FDA issues safety measures for all gadolinium-based contrast agents for MRI

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 11:10
Display Headline
FDA issues safety measures for all gadolinium-based contrast agents for MRI

A US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) Drug Safety Communication concerning a New Class Warning for all gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been released. Gadolinium has been found to remain in patients’ bodies, including the brain, for months to years.1

The FDA concluded that the benefit of all approved GBCAs outweighs any potential risks because gadolinium retention has not been directly linked to adverse health effects in patients with normal kidney function. To date, the only known adverse health effect related to gadolinium retention is a rare condition called nephrogenic systemic fibrosis that occurs in a small subgroup of patients with preexisting kidney failure. However, the FDA has recently received reports of adverse events involving multiple organ systems in patients with normal kidney function.1

After a review by the Medical Imaging Drugs Advisory Committee, the FDA is requiring several actions1:

  • the development of a new Patient Medication Guide for GBCAs
  • a requirement that every patient must read educational information before receiving a GBCA
  • manufacturers of GBCAs must conduct human and animal studies to further assess the safety of these contrast agents.

FDA recommendations for your practice

The FDA advises that health care professionals should consider the retention characteristics of each agent when choosing a GBCA for patients who might be of higher risk for gadolinium retention.1,2 These patients include1:

  • those requiring multiple lifetime doses
  • pregnant women
  • children
  • patients with inflammatory conditions.

There are 2 types of GBCAs based on chemical structure: linear and macrocyclic. Linear GBCAs result in more retention and retention for a longer time than macrocyclic GBCAs.2 A list of FDA-approved GBCAs with their chemical structures is found here: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm589213.htm.2

Recommendations also state that repeated GBCA imaging studies be minimized when possible, particularly closely spaced MRI studies. However, necessary GBCA MRI scans should not be avoided or deferred.1

Report adverse effects

Health care professionals and patients are encouraged to report adverse effects or side effects related to the use of GBCAs to the FDA’s MedWatch Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program found here: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch/index.cfm?action=reporting.home.

References
  1. US Food & Drug Administration. Safety: Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents (GBCAs): Drug Safety Communication - Retained in Body; New Class Warnings. https://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm589580.htm. Published December 19, 2017. Accessed January 10, 2018.
  2. US Food & Drug Administration. Drugs: FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA warns that gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are retained in the body; requires new class warning. https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm589213.htm. Published December 19, 2017. Accessed January 10, 2018.
Issue
OBG Management - 30(1)
Publications
Topics
Sections

A US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) Drug Safety Communication concerning a New Class Warning for all gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been released. Gadolinium has been found to remain in patients’ bodies, including the brain, for months to years.1

The FDA concluded that the benefit of all approved GBCAs outweighs any potential risks because gadolinium retention has not been directly linked to adverse health effects in patients with normal kidney function. To date, the only known adverse health effect related to gadolinium retention is a rare condition called nephrogenic systemic fibrosis that occurs in a small subgroup of patients with preexisting kidney failure. However, the FDA has recently received reports of adverse events involving multiple organ systems in patients with normal kidney function.1

After a review by the Medical Imaging Drugs Advisory Committee, the FDA is requiring several actions1:

  • the development of a new Patient Medication Guide for GBCAs
  • a requirement that every patient must read educational information before receiving a GBCA
  • manufacturers of GBCAs must conduct human and animal studies to further assess the safety of these contrast agents.

FDA recommendations for your practice

The FDA advises that health care professionals should consider the retention characteristics of each agent when choosing a GBCA for patients who might be of higher risk for gadolinium retention.1,2 These patients include1:

  • those requiring multiple lifetime doses
  • pregnant women
  • children
  • patients with inflammatory conditions.

There are 2 types of GBCAs based on chemical structure: linear and macrocyclic. Linear GBCAs result in more retention and retention for a longer time than macrocyclic GBCAs.2 A list of FDA-approved GBCAs with their chemical structures is found here: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm589213.htm.2

Recommendations also state that repeated GBCA imaging studies be minimized when possible, particularly closely spaced MRI studies. However, necessary GBCA MRI scans should not be avoided or deferred.1

Report adverse effects

Health care professionals and patients are encouraged to report adverse effects or side effects related to the use of GBCAs to the FDA’s MedWatch Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program found here: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch/index.cfm?action=reporting.home.

A US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) Drug Safety Communication concerning a New Class Warning for all gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been released. Gadolinium has been found to remain in patients’ bodies, including the brain, for months to years.1

The FDA concluded that the benefit of all approved GBCAs outweighs any potential risks because gadolinium retention has not been directly linked to adverse health effects in patients with normal kidney function. To date, the only known adverse health effect related to gadolinium retention is a rare condition called nephrogenic systemic fibrosis that occurs in a small subgroup of patients with preexisting kidney failure. However, the FDA has recently received reports of adverse events involving multiple organ systems in patients with normal kidney function.1

After a review by the Medical Imaging Drugs Advisory Committee, the FDA is requiring several actions1:

  • the development of a new Patient Medication Guide for GBCAs
  • a requirement that every patient must read educational information before receiving a GBCA
  • manufacturers of GBCAs must conduct human and animal studies to further assess the safety of these contrast agents.

FDA recommendations for your practice

The FDA advises that health care professionals should consider the retention characteristics of each agent when choosing a GBCA for patients who might be of higher risk for gadolinium retention.1,2 These patients include1:

  • those requiring multiple lifetime doses
  • pregnant women
  • children
  • patients with inflammatory conditions.

There are 2 types of GBCAs based on chemical structure: linear and macrocyclic. Linear GBCAs result in more retention and retention for a longer time than macrocyclic GBCAs.2 A list of FDA-approved GBCAs with their chemical structures is found here: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm589213.htm.2

Recommendations also state that repeated GBCA imaging studies be minimized when possible, particularly closely spaced MRI studies. However, necessary GBCA MRI scans should not be avoided or deferred.1

Report adverse effects

Health care professionals and patients are encouraged to report adverse effects or side effects related to the use of GBCAs to the FDA’s MedWatch Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program found here: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch/index.cfm?action=reporting.home.

References
  1. US Food & Drug Administration. Safety: Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents (GBCAs): Drug Safety Communication - Retained in Body; New Class Warnings. https://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm589580.htm. Published December 19, 2017. Accessed January 10, 2018.
  2. US Food & Drug Administration. Drugs: FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA warns that gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are retained in the body; requires new class warning. https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm589213.htm. Published December 19, 2017. Accessed January 10, 2018.
References
  1. US Food & Drug Administration. Safety: Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents (GBCAs): Drug Safety Communication - Retained in Body; New Class Warnings. https://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm589580.htm. Published December 19, 2017. Accessed January 10, 2018.
  2. US Food & Drug Administration. Drugs: FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA warns that gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are retained in the body; requires new class warning. https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm589213.htm. Published December 19, 2017. Accessed January 10, 2018.
Issue
OBG Management - 30(1)
Issue
OBG Management - 30(1)
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
FDA issues safety measures for all gadolinium-based contrast agents for MRI
Display Headline
FDA issues safety measures for all gadolinium-based contrast agents for MRI
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

NSAIDs reduce spinal pain but are not "clinically important"

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/14/2018 - 11:55

Background: Although neck and low back pain are leading causes of pain and disability, there is no consensus first-line pharmacologic therapy for treatment. Recent research has pointed to acetaminophen as being ineffective, which – in combination with increased awareness of opioid dependency and adverse risks – could lead to greater use of NSAIDs.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting: Randomized controlled trials.


Synopsis: Researchers used MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and LILACS to select 35 randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the impact of NSAIDs on reducing spinal pain and disability from a total of 302 full-text articles. Trial data were pooled based on follow-up time and outcomes. Pain and disability outcomes were converted to a 100-point scale with a 10-point difference between groups defined as “clinically important.” NSAIDs were found to offer greater pain reduction than placebo in the immediate (number needed to treat, 5; 95% confidence interval, 4-6) and short (NNT, 6; 95% CI, 4-10) range. However, this effect did not meet the specified 10-point difference to support “clinical importance,” despite having favorable numbers needed to treat. Limited corresponding safety analysis did not find significant adverse event rate differences other than increased reporting of gastrointestinal symptoms.

Bottom line: NSAIDs reduce spinal pain, compared with placebo, with low numbers needed to treat, but nevertheless were not determined to have a “clinically important” effect.

Citation: Machado GC et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for spinal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jul;76(7):1269-78.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Background: Although neck and low back pain are leading causes of pain and disability, there is no consensus first-line pharmacologic therapy for treatment. Recent research has pointed to acetaminophen as being ineffective, which – in combination with increased awareness of opioid dependency and adverse risks – could lead to greater use of NSAIDs.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting: Randomized controlled trials.


Synopsis: Researchers used MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and LILACS to select 35 randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the impact of NSAIDs on reducing spinal pain and disability from a total of 302 full-text articles. Trial data were pooled based on follow-up time and outcomes. Pain and disability outcomes were converted to a 100-point scale with a 10-point difference between groups defined as “clinically important.” NSAIDs were found to offer greater pain reduction than placebo in the immediate (number needed to treat, 5; 95% confidence interval, 4-6) and short (NNT, 6; 95% CI, 4-10) range. However, this effect did not meet the specified 10-point difference to support “clinical importance,” despite having favorable numbers needed to treat. Limited corresponding safety analysis did not find significant adverse event rate differences other than increased reporting of gastrointestinal symptoms.

Bottom line: NSAIDs reduce spinal pain, compared with placebo, with low numbers needed to treat, but nevertheless were not determined to have a “clinically important” effect.

Citation: Machado GC et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for spinal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jul;76(7):1269-78.

Background: Although neck and low back pain are leading causes of pain and disability, there is no consensus first-line pharmacologic therapy for treatment. Recent research has pointed to acetaminophen as being ineffective, which – in combination with increased awareness of opioid dependency and adverse risks – could lead to greater use of NSAIDs.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting: Randomized controlled trials.


Synopsis: Researchers used MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and LILACS to select 35 randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the impact of NSAIDs on reducing spinal pain and disability from a total of 302 full-text articles. Trial data were pooled based on follow-up time and outcomes. Pain and disability outcomes were converted to a 100-point scale with a 10-point difference between groups defined as “clinically important.” NSAIDs were found to offer greater pain reduction than placebo in the immediate (number needed to treat, 5; 95% confidence interval, 4-6) and short (NNT, 6; 95% CI, 4-10) range. However, this effect did not meet the specified 10-point difference to support “clinical importance,” despite having favorable numbers needed to treat. Limited corresponding safety analysis did not find significant adverse event rate differences other than increased reporting of gastrointestinal symptoms.

Bottom line: NSAIDs reduce spinal pain, compared with placebo, with low numbers needed to treat, but nevertheless were not determined to have a “clinically important” effect.

Citation: Machado GC et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for spinal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jul;76(7):1269-78.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Malpractice premiums dip again

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 04/03/2019 - 10:24

 



Malpractice premiums continue to inch down but wide disparities in total cost still linger across states.

Internists, general surgeons, and obstetrician-gynecologists experienced a respective 1% drop in their medical liability premiums last year, according to the 2017 Medical Liability Monitor Annual Rate Survey. The rate drop follows an ongoing trend of decreasing premiums over the last decade.

“The takeaways for doctors are really all good ones in that the rates remain very stable,” said Paul A. Greve Jr. senior vice president/senior consultant for Willis Towers Watson Health Care Practice and coauthor of the 2017 MLM Survey report. “The market for physician coverage remains very competitive because there are so many players involved for what is really a shrinking number of buyers, so the groups and individual physicians that are buying are seeing favorable pricing.”

Paul A. Greve Jr.


Premiums differed vastly across geographic area, consistent with previous years. Southern Florida internists for example, paid $47,707 for malpractice insurance last year, while their Minnesota colleagues paid $3,375. For ob.gyns., premiums ranged from $214,999 in southern New York to $16,240 in central California. General surgeons in Southern Florida paid $190,829 in 2016, while those in Wisconsin paid $10,868.

Overall, no states experienced a premium rate change in the double digits, and physicians in only five states – Hawaii, Kansas, Michigan, Montana, and Ohio – saw premium decreases of more than 5%. No states experienced rate increases of more than 5%.

Fewer claims filed by plaintiffs’ attorneys is one factor contributing to the continued stability of malpractice premiums, according to analysts. However, there are signs that high verdicts are on the rise, said Michael Matray, editor of the Medical Liability Monitor and chief content officer for Cunningham Group. Survey data show claims closing at greater than $1 million are increasing.
Michael Matray


“There is data that indicates claim severity has experienced a slight uptick,” Mr. Matray said in an interview. “It obviously hasn’t affected rates, yet. This could be due to the positive effect state-level tort reforms have had – where plaintiff attorneys are only bringing cases that are a slam dunk and carry a larger dollar value.”

Continued practice consolidation and the increase in employed physicians also helped keep premiums steady, Mr. Greve said in an interview. Consolidation means fewer buyers and a more competitive market, which helps keep premiums low and stable.

The jury is still out on how the move to value-based care might impact medical malpractice insurance payments. There is concern that the methods required to determine health care value could unwittingly increase malpractice risk, Mr. Matray said.

“To support value-based reimbursement models, a health care system must manage a vast network of public and private data used by various entities in order to monitor quality and cost,” Mr. Matray said. “The collection of that data requires using electronic health record technology that many physicians find onerous. This leads to physician burnout and dangerous EHR workarounds, such as copy-and-paste practices where previous EHR entries are cloned and inserted into a new progress note, as well as disabling or overriding burdensome safety alerts, to save time and increase efficiency. You can see how this would increase medical liability claim risk.”

The MLM survey is published yearly based on July 1 premium data from the major malpractice insurers and examines premium rates for mature, claims-made policies with $1 million/$3 million limits for internists, general surgeons, and ob.gyns.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 



Malpractice premiums continue to inch down but wide disparities in total cost still linger across states.

Internists, general surgeons, and obstetrician-gynecologists experienced a respective 1% drop in their medical liability premiums last year, according to the 2017 Medical Liability Monitor Annual Rate Survey. The rate drop follows an ongoing trend of decreasing premiums over the last decade.

“The takeaways for doctors are really all good ones in that the rates remain very stable,” said Paul A. Greve Jr. senior vice president/senior consultant for Willis Towers Watson Health Care Practice and coauthor of the 2017 MLM Survey report. “The market for physician coverage remains very competitive because there are so many players involved for what is really a shrinking number of buyers, so the groups and individual physicians that are buying are seeing favorable pricing.”

Paul A. Greve Jr.


Premiums differed vastly across geographic area, consistent with previous years. Southern Florida internists for example, paid $47,707 for malpractice insurance last year, while their Minnesota colleagues paid $3,375. For ob.gyns., premiums ranged from $214,999 in southern New York to $16,240 in central California. General surgeons in Southern Florida paid $190,829 in 2016, while those in Wisconsin paid $10,868.

Overall, no states experienced a premium rate change in the double digits, and physicians in only five states – Hawaii, Kansas, Michigan, Montana, and Ohio – saw premium decreases of more than 5%. No states experienced rate increases of more than 5%.

Fewer claims filed by plaintiffs’ attorneys is one factor contributing to the continued stability of malpractice premiums, according to analysts. However, there are signs that high verdicts are on the rise, said Michael Matray, editor of the Medical Liability Monitor and chief content officer for Cunningham Group. Survey data show claims closing at greater than $1 million are increasing.
Michael Matray


“There is data that indicates claim severity has experienced a slight uptick,” Mr. Matray said in an interview. “It obviously hasn’t affected rates, yet. This could be due to the positive effect state-level tort reforms have had – where plaintiff attorneys are only bringing cases that are a slam dunk and carry a larger dollar value.”

Continued practice consolidation and the increase in employed physicians also helped keep premiums steady, Mr. Greve said in an interview. Consolidation means fewer buyers and a more competitive market, which helps keep premiums low and stable.

The jury is still out on how the move to value-based care might impact medical malpractice insurance payments. There is concern that the methods required to determine health care value could unwittingly increase malpractice risk, Mr. Matray said.

“To support value-based reimbursement models, a health care system must manage a vast network of public and private data used by various entities in order to monitor quality and cost,” Mr. Matray said. “The collection of that data requires using electronic health record technology that many physicians find onerous. This leads to physician burnout and dangerous EHR workarounds, such as copy-and-paste practices where previous EHR entries are cloned and inserted into a new progress note, as well as disabling or overriding burdensome safety alerts, to save time and increase efficiency. You can see how this would increase medical liability claim risk.”

The MLM survey is published yearly based on July 1 premium data from the major malpractice insurers and examines premium rates for mature, claims-made policies with $1 million/$3 million limits for internists, general surgeons, and ob.gyns.

 



Malpractice premiums continue to inch down but wide disparities in total cost still linger across states.

Internists, general surgeons, and obstetrician-gynecologists experienced a respective 1% drop in their medical liability premiums last year, according to the 2017 Medical Liability Monitor Annual Rate Survey. The rate drop follows an ongoing trend of decreasing premiums over the last decade.

“The takeaways for doctors are really all good ones in that the rates remain very stable,” said Paul A. Greve Jr. senior vice president/senior consultant for Willis Towers Watson Health Care Practice and coauthor of the 2017 MLM Survey report. “The market for physician coverage remains very competitive because there are so many players involved for what is really a shrinking number of buyers, so the groups and individual physicians that are buying are seeing favorable pricing.”

Paul A. Greve Jr.


Premiums differed vastly across geographic area, consistent with previous years. Southern Florida internists for example, paid $47,707 for malpractice insurance last year, while their Minnesota colleagues paid $3,375. For ob.gyns., premiums ranged from $214,999 in southern New York to $16,240 in central California. General surgeons in Southern Florida paid $190,829 in 2016, while those in Wisconsin paid $10,868.

Overall, no states experienced a premium rate change in the double digits, and physicians in only five states – Hawaii, Kansas, Michigan, Montana, and Ohio – saw premium decreases of more than 5%. No states experienced rate increases of more than 5%.

Fewer claims filed by plaintiffs’ attorneys is one factor contributing to the continued stability of malpractice premiums, according to analysts. However, there are signs that high verdicts are on the rise, said Michael Matray, editor of the Medical Liability Monitor and chief content officer for Cunningham Group. Survey data show claims closing at greater than $1 million are increasing.
Michael Matray


“There is data that indicates claim severity has experienced a slight uptick,” Mr. Matray said in an interview. “It obviously hasn’t affected rates, yet. This could be due to the positive effect state-level tort reforms have had – where plaintiff attorneys are only bringing cases that are a slam dunk and carry a larger dollar value.”

Continued practice consolidation and the increase in employed physicians also helped keep premiums steady, Mr. Greve said in an interview. Consolidation means fewer buyers and a more competitive market, which helps keep premiums low and stable.

The jury is still out on how the move to value-based care might impact medical malpractice insurance payments. There is concern that the methods required to determine health care value could unwittingly increase malpractice risk, Mr. Matray said.

“To support value-based reimbursement models, a health care system must manage a vast network of public and private data used by various entities in order to monitor quality and cost,” Mr. Matray said. “The collection of that data requires using electronic health record technology that many physicians find onerous. This leads to physician burnout and dangerous EHR workarounds, such as copy-and-paste practices where previous EHR entries are cloned and inserted into a new progress note, as well as disabling or overriding burdensome safety alerts, to save time and increase efficiency. You can see how this would increase medical liability claim risk.”

The MLM survey is published yearly based on July 1 premium data from the major malpractice insurers and examines premium rates for mature, claims-made policies with $1 million/$3 million limits for internists, general surgeons, and ob.gyns.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

AAD guidelines favor surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancers

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:20

 

Surgical therapies remain the preferred treatment for the management of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), according to new practice guidelines issued by the American Academy of Dermatology.

Nonsurgical approaches such as cryotherapy, photodynamic therapy, and radiation may be considered for low-risk cancers if surgery is contraindicated, but these methods have lower cure rates, according to the guidelines. Christopher K. Bichakjian, MD, professor of dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and Murad Alam, MD, professor of dermatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, cochaired the work groups that developed the guidelines.

Dr. Murad Alam


The guidelines for BCC and cSCC, published online in two separate papers (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jan. 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.10.006; J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jan. 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.10.007), also discuss biopsy techniques, tumor staging, and prevention of recurrence of nonmelanoma skin cancers.

The most suitable stratification for localized BCC and cSCC is the framework provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the authors said in the guidelines.

For suspected BCC and cSCC, recommended biopsy techniques are punch biopsy, shave biopsy, and excisional biopsy. Biopsy technique is “contingent on the clinical characteristics of the suspected tumor, including morphology, expected histologic subtype and depth, natural history, and anatomic location; patient-specific factors, such as bleeding and wound healing diatheses; and patient preference and physician judgment,” the guidelines state. If the initial biopsy proves insufficient for diagnosis, a repeat biopsy may be considered.

For surgical treatment of BCC, curettage and electrodessication may be considered for low-risk tumors in nonterminal hair-bearing locations. Surgical excision with 4-mm clinical margins and histologic margin assessment is recommended for low-risk primary BCC. For high-risk BCC, Mohs micrographic surgery is recommended, the authors said.

Surgical options for cSCC also include curettage and electrodessication and standard excision for low-risk disease, and Mohs micrographic surgery for high-risk cSCC. In both BCC and cSCC, standard excision may be considered for high-risk tumors in some cases, but “strong caution is advised when selecting a treatment modality” for high-risk tumors “without complete margin assessment,” the guidelines state.

Nonsurgical therapies are generally not recommended as first-line treatment, especially in cSCC because of possible recurrence and metastasis. In cases where nonsurgical therapies are preferred, options may include cryosurgery, topical therapy, photodynamic therapy, radiation, or laser therapy, “with the understanding that the cure rate may be lower,” the authors wrote.

Patients with diagnosed nonmelanoma skin cancer should continue to undergo screening for new primary skin cancers (including BCC, cSCC, and melanoma) at least once per year, the guideline states. They should also be counseled on sun protection, tanning bed avoidance, and regular use of broad-spectrum sunscreen.

Although the new guidelines mainly “reaffirm common knowledge and current practice,” they offer a reminder of “alternative therapeutic or preventive options when insufficient evidence is available to support new therapies or previously dogmatic practice patterns,” the authors said.

These are the first guidelines of care for BCC and cSCC published by the AAD. Commonly used guidelines for the management of BCC and cSCC are published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, which are frequently referenced throughout the new AAD guidelines, Dr. Bichakjian said in an interview. While the aim of the cancer network is to develop multidisciplinary guidelines, reflected by the composition of the panel members, “AAD guidelines of care are established primarily by dermatologists for dermatologists,” he pointed out. “However, the work group recognizes that a variety of health care providers outside of dermatology take care of patients with BCC and cSCC, and acknowledges the importance of multidisciplinary care,” he added. “With these considerations in mind, reviewers from specialties outside of dermatology, including plastic surgery, otolaryngology/head and neck surgery, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and family medicine, were invited to critically review the current guidelines.”

The guidelines do not cover the management of actinic keratosis and cSCC in situ, he said. “The work group acknowledges the importance of appropriate management of premalignant and in situ lesions in the prevention of their potential progression to cSCC. However, additional data to provide comprehensive evidence-based recommendations were deemed too extensive to include in the current guidelines and will need to addressed separately.”

In an interview, David J. Leffell, MD, who was not an author of the guidelines, said that the new guidelines do an effective job of “highlighting where valid outcomes data exist and areas where they do not” for a wide range of therapies. They also “attempt to standardize approaches to diagnosis and care of nonmelanoma skin cancer and in general are consistent with established practice patterns,” he added. “Those contemporary approaches have developed in largely empirical fashion over many decades, but bear clarification and reinforcement,” said Dr. Leffell, professor of dermatology and surgery and chief of the section of dermatologic surgery and cutaneous oncology at Yale University, New Haven, Conn.

The guidelines “thoroughly summarize evidence-based recommendations for the entire spectrum of disease management,” Daniel D. Bennett, MD, of the department of dermatology at the University of Wisconsin – Madison, said in an interview. “While surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for BCC and cutaneous SCC, these guidelines include excellent reviews of nonsurgical management options,” he said.

Dr. Bichakjian, who is also chief of the division of cutaneous surgery and oncology at the University of Michigan, had no relevant financial disclosures to report. Dr. Alam, who is also chief of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery in the department of dermatology at Northwestern, disclosed relationships with Amway, OptMed, and 3M. Dr. Bennett and Dr. Leffell had no relevant disclosures.

 

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Surgical therapies remain the preferred treatment for the management of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), according to new practice guidelines issued by the American Academy of Dermatology.

Nonsurgical approaches such as cryotherapy, photodynamic therapy, and radiation may be considered for low-risk cancers if surgery is contraindicated, but these methods have lower cure rates, according to the guidelines. Christopher K. Bichakjian, MD, professor of dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and Murad Alam, MD, professor of dermatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, cochaired the work groups that developed the guidelines.

Dr. Murad Alam


The guidelines for BCC and cSCC, published online in two separate papers (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jan. 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.10.006; J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jan. 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.10.007), also discuss biopsy techniques, tumor staging, and prevention of recurrence of nonmelanoma skin cancers.

The most suitable stratification for localized BCC and cSCC is the framework provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the authors said in the guidelines.

For suspected BCC and cSCC, recommended biopsy techniques are punch biopsy, shave biopsy, and excisional biopsy. Biopsy technique is “contingent on the clinical characteristics of the suspected tumor, including morphology, expected histologic subtype and depth, natural history, and anatomic location; patient-specific factors, such as bleeding and wound healing diatheses; and patient preference and physician judgment,” the guidelines state. If the initial biopsy proves insufficient for diagnosis, a repeat biopsy may be considered.

For surgical treatment of BCC, curettage and electrodessication may be considered for low-risk tumors in nonterminal hair-bearing locations. Surgical excision with 4-mm clinical margins and histologic margin assessment is recommended for low-risk primary BCC. For high-risk BCC, Mohs micrographic surgery is recommended, the authors said.

Surgical options for cSCC also include curettage and electrodessication and standard excision for low-risk disease, and Mohs micrographic surgery for high-risk cSCC. In both BCC and cSCC, standard excision may be considered for high-risk tumors in some cases, but “strong caution is advised when selecting a treatment modality” for high-risk tumors “without complete margin assessment,” the guidelines state.

Nonsurgical therapies are generally not recommended as first-line treatment, especially in cSCC because of possible recurrence and metastasis. In cases where nonsurgical therapies are preferred, options may include cryosurgery, topical therapy, photodynamic therapy, radiation, or laser therapy, “with the understanding that the cure rate may be lower,” the authors wrote.

Patients with diagnosed nonmelanoma skin cancer should continue to undergo screening for new primary skin cancers (including BCC, cSCC, and melanoma) at least once per year, the guideline states. They should also be counseled on sun protection, tanning bed avoidance, and regular use of broad-spectrum sunscreen.

Although the new guidelines mainly “reaffirm common knowledge and current practice,” they offer a reminder of “alternative therapeutic or preventive options when insufficient evidence is available to support new therapies or previously dogmatic practice patterns,” the authors said.

These are the first guidelines of care for BCC and cSCC published by the AAD. Commonly used guidelines for the management of BCC and cSCC are published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, which are frequently referenced throughout the new AAD guidelines, Dr. Bichakjian said in an interview. While the aim of the cancer network is to develop multidisciplinary guidelines, reflected by the composition of the panel members, “AAD guidelines of care are established primarily by dermatologists for dermatologists,” he pointed out. “However, the work group recognizes that a variety of health care providers outside of dermatology take care of patients with BCC and cSCC, and acknowledges the importance of multidisciplinary care,” he added. “With these considerations in mind, reviewers from specialties outside of dermatology, including plastic surgery, otolaryngology/head and neck surgery, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and family medicine, were invited to critically review the current guidelines.”

The guidelines do not cover the management of actinic keratosis and cSCC in situ, he said. “The work group acknowledges the importance of appropriate management of premalignant and in situ lesions in the prevention of their potential progression to cSCC. However, additional data to provide comprehensive evidence-based recommendations were deemed too extensive to include in the current guidelines and will need to addressed separately.”

In an interview, David J. Leffell, MD, who was not an author of the guidelines, said that the new guidelines do an effective job of “highlighting where valid outcomes data exist and areas where they do not” for a wide range of therapies. They also “attempt to standardize approaches to diagnosis and care of nonmelanoma skin cancer and in general are consistent with established practice patterns,” he added. “Those contemporary approaches have developed in largely empirical fashion over many decades, but bear clarification and reinforcement,” said Dr. Leffell, professor of dermatology and surgery and chief of the section of dermatologic surgery and cutaneous oncology at Yale University, New Haven, Conn.

The guidelines “thoroughly summarize evidence-based recommendations for the entire spectrum of disease management,” Daniel D. Bennett, MD, of the department of dermatology at the University of Wisconsin – Madison, said in an interview. “While surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for BCC and cutaneous SCC, these guidelines include excellent reviews of nonsurgical management options,” he said.

Dr. Bichakjian, who is also chief of the division of cutaneous surgery and oncology at the University of Michigan, had no relevant financial disclosures to report. Dr. Alam, who is also chief of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery in the department of dermatology at Northwestern, disclosed relationships with Amway, OptMed, and 3M. Dr. Bennett and Dr. Leffell had no relevant disclosures.

 

 

 

Surgical therapies remain the preferred treatment for the management of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), according to new practice guidelines issued by the American Academy of Dermatology.

Nonsurgical approaches such as cryotherapy, photodynamic therapy, and radiation may be considered for low-risk cancers if surgery is contraindicated, but these methods have lower cure rates, according to the guidelines. Christopher K. Bichakjian, MD, professor of dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and Murad Alam, MD, professor of dermatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, cochaired the work groups that developed the guidelines.

Dr. Murad Alam


The guidelines for BCC and cSCC, published online in two separate papers (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jan. 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.10.006; J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jan. 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.10.007), also discuss biopsy techniques, tumor staging, and prevention of recurrence of nonmelanoma skin cancers.

The most suitable stratification for localized BCC and cSCC is the framework provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the authors said in the guidelines.

For suspected BCC and cSCC, recommended biopsy techniques are punch biopsy, shave biopsy, and excisional biopsy. Biopsy technique is “contingent on the clinical characteristics of the suspected tumor, including morphology, expected histologic subtype and depth, natural history, and anatomic location; patient-specific factors, such as bleeding and wound healing diatheses; and patient preference and physician judgment,” the guidelines state. If the initial biopsy proves insufficient for diagnosis, a repeat biopsy may be considered.

For surgical treatment of BCC, curettage and electrodessication may be considered for low-risk tumors in nonterminal hair-bearing locations. Surgical excision with 4-mm clinical margins and histologic margin assessment is recommended for low-risk primary BCC. For high-risk BCC, Mohs micrographic surgery is recommended, the authors said.

Surgical options for cSCC also include curettage and electrodessication and standard excision for low-risk disease, and Mohs micrographic surgery for high-risk cSCC. In both BCC and cSCC, standard excision may be considered for high-risk tumors in some cases, but “strong caution is advised when selecting a treatment modality” for high-risk tumors “without complete margin assessment,” the guidelines state.

Nonsurgical therapies are generally not recommended as first-line treatment, especially in cSCC because of possible recurrence and metastasis. In cases where nonsurgical therapies are preferred, options may include cryosurgery, topical therapy, photodynamic therapy, radiation, or laser therapy, “with the understanding that the cure rate may be lower,” the authors wrote.

Patients with diagnosed nonmelanoma skin cancer should continue to undergo screening for new primary skin cancers (including BCC, cSCC, and melanoma) at least once per year, the guideline states. They should also be counseled on sun protection, tanning bed avoidance, and regular use of broad-spectrum sunscreen.

Although the new guidelines mainly “reaffirm common knowledge and current practice,” they offer a reminder of “alternative therapeutic or preventive options when insufficient evidence is available to support new therapies or previously dogmatic practice patterns,” the authors said.

These are the first guidelines of care for BCC and cSCC published by the AAD. Commonly used guidelines for the management of BCC and cSCC are published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, which are frequently referenced throughout the new AAD guidelines, Dr. Bichakjian said in an interview. While the aim of the cancer network is to develop multidisciplinary guidelines, reflected by the composition of the panel members, “AAD guidelines of care are established primarily by dermatologists for dermatologists,” he pointed out. “However, the work group recognizes that a variety of health care providers outside of dermatology take care of patients with BCC and cSCC, and acknowledges the importance of multidisciplinary care,” he added. “With these considerations in mind, reviewers from specialties outside of dermatology, including plastic surgery, otolaryngology/head and neck surgery, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and family medicine, were invited to critically review the current guidelines.”

The guidelines do not cover the management of actinic keratosis and cSCC in situ, he said. “The work group acknowledges the importance of appropriate management of premalignant and in situ lesions in the prevention of their potential progression to cSCC. However, additional data to provide comprehensive evidence-based recommendations were deemed too extensive to include in the current guidelines and will need to addressed separately.”

In an interview, David J. Leffell, MD, who was not an author of the guidelines, said that the new guidelines do an effective job of “highlighting where valid outcomes data exist and areas where they do not” for a wide range of therapies. They also “attempt to standardize approaches to diagnosis and care of nonmelanoma skin cancer and in general are consistent with established practice patterns,” he added. “Those contemporary approaches have developed in largely empirical fashion over many decades, but bear clarification and reinforcement,” said Dr. Leffell, professor of dermatology and surgery and chief of the section of dermatologic surgery and cutaneous oncology at Yale University, New Haven, Conn.

The guidelines “thoroughly summarize evidence-based recommendations for the entire spectrum of disease management,” Daniel D. Bennett, MD, of the department of dermatology at the University of Wisconsin – Madison, said in an interview. “While surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for BCC and cutaneous SCC, these guidelines include excellent reviews of nonsurgical management options,” he said.

Dr. Bichakjian, who is also chief of the division of cutaneous surgery and oncology at the University of Michigan, had no relevant financial disclosures to report. Dr. Alam, who is also chief of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery in the department of dermatology at Northwestern, disclosed relationships with Amway, OptMed, and 3M. Dr. Bennett and Dr. Leffell had no relevant disclosures.

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Predictors may help to spot risk for hydroxychloroquine nonadherence

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 10:15

 

Varying degrees of nonadherence to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) treatment characterize the great majority of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus on Medicaid who are newly prescribed the antimalarial, an administrative claims database study has revealed.

Alliance/thinkstockphotos.com
“Conflicting results regarding risk factors for nonadherence and physicians’ inability to accurately predict who is likely to nonadhere make it difficult to know who to target and how to intervene,” they wrote in Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism.

In the current study, Candace H. Feldman, MD, ScD, and her coinvestigators used Medicaid data from 28 U.S. states to identify 10,406 adult HCQ initiators with SLE during 2001-2010. Patients included in the study were required to have more than 365 days of continuous follow-up documented.

The researchers described four distinctive monthly patterns of behavior during the first year of use, in which they defined nonadherence as less than 80% of days covered per month by a HCQ prescription. Group 1 comprised 36% who were “persistent nonadherers” who had very few HCQ refills after the initial dispensing.

Almost half of the cohort (47%) formed two dynamic patterns of partial adherence (groups 2 and 3). The trajectories for these groups were similar until month 5, when they diverged: group 3 improved slightly and then reached a plateau, whereas group 2 became nearly completely nonadherent for the remainder of follow-up. At this 5-month point of divergence, belonging to group 2 was more likely among patients with younger age and antidepressant use. Also, patients in group 3 had more hospitalizations beginning at 4 months and longer hospitalizations at 5 months.

For these two “undecided” groups, 5 months may be a “critical juncture” for physicians to intervene, the authors said.

“Five months might also be the point at which patients feel that they have adequately trialed the medication, and if there is no symptomatic improvement, they discontinue. With the growing body of literature suggesting long-term preventive effects from HCQ, increased provider and patient education at this juncture may be beneficial,” they wrote.

Group 4 had persistent adherence and constituted 17% of the cohort, although this group also experienced a decline in adherence at 9 months.

The mean age of group 4 was about 40 years, which was significantly older than 37 years in groups 1-3. Blacks comprised the highest percentage of patients in groups 1-3 (43%-45%), whereas whites at 40% were the highest proportion in group 4. Individuals in group 4 also had slightly higher average income than did group 1 (mean $46,000 vs. $44,000). The index for SLE risk adjustment was highest for group 4 patients (1.3 vs. 0.9-1.1 for other groups), indicating they may have had more SLE-related comorbidities. Group 4 patients also had a greater average number of medications dispensed and a higher mean daily prednisone-equivalent dose.

Patients aged 18-50 or with black race or Hispanic ethnicity were significantly more likely to be in one of the nonadherent trajectory groups (1, 2, and 3), whereas Asians were less likely to be in group 1 than in group 4, compared with whites.

Diabetes made patients more likely to belong to group 1 than group 4, whereas each unit increase in the SLE risk-adjustment index increased the odds of belonging to group 1 vs. 4. Antidepressant use was associated with greater likelihood of belong to groups 1 or 2 vs. group 4.

Addressing potentially modifiable factors such as ensuring sustained access to health care, particularly for patients with severe disease, might go some way to improving adherence, suggested the researchers, who also noted that increased counseling and support at the time of the first HCQ prescription and throughout the first year of use are also needed in order to “promote more sustained patterns of adherence for all patients.”

The study was funded by a Rheumatology Research Foundation Investigator Award and individual grant awards from the National Institutes of Health. No relevant financial disclosures were declared by the authors.

SOURCE: Feldman C et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Jan 8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.01.002

Publications
Topics
Sections
Related Articles

 

Varying degrees of nonadherence to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) treatment characterize the great majority of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus on Medicaid who are newly prescribed the antimalarial, an administrative claims database study has revealed.

Alliance/thinkstockphotos.com
“Conflicting results regarding risk factors for nonadherence and physicians’ inability to accurately predict who is likely to nonadhere make it difficult to know who to target and how to intervene,” they wrote in Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism.

In the current study, Candace H. Feldman, MD, ScD, and her coinvestigators used Medicaid data from 28 U.S. states to identify 10,406 adult HCQ initiators with SLE during 2001-2010. Patients included in the study were required to have more than 365 days of continuous follow-up documented.

The researchers described four distinctive monthly patterns of behavior during the first year of use, in which they defined nonadherence as less than 80% of days covered per month by a HCQ prescription. Group 1 comprised 36% who were “persistent nonadherers” who had very few HCQ refills after the initial dispensing.

Almost half of the cohort (47%) formed two dynamic patterns of partial adherence (groups 2 and 3). The trajectories for these groups were similar until month 5, when they diverged: group 3 improved slightly and then reached a plateau, whereas group 2 became nearly completely nonadherent for the remainder of follow-up. At this 5-month point of divergence, belonging to group 2 was more likely among patients with younger age and antidepressant use. Also, patients in group 3 had more hospitalizations beginning at 4 months and longer hospitalizations at 5 months.

For these two “undecided” groups, 5 months may be a “critical juncture” for physicians to intervene, the authors said.

“Five months might also be the point at which patients feel that they have adequately trialed the medication, and if there is no symptomatic improvement, they discontinue. With the growing body of literature suggesting long-term preventive effects from HCQ, increased provider and patient education at this juncture may be beneficial,” they wrote.

Group 4 had persistent adherence and constituted 17% of the cohort, although this group also experienced a decline in adherence at 9 months.

The mean age of group 4 was about 40 years, which was significantly older than 37 years in groups 1-3. Blacks comprised the highest percentage of patients in groups 1-3 (43%-45%), whereas whites at 40% were the highest proportion in group 4. Individuals in group 4 also had slightly higher average income than did group 1 (mean $46,000 vs. $44,000). The index for SLE risk adjustment was highest for group 4 patients (1.3 vs. 0.9-1.1 for other groups), indicating they may have had more SLE-related comorbidities. Group 4 patients also had a greater average number of medications dispensed and a higher mean daily prednisone-equivalent dose.

Patients aged 18-50 or with black race or Hispanic ethnicity were significantly more likely to be in one of the nonadherent trajectory groups (1, 2, and 3), whereas Asians were less likely to be in group 1 than in group 4, compared with whites.

Diabetes made patients more likely to belong to group 1 than group 4, whereas each unit increase in the SLE risk-adjustment index increased the odds of belonging to group 1 vs. 4. Antidepressant use was associated with greater likelihood of belong to groups 1 or 2 vs. group 4.

Addressing potentially modifiable factors such as ensuring sustained access to health care, particularly for patients with severe disease, might go some way to improving adherence, suggested the researchers, who also noted that increased counseling and support at the time of the first HCQ prescription and throughout the first year of use are also needed in order to “promote more sustained patterns of adherence for all patients.”

The study was funded by a Rheumatology Research Foundation Investigator Award and individual grant awards from the National Institutes of Health. No relevant financial disclosures were declared by the authors.

SOURCE: Feldman C et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Jan 8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.01.002

 

Varying degrees of nonadherence to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) treatment characterize the great majority of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus on Medicaid who are newly prescribed the antimalarial, an administrative claims database study has revealed.

Alliance/thinkstockphotos.com
“Conflicting results regarding risk factors for nonadherence and physicians’ inability to accurately predict who is likely to nonadhere make it difficult to know who to target and how to intervene,” they wrote in Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism.

In the current study, Candace H. Feldman, MD, ScD, and her coinvestigators used Medicaid data from 28 U.S. states to identify 10,406 adult HCQ initiators with SLE during 2001-2010. Patients included in the study were required to have more than 365 days of continuous follow-up documented.

The researchers described four distinctive monthly patterns of behavior during the first year of use, in which they defined nonadherence as less than 80% of days covered per month by a HCQ prescription. Group 1 comprised 36% who were “persistent nonadherers” who had very few HCQ refills after the initial dispensing.

Almost half of the cohort (47%) formed two dynamic patterns of partial adherence (groups 2 and 3). The trajectories for these groups were similar until month 5, when they diverged: group 3 improved slightly and then reached a plateau, whereas group 2 became nearly completely nonadherent for the remainder of follow-up. At this 5-month point of divergence, belonging to group 2 was more likely among patients with younger age and antidepressant use. Also, patients in group 3 had more hospitalizations beginning at 4 months and longer hospitalizations at 5 months.

For these two “undecided” groups, 5 months may be a “critical juncture” for physicians to intervene, the authors said.

“Five months might also be the point at which patients feel that they have adequately trialed the medication, and if there is no symptomatic improvement, they discontinue. With the growing body of literature suggesting long-term preventive effects from HCQ, increased provider and patient education at this juncture may be beneficial,” they wrote.

Group 4 had persistent adherence and constituted 17% of the cohort, although this group also experienced a decline in adherence at 9 months.

The mean age of group 4 was about 40 years, which was significantly older than 37 years in groups 1-3. Blacks comprised the highest percentage of patients in groups 1-3 (43%-45%), whereas whites at 40% were the highest proportion in group 4. Individuals in group 4 also had slightly higher average income than did group 1 (mean $46,000 vs. $44,000). The index for SLE risk adjustment was highest for group 4 patients (1.3 vs. 0.9-1.1 for other groups), indicating they may have had more SLE-related comorbidities. Group 4 patients also had a greater average number of medications dispensed and a higher mean daily prednisone-equivalent dose.

Patients aged 18-50 or with black race or Hispanic ethnicity were significantly more likely to be in one of the nonadherent trajectory groups (1, 2, and 3), whereas Asians were less likely to be in group 1 than in group 4, compared with whites.

Diabetes made patients more likely to belong to group 1 than group 4, whereas each unit increase in the SLE risk-adjustment index increased the odds of belonging to group 1 vs. 4. Antidepressant use was associated with greater likelihood of belong to groups 1 or 2 vs. group 4.

Addressing potentially modifiable factors such as ensuring sustained access to health care, particularly for patients with severe disease, might go some way to improving adherence, suggested the researchers, who also noted that increased counseling and support at the time of the first HCQ prescription and throughout the first year of use are also needed in order to “promote more sustained patterns of adherence for all patients.”

The study was funded by a Rheumatology Research Foundation Investigator Award and individual grant awards from the National Institutes of Health. No relevant financial disclosures were declared by the authors.

SOURCE: Feldman C et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Jan 8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.01.002

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Five months after the first HCQ prescription might be a critical time point to review and educate patients on the importance of continuing treatment, particularly for patients who are “partial” adherers.

Major finding: Almost half of the cohort (47%) formed two dynamic patterns of partial adherence.

Data source: A longitudinal study of 10,406 Medicaid beneficiaries with SLE who were prescribed hydroxychloroquine for the first time.

Disclosures: The study was funded by a Rheumatology Research Foundation Investigator Award and individual grant awards from the National Institutes of Health. No relevant financial disclosures were declared by the authors.

Source: Feldman C et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Jan 8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.01.002

Disqus Comments
Default

Pulmonary Mucormycosis in a Patient With Uncontrolled Diabetes

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/03/2022 - 15:21
Prompt diagnosis of a patient presenting with rhinocerebral, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and central nervous system manifestations is critical for treatment of this potentially fatal fungal infection.

Mucorales fungi are ubiquitous organisms commonly inhabiting soil and can cause opportunistic infections. The majority of infections are caused by 3 genera: Rhizopus, Mucor, and Rhizomucor.1 Infection occurs by inhalation or by direct contact with damaged skin. Mucorales infections can have cutaneous, rhinocerebral, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and central nervous system manifestations. Pulmonary mucormycosis is often rapidly progressive with angioinvasion and fulminant necrosis causing acute dyspnea, hemoptysis, and chest pain. More indolent pulmonary Mucorales infections can mimic a pulmonary mass with occasional cavitation found on imaging studies similar to other fungal infections (eg, Aspergillus).2 Risk factors include severe uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM), recurrent diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), immunosuppression due to congenital or acquired causes, hematologic malignancies, and chronic renal failure.3 The authors present a case of a patient with recurrent DKA and pulmonary mucormycosis.

Case Presentation

A 62-year-old male with DM and a more than 30-pack-year smoking history presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain and chest pain ongoing for about 1 week. The patient had a history of frequent admissions with DKA and medication nonadherence.

On admission, the patient was hemodynamically stable. His vital signs were: temperature 97.4° F, heart rate 89 bpm, respirations 24 breathes per minute, blood pressure 146/86 mm Hg, and oxygen saturation 94% on ambient air. The patient appeared ill but the physical examination was otherwise unremarkable. Laboratory results revealed a white blood cell count of 24,400 with neutrophilic predominance, blood glucose 658 mg/dL, creatinine clearance 2.16 mL/min/1.73 m2, sodium level 124 mEq/L, bicarbonate 6 mEq/L, anion gap 27 mEq/L, 6.8 pH, partial pressure of CO2 11 mm Hg, and lactic acid 2.3 mmol/L.

The patient admitted for DKA management and placed on an insulin drip. Although he did not have a fever or cough productive of sputum or hemoptysis, there was concern that pneumonia might have precipitated DKA. A chest X-ray revealed a patchy, right suprahilar opacity (Figure 1).

The patient was placed on vancomycin 1,000 mg every 12 hours and cefepime 2,000 mg every 12 hours for possible hospital-acquired pneumonia because of his history of recent DKA hospitalization. Once the patient’s anion gap was closed and metabolic acidosis was resolved, the insulin drip was discontinued, and the patient was transferred to the general medical ward for further management. There, he continued to report having chest pain. A computed tomography (CT) scan without contrast of the chest (contrast was held due to recent acute kidney injury) revealed right hilar soft tissue density obstructing the bronchus intermidius, which had resulted in a right-lung collapse and right-sided pleural effusion (Figure 2). The left lung was clear, and there was no evidence of nodularity.

Given the patient’s extensive smoking history, the initial concern was for pulmonary malignancy. The decision was made to proceed with bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle biopsy. Endobronchial brushings and biopsies of R11, 7, right bronchus intermedius, and right upper lobe were obtained. Gross inspection of the airway revealed markedly abnormal-appearing mucosa involving the take off to the right upper lobe and the entire bronchus intermedius with friable, cobblestoned, and edematous mucosa. Biopsies and immunostaining for occult carcinoma markers, including CD-56, TTF-1, Synaptophysin A, chromogranin, AE1/AE3, and CK-5/6, were negative for malignancy. Final microbiologic analysis was positive for Mucor. There was no evidence of bacterial or mycobacterial growth.

Due to continued suspicion for malignancy and lack of histologic yield, the patient underwent a repeat endobronchial ultrasound-guided needle biopsy. On this occasion, gross inspection revealed significant mucosal necrosis and extensive, extrinsic bronchial compression starting from the right bronchial division and notable throughout the right middle and lower lobes (Figure 3).

Bronchial washings revealed necrotic material with rare fungal hyphae present. Biopsies yielded necrotic material or lung tissue containing nonseptate hyphae with rare, right-angle branching consistent with Mucor (Figures 4 and 5). Malignancy was not present in the specimens obtained.

Based on the bronchoscopy results, thoracic surgery and infectious disease specialists were consulted. Surgical intervention was not recommended because of concerns for potential postoperative complications. The infectious disease specialists recommended initiation of liposomal amphotericin B at 10 mg/kg/d. Magnetic resonance imaging of the head showed parietal lobe enhancement with restricted diffusion most consistent with prior infarct. Paranasal sinus disease also was demonstrated. The latter findings prompted further evaluation. The patient underwent right and left endoscopic resection of concha bullosa as well as left maxillary endoscopic antrostomy. Gross examination showed thick mucosa in left concha bullosa, polypoid changes anterior to bulla ethmoidalis, and clear left maxillary sinus. The procedure had to be aborted when the patient experienced cardiac arrest secondary to ventricular fibrillation; he was successfully resuscitated.

Samples from the contents of right and left sinuses as well as left concha bullosa were submitted to pathology, showing benign respiratory mucosa with chronic inflammation and foci of bone without fungal elements. There was no other evidence of disseminated mucormycosis. The patient had a prolonged hospital course complicated by progressive hypoxemia, acute kidney injury, and toxic metabolic encephalopathy. Three months after his original diagnosis, he sustained another cardiac arrest in the hospital. Shortly after achieving return of spontaneous circulation and initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation, the family elected to withdraw care. The family declined an autopsy.

 

 

Discussion

This article describes a case of subacute pulmonary mucormycosis in a patient with recurrent DKA. Although patients with poorly controlled DM commonly present with the rhinocerebral form of mucormycosis, pulmonary involvement with a subacute course has been described. Determining the final diagnosis for the current patient was challenging due to the subtlety of his respiratory symptoms and the inconsistent initial findings on chest radiography. A pulmonary disease was finally suspected when a mass was found on the CT scan. However, the middle mediastinal mass was more suspicious for malignancy, particularly given the patient’s smoking history and persistent hyponatremia. In fact, the lack of any neoplastic findings on the initial endobronchial biopsy prompted the health care team to pursue a second biopsy that was consistent with mucormycosis.

This case demonstrates the challenges of prompt diagnosis and treatment of this potentially fatal infection. Furthermore, the extent of the disease at diagnosis precluded this patient from having a surgical intervention, which has been associated with better outcomes than those of medical management alone. Finally, it remains unknown whether the patient had an underlying malignancy, which could have increased the likelihood of pulmonary mucormycosis; the biopsy yield may have been confounded by repeated sampling of necrotic material caused by mucormycosis. Further investigation of any potential pulmonary neoplasm was limited by the patient’s clinical condition and the poor prognosis due to the extent of infection.

Mucorales is an order of fungi comprised of 6 main families that have potential to cause a variety of infections. The genera Mucor, Rhizopus, and Rhizomucor cause the majority of infections.1 Mucormycosis (infection with Mucorales) is generally a rare fungal infection with an incidence of about 500 cases per year in the U.S. However, the incidence is increasing with an aging population, higher prevalence of DM and chronic kidney disease, and a growing population of immunocompromised patients due to advances in cancer therapy and transplantation. Risk factors for pulmonary mucormycosis include conditions associated with congenital and acquired immunodeficiency: hematologic malignancies, uncontrolled DM, solid tumors, and organ transplantation.2

 

Presentation

Notably, there seems to be an association between specific organ system involvement and predisposing conditions. Pulmonary mucormycosis occurs much less frequently than does the rhinocerebral form in patients with DKA but occurs more commonly in patients with neutropenia that is due to chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for the treatment of hematologic malignancies.2

The mechanisms for preferential site infection are not well understood with current knowledge of mucormycosis pathogenesis. Current research demonstrates monocytes and neutrophils may play a vital role in the body’s defense against Mucor by both phagocytosis and oxidative damage. Chemotaxis and oxidative cell lysis seem to be compromised in states of hyperglycemia and acidosis. Iron metabolism repeatedly has been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis of mucormycosis. Specifically, patients receiving deferoxamine seem to have a predisposition to Mucorales infections, presumably due to the increased iron supply to the fungus.4 Notably, systemic acidosis also facilitates higher concentrations of available serum iron.

One of the main characteristics of mucormycosis is its ability to aggressively invade blood vessels, causing thrombosis and necrosis and subsequently disseminate hematogenously or through the lymphatic system. This property, at least in large part, depends on endothelial cell damage following phagocytosis of fungus by these cells.

Of note, some of the azole class of drugs (eg, voriconazole), which may be used for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with hematologic malignancies accompanied by neutropenia, have been implicated in predisposition to mucormycosis.2 It also is commonly seen in patients undergoing HSCT. Patients with DM and DKA also can present with pulmonary mucormycosis but generally have a more indolent course unless they develop pulmonary hemorrhage.3 Infection usually occurs by inhalation.

Patients may report dyspnea, cough, and chest pain, which is sometimes accompanied by a fever. Presentation is generally indistinguishable from other causes of pneumonia, and the routinely obtained sputum cultures are usually not diagnostically significant.

Radiographic findings are variable and may include pulmonary nodules, consolidations, masses, and cavitary lesions.1 Due to tissue invasion, a CT scan of the chest might demonstrate a mass crossing mediastinal tissue planes. Definitive diagnosis requires a biopsy with a demonstration of characteristic broad-based nonseptate hyphae with tissue invasion as well as a positive culture (Figures 4 and 5).5 Due to nonspecific symptoms as well as laboratory and imaging findings, a biopsy and, therefore, definitive diagnosis are often delayed. However, postponing medical and surgical therapy for mucormycosis has been associated with worse outcomes.6 With the absence of easily available serologic tests and unspecific symptoms in early disease, many mucormycosis cases are diagnosed postmortem.

 

 

Treatments

Recently described therapy advancements have indicated improved outcomes.7 Nevertheless, prognosis remains universally poor with 65% to 70% mortality for patients with cases of isolated pulmonary mucormycosis.8 Many of these patients succumb to sepsis, respiratory failure, and hemoptysis. Patients with pulmonary mucormycosis usually die of dissemination rather than of the sequelae of the pulmonary disease. In fact, pulmonary infection seems to have the highest incidence of dissemination in patients with neutropenia. Surgical therapy seems to have more favorable outcomes than treatment with antifungals alone, especially when considering infection primarily affecting 1 lung.8

Amphotericin B remains the first-line agent for treatment of pulmonary mucormycosis. Retrospective studies show that this agent remains one of the few with activity against Mucor with reported successful outcomes. Specifically, the liposomal formulation seems to have greater efficacy.9 Strong prospective data are lacking. An increasing body of evidence supports a potential benefit from adding echinocandins.10 Although these agents have minimal activity against mucormycosis in vitro, adjunctive therapy to amphotericin resulted in better survival. Alternative regimens include the combination of amphotericin with posaconazole or itraconazole. Both these agents seem to have in vitro activity against mucormycosis pathogens, although poor absorption of these agents puts the potential benefit of such combinations in question.

In patients unable to tolerate polyenes due to adverse effects (AEs), the use of posaconazole as monotherapy has been reported with positive results. One retrospective study reported treatment success in up to 60% and stable disease in 21% of patients at 12 weeks. This study included 24 out of 36 patients with pulmonary mucormycosis.11 Significantly fewer AEs and oral administration makes posaconazole an attractive alternative treatment for mucormycosis and needs further prospective evaluation.

Novel therapies have been attempted, though without success thus far. One randomized clinical trial conducted on patients with mucormycosis attempted to determine whether capitalizing on iron metabolism by Mucor by providing adjunctive deferasirox, an iron chelator, would lead to an initial improvement in mortality. However, outcomes did not improve and resulted in higher mortality rates at 90 days in the intervention group.12

Reversal of underlying conditions remains the cornerstone of successful therapy. If possible, it is important to cease immunosuppression by avoiding corticosteroids, correcting acidosis and hyperglycemia, and discontinuing aluminum and iron chelators.13 This approach becomes problematic in patients with DM with poor glucose control due to nonadherence or lack of resources and in situations where the underlying condition is difficult to treat or the treatment puts patients at risk for mucormycosis (eg, malignancies). Surgery in addition to antifungal therapy should be pursued wherever possible for definitive therapy.

References

1. Ribes JA, Vanover-Sams CL, Baker DJ. Zygomycetes in human disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13(2):236-301.

2. Smith JA, Kauffman CA. Pulmonary fungal infections. Respirology. 2012;17(6):913-926.

3. Spellberg B, Edwards J Jr, Ibrahim A. Novel perspectives on mucormycosis: pathophysiology, presentation, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(3):556-569.

4. Prokopowicz GP, Bradley SF, Kauffman CA. Indolent zygomycosis associated with deferoxamine chelation therapy. Mycoses. 1994;37(11-12):427-431.

5. Hamilos G, Samonis G, Kontoyiannis DP. Pulmonary mucormycosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;32(6):693-702.

6. Chamilos G, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. Delaying amphotericin B-based frontline therapy significantly increases mortality among patients with hematologic malignancy who have zygomycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(4):503-509.

7. Parfrey NA. Improved diagnosis and prognosis of mucormycosis. A clinicopathologic study of 33 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 1986;65(2):113-123.

8. Tedder M, Spratt JA, Anstadt MP, Hegde SS, Tedder SD, Lowe JE. Pulmonary mucormycosis: results of medical and surgical therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57(4):1044-1050.

9. Ibrahim AS, Avanessian V, Spellberg B, Edwards JE Jr. Liposomal amphotericin B, and not amphotericin B deoxycholate, improves survival of diabetic mice infected with Rhizopus oryzae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(10):3343-3344.

10. Reed C, Bryant R, Ibrahim AS, et al. Combination polyene-caspofungin treatment of rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(3):364-371.

11. van Burik JA, Hare RS, Solomon HF, Corrado ML, Kontoyiannis DP. Posaconazole is effective as salvage therapy in zygomycosis: a retrospective summary of 91 cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(7):e61-e65.

12. Spellberg B, Ibrahim AS, Chin-Hong PV, et al. The Deferasirox-AmBisome Therapy for Mucormycosis (DEFEAT Mucor) study: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(3):715-722.

13. de Locht M, Boelaert JR, Schneider YJ. Iron uptake from ferrioxamine and from ferrirhizoferrin by germinating spores of Rhizopus microsporus. Biochem Pharmacol. 1994; 47(10):1843-1850.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Lipatov, Dr. Patel, Dr. Lat, and Dr. Shakespeare are Internal Medicine Residents at Scott and White Memorial Hospital. Dr. Wang and Dr. Prakash are Physicians at the Central Texas Veterans Health Care System; all in Temple, Texas.
Correspondence: Dr. Lipatov ([email protected])

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of
Federal Practitioner , Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the U.S. Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 35(1)a
Publications
Topics
Page Number
32-36
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Lipatov, Dr. Patel, Dr. Lat, and Dr. Shakespeare are Internal Medicine Residents at Scott and White Memorial Hospital. Dr. Wang and Dr. Prakash are Physicians at the Central Texas Veterans Health Care System; all in Temple, Texas.
Correspondence: Dr. Lipatov ([email protected])

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of
Federal Practitioner , Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the U.S. Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Lipatov, Dr. Patel, Dr. Lat, and Dr. Shakespeare are Internal Medicine Residents at Scott and White Memorial Hospital. Dr. Wang and Dr. Prakash are Physicians at the Central Texas Veterans Health Care System; all in Temple, Texas.
Correspondence: Dr. Lipatov ([email protected])

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of
Federal Practitioner , Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the U.S. Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Article PDF
Article PDF
Prompt diagnosis of a patient presenting with rhinocerebral, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and central nervous system manifestations is critical for treatment of this potentially fatal fungal infection.
Prompt diagnosis of a patient presenting with rhinocerebral, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and central nervous system manifestations is critical for treatment of this potentially fatal fungal infection.

Mucorales fungi are ubiquitous organisms commonly inhabiting soil and can cause opportunistic infections. The majority of infections are caused by 3 genera: Rhizopus, Mucor, and Rhizomucor.1 Infection occurs by inhalation or by direct contact with damaged skin. Mucorales infections can have cutaneous, rhinocerebral, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and central nervous system manifestations. Pulmonary mucormycosis is often rapidly progressive with angioinvasion and fulminant necrosis causing acute dyspnea, hemoptysis, and chest pain. More indolent pulmonary Mucorales infections can mimic a pulmonary mass with occasional cavitation found on imaging studies similar to other fungal infections (eg, Aspergillus).2 Risk factors include severe uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM), recurrent diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), immunosuppression due to congenital or acquired causes, hematologic malignancies, and chronic renal failure.3 The authors present a case of a patient with recurrent DKA and pulmonary mucormycosis.

Case Presentation

A 62-year-old male with DM and a more than 30-pack-year smoking history presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain and chest pain ongoing for about 1 week. The patient had a history of frequent admissions with DKA and medication nonadherence.

On admission, the patient was hemodynamically stable. His vital signs were: temperature 97.4° F, heart rate 89 bpm, respirations 24 breathes per minute, blood pressure 146/86 mm Hg, and oxygen saturation 94% on ambient air. The patient appeared ill but the physical examination was otherwise unremarkable. Laboratory results revealed a white blood cell count of 24,400 with neutrophilic predominance, blood glucose 658 mg/dL, creatinine clearance 2.16 mL/min/1.73 m2, sodium level 124 mEq/L, bicarbonate 6 mEq/L, anion gap 27 mEq/L, 6.8 pH, partial pressure of CO2 11 mm Hg, and lactic acid 2.3 mmol/L.

The patient admitted for DKA management and placed on an insulin drip. Although he did not have a fever or cough productive of sputum or hemoptysis, there was concern that pneumonia might have precipitated DKA. A chest X-ray revealed a patchy, right suprahilar opacity (Figure 1).

The patient was placed on vancomycin 1,000 mg every 12 hours and cefepime 2,000 mg every 12 hours for possible hospital-acquired pneumonia because of his history of recent DKA hospitalization. Once the patient’s anion gap was closed and metabolic acidosis was resolved, the insulin drip was discontinued, and the patient was transferred to the general medical ward for further management. There, he continued to report having chest pain. A computed tomography (CT) scan without contrast of the chest (contrast was held due to recent acute kidney injury) revealed right hilar soft tissue density obstructing the bronchus intermidius, which had resulted in a right-lung collapse and right-sided pleural effusion (Figure 2). The left lung was clear, and there was no evidence of nodularity.

Given the patient’s extensive smoking history, the initial concern was for pulmonary malignancy. The decision was made to proceed with bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle biopsy. Endobronchial brushings and biopsies of R11, 7, right bronchus intermedius, and right upper lobe were obtained. Gross inspection of the airway revealed markedly abnormal-appearing mucosa involving the take off to the right upper lobe and the entire bronchus intermedius with friable, cobblestoned, and edematous mucosa. Biopsies and immunostaining for occult carcinoma markers, including CD-56, TTF-1, Synaptophysin A, chromogranin, AE1/AE3, and CK-5/6, were negative for malignancy. Final microbiologic analysis was positive for Mucor. There was no evidence of bacterial or mycobacterial growth.

Due to continued suspicion for malignancy and lack of histologic yield, the patient underwent a repeat endobronchial ultrasound-guided needle biopsy. On this occasion, gross inspection revealed significant mucosal necrosis and extensive, extrinsic bronchial compression starting from the right bronchial division and notable throughout the right middle and lower lobes (Figure 3).

Bronchial washings revealed necrotic material with rare fungal hyphae present. Biopsies yielded necrotic material or lung tissue containing nonseptate hyphae with rare, right-angle branching consistent with Mucor (Figures 4 and 5). Malignancy was not present in the specimens obtained.

Based on the bronchoscopy results, thoracic surgery and infectious disease specialists were consulted. Surgical intervention was not recommended because of concerns for potential postoperative complications. The infectious disease specialists recommended initiation of liposomal amphotericin B at 10 mg/kg/d. Magnetic resonance imaging of the head showed parietal lobe enhancement with restricted diffusion most consistent with prior infarct. Paranasal sinus disease also was demonstrated. The latter findings prompted further evaluation. The patient underwent right and left endoscopic resection of concha bullosa as well as left maxillary endoscopic antrostomy. Gross examination showed thick mucosa in left concha bullosa, polypoid changes anterior to bulla ethmoidalis, and clear left maxillary sinus. The procedure had to be aborted when the patient experienced cardiac arrest secondary to ventricular fibrillation; he was successfully resuscitated.

Samples from the contents of right and left sinuses as well as left concha bullosa were submitted to pathology, showing benign respiratory mucosa with chronic inflammation and foci of bone without fungal elements. There was no other evidence of disseminated mucormycosis. The patient had a prolonged hospital course complicated by progressive hypoxemia, acute kidney injury, and toxic metabolic encephalopathy. Three months after his original diagnosis, he sustained another cardiac arrest in the hospital. Shortly after achieving return of spontaneous circulation and initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation, the family elected to withdraw care. The family declined an autopsy.

 

 

Discussion

This article describes a case of subacute pulmonary mucormycosis in a patient with recurrent DKA. Although patients with poorly controlled DM commonly present with the rhinocerebral form of mucormycosis, pulmonary involvement with a subacute course has been described. Determining the final diagnosis for the current patient was challenging due to the subtlety of his respiratory symptoms and the inconsistent initial findings on chest radiography. A pulmonary disease was finally suspected when a mass was found on the CT scan. However, the middle mediastinal mass was more suspicious for malignancy, particularly given the patient’s smoking history and persistent hyponatremia. In fact, the lack of any neoplastic findings on the initial endobronchial biopsy prompted the health care team to pursue a second biopsy that was consistent with mucormycosis.

This case demonstrates the challenges of prompt diagnosis and treatment of this potentially fatal infection. Furthermore, the extent of the disease at diagnosis precluded this patient from having a surgical intervention, which has been associated with better outcomes than those of medical management alone. Finally, it remains unknown whether the patient had an underlying malignancy, which could have increased the likelihood of pulmonary mucormycosis; the biopsy yield may have been confounded by repeated sampling of necrotic material caused by mucormycosis. Further investigation of any potential pulmonary neoplasm was limited by the patient’s clinical condition and the poor prognosis due to the extent of infection.

Mucorales is an order of fungi comprised of 6 main families that have potential to cause a variety of infections. The genera Mucor, Rhizopus, and Rhizomucor cause the majority of infections.1 Mucormycosis (infection with Mucorales) is generally a rare fungal infection with an incidence of about 500 cases per year in the U.S. However, the incidence is increasing with an aging population, higher prevalence of DM and chronic kidney disease, and a growing population of immunocompromised patients due to advances in cancer therapy and transplantation. Risk factors for pulmonary mucormycosis include conditions associated with congenital and acquired immunodeficiency: hematologic malignancies, uncontrolled DM, solid tumors, and organ transplantation.2

 

Presentation

Notably, there seems to be an association between specific organ system involvement and predisposing conditions. Pulmonary mucormycosis occurs much less frequently than does the rhinocerebral form in patients with DKA but occurs more commonly in patients with neutropenia that is due to chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for the treatment of hematologic malignancies.2

The mechanisms for preferential site infection are not well understood with current knowledge of mucormycosis pathogenesis. Current research demonstrates monocytes and neutrophils may play a vital role in the body’s defense against Mucor by both phagocytosis and oxidative damage. Chemotaxis and oxidative cell lysis seem to be compromised in states of hyperglycemia and acidosis. Iron metabolism repeatedly has been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis of mucormycosis. Specifically, patients receiving deferoxamine seem to have a predisposition to Mucorales infections, presumably due to the increased iron supply to the fungus.4 Notably, systemic acidosis also facilitates higher concentrations of available serum iron.

One of the main characteristics of mucormycosis is its ability to aggressively invade blood vessels, causing thrombosis and necrosis and subsequently disseminate hematogenously or through the lymphatic system. This property, at least in large part, depends on endothelial cell damage following phagocytosis of fungus by these cells.

Of note, some of the azole class of drugs (eg, voriconazole), which may be used for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with hematologic malignancies accompanied by neutropenia, have been implicated in predisposition to mucormycosis.2 It also is commonly seen in patients undergoing HSCT. Patients with DM and DKA also can present with pulmonary mucormycosis but generally have a more indolent course unless they develop pulmonary hemorrhage.3 Infection usually occurs by inhalation.

Patients may report dyspnea, cough, and chest pain, which is sometimes accompanied by a fever. Presentation is generally indistinguishable from other causes of pneumonia, and the routinely obtained sputum cultures are usually not diagnostically significant.

Radiographic findings are variable and may include pulmonary nodules, consolidations, masses, and cavitary lesions.1 Due to tissue invasion, a CT scan of the chest might demonstrate a mass crossing mediastinal tissue planes. Definitive diagnosis requires a biopsy with a demonstration of characteristic broad-based nonseptate hyphae with tissue invasion as well as a positive culture (Figures 4 and 5).5 Due to nonspecific symptoms as well as laboratory and imaging findings, a biopsy and, therefore, definitive diagnosis are often delayed. However, postponing medical and surgical therapy for mucormycosis has been associated with worse outcomes.6 With the absence of easily available serologic tests and unspecific symptoms in early disease, many mucormycosis cases are diagnosed postmortem.

 

 

Treatments

Recently described therapy advancements have indicated improved outcomes.7 Nevertheless, prognosis remains universally poor with 65% to 70% mortality for patients with cases of isolated pulmonary mucormycosis.8 Many of these patients succumb to sepsis, respiratory failure, and hemoptysis. Patients with pulmonary mucormycosis usually die of dissemination rather than of the sequelae of the pulmonary disease. In fact, pulmonary infection seems to have the highest incidence of dissemination in patients with neutropenia. Surgical therapy seems to have more favorable outcomes than treatment with antifungals alone, especially when considering infection primarily affecting 1 lung.8

Amphotericin B remains the first-line agent for treatment of pulmonary mucormycosis. Retrospective studies show that this agent remains one of the few with activity against Mucor with reported successful outcomes. Specifically, the liposomal formulation seems to have greater efficacy.9 Strong prospective data are lacking. An increasing body of evidence supports a potential benefit from adding echinocandins.10 Although these agents have minimal activity against mucormycosis in vitro, adjunctive therapy to amphotericin resulted in better survival. Alternative regimens include the combination of amphotericin with posaconazole or itraconazole. Both these agents seem to have in vitro activity against mucormycosis pathogens, although poor absorption of these agents puts the potential benefit of such combinations in question.

In patients unable to tolerate polyenes due to adverse effects (AEs), the use of posaconazole as monotherapy has been reported with positive results. One retrospective study reported treatment success in up to 60% and stable disease in 21% of patients at 12 weeks. This study included 24 out of 36 patients with pulmonary mucormycosis.11 Significantly fewer AEs and oral administration makes posaconazole an attractive alternative treatment for mucormycosis and needs further prospective evaluation.

Novel therapies have been attempted, though without success thus far. One randomized clinical trial conducted on patients with mucormycosis attempted to determine whether capitalizing on iron metabolism by Mucor by providing adjunctive deferasirox, an iron chelator, would lead to an initial improvement in mortality. However, outcomes did not improve and resulted in higher mortality rates at 90 days in the intervention group.12

Reversal of underlying conditions remains the cornerstone of successful therapy. If possible, it is important to cease immunosuppression by avoiding corticosteroids, correcting acidosis and hyperglycemia, and discontinuing aluminum and iron chelators.13 This approach becomes problematic in patients with DM with poor glucose control due to nonadherence or lack of resources and in situations where the underlying condition is difficult to treat or the treatment puts patients at risk for mucormycosis (eg, malignancies). Surgery in addition to antifungal therapy should be pursued wherever possible for definitive therapy.

Mucorales fungi are ubiquitous organisms commonly inhabiting soil and can cause opportunistic infections. The majority of infections are caused by 3 genera: Rhizopus, Mucor, and Rhizomucor.1 Infection occurs by inhalation or by direct contact with damaged skin. Mucorales infections can have cutaneous, rhinocerebral, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and central nervous system manifestations. Pulmonary mucormycosis is often rapidly progressive with angioinvasion and fulminant necrosis causing acute dyspnea, hemoptysis, and chest pain. More indolent pulmonary Mucorales infections can mimic a pulmonary mass with occasional cavitation found on imaging studies similar to other fungal infections (eg, Aspergillus).2 Risk factors include severe uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM), recurrent diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), immunosuppression due to congenital or acquired causes, hematologic malignancies, and chronic renal failure.3 The authors present a case of a patient with recurrent DKA and pulmonary mucormycosis.

Case Presentation

A 62-year-old male with DM and a more than 30-pack-year smoking history presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain and chest pain ongoing for about 1 week. The patient had a history of frequent admissions with DKA and medication nonadherence.

On admission, the patient was hemodynamically stable. His vital signs were: temperature 97.4° F, heart rate 89 bpm, respirations 24 breathes per minute, blood pressure 146/86 mm Hg, and oxygen saturation 94% on ambient air. The patient appeared ill but the physical examination was otherwise unremarkable. Laboratory results revealed a white blood cell count of 24,400 with neutrophilic predominance, blood glucose 658 mg/dL, creatinine clearance 2.16 mL/min/1.73 m2, sodium level 124 mEq/L, bicarbonate 6 mEq/L, anion gap 27 mEq/L, 6.8 pH, partial pressure of CO2 11 mm Hg, and lactic acid 2.3 mmol/L.

The patient admitted for DKA management and placed on an insulin drip. Although he did not have a fever or cough productive of sputum or hemoptysis, there was concern that pneumonia might have precipitated DKA. A chest X-ray revealed a patchy, right suprahilar opacity (Figure 1).

The patient was placed on vancomycin 1,000 mg every 12 hours and cefepime 2,000 mg every 12 hours for possible hospital-acquired pneumonia because of his history of recent DKA hospitalization. Once the patient’s anion gap was closed and metabolic acidosis was resolved, the insulin drip was discontinued, and the patient was transferred to the general medical ward for further management. There, he continued to report having chest pain. A computed tomography (CT) scan without contrast of the chest (contrast was held due to recent acute kidney injury) revealed right hilar soft tissue density obstructing the bronchus intermidius, which had resulted in a right-lung collapse and right-sided pleural effusion (Figure 2). The left lung was clear, and there was no evidence of nodularity.

Given the patient’s extensive smoking history, the initial concern was for pulmonary malignancy. The decision was made to proceed with bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle biopsy. Endobronchial brushings and biopsies of R11, 7, right bronchus intermedius, and right upper lobe were obtained. Gross inspection of the airway revealed markedly abnormal-appearing mucosa involving the take off to the right upper lobe and the entire bronchus intermedius with friable, cobblestoned, and edematous mucosa. Biopsies and immunostaining for occult carcinoma markers, including CD-56, TTF-1, Synaptophysin A, chromogranin, AE1/AE3, and CK-5/6, were negative for malignancy. Final microbiologic analysis was positive for Mucor. There was no evidence of bacterial or mycobacterial growth.

Due to continued suspicion for malignancy and lack of histologic yield, the patient underwent a repeat endobronchial ultrasound-guided needle biopsy. On this occasion, gross inspection revealed significant mucosal necrosis and extensive, extrinsic bronchial compression starting from the right bronchial division and notable throughout the right middle and lower lobes (Figure 3).

Bronchial washings revealed necrotic material with rare fungal hyphae present. Biopsies yielded necrotic material or lung tissue containing nonseptate hyphae with rare, right-angle branching consistent with Mucor (Figures 4 and 5). Malignancy was not present in the specimens obtained.

Based on the bronchoscopy results, thoracic surgery and infectious disease specialists were consulted. Surgical intervention was not recommended because of concerns for potential postoperative complications. The infectious disease specialists recommended initiation of liposomal amphotericin B at 10 mg/kg/d. Magnetic resonance imaging of the head showed parietal lobe enhancement with restricted diffusion most consistent with prior infarct. Paranasal sinus disease also was demonstrated. The latter findings prompted further evaluation. The patient underwent right and left endoscopic resection of concha bullosa as well as left maxillary endoscopic antrostomy. Gross examination showed thick mucosa in left concha bullosa, polypoid changes anterior to bulla ethmoidalis, and clear left maxillary sinus. The procedure had to be aborted when the patient experienced cardiac arrest secondary to ventricular fibrillation; he was successfully resuscitated.

Samples from the contents of right and left sinuses as well as left concha bullosa were submitted to pathology, showing benign respiratory mucosa with chronic inflammation and foci of bone without fungal elements. There was no other evidence of disseminated mucormycosis. The patient had a prolonged hospital course complicated by progressive hypoxemia, acute kidney injury, and toxic metabolic encephalopathy. Three months after his original diagnosis, he sustained another cardiac arrest in the hospital. Shortly after achieving return of spontaneous circulation and initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation, the family elected to withdraw care. The family declined an autopsy.

 

 

Discussion

This article describes a case of subacute pulmonary mucormycosis in a patient with recurrent DKA. Although patients with poorly controlled DM commonly present with the rhinocerebral form of mucormycosis, pulmonary involvement with a subacute course has been described. Determining the final diagnosis for the current patient was challenging due to the subtlety of his respiratory symptoms and the inconsistent initial findings on chest radiography. A pulmonary disease was finally suspected when a mass was found on the CT scan. However, the middle mediastinal mass was more suspicious for malignancy, particularly given the patient’s smoking history and persistent hyponatremia. In fact, the lack of any neoplastic findings on the initial endobronchial biopsy prompted the health care team to pursue a second biopsy that was consistent with mucormycosis.

This case demonstrates the challenges of prompt diagnosis and treatment of this potentially fatal infection. Furthermore, the extent of the disease at diagnosis precluded this patient from having a surgical intervention, which has been associated with better outcomes than those of medical management alone. Finally, it remains unknown whether the patient had an underlying malignancy, which could have increased the likelihood of pulmonary mucormycosis; the biopsy yield may have been confounded by repeated sampling of necrotic material caused by mucormycosis. Further investigation of any potential pulmonary neoplasm was limited by the patient’s clinical condition and the poor prognosis due to the extent of infection.

Mucorales is an order of fungi comprised of 6 main families that have potential to cause a variety of infections. The genera Mucor, Rhizopus, and Rhizomucor cause the majority of infections.1 Mucormycosis (infection with Mucorales) is generally a rare fungal infection with an incidence of about 500 cases per year in the U.S. However, the incidence is increasing with an aging population, higher prevalence of DM and chronic kidney disease, and a growing population of immunocompromised patients due to advances in cancer therapy and transplantation. Risk factors for pulmonary mucormycosis include conditions associated with congenital and acquired immunodeficiency: hematologic malignancies, uncontrolled DM, solid tumors, and organ transplantation.2

 

Presentation

Notably, there seems to be an association between specific organ system involvement and predisposing conditions. Pulmonary mucormycosis occurs much less frequently than does the rhinocerebral form in patients with DKA but occurs more commonly in patients with neutropenia that is due to chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for the treatment of hematologic malignancies.2

The mechanisms for preferential site infection are not well understood with current knowledge of mucormycosis pathogenesis. Current research demonstrates monocytes and neutrophils may play a vital role in the body’s defense against Mucor by both phagocytosis and oxidative damage. Chemotaxis and oxidative cell lysis seem to be compromised in states of hyperglycemia and acidosis. Iron metabolism repeatedly has been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis of mucormycosis. Specifically, patients receiving deferoxamine seem to have a predisposition to Mucorales infections, presumably due to the increased iron supply to the fungus.4 Notably, systemic acidosis also facilitates higher concentrations of available serum iron.

One of the main characteristics of mucormycosis is its ability to aggressively invade blood vessels, causing thrombosis and necrosis and subsequently disseminate hematogenously or through the lymphatic system. This property, at least in large part, depends on endothelial cell damage following phagocytosis of fungus by these cells.

Of note, some of the azole class of drugs (eg, voriconazole), which may be used for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with hematologic malignancies accompanied by neutropenia, have been implicated in predisposition to mucormycosis.2 It also is commonly seen in patients undergoing HSCT. Patients with DM and DKA also can present with pulmonary mucormycosis but generally have a more indolent course unless they develop pulmonary hemorrhage.3 Infection usually occurs by inhalation.

Patients may report dyspnea, cough, and chest pain, which is sometimes accompanied by a fever. Presentation is generally indistinguishable from other causes of pneumonia, and the routinely obtained sputum cultures are usually not diagnostically significant.

Radiographic findings are variable and may include pulmonary nodules, consolidations, masses, and cavitary lesions.1 Due to tissue invasion, a CT scan of the chest might demonstrate a mass crossing mediastinal tissue planes. Definitive diagnosis requires a biopsy with a demonstration of characteristic broad-based nonseptate hyphae with tissue invasion as well as a positive culture (Figures 4 and 5).5 Due to nonspecific symptoms as well as laboratory and imaging findings, a biopsy and, therefore, definitive diagnosis are often delayed. However, postponing medical and surgical therapy for mucormycosis has been associated with worse outcomes.6 With the absence of easily available serologic tests and unspecific symptoms in early disease, many mucormycosis cases are diagnosed postmortem.

 

 

Treatments

Recently described therapy advancements have indicated improved outcomes.7 Nevertheless, prognosis remains universally poor with 65% to 70% mortality for patients with cases of isolated pulmonary mucormycosis.8 Many of these patients succumb to sepsis, respiratory failure, and hemoptysis. Patients with pulmonary mucormycosis usually die of dissemination rather than of the sequelae of the pulmonary disease. In fact, pulmonary infection seems to have the highest incidence of dissemination in patients with neutropenia. Surgical therapy seems to have more favorable outcomes than treatment with antifungals alone, especially when considering infection primarily affecting 1 lung.8

Amphotericin B remains the first-line agent for treatment of pulmonary mucormycosis. Retrospective studies show that this agent remains one of the few with activity against Mucor with reported successful outcomes. Specifically, the liposomal formulation seems to have greater efficacy.9 Strong prospective data are lacking. An increasing body of evidence supports a potential benefit from adding echinocandins.10 Although these agents have minimal activity against mucormycosis in vitro, adjunctive therapy to amphotericin resulted in better survival. Alternative regimens include the combination of amphotericin with posaconazole or itraconazole. Both these agents seem to have in vitro activity against mucormycosis pathogens, although poor absorption of these agents puts the potential benefit of such combinations in question.

In patients unable to tolerate polyenes due to adverse effects (AEs), the use of posaconazole as monotherapy has been reported with positive results. One retrospective study reported treatment success in up to 60% and stable disease in 21% of patients at 12 weeks. This study included 24 out of 36 patients with pulmonary mucormycosis.11 Significantly fewer AEs and oral administration makes posaconazole an attractive alternative treatment for mucormycosis and needs further prospective evaluation.

Novel therapies have been attempted, though without success thus far. One randomized clinical trial conducted on patients with mucormycosis attempted to determine whether capitalizing on iron metabolism by Mucor by providing adjunctive deferasirox, an iron chelator, would lead to an initial improvement in mortality. However, outcomes did not improve and resulted in higher mortality rates at 90 days in the intervention group.12

Reversal of underlying conditions remains the cornerstone of successful therapy. If possible, it is important to cease immunosuppression by avoiding corticosteroids, correcting acidosis and hyperglycemia, and discontinuing aluminum and iron chelators.13 This approach becomes problematic in patients with DM with poor glucose control due to nonadherence or lack of resources and in situations where the underlying condition is difficult to treat or the treatment puts patients at risk for mucormycosis (eg, malignancies). Surgery in addition to antifungal therapy should be pursued wherever possible for definitive therapy.

References

1. Ribes JA, Vanover-Sams CL, Baker DJ. Zygomycetes in human disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13(2):236-301.

2. Smith JA, Kauffman CA. Pulmonary fungal infections. Respirology. 2012;17(6):913-926.

3. Spellberg B, Edwards J Jr, Ibrahim A. Novel perspectives on mucormycosis: pathophysiology, presentation, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(3):556-569.

4. Prokopowicz GP, Bradley SF, Kauffman CA. Indolent zygomycosis associated with deferoxamine chelation therapy. Mycoses. 1994;37(11-12):427-431.

5. Hamilos G, Samonis G, Kontoyiannis DP. Pulmonary mucormycosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;32(6):693-702.

6. Chamilos G, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. Delaying amphotericin B-based frontline therapy significantly increases mortality among patients with hematologic malignancy who have zygomycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(4):503-509.

7. Parfrey NA. Improved diagnosis and prognosis of mucormycosis. A clinicopathologic study of 33 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 1986;65(2):113-123.

8. Tedder M, Spratt JA, Anstadt MP, Hegde SS, Tedder SD, Lowe JE. Pulmonary mucormycosis: results of medical and surgical therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57(4):1044-1050.

9. Ibrahim AS, Avanessian V, Spellberg B, Edwards JE Jr. Liposomal amphotericin B, and not amphotericin B deoxycholate, improves survival of diabetic mice infected with Rhizopus oryzae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(10):3343-3344.

10. Reed C, Bryant R, Ibrahim AS, et al. Combination polyene-caspofungin treatment of rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(3):364-371.

11. van Burik JA, Hare RS, Solomon HF, Corrado ML, Kontoyiannis DP. Posaconazole is effective as salvage therapy in zygomycosis: a retrospective summary of 91 cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(7):e61-e65.

12. Spellberg B, Ibrahim AS, Chin-Hong PV, et al. The Deferasirox-AmBisome Therapy for Mucormycosis (DEFEAT Mucor) study: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(3):715-722.

13. de Locht M, Boelaert JR, Schneider YJ. Iron uptake from ferrioxamine and from ferrirhizoferrin by germinating spores of Rhizopus microsporus. Biochem Pharmacol. 1994; 47(10):1843-1850.

References

1. Ribes JA, Vanover-Sams CL, Baker DJ. Zygomycetes in human disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13(2):236-301.

2. Smith JA, Kauffman CA. Pulmonary fungal infections. Respirology. 2012;17(6):913-926.

3. Spellberg B, Edwards J Jr, Ibrahim A. Novel perspectives on mucormycosis: pathophysiology, presentation, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(3):556-569.

4. Prokopowicz GP, Bradley SF, Kauffman CA. Indolent zygomycosis associated with deferoxamine chelation therapy. Mycoses. 1994;37(11-12):427-431.

5. Hamilos G, Samonis G, Kontoyiannis DP. Pulmonary mucormycosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;32(6):693-702.

6. Chamilos G, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. Delaying amphotericin B-based frontline therapy significantly increases mortality among patients with hematologic malignancy who have zygomycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(4):503-509.

7. Parfrey NA. Improved diagnosis and prognosis of mucormycosis. A clinicopathologic study of 33 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 1986;65(2):113-123.

8. Tedder M, Spratt JA, Anstadt MP, Hegde SS, Tedder SD, Lowe JE. Pulmonary mucormycosis: results of medical and surgical therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57(4):1044-1050.

9. Ibrahim AS, Avanessian V, Spellberg B, Edwards JE Jr. Liposomal amphotericin B, and not amphotericin B deoxycholate, improves survival of diabetic mice infected with Rhizopus oryzae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(10):3343-3344.

10. Reed C, Bryant R, Ibrahim AS, et al. Combination polyene-caspofungin treatment of rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(3):364-371.

11. van Burik JA, Hare RS, Solomon HF, Corrado ML, Kontoyiannis DP. Posaconazole is effective as salvage therapy in zygomycosis: a retrospective summary of 91 cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(7):e61-e65.

12. Spellberg B, Ibrahim AS, Chin-Hong PV, et al. The Deferasirox-AmBisome Therapy for Mucormycosis (DEFEAT Mucor) study: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(3):715-722.

13. de Locht M, Boelaert JR, Schneider YJ. Iron uptake from ferrioxamine and from ferrirhizoferrin by germinating spores of Rhizopus microsporus. Biochem Pharmacol. 1994; 47(10):1843-1850.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 35(1)a
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 35(1)a
Page Number
32-36
Page Number
32-36
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

KRd improves OS in relapsed/refractory MM

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/19/2018 - 00:03
Display Headline
KRd improves OS in relapsed/refractory MM

Photo by Bill Branson
Vials of drugs

Adding carfilzomib (K) to treatment with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) can improve overall survival (OS) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), according to research published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Final results from the phase 3 ASPIRE trial showed that KRd reduced the risk of death by 21% and extended OS by 7.9 months, when compared to Rd.

In patients at first relapse, KRd was associated with an OS improvement of 11.4 months.

“Results from the final analysis of the phase 3 ASPIRE trial . . . are significant, as they further validate carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as a standard-of-care regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma,” said study author Keith Stewart, MBChB, of Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona.

“Furthermore, these data showed that early use of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone at first relapse provided nearly 1 additional year of survival for patients, regardless of prior treatment with bortezomib or transplant.”

ASPIRE enrolled 792 MM patients who had received a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1-3). They were randomized to receive KRd (n=396) or Rd (n=396). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the treatment arms.

Details on patients and treatment, as well as interim results from ASPIRE, were reported at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting and published in NEJM in January 2015.

Treatment update

In the final analysis, there were 340 patients in the KRd arm and 358 in the Rd arm who stopped study treatment.

Reasons for discontinuation (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) were disease progression (n=188 and 224), adverse events (AEs, n=79 and 85), other reasons (n=61 and 35), withdrawn consent (n=10 and 12), and noncompliance (n=2 and 1).

A total of 182 patients in the KRd arm and 211 in the Rd arm received subsequent treatment for MM. These treatments were generally balanced between the KRd and Rd arms.

The median time to next treatment from the time of randomization was 39.0 months in the KRd arm and 24.4 months in the Rd arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.65 P<0.001).

Survival

Interim ASPIRE data had shown a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and a trend toward improved OS in patients who received KRd. Now, researchers have observed a significant improvement in both endpoints with KRd.

The data cutoff for the final analysis was April 28, 2017. For PFS, the median follow-up was 48.8 months in the KRd arm and 48.0 months in the Rd arm.

The median PFS was 26.1 months in the KRd arm and 16.6 months in the Rd arm (9.5-month improvement, HR=0.66; P<0.001). The 3-year PFS rates were 38.2% and 28.4%, respectively. And the 5-year PFS rates were 25.6% and 17.3%, respectively.

The median follow-up for OS was 67.1 months. The median OS was 48.3 months in the KRd arm and 40.4 months in the Rd arm (7.9-month improvement, HR=0.79, P=0.0045).

The researchers also performed subgroup analyses according to prior lines of therapy, prior bortezomib exposure at first relapse, and prior transplant at first relapse.

In patients who had received 1 prior line of therapy, the median OS was 47.3 months in the KRd arm and 35.9 months in the Rd arm (11.4-month improvement, HR=0.81). For patients with 2 or more prior lines of therapy, the median OS was 48.8 months and 42.3 months, respectively (6.5-month improvement, HR=0.79).

Among patients with prior bortezomib exposure at first relapse, the median OS was 45.9 months in the KRd arm and 33.9 months in the Rd arm (12-month improvement, HR=0.82). Among patients without prior bortezomib exposure at first relapse, the median OS was 48.3 months and 40.4 months, respectively (7.9-month improvement, HR=0.80).

 

 

Among patients with prior transplant at first relapse, the median OS was 57.2 months in the KRd arm and 38.6 months in the Rd arm (18.6-month improvement, HR=0.71).

Safety

The incidence of treatment-emergent AEs was 98% in the KRd arm and 97.9% in the Rd arm. The incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was 87% and 83.3%, respectively. The incidence of serious AEs was 65.3% and 56.8%, respectively.

Treatment discontinuation due to an AE occurred in 19.9% of patients in the KRd arm and 21.5% of patients in the Rd arm.

AEs of interest (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) included acute renal failure (9.2% and 7.7%), cardiac failure (7.1% and 4.1%), ischemic heart disease (6.9% and 4.6%), hypertension (17.1% and 8.7%), hematopoietic thrombocytopenia (32.7% and 26.2%), and peripheral neuropathy (18.9% and 17.2%).

Fatal AEs were reported in 11.5% of patients in the KRd arm and 10.8% of those in the Rd arm.

Fatal AEs reported in at least 2 patients in the KRd arm included (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) cardiac disorders (2.6% and 2.3%), pneumonia (1.5% and 0.8%), sepsis (0.8% for both), myocardial infarction (0.8% and 0.5%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (0.8% and 0%), death (0.5% for both), and cardiac arrest (0.5% and 0.3%).

This trial was funded by Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Publications
Topics

Photo by Bill Branson
Vials of drugs

Adding carfilzomib (K) to treatment with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) can improve overall survival (OS) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), according to research published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Final results from the phase 3 ASPIRE trial showed that KRd reduced the risk of death by 21% and extended OS by 7.9 months, when compared to Rd.

In patients at first relapse, KRd was associated with an OS improvement of 11.4 months.

“Results from the final analysis of the phase 3 ASPIRE trial . . . are significant, as they further validate carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as a standard-of-care regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma,” said study author Keith Stewart, MBChB, of Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona.

“Furthermore, these data showed that early use of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone at first relapse provided nearly 1 additional year of survival for patients, regardless of prior treatment with bortezomib or transplant.”

ASPIRE enrolled 792 MM patients who had received a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1-3). They were randomized to receive KRd (n=396) or Rd (n=396). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the treatment arms.

Details on patients and treatment, as well as interim results from ASPIRE, were reported at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting and published in NEJM in January 2015.

Treatment update

In the final analysis, there were 340 patients in the KRd arm and 358 in the Rd arm who stopped study treatment.

Reasons for discontinuation (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) were disease progression (n=188 and 224), adverse events (AEs, n=79 and 85), other reasons (n=61 and 35), withdrawn consent (n=10 and 12), and noncompliance (n=2 and 1).

A total of 182 patients in the KRd arm and 211 in the Rd arm received subsequent treatment for MM. These treatments were generally balanced between the KRd and Rd arms.

The median time to next treatment from the time of randomization was 39.0 months in the KRd arm and 24.4 months in the Rd arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.65 P<0.001).

Survival

Interim ASPIRE data had shown a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and a trend toward improved OS in patients who received KRd. Now, researchers have observed a significant improvement in both endpoints with KRd.

The data cutoff for the final analysis was April 28, 2017. For PFS, the median follow-up was 48.8 months in the KRd arm and 48.0 months in the Rd arm.

The median PFS was 26.1 months in the KRd arm and 16.6 months in the Rd arm (9.5-month improvement, HR=0.66; P<0.001). The 3-year PFS rates were 38.2% and 28.4%, respectively. And the 5-year PFS rates were 25.6% and 17.3%, respectively.

The median follow-up for OS was 67.1 months. The median OS was 48.3 months in the KRd arm and 40.4 months in the Rd arm (7.9-month improvement, HR=0.79, P=0.0045).

The researchers also performed subgroup analyses according to prior lines of therapy, prior bortezomib exposure at first relapse, and prior transplant at first relapse.

In patients who had received 1 prior line of therapy, the median OS was 47.3 months in the KRd arm and 35.9 months in the Rd arm (11.4-month improvement, HR=0.81). For patients with 2 or more prior lines of therapy, the median OS was 48.8 months and 42.3 months, respectively (6.5-month improvement, HR=0.79).

Among patients with prior bortezomib exposure at first relapse, the median OS was 45.9 months in the KRd arm and 33.9 months in the Rd arm (12-month improvement, HR=0.82). Among patients without prior bortezomib exposure at first relapse, the median OS was 48.3 months and 40.4 months, respectively (7.9-month improvement, HR=0.80).

 

 

Among patients with prior transplant at first relapse, the median OS was 57.2 months in the KRd arm and 38.6 months in the Rd arm (18.6-month improvement, HR=0.71).

Safety

The incidence of treatment-emergent AEs was 98% in the KRd arm and 97.9% in the Rd arm. The incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was 87% and 83.3%, respectively. The incidence of serious AEs was 65.3% and 56.8%, respectively.

Treatment discontinuation due to an AE occurred in 19.9% of patients in the KRd arm and 21.5% of patients in the Rd arm.

AEs of interest (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) included acute renal failure (9.2% and 7.7%), cardiac failure (7.1% and 4.1%), ischemic heart disease (6.9% and 4.6%), hypertension (17.1% and 8.7%), hematopoietic thrombocytopenia (32.7% and 26.2%), and peripheral neuropathy (18.9% and 17.2%).

Fatal AEs were reported in 11.5% of patients in the KRd arm and 10.8% of those in the Rd arm.

Fatal AEs reported in at least 2 patients in the KRd arm included (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) cardiac disorders (2.6% and 2.3%), pneumonia (1.5% and 0.8%), sepsis (0.8% for both), myocardial infarction (0.8% and 0.5%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (0.8% and 0%), death (0.5% for both), and cardiac arrest (0.5% and 0.3%).

This trial was funded by Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Photo by Bill Branson
Vials of drugs

Adding carfilzomib (K) to treatment with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) can improve overall survival (OS) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), according to research published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Final results from the phase 3 ASPIRE trial showed that KRd reduced the risk of death by 21% and extended OS by 7.9 months, when compared to Rd.

In patients at first relapse, KRd was associated with an OS improvement of 11.4 months.

“Results from the final analysis of the phase 3 ASPIRE trial . . . are significant, as they further validate carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as a standard-of-care regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma,” said study author Keith Stewart, MBChB, of Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona.

“Furthermore, these data showed that early use of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone at first relapse provided nearly 1 additional year of survival for patients, regardless of prior treatment with bortezomib or transplant.”

ASPIRE enrolled 792 MM patients who had received a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1-3). They were randomized to receive KRd (n=396) or Rd (n=396). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the treatment arms.

Details on patients and treatment, as well as interim results from ASPIRE, were reported at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting and published in NEJM in January 2015.

Treatment update

In the final analysis, there were 340 patients in the KRd arm and 358 in the Rd arm who stopped study treatment.

Reasons for discontinuation (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) were disease progression (n=188 and 224), adverse events (AEs, n=79 and 85), other reasons (n=61 and 35), withdrawn consent (n=10 and 12), and noncompliance (n=2 and 1).

A total of 182 patients in the KRd arm and 211 in the Rd arm received subsequent treatment for MM. These treatments were generally balanced between the KRd and Rd arms.

The median time to next treatment from the time of randomization was 39.0 months in the KRd arm and 24.4 months in the Rd arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.65 P<0.001).

Survival

Interim ASPIRE data had shown a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and a trend toward improved OS in patients who received KRd. Now, researchers have observed a significant improvement in both endpoints with KRd.

The data cutoff for the final analysis was April 28, 2017. For PFS, the median follow-up was 48.8 months in the KRd arm and 48.0 months in the Rd arm.

The median PFS was 26.1 months in the KRd arm and 16.6 months in the Rd arm (9.5-month improvement, HR=0.66; P<0.001). The 3-year PFS rates were 38.2% and 28.4%, respectively. And the 5-year PFS rates were 25.6% and 17.3%, respectively.

The median follow-up for OS was 67.1 months. The median OS was 48.3 months in the KRd arm and 40.4 months in the Rd arm (7.9-month improvement, HR=0.79, P=0.0045).

The researchers also performed subgroup analyses according to prior lines of therapy, prior bortezomib exposure at first relapse, and prior transplant at first relapse.

In patients who had received 1 prior line of therapy, the median OS was 47.3 months in the KRd arm and 35.9 months in the Rd arm (11.4-month improvement, HR=0.81). For patients with 2 or more prior lines of therapy, the median OS was 48.8 months and 42.3 months, respectively (6.5-month improvement, HR=0.79).

Among patients with prior bortezomib exposure at first relapse, the median OS was 45.9 months in the KRd arm and 33.9 months in the Rd arm (12-month improvement, HR=0.82). Among patients without prior bortezomib exposure at first relapse, the median OS was 48.3 months and 40.4 months, respectively (7.9-month improvement, HR=0.80).

 

 

Among patients with prior transplant at first relapse, the median OS was 57.2 months in the KRd arm and 38.6 months in the Rd arm (18.6-month improvement, HR=0.71).

Safety

The incidence of treatment-emergent AEs was 98% in the KRd arm and 97.9% in the Rd arm. The incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was 87% and 83.3%, respectively. The incidence of serious AEs was 65.3% and 56.8%, respectively.

Treatment discontinuation due to an AE occurred in 19.9% of patients in the KRd arm and 21.5% of patients in the Rd arm.

AEs of interest (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) included acute renal failure (9.2% and 7.7%), cardiac failure (7.1% and 4.1%), ischemic heart disease (6.9% and 4.6%), hypertension (17.1% and 8.7%), hematopoietic thrombocytopenia (32.7% and 26.2%), and peripheral neuropathy (18.9% and 17.2%).

Fatal AEs were reported in 11.5% of patients in the KRd arm and 10.8% of those in the Rd arm.

Fatal AEs reported in at least 2 patients in the KRd arm included (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) cardiac disorders (2.6% and 2.3%), pneumonia (1.5% and 0.8%), sepsis (0.8% for both), myocardial infarction (0.8% and 0.5%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (0.8% and 0%), death (0.5% for both), and cardiac arrest (0.5% and 0.3%).

This trial was funded by Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
KRd improves OS in relapsed/refractory MM
Display Headline
KRd improves OS in relapsed/refractory MM
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

FDA surveillance shows how rivaroxaban compares to warfarin

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/19/2018 - 00:01
Display Headline
FDA surveillance shows how rivaroxaban compares to warfarin

Rivaroxaban

The US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Mini-Sentinel surveillance system has revealed no new safety concerns associated with rivaroxaban use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Results from this surveillance showed the risk of ischemic stroke was lower in patients who received rivaroxaban than in those who received warfarin.

Rivaroxaban was also associated with a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage but a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to warfarin.

These findings were published in Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety.

About the surveillance

The FDA’s Sentinel Initiative began in 2008 as a multi-year effort to create a national electronic system for monitoring the safety of approved and FDA-regulated medical products using existing electronic healthcare data from multiple sources.

The initiative is the FDA’s response to the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA), and it includes Mini-Sentinel, a working pilot project to develop an active surveillance system and complement existing methods of safety surveillance.

Rivaroxaban results

Researchers analyzed Mini-Sentinel data for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who initiated treatment with rivaroxaban or warfarin from November 2011 to April 2015.

To examine the safety of both products, methodologies included assessing ICD-9-CM codes from inpatient claims and evaluating rates of gastrointestinal bleeding, ischemic stroke, and intracranial hemorrhage.*

The incidence of ischemic stroke was higher among patients on warfarin (268/80,180) than among those on rivaroxaban (82/36,512). The adjusted incidence rate per 1000 person-years was 9.57 among rivaroxaban users and 17.10 among warfarin users. The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.47-0.79).

The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding was higher among patients on rivaroxaban (423/36,173) than among those on warfarin (651/79,520). The incidence rate was 50.20 among rivaroxaban users and 34.82 among warfarin users. The hazard ratio was 1.47 (95% CI, 1.29-1.67).

The incidence of intracranial hemorrhage was higher among patients on warfarin (143/79,529) than among those on rivaroxaban (46/36,171).The incidence rate was 5.41 among rivaroxaban users and 7.49 among warfarin users. The hazard ratio was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.50-1.01).

*Total patient numbers differed in the analyses for each endpoint. For example, there were 80,180 warfarin users in the ischemic stroke analysis and 79,520 warfarin users in the analysis of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Publications
Topics

Rivaroxaban

The US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Mini-Sentinel surveillance system has revealed no new safety concerns associated with rivaroxaban use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Results from this surveillance showed the risk of ischemic stroke was lower in patients who received rivaroxaban than in those who received warfarin.

Rivaroxaban was also associated with a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage but a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to warfarin.

These findings were published in Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety.

About the surveillance

The FDA’s Sentinel Initiative began in 2008 as a multi-year effort to create a national electronic system for monitoring the safety of approved and FDA-regulated medical products using existing electronic healthcare data from multiple sources.

The initiative is the FDA’s response to the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA), and it includes Mini-Sentinel, a working pilot project to develop an active surveillance system and complement existing methods of safety surveillance.

Rivaroxaban results

Researchers analyzed Mini-Sentinel data for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who initiated treatment with rivaroxaban or warfarin from November 2011 to April 2015.

To examine the safety of both products, methodologies included assessing ICD-9-CM codes from inpatient claims and evaluating rates of gastrointestinal bleeding, ischemic stroke, and intracranial hemorrhage.*

The incidence of ischemic stroke was higher among patients on warfarin (268/80,180) than among those on rivaroxaban (82/36,512). The adjusted incidence rate per 1000 person-years was 9.57 among rivaroxaban users and 17.10 among warfarin users. The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.47-0.79).

The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding was higher among patients on rivaroxaban (423/36,173) than among those on warfarin (651/79,520). The incidence rate was 50.20 among rivaroxaban users and 34.82 among warfarin users. The hazard ratio was 1.47 (95% CI, 1.29-1.67).

The incidence of intracranial hemorrhage was higher among patients on warfarin (143/79,529) than among those on rivaroxaban (46/36,171).The incidence rate was 5.41 among rivaroxaban users and 7.49 among warfarin users. The hazard ratio was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.50-1.01).

*Total patient numbers differed in the analyses for each endpoint. For example, there were 80,180 warfarin users in the ischemic stroke analysis and 79,520 warfarin users in the analysis of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Rivaroxaban

The US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Mini-Sentinel surveillance system has revealed no new safety concerns associated with rivaroxaban use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Results from this surveillance showed the risk of ischemic stroke was lower in patients who received rivaroxaban than in those who received warfarin.

Rivaroxaban was also associated with a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage but a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to warfarin.

These findings were published in Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety.

About the surveillance

The FDA’s Sentinel Initiative began in 2008 as a multi-year effort to create a national electronic system for monitoring the safety of approved and FDA-regulated medical products using existing electronic healthcare data from multiple sources.

The initiative is the FDA’s response to the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA), and it includes Mini-Sentinel, a working pilot project to develop an active surveillance system and complement existing methods of safety surveillance.

Rivaroxaban results

Researchers analyzed Mini-Sentinel data for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who initiated treatment with rivaroxaban or warfarin from November 2011 to April 2015.

To examine the safety of both products, methodologies included assessing ICD-9-CM codes from inpatient claims and evaluating rates of gastrointestinal bleeding, ischemic stroke, and intracranial hemorrhage.*

The incidence of ischemic stroke was higher among patients on warfarin (268/80,180) than among those on rivaroxaban (82/36,512). The adjusted incidence rate per 1000 person-years was 9.57 among rivaroxaban users and 17.10 among warfarin users. The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.47-0.79).

The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding was higher among patients on rivaroxaban (423/36,173) than among those on warfarin (651/79,520). The incidence rate was 50.20 among rivaroxaban users and 34.82 among warfarin users. The hazard ratio was 1.47 (95% CI, 1.29-1.67).

The incidence of intracranial hemorrhage was higher among patients on warfarin (143/79,529) than among those on rivaroxaban (46/36,171).The incidence rate was 5.41 among rivaroxaban users and 7.49 among warfarin users. The hazard ratio was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.50-1.01).

*Total patient numbers differed in the analyses for each endpoint. For example, there were 80,180 warfarin users in the ischemic stroke analysis and 79,520 warfarin users in the analysis of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
FDA surveillance shows how rivaroxaban compares to warfarin
Display Headline
FDA surveillance shows how rivaroxaban compares to warfarin
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Compound may treat drug-resistant malaria

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/19/2018 - 00:01
Display Headline
Compound may treat drug-resistant malaria

University of Manchester
The “robot scientist” Eve Photo from Ross King,

The antimicrobial agent triclosan may be able to fight drug-resistant malaria, according to research published in Scientific Reports.

For this work, researchers used an artificially intelligent “robot scientist” named Eve to perform a high-throughput screen of potential antimalarial compounds.

The screen revealed that triclosan is effective against Plasmodium parasites that have grown resistant to the antimalarial drug pyrimethamine.

Researchers have known for some time that triclosan inhibits in vitro growth of Plasmodium parasites. They assumed this was because triclosan inhibits the enzyme enoyl reductase (ENR).

However, subsequent work showed that improving triclosan’s ability to target ENR had no effect on parasite growth in the blood.

With the current study, researchers discovered that triclosan also affects parasite growth by inhibiting an enzyme called dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), which is the target of the antimalarial drug pyrimethamine.

The researchers conducted growth competition experiments with 3 yeast strains dependent on a DHFR enzyme from Plasmodium falciparum, a DHFR enzyme from Plasmodium vivax, and human DHFR.

The team used Eve to screen compounds and identify drugs that inhibit the parasite targets but not the human counterpart.

The researchers found that triclosan was able to target and act on DHFR in both wild-type and pyrimethamine-resistant P falciparum and P vivax parasites.

Because triclosan inhibits both ENR and DHFR, the researchers think it may be possible to target Plasmodium parasites at both the liver and blood stages.

“The discovery by our robot ‘colleague’ Eve that triclosan is effective against malaria targets offers hope that we may be able to use it to develop a new drug,” said study author Elizabeth Bilsland, PhD, of the University of Campinas in Brazil.

“We know it is a safe compound, and its ability to target 2 points in the malaria parasite’s life-cycle means the parasite will find it difficult to evolve resistance.”

Eve was developed to speed up the drug discovery process by automatically developing and testing hypotheses to explain observations, run experiments using laboratory robotics, interpret the results to amend hypotheses, and then repeat the cycle.

“Artificial intelligence and machine-learning enables us to create automated scientists that do not just take a ‘brute force’ approach but, rather, take an intelligent approach to science,” said Ross King, PhD, a professor at the University of Manchester in the UK who led the development of Eve.

“This could greatly speed up the drug discovery process and potentially reap huge rewards.”

Publications
Topics

University of Manchester
The “robot scientist” Eve Photo from Ross King,

The antimicrobial agent triclosan may be able to fight drug-resistant malaria, according to research published in Scientific Reports.

For this work, researchers used an artificially intelligent “robot scientist” named Eve to perform a high-throughput screen of potential antimalarial compounds.

The screen revealed that triclosan is effective against Plasmodium parasites that have grown resistant to the antimalarial drug pyrimethamine.

Researchers have known for some time that triclosan inhibits in vitro growth of Plasmodium parasites. They assumed this was because triclosan inhibits the enzyme enoyl reductase (ENR).

However, subsequent work showed that improving triclosan’s ability to target ENR had no effect on parasite growth in the blood.

With the current study, researchers discovered that triclosan also affects parasite growth by inhibiting an enzyme called dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), which is the target of the antimalarial drug pyrimethamine.

The researchers conducted growth competition experiments with 3 yeast strains dependent on a DHFR enzyme from Plasmodium falciparum, a DHFR enzyme from Plasmodium vivax, and human DHFR.

The team used Eve to screen compounds and identify drugs that inhibit the parasite targets but not the human counterpart.

The researchers found that triclosan was able to target and act on DHFR in both wild-type and pyrimethamine-resistant P falciparum and P vivax parasites.

Because triclosan inhibits both ENR and DHFR, the researchers think it may be possible to target Plasmodium parasites at both the liver and blood stages.

“The discovery by our robot ‘colleague’ Eve that triclosan is effective against malaria targets offers hope that we may be able to use it to develop a new drug,” said study author Elizabeth Bilsland, PhD, of the University of Campinas in Brazil.

“We know it is a safe compound, and its ability to target 2 points in the malaria parasite’s life-cycle means the parasite will find it difficult to evolve resistance.”

Eve was developed to speed up the drug discovery process by automatically developing and testing hypotheses to explain observations, run experiments using laboratory robotics, interpret the results to amend hypotheses, and then repeat the cycle.

“Artificial intelligence and machine-learning enables us to create automated scientists that do not just take a ‘brute force’ approach but, rather, take an intelligent approach to science,” said Ross King, PhD, a professor at the University of Manchester in the UK who led the development of Eve.

“This could greatly speed up the drug discovery process and potentially reap huge rewards.”

University of Manchester
The “robot scientist” Eve Photo from Ross King,

The antimicrobial agent triclosan may be able to fight drug-resistant malaria, according to research published in Scientific Reports.

For this work, researchers used an artificially intelligent “robot scientist” named Eve to perform a high-throughput screen of potential antimalarial compounds.

The screen revealed that triclosan is effective against Plasmodium parasites that have grown resistant to the antimalarial drug pyrimethamine.

Researchers have known for some time that triclosan inhibits in vitro growth of Plasmodium parasites. They assumed this was because triclosan inhibits the enzyme enoyl reductase (ENR).

However, subsequent work showed that improving triclosan’s ability to target ENR had no effect on parasite growth in the blood.

With the current study, researchers discovered that triclosan also affects parasite growth by inhibiting an enzyme called dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), which is the target of the antimalarial drug pyrimethamine.

The researchers conducted growth competition experiments with 3 yeast strains dependent on a DHFR enzyme from Plasmodium falciparum, a DHFR enzyme from Plasmodium vivax, and human DHFR.

The team used Eve to screen compounds and identify drugs that inhibit the parasite targets but not the human counterpart.

The researchers found that triclosan was able to target and act on DHFR in both wild-type and pyrimethamine-resistant P falciparum and P vivax parasites.

Because triclosan inhibits both ENR and DHFR, the researchers think it may be possible to target Plasmodium parasites at both the liver and blood stages.

“The discovery by our robot ‘colleague’ Eve that triclosan is effective against malaria targets offers hope that we may be able to use it to develop a new drug,” said study author Elizabeth Bilsland, PhD, of the University of Campinas in Brazil.

“We know it is a safe compound, and its ability to target 2 points in the malaria parasite’s life-cycle means the parasite will find it difficult to evolve resistance.”

Eve was developed to speed up the drug discovery process by automatically developing and testing hypotheses to explain observations, run experiments using laboratory robotics, interpret the results to amend hypotheses, and then repeat the cycle.

“Artificial intelligence and machine-learning enables us to create automated scientists that do not just take a ‘brute force’ approach but, rather, take an intelligent approach to science,” said Ross King, PhD, a professor at the University of Manchester in the UK who led the development of Eve.

“This could greatly speed up the drug discovery process and potentially reap huge rewards.”

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Compound may treat drug-resistant malaria
Display Headline
Compound may treat drug-resistant malaria
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

CBT cost effective for depressed teens refusing antidepressants

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 14:43



Brief primary care cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) among youth who decline antidepressant therapy appears cost-effective, results of a study found.

“In this study, we demonstrate that brief primary care CBT is a cost-effective treatment option for adolescents with depression and likely generates cost savings over 2 years,” said John F. Dickerson, PhD, of Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Ore., and his associates

Rawpixel/Thinkstock
Doctor talking with teen girl.
A total of 212 youth with depression (mean age, 15 years) were randomly assigned to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU plus brief individual CBT. Clinical outcomes included depression-free days and estimated quality-adjusted life-years.

Youth randomly assigned to CBT plus TAU had 26.8 more depression-free days (P = .043) and 0.067 more quality-adjusted life-years (P = .043) on average, compared with patients receiving TAU over a 12-month period. Also, patients in the CBT group had fewer hospitalizations, compared with patients in the TAU group (1.1% vs. 8.8% during 12 months, and 4.4% vs. 12.1% during 24 months), reported Dr. Dickerson and his colleagues.

By the end of the 24-month follow-up, average total costs were $2,811 among youth randomly assigned to CBT plus TAU and $7,354 among youth assigned TAU (adjusted to 2008 U.S. dollars).

“Many adolescents with depression choose to not initiate or continue antidepressant therapy, which limits their options for depression treatment,” the investigators said. “In this evaluation, it is demonstrated that brief, primary care–based CBT is a cost-effective option for the treatment of depression among adolescents with depression who decline or quickly discontinue pharmacotherapy.”

Read more at Pediatrics (2018. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1969).

Publications
Topics
Sections



Brief primary care cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) among youth who decline antidepressant therapy appears cost-effective, results of a study found.

“In this study, we demonstrate that brief primary care CBT is a cost-effective treatment option for adolescents with depression and likely generates cost savings over 2 years,” said John F. Dickerson, PhD, of Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Ore., and his associates

Rawpixel/Thinkstock
Doctor talking with teen girl.
A total of 212 youth with depression (mean age, 15 years) were randomly assigned to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU plus brief individual CBT. Clinical outcomes included depression-free days and estimated quality-adjusted life-years.

Youth randomly assigned to CBT plus TAU had 26.8 more depression-free days (P = .043) and 0.067 more quality-adjusted life-years (P = .043) on average, compared with patients receiving TAU over a 12-month period. Also, patients in the CBT group had fewer hospitalizations, compared with patients in the TAU group (1.1% vs. 8.8% during 12 months, and 4.4% vs. 12.1% during 24 months), reported Dr. Dickerson and his colleagues.

By the end of the 24-month follow-up, average total costs were $2,811 among youth randomly assigned to CBT plus TAU and $7,354 among youth assigned TAU (adjusted to 2008 U.S. dollars).

“Many adolescents with depression choose to not initiate or continue antidepressant therapy, which limits their options for depression treatment,” the investigators said. “In this evaluation, it is demonstrated that brief, primary care–based CBT is a cost-effective option for the treatment of depression among adolescents with depression who decline or quickly discontinue pharmacotherapy.”

Read more at Pediatrics (2018. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1969).



Brief primary care cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) among youth who decline antidepressant therapy appears cost-effective, results of a study found.

“In this study, we demonstrate that brief primary care CBT is a cost-effective treatment option for adolescents with depression and likely generates cost savings over 2 years,” said John F. Dickerson, PhD, of Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Ore., and his associates

Rawpixel/Thinkstock
Doctor talking with teen girl.
A total of 212 youth with depression (mean age, 15 years) were randomly assigned to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU plus brief individual CBT. Clinical outcomes included depression-free days and estimated quality-adjusted life-years.

Youth randomly assigned to CBT plus TAU had 26.8 more depression-free days (P = .043) and 0.067 more quality-adjusted life-years (P = .043) on average, compared with patients receiving TAU over a 12-month period. Also, patients in the CBT group had fewer hospitalizations, compared with patients in the TAU group (1.1% vs. 8.8% during 12 months, and 4.4% vs. 12.1% during 24 months), reported Dr. Dickerson and his colleagues.

By the end of the 24-month follow-up, average total costs were $2,811 among youth randomly assigned to CBT plus TAU and $7,354 among youth assigned TAU (adjusted to 2008 U.S. dollars).

“Many adolescents with depression choose to not initiate or continue antidepressant therapy, which limits their options for depression treatment,” the investigators said. “In this evaluation, it is demonstrated that brief, primary care–based CBT is a cost-effective option for the treatment of depression among adolescents with depression who decline or quickly discontinue pharmacotherapy.”

Read more at Pediatrics (2018. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1969).

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM PEDIATRICS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default