compromise that includes scaling back his usage is unlikely to succeed. And, finally, you tell them that because of marijuana’s pharmacokinetics, their son’s urine tests will always be positive and not reflective of the how much he is using or whether he is intoxicated.
Scenarios similar to this are increasingly common for those of us living in states that have legalized recreational cannabis use. The absence of a laboratory test that can determine when a person is impaired by marijuana has made life difficult for law enforcement officers accustomed to relying on breath and blood tests for alcohol to confirm their suspicion that a driver is under the influence.
In addition, because marijuana is still detectable days after it is used, many well-paying jobs go unfilled when potential applicants are hesitant to submit to a required drug test. The quirky pharmacokinetics of cannabis are well-known to the recreational users and they see no reason to risk failing a urine test regardless of how good the job may be.
This lack of a reliable indicator of cannabis intoxication has not gone unnoticed, and in a recent study published in the journal Neuropharmacology, researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston report some hopeful results using fNIRS brain scanning. The investigators observed an increase in the level of oxygenated hemoglobin concentration (HbO), which is a type of neural activity signature, in the prefrontal cortex region of the volunteers who reported being impaired.
While a brain scan may sound like an unwieldy tool to use on roadside sobriety stops, the researchers report that portable scanners – some using skull cap sensors – could be easily adapted for use by law enforcement in the field. This technology also could be used by employers on the job site to test truck drivers and heavy machine operators at the beginning of each shift, thereby allaying the fears of responsible cannabis users.
This technology might be helpful to you in advising the parents of the 16-year-old you suspect of heavy usage. It would certainly help in confirming the suspicion that he is using more often than he claims. However, the contract the parents propose still may not work. If this young man demonstrates on multiple attempts that his word can’t be trusted, technology isn’t going to be the answer.
Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.” Other than a Littman stethoscope he accepted as a first-year medical student in 1966, Dr. Wilkoff reports having nothing to disclose. Email him at [email protected].
Screen time in first year may raise autism risk at age 3
Boys exposed to at least 2 hours a day of screen time by 1 year of age were significantly more likely to have an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis at 3 years, based on data from more than 80,000 children.
The World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend against any screen time for infants up to 1 year of age and 18 months of age, respectively, wrote Megumi Kushima, MA, of the University of Yamanashi (Japan), and colleagues on behalf of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group.
The extent to which screen time duration in infancy is associated with subsequent ASD diagnosis remains unclear, the researchers said. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has increased screen time among children worldwide, which makes an examination of the impact of screen time on children’s health an important public health issue.
In a study published in JAMA Pediatrics, the researchers recruited pregnant women between 2011 and 2014; data were analyzed in December 2020. The final study population included 84,030 mother-child pairs. The primary exposure of screen time at 1 year of age was assessed by questionnaire, in which mothers were asked to report their number of hours they let their child watch TV or DVDs daily. Responses were none (no screen time), less than 1 hour, 1 hour or more but less than 2 hours, 2 hours or more but less than 4 hours, and 4 hours or more.
The primary outcome was ASD diagnosis at 3 years of age, and mothers were asked via questionnaire whether their 3-year-old had been diagnosed with ASD from age 2.
The study was conducted by the Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group at 15 regional centers across Japan.
Overall, 330 children had received an ASD diagnosis at age 3 years, a prevalence of 0.4%. Of these, 251 (76%) were boys, and 79 (24%) were girls. Independent of ASD, the most common response for screen time was less than 1 hour, which was reported by 27,707 mothers. The proportion of children with ASD at age 3 increased as screen time at age 1 increased, the percentages were 5.8%, 22.3%, 30.2%, and 31.7% for children with no screen time, less than 1 hour, 1 to less than 2 hours, and 2 to less than 4 hours, respectively. The percentage of children with ASD diagnoses who had 4 hours or more of daily screen time was 10%.
Logistic regression analysis showed that longer screen time at age 1 year was significantly associated with higher odds of ASD at 3 years in boys, but not in girls. The researchers controlled for variables including maternal maltreatment and children’s predisposition to ASD. Among boys, the adjusted odds ratios for screen times of less than 1 hour, 1 hour to less than 2 hours, 2 hours to less than 4 hours, and more than 4 hours were 1.38, 2.16, 3.48, and 3.02, respectively.
Screen time at age 3 years was not associated with ASD diagnosis at age 3 years, potentially “because the association with environmental factors on brain development varies with age,” the researchers noted.
The study findings were limited by several factors including the reliance on parental reports of screen time and potential for reporting bias, the researchers noted. Other limitations included the possible missed diagnoses of mild ASD cases at 3 years, and the inability to consider variables such as childcare environment, living conditions, diseases, genetics, and disabilities.
However, the results were strengthened by the large study population and examination of screen time in early childhood, they said. More research is needed to examine other factors that contribute to the association between ASD and screen time, but given the rapid increase in device use in children, “it is necessary to review its health effects on infants and control excessive screen time.”
Strong study, but some gaps appear
The study is strong in many respects, Karalyn Kinsella, MD, a pediatrician in private practice in Cheshire, Conn., said in an interview.
However, “what I am not sure they addressed is that children on the spectrum are often not entertained by basic toys and may be hard to manage behaviorally,” Dr. Kinsella said. Consequently, parents may be more inclined to offer screen time as a way to pacify children with behavioral difficulties. “Parents also may see that their children are happier interacting with devices, so they may be more apt to let them continue with screen time.We know screen time is not good for the developing brain, however; I worry that the message from this study is that screen time causes autism in boys.
“What I would have liked to know from the parents who allowed more screen time was why they were offering it,” Dr. Kinsella said. “Was it because their child was difficult behaviorally or because that is the one place that they seemed to have satisfaction? To me, that would indicate the reverse hypothesis.” That said, the study findings “remind us to counsel families about screen time, especially in the age of COVID-19. Kids are home much longer than usual, which ultimately leads to more screen time.”
The study was funded by the Japanese Ministry of Environment. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. Dr. Kinsella had no financial conflicts to disclose, but serves as a member of the Pediatric News editorial advisory board.
Boys exposed to at least 2 hours a day of screen time by 1 year of age were significantly more likely to have an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis at 3 years, based on data from more than 80,000 children.
The World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend against any screen time for infants up to 1 year of age and 18 months of age, respectively, wrote Megumi Kushima, MA, of the University of Yamanashi (Japan), and colleagues on behalf of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group.
The extent to which screen time duration in infancy is associated with subsequent ASD diagnosis remains unclear, the researchers said. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has increased screen time among children worldwide, which makes an examination of the impact of screen time on children’s health an important public health issue.
In a study published in JAMA Pediatrics, the researchers recruited pregnant women between 2011 and 2014; data were analyzed in December 2020. The final study population included 84,030 mother-child pairs. The primary exposure of screen time at 1 year of age was assessed by questionnaire, in which mothers were asked to report their number of hours they let their child watch TV or DVDs daily. Responses were none (no screen time), less than 1 hour, 1 hour or more but less than 2 hours, 2 hours or more but less than 4 hours, and 4 hours or more.
The primary outcome was ASD diagnosis at 3 years of age, and mothers were asked via questionnaire whether their 3-year-old had been diagnosed with ASD from age 2.
The study was conducted by the Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group at 15 regional centers across Japan.
Overall, 330 children had received an ASD diagnosis at age 3 years, a prevalence of 0.4%. Of these, 251 (76%) were boys, and 79 (24%) were girls. Independent of ASD, the most common response for screen time was less than 1 hour, which was reported by 27,707 mothers. The proportion of children with ASD at age 3 increased as screen time at age 1 increased, the percentages were 5.8%, 22.3%, 30.2%, and 31.7% for children with no screen time, less than 1 hour, 1 to less than 2 hours, and 2 to less than 4 hours, respectively. The percentage of children with ASD diagnoses who had 4 hours or more of daily screen time was 10%.
Logistic regression analysis showed that longer screen time at age 1 year was significantly associated with higher odds of ASD at 3 years in boys, but not in girls. The researchers controlled for variables including maternal maltreatment and children’s predisposition to ASD. Among boys, the adjusted odds ratios for screen times of less than 1 hour, 1 hour to less than 2 hours, 2 hours to less than 4 hours, and more than 4 hours were 1.38, 2.16, 3.48, and 3.02, respectively.
Screen time at age 3 years was not associated with ASD diagnosis at age 3 years, potentially “because the association with environmental factors on brain development varies with age,” the researchers noted.
The study findings were limited by several factors including the reliance on parental reports of screen time and potential for reporting bias, the researchers noted. Other limitations included the possible missed diagnoses of mild ASD cases at 3 years, and the inability to consider variables such as childcare environment, living conditions, diseases, genetics, and disabilities.
However, the results were strengthened by the large study population and examination of screen time in early childhood, they said. More research is needed to examine other factors that contribute to the association between ASD and screen time, but given the rapid increase in device use in children, “it is necessary to review its health effects on infants and control excessive screen time.”
Strong study, but some gaps appear
The study is strong in many respects, Karalyn Kinsella, MD, a pediatrician in private practice in Cheshire, Conn., said in an interview.
However, “what I am not sure they addressed is that children on the spectrum are often not entertained by basic toys and may be hard to manage behaviorally,” Dr. Kinsella said. Consequently, parents may be more inclined to offer screen time as a way to pacify children with behavioral difficulties. “Parents also may see that their children are happier interacting with devices, so they may be more apt to let them continue with screen time.We know screen time is not good for the developing brain, however; I worry that the message from this study is that screen time causes autism in boys.
“What I would have liked to know from the parents who allowed more screen time was why they were offering it,” Dr. Kinsella said. “Was it because their child was difficult behaviorally or because that is the one place that they seemed to have satisfaction? To me, that would indicate the reverse hypothesis.” That said, the study findings “remind us to counsel families about screen time, especially in the age of COVID-19. Kids are home much longer than usual, which ultimately leads to more screen time.”
The study was funded by the Japanese Ministry of Environment. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. Dr. Kinsella had no financial conflicts to disclose, but serves as a member of the Pediatric News editorial advisory board.
Boys exposed to at least 2 hours a day of screen time by 1 year of age were significantly more likely to have an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis at 3 years, based on data from more than 80,000 children.
The World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend against any screen time for infants up to 1 year of age and 18 months of age, respectively, wrote Megumi Kushima, MA, of the University of Yamanashi (Japan), and colleagues on behalf of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group.
The extent to which screen time duration in infancy is associated with subsequent ASD diagnosis remains unclear, the researchers said. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has increased screen time among children worldwide, which makes an examination of the impact of screen time on children’s health an important public health issue.
In a study published in JAMA Pediatrics, the researchers recruited pregnant women between 2011 and 2014; data were analyzed in December 2020. The final study population included 84,030 mother-child pairs. The primary exposure of screen time at 1 year of age was assessed by questionnaire, in which mothers were asked to report their number of hours they let their child watch TV or DVDs daily. Responses were none (no screen time), less than 1 hour, 1 hour or more but less than 2 hours, 2 hours or more but less than 4 hours, and 4 hours or more.
The primary outcome was ASD diagnosis at 3 years of age, and mothers were asked via questionnaire whether their 3-year-old had been diagnosed with ASD from age 2.
The study was conducted by the Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group at 15 regional centers across Japan.
Overall, 330 children had received an ASD diagnosis at age 3 years, a prevalence of 0.4%. Of these, 251 (76%) were boys, and 79 (24%) were girls. Independent of ASD, the most common response for screen time was less than 1 hour, which was reported by 27,707 mothers. The proportion of children with ASD at age 3 increased as screen time at age 1 increased, the percentages were 5.8%, 22.3%, 30.2%, and 31.7% for children with no screen time, less than 1 hour, 1 to less than 2 hours, and 2 to less than 4 hours, respectively. The percentage of children with ASD diagnoses who had 4 hours or more of daily screen time was 10%.
Logistic regression analysis showed that longer screen time at age 1 year was significantly associated with higher odds of ASD at 3 years in boys, but not in girls. The researchers controlled for variables including maternal maltreatment and children’s predisposition to ASD. Among boys, the adjusted odds ratios for screen times of less than 1 hour, 1 hour to less than 2 hours, 2 hours to less than 4 hours, and more than 4 hours were 1.38, 2.16, 3.48, and 3.02, respectively.
Screen time at age 3 years was not associated with ASD diagnosis at age 3 years, potentially “because the association with environmental factors on brain development varies with age,” the researchers noted.
The study findings were limited by several factors including the reliance on parental reports of screen time and potential for reporting bias, the researchers noted. Other limitations included the possible missed diagnoses of mild ASD cases at 3 years, and the inability to consider variables such as childcare environment, living conditions, diseases, genetics, and disabilities.
However, the results were strengthened by the large study population and examination of screen time in early childhood, they said. More research is needed to examine other factors that contribute to the association between ASD and screen time, but given the rapid increase in device use in children, “it is necessary to review its health effects on infants and control excessive screen time.”
Strong study, but some gaps appear
The study is strong in many respects, Karalyn Kinsella, MD, a pediatrician in private practice in Cheshire, Conn., said in an interview.
However, “what I am not sure they addressed is that children on the spectrum are often not entertained by basic toys and may be hard to manage behaviorally,” Dr. Kinsella said. Consequently, parents may be more inclined to offer screen time as a way to pacify children with behavioral difficulties. “Parents also may see that their children are happier interacting with devices, so they may be more apt to let them continue with screen time.We know screen time is not good for the developing brain, however; I worry that the message from this study is that screen time causes autism in boys.
“What I would have liked to know from the parents who allowed more screen time was why they were offering it,” Dr. Kinsella said. “Was it because their child was difficult behaviorally or because that is the one place that they seemed to have satisfaction? To me, that would indicate the reverse hypothesis.” That said, the study findings “remind us to counsel families about screen time, especially in the age of COVID-19. Kids are home much longer than usual, which ultimately leads to more screen time.”
The study was funded by the Japanese Ministry of Environment. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. Dr. Kinsella had no financial conflicts to disclose, but serves as a member of the Pediatric News editorial advisory board.
FROM JAMA PEDIATRICS
Future respiratory infection risk raised by early life virus exposure
Many factors influence a child’s subsequent susceptibility to respiratory tract infection (RTI), including breastfeeding, crowded conditions, and exposure to environmental tobacco. Now researchers have found that asymptomatic viral infection in the first days of a baby’s life are linked to a greater risk of respiratory infections in later life.
The new research, published in Nature Microbiology, was conducted as part of the Microbiome Utrecht Infant Study (MUIS), a healthy infant birth cohort study that’s been running for 6 years.
In their study, the authors explained how the respiratory tract is “populated by a specialized microbial ecosystem, which is seeded during and directly following birth,” adding that, “despite recognition of many host and environmental factors known to modulate RTI susceptibility, the mechanism by which a child develops recurrent or severe RTIs, while others remain healthy, remains largely unknown”.
Researchers from the University of Edinburgh and University Medical Centre Utrecht (the Netherlands) examined nasal mucosa samples of 114 babies at various times from birth until 12 months of age. They then analyzed the gene activity of the babies’ nasal mucosa, the microbes present in the lining of the nose, and any viruses that infected the children.
Interferon-related mucosal gene activity
The researchers described how the microbiome – the community of microbes in the body – of a newborn baby can be influenced by many things, including delivery method, breastfeeding, antibiotics and the hospital environment. They highlighted how viruses were found to interact with a newborn’s immune system and microbiome in a way that affected both a child’s risk, and number, of subsequent infections.
They explained how when a viral infection was detected in the first days after birth, which they said largely occurred asymptomatically, specific mucosal genes were activated – genes involved with interferons – coinciding with a change in the composition of the microbiome, promoting the growth of potentially harmful microbes.
“The interferon-related gene activity caused by an early first viral infection is thought to create a proinflammatory environment that makes babies susceptible to future infections,” they said, adding that in their study they have demonstrated that “first asymptomatic viral encounters were associated with increased interferon signaling, and preceded the development of disadvantageous respiratory microbiota profiles and clinical RTIs”.
Proinflammatory and microbiologically perturbed environment
Debby Bogaert, PhD, chair of paediatric medicine at the University of Edinburgh, said: “We were surprised to see viral infections occur so early in life, and go mostly unnoticed, probably because the infant’s immune system is in what is known as a state of tolerance after birth. Despite this, these infections seem to affect a normal immune development, which is important to know.”
The authors wrote that their data supports the hypothesis that first viral encounters trigger an interferon-associated proinflammatory environment, which then further drives airway inflammation and symptomatology in a “self-enforcing positive feedback loop”. They said that this “proinflammatory and microbiologically perturbed environment in turn renders an individual more vulnerable to recurrent viral-induced RTIs”.
Wouter de Steenhuijsen, PhD, postdoctoral investigator at University Medical Centre Utrecht, said: “Although further work will be needed to confirm the causality of our findings, the data from this study indicate that early-life encounters with respiratory viruses – especially during the first days of life – may set the tone for subsequent non-beneficial host-microbe interactions, which are related to an infection risk and possibly long term respiratory health.”
Dr. Bogaert added: “Only from birth onwards will an infant start to develop its microbiome. Limiting the number of viral encounters in those first days to weeks of life might be essential for a healthy immune and microbiome development, and consequently long term respiratory health.”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape UK.
Many factors influence a child’s subsequent susceptibility to respiratory tract infection (RTI), including breastfeeding, crowded conditions, and exposure to environmental tobacco. Now researchers have found that asymptomatic viral infection in the first days of a baby’s life are linked to a greater risk of respiratory infections in later life.
The new research, published in Nature Microbiology, was conducted as part of the Microbiome Utrecht Infant Study (MUIS), a healthy infant birth cohort study that’s been running for 6 years.
In their study, the authors explained how the respiratory tract is “populated by a specialized microbial ecosystem, which is seeded during and directly following birth,” adding that, “despite recognition of many host and environmental factors known to modulate RTI susceptibility, the mechanism by which a child develops recurrent or severe RTIs, while others remain healthy, remains largely unknown”.
Researchers from the University of Edinburgh and University Medical Centre Utrecht (the Netherlands) examined nasal mucosa samples of 114 babies at various times from birth until 12 months of age. They then analyzed the gene activity of the babies’ nasal mucosa, the microbes present in the lining of the nose, and any viruses that infected the children.
Interferon-related mucosal gene activity
The researchers described how the microbiome – the community of microbes in the body – of a newborn baby can be influenced by many things, including delivery method, breastfeeding, antibiotics and the hospital environment. They highlighted how viruses were found to interact with a newborn’s immune system and microbiome in a way that affected both a child’s risk, and number, of subsequent infections.
They explained how when a viral infection was detected in the first days after birth, which they said largely occurred asymptomatically, specific mucosal genes were activated – genes involved with interferons – coinciding with a change in the composition of the microbiome, promoting the growth of potentially harmful microbes.
“The interferon-related gene activity caused by an early first viral infection is thought to create a proinflammatory environment that makes babies susceptible to future infections,” they said, adding that in their study they have demonstrated that “first asymptomatic viral encounters were associated with increased interferon signaling, and preceded the development of disadvantageous respiratory microbiota profiles and clinical RTIs”.
Proinflammatory and microbiologically perturbed environment
Debby Bogaert, PhD, chair of paediatric medicine at the University of Edinburgh, said: “We were surprised to see viral infections occur so early in life, and go mostly unnoticed, probably because the infant’s immune system is in what is known as a state of tolerance after birth. Despite this, these infections seem to affect a normal immune development, which is important to know.”
The authors wrote that their data supports the hypothesis that first viral encounters trigger an interferon-associated proinflammatory environment, which then further drives airway inflammation and symptomatology in a “self-enforcing positive feedback loop”. They said that this “proinflammatory and microbiologically perturbed environment in turn renders an individual more vulnerable to recurrent viral-induced RTIs”.
Wouter de Steenhuijsen, PhD, postdoctoral investigator at University Medical Centre Utrecht, said: “Although further work will be needed to confirm the causality of our findings, the data from this study indicate that early-life encounters with respiratory viruses – especially during the first days of life – may set the tone for subsequent non-beneficial host-microbe interactions, which are related to an infection risk and possibly long term respiratory health.”
Dr. Bogaert added: “Only from birth onwards will an infant start to develop its microbiome. Limiting the number of viral encounters in those first days to weeks of life might be essential for a healthy immune and microbiome development, and consequently long term respiratory health.”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape UK.
Many factors influence a child’s subsequent susceptibility to respiratory tract infection (RTI), including breastfeeding, crowded conditions, and exposure to environmental tobacco. Now researchers have found that asymptomatic viral infection in the first days of a baby’s life are linked to a greater risk of respiratory infections in later life.
The new research, published in Nature Microbiology, was conducted as part of the Microbiome Utrecht Infant Study (MUIS), a healthy infant birth cohort study that’s been running for 6 years.
In their study, the authors explained how the respiratory tract is “populated by a specialized microbial ecosystem, which is seeded during and directly following birth,” adding that, “despite recognition of many host and environmental factors known to modulate RTI susceptibility, the mechanism by which a child develops recurrent or severe RTIs, while others remain healthy, remains largely unknown”.
Researchers from the University of Edinburgh and University Medical Centre Utrecht (the Netherlands) examined nasal mucosa samples of 114 babies at various times from birth until 12 months of age. They then analyzed the gene activity of the babies’ nasal mucosa, the microbes present in the lining of the nose, and any viruses that infected the children.
Interferon-related mucosal gene activity
The researchers described how the microbiome – the community of microbes in the body – of a newborn baby can be influenced by many things, including delivery method, breastfeeding, antibiotics and the hospital environment. They highlighted how viruses were found to interact with a newborn’s immune system and microbiome in a way that affected both a child’s risk, and number, of subsequent infections.
They explained how when a viral infection was detected in the first days after birth, which they said largely occurred asymptomatically, specific mucosal genes were activated – genes involved with interferons – coinciding with a change in the composition of the microbiome, promoting the growth of potentially harmful microbes.
“The interferon-related gene activity caused by an early first viral infection is thought to create a proinflammatory environment that makes babies susceptible to future infections,” they said, adding that in their study they have demonstrated that “first asymptomatic viral encounters were associated with increased interferon signaling, and preceded the development of disadvantageous respiratory microbiota profiles and clinical RTIs”.
Proinflammatory and microbiologically perturbed environment
Debby Bogaert, PhD, chair of paediatric medicine at the University of Edinburgh, said: “We were surprised to see viral infections occur so early in life, and go mostly unnoticed, probably because the infant’s immune system is in what is known as a state of tolerance after birth. Despite this, these infections seem to affect a normal immune development, which is important to know.”
The authors wrote that their data supports the hypothesis that first viral encounters trigger an interferon-associated proinflammatory environment, which then further drives airway inflammation and symptomatology in a “self-enforcing positive feedback loop”. They said that this “proinflammatory and microbiologically perturbed environment in turn renders an individual more vulnerable to recurrent viral-induced RTIs”.
Wouter de Steenhuijsen, PhD, postdoctoral investigator at University Medical Centre Utrecht, said: “Although further work will be needed to confirm the causality of our findings, the data from this study indicate that early-life encounters with respiratory viruses – especially during the first days of life – may set the tone for subsequent non-beneficial host-microbe interactions, which are related to an infection risk and possibly long term respiratory health.”
Dr. Bogaert added: “Only from birth onwards will an infant start to develop its microbiome. Limiting the number of viral encounters in those first days to weeks of life might be essential for a healthy immune and microbiome development, and consequently long term respiratory health.”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape UK.
FROM NATURE MICROBIOLOGY