Rociletinib active against resistant NSCLC

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Rociletinib active against resistant NSCLC

Rociletinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets mutations causing treatment resistance, showed sustained activity against resistant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase I clinical trial, according to a report published online April 30 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The study, sponsored by Clovis Oncology, the maker of rociletinib, involved 130 patients enrolled over the course of 2 years at 10 medical centers in the United States, France, and Australia. All the study participants had received at least one first- or second-generation EGFR inhibitor (usually erlotinib), and their NSCLC tumors had mutated and developed resistance to the therapy. Half of these patients had three or more sites of metastasis, and 44% had brain involvement, said Dr. Lecia V. Sequist of the deparment of medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and her associates.

A total of 92 patients received therapeutic doses of rociletinib. After a median follow-up of 10 weeks, the response rate among the 46 whose cancer had known EGFR T790M mutations was 59%; 43 of these 46 patients achieved a partial response, a complete response, or disease stabilization. As expected, the response rate was lower, at 29%, among the 17 patients whose tumors were T790M negative, the investigators reported (New Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 30 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1413654]).

“Rociletinib did not cause the syndrome of rash, stomatitis, and paronychia that is associated with inhibition of nonmutant EGFR,” they wrote, and the most common grade 3 toxic effect was hyperglycemia. No hyperglycemic events led to discontinuation of treatment, and most were managed with a dose reduction plus use of an oral hypoglycemic agent, usually metformin. Both the hyperglycemia and the metformin may have contributed to gastrointestinal adverse events, which were generally mild.

The main limitation of this study is the small number of patients who have received rociletinib. Larger studies of the agent are now underway, Dr. Sequist and her associates said.

This study was funded by Clovis Oncology, maker of rociletinib, which also participated in study design and data collection and analysis. Dr. Sequist reported receiving personal fees from, and consulting for, Clovis Oncology, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Genentech, Merrimack, and Taiho, and her associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
Rociletinib, NSCLC
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Rociletinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets mutations causing treatment resistance, showed sustained activity against resistant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase I clinical trial, according to a report published online April 30 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The study, sponsored by Clovis Oncology, the maker of rociletinib, involved 130 patients enrolled over the course of 2 years at 10 medical centers in the United States, France, and Australia. All the study participants had received at least one first- or second-generation EGFR inhibitor (usually erlotinib), and their NSCLC tumors had mutated and developed resistance to the therapy. Half of these patients had three or more sites of metastasis, and 44% had brain involvement, said Dr. Lecia V. Sequist of the deparment of medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and her associates.

A total of 92 patients received therapeutic doses of rociletinib. After a median follow-up of 10 weeks, the response rate among the 46 whose cancer had known EGFR T790M mutations was 59%; 43 of these 46 patients achieved a partial response, a complete response, or disease stabilization. As expected, the response rate was lower, at 29%, among the 17 patients whose tumors were T790M negative, the investigators reported (New Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 30 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1413654]).

“Rociletinib did not cause the syndrome of rash, stomatitis, and paronychia that is associated with inhibition of nonmutant EGFR,” they wrote, and the most common grade 3 toxic effect was hyperglycemia. No hyperglycemic events led to discontinuation of treatment, and most were managed with a dose reduction plus use of an oral hypoglycemic agent, usually metformin. Both the hyperglycemia and the metformin may have contributed to gastrointestinal adverse events, which were generally mild.

The main limitation of this study is the small number of patients who have received rociletinib. Larger studies of the agent are now underway, Dr. Sequist and her associates said.

This study was funded by Clovis Oncology, maker of rociletinib, which also participated in study design and data collection and analysis. Dr. Sequist reported receiving personal fees from, and consulting for, Clovis Oncology, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Genentech, Merrimack, and Taiho, and her associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

Rociletinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets mutations causing treatment resistance, showed sustained activity against resistant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase I clinical trial, according to a report published online April 30 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The study, sponsored by Clovis Oncology, the maker of rociletinib, involved 130 patients enrolled over the course of 2 years at 10 medical centers in the United States, France, and Australia. All the study participants had received at least one first- or second-generation EGFR inhibitor (usually erlotinib), and their NSCLC tumors had mutated and developed resistance to the therapy. Half of these patients had three or more sites of metastasis, and 44% had brain involvement, said Dr. Lecia V. Sequist of the deparment of medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and her associates.

A total of 92 patients received therapeutic doses of rociletinib. After a median follow-up of 10 weeks, the response rate among the 46 whose cancer had known EGFR T790M mutations was 59%; 43 of these 46 patients achieved a partial response, a complete response, or disease stabilization. As expected, the response rate was lower, at 29%, among the 17 patients whose tumors were T790M negative, the investigators reported (New Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 30 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1413654]).

“Rociletinib did not cause the syndrome of rash, stomatitis, and paronychia that is associated with inhibition of nonmutant EGFR,” they wrote, and the most common grade 3 toxic effect was hyperglycemia. No hyperglycemic events led to discontinuation of treatment, and most were managed with a dose reduction plus use of an oral hypoglycemic agent, usually metformin. Both the hyperglycemia and the metformin may have contributed to gastrointestinal adverse events, which were generally mild.

The main limitation of this study is the small number of patients who have received rociletinib. Larger studies of the agent are now underway, Dr. Sequist and her associates said.

This study was funded by Clovis Oncology, maker of rociletinib, which also participated in study design and data collection and analysis. Dr. Sequist reported receiving personal fees from, and consulting for, Clovis Oncology, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Genentech, Merrimack, and Taiho, and her associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Rociletinib active against resistant NSCLC
Display Headline
Rociletinib active against resistant NSCLC
Legacy Keywords
Rociletinib, NSCLC
Legacy Keywords
Rociletinib, NSCLC
Sections
Article Source

FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Rociletinib exerted prolonged disease control in a phase I study of resistant non–small cell lung cancer.

Major finding: After a median follow-up of 10 weeks, the response rate among the 46 patients whose NSCLC had known EGFR T790M mutations was 59%.

Data source: An international phase I trial of rociletinib in 130 patients whose NSCLC developed resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Clovis Oncology, maker of rociletinib, which also participated in study design and data collection and analysis. Dr. Sequist reported receiving personal fees from, and consulting for, Clovis Oncology, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Genentech, Merrimack, and Taiho, and her associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

New agent targets EGFR resistance in NSCLC

Cancers will continue to mutate
Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
New agent targets EGFR resistance in NSCLC

A new agent targeting tumors that develop resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors proved to be “highly active” in a phase I clinical trial involving 253 patients with advanced, resistant NSCLC, according to a report published online April 30 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Most patients who initially respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib develop resistance and show disease progression within 2 years, because the tumors develop additional EGFR mutations, particularly T790M resistance mutations. Preliminary studies suggested that a new oral agent, AZD9291, would target T790M-mediated resistance. In a phase I trial to assess its safety and efficacy, 127 study participants had known EGFR T790M mutations, and the remainder had other or unknown mutations, said Dr. Pasi A. Janne of the Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology and the Belfer Institute for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Institute, Boston, and his associates.

The study – designed and funded by AstraZeneca, which also collected and analyzed the data in conjunction with the scientific authors – was conducted at 33 sites in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, France, Spain, Germany, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Of the 239 patients who could be evaluated for a response, 123 (51%) showed a partial or complete response. In the subset of patients with known EGFR T790M mutations, the objective response rate was even higher, at 61%.

In contrast, the objective response rate was 21% in the subset of 61 patients who did not have known EGFR T790M mutations, the investigators said (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 30 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411817]). Median progression-free survival was estimated to be 9.6 months in patients with EGFR T790M-positive tumors, although many are still alive and the final survival data have yet to be calculated. In contrast, progression-free survival was 2.8 months in patients with EGFR T790M-negative tumors.

No dose-limiting toxic effects occurred and therefore the maximal efficacy dose with an acceptable level of adverse events cannot be established yet. The most common adverse events were diarrhea (47% of patients), rash (40%), nausea (22%), and decreased appetite (21%). Serious events that were considered to be possibly treatment-related occurred in 6% of patients, and included one fatal case of pneumonia and six cases of pneumonitis-like events that resolved when the drug was discontinued.

These findings demonstrate that “a structurally distinct EGFR inhibitor, one that is selective for the mutated form of EGFR, can be clinically effective and has a side-effect profile that is not dose limiting in the majority of patients in whom T790M-mediated drug resistance has developed,” Dr. Janne and his associates said.

Astra Zeneca is the maker of AZD9291. Dr. Janne reported ties to AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Pfizer, Merrimack, Clovis Oncology, Roche, and Gatekeeper, as well as several patents related to genetically targeted cancer treatments; his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

References

Click for Credit Link
Body

Finding effective and relatively safe agents to address drug resistance in NSCLC is encouraging, and there is every reason to be cautiously optimistic about lung cancer treatment. But it is almost certain that cancer cells will continue to evolve and eventually develop resistance to these agents also.

The keys to keeping up with evolving cancers are to continue performing genomic analysis of resistant lesions and to translate laboratory findings to the clinic as rapidly as possible.

Dr. Ramaswamy Govindan is with the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University, St. Louis. He reported receiving consulting fees and honoraria from Pfizer, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clovis Oncology, Helsinn Healthcare, Genentech, AbbVie, and GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Govindan made these remarks in an editorial accompanying Dr. Janne’s report (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 30 [doi:10.1056/NEJMe1500181]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Sections
Click for Credit Link
Click for Credit Link
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Body

Finding effective and relatively safe agents to address drug resistance in NSCLC is encouraging, and there is every reason to be cautiously optimistic about lung cancer treatment. But it is almost certain that cancer cells will continue to evolve and eventually develop resistance to these agents also.

The keys to keeping up with evolving cancers are to continue performing genomic analysis of resistant lesions and to translate laboratory findings to the clinic as rapidly as possible.

Dr. Ramaswamy Govindan is with the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University, St. Louis. He reported receiving consulting fees and honoraria from Pfizer, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clovis Oncology, Helsinn Healthcare, Genentech, AbbVie, and GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Govindan made these remarks in an editorial accompanying Dr. Janne’s report (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 30 [doi:10.1056/NEJMe1500181]).

Body

Finding effective and relatively safe agents to address drug resistance in NSCLC is encouraging, and there is every reason to be cautiously optimistic about lung cancer treatment. But it is almost certain that cancer cells will continue to evolve and eventually develop resistance to these agents also.

The keys to keeping up with evolving cancers are to continue performing genomic analysis of resistant lesions and to translate laboratory findings to the clinic as rapidly as possible.

Dr. Ramaswamy Govindan is with the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University, St. Louis. He reported receiving consulting fees and honoraria from Pfizer, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clovis Oncology, Helsinn Healthcare, Genentech, AbbVie, and GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Govindan made these remarks in an editorial accompanying Dr. Janne’s report (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 30 [doi:10.1056/NEJMe1500181]).

Title
Cancers will continue to mutate
Cancers will continue to mutate

A new agent targeting tumors that develop resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors proved to be “highly active” in a phase I clinical trial involving 253 patients with advanced, resistant NSCLC, according to a report published online April 30 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Most patients who initially respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib develop resistance and show disease progression within 2 years, because the tumors develop additional EGFR mutations, particularly T790M resistance mutations. Preliminary studies suggested that a new oral agent, AZD9291, would target T790M-mediated resistance. In a phase I trial to assess its safety and efficacy, 127 study participants had known EGFR T790M mutations, and the remainder had other or unknown mutations, said Dr. Pasi A. Janne of the Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology and the Belfer Institute for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Institute, Boston, and his associates.

The study – designed and funded by AstraZeneca, which also collected and analyzed the data in conjunction with the scientific authors – was conducted at 33 sites in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, France, Spain, Germany, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Of the 239 patients who could be evaluated for a response, 123 (51%) showed a partial or complete response. In the subset of patients with known EGFR T790M mutations, the objective response rate was even higher, at 61%.

In contrast, the objective response rate was 21% in the subset of 61 patients who did not have known EGFR T790M mutations, the investigators said (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 30 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411817]). Median progression-free survival was estimated to be 9.6 months in patients with EGFR T790M-positive tumors, although many are still alive and the final survival data have yet to be calculated. In contrast, progression-free survival was 2.8 months in patients with EGFR T790M-negative tumors.

No dose-limiting toxic effects occurred and therefore the maximal efficacy dose with an acceptable level of adverse events cannot be established yet. The most common adverse events were diarrhea (47% of patients), rash (40%), nausea (22%), and decreased appetite (21%). Serious events that were considered to be possibly treatment-related occurred in 6% of patients, and included one fatal case of pneumonia and six cases of pneumonitis-like events that resolved when the drug was discontinued.

These findings demonstrate that “a structurally distinct EGFR inhibitor, one that is selective for the mutated form of EGFR, can be clinically effective and has a side-effect profile that is not dose limiting in the majority of patients in whom T790M-mediated drug resistance has developed,” Dr. Janne and his associates said.

Astra Zeneca is the maker of AZD9291. Dr. Janne reported ties to AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Pfizer, Merrimack, Clovis Oncology, Roche, and Gatekeeper, as well as several patents related to genetically targeted cancer treatments; his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

A new agent targeting tumors that develop resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors proved to be “highly active” in a phase I clinical trial involving 253 patients with advanced, resistant NSCLC, according to a report published online April 30 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Most patients who initially respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib develop resistance and show disease progression within 2 years, because the tumors develop additional EGFR mutations, particularly T790M resistance mutations. Preliminary studies suggested that a new oral agent, AZD9291, would target T790M-mediated resistance. In a phase I trial to assess its safety and efficacy, 127 study participants had known EGFR T790M mutations, and the remainder had other or unknown mutations, said Dr. Pasi A. Janne of the Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology and the Belfer Institute for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Institute, Boston, and his associates.

The study – designed and funded by AstraZeneca, which also collected and analyzed the data in conjunction with the scientific authors – was conducted at 33 sites in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, France, Spain, Germany, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Of the 239 patients who could be evaluated for a response, 123 (51%) showed a partial or complete response. In the subset of patients with known EGFR T790M mutations, the objective response rate was even higher, at 61%.

In contrast, the objective response rate was 21% in the subset of 61 patients who did not have known EGFR T790M mutations, the investigators said (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 30 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411817]). Median progression-free survival was estimated to be 9.6 months in patients with EGFR T790M-positive tumors, although many are still alive and the final survival data have yet to be calculated. In contrast, progression-free survival was 2.8 months in patients with EGFR T790M-negative tumors.

No dose-limiting toxic effects occurred and therefore the maximal efficacy dose with an acceptable level of adverse events cannot be established yet. The most common adverse events were diarrhea (47% of patients), rash (40%), nausea (22%), and decreased appetite (21%). Serious events that were considered to be possibly treatment-related occurred in 6% of patients, and included one fatal case of pneumonia and six cases of pneumonitis-like events that resolved when the drug was discontinued.

These findings demonstrate that “a structurally distinct EGFR inhibitor, one that is selective for the mutated form of EGFR, can be clinically effective and has a side-effect profile that is not dose limiting in the majority of patients in whom T790M-mediated drug resistance has developed,” Dr. Janne and his associates said.

Astra Zeneca is the maker of AZD9291. Dr. Janne reported ties to AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Pfizer, Merrimack, Clovis Oncology, Roche, and Gatekeeper, as well as several patents related to genetically targeted cancer treatments; his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
New agent targets EGFR resistance in NSCLC
Display Headline
New agent targets EGFR resistance in NSCLC
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: AZD9291 was highly active against advanced NSCLC that had mutated to become resistant to treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Major finding: The objective response rate was 51% in the entire study population and 61% in the subset of patients with known EGFR T790M mutations.

Data source: An industry-funded phase I clinical trial of 253 patients in nine countries whose advanced NSCLC had developed treatment resistance.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Astra Zeneca, maker of AZD9291. Dr. Janne reported ties to AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Pfizer, Merrimack, Clovis Oncology, Roche, and Gatekeeper, as well as several patents related to genetically targeted cancer treatments; his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

Implantable filter doesn’t cut rate of recurrent PE

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Implantable filter doesn’t cut rate of recurrent PE

Implanting a retrievable filter in the inferior vena cava did not reduce the rate of recurrent pulmonary embolism or mortality in high-risk patients, according to a report published online April 28 in JAMA.

In recent years, there has been a sharp increase in the use of these devices as an add-on to anticoagulant therapy among patients hospitalized for acute PE associated with lower-limb deep or superficial vein thrombosis. Several clinical guidelines advocate this strategy, though others do not, citing the paucity of reliable data concerning both risks and benefits.

The findings in this study “do not support the use of this type of filter in patients who can be treated with anticoagulation alone,” and clinical guidelines recommending this approach should be reexamined, Dr. Patrick Mismetti of the University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, France, and his associates said.

They performed a randomized, open-label clinical study at 17 French medical centers to compare anticoagulation alone against anticoagulation plus implanting a filter to be retrieved 3 months later.

The study participants were 399 adults enrolled during a 6-year period who were deemed at high risk for recurrent PE because of advanced age, active cancer, chronic cardiac or respiratory insufficiency, ischemic stroke with leg paralysis, DVT that was bilateral or affected the iliocaval segment, or signs of right ventricular dysfunction or myocardial injury.

The primary efficacy outcome, recurrent PE within 3 months of hospitalization, developed in 6 of 200 patients assigned to receive an implantable filter (3%) and 3 of the 199 assigned to the control group (1.5%). All but one of these episodes of recurrent PE were fatal. One additional PE developed in each study group between 3 and 6 months. There were no differences between patients who received an inferior vena cava filter and those who did not in the incidence of DVT, major bleeding, or death from any cause at 3 or 6 months, the investigators said (JAMA 2015 April 28 [doi:10.1001/jama.2015.3780]).

Besides failing to prevent recurrent PE, the filter implantation caused access site hematomas in five patients, and the filter itself caused thrombosis formation in three. One patient developed cardiac arrest during the procedure. In addition, retrieval of the device failed in 11 patients because of mechanical problems.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
implantable filter, PE, pulmonary embolism
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Implanting a retrievable filter in the inferior vena cava did not reduce the rate of recurrent pulmonary embolism or mortality in high-risk patients, according to a report published online April 28 in JAMA.

In recent years, there has been a sharp increase in the use of these devices as an add-on to anticoagulant therapy among patients hospitalized for acute PE associated with lower-limb deep or superficial vein thrombosis. Several clinical guidelines advocate this strategy, though others do not, citing the paucity of reliable data concerning both risks and benefits.

The findings in this study “do not support the use of this type of filter in patients who can be treated with anticoagulation alone,” and clinical guidelines recommending this approach should be reexamined, Dr. Patrick Mismetti of the University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, France, and his associates said.

They performed a randomized, open-label clinical study at 17 French medical centers to compare anticoagulation alone against anticoagulation plus implanting a filter to be retrieved 3 months later.

The study participants were 399 adults enrolled during a 6-year period who were deemed at high risk for recurrent PE because of advanced age, active cancer, chronic cardiac or respiratory insufficiency, ischemic stroke with leg paralysis, DVT that was bilateral or affected the iliocaval segment, or signs of right ventricular dysfunction or myocardial injury.

The primary efficacy outcome, recurrent PE within 3 months of hospitalization, developed in 6 of 200 patients assigned to receive an implantable filter (3%) and 3 of the 199 assigned to the control group (1.5%). All but one of these episodes of recurrent PE were fatal. One additional PE developed in each study group between 3 and 6 months. There were no differences between patients who received an inferior vena cava filter and those who did not in the incidence of DVT, major bleeding, or death from any cause at 3 or 6 months, the investigators said (JAMA 2015 April 28 [doi:10.1001/jama.2015.3780]).

Besides failing to prevent recurrent PE, the filter implantation caused access site hematomas in five patients, and the filter itself caused thrombosis formation in three. One patient developed cardiac arrest during the procedure. In addition, retrieval of the device failed in 11 patients because of mechanical problems.

Implanting a retrievable filter in the inferior vena cava did not reduce the rate of recurrent pulmonary embolism or mortality in high-risk patients, according to a report published online April 28 in JAMA.

In recent years, there has been a sharp increase in the use of these devices as an add-on to anticoagulant therapy among patients hospitalized for acute PE associated with lower-limb deep or superficial vein thrombosis. Several clinical guidelines advocate this strategy, though others do not, citing the paucity of reliable data concerning both risks and benefits.

The findings in this study “do not support the use of this type of filter in patients who can be treated with anticoagulation alone,” and clinical guidelines recommending this approach should be reexamined, Dr. Patrick Mismetti of the University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, France, and his associates said.

They performed a randomized, open-label clinical study at 17 French medical centers to compare anticoagulation alone against anticoagulation plus implanting a filter to be retrieved 3 months later.

The study participants were 399 adults enrolled during a 6-year period who were deemed at high risk for recurrent PE because of advanced age, active cancer, chronic cardiac or respiratory insufficiency, ischemic stroke with leg paralysis, DVT that was bilateral or affected the iliocaval segment, or signs of right ventricular dysfunction or myocardial injury.

The primary efficacy outcome, recurrent PE within 3 months of hospitalization, developed in 6 of 200 patients assigned to receive an implantable filter (3%) and 3 of the 199 assigned to the control group (1.5%). All but one of these episodes of recurrent PE were fatal. One additional PE developed in each study group between 3 and 6 months. There were no differences between patients who received an inferior vena cava filter and those who did not in the incidence of DVT, major bleeding, or death from any cause at 3 or 6 months, the investigators said (JAMA 2015 April 28 [doi:10.1001/jama.2015.3780]).

Besides failing to prevent recurrent PE, the filter implantation caused access site hematomas in five patients, and the filter itself caused thrombosis formation in three. One patient developed cardiac arrest during the procedure. In addition, retrieval of the device failed in 11 patients because of mechanical problems.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Implantable filter doesn’t cut rate of recurrent PE
Display Headline
Implantable filter doesn’t cut rate of recurrent PE
Legacy Keywords
implantable filter, PE, pulmonary embolism
Legacy Keywords
implantable filter, PE, pulmonary embolism
Sections
Article Source

FROM JAMA

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Use of a retrievable filter implanted in the inferior vena cava did not reduce the rate of recurrent pulmonary embolism.

Major finding: The primary efficacy outcome, recurrent PE within 3 months of hospitalization, developed in 6 of 200 patients assigned to receive an implantable filter (3%) and 3 of 199 assigned to the control group (1.5%).

Data source: An open-label randomized trial involving 399 adults hospitalized in France for acute PE.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by the University Hospital of Saint-Etienne and supported by the French Department of Health, Fondation de l’Avenir, and Fondation de France. Vena cava filters were provided free of charge by ALN Implants Chirurgicaux. Dr. Mismetti and his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

More than 75% with sickle cell crises don’t get hydroxyurea

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
More than 75% with sickle cell crises don’t get hydroxyurea

More than 75% of adults with sickle cell anemia who have frequent pain crises fail to receive hydroxyurea therapy as strongly recommended in National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute clinical guidelines, according to a Research Letter to the Editor published online April 28 in JAMA.

Despite proven benefits in decreasing pain crises, hospitalizations, blood transfusions, and possibly mortality, hydroxyurea, a “safe and inexpensive drug,” is thought to be underused. To document the actual use of the drug when indicated, investigators analyzed information in a nationwide insurance claims database covering nearly 27 million patients per year. They focused on the records of 570 adults hospitalized or treated in an emergency department for a sickle cell pain crisis at least three times during a 1-year period, said Dr. Nicolas Stettler of the Lewin Group, a health care consulting firm in Falls Church, Va., and his associates.

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Osaro Erhabor/Creative Commons License

Only 15.1% of these patients received hydroxyurea within 3 months of their third crisis, only 18.2% received the agent within 6 months, and only 22.7% received it within 12 months. These figures likely represent a conservative estimate of the hydroxyurea treatment gap, since the study didn’t include the large uninsured and publicly insured populations who have more limited access to health care, Dr. Stettler and his associates noted (JAMA 2015;313:1671-2).

Several barriers to this treatment have been identified in previous research, including fear of adverse events, lack of clinician training, and failure to use shared decision making. “To address this gap, it may be necessary to enhance patient outreach and clinician training and develop health care quality measures aimed at increasing the use of hydroxyurea for all patients who would benefit,” they added.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
sickle cell disease
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

More than 75% of adults with sickle cell anemia who have frequent pain crises fail to receive hydroxyurea therapy as strongly recommended in National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute clinical guidelines, according to a Research Letter to the Editor published online April 28 in JAMA.

Despite proven benefits in decreasing pain crises, hospitalizations, blood transfusions, and possibly mortality, hydroxyurea, a “safe and inexpensive drug,” is thought to be underused. To document the actual use of the drug when indicated, investigators analyzed information in a nationwide insurance claims database covering nearly 27 million patients per year. They focused on the records of 570 adults hospitalized or treated in an emergency department for a sickle cell pain crisis at least three times during a 1-year period, said Dr. Nicolas Stettler of the Lewin Group, a health care consulting firm in Falls Church, Va., and his associates.

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Osaro Erhabor/Creative Commons License

Only 15.1% of these patients received hydroxyurea within 3 months of their third crisis, only 18.2% received the agent within 6 months, and only 22.7% received it within 12 months. These figures likely represent a conservative estimate of the hydroxyurea treatment gap, since the study didn’t include the large uninsured and publicly insured populations who have more limited access to health care, Dr. Stettler and his associates noted (JAMA 2015;313:1671-2).

Several barriers to this treatment have been identified in previous research, including fear of adverse events, lack of clinician training, and failure to use shared decision making. “To address this gap, it may be necessary to enhance patient outreach and clinician training and develop health care quality measures aimed at increasing the use of hydroxyurea for all patients who would benefit,” they added.

More than 75% of adults with sickle cell anemia who have frequent pain crises fail to receive hydroxyurea therapy as strongly recommended in National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute clinical guidelines, according to a Research Letter to the Editor published online April 28 in JAMA.

Despite proven benefits in decreasing pain crises, hospitalizations, blood transfusions, and possibly mortality, hydroxyurea, a “safe and inexpensive drug,” is thought to be underused. To document the actual use of the drug when indicated, investigators analyzed information in a nationwide insurance claims database covering nearly 27 million patients per year. They focused on the records of 570 adults hospitalized or treated in an emergency department for a sickle cell pain crisis at least three times during a 1-year period, said Dr. Nicolas Stettler of the Lewin Group, a health care consulting firm in Falls Church, Va., and his associates.

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Osaro Erhabor/Creative Commons License

Only 15.1% of these patients received hydroxyurea within 3 months of their third crisis, only 18.2% received the agent within 6 months, and only 22.7% received it within 12 months. These figures likely represent a conservative estimate of the hydroxyurea treatment gap, since the study didn’t include the large uninsured and publicly insured populations who have more limited access to health care, Dr. Stettler and his associates noted (JAMA 2015;313:1671-2).

Several barriers to this treatment have been identified in previous research, including fear of adverse events, lack of clinician training, and failure to use shared decision making. “To address this gap, it may be necessary to enhance patient outreach and clinician training and develop health care quality measures aimed at increasing the use of hydroxyurea for all patients who would benefit,” they added.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
More than 75% with sickle cell crises don’t get hydroxyurea
Display Headline
More than 75% with sickle cell crises don’t get hydroxyurea
Legacy Keywords
sickle cell disease
Legacy Keywords
sickle cell disease
Article Source

FROM JAMA

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: More than 75% of adults with sickle cell anemia who have frequent pain crises fail to get hydroxyurea therapy as recommended.

Major finding: Only 15.1% of adults with sickle cell anemia received hydroxyurea within 3 months of their third pain crisis, only 18.2% received the agent within 6 months, and only 22.7% received it within 12 months.

Data source: An analysis of information in a large nationwide insurance claims database involving 570 adults with frequent hospitalizations for sickle cell pain crises.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the Lewin Group, a health care consulting firm. Dr. Stettler and his associates reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

CVD Risk Persists for 40 Years in Hodgkin’s Survivors

Rise to the challenge
Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
CVD Risk Persists for 40 Years in Hodgkin’s Survivors

People who survive Hodgkin’s lymphoma in adolescence or young adulthood remain at very high risk for cardiovascular disease for at least 40 years – the longest period for which they have been followed, according to the results of a retrospective cohort study of more than 2,500 patients.

Until now, follow-up studies of such patients “rarely exceeded 20-25 years,” before most survivors reached the age at which cardiovascular disease (CVD) becomes commonplace in the general population. To compare CVD rates between survivors and the general population at later ages, investigators examined the medical records of 2,524 individuals who survived 5 years or more after being treated for Hodgkin’s lymphoma as adolescents or young adults at five Dutch medical centers between 1965 and 1995.

A total of 81% of the cohort had received mediastinal radiotherapy and 31% had received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. After 5-47 years of follow-up, 797 of these patients experienced 1,713 cardiovascular events. The most frequently occurring events included 401 coronary heart disease events (such as myocardial infarction and angina pectoris), 374 valvular heart disease events, and 140 heart failure events (such as cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure), Frederika A. van Nimwegen of the department of epidemiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, and her colleagues wrote in JAMA Internal Medicine on April 27 (doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1180).

Compared with the general population, Hodgkin’s survivors had a 3.2-fold higher standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of developing coronary heart disease and a 6.8-fold higher SIR of developing heart failure, corresponding to 70 excess cases of coronary heart disease and 58 excess cases of heart failure per 10,000 person-years.

These risks were significantly higher for survivors than for the general population at all ages, but patients who had been diagnosed and treated before the age of 25 years were at particularly elevated risk: they carried a 4.6- to 7.5-fold higher risk of coronary heart disease and a 10.9- to 40.5-fold higher risk of heart failure. At 40 years after Hodgkin’s diagnosis and treatment, the cumulative incidence of any type of CVD was 50%, the investigators wrote. Both survivors of Hodgkin’s lymphoma and their physicians should be aware that these patients remain at substantially increased cardiovascular risk throughout their lives, Ms. Van Nimwegen and her colleagues wrote.

This study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society. Ms. van Nimwegen and her colleagues reported having no financial disclosures.

References

Body

Primary care physicians must rise to the challenge of promoting the health of cancer survivors. Previous research suggests that many are not comfortable caring for this patient population and report knowledge gaps regarding the additional screening and surveillance they require. Most patients in the study by Ms. van Nimwegen and her colleagues were not screened for CVD.

Asking just a few key questions will identify these patients: What kind of cancer did you have? How old were you at diagnosis? Did you receive any chest radiotherapy? Did you receive doxorubicin (which they may know only by the brand name Adriamycin)? Our clinical experience has been that patients typically know the answers to these basic questions, which is a simple way of identifying those at increased risk.

Dr. Emily Tonorezos is with the department of medicine at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and at Cornell University, both in New York. Dr. Linda Overholser is with the division of general internal medicine at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora. They reported having no relevant financial disclosures. These comments are adapted from an accompanying editorial written by Dr. Tonorezos and Dr. Overholser (JAMA Intern. Med. 2015 April 27 [doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1187]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Mary Ann Moon, Family Practice News Digital Network

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Mary Ann Moon, Family Practice News Digital Network

Author and Disclosure Information

Mary Ann Moon, Family Practice News Digital Network

Body

Primary care physicians must rise to the challenge of promoting the health of cancer survivors. Previous research suggests that many are not comfortable caring for this patient population and report knowledge gaps regarding the additional screening and surveillance they require. Most patients in the study by Ms. van Nimwegen and her colleagues were not screened for CVD.

Asking just a few key questions will identify these patients: What kind of cancer did you have? How old were you at diagnosis? Did you receive any chest radiotherapy? Did you receive doxorubicin (which they may know only by the brand name Adriamycin)? Our clinical experience has been that patients typically know the answers to these basic questions, which is a simple way of identifying those at increased risk.

Dr. Emily Tonorezos is with the department of medicine at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and at Cornell University, both in New York. Dr. Linda Overholser is with the division of general internal medicine at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora. They reported having no relevant financial disclosures. These comments are adapted from an accompanying editorial written by Dr. Tonorezos and Dr. Overholser (JAMA Intern. Med. 2015 April 27 [doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1187]).

Body

Primary care physicians must rise to the challenge of promoting the health of cancer survivors. Previous research suggests that many are not comfortable caring for this patient population and report knowledge gaps regarding the additional screening and surveillance they require. Most patients in the study by Ms. van Nimwegen and her colleagues were not screened for CVD.

Asking just a few key questions will identify these patients: What kind of cancer did you have? How old were you at diagnosis? Did you receive any chest radiotherapy? Did you receive doxorubicin (which they may know only by the brand name Adriamycin)? Our clinical experience has been that patients typically know the answers to these basic questions, which is a simple way of identifying those at increased risk.

Dr. Emily Tonorezos is with the department of medicine at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and at Cornell University, both in New York. Dr. Linda Overholser is with the division of general internal medicine at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora. They reported having no relevant financial disclosures. These comments are adapted from an accompanying editorial written by Dr. Tonorezos and Dr. Overholser (JAMA Intern. Med. 2015 April 27 [doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1187]).

Title
Rise to the challenge
Rise to the challenge

People who survive Hodgkin’s lymphoma in adolescence or young adulthood remain at very high risk for cardiovascular disease for at least 40 years – the longest period for which they have been followed, according to the results of a retrospective cohort study of more than 2,500 patients.

Until now, follow-up studies of such patients “rarely exceeded 20-25 years,” before most survivors reached the age at which cardiovascular disease (CVD) becomes commonplace in the general population. To compare CVD rates between survivors and the general population at later ages, investigators examined the medical records of 2,524 individuals who survived 5 years or more after being treated for Hodgkin’s lymphoma as adolescents or young adults at five Dutch medical centers between 1965 and 1995.

A total of 81% of the cohort had received mediastinal radiotherapy and 31% had received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. After 5-47 years of follow-up, 797 of these patients experienced 1,713 cardiovascular events. The most frequently occurring events included 401 coronary heart disease events (such as myocardial infarction and angina pectoris), 374 valvular heart disease events, and 140 heart failure events (such as cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure), Frederika A. van Nimwegen of the department of epidemiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, and her colleagues wrote in JAMA Internal Medicine on April 27 (doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1180).

Compared with the general population, Hodgkin’s survivors had a 3.2-fold higher standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of developing coronary heart disease and a 6.8-fold higher SIR of developing heart failure, corresponding to 70 excess cases of coronary heart disease and 58 excess cases of heart failure per 10,000 person-years.

These risks were significantly higher for survivors than for the general population at all ages, but patients who had been diagnosed and treated before the age of 25 years were at particularly elevated risk: they carried a 4.6- to 7.5-fold higher risk of coronary heart disease and a 10.9- to 40.5-fold higher risk of heart failure. At 40 years after Hodgkin’s diagnosis and treatment, the cumulative incidence of any type of CVD was 50%, the investigators wrote. Both survivors of Hodgkin’s lymphoma and their physicians should be aware that these patients remain at substantially increased cardiovascular risk throughout their lives, Ms. Van Nimwegen and her colleagues wrote.

This study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society. Ms. van Nimwegen and her colleagues reported having no financial disclosures.

People who survive Hodgkin’s lymphoma in adolescence or young adulthood remain at very high risk for cardiovascular disease for at least 40 years – the longest period for which they have been followed, according to the results of a retrospective cohort study of more than 2,500 patients.

Until now, follow-up studies of such patients “rarely exceeded 20-25 years,” before most survivors reached the age at which cardiovascular disease (CVD) becomes commonplace in the general population. To compare CVD rates between survivors and the general population at later ages, investigators examined the medical records of 2,524 individuals who survived 5 years or more after being treated for Hodgkin’s lymphoma as adolescents or young adults at five Dutch medical centers between 1965 and 1995.

A total of 81% of the cohort had received mediastinal radiotherapy and 31% had received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. After 5-47 years of follow-up, 797 of these patients experienced 1,713 cardiovascular events. The most frequently occurring events included 401 coronary heart disease events (such as myocardial infarction and angina pectoris), 374 valvular heart disease events, and 140 heart failure events (such as cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure), Frederika A. van Nimwegen of the department of epidemiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, and her colleagues wrote in JAMA Internal Medicine on April 27 (doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1180).

Compared with the general population, Hodgkin’s survivors had a 3.2-fold higher standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of developing coronary heart disease and a 6.8-fold higher SIR of developing heart failure, corresponding to 70 excess cases of coronary heart disease and 58 excess cases of heart failure per 10,000 person-years.

These risks were significantly higher for survivors than for the general population at all ages, but patients who had been diagnosed and treated before the age of 25 years were at particularly elevated risk: they carried a 4.6- to 7.5-fold higher risk of coronary heart disease and a 10.9- to 40.5-fold higher risk of heart failure. At 40 years after Hodgkin’s diagnosis and treatment, the cumulative incidence of any type of CVD was 50%, the investigators wrote. Both survivors of Hodgkin’s lymphoma and their physicians should be aware that these patients remain at substantially increased cardiovascular risk throughout their lives, Ms. Van Nimwegen and her colleagues wrote.

This study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society. Ms. van Nimwegen and her colleagues reported having no financial disclosures.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
CVD Risk Persists for 40 Years in Hodgkin’s Survivors
Display Headline
CVD Risk Persists for 40 Years in Hodgkin’s Survivors
Article Source

FROM JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

More physicians support Democratic candidates

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
More physicians support Democratic candidates

Most U.S. physicians who made political contributions during the 2013-2014 congressional election cycle donated to Democrats, continuing the trend away from Republicans that was first noted among medical professionals between 1991 and 2012, according to a report published April 27 in JAMA Internal Medicine.

In an analysis of physicians’ federal political contributions, 55% of contributors donated to Democrats and 45% to Republicans during the most recent congressional election cycle. In contrast, general public support resulted in the “Republican surge” in which conservatives gained nine Senate seats and increased their majority in the House, said Adam Bonica, Ph.D., of the department of political science, Stanford (Calif.) University, and his associates.

© BrianAJackson/Thinkstock

The current report shows that the shift away from predominantly Republican and toward predominantly Democratic support, which began in the 1990s, still persists for physicians.

“Given the increasing numbers of women physicians and salaried physicians, who typically ally with the Democrats, in contrast to surgeons, who typically ally with the Republicans, our findings suggest that the medical profession will be challenged to achieve consensus on health policy issues. The profession is unlikely to speak with one voice on questions such as the provision of health insurance or controlling the costs of medical care,” the investigators wrote (JAMA Intern. Med. 2015 April 27 [doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1332]).

However, this polarization among physicians “may spur both political parties to work harder to maintain and increase physicians’ support. Thus, the political divisions among physicians may have the unintended effect of enhancing the political standing of the medical profession,” they added.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
elections, vote, donate, candidate, politics, doctors
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Most U.S. physicians who made political contributions during the 2013-2014 congressional election cycle donated to Democrats, continuing the trend away from Republicans that was first noted among medical professionals between 1991 and 2012, according to a report published April 27 in JAMA Internal Medicine.

In an analysis of physicians’ federal political contributions, 55% of contributors donated to Democrats and 45% to Republicans during the most recent congressional election cycle. In contrast, general public support resulted in the “Republican surge” in which conservatives gained nine Senate seats and increased their majority in the House, said Adam Bonica, Ph.D., of the department of political science, Stanford (Calif.) University, and his associates.

© BrianAJackson/Thinkstock

The current report shows that the shift away from predominantly Republican and toward predominantly Democratic support, which began in the 1990s, still persists for physicians.

“Given the increasing numbers of women physicians and salaried physicians, who typically ally with the Democrats, in contrast to surgeons, who typically ally with the Republicans, our findings suggest that the medical profession will be challenged to achieve consensus on health policy issues. The profession is unlikely to speak with one voice on questions such as the provision of health insurance or controlling the costs of medical care,” the investigators wrote (JAMA Intern. Med. 2015 April 27 [doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1332]).

However, this polarization among physicians “may spur both political parties to work harder to maintain and increase physicians’ support. Thus, the political divisions among physicians may have the unintended effect of enhancing the political standing of the medical profession,” they added.

Most U.S. physicians who made political contributions during the 2013-2014 congressional election cycle donated to Democrats, continuing the trend away from Republicans that was first noted among medical professionals between 1991 and 2012, according to a report published April 27 in JAMA Internal Medicine.

In an analysis of physicians’ federal political contributions, 55% of contributors donated to Democrats and 45% to Republicans during the most recent congressional election cycle. In contrast, general public support resulted in the “Republican surge” in which conservatives gained nine Senate seats and increased their majority in the House, said Adam Bonica, Ph.D., of the department of political science, Stanford (Calif.) University, and his associates.

© BrianAJackson/Thinkstock

The current report shows that the shift away from predominantly Republican and toward predominantly Democratic support, which began in the 1990s, still persists for physicians.

“Given the increasing numbers of women physicians and salaried physicians, who typically ally with the Democrats, in contrast to surgeons, who typically ally with the Republicans, our findings suggest that the medical profession will be challenged to achieve consensus on health policy issues. The profession is unlikely to speak with one voice on questions such as the provision of health insurance or controlling the costs of medical care,” the investigators wrote (JAMA Intern. Med. 2015 April 27 [doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1332]).

However, this polarization among physicians “may spur both political parties to work harder to maintain and increase physicians’ support. Thus, the political divisions among physicians may have the unintended effect of enhancing the political standing of the medical profession,” they added.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
More physicians support Democratic candidates
Display Headline
More physicians support Democratic candidates
Legacy Keywords
elections, vote, donate, candidate, politics, doctors
Legacy Keywords
elections, vote, donate, candidate, politics, doctors
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: More physicians contributed to Democratic candidates in the 2013-2014 congressional election cycle, despite the “Republican surge.”

Major finding: Fifty-five percent of physicians who contributed to federal congressional campaigns during the most recent election cycle donated to Democrats, while 45% donated to Republicans.

Data source: An analysis of 2013 and 2014 federal campaign contributions from physicians.

Disclosures: The authors reported no relevant conflicts of interest.

CVD risk persists for 40 years in Hodgkin’s survivors

Rise to the challenge
Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
CVD risk persists for 40 years in Hodgkin’s survivors

People who survive Hodgkin’s lymphoma in adolescence or young adulthood remain at very high risk for cardiovascular disease for at least 40 years – the longest period for which they have been followed, according to the results of a retrospective cohort study of more than 2,500 patients.

Until now, follow-up studies of such patients “rarely exceeded 20-25 years,” before most survivors reached the age at which cardiovascular disease (CVD) becomes commonplace in the general population. To compare CVD rates between survivors and the general population at later ages, investigators examined the medical records of 2,524 individuals who survived 5 years or more after being treated for Hodgkin’s lymphoma as adolescents or young adults at five Dutch medical centers between 1965 and 1995.

A total of 81% of the cohort had received mediastinal radiotherapy and 31% had received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. After 5-47 years of follow-up, 797 of these patients experienced 1,713 cardiovascular events. The most frequently occurring events included 401 coronary heart disease events (such as myocardial infarction and angina pectoris), 374 valvular heart disease events, and 140 heart failure events (such as cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure), Frederika A. van Nimwegen of the department of epidemiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, and her colleagues wrote in JAMA Internal Medicine on April 27 (doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1180).

Compared with the general population, Hodgkin’s survivors had a 3.2-fold higher standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of developing coronary heart disease and a 6.8-fold higher SIR of developing heart failure, corresponding to 70 excess cases of coronary heart disease and 58 excess cases of heart failure per 10,000 person-years.

These risks were significantly higher for survivors than for the general population at all ages, but patients who had been diagnosed and treated before the age of 25 years were at particularly elevated risk: they carried a 4.6- to 7.5-fold higher risk of coronary heart disease and a 10.9- to 40.5-fold higher risk of heart failure. At 40 years after Hodgkin’s diagnosis and treatment, the cumulative incidence of any type of CVD was 50%, the investigators wrote. Both survivors of Hodgkin’s lymphoma and their physicians should be aware that these patients remain at substantially increased cardiovascular risk throughout their lives, Ms. Van Nimwegen and her colleagues wrote.

This study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society. Ms. van Nimwegen and her colleagues reported having no financial disclosures.

References

Click for Credit Link
Body

Primary care physicians must rise to the challenge of promoting the health of cancer survivors. Previous research suggests that many are not comfortable caring for this patient population and report knowledge gaps regarding the additional screening and surveillance they require. Most patients in the study by Ms. van Nimwegen and her colleagues were not screened for CVD.

Asking just a few key questions will identify these patients: What kind of cancer did you have? How old were you at diagnosis? Did you receive any chest radiotherapy? Did you receive doxorubicin (which they may know only by the brand name Adriamycin)? Our clinical experience has been that patients typically know the answers to these basic questions, which is a simple way of identifying those at increased risk.

Dr. Emily Tonorezos is with the department of medicine at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and at Cornell University, both in New York. Dr. Linda Overholser is with the division of general internal medicine at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora. They reported having no relevant financial disclosures. These comments are adapted from an accompanying editorial written by Dr. Tonorezos and Dr. Overholser (JAMA Intern. Med. 2015 April 27 [doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1187]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Click for Credit Link
Click for Credit Link
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Body

Primary care physicians must rise to the challenge of promoting the health of cancer survivors. Previous research suggests that many are not comfortable caring for this patient population and report knowledge gaps regarding the additional screening and surveillance they require. Most patients in the study by Ms. van Nimwegen and her colleagues were not screened for CVD.

Asking just a few key questions will identify these patients: What kind of cancer did you have? How old were you at diagnosis? Did you receive any chest radiotherapy? Did you receive doxorubicin (which they may know only by the brand name Adriamycin)? Our clinical experience has been that patients typically know the answers to these basic questions, which is a simple way of identifying those at increased risk.

Dr. Emily Tonorezos is with the department of medicine at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and at Cornell University, both in New York. Dr. Linda Overholser is with the division of general internal medicine at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora. They reported having no relevant financial disclosures. These comments are adapted from an accompanying editorial written by Dr. Tonorezos and Dr. Overholser (JAMA Intern. Med. 2015 April 27 [doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1187]).

Body

Primary care physicians must rise to the challenge of promoting the health of cancer survivors. Previous research suggests that many are not comfortable caring for this patient population and report knowledge gaps regarding the additional screening and surveillance they require. Most patients in the study by Ms. van Nimwegen and her colleagues were not screened for CVD.

Asking just a few key questions will identify these patients: What kind of cancer did you have? How old were you at diagnosis? Did you receive any chest radiotherapy? Did you receive doxorubicin (which they may know only by the brand name Adriamycin)? Our clinical experience has been that patients typically know the answers to these basic questions, which is a simple way of identifying those at increased risk.

Dr. Emily Tonorezos is with the department of medicine at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and at Cornell University, both in New York. Dr. Linda Overholser is with the division of general internal medicine at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora. They reported having no relevant financial disclosures. These comments are adapted from an accompanying editorial written by Dr. Tonorezos and Dr. Overholser (JAMA Intern. Med. 2015 April 27 [doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1187]).

Title
Rise to the challenge
Rise to the challenge

People who survive Hodgkin’s lymphoma in adolescence or young adulthood remain at very high risk for cardiovascular disease for at least 40 years – the longest period for which they have been followed, according to the results of a retrospective cohort study of more than 2,500 patients.

Until now, follow-up studies of such patients “rarely exceeded 20-25 years,” before most survivors reached the age at which cardiovascular disease (CVD) becomes commonplace in the general population. To compare CVD rates between survivors and the general population at later ages, investigators examined the medical records of 2,524 individuals who survived 5 years or more after being treated for Hodgkin’s lymphoma as adolescents or young adults at five Dutch medical centers between 1965 and 1995.

A total of 81% of the cohort had received mediastinal radiotherapy and 31% had received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. After 5-47 years of follow-up, 797 of these patients experienced 1,713 cardiovascular events. The most frequently occurring events included 401 coronary heart disease events (such as myocardial infarction and angina pectoris), 374 valvular heart disease events, and 140 heart failure events (such as cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure), Frederika A. van Nimwegen of the department of epidemiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, and her colleagues wrote in JAMA Internal Medicine on April 27 (doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1180).

Compared with the general population, Hodgkin’s survivors had a 3.2-fold higher standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of developing coronary heart disease and a 6.8-fold higher SIR of developing heart failure, corresponding to 70 excess cases of coronary heart disease and 58 excess cases of heart failure per 10,000 person-years.

These risks were significantly higher for survivors than for the general population at all ages, but patients who had been diagnosed and treated before the age of 25 years were at particularly elevated risk: they carried a 4.6- to 7.5-fold higher risk of coronary heart disease and a 10.9- to 40.5-fold higher risk of heart failure. At 40 years after Hodgkin’s diagnosis and treatment, the cumulative incidence of any type of CVD was 50%, the investigators wrote. Both survivors of Hodgkin’s lymphoma and their physicians should be aware that these patients remain at substantially increased cardiovascular risk throughout their lives, Ms. Van Nimwegen and her colleagues wrote.

This study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society. Ms. van Nimwegen and her colleagues reported having no financial disclosures.

People who survive Hodgkin’s lymphoma in adolescence or young adulthood remain at very high risk for cardiovascular disease for at least 40 years – the longest period for which they have been followed, according to the results of a retrospective cohort study of more than 2,500 patients.

Until now, follow-up studies of such patients “rarely exceeded 20-25 years,” before most survivors reached the age at which cardiovascular disease (CVD) becomes commonplace in the general population. To compare CVD rates between survivors and the general population at later ages, investigators examined the medical records of 2,524 individuals who survived 5 years or more after being treated for Hodgkin’s lymphoma as adolescents or young adults at five Dutch medical centers between 1965 and 1995.

A total of 81% of the cohort had received mediastinal radiotherapy and 31% had received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. After 5-47 years of follow-up, 797 of these patients experienced 1,713 cardiovascular events. The most frequently occurring events included 401 coronary heart disease events (such as myocardial infarction and angina pectoris), 374 valvular heart disease events, and 140 heart failure events (such as cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure), Frederika A. van Nimwegen of the department of epidemiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, and her colleagues wrote in JAMA Internal Medicine on April 27 (doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1180).

Compared with the general population, Hodgkin’s survivors had a 3.2-fold higher standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of developing coronary heart disease and a 6.8-fold higher SIR of developing heart failure, corresponding to 70 excess cases of coronary heart disease and 58 excess cases of heart failure per 10,000 person-years.

These risks were significantly higher for survivors than for the general population at all ages, but patients who had been diagnosed and treated before the age of 25 years were at particularly elevated risk: they carried a 4.6- to 7.5-fold higher risk of coronary heart disease and a 10.9- to 40.5-fold higher risk of heart failure. At 40 years after Hodgkin’s diagnosis and treatment, the cumulative incidence of any type of CVD was 50%, the investigators wrote. Both survivors of Hodgkin’s lymphoma and their physicians should be aware that these patients remain at substantially increased cardiovascular risk throughout their lives, Ms. Van Nimwegen and her colleagues wrote.

This study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society. Ms. van Nimwegen and her colleagues reported having no financial disclosures.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
CVD risk persists for 40 years in Hodgkin’s survivors
Display Headline
CVD risk persists for 40 years in Hodgkin’s survivors
Article Source

FROM JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Hodgkin’s lymphoma survivors remain at high cardiovascular risk for at least 40 years, which is the longest they have been followed.

Major finding: At 40 years after Hodgkin’s diagnosis and treatment, the cumulative incidence of any type of cardiovascular disease was 50%.

Data source: Retrospective cohort study involved 2,524 Dutch patients who were first treated for Hodgkin’s lymphoma in 1965-1995 and followed for cardiovascular events for up to 47 years.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society. Ms. van Nimwegen and her colleagues reported having no financial disclosures.

May 2015: Click for Credit

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
May 2015: Click for Credit
Stay up to date on important developments in research and practice recommendations and earn CE/CME credit by reading the articles that follow. All posttests must be completed and submitted online.

Here are 5 articles in the May issue of Clinician Reviews (accreditation valid until January 1, 2016):

1. Clindamycin, TMP-SMX Are Equally Effective for Skin Infections
To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/1cVxR85

VITALS
Key clinical point:
Clindamycin and TMP-SMX had similar efficacy and adverse-effect profiles for treating uncomplicated skin infections, including both abscesses and cellulitis.
Major finding: At 7-10 days after therapy completion, the rates of cure in the evaluable population were 89.5% with clindamycin and 88.2% with TMP-SMX.
Data source: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial involving 524 adults and children followed for 1 month after treatment.
Disclosures: This trial was supported by the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCT00730028). Dr Miller reported receiving consulting fees from Cubist, Durata, and Pfizer; his associates reported ties to Cubist, Pfizer, EMMES, Theravance, AstraZeneca, Trius, Merck, and Cerexa.

2. Hormone Therapy 10 Years Postmenopause Increases Risks
To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/1OBYcUe

VITALS
Key clinical point:
Hormone therapy in postmenopausal women increases stroke risk.
Major finding:
Stroke increased by 24%, venous thromboembolism by 92%, and pulmonary embolism by 81% in postmenopausal women receiving hormone therapy.
Data source:
A review and meta-analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials involving 40,140 postmenopausal women who received orally administered hormone therapy, placebo, or no treatment for prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Disclosures:
One study was funded by Wyeth-Ayerst. Two studies received partial funding from Novo-Nordisk Pharmaceutical, and one study was funded by the National Institutes of Health with support from Wyeth-Ayerst, Hoffman-La Roche, Pharmacia, and Upjohn. Eight other studies used medication provided by various pharmaceutical companies.

3. "Perfect storm" of Depression, Stress Raises Risk for MI, Death
To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/1yM2HtF

VITALS
Key clinical point:
Concurrent depression and stress in coronary heart disease patients may increase early risk for MI and death. 
Major finding:
CHD patients with high depressive symptoms and high stress at baseline had an increased risk for MI and death early during follow-up (adjusted HR, 1.48).
Data source:
A prospective cohort study of 4,487 adults.
Disclosures:
The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute supported the study. Dr Alcántara reported having no disclosures; two other authors received salary support from Amgen for research, and one served as a consultant for DiaDexus.

4. Type 2 Diabetes Lower in Familial Hypercholesterolemia
To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/1bplTDc

VITALS
Key clinical point:
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes appears to be significantly lower in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia than in their unaffected relatives.
Major finding:
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes was 1.75% in 25,137 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, compared with 2.93% in 38,183 of their unaffected relatives.
Data source:
An observational cross-sectional analysis of data for 63,320 people in the Dutch national registry of familial hypercholesterolemia.
Disclosures:
The study sponsor was not specified; the familial hypercholesterolemia registry is subsidized by the Dutch government. Dr Besseling reported having no financial disclosures; his associates reported ties to Aegerion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cerenis, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, JSiS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, and Sanofi.

5. Mongersen Induces 55%-65% Remission Rates in Crohn’s
To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/1DctonL

VITALS
Key clinical point:
Mongersen, an oral SMAD7 antisense oligonucleotide, induced remission rates as high as 55%-65% in a small 2-week phase II clinical trial.
Major finding:
Rates of remission were 65% in the 43 participants who received 160 mg of mongersen, 55% in the 40 who received 40 mg, 12% in the 41 who received 10 mg, and 10% in the 42 who received placebo.
Data source:
A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II clinical trial involving 166 adults at 17 medical centers in Italy and Germany.
Disclosures: This study was sponsored by Giuliani, acting under contract to Nogra Pharma. Dr Monteleone reported ties to Giuliani, Novo Nordisk, Teva, Sirtris, Lycera, Sofar, and Zambon, and holds a patent related to the use of SMAD7 antisense oligonucleotides in Crohn’s disease. His associates reported financial ties to numerous industry sources.

References

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Mary Ann Moon, Tara Haelle, Sharon Worcester

Issue
Clinician Reviews - 25(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
42-48
Legacy Keywords
clindamycin, skin infections, hormone therapy, postmenopause, depression, stress, myocardial infarction, type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Mary Ann Moon, Tara Haelle, Sharon Worcester

Author and Disclosure Information

Mary Ann Moon, Tara Haelle, Sharon Worcester

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles
Stay up to date on important developments in research and practice recommendations and earn CE/CME credit by reading the articles that follow. All posttests must be completed and submitted online.
Stay up to date on important developments in research and practice recommendations and earn CE/CME credit by reading the articles that follow. All posttests must be completed and submitted online.

Here are 5 articles in the May issue of Clinician Reviews (accreditation valid until January 1, 2016):

1. Clindamycin, TMP-SMX Are Equally Effective for Skin Infections
To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/1cVxR85

VITALS
Key clinical point:
Clindamycin and TMP-SMX had similar efficacy and adverse-effect profiles for treating uncomplicated skin infections, including both abscesses and cellulitis.
Major finding: At 7-10 days after therapy completion, the rates of cure in the evaluable population were 89.5% with clindamycin and 88.2% with TMP-SMX.
Data source: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial involving 524 adults and children followed for 1 month after treatment.
Disclosures: This trial was supported by the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCT00730028). Dr Miller reported receiving consulting fees from Cubist, Durata, and Pfizer; his associates reported ties to Cubist, Pfizer, EMMES, Theravance, AstraZeneca, Trius, Merck, and Cerexa.

2. Hormone Therapy 10 Years Postmenopause Increases Risks
To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/1OBYcUe

VITALS
Key clinical point:
Hormone therapy in postmenopausal women increases stroke risk.
Major finding:
Stroke increased by 24%, venous thromboembolism by 92%, and pulmonary embolism by 81% in postmenopausal women receiving hormone therapy.
Data source:
A review and meta-analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials involving 40,140 postmenopausal women who received orally administered hormone therapy, placebo, or no treatment for prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Disclosures:
One study was funded by Wyeth-Ayerst. Two studies received partial funding from Novo-Nordisk Pharmaceutical, and one study was funded by the National Institutes of Health with support from Wyeth-Ayerst, Hoffman-La Roche, Pharmacia, and Upjohn. Eight other studies used medication provided by various pharmaceutical companies.

3. "Perfect storm" of Depression, Stress Raises Risk for MI, Death
To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/1yM2HtF

VITALS
Key clinical point:
Concurrent depression and stress in coronary heart disease patients may increase early risk for MI and death. 
Major finding:
CHD patients with high depressive symptoms and high stress at baseline had an increased risk for MI and death early during follow-up (adjusted HR, 1.48).
Data source:
A prospective cohort study of 4,487 adults.
Disclosures:
The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute supported the study. Dr Alcántara reported having no disclosures; two other authors received salary support from Amgen for research, and one served as a consultant for DiaDexus.

4. Type 2 Diabetes Lower in Familial Hypercholesterolemia
To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/1bplTDc

VITALS
Key clinical point:
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes appears to be significantly lower in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia than in their unaffected relatives.
Major finding:
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes was 1.75% in 25,137 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, compared with 2.93% in 38,183 of their unaffected relatives.
Data source:
An observational cross-sectional analysis of data for 63,320 people in the Dutch national registry of familial hypercholesterolemia.
Disclosures:
The study sponsor was not specified; the familial hypercholesterolemia registry is subsidized by the Dutch government. Dr Besseling reported having no financial disclosures; his associates reported ties to Aegerion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cerenis, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, JSiS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, and Sanofi.

5. Mongersen Induces 55%-65% Remission Rates in Crohn’s
To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/1DctonL

VITALS
Key clinical point:
Mongersen, an oral SMAD7 antisense oligonucleotide, induced remission rates as high as 55%-65% in a small 2-week phase II clinical trial.
Major finding:
Rates of remission were 65% in the 43 participants who received 160 mg of mongersen, 55% in the 40 who received 40 mg, 12% in the 41 who received 10 mg, and 10% in the 42 who received placebo.
Data source:
A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II clinical trial involving 166 adults at 17 medical centers in Italy and Germany.
Disclosures: This study was sponsored by Giuliani, acting under contract to Nogra Pharma. Dr Monteleone reported ties to Giuliani, Novo Nordisk, Teva, Sirtris, Lycera, Sofar, and Zambon, and holds a patent related to the use of SMAD7 antisense oligonucleotides in Crohn’s disease. His associates reported financial ties to numerous industry sources.

Here are 5 articles in the May issue of Clinician Reviews (accreditation valid until January 1, 2016):

1. Clindamycin, TMP-SMX Are Equally Effective for Skin Infections
To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/1cVxR85

VITALS
Key clinical point:
Clindamycin and TMP-SMX had similar efficacy and adverse-effect profiles for treating uncomplicated skin infections, including both abscesses and cellulitis.
Major finding: At 7-10 days after therapy completion, the rates of cure in the evaluable population were 89.5% with clindamycin and 88.2% with TMP-SMX.
Data source: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial involving 524 adults and children followed for 1 month after treatment.
Disclosures: This trial was supported by the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCT00730028). Dr Miller reported receiving consulting fees from Cubist, Durata, and Pfizer; his associates reported ties to Cubist, Pfizer, EMMES, Theravance, AstraZeneca, Trius, Merck, and Cerexa.

2. Hormone Therapy 10 Years Postmenopause Increases Risks
To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/1OBYcUe

VITALS
Key clinical point:
Hormone therapy in postmenopausal women increases stroke risk.
Major finding:
Stroke increased by 24%, venous thromboembolism by 92%, and pulmonary embolism by 81% in postmenopausal women receiving hormone therapy.
Data source:
A review and meta-analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials involving 40,140 postmenopausal women who received orally administered hormone therapy, placebo, or no treatment for prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Disclosures:
One study was funded by Wyeth-Ayerst. Two studies received partial funding from Novo-Nordisk Pharmaceutical, and one study was funded by the National Institutes of Health with support from Wyeth-Ayerst, Hoffman-La Roche, Pharmacia, and Upjohn. Eight other studies used medication provided by various pharmaceutical companies.

3. "Perfect storm" of Depression, Stress Raises Risk for MI, Death
To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/1yM2HtF

VITALS
Key clinical point:
Concurrent depression and stress in coronary heart disease patients may increase early risk for MI and death. 
Major finding:
CHD patients with high depressive symptoms and high stress at baseline had an increased risk for MI and death early during follow-up (adjusted HR, 1.48).
Data source:
A prospective cohort study of 4,487 adults.
Disclosures:
The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute supported the study. Dr Alcántara reported having no disclosures; two other authors received salary support from Amgen for research, and one served as a consultant for DiaDexus.

4. Type 2 Diabetes Lower in Familial Hypercholesterolemia
To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/1bplTDc

VITALS
Key clinical point:
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes appears to be significantly lower in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia than in their unaffected relatives.
Major finding:
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes was 1.75% in 25,137 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, compared with 2.93% in 38,183 of their unaffected relatives.
Data source:
An observational cross-sectional analysis of data for 63,320 people in the Dutch national registry of familial hypercholesterolemia.
Disclosures:
The study sponsor was not specified; the familial hypercholesterolemia registry is subsidized by the Dutch government. Dr Besseling reported having no financial disclosures; his associates reported ties to Aegerion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cerenis, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, JSiS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, and Sanofi.

5. Mongersen Induces 55%-65% Remission Rates in Crohn’s
To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/1DctonL

VITALS
Key clinical point:
Mongersen, an oral SMAD7 antisense oligonucleotide, induced remission rates as high as 55%-65% in a small 2-week phase II clinical trial.
Major finding:
Rates of remission were 65% in the 43 participants who received 160 mg of mongersen, 55% in the 40 who received 40 mg, 12% in the 41 who received 10 mg, and 10% in the 42 who received placebo.
Data source:
A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II clinical trial involving 166 adults at 17 medical centers in Italy and Germany.
Disclosures: This study was sponsored by Giuliani, acting under contract to Nogra Pharma. Dr Monteleone reported ties to Giuliani, Novo Nordisk, Teva, Sirtris, Lycera, Sofar, and Zambon, and holds a patent related to the use of SMAD7 antisense oligonucleotides in Crohn’s disease. His associates reported financial ties to numerous industry sources.

References

References

Issue
Clinician Reviews - 25(5)
Issue
Clinician Reviews - 25(5)
Page Number
42-48
Page Number
42-48
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
May 2015: Click for Credit
Display Headline
May 2015: Click for Credit
Legacy Keywords
clindamycin, skin infections, hormone therapy, postmenopause, depression, stress, myocardial infarction, type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia
Legacy Keywords
clindamycin, skin infections, hormone therapy, postmenopause, depression, stress, myocardial infarction, type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Alcoholic Hepatitis: Pentoxifylline, Prednisolone Don’t Improve Survival

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Alcoholic Hepatitis: Pentoxifylline, Prednisolone Don’t Improve Survival

Neither pentoxifylline nor prednisolone reduced 28-day mortality, 90-day mortality, or 1-year mortality among adults with alcoholic hepatitis in a multicenter clinical trial comparing the two agents, according to a report published online April 23 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Pentoxifylline and glucocorticoids are the only drugs endorsed for this indication in treatment guidelines from the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease and the European Association for the Study of the Liver. However, the evidence in support of both has been conflicting, and their use remains controversial. The Steroids or Pentoxifylline for Alcoholic Hepatitis (SOPAH) study was a randomized, double-blind trial comparing the two drugs against each other and against placebo in 1,103 patients enrolled during a 3-year period at 65 hospitals across the United Kingdom, said Dr. Mark R. Thursz of Imperial College, London, and his associates.

The primary endpoint of the study, mortality at the conclusion of the 28-day course of treatment, was 14% in the group taking prednisolone plus placebo, 19% in those taking pentoxifylline plus placebo, 13% in those taking both prednisolone plus pentoxifylline, and 17% in those taking two placebos – all nonsignificant differences. In addition, neither active drug affected mortality or the need for liver transplantation at 90 days or at 1 year, the investigators reported (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 23 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1412278]).

Cumulative mortality at 1 year was “alarming” but nearly identical between the groups who received the two active agents and the groups who did not: 56% with pentoxifylline and 57% without it; 57% with prednisolone and 56% without it.

Infection accounted for 24% of all deaths, but the number of infections among patients receiving prednisolone was no higher than that for the other patient groups, Dr. Thursz and his associates added.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Mary Ann Moon, Family Practice News Digital Network

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Mary Ann Moon, Family Practice News Digital Network

Author and Disclosure Information

Mary Ann Moon, Family Practice News Digital Network

Neither pentoxifylline nor prednisolone reduced 28-day mortality, 90-day mortality, or 1-year mortality among adults with alcoholic hepatitis in a multicenter clinical trial comparing the two agents, according to a report published online April 23 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Pentoxifylline and glucocorticoids are the only drugs endorsed for this indication in treatment guidelines from the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease and the European Association for the Study of the Liver. However, the evidence in support of both has been conflicting, and their use remains controversial. The Steroids or Pentoxifylline for Alcoholic Hepatitis (SOPAH) study was a randomized, double-blind trial comparing the two drugs against each other and against placebo in 1,103 patients enrolled during a 3-year period at 65 hospitals across the United Kingdom, said Dr. Mark R. Thursz of Imperial College, London, and his associates.

The primary endpoint of the study, mortality at the conclusion of the 28-day course of treatment, was 14% in the group taking prednisolone plus placebo, 19% in those taking pentoxifylline plus placebo, 13% in those taking both prednisolone plus pentoxifylline, and 17% in those taking two placebos – all nonsignificant differences. In addition, neither active drug affected mortality or the need for liver transplantation at 90 days or at 1 year, the investigators reported (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 23 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1412278]).

Cumulative mortality at 1 year was “alarming” but nearly identical between the groups who received the two active agents and the groups who did not: 56% with pentoxifylline and 57% without it; 57% with prednisolone and 56% without it.

Infection accounted for 24% of all deaths, but the number of infections among patients receiving prednisolone was no higher than that for the other patient groups, Dr. Thursz and his associates added.

Neither pentoxifylline nor prednisolone reduced 28-day mortality, 90-day mortality, or 1-year mortality among adults with alcoholic hepatitis in a multicenter clinical trial comparing the two agents, according to a report published online April 23 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Pentoxifylline and glucocorticoids are the only drugs endorsed for this indication in treatment guidelines from the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease and the European Association for the Study of the Liver. However, the evidence in support of both has been conflicting, and their use remains controversial. The Steroids or Pentoxifylline for Alcoholic Hepatitis (SOPAH) study was a randomized, double-blind trial comparing the two drugs against each other and against placebo in 1,103 patients enrolled during a 3-year period at 65 hospitals across the United Kingdom, said Dr. Mark R. Thursz of Imperial College, London, and his associates.

The primary endpoint of the study, mortality at the conclusion of the 28-day course of treatment, was 14% in the group taking prednisolone plus placebo, 19% in those taking pentoxifylline plus placebo, 13% in those taking both prednisolone plus pentoxifylline, and 17% in those taking two placebos – all nonsignificant differences. In addition, neither active drug affected mortality or the need for liver transplantation at 90 days or at 1 year, the investigators reported (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 23 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1412278]).

Cumulative mortality at 1 year was “alarming” but nearly identical between the groups who received the two active agents and the groups who did not: 56% with pentoxifylline and 57% without it; 57% with prednisolone and 56% without it.

Infection accounted for 24% of all deaths, but the number of infections among patients receiving prednisolone was no higher than that for the other patient groups, Dr. Thursz and his associates added.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Alcoholic Hepatitis: Pentoxifylline, Prednisolone Don’t Improve Survival
Display Headline
Alcoholic Hepatitis: Pentoxifylline, Prednisolone Don’t Improve Survival
Article Source

FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Forgoing radiotherapy after chemo in early Hodgkin’s is close call

Is 4% relapse rate worth it?
Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Forgoing radiotherapy after chemo in early Hodgkin’s is close call

For patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma, forgoing radiotherapy after three cycles of chemotherapy when PET scans show negative findings – known as a PET-directed or response-adapted approach – was not found to be noninferior to routine consolidation radiotherapy in extending progression-free survival, according to a report published online April 23 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The PET-directed technique is intended to spare the estimated 9 out of 10 patients who are cured by the chemotherapy from having to receive unnecessary radiotherapy, which carries late toxic effects such as secondary cancers and premature cardiovascular disease. To determine whether this approach caused an unacceptable increase in the relapse rate, researchers performed a randomized, controlled, phase III noninferiority trial in 602 previously untreated patients aged 16-75 years (median age, 34 years) who had stage IA or IIA Hodgkin’s lymphoma with no mediastinal bulk and no night sweats, unexplained fever, or weight loss, reported Dr. John Radford of the Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester (England), and his associates.

The study participants, enrolled and treated at 94 medical centers across the United Kingdom, had three cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine therapy and then underwent PET scanning. The 420 who had negative findings on PET then were randomly assigned to receive either 30 Gy of involved-field radiotherapy (209 patients) or no further treatment (211 patients).

After a median of 62 months of follow-up, both groups had excellent outcomes. Three-year progression-free survival was 94.6% with radiotherapy and 90.8% without it; overall survival was 97.1% with radiotherapy and 99.0% without it. However, the modest advantage conveyed by radiotherapy in the 3-year progression-free survival rate – 3.8 percentage points in the intention-to-treat analysis and 6.3 percentage points in the per-protocol analysis – was enough to negate a finding of noninferiority for forgoing radiotherapy, the investigators wrote (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 23 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1408648]).

It is important to note that this marginal survival advantage “is bought at the expense of exposing all patients to radiation, most of whom will not benefit and some of whom will be harmed,” Dr. Radford and his associates wrote.

This report addressed medium-term outcomes. Continued follow-up in this ongoing study will determine whether the response-adapted approach leads to fewer second cancers, less cardiovascular disease, and superior survival in the long term, they added.

References

Body

The report by Radford et al. raises important questions. Is a 4 percentage-point difference in the rate of relapse worth the added risks of radiation therapy? And should 100 patients be exposed to radiation to keep 4 from relapsing, with no evidence of long-term benefit?

When patients are fully informed of the risks and benefits, some will choose the additional radiotherapy because they cannot abide any increase in the medium-term risk of relapse. But others will elect to minimize their long-term risks and trust that they are among the 90% of patients who have been cured by chemotherapy and can forgo radiation.

Dr. Dan L. Longo is a deputy editor of NEJM and professor of medicine at Harvard and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, both in Boston. He reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. James O. Armitage is in the division of hematology-oncology at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha. He reported receiving personal fees from Celgene, Conatus, Coherus, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Spectrum, TESARO, and Ziopharm. Dr. Longo and Dr. Armitage made these remarks in an editorial accompanying Dr. Radford’s report (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 23 [doi:10.1056/NEJMe1502888]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
Radiotherapy, Hodgkin's lymphoma
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Body

The report by Radford et al. raises important questions. Is a 4 percentage-point difference in the rate of relapse worth the added risks of radiation therapy? And should 100 patients be exposed to radiation to keep 4 from relapsing, with no evidence of long-term benefit?

When patients are fully informed of the risks and benefits, some will choose the additional radiotherapy because they cannot abide any increase in the medium-term risk of relapse. But others will elect to minimize their long-term risks and trust that they are among the 90% of patients who have been cured by chemotherapy and can forgo radiation.

Dr. Dan L. Longo is a deputy editor of NEJM and professor of medicine at Harvard and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, both in Boston. He reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. James O. Armitage is in the division of hematology-oncology at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha. He reported receiving personal fees from Celgene, Conatus, Coherus, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Spectrum, TESARO, and Ziopharm. Dr. Longo and Dr. Armitage made these remarks in an editorial accompanying Dr. Radford’s report (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 23 [doi:10.1056/NEJMe1502888]).

Body

The report by Radford et al. raises important questions. Is a 4 percentage-point difference in the rate of relapse worth the added risks of radiation therapy? And should 100 patients be exposed to radiation to keep 4 from relapsing, with no evidence of long-term benefit?

When patients are fully informed of the risks and benefits, some will choose the additional radiotherapy because they cannot abide any increase in the medium-term risk of relapse. But others will elect to minimize their long-term risks and trust that they are among the 90% of patients who have been cured by chemotherapy and can forgo radiation.

Dr. Dan L. Longo is a deputy editor of NEJM and professor of medicine at Harvard and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, both in Boston. He reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. James O. Armitage is in the division of hematology-oncology at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha. He reported receiving personal fees from Celgene, Conatus, Coherus, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Spectrum, TESARO, and Ziopharm. Dr. Longo and Dr. Armitage made these remarks in an editorial accompanying Dr. Radford’s report (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 23 [doi:10.1056/NEJMe1502888]).

Title
Is 4% relapse rate worth it?
Is 4% relapse rate worth it?

For patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma, forgoing radiotherapy after three cycles of chemotherapy when PET scans show negative findings – known as a PET-directed or response-adapted approach – was not found to be noninferior to routine consolidation radiotherapy in extending progression-free survival, according to a report published online April 23 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The PET-directed technique is intended to spare the estimated 9 out of 10 patients who are cured by the chemotherapy from having to receive unnecessary radiotherapy, which carries late toxic effects such as secondary cancers and premature cardiovascular disease. To determine whether this approach caused an unacceptable increase in the relapse rate, researchers performed a randomized, controlled, phase III noninferiority trial in 602 previously untreated patients aged 16-75 years (median age, 34 years) who had stage IA or IIA Hodgkin’s lymphoma with no mediastinal bulk and no night sweats, unexplained fever, or weight loss, reported Dr. John Radford of the Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester (England), and his associates.

The study participants, enrolled and treated at 94 medical centers across the United Kingdom, had three cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine therapy and then underwent PET scanning. The 420 who had negative findings on PET then were randomly assigned to receive either 30 Gy of involved-field radiotherapy (209 patients) or no further treatment (211 patients).

After a median of 62 months of follow-up, both groups had excellent outcomes. Three-year progression-free survival was 94.6% with radiotherapy and 90.8% without it; overall survival was 97.1% with radiotherapy and 99.0% without it. However, the modest advantage conveyed by radiotherapy in the 3-year progression-free survival rate – 3.8 percentage points in the intention-to-treat analysis and 6.3 percentage points in the per-protocol analysis – was enough to negate a finding of noninferiority for forgoing radiotherapy, the investigators wrote (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 23 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1408648]).

It is important to note that this marginal survival advantage “is bought at the expense of exposing all patients to radiation, most of whom will not benefit and some of whom will be harmed,” Dr. Radford and his associates wrote.

This report addressed medium-term outcomes. Continued follow-up in this ongoing study will determine whether the response-adapted approach leads to fewer second cancers, less cardiovascular disease, and superior survival in the long term, they added.

For patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma, forgoing radiotherapy after three cycles of chemotherapy when PET scans show negative findings – known as a PET-directed or response-adapted approach – was not found to be noninferior to routine consolidation radiotherapy in extending progression-free survival, according to a report published online April 23 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The PET-directed technique is intended to spare the estimated 9 out of 10 patients who are cured by the chemotherapy from having to receive unnecessary radiotherapy, which carries late toxic effects such as secondary cancers and premature cardiovascular disease. To determine whether this approach caused an unacceptable increase in the relapse rate, researchers performed a randomized, controlled, phase III noninferiority trial in 602 previously untreated patients aged 16-75 years (median age, 34 years) who had stage IA or IIA Hodgkin’s lymphoma with no mediastinal bulk and no night sweats, unexplained fever, or weight loss, reported Dr. John Radford of the Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester (England), and his associates.

The study participants, enrolled and treated at 94 medical centers across the United Kingdom, had three cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine therapy and then underwent PET scanning. The 420 who had negative findings on PET then were randomly assigned to receive either 30 Gy of involved-field radiotherapy (209 patients) or no further treatment (211 patients).

After a median of 62 months of follow-up, both groups had excellent outcomes. Three-year progression-free survival was 94.6% with radiotherapy and 90.8% without it; overall survival was 97.1% with radiotherapy and 99.0% without it. However, the modest advantage conveyed by radiotherapy in the 3-year progression-free survival rate – 3.8 percentage points in the intention-to-treat analysis and 6.3 percentage points in the per-protocol analysis – was enough to negate a finding of noninferiority for forgoing radiotherapy, the investigators wrote (N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 April 23 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1408648]).

It is important to note that this marginal survival advantage “is bought at the expense of exposing all patients to radiation, most of whom will not benefit and some of whom will be harmed,” Dr. Radford and his associates wrote.

This report addressed medium-term outcomes. Continued follow-up in this ongoing study will determine whether the response-adapted approach leads to fewer second cancers, less cardiovascular disease, and superior survival in the long term, they added.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Forgoing radiotherapy after chemo in early Hodgkin’s is close call
Display Headline
Forgoing radiotherapy after chemo in early Hodgkin’s is close call
Legacy Keywords
Radiotherapy, Hodgkin's lymphoma
Legacy Keywords
Radiotherapy, Hodgkin's lymphoma
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Foregoing radiotherapy after chemotherapy was not found “noninferior” to undergoing radiotherapy for early-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Major finding: Three-year progression-free survival was 94.6% with radiotherapy and 90.8% without it, and overall survival was 97.1% with radiotherapy and 99.0% without it.

Data source: A randomized, controlled phase III noninferiority trial involving 420 adolescents and adults at 94 medical centers in the United Kingdom followed for a median of 5 years.

Disclosures: This study was supported by Leukemia and Lymphoma Research, the Lymphoma Research Trust, Teenage Cancer Trust, and the U.K. Department of Health; no commercial support was provided. Dr. Radford reported having no relevant financial disclosures; two of his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.