User login
Novel chip system could improve preclinical drug studies
A novel multiorgan body-on-a-chip system shows promise to improve the preclinical evaluation of various anticancer therapies, investigators report.
“Initially, organ-on-a-chip systems were designed for specific applications with limited ability for reconfiguration and typically with cells from a single organ,” wrote Christopher W. McAleer, PhD, of Hesperos Inc., Orlando, and colleagues. Their report is in Science Translational Medicine.
“To address these issues, a reconfigurable body-on-a-chip system was developed with the capacity to house multiple organ-like tissue constructs,” the authors explained.
The researchers used two different system configurations to evaluate the off-target organ toxicities, metabolism, and efficacy of diclofenac and imatinib (system 1), in addition to tamoxifen (system 2). Both therapies were combined with verapamil in the study.
In system 1, cancer-derived bone marrow cells were cultured with primary hepatocytes, and were analyzed for anti-leukemic activity. In this configuration, both imatinib and diclofenac showed cytostatic activity on cancer progression in the bone marrow cells.
“Liver viability was not affected by imatinib; however, diclofenac reduced liver viability by 30%,” the researchers wrote.
System 2 included a wide variety of cell-lines, including primary hepatocytes, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes, a multidrug-resistant vulva cancer line, and a non-multidrug-resistant breast cancer line.
In this configuration, tamoxifen monotherapy and tamoxifen coadministered with verapamil resulted in off-target cardiac toxicities, but did not alter cell viability.
“These systems demonstrate the utility of a human cell–based in vitro culture system to evaluate both on-target efficacy and off-target toxicity for parent drugs and their metabolites,” Dr. McAleer and colleagues wrote.
The researchers acknowledged that the dosing parameters used in the model were acute. As a result, chronic, low-dose treatment strategies may reflect clinical conditions more accurately.
“These systems can augment and reduce the use of animals and increase the efficiency of drug evaluations in preclinical studies,” they concluded.
The study was supported by Hesperos Internal Development funds, the NIH, and Roche. The authors reported financial affiliations with Hesperos and Roche.
SOURCE: McAleer CW et al. Sci Transl Med. 2019 Jun 19. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav1386.
A novel multiorgan body-on-a-chip system shows promise to improve the preclinical evaluation of various anticancer therapies, investigators report.
“Initially, organ-on-a-chip systems were designed for specific applications with limited ability for reconfiguration and typically with cells from a single organ,” wrote Christopher W. McAleer, PhD, of Hesperos Inc., Orlando, and colleagues. Their report is in Science Translational Medicine.
“To address these issues, a reconfigurable body-on-a-chip system was developed with the capacity to house multiple organ-like tissue constructs,” the authors explained.
The researchers used two different system configurations to evaluate the off-target organ toxicities, metabolism, and efficacy of diclofenac and imatinib (system 1), in addition to tamoxifen (system 2). Both therapies were combined with verapamil in the study.
In system 1, cancer-derived bone marrow cells were cultured with primary hepatocytes, and were analyzed for anti-leukemic activity. In this configuration, both imatinib and diclofenac showed cytostatic activity on cancer progression in the bone marrow cells.
“Liver viability was not affected by imatinib; however, diclofenac reduced liver viability by 30%,” the researchers wrote.
System 2 included a wide variety of cell-lines, including primary hepatocytes, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes, a multidrug-resistant vulva cancer line, and a non-multidrug-resistant breast cancer line.
In this configuration, tamoxifen monotherapy and tamoxifen coadministered with verapamil resulted in off-target cardiac toxicities, but did not alter cell viability.
“These systems demonstrate the utility of a human cell–based in vitro culture system to evaluate both on-target efficacy and off-target toxicity for parent drugs and their metabolites,” Dr. McAleer and colleagues wrote.
The researchers acknowledged that the dosing parameters used in the model were acute. As a result, chronic, low-dose treatment strategies may reflect clinical conditions more accurately.
“These systems can augment and reduce the use of animals and increase the efficiency of drug evaluations in preclinical studies,” they concluded.
The study was supported by Hesperos Internal Development funds, the NIH, and Roche. The authors reported financial affiliations with Hesperos and Roche.
SOURCE: McAleer CW et al. Sci Transl Med. 2019 Jun 19. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav1386.
A novel multiorgan body-on-a-chip system shows promise to improve the preclinical evaluation of various anticancer therapies, investigators report.
“Initially, organ-on-a-chip systems were designed for specific applications with limited ability for reconfiguration and typically with cells from a single organ,” wrote Christopher W. McAleer, PhD, of Hesperos Inc., Orlando, and colleagues. Their report is in Science Translational Medicine.
“To address these issues, a reconfigurable body-on-a-chip system was developed with the capacity to house multiple organ-like tissue constructs,” the authors explained.
The researchers used two different system configurations to evaluate the off-target organ toxicities, metabolism, and efficacy of diclofenac and imatinib (system 1), in addition to tamoxifen (system 2). Both therapies were combined with verapamil in the study.
In system 1, cancer-derived bone marrow cells were cultured with primary hepatocytes, and were analyzed for anti-leukemic activity. In this configuration, both imatinib and diclofenac showed cytostatic activity on cancer progression in the bone marrow cells.
“Liver viability was not affected by imatinib; however, diclofenac reduced liver viability by 30%,” the researchers wrote.
System 2 included a wide variety of cell-lines, including primary hepatocytes, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes, a multidrug-resistant vulva cancer line, and a non-multidrug-resistant breast cancer line.
In this configuration, tamoxifen monotherapy and tamoxifen coadministered with verapamil resulted in off-target cardiac toxicities, but did not alter cell viability.
“These systems demonstrate the utility of a human cell–based in vitro culture system to evaluate both on-target efficacy and off-target toxicity for parent drugs and their metabolites,” Dr. McAleer and colleagues wrote.
The researchers acknowledged that the dosing parameters used in the model were acute. As a result, chronic, low-dose treatment strategies may reflect clinical conditions more accurately.
“These systems can augment and reduce the use of animals and increase the efficiency of drug evaluations in preclinical studies,” they concluded.
The study was supported by Hesperos Internal Development funds, the NIH, and Roche. The authors reported financial affiliations with Hesperos and Roche.
SOURCE: McAleer CW et al. Sci Transl Med. 2019 Jun 19. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav1386.
FROM SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Key clinical point: A novel multiorgan body-on-a-chip system shows promise to improve the preclinical evaluation of anticancer therapies.
Major finding: Overall, results support the utility of the system to assess both off-target toxicity and on-target efficacy for various anticancer drugs.
Study details: A study exploring the utility of a multi-organ-on-a-chip system to assess safety and effectiveness of anticancer therapies in the preclinical setting.
Disclosures: The study was supported by Hesperos Internal Development funds, the NIH, and Roche. The authors reported financial affiliations with Hesperos and Roche.
Source: McAleer CW et al. Sci Transl Med. 2019 Jun 19. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav1386.
Durable transfusion independence in MDS with imetelstat
AMSTERDAM – For patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) for whom erythropoietin therapy has failed, the novel telomerase inhibitor imetelstat may provide long-lasting independence from transfusion, investigators reported.
Among 38 patients with low-risk MDS who had relapsed or were refractory to treatment with an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) who received imetelstat, 16 (42%) were free from the need for transfusion for at least 8 weeks, with one patient being transfusion free for up to 141 weeks, reported Pierre Fenaux, MD, of Hôpital Saint-Louis in Paris.
Patients with a generally worse prognosis “tended to respond better to imetelstat in terms of transfusion independence, which suggests that the drug is promising for higher-risk MDS,” he said at a briefing prior to his presentation of the data at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association.
Imetelstat is a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor targeting cells with short telomere lengths and active telomerase, the enzyme that maintains telomere length. Higher telomerase activity and shorter telomeres are predictive of shorter overall survival in patients with MDS, Dr. Fenaux explained.
He and colleagues enrolled 38 patients, median age 71.5 years, with low-risk MDS, with an International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) score of low or intermediate-1, whose disease was relapsed or refractory to ESA or to erythropoietin at a dose of more than 500 mU/mL. Of this group, 24 patients had IPSS low disease, 14 had intermediate-1 disease.
The median transfusion burden was 8 units per 8 weeks (range 4-14). The majority of patients (34, or 89%) had received prior ESAs.
The patients were transfusion dependent, defined as the need for 4 or more units of red blood cells within 8 weeks over the 16 weeks prior to study entry.
No patients had the 5q deletion, and no patients had received either a hypomethylating agent or lenolidamide (Revlimid), neither of which are approved for this indication in Europe.
The patients received imetelstat 7.5 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks.
As noted earlier, 16 patients (42%) achieved the primary endpoint of 8-week transfusion independence, with a median duration of 85.9 weeks (range 8-141 weeks).
Eleven patients (29%) had transfusion independence lasting at least 24 weeks – a secondary endpoint – and 26 (68%) met International Working Group 2006 criteria for a HI-E (erythroid) response, with 12 of these patients having an increase in hemoglobin of 1.5 g/dL or greater lasting for at least 8 weeks, and all 26 having a reduction in transfusions of 4 or more units over 8 weeks.
There was evidence to suggest a disease-modifying effect of imetelstat, with five patients achieving a complete response (CR), and five having a marrow CR.
The most frequent adverse events were manageable and reversible grade 3 or greater cytopenias, but there were no new safety signals seen. Two patients were hospitalized for febrile neutropenia, but there were no treatment-related deaths.
Based on these results, investigators are planning a phase 3 study comparing imetelstat with placebo in a 2:1 ratio. The trial is scheduled to begin in the late summer or fall of 2019.
When asked if imetelstat might have off-target effects by inhibiting telomerase in other cells, Dr. Fenaux replied that the mechanism of action is unclear, and that its potential effects on erythropoiesis are still unknown.
Briefing moderator Anton Hagenbeek, MD, of Amsterdam University Medical Center, commented on the drug’s potential for treating MDS, and asked whether investigators are considering combining it with other therapies for MDS.
“I think the first step will be to study it in high-risk MDS as a single agent before combining it, including with hypomethylating agents, et cetera,” Dr. Fenaux replied.
SOURCE: Fenaux P et al. EHA 2019, Abstract S837.
AMSTERDAM – For patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) for whom erythropoietin therapy has failed, the novel telomerase inhibitor imetelstat may provide long-lasting independence from transfusion, investigators reported.
Among 38 patients with low-risk MDS who had relapsed or were refractory to treatment with an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) who received imetelstat, 16 (42%) were free from the need for transfusion for at least 8 weeks, with one patient being transfusion free for up to 141 weeks, reported Pierre Fenaux, MD, of Hôpital Saint-Louis in Paris.
Patients with a generally worse prognosis “tended to respond better to imetelstat in terms of transfusion independence, which suggests that the drug is promising for higher-risk MDS,” he said at a briefing prior to his presentation of the data at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association.
Imetelstat is a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor targeting cells with short telomere lengths and active telomerase, the enzyme that maintains telomere length. Higher telomerase activity and shorter telomeres are predictive of shorter overall survival in patients with MDS, Dr. Fenaux explained.
He and colleagues enrolled 38 patients, median age 71.5 years, with low-risk MDS, with an International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) score of low or intermediate-1, whose disease was relapsed or refractory to ESA or to erythropoietin at a dose of more than 500 mU/mL. Of this group, 24 patients had IPSS low disease, 14 had intermediate-1 disease.
The median transfusion burden was 8 units per 8 weeks (range 4-14). The majority of patients (34, or 89%) had received prior ESAs.
The patients were transfusion dependent, defined as the need for 4 or more units of red blood cells within 8 weeks over the 16 weeks prior to study entry.
No patients had the 5q deletion, and no patients had received either a hypomethylating agent or lenolidamide (Revlimid), neither of which are approved for this indication in Europe.
The patients received imetelstat 7.5 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks.
As noted earlier, 16 patients (42%) achieved the primary endpoint of 8-week transfusion independence, with a median duration of 85.9 weeks (range 8-141 weeks).
Eleven patients (29%) had transfusion independence lasting at least 24 weeks – a secondary endpoint – and 26 (68%) met International Working Group 2006 criteria for a HI-E (erythroid) response, with 12 of these patients having an increase in hemoglobin of 1.5 g/dL or greater lasting for at least 8 weeks, and all 26 having a reduction in transfusions of 4 or more units over 8 weeks.
There was evidence to suggest a disease-modifying effect of imetelstat, with five patients achieving a complete response (CR), and five having a marrow CR.
The most frequent adverse events were manageable and reversible grade 3 or greater cytopenias, but there were no new safety signals seen. Two patients were hospitalized for febrile neutropenia, but there were no treatment-related deaths.
Based on these results, investigators are planning a phase 3 study comparing imetelstat with placebo in a 2:1 ratio. The trial is scheduled to begin in the late summer or fall of 2019.
When asked if imetelstat might have off-target effects by inhibiting telomerase in other cells, Dr. Fenaux replied that the mechanism of action is unclear, and that its potential effects on erythropoiesis are still unknown.
Briefing moderator Anton Hagenbeek, MD, of Amsterdam University Medical Center, commented on the drug’s potential for treating MDS, and asked whether investigators are considering combining it with other therapies for MDS.
“I think the first step will be to study it in high-risk MDS as a single agent before combining it, including with hypomethylating agents, et cetera,” Dr. Fenaux replied.
SOURCE: Fenaux P et al. EHA 2019, Abstract S837.
AMSTERDAM – For patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) for whom erythropoietin therapy has failed, the novel telomerase inhibitor imetelstat may provide long-lasting independence from transfusion, investigators reported.
Among 38 patients with low-risk MDS who had relapsed or were refractory to treatment with an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) who received imetelstat, 16 (42%) were free from the need for transfusion for at least 8 weeks, with one patient being transfusion free for up to 141 weeks, reported Pierre Fenaux, MD, of Hôpital Saint-Louis in Paris.
Patients with a generally worse prognosis “tended to respond better to imetelstat in terms of transfusion independence, which suggests that the drug is promising for higher-risk MDS,” he said at a briefing prior to his presentation of the data at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association.
Imetelstat is a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor targeting cells with short telomere lengths and active telomerase, the enzyme that maintains telomere length. Higher telomerase activity and shorter telomeres are predictive of shorter overall survival in patients with MDS, Dr. Fenaux explained.
He and colleagues enrolled 38 patients, median age 71.5 years, with low-risk MDS, with an International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) score of low or intermediate-1, whose disease was relapsed or refractory to ESA or to erythropoietin at a dose of more than 500 mU/mL. Of this group, 24 patients had IPSS low disease, 14 had intermediate-1 disease.
The median transfusion burden was 8 units per 8 weeks (range 4-14). The majority of patients (34, or 89%) had received prior ESAs.
The patients were transfusion dependent, defined as the need for 4 or more units of red blood cells within 8 weeks over the 16 weeks prior to study entry.
No patients had the 5q deletion, and no patients had received either a hypomethylating agent or lenolidamide (Revlimid), neither of which are approved for this indication in Europe.
The patients received imetelstat 7.5 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks.
As noted earlier, 16 patients (42%) achieved the primary endpoint of 8-week transfusion independence, with a median duration of 85.9 weeks (range 8-141 weeks).
Eleven patients (29%) had transfusion independence lasting at least 24 weeks – a secondary endpoint – and 26 (68%) met International Working Group 2006 criteria for a HI-E (erythroid) response, with 12 of these patients having an increase in hemoglobin of 1.5 g/dL or greater lasting for at least 8 weeks, and all 26 having a reduction in transfusions of 4 or more units over 8 weeks.
There was evidence to suggest a disease-modifying effect of imetelstat, with five patients achieving a complete response (CR), and five having a marrow CR.
The most frequent adverse events were manageable and reversible grade 3 or greater cytopenias, but there were no new safety signals seen. Two patients were hospitalized for febrile neutropenia, but there were no treatment-related deaths.
Based on these results, investigators are planning a phase 3 study comparing imetelstat with placebo in a 2:1 ratio. The trial is scheduled to begin in the late summer or fall of 2019.
When asked if imetelstat might have off-target effects by inhibiting telomerase in other cells, Dr. Fenaux replied that the mechanism of action is unclear, and that its potential effects on erythropoiesis are still unknown.
Briefing moderator Anton Hagenbeek, MD, of Amsterdam University Medical Center, commented on the drug’s potential for treating MDS, and asked whether investigators are considering combining it with other therapies for MDS.
“I think the first step will be to study it in high-risk MDS as a single agent before combining it, including with hypomethylating agents, et cetera,” Dr. Fenaux replied.
SOURCE: Fenaux P et al. EHA 2019, Abstract S837.
REPORTING FROM EHA CONGRESS
Antibody targeting ‘do not eat me’ signals is active in AML, MDS
CHICAGO – A novel antibody against CD47 – the “do not eat me” protein – is well tolerated and active in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), according to initial results of a phase 1b study.
Combined with azacitidine, the antibody Hu5F9-G4 (5F9) produced an overall response rate of 64% in untreated AML (9 of 14 patients) and 91% in untreated MDS (10 of 11 patients), according to investigator David A. Sallman, MD, of Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Fla.
With a median follow-up of 3.8 months, none of those patients had yet progressed on the 5F9/azacitidine combination, Dr. Sallman reported during a poster presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
A maximum tolerated dose of 5F9 plus the hypomethylating agent was not reached in the study, according to the investigators.
“This was a well-tolerated and safe combination, with encouraging efficacy data in this small cohort that hasn’t been followed for too, too long,” Tara L. Lin, MD, of the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, said during a poster discussion session.
“Most interesting is the fact that the combination seems to eliminate the leukemia stem cell population in those patients who respond,” she added.
The fact that 5F9 plus azacitidine eradicated leukemia stem cells in responding patients provides a mechanism for potential long-term durability of response, according to Dr. Sallman and his colleagues.
This first-in-class antibody targets CD47, a “do not eat me” macrophage checkpoint that is overexpressed on tumors, enabling immune invasion, they reported.
However, since CD47 is also expressed on older red blood cells, 5F9 is associated with transient anemia in the first cycle of treatment, Dr. Sallman told attendees at the poster discussion session.
“We do mitigate that with a priming dose of 5F9 that saturates these old red blood cells,” he said. “Over time, going along with the response, the patients have marked hemoglobin improvement, and we do not see worsening of other infection-related complications or cytopenias outside of anemia.”
Based on these results, expansion cohorts have been initiated in both AML and MDS, according to the investigators’ report.
When asked if 5F9 could be tolerable as part of more intensive regimens for fit patients, Dr. Sallman said there are a “whole host of combinations” that may possibly make sense.
“How chemotherapies and other novel agents impact these ‘eat me’ signals – I think some of that needs to be further investigated to come up with the most rational combination,” he said during a question and answer session.
Research funding for the study came from Forty Seven and the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. Dr. Salman reported having no relationships to disclose. Study coauthors reported relationships with Abbvie, Agios, Celgene, Incyte, and Novartis, among other companies.
SOURCE: Sallman DA et al. ASCO 2019, Abstract 7009.
CHICAGO – A novel antibody against CD47 – the “do not eat me” protein – is well tolerated and active in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), according to initial results of a phase 1b study.
Combined with azacitidine, the antibody Hu5F9-G4 (5F9) produced an overall response rate of 64% in untreated AML (9 of 14 patients) and 91% in untreated MDS (10 of 11 patients), according to investigator David A. Sallman, MD, of Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Fla.
With a median follow-up of 3.8 months, none of those patients had yet progressed on the 5F9/azacitidine combination, Dr. Sallman reported during a poster presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
A maximum tolerated dose of 5F9 plus the hypomethylating agent was not reached in the study, according to the investigators.
“This was a well-tolerated and safe combination, with encouraging efficacy data in this small cohort that hasn’t been followed for too, too long,” Tara L. Lin, MD, of the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, said during a poster discussion session.
“Most interesting is the fact that the combination seems to eliminate the leukemia stem cell population in those patients who respond,” she added.
The fact that 5F9 plus azacitidine eradicated leukemia stem cells in responding patients provides a mechanism for potential long-term durability of response, according to Dr. Sallman and his colleagues.
This first-in-class antibody targets CD47, a “do not eat me” macrophage checkpoint that is overexpressed on tumors, enabling immune invasion, they reported.
However, since CD47 is also expressed on older red blood cells, 5F9 is associated with transient anemia in the first cycle of treatment, Dr. Sallman told attendees at the poster discussion session.
“We do mitigate that with a priming dose of 5F9 that saturates these old red blood cells,” he said. “Over time, going along with the response, the patients have marked hemoglobin improvement, and we do not see worsening of other infection-related complications or cytopenias outside of anemia.”
Based on these results, expansion cohorts have been initiated in both AML and MDS, according to the investigators’ report.
When asked if 5F9 could be tolerable as part of more intensive regimens for fit patients, Dr. Sallman said there are a “whole host of combinations” that may possibly make sense.
“How chemotherapies and other novel agents impact these ‘eat me’ signals – I think some of that needs to be further investigated to come up with the most rational combination,” he said during a question and answer session.
Research funding for the study came from Forty Seven and the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. Dr. Salman reported having no relationships to disclose. Study coauthors reported relationships with Abbvie, Agios, Celgene, Incyte, and Novartis, among other companies.
SOURCE: Sallman DA et al. ASCO 2019, Abstract 7009.
CHICAGO – A novel antibody against CD47 – the “do not eat me” protein – is well tolerated and active in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), according to initial results of a phase 1b study.
Combined with azacitidine, the antibody Hu5F9-G4 (5F9) produced an overall response rate of 64% in untreated AML (9 of 14 patients) and 91% in untreated MDS (10 of 11 patients), according to investigator David A. Sallman, MD, of Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Fla.
With a median follow-up of 3.8 months, none of those patients had yet progressed on the 5F9/azacitidine combination, Dr. Sallman reported during a poster presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
A maximum tolerated dose of 5F9 plus the hypomethylating agent was not reached in the study, according to the investigators.
“This was a well-tolerated and safe combination, with encouraging efficacy data in this small cohort that hasn’t been followed for too, too long,” Tara L. Lin, MD, of the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, said during a poster discussion session.
“Most interesting is the fact that the combination seems to eliminate the leukemia stem cell population in those patients who respond,” she added.
The fact that 5F9 plus azacitidine eradicated leukemia stem cells in responding patients provides a mechanism for potential long-term durability of response, according to Dr. Sallman and his colleagues.
This first-in-class antibody targets CD47, a “do not eat me” macrophage checkpoint that is overexpressed on tumors, enabling immune invasion, they reported.
However, since CD47 is also expressed on older red blood cells, 5F9 is associated with transient anemia in the first cycle of treatment, Dr. Sallman told attendees at the poster discussion session.
“We do mitigate that with a priming dose of 5F9 that saturates these old red blood cells,” he said. “Over time, going along with the response, the patients have marked hemoglobin improvement, and we do not see worsening of other infection-related complications or cytopenias outside of anemia.”
Based on these results, expansion cohorts have been initiated in both AML and MDS, according to the investigators’ report.
When asked if 5F9 could be tolerable as part of more intensive regimens for fit patients, Dr. Sallman said there are a “whole host of combinations” that may possibly make sense.
“How chemotherapies and other novel agents impact these ‘eat me’ signals – I think some of that needs to be further investigated to come up with the most rational combination,” he said during a question and answer session.
Research funding for the study came from Forty Seven and the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. Dr. Salman reported having no relationships to disclose. Study coauthors reported relationships with Abbvie, Agios, Celgene, Incyte, and Novartis, among other companies.
SOURCE: Sallman DA et al. ASCO 2019, Abstract 7009.
REPORTING FROM ASCO 2019
Fixed-duration venetoclax-obinutuzumab superior to standard CLL therapy
CHICAGO – A fixed-duration venetoclax-obinutuzumab regimen is safe and provides a superior outcome versus standard chlorambucil-obinutuzumab in elderly patients with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and comorbidities, results of a randomized phase 3 trial showed.
At 24 months, progression-free survival was 88.2% for the venetoclax-obinutuzumab regimen, versus 64.1% for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.53; P less than .0001) in CLL-14, an open-label, multinational trial presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The regimen, given for just 12 28-day cycles, also achieved the highest rate of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative responses ever seen in a randomized prospective CLL study, according to investigator Kirsten Fischer, MD, of the University of Cologne in Germany.
“We really think that these unprecedented MRD negativity levels will eventually translate into an improved overall survival,” Dr. Fischer said during an oral abstract presentation.
Matthew Steven Davids, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School, Boston, said venetoclax plus obinutuzumab offers the potential for 1-year, time-limited therapy, which limits concerns over long-term adherence and has the potential for cost savings, should the therapy prove to be highly durable with further follow-up.
“A limitation of the study is that the comparator arm – chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab – is directly applicable to only a relatively small subset of our older and frailer CLL patients,” Dr. Davids said during a podium discussion of the results.
“But nonetheless, venetoclax plus obinutuzumab is a promising, time-limited regimen, and CLL14 is an immediately practice-changing study for frontline CLL treatment,” he added.
The regimen stands in contrast to ibrutinib, which offers durable responses but requires continuous dosing, and FCR (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab), a time-limited therapy with curative potential that is restricted to younger patients with IGHV-mutated CLL, according to Dr. Davids.
In CLL-14, 432 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive venetoclax-obinutuzumab for six cycles followed by venetoclax for six cycles, or chlorambucil-obinutuzumab for six cycles followed by chlorambucil for six cycles. The median age was 72 years in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab arm and 71 years in the chlorambucil-obinutuzumab arm.
The overall response rate was 85% for venetoclax-obinutuzumab and 71% for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (P = .0007), Dr. Fischer reported at the meeting.
The improvement in progression-free survival seen in the overall study population was also seen in patients with TP53 deletions or mutations, and in those with unmutated IGHV, Dr. Fischer reported.
Rates of MRD negativity in peripheral blood were 76% versus 35% for the venetoclax- and chlorambucil-containing combinations, respectively (P less than .001), and similarly, MRD negativity in bone marrow was 57% versus 17% (P less than .001), she said.
There were no significant differences in the rates of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, which occurred in 52.8% of the venetoclax–obinutuzumab treated patients and 48.1% of the chlorambucil-obinutuzumab treated patients, or in grade 3 or 4 infections, which occurred in 17.5% and 15.0%, respectively, according to a report, published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine (2019;380:2225-36).
Likewise, all-cause mortality was not significantly different between the arms, at 9.3% and 7.9%, respectively.
F. Hoffmann-La Roche and AbbVie supported the study. Dr. Fischer reported travel, accommodations, or expenses from Roche in her abstract disclosure.
SOURCE: Fischer K et al. ASCO 2019, Abstract 7502.
CHICAGO – A fixed-duration venetoclax-obinutuzumab regimen is safe and provides a superior outcome versus standard chlorambucil-obinutuzumab in elderly patients with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and comorbidities, results of a randomized phase 3 trial showed.
At 24 months, progression-free survival was 88.2% for the venetoclax-obinutuzumab regimen, versus 64.1% for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.53; P less than .0001) in CLL-14, an open-label, multinational trial presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The regimen, given for just 12 28-day cycles, also achieved the highest rate of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative responses ever seen in a randomized prospective CLL study, according to investigator Kirsten Fischer, MD, of the University of Cologne in Germany.
“We really think that these unprecedented MRD negativity levels will eventually translate into an improved overall survival,” Dr. Fischer said during an oral abstract presentation.
Matthew Steven Davids, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School, Boston, said venetoclax plus obinutuzumab offers the potential for 1-year, time-limited therapy, which limits concerns over long-term adherence and has the potential for cost savings, should the therapy prove to be highly durable with further follow-up.
“A limitation of the study is that the comparator arm – chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab – is directly applicable to only a relatively small subset of our older and frailer CLL patients,” Dr. Davids said during a podium discussion of the results.
“But nonetheless, venetoclax plus obinutuzumab is a promising, time-limited regimen, and CLL14 is an immediately practice-changing study for frontline CLL treatment,” he added.
The regimen stands in contrast to ibrutinib, which offers durable responses but requires continuous dosing, and FCR (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab), a time-limited therapy with curative potential that is restricted to younger patients with IGHV-mutated CLL, according to Dr. Davids.
In CLL-14, 432 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive venetoclax-obinutuzumab for six cycles followed by venetoclax for six cycles, or chlorambucil-obinutuzumab for six cycles followed by chlorambucil for six cycles. The median age was 72 years in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab arm and 71 years in the chlorambucil-obinutuzumab arm.
The overall response rate was 85% for venetoclax-obinutuzumab and 71% for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (P = .0007), Dr. Fischer reported at the meeting.
The improvement in progression-free survival seen in the overall study population was also seen in patients with TP53 deletions or mutations, and in those with unmutated IGHV, Dr. Fischer reported.
Rates of MRD negativity in peripheral blood were 76% versus 35% for the venetoclax- and chlorambucil-containing combinations, respectively (P less than .001), and similarly, MRD negativity in bone marrow was 57% versus 17% (P less than .001), she said.
There were no significant differences in the rates of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, which occurred in 52.8% of the venetoclax–obinutuzumab treated patients and 48.1% of the chlorambucil-obinutuzumab treated patients, or in grade 3 or 4 infections, which occurred in 17.5% and 15.0%, respectively, according to a report, published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine (2019;380:2225-36).
Likewise, all-cause mortality was not significantly different between the arms, at 9.3% and 7.9%, respectively.
F. Hoffmann-La Roche and AbbVie supported the study. Dr. Fischer reported travel, accommodations, or expenses from Roche in her abstract disclosure.
SOURCE: Fischer K et al. ASCO 2019, Abstract 7502.
CHICAGO – A fixed-duration venetoclax-obinutuzumab regimen is safe and provides a superior outcome versus standard chlorambucil-obinutuzumab in elderly patients with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and comorbidities, results of a randomized phase 3 trial showed.
At 24 months, progression-free survival was 88.2% for the venetoclax-obinutuzumab regimen, versus 64.1% for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.53; P less than .0001) in CLL-14, an open-label, multinational trial presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The regimen, given for just 12 28-day cycles, also achieved the highest rate of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative responses ever seen in a randomized prospective CLL study, according to investigator Kirsten Fischer, MD, of the University of Cologne in Germany.
“We really think that these unprecedented MRD negativity levels will eventually translate into an improved overall survival,” Dr. Fischer said during an oral abstract presentation.
Matthew Steven Davids, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School, Boston, said venetoclax plus obinutuzumab offers the potential for 1-year, time-limited therapy, which limits concerns over long-term adherence and has the potential for cost savings, should the therapy prove to be highly durable with further follow-up.
“A limitation of the study is that the comparator arm – chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab – is directly applicable to only a relatively small subset of our older and frailer CLL patients,” Dr. Davids said during a podium discussion of the results.
“But nonetheless, venetoclax plus obinutuzumab is a promising, time-limited regimen, and CLL14 is an immediately practice-changing study for frontline CLL treatment,” he added.
The regimen stands in contrast to ibrutinib, which offers durable responses but requires continuous dosing, and FCR (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab), a time-limited therapy with curative potential that is restricted to younger patients with IGHV-mutated CLL, according to Dr. Davids.
In CLL-14, 432 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive venetoclax-obinutuzumab for six cycles followed by venetoclax for six cycles, or chlorambucil-obinutuzumab for six cycles followed by chlorambucil for six cycles. The median age was 72 years in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab arm and 71 years in the chlorambucil-obinutuzumab arm.
The overall response rate was 85% for venetoclax-obinutuzumab and 71% for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (P = .0007), Dr. Fischer reported at the meeting.
The improvement in progression-free survival seen in the overall study population was also seen in patients with TP53 deletions or mutations, and in those with unmutated IGHV, Dr. Fischer reported.
Rates of MRD negativity in peripheral blood were 76% versus 35% for the venetoclax- and chlorambucil-containing combinations, respectively (P less than .001), and similarly, MRD negativity in bone marrow was 57% versus 17% (P less than .001), she said.
There were no significant differences in the rates of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, which occurred in 52.8% of the venetoclax–obinutuzumab treated patients and 48.1% of the chlorambucil-obinutuzumab treated patients, or in grade 3 or 4 infections, which occurred in 17.5% and 15.0%, respectively, according to a report, published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine (2019;380:2225-36).
Likewise, all-cause mortality was not significantly different between the arms, at 9.3% and 7.9%, respectively.
F. Hoffmann-La Roche and AbbVie supported the study. Dr. Fischer reported travel, accommodations, or expenses from Roche in her abstract disclosure.
SOURCE: Fischer K et al. ASCO 2019, Abstract 7502.
REPORTING FROM ASCO 2019
SC-PEG comparable to pegaspargase in young ALL/LL patients
CHICAGO – Calaspargase pegol (SC-PEG) produces similar outcomes as standard pegaspargase in pediatric and young adult patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL), according to a phase 2 trial.
Patients who received SC-PEG every 3 weeks had similar serum asparaginase activity (SAA), toxicities, and survival rates as patients who received standard pegaspargase every 2 weeks.
Lynda M. Vrooman, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, presented these results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The trial (NCT01574274) enrolled 239 patients, 230 with ALL and 9 with LL. Most patients had B-cell (n = 207) disease. The patients’ median age was 5.2 years (range, 1.0-20.9 years).
“There were no differences in presenting features by randomization,” Dr. Vrooman noted.
The patients were randomized to receive pegaspargase (n = 120) or SC-PEG (n = 119), a pegylated asparaginase formulation with longer half-life. SC-PEG was given at 2,500 IU/m2 every 3 weeks, and pegaspargase was given at 2,500 IU/m2 every 2 weeks.
Either asparaginase product was given as part of a 4-week induction regimen (vincristine, prednisone, doxorubicin, and methotrexate), a 3-week intensification regimen (intrathecal chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy) for central nervous system disease, and a 27-week second consolidation regimen (mercaptopurine, methotrexate, and, in high-risk patients, doxorubicin).
SAA
The researchers observed significantly longer SAA with SC-PEG during induction but not after.
During induction, at 25 days after the first asparaginase dose, 88% of patients on SC-PEG and 17% of those on pegaspargase had SAA of at least 0.10 IU/mL (P less than .001). Post-induction, at week 25, 100% of patients in each group had a nadir SAA of at least 0.10 IU/mL.
“The high nadir serum asparaginase activity levels observed for both preparations suggest dosing strategies could be further optimized,” Dr. Vrooman noted.
Safety
There were no significant differences in adverse events between the SC-PEG and pegaspargase arms during or after induction.
Adverse events during induction (in the SC-PEG and pegaspargase arms, respectively) included grade 2 or higher asparaginase allergy (0% and 1%), grade 2 or higher pancreatitis (3% in both), grade 2 or higher thrombosis (3% and 9%), grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia (3% and 1%), grade 3 or higher bacterial infection (12% and 9%), and grade 3 or higher fungal infection (4% and 5%).
Adverse events after induction (in the SC-PEG and pegaspargase arms, respectively) included grade 2 or higher asparaginase allergy (17% and 14%), grade 2 or higher pancreatitis (15% in both), grade 2 or higher thrombosis (18% and 13%), grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia (4% and 3%), grade 3 or higher bacterial infection (12% and 15%), grade 3 or higher fungal infection (2% and 1%), grade 2 or higher bone fracture (3% and 8%), and grade 2 or higher osteonecrosis (3% and 4%).
Response and survival
The complete response rate was 95% (109/115) in the SC-PEG arm and 99% (114/115) in the pegaspargase arm. Rates of induction failure were 3% (n = 4) and 1% (n = 1), respectively, and rates of relapse were 3% (n = 5) and 8% (n = 10), respectively.
There were two induction deaths and two remission deaths in the SC-PEG arm but no induction or remission deaths in the pegaspargase arm.
The median follow-up was 4 years. The 4-year event-free survival rate was 87.7% with SC-PEG and 90.2% with pegaspargase (P = .78). The 4-year overall survival rate was 94.8% and 95.6%, respectively (P = .74).
In closing, Dr. Vrooman said these data suggest SC-PEG provides similar results as standard pegaspargase. She noted that these data informed the U.S. approval of SC-PEG for pediatric and young adult ALL.
This trial was sponsored by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in collaboration with Shire and the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Vrooman said she had no relationships to disclose.
SOURCE: Vrooman LM et al. ASCO 2019. Abstract 10006.
CHICAGO – Calaspargase pegol (SC-PEG) produces similar outcomes as standard pegaspargase in pediatric and young adult patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL), according to a phase 2 trial.
Patients who received SC-PEG every 3 weeks had similar serum asparaginase activity (SAA), toxicities, and survival rates as patients who received standard pegaspargase every 2 weeks.
Lynda M. Vrooman, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, presented these results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The trial (NCT01574274) enrolled 239 patients, 230 with ALL and 9 with LL. Most patients had B-cell (n = 207) disease. The patients’ median age was 5.2 years (range, 1.0-20.9 years).
“There were no differences in presenting features by randomization,” Dr. Vrooman noted.
The patients were randomized to receive pegaspargase (n = 120) or SC-PEG (n = 119), a pegylated asparaginase formulation with longer half-life. SC-PEG was given at 2,500 IU/m2 every 3 weeks, and pegaspargase was given at 2,500 IU/m2 every 2 weeks.
Either asparaginase product was given as part of a 4-week induction regimen (vincristine, prednisone, doxorubicin, and methotrexate), a 3-week intensification regimen (intrathecal chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy) for central nervous system disease, and a 27-week second consolidation regimen (mercaptopurine, methotrexate, and, in high-risk patients, doxorubicin).
SAA
The researchers observed significantly longer SAA with SC-PEG during induction but not after.
During induction, at 25 days after the first asparaginase dose, 88% of patients on SC-PEG and 17% of those on pegaspargase had SAA of at least 0.10 IU/mL (P less than .001). Post-induction, at week 25, 100% of patients in each group had a nadir SAA of at least 0.10 IU/mL.
“The high nadir serum asparaginase activity levels observed for both preparations suggest dosing strategies could be further optimized,” Dr. Vrooman noted.
Safety
There were no significant differences in adverse events between the SC-PEG and pegaspargase arms during or after induction.
Adverse events during induction (in the SC-PEG and pegaspargase arms, respectively) included grade 2 or higher asparaginase allergy (0% and 1%), grade 2 or higher pancreatitis (3% in both), grade 2 or higher thrombosis (3% and 9%), grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia (3% and 1%), grade 3 or higher bacterial infection (12% and 9%), and grade 3 or higher fungal infection (4% and 5%).
Adverse events after induction (in the SC-PEG and pegaspargase arms, respectively) included grade 2 or higher asparaginase allergy (17% and 14%), grade 2 or higher pancreatitis (15% in both), grade 2 or higher thrombosis (18% and 13%), grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia (4% and 3%), grade 3 or higher bacterial infection (12% and 15%), grade 3 or higher fungal infection (2% and 1%), grade 2 or higher bone fracture (3% and 8%), and grade 2 or higher osteonecrosis (3% and 4%).
Response and survival
The complete response rate was 95% (109/115) in the SC-PEG arm and 99% (114/115) in the pegaspargase arm. Rates of induction failure were 3% (n = 4) and 1% (n = 1), respectively, and rates of relapse were 3% (n = 5) and 8% (n = 10), respectively.
There were two induction deaths and two remission deaths in the SC-PEG arm but no induction or remission deaths in the pegaspargase arm.
The median follow-up was 4 years. The 4-year event-free survival rate was 87.7% with SC-PEG and 90.2% with pegaspargase (P = .78). The 4-year overall survival rate was 94.8% and 95.6%, respectively (P = .74).
In closing, Dr. Vrooman said these data suggest SC-PEG provides similar results as standard pegaspargase. She noted that these data informed the U.S. approval of SC-PEG for pediatric and young adult ALL.
This trial was sponsored by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in collaboration with Shire and the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Vrooman said she had no relationships to disclose.
SOURCE: Vrooman LM et al. ASCO 2019. Abstract 10006.
CHICAGO – Calaspargase pegol (SC-PEG) produces similar outcomes as standard pegaspargase in pediatric and young adult patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL), according to a phase 2 trial.
Patients who received SC-PEG every 3 weeks had similar serum asparaginase activity (SAA), toxicities, and survival rates as patients who received standard pegaspargase every 2 weeks.
Lynda M. Vrooman, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, presented these results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The trial (NCT01574274) enrolled 239 patients, 230 with ALL and 9 with LL. Most patients had B-cell (n = 207) disease. The patients’ median age was 5.2 years (range, 1.0-20.9 years).
“There were no differences in presenting features by randomization,” Dr. Vrooman noted.
The patients were randomized to receive pegaspargase (n = 120) or SC-PEG (n = 119), a pegylated asparaginase formulation with longer half-life. SC-PEG was given at 2,500 IU/m2 every 3 weeks, and pegaspargase was given at 2,500 IU/m2 every 2 weeks.
Either asparaginase product was given as part of a 4-week induction regimen (vincristine, prednisone, doxorubicin, and methotrexate), a 3-week intensification regimen (intrathecal chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy) for central nervous system disease, and a 27-week second consolidation regimen (mercaptopurine, methotrexate, and, in high-risk patients, doxorubicin).
SAA
The researchers observed significantly longer SAA with SC-PEG during induction but not after.
During induction, at 25 days after the first asparaginase dose, 88% of patients on SC-PEG and 17% of those on pegaspargase had SAA of at least 0.10 IU/mL (P less than .001). Post-induction, at week 25, 100% of patients in each group had a nadir SAA of at least 0.10 IU/mL.
“The high nadir serum asparaginase activity levels observed for both preparations suggest dosing strategies could be further optimized,” Dr. Vrooman noted.
Safety
There were no significant differences in adverse events between the SC-PEG and pegaspargase arms during or after induction.
Adverse events during induction (in the SC-PEG and pegaspargase arms, respectively) included grade 2 or higher asparaginase allergy (0% and 1%), grade 2 or higher pancreatitis (3% in both), grade 2 or higher thrombosis (3% and 9%), grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia (3% and 1%), grade 3 or higher bacterial infection (12% and 9%), and grade 3 or higher fungal infection (4% and 5%).
Adverse events after induction (in the SC-PEG and pegaspargase arms, respectively) included grade 2 or higher asparaginase allergy (17% and 14%), grade 2 or higher pancreatitis (15% in both), grade 2 or higher thrombosis (18% and 13%), grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia (4% and 3%), grade 3 or higher bacterial infection (12% and 15%), grade 3 or higher fungal infection (2% and 1%), grade 2 or higher bone fracture (3% and 8%), and grade 2 or higher osteonecrosis (3% and 4%).
Response and survival
The complete response rate was 95% (109/115) in the SC-PEG arm and 99% (114/115) in the pegaspargase arm. Rates of induction failure were 3% (n = 4) and 1% (n = 1), respectively, and rates of relapse were 3% (n = 5) and 8% (n = 10), respectively.
There were two induction deaths and two remission deaths in the SC-PEG arm but no induction or remission deaths in the pegaspargase arm.
The median follow-up was 4 years. The 4-year event-free survival rate was 87.7% with SC-PEG and 90.2% with pegaspargase (P = .78). The 4-year overall survival rate was 94.8% and 95.6%, respectively (P = .74).
In closing, Dr. Vrooman said these data suggest SC-PEG provides similar results as standard pegaspargase. She noted that these data informed the U.S. approval of SC-PEG for pediatric and young adult ALL.
This trial was sponsored by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in collaboration with Shire and the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Vrooman said she had no relationships to disclose.
SOURCE: Vrooman LM et al. ASCO 2019. Abstract 10006.
REPORTING FROM ASCO 2019
Low intensity bridging may be best path to CAR T in adult ALL
CHICAGO – A low intensity chemotherapy regimen may be the best approach to bridge patients waiting for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, according to a retrospective analysis of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
Investigators found that high intensity bridging regimens provided no clear outcome benefit, but did produce a greater number of infections.
But the decision on the type of regimen is very much dependent on the individual patient, Karlo Perica, MD, PhD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Dr. Perica and his colleagues at Memorial Sloan Kettering examined the effectiveness and toxicity of bridging therapies provided to relapsed or refractory ALL patients waiting to receive CD19 CAR T-cell therapy as part of a phase 1 trial (N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 1;378[5]:449-59).
Bridging therapy was defined as any therapy given from leukapheresis to cell infusion.
The low-intensity regimens included POMP (6-mercaptopurine, vincristine, methotrexate, and prednisone, or combinations), liposomal vincristine, mini-hyper CVD (reduced cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone, methotrexate, Ara-C), blinatumomab, inotuzumab, oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor-based regimens, or hydroxyurea.
The high-intensity regimens included hyper-CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone), high-dose cytarabine, attenuated FLAG/FLAG-IDA (reduced fludarabine, cytarabine, G-CSF plus or minus idarubicin), and pediatric-type induction.
Of the 53 patients who were ultimately infused with CAR T cells, 19 received some type of high intensity regimen, 29 received low intensity regimens, and 5 received no bridging treatment. The group overall was heavily pretreated. Nearly a third of the low intensity and no bridging patients and 42% of the high intensity patients had previously undergone transplant. More than 40% of the low intensity and no bridging patients and about a quarter of the high intensity bridging group had four or more prior lines of therapy.
The use of high intensity bridging therapy was not associated with improved overall response or relapse-free survival to CAR T-cell therapy, the investigators reported. In a subgroup with 23 high disease burden patients with greater than 20% blasts, there was no difference in MRD-negative complete response by intensity (75% versus 60%, Fisher’s P = .65).
High intensity bridging was also not associated with successful CAR T-cell infusion, versus low intensity regimens (63% versus 79%, P greater than .05) or a combined endpoint of CAR T-cell infusion plus transplant or alternative treatment (80% versus 86%, P greater than .05).
In terms of toxicity, the high intensity bridging regimens were associated with a higher rate of grade 3 or 4 infections – 15 versus 11 infections (Fisher’s P = .002). But there was no association with post-infusion grade 3 or 4 cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity.
Dr. Perica said the results reflect that the real goal of bridging is not to reduce disease burden but instead to successfully bring patients to the next phase of their treatment. “The goal of the bridging therapy is to get the patient to the CAR infusion,” he said.
Due to the retrospective nature of the study, Dr. Perica said he can’t recommend any single bridging regimen and he emphasized that the decisions are patient-specific.
The original study was funded by several foundations and Juno Therapeutics. Dr. Perica reported royalties from technology licensed to Neximmune.
SOURCE: Perica K et al. ASCO 2019, Abstract 2520.
CHICAGO – A low intensity chemotherapy regimen may be the best approach to bridge patients waiting for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, according to a retrospective analysis of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
Investigators found that high intensity bridging regimens provided no clear outcome benefit, but did produce a greater number of infections.
But the decision on the type of regimen is very much dependent on the individual patient, Karlo Perica, MD, PhD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Dr. Perica and his colleagues at Memorial Sloan Kettering examined the effectiveness and toxicity of bridging therapies provided to relapsed or refractory ALL patients waiting to receive CD19 CAR T-cell therapy as part of a phase 1 trial (N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 1;378[5]:449-59).
Bridging therapy was defined as any therapy given from leukapheresis to cell infusion.
The low-intensity regimens included POMP (6-mercaptopurine, vincristine, methotrexate, and prednisone, or combinations), liposomal vincristine, mini-hyper CVD (reduced cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone, methotrexate, Ara-C), blinatumomab, inotuzumab, oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor-based regimens, or hydroxyurea.
The high-intensity regimens included hyper-CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone), high-dose cytarabine, attenuated FLAG/FLAG-IDA (reduced fludarabine, cytarabine, G-CSF plus or minus idarubicin), and pediatric-type induction.
Of the 53 patients who were ultimately infused with CAR T cells, 19 received some type of high intensity regimen, 29 received low intensity regimens, and 5 received no bridging treatment. The group overall was heavily pretreated. Nearly a third of the low intensity and no bridging patients and 42% of the high intensity patients had previously undergone transplant. More than 40% of the low intensity and no bridging patients and about a quarter of the high intensity bridging group had four or more prior lines of therapy.
The use of high intensity bridging therapy was not associated with improved overall response or relapse-free survival to CAR T-cell therapy, the investigators reported. In a subgroup with 23 high disease burden patients with greater than 20% blasts, there was no difference in MRD-negative complete response by intensity (75% versus 60%, Fisher’s P = .65).
High intensity bridging was also not associated with successful CAR T-cell infusion, versus low intensity regimens (63% versus 79%, P greater than .05) or a combined endpoint of CAR T-cell infusion plus transplant or alternative treatment (80% versus 86%, P greater than .05).
In terms of toxicity, the high intensity bridging regimens were associated with a higher rate of grade 3 or 4 infections – 15 versus 11 infections (Fisher’s P = .002). But there was no association with post-infusion grade 3 or 4 cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity.
Dr. Perica said the results reflect that the real goal of bridging is not to reduce disease burden but instead to successfully bring patients to the next phase of their treatment. “The goal of the bridging therapy is to get the patient to the CAR infusion,” he said.
Due to the retrospective nature of the study, Dr. Perica said he can’t recommend any single bridging regimen and he emphasized that the decisions are patient-specific.
The original study was funded by several foundations and Juno Therapeutics. Dr. Perica reported royalties from technology licensed to Neximmune.
SOURCE: Perica K et al. ASCO 2019, Abstract 2520.
CHICAGO – A low intensity chemotherapy regimen may be the best approach to bridge patients waiting for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, according to a retrospective analysis of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
Investigators found that high intensity bridging regimens provided no clear outcome benefit, but did produce a greater number of infections.
But the decision on the type of regimen is very much dependent on the individual patient, Karlo Perica, MD, PhD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Dr. Perica and his colleagues at Memorial Sloan Kettering examined the effectiveness and toxicity of bridging therapies provided to relapsed or refractory ALL patients waiting to receive CD19 CAR T-cell therapy as part of a phase 1 trial (N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 1;378[5]:449-59).
Bridging therapy was defined as any therapy given from leukapheresis to cell infusion.
The low-intensity regimens included POMP (6-mercaptopurine, vincristine, methotrexate, and prednisone, or combinations), liposomal vincristine, mini-hyper CVD (reduced cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone, methotrexate, Ara-C), blinatumomab, inotuzumab, oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor-based regimens, or hydroxyurea.
The high-intensity regimens included hyper-CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone), high-dose cytarabine, attenuated FLAG/FLAG-IDA (reduced fludarabine, cytarabine, G-CSF plus or minus idarubicin), and pediatric-type induction.
Of the 53 patients who were ultimately infused with CAR T cells, 19 received some type of high intensity regimen, 29 received low intensity regimens, and 5 received no bridging treatment. The group overall was heavily pretreated. Nearly a third of the low intensity and no bridging patients and 42% of the high intensity patients had previously undergone transplant. More than 40% of the low intensity and no bridging patients and about a quarter of the high intensity bridging group had four or more prior lines of therapy.
The use of high intensity bridging therapy was not associated with improved overall response or relapse-free survival to CAR T-cell therapy, the investigators reported. In a subgroup with 23 high disease burden patients with greater than 20% blasts, there was no difference in MRD-negative complete response by intensity (75% versus 60%, Fisher’s P = .65).
High intensity bridging was also not associated with successful CAR T-cell infusion, versus low intensity regimens (63% versus 79%, P greater than .05) or a combined endpoint of CAR T-cell infusion plus transplant or alternative treatment (80% versus 86%, P greater than .05).
In terms of toxicity, the high intensity bridging regimens were associated with a higher rate of grade 3 or 4 infections – 15 versus 11 infections (Fisher’s P = .002). But there was no association with post-infusion grade 3 or 4 cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity.
Dr. Perica said the results reflect that the real goal of bridging is not to reduce disease burden but instead to successfully bring patients to the next phase of their treatment. “The goal of the bridging therapy is to get the patient to the CAR infusion,” he said.
Due to the retrospective nature of the study, Dr. Perica said he can’t recommend any single bridging regimen and he emphasized that the decisions are patient-specific.
The original study was funded by several foundations and Juno Therapeutics. Dr. Perica reported royalties from technology licensed to Neximmune.
SOURCE: Perica K et al. ASCO 2019, Abstract 2520.
FROM ASCO 2019
Combo produces ‘best response rate’ after first relapse in kids with AML
CHICAGO – Administering CPX-351 prior to a three-drug regimen produced a high response rate in pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first relapse.
In a phase 1/2 trial, CPX-351 followed by fludarabine, cytarabine, and filgrastim (FLAG) produced an overall response rate of 81%, and 70% of responders had their best response while receiving CPX-351.
“This is the best response rate published in North America for those [pediatric AML patients] in first relapse,” said Todd Cooper, DO, of Seattle Children’s Hospital in Washington.
Dr. Cooper presented results from the phase 1/2 AAML1421 trial (NCT02642965) at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The primary objective of phase 1 was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose and toxicities of CPX-351, a liposomal preparation of cytarabine and daunorubicin. The primary objective of phase 2 was to assess the best response in patients who received CPX-351 in cycle 1 and FLAG in cycle 2.
The trial enrolled 38 AML patients, 6 in the dose-finding phase and 32 in the efficacy phase. The patients’ median age at study entry was 11.91 years (range, 1.81-21.5). Most patients (88.9%) had CNS 1 disease, and most (73.7%) had not received a transplant.
Half of patients had a first complete response (CR) that lasted 180 to 365 days, 13.2% had a first CR lasting less than 180 days, and 36.8% had a first CR lasting more than 1 year.
Dosing and toxicity
During the dose-finding portion of the study, the first dose level of CPX-351 was 135 units/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5. There was one dose-limiting toxicity — grade 3 decrease in ejection fraction — so 135 units/m2 was deemed the recommended phase 2 dose.
The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events observed with CPX-351 in cycle 1 were infections and infestations (47.4%), febrile neutropenia (44.7%), maculopapular rash (39.5%), and prolonged QT interval (18.4%).
The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events observed with FLAG in cycle 2 were febrile neutropenia (23.1%), prolonged QT interval (23.1%), and infections and infestations (19.2%).
Response and survival
There were 37 patients evaluable for response. The overall response rate was defined as CR plus CR without platelet recovery (CRp) plus CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi).
The overall response rate was 81.1% (n = 30), which included 20 CRs (54.1%), 5 CRps (13.5%), and 5 CRis (13.5%). Five patients had a partial response (13.5%), and two patients had treatment failure (5.4%).
During CPX-351 treatment (n = 37), the CR rate was 37.8% (n = 14), the CRp rate was 5.4% (n = 2), and the CRi rate was 32.4% (n = 12).
During FLAG treatment (n = 27), the CR rate was 48.1% (n = 13), the CRp rate was 25.9% (n = 7), and the CRi rate was 7.4% (n = 2).
Of the 25 patients who achieved a CR or CRp at any time, 21 (84%) were minimal residual disease negative by flow cytometry. Twelve patients were minimal residual disease negative after cycle 1.
Most patients who achieved a CRi or better (83.3%) went on to hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
The 2-year overall survival was 47% for all patients and 60% for responders. None of the non-responders were still alive 2 years after therapy.
“The results certainly warrant a phase 3 study of CPX-351,” Dr. Cooper said. “In fact, it is the lead molecule that’s going to be incorporated into the next COG phase 3 study.”
AAML1421 was sponsored by the Children’s Oncology Group in collaboration with the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Cooper disclosed relationships with Juno Therapeutics and Celgene.
SOURCE: Cooper TM et al. ASCO 2019. Abstract 10003.
CHICAGO – Administering CPX-351 prior to a three-drug regimen produced a high response rate in pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first relapse.
In a phase 1/2 trial, CPX-351 followed by fludarabine, cytarabine, and filgrastim (FLAG) produced an overall response rate of 81%, and 70% of responders had their best response while receiving CPX-351.
“This is the best response rate published in North America for those [pediatric AML patients] in first relapse,” said Todd Cooper, DO, of Seattle Children’s Hospital in Washington.
Dr. Cooper presented results from the phase 1/2 AAML1421 trial (NCT02642965) at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The primary objective of phase 1 was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose and toxicities of CPX-351, a liposomal preparation of cytarabine and daunorubicin. The primary objective of phase 2 was to assess the best response in patients who received CPX-351 in cycle 1 and FLAG in cycle 2.
The trial enrolled 38 AML patients, 6 in the dose-finding phase and 32 in the efficacy phase. The patients’ median age at study entry was 11.91 years (range, 1.81-21.5). Most patients (88.9%) had CNS 1 disease, and most (73.7%) had not received a transplant.
Half of patients had a first complete response (CR) that lasted 180 to 365 days, 13.2% had a first CR lasting less than 180 days, and 36.8% had a first CR lasting more than 1 year.
Dosing and toxicity
During the dose-finding portion of the study, the first dose level of CPX-351 was 135 units/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5. There was one dose-limiting toxicity — grade 3 decrease in ejection fraction — so 135 units/m2 was deemed the recommended phase 2 dose.
The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events observed with CPX-351 in cycle 1 were infections and infestations (47.4%), febrile neutropenia (44.7%), maculopapular rash (39.5%), and prolonged QT interval (18.4%).
The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events observed with FLAG in cycle 2 were febrile neutropenia (23.1%), prolonged QT interval (23.1%), and infections and infestations (19.2%).
Response and survival
There were 37 patients evaluable for response. The overall response rate was defined as CR plus CR without platelet recovery (CRp) plus CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi).
The overall response rate was 81.1% (n = 30), which included 20 CRs (54.1%), 5 CRps (13.5%), and 5 CRis (13.5%). Five patients had a partial response (13.5%), and two patients had treatment failure (5.4%).
During CPX-351 treatment (n = 37), the CR rate was 37.8% (n = 14), the CRp rate was 5.4% (n = 2), and the CRi rate was 32.4% (n = 12).
During FLAG treatment (n = 27), the CR rate was 48.1% (n = 13), the CRp rate was 25.9% (n = 7), and the CRi rate was 7.4% (n = 2).
Of the 25 patients who achieved a CR or CRp at any time, 21 (84%) were minimal residual disease negative by flow cytometry. Twelve patients were minimal residual disease negative after cycle 1.
Most patients who achieved a CRi or better (83.3%) went on to hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
The 2-year overall survival was 47% for all patients and 60% for responders. None of the non-responders were still alive 2 years after therapy.
“The results certainly warrant a phase 3 study of CPX-351,” Dr. Cooper said. “In fact, it is the lead molecule that’s going to be incorporated into the next COG phase 3 study.”
AAML1421 was sponsored by the Children’s Oncology Group in collaboration with the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Cooper disclosed relationships with Juno Therapeutics and Celgene.
SOURCE: Cooper TM et al. ASCO 2019. Abstract 10003.
CHICAGO – Administering CPX-351 prior to a three-drug regimen produced a high response rate in pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first relapse.
In a phase 1/2 trial, CPX-351 followed by fludarabine, cytarabine, and filgrastim (FLAG) produced an overall response rate of 81%, and 70% of responders had their best response while receiving CPX-351.
“This is the best response rate published in North America for those [pediatric AML patients] in first relapse,” said Todd Cooper, DO, of Seattle Children’s Hospital in Washington.
Dr. Cooper presented results from the phase 1/2 AAML1421 trial (NCT02642965) at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The primary objective of phase 1 was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose and toxicities of CPX-351, a liposomal preparation of cytarabine and daunorubicin. The primary objective of phase 2 was to assess the best response in patients who received CPX-351 in cycle 1 and FLAG in cycle 2.
The trial enrolled 38 AML patients, 6 in the dose-finding phase and 32 in the efficacy phase. The patients’ median age at study entry was 11.91 years (range, 1.81-21.5). Most patients (88.9%) had CNS 1 disease, and most (73.7%) had not received a transplant.
Half of patients had a first complete response (CR) that lasted 180 to 365 days, 13.2% had a first CR lasting less than 180 days, and 36.8% had a first CR lasting more than 1 year.
Dosing and toxicity
During the dose-finding portion of the study, the first dose level of CPX-351 was 135 units/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5. There was one dose-limiting toxicity — grade 3 decrease in ejection fraction — so 135 units/m2 was deemed the recommended phase 2 dose.
The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events observed with CPX-351 in cycle 1 were infections and infestations (47.4%), febrile neutropenia (44.7%), maculopapular rash (39.5%), and prolonged QT interval (18.4%).
The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events observed with FLAG in cycle 2 were febrile neutropenia (23.1%), prolonged QT interval (23.1%), and infections and infestations (19.2%).
Response and survival
There were 37 patients evaluable for response. The overall response rate was defined as CR plus CR without platelet recovery (CRp) plus CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi).
The overall response rate was 81.1% (n = 30), which included 20 CRs (54.1%), 5 CRps (13.5%), and 5 CRis (13.5%). Five patients had a partial response (13.5%), and two patients had treatment failure (5.4%).
During CPX-351 treatment (n = 37), the CR rate was 37.8% (n = 14), the CRp rate was 5.4% (n = 2), and the CRi rate was 32.4% (n = 12).
During FLAG treatment (n = 27), the CR rate was 48.1% (n = 13), the CRp rate was 25.9% (n = 7), and the CRi rate was 7.4% (n = 2).
Of the 25 patients who achieved a CR or CRp at any time, 21 (84%) were minimal residual disease negative by flow cytometry. Twelve patients were minimal residual disease negative after cycle 1.
Most patients who achieved a CRi or better (83.3%) went on to hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
The 2-year overall survival was 47% for all patients and 60% for responders. None of the non-responders were still alive 2 years after therapy.
“The results certainly warrant a phase 3 study of CPX-351,” Dr. Cooper said. “In fact, it is the lead molecule that’s going to be incorporated into the next COG phase 3 study.”
AAML1421 was sponsored by the Children’s Oncology Group in collaboration with the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Cooper disclosed relationships with Juno Therapeutics and Celgene.
SOURCE: Cooper TM et al. ASCO 2019. Abstract 10003.
REPORTING FROM ASCO 2019
Venetoclax plus ibrutinib appears to suit elderly and high-risk patients with CLL
A combination of venetoclax and ibrutinib may be a safe and effective treatment option for previously untreated elderly and high-risk patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to investigators of a phase 2 trial of the combination.
About 88% of patients achieved complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery after 12 cycles of treatment, reported lead author Nitin Jain, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and colleagues.
There were no new safety signals for the combination of ibrutinib, an irreversible inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, and venetoclax, a B-cell lymphoma 2 protein inhibitor, the investigators noted.
“This combination was reported to be safe and active in patients with mantle cell lymphoma,” they wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine. “Given the clinically complementary activity, preclinical synergism, and nonoverlapping toxic effects, we examined the safety and efficacy of combined ibrutinib and venetoclax treatment in previously untreated patients with CLL.”
In particular, the investigators recruited older patients, as this is a common population that can be challenging to treat. “Because CLL typically occurs in older adults, the majority of patients who need treatment are older than 65 years of age,” the investigators wrote. “This group of patients often has unacceptable side effects and has a lower rate of complete remission and undetectable minimal residual disease with chemoimmunotherapy than younger patients.”
The open-label, phase 2 trial enrolled 80 elderly and high-risk patients with previously untreated CLL. Eligibility required an age of at least 65 years or presence of at least one high-risk genetic feature; namely, mutated TP53, unmutated IgVH, or chromosome 11q deletion.
In order to reduce the risk of tumor lysis syndrome, ibrutinib (420 mg once daily) was given as monotherapy for three 28-day cycles. From the fourth cycle onward, venetoclax was also given, with weekly dose escalations to a target dose of 400 mg once daily. The combination was given for 24 cycles, with treatment continuation offered to patients who were still positive for minimal residual disease.
The median patient age was 65 years, with 30% of the population aged 70 years or older. A large majority (92%) had at least one high-risk genetic feature.
Following initiation with three cycles of ibrutinib, most patients had partial responses, the investigators wrote; however, with the addition of venetoclax, responses improved over time. Of all 80 patients, 59 (74%) had a best response of complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery.
After six cycles, 51 out of 70 patients (73%) achieved this marker. After 12 cycles, 29 of 33 patients (88%) had this response, with 61% of the same group demonstrating undetectable minimal residual disease in bone marrow.
After 18 cycles, 25 of 26 patients (96%) had complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery, 18 of which (69%) were negative for minimal residual disease. Three patients completed 24 cycles of combined therapy, all of whom achieved complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery and undetectable minimal residual disease.
Focusing on patients aged 65 years or older, 74% had complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery after six cycles of therapy and nearly half (44%) had undetectable minimal residual disease. After 12 cycles, these rates increased to 94% and 76%, respectively. Responses were also seen across genetically high-risk subgroups.
One patient died from a cryptococcal infection of the central nervous system; this was deemed unrelated to treatment, as symptoms began prior to initiation of treatment and only one dose of ibrutinib was given.
The estimated 1-year progression-free survival rate was 98% and the estimated overall survival rate was 99%. At the time of publication, no patients had disease progression.
Among all patients, 60% experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events, the most common being neutropenia (48%).
Almost half of the patient population (44%) required dose reductions of ibrutinib, most commonly because of atrial fibrillation, and 24% required dose reductions of venetoclax, most often because of neutropenia.
“Our data showed that combination therapy with ibrutinib and venetoclax was effective in patients with CLL, with no new toxic effects from the combination that were not reported previously for the individual agents,” the investigators wrote, adding that the efficacy findings were also “substantially better” than what has been reported with monotherapy for each of the agents in patients with CLL.
The study was funded by AbbVie, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Moon Shot program, the Andrew Sabin Family Foundation, and the CLL Global Research Foundation. The investigators reported relationships with AbbVie, Incyte, Celgene, and other companies.
SOURCE: Jain N et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:2095-103.
In addition to noting the “impressive” results from combining venetoclax and ibrutinib as frontline CLL therapy, Adrian Wiestner, MD, PhD, highlighted the lack of a Kaplan-Meier curve in the paper published by Jain et al. in the New England Journal of Medicine.
“Here, assessment of minimal residual disease has replaced the progression-free survival curve of old, indicating a possible shift in focus away from traditional clinical trial endpoints and toward even more stringent measures of clinical efficacy that may be central to regulatory decisions,” Dr. Wiestner wrote.
Dr. Wiestner of the National Institutes of Health made his remarks in an accompanying editorial (N Engl J Med. 2019 May 29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1904362). He reported grants from with Merck, Pharmacyclics (an AbbVie company), and Acerta Pharma.
In addition to noting the “impressive” results from combining venetoclax and ibrutinib as frontline CLL therapy, Adrian Wiestner, MD, PhD, highlighted the lack of a Kaplan-Meier curve in the paper published by Jain et al. in the New England Journal of Medicine.
“Here, assessment of minimal residual disease has replaced the progression-free survival curve of old, indicating a possible shift in focus away from traditional clinical trial endpoints and toward even more stringent measures of clinical efficacy that may be central to regulatory decisions,” Dr. Wiestner wrote.
Dr. Wiestner of the National Institutes of Health made his remarks in an accompanying editorial (N Engl J Med. 2019 May 29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1904362). He reported grants from with Merck, Pharmacyclics (an AbbVie company), and Acerta Pharma.
In addition to noting the “impressive” results from combining venetoclax and ibrutinib as frontline CLL therapy, Adrian Wiestner, MD, PhD, highlighted the lack of a Kaplan-Meier curve in the paper published by Jain et al. in the New England Journal of Medicine.
“Here, assessment of minimal residual disease has replaced the progression-free survival curve of old, indicating a possible shift in focus away from traditional clinical trial endpoints and toward even more stringent measures of clinical efficacy that may be central to regulatory decisions,” Dr. Wiestner wrote.
Dr. Wiestner of the National Institutes of Health made his remarks in an accompanying editorial (N Engl J Med. 2019 May 29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1904362). He reported grants from with Merck, Pharmacyclics (an AbbVie company), and Acerta Pharma.
A combination of venetoclax and ibrutinib may be a safe and effective treatment option for previously untreated elderly and high-risk patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to investigators of a phase 2 trial of the combination.
About 88% of patients achieved complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery after 12 cycles of treatment, reported lead author Nitin Jain, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and colleagues.
There were no new safety signals for the combination of ibrutinib, an irreversible inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, and venetoclax, a B-cell lymphoma 2 protein inhibitor, the investigators noted.
“This combination was reported to be safe and active in patients with mantle cell lymphoma,” they wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine. “Given the clinically complementary activity, preclinical synergism, and nonoverlapping toxic effects, we examined the safety and efficacy of combined ibrutinib and venetoclax treatment in previously untreated patients with CLL.”
In particular, the investigators recruited older patients, as this is a common population that can be challenging to treat. “Because CLL typically occurs in older adults, the majority of patients who need treatment are older than 65 years of age,” the investigators wrote. “This group of patients often has unacceptable side effects and has a lower rate of complete remission and undetectable minimal residual disease with chemoimmunotherapy than younger patients.”
The open-label, phase 2 trial enrolled 80 elderly and high-risk patients with previously untreated CLL. Eligibility required an age of at least 65 years or presence of at least one high-risk genetic feature; namely, mutated TP53, unmutated IgVH, or chromosome 11q deletion.
In order to reduce the risk of tumor lysis syndrome, ibrutinib (420 mg once daily) was given as monotherapy for three 28-day cycles. From the fourth cycle onward, venetoclax was also given, with weekly dose escalations to a target dose of 400 mg once daily. The combination was given for 24 cycles, with treatment continuation offered to patients who were still positive for minimal residual disease.
The median patient age was 65 years, with 30% of the population aged 70 years or older. A large majority (92%) had at least one high-risk genetic feature.
Following initiation with three cycles of ibrutinib, most patients had partial responses, the investigators wrote; however, with the addition of venetoclax, responses improved over time. Of all 80 patients, 59 (74%) had a best response of complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery.
After six cycles, 51 out of 70 patients (73%) achieved this marker. After 12 cycles, 29 of 33 patients (88%) had this response, with 61% of the same group demonstrating undetectable minimal residual disease in bone marrow.
After 18 cycles, 25 of 26 patients (96%) had complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery, 18 of which (69%) were negative for minimal residual disease. Three patients completed 24 cycles of combined therapy, all of whom achieved complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery and undetectable minimal residual disease.
Focusing on patients aged 65 years or older, 74% had complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery after six cycles of therapy and nearly half (44%) had undetectable minimal residual disease. After 12 cycles, these rates increased to 94% and 76%, respectively. Responses were also seen across genetically high-risk subgroups.
One patient died from a cryptococcal infection of the central nervous system; this was deemed unrelated to treatment, as symptoms began prior to initiation of treatment and only one dose of ibrutinib was given.
The estimated 1-year progression-free survival rate was 98% and the estimated overall survival rate was 99%. At the time of publication, no patients had disease progression.
Among all patients, 60% experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events, the most common being neutropenia (48%).
Almost half of the patient population (44%) required dose reductions of ibrutinib, most commonly because of atrial fibrillation, and 24% required dose reductions of venetoclax, most often because of neutropenia.
“Our data showed that combination therapy with ibrutinib and venetoclax was effective in patients with CLL, with no new toxic effects from the combination that were not reported previously for the individual agents,” the investigators wrote, adding that the efficacy findings were also “substantially better” than what has been reported with monotherapy for each of the agents in patients with CLL.
The study was funded by AbbVie, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Moon Shot program, the Andrew Sabin Family Foundation, and the CLL Global Research Foundation. The investigators reported relationships with AbbVie, Incyte, Celgene, and other companies.
SOURCE: Jain N et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:2095-103.
A combination of venetoclax and ibrutinib may be a safe and effective treatment option for previously untreated elderly and high-risk patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to investigators of a phase 2 trial of the combination.
About 88% of patients achieved complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery after 12 cycles of treatment, reported lead author Nitin Jain, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and colleagues.
There were no new safety signals for the combination of ibrutinib, an irreversible inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, and venetoclax, a B-cell lymphoma 2 protein inhibitor, the investigators noted.
“This combination was reported to be safe and active in patients with mantle cell lymphoma,” they wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine. “Given the clinically complementary activity, preclinical synergism, and nonoverlapping toxic effects, we examined the safety and efficacy of combined ibrutinib and venetoclax treatment in previously untreated patients with CLL.”
In particular, the investigators recruited older patients, as this is a common population that can be challenging to treat. “Because CLL typically occurs in older adults, the majority of patients who need treatment are older than 65 years of age,” the investigators wrote. “This group of patients often has unacceptable side effects and has a lower rate of complete remission and undetectable minimal residual disease with chemoimmunotherapy than younger patients.”
The open-label, phase 2 trial enrolled 80 elderly and high-risk patients with previously untreated CLL. Eligibility required an age of at least 65 years or presence of at least one high-risk genetic feature; namely, mutated TP53, unmutated IgVH, or chromosome 11q deletion.
In order to reduce the risk of tumor lysis syndrome, ibrutinib (420 mg once daily) was given as monotherapy for three 28-day cycles. From the fourth cycle onward, venetoclax was also given, with weekly dose escalations to a target dose of 400 mg once daily. The combination was given for 24 cycles, with treatment continuation offered to patients who were still positive for minimal residual disease.
The median patient age was 65 years, with 30% of the population aged 70 years or older. A large majority (92%) had at least one high-risk genetic feature.
Following initiation with three cycles of ibrutinib, most patients had partial responses, the investigators wrote; however, with the addition of venetoclax, responses improved over time. Of all 80 patients, 59 (74%) had a best response of complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery.
After six cycles, 51 out of 70 patients (73%) achieved this marker. After 12 cycles, 29 of 33 patients (88%) had this response, with 61% of the same group demonstrating undetectable minimal residual disease in bone marrow.
After 18 cycles, 25 of 26 patients (96%) had complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery, 18 of which (69%) were negative for minimal residual disease. Three patients completed 24 cycles of combined therapy, all of whom achieved complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery and undetectable minimal residual disease.
Focusing on patients aged 65 years or older, 74% had complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery after six cycles of therapy and nearly half (44%) had undetectable minimal residual disease. After 12 cycles, these rates increased to 94% and 76%, respectively. Responses were also seen across genetically high-risk subgroups.
One patient died from a cryptococcal infection of the central nervous system; this was deemed unrelated to treatment, as symptoms began prior to initiation of treatment and only one dose of ibrutinib was given.
The estimated 1-year progression-free survival rate was 98% and the estimated overall survival rate was 99%. At the time of publication, no patients had disease progression.
Among all patients, 60% experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events, the most common being neutropenia (48%).
Almost half of the patient population (44%) required dose reductions of ibrutinib, most commonly because of atrial fibrillation, and 24% required dose reductions of venetoclax, most often because of neutropenia.
“Our data showed that combination therapy with ibrutinib and venetoclax was effective in patients with CLL, with no new toxic effects from the combination that were not reported previously for the individual agents,” the investigators wrote, adding that the efficacy findings were also “substantially better” than what has been reported with monotherapy for each of the agents in patients with CLL.
The study was funded by AbbVie, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Moon Shot program, the Andrew Sabin Family Foundation, and the CLL Global Research Foundation. The investigators reported relationships with AbbVie, Incyte, Celgene, and other companies.
SOURCE: Jain N et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:2095-103.
FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Key clinical point:
Major finding: After 12 cycles of treatment with venetoclax and ibrutinib, 88% of patients had complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery.
Study details: A randomized, open-label, phase 2 study involving 80 elderly and high-risk patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Disclosures: The study was funded by AbbVie, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Moon Shot program, the Andrew Sabin Family Foundation, and the CLL Global Research Foundation. The investigators reported relationships with AbbVie, Incyte, Celgene, and other companies.
Source: Jain N et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:2095-103.
Genetic analysis identifies prognostic markers in CLL
A genetic analysis of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with frontline, rituximab-based regimens found that deletion 11q22 and unmutated IgVH status may predict worse prognosis.
Michaela Spunarova, MD, of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, and colleagues conducted a genetic analysis of 177 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The results of the analysis were published in Leukemia Research.
The study focused on patients with CLL with an intact TP53 gene, looking at recurrently muted genes in CLL, genomic aberrations by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and IgVH status, according to the researchers.
The team analyzed the effects of these mutations on progression-free survival (PFS) following frontline treatment with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) or fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) therapeutic regimens.
Dr. Spunarova and colleagues used next-generation sequencing to analyze DNA from the patient samples. Data on 11q22, 13q14, trisomy 12, and IgVH mutation status were also considered in the analyses of PFS.
After analysis, the researchers validated that unmutated IgVH status is an indicator of poor prognosis in CLL patients with wild-type TP53 treated with frontline FCR.
When looking at both BR and FCR regimens, a single 11q22 deletion, lacking an ATM mutation on the other allele, resulted in the shortest PFS, at a median of just 16 months.
“Based on our data, special attention should be given to CLL patients harboring a sole 11q22 deletion, with no ATM mutation on the other allele, who manifest particularly short PFS,” they noted.
The researchers acknowledged a key limitation of the study was the small sample size. As a result, the results should be interpreted in a careful manner.
The study was funded by the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic. The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Spunarova M et al. Leuk Res. 2019 Jun;81:75-81.
A genetic analysis of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with frontline, rituximab-based regimens found that deletion 11q22 and unmutated IgVH status may predict worse prognosis.
Michaela Spunarova, MD, of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, and colleagues conducted a genetic analysis of 177 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The results of the analysis were published in Leukemia Research.
The study focused on patients with CLL with an intact TP53 gene, looking at recurrently muted genes in CLL, genomic aberrations by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and IgVH status, according to the researchers.
The team analyzed the effects of these mutations on progression-free survival (PFS) following frontline treatment with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) or fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) therapeutic regimens.
Dr. Spunarova and colleagues used next-generation sequencing to analyze DNA from the patient samples. Data on 11q22, 13q14, trisomy 12, and IgVH mutation status were also considered in the analyses of PFS.
After analysis, the researchers validated that unmutated IgVH status is an indicator of poor prognosis in CLL patients with wild-type TP53 treated with frontline FCR.
When looking at both BR and FCR regimens, a single 11q22 deletion, lacking an ATM mutation on the other allele, resulted in the shortest PFS, at a median of just 16 months.
“Based on our data, special attention should be given to CLL patients harboring a sole 11q22 deletion, with no ATM mutation on the other allele, who manifest particularly short PFS,” they noted.
The researchers acknowledged a key limitation of the study was the small sample size. As a result, the results should be interpreted in a careful manner.
The study was funded by the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic. The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Spunarova M et al. Leuk Res. 2019 Jun;81:75-81.
A genetic analysis of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with frontline, rituximab-based regimens found that deletion 11q22 and unmutated IgVH status may predict worse prognosis.
Michaela Spunarova, MD, of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, and colleagues conducted a genetic analysis of 177 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The results of the analysis were published in Leukemia Research.
The study focused on patients with CLL with an intact TP53 gene, looking at recurrently muted genes in CLL, genomic aberrations by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and IgVH status, according to the researchers.
The team analyzed the effects of these mutations on progression-free survival (PFS) following frontline treatment with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) or fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) therapeutic regimens.
Dr. Spunarova and colleagues used next-generation sequencing to analyze DNA from the patient samples. Data on 11q22, 13q14, trisomy 12, and IgVH mutation status were also considered in the analyses of PFS.
After analysis, the researchers validated that unmutated IgVH status is an indicator of poor prognosis in CLL patients with wild-type TP53 treated with frontline FCR.
When looking at both BR and FCR regimens, a single 11q22 deletion, lacking an ATM mutation on the other allele, resulted in the shortest PFS, at a median of just 16 months.
“Based on our data, special attention should be given to CLL patients harboring a sole 11q22 deletion, with no ATM mutation on the other allele, who manifest particularly short PFS,” they noted.
The researchers acknowledged a key limitation of the study was the small sample size. As a result, the results should be interpreted in a careful manner.
The study was funded by the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic. The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Spunarova M et al. Leuk Res. 2019 Jun;81:75-81.
FROM LEUKEMIA RESEARCH
NGS comparable to FC for minimal residual disease assessment
NEW ORLEANS – Next-generation sequencing of peripheral blood is at least as effective as flow cytometry of bone marrow for assessing minimal residual disease, according to a new study.
Researchers compared bone marrow flow cytometry (FC) and peripheral blood next-generation sequencing (NGS) for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in pediatric and young adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) who received treatment with tisagenlecleucel. There was a high level of concordance between the assays, but the NGS assay detected more MRD-positive samples and NGS results provided a longer lead time to relapse.
Michael A. Pulsipher, MD, of the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, presented these results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology.
The researchers analyzed samples from pediatric and young adult patients aged 2-25 years who had relapsed or refractory B-ALL and received treatment with tisagenlecleucel on the ELIANA or ENSIGN trials.
The patients had received at least two prior lines of therapy and were ineligible for allogeneic transplant. They received a single dose of tisagenlecleucel. MRD was assessed before tisagenlecleucel infusion, at various time points after infusion, and at relapse.
Dr. Pulsipher and his colleagues compared MRD results from an NGS assay – Adaptive Biotechnologies’ clonoSEQ – using peripheral blood and results from FC of bone marrow. NGS and FC results were available for 237 samples from 83 patients.
After treatment, NGS detected more MRD-positive samples at each sensitivity level tested (10-4, 10-5, and 10-6). At 10-6, NGS detected 18% more MRD-positive samples than did FC – 50% and 32%, respectively.
Detection of MRD positivity prior to relapse was faster with NGS than with FC. In 17 of 34 patients with morphological relapse, NGS provided a median lead time of 67 days. FC provided a median lead time of 39 days in 11 of the 34 patients.
About 80% of patients who had an MRD status of zero by NGS at day 28 remained relapse-free for up to 3 years.
Among complete responders (n = 50), the duration of response was significantly longer in patients who had an MRD status of zero at day 28 by NGS than in patients who had an MRD status greater than zero (P = .0003). Overall survival was significantly better among patients with an MRD status of zero as well (P = .0004).
Dr. Pulsipher said additional studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine the best way to know if a patient has been cured or needs additional therapy after tisagenlecleucel.
Dr. Pulsipher reported relationships with Adaptive Biotech, Novartis, Incyte, Amgen, Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Medac Pharma, and Miltenyi Biotec. ELIANA and ENSIGN were funded by Novartis, which markets tisagenlecleucel as Kymriah.
SOURCE: Pulsipher MA et al. ASPHO 2019, Abstract 2001.
NEW ORLEANS – Next-generation sequencing of peripheral blood is at least as effective as flow cytometry of bone marrow for assessing minimal residual disease, according to a new study.
Researchers compared bone marrow flow cytometry (FC) and peripheral blood next-generation sequencing (NGS) for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in pediatric and young adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) who received treatment with tisagenlecleucel. There was a high level of concordance between the assays, but the NGS assay detected more MRD-positive samples and NGS results provided a longer lead time to relapse.
Michael A. Pulsipher, MD, of the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, presented these results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology.
The researchers analyzed samples from pediatric and young adult patients aged 2-25 years who had relapsed or refractory B-ALL and received treatment with tisagenlecleucel on the ELIANA or ENSIGN trials.
The patients had received at least two prior lines of therapy and were ineligible for allogeneic transplant. They received a single dose of tisagenlecleucel. MRD was assessed before tisagenlecleucel infusion, at various time points after infusion, and at relapse.
Dr. Pulsipher and his colleagues compared MRD results from an NGS assay – Adaptive Biotechnologies’ clonoSEQ – using peripheral blood and results from FC of bone marrow. NGS and FC results were available for 237 samples from 83 patients.
After treatment, NGS detected more MRD-positive samples at each sensitivity level tested (10-4, 10-5, and 10-6). At 10-6, NGS detected 18% more MRD-positive samples than did FC – 50% and 32%, respectively.
Detection of MRD positivity prior to relapse was faster with NGS than with FC. In 17 of 34 patients with morphological relapse, NGS provided a median lead time of 67 days. FC provided a median lead time of 39 days in 11 of the 34 patients.
About 80% of patients who had an MRD status of zero by NGS at day 28 remained relapse-free for up to 3 years.
Among complete responders (n = 50), the duration of response was significantly longer in patients who had an MRD status of zero at day 28 by NGS than in patients who had an MRD status greater than zero (P = .0003). Overall survival was significantly better among patients with an MRD status of zero as well (P = .0004).
Dr. Pulsipher said additional studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine the best way to know if a patient has been cured or needs additional therapy after tisagenlecleucel.
Dr. Pulsipher reported relationships with Adaptive Biotech, Novartis, Incyte, Amgen, Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Medac Pharma, and Miltenyi Biotec. ELIANA and ENSIGN were funded by Novartis, which markets tisagenlecleucel as Kymriah.
SOURCE: Pulsipher MA et al. ASPHO 2019, Abstract 2001.
NEW ORLEANS – Next-generation sequencing of peripheral blood is at least as effective as flow cytometry of bone marrow for assessing minimal residual disease, according to a new study.
Researchers compared bone marrow flow cytometry (FC) and peripheral blood next-generation sequencing (NGS) for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in pediatric and young adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) who received treatment with tisagenlecleucel. There was a high level of concordance between the assays, but the NGS assay detected more MRD-positive samples and NGS results provided a longer lead time to relapse.
Michael A. Pulsipher, MD, of the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, presented these results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology.
The researchers analyzed samples from pediatric and young adult patients aged 2-25 years who had relapsed or refractory B-ALL and received treatment with tisagenlecleucel on the ELIANA or ENSIGN trials.
The patients had received at least two prior lines of therapy and were ineligible for allogeneic transplant. They received a single dose of tisagenlecleucel. MRD was assessed before tisagenlecleucel infusion, at various time points after infusion, and at relapse.
Dr. Pulsipher and his colleagues compared MRD results from an NGS assay – Adaptive Biotechnologies’ clonoSEQ – using peripheral blood and results from FC of bone marrow. NGS and FC results were available for 237 samples from 83 patients.
After treatment, NGS detected more MRD-positive samples at each sensitivity level tested (10-4, 10-5, and 10-6). At 10-6, NGS detected 18% more MRD-positive samples than did FC – 50% and 32%, respectively.
Detection of MRD positivity prior to relapse was faster with NGS than with FC. In 17 of 34 patients with morphological relapse, NGS provided a median lead time of 67 days. FC provided a median lead time of 39 days in 11 of the 34 patients.
About 80% of patients who had an MRD status of zero by NGS at day 28 remained relapse-free for up to 3 years.
Among complete responders (n = 50), the duration of response was significantly longer in patients who had an MRD status of zero at day 28 by NGS than in patients who had an MRD status greater than zero (P = .0003). Overall survival was significantly better among patients with an MRD status of zero as well (P = .0004).
Dr. Pulsipher said additional studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine the best way to know if a patient has been cured or needs additional therapy after tisagenlecleucel.
Dr. Pulsipher reported relationships with Adaptive Biotech, Novartis, Incyte, Amgen, Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Medac Pharma, and Miltenyi Biotec. ELIANA and ENSIGN were funded by Novartis, which markets tisagenlecleucel as Kymriah.
SOURCE: Pulsipher MA et al. ASPHO 2019, Abstract 2001.
REPORTING FROM 2019 ASPHO CONFERENCE
Key clinical point: Major finding: At the highest sensitivity level tested, next-generation sequencing detected 18% more minimal residual disease–positive samples than did flow cytometry – 50% and 32%, respectively.
Study details: An analysis of samples from pediatric and young adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia who received treatment with tisagenlecleucel on the ELIANA and ENSIGN trials.
Disclosures: The speaker reported relationships with Adaptive Biotech, Novartis, Incyte, Amgen, Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Medac Pharma, and Miltenyi Biotec. The ELIANA and ENSIGN trials were funded by Novartis, which markets tisagenlecleucel as Kymriah.
Source: Pulsipher MA et al. ASPHO 2019, Abstract 2001.