User login
When is it appropriate to remove ovaries in hysterectomy?
LAS VEGAS – The removal of both ovaries during hysterectomy – bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) – has declined sharply in popularity as physicians have become more aware of its risks.
Still, “we’re still seeing a relatively high rate of inappropriate BSO,” Amanda Nickles Fader, MD, said, despite “the many benefits of ovarian conservation. Strong consideration should be made for maintaining normal ovaries in premenopausal women who are not at higher genetic risk of ovarian cancer.”
Dr. Nickles Fader, director of the Kelly gynecologic oncology service and the director of the center for rare gynecologic cancers at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, who spoke at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium, urged gynecologists to understand the data about ovarian conservation in hysterectomy and carefully counsel patients.
“We can counsel patients with 100% certainty that BSO absolutely reduces ovarian and fallopian tube cancer rates. That’s a given,” she said. “Women get very excited about that, but you’ve got to be careful to counsel them about the flip side: The overall benefit may not be there when you consider the other morbidity and mortality that may occur because of this removal.”
As she noted, multiple retrospective, prospective, and observational studies have linked ovary removal to a variety of heightened risks, especially on the cardiac front. She highlighted a 2009 study of nearly 30,000 nurses who’d undergone hysterectomy for benign disease, about which the authors wrote that, “compared with ovarian conservation, bilateral oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease is associated with a decreased risk of breast and ovarian cancer but an increased risk of all-cause mortality, fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease, and lung cancer.” No age group gained a survival benefit from oophorectomy (Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;113[5]:1027-37 ).
Meanwhile, over the past decade, the “pendulum has swung” toward ovary conservation, at least in premenopausal women, Dr. Nickles Fader said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.
A 2016 analysis of health statistics in five U.S. Eastern and Midwestern states found that, rates of hospital-based, hysterectomy-alone procedures grew by 15% from 2005 to 2013, while rates of oophorectomy alone and hysterectomy/oophorectomy combination procedures declined by 12% and 29%, respectively.
Still, Dr. Nickles Fader said, as many as 60% of hysterectomies are still performed in conjunction with oophorectomy.
Ovary removal, of course, can be appropriate when patients are at risk of ovarian cancer. Hereditary ovarian cancer accounts for up to 25% of epithelial ovarian cancer, she said, and research suggests that risk-reducing surgery is an effective preventative approach when high-penetrance genes are present. However, the value of the surgery is less clear in regard to moderate-penetrance genes.
Dr. Nickles Fader pointed to guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network that specify genes and syndromes that should trigger risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or hysterectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy after childbirth.
Researchers are exploring salpingectomy – fallopian tube removal – as a possible replacement for oophorectomy. Dr. Nickles Fader highlighted a small pilot study published in 2018 that reported “BRCA mutation carriers who underwent bilateral salpingectomy had no intraoperative complications, were satisfied with their procedure choice, and had decreased cancer worry and anxiety after the procedure.”
Moving forward, she said, research will provide more insight into preventative options such as removing fallopian tubes alone instead of ovaries. “We’re starting to learn, and will probably know in the next 10-15 years, whether oophorectomy is necessary for all high-risk and moderate-risk women or if we can get away with removing their tubes and giving them the maximal health benefits of ovarian conservation.”
Dr. Nickles Fader reported consulting for Ethicon Endosurgery.
LAS VEGAS – The removal of both ovaries during hysterectomy – bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) – has declined sharply in popularity as physicians have become more aware of its risks.
Still, “we’re still seeing a relatively high rate of inappropriate BSO,” Amanda Nickles Fader, MD, said, despite “the many benefits of ovarian conservation. Strong consideration should be made for maintaining normal ovaries in premenopausal women who are not at higher genetic risk of ovarian cancer.”
Dr. Nickles Fader, director of the Kelly gynecologic oncology service and the director of the center for rare gynecologic cancers at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, who spoke at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium, urged gynecologists to understand the data about ovarian conservation in hysterectomy and carefully counsel patients.
“We can counsel patients with 100% certainty that BSO absolutely reduces ovarian and fallopian tube cancer rates. That’s a given,” she said. “Women get very excited about that, but you’ve got to be careful to counsel them about the flip side: The overall benefit may not be there when you consider the other morbidity and mortality that may occur because of this removal.”
As she noted, multiple retrospective, prospective, and observational studies have linked ovary removal to a variety of heightened risks, especially on the cardiac front. She highlighted a 2009 study of nearly 30,000 nurses who’d undergone hysterectomy for benign disease, about which the authors wrote that, “compared with ovarian conservation, bilateral oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease is associated with a decreased risk of breast and ovarian cancer but an increased risk of all-cause mortality, fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease, and lung cancer.” No age group gained a survival benefit from oophorectomy (Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;113[5]:1027-37 ).
Meanwhile, over the past decade, the “pendulum has swung” toward ovary conservation, at least in premenopausal women, Dr. Nickles Fader said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.
A 2016 analysis of health statistics in five U.S. Eastern and Midwestern states found that, rates of hospital-based, hysterectomy-alone procedures grew by 15% from 2005 to 2013, while rates of oophorectomy alone and hysterectomy/oophorectomy combination procedures declined by 12% and 29%, respectively.
Still, Dr. Nickles Fader said, as many as 60% of hysterectomies are still performed in conjunction with oophorectomy.
Ovary removal, of course, can be appropriate when patients are at risk of ovarian cancer. Hereditary ovarian cancer accounts for up to 25% of epithelial ovarian cancer, she said, and research suggests that risk-reducing surgery is an effective preventative approach when high-penetrance genes are present. However, the value of the surgery is less clear in regard to moderate-penetrance genes.
Dr. Nickles Fader pointed to guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network that specify genes and syndromes that should trigger risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or hysterectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy after childbirth.
Researchers are exploring salpingectomy – fallopian tube removal – as a possible replacement for oophorectomy. Dr. Nickles Fader highlighted a small pilot study published in 2018 that reported “BRCA mutation carriers who underwent bilateral salpingectomy had no intraoperative complications, were satisfied with their procedure choice, and had decreased cancer worry and anxiety after the procedure.”
Moving forward, she said, research will provide more insight into preventative options such as removing fallopian tubes alone instead of ovaries. “We’re starting to learn, and will probably know in the next 10-15 years, whether oophorectomy is necessary for all high-risk and moderate-risk women or if we can get away with removing their tubes and giving them the maximal health benefits of ovarian conservation.”
Dr. Nickles Fader reported consulting for Ethicon Endosurgery.
LAS VEGAS – The removal of both ovaries during hysterectomy – bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) – has declined sharply in popularity as physicians have become more aware of its risks.
Still, “we’re still seeing a relatively high rate of inappropriate BSO,” Amanda Nickles Fader, MD, said, despite “the many benefits of ovarian conservation. Strong consideration should be made for maintaining normal ovaries in premenopausal women who are not at higher genetic risk of ovarian cancer.”
Dr. Nickles Fader, director of the Kelly gynecologic oncology service and the director of the center for rare gynecologic cancers at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, who spoke at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium, urged gynecologists to understand the data about ovarian conservation in hysterectomy and carefully counsel patients.
“We can counsel patients with 100% certainty that BSO absolutely reduces ovarian and fallopian tube cancer rates. That’s a given,” she said. “Women get very excited about that, but you’ve got to be careful to counsel them about the flip side: The overall benefit may not be there when you consider the other morbidity and mortality that may occur because of this removal.”
As she noted, multiple retrospective, prospective, and observational studies have linked ovary removal to a variety of heightened risks, especially on the cardiac front. She highlighted a 2009 study of nearly 30,000 nurses who’d undergone hysterectomy for benign disease, about which the authors wrote that, “compared with ovarian conservation, bilateral oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease is associated with a decreased risk of breast and ovarian cancer but an increased risk of all-cause mortality, fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease, and lung cancer.” No age group gained a survival benefit from oophorectomy (Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;113[5]:1027-37 ).
Meanwhile, over the past decade, the “pendulum has swung” toward ovary conservation, at least in premenopausal women, Dr. Nickles Fader said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.
A 2016 analysis of health statistics in five U.S. Eastern and Midwestern states found that, rates of hospital-based, hysterectomy-alone procedures grew by 15% from 2005 to 2013, while rates of oophorectomy alone and hysterectomy/oophorectomy combination procedures declined by 12% and 29%, respectively.
Still, Dr. Nickles Fader said, as many as 60% of hysterectomies are still performed in conjunction with oophorectomy.
Ovary removal, of course, can be appropriate when patients are at risk of ovarian cancer. Hereditary ovarian cancer accounts for up to 25% of epithelial ovarian cancer, she said, and research suggests that risk-reducing surgery is an effective preventative approach when high-penetrance genes are present. However, the value of the surgery is less clear in regard to moderate-penetrance genes.
Dr. Nickles Fader pointed to guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network that specify genes and syndromes that should trigger risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or hysterectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy after childbirth.
Researchers are exploring salpingectomy – fallopian tube removal – as a possible replacement for oophorectomy. Dr. Nickles Fader highlighted a small pilot study published in 2018 that reported “BRCA mutation carriers who underwent bilateral salpingectomy had no intraoperative complications, were satisfied with their procedure choice, and had decreased cancer worry and anxiety after the procedure.”
Moving forward, she said, research will provide more insight into preventative options such as removing fallopian tubes alone instead of ovaries. “We’re starting to learn, and will probably know in the next 10-15 years, whether oophorectomy is necessary for all high-risk and moderate-risk women or if we can get away with removing their tubes and giving them the maximal health benefits of ovarian conservation.”
Dr. Nickles Fader reported consulting for Ethicon Endosurgery.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM PAGS
Despite risks, exercise is important for patients with sickle cell
SAN DIEGO – Don’t let all your patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA) and sickle cell trait (SCT) off the hook when it comes to exercise. That was the advice from Robert I. Liem, MD, a pediatric hematologist-oncologist who studies fitness.
While some patients may face risk, these conditions should pose less of a barrier to moderate- and even high-intensity exercise, Dr. Liem, of Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago and Northwestern University, Chicago, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
“Instead of just focusing on potential harms, we should consider a paradigm shift, especially in sickle cell anemia,” he said. “There, we can start to consider the benefits of exercise, which may include some disease-modifying effects.”
There have been no formal studies into whether high-intensity exercise poses harm in patients with SCA, Dr. Liem noted. Why? There are several reasons, he said, including concern that exercise could increase sickling of red blood cells and assumptions about “sedentary behavior” in SCA.
However, there are indications that factors other than SCA may be reducing fitness in this population, a fact that could potentially be reversed by exercise.
Dr. Liem led a study that found “children and young adults with SCA have reduced exercise capacity attributable to factors independent of anemia.” The study showed that peak VO2 was 30% lower in children and young adults with SCA, compared with controls (Physiol Rep. 2015. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12338).
There are many possible explanations for this, he said, including patient-related factors such as pain during exercise and poor access to fitness resources.
Another study found low fitness in 83% of adults with SCA and identified chronic anemia as the most important factor (Am J Hematol. 2014 Aug;89[8]:819-24).
In patients with sickle cell trait, which Dr. Liem said affects an estimated 6%-9% of African-Americans, early reports of sudden death appeared in the 1960s and 1970s, and recent studies have provided more insight into the risk.
In 2012, a study tracked NCAA student athletes and found that Division I football players with SCT faced a 37-fold higher risk of exertion-related death than did athletes without SCT. Five players with SCT, all black and all Division I football players, had died over a 5-year period (Br J Sports Med 2012 Apr;46[5]:325-30).
A 2016 study, meanwhile, tracked more than 47,000 black soldiers in the U.S. Army and found those with SCT didn’t face a higher risk of death although they did have a “significantly higher risk” of exertional rhabdomyolysis (N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4; 375[5]:435-42).
While the cause of exercise-related harm in SCT isn’t fully understood, Dr. Liem said, it’s possible that extreme states such as severe dehydration, acidosis, and hypoxemia may trigger sickling. A combination of SCT, extreme exercise, heat, and genetic predisposition could produce harm by creating a “perfect storm,” he added.
Should patients with SCA or SCT exercise? Yes, Dr. Liem said, pointing to the importance of fitness in the general population.
Exercising to volitional exhaustion appears to be safe in children and adults with SCA, he said, and lack of exercise could lead to a variety of negative effects on growth in children and on quality of life.
There are “limited but promising data” linking exercise to benefits in SCA and SCT populations, he said.
Moving forward, Dr. Liem noted that guidelines from the NCAA and National Athletic Trainers’ Association offer insight into exercise best practices in SCT. They’re designed to promote acclimation during training, access to fluids, and prompt recognition of symptoms of heat-related illness and a condition known as “exercise collapse associated with sickle trait.”
However, there are no guidelines for exercise in SCA and it’s not helpful to let patients set limits on themselves based on the symptoms they experience, he said.
Dr. Liem reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – Don’t let all your patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA) and sickle cell trait (SCT) off the hook when it comes to exercise. That was the advice from Robert I. Liem, MD, a pediatric hematologist-oncologist who studies fitness.
While some patients may face risk, these conditions should pose less of a barrier to moderate- and even high-intensity exercise, Dr. Liem, of Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago and Northwestern University, Chicago, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
“Instead of just focusing on potential harms, we should consider a paradigm shift, especially in sickle cell anemia,” he said. “There, we can start to consider the benefits of exercise, which may include some disease-modifying effects.”
There have been no formal studies into whether high-intensity exercise poses harm in patients with SCA, Dr. Liem noted. Why? There are several reasons, he said, including concern that exercise could increase sickling of red blood cells and assumptions about “sedentary behavior” in SCA.
However, there are indications that factors other than SCA may be reducing fitness in this population, a fact that could potentially be reversed by exercise.
Dr. Liem led a study that found “children and young adults with SCA have reduced exercise capacity attributable to factors independent of anemia.” The study showed that peak VO2 was 30% lower in children and young adults with SCA, compared with controls (Physiol Rep. 2015. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12338).
There are many possible explanations for this, he said, including patient-related factors such as pain during exercise and poor access to fitness resources.
Another study found low fitness in 83% of adults with SCA and identified chronic anemia as the most important factor (Am J Hematol. 2014 Aug;89[8]:819-24).
In patients with sickle cell trait, which Dr. Liem said affects an estimated 6%-9% of African-Americans, early reports of sudden death appeared in the 1960s and 1970s, and recent studies have provided more insight into the risk.
In 2012, a study tracked NCAA student athletes and found that Division I football players with SCT faced a 37-fold higher risk of exertion-related death than did athletes without SCT. Five players with SCT, all black and all Division I football players, had died over a 5-year period (Br J Sports Med 2012 Apr;46[5]:325-30).
A 2016 study, meanwhile, tracked more than 47,000 black soldiers in the U.S. Army and found those with SCT didn’t face a higher risk of death although they did have a “significantly higher risk” of exertional rhabdomyolysis (N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4; 375[5]:435-42).
While the cause of exercise-related harm in SCT isn’t fully understood, Dr. Liem said, it’s possible that extreme states such as severe dehydration, acidosis, and hypoxemia may trigger sickling. A combination of SCT, extreme exercise, heat, and genetic predisposition could produce harm by creating a “perfect storm,” he added.
Should patients with SCA or SCT exercise? Yes, Dr. Liem said, pointing to the importance of fitness in the general population.
Exercising to volitional exhaustion appears to be safe in children and adults with SCA, he said, and lack of exercise could lead to a variety of negative effects on growth in children and on quality of life.
There are “limited but promising data” linking exercise to benefits in SCA and SCT populations, he said.
Moving forward, Dr. Liem noted that guidelines from the NCAA and National Athletic Trainers’ Association offer insight into exercise best practices in SCT. They’re designed to promote acclimation during training, access to fluids, and prompt recognition of symptoms of heat-related illness and a condition known as “exercise collapse associated with sickle trait.”
However, there are no guidelines for exercise in SCA and it’s not helpful to let patients set limits on themselves based on the symptoms they experience, he said.
Dr. Liem reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – Don’t let all your patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA) and sickle cell trait (SCT) off the hook when it comes to exercise. That was the advice from Robert I. Liem, MD, a pediatric hematologist-oncologist who studies fitness.
While some patients may face risk, these conditions should pose less of a barrier to moderate- and even high-intensity exercise, Dr. Liem, of Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago and Northwestern University, Chicago, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
“Instead of just focusing on potential harms, we should consider a paradigm shift, especially in sickle cell anemia,” he said. “There, we can start to consider the benefits of exercise, which may include some disease-modifying effects.”
There have been no formal studies into whether high-intensity exercise poses harm in patients with SCA, Dr. Liem noted. Why? There are several reasons, he said, including concern that exercise could increase sickling of red blood cells and assumptions about “sedentary behavior” in SCA.
However, there are indications that factors other than SCA may be reducing fitness in this population, a fact that could potentially be reversed by exercise.
Dr. Liem led a study that found “children and young adults with SCA have reduced exercise capacity attributable to factors independent of anemia.” The study showed that peak VO2 was 30% lower in children and young adults with SCA, compared with controls (Physiol Rep. 2015. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12338).
There are many possible explanations for this, he said, including patient-related factors such as pain during exercise and poor access to fitness resources.
Another study found low fitness in 83% of adults with SCA and identified chronic anemia as the most important factor (Am J Hematol. 2014 Aug;89[8]:819-24).
In patients with sickle cell trait, which Dr. Liem said affects an estimated 6%-9% of African-Americans, early reports of sudden death appeared in the 1960s and 1970s, and recent studies have provided more insight into the risk.
In 2012, a study tracked NCAA student athletes and found that Division I football players with SCT faced a 37-fold higher risk of exertion-related death than did athletes without SCT. Five players with SCT, all black and all Division I football players, had died over a 5-year period (Br J Sports Med 2012 Apr;46[5]:325-30).
A 2016 study, meanwhile, tracked more than 47,000 black soldiers in the U.S. Army and found those with SCT didn’t face a higher risk of death although they did have a “significantly higher risk” of exertional rhabdomyolysis (N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4; 375[5]:435-42).
While the cause of exercise-related harm in SCT isn’t fully understood, Dr. Liem said, it’s possible that extreme states such as severe dehydration, acidosis, and hypoxemia may trigger sickling. A combination of SCT, extreme exercise, heat, and genetic predisposition could produce harm by creating a “perfect storm,” he added.
Should patients with SCA or SCT exercise? Yes, Dr. Liem said, pointing to the importance of fitness in the general population.
Exercising to volitional exhaustion appears to be safe in children and adults with SCA, he said, and lack of exercise could lead to a variety of negative effects on growth in children and on quality of life.
There are “limited but promising data” linking exercise to benefits in SCA and SCT populations, he said.
Moving forward, Dr. Liem noted that guidelines from the NCAA and National Athletic Trainers’ Association offer insight into exercise best practices in SCT. They’re designed to promote acclimation during training, access to fluids, and prompt recognition of symptoms of heat-related illness and a condition known as “exercise collapse associated with sickle trait.”
However, there are no guidelines for exercise in SCA and it’s not helpful to let patients set limits on themselves based on the symptoms they experience, he said.
Dr. Liem reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM ASH 2018
Tom Brokaw opens up on surviving multiple myeloma
SAN DIEGO – Tom Brokaw has devoted his life to openness and transparency. But he kept mum about a big story that only he could fully tell – his diagnosis of multiple myeloma. He alerted his bosses and a few loved ones but otherwise kept his condition secret even as he struggled to walk and navigate stairs.
“I didn’t want to be Tom Brokaw, cancer victim,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. But he did decide to go public in a big way and he said he doesn’t regret it. “I’m kind of the multiple myeloma poster boy.”
Since opening up about myeloma, “I have learned more about life and medicine, and kindness and the extraordinary strength of this country, than I have in all my other experiences,” he said. “I can say, oddly enough, at age 78 about to be 79, that having multiple myeloma has been a kind of privilege for me.”
Mr. Brokaw is best known as the longtime anchor of “NBC Nightly News” and author of “The Greatest Generation,” about the American experience in World War II. He was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2013 and revealed his condition publicly in 2014.
In 2016, he described his treatment in a New York Times commentary: “...three years of chemotherapy, a spinal operation that cost me three inches of height, monthly infusions of bone supplements, and drugs to prevent respiratory infection.” He also described fatigue, bone damage, and a 24-pill-a-day regimen.
In his presentation at ASH, Mr. Brokaw detailed the adjustment of having to slow down after an active life as a cyclist and outdoorsman. “I’m not going to go down the street with a cane. My birth certificate says I’m 78 years old, but I still think I’m 38, anchoring the news.”
“There was so much concentration on the disease itself that I don’t think I got as much as I needed regarding the radiant effects.”
At one point, he fell while running with his dog, and developed an infection in a cavity in his elbow. Still, he refused to cancel a flight to Washington, D.C., for an interview with the secretary of defense. The infection got worse, soaking his shirt with leakage, and when he returned “they slammed me into intensive care.”
He got a stern instruction that “you can’t do this anymore,” and he responded with an “ohh-kay.”
“It’s the anchorman in me. You get used to doing what you want to do. But I have to be much more careful about what I do and when I do it,” he said.
Now, Mr. Brokaw still struggles to follow advice about risks such as flying. But he remains active as a speaker, a special correspondent for NBC, and an author. “By and large,” he said, “I’m getting along OK. I’m grateful for that.”
SAN DIEGO – Tom Brokaw has devoted his life to openness and transparency. But he kept mum about a big story that only he could fully tell – his diagnosis of multiple myeloma. He alerted his bosses and a few loved ones but otherwise kept his condition secret even as he struggled to walk and navigate stairs.
“I didn’t want to be Tom Brokaw, cancer victim,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. But he did decide to go public in a big way and he said he doesn’t regret it. “I’m kind of the multiple myeloma poster boy.”
Since opening up about myeloma, “I have learned more about life and medicine, and kindness and the extraordinary strength of this country, than I have in all my other experiences,” he said. “I can say, oddly enough, at age 78 about to be 79, that having multiple myeloma has been a kind of privilege for me.”
Mr. Brokaw is best known as the longtime anchor of “NBC Nightly News” and author of “The Greatest Generation,” about the American experience in World War II. He was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2013 and revealed his condition publicly in 2014.
In 2016, he described his treatment in a New York Times commentary: “...three years of chemotherapy, a spinal operation that cost me three inches of height, monthly infusions of bone supplements, and drugs to prevent respiratory infection.” He also described fatigue, bone damage, and a 24-pill-a-day regimen.
In his presentation at ASH, Mr. Brokaw detailed the adjustment of having to slow down after an active life as a cyclist and outdoorsman. “I’m not going to go down the street with a cane. My birth certificate says I’m 78 years old, but I still think I’m 38, anchoring the news.”
“There was so much concentration on the disease itself that I don’t think I got as much as I needed regarding the radiant effects.”
At one point, he fell while running with his dog, and developed an infection in a cavity in his elbow. Still, he refused to cancel a flight to Washington, D.C., for an interview with the secretary of defense. The infection got worse, soaking his shirt with leakage, and when he returned “they slammed me into intensive care.”
He got a stern instruction that “you can’t do this anymore,” and he responded with an “ohh-kay.”
“It’s the anchorman in me. You get used to doing what you want to do. But I have to be much more careful about what I do and when I do it,” he said.
Now, Mr. Brokaw still struggles to follow advice about risks such as flying. But he remains active as a speaker, a special correspondent for NBC, and an author. “By and large,” he said, “I’m getting along OK. I’m grateful for that.”
SAN DIEGO – Tom Brokaw has devoted his life to openness and transparency. But he kept mum about a big story that only he could fully tell – his diagnosis of multiple myeloma. He alerted his bosses and a few loved ones but otherwise kept his condition secret even as he struggled to walk and navigate stairs.
“I didn’t want to be Tom Brokaw, cancer victim,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. But he did decide to go public in a big way and he said he doesn’t regret it. “I’m kind of the multiple myeloma poster boy.”
Since opening up about myeloma, “I have learned more about life and medicine, and kindness and the extraordinary strength of this country, than I have in all my other experiences,” he said. “I can say, oddly enough, at age 78 about to be 79, that having multiple myeloma has been a kind of privilege for me.”
Mr. Brokaw is best known as the longtime anchor of “NBC Nightly News” and author of “The Greatest Generation,” about the American experience in World War II. He was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2013 and revealed his condition publicly in 2014.
In 2016, he described his treatment in a New York Times commentary: “...three years of chemotherapy, a spinal operation that cost me three inches of height, monthly infusions of bone supplements, and drugs to prevent respiratory infection.” He also described fatigue, bone damage, and a 24-pill-a-day regimen.
In his presentation at ASH, Mr. Brokaw detailed the adjustment of having to slow down after an active life as a cyclist and outdoorsman. “I’m not going to go down the street with a cane. My birth certificate says I’m 78 years old, but I still think I’m 38, anchoring the news.”
“There was so much concentration on the disease itself that I don’t think I got as much as I needed regarding the radiant effects.”
At one point, he fell while running with his dog, and developed an infection in a cavity in his elbow. Still, he refused to cancel a flight to Washington, D.C., for an interview with the secretary of defense. The infection got worse, soaking his shirt with leakage, and when he returned “they slammed me into intensive care.”
He got a stern instruction that “you can’t do this anymore,” and he responded with an “ohh-kay.”
“It’s the anchorman in me. You get used to doing what you want to do. But I have to be much more careful about what I do and when I do it,” he said.
Now, Mr. Brokaw still struggles to follow advice about risks such as flying. But he remains active as a speaker, a special correspondent for NBC, and an author. “By and large,” he said, “I’m getting along OK. I’m grateful for that.”
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM ASH 2018
Potty pathogens in space, fundus photos, and ethnic microbiomes
The earth is not enough
Earthly competitors have proved to be unworthy, so this week, Bacteria vs. the World visits the International Space Station, which – and we double-checked this – is in space. It’s a pretty exclusive location, and admission is by invitation only. Unless, of, course, you happen to be the ultimate hitchhiker. Four samples taken from the toilet of the ISS (and one from a piece of exercise equipment) were found to contain unknown strains of antibiotic-resistant Enterobacter bugandensis, investigators reported (BMC Microbiol. 2018 Nov 23;18[1]:175).
These bacterial stowaways were not virulent, lead author Nitin Singh, PhD, of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory said in a separate statement. But an analysis conducted by the team “reveals that the ISS isolates have a 79% probability of being a human pathogen.”
So, what does this mean for future space exploration? Cue the “Star Trek” music: “Space … the final frontier. These are the voyages of the bacterial transport ship Enterprise.”
Putting the FUN in fundus photos
You just got even more dependent on your phone: The American Academy of Opthalmology has published guidelines on how to use smartphones to take fundus photography, a.k.a. photographs of the back of the eye.
Advancement in smartphone optical quality has turned them into an important clinical tool, especially for specialists in low-funded or rural areas who don’t have access to imaging systems. Doctors can purchase special lenses and phone software to take these photos and then can easily upload the images to their Instagram accounts. (Even doctors need likes.)
An eye hospital in India has taken fundus accessibility a step further and posted a video on YouTube showing how to make a functional fundus camera that costs only 100 rupees. All you need in some cardboard, a water bottle, and a lens. “MacGyver: Chennai Edition.”
I feel it in my gut
Whoever said “inside, we’re all the same” clearly wasn’t considering the gut. A study from Vanderbilt University comprising 1,700 American subjects found that differences in gut microbiomes are most consistently linked with ethnicity. Vanderbilt biologist Seth Bordenstein emphasized how changing the gut microbiome can lead to curing illness but that it’s imperative that medical professionals understand how the gut differs across ethnicities.
Researchers found 12 types of bacteria that vary in abundancy by ethnicity. No comment on whether this was linked to differences in cuisine, but this writer fervently hopes new research arrives proving that tacos produce the healthiest gut microbiome.
F-bombing blood cancer
Call it a tale of two Toms.
TV newsman Tom Brokaw, who has multiple myeloma, says he’s become the “poster boy” for blood cancer. At first, though, he kept his diagnosis secret from just about everyone. But occasionally he let his emotions get the best of him. Especially when he’d see a Manhattan bus stop ad spotlighting the chiseled body of another Tom: the quarterback named Brady.
As he explained in a presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, he found it harder to get around because of back problems, which are common in multiple myeloma. As a result, he couldn’t manage to get to the office.
Still, “every day I’d force myself to leave the walker at home,” he recalled. “In that cold and sleety fall, I’d walk half a block to the coffee shop to get a bagel. There was this enormous new bus stop, with an animated advertisement board. Looking right at me was Tom Brady, advertising Ugg boots. I’d look down 79th Street at every inch of Tom Brady, and all the little old ladies were mooning over him as they were getting on the bus.”
Brokaw knew just what to do to make himself feel better. “I’d hobble over and look at him and drop the F-bomb on him every morning. Frankly, it was therapeutic for me.”
Later, he met the New England Patriots quarterback and told him the story, replacing “F-bomb” with the real word. “He had this little posse with him, and they roared. They said nobody talks to Tom like that.”
Brokaw still resists pleas to slow down from concerned loved ones, such as his emergency physician daughter. “My birth certificate says I’m 78 years old,” he said, “but I still think I’m 38 anchoring the news.” And still tossing tight-spiral F-bombs at cancer and gridiron G.O.A.T.s alike.
The earth is not enough
Earthly competitors have proved to be unworthy, so this week, Bacteria vs. the World visits the International Space Station, which – and we double-checked this – is in space. It’s a pretty exclusive location, and admission is by invitation only. Unless, of, course, you happen to be the ultimate hitchhiker. Four samples taken from the toilet of the ISS (and one from a piece of exercise equipment) were found to contain unknown strains of antibiotic-resistant Enterobacter bugandensis, investigators reported (BMC Microbiol. 2018 Nov 23;18[1]:175).
These bacterial stowaways were not virulent, lead author Nitin Singh, PhD, of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory said in a separate statement. But an analysis conducted by the team “reveals that the ISS isolates have a 79% probability of being a human pathogen.”
So, what does this mean for future space exploration? Cue the “Star Trek” music: “Space … the final frontier. These are the voyages of the bacterial transport ship Enterprise.”
Putting the FUN in fundus photos
You just got even more dependent on your phone: The American Academy of Opthalmology has published guidelines on how to use smartphones to take fundus photography, a.k.a. photographs of the back of the eye.
Advancement in smartphone optical quality has turned them into an important clinical tool, especially for specialists in low-funded or rural areas who don’t have access to imaging systems. Doctors can purchase special lenses and phone software to take these photos and then can easily upload the images to their Instagram accounts. (Even doctors need likes.)
An eye hospital in India has taken fundus accessibility a step further and posted a video on YouTube showing how to make a functional fundus camera that costs only 100 rupees. All you need in some cardboard, a water bottle, and a lens. “MacGyver: Chennai Edition.”
I feel it in my gut
Whoever said “inside, we’re all the same” clearly wasn’t considering the gut. A study from Vanderbilt University comprising 1,700 American subjects found that differences in gut microbiomes are most consistently linked with ethnicity. Vanderbilt biologist Seth Bordenstein emphasized how changing the gut microbiome can lead to curing illness but that it’s imperative that medical professionals understand how the gut differs across ethnicities.
Researchers found 12 types of bacteria that vary in abundancy by ethnicity. No comment on whether this was linked to differences in cuisine, but this writer fervently hopes new research arrives proving that tacos produce the healthiest gut microbiome.
F-bombing blood cancer
Call it a tale of two Toms.
TV newsman Tom Brokaw, who has multiple myeloma, says he’s become the “poster boy” for blood cancer. At first, though, he kept his diagnosis secret from just about everyone. But occasionally he let his emotions get the best of him. Especially when he’d see a Manhattan bus stop ad spotlighting the chiseled body of another Tom: the quarterback named Brady.
As he explained in a presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, he found it harder to get around because of back problems, which are common in multiple myeloma. As a result, he couldn’t manage to get to the office.
Still, “every day I’d force myself to leave the walker at home,” he recalled. “In that cold and sleety fall, I’d walk half a block to the coffee shop to get a bagel. There was this enormous new bus stop, with an animated advertisement board. Looking right at me was Tom Brady, advertising Ugg boots. I’d look down 79th Street at every inch of Tom Brady, and all the little old ladies were mooning over him as they were getting on the bus.”
Brokaw knew just what to do to make himself feel better. “I’d hobble over and look at him and drop the F-bomb on him every morning. Frankly, it was therapeutic for me.”
Later, he met the New England Patriots quarterback and told him the story, replacing “F-bomb” with the real word. “He had this little posse with him, and they roared. They said nobody talks to Tom like that.”
Brokaw still resists pleas to slow down from concerned loved ones, such as his emergency physician daughter. “My birth certificate says I’m 78 years old,” he said, “but I still think I’m 38 anchoring the news.” And still tossing tight-spiral F-bombs at cancer and gridiron G.O.A.T.s alike.
The earth is not enough
Earthly competitors have proved to be unworthy, so this week, Bacteria vs. the World visits the International Space Station, which – and we double-checked this – is in space. It’s a pretty exclusive location, and admission is by invitation only. Unless, of, course, you happen to be the ultimate hitchhiker. Four samples taken from the toilet of the ISS (and one from a piece of exercise equipment) were found to contain unknown strains of antibiotic-resistant Enterobacter bugandensis, investigators reported (BMC Microbiol. 2018 Nov 23;18[1]:175).
These bacterial stowaways were not virulent, lead author Nitin Singh, PhD, of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory said in a separate statement. But an analysis conducted by the team “reveals that the ISS isolates have a 79% probability of being a human pathogen.”
So, what does this mean for future space exploration? Cue the “Star Trek” music: “Space … the final frontier. These are the voyages of the bacterial transport ship Enterprise.”
Putting the FUN in fundus photos
You just got even more dependent on your phone: The American Academy of Opthalmology has published guidelines on how to use smartphones to take fundus photography, a.k.a. photographs of the back of the eye.
Advancement in smartphone optical quality has turned them into an important clinical tool, especially for specialists in low-funded or rural areas who don’t have access to imaging systems. Doctors can purchase special lenses and phone software to take these photos and then can easily upload the images to their Instagram accounts. (Even doctors need likes.)
An eye hospital in India has taken fundus accessibility a step further and posted a video on YouTube showing how to make a functional fundus camera that costs only 100 rupees. All you need in some cardboard, a water bottle, and a lens. “MacGyver: Chennai Edition.”
I feel it in my gut
Whoever said “inside, we’re all the same” clearly wasn’t considering the gut. A study from Vanderbilt University comprising 1,700 American subjects found that differences in gut microbiomes are most consistently linked with ethnicity. Vanderbilt biologist Seth Bordenstein emphasized how changing the gut microbiome can lead to curing illness but that it’s imperative that medical professionals understand how the gut differs across ethnicities.
Researchers found 12 types of bacteria that vary in abundancy by ethnicity. No comment on whether this was linked to differences in cuisine, but this writer fervently hopes new research arrives proving that tacos produce the healthiest gut microbiome.
F-bombing blood cancer
Call it a tale of two Toms.
TV newsman Tom Brokaw, who has multiple myeloma, says he’s become the “poster boy” for blood cancer. At first, though, he kept his diagnosis secret from just about everyone. But occasionally he let his emotions get the best of him. Especially when he’d see a Manhattan bus stop ad spotlighting the chiseled body of another Tom: the quarterback named Brady.
As he explained in a presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, he found it harder to get around because of back problems, which are common in multiple myeloma. As a result, he couldn’t manage to get to the office.
Still, “every day I’d force myself to leave the walker at home,” he recalled. “In that cold and sleety fall, I’d walk half a block to the coffee shop to get a bagel. There was this enormous new bus stop, with an animated advertisement board. Looking right at me was Tom Brady, advertising Ugg boots. I’d look down 79th Street at every inch of Tom Brady, and all the little old ladies were mooning over him as they were getting on the bus.”
Brokaw knew just what to do to make himself feel better. “I’d hobble over and look at him and drop the F-bomb on him every morning. Frankly, it was therapeutic for me.”
Later, he met the New England Patriots quarterback and told him the story, replacing “F-bomb” with the real word. “He had this little posse with him, and they roared. They said nobody talks to Tom like that.”
Brokaw still resists pleas to slow down from concerned loved ones, such as his emergency physician daughter. “My birth certificate says I’m 78 years old,” he said, “but I still think I’m 38 anchoring the news.” And still tossing tight-spiral F-bombs at cancer and gridiron G.O.A.T.s alike.
Harnessing the power of urine tests in pain care
SAN DIEGO – Clinicians have few tools to in their patients. However, addiction specialist and internist Edwin Salsitz, MD, says an inexpensive and simple tool, the urine test, can provide an impressive amount of useful information.
“The urine drug test, or another matrix for testing, gives one of the only objective factors we have to see how a patient is doing, if they’re following the treatment plan,” said Dr. Salsitz, of Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, in a presentation at Pain Care for Primary Care, a symposium offered by the American Pain Society and the Global Academy for Medical Education.
Dr. Salsitz offered these tips about urine tests in pain care:
Consider urine tests before beginning opioid therapy
Dr. Salsitz pointed to this 2016 recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: “When prescribing opioids for chronic pain, clinicians should use urine drug testing before starting opioid therapy and consider urine drug testing at least annually to assess for prescribed medications as well as other controlled prescription drugs and illicit drugs.” As Dr. Salsitz puts it, these tests “can help identify misuse, which hopefully hasn’t gotten to addiction yet.”
Ask the patient what the urine test will reveal
Dr. Salsitz likes to tell patients: “If you tell me the truth, no matter what’s in the urine, it’s going to be OK. I’m not going to stop prescribing or do anything harmful to you.” But, he tells patients, if they lie, “you’re going to start breaking the trust between us. Once you do that, it becomes a problem. I don’t know what’s true or not.” In some cases, he said, patients will fess up to drug use that wouldn’t have shown up in the urine tests because it didn’t happen recently enough. “We’ll talk about whether it’s a problem,” he said.
Begin with an immunoassay panel test (IA)
The CDC recommends using an immunoassay panel first in most situations. “You can do this in the office,” Dr. Salsitz said, using a dipstick-style test. Or you can “send it out to a lab, and they’ll do the same thing.”
Understand what IA tests do and don’t do
Standard 5-drug IA screening tests detect marijuana, cocaine, amphetamine/methamphetamine, PCP, and opiates (morphine/codeine). Keep in mind, Dr. Salsitz said, that opiates and opioids aren’t the same. That means IA tests don’t pick up oxycodone use, for example, he said. More sophisticated (and more expensive) tests can distinguish between types of drugs (for example, morphine vs. codeine) and can detect drugs that aren’t included in the IA tests.
Don’t make assumptions about positive or negative tests
A positive drug test for cocaine doesn’t necessarily mean the person is addicted, Dr. Salsitz said. “It just means they used that molecule in the last 3 days. It’s up to you to figure out what it actually means.” And if a patient’s urine fails to show that he or she is taking a prescribed medication, that doesn’t necessarily indicate that the drug is being illegally diverted. The patient could have run out of the drug or lost insurance coverage, Dr. Salsitz said.
Be aware that patients may fake urine tests
“Cheating is a huge problem,” Dr. Salsitz said. “Is it their urine or not their urine?” Many kits promise to help people provide fake urine, and some have even provided fake penises to foil observed urine collection. What to do? Alternative tests that rely on hair, saliva, and even sweat are available, Dr. Salsitz said, and these make cheating more difficult. However, they have various limitations. Saliva, for example, only tells you what patients are using now, not what they used days ago, he said, and it’s not sensitive for marijuana.
Dr. Salsitz reported no disclosures.
The Global Academy for Medical Education, which offered the Pain Care for Primary Care symposium, and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
SAN DIEGO – Clinicians have few tools to in their patients. However, addiction specialist and internist Edwin Salsitz, MD, says an inexpensive and simple tool, the urine test, can provide an impressive amount of useful information.
“The urine drug test, or another matrix for testing, gives one of the only objective factors we have to see how a patient is doing, if they’re following the treatment plan,” said Dr. Salsitz, of Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, in a presentation at Pain Care for Primary Care, a symposium offered by the American Pain Society and the Global Academy for Medical Education.
Dr. Salsitz offered these tips about urine tests in pain care:
Consider urine tests before beginning opioid therapy
Dr. Salsitz pointed to this 2016 recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: “When prescribing opioids for chronic pain, clinicians should use urine drug testing before starting opioid therapy and consider urine drug testing at least annually to assess for prescribed medications as well as other controlled prescription drugs and illicit drugs.” As Dr. Salsitz puts it, these tests “can help identify misuse, which hopefully hasn’t gotten to addiction yet.”
Ask the patient what the urine test will reveal
Dr. Salsitz likes to tell patients: “If you tell me the truth, no matter what’s in the urine, it’s going to be OK. I’m not going to stop prescribing or do anything harmful to you.” But, he tells patients, if they lie, “you’re going to start breaking the trust between us. Once you do that, it becomes a problem. I don’t know what’s true or not.” In some cases, he said, patients will fess up to drug use that wouldn’t have shown up in the urine tests because it didn’t happen recently enough. “We’ll talk about whether it’s a problem,” he said.
Begin with an immunoassay panel test (IA)
The CDC recommends using an immunoassay panel first in most situations. “You can do this in the office,” Dr. Salsitz said, using a dipstick-style test. Or you can “send it out to a lab, and they’ll do the same thing.”
Understand what IA tests do and don’t do
Standard 5-drug IA screening tests detect marijuana, cocaine, amphetamine/methamphetamine, PCP, and opiates (morphine/codeine). Keep in mind, Dr. Salsitz said, that opiates and opioids aren’t the same. That means IA tests don’t pick up oxycodone use, for example, he said. More sophisticated (and more expensive) tests can distinguish between types of drugs (for example, morphine vs. codeine) and can detect drugs that aren’t included in the IA tests.
Don’t make assumptions about positive or negative tests
A positive drug test for cocaine doesn’t necessarily mean the person is addicted, Dr. Salsitz said. “It just means they used that molecule in the last 3 days. It’s up to you to figure out what it actually means.” And if a patient’s urine fails to show that he or she is taking a prescribed medication, that doesn’t necessarily indicate that the drug is being illegally diverted. The patient could have run out of the drug or lost insurance coverage, Dr. Salsitz said.
Be aware that patients may fake urine tests
“Cheating is a huge problem,” Dr. Salsitz said. “Is it their urine or not their urine?” Many kits promise to help people provide fake urine, and some have even provided fake penises to foil observed urine collection. What to do? Alternative tests that rely on hair, saliva, and even sweat are available, Dr. Salsitz said, and these make cheating more difficult. However, they have various limitations. Saliva, for example, only tells you what patients are using now, not what they used days ago, he said, and it’s not sensitive for marijuana.
Dr. Salsitz reported no disclosures.
The Global Academy for Medical Education, which offered the Pain Care for Primary Care symposium, and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
SAN DIEGO – Clinicians have few tools to in their patients. However, addiction specialist and internist Edwin Salsitz, MD, says an inexpensive and simple tool, the urine test, can provide an impressive amount of useful information.
“The urine drug test, or another matrix for testing, gives one of the only objective factors we have to see how a patient is doing, if they’re following the treatment plan,” said Dr. Salsitz, of Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, in a presentation at Pain Care for Primary Care, a symposium offered by the American Pain Society and the Global Academy for Medical Education.
Dr. Salsitz offered these tips about urine tests in pain care:
Consider urine tests before beginning opioid therapy
Dr. Salsitz pointed to this 2016 recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: “When prescribing opioids for chronic pain, clinicians should use urine drug testing before starting opioid therapy and consider urine drug testing at least annually to assess for prescribed medications as well as other controlled prescription drugs and illicit drugs.” As Dr. Salsitz puts it, these tests “can help identify misuse, which hopefully hasn’t gotten to addiction yet.”
Ask the patient what the urine test will reveal
Dr. Salsitz likes to tell patients: “If you tell me the truth, no matter what’s in the urine, it’s going to be OK. I’m not going to stop prescribing or do anything harmful to you.” But, he tells patients, if they lie, “you’re going to start breaking the trust between us. Once you do that, it becomes a problem. I don’t know what’s true or not.” In some cases, he said, patients will fess up to drug use that wouldn’t have shown up in the urine tests because it didn’t happen recently enough. “We’ll talk about whether it’s a problem,” he said.
Begin with an immunoassay panel test (IA)
The CDC recommends using an immunoassay panel first in most situations. “You can do this in the office,” Dr. Salsitz said, using a dipstick-style test. Or you can “send it out to a lab, and they’ll do the same thing.”
Understand what IA tests do and don’t do
Standard 5-drug IA screening tests detect marijuana, cocaine, amphetamine/methamphetamine, PCP, and opiates (morphine/codeine). Keep in mind, Dr. Salsitz said, that opiates and opioids aren’t the same. That means IA tests don’t pick up oxycodone use, for example, he said. More sophisticated (and more expensive) tests can distinguish between types of drugs (for example, morphine vs. codeine) and can detect drugs that aren’t included in the IA tests.
Don’t make assumptions about positive or negative tests
A positive drug test for cocaine doesn’t necessarily mean the person is addicted, Dr. Salsitz said. “It just means they used that molecule in the last 3 days. It’s up to you to figure out what it actually means.” And if a patient’s urine fails to show that he or she is taking a prescribed medication, that doesn’t necessarily indicate that the drug is being illegally diverted. The patient could have run out of the drug or lost insurance coverage, Dr. Salsitz said.
Be aware that patients may fake urine tests
“Cheating is a huge problem,” Dr. Salsitz said. “Is it their urine or not their urine?” Many kits promise to help people provide fake urine, and some have even provided fake penises to foil observed urine collection. What to do? Alternative tests that rely on hair, saliva, and even sweat are available, Dr. Salsitz said, and these make cheating more difficult. However, they have various limitations. Saliva, for example, only tells you what patients are using now, not what they used days ago, he said, and it’s not sensitive for marijuana.
Dr. Salsitz reported no disclosures.
The Global Academy for Medical Education, which offered the Pain Care for Primary Care symposium, and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM PAIN CARE FOR PRIMARY CARE
Pot for chronic pain? The jury is still out
SAN DIEGO – Is pot a valid alternative to opioids for patients with chronic pain? The verdict on the use of medical marijuana is still hazy, a pain specialist told primary care colleagues. “There’s some evidence for pain, but it’s not extensive,” said Timothy Furnish, MD, of the University of California at San Diego.
Still, he said, studies suggest that the expanding legal use of medical marijuana isn’t boosting opioid use or worsening traffic accident rates. (JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178[5]:667-72; Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106[11]:2032-7) And, he said, two things are clear: “There is no one who has overdosed and died specifically from marijuana ... and compared to opioids, cannabinoids have a relatively good safety profile.”
Dr. Furnish spoke in a presentation at Pain Care for Primary Care, a symposium held by the American Pain Society and Global Academy for Medical Education.
Thirty-three states and the District of Columbia allow – or will soon allow – the medical use of marijuana, although their laws and policies vary widely. The newest states to join the list are Utah, Missouri, and Oklahoma, where voters passed medical marijuana measures this year.
Ten states and the District of Columbia also allow the recreational use of marijuana.
However, most states in the South, including Texas and Georgia, don’t allow medical marijuana. The other states that continue to forbid it are in the Midwest and Rocky Mountain regions.
How does cannabis fare against pain? Dr. Furnish pointed to a 2011 systematic review of 18 randomized trials in noncancer chronic pain that showed that “overall there is evidence that cannabinoids are safe and modestly effective in neuropathic pain with preliminary evidence of efficacy in fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis” (Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Nov;72[5]:735-44).
More recently, a 2018 systematic review and meta-analysis of 104 studies found that “it seems unlikely that cannabinoids are highly effective medicines” for chronic noncancer pain (Pain. 2018 Oct;159[10]:1932-54).
In cancer pain, Dr. Furnish said, evidence supporting marijuana is limited and mainly involves nabiximols (Sativex), a cannabis-based inhaled spray that is approved in several nations outside the United States as a treatment for muscle stiffness and spasm in MS. The drug is still an investigational medication in the United States.
How much marijuana should patients with pain take? In the clinic, Dr. Furnish said, “patients actually do best on a relatively modest dose or low dose. High doses are probably more escape than pain relief.”
Dr. Furnish said that because of safety concerns, he never advises patients to smoke marijuana. “Vaporizing may be safer,” he said, noting that the inhaled route has a relatively rapid onset (2-10 minutes) and lasts for 2-4 hours.
Be aware, he said, that cannabis taken orally may not kick in for 30-90 minutes – “it will depend on what they’ve already ingested, and if they have recently consumed a fatty meal” – and patients may have trouble titrating their doses properly. “It’s a little bit easier to ingest more than they intended,” he said.
If you do want to give patients guidance about medical marijuana, keep in mind that “we can’t write a prescription. We only make recommendations,” he said.
“Use some of the same criteria that you’d use in suggesting a patient for opioid therapy,” he said. For example, exclude patients with active psychosis and schizophrenia.
Another red flag is a significant substance abuse history, since there is “abuse and dependence” in marijuana, he said. “Regular heavy users can experience withdrawal, but it tends to be a lot lighter than opioid withdrawal.”
Also be aware, he said, that there’s no federal oversight of medical marijuana, and “production, purity, potency, and state oversight vary widely.”
Global Academy for Medical Education and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
Dr. Furnish has no disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – Is pot a valid alternative to opioids for patients with chronic pain? The verdict on the use of medical marijuana is still hazy, a pain specialist told primary care colleagues. “There’s some evidence for pain, but it’s not extensive,” said Timothy Furnish, MD, of the University of California at San Diego.
Still, he said, studies suggest that the expanding legal use of medical marijuana isn’t boosting opioid use or worsening traffic accident rates. (JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178[5]:667-72; Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106[11]:2032-7) And, he said, two things are clear: “There is no one who has overdosed and died specifically from marijuana ... and compared to opioids, cannabinoids have a relatively good safety profile.”
Dr. Furnish spoke in a presentation at Pain Care for Primary Care, a symposium held by the American Pain Society and Global Academy for Medical Education.
Thirty-three states and the District of Columbia allow – or will soon allow – the medical use of marijuana, although their laws and policies vary widely. The newest states to join the list are Utah, Missouri, and Oklahoma, where voters passed medical marijuana measures this year.
Ten states and the District of Columbia also allow the recreational use of marijuana.
However, most states in the South, including Texas and Georgia, don’t allow medical marijuana. The other states that continue to forbid it are in the Midwest and Rocky Mountain regions.
How does cannabis fare against pain? Dr. Furnish pointed to a 2011 systematic review of 18 randomized trials in noncancer chronic pain that showed that “overall there is evidence that cannabinoids are safe and modestly effective in neuropathic pain with preliminary evidence of efficacy in fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis” (Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Nov;72[5]:735-44).
More recently, a 2018 systematic review and meta-analysis of 104 studies found that “it seems unlikely that cannabinoids are highly effective medicines” for chronic noncancer pain (Pain. 2018 Oct;159[10]:1932-54).
In cancer pain, Dr. Furnish said, evidence supporting marijuana is limited and mainly involves nabiximols (Sativex), a cannabis-based inhaled spray that is approved in several nations outside the United States as a treatment for muscle stiffness and spasm in MS. The drug is still an investigational medication in the United States.
How much marijuana should patients with pain take? In the clinic, Dr. Furnish said, “patients actually do best on a relatively modest dose or low dose. High doses are probably more escape than pain relief.”
Dr. Furnish said that because of safety concerns, he never advises patients to smoke marijuana. “Vaporizing may be safer,” he said, noting that the inhaled route has a relatively rapid onset (2-10 minutes) and lasts for 2-4 hours.
Be aware, he said, that cannabis taken orally may not kick in for 30-90 minutes – “it will depend on what they’ve already ingested, and if they have recently consumed a fatty meal” – and patients may have trouble titrating their doses properly. “It’s a little bit easier to ingest more than they intended,” he said.
If you do want to give patients guidance about medical marijuana, keep in mind that “we can’t write a prescription. We only make recommendations,” he said.
“Use some of the same criteria that you’d use in suggesting a patient for opioid therapy,” he said. For example, exclude patients with active psychosis and schizophrenia.
Another red flag is a significant substance abuse history, since there is “abuse and dependence” in marijuana, he said. “Regular heavy users can experience withdrawal, but it tends to be a lot lighter than opioid withdrawal.”
Also be aware, he said, that there’s no federal oversight of medical marijuana, and “production, purity, potency, and state oversight vary widely.”
Global Academy for Medical Education and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
Dr. Furnish has no disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – Is pot a valid alternative to opioids for patients with chronic pain? The verdict on the use of medical marijuana is still hazy, a pain specialist told primary care colleagues. “There’s some evidence for pain, but it’s not extensive,” said Timothy Furnish, MD, of the University of California at San Diego.
Still, he said, studies suggest that the expanding legal use of medical marijuana isn’t boosting opioid use or worsening traffic accident rates. (JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178[5]:667-72; Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106[11]:2032-7) And, he said, two things are clear: “There is no one who has overdosed and died specifically from marijuana ... and compared to opioids, cannabinoids have a relatively good safety profile.”
Dr. Furnish spoke in a presentation at Pain Care for Primary Care, a symposium held by the American Pain Society and Global Academy for Medical Education.
Thirty-three states and the District of Columbia allow – or will soon allow – the medical use of marijuana, although their laws and policies vary widely. The newest states to join the list are Utah, Missouri, and Oklahoma, where voters passed medical marijuana measures this year.
Ten states and the District of Columbia also allow the recreational use of marijuana.
However, most states in the South, including Texas and Georgia, don’t allow medical marijuana. The other states that continue to forbid it are in the Midwest and Rocky Mountain regions.
How does cannabis fare against pain? Dr. Furnish pointed to a 2011 systematic review of 18 randomized trials in noncancer chronic pain that showed that “overall there is evidence that cannabinoids are safe and modestly effective in neuropathic pain with preliminary evidence of efficacy in fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis” (Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Nov;72[5]:735-44).
More recently, a 2018 systematic review and meta-analysis of 104 studies found that “it seems unlikely that cannabinoids are highly effective medicines” for chronic noncancer pain (Pain. 2018 Oct;159[10]:1932-54).
In cancer pain, Dr. Furnish said, evidence supporting marijuana is limited and mainly involves nabiximols (Sativex), a cannabis-based inhaled spray that is approved in several nations outside the United States as a treatment for muscle stiffness and spasm in MS. The drug is still an investigational medication in the United States.
How much marijuana should patients with pain take? In the clinic, Dr. Furnish said, “patients actually do best on a relatively modest dose or low dose. High doses are probably more escape than pain relief.”
Dr. Furnish said that because of safety concerns, he never advises patients to smoke marijuana. “Vaporizing may be safer,” he said, noting that the inhaled route has a relatively rapid onset (2-10 minutes) and lasts for 2-4 hours.
Be aware, he said, that cannabis taken orally may not kick in for 30-90 minutes – “it will depend on what they’ve already ingested, and if they have recently consumed a fatty meal” – and patients may have trouble titrating their doses properly. “It’s a little bit easier to ingest more than they intended,” he said.
If you do want to give patients guidance about medical marijuana, keep in mind that “we can’t write a prescription. We only make recommendations,” he said.
“Use some of the same criteria that you’d use in suggesting a patient for opioid therapy,” he said. For example, exclude patients with active psychosis and schizophrenia.
Another red flag is a significant substance abuse history, since there is “abuse and dependence” in marijuana, he said. “Regular heavy users can experience withdrawal, but it tends to be a lot lighter than opioid withdrawal.”
Also be aware, he said, that there’s no federal oversight of medical marijuana, and “production, purity, potency, and state oversight vary widely.”
Global Academy for Medical Education and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
Dr. Furnish has no disclosures.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM PAIN CARE FOR PRIMARY CARE
Probative pee, Pilgrim obesity, and med school baked bribes
He tweets, he (doesn’t) score!
We all know that less sleep equals poor job performance. Up way too late on a Sunday night means you might fall face first into your keyboard the next morning and accidentally send an email that ends with “hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.” So, yeah, sleep is important.
It’s especially important when you are a professional athlete and your entire livelihood depends on you being in tip-top shape. Researchers from the State University of New York at Stony Brook studied the performance of NBA players in relation to their late-night Twitter binges. Unsurprisingly, tweeting in the wee hours correlated with fewer points and fewer rebounds in the next day’s game. We’re sure coaches are just thrilled to hear about their players spending precious night hours @-ing random trolls on Twitter. Does this mean less tweeting and more sleep means anyone can be the next LeBron? Or, um, the next @KingJames? Probably not … but give it a try.
Poppy seeds and probative pee
As you tuck into your Thanksgiving leftovers, give a thought to a valiant physician who ate and drank – and peed – for science. Not just once, but twice.
At the recent Pain Care for Primary Care symposium in San Diego, Mount Sinai Beth Israel addiction specialist Edwin Salsitz, MD, gave a presentation about drug screening and mentioned his own homegrown investigation into two reputed sources of false positives.
A few years ago, a patient tested positive for opiates and, like many before him, blamed his fondness for poppy-seed bagels. Dr. Salsitz asked the patient to buy him a poppy bagel from his usual source, then the doctor went home and ate it on a Sunday prior to collecting his own pee. The doctor’s subsequent urine test was positive for opiates, and the patient was off the hook. (For more about the poppy-seed menace to accurate opiate testing, check this clinical update from the Aegis testing company.)
Later, it was time to check another possible urban legend. Dr. Salsitz got some mate de coca tea from a friend who’d returned from South America. Again, he took time out of a Sunday, this time to enjoy a hot beverage, mate de coca style, and collect his own pee. The urine test was positive this time, too – for cocaine.
The moral of the story? If you have a drug test looming, be safe and just stick to a croissant and coffee.
Psst … want a cookie?
In medical school, the best and brightest sacrifice their bodies and social lives to absorb knowledge like human sponges. Or maybe it’s where they absorb cookies in exchange for positive end-of-course evaluations.
Investigators from the University of Münster (Germany) decided to give 118 of the school’s third-year medical students a little test. During a course on emergency medicine, some groups were given access to free chocolate cookies (Discus deliciosum spp.) in their sessions, and some groups were not. When it came time to fill out their “student evaluations of teaching” at the end of the semester, the “cookie group” was more generous in its ratings of the course material and gave significantly higher scores to the teachers and to the course overall, compared with the control group (Med Educ. 2018 Oct;52[10]:1064-72).
This all seemed a little suspicious, so we did a little digging. Turns out that the cookie group – the one that provided all that warm, chocolatey positive reinforcement – was chock full of the usual suspects: Ernie the elf, Mrs. Fields, Famous Amos, and Mr. Big himself, Cookie Monster.
Why Myles Standish wasn’t fat
In the autumn of 1621, obesity didn’t dine with the 53 Pilgrims who gave culinary thanks for surviving their first disappointing Boston Bruins season. Er, for their first harvest after a brutal New England winter. Why was that first Thanksgiving such a svelte affair, free of the high-BMI epidemic that afflicts so many Bruins faithful nearly 4 centuries later? Was it the free-range turkey? The lean venison? The Wampanoag guests’ demands for a DASH-diet dinner?
A modern study may help reveal the historical truth: 17th century Plymouth Plantation wasn’t yet bisected by the 21st century Cape Cod traffic snarling the Pilgrims Highway, a.k.a. Massachusetts Route 3.
It was Spanish researchers, not English Puritans, who unbuckled the portly puzzle’s Pilgrim hat. Investigators with the Barcelona Institute for Global Health examined the link between traffic noise exposure and obesity markers among a group of Swiss adults. The verdict? Those exposed to the highest levels of traffic noise ran the greatest risk of becoming obese. Specifically, every 10-decibel rise in road noise packed on another 17% increase in obesity. Seems tractor-trailer downshifts and honking horns may disturb sleep, gridlocking glucose metabolism and diverting everyone to the nearest drive-thru.
Next on the Spaniards’ research to-do list: Can your New England uncle’s annual Turkey Day tales of Red Sox triumphs trigger psychosis among familial Yankees fans?
He tweets, he (doesn’t) score!
We all know that less sleep equals poor job performance. Up way too late on a Sunday night means you might fall face first into your keyboard the next morning and accidentally send an email that ends with “hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.” So, yeah, sleep is important.
It’s especially important when you are a professional athlete and your entire livelihood depends on you being in tip-top shape. Researchers from the State University of New York at Stony Brook studied the performance of NBA players in relation to their late-night Twitter binges. Unsurprisingly, tweeting in the wee hours correlated with fewer points and fewer rebounds in the next day’s game. We’re sure coaches are just thrilled to hear about their players spending precious night hours @-ing random trolls on Twitter. Does this mean less tweeting and more sleep means anyone can be the next LeBron? Or, um, the next @KingJames? Probably not … but give it a try.
Poppy seeds and probative pee
As you tuck into your Thanksgiving leftovers, give a thought to a valiant physician who ate and drank – and peed – for science. Not just once, but twice.
At the recent Pain Care for Primary Care symposium in San Diego, Mount Sinai Beth Israel addiction specialist Edwin Salsitz, MD, gave a presentation about drug screening and mentioned his own homegrown investigation into two reputed sources of false positives.
A few years ago, a patient tested positive for opiates and, like many before him, blamed his fondness for poppy-seed bagels. Dr. Salsitz asked the patient to buy him a poppy bagel from his usual source, then the doctor went home and ate it on a Sunday prior to collecting his own pee. The doctor’s subsequent urine test was positive for opiates, and the patient was off the hook. (For more about the poppy-seed menace to accurate opiate testing, check this clinical update from the Aegis testing company.)
Later, it was time to check another possible urban legend. Dr. Salsitz got some mate de coca tea from a friend who’d returned from South America. Again, he took time out of a Sunday, this time to enjoy a hot beverage, mate de coca style, and collect his own pee. The urine test was positive this time, too – for cocaine.
The moral of the story? If you have a drug test looming, be safe and just stick to a croissant and coffee.
Psst … want a cookie?
In medical school, the best and brightest sacrifice their bodies and social lives to absorb knowledge like human sponges. Or maybe it’s where they absorb cookies in exchange for positive end-of-course evaluations.
Investigators from the University of Münster (Germany) decided to give 118 of the school’s third-year medical students a little test. During a course on emergency medicine, some groups were given access to free chocolate cookies (Discus deliciosum spp.) in their sessions, and some groups were not. When it came time to fill out their “student evaluations of teaching” at the end of the semester, the “cookie group” was more generous in its ratings of the course material and gave significantly higher scores to the teachers and to the course overall, compared with the control group (Med Educ. 2018 Oct;52[10]:1064-72).
This all seemed a little suspicious, so we did a little digging. Turns out that the cookie group – the one that provided all that warm, chocolatey positive reinforcement – was chock full of the usual suspects: Ernie the elf, Mrs. Fields, Famous Amos, and Mr. Big himself, Cookie Monster.
Why Myles Standish wasn’t fat
In the autumn of 1621, obesity didn’t dine with the 53 Pilgrims who gave culinary thanks for surviving their first disappointing Boston Bruins season. Er, for their first harvest after a brutal New England winter. Why was that first Thanksgiving such a svelte affair, free of the high-BMI epidemic that afflicts so many Bruins faithful nearly 4 centuries later? Was it the free-range turkey? The lean venison? The Wampanoag guests’ demands for a DASH-diet dinner?
A modern study may help reveal the historical truth: 17th century Plymouth Plantation wasn’t yet bisected by the 21st century Cape Cod traffic snarling the Pilgrims Highway, a.k.a. Massachusetts Route 3.
It was Spanish researchers, not English Puritans, who unbuckled the portly puzzle’s Pilgrim hat. Investigators with the Barcelona Institute for Global Health examined the link between traffic noise exposure and obesity markers among a group of Swiss adults. The verdict? Those exposed to the highest levels of traffic noise ran the greatest risk of becoming obese. Specifically, every 10-decibel rise in road noise packed on another 17% increase in obesity. Seems tractor-trailer downshifts and honking horns may disturb sleep, gridlocking glucose metabolism and diverting everyone to the nearest drive-thru.
Next on the Spaniards’ research to-do list: Can your New England uncle’s annual Turkey Day tales of Red Sox triumphs trigger psychosis among familial Yankees fans?
He tweets, he (doesn’t) score!
We all know that less sleep equals poor job performance. Up way too late on a Sunday night means you might fall face first into your keyboard the next morning and accidentally send an email that ends with “hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.” So, yeah, sleep is important.
It’s especially important when you are a professional athlete and your entire livelihood depends on you being in tip-top shape. Researchers from the State University of New York at Stony Brook studied the performance of NBA players in relation to their late-night Twitter binges. Unsurprisingly, tweeting in the wee hours correlated with fewer points and fewer rebounds in the next day’s game. We’re sure coaches are just thrilled to hear about their players spending precious night hours @-ing random trolls on Twitter. Does this mean less tweeting and more sleep means anyone can be the next LeBron? Or, um, the next @KingJames? Probably not … but give it a try.
Poppy seeds and probative pee
As you tuck into your Thanksgiving leftovers, give a thought to a valiant physician who ate and drank – and peed – for science. Not just once, but twice.
At the recent Pain Care for Primary Care symposium in San Diego, Mount Sinai Beth Israel addiction specialist Edwin Salsitz, MD, gave a presentation about drug screening and mentioned his own homegrown investigation into two reputed sources of false positives.
A few years ago, a patient tested positive for opiates and, like many before him, blamed his fondness for poppy-seed bagels. Dr. Salsitz asked the patient to buy him a poppy bagel from his usual source, then the doctor went home and ate it on a Sunday prior to collecting his own pee. The doctor’s subsequent urine test was positive for opiates, and the patient was off the hook. (For more about the poppy-seed menace to accurate opiate testing, check this clinical update from the Aegis testing company.)
Later, it was time to check another possible urban legend. Dr. Salsitz got some mate de coca tea from a friend who’d returned from South America. Again, he took time out of a Sunday, this time to enjoy a hot beverage, mate de coca style, and collect his own pee. The urine test was positive this time, too – for cocaine.
The moral of the story? If you have a drug test looming, be safe and just stick to a croissant and coffee.
Psst … want a cookie?
In medical school, the best and brightest sacrifice their bodies and social lives to absorb knowledge like human sponges. Or maybe it’s where they absorb cookies in exchange for positive end-of-course evaluations.
Investigators from the University of Münster (Germany) decided to give 118 of the school’s third-year medical students a little test. During a course on emergency medicine, some groups were given access to free chocolate cookies (Discus deliciosum spp.) in their sessions, and some groups were not. When it came time to fill out their “student evaluations of teaching” at the end of the semester, the “cookie group” was more generous in its ratings of the course material and gave significantly higher scores to the teachers and to the course overall, compared with the control group (Med Educ. 2018 Oct;52[10]:1064-72).
This all seemed a little suspicious, so we did a little digging. Turns out that the cookie group – the one that provided all that warm, chocolatey positive reinforcement – was chock full of the usual suspects: Ernie the elf, Mrs. Fields, Famous Amos, and Mr. Big himself, Cookie Monster.
Why Myles Standish wasn’t fat
In the autumn of 1621, obesity didn’t dine with the 53 Pilgrims who gave culinary thanks for surviving their first disappointing Boston Bruins season. Er, for their first harvest after a brutal New England winter. Why was that first Thanksgiving such a svelte affair, free of the high-BMI epidemic that afflicts so many Bruins faithful nearly 4 centuries later? Was it the free-range turkey? The lean venison? The Wampanoag guests’ demands for a DASH-diet dinner?
A modern study may help reveal the historical truth: 17th century Plymouth Plantation wasn’t yet bisected by the 21st century Cape Cod traffic snarling the Pilgrims Highway, a.k.a. Massachusetts Route 3.
It was Spanish researchers, not English Puritans, who unbuckled the portly puzzle’s Pilgrim hat. Investigators with the Barcelona Institute for Global Health examined the link between traffic noise exposure and obesity markers among a group of Swiss adults. The verdict? Those exposed to the highest levels of traffic noise ran the greatest risk of becoming obese. Specifically, every 10-decibel rise in road noise packed on another 17% increase in obesity. Seems tractor-trailer downshifts and honking horns may disturb sleep, gridlocking glucose metabolism and diverting everyone to the nearest drive-thru.
Next on the Spaniards’ research to-do list: Can your New England uncle’s annual Turkey Day tales of Red Sox triumphs trigger psychosis among familial Yankees fans?
Expert Q&A: What’s new in alopecia areata research and treatment?
LAS VEGAS – Alopecia is hard to bear for patients and has been difficult to treat, but “,” according to Maria Hordinsky, MD.
Dr. Hordinsky, professor and chair of the department of dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, discussed hair disorders in multiple presentations at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar. In an interview after her session on alopecia areata, she elaborated on the state of research and treatment for patients with this diagnosis.
DERMATOLOGY NEWS: What has changed in alopecia areata treatment over the last few years?
Dr. Hordinsky: There is still no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment for this disease. But recent studies have helped us understand how alopecia areata occurs, how important interleukin-15 is, and how to target this cytokine as well as others. At the same time, expertise has developed at several centers across the United States with using the Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib [Xeljanz] at 5 milligrams twice a day. This has led to more off-label use. Concurrently, many pharmaceutical companies with interest in alopecia areata have begun to study different JAK inhibitors that target different cytokine receptors. Researchers also are exploring topical JAK inhibitors.
DN: What about the high costs of these drugs?
Dr. Hordinsky: Some insurers are covering tofacitinib, and patient assistance programs are very helpful and beneficial. In my own practice, most patients taking these drugs are using those programs.
DN: Are any treatments being used less than in the past?
Dr. Hordinsky: We’re still using tools that we have in the toolbox because we don’t have an approved treatment. We use topical steroids and intralesional steroids. We also use prednisone as needed, and we use contact sensitization therapy.
DN: In your presentation, you talked about alopecia areata in body areas outside of the scalp. What should dermatologists know about the eyebrows in patients with alopecia areata?
Dr. Hordinsky: Some patients don’t care as much about the scalp hair loss because they’ve figured out how to deal with it. What really bothers some patients is their eyebrow hair loss. You can think of situations where alopecia areata creates a circle in the middle of the eyebrow on the left side, but not the right, or you lose one eyebrow but not the other. We use techniques such as intralesional steroids. If there’s some hair growth present that’s lightly pigmented, we may apply topical minoxidil or Latisse [bimatoprost] to the brow area. Patients may also do microblading.
DN: Are there eyebrow prosthetics?
Dr. Hordinsky: Yes, there are. The National Alopecia Areata Foundation provides a lot of information to patients and providers about these devices. There are devices that you can tape on your brow area. Some don’t look great cosmetically, but some look fantastic. Microblading may create the most normal appearance.
DN: What about eyelashes?
Dr. Hordinsky: Eyelash loss is tough and really bothersome to patients if they don’t wear glasses because of the protection provided by eyelashes, such as when you blink against airborne dust. If there is some hair present in the eyebrow regions, one can try to regrow hair and use something that’s safe in that region, like topical Latisse. These treatments have to be tried for a couple of months before you say yea or nay, and you and the patient have to have reasonable expectations.
DN: What about men’s beards?
Dr. Hordinsky: You can treat those areas with topical or intralesional steroids. My own experience is that you have to use intralesional steroids, and overall, this form of alopecia areata may be one of the most difficult to manage successfully.
DN: Do men complain about missing chest hair?
Dr. Hordinsky: Chest hair doesn’t come up a lot for me. For men, it’s mainly the beard area. But people with alopecia areata may sometimes minimize or not bring up discussion of loss of hair in the underarms, the genital region, or the chest. It may be because they’ve figured out how to deal with it.
DN: How do you think treatments will improve over the next 5-10 years?
Dr. Hordinsky: We have a number of companies putting JAK inhibitors into clinical trials. A major step forward will be figuring out which one works the best, and then the next hurdle will be sustainability. There are very few studies in alopecia areata about how long a response to treatment can be maintained. Another big step will be the development of a topical agent that is able to penetrate through the skin to the level of the immune attack at the lower part of the hair follicle and provide the opportunity to possibly not only grow hair but also to maintain hair growth. So there’s a lot of evolution going on right now.
Dr. Hordinsky disclosed consulting work with Procter & Gamble, Concert, and Cassiopea, and grant/research support from Aclaris, National Alopecia Areata Foundation, Allergan.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
LAS VEGAS – Alopecia is hard to bear for patients and has been difficult to treat, but “,” according to Maria Hordinsky, MD.
Dr. Hordinsky, professor and chair of the department of dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, discussed hair disorders in multiple presentations at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar. In an interview after her session on alopecia areata, she elaborated on the state of research and treatment for patients with this diagnosis.
DERMATOLOGY NEWS: What has changed in alopecia areata treatment over the last few years?
Dr. Hordinsky: There is still no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment for this disease. But recent studies have helped us understand how alopecia areata occurs, how important interleukin-15 is, and how to target this cytokine as well as others. At the same time, expertise has developed at several centers across the United States with using the Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib [Xeljanz] at 5 milligrams twice a day. This has led to more off-label use. Concurrently, many pharmaceutical companies with interest in alopecia areata have begun to study different JAK inhibitors that target different cytokine receptors. Researchers also are exploring topical JAK inhibitors.
DN: What about the high costs of these drugs?
Dr. Hordinsky: Some insurers are covering tofacitinib, and patient assistance programs are very helpful and beneficial. In my own practice, most patients taking these drugs are using those programs.
DN: Are any treatments being used less than in the past?
Dr. Hordinsky: We’re still using tools that we have in the toolbox because we don’t have an approved treatment. We use topical steroids and intralesional steroids. We also use prednisone as needed, and we use contact sensitization therapy.
DN: In your presentation, you talked about alopecia areata in body areas outside of the scalp. What should dermatologists know about the eyebrows in patients with alopecia areata?
Dr. Hordinsky: Some patients don’t care as much about the scalp hair loss because they’ve figured out how to deal with it. What really bothers some patients is their eyebrow hair loss. You can think of situations where alopecia areata creates a circle in the middle of the eyebrow on the left side, but not the right, or you lose one eyebrow but not the other. We use techniques such as intralesional steroids. If there’s some hair growth present that’s lightly pigmented, we may apply topical minoxidil or Latisse [bimatoprost] to the brow area. Patients may also do microblading.
DN: Are there eyebrow prosthetics?
Dr. Hordinsky: Yes, there are. The National Alopecia Areata Foundation provides a lot of information to patients and providers about these devices. There are devices that you can tape on your brow area. Some don’t look great cosmetically, but some look fantastic. Microblading may create the most normal appearance.
DN: What about eyelashes?
Dr. Hordinsky: Eyelash loss is tough and really bothersome to patients if they don’t wear glasses because of the protection provided by eyelashes, such as when you blink against airborne dust. If there is some hair present in the eyebrow regions, one can try to regrow hair and use something that’s safe in that region, like topical Latisse. These treatments have to be tried for a couple of months before you say yea or nay, and you and the patient have to have reasonable expectations.
DN: What about men’s beards?
Dr. Hordinsky: You can treat those areas with topical or intralesional steroids. My own experience is that you have to use intralesional steroids, and overall, this form of alopecia areata may be one of the most difficult to manage successfully.
DN: Do men complain about missing chest hair?
Dr. Hordinsky: Chest hair doesn’t come up a lot for me. For men, it’s mainly the beard area. But people with alopecia areata may sometimes minimize or not bring up discussion of loss of hair in the underarms, the genital region, or the chest. It may be because they’ve figured out how to deal with it.
DN: How do you think treatments will improve over the next 5-10 years?
Dr. Hordinsky: We have a number of companies putting JAK inhibitors into clinical trials. A major step forward will be figuring out which one works the best, and then the next hurdle will be sustainability. There are very few studies in alopecia areata about how long a response to treatment can be maintained. Another big step will be the development of a topical agent that is able to penetrate through the skin to the level of the immune attack at the lower part of the hair follicle and provide the opportunity to possibly not only grow hair but also to maintain hair growth. So there’s a lot of evolution going on right now.
Dr. Hordinsky disclosed consulting work with Procter & Gamble, Concert, and Cassiopea, and grant/research support from Aclaris, National Alopecia Areata Foundation, Allergan.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
LAS VEGAS – Alopecia is hard to bear for patients and has been difficult to treat, but “,” according to Maria Hordinsky, MD.
Dr. Hordinsky, professor and chair of the department of dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, discussed hair disorders in multiple presentations at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar. In an interview after her session on alopecia areata, she elaborated on the state of research and treatment for patients with this diagnosis.
DERMATOLOGY NEWS: What has changed in alopecia areata treatment over the last few years?
Dr. Hordinsky: There is still no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment for this disease. But recent studies have helped us understand how alopecia areata occurs, how important interleukin-15 is, and how to target this cytokine as well as others. At the same time, expertise has developed at several centers across the United States with using the Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib [Xeljanz] at 5 milligrams twice a day. This has led to more off-label use. Concurrently, many pharmaceutical companies with interest in alopecia areata have begun to study different JAK inhibitors that target different cytokine receptors. Researchers also are exploring topical JAK inhibitors.
DN: What about the high costs of these drugs?
Dr. Hordinsky: Some insurers are covering tofacitinib, and patient assistance programs are very helpful and beneficial. In my own practice, most patients taking these drugs are using those programs.
DN: Are any treatments being used less than in the past?
Dr. Hordinsky: We’re still using tools that we have in the toolbox because we don’t have an approved treatment. We use topical steroids and intralesional steroids. We also use prednisone as needed, and we use contact sensitization therapy.
DN: In your presentation, you talked about alopecia areata in body areas outside of the scalp. What should dermatologists know about the eyebrows in patients with alopecia areata?
Dr. Hordinsky: Some patients don’t care as much about the scalp hair loss because they’ve figured out how to deal with it. What really bothers some patients is their eyebrow hair loss. You can think of situations where alopecia areata creates a circle in the middle of the eyebrow on the left side, but not the right, or you lose one eyebrow but not the other. We use techniques such as intralesional steroids. If there’s some hair growth present that’s lightly pigmented, we may apply topical minoxidil or Latisse [bimatoprost] to the brow area. Patients may also do microblading.
DN: Are there eyebrow prosthetics?
Dr. Hordinsky: Yes, there are. The National Alopecia Areata Foundation provides a lot of information to patients and providers about these devices. There are devices that you can tape on your brow area. Some don’t look great cosmetically, but some look fantastic. Microblading may create the most normal appearance.
DN: What about eyelashes?
Dr. Hordinsky: Eyelash loss is tough and really bothersome to patients if they don’t wear glasses because of the protection provided by eyelashes, such as when you blink against airborne dust. If there is some hair present in the eyebrow regions, one can try to regrow hair and use something that’s safe in that region, like topical Latisse. These treatments have to be tried for a couple of months before you say yea or nay, and you and the patient have to have reasonable expectations.
DN: What about men’s beards?
Dr. Hordinsky: You can treat those areas with topical or intralesional steroids. My own experience is that you have to use intralesional steroids, and overall, this form of alopecia areata may be one of the most difficult to manage successfully.
DN: Do men complain about missing chest hair?
Dr. Hordinsky: Chest hair doesn’t come up a lot for me. For men, it’s mainly the beard area. But people with alopecia areata may sometimes minimize or not bring up discussion of loss of hair in the underarms, the genital region, or the chest. It may be because they’ve figured out how to deal with it.
DN: How do you think treatments will improve over the next 5-10 years?
Dr. Hordinsky: We have a number of companies putting JAK inhibitors into clinical trials. A major step forward will be figuring out which one works the best, and then the next hurdle will be sustainability. There are very few studies in alopecia areata about how long a response to treatment can be maintained. Another big step will be the development of a topical agent that is able to penetrate through the skin to the level of the immune attack at the lower part of the hair follicle and provide the opportunity to possibly not only grow hair but also to maintain hair growth. So there’s a lot of evolution going on right now.
Dr. Hordinsky disclosed consulting work with Procter & Gamble, Concert, and Cassiopea, and grant/research support from Aclaris, National Alopecia Areata Foundation, Allergan.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM SDEF LAS VEGAS DERMATOLOGY SEMINAR
Topical treatments remain a good option for psoriasis
LAS VEGAS – in mild cases of psoriasis.
Topicals often are a worthwhile complement to even the most advanced systemic medications, according to Linda Stein Gold, MD, director of clinical research in the department of dermatology at the Henry Ford Health System, Detroit.
Speaking at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar, she pointed out that as the variety of vehicles for topical treatments has grown, so has the need to pay attention to the potency of these treatments. “Traditionally, we had thought we had to use a thick ointment to drive the drug in and get the best efficacy,” she said. “But we’ve changed our thought process.”
For example, betamethasone dipropionate 0.05%, now comes in multiple types of ointments and creams, with different potency classes, including Diprolene ointment, 0.05%, Diprosone cream, 0.05%, Diprolene cream AF, 0.05%, and Diprolene cream, 0.05%, as well as a lotion and an emollient spray.
“It’s the same active drug, but different vehicles absolutely change the potency of the drug,” Dr. Stein Gold said.
So which is the most potent? She said you can’t tell just by the vehicle. In this case, the most potent forms – in the “superpotent” class 1 – are Diprolene cream, 0.05%, and Diprolene ointment, 0.05%. (The National Psoriasis Foundation has a potency chart for topical psoriasis medications.)
She also recommended considering combination therapy with tazarotene. Tazarotene, a vitamin A derivative, is associated with a variety of side effects in 10%-30% of patients, including pruritus, erythema, irritation, skin pain, psoriasis worsening, and burning/stinging. But combination therapy with topical corticosteroids can reduce adverse effects, and it boosts efficacy as well, Dr. Stein Gold said.
She added that tazarotene can be a tool against acne. The 0.1% cream and gel formulations are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating acne; the 0.05% cream and gel forms are approved only for psoriasis. “Both concentrations work well and hit the different pillars of the pathogenesis of acne,” she said.
In addition, Dr. Stein Gold noted that she led two 2018 studies that found a fixed combination of halobetasol propionate 0.01% and tazarotene 0.045% lotion in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis was associated with significant reductions in the severity of the clinical signs of psoriasis, and minimal safety concerns (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Aug;79[2]:287-93).
As for the future in topical treatment for psoriasis, she said researchers are exploring phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, Janus kinase inhibitors, and aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists.
Dr. Stein Gold disclosed speaker bureau relationships with Galderma, Leo, Valeant, Novartis, Celgene and Allergan; consulting for Sol‐Gel, Galderma, Leo, Novan, Valeant, Dermira, Novartis, Celgene, Allergan, Foamix, Promius, Anacor and Medimetriks; receiving grant/research support from Galderma, Leo, Novan, Valeant, Dermira, Novartis, Celgene, Allergan and Foamix; and serving on scientific advisory boards for Galderma, Leo, Novan, Valeant, Dermira, Novartis, Celgene, Allergan, Foamix and Promius.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
LAS VEGAS – in mild cases of psoriasis.
Topicals often are a worthwhile complement to even the most advanced systemic medications, according to Linda Stein Gold, MD, director of clinical research in the department of dermatology at the Henry Ford Health System, Detroit.
Speaking at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar, she pointed out that as the variety of vehicles for topical treatments has grown, so has the need to pay attention to the potency of these treatments. “Traditionally, we had thought we had to use a thick ointment to drive the drug in and get the best efficacy,” she said. “But we’ve changed our thought process.”
For example, betamethasone dipropionate 0.05%, now comes in multiple types of ointments and creams, with different potency classes, including Diprolene ointment, 0.05%, Diprosone cream, 0.05%, Diprolene cream AF, 0.05%, and Diprolene cream, 0.05%, as well as a lotion and an emollient spray.
“It’s the same active drug, but different vehicles absolutely change the potency of the drug,” Dr. Stein Gold said.
So which is the most potent? She said you can’t tell just by the vehicle. In this case, the most potent forms – in the “superpotent” class 1 – are Diprolene cream, 0.05%, and Diprolene ointment, 0.05%. (The National Psoriasis Foundation has a potency chart for topical psoriasis medications.)
She also recommended considering combination therapy with tazarotene. Tazarotene, a vitamin A derivative, is associated with a variety of side effects in 10%-30% of patients, including pruritus, erythema, irritation, skin pain, psoriasis worsening, and burning/stinging. But combination therapy with topical corticosteroids can reduce adverse effects, and it boosts efficacy as well, Dr. Stein Gold said.
She added that tazarotene can be a tool against acne. The 0.1% cream and gel formulations are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating acne; the 0.05% cream and gel forms are approved only for psoriasis. “Both concentrations work well and hit the different pillars of the pathogenesis of acne,” she said.
In addition, Dr. Stein Gold noted that she led two 2018 studies that found a fixed combination of halobetasol propionate 0.01% and tazarotene 0.045% lotion in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis was associated with significant reductions in the severity of the clinical signs of psoriasis, and minimal safety concerns (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Aug;79[2]:287-93).
As for the future in topical treatment for psoriasis, she said researchers are exploring phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, Janus kinase inhibitors, and aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists.
Dr. Stein Gold disclosed speaker bureau relationships with Galderma, Leo, Valeant, Novartis, Celgene and Allergan; consulting for Sol‐Gel, Galderma, Leo, Novan, Valeant, Dermira, Novartis, Celgene, Allergan, Foamix, Promius, Anacor and Medimetriks; receiving grant/research support from Galderma, Leo, Novan, Valeant, Dermira, Novartis, Celgene, Allergan and Foamix; and serving on scientific advisory boards for Galderma, Leo, Novan, Valeant, Dermira, Novartis, Celgene, Allergan, Foamix and Promius.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
LAS VEGAS – in mild cases of psoriasis.
Topicals often are a worthwhile complement to even the most advanced systemic medications, according to Linda Stein Gold, MD, director of clinical research in the department of dermatology at the Henry Ford Health System, Detroit.
Speaking at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar, she pointed out that as the variety of vehicles for topical treatments has grown, so has the need to pay attention to the potency of these treatments. “Traditionally, we had thought we had to use a thick ointment to drive the drug in and get the best efficacy,” she said. “But we’ve changed our thought process.”
For example, betamethasone dipropionate 0.05%, now comes in multiple types of ointments and creams, with different potency classes, including Diprolene ointment, 0.05%, Diprosone cream, 0.05%, Diprolene cream AF, 0.05%, and Diprolene cream, 0.05%, as well as a lotion and an emollient spray.
“It’s the same active drug, but different vehicles absolutely change the potency of the drug,” Dr. Stein Gold said.
So which is the most potent? She said you can’t tell just by the vehicle. In this case, the most potent forms – in the “superpotent” class 1 – are Diprolene cream, 0.05%, and Diprolene ointment, 0.05%. (The National Psoriasis Foundation has a potency chart for topical psoriasis medications.)
She also recommended considering combination therapy with tazarotene. Tazarotene, a vitamin A derivative, is associated with a variety of side effects in 10%-30% of patients, including pruritus, erythema, irritation, skin pain, psoriasis worsening, and burning/stinging. But combination therapy with topical corticosteroids can reduce adverse effects, and it boosts efficacy as well, Dr. Stein Gold said.
She added that tazarotene can be a tool against acne. The 0.1% cream and gel formulations are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating acne; the 0.05% cream and gel forms are approved only for psoriasis. “Both concentrations work well and hit the different pillars of the pathogenesis of acne,” she said.
In addition, Dr. Stein Gold noted that she led two 2018 studies that found a fixed combination of halobetasol propionate 0.01% and tazarotene 0.045% lotion in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis was associated with significant reductions in the severity of the clinical signs of psoriasis, and minimal safety concerns (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Aug;79[2]:287-93).
As for the future in topical treatment for psoriasis, she said researchers are exploring phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, Janus kinase inhibitors, and aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists.
Dr. Stein Gold disclosed speaker bureau relationships with Galderma, Leo, Valeant, Novartis, Celgene and Allergan; consulting for Sol‐Gel, Galderma, Leo, Novan, Valeant, Dermira, Novartis, Celgene, Allergan, Foamix, Promius, Anacor and Medimetriks; receiving grant/research support from Galderma, Leo, Novan, Valeant, Dermira, Novartis, Celgene, Allergan and Foamix; and serving on scientific advisory boards for Galderma, Leo, Novan, Valeant, Dermira, Novartis, Celgene, Allergan, Foamix and Promius.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM SDEF LAS VEGAS DERMATOLOGY SEMINAR
Treating psoriasis with biologics: Recommendations from an expert
LAS VEGAS – If you’re considering adding biologics for psoriasis to your clinical practice, dermatologist Kristina C. Duffin, MD, has some advice: Don’t expect to just use one drug, focus on comorbidities, and embrace strategies to bypass the potential obstacle of prior-authorization approvals.
Here are some tips from Dr. Duffin, who spoke at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar:
- Don’t expect a one-size-fits-all medication. “There is no one, single go-to drug,” said Dr. Duffin, who is cochair of the department of dermatology at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City. “Maybe someday, we will have a biological personalized medicine marker to say this is the right drug, but for now we don’t.” More than 10 biologics are available to treat psoriasis, she said, and more are in the pipeline.
- Pay close attention to comorbidities. It’s important to “have a good grasp” of a patient’s comorbidities, which can help focus the choice of a biologic, Dr. Duffin said. She recommends starting with an anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents for patients with psoriatic arthritis. For patients with Crohn’s disease, she recommends anti-TNF (adalimumab, infliximab) and anti-interleukin–12/23 or anti-IL-23 agents (ustekinumab). Anti-TNF agents should be avoided in patients with multiple sclerosis, and anti-IL-17 agents shouldn’t be given to patients with recurrent candidiasis, she noted.
- Encourage patients to make prompt decisions. Dr. Duffin sits down with patients to discuss various biologic options, and she goes over information in handouts. She also focuses on their needs: “Are they interested in getting better fast? Do they want to be clear for their wedding in a month?” She prefers to not let patients go home to think about what they’d like to do. Instead, she advises patients to make choices while at the office visit.
- Order lab tests and be careful about vaccines. Dr. Duffin orders the following tests for all patients who are starting on biologics: CBC, comprehensive metabolic panel, hepatitis B and C, and tuberculosis. She orders HIV, Hba1c and lipid tests, if appropriate. She prefers that patients treated with biologics avoid live vaccines. She suggests other vaccines, if indicated, such as seasonal influenza and pneumonia vaccines, and for those aged 50 years and older, herpes zoster vaccine. She urges patients to call the office if they have an infection or need surgery because they may need to discuss putting a temporary hold on the biologics.
- Understand how to navigate formularies.“Getting drugs approved for patients with Medicare is a challenge,” Dr. Duffin said. It’s helpful to understand how insurers handle specific psoriasis drugs so you can choose one that’s likely to be covered if you’re unsure which one is best. The website www.covermymeds.com allows physicians to easily check insurer formularies, free of charge, she said.
- Documentation is crucial when you’re dealing with an insurer. Document body surface area, Psoriasis Area Severity Index scores, or physician global assessment measures, she advised. An app provided by the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis, is a helpful in determining these measurements, she said. Also include information about failed treatments and the rationale behind why you chose a specific treatment, she said. “If denial happens, get the details,” she said. This may turn up a clerical error on the insurer’s part that incorrectly led to a denial.
- Escalate challenges to drug denials. If the preferred treatment is denied, one option is to appeal the denial. As a resource, Dr. Duffin pointed to sample letters for appealing denials for physicians and patients on the websites for the American Academy of Dermatology and the National Psoriasis Foundation. Ask for a limited 6-month approval, she said, or have the patient write a letter to the insurer using one of the sample letter templates. Another option is to ask the insurer for a “peer-to-peer” review, she said. “Sometimes it’s really hard for insurance company folks to say no to you if you have a really good story,” she commented.
- Help your patients get financial assistance. Almost every biologic manufacturer has a patient assistance plan, which can also help with deductibles and copays, Dr. Duffin said.
Dr. Duffin discloses consulting for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sienna. She has received grant/contracted research support from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sienna, Stiefel, and UCB.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
LAS VEGAS – If you’re considering adding biologics for psoriasis to your clinical practice, dermatologist Kristina C. Duffin, MD, has some advice: Don’t expect to just use one drug, focus on comorbidities, and embrace strategies to bypass the potential obstacle of prior-authorization approvals.
Here are some tips from Dr. Duffin, who spoke at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar:
- Don’t expect a one-size-fits-all medication. “There is no one, single go-to drug,” said Dr. Duffin, who is cochair of the department of dermatology at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City. “Maybe someday, we will have a biological personalized medicine marker to say this is the right drug, but for now we don’t.” More than 10 biologics are available to treat psoriasis, she said, and more are in the pipeline.
- Pay close attention to comorbidities. It’s important to “have a good grasp” of a patient’s comorbidities, which can help focus the choice of a biologic, Dr. Duffin said. She recommends starting with an anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents for patients with psoriatic arthritis. For patients with Crohn’s disease, she recommends anti-TNF (adalimumab, infliximab) and anti-interleukin–12/23 or anti-IL-23 agents (ustekinumab). Anti-TNF agents should be avoided in patients with multiple sclerosis, and anti-IL-17 agents shouldn’t be given to patients with recurrent candidiasis, she noted.
- Encourage patients to make prompt decisions. Dr. Duffin sits down with patients to discuss various biologic options, and she goes over information in handouts. She also focuses on their needs: “Are they interested in getting better fast? Do they want to be clear for their wedding in a month?” She prefers to not let patients go home to think about what they’d like to do. Instead, she advises patients to make choices while at the office visit.
- Order lab tests and be careful about vaccines. Dr. Duffin orders the following tests for all patients who are starting on biologics: CBC, comprehensive metabolic panel, hepatitis B and C, and tuberculosis. She orders HIV, Hba1c and lipid tests, if appropriate. She prefers that patients treated with biologics avoid live vaccines. She suggests other vaccines, if indicated, such as seasonal influenza and pneumonia vaccines, and for those aged 50 years and older, herpes zoster vaccine. She urges patients to call the office if they have an infection or need surgery because they may need to discuss putting a temporary hold on the biologics.
- Understand how to navigate formularies.“Getting drugs approved for patients with Medicare is a challenge,” Dr. Duffin said. It’s helpful to understand how insurers handle specific psoriasis drugs so you can choose one that’s likely to be covered if you’re unsure which one is best. The website www.covermymeds.com allows physicians to easily check insurer formularies, free of charge, she said.
- Documentation is crucial when you’re dealing with an insurer. Document body surface area, Psoriasis Area Severity Index scores, or physician global assessment measures, she advised. An app provided by the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis, is a helpful in determining these measurements, she said. Also include information about failed treatments and the rationale behind why you chose a specific treatment, she said. “If denial happens, get the details,” she said. This may turn up a clerical error on the insurer’s part that incorrectly led to a denial.
- Escalate challenges to drug denials. If the preferred treatment is denied, one option is to appeal the denial. As a resource, Dr. Duffin pointed to sample letters for appealing denials for physicians and patients on the websites for the American Academy of Dermatology and the National Psoriasis Foundation. Ask for a limited 6-month approval, she said, or have the patient write a letter to the insurer using one of the sample letter templates. Another option is to ask the insurer for a “peer-to-peer” review, she said. “Sometimes it’s really hard for insurance company folks to say no to you if you have a really good story,” she commented.
- Help your patients get financial assistance. Almost every biologic manufacturer has a patient assistance plan, which can also help with deductibles and copays, Dr. Duffin said.
Dr. Duffin discloses consulting for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sienna. She has received grant/contracted research support from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sienna, Stiefel, and UCB.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
LAS VEGAS – If you’re considering adding biologics for psoriasis to your clinical practice, dermatologist Kristina C. Duffin, MD, has some advice: Don’t expect to just use one drug, focus on comorbidities, and embrace strategies to bypass the potential obstacle of prior-authorization approvals.
Here are some tips from Dr. Duffin, who spoke at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar:
- Don’t expect a one-size-fits-all medication. “There is no one, single go-to drug,” said Dr. Duffin, who is cochair of the department of dermatology at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City. “Maybe someday, we will have a biological personalized medicine marker to say this is the right drug, but for now we don’t.” More than 10 biologics are available to treat psoriasis, she said, and more are in the pipeline.
- Pay close attention to comorbidities. It’s important to “have a good grasp” of a patient’s comorbidities, which can help focus the choice of a biologic, Dr. Duffin said. She recommends starting with an anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents for patients with psoriatic arthritis. For patients with Crohn’s disease, she recommends anti-TNF (adalimumab, infliximab) and anti-interleukin–12/23 or anti-IL-23 agents (ustekinumab). Anti-TNF agents should be avoided in patients with multiple sclerosis, and anti-IL-17 agents shouldn’t be given to patients with recurrent candidiasis, she noted.
- Encourage patients to make prompt decisions. Dr. Duffin sits down with patients to discuss various biologic options, and she goes over information in handouts. She also focuses on their needs: “Are they interested in getting better fast? Do they want to be clear for their wedding in a month?” She prefers to not let patients go home to think about what they’d like to do. Instead, she advises patients to make choices while at the office visit.
- Order lab tests and be careful about vaccines. Dr. Duffin orders the following tests for all patients who are starting on biologics: CBC, comprehensive metabolic panel, hepatitis B and C, and tuberculosis. She orders HIV, Hba1c and lipid tests, if appropriate. She prefers that patients treated with biologics avoid live vaccines. She suggests other vaccines, if indicated, such as seasonal influenza and pneumonia vaccines, and for those aged 50 years and older, herpes zoster vaccine. She urges patients to call the office if they have an infection or need surgery because they may need to discuss putting a temporary hold on the biologics.
- Understand how to navigate formularies.“Getting drugs approved for patients with Medicare is a challenge,” Dr. Duffin said. It’s helpful to understand how insurers handle specific psoriasis drugs so you can choose one that’s likely to be covered if you’re unsure which one is best. The website www.covermymeds.com allows physicians to easily check insurer formularies, free of charge, she said.
- Documentation is crucial when you’re dealing with an insurer. Document body surface area, Psoriasis Area Severity Index scores, or physician global assessment measures, she advised. An app provided by the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis, is a helpful in determining these measurements, she said. Also include information about failed treatments and the rationale behind why you chose a specific treatment, she said. “If denial happens, get the details,” she said. This may turn up a clerical error on the insurer’s part that incorrectly led to a denial.
- Escalate challenges to drug denials. If the preferred treatment is denied, one option is to appeal the denial. As a resource, Dr. Duffin pointed to sample letters for appealing denials for physicians and patients on the websites for the American Academy of Dermatology and the National Psoriasis Foundation. Ask for a limited 6-month approval, she said, or have the patient write a letter to the insurer using one of the sample letter templates. Another option is to ask the insurer for a “peer-to-peer” review, she said. “Sometimes it’s really hard for insurance company folks to say no to you if you have a really good story,” she commented.
- Help your patients get financial assistance. Almost every biologic manufacturer has a patient assistance plan, which can also help with deductibles and copays, Dr. Duffin said.
Dr. Duffin discloses consulting for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sienna. She has received grant/contracted research support from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sienna, Stiefel, and UCB.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM SDEF LAS VEGAS DERMATOLOGY SEMINAR