User login
Sharon Worcester is an award-winning medical journalist for MDedge News. She has been with the company since 1996, first as the Southeast Bureau Chief (1996-2009) when the company was known as International Medical News Group, then as a freelance writer (2010-2015) before returning as a reporter in 2015. She previously worked as a daily newspaper reporter covering health and local government. Sharon currently reports primarily on oncology and hematology. She has a BA from Eckerd College and an MA in Mass Communication/Print Journalism from the University of Florida. Connect with her via LinkedIn and follow her on twitter @SW_MedReporter.
Combination immunotherapy ups survival in ILD patients with anti-MDA5–positive dermatomyositis
CHICAGO – Early treatment with combined high-dose glucocorticoids, tacrolimus, and intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy significantly improves survival vs. step-up therapy in interstitial lung disease patients with anti–melanoma differentiation–associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5)–positive dermatomyositis, according to findings from a prospective, multicenter study.
However, the combination therapy was associated with a high risk of cytomegalovirus reactivation and other opportunistic infections that warrants careful monitoring of treated patients, Hideaki Tsuji, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.
ILD accompanied by anti-MDA5–positive dermatomyositis (DM) is often intractable and associated with high mortality in Japanese patients. Case reports have suggested improved outcomes with combined immunosuppressive therapy, but a standard treatment has not been established, said Dr. Tsuji of Kyoto University.
“Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined immunosuppressive therapy for anti-MDA5–positive DM with ILD in a prospective single-arm study,” he said, adding that early administration, a short interval of intravenous cyclophosphamide, use of plasmapheresis as an additional therapy, and control of opportunistic infections may contribute to the improved outcomes seen with the regimen in this study.
The primary endpoint of 6-month survival was reached by 24 (89%) of 27 patients treated with the combination regimen for 52 weeks, compared with 5 (33%) of 15 historical controls who received high-dose glucocorticoids followed by step-wise addition of immunosuppressants. At 12 months, the survival rates were 85% and 33%, respectively, Dr. Tsuji said.
Additionally, anti-MDA5 titer, serum ferritin level, C-reactive protein level, lactate dehydrogenase, and KL-6 level gradually decreased over the 52 months, and percent vital capacity increased with combination vs. step-up therapy, he noted.
Cytomegalovirus reactivation occurred in 90% of combination regimen patients vs. 33% of controls over the 52-week study period, he said, adding that pneumocystic pneumonia and sepsis also occurred in combination regimen group patients, and were associated with death in four patients.
When the 23 surviving patients in the combination regimen group were compared with the 4 in the group who died, it was noted that the deceased patients were significantly more likely to have cutaneous ulcers (75% vs. 13%), higher mean C-reactive protein level (2.7 vs. 0.77 mg/dL), and higher creatine kinase level (644.3 vs. 219.3 IU/L), respectively, before treatment, he said.
Study subjects were Japanese adults with new-onset anti-MDA5–positive dermatomyositis with interstitial lung disease (ILD) who were enrolled between July 2014 and September 2017.
They were treated with 1 mg/kg/day of prednisolone for 4 weeks with reduced doses thereafter, 500-1,000 mg/m2 of IV cyclophosphamide every 2 weeks for six cycles then every 4 weeks for up to a total of 10-15 treatments, and 10-12 ng/mL of tacrolimus (12-hour trough). Plasmapheresis was allowed in patients who progressed and needed oxygenation after the regimen was initiated, and it was administered in nine patients (31%) in the combination regimen group vs. one (7%) of the historical controls.
Given the different frequencies of rapidly progressive ILD in Asian vs. Western countries (39%-71% vs. 22%-57%, respectively), it is unclear whether the results seen in this study can be extrapolated to patients from the United States and Europe. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the efficacy of the regimen in those patient populations, Dr. Tsuji said, also noting that future studies should evaluate risk-based modifications of the regimen to identify the optimal treatment for individuals based on factors such as age, respiratory dysfunction, hyperferritinemia, and treatment delay.
Dr. Tsuji reported having no disclosures.
SOURCE: Tsuji H et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10), Abstract 838.
CHICAGO – Early treatment with combined high-dose glucocorticoids, tacrolimus, and intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy significantly improves survival vs. step-up therapy in interstitial lung disease patients with anti–melanoma differentiation–associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5)–positive dermatomyositis, according to findings from a prospective, multicenter study.
However, the combination therapy was associated with a high risk of cytomegalovirus reactivation and other opportunistic infections that warrants careful monitoring of treated patients, Hideaki Tsuji, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.
ILD accompanied by anti-MDA5–positive dermatomyositis (DM) is often intractable and associated with high mortality in Japanese patients. Case reports have suggested improved outcomes with combined immunosuppressive therapy, but a standard treatment has not been established, said Dr. Tsuji of Kyoto University.
“Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined immunosuppressive therapy for anti-MDA5–positive DM with ILD in a prospective single-arm study,” he said, adding that early administration, a short interval of intravenous cyclophosphamide, use of plasmapheresis as an additional therapy, and control of opportunistic infections may contribute to the improved outcomes seen with the regimen in this study.
The primary endpoint of 6-month survival was reached by 24 (89%) of 27 patients treated with the combination regimen for 52 weeks, compared with 5 (33%) of 15 historical controls who received high-dose glucocorticoids followed by step-wise addition of immunosuppressants. At 12 months, the survival rates were 85% and 33%, respectively, Dr. Tsuji said.
Additionally, anti-MDA5 titer, serum ferritin level, C-reactive protein level, lactate dehydrogenase, and KL-6 level gradually decreased over the 52 months, and percent vital capacity increased with combination vs. step-up therapy, he noted.
Cytomegalovirus reactivation occurred in 90% of combination regimen patients vs. 33% of controls over the 52-week study period, he said, adding that pneumocystic pneumonia and sepsis also occurred in combination regimen group patients, and were associated with death in four patients.
When the 23 surviving patients in the combination regimen group were compared with the 4 in the group who died, it was noted that the deceased patients were significantly more likely to have cutaneous ulcers (75% vs. 13%), higher mean C-reactive protein level (2.7 vs. 0.77 mg/dL), and higher creatine kinase level (644.3 vs. 219.3 IU/L), respectively, before treatment, he said.
Study subjects were Japanese adults with new-onset anti-MDA5–positive dermatomyositis with interstitial lung disease (ILD) who were enrolled between July 2014 and September 2017.
They were treated with 1 mg/kg/day of prednisolone for 4 weeks with reduced doses thereafter, 500-1,000 mg/m2 of IV cyclophosphamide every 2 weeks for six cycles then every 4 weeks for up to a total of 10-15 treatments, and 10-12 ng/mL of tacrolimus (12-hour trough). Plasmapheresis was allowed in patients who progressed and needed oxygenation after the regimen was initiated, and it was administered in nine patients (31%) in the combination regimen group vs. one (7%) of the historical controls.
Given the different frequencies of rapidly progressive ILD in Asian vs. Western countries (39%-71% vs. 22%-57%, respectively), it is unclear whether the results seen in this study can be extrapolated to patients from the United States and Europe. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the efficacy of the regimen in those patient populations, Dr. Tsuji said, also noting that future studies should evaluate risk-based modifications of the regimen to identify the optimal treatment for individuals based on factors such as age, respiratory dysfunction, hyperferritinemia, and treatment delay.
Dr. Tsuji reported having no disclosures.
SOURCE: Tsuji H et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10), Abstract 838.
CHICAGO – Early treatment with combined high-dose glucocorticoids, tacrolimus, and intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy significantly improves survival vs. step-up therapy in interstitial lung disease patients with anti–melanoma differentiation–associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5)–positive dermatomyositis, according to findings from a prospective, multicenter study.
However, the combination therapy was associated with a high risk of cytomegalovirus reactivation and other opportunistic infections that warrants careful monitoring of treated patients, Hideaki Tsuji, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.
ILD accompanied by anti-MDA5–positive dermatomyositis (DM) is often intractable and associated with high mortality in Japanese patients. Case reports have suggested improved outcomes with combined immunosuppressive therapy, but a standard treatment has not been established, said Dr. Tsuji of Kyoto University.
“Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined immunosuppressive therapy for anti-MDA5–positive DM with ILD in a prospective single-arm study,” he said, adding that early administration, a short interval of intravenous cyclophosphamide, use of plasmapheresis as an additional therapy, and control of opportunistic infections may contribute to the improved outcomes seen with the regimen in this study.
The primary endpoint of 6-month survival was reached by 24 (89%) of 27 patients treated with the combination regimen for 52 weeks, compared with 5 (33%) of 15 historical controls who received high-dose glucocorticoids followed by step-wise addition of immunosuppressants. At 12 months, the survival rates were 85% and 33%, respectively, Dr. Tsuji said.
Additionally, anti-MDA5 titer, serum ferritin level, C-reactive protein level, lactate dehydrogenase, and KL-6 level gradually decreased over the 52 months, and percent vital capacity increased with combination vs. step-up therapy, he noted.
Cytomegalovirus reactivation occurred in 90% of combination regimen patients vs. 33% of controls over the 52-week study period, he said, adding that pneumocystic pneumonia and sepsis also occurred in combination regimen group patients, and were associated with death in four patients.
When the 23 surviving patients in the combination regimen group were compared with the 4 in the group who died, it was noted that the deceased patients were significantly more likely to have cutaneous ulcers (75% vs. 13%), higher mean C-reactive protein level (2.7 vs. 0.77 mg/dL), and higher creatine kinase level (644.3 vs. 219.3 IU/L), respectively, before treatment, he said.
Study subjects were Japanese adults with new-onset anti-MDA5–positive dermatomyositis with interstitial lung disease (ILD) who were enrolled between July 2014 and September 2017.
They were treated with 1 mg/kg/day of prednisolone for 4 weeks with reduced doses thereafter, 500-1,000 mg/m2 of IV cyclophosphamide every 2 weeks for six cycles then every 4 weeks for up to a total of 10-15 treatments, and 10-12 ng/mL of tacrolimus (12-hour trough). Plasmapheresis was allowed in patients who progressed and needed oxygenation after the regimen was initiated, and it was administered in nine patients (31%) in the combination regimen group vs. one (7%) of the historical controls.
Given the different frequencies of rapidly progressive ILD in Asian vs. Western countries (39%-71% vs. 22%-57%, respectively), it is unclear whether the results seen in this study can be extrapolated to patients from the United States and Europe. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the efficacy of the regimen in those patient populations, Dr. Tsuji said, also noting that future studies should evaluate risk-based modifications of the regimen to identify the optimal treatment for individuals based on factors such as age, respiratory dysfunction, hyperferritinemia, and treatment delay.
Dr. Tsuji reported having no disclosures.
SOURCE: Tsuji H et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10), Abstract 838.
REPORTING FROM THE ACR ANNUAL MEETING
Key clinical point:
Major finding: 6-month survival was 89% vs. 33% with combination immunotherapy vs. step-up therapy.
Study details: A prospective, multicenter study of 27 patients and 15 historical controls.
Disclosures: Dr. Tsuji reported having no disclosures.
Source: Tsuji H et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10), Abstract 838.
Dr. Ingrid A. Mayer on neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: The times are changing
SAN ANTONIO – Phase 2 neoadjuvant endocrine therapy breast cancer trials can and should serve as a testing platform to inform the design of phase 3 trials with the ability to change practice, according to Ingrid A. Mayer, MD.
Correlating outcomes such as the Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index and Ki67 blood levels from phase 2 trials to larger, similarly designed trials could reduce costs, time, and the need for large numbers of patients, thereby promoting more efficient development of effective breast cancer therapies, she said during a plenary lecture at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
In this video interview, Dr. Mayer, director of breast medical oncology at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn., explained that while neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is suitable for down-staging tumors in women with stage I-III breast cancer, it is not commonly used, as those patients are also good surgery candidates.
However, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy can be “an incredible platform” to test novel combinations of endocrine therapy agents with or without targeted treatments, validate new biomarkers, discover mechanisms of resistance, and predict the best combinations for moving forward in phase 3 trials, she said, adding that “this is something that all academic institutions potentially should be doing.”
Although the direct clinical benefit for patients who participate in such trials is not tremendous, participation has the potential to ultimately improve outcomes for participants and for “their friends and families and daughters,” and to help propel the science forward, Dr. Meyer noted.
“I would argue that we really should be moving forward to designing trials in the neoadjuvant endocrine setting more and more, and really utilizing this platform for that end,” she said.
Dr. Mayer reported having no relevant disclosures.
SAN ANTONIO – Phase 2 neoadjuvant endocrine therapy breast cancer trials can and should serve as a testing platform to inform the design of phase 3 trials with the ability to change practice, according to Ingrid A. Mayer, MD.
Correlating outcomes such as the Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index and Ki67 blood levels from phase 2 trials to larger, similarly designed trials could reduce costs, time, and the need for large numbers of patients, thereby promoting more efficient development of effective breast cancer therapies, she said during a plenary lecture at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
In this video interview, Dr. Mayer, director of breast medical oncology at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn., explained that while neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is suitable for down-staging tumors in women with stage I-III breast cancer, it is not commonly used, as those patients are also good surgery candidates.
However, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy can be “an incredible platform” to test novel combinations of endocrine therapy agents with or without targeted treatments, validate new biomarkers, discover mechanisms of resistance, and predict the best combinations for moving forward in phase 3 trials, she said, adding that “this is something that all academic institutions potentially should be doing.”
Although the direct clinical benefit for patients who participate in such trials is not tremendous, participation has the potential to ultimately improve outcomes for participants and for “their friends and families and daughters,” and to help propel the science forward, Dr. Meyer noted.
“I would argue that we really should be moving forward to designing trials in the neoadjuvant endocrine setting more and more, and really utilizing this platform for that end,” she said.
Dr. Mayer reported having no relevant disclosures.
SAN ANTONIO – Phase 2 neoadjuvant endocrine therapy breast cancer trials can and should serve as a testing platform to inform the design of phase 3 trials with the ability to change practice, according to Ingrid A. Mayer, MD.
Correlating outcomes such as the Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index and Ki67 blood levels from phase 2 trials to larger, similarly designed trials could reduce costs, time, and the need for large numbers of patients, thereby promoting more efficient development of effective breast cancer therapies, she said during a plenary lecture at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
In this video interview, Dr. Mayer, director of breast medical oncology at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn., explained that while neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is suitable for down-staging tumors in women with stage I-III breast cancer, it is not commonly used, as those patients are also good surgery candidates.
However, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy can be “an incredible platform” to test novel combinations of endocrine therapy agents with or without targeted treatments, validate new biomarkers, discover mechanisms of resistance, and predict the best combinations for moving forward in phase 3 trials, she said, adding that “this is something that all academic institutions potentially should be doing.”
Although the direct clinical benefit for patients who participate in such trials is not tremendous, participation has the potential to ultimately improve outcomes for participants and for “their friends and families and daughters,” and to help propel the science forward, Dr. Meyer noted.
“I would argue that we really should be moving forward to designing trials in the neoadjuvant endocrine setting more and more, and really utilizing this platform for that end,” she said.
Dr. Mayer reported having no relevant disclosures.
REPORTING FROM SABCS 2018
Exercise during adjuvant breast cancer therapy improves CV outcomes
SAN ANTONIO – A tailored 12-month exercise program during adjuvant breast cancer treatment appears to protect cardiovascular function, particularly in patients receiving chemotherapy, according to findings from the randomized EBBA-II trial.
The overall change in VO2max at 12 months was +0.3% in 271 patients randomized to the intervention group, compared with –8.9% in 274 patients in the “usual care” control group, Inger Thune, MD, PhD, said at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
Among patients receiving chemotherapy, the VO2max change at 12 months was +1.6% in 120 patients in the intervention group, compared with –2.76% in 122 patients in the control group, said Dr. Thune of the Cancer Center at Oslo University Hospital.
Study participants were women aged 18-75 years (mean of 55 years at diagnosis) with stage I-II breast cancer, mean body mass index of 25 kg/m2, and a mean VO2max before surgery of 31.5 mL/kg per minute. The intervention group entered a 12-month individualized exercise program 2-3 weeks after surgery based on their own VO2max at baseline.
They met for training sessions in groups of 10-12 women for 60 minutes twice weekly over the 12-month study period, and were also told to perform at least 120 minutes of exercise at home for a total of 240 minutes of exercise weekly.
Of note, the adherence rate among participants was encouragingly high at about 90%, she said, adding that the findings strongly support tailored exercise during adjuvant breast cancer treatment, as such an intervention appears to counteract declines in cardiovascular function – particularly in those receiving chemotherapy.
In this video interview, Dr. Thune further discussed the study design, implications of the findings, and future directions.
“Cardiovascular morbidity is so important for our breast cancer patients that I think that it’s time to have physical activity [and] physical function as a main interest for all clinicians dealing with breast cancer patients,” she said.
Dr. Thune reported having no disclosures.
SAN ANTONIO – A tailored 12-month exercise program during adjuvant breast cancer treatment appears to protect cardiovascular function, particularly in patients receiving chemotherapy, according to findings from the randomized EBBA-II trial.
The overall change in VO2max at 12 months was +0.3% in 271 patients randomized to the intervention group, compared with –8.9% in 274 patients in the “usual care” control group, Inger Thune, MD, PhD, said at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
Among patients receiving chemotherapy, the VO2max change at 12 months was +1.6% in 120 patients in the intervention group, compared with –2.76% in 122 patients in the control group, said Dr. Thune of the Cancer Center at Oslo University Hospital.
Study participants were women aged 18-75 years (mean of 55 years at diagnosis) with stage I-II breast cancer, mean body mass index of 25 kg/m2, and a mean VO2max before surgery of 31.5 mL/kg per minute. The intervention group entered a 12-month individualized exercise program 2-3 weeks after surgery based on their own VO2max at baseline.
They met for training sessions in groups of 10-12 women for 60 minutes twice weekly over the 12-month study period, and were also told to perform at least 120 minutes of exercise at home for a total of 240 minutes of exercise weekly.
Of note, the adherence rate among participants was encouragingly high at about 90%, she said, adding that the findings strongly support tailored exercise during adjuvant breast cancer treatment, as such an intervention appears to counteract declines in cardiovascular function – particularly in those receiving chemotherapy.
In this video interview, Dr. Thune further discussed the study design, implications of the findings, and future directions.
“Cardiovascular morbidity is so important for our breast cancer patients that I think that it’s time to have physical activity [and] physical function as a main interest for all clinicians dealing with breast cancer patients,” she said.
Dr. Thune reported having no disclosures.
SAN ANTONIO – A tailored 12-month exercise program during adjuvant breast cancer treatment appears to protect cardiovascular function, particularly in patients receiving chemotherapy, according to findings from the randomized EBBA-II trial.
The overall change in VO2max at 12 months was +0.3% in 271 patients randomized to the intervention group, compared with –8.9% in 274 patients in the “usual care” control group, Inger Thune, MD, PhD, said at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
Among patients receiving chemotherapy, the VO2max change at 12 months was +1.6% in 120 patients in the intervention group, compared with –2.76% in 122 patients in the control group, said Dr. Thune of the Cancer Center at Oslo University Hospital.
Study participants were women aged 18-75 years (mean of 55 years at diagnosis) with stage I-II breast cancer, mean body mass index of 25 kg/m2, and a mean VO2max before surgery of 31.5 mL/kg per minute. The intervention group entered a 12-month individualized exercise program 2-3 weeks after surgery based on their own VO2max at baseline.
They met for training sessions in groups of 10-12 women for 60 minutes twice weekly over the 12-month study period, and were also told to perform at least 120 minutes of exercise at home for a total of 240 minutes of exercise weekly.
Of note, the adherence rate among participants was encouragingly high at about 90%, she said, adding that the findings strongly support tailored exercise during adjuvant breast cancer treatment, as such an intervention appears to counteract declines in cardiovascular function – particularly in those receiving chemotherapy.
In this video interview, Dr. Thune further discussed the study design, implications of the findings, and future directions.
“Cardiovascular morbidity is so important for our breast cancer patients that I think that it’s time to have physical activity [and] physical function as a main interest for all clinicians dealing with breast cancer patients,” she said.
Dr. Thune reported having no disclosures.
REPORTING FROM SABCS 2018
Key clinical point: An exercise program during adjuvant breast cancer treatment improves cardiovascular outcomes.
Major finding: The rate of VO2max change at 12 months was +0.3% in the exercise group versus –8.9% in the control group.
Study details: EBBA-II, a randomized trial of 546 women.
Disclosures: Dr. Thune reported having no disclosures.
Extended anastrozole improves DFS, distant DFS
SAN ANTONIO – Extending treatment with adjuvant anastrozole (Arimidex) to 10 years led to significantly higher rates of disease-free and distant disease-free survival in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer in the prospective, randomized, open-label phase 3 Arimidex Extended Adjuvant Randomized Study (AERAS).
After a median of 4.9 years of follow-up, the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) was 91.9% in 840 women who were randomized to continue receiving anastrozole for an additional 5 years versus 84.4% in 843 who stopped after the initial 5 years (hazard ratio, 0.548; P = .0004), Shoichiro Ohtani, MD, reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
The rate of 5-year distant DFS was 97.2% vs. 94.3% in the groups, respectively (HR, 0.514; P = .0077), said Dr. Ohtani, of Hiroshima City (Japan) Hiroshima Citizens Hospital.
“As we expected, there was no difference between the two groups in overall survival,” he said; overall survival was 99.5% and 99.6% in the groups, respectively (HR, 1.389; P = .665).
Study subjects were postmenopausal patients with stages I-III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HR+ BC) with a median age of 64 years who were disease-free after 5 years of either anastrozole alone or tamoxifen for 2-3 years followed by anastrozole 2-3 years. They were enrolled between November 2007 and November 2012.
Treatment with an aromatase inhibitor such as anastrozole for up to 5 years either as up-front monotherapy or after 2-3 years of tamoxifen therapy is the treatment of choice for HR+ BC in postmenopausal women, but it was thought that extending aromatase inhibitor therapy to 10 years might reduce the risk of breast cancer recurrence, Dr. Ohtani explained.
Indeed, while women randomized to extended anastrozole treatment in the current study experienced more bone-related adverse events, including arthralgia (19.2% vs. 11.7%), stiff joints (11.7% vs. 4.9%), bone fractures (2.8% vs. 1.1%), and new-onset osteoporosis (33% vs. 28%) than did those in the group that stopped anastrozole at 5 years, extended treatment significantly reduced recurrence rates.
The findings show that extended adjuvant anastrozole treatment for an additional 5 years after initial treatment is safe and provides important DFS and distant DFS benefits, he concluded.
Dr. Ohtani has received speaker fees from CHUGAI, Astra Zeneca, Novartis,and Ezai.
SOURCE: Ohtani S et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS3-04.
SAN ANTONIO – Extending treatment with adjuvant anastrozole (Arimidex) to 10 years led to significantly higher rates of disease-free and distant disease-free survival in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer in the prospective, randomized, open-label phase 3 Arimidex Extended Adjuvant Randomized Study (AERAS).
After a median of 4.9 years of follow-up, the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) was 91.9% in 840 women who were randomized to continue receiving anastrozole for an additional 5 years versus 84.4% in 843 who stopped after the initial 5 years (hazard ratio, 0.548; P = .0004), Shoichiro Ohtani, MD, reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
The rate of 5-year distant DFS was 97.2% vs. 94.3% in the groups, respectively (HR, 0.514; P = .0077), said Dr. Ohtani, of Hiroshima City (Japan) Hiroshima Citizens Hospital.
“As we expected, there was no difference between the two groups in overall survival,” he said; overall survival was 99.5% and 99.6% in the groups, respectively (HR, 1.389; P = .665).
Study subjects were postmenopausal patients with stages I-III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HR+ BC) with a median age of 64 years who were disease-free after 5 years of either anastrozole alone or tamoxifen for 2-3 years followed by anastrozole 2-3 years. They were enrolled between November 2007 and November 2012.
Treatment with an aromatase inhibitor such as anastrozole for up to 5 years either as up-front monotherapy or after 2-3 years of tamoxifen therapy is the treatment of choice for HR+ BC in postmenopausal women, but it was thought that extending aromatase inhibitor therapy to 10 years might reduce the risk of breast cancer recurrence, Dr. Ohtani explained.
Indeed, while women randomized to extended anastrozole treatment in the current study experienced more bone-related adverse events, including arthralgia (19.2% vs. 11.7%), stiff joints (11.7% vs. 4.9%), bone fractures (2.8% vs. 1.1%), and new-onset osteoporosis (33% vs. 28%) than did those in the group that stopped anastrozole at 5 years, extended treatment significantly reduced recurrence rates.
The findings show that extended adjuvant anastrozole treatment for an additional 5 years after initial treatment is safe and provides important DFS and distant DFS benefits, he concluded.
Dr. Ohtani has received speaker fees from CHUGAI, Astra Zeneca, Novartis,and Ezai.
SOURCE: Ohtani S et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS3-04.
SAN ANTONIO – Extending treatment with adjuvant anastrozole (Arimidex) to 10 years led to significantly higher rates of disease-free and distant disease-free survival in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer in the prospective, randomized, open-label phase 3 Arimidex Extended Adjuvant Randomized Study (AERAS).
After a median of 4.9 years of follow-up, the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) was 91.9% in 840 women who were randomized to continue receiving anastrozole for an additional 5 years versus 84.4% in 843 who stopped after the initial 5 years (hazard ratio, 0.548; P = .0004), Shoichiro Ohtani, MD, reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
The rate of 5-year distant DFS was 97.2% vs. 94.3% in the groups, respectively (HR, 0.514; P = .0077), said Dr. Ohtani, of Hiroshima City (Japan) Hiroshima Citizens Hospital.
“As we expected, there was no difference between the two groups in overall survival,” he said; overall survival was 99.5% and 99.6% in the groups, respectively (HR, 1.389; P = .665).
Study subjects were postmenopausal patients with stages I-III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HR+ BC) with a median age of 64 years who were disease-free after 5 years of either anastrozole alone or tamoxifen for 2-3 years followed by anastrozole 2-3 years. They were enrolled between November 2007 and November 2012.
Treatment with an aromatase inhibitor such as anastrozole for up to 5 years either as up-front monotherapy or after 2-3 years of tamoxifen therapy is the treatment of choice for HR+ BC in postmenopausal women, but it was thought that extending aromatase inhibitor therapy to 10 years might reduce the risk of breast cancer recurrence, Dr. Ohtani explained.
Indeed, while women randomized to extended anastrozole treatment in the current study experienced more bone-related adverse events, including arthralgia (19.2% vs. 11.7%), stiff joints (11.7% vs. 4.9%), bone fractures (2.8% vs. 1.1%), and new-onset osteoporosis (33% vs. 28%) than did those in the group that stopped anastrozole at 5 years, extended treatment significantly reduced recurrence rates.
The findings show that extended adjuvant anastrozole treatment for an additional 5 years after initial treatment is safe and provides important DFS and distant DFS benefits, he concluded.
Dr. Ohtani has received speaker fees from CHUGAI, Astra Zeneca, Novartis,and Ezai.
SOURCE: Ohtani S et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS3-04.
REPORTING FROM SABCS 2018
Key clinical point: Extending treatment with adjuvant anastrozole to 10 years improves disease free survival and distant DFS in HR+ breast cancer.
Major finding: DFS was 91.9% in patients who continued anastrozole versus 84.4% in those who stopped anastrozole after the initial 5 years (hazard ratio, 0.548; P = .0004).
Study details: A prospective, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of 1,683 patients.
Disclosures: Dr. Ohtani has received speaker fees from CHUGAI, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, and Ezai.
Source: Ohtani S et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS3-04.
TNBC survival appears better when adjuvant chemotherapy is delivered within 30 days
SAN ANTONIO – The longer the delay in initiating adjuvant chemotherapy, the worse the survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), findings from a review of nearly 700 cases suggest.
Delays of more than 30 days between surgery and initiation of chemotherapy were associated with lower disease-free survival (DFS), distant recurrence–free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS), Zaida Morante, MD, reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
In 687 women with clinical stage I, II, or III TNBC who were diagnosed at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas in Lima, Peru, during 2000-2014 and followed for a median of 8.5 years, time to chemotherapy was less than 30 days in 189 patients (27.5%), 31-60 days in 329 patients (47.9%), 61-90 days in 115 patients (16.7%), and more than 91 days in 54 patients (7.9%), said Dr. Morante, a medical oncologist at the institute.
Overall survival at 10 years was 82% in those who received chemotherapy within 30 days of surgery, compared with 67.4%, 67.1%, and 65.1% in those treated at 31-60, 61-90, and more than 91 days after surgery, respectively, she said.
“The difference was consistent across the different periods of the evaluation,” she said during a press briefing at the symposium. “Additionally, the benefit of receiving chemotherapy within 30 days exists and is statistically significant for [nodal status] N0 and N1 (hazard ratios, 1.701 and 2.498).”
In those with N2 and N3 nodal status, there was a numerical difference, but it didn’t reach statistical significance.
DFS was also significantly worse if treated later than 30 days after surgery; those treated within 30 days had 10-year DFS of 81.4%, compared with 68.8%, 70.8%, and 68.1% in the other groups, respectively. The difference was even more pronounced for 10-year DRFS, which was 80.2%, 64.9%, 67.5%, and 58.6% in the groups, respectively.
Multivariate analyses confirmed that time to adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for survival, she said, noting that compared with patients treated within 30 days of surgery, those treated at 31-60 days had 1.9-fold increased risk of death, and those treated at 61-90 days had a 2.4-fold increased risk of death.
“The difference in 10-year overall survival rates between receiving chemotherapy within 30 days after surgery and after 30 days was more than 10%,” she said. “These results represent a feasible opportunity for improving outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer patients.”
Although only 28% of patients in this review received adjuvant chemotherapy within 30 days, most patients in the United States “will fall within the 30 days and under” category, said press briefing moderator Carlos Arteaga, MD, professor and director of the Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas.
However, the findings might suggest a greater role for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in these patients.
“Because this is systemic therapy ... it’s treating the systemic disease. I wonder if this is arguing ... that we need to have an impetus to deliver the systemic therapy as soon as we can – early, even before the operation,” he said.
Indeed, while timing isn’t everything, Dr. Morante’s findings and others presented at the meeting “highlight the possibility that perhaps it is more important than we previously suspected,” discussant Joseph A. Sparano, MD, said at the meeting, adding that the findings raise questions about current paradigms for management of breast cancer.
“We now have substantial data suggesting that the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy matters in triple-negative breast cancer, and that 30 days may be optimal,” said Dr. Sparano, professor at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York.
“This doesn’t mean that patients who may not be ready for the chemotherapy because of complications related to the surgery should be forced into a situation where they are at higher risk from receiving the chemotherapy, but nevertheless, the results are important,” he said.
Dr. Morante and Dr. Arteaga each reported having no relevant conflicts of interest to declare. Dr. Sparano has received consulting fees from Roche, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Celldex, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Adgero. He also has ownership interests with MetaStat.
SOURCE: Morante Z et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS2-05.
SAN ANTONIO – The longer the delay in initiating adjuvant chemotherapy, the worse the survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), findings from a review of nearly 700 cases suggest.
Delays of more than 30 days between surgery and initiation of chemotherapy were associated with lower disease-free survival (DFS), distant recurrence–free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS), Zaida Morante, MD, reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
In 687 women with clinical stage I, II, or III TNBC who were diagnosed at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas in Lima, Peru, during 2000-2014 and followed for a median of 8.5 years, time to chemotherapy was less than 30 days in 189 patients (27.5%), 31-60 days in 329 patients (47.9%), 61-90 days in 115 patients (16.7%), and more than 91 days in 54 patients (7.9%), said Dr. Morante, a medical oncologist at the institute.
Overall survival at 10 years was 82% in those who received chemotherapy within 30 days of surgery, compared with 67.4%, 67.1%, and 65.1% in those treated at 31-60, 61-90, and more than 91 days after surgery, respectively, she said.
“The difference was consistent across the different periods of the evaluation,” she said during a press briefing at the symposium. “Additionally, the benefit of receiving chemotherapy within 30 days exists and is statistically significant for [nodal status] N0 and N1 (hazard ratios, 1.701 and 2.498).”
In those with N2 and N3 nodal status, there was a numerical difference, but it didn’t reach statistical significance.
DFS was also significantly worse if treated later than 30 days after surgery; those treated within 30 days had 10-year DFS of 81.4%, compared with 68.8%, 70.8%, and 68.1% in the other groups, respectively. The difference was even more pronounced for 10-year DRFS, which was 80.2%, 64.9%, 67.5%, and 58.6% in the groups, respectively.
Multivariate analyses confirmed that time to adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for survival, she said, noting that compared with patients treated within 30 days of surgery, those treated at 31-60 days had 1.9-fold increased risk of death, and those treated at 61-90 days had a 2.4-fold increased risk of death.
“The difference in 10-year overall survival rates between receiving chemotherapy within 30 days after surgery and after 30 days was more than 10%,” she said. “These results represent a feasible opportunity for improving outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer patients.”
Although only 28% of patients in this review received adjuvant chemotherapy within 30 days, most patients in the United States “will fall within the 30 days and under” category, said press briefing moderator Carlos Arteaga, MD, professor and director of the Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas.
However, the findings might suggest a greater role for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in these patients.
“Because this is systemic therapy ... it’s treating the systemic disease. I wonder if this is arguing ... that we need to have an impetus to deliver the systemic therapy as soon as we can – early, even before the operation,” he said.
Indeed, while timing isn’t everything, Dr. Morante’s findings and others presented at the meeting “highlight the possibility that perhaps it is more important than we previously suspected,” discussant Joseph A. Sparano, MD, said at the meeting, adding that the findings raise questions about current paradigms for management of breast cancer.
“We now have substantial data suggesting that the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy matters in triple-negative breast cancer, and that 30 days may be optimal,” said Dr. Sparano, professor at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York.
“This doesn’t mean that patients who may not be ready for the chemotherapy because of complications related to the surgery should be forced into a situation where they are at higher risk from receiving the chemotherapy, but nevertheless, the results are important,” he said.
Dr. Morante and Dr. Arteaga each reported having no relevant conflicts of interest to declare. Dr. Sparano has received consulting fees from Roche, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Celldex, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Adgero. He also has ownership interests with MetaStat.
SOURCE: Morante Z et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS2-05.
SAN ANTONIO – The longer the delay in initiating adjuvant chemotherapy, the worse the survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), findings from a review of nearly 700 cases suggest.
Delays of more than 30 days between surgery and initiation of chemotherapy were associated with lower disease-free survival (DFS), distant recurrence–free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS), Zaida Morante, MD, reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
In 687 women with clinical stage I, II, or III TNBC who were diagnosed at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas in Lima, Peru, during 2000-2014 and followed for a median of 8.5 years, time to chemotherapy was less than 30 days in 189 patients (27.5%), 31-60 days in 329 patients (47.9%), 61-90 days in 115 patients (16.7%), and more than 91 days in 54 patients (7.9%), said Dr. Morante, a medical oncologist at the institute.
Overall survival at 10 years was 82% in those who received chemotherapy within 30 days of surgery, compared with 67.4%, 67.1%, and 65.1% in those treated at 31-60, 61-90, and more than 91 days after surgery, respectively, she said.
“The difference was consistent across the different periods of the evaluation,” she said during a press briefing at the symposium. “Additionally, the benefit of receiving chemotherapy within 30 days exists and is statistically significant for [nodal status] N0 and N1 (hazard ratios, 1.701 and 2.498).”
In those with N2 and N3 nodal status, there was a numerical difference, but it didn’t reach statistical significance.
DFS was also significantly worse if treated later than 30 days after surgery; those treated within 30 days had 10-year DFS of 81.4%, compared with 68.8%, 70.8%, and 68.1% in the other groups, respectively. The difference was even more pronounced for 10-year DRFS, which was 80.2%, 64.9%, 67.5%, and 58.6% in the groups, respectively.
Multivariate analyses confirmed that time to adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for survival, she said, noting that compared with patients treated within 30 days of surgery, those treated at 31-60 days had 1.9-fold increased risk of death, and those treated at 61-90 days had a 2.4-fold increased risk of death.
“The difference in 10-year overall survival rates between receiving chemotherapy within 30 days after surgery and after 30 days was more than 10%,” she said. “These results represent a feasible opportunity for improving outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer patients.”
Although only 28% of patients in this review received adjuvant chemotherapy within 30 days, most patients in the United States “will fall within the 30 days and under” category, said press briefing moderator Carlos Arteaga, MD, professor and director of the Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas.
However, the findings might suggest a greater role for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in these patients.
“Because this is systemic therapy ... it’s treating the systemic disease. I wonder if this is arguing ... that we need to have an impetus to deliver the systemic therapy as soon as we can – early, even before the operation,” he said.
Indeed, while timing isn’t everything, Dr. Morante’s findings and others presented at the meeting “highlight the possibility that perhaps it is more important than we previously suspected,” discussant Joseph A. Sparano, MD, said at the meeting, adding that the findings raise questions about current paradigms for management of breast cancer.
“We now have substantial data suggesting that the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy matters in triple-negative breast cancer, and that 30 days may be optimal,” said Dr. Sparano, professor at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York.
“This doesn’t mean that patients who may not be ready for the chemotherapy because of complications related to the surgery should be forced into a situation where they are at higher risk from receiving the chemotherapy, but nevertheless, the results are important,” he said.
Dr. Morante and Dr. Arteaga each reported having no relevant conflicts of interest to declare. Dr. Sparano has received consulting fees from Roche, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Celldex, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Adgero. He also has ownership interests with MetaStat.
SOURCE: Morante Z et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS2-05.
REPORTING FROM SABCS 2018
Key clinical point: Outcomes are improved with adjuvant chemotherapy within 30 days of surgery, compared with beyond 30 days, in triple-negative breast cancer.
Major finding: 10-year overall survival was 82% with chemotherapy within 30 days of surgery versus 67.4%, 67.1%, and 65.1% with chemotherapy at 31-60, 61-90, and more than 91 days after surgery, respectively.
Study details: A retrospective review of 687 cases of TNBC.
Disclosures: Dr. Morante and Dr. Arteaga each reported having no relevant conflicts of interest to declare. Dr. Sparano has received consulting fees from Roche, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Celldex, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Adgero. He also has ownership interests with MetaStat.
Source: Morante Z et al., SABCS 2018 Abstract GS2-05.
PD-L1 expression best predicts response to atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel for mTNBC
SAN ANTONIO – in patients with untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, according to exploratory efficacy analyses of data from the phase 3 IMpassion130 trial.
The analyses of data for the 902 patients randomized to receive the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab (Tecentriq) plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)–paclitaxel or placebo plus nab-palcitaxel for the study also showed consistency between local and central estrogen-receptor, progesterone-receptor, and human epidermal growth factor–receptor 2 testing, Leisha A. Emens, MD, reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
“IMpassion130 is the first phase 3 study to demonstrate a benefit from [atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel] in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC),” said Dr. Emens, professor of medicine in hematology/oncology, coleader of the Hillman Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Program, and director of translational immunotherapy for the Women’s Cancer Research Center at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
She explained that progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better in PD-L1–positive mTNBC patients treated with the atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel, than in those who received placebo + nab-paclitaxel (hazard ratios in the intent-to-treat population, 0.8 and 0.62, respectively).
At the first interim overall survival analysis, a clinically meaningful improvement in OS was seen in PD-L1–positive patients in the treatment group (HR, 0.62; median OS improvement from 15.5 months with placebo to 25 months), she added.
In exploratory analyses, Dr. Emens and her colleagues sought to evaluate whether preexisting immune biology is associated with clinical benefit from atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel, as has been demonstrated in studies of other agents that target the PD-1 pathway in other cancer types of cancer. They also assessed BRCA 1/2 mutation status as a biomarker for response.
“In patients enrolled on the IMpassion130 trial we found that PD-L1 in triple-negative breast cancer was expressed primarily on tumor-infiltrating immune cells,” she said. “In contrast to this, we found a very low rate of PD-L1 expression specifically on tumor cells across the patient population.”
Looking at both of those biomarkers together showed that a majority of patients with expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells were included in the PD-L1 immune cell–positive population, with only 2% having PD-L1 expression exclusively on their tumor cells.
Data previously reported at the European Society for Medical Oncology and published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed a PFS benefit, as well as a clinically meaningful improvement in OS of nearly 10 months, specifically in patients with PD-L1 immune cell–positive lesions treated with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel, she noted.
“In data presented for the first time today you can see that PD-L1–negative patients derive no overall survival benefit as there was no treatment effect with this therapy combination,” she said.
A trend was seen toward an association between immune cell positivity and poor prognosis, but this was not statistically significant, she said.
“Taken together, these data definitively show that PD-L1 immune cell positivity is predictive of both progression-free and overall survival benefit with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel,” she said.
She and her colleagues also looked at the level of PD-L1 expression in immune cells to assess whether there is a threshold that might be required.
“As long as there was a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more in the immune cells, there was a significant progression-free and overall survival benefit for patients treated with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel. This suggests that this expression of over 1% will represent a threshold for identifying those patients who are likely to benefit from this combination,” she said.
Further assessment by CD8 T-cell status showed that patients who had CD8-positive T cells but who were PD-L1 immune cell negative had no benefit from atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel, whereas those who were positive for both CD8 and PD-L1 expression on their immune cells derived significant PFS and OS benefit (HR, 0.89 and 0.77, respectively).
“So patients with CD8-positive tumors derive clinical benefit only if their tumors are also PD-L1-positive,” she said.
Similarly, no clinical benefit was seen in patients with stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)–positive tumors but who were PD-L1-negative, whereas those with stromal TIL-positive PD-L1–positive tumors derived significant PFS and OS benefit (HRs, 0.99 and 1.53, respectively), and this was also seen in the 15% of evaluable patients who had BRCA mutations.
“In patients who were BRCA mutated, but who were PD-L1 immune cell negative, there was no association of progression-free survival or an overall survival benefit [with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel]. In contrast, in patients who were BRCA mutated but PD-L1 immune cell positive ... there was an association with progression-free survival and a trend toward overall survival,” she said, noting that while the BRCA mutation findings are limited by small numbers, “they do show that mutations in BRCA and PD-L1 expression in immune cells are independent biomarkers; patients with BRCA1 or 2 mutations derive clinical benefit only if their tumors are also PD-L1 positive.”
“In this phase 3 IMpassion130 study, PD-L1 expression on immune cells is a predictive biomarker for selecting patients who benefit clinically during first-line treatment with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer,” she concluded, adding that “patients with newly diagnosed metastatic and unresectable locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer should be routinely tested for their PD-L1 immune cell status to determine if they might benefit from the combination of atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel.
IMpassion130 was sponsored by Hoffman-La Roche. Dr. Emens reported receiving royalties and consulting fees from several companies. She has contracts with Roche/Genentech, Corvus, AstraZeneca, and EMD Serono, and ownership in Molecuvax. She receives other support from DSMB and Syndax, and has received grants from Aduro Biotech, Merck, Maxcyte, and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. She also reported serving as a member of the Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committee on Tissue, Cell, and Gene Therapies, and is a member of the board of directors for the Society of Immunotherapy for Cancer.
SOURCE: Emens L et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS1-04.
SAN ANTONIO – in patients with untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, according to exploratory efficacy analyses of data from the phase 3 IMpassion130 trial.
The analyses of data for the 902 patients randomized to receive the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab (Tecentriq) plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)–paclitaxel or placebo plus nab-palcitaxel for the study also showed consistency between local and central estrogen-receptor, progesterone-receptor, and human epidermal growth factor–receptor 2 testing, Leisha A. Emens, MD, reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
“IMpassion130 is the first phase 3 study to demonstrate a benefit from [atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel] in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC),” said Dr. Emens, professor of medicine in hematology/oncology, coleader of the Hillman Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Program, and director of translational immunotherapy for the Women’s Cancer Research Center at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
She explained that progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better in PD-L1–positive mTNBC patients treated with the atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel, than in those who received placebo + nab-paclitaxel (hazard ratios in the intent-to-treat population, 0.8 and 0.62, respectively).
At the first interim overall survival analysis, a clinically meaningful improvement in OS was seen in PD-L1–positive patients in the treatment group (HR, 0.62; median OS improvement from 15.5 months with placebo to 25 months), she added.
In exploratory analyses, Dr. Emens and her colleagues sought to evaluate whether preexisting immune biology is associated with clinical benefit from atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel, as has been demonstrated in studies of other agents that target the PD-1 pathway in other cancer types of cancer. They also assessed BRCA 1/2 mutation status as a biomarker for response.
“In patients enrolled on the IMpassion130 trial we found that PD-L1 in triple-negative breast cancer was expressed primarily on tumor-infiltrating immune cells,” she said. “In contrast to this, we found a very low rate of PD-L1 expression specifically on tumor cells across the patient population.”
Looking at both of those biomarkers together showed that a majority of patients with expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells were included in the PD-L1 immune cell–positive population, with only 2% having PD-L1 expression exclusively on their tumor cells.
Data previously reported at the European Society for Medical Oncology and published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed a PFS benefit, as well as a clinically meaningful improvement in OS of nearly 10 months, specifically in patients with PD-L1 immune cell–positive lesions treated with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel, she noted.
“In data presented for the first time today you can see that PD-L1–negative patients derive no overall survival benefit as there was no treatment effect with this therapy combination,” she said.
A trend was seen toward an association between immune cell positivity and poor prognosis, but this was not statistically significant, she said.
“Taken together, these data definitively show that PD-L1 immune cell positivity is predictive of both progression-free and overall survival benefit with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel,” she said.
She and her colleagues also looked at the level of PD-L1 expression in immune cells to assess whether there is a threshold that might be required.
“As long as there was a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more in the immune cells, there was a significant progression-free and overall survival benefit for patients treated with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel. This suggests that this expression of over 1% will represent a threshold for identifying those patients who are likely to benefit from this combination,” she said.
Further assessment by CD8 T-cell status showed that patients who had CD8-positive T cells but who were PD-L1 immune cell negative had no benefit from atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel, whereas those who were positive for both CD8 and PD-L1 expression on their immune cells derived significant PFS and OS benefit (HR, 0.89 and 0.77, respectively).
“So patients with CD8-positive tumors derive clinical benefit only if their tumors are also PD-L1-positive,” she said.
Similarly, no clinical benefit was seen in patients with stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)–positive tumors but who were PD-L1-negative, whereas those with stromal TIL-positive PD-L1–positive tumors derived significant PFS and OS benefit (HRs, 0.99 and 1.53, respectively), and this was also seen in the 15% of evaluable patients who had BRCA mutations.
“In patients who were BRCA mutated, but who were PD-L1 immune cell negative, there was no association of progression-free survival or an overall survival benefit [with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel]. In contrast, in patients who were BRCA mutated but PD-L1 immune cell positive ... there was an association with progression-free survival and a trend toward overall survival,” she said, noting that while the BRCA mutation findings are limited by small numbers, “they do show that mutations in BRCA and PD-L1 expression in immune cells are independent biomarkers; patients with BRCA1 or 2 mutations derive clinical benefit only if their tumors are also PD-L1 positive.”
“In this phase 3 IMpassion130 study, PD-L1 expression on immune cells is a predictive biomarker for selecting patients who benefit clinically during first-line treatment with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer,” she concluded, adding that “patients with newly diagnosed metastatic and unresectable locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer should be routinely tested for their PD-L1 immune cell status to determine if they might benefit from the combination of atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel.
IMpassion130 was sponsored by Hoffman-La Roche. Dr. Emens reported receiving royalties and consulting fees from several companies. She has contracts with Roche/Genentech, Corvus, AstraZeneca, and EMD Serono, and ownership in Molecuvax. She receives other support from DSMB and Syndax, and has received grants from Aduro Biotech, Merck, Maxcyte, and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. She also reported serving as a member of the Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committee on Tissue, Cell, and Gene Therapies, and is a member of the board of directors for the Society of Immunotherapy for Cancer.
SOURCE: Emens L et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS1-04.
SAN ANTONIO – in patients with untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, according to exploratory efficacy analyses of data from the phase 3 IMpassion130 trial.
The analyses of data for the 902 patients randomized to receive the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab (Tecentriq) plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)–paclitaxel or placebo plus nab-palcitaxel for the study also showed consistency between local and central estrogen-receptor, progesterone-receptor, and human epidermal growth factor–receptor 2 testing, Leisha A. Emens, MD, reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
“IMpassion130 is the first phase 3 study to demonstrate a benefit from [atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel] in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC),” said Dr. Emens, professor of medicine in hematology/oncology, coleader of the Hillman Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Program, and director of translational immunotherapy for the Women’s Cancer Research Center at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
She explained that progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better in PD-L1–positive mTNBC patients treated with the atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel, than in those who received placebo + nab-paclitaxel (hazard ratios in the intent-to-treat population, 0.8 and 0.62, respectively).
At the first interim overall survival analysis, a clinically meaningful improvement in OS was seen in PD-L1–positive patients in the treatment group (HR, 0.62; median OS improvement from 15.5 months with placebo to 25 months), she added.
In exploratory analyses, Dr. Emens and her colleagues sought to evaluate whether preexisting immune biology is associated with clinical benefit from atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel, as has been demonstrated in studies of other agents that target the PD-1 pathway in other cancer types of cancer. They also assessed BRCA 1/2 mutation status as a biomarker for response.
“In patients enrolled on the IMpassion130 trial we found that PD-L1 in triple-negative breast cancer was expressed primarily on tumor-infiltrating immune cells,” she said. “In contrast to this, we found a very low rate of PD-L1 expression specifically on tumor cells across the patient population.”
Looking at both of those biomarkers together showed that a majority of patients with expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells were included in the PD-L1 immune cell–positive population, with only 2% having PD-L1 expression exclusively on their tumor cells.
Data previously reported at the European Society for Medical Oncology and published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed a PFS benefit, as well as a clinically meaningful improvement in OS of nearly 10 months, specifically in patients with PD-L1 immune cell–positive lesions treated with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel, she noted.
“In data presented for the first time today you can see that PD-L1–negative patients derive no overall survival benefit as there was no treatment effect with this therapy combination,” she said.
A trend was seen toward an association between immune cell positivity and poor prognosis, but this was not statistically significant, she said.
“Taken together, these data definitively show that PD-L1 immune cell positivity is predictive of both progression-free and overall survival benefit with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel,” she said.
She and her colleagues also looked at the level of PD-L1 expression in immune cells to assess whether there is a threshold that might be required.
“As long as there was a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more in the immune cells, there was a significant progression-free and overall survival benefit for patients treated with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel. This suggests that this expression of over 1% will represent a threshold for identifying those patients who are likely to benefit from this combination,” she said.
Further assessment by CD8 T-cell status showed that patients who had CD8-positive T cells but who were PD-L1 immune cell negative had no benefit from atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel, whereas those who were positive for both CD8 and PD-L1 expression on their immune cells derived significant PFS and OS benefit (HR, 0.89 and 0.77, respectively).
“So patients with CD8-positive tumors derive clinical benefit only if their tumors are also PD-L1-positive,” she said.
Similarly, no clinical benefit was seen in patients with stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)–positive tumors but who were PD-L1-negative, whereas those with stromal TIL-positive PD-L1–positive tumors derived significant PFS and OS benefit (HRs, 0.99 and 1.53, respectively), and this was also seen in the 15% of evaluable patients who had BRCA mutations.
“In patients who were BRCA mutated, but who were PD-L1 immune cell negative, there was no association of progression-free survival or an overall survival benefit [with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel]. In contrast, in patients who were BRCA mutated but PD-L1 immune cell positive ... there was an association with progression-free survival and a trend toward overall survival,” she said, noting that while the BRCA mutation findings are limited by small numbers, “they do show that mutations in BRCA and PD-L1 expression in immune cells are independent biomarkers; patients with BRCA1 or 2 mutations derive clinical benefit only if their tumors are also PD-L1 positive.”
“In this phase 3 IMpassion130 study, PD-L1 expression on immune cells is a predictive biomarker for selecting patients who benefit clinically during first-line treatment with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer,” she concluded, adding that “patients with newly diagnosed metastatic and unresectable locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer should be routinely tested for their PD-L1 immune cell status to determine if they might benefit from the combination of atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel.
IMpassion130 was sponsored by Hoffman-La Roche. Dr. Emens reported receiving royalties and consulting fees from several companies. She has contracts with Roche/Genentech, Corvus, AstraZeneca, and EMD Serono, and ownership in Molecuvax. She receives other support from DSMB and Syndax, and has received grants from Aduro Biotech, Merck, Maxcyte, and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. She also reported serving as a member of the Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committee on Tissue, Cell, and Gene Therapies, and is a member of the board of directors for the Society of Immunotherapy for Cancer.
SOURCE: Emens L et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS1-04.
REPORTING FROM SABCS 2018
Key clinical point: Treatment-naive mTNBC patients should be tested for PD-L1 expression as a biomarker of potential benefit from atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel.
Major finding: PD-L1 expression of at least 1% confers a significant PFS and OS benefit in patients treated with atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel.
Study details: Exploratory efficacy analyses of a phase 3 study of 902 patients.
Disclosures: IMpassion130 was sponsored by Hoffman-La Roche. Dr. Emens reported receiving royalties from and consulting fees from several companies. She has contracts with Roche/Genentech, Corvus, AstraZeneca, and EMD Serono, and ownership in Molecuvax. She receives other support from DSMB and Syndax, and has received grants from Aduro Biotech, Merck, Maxcyte, and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. She also reported serving as a member of the FDA Advisory Committee on Tissue, Cell, and Gene Therapies, and is a member of the board of directors for the Society of Immunotherapy for Cancer.
Source: Emens L et al. SABCS 2018, Abstract GS1-04.
2018: A banner year for hematology drug approvals
SAN DIEGO – It was banner year for new hematology drug approvals, according to R. Angelo de Claro, MD, of the Food and Drug Administration.
, including 12 first-time approvals, 5 new biosimilars, and 15 new indications for previously approved drugs, Dr. de Claro, clinical team leader in the FDA’s division of hematology products in Silver Spring, Md., said during an overview of the approvals at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
These include six new approvals for first-line treatment, and eight for pediatric indications, he said.
Highlights were discussed at two ASH-FDA joint symposia at the meeting, including one focused on the malignant hematology approvals, and another on the nonmalignant hematology approvals. In a video interview, Dr. de Claro provides some additional insight into their importance and about what might lie ahead.
“I think what’s exciting is that you have drug development occurring in more common conditions such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, as well as in rare conditions, including hairy cell leukemia – and the first-ever approval in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis,” he said. “It’s been very busy at the FDA; stay tuned ... the year’s not done yet. There could be more coming and we certainly anticipate more applications in the future.”
Dr. de Claro is an FDA employee. He reported having no other relevant disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – It was banner year for new hematology drug approvals, according to R. Angelo de Claro, MD, of the Food and Drug Administration.
, including 12 first-time approvals, 5 new biosimilars, and 15 new indications for previously approved drugs, Dr. de Claro, clinical team leader in the FDA’s division of hematology products in Silver Spring, Md., said during an overview of the approvals at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
These include six new approvals for first-line treatment, and eight for pediatric indications, he said.
Highlights were discussed at two ASH-FDA joint symposia at the meeting, including one focused on the malignant hematology approvals, and another on the nonmalignant hematology approvals. In a video interview, Dr. de Claro provides some additional insight into their importance and about what might lie ahead.
“I think what’s exciting is that you have drug development occurring in more common conditions such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, as well as in rare conditions, including hairy cell leukemia – and the first-ever approval in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis,” he said. “It’s been very busy at the FDA; stay tuned ... the year’s not done yet. There could be more coming and we certainly anticipate more applications in the future.”
Dr. de Claro is an FDA employee. He reported having no other relevant disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – It was banner year for new hematology drug approvals, according to R. Angelo de Claro, MD, of the Food and Drug Administration.
, including 12 first-time approvals, 5 new biosimilars, and 15 new indications for previously approved drugs, Dr. de Claro, clinical team leader in the FDA’s division of hematology products in Silver Spring, Md., said during an overview of the approvals at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
These include six new approvals for first-line treatment, and eight for pediatric indications, he said.
Highlights were discussed at two ASH-FDA joint symposia at the meeting, including one focused on the malignant hematology approvals, and another on the nonmalignant hematology approvals. In a video interview, Dr. de Claro provides some additional insight into their importance and about what might lie ahead.
“I think what’s exciting is that you have drug development occurring in more common conditions such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, as well as in rare conditions, including hairy cell leukemia – and the first-ever approval in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis,” he said. “It’s been very busy at the FDA; stay tuned ... the year’s not done yet. There could be more coming and we certainly anticipate more applications in the future.”
Dr. de Claro is an FDA employee. He reported having no other relevant disclosures.
REPORTING FROM ASH 2018
Phase 3 study confirms biosimilarity of PF-05280586 with rituximab
SAN DIEGO – The potential rituximab biosimilar drug PF-05280586 showed efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics similar to those of rituximab at up to 26 weeks in a randomized phase 3 study of treatment-naive patients with CD20-positive low tumor burden follicular lymphoma (LTB-FL).
The primary endpoint of overall response rate at 26 weeks was 75.5% in 196 patients randomized to receive PF-05280586, and 70.7% in 198 patients who received a rituximab reference product sourced from the European Union (MabThera; rituximab‑EU), Jeff Sharman, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
“This resulted in a difference between the two arms of 4.66%,” said Dr. Sharman of Willamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center, Springfield, Ore.
The 95% confidence interval for this difference ... was entirely contained within the prespecified equivalence margin, he said.
“Depth of response was a key secondary endpoint, and rates of complete response were 29.3% and 30.4%, respectively,” he said, noting that rates of partial response, stable response, and progressive disease were also similar between the two study arms.
Estimated 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were also highly similar at 76.4% and 81.2% in the PF-05280586 and rituximab-EU arms.
Rapid depletion in CD19-positive B-cell counts was observed in both groups after initial dosing, with recovery by week 39 and a sustained increase until the end of week 52.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 78.6% vs. 72.1% of patients in the PF‑05280586 vs. rituximab‑EU arms, respectively, and the rates of serious adverse events and grade 3 events were similar in the groups, as were rates of infusion interruptions or infusion-related reactions (IRRs), Dr. Sharman said.
IRRs occurred in about 25% of patients in each arm, and most were grade 1 or 2. Grade 3 IRRs occurred in 2.6% vs. 0.5% of patients in the groups, respectively, and no grade 4 IRRs occurred.
Rates of anti-drug antibodies were also similar in the two groups, as were serum drug concentrations – regardless of anti-drug antibody status, he noted.
Study subjects were adults with a mean age of 60 years and histologically confirmed CD20-positive grade 1-3a follicular lymphoma with no prior rituximab or system therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). They had Ann Arbor disease stages II (26.9%), III (44.2%) or IV (28.9%), ECOG performance status of 0-1, and at least 1 measurable disease lesion identifiable on imaging.
Risk level as assessed by the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index–2 was low in 28.4%, medium in 66%, and high in 5.6% of patients.
Treatment with each agent was given at intravenous doses of 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks at days 1, 8, 15, and 22.
PF-05280586 is being developed by Pfizer, and in this 52-week double-blind study – the largest study to date of the early use of the potential rituximab biosimilar in patients with previously untreated CD20-positive LTB-FL – the primary endpoint was met, demonstrating its therapeutic equivalence with rituximab-EU for overall response rate at week 26, Dr. Sharman said.
“These results therefore confirm the biosimilarity of PF-05280586 with rituximab-EU,” he concluded.
Of note, the reporting of these findings comes on the heels of the first Food and Drug Administration approval of a biosimilar rituximab product for the treatment of NHL; Celltrion’s product Truxima (formerly CT-P10), a biosimilar of Genentech’s Rituxan (rituximab), was approved Nov. 28 to treat adults with CD20-positive, B-cell NHL, either as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy.
The PF-0528056 study was sponsored by Pfizer. Dr. Sharman has been a consultant for, and/or received research funding and honoraria from Acerta, Pharmacyclics (an AbbVie Company), Pfizer, TG Therapeutics, Abbvie, and Genentech.
SOURCE: Sharman J et al. ASH 2018: Abstract 394.
SAN DIEGO – The potential rituximab biosimilar drug PF-05280586 showed efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics similar to those of rituximab at up to 26 weeks in a randomized phase 3 study of treatment-naive patients with CD20-positive low tumor burden follicular lymphoma (LTB-FL).
The primary endpoint of overall response rate at 26 weeks was 75.5% in 196 patients randomized to receive PF-05280586, and 70.7% in 198 patients who received a rituximab reference product sourced from the European Union (MabThera; rituximab‑EU), Jeff Sharman, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
“This resulted in a difference between the two arms of 4.66%,” said Dr. Sharman of Willamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center, Springfield, Ore.
The 95% confidence interval for this difference ... was entirely contained within the prespecified equivalence margin, he said.
“Depth of response was a key secondary endpoint, and rates of complete response were 29.3% and 30.4%, respectively,” he said, noting that rates of partial response, stable response, and progressive disease were also similar between the two study arms.
Estimated 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were also highly similar at 76.4% and 81.2% in the PF-05280586 and rituximab-EU arms.
Rapid depletion in CD19-positive B-cell counts was observed in both groups after initial dosing, with recovery by week 39 and a sustained increase until the end of week 52.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 78.6% vs. 72.1% of patients in the PF‑05280586 vs. rituximab‑EU arms, respectively, and the rates of serious adverse events and grade 3 events were similar in the groups, as were rates of infusion interruptions or infusion-related reactions (IRRs), Dr. Sharman said.
IRRs occurred in about 25% of patients in each arm, and most were grade 1 or 2. Grade 3 IRRs occurred in 2.6% vs. 0.5% of patients in the groups, respectively, and no grade 4 IRRs occurred.
Rates of anti-drug antibodies were also similar in the two groups, as were serum drug concentrations – regardless of anti-drug antibody status, he noted.
Study subjects were adults with a mean age of 60 years and histologically confirmed CD20-positive grade 1-3a follicular lymphoma with no prior rituximab or system therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). They had Ann Arbor disease stages II (26.9%), III (44.2%) or IV (28.9%), ECOG performance status of 0-1, and at least 1 measurable disease lesion identifiable on imaging.
Risk level as assessed by the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index–2 was low in 28.4%, medium in 66%, and high in 5.6% of patients.
Treatment with each agent was given at intravenous doses of 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks at days 1, 8, 15, and 22.
PF-05280586 is being developed by Pfizer, and in this 52-week double-blind study – the largest study to date of the early use of the potential rituximab biosimilar in patients with previously untreated CD20-positive LTB-FL – the primary endpoint was met, demonstrating its therapeutic equivalence with rituximab-EU for overall response rate at week 26, Dr. Sharman said.
“These results therefore confirm the biosimilarity of PF-05280586 with rituximab-EU,” he concluded.
Of note, the reporting of these findings comes on the heels of the first Food and Drug Administration approval of a biosimilar rituximab product for the treatment of NHL; Celltrion’s product Truxima (formerly CT-P10), a biosimilar of Genentech’s Rituxan (rituximab), was approved Nov. 28 to treat adults with CD20-positive, B-cell NHL, either as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy.
The PF-0528056 study was sponsored by Pfizer. Dr. Sharman has been a consultant for, and/or received research funding and honoraria from Acerta, Pharmacyclics (an AbbVie Company), Pfizer, TG Therapeutics, Abbvie, and Genentech.
SOURCE: Sharman J et al. ASH 2018: Abstract 394.
SAN DIEGO – The potential rituximab biosimilar drug PF-05280586 showed efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics similar to those of rituximab at up to 26 weeks in a randomized phase 3 study of treatment-naive patients with CD20-positive low tumor burden follicular lymphoma (LTB-FL).
The primary endpoint of overall response rate at 26 weeks was 75.5% in 196 patients randomized to receive PF-05280586, and 70.7% in 198 patients who received a rituximab reference product sourced from the European Union (MabThera; rituximab‑EU), Jeff Sharman, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
“This resulted in a difference between the two arms of 4.66%,” said Dr. Sharman of Willamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center, Springfield, Ore.
The 95% confidence interval for this difference ... was entirely contained within the prespecified equivalence margin, he said.
“Depth of response was a key secondary endpoint, and rates of complete response were 29.3% and 30.4%, respectively,” he said, noting that rates of partial response, stable response, and progressive disease were also similar between the two study arms.
Estimated 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were also highly similar at 76.4% and 81.2% in the PF-05280586 and rituximab-EU arms.
Rapid depletion in CD19-positive B-cell counts was observed in both groups after initial dosing, with recovery by week 39 and a sustained increase until the end of week 52.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 78.6% vs. 72.1% of patients in the PF‑05280586 vs. rituximab‑EU arms, respectively, and the rates of serious adverse events and grade 3 events were similar in the groups, as were rates of infusion interruptions or infusion-related reactions (IRRs), Dr. Sharman said.
IRRs occurred in about 25% of patients in each arm, and most were grade 1 or 2. Grade 3 IRRs occurred in 2.6% vs. 0.5% of patients in the groups, respectively, and no grade 4 IRRs occurred.
Rates of anti-drug antibodies were also similar in the two groups, as were serum drug concentrations – regardless of anti-drug antibody status, he noted.
Study subjects were adults with a mean age of 60 years and histologically confirmed CD20-positive grade 1-3a follicular lymphoma with no prior rituximab or system therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). They had Ann Arbor disease stages II (26.9%), III (44.2%) or IV (28.9%), ECOG performance status of 0-1, and at least 1 measurable disease lesion identifiable on imaging.
Risk level as assessed by the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index–2 was low in 28.4%, medium in 66%, and high in 5.6% of patients.
Treatment with each agent was given at intravenous doses of 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks at days 1, 8, 15, and 22.
PF-05280586 is being developed by Pfizer, and in this 52-week double-blind study – the largest study to date of the early use of the potential rituximab biosimilar in patients with previously untreated CD20-positive LTB-FL – the primary endpoint was met, demonstrating its therapeutic equivalence with rituximab-EU for overall response rate at week 26, Dr. Sharman said.
“These results therefore confirm the biosimilarity of PF-05280586 with rituximab-EU,” he concluded.
Of note, the reporting of these findings comes on the heels of the first Food and Drug Administration approval of a biosimilar rituximab product for the treatment of NHL; Celltrion’s product Truxima (formerly CT-P10), a biosimilar of Genentech’s Rituxan (rituximab), was approved Nov. 28 to treat adults with CD20-positive, B-cell NHL, either as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy.
The PF-0528056 study was sponsored by Pfizer. Dr. Sharman has been a consultant for, and/or received research funding and honoraria from Acerta, Pharmacyclics (an AbbVie Company), Pfizer, TG Therapeutics, Abbvie, and Genentech.
SOURCE: Sharman J et al. ASH 2018: Abstract 394.
REPORTING FROM ASH 2018
Key clinical point: PF-05280586 shows biosimilarity to rituximab at up to 26 weeks.
Major finding: ORR at 26 weeks was 75.5% vs. 70.7% with PF-05280586 vs. rituximab, respectively.
Study details: A phase 3 study of 394 patients.
Disclosures: This study was sponsored by Pfizer. Dr. Sharman has been a consultant for, and/or received research funding and honoraria from Acerta, Pharmacyclics (an AbbVie Company), Pfizer, TG Therapeutics, Abbvie, and Genentech.
Source: Sharman J et al. ASH 2018: Abstract 394.
Factor IX expression stable at up to 8 years with gene therapy
SAN DIEGO – according to interim follow-up data from a phase 1/2 dose-escalation study.
The therapy – a self-complementary adeno-associated virus vector containing a codon-optimized factor IX gene, under control of a synthetic liver specific promoter and pseudotyped with serotype 8 capsid (scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco) – was previously shown to result in a dose-dependent increase in plasma factor IX levels in all 10 patients enrolled in the study, and an earlier update showed stable factor IX activity for at least 3 years, Ulrike M. Reiss, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
However, declining factor IX expression over time remains a concern, because AAV-mediated transgene expression is mediated mainly by episomally retained viral genomes, which may be lost with natural turnover of hepatocytes, noted Dr. Reiss, director of the clinical hematology division and the Hemophilia Treatment Center at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis.
At the “halfway mark,” with a median follow-up of 6.7 years in 10 patients aged 18-64 years who were treated with doses of either 2 x 1011, 6 x 1011, or 2 x 1012 vector genomes per kg (in 2, 2, and 6 patients, respectively), “factor IX expression has been persistent and stable in all participants after vector infusion,” she said.
“Factor IX expression was vector-dose dependent, achieving average levels of 1.9%-2.3% at the lower doses, and 5.1% at the high vector dose. All patients converted from having severe hemophilia to mild-moderate hemophilia,” she added.
The single significant adverse event observed during annual follow-up evaluations in the patients was a vector-related, immune-mediated liver inflammation occurring within 2-3 months of infusion in four of the six high-dose participants.
“There was complete resolution in all cases after a short course of corticosteroids over 8-12 weeks, including the taper. There were no late sequelae or any recurrence of transaminitis over time,” Dr. Reiss said. “We did not observe any new factor IX inhibitor or any late toxicity in any of these participants.”
Additionally, a comparison of average data across 3 years prior to gene therapy with the average data at 6.7 years after gene therapy showed that the annualized bleed rate decreased by 82% in the 10 participants and factor IX use decreased by 66%. In the high-dose group, the bleed rate decreased from 21 bleeds to 2 bleeds per year, and vector consumption was markedly reduced to a mean of 500 IU/kg per year from a mean of more than 2800 IU/kg per year. “Only one of the six patients in the high-dose group currently continues on prophylaxis treatment, whereas three in the low- and mid-dose groups are currently on prophylaxis,” she said. “In all [patients], the interval between prophylactic infusions has lengthened.”
Of note, Dr. Reiss and her colleagues explored the ability of using a modified, empty capsid-reduced vector preparation of the gene therapy to prevent the transaminitis seen in the 2-3 months after infusion. A new clinical preparation of scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco was manufactured with most of the empty particles removed by cesium chloride density centrifugation, but this approach provided no benefit in that regard.
“This further supports the observation that the anticapsid immune response is vector-dose dependent,” she said.
Additionally, the pattern of humoral response to AAV8 capsid was consistent with the primary immune response in participants.
“High IgG antibody titers have persisted for over 6 years; this finding is important because it will preclude these patients from any retreatment with the same vector or even potentially alternative AAV vectors of other serotypes with cross-reactive antigenicity,” she said.
Dr. Reiss reported having no relevant disclosures
SOURCE: Reiss UM et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 491.
SAN DIEGO – according to interim follow-up data from a phase 1/2 dose-escalation study.
The therapy – a self-complementary adeno-associated virus vector containing a codon-optimized factor IX gene, under control of a synthetic liver specific promoter and pseudotyped with serotype 8 capsid (scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco) – was previously shown to result in a dose-dependent increase in plasma factor IX levels in all 10 patients enrolled in the study, and an earlier update showed stable factor IX activity for at least 3 years, Ulrike M. Reiss, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
However, declining factor IX expression over time remains a concern, because AAV-mediated transgene expression is mediated mainly by episomally retained viral genomes, which may be lost with natural turnover of hepatocytes, noted Dr. Reiss, director of the clinical hematology division and the Hemophilia Treatment Center at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis.
At the “halfway mark,” with a median follow-up of 6.7 years in 10 patients aged 18-64 years who were treated with doses of either 2 x 1011, 6 x 1011, or 2 x 1012 vector genomes per kg (in 2, 2, and 6 patients, respectively), “factor IX expression has been persistent and stable in all participants after vector infusion,” she said.
“Factor IX expression was vector-dose dependent, achieving average levels of 1.9%-2.3% at the lower doses, and 5.1% at the high vector dose. All patients converted from having severe hemophilia to mild-moderate hemophilia,” she added.
The single significant adverse event observed during annual follow-up evaluations in the patients was a vector-related, immune-mediated liver inflammation occurring within 2-3 months of infusion in four of the six high-dose participants.
“There was complete resolution in all cases after a short course of corticosteroids over 8-12 weeks, including the taper. There were no late sequelae or any recurrence of transaminitis over time,” Dr. Reiss said. “We did not observe any new factor IX inhibitor or any late toxicity in any of these participants.”
Additionally, a comparison of average data across 3 years prior to gene therapy with the average data at 6.7 years after gene therapy showed that the annualized bleed rate decreased by 82% in the 10 participants and factor IX use decreased by 66%. In the high-dose group, the bleed rate decreased from 21 bleeds to 2 bleeds per year, and vector consumption was markedly reduced to a mean of 500 IU/kg per year from a mean of more than 2800 IU/kg per year. “Only one of the six patients in the high-dose group currently continues on prophylaxis treatment, whereas three in the low- and mid-dose groups are currently on prophylaxis,” she said. “In all [patients], the interval between prophylactic infusions has lengthened.”
Of note, Dr. Reiss and her colleagues explored the ability of using a modified, empty capsid-reduced vector preparation of the gene therapy to prevent the transaminitis seen in the 2-3 months after infusion. A new clinical preparation of scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco was manufactured with most of the empty particles removed by cesium chloride density centrifugation, but this approach provided no benefit in that regard.
“This further supports the observation that the anticapsid immune response is vector-dose dependent,” she said.
Additionally, the pattern of humoral response to AAV8 capsid was consistent with the primary immune response in participants.
“High IgG antibody titers have persisted for over 6 years; this finding is important because it will preclude these patients from any retreatment with the same vector or even potentially alternative AAV vectors of other serotypes with cross-reactive antigenicity,” she said.
Dr. Reiss reported having no relevant disclosures
SOURCE: Reiss UM et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 491.
SAN DIEGO – according to interim follow-up data from a phase 1/2 dose-escalation study.
The therapy – a self-complementary adeno-associated virus vector containing a codon-optimized factor IX gene, under control of a synthetic liver specific promoter and pseudotyped with serotype 8 capsid (scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco) – was previously shown to result in a dose-dependent increase in plasma factor IX levels in all 10 patients enrolled in the study, and an earlier update showed stable factor IX activity for at least 3 years, Ulrike M. Reiss, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
However, declining factor IX expression over time remains a concern, because AAV-mediated transgene expression is mediated mainly by episomally retained viral genomes, which may be lost with natural turnover of hepatocytes, noted Dr. Reiss, director of the clinical hematology division and the Hemophilia Treatment Center at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis.
At the “halfway mark,” with a median follow-up of 6.7 years in 10 patients aged 18-64 years who were treated with doses of either 2 x 1011, 6 x 1011, or 2 x 1012 vector genomes per kg (in 2, 2, and 6 patients, respectively), “factor IX expression has been persistent and stable in all participants after vector infusion,” she said.
“Factor IX expression was vector-dose dependent, achieving average levels of 1.9%-2.3% at the lower doses, and 5.1% at the high vector dose. All patients converted from having severe hemophilia to mild-moderate hemophilia,” she added.
The single significant adverse event observed during annual follow-up evaluations in the patients was a vector-related, immune-mediated liver inflammation occurring within 2-3 months of infusion in four of the six high-dose participants.
“There was complete resolution in all cases after a short course of corticosteroids over 8-12 weeks, including the taper. There were no late sequelae or any recurrence of transaminitis over time,” Dr. Reiss said. “We did not observe any new factor IX inhibitor or any late toxicity in any of these participants.”
Additionally, a comparison of average data across 3 years prior to gene therapy with the average data at 6.7 years after gene therapy showed that the annualized bleed rate decreased by 82% in the 10 participants and factor IX use decreased by 66%. In the high-dose group, the bleed rate decreased from 21 bleeds to 2 bleeds per year, and vector consumption was markedly reduced to a mean of 500 IU/kg per year from a mean of more than 2800 IU/kg per year. “Only one of the six patients in the high-dose group currently continues on prophylaxis treatment, whereas three in the low- and mid-dose groups are currently on prophylaxis,” she said. “In all [patients], the interval between prophylactic infusions has lengthened.”
Of note, Dr. Reiss and her colleagues explored the ability of using a modified, empty capsid-reduced vector preparation of the gene therapy to prevent the transaminitis seen in the 2-3 months after infusion. A new clinical preparation of scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco was manufactured with most of the empty particles removed by cesium chloride density centrifugation, but this approach provided no benefit in that regard.
“This further supports the observation that the anticapsid immune response is vector-dose dependent,” she said.
Additionally, the pattern of humoral response to AAV8 capsid was consistent with the primary immune response in participants.
“High IgG antibody titers have persisted for over 6 years; this finding is important because it will preclude these patients from any retreatment with the same vector or even potentially alternative AAV vectors of other serotypes with cross-reactive antigenicity,” she said.
Dr. Reiss reported having no relevant disclosures
SOURCE: Reiss UM et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 491.
REPORTING FROM ASH 2018
Key clinical point: With a median follow-up of 6.7 years in 10 patients aged 18-64 years who were treated with scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIX–comediated gene therapy, factor IX expression has been persistent and stable.
Major finding: Factor IX expression averaged 1.9%-2.3% at the lower doses, and 5.1% at the high dose at up to 8.6 years.
Study details: An interim follow-up data for 10 patients in a phase 1/2 study.
Disclosures: Dr. Reiss reported having no disclosures.
Source: Reiss UM et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 491.
Large cohort study IDs prognostic factors in thromboangiitis obliterans
CHICAGO – Nonwhite ethnicity and limb infection at diagnosis predict vascular events in patients with thromboangiitis obliterans (TAO), and the latter also predicts amputation, which occurs within 10 years of diagnosis in nearly a third of patients, according to findings from a large retrospective French cohort study.
After a mean follow-up of 5.7 years, 58.9% of 224 patients with TAO – also known as Buerger’s disease – experienced a vascular event, 21.4% experienced at least one amputation, and 1.3% died, Alexandre Le Joncour, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.
The 5- and 15-year vascular event-free survival rates were 45% and 28%, respectively, and the 10- and 15-year amputation-free survival rates were 74%, and 66%, respectively, said Dr. Le Joncour of Sorbonne University, Paris.
Of note, no significant difference was seen in the vascular event-free survival rates based on tobacco use levels (more than 22 pack-years vs. 22 or fewer pack-years; HR, 1.2), he said.
Patient characteristics and clinical factors found to independently predict vascular events included nonwhite ethnicity (hazard ratio, 2.35; P = .005) and limb infection at diagnosis (HR, 3.29; P = .045). Limb infection at diagnosis also independently predicted amputation (HR, 12.1; P less than .001), he said.
“But there was no significant [association with amputation] in patients who had claudication, critical ischemia, or ischemic ulcers/necrosis,” he noted, adding that a comparison of white and nonwhite patients showed that the groups were similar with respect to epidemiologic and cardiovascular factors, clinical symptom distribution, and rates of addiction to tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drugs.
It was also clear that patients who quit using tobacco had a significantly lower risk of amputation than did those who continued using tobacco (P = .001), he said, explaining that 43 of the 48 patients who experienced amputation were current smokers, and 5 were ex-smokers at the time of amputation.
Dr. Le Joncour and his colleagues included TAO patients diagnosed between 1967 and 2016 at a median age of 36 years at the time of first symptoms, with a median of 12 months from symptom onset until diagnosis. About 76% were men, and about 83% were white. Patients with diabetes, atherosclerosis, arterial emboli, connective tissue disease, and/or thrombophilia were excluded.
Vascular events in this study were defined as “an acute worsening of the disease course requiring treatment modifications,” and included critical ischemia (35% of cases), ulcers/necrosis (33%), claudication worsening (16%), deep vein thrombosis (3%), superficial phlebitis (7%), limb infection (4%), and “other” events (2%).
Major amputation was defined as “an amputation involving the tibio-tarsian articulation for lower limbs and the metacarpophalangeal articulation for upper limbs,” he explained.
The median time to amputation was 4 years, and patients who experienced amputation had a median age of 39 years. Half of the 48 patients who experienced amputation had one amputation, nearly a third had two amputations, and 19% had three amputations. About two-thirds had minor amputations and a third had major amputations.
The findings provide important prognostic information regarding TAO, Dr. Le Joncour said, noting that long-term data on outcomes in TAO patients have been lacking.
“We found specific characteristics that identified those at highest risk for subsequent vascular complications, and these factors are not only important predictors of vascular complications or relapse, but may also serve to adjust more aggressive management and close follow-up of these patients,” he concluded.
Dr. Le Joncour reported having no disclosures.
SOURCE: Le Joncour A et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract 1885.
CHICAGO – Nonwhite ethnicity and limb infection at diagnosis predict vascular events in patients with thromboangiitis obliterans (TAO), and the latter also predicts amputation, which occurs within 10 years of diagnosis in nearly a third of patients, according to findings from a large retrospective French cohort study.
After a mean follow-up of 5.7 years, 58.9% of 224 patients with TAO – also known as Buerger’s disease – experienced a vascular event, 21.4% experienced at least one amputation, and 1.3% died, Alexandre Le Joncour, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.
The 5- and 15-year vascular event-free survival rates were 45% and 28%, respectively, and the 10- and 15-year amputation-free survival rates were 74%, and 66%, respectively, said Dr. Le Joncour of Sorbonne University, Paris.
Of note, no significant difference was seen in the vascular event-free survival rates based on tobacco use levels (more than 22 pack-years vs. 22 or fewer pack-years; HR, 1.2), he said.
Patient characteristics and clinical factors found to independently predict vascular events included nonwhite ethnicity (hazard ratio, 2.35; P = .005) and limb infection at diagnosis (HR, 3.29; P = .045). Limb infection at diagnosis also independently predicted amputation (HR, 12.1; P less than .001), he said.
“But there was no significant [association with amputation] in patients who had claudication, critical ischemia, or ischemic ulcers/necrosis,” he noted, adding that a comparison of white and nonwhite patients showed that the groups were similar with respect to epidemiologic and cardiovascular factors, clinical symptom distribution, and rates of addiction to tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drugs.
It was also clear that patients who quit using tobacco had a significantly lower risk of amputation than did those who continued using tobacco (P = .001), he said, explaining that 43 of the 48 patients who experienced amputation were current smokers, and 5 were ex-smokers at the time of amputation.
Dr. Le Joncour and his colleagues included TAO patients diagnosed between 1967 and 2016 at a median age of 36 years at the time of first symptoms, with a median of 12 months from symptom onset until diagnosis. About 76% were men, and about 83% were white. Patients with diabetes, atherosclerosis, arterial emboli, connective tissue disease, and/or thrombophilia were excluded.
Vascular events in this study were defined as “an acute worsening of the disease course requiring treatment modifications,” and included critical ischemia (35% of cases), ulcers/necrosis (33%), claudication worsening (16%), deep vein thrombosis (3%), superficial phlebitis (7%), limb infection (4%), and “other” events (2%).
Major amputation was defined as “an amputation involving the tibio-tarsian articulation for lower limbs and the metacarpophalangeal articulation for upper limbs,” he explained.
The median time to amputation was 4 years, and patients who experienced amputation had a median age of 39 years. Half of the 48 patients who experienced amputation had one amputation, nearly a third had two amputations, and 19% had three amputations. About two-thirds had minor amputations and a third had major amputations.
The findings provide important prognostic information regarding TAO, Dr. Le Joncour said, noting that long-term data on outcomes in TAO patients have been lacking.
“We found specific characteristics that identified those at highest risk for subsequent vascular complications, and these factors are not only important predictors of vascular complications or relapse, but may also serve to adjust more aggressive management and close follow-up of these patients,” he concluded.
Dr. Le Joncour reported having no disclosures.
SOURCE: Le Joncour A et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract 1885.
CHICAGO – Nonwhite ethnicity and limb infection at diagnosis predict vascular events in patients with thromboangiitis obliterans (TAO), and the latter also predicts amputation, which occurs within 10 years of diagnosis in nearly a third of patients, according to findings from a large retrospective French cohort study.
After a mean follow-up of 5.7 years, 58.9% of 224 patients with TAO – also known as Buerger’s disease – experienced a vascular event, 21.4% experienced at least one amputation, and 1.3% died, Alexandre Le Joncour, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.
The 5- and 15-year vascular event-free survival rates were 45% and 28%, respectively, and the 10- and 15-year amputation-free survival rates were 74%, and 66%, respectively, said Dr. Le Joncour of Sorbonne University, Paris.
Of note, no significant difference was seen in the vascular event-free survival rates based on tobacco use levels (more than 22 pack-years vs. 22 or fewer pack-years; HR, 1.2), he said.
Patient characteristics and clinical factors found to independently predict vascular events included nonwhite ethnicity (hazard ratio, 2.35; P = .005) and limb infection at diagnosis (HR, 3.29; P = .045). Limb infection at diagnosis also independently predicted amputation (HR, 12.1; P less than .001), he said.
“But there was no significant [association with amputation] in patients who had claudication, critical ischemia, or ischemic ulcers/necrosis,” he noted, adding that a comparison of white and nonwhite patients showed that the groups were similar with respect to epidemiologic and cardiovascular factors, clinical symptom distribution, and rates of addiction to tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drugs.
It was also clear that patients who quit using tobacco had a significantly lower risk of amputation than did those who continued using tobacco (P = .001), he said, explaining that 43 of the 48 patients who experienced amputation were current smokers, and 5 were ex-smokers at the time of amputation.
Dr. Le Joncour and his colleagues included TAO patients diagnosed between 1967 and 2016 at a median age of 36 years at the time of first symptoms, with a median of 12 months from symptom onset until diagnosis. About 76% were men, and about 83% were white. Patients with diabetes, atherosclerosis, arterial emboli, connective tissue disease, and/or thrombophilia were excluded.
Vascular events in this study were defined as “an acute worsening of the disease course requiring treatment modifications,” and included critical ischemia (35% of cases), ulcers/necrosis (33%), claudication worsening (16%), deep vein thrombosis (3%), superficial phlebitis (7%), limb infection (4%), and “other” events (2%).
Major amputation was defined as “an amputation involving the tibio-tarsian articulation for lower limbs and the metacarpophalangeal articulation for upper limbs,” he explained.
The median time to amputation was 4 years, and patients who experienced amputation had a median age of 39 years. Half of the 48 patients who experienced amputation had one amputation, nearly a third had two amputations, and 19% had three amputations. About two-thirds had minor amputations and a third had major amputations.
The findings provide important prognostic information regarding TAO, Dr. Le Joncour said, noting that long-term data on outcomes in TAO patients have been lacking.
“We found specific characteristics that identified those at highest risk for subsequent vascular complications, and these factors are not only important predictors of vascular complications or relapse, but may also serve to adjust more aggressive management and close follow-up of these patients,” he concluded.
Dr. Le Joncour reported having no disclosures.
SOURCE: Le Joncour A et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract 1885.
REPORTING FROM THE ACR ANNUAL MEETING
Key clinical point: Nonwhite ethnicity and limb infection predict poor prognosis in TAO.
Major finding: Ethnicity predicts vascular events (HR, 2.35); limb infection at diagnosis predicts vascular events and amputation (HR, 3.29 and 12.1, respectively).
Study details: A retrospective cohort study of 224 patients.
Disclosures: Dr. Le Joncour reported having no disclosures.
Source: Le Joncour A et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract 1885.