User login
Doug Brunk is a San Diego-based award-winning reporter who began covering health care in 1991. Before joining the company, he wrote for the health sciences division of Columbia University and was an associate editor at Contemporary Long Term Care magazine when it won a Jesse H. Neal Award. His work has been syndicated by the Los Angeles Times and he is the author of two books related to the University of Kentucky Wildcats men's basketball program. Doug has a master’s degree in magazine journalism from the S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University. Follow him on Twitter @dougbrunk.
Daily moisturizers a bedrock of atopic dermatitis management
Mounting .
In an updated review of clinical evidence on the topic, Adelaide A. Hebert, MD, Noreen Heer Nicol, PhD, RN, FNP, and colleagues evaluated 13 trials that assessed daily moisturization for the treatment of AD published between 2006 and 2019. “The bottom line is, daily moisturization increased skin hydration and it decreased transepidermal water loss in all children and adults in the 13 studies we looked at,” Dr. Nicol, associate dean and associate professor of nursing at the University of Colorado, Denver, said at the Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis symposium.
Based on published evidence in the review, she and her coauthors assembled six points regarding the importance of essential skin repair in AD:
1. It strengthens the barrier that protects against environmental triggers such as skin irritants aeroallergens, dust mites, and pet dander.
2. It decreases moisture loss that perpetuates damage and can provoke inflammatory processes.
3. It promotes a healthy microbiome via induction of antimicrobial peptides.
4. It maintains stratum corneum acidification, which protects against pathogens.
5. It reduces recurrence of flares when used daily.
6. It prevents the onset of AD when applied early in life to at-risk children.
A separate review of optimal AD care authored by Dr. Nicol underscores the importance of foundational management, “meaning that we want you to use hydration and daily moisturizers as part of your everyday management,” she said. “Without good barrier repair, infections and allergens can break through. The intention is to have that barrier repair a key point of moisturizer use.”
In a 2014 published study, researchers investigated the role of proactive emollient therapy in preventing AD in 124 neonates in the United States and the United Kingdom with a first-degree relative with a history of allergic rhinitis, asthma, or AD. The treatment group received daily total body application of Aquaphor Healing Ointment, Cetaphil Cream, or sunflower seed oil, starting at 3 weeks of age, while the control group received no moisturizers. They found that daily emollient therapy significantly reduced the cumulative incidence of AD at 6 months (22% vs. 42% among controls). A follow-up study confirmed a protective but nonsignificant effect of daily moisturizer use at 12 months (AD was diagnosed in 13.2% of those in the treatment group vs. 25% in the control group), most likely due to the study being underpowered.
“The message here is simple,” Dr. Nicol said. “Wouldn’t it be wonderful if we could reduce the burden of AD by doing something as straightforward as moisturizer use in our neonates?”
With so many moisturizers on the market today, considerations include active ingredients, side effects, absorption, and amount required for efficacy. “On the average adult, head to toe, front to back, one time it takes about 30 grams or one ounce of something to cover them completely, so you want to make sure people are using enough,” Dr. Nicol said. “You don’t want to be prescribing people 15- and 30-gram tubes of product and hoping they have enough to cover their bodies multiple times.”
Ten years ago, a randomized, controlled trial found that Aquaphor Healing Ointment was 47 times more cost-effective than prescription barrier creams Atopiclair nonsteroidal cream and EpiCeram controlled release skin barrier emulsion. “The most expensive things do not have to be the best things to be used,” Dr. Nicol said. “Recognize what the properties of these products are and what the benefit is.”
A basic principle of skin care for AD patients recommended by Dr. Nicol and colleagues at National Jewish Health, Denver, includes applying a fragrance-free moisturizer within 3 minutes of finishing a bath or a shower. They recommend products sold in 1-pound jars or large tubes, such as Aquaphor Healing Ointment, Vaniply Ointment, Eucerin Creme (various formulations), Vanicream, CeraVe Cream, or Cetaphil cream. “Vaseline is a good occlusive preparation to seal in but is most effective after bath or shower,” the recommendations continue. “Topical maintenance medications may be used in place of moisturizers or sealer when prescribed.”
She recommends including a list of preferred moisturizers for patients to use into written action plans for skin care. “This adds a lot of benefit to patients,” she said. “Always put the patient at the center of your decision-making. Spend time listening to them, give them options of things that they are willing to use so that they can trust you.”
Dr. Nicol disclosed that she has served as an advisory board member for Eli Lilly & Co.
Mounting .
In an updated review of clinical evidence on the topic, Adelaide A. Hebert, MD, Noreen Heer Nicol, PhD, RN, FNP, and colleagues evaluated 13 trials that assessed daily moisturization for the treatment of AD published between 2006 and 2019. “The bottom line is, daily moisturization increased skin hydration and it decreased transepidermal water loss in all children and adults in the 13 studies we looked at,” Dr. Nicol, associate dean and associate professor of nursing at the University of Colorado, Denver, said at the Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis symposium.
Based on published evidence in the review, she and her coauthors assembled six points regarding the importance of essential skin repair in AD:
1. It strengthens the barrier that protects against environmental triggers such as skin irritants aeroallergens, dust mites, and pet dander.
2. It decreases moisture loss that perpetuates damage and can provoke inflammatory processes.
3. It promotes a healthy microbiome via induction of antimicrobial peptides.
4. It maintains stratum corneum acidification, which protects against pathogens.
5. It reduces recurrence of flares when used daily.
6. It prevents the onset of AD when applied early in life to at-risk children.
A separate review of optimal AD care authored by Dr. Nicol underscores the importance of foundational management, “meaning that we want you to use hydration and daily moisturizers as part of your everyday management,” she said. “Without good barrier repair, infections and allergens can break through. The intention is to have that barrier repair a key point of moisturizer use.”
In a 2014 published study, researchers investigated the role of proactive emollient therapy in preventing AD in 124 neonates in the United States and the United Kingdom with a first-degree relative with a history of allergic rhinitis, asthma, or AD. The treatment group received daily total body application of Aquaphor Healing Ointment, Cetaphil Cream, or sunflower seed oil, starting at 3 weeks of age, while the control group received no moisturizers. They found that daily emollient therapy significantly reduced the cumulative incidence of AD at 6 months (22% vs. 42% among controls). A follow-up study confirmed a protective but nonsignificant effect of daily moisturizer use at 12 months (AD was diagnosed in 13.2% of those in the treatment group vs. 25% in the control group), most likely due to the study being underpowered.
“The message here is simple,” Dr. Nicol said. “Wouldn’t it be wonderful if we could reduce the burden of AD by doing something as straightforward as moisturizer use in our neonates?”
With so many moisturizers on the market today, considerations include active ingredients, side effects, absorption, and amount required for efficacy. “On the average adult, head to toe, front to back, one time it takes about 30 grams or one ounce of something to cover them completely, so you want to make sure people are using enough,” Dr. Nicol said. “You don’t want to be prescribing people 15- and 30-gram tubes of product and hoping they have enough to cover their bodies multiple times.”
Ten years ago, a randomized, controlled trial found that Aquaphor Healing Ointment was 47 times more cost-effective than prescription barrier creams Atopiclair nonsteroidal cream and EpiCeram controlled release skin barrier emulsion. “The most expensive things do not have to be the best things to be used,” Dr. Nicol said. “Recognize what the properties of these products are and what the benefit is.”
A basic principle of skin care for AD patients recommended by Dr. Nicol and colleagues at National Jewish Health, Denver, includes applying a fragrance-free moisturizer within 3 minutes of finishing a bath or a shower. They recommend products sold in 1-pound jars or large tubes, such as Aquaphor Healing Ointment, Vaniply Ointment, Eucerin Creme (various formulations), Vanicream, CeraVe Cream, or Cetaphil cream. “Vaseline is a good occlusive preparation to seal in but is most effective after bath or shower,” the recommendations continue. “Topical maintenance medications may be used in place of moisturizers or sealer when prescribed.”
She recommends including a list of preferred moisturizers for patients to use into written action plans for skin care. “This adds a lot of benefit to patients,” she said. “Always put the patient at the center of your decision-making. Spend time listening to them, give them options of things that they are willing to use so that they can trust you.”
Dr. Nicol disclosed that she has served as an advisory board member for Eli Lilly & Co.
Mounting .
In an updated review of clinical evidence on the topic, Adelaide A. Hebert, MD, Noreen Heer Nicol, PhD, RN, FNP, and colleagues evaluated 13 trials that assessed daily moisturization for the treatment of AD published between 2006 and 2019. “The bottom line is, daily moisturization increased skin hydration and it decreased transepidermal water loss in all children and adults in the 13 studies we looked at,” Dr. Nicol, associate dean and associate professor of nursing at the University of Colorado, Denver, said at the Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis symposium.
Based on published evidence in the review, she and her coauthors assembled six points regarding the importance of essential skin repair in AD:
1. It strengthens the barrier that protects against environmental triggers such as skin irritants aeroallergens, dust mites, and pet dander.
2. It decreases moisture loss that perpetuates damage and can provoke inflammatory processes.
3. It promotes a healthy microbiome via induction of antimicrobial peptides.
4. It maintains stratum corneum acidification, which protects against pathogens.
5. It reduces recurrence of flares when used daily.
6. It prevents the onset of AD when applied early in life to at-risk children.
A separate review of optimal AD care authored by Dr. Nicol underscores the importance of foundational management, “meaning that we want you to use hydration and daily moisturizers as part of your everyday management,” she said. “Without good barrier repair, infections and allergens can break through. The intention is to have that barrier repair a key point of moisturizer use.”
In a 2014 published study, researchers investigated the role of proactive emollient therapy in preventing AD in 124 neonates in the United States and the United Kingdom with a first-degree relative with a history of allergic rhinitis, asthma, or AD. The treatment group received daily total body application of Aquaphor Healing Ointment, Cetaphil Cream, or sunflower seed oil, starting at 3 weeks of age, while the control group received no moisturizers. They found that daily emollient therapy significantly reduced the cumulative incidence of AD at 6 months (22% vs. 42% among controls). A follow-up study confirmed a protective but nonsignificant effect of daily moisturizer use at 12 months (AD was diagnosed in 13.2% of those in the treatment group vs. 25% in the control group), most likely due to the study being underpowered.
“The message here is simple,” Dr. Nicol said. “Wouldn’t it be wonderful if we could reduce the burden of AD by doing something as straightforward as moisturizer use in our neonates?”
With so many moisturizers on the market today, considerations include active ingredients, side effects, absorption, and amount required for efficacy. “On the average adult, head to toe, front to back, one time it takes about 30 grams or one ounce of something to cover them completely, so you want to make sure people are using enough,” Dr. Nicol said. “You don’t want to be prescribing people 15- and 30-gram tubes of product and hoping they have enough to cover their bodies multiple times.”
Ten years ago, a randomized, controlled trial found that Aquaphor Healing Ointment was 47 times more cost-effective than prescription barrier creams Atopiclair nonsteroidal cream and EpiCeram controlled release skin barrier emulsion. “The most expensive things do not have to be the best things to be used,” Dr. Nicol said. “Recognize what the properties of these products are and what the benefit is.”
A basic principle of skin care for AD patients recommended by Dr. Nicol and colleagues at National Jewish Health, Denver, includes applying a fragrance-free moisturizer within 3 minutes of finishing a bath or a shower. They recommend products sold in 1-pound jars or large tubes, such as Aquaphor Healing Ointment, Vaniply Ointment, Eucerin Creme (various formulations), Vanicream, CeraVe Cream, or Cetaphil cream. “Vaseline is a good occlusive preparation to seal in but is most effective after bath or shower,” the recommendations continue. “Topical maintenance medications may be used in place of moisturizers or sealer when prescribed.”
She recommends including a list of preferred moisturizers for patients to use into written action plans for skin care. “This adds a lot of benefit to patients,” she said. “Always put the patient at the center of your decision-making. Spend time listening to them, give them options of things that they are willing to use so that they can trust you.”
Dr. Nicol disclosed that she has served as an advisory board member for Eli Lilly & Co.
FROM REVOLUTIONIZING AD 2020
Skin rejuvenation: Full-field ablative resurfacing remains a gold standard
according to Brian S. Biesman, MD.
“When performing laser skin resurfacing, our goal is to match the degree of injury to the needs of the patient we’re treating,” Dr. Biesman, an oculofacial plastic surgeon who practices in Nashville, Tenn., said during a virtual course on laser and aesthetic skin therapy.
“If we’re treating a 35-year-old with minimal photoaging, we don’t need to use full-field resurfacing. By the same token, a 60-year-old who’s never had anything but sun exposure is not going to do well with nonablative fractional resurfacing or other modalities that produce only modest changes,” he noted. “Full ablative resurfacing is a useful tool that can be used to treat a variety of patients. We can tailor each treatment to the individual patient. We can simply dial the energy up or down and adjust the density.”
Full-field laser ablation removes the epidermis as well as a part of the dermis, and the degree of dermal injury varies depending on the relative aggressiveness of the treatment. “We can treat very superficially in the dermis or we can do deep dermal treatments,” he said at the meeting, which was sponsored by Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Wellman Center for Photomedicine.
“The residual thermal injury will vary to some degree, depending on our treatment parameters. It does cause immediate collagen contracture. It also stimulates a process of neocollagenesis.”
Two main lasers used for full-field treatments are the erbium:YAG laser and the CO2 laser at wavelengths of 2,940 nm and 10,600 nm, respectively. “The erbium:YAG is far more highly absorbed by water, by a factor of about 13,” he said. “But both of these wavelengths can be used successfully as long as you understand the physics behind them.”
The short-pulsed erbium:YAG laser ablates effectively, producing about a 10 mcm zone of thermal injury. “That’s not going to induce much by the way of remodeling, but it will be effective in removing tissue from the superficial layers of the skin,” said Dr. Biesman, who is a past president of the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery. “There’s also an absorption peak for collagen, so if you’re treating a scar, this laser can be highly effective.”
The CO2 laser creates more residual thermal injury during full-field resurfacing, compared with the short-pulsed erbium:YAG laser. The long-pulsed erbium:YAG laser can be used in both short- and long-pulsed modes and is more ablative than the CO2 laser when used in short-pulsed mode. When used in long-pulse mode, it makes it possible to produce results “very similar to CO2 in terms of the thermal injury profile,” he said. “It’s a versatile device. So, the CO2 in its native mode produces more thermal injury, while the erbium:YAG laser is more ablative. Both can be used effectively for facial skin rejuvenation.”
Full-field laser resurfacing requires local infiltration with lidocaine 1% or 2% with epinephrine or general anesthesia. “This is not a treatment that you can do comfortably under topical anesthesia, even if you’re using cold air unless you are doing treatments essentially confined to the epidermis and superficial dermis,” Dr. Biesman said. “When working around the eyes or on the face you need to use ocular protection with metal ocular shields. There’s no two ways about it. There is no scenario in which you’re doing an ablative resurfacing around the eye where you don’t use metal corneal shields.”
Energy and density levels can be fine-tuned in order to optimize treatment. For deep rhytides in the perioral region or on the forehead or lateral cheeks, clinicians may choose to treat at a higher density, while rhytides located in other areas may respond well to treatments at a lower density. Relative danger zones include the eyelids in general, especially the medial lower eyelid, as well as the upper lip. “These are the areas that are most prone to developing scarring,” he said.
For the upper eyelids, Dr. Biesman treats from the lashes to the upper brow. “It’s important to protect the lashes and treat from the lower-lid margin all the way down to the orbital rim. I debride relatively aggressively. I want to debride all the eschar created by the first pass and come back with a second pass. I sometimes will decrease the density on the second pass, depending on the type of tissue response that I see. If I see a dramatic response on the second pass I will definitely decrease the density.” He uses Aquaphor to protect the eyebrows. “It’s difficult to do that on the lashes. For the lashes, I usually use a wet tongue blade and keep the lid on stretch as I do my treatments.”
Dr. Biesman recommends feathering to blend full-field treatments with the neck. This means bringing treatments below the mandible. “There are times when we want to conservatively treat the neck,” he said. “The neck does not recover nearly as well after ablative resurfacing as the face does due to the fact that there’s probably about 90% fewer sebaceous glands and hair follicles in the neck relative to the face.”
In Dr. Biesman’s opinion, the important perioperative preparation is counseling the patient, including setting realistic expectations and devising a plan for wound care. “They can expect 7-10 days to heal, depending on the area we’re treating and the relative aggressiveness of the planned treatment,” he said. For patients with a history of herpes simplex virus type 1, he recommends antiviral treatment prior to the procedure. “If you do encounter a herpetic infection postoperatively, you may not see typical clinical signs of blistering as the epidermis has been removed.”
Dr. Biesman uses both antiviral and antibiotic prophylaxis prior to full-field treatments. “The literature by and large says that antibiotic/antiviral prophylaxis is not required prior to full-face ablation,” he said. “The reason I choose to is that I have had some issues with community-acquired MRSA infections. Because it’s so ubiquitous these days, I typically do prescribe an agent that gives good MRSA coverage.”
As for wound care, the literature differs on open versus closed techniques. Dr. Biesman favors using Aquaphor for the first week or so and seeing patients back on posttreatment day 2, “who by that time are usually beyond the inflammatory phase of wound healing,” he said. “A lot of the initial oozing has stopped by then. We clean that off any dried exudate in the office very carefully. We debride gently with warm-water soaks and I like to use PRP [platelet-rich plasma]. There is literature to support the role of PRP in wound healing.”
Even in the most experienced hands, complications can occur from full-field laser resurfacing, including bacterial, viral, or fungal infections. Other potential complications include persistent erythema, hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, scarring, and ectropion. “Knowledge of treatment parameters, endpoints, and wound healing is required for safe and successful outcomes,” Dr. Biesman said.
He reported having no relevant disclosures related to his presentation.
according to Brian S. Biesman, MD.
“When performing laser skin resurfacing, our goal is to match the degree of injury to the needs of the patient we’re treating,” Dr. Biesman, an oculofacial plastic surgeon who practices in Nashville, Tenn., said during a virtual course on laser and aesthetic skin therapy.
“If we’re treating a 35-year-old with minimal photoaging, we don’t need to use full-field resurfacing. By the same token, a 60-year-old who’s never had anything but sun exposure is not going to do well with nonablative fractional resurfacing or other modalities that produce only modest changes,” he noted. “Full ablative resurfacing is a useful tool that can be used to treat a variety of patients. We can tailor each treatment to the individual patient. We can simply dial the energy up or down and adjust the density.”
Full-field laser ablation removes the epidermis as well as a part of the dermis, and the degree of dermal injury varies depending on the relative aggressiveness of the treatment. “We can treat very superficially in the dermis or we can do deep dermal treatments,” he said at the meeting, which was sponsored by Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Wellman Center for Photomedicine.
“The residual thermal injury will vary to some degree, depending on our treatment parameters. It does cause immediate collagen contracture. It also stimulates a process of neocollagenesis.”
Two main lasers used for full-field treatments are the erbium:YAG laser and the CO2 laser at wavelengths of 2,940 nm and 10,600 nm, respectively. “The erbium:YAG is far more highly absorbed by water, by a factor of about 13,” he said. “But both of these wavelengths can be used successfully as long as you understand the physics behind them.”
The short-pulsed erbium:YAG laser ablates effectively, producing about a 10 mcm zone of thermal injury. “That’s not going to induce much by the way of remodeling, but it will be effective in removing tissue from the superficial layers of the skin,” said Dr. Biesman, who is a past president of the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery. “There’s also an absorption peak for collagen, so if you’re treating a scar, this laser can be highly effective.”
The CO2 laser creates more residual thermal injury during full-field resurfacing, compared with the short-pulsed erbium:YAG laser. The long-pulsed erbium:YAG laser can be used in both short- and long-pulsed modes and is more ablative than the CO2 laser when used in short-pulsed mode. When used in long-pulse mode, it makes it possible to produce results “very similar to CO2 in terms of the thermal injury profile,” he said. “It’s a versatile device. So, the CO2 in its native mode produces more thermal injury, while the erbium:YAG laser is more ablative. Both can be used effectively for facial skin rejuvenation.”
Full-field laser resurfacing requires local infiltration with lidocaine 1% or 2% with epinephrine or general anesthesia. “This is not a treatment that you can do comfortably under topical anesthesia, even if you’re using cold air unless you are doing treatments essentially confined to the epidermis and superficial dermis,” Dr. Biesman said. “When working around the eyes or on the face you need to use ocular protection with metal ocular shields. There’s no two ways about it. There is no scenario in which you’re doing an ablative resurfacing around the eye where you don’t use metal corneal shields.”
Energy and density levels can be fine-tuned in order to optimize treatment. For deep rhytides in the perioral region or on the forehead or lateral cheeks, clinicians may choose to treat at a higher density, while rhytides located in other areas may respond well to treatments at a lower density. Relative danger zones include the eyelids in general, especially the medial lower eyelid, as well as the upper lip. “These are the areas that are most prone to developing scarring,” he said.
For the upper eyelids, Dr. Biesman treats from the lashes to the upper brow. “It’s important to protect the lashes and treat from the lower-lid margin all the way down to the orbital rim. I debride relatively aggressively. I want to debride all the eschar created by the first pass and come back with a second pass. I sometimes will decrease the density on the second pass, depending on the type of tissue response that I see. If I see a dramatic response on the second pass I will definitely decrease the density.” He uses Aquaphor to protect the eyebrows. “It’s difficult to do that on the lashes. For the lashes, I usually use a wet tongue blade and keep the lid on stretch as I do my treatments.”
Dr. Biesman recommends feathering to blend full-field treatments with the neck. This means bringing treatments below the mandible. “There are times when we want to conservatively treat the neck,” he said. “The neck does not recover nearly as well after ablative resurfacing as the face does due to the fact that there’s probably about 90% fewer sebaceous glands and hair follicles in the neck relative to the face.”
In Dr. Biesman’s opinion, the important perioperative preparation is counseling the patient, including setting realistic expectations and devising a plan for wound care. “They can expect 7-10 days to heal, depending on the area we’re treating and the relative aggressiveness of the planned treatment,” he said. For patients with a history of herpes simplex virus type 1, he recommends antiviral treatment prior to the procedure. “If you do encounter a herpetic infection postoperatively, you may not see typical clinical signs of blistering as the epidermis has been removed.”
Dr. Biesman uses both antiviral and antibiotic prophylaxis prior to full-field treatments. “The literature by and large says that antibiotic/antiviral prophylaxis is not required prior to full-face ablation,” he said. “The reason I choose to is that I have had some issues with community-acquired MRSA infections. Because it’s so ubiquitous these days, I typically do prescribe an agent that gives good MRSA coverage.”
As for wound care, the literature differs on open versus closed techniques. Dr. Biesman favors using Aquaphor for the first week or so and seeing patients back on posttreatment day 2, “who by that time are usually beyond the inflammatory phase of wound healing,” he said. “A lot of the initial oozing has stopped by then. We clean that off any dried exudate in the office very carefully. We debride gently with warm-water soaks and I like to use PRP [platelet-rich plasma]. There is literature to support the role of PRP in wound healing.”
Even in the most experienced hands, complications can occur from full-field laser resurfacing, including bacterial, viral, or fungal infections. Other potential complications include persistent erythema, hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, scarring, and ectropion. “Knowledge of treatment parameters, endpoints, and wound healing is required for safe and successful outcomes,” Dr. Biesman said.
He reported having no relevant disclosures related to his presentation.
according to Brian S. Biesman, MD.
“When performing laser skin resurfacing, our goal is to match the degree of injury to the needs of the patient we’re treating,” Dr. Biesman, an oculofacial plastic surgeon who practices in Nashville, Tenn., said during a virtual course on laser and aesthetic skin therapy.
“If we’re treating a 35-year-old with minimal photoaging, we don’t need to use full-field resurfacing. By the same token, a 60-year-old who’s never had anything but sun exposure is not going to do well with nonablative fractional resurfacing or other modalities that produce only modest changes,” he noted. “Full ablative resurfacing is a useful tool that can be used to treat a variety of patients. We can tailor each treatment to the individual patient. We can simply dial the energy up or down and adjust the density.”
Full-field laser ablation removes the epidermis as well as a part of the dermis, and the degree of dermal injury varies depending on the relative aggressiveness of the treatment. “We can treat very superficially in the dermis or we can do deep dermal treatments,” he said at the meeting, which was sponsored by Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Wellman Center for Photomedicine.
“The residual thermal injury will vary to some degree, depending on our treatment parameters. It does cause immediate collagen contracture. It also stimulates a process of neocollagenesis.”
Two main lasers used for full-field treatments are the erbium:YAG laser and the CO2 laser at wavelengths of 2,940 nm and 10,600 nm, respectively. “The erbium:YAG is far more highly absorbed by water, by a factor of about 13,” he said. “But both of these wavelengths can be used successfully as long as you understand the physics behind them.”
The short-pulsed erbium:YAG laser ablates effectively, producing about a 10 mcm zone of thermal injury. “That’s not going to induce much by the way of remodeling, but it will be effective in removing tissue from the superficial layers of the skin,” said Dr. Biesman, who is a past president of the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery. “There’s also an absorption peak for collagen, so if you’re treating a scar, this laser can be highly effective.”
The CO2 laser creates more residual thermal injury during full-field resurfacing, compared with the short-pulsed erbium:YAG laser. The long-pulsed erbium:YAG laser can be used in both short- and long-pulsed modes and is more ablative than the CO2 laser when used in short-pulsed mode. When used in long-pulse mode, it makes it possible to produce results “very similar to CO2 in terms of the thermal injury profile,” he said. “It’s a versatile device. So, the CO2 in its native mode produces more thermal injury, while the erbium:YAG laser is more ablative. Both can be used effectively for facial skin rejuvenation.”
Full-field laser resurfacing requires local infiltration with lidocaine 1% or 2% with epinephrine or general anesthesia. “This is not a treatment that you can do comfortably under topical anesthesia, even if you’re using cold air unless you are doing treatments essentially confined to the epidermis and superficial dermis,” Dr. Biesman said. “When working around the eyes or on the face you need to use ocular protection with metal ocular shields. There’s no two ways about it. There is no scenario in which you’re doing an ablative resurfacing around the eye where you don’t use metal corneal shields.”
Energy and density levels can be fine-tuned in order to optimize treatment. For deep rhytides in the perioral region or on the forehead or lateral cheeks, clinicians may choose to treat at a higher density, while rhytides located in other areas may respond well to treatments at a lower density. Relative danger zones include the eyelids in general, especially the medial lower eyelid, as well as the upper lip. “These are the areas that are most prone to developing scarring,” he said.
For the upper eyelids, Dr. Biesman treats from the lashes to the upper brow. “It’s important to protect the lashes and treat from the lower-lid margin all the way down to the orbital rim. I debride relatively aggressively. I want to debride all the eschar created by the first pass and come back with a second pass. I sometimes will decrease the density on the second pass, depending on the type of tissue response that I see. If I see a dramatic response on the second pass I will definitely decrease the density.” He uses Aquaphor to protect the eyebrows. “It’s difficult to do that on the lashes. For the lashes, I usually use a wet tongue blade and keep the lid on stretch as I do my treatments.”
Dr. Biesman recommends feathering to blend full-field treatments with the neck. This means bringing treatments below the mandible. “There are times when we want to conservatively treat the neck,” he said. “The neck does not recover nearly as well after ablative resurfacing as the face does due to the fact that there’s probably about 90% fewer sebaceous glands and hair follicles in the neck relative to the face.”
In Dr. Biesman’s opinion, the important perioperative preparation is counseling the patient, including setting realistic expectations and devising a plan for wound care. “They can expect 7-10 days to heal, depending on the area we’re treating and the relative aggressiveness of the planned treatment,” he said. For patients with a history of herpes simplex virus type 1, he recommends antiviral treatment prior to the procedure. “If you do encounter a herpetic infection postoperatively, you may not see typical clinical signs of blistering as the epidermis has been removed.”
Dr. Biesman uses both antiviral and antibiotic prophylaxis prior to full-field treatments. “The literature by and large says that antibiotic/antiviral prophylaxis is not required prior to full-face ablation,” he said. “The reason I choose to is that I have had some issues with community-acquired MRSA infections. Because it’s so ubiquitous these days, I typically do prescribe an agent that gives good MRSA coverage.”
As for wound care, the literature differs on open versus closed techniques. Dr. Biesman favors using Aquaphor for the first week or so and seeing patients back on posttreatment day 2, “who by that time are usually beyond the inflammatory phase of wound healing,” he said. “A lot of the initial oozing has stopped by then. We clean that off any dried exudate in the office very carefully. We debride gently with warm-water soaks and I like to use PRP [platelet-rich plasma]. There is literature to support the role of PRP in wound healing.”
Even in the most experienced hands, complications can occur from full-field laser resurfacing, including bacterial, viral, or fungal infections. Other potential complications include persistent erythema, hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, scarring, and ectropion. “Knowledge of treatment parameters, endpoints, and wound healing is required for safe and successful outcomes,” Dr. Biesman said.
He reported having no relevant disclosures related to his presentation.
FROM A LASER & AESTHETIC SKIN THERAPY COURSE
Baseline body surface area may drive optimal baricitinib responses
results from an analysis of phase 3 data showed.
“This proposed clinical tailoring approach for baricitinib 2 mg allows for treatment of patients who are more likely to respond to therapy and rapid decision on discontinuation of treatment for those who are not likely to benefit from baricitinib 2 mg,” Eric L. Simpson, MD, said during a late-breaking abstract session at the Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis virtual symposium.
Baricitinib is an oral, reversible and selective Janus kinase 1/JAK2 inhibitor that is approved in Europe for the treatment of moderate to severe AD in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy. In the United States, it is approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis, and is currently under Food and Drug Administration review in the United States for AD.
For the current analysis, Dr. Simpson, professor of dermatology at Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, and colleagues set out to identify responders to baricitinib 2 mg using a tailored approach based on baseline BSA affected and early clinical improvement in the phase 3 monotherapy trial BREEZE-AD5. The trial enrolled 440 patients: 147 to placebo, 147 to baricitinib 1 mg once daily, and 146 to baricitinib 2 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)–75 at week 16.
“Understanding which patients can benefit most from this treatment was our goal,” Dr. Simpson said. “By tailoring your therapy, you can significantly improve the patient experience, increase the cost-effectiveness of a therapy, and you can ensure that only patients who are likely to benefit are exposed to a drug.”
The researchers used a classification and regression tree algorithm that identified baseline BSA as the strongest predictor of EASI-75 response at week 16. A BSA cutoff of 50% was established as the optimal cutoff for sensitivity and negative predictive value. Results for EASI-75 and Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) scores of 0 or 1 were confirmed using a BSA of 10%-50% at baseline to predict response, compared with a BSA or greater than 50% at baseline.
Sensitivity analyses revealed that about 90% of patients with an EASI-75 response were in the BSA 10%-50% group. Conversely, among patients with a BSA greater than 50%, the negative predictive value was greater than 90%, “so there’s a 90% chance you’re not going to hit that EASI-75 at week 16 if your BSA is greater than 50%,” Dr. Simpson explained. “The same holds true for vIGA-AD, so that 50% cutoff is important for understanding whether someone is going to respond or not.”
On the EASI-75, 38% of patients in the BSA 10%-50% group responded to baricitinib at week 16, compared with 10% in the BSA greater than 50% group. A similar association was observed on the vIGA-AD, where 32% of patients in the BSA 10%-50% group responded to baricitinib at week 16, compared with 5% in the BSA greater than 50% group.
When stratified by early response assessed at week 4, based on a 4-point improvement or greater on the Itch Numeric Rating Scale, 55% of those patients became EASI-75 responders, compared with 17% who were not. A similar association was observed by early response assessed at week 8.
“Due to the rapid onset of response, clinical assessment of patients after 4-8 weeks of initiation of baricitinib 2 mg treatment provided a positive feedback to patients who are likely to benefit from long-term therapy,” Dr. Simpson said. “This analysis may allow for a precision-medicine approach to therapy in moderate to severe AD.”
The study was supported by Eli Lilly, and was under license from Incyte. Dr. Simpson reported serving as an investigator for and consultant to numerous pharmaceutical companies.
results from an analysis of phase 3 data showed.
“This proposed clinical tailoring approach for baricitinib 2 mg allows for treatment of patients who are more likely to respond to therapy and rapid decision on discontinuation of treatment for those who are not likely to benefit from baricitinib 2 mg,” Eric L. Simpson, MD, said during a late-breaking abstract session at the Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis virtual symposium.
Baricitinib is an oral, reversible and selective Janus kinase 1/JAK2 inhibitor that is approved in Europe for the treatment of moderate to severe AD in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy. In the United States, it is approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis, and is currently under Food and Drug Administration review in the United States for AD.
For the current analysis, Dr. Simpson, professor of dermatology at Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, and colleagues set out to identify responders to baricitinib 2 mg using a tailored approach based on baseline BSA affected and early clinical improvement in the phase 3 monotherapy trial BREEZE-AD5. The trial enrolled 440 patients: 147 to placebo, 147 to baricitinib 1 mg once daily, and 146 to baricitinib 2 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)–75 at week 16.
“Understanding which patients can benefit most from this treatment was our goal,” Dr. Simpson said. “By tailoring your therapy, you can significantly improve the patient experience, increase the cost-effectiveness of a therapy, and you can ensure that only patients who are likely to benefit are exposed to a drug.”
The researchers used a classification and regression tree algorithm that identified baseline BSA as the strongest predictor of EASI-75 response at week 16. A BSA cutoff of 50% was established as the optimal cutoff for sensitivity and negative predictive value. Results for EASI-75 and Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) scores of 0 or 1 were confirmed using a BSA of 10%-50% at baseline to predict response, compared with a BSA or greater than 50% at baseline.
Sensitivity analyses revealed that about 90% of patients with an EASI-75 response were in the BSA 10%-50% group. Conversely, among patients with a BSA greater than 50%, the negative predictive value was greater than 90%, “so there’s a 90% chance you’re not going to hit that EASI-75 at week 16 if your BSA is greater than 50%,” Dr. Simpson explained. “The same holds true for vIGA-AD, so that 50% cutoff is important for understanding whether someone is going to respond or not.”
On the EASI-75, 38% of patients in the BSA 10%-50% group responded to baricitinib at week 16, compared with 10% in the BSA greater than 50% group. A similar association was observed on the vIGA-AD, where 32% of patients in the BSA 10%-50% group responded to baricitinib at week 16, compared with 5% in the BSA greater than 50% group.
When stratified by early response assessed at week 4, based on a 4-point improvement or greater on the Itch Numeric Rating Scale, 55% of those patients became EASI-75 responders, compared with 17% who were not. A similar association was observed by early response assessed at week 8.
“Due to the rapid onset of response, clinical assessment of patients after 4-8 weeks of initiation of baricitinib 2 mg treatment provided a positive feedback to patients who are likely to benefit from long-term therapy,” Dr. Simpson said. “This analysis may allow for a precision-medicine approach to therapy in moderate to severe AD.”
The study was supported by Eli Lilly, and was under license from Incyte. Dr. Simpson reported serving as an investigator for and consultant to numerous pharmaceutical companies.
results from an analysis of phase 3 data showed.
“This proposed clinical tailoring approach for baricitinib 2 mg allows for treatment of patients who are more likely to respond to therapy and rapid decision on discontinuation of treatment for those who are not likely to benefit from baricitinib 2 mg,” Eric L. Simpson, MD, said during a late-breaking abstract session at the Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis virtual symposium.
Baricitinib is an oral, reversible and selective Janus kinase 1/JAK2 inhibitor that is approved in Europe for the treatment of moderate to severe AD in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy. In the United States, it is approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis, and is currently under Food and Drug Administration review in the United States for AD.
For the current analysis, Dr. Simpson, professor of dermatology at Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, and colleagues set out to identify responders to baricitinib 2 mg using a tailored approach based on baseline BSA affected and early clinical improvement in the phase 3 monotherapy trial BREEZE-AD5. The trial enrolled 440 patients: 147 to placebo, 147 to baricitinib 1 mg once daily, and 146 to baricitinib 2 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)–75 at week 16.
“Understanding which patients can benefit most from this treatment was our goal,” Dr. Simpson said. “By tailoring your therapy, you can significantly improve the patient experience, increase the cost-effectiveness of a therapy, and you can ensure that only patients who are likely to benefit are exposed to a drug.”
The researchers used a classification and regression tree algorithm that identified baseline BSA as the strongest predictor of EASI-75 response at week 16. A BSA cutoff of 50% was established as the optimal cutoff for sensitivity and negative predictive value. Results for EASI-75 and Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) scores of 0 or 1 were confirmed using a BSA of 10%-50% at baseline to predict response, compared with a BSA or greater than 50% at baseline.
Sensitivity analyses revealed that about 90% of patients with an EASI-75 response were in the BSA 10%-50% group. Conversely, among patients with a BSA greater than 50%, the negative predictive value was greater than 90%, “so there’s a 90% chance you’re not going to hit that EASI-75 at week 16 if your BSA is greater than 50%,” Dr. Simpson explained. “The same holds true for vIGA-AD, so that 50% cutoff is important for understanding whether someone is going to respond or not.”
On the EASI-75, 38% of patients in the BSA 10%-50% group responded to baricitinib at week 16, compared with 10% in the BSA greater than 50% group. A similar association was observed on the vIGA-AD, where 32% of patients in the BSA 10%-50% group responded to baricitinib at week 16, compared with 5% in the BSA greater than 50% group.
When stratified by early response assessed at week 4, based on a 4-point improvement or greater on the Itch Numeric Rating Scale, 55% of those patients became EASI-75 responders, compared with 17% who were not. A similar association was observed by early response assessed at week 8.
“Due to the rapid onset of response, clinical assessment of patients after 4-8 weeks of initiation of baricitinib 2 mg treatment provided a positive feedback to patients who are likely to benefit from long-term therapy,” Dr. Simpson said. “This analysis may allow for a precision-medicine approach to therapy in moderate to severe AD.”
The study was supported by Eli Lilly, and was under license from Incyte. Dr. Simpson reported serving as an investigator for and consultant to numerous pharmaceutical companies.
FROM REVOLUTIONIZING AD 2020
Avoiding atopic dermatitis triggers easier said than done
“Guidelines on trigger avoidance are written as if it’s easy to do,” Jonathan I. Silverberg, MD, PhD, MPH, said during the Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis virtual symposium. “It turns out that trigger avoidance is really complicated.”
He and his colleagues conducted a study of most common triggers for itch based on a prospective dermatology practice–based study of 587 adults with AD . About two-thirds (65%) reported one or more itch trigger in the past week and 36% had three or more itch triggers in the past week. The two most common triggers were stress (35%) and sweat (31%).
“To me, this is provocative, because this is not how I was trained in residency,” said Dr. Silverberg, director of clinical research in the division of dermatology at George Washington University, Washington. “I was trained that it’s all about excess showering, dry air, or cold temperature. Those are important, but the most common triggers are stress and sweat.”
AD triggers are also commonly linked to seasonality. “If you ask patients when their AD is worse, sometimes it’s winter,” he said. “Sometimes it’s spring. Sometimes it’s summer. It turns out that there is a distinct set of triggers that are associated with AD seasonality.” Wintertime worsening of disease is associated with cold temperature and weather change, he continued, while springtime worsening of disease is often linked to weather change and dry air. Common summertime triggers for flares include hot temperature, heat, sweat, weather change, sunlight, humid air, and dry air. “In the fall, the weather change again comes up as a trigger. Humid air does as well.”
In their prospective study, Dr. Silverberg and colleagues found that 90% of those who had at least three itch triggers reported 3 months or less of AD remission in the past year, “meaning that 90% are reporting persistent disease when they have multiple itch triggers,” he said. In addition, 78% reported two or more flares per year and 61% reported that AD is worse during certain seasons.
Potential mitigation strategies for stress include stress management, biofeedback, meditation, relaxation training, and mindfulness. “These don’t necessarily require expensive psychotherapy,” he said. Freely available iPhone apps can be incorporated into daily practice, such as Calm, Relax with Andrew Johnson, Nature Sounds Relax and Sleep, Breathe2Relax, and Headspace.
Many AD patients are sedentary and avoid vigorous physical activity owing to heat and sweat as triggers. Simple solutions include exercising in a cooler temperature environment, “not just using fans,” he said. “Take a quick shower right after working out and consider pre- and/or post treatment with topical medication.”
High temperature and sweating can be problematic at bedtime, he continued. Even if the indoor temperature is 70° F, that might jump to 85° F or 90° F under a thick blanket. “That heat can trigger itch and may cause sweating, which can trigger itch,” said Dr. Silverberg, who has AD and is director of patch testing at George Washington University. Potential solutions include using a lighter blanket, lowering the indoor temperature, and wearing breathable pajamas.
Dryness, another common AD trigger, can be secondary to a combination of low outdoor and/or indoor humidity. “Lower outdoor humidity is a particular problem in the wintertime, because cold air doesn’t hold moisture as well,” he said. “That’s why the air feels much dryer in the wintertime. There’s also a problem of indoor heating and cooling. Sometimes central air systems can lower humidity to the point where it’s bone dry.”
In an effort to determine the impact of specific climatic factors on the U.S. prevalence of AD, Dr. Silverberg and colleagues conducted a study using a merged analysis of the 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health from a representative sample of 91,642 children aged 0-17 years and 2006-2007 measurements from the National Climate Data Center and Weather Service. They found that childhood AD prevalence was increased in geographical areas that use more indoor heat and cooling and had lower outdoor humidity. “So, we see that there’s a direct correlate of this dryness issue that is leading to more AD throughout the U.S.,” he said.
Practical solutions to mitigate the effect of dry air on AD include opening windows to allow entry of moist air, “which can be particularly helpful in residences that are overheated,” he said. “I deal with this a lot in patients who live in dormitories. Use humidifiers to add moisture back into the air. Aim for 40%-50% indoor humidity to avoid mold and dust mites. It’s better to use demineralized water to reduce bacterial growth. This can be helpful for aeroallergies. Of note, there are really no well-done studies that have examined the efficacy of humidifiers in AD, but based on our anecdotal experience, this is a good way to go.”
Cold temperatures and trigger intense itch, even in the setting of high humidity. “For me personally, this is one of my most brutal triggers,” Dr. Silverberg said. “When I’m in a place with extremes of cold, I get a rapid onset of itch, a mix of itch and pain, particularly on the dorsal hands. For solutions, you can encourage patients to avoid extremely low temperatures, to bundle up, and to potentially use hand warmers or other heating devices.”
Clothing can be a trigger as well, especially tight-fitting clothes, hot and nonbreathable clothes, and large-diameter wool, which has been shown to induce itching and irritation. Mitigation strategies include wearing loose-fitting, lightweight, nonirritating fabric. “Traditional cotton and silk fabrics have mixed evidence in improving AD but are generally safe,” he said. “Ultra- or superfine merino wool has been shown to be nonpruritic. There is sparse evidence to support chemically treated/coated clothing for AD, but this may be an emerging area.”
Dr. Silverberg pointed out variability of cultural perspectives and preferences for bathing practices, including temperature, duration, frequency, optimal bathing products, and the use of loofahs and other scrubbing products. “This stems from different perceptions of what it means to be clean, and how dry our skin should feel after a shower,” he said. “Many clinicians and patients were taught that regular bathing is harmful in AD. It turns out that’s not true.”
In a recently published systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 studies, he and his colleagues examined efficacy outcomes of different bathing/showering regimens in AD. All 13 studies showed numerically reduced AD severity with any bathing regimen in at least one time point. Numerical decreases over time were observed for body surface area (BSA), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), and/or SCORAD measures for daily and less than daily bathing, with or without application of emollients or topical corticosteroids. In random effects regression models, taking baths more than or less than seven times per week were not associated with significant differences of Cohen’s D scores for EASI, SCORAD, or BSA. “The take-home message here is, let your AD patients bathe,” Dr. Silverberg said. “Bathing is good. It can be channeled to help the eczema, but it has to be done the right way.”
Patients should be counseled to use nonirritating cleansers and shampoos, avoid excessively long baths/showers, avoid excessively hot baths/showers, avoid excessive rubbing or scrubbing of skin, and to apply emollients and/or topical corticosteroids immediately after the bath/shower.
PROMIS Itch-Triggers is a simple and feasible checklist to screen for the most common itch triggers in AD in clinical practice (patients are asked to check off which of the following have caused their itch in the previous 7 days: cold temperature, hot temperature, heat, sweat, tight clothing, fragrances, boredom, talking about itch, stress, weather change, sunlight, humid air, dry air). “It takes less than 1 minute to complete,” he said. “Additional testing with skin patch and/or prick testing may be warranted to identify allergenic triggers.”
Dr. Silverberg reported that he is a consultant to and/or an advisory board member for several pharmaceutical companies. He is also a speaker for Regeneron and Sanofi and has received a grant from Galderma.
“Guidelines on trigger avoidance are written as if it’s easy to do,” Jonathan I. Silverberg, MD, PhD, MPH, said during the Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis virtual symposium. “It turns out that trigger avoidance is really complicated.”
He and his colleagues conducted a study of most common triggers for itch based on a prospective dermatology practice–based study of 587 adults with AD . About two-thirds (65%) reported one or more itch trigger in the past week and 36% had three or more itch triggers in the past week. The two most common triggers were stress (35%) and sweat (31%).
“To me, this is provocative, because this is not how I was trained in residency,” said Dr. Silverberg, director of clinical research in the division of dermatology at George Washington University, Washington. “I was trained that it’s all about excess showering, dry air, or cold temperature. Those are important, but the most common triggers are stress and sweat.”
AD triggers are also commonly linked to seasonality. “If you ask patients when their AD is worse, sometimes it’s winter,” he said. “Sometimes it’s spring. Sometimes it’s summer. It turns out that there is a distinct set of triggers that are associated with AD seasonality.” Wintertime worsening of disease is associated with cold temperature and weather change, he continued, while springtime worsening of disease is often linked to weather change and dry air. Common summertime triggers for flares include hot temperature, heat, sweat, weather change, sunlight, humid air, and dry air. “In the fall, the weather change again comes up as a trigger. Humid air does as well.”
In their prospective study, Dr. Silverberg and colleagues found that 90% of those who had at least three itch triggers reported 3 months or less of AD remission in the past year, “meaning that 90% are reporting persistent disease when they have multiple itch triggers,” he said. In addition, 78% reported two or more flares per year and 61% reported that AD is worse during certain seasons.
Potential mitigation strategies for stress include stress management, biofeedback, meditation, relaxation training, and mindfulness. “These don’t necessarily require expensive psychotherapy,” he said. Freely available iPhone apps can be incorporated into daily practice, such as Calm, Relax with Andrew Johnson, Nature Sounds Relax and Sleep, Breathe2Relax, and Headspace.
Many AD patients are sedentary and avoid vigorous physical activity owing to heat and sweat as triggers. Simple solutions include exercising in a cooler temperature environment, “not just using fans,” he said. “Take a quick shower right after working out and consider pre- and/or post treatment with topical medication.”
High temperature and sweating can be problematic at bedtime, he continued. Even if the indoor temperature is 70° F, that might jump to 85° F or 90° F under a thick blanket. “That heat can trigger itch and may cause sweating, which can trigger itch,” said Dr. Silverberg, who has AD and is director of patch testing at George Washington University. Potential solutions include using a lighter blanket, lowering the indoor temperature, and wearing breathable pajamas.
Dryness, another common AD trigger, can be secondary to a combination of low outdoor and/or indoor humidity. “Lower outdoor humidity is a particular problem in the wintertime, because cold air doesn’t hold moisture as well,” he said. “That’s why the air feels much dryer in the wintertime. There’s also a problem of indoor heating and cooling. Sometimes central air systems can lower humidity to the point where it’s bone dry.”
In an effort to determine the impact of specific climatic factors on the U.S. prevalence of AD, Dr. Silverberg and colleagues conducted a study using a merged analysis of the 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health from a representative sample of 91,642 children aged 0-17 years and 2006-2007 measurements from the National Climate Data Center and Weather Service. They found that childhood AD prevalence was increased in geographical areas that use more indoor heat and cooling and had lower outdoor humidity. “So, we see that there’s a direct correlate of this dryness issue that is leading to more AD throughout the U.S.,” he said.
Practical solutions to mitigate the effect of dry air on AD include opening windows to allow entry of moist air, “which can be particularly helpful in residences that are overheated,” he said. “I deal with this a lot in patients who live in dormitories. Use humidifiers to add moisture back into the air. Aim for 40%-50% indoor humidity to avoid mold and dust mites. It’s better to use demineralized water to reduce bacterial growth. This can be helpful for aeroallergies. Of note, there are really no well-done studies that have examined the efficacy of humidifiers in AD, but based on our anecdotal experience, this is a good way to go.”
Cold temperatures and trigger intense itch, even in the setting of high humidity. “For me personally, this is one of my most brutal triggers,” Dr. Silverberg said. “When I’m in a place with extremes of cold, I get a rapid onset of itch, a mix of itch and pain, particularly on the dorsal hands. For solutions, you can encourage patients to avoid extremely low temperatures, to bundle up, and to potentially use hand warmers or other heating devices.”
Clothing can be a trigger as well, especially tight-fitting clothes, hot and nonbreathable clothes, and large-diameter wool, which has been shown to induce itching and irritation. Mitigation strategies include wearing loose-fitting, lightweight, nonirritating fabric. “Traditional cotton and silk fabrics have mixed evidence in improving AD but are generally safe,” he said. “Ultra- or superfine merino wool has been shown to be nonpruritic. There is sparse evidence to support chemically treated/coated clothing for AD, but this may be an emerging area.”
Dr. Silverberg pointed out variability of cultural perspectives and preferences for bathing practices, including temperature, duration, frequency, optimal bathing products, and the use of loofahs and other scrubbing products. “This stems from different perceptions of what it means to be clean, and how dry our skin should feel after a shower,” he said. “Many clinicians and patients were taught that regular bathing is harmful in AD. It turns out that’s not true.”
In a recently published systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 studies, he and his colleagues examined efficacy outcomes of different bathing/showering regimens in AD. All 13 studies showed numerically reduced AD severity with any bathing regimen in at least one time point. Numerical decreases over time were observed for body surface area (BSA), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), and/or SCORAD measures for daily and less than daily bathing, with or without application of emollients or topical corticosteroids. In random effects regression models, taking baths more than or less than seven times per week were not associated with significant differences of Cohen’s D scores for EASI, SCORAD, or BSA. “The take-home message here is, let your AD patients bathe,” Dr. Silverberg said. “Bathing is good. It can be channeled to help the eczema, but it has to be done the right way.”
Patients should be counseled to use nonirritating cleansers and shampoos, avoid excessively long baths/showers, avoid excessively hot baths/showers, avoid excessive rubbing or scrubbing of skin, and to apply emollients and/or topical corticosteroids immediately after the bath/shower.
PROMIS Itch-Triggers is a simple and feasible checklist to screen for the most common itch triggers in AD in clinical practice (patients are asked to check off which of the following have caused their itch in the previous 7 days: cold temperature, hot temperature, heat, sweat, tight clothing, fragrances, boredom, talking about itch, stress, weather change, sunlight, humid air, dry air). “It takes less than 1 minute to complete,” he said. “Additional testing with skin patch and/or prick testing may be warranted to identify allergenic triggers.”
Dr. Silverberg reported that he is a consultant to and/or an advisory board member for several pharmaceutical companies. He is also a speaker for Regeneron and Sanofi and has received a grant from Galderma.
“Guidelines on trigger avoidance are written as if it’s easy to do,” Jonathan I. Silverberg, MD, PhD, MPH, said during the Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis virtual symposium. “It turns out that trigger avoidance is really complicated.”
He and his colleagues conducted a study of most common triggers for itch based on a prospective dermatology practice–based study of 587 adults with AD . About two-thirds (65%) reported one or more itch trigger in the past week and 36% had three or more itch triggers in the past week. The two most common triggers were stress (35%) and sweat (31%).
“To me, this is provocative, because this is not how I was trained in residency,” said Dr. Silverberg, director of clinical research in the division of dermatology at George Washington University, Washington. “I was trained that it’s all about excess showering, dry air, or cold temperature. Those are important, but the most common triggers are stress and sweat.”
AD triggers are also commonly linked to seasonality. “If you ask patients when their AD is worse, sometimes it’s winter,” he said. “Sometimes it’s spring. Sometimes it’s summer. It turns out that there is a distinct set of triggers that are associated with AD seasonality.” Wintertime worsening of disease is associated with cold temperature and weather change, he continued, while springtime worsening of disease is often linked to weather change and dry air. Common summertime triggers for flares include hot temperature, heat, sweat, weather change, sunlight, humid air, and dry air. “In the fall, the weather change again comes up as a trigger. Humid air does as well.”
In their prospective study, Dr. Silverberg and colleagues found that 90% of those who had at least three itch triggers reported 3 months or less of AD remission in the past year, “meaning that 90% are reporting persistent disease when they have multiple itch triggers,” he said. In addition, 78% reported two or more flares per year and 61% reported that AD is worse during certain seasons.
Potential mitigation strategies for stress include stress management, biofeedback, meditation, relaxation training, and mindfulness. “These don’t necessarily require expensive psychotherapy,” he said. Freely available iPhone apps can be incorporated into daily practice, such as Calm, Relax with Andrew Johnson, Nature Sounds Relax and Sleep, Breathe2Relax, and Headspace.
Many AD patients are sedentary and avoid vigorous physical activity owing to heat and sweat as triggers. Simple solutions include exercising in a cooler temperature environment, “not just using fans,” he said. “Take a quick shower right after working out and consider pre- and/or post treatment with topical medication.”
High temperature and sweating can be problematic at bedtime, he continued. Even if the indoor temperature is 70° F, that might jump to 85° F or 90° F under a thick blanket. “That heat can trigger itch and may cause sweating, which can trigger itch,” said Dr. Silverberg, who has AD and is director of patch testing at George Washington University. Potential solutions include using a lighter blanket, lowering the indoor temperature, and wearing breathable pajamas.
Dryness, another common AD trigger, can be secondary to a combination of low outdoor and/or indoor humidity. “Lower outdoor humidity is a particular problem in the wintertime, because cold air doesn’t hold moisture as well,” he said. “That’s why the air feels much dryer in the wintertime. There’s also a problem of indoor heating and cooling. Sometimes central air systems can lower humidity to the point where it’s bone dry.”
In an effort to determine the impact of specific climatic factors on the U.S. prevalence of AD, Dr. Silverberg and colleagues conducted a study using a merged analysis of the 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health from a representative sample of 91,642 children aged 0-17 years and 2006-2007 measurements from the National Climate Data Center and Weather Service. They found that childhood AD prevalence was increased in geographical areas that use more indoor heat and cooling and had lower outdoor humidity. “So, we see that there’s a direct correlate of this dryness issue that is leading to more AD throughout the U.S.,” he said.
Practical solutions to mitigate the effect of dry air on AD include opening windows to allow entry of moist air, “which can be particularly helpful in residences that are overheated,” he said. “I deal with this a lot in patients who live in dormitories. Use humidifiers to add moisture back into the air. Aim for 40%-50% indoor humidity to avoid mold and dust mites. It’s better to use demineralized water to reduce bacterial growth. This can be helpful for aeroallergies. Of note, there are really no well-done studies that have examined the efficacy of humidifiers in AD, but based on our anecdotal experience, this is a good way to go.”
Cold temperatures and trigger intense itch, even in the setting of high humidity. “For me personally, this is one of my most brutal triggers,” Dr. Silverberg said. “When I’m in a place with extremes of cold, I get a rapid onset of itch, a mix of itch and pain, particularly on the dorsal hands. For solutions, you can encourage patients to avoid extremely low temperatures, to bundle up, and to potentially use hand warmers or other heating devices.”
Clothing can be a trigger as well, especially tight-fitting clothes, hot and nonbreathable clothes, and large-diameter wool, which has been shown to induce itching and irritation. Mitigation strategies include wearing loose-fitting, lightweight, nonirritating fabric. “Traditional cotton and silk fabrics have mixed evidence in improving AD but are generally safe,” he said. “Ultra- or superfine merino wool has been shown to be nonpruritic. There is sparse evidence to support chemically treated/coated clothing for AD, but this may be an emerging area.”
Dr. Silverberg pointed out variability of cultural perspectives and preferences for bathing practices, including temperature, duration, frequency, optimal bathing products, and the use of loofahs and other scrubbing products. “This stems from different perceptions of what it means to be clean, and how dry our skin should feel after a shower,” he said. “Many clinicians and patients were taught that regular bathing is harmful in AD. It turns out that’s not true.”
In a recently published systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 studies, he and his colleagues examined efficacy outcomes of different bathing/showering regimens in AD. All 13 studies showed numerically reduced AD severity with any bathing regimen in at least one time point. Numerical decreases over time were observed for body surface area (BSA), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), and/or SCORAD measures for daily and less than daily bathing, with or without application of emollients or topical corticosteroids. In random effects regression models, taking baths more than or less than seven times per week were not associated with significant differences of Cohen’s D scores for EASI, SCORAD, or BSA. “The take-home message here is, let your AD patients bathe,” Dr. Silverberg said. “Bathing is good. It can be channeled to help the eczema, but it has to be done the right way.”
Patients should be counseled to use nonirritating cleansers and shampoos, avoid excessively long baths/showers, avoid excessively hot baths/showers, avoid excessive rubbing or scrubbing of skin, and to apply emollients and/or topical corticosteroids immediately after the bath/shower.
PROMIS Itch-Triggers is a simple and feasible checklist to screen for the most common itch triggers in AD in clinical practice (patients are asked to check off which of the following have caused their itch in the previous 7 days: cold temperature, hot temperature, heat, sweat, tight clothing, fragrances, boredom, talking about itch, stress, weather change, sunlight, humid air, dry air). “It takes less than 1 minute to complete,” he said. “Additional testing with skin patch and/or prick testing may be warranted to identify allergenic triggers.”
Dr. Silverberg reported that he is a consultant to and/or an advisory board member for several pharmaceutical companies. He is also a speaker for Regeneron and Sanofi and has received a grant from Galderma.
FROM REVOLUTIONIZING AD 2020
Dupilumab curbed itch intensity, frequency in children with severe eczema
.
The findings come from a post hoc analysis of a phase 3 trial known as LIBERTY AD PEDS (NCT03345914) that Gil Yosipovitch, MD, presented during a late-breaking research session at the Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis virtual symposium.
“Severe AD is complex, highly symptomatic, multidimensional condition characterized by an intense pruritus that negatively impacts a patient’s life,” said Dr. Yosipovitch, professor of dermatology and director of the Miami Itch Center at the University of Miami. Published data from the double-blind, placebo-controlled, 16-week, LIBERTY AD PEDS trial in children aged 6–11 years with severe AD showed that dupilumab significantly improved AD signs, symptoms, and quality of life, with an acceptable safety profile (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;21:119-31).
For the current analysis, Dr. Yosipovitch and colleagues evaluated the time to onset, magnitude, and sustainability of the effect of dupilumab on different measures of itch using data from approved Food and Drug Administration doses studied in the LIBERTY AD PEDS trial. A total of 243 children aged 6-11 years were randomized to dupilumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (300 mg q4w, baseline weight of less than 30 kg; 600-mg loading dose), 200 mg every 2 weeks (200 mg q2w, baseline weight 30 kg or greater; 400-mg loading dose), or placebo. All patients received concomitant medium-potency topical corticosteroids.
The mean age of patients was 8.4 years and those in the 300-mg q4w group were about 2 years younger than those in the 200-mg q2w group. On the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), the researchers observed that treatment with dupilumab was associated with a significant improvement from baseline in daily worst itch score through day 22 in the 300-mg q4w group and the 200-mg q2w group, compared with placebo (–29% vs. –30%, respectively; P less than or equal to .001 and P less than or equal to .05). Treatment with dupilumab was also associated with a significant improvement from baseline in weekly average of daily worst itch score through week 16, compared with placebo (–55% vs. –58%; P less than or equal to .001). Similarly, a higher daily proportion of dupilumab-treated patients achieved a 2-point or more improvement in worst itch score, compared with placebo (51% vs. 49%; P less than or equal to .001 and P less than or equal to .05). The same association held true for the daily proportion of dupilumab-treated patients who achieved a 4-point or more improvement in worst itch score, compared with placebo (21% in both groups; P less than or equal to .05).
By week 16, a higher weekly proportion of dupilumab-treated patients achieved a 2-point or more improvement in worst itch score, compared with placebo (72% in the 300-mg q4w group vs. 74% in the 200-mg q2w group; P less than or equal to .001). The same association held true for the daily proportion of dupilumab-treated patients who achieved a 4-point or more improvement in worst itch score, compared with placebo (54% vs. 61%; P less than or equal to .001).
Next, the researchers evaluated the proportion of patients reporting the number of days with itchy skin over the previous 7 days as assessed from the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) itch item question: “Over the last week, on how many days has your child’s skin been itchy because of their eczema?” By week 16, the majority of children treated with dupilumab achieved a reduction of days experiencing itch from every day at baseline to at most 2 days, with some improvement to zero days per week.
“Overall, in the LIBERTY AD PEDS trial, dupilumab was well tolerated and data were consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile observed in adults and adolescents,” Dr. Yosipovitch said. “Injection site reactions and conjunctivitis were more common with dupilumab. Infections and AD exacerbations were more common with placebo.”
The study was sponsored by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Yosipovitch and coauthors reporting having received financial grants and research grants from numerous pharmaceutical companies.
.
The findings come from a post hoc analysis of a phase 3 trial known as LIBERTY AD PEDS (NCT03345914) that Gil Yosipovitch, MD, presented during a late-breaking research session at the Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis virtual symposium.
“Severe AD is complex, highly symptomatic, multidimensional condition characterized by an intense pruritus that negatively impacts a patient’s life,” said Dr. Yosipovitch, professor of dermatology and director of the Miami Itch Center at the University of Miami. Published data from the double-blind, placebo-controlled, 16-week, LIBERTY AD PEDS trial in children aged 6–11 years with severe AD showed that dupilumab significantly improved AD signs, symptoms, and quality of life, with an acceptable safety profile (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;21:119-31).
For the current analysis, Dr. Yosipovitch and colleagues evaluated the time to onset, magnitude, and sustainability of the effect of dupilumab on different measures of itch using data from approved Food and Drug Administration doses studied in the LIBERTY AD PEDS trial. A total of 243 children aged 6-11 years were randomized to dupilumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (300 mg q4w, baseline weight of less than 30 kg; 600-mg loading dose), 200 mg every 2 weeks (200 mg q2w, baseline weight 30 kg or greater; 400-mg loading dose), or placebo. All patients received concomitant medium-potency topical corticosteroids.
The mean age of patients was 8.4 years and those in the 300-mg q4w group were about 2 years younger than those in the 200-mg q2w group. On the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), the researchers observed that treatment with dupilumab was associated with a significant improvement from baseline in daily worst itch score through day 22 in the 300-mg q4w group and the 200-mg q2w group, compared with placebo (–29% vs. –30%, respectively; P less than or equal to .001 and P less than or equal to .05). Treatment with dupilumab was also associated with a significant improvement from baseline in weekly average of daily worst itch score through week 16, compared with placebo (–55% vs. –58%; P less than or equal to .001). Similarly, a higher daily proportion of dupilumab-treated patients achieved a 2-point or more improvement in worst itch score, compared with placebo (51% vs. 49%; P less than or equal to .001 and P less than or equal to .05). The same association held true for the daily proportion of dupilumab-treated patients who achieved a 4-point or more improvement in worst itch score, compared with placebo (21% in both groups; P less than or equal to .05).
By week 16, a higher weekly proportion of dupilumab-treated patients achieved a 2-point or more improvement in worst itch score, compared with placebo (72% in the 300-mg q4w group vs. 74% in the 200-mg q2w group; P less than or equal to .001). The same association held true for the daily proportion of dupilumab-treated patients who achieved a 4-point or more improvement in worst itch score, compared with placebo (54% vs. 61%; P less than or equal to .001).
Next, the researchers evaluated the proportion of patients reporting the number of days with itchy skin over the previous 7 days as assessed from the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) itch item question: “Over the last week, on how many days has your child’s skin been itchy because of their eczema?” By week 16, the majority of children treated with dupilumab achieved a reduction of days experiencing itch from every day at baseline to at most 2 days, with some improvement to zero days per week.
“Overall, in the LIBERTY AD PEDS trial, dupilumab was well tolerated and data were consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile observed in adults and adolescents,” Dr. Yosipovitch said. “Injection site reactions and conjunctivitis were more common with dupilumab. Infections and AD exacerbations were more common with placebo.”
The study was sponsored by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Yosipovitch and coauthors reporting having received financial grants and research grants from numerous pharmaceutical companies.
.
The findings come from a post hoc analysis of a phase 3 trial known as LIBERTY AD PEDS (NCT03345914) that Gil Yosipovitch, MD, presented during a late-breaking research session at the Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis virtual symposium.
“Severe AD is complex, highly symptomatic, multidimensional condition characterized by an intense pruritus that negatively impacts a patient’s life,” said Dr. Yosipovitch, professor of dermatology and director of the Miami Itch Center at the University of Miami. Published data from the double-blind, placebo-controlled, 16-week, LIBERTY AD PEDS trial in children aged 6–11 years with severe AD showed that dupilumab significantly improved AD signs, symptoms, and quality of life, with an acceptable safety profile (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;21:119-31).
For the current analysis, Dr. Yosipovitch and colleagues evaluated the time to onset, magnitude, and sustainability of the effect of dupilumab on different measures of itch using data from approved Food and Drug Administration doses studied in the LIBERTY AD PEDS trial. A total of 243 children aged 6-11 years were randomized to dupilumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (300 mg q4w, baseline weight of less than 30 kg; 600-mg loading dose), 200 mg every 2 weeks (200 mg q2w, baseline weight 30 kg or greater; 400-mg loading dose), or placebo. All patients received concomitant medium-potency topical corticosteroids.
The mean age of patients was 8.4 years and those in the 300-mg q4w group were about 2 years younger than those in the 200-mg q2w group. On the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), the researchers observed that treatment with dupilumab was associated with a significant improvement from baseline in daily worst itch score through day 22 in the 300-mg q4w group and the 200-mg q2w group, compared with placebo (–29% vs. –30%, respectively; P less than or equal to .001 and P less than or equal to .05). Treatment with dupilumab was also associated with a significant improvement from baseline in weekly average of daily worst itch score through week 16, compared with placebo (–55% vs. –58%; P less than or equal to .001). Similarly, a higher daily proportion of dupilumab-treated patients achieved a 2-point or more improvement in worst itch score, compared with placebo (51% vs. 49%; P less than or equal to .001 and P less than or equal to .05). The same association held true for the daily proportion of dupilumab-treated patients who achieved a 4-point or more improvement in worst itch score, compared with placebo (21% in both groups; P less than or equal to .05).
By week 16, a higher weekly proportion of dupilumab-treated patients achieved a 2-point or more improvement in worst itch score, compared with placebo (72% in the 300-mg q4w group vs. 74% in the 200-mg q2w group; P less than or equal to .001). The same association held true for the daily proportion of dupilumab-treated patients who achieved a 4-point or more improvement in worst itch score, compared with placebo (54% vs. 61%; P less than or equal to .001).
Next, the researchers evaluated the proportion of patients reporting the number of days with itchy skin over the previous 7 days as assessed from the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) itch item question: “Over the last week, on how many days has your child’s skin been itchy because of their eczema?” By week 16, the majority of children treated with dupilumab achieved a reduction of days experiencing itch from every day at baseline to at most 2 days, with some improvement to zero days per week.
“Overall, in the LIBERTY AD PEDS trial, dupilumab was well tolerated and data were consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile observed in adults and adolescents,” Dr. Yosipovitch said. “Injection site reactions and conjunctivitis were more common with dupilumab. Infections and AD exacerbations were more common with placebo.”
The study was sponsored by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Yosipovitch and coauthors reporting having received financial grants and research grants from numerous pharmaceutical companies.
REPORTING FROM REVOLUTIONIZING AD 2020
FDA warns about risk for false negatives from Curative COVID test
which is being used in Los Angeles and other large metropolitan areas in the United States.
The real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was developed by Menlo Park, Calif.–based health care start-up Curative. Results are analyzed by the company’s clinical lab, KorvaLabs. The test, which is authorized for prescription use only, received emergency-use authorization from the FDA on April 16, 2020. By Nov. 9, the company had processed 6 million test results, according to the company.
The FDA alert cautions that false negative results from any COVID-19 test can lead to delays in or the lack of supportive treatment and increase the risk for viral spread.
To mitigate the risk for false negatives, the agency advises clinicians to perform the Curative test as described in the product’s Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers. This includes limiting its use to people who have had COVID-19 symptoms for 14 days or less. “Consider retesting your patients using a different test if you suspect an inaccurate result was given recently by the Curative SARS-Cov-2 test,” the FDA alert stated. “If testing was performed more than 2 weeks ago, and there is no reason to suspect current SARS-CoV-2 infection, it is not necessary to retest.”
The alert also notes that a negative result from the Curative PCR test “does not rule out COVID-19 and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or patient management decisions. A negative result does not exclude the possibility of COVID-19.”
According to a press release issued by Curative on Oct. 7, its PCR test is being used by the Department of Defense, as well as the states of Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia (Atlanta and Savannah), Illinois (Chicago), Louisiana, Texas, and Wyoming. The company also operates Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–certified laboratories in San Dimas, Calif.; Washington, D.C.; and Pflugerville, Tex.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
which is being used in Los Angeles and other large metropolitan areas in the United States.
The real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was developed by Menlo Park, Calif.–based health care start-up Curative. Results are analyzed by the company’s clinical lab, KorvaLabs. The test, which is authorized for prescription use only, received emergency-use authorization from the FDA on April 16, 2020. By Nov. 9, the company had processed 6 million test results, according to the company.
The FDA alert cautions that false negative results from any COVID-19 test can lead to delays in or the lack of supportive treatment and increase the risk for viral spread.
To mitigate the risk for false negatives, the agency advises clinicians to perform the Curative test as described in the product’s Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers. This includes limiting its use to people who have had COVID-19 symptoms for 14 days or less. “Consider retesting your patients using a different test if you suspect an inaccurate result was given recently by the Curative SARS-Cov-2 test,” the FDA alert stated. “If testing was performed more than 2 weeks ago, and there is no reason to suspect current SARS-CoV-2 infection, it is not necessary to retest.”
The alert also notes that a negative result from the Curative PCR test “does not rule out COVID-19 and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or patient management decisions. A negative result does not exclude the possibility of COVID-19.”
According to a press release issued by Curative on Oct. 7, its PCR test is being used by the Department of Defense, as well as the states of Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia (Atlanta and Savannah), Illinois (Chicago), Louisiana, Texas, and Wyoming. The company also operates Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–certified laboratories in San Dimas, Calif.; Washington, D.C.; and Pflugerville, Tex.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
which is being used in Los Angeles and other large metropolitan areas in the United States.
The real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was developed by Menlo Park, Calif.–based health care start-up Curative. Results are analyzed by the company’s clinical lab, KorvaLabs. The test, which is authorized for prescription use only, received emergency-use authorization from the FDA on April 16, 2020. By Nov. 9, the company had processed 6 million test results, according to the company.
The FDA alert cautions that false negative results from any COVID-19 test can lead to delays in or the lack of supportive treatment and increase the risk for viral spread.
To mitigate the risk for false negatives, the agency advises clinicians to perform the Curative test as described in the product’s Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers. This includes limiting its use to people who have had COVID-19 symptoms for 14 days or less. “Consider retesting your patients using a different test if you suspect an inaccurate result was given recently by the Curative SARS-Cov-2 test,” the FDA alert stated. “If testing was performed more than 2 weeks ago, and there is no reason to suspect current SARS-CoV-2 infection, it is not necessary to retest.”
The alert also notes that a negative result from the Curative PCR test “does not rule out COVID-19 and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or patient management decisions. A negative result does not exclude the possibility of COVID-19.”
According to a press release issued by Curative on Oct. 7, its PCR test is being used by the Department of Defense, as well as the states of Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia (Atlanta and Savannah), Illinois (Chicago), Louisiana, Texas, and Wyoming. The company also operates Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–certified laboratories in San Dimas, Calif.; Washington, D.C.; and Pflugerville, Tex.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Light-based technologies emerging as promising acne treatments
such as Fernanda H. Sakamoto, MD, PhD.
“I love treating acne, because it can have a huge impact on our patients’ lives,” Dr. Sakamoto, a dermatologist at the Wellman Center for Photomedicine at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, said during a virtual course on laser and aesthetic skin therapy. “Acne is the most common disease in dermatology, affecting about 80% of our patients. Eleven percent of these patients have difficult-to-treat acne, and it is also the No. 1 cause of depression and suicide among teenagers and young adults. And, even though there’s no strong evidence that optical treatments work better than conventional acne treatments, people still spend a lot on those treatments: more than 220 million in 2019.”
Early results from a pilot study suggest that use of a novel laser system known as Accure in patients with mild to moderate acne resulted in an 80% reduction in acne lesions at 12 weeks. The laser prototype, which uses a 1,726 nm wavelength and is being developed by researchers at the Wellman Center for Photomedicine, features a built-in thermal camera in the handpiece that allows the user to monitor the skin’s temperature during treatment.
In initial pilot studies of the device, Dr. Sakamoto and colleagues observed consistent damage of the sebaceous glands, with no damage to the epidermis, surrounding dermis, or other follicular structures. “But because the contrast of absorption of lipids and water is not very high, we needed to create a laser with features that we have never seen before,” she said. “One of them is a robust cooling system. The second prototype features a built-in thermal camera within the handpiece that allows us to see the temperature while we’re treating the patient. It also has built-in software that would shut down the laser if the temperature is too high. “This is the first laser with some safety features that will give the user direct feedback while treating the patient,” she said, noting that its “unique cooling system and real-time monitoring ... makes it different from any of the lasers we see on the market right now.”
Dr. Sakamoto and colleagues (Emil Tanghetti, MD, in San Diego, Roy Geronemus, MD, in New York, and Joel L. Cohen, MD, in Colorado) are conducting a clinical trial of the device, to evaluate whether Accure can selectively target sebaceous glands. As of Oct. 23, 2020, the study enrolled more than 50 patients, who are followed at 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks post treatment, she said.
To date, 16 patients have completed the study, and the researchers have observed an average lesion reduction of 80% at 12 weeks post treatment, after four treatment sessions. This amounted to more than 12,000 trigger pulls of the device, with no unexpected adverse events. Average visual analogue scale pain scores immediately after treatment have been 1.09 out of 10.
Histologic assessment of skin samples collected from the study participants have revealed selective damage of the sebaceous glands with a normal epidermis and surrounding dermis. “Because this laser is near infrared, it is not absorbed by melanin, making it possible for a safe treatment in darker skin tones,” Dr. Sakamoto said during the meeting, which was sponsored by Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Wellman Center for Photomedicine.
“We have shown that it is possible to create a selective laser for acne treatment at 1,726 nm. We have proven it mathematically as well as with histological samples,” she said. “Now we are moving on to a larger clinical trial for the FDA clearance.”
Another strategy being developed for acne treatment is to make nonselective lasers selective by adding gold microparticles into the hair follicle and sebaceous glands, to allow the lasers to be absorbed. In a study that used a free electron laser, Dr. Sakamoto and colleagues demonstrated that these microparticles can stay within the sebaceous glands for selective damage of the sebaceous glands. In a subsequent pilot clinical trial they showed that the addition of the gold microparticles followed by a diode laser treatment made it possible to reduce both inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions.
More recently, an open-label European study of acne treatment with light absorbing gold microparticles and optical pulses demonstrated that the treatment led to an 80%-90% reduction of inflammatory lesions at 12 weeks, with a reduction of Investigator’s Global Assessment scale from 2 to 4.
The Food and Drug Administration cleared the treatment, Sebacia Microparticles, for the treatment of mild to moderate acne in September of 2018, but according to Dr. Sakamoto, “the company has struggled, as they were only commercializing the device in California and Washington, DC.”
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is also being studied as an acne treatment. “PDT uses a photosensitizer that needs to be activated by a light source,” she noted. “The combination of red light and aminolevulinic acid (ALA) or methyl ester ALA has been shown to damage the sebaceous glands”.
In a recent randomized controlled trial that compared PDT to adapalene gel plus oral doxycycline, PDT showed superiority. “Because PDT induces apoptosis of the sebaceous glands, it causes a lot of pain and side effects after treatment,” Dr. Sakamoto said. “However, it can clear 80%-90% of acne in 80%-90% of patients. But because of the side effects, PDT should be limited to those patients who cannot take conventional treatments.”
Dr. Sakamoto reported having received research funding and/or consulting fees from numerous device and pharmaceutical companies.
such as Fernanda H. Sakamoto, MD, PhD.
“I love treating acne, because it can have a huge impact on our patients’ lives,” Dr. Sakamoto, a dermatologist at the Wellman Center for Photomedicine at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, said during a virtual course on laser and aesthetic skin therapy. “Acne is the most common disease in dermatology, affecting about 80% of our patients. Eleven percent of these patients have difficult-to-treat acne, and it is also the No. 1 cause of depression and suicide among teenagers and young adults. And, even though there’s no strong evidence that optical treatments work better than conventional acne treatments, people still spend a lot on those treatments: more than 220 million in 2019.”
Early results from a pilot study suggest that use of a novel laser system known as Accure in patients with mild to moderate acne resulted in an 80% reduction in acne lesions at 12 weeks. The laser prototype, which uses a 1,726 nm wavelength and is being developed by researchers at the Wellman Center for Photomedicine, features a built-in thermal camera in the handpiece that allows the user to monitor the skin’s temperature during treatment.
In initial pilot studies of the device, Dr. Sakamoto and colleagues observed consistent damage of the sebaceous glands, with no damage to the epidermis, surrounding dermis, or other follicular structures. “But because the contrast of absorption of lipids and water is not very high, we needed to create a laser with features that we have never seen before,” she said. “One of them is a robust cooling system. The second prototype features a built-in thermal camera within the handpiece that allows us to see the temperature while we’re treating the patient. It also has built-in software that would shut down the laser if the temperature is too high. “This is the first laser with some safety features that will give the user direct feedback while treating the patient,” she said, noting that its “unique cooling system and real-time monitoring ... makes it different from any of the lasers we see on the market right now.”
Dr. Sakamoto and colleagues (Emil Tanghetti, MD, in San Diego, Roy Geronemus, MD, in New York, and Joel L. Cohen, MD, in Colorado) are conducting a clinical trial of the device, to evaluate whether Accure can selectively target sebaceous glands. As of Oct. 23, 2020, the study enrolled more than 50 patients, who are followed at 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks post treatment, she said.
To date, 16 patients have completed the study, and the researchers have observed an average lesion reduction of 80% at 12 weeks post treatment, after four treatment sessions. This amounted to more than 12,000 trigger pulls of the device, with no unexpected adverse events. Average visual analogue scale pain scores immediately after treatment have been 1.09 out of 10.
Histologic assessment of skin samples collected from the study participants have revealed selective damage of the sebaceous glands with a normal epidermis and surrounding dermis. “Because this laser is near infrared, it is not absorbed by melanin, making it possible for a safe treatment in darker skin tones,” Dr. Sakamoto said during the meeting, which was sponsored by Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Wellman Center for Photomedicine.
“We have shown that it is possible to create a selective laser for acne treatment at 1,726 nm. We have proven it mathematically as well as with histological samples,” she said. “Now we are moving on to a larger clinical trial for the FDA clearance.”
Another strategy being developed for acne treatment is to make nonselective lasers selective by adding gold microparticles into the hair follicle and sebaceous glands, to allow the lasers to be absorbed. In a study that used a free electron laser, Dr. Sakamoto and colleagues demonstrated that these microparticles can stay within the sebaceous glands for selective damage of the sebaceous glands. In a subsequent pilot clinical trial they showed that the addition of the gold microparticles followed by a diode laser treatment made it possible to reduce both inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions.
More recently, an open-label European study of acne treatment with light absorbing gold microparticles and optical pulses demonstrated that the treatment led to an 80%-90% reduction of inflammatory lesions at 12 weeks, with a reduction of Investigator’s Global Assessment scale from 2 to 4.
The Food and Drug Administration cleared the treatment, Sebacia Microparticles, for the treatment of mild to moderate acne in September of 2018, but according to Dr. Sakamoto, “the company has struggled, as they were only commercializing the device in California and Washington, DC.”
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is also being studied as an acne treatment. “PDT uses a photosensitizer that needs to be activated by a light source,” she noted. “The combination of red light and aminolevulinic acid (ALA) or methyl ester ALA has been shown to damage the sebaceous glands”.
In a recent randomized controlled trial that compared PDT to adapalene gel plus oral doxycycline, PDT showed superiority. “Because PDT induces apoptosis of the sebaceous glands, it causes a lot of pain and side effects after treatment,” Dr. Sakamoto said. “However, it can clear 80%-90% of acne in 80%-90% of patients. But because of the side effects, PDT should be limited to those patients who cannot take conventional treatments.”
Dr. Sakamoto reported having received research funding and/or consulting fees from numerous device and pharmaceutical companies.
such as Fernanda H. Sakamoto, MD, PhD.
“I love treating acne, because it can have a huge impact on our patients’ lives,” Dr. Sakamoto, a dermatologist at the Wellman Center for Photomedicine at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, said during a virtual course on laser and aesthetic skin therapy. “Acne is the most common disease in dermatology, affecting about 80% of our patients. Eleven percent of these patients have difficult-to-treat acne, and it is also the No. 1 cause of depression and suicide among teenagers and young adults. And, even though there’s no strong evidence that optical treatments work better than conventional acne treatments, people still spend a lot on those treatments: more than 220 million in 2019.”
Early results from a pilot study suggest that use of a novel laser system known as Accure in patients with mild to moderate acne resulted in an 80% reduction in acne lesions at 12 weeks. The laser prototype, which uses a 1,726 nm wavelength and is being developed by researchers at the Wellman Center for Photomedicine, features a built-in thermal camera in the handpiece that allows the user to monitor the skin’s temperature during treatment.
In initial pilot studies of the device, Dr. Sakamoto and colleagues observed consistent damage of the sebaceous glands, with no damage to the epidermis, surrounding dermis, or other follicular structures. “But because the contrast of absorption of lipids and water is not very high, we needed to create a laser with features that we have never seen before,” she said. “One of them is a robust cooling system. The second prototype features a built-in thermal camera within the handpiece that allows us to see the temperature while we’re treating the patient. It also has built-in software that would shut down the laser if the temperature is too high. “This is the first laser with some safety features that will give the user direct feedback while treating the patient,” she said, noting that its “unique cooling system and real-time monitoring ... makes it different from any of the lasers we see on the market right now.”
Dr. Sakamoto and colleagues (Emil Tanghetti, MD, in San Diego, Roy Geronemus, MD, in New York, and Joel L. Cohen, MD, in Colorado) are conducting a clinical trial of the device, to evaluate whether Accure can selectively target sebaceous glands. As of Oct. 23, 2020, the study enrolled more than 50 patients, who are followed at 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks post treatment, she said.
To date, 16 patients have completed the study, and the researchers have observed an average lesion reduction of 80% at 12 weeks post treatment, after four treatment sessions. This amounted to more than 12,000 trigger pulls of the device, with no unexpected adverse events. Average visual analogue scale pain scores immediately after treatment have been 1.09 out of 10.
Histologic assessment of skin samples collected from the study participants have revealed selective damage of the sebaceous glands with a normal epidermis and surrounding dermis. “Because this laser is near infrared, it is not absorbed by melanin, making it possible for a safe treatment in darker skin tones,” Dr. Sakamoto said during the meeting, which was sponsored by Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Wellman Center for Photomedicine.
“We have shown that it is possible to create a selective laser for acne treatment at 1,726 nm. We have proven it mathematically as well as with histological samples,” she said. “Now we are moving on to a larger clinical trial for the FDA clearance.”
Another strategy being developed for acne treatment is to make nonselective lasers selective by adding gold microparticles into the hair follicle and sebaceous glands, to allow the lasers to be absorbed. In a study that used a free electron laser, Dr. Sakamoto and colleagues demonstrated that these microparticles can stay within the sebaceous glands for selective damage of the sebaceous glands. In a subsequent pilot clinical trial they showed that the addition of the gold microparticles followed by a diode laser treatment made it possible to reduce both inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions.
More recently, an open-label European study of acne treatment with light absorbing gold microparticles and optical pulses demonstrated that the treatment led to an 80%-90% reduction of inflammatory lesions at 12 weeks, with a reduction of Investigator’s Global Assessment scale from 2 to 4.
The Food and Drug Administration cleared the treatment, Sebacia Microparticles, for the treatment of mild to moderate acne in September of 2018, but according to Dr. Sakamoto, “the company has struggled, as they were only commercializing the device in California and Washington, DC.”
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is also being studied as an acne treatment. “PDT uses a photosensitizer that needs to be activated by a light source,” she noted. “The combination of red light and aminolevulinic acid (ALA) or methyl ester ALA has been shown to damage the sebaceous glands”.
In a recent randomized controlled trial that compared PDT to adapalene gel plus oral doxycycline, PDT showed superiority. “Because PDT induces apoptosis of the sebaceous glands, it causes a lot of pain and side effects after treatment,” Dr. Sakamoto said. “However, it can clear 80%-90% of acne in 80%-90% of patients. But because of the side effects, PDT should be limited to those patients who cannot take conventional treatments.”
Dr. Sakamoto reported having received research funding and/or consulting fees from numerous device and pharmaceutical companies.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM A LASER & AESTHETIC SKIN THERAPY COURSE
More severe AD correlates with worse sleep health and attention problems in children
, results from a national survey demonstrated.
“We think it’s important for dermatologists and pediatricians to be monitoring children with AD for sleep and attention dysregulation,” Nina Y. Zhou said during a late-breaking research session at the Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis virtual symposium. “It’s also important to highlight sleep hygiene habits to improve sleep health overall.”
In an effort to determine the impact of AD severity on these symptoms in young children with AD and characterize sleep health and attention regulation behaviors, Ms. Zhou, a medical student at Northwestern University, Chicago, and colleagues drew from a national survey distributed via panel company OP4G and the National Eczema Association that was conducted with parents of 60 children with AD aged 1-5 years. Questionnaires included the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Early Childhood Sleep Health Measures to assess sleep health, the Peak Pruritus NRS to measure itch severity, and the Multidimensional Assessment Profile of Attention Regulation (MAPS-AR) to measure attention dysregulation related to inattention and hyperactivity. The researchers performed linear regression to determine the predictors of sleep health and attention dysregulation.
The mean age of 60 children was 3 years, 55% were male, 32% were black, 42% had severe disease, 42% had moderate disease, and 16% had mild disease. Children with more extensive AD were significantly more likely to report worse sleep disturbance. The proportion of children who reported sleep disturbance on at least 5 nights per week was 67% among those with severe AD, 24% among those with moderate AD, and 0% among those with mild AD.
In addition, 72% of parents of children with severe AD reported trouble paying attention at least 3 times per week “no matter what was going on,” compared with 24% of those with moderate AD and none of those with mild AD.
Parents of children with more severe AD reported more itch-related burden and significantly decreased quality of life for their children. For example, 76% of parents with children who had severe AD reported “because of itch, their child was frustrated,” compared to 44% of those with moderate AD and 10% with mild AD.
In fully adjusted linear regression analysis, the strongest predictors of sleep disturbance were AD severity (unstandardized beta value = 0.79, P less than .01) and being Black (unstandardized beta value = 3.89, P = .03). AD severity (unstandardized beta value = 1.22, P less than .01) and being Black (unstandardized beta value = 7.79, P less than .01) also predicted more attention dysregulation.
Household income appeared to differ significantly based on AD severity groups. “If you have mild AD, you are more likely to come from a higher income household,” Ms. Zhou said.
She concluded her presentation by calling for future studies with larger samples sizes to establish causality and directional effects between AD severity, itch, sleep, race, and attention.
The study was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Ms. Zhou reported having no financial disclosures.
, results from a national survey demonstrated.
“We think it’s important for dermatologists and pediatricians to be monitoring children with AD for sleep and attention dysregulation,” Nina Y. Zhou said during a late-breaking research session at the Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis virtual symposium. “It’s also important to highlight sleep hygiene habits to improve sleep health overall.”
In an effort to determine the impact of AD severity on these symptoms in young children with AD and characterize sleep health and attention regulation behaviors, Ms. Zhou, a medical student at Northwestern University, Chicago, and colleagues drew from a national survey distributed via panel company OP4G and the National Eczema Association that was conducted with parents of 60 children with AD aged 1-5 years. Questionnaires included the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Early Childhood Sleep Health Measures to assess sleep health, the Peak Pruritus NRS to measure itch severity, and the Multidimensional Assessment Profile of Attention Regulation (MAPS-AR) to measure attention dysregulation related to inattention and hyperactivity. The researchers performed linear regression to determine the predictors of sleep health and attention dysregulation.
The mean age of 60 children was 3 years, 55% were male, 32% were black, 42% had severe disease, 42% had moderate disease, and 16% had mild disease. Children with more extensive AD were significantly more likely to report worse sleep disturbance. The proportion of children who reported sleep disturbance on at least 5 nights per week was 67% among those with severe AD, 24% among those with moderate AD, and 0% among those with mild AD.
In addition, 72% of parents of children with severe AD reported trouble paying attention at least 3 times per week “no matter what was going on,” compared with 24% of those with moderate AD and none of those with mild AD.
Parents of children with more severe AD reported more itch-related burden and significantly decreased quality of life for their children. For example, 76% of parents with children who had severe AD reported “because of itch, their child was frustrated,” compared to 44% of those with moderate AD and 10% with mild AD.
In fully adjusted linear regression analysis, the strongest predictors of sleep disturbance were AD severity (unstandardized beta value = 0.79, P less than .01) and being Black (unstandardized beta value = 3.89, P = .03). AD severity (unstandardized beta value = 1.22, P less than .01) and being Black (unstandardized beta value = 7.79, P less than .01) also predicted more attention dysregulation.
Household income appeared to differ significantly based on AD severity groups. “If you have mild AD, you are more likely to come from a higher income household,” Ms. Zhou said.
She concluded her presentation by calling for future studies with larger samples sizes to establish causality and directional effects between AD severity, itch, sleep, race, and attention.
The study was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Ms. Zhou reported having no financial disclosures.
, results from a national survey demonstrated.
“We think it’s important for dermatologists and pediatricians to be monitoring children with AD for sleep and attention dysregulation,” Nina Y. Zhou said during a late-breaking research session at the Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis virtual symposium. “It’s also important to highlight sleep hygiene habits to improve sleep health overall.”
In an effort to determine the impact of AD severity on these symptoms in young children with AD and characterize sleep health and attention regulation behaviors, Ms. Zhou, a medical student at Northwestern University, Chicago, and colleagues drew from a national survey distributed via panel company OP4G and the National Eczema Association that was conducted with parents of 60 children with AD aged 1-5 years. Questionnaires included the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Early Childhood Sleep Health Measures to assess sleep health, the Peak Pruritus NRS to measure itch severity, and the Multidimensional Assessment Profile of Attention Regulation (MAPS-AR) to measure attention dysregulation related to inattention and hyperactivity. The researchers performed linear regression to determine the predictors of sleep health and attention dysregulation.
The mean age of 60 children was 3 years, 55% were male, 32% were black, 42% had severe disease, 42% had moderate disease, and 16% had mild disease. Children with more extensive AD were significantly more likely to report worse sleep disturbance. The proportion of children who reported sleep disturbance on at least 5 nights per week was 67% among those with severe AD, 24% among those with moderate AD, and 0% among those with mild AD.
In addition, 72% of parents of children with severe AD reported trouble paying attention at least 3 times per week “no matter what was going on,” compared with 24% of those with moderate AD and none of those with mild AD.
Parents of children with more severe AD reported more itch-related burden and significantly decreased quality of life for their children. For example, 76% of parents with children who had severe AD reported “because of itch, their child was frustrated,” compared to 44% of those with moderate AD and 10% with mild AD.
In fully adjusted linear regression analysis, the strongest predictors of sleep disturbance were AD severity (unstandardized beta value = 0.79, P less than .01) and being Black (unstandardized beta value = 3.89, P = .03). AD severity (unstandardized beta value = 1.22, P less than .01) and being Black (unstandardized beta value = 7.79, P less than .01) also predicted more attention dysregulation.
Household income appeared to differ significantly based on AD severity groups. “If you have mild AD, you are more likely to come from a higher income household,” Ms. Zhou said.
She concluded her presentation by calling for future studies with larger samples sizes to establish causality and directional effects between AD severity, itch, sleep, race, and attention.
The study was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Ms. Zhou reported having no financial disclosures.
FROM REVOLUTIONIZING AD 2020
E-cigarette use tied to increased COPD, asthma risk
Results from a large national prospective cohort study of adults demonstrated that the use of electronic cigarettes is associated with an increased risk of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema, and chronic bronchitis – independent of cigarette smoking and other combustible tobacco product use.
“Our longitudinal results are consistent with the findings of prior population studies,” researchers led by Wubin Xie, DrPH, MPH, wrote in a study published online in JAMA Network Open. “With a more refined study design assessing multiple respiratory conditions and extensive sensitivity checks to mitigate bias from reverse causation and residual confounding by cigarette smoking and other tobacco product use, our results strengthen the evidence of the potential role of e-cigarette use in pulmonary disease pathogenesis. The findings may be used to inform counseling of patients on the potential risks of e-cigarette use.”
Dr. Xie of Boston University, and colleagues used data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study waves 1-4 to examine the association of e-cigarette use with incident respiratory conditions, including COPD, emphysema, chronic bronchitis, and asthma. An earlier analysis of PATH data found an association between e-cigarette use with a composite respiratory disease outcome, but it did not consider the timing of respiratory events over follow-up and was underpowered to evaluate specific respiratory conditions.
The current analysis included data from 21,618 U.S. adults who were surveyed in four waves of PATH between 2013 and 2018. Of these, 49% were men, 65% were non-Hispanic White, 12% were non-Hispanic Black, 16% were Hispanic, and the remainder were non-Hispanic other. Their mean pack-years was 6.7 at baseline, 26% had self-reported hypertension, and their mean body mass index was 27.8 kg/m2. The analysis was limited to data from the wave 1 cohort of adults and the prospective follow-up at waves 2-4 from public use files. It excluded adults who reported a history of a respiratory condition such as COPD, emphysema, chronic bronchitis, or asthma at wave 1 (baseline).
Two-thirds of respondents (66%) were never e-cigarette users, 12% were former e-cigarette users, and 5% were current e-cigarette users. After the researchers adjusted for cigarette and other combustible tobacco product use, demographic characteristics, and chronic health conditions, they observed an increased risk of respiratory disease among former e-cigarette users (incidence rate ratio, 1.28) and current e-cigarette users (IRR, 1.31). Among respondents with good self-reported health, the IRR for former e-cigarette users was 1.21 and the IRR for current e-cigarette users was 1.43. As for specific respiratory diseases among current e-cigarette users, the IRR was 1.33 for chronic bronchitis, 1.69 for emphysema, 1.57 for COPD, and 1.31 for asthma.
“Our findings on clinical outcome were consistent with studies assessing in vivo biomarkers of e-cigarette exposure in animal subjects, human participants, and population studies,” the authors wrote. “Studies have documented that exclusive e-cigarette use may be associated with higher exposure to harmful and potentially harmful constituents, compared with tobacco nonuse. The potential mechanisms of the association of e-cigarette exposure with pulmonary diseases include pulmonary inflammation, increased oxidative stress, and inhibited immune response. Animal studies have generated substantial evidence on e-cigarette exposure and emphysematous lung destruction, loss of pulmonary capillaries, reduced small airway function, and airway hyperresponsiveness, suggesting the plausibility of e-cigarettes causing chronic lung diseases.”
They acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its reliance on self-reported measures of e-cigarette and other tobacco product use and its reliance on self-reported diagnoses of respiratory diseases.
The study was supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; the Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products; and the American Lung Association Public Policy Research Award. Dr. Xie reported having no financial disclosures. His coauthors reported having received research grants and personal fees from a variety of sources.
SOURCE: Xie W et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 12. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.20816
Results from a large national prospective cohort study of adults demonstrated that the use of electronic cigarettes is associated with an increased risk of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema, and chronic bronchitis – independent of cigarette smoking and other combustible tobacco product use.
“Our longitudinal results are consistent with the findings of prior population studies,” researchers led by Wubin Xie, DrPH, MPH, wrote in a study published online in JAMA Network Open. “With a more refined study design assessing multiple respiratory conditions and extensive sensitivity checks to mitigate bias from reverse causation and residual confounding by cigarette smoking and other tobacco product use, our results strengthen the evidence of the potential role of e-cigarette use in pulmonary disease pathogenesis. The findings may be used to inform counseling of patients on the potential risks of e-cigarette use.”
Dr. Xie of Boston University, and colleagues used data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study waves 1-4 to examine the association of e-cigarette use with incident respiratory conditions, including COPD, emphysema, chronic bronchitis, and asthma. An earlier analysis of PATH data found an association between e-cigarette use with a composite respiratory disease outcome, but it did not consider the timing of respiratory events over follow-up and was underpowered to evaluate specific respiratory conditions.
The current analysis included data from 21,618 U.S. adults who were surveyed in four waves of PATH between 2013 and 2018. Of these, 49% were men, 65% were non-Hispanic White, 12% were non-Hispanic Black, 16% were Hispanic, and the remainder were non-Hispanic other. Their mean pack-years was 6.7 at baseline, 26% had self-reported hypertension, and their mean body mass index was 27.8 kg/m2. The analysis was limited to data from the wave 1 cohort of adults and the prospective follow-up at waves 2-4 from public use files. It excluded adults who reported a history of a respiratory condition such as COPD, emphysema, chronic bronchitis, or asthma at wave 1 (baseline).
Two-thirds of respondents (66%) were never e-cigarette users, 12% were former e-cigarette users, and 5% were current e-cigarette users. After the researchers adjusted for cigarette and other combustible tobacco product use, demographic characteristics, and chronic health conditions, they observed an increased risk of respiratory disease among former e-cigarette users (incidence rate ratio, 1.28) and current e-cigarette users (IRR, 1.31). Among respondents with good self-reported health, the IRR for former e-cigarette users was 1.21 and the IRR for current e-cigarette users was 1.43. As for specific respiratory diseases among current e-cigarette users, the IRR was 1.33 for chronic bronchitis, 1.69 for emphysema, 1.57 for COPD, and 1.31 for asthma.
“Our findings on clinical outcome were consistent with studies assessing in vivo biomarkers of e-cigarette exposure in animal subjects, human participants, and population studies,” the authors wrote. “Studies have documented that exclusive e-cigarette use may be associated with higher exposure to harmful and potentially harmful constituents, compared with tobacco nonuse. The potential mechanisms of the association of e-cigarette exposure with pulmonary diseases include pulmonary inflammation, increased oxidative stress, and inhibited immune response. Animal studies have generated substantial evidence on e-cigarette exposure and emphysematous lung destruction, loss of pulmonary capillaries, reduced small airway function, and airway hyperresponsiveness, suggesting the plausibility of e-cigarettes causing chronic lung diseases.”
They acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its reliance on self-reported measures of e-cigarette and other tobacco product use and its reliance on self-reported diagnoses of respiratory diseases.
The study was supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; the Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products; and the American Lung Association Public Policy Research Award. Dr. Xie reported having no financial disclosures. His coauthors reported having received research grants and personal fees from a variety of sources.
SOURCE: Xie W et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 12. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.20816
Results from a large national prospective cohort study of adults demonstrated that the use of electronic cigarettes is associated with an increased risk of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema, and chronic bronchitis – independent of cigarette smoking and other combustible tobacco product use.
“Our longitudinal results are consistent with the findings of prior population studies,” researchers led by Wubin Xie, DrPH, MPH, wrote in a study published online in JAMA Network Open. “With a more refined study design assessing multiple respiratory conditions and extensive sensitivity checks to mitigate bias from reverse causation and residual confounding by cigarette smoking and other tobacco product use, our results strengthen the evidence of the potential role of e-cigarette use in pulmonary disease pathogenesis. The findings may be used to inform counseling of patients on the potential risks of e-cigarette use.”
Dr. Xie of Boston University, and colleagues used data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study waves 1-4 to examine the association of e-cigarette use with incident respiratory conditions, including COPD, emphysema, chronic bronchitis, and asthma. An earlier analysis of PATH data found an association between e-cigarette use with a composite respiratory disease outcome, but it did not consider the timing of respiratory events over follow-up and was underpowered to evaluate specific respiratory conditions.
The current analysis included data from 21,618 U.S. adults who were surveyed in four waves of PATH between 2013 and 2018. Of these, 49% were men, 65% were non-Hispanic White, 12% were non-Hispanic Black, 16% were Hispanic, and the remainder were non-Hispanic other. Their mean pack-years was 6.7 at baseline, 26% had self-reported hypertension, and their mean body mass index was 27.8 kg/m2. The analysis was limited to data from the wave 1 cohort of adults and the prospective follow-up at waves 2-4 from public use files. It excluded adults who reported a history of a respiratory condition such as COPD, emphysema, chronic bronchitis, or asthma at wave 1 (baseline).
Two-thirds of respondents (66%) were never e-cigarette users, 12% were former e-cigarette users, and 5% were current e-cigarette users. After the researchers adjusted for cigarette and other combustible tobacco product use, demographic characteristics, and chronic health conditions, they observed an increased risk of respiratory disease among former e-cigarette users (incidence rate ratio, 1.28) and current e-cigarette users (IRR, 1.31). Among respondents with good self-reported health, the IRR for former e-cigarette users was 1.21 and the IRR for current e-cigarette users was 1.43. As for specific respiratory diseases among current e-cigarette users, the IRR was 1.33 for chronic bronchitis, 1.69 for emphysema, 1.57 for COPD, and 1.31 for asthma.
“Our findings on clinical outcome were consistent with studies assessing in vivo biomarkers of e-cigarette exposure in animal subjects, human participants, and population studies,” the authors wrote. “Studies have documented that exclusive e-cigarette use may be associated with higher exposure to harmful and potentially harmful constituents, compared with tobacco nonuse. The potential mechanisms of the association of e-cigarette exposure with pulmonary diseases include pulmonary inflammation, increased oxidative stress, and inhibited immune response. Animal studies have generated substantial evidence on e-cigarette exposure and emphysematous lung destruction, loss of pulmonary capillaries, reduced small airway function, and airway hyperresponsiveness, suggesting the plausibility of e-cigarettes causing chronic lung diseases.”
They acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its reliance on self-reported measures of e-cigarette and other tobacco product use and its reliance on self-reported diagnoses of respiratory diseases.
The study was supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; the Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products; and the American Lung Association Public Policy Research Award. Dr. Xie reported having no financial disclosures. His coauthors reported having received research grants and personal fees from a variety of sources.
SOURCE: Xie W et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 12. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.20816
FROM JAMA NETWORK OPEN
Palpation key when evaluating the skin for suspected MCC
“The lack of a pathognomonic appearance is often what precludes an early diagnosis of this cancer,” Dr. Thakuria, a dermatologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, said during a virtual forum on cutaneous malignancies jointly presented by Postgraduate Institute for Medicine and the Global Academy for Medical Education. “MCCs can vary in appearance in their color, from pink to red to purple, or sometimes they have no color at all. They can be exophytic and obvious, or subtle, deeper tumors. These tumors are generally firm and nontender and are characterized by rapid growth, which is usually but not exclusively the feature that prompts biopsy.”
The typical patient with MCC is elderly, with an average age of 75 years. It affects males more than females by an approximately 2:1 ratio and tends to occur in fair-skinned individuals, although MCC does develop in skin of color. “While the majority of patients with this disease are immunocompetent, immunosuppressed patients are overrepresented in this disease, compared with the general population,” she said.
The clinical differential diagnosis is broad and includes both malignant and benign tumors, which requires a high index of suspicion. Most primary lesions are located on the head and neck, lower limb, and upper limb, but they may appear in non–sun exposed areas, such as the buttocks, as well.
One prospective study of 195 MCC patients found that 56% of clinicians presumed that these tumors were benign at the time of biopsy, and 32% were thought to have a cyst or acneiform lesion. The study authors summarized key clinical features of MCC with the acronym AEIOU: A stands for asymptomatic or nontender; E stands for expanding rapidly, usually over a duration less than 3 months; I stands for immunosuppression; O stands for patient older than age 50 years; and U stands for UV exposed skin location. The researchers found that 89% of the patients studied met three or more of the AEIOU criteria.
Dr. Thakuria, codirector of the Merkel Cell Carcinoma Center of Excellence at the Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center and assistant professor of dermatology at Harvard University, both in Boston, shared the following tips for dermatologic evaluation when MCC is suspected:
- Measure and record the clinical diameter of the lesions. “This helps you determine the T staging later, and from there can help you decide on proper treatment,” she said.
- Inspect and palpate the surrounding skin to look for in-transit metastases. “This may actually upstage the patient.”
- For a subcutaneous nodule, hub your punch biopsy. “These tumors can be centered in the deep dermis or fat,” Dr. Thakuria said. “If you really suspect MCC and you don’t get a result on your first biopsy, you may want to consider doing a second deeper biopsy, perhaps even a telescoping biopsy. This is especially true if your first biopsy was via shave technique and showed normal skin.”
- Refer to surgical oncology and radiation oncology ASAP. “You want to call them to ensure speedy consultation, within 1 week if possible,” she said. “Remember that all clinically node-negative MCCs warrant consideration of sentinel lymph node biopsy, regardless of tumor size. Upstaging will occur in 25%-32% of patients.”
Staging workup includes a full skin and lymph node exam to identify in-transit metastases and regional lymphadenopathy. “Palpation is key,” Dr. Thakuria said. “Next, you want to do some form of radiographic examination, so either a scalp to toes PET/CT or CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Finally, sentinel lymph node biopsy is going to be important if you have a clinically node-negative patient but you want to pathologically stage the person appropriately.” Although not formally part of the staging workup, she recommends ordering an AMERK test at diagnosis. AMERK detects antibodies to a Merkel cell polyomavirus oncoprotein, which is a marker of disease status present in about half of MCC patients. It falls with the treatment of cancer and rises with recurrence.
Discussing prognosis with MCC patients “can be challenging and uncomfortable, but even more so if you’re unfamiliar with some of the nuances of the terminology that is used,” Dr. Thakuria said. “Patients who go to Google are often going to encounter overall survival numbers, which are going to be worse than disease-specific numbers in any disease because they take into account death from any cause. This effect is heightened in MCC because this is cancer of predominately older adults, so there are other competing causes of death in this population, which drags down the overall survival estimates.”
Another point to remember when discussing survival with patients is that advances in immunotherapy are not necessarily reflected in national databases. “This is important, because usually in any cancer there’s a 5- to 10-year lag in survival information,” she said. “The last 5 years have brought an incredible change to MCC because of the advent of immunotherapy. Now we’re seeing incredible responses [in the clinic], but we’re not yet seeing those reflected in our survival tables.”
According to an analysis of prognostic factors from 9,387 MCC cases, nodal status is one of most important predictors of lower survival at 5 years, compared with having local disease: 35% versus 51%, respectively. Among patients with macroscopic lymph nodes, having known primary disease is associated with a lower survival at 5 years, compared with having unknown primary disease (27% vs. 42% at five years).
Dr. Thakuria concluded her presentation by recommending a three-step plan for surveillance, starting with a full skin and lymph node exam every 3-6 months for the first 3 years and every 6-12 months thereafter. Second, she advised routine imaging for high risk patients (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 2 and above) and symptom-directed imaging for low-risk patients. Finally, she recommended the AMERK test every 3 months for the first 2-3 years in patients who were seropositive at diagnosis. A rising titer may be an early indicator of recurrence.
Global Academy for Medical Education and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
Dr. Thakuria reported having no financial disclosures.
“The lack of a pathognomonic appearance is often what precludes an early diagnosis of this cancer,” Dr. Thakuria, a dermatologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, said during a virtual forum on cutaneous malignancies jointly presented by Postgraduate Institute for Medicine and the Global Academy for Medical Education. “MCCs can vary in appearance in their color, from pink to red to purple, or sometimes they have no color at all. They can be exophytic and obvious, or subtle, deeper tumors. These tumors are generally firm and nontender and are characterized by rapid growth, which is usually but not exclusively the feature that prompts biopsy.”
The typical patient with MCC is elderly, with an average age of 75 years. It affects males more than females by an approximately 2:1 ratio and tends to occur in fair-skinned individuals, although MCC does develop in skin of color. “While the majority of patients with this disease are immunocompetent, immunosuppressed patients are overrepresented in this disease, compared with the general population,” she said.
The clinical differential diagnosis is broad and includes both malignant and benign tumors, which requires a high index of suspicion. Most primary lesions are located on the head and neck, lower limb, and upper limb, but they may appear in non–sun exposed areas, such as the buttocks, as well.
One prospective study of 195 MCC patients found that 56% of clinicians presumed that these tumors were benign at the time of biopsy, and 32% were thought to have a cyst or acneiform lesion. The study authors summarized key clinical features of MCC with the acronym AEIOU: A stands for asymptomatic or nontender; E stands for expanding rapidly, usually over a duration less than 3 months; I stands for immunosuppression; O stands for patient older than age 50 years; and U stands for UV exposed skin location. The researchers found that 89% of the patients studied met three or more of the AEIOU criteria.
Dr. Thakuria, codirector of the Merkel Cell Carcinoma Center of Excellence at the Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center and assistant professor of dermatology at Harvard University, both in Boston, shared the following tips for dermatologic evaluation when MCC is suspected:
- Measure and record the clinical diameter of the lesions. “This helps you determine the T staging later, and from there can help you decide on proper treatment,” she said.
- Inspect and palpate the surrounding skin to look for in-transit metastases. “This may actually upstage the patient.”
- For a subcutaneous nodule, hub your punch biopsy. “These tumors can be centered in the deep dermis or fat,” Dr. Thakuria said. “If you really suspect MCC and you don’t get a result on your first biopsy, you may want to consider doing a second deeper biopsy, perhaps even a telescoping biopsy. This is especially true if your first biopsy was via shave technique and showed normal skin.”
- Refer to surgical oncology and radiation oncology ASAP. “You want to call them to ensure speedy consultation, within 1 week if possible,” she said. “Remember that all clinically node-negative MCCs warrant consideration of sentinel lymph node biopsy, regardless of tumor size. Upstaging will occur in 25%-32% of patients.”
Staging workup includes a full skin and lymph node exam to identify in-transit metastases and regional lymphadenopathy. “Palpation is key,” Dr. Thakuria said. “Next, you want to do some form of radiographic examination, so either a scalp to toes PET/CT or CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Finally, sentinel lymph node biopsy is going to be important if you have a clinically node-negative patient but you want to pathologically stage the person appropriately.” Although not formally part of the staging workup, she recommends ordering an AMERK test at diagnosis. AMERK detects antibodies to a Merkel cell polyomavirus oncoprotein, which is a marker of disease status present in about half of MCC patients. It falls with the treatment of cancer and rises with recurrence.
Discussing prognosis with MCC patients “can be challenging and uncomfortable, but even more so if you’re unfamiliar with some of the nuances of the terminology that is used,” Dr. Thakuria said. “Patients who go to Google are often going to encounter overall survival numbers, which are going to be worse than disease-specific numbers in any disease because they take into account death from any cause. This effect is heightened in MCC because this is cancer of predominately older adults, so there are other competing causes of death in this population, which drags down the overall survival estimates.”
Another point to remember when discussing survival with patients is that advances in immunotherapy are not necessarily reflected in national databases. “This is important, because usually in any cancer there’s a 5- to 10-year lag in survival information,” she said. “The last 5 years have brought an incredible change to MCC because of the advent of immunotherapy. Now we’re seeing incredible responses [in the clinic], but we’re not yet seeing those reflected in our survival tables.”
According to an analysis of prognostic factors from 9,387 MCC cases, nodal status is one of most important predictors of lower survival at 5 years, compared with having local disease: 35% versus 51%, respectively. Among patients with macroscopic lymph nodes, having known primary disease is associated with a lower survival at 5 years, compared with having unknown primary disease (27% vs. 42% at five years).
Dr. Thakuria concluded her presentation by recommending a three-step plan for surveillance, starting with a full skin and lymph node exam every 3-6 months for the first 3 years and every 6-12 months thereafter. Second, she advised routine imaging for high risk patients (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 2 and above) and symptom-directed imaging for low-risk patients. Finally, she recommended the AMERK test every 3 months for the first 2-3 years in patients who were seropositive at diagnosis. A rising titer may be an early indicator of recurrence.
Global Academy for Medical Education and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
Dr. Thakuria reported having no financial disclosures.
“The lack of a pathognomonic appearance is often what precludes an early diagnosis of this cancer,” Dr. Thakuria, a dermatologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, said during a virtual forum on cutaneous malignancies jointly presented by Postgraduate Institute for Medicine and the Global Academy for Medical Education. “MCCs can vary in appearance in their color, from pink to red to purple, or sometimes they have no color at all. They can be exophytic and obvious, or subtle, deeper tumors. These tumors are generally firm and nontender and are characterized by rapid growth, which is usually but not exclusively the feature that prompts biopsy.”
The typical patient with MCC is elderly, with an average age of 75 years. It affects males more than females by an approximately 2:1 ratio and tends to occur in fair-skinned individuals, although MCC does develop in skin of color. “While the majority of patients with this disease are immunocompetent, immunosuppressed patients are overrepresented in this disease, compared with the general population,” she said.
The clinical differential diagnosis is broad and includes both malignant and benign tumors, which requires a high index of suspicion. Most primary lesions are located on the head and neck, lower limb, and upper limb, but they may appear in non–sun exposed areas, such as the buttocks, as well.
One prospective study of 195 MCC patients found that 56% of clinicians presumed that these tumors were benign at the time of biopsy, and 32% were thought to have a cyst or acneiform lesion. The study authors summarized key clinical features of MCC with the acronym AEIOU: A stands for asymptomatic or nontender; E stands for expanding rapidly, usually over a duration less than 3 months; I stands for immunosuppression; O stands for patient older than age 50 years; and U stands for UV exposed skin location. The researchers found that 89% of the patients studied met three or more of the AEIOU criteria.
Dr. Thakuria, codirector of the Merkel Cell Carcinoma Center of Excellence at the Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center and assistant professor of dermatology at Harvard University, both in Boston, shared the following tips for dermatologic evaluation when MCC is suspected:
- Measure and record the clinical diameter of the lesions. “This helps you determine the T staging later, and from there can help you decide on proper treatment,” she said.
- Inspect and palpate the surrounding skin to look for in-transit metastases. “This may actually upstage the patient.”
- For a subcutaneous nodule, hub your punch biopsy. “These tumors can be centered in the deep dermis or fat,” Dr. Thakuria said. “If you really suspect MCC and you don’t get a result on your first biopsy, you may want to consider doing a second deeper biopsy, perhaps even a telescoping biopsy. This is especially true if your first biopsy was via shave technique and showed normal skin.”
- Refer to surgical oncology and radiation oncology ASAP. “You want to call them to ensure speedy consultation, within 1 week if possible,” she said. “Remember that all clinically node-negative MCCs warrant consideration of sentinel lymph node biopsy, regardless of tumor size. Upstaging will occur in 25%-32% of patients.”
Staging workup includes a full skin and lymph node exam to identify in-transit metastases and regional lymphadenopathy. “Palpation is key,” Dr. Thakuria said. “Next, you want to do some form of radiographic examination, so either a scalp to toes PET/CT or CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Finally, sentinel lymph node biopsy is going to be important if you have a clinically node-negative patient but you want to pathologically stage the person appropriately.” Although not formally part of the staging workup, she recommends ordering an AMERK test at diagnosis. AMERK detects antibodies to a Merkel cell polyomavirus oncoprotein, which is a marker of disease status present in about half of MCC patients. It falls with the treatment of cancer and rises with recurrence.
Discussing prognosis with MCC patients “can be challenging and uncomfortable, but even more so if you’re unfamiliar with some of the nuances of the terminology that is used,” Dr. Thakuria said. “Patients who go to Google are often going to encounter overall survival numbers, which are going to be worse than disease-specific numbers in any disease because they take into account death from any cause. This effect is heightened in MCC because this is cancer of predominately older adults, so there are other competing causes of death in this population, which drags down the overall survival estimates.”
Another point to remember when discussing survival with patients is that advances in immunotherapy are not necessarily reflected in national databases. “This is important, because usually in any cancer there’s a 5- to 10-year lag in survival information,” she said. “The last 5 years have brought an incredible change to MCC because of the advent of immunotherapy. Now we’re seeing incredible responses [in the clinic], but we’re not yet seeing those reflected in our survival tables.”
According to an analysis of prognostic factors from 9,387 MCC cases, nodal status is one of most important predictors of lower survival at 5 years, compared with having local disease: 35% versus 51%, respectively. Among patients with macroscopic lymph nodes, having known primary disease is associated with a lower survival at 5 years, compared with having unknown primary disease (27% vs. 42% at five years).
Dr. Thakuria concluded her presentation by recommending a three-step plan for surveillance, starting with a full skin and lymph node exam every 3-6 months for the first 3 years and every 6-12 months thereafter. Second, she advised routine imaging for high risk patients (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 2 and above) and symptom-directed imaging for low-risk patients. Finally, she recommended the AMERK test every 3 months for the first 2-3 years in patients who were seropositive at diagnosis. A rising titer may be an early indicator of recurrence.
Global Academy for Medical Education and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
Dr. Thakuria reported having no financial disclosures.
FROM THE CUTANEOUS MALIGNANCIES FORUM