User login
ClinicalEdge only
Chemo-free combo gets high response rate in relapsed or refractory DLBCL
LUGANO, Switzerland – A chemotherapy-free combination of lenalidomide (Revlimid) and the novel anti-CD19 antibody tafasitamab (MOR208) continues to show encouraging clinical activity against relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma, with durable responses and promising progression-free and overall survival, investigators in the phase 2 L-MIND study reported.
After a median follow-up of 17.3 months, the overall response rate (ORR) – the primary endpoint in the single arm trial – was 60%, consisting of 42.5% complete responses (CR) and 17.5% partial responses (PR), reported Giles Salles, MD, PhD, of Claude Bernard University in Lyon, France.
“We see consistently high activity in transplant-ineligible subgroups, patients who have limited treatment options and who have really poor prognosis,” he said at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (15-ICML).
In a preclinical study, a combination of MOR208 and lenalidomide showed synergistic antileukemic and antilymphoma activity both in vivo and in vitro. In addition, both lenalidomide and MOR208 have shown significant activity against relapsed, refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas.
At the previous ICML meeting in 2017, Dr. Salles reported early interim results from the study, which showed that among 34 patients evaluable for response, the ORR was 56%, including complete responses in 32% of patients.
The L-MIND investigators enrolled transplant-ineligible patients 18 years and older with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and adequate organ function who had disease progression after 1-3 prior lines of therapy.
Patients with primary refractory DLBCL, double-hit or triple-hit DLBCL (i.e., mutations in Myc, BCL2, and/or BCL6), other non-Hodgkin lymphoma histological subtypes, or central nervous system lymphoma involvement were excluded.
Patients received tafasitamab 12 mg/kg intravenously on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for cycles 1-3 and on days 1 and 15 of cycles 4-12. Lenalidomide 25 mg orally was delivered on days 1-21 of each cycle. Patients with stable disease or better at the end of 12 cycles could be maintained on tafasitamab at the same dose on days 1 and 15.
As noted, the combination was associated with an ORR among 80 patients of 60%, consisting of 34 CR (42.5%) complete responses and 14 (17.5%) PR. An additional 11 patients (13.75%) had stable disease, 13 (16.25%) had disease progression, and eight (10%) were not evaluable because of missing post-baseline tumor assessments.
The median duration of response in the entire cohort was 21.7 months. For patients with a CR, the median duration of response had not been reached at the time of data cutoff. For patients with a PR, the median duration of response was 4.4 months.
Hematologic treatment-emergent toxicities occurring in 10% or more of patients included (in descending order of frequency) neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and febrile neutropenia.
Nonhematologic treatment-emergent events occurring in at least 10% of patients included diarrhea, asthenia, peripheral edema, pyrexia, rash, decreased appetite, hypokalemia, fatigue, and similar events, the majority of which were grade 1 or 2 in severity.
“The durable responses and favorable overall survival I would say represent a remarkable outcome, and this combination of lenalidomide with tafasitamab results in a new chemo-free immunotherapy for patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL,” Dr. Salles said.
The L-MIND study is funded by MorphoSys Ag. Dr. Salles reported receiving fees for advisory board/consulting activities and educational activities from MorphoSys and other companies.
SOURCE: Salles G et al. 15-ICML, Abstract 124.
LUGANO, Switzerland – A chemotherapy-free combination of lenalidomide (Revlimid) and the novel anti-CD19 antibody tafasitamab (MOR208) continues to show encouraging clinical activity against relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma, with durable responses and promising progression-free and overall survival, investigators in the phase 2 L-MIND study reported.
After a median follow-up of 17.3 months, the overall response rate (ORR) – the primary endpoint in the single arm trial – was 60%, consisting of 42.5% complete responses (CR) and 17.5% partial responses (PR), reported Giles Salles, MD, PhD, of Claude Bernard University in Lyon, France.
“We see consistently high activity in transplant-ineligible subgroups, patients who have limited treatment options and who have really poor prognosis,” he said at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (15-ICML).
In a preclinical study, a combination of MOR208 and lenalidomide showed synergistic antileukemic and antilymphoma activity both in vivo and in vitro. In addition, both lenalidomide and MOR208 have shown significant activity against relapsed, refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas.
At the previous ICML meeting in 2017, Dr. Salles reported early interim results from the study, which showed that among 34 patients evaluable for response, the ORR was 56%, including complete responses in 32% of patients.
The L-MIND investigators enrolled transplant-ineligible patients 18 years and older with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and adequate organ function who had disease progression after 1-3 prior lines of therapy.
Patients with primary refractory DLBCL, double-hit or triple-hit DLBCL (i.e., mutations in Myc, BCL2, and/or BCL6), other non-Hodgkin lymphoma histological subtypes, or central nervous system lymphoma involvement were excluded.
Patients received tafasitamab 12 mg/kg intravenously on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for cycles 1-3 and on days 1 and 15 of cycles 4-12. Lenalidomide 25 mg orally was delivered on days 1-21 of each cycle. Patients with stable disease or better at the end of 12 cycles could be maintained on tafasitamab at the same dose on days 1 and 15.
As noted, the combination was associated with an ORR among 80 patients of 60%, consisting of 34 CR (42.5%) complete responses and 14 (17.5%) PR. An additional 11 patients (13.75%) had stable disease, 13 (16.25%) had disease progression, and eight (10%) were not evaluable because of missing post-baseline tumor assessments.
The median duration of response in the entire cohort was 21.7 months. For patients with a CR, the median duration of response had not been reached at the time of data cutoff. For patients with a PR, the median duration of response was 4.4 months.
Hematologic treatment-emergent toxicities occurring in 10% or more of patients included (in descending order of frequency) neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and febrile neutropenia.
Nonhematologic treatment-emergent events occurring in at least 10% of patients included diarrhea, asthenia, peripheral edema, pyrexia, rash, decreased appetite, hypokalemia, fatigue, and similar events, the majority of which were grade 1 or 2 in severity.
“The durable responses and favorable overall survival I would say represent a remarkable outcome, and this combination of lenalidomide with tafasitamab results in a new chemo-free immunotherapy for patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL,” Dr. Salles said.
The L-MIND study is funded by MorphoSys Ag. Dr. Salles reported receiving fees for advisory board/consulting activities and educational activities from MorphoSys and other companies.
SOURCE: Salles G et al. 15-ICML, Abstract 124.
LUGANO, Switzerland – A chemotherapy-free combination of lenalidomide (Revlimid) and the novel anti-CD19 antibody tafasitamab (MOR208) continues to show encouraging clinical activity against relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma, with durable responses and promising progression-free and overall survival, investigators in the phase 2 L-MIND study reported.
After a median follow-up of 17.3 months, the overall response rate (ORR) – the primary endpoint in the single arm trial – was 60%, consisting of 42.5% complete responses (CR) and 17.5% partial responses (PR), reported Giles Salles, MD, PhD, of Claude Bernard University in Lyon, France.
“We see consistently high activity in transplant-ineligible subgroups, patients who have limited treatment options and who have really poor prognosis,” he said at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (15-ICML).
In a preclinical study, a combination of MOR208 and lenalidomide showed synergistic antileukemic and antilymphoma activity both in vivo and in vitro. In addition, both lenalidomide and MOR208 have shown significant activity against relapsed, refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas.
At the previous ICML meeting in 2017, Dr. Salles reported early interim results from the study, which showed that among 34 patients evaluable for response, the ORR was 56%, including complete responses in 32% of patients.
The L-MIND investigators enrolled transplant-ineligible patients 18 years and older with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and adequate organ function who had disease progression after 1-3 prior lines of therapy.
Patients with primary refractory DLBCL, double-hit or triple-hit DLBCL (i.e., mutations in Myc, BCL2, and/or BCL6), other non-Hodgkin lymphoma histological subtypes, or central nervous system lymphoma involvement were excluded.
Patients received tafasitamab 12 mg/kg intravenously on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for cycles 1-3 and on days 1 and 15 of cycles 4-12. Lenalidomide 25 mg orally was delivered on days 1-21 of each cycle. Patients with stable disease or better at the end of 12 cycles could be maintained on tafasitamab at the same dose on days 1 and 15.
As noted, the combination was associated with an ORR among 80 patients of 60%, consisting of 34 CR (42.5%) complete responses and 14 (17.5%) PR. An additional 11 patients (13.75%) had stable disease, 13 (16.25%) had disease progression, and eight (10%) were not evaluable because of missing post-baseline tumor assessments.
The median duration of response in the entire cohort was 21.7 months. For patients with a CR, the median duration of response had not been reached at the time of data cutoff. For patients with a PR, the median duration of response was 4.4 months.
Hematologic treatment-emergent toxicities occurring in 10% or more of patients included (in descending order of frequency) neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and febrile neutropenia.
Nonhematologic treatment-emergent events occurring in at least 10% of patients included diarrhea, asthenia, peripheral edema, pyrexia, rash, decreased appetite, hypokalemia, fatigue, and similar events, the majority of which were grade 1 or 2 in severity.
“The durable responses and favorable overall survival I would say represent a remarkable outcome, and this combination of lenalidomide with tafasitamab results in a new chemo-free immunotherapy for patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL,” Dr. Salles said.
The L-MIND study is funded by MorphoSys Ag. Dr. Salles reported receiving fees for advisory board/consulting activities and educational activities from MorphoSys and other companies.
SOURCE: Salles G et al. 15-ICML, Abstract 124.
REPORTING FROM 15-ICML
CAR T-cell therapy less effective in transformed follicular lymphoma
All complete responders with FL were still in remission at a median follow-up of 24 months, but the median duration of response was 10.2 months for patients with tFL.
Alexandre V. Hirayama, MD, of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, and colleagues reported these results in Blood.
The trial enrolled 21 adults with relapsed/refractory CD19+ B-cell malignancies, including 8 patients with FL and 13 with tFL. At baseline, the FL/tFL patients had a median age of 56 years (range, 51-62), and 67% were male. Most patients (n = 19) had stage III/IV disease, 17 had extranodal disease, 8 had bulky disease, and 6 had bone marrow involvement. The patients had received a median of 5 prior therapies (range, 2-8), and 13 had received a transplant.
In this study, patients received a lymphodepleting regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed by 2 x 106 CD19 CAR T cells/kg. Five patients (one with FL and four with tFL) also received bridging chemotherapy between leukapheresis and lymphodepletion.
Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome occurred in 50% of FL patients and 39% of tFL patients (P = .35). Grade 1-2 neurotoxicity occurred in 50% and 23%, respectively (P = .67). There were no cases of grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity.
Most FL patients (7 of 8; 88%) achieved a complete response (CR) to treatment, and all of these patients were still in CR at a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 5-37 months). One FL patient received a transplant while in CR.
Six of 13 tFL patients (46%) achieved a CR. At a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 3-39 months), the median duration of response was 10.2 months. The median progression-free survival was 11.2 months in patients who achieved a CR and 1.4 months in all tFL patients.
The researchers noted that peak CAR T-cell counts and the duration of CAR T-cell detection were similar between FL and tFL patients. However, tFL patients had higher serum interleukin-8 concentrations and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels before treatment.
Past research suggested that IL-8 mediates the recruitment of tumor-associated neutrophils, promotes diffuse large B-cell lymphoma progression, and can contribute to local immune suppression. Other studies have linked elevated lactate dehydrogenase to aggressive disease and a more immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.
“Although these data raise the possibility that differences in the tumor microenvironment may, in part, contribute to differences in outcomes after CAR T-cell immunotherapy in FL and tFL patients, additional studies are required,” the researchers wrote.
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Life Science Discovery Fund, the Bezos family, the University of British Columbia Clinician Investigator Program, the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center’s Immunotherapy Integrated Research Center, and Juno Therapeutics/Celgene.
The researchers disclosed relationships with Celgene, Juno Therapeutics, Lyell Immunopharma, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Nohla, Kite Pharma, Gilead, Genentech, Novartis, Eureka Therapeutics, Nektar Therapeutics, Caribou Biosciences, Precision Biosciences, Aptevo, Humanigen, and Allogene.
SOURCE: Hirayama AV et al. Blood. 2019 Jun 26. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000905
All complete responders with FL were still in remission at a median follow-up of 24 months, but the median duration of response was 10.2 months for patients with tFL.
Alexandre V. Hirayama, MD, of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, and colleagues reported these results in Blood.
The trial enrolled 21 adults with relapsed/refractory CD19+ B-cell malignancies, including 8 patients with FL and 13 with tFL. At baseline, the FL/tFL patients had a median age of 56 years (range, 51-62), and 67% were male. Most patients (n = 19) had stage III/IV disease, 17 had extranodal disease, 8 had bulky disease, and 6 had bone marrow involvement. The patients had received a median of 5 prior therapies (range, 2-8), and 13 had received a transplant.
In this study, patients received a lymphodepleting regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed by 2 x 106 CD19 CAR T cells/kg. Five patients (one with FL and four with tFL) also received bridging chemotherapy between leukapheresis and lymphodepletion.
Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome occurred in 50% of FL patients and 39% of tFL patients (P = .35). Grade 1-2 neurotoxicity occurred in 50% and 23%, respectively (P = .67). There were no cases of grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity.
Most FL patients (7 of 8; 88%) achieved a complete response (CR) to treatment, and all of these patients were still in CR at a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 5-37 months). One FL patient received a transplant while in CR.
Six of 13 tFL patients (46%) achieved a CR. At a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 3-39 months), the median duration of response was 10.2 months. The median progression-free survival was 11.2 months in patients who achieved a CR and 1.4 months in all tFL patients.
The researchers noted that peak CAR T-cell counts and the duration of CAR T-cell detection were similar between FL and tFL patients. However, tFL patients had higher serum interleukin-8 concentrations and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels before treatment.
Past research suggested that IL-8 mediates the recruitment of tumor-associated neutrophils, promotes diffuse large B-cell lymphoma progression, and can contribute to local immune suppression. Other studies have linked elevated lactate dehydrogenase to aggressive disease and a more immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.
“Although these data raise the possibility that differences in the tumor microenvironment may, in part, contribute to differences in outcomes after CAR T-cell immunotherapy in FL and tFL patients, additional studies are required,” the researchers wrote.
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Life Science Discovery Fund, the Bezos family, the University of British Columbia Clinician Investigator Program, the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center’s Immunotherapy Integrated Research Center, and Juno Therapeutics/Celgene.
The researchers disclosed relationships with Celgene, Juno Therapeutics, Lyell Immunopharma, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Nohla, Kite Pharma, Gilead, Genentech, Novartis, Eureka Therapeutics, Nektar Therapeutics, Caribou Biosciences, Precision Biosciences, Aptevo, Humanigen, and Allogene.
SOURCE: Hirayama AV et al. Blood. 2019 Jun 26. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000905
All complete responders with FL were still in remission at a median follow-up of 24 months, but the median duration of response was 10.2 months for patients with tFL.
Alexandre V. Hirayama, MD, of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, and colleagues reported these results in Blood.
The trial enrolled 21 adults with relapsed/refractory CD19+ B-cell malignancies, including 8 patients with FL and 13 with tFL. At baseline, the FL/tFL patients had a median age of 56 years (range, 51-62), and 67% were male. Most patients (n = 19) had stage III/IV disease, 17 had extranodal disease, 8 had bulky disease, and 6 had bone marrow involvement. The patients had received a median of 5 prior therapies (range, 2-8), and 13 had received a transplant.
In this study, patients received a lymphodepleting regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed by 2 x 106 CD19 CAR T cells/kg. Five patients (one with FL and four with tFL) also received bridging chemotherapy between leukapheresis and lymphodepletion.
Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome occurred in 50% of FL patients and 39% of tFL patients (P = .35). Grade 1-2 neurotoxicity occurred in 50% and 23%, respectively (P = .67). There were no cases of grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity.
Most FL patients (7 of 8; 88%) achieved a complete response (CR) to treatment, and all of these patients were still in CR at a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 5-37 months). One FL patient received a transplant while in CR.
Six of 13 tFL patients (46%) achieved a CR. At a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 3-39 months), the median duration of response was 10.2 months. The median progression-free survival was 11.2 months in patients who achieved a CR and 1.4 months in all tFL patients.
The researchers noted that peak CAR T-cell counts and the duration of CAR T-cell detection were similar between FL and tFL patients. However, tFL patients had higher serum interleukin-8 concentrations and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels before treatment.
Past research suggested that IL-8 mediates the recruitment of tumor-associated neutrophils, promotes diffuse large B-cell lymphoma progression, and can contribute to local immune suppression. Other studies have linked elevated lactate dehydrogenase to aggressive disease and a more immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.
“Although these data raise the possibility that differences in the tumor microenvironment may, in part, contribute to differences in outcomes after CAR T-cell immunotherapy in FL and tFL patients, additional studies are required,” the researchers wrote.
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Life Science Discovery Fund, the Bezos family, the University of British Columbia Clinician Investigator Program, the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center’s Immunotherapy Integrated Research Center, and Juno Therapeutics/Celgene.
The researchers disclosed relationships with Celgene, Juno Therapeutics, Lyell Immunopharma, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Nohla, Kite Pharma, Gilead, Genentech, Novartis, Eureka Therapeutics, Nektar Therapeutics, Caribou Biosciences, Precision Biosciences, Aptevo, Humanigen, and Allogene.
SOURCE: Hirayama AV et al. Blood. 2019 Jun 26. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000905
FROM BLOOD
Flavopiridol elicits poor response in mantle cell lymphoma, DLBCL
Flavopiridol – also known as alvocidib – showed minimal clinical response in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and other B-cell lymphomas, according to results from a single-center, phase 1/2 trial.
“Promising preclinical data in cell lines derived from MCL and activated DLBCL led to a series of clinical trials of flavopiridol in various hematological malignancies,” wrote Milos D. Miljković, MD, and colleagues in the lymphoid malignancies branch of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Md. The findings were published in a letter to the editor in Leukemia & Lymphoma.
The study included 28 patients with relapsed/refractory MCL, DLBCL, transformed follicular lymphoma, and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma who received a hybrid dosing regimen of the novel CDK inhibitor. Flavopiridol was administered as a 30-minute bolus, followed by a 4-hour infusion.
The researchers used an intrapatient dose escalation between the first and successive cycles, in addition to a three-plus-three interpatient escalation, to lessen the risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS).
The primary outcomes were the clinical response rate, maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities, and toxicity profile of the hybrid dosing regimen.
Of 26 evaluable patients, one patient with DLBCL maintained a partial response for 84 days (overall response rate, 3.8%). One patient with MCL had a 50% decrease in the size of target lesions at 2 months, but this was not sustained at 4 months. In total, nine patients had stable disease for a disease control rate of 38.4%.
“[Flavopiridol] had minimal efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma, casting doubt on the utility of CDK inhibition in this disease,” the researchers wrote.
With respect to safety, there were eight dose-limiting toxicities reported in three patients. These included grade 3 TLS, elevated transaminase levels, hypoalbuminemia, hyperkalemia, non-neutropenic infection, and grade 4 metabolic acidosis and gastrointestinal perforation.
The most common treatment-related toxicities were hematologic, including neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis, and lymphopenia.
Dr. Miljković and colleagues noted that CDK inhibitor therapy may elicit better responses when used in combination with other agents.
“Ongoing trials of more specific CDK inhibitors in combination with other agents will help elucidate their role in lymphoma treatment,” they wrote.
The trial is sponsored by the National Cancer Institute and the study authors are employees of the National Cancer Institute.
SOURCE: Miljkovic MD et al. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 Jun 17. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1627540.
Flavopiridol – also known as alvocidib – showed minimal clinical response in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and other B-cell lymphomas, according to results from a single-center, phase 1/2 trial.
“Promising preclinical data in cell lines derived from MCL and activated DLBCL led to a series of clinical trials of flavopiridol in various hematological malignancies,” wrote Milos D. Miljković, MD, and colleagues in the lymphoid malignancies branch of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Md. The findings were published in a letter to the editor in Leukemia & Lymphoma.
The study included 28 patients with relapsed/refractory MCL, DLBCL, transformed follicular lymphoma, and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma who received a hybrid dosing regimen of the novel CDK inhibitor. Flavopiridol was administered as a 30-minute bolus, followed by a 4-hour infusion.
The researchers used an intrapatient dose escalation between the first and successive cycles, in addition to a three-plus-three interpatient escalation, to lessen the risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS).
The primary outcomes were the clinical response rate, maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities, and toxicity profile of the hybrid dosing regimen.
Of 26 evaluable patients, one patient with DLBCL maintained a partial response for 84 days (overall response rate, 3.8%). One patient with MCL had a 50% decrease in the size of target lesions at 2 months, but this was not sustained at 4 months. In total, nine patients had stable disease for a disease control rate of 38.4%.
“[Flavopiridol] had minimal efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma, casting doubt on the utility of CDK inhibition in this disease,” the researchers wrote.
With respect to safety, there were eight dose-limiting toxicities reported in three patients. These included grade 3 TLS, elevated transaminase levels, hypoalbuminemia, hyperkalemia, non-neutropenic infection, and grade 4 metabolic acidosis and gastrointestinal perforation.
The most common treatment-related toxicities were hematologic, including neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis, and lymphopenia.
Dr. Miljković and colleagues noted that CDK inhibitor therapy may elicit better responses when used in combination with other agents.
“Ongoing trials of more specific CDK inhibitors in combination with other agents will help elucidate their role in lymphoma treatment,” they wrote.
The trial is sponsored by the National Cancer Institute and the study authors are employees of the National Cancer Institute.
SOURCE: Miljkovic MD et al. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 Jun 17. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1627540.
Flavopiridol – also known as alvocidib – showed minimal clinical response in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and other B-cell lymphomas, according to results from a single-center, phase 1/2 trial.
“Promising preclinical data in cell lines derived from MCL and activated DLBCL led to a series of clinical trials of flavopiridol in various hematological malignancies,” wrote Milos D. Miljković, MD, and colleagues in the lymphoid malignancies branch of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Md. The findings were published in a letter to the editor in Leukemia & Lymphoma.
The study included 28 patients with relapsed/refractory MCL, DLBCL, transformed follicular lymphoma, and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma who received a hybrid dosing regimen of the novel CDK inhibitor. Flavopiridol was administered as a 30-minute bolus, followed by a 4-hour infusion.
The researchers used an intrapatient dose escalation between the first and successive cycles, in addition to a three-plus-three interpatient escalation, to lessen the risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS).
The primary outcomes were the clinical response rate, maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities, and toxicity profile of the hybrid dosing regimen.
Of 26 evaluable patients, one patient with DLBCL maintained a partial response for 84 days (overall response rate, 3.8%). One patient with MCL had a 50% decrease in the size of target lesions at 2 months, but this was not sustained at 4 months. In total, nine patients had stable disease for a disease control rate of 38.4%.
“[Flavopiridol] had minimal efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma, casting doubt on the utility of CDK inhibition in this disease,” the researchers wrote.
With respect to safety, there were eight dose-limiting toxicities reported in three patients. These included grade 3 TLS, elevated transaminase levels, hypoalbuminemia, hyperkalemia, non-neutropenic infection, and grade 4 metabolic acidosis and gastrointestinal perforation.
The most common treatment-related toxicities were hematologic, including neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis, and lymphopenia.
Dr. Miljković and colleagues noted that CDK inhibitor therapy may elicit better responses when used in combination with other agents.
“Ongoing trials of more specific CDK inhibitors in combination with other agents will help elucidate their role in lymphoma treatment,” they wrote.
The trial is sponsored by the National Cancer Institute and the study authors are employees of the National Cancer Institute.
SOURCE: Miljkovic MD et al. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 Jun 17. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1627540.
FROM LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
Intravenous CNS chemo looks best for testicular DLBCL
For patients with testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (T-DLBCL), intravenous central nervous system (CNS)–directed chemotherapy and prophylactic treatment of the contralateral testis offer the best survival outcomes, according to findings from a recent retrospective analysis.
In contrast, intrathecal chemotherapy offered no benefit, reported lead author Susanna Mannisto, MD, of Helsinki University Hospital in Finland, and her colleagues. Survival advantages gained by CNS-directed chemotherapy were generally due to control of systemic disease rather than prevention of CNS progression, they noted.
There have not been randomized trials conducted specifically in T-DLBCL and treatment guidelines are currently based on phase 2 trials. Treatment for T-DLBCL typically involves cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone plus rituximab (R–CHOP), with the addition of CNS prophylaxis with either intravenous or intrathecal methotrexate or cytarabine (AraC) in eligible patients. “Thus far, however, no prospective randomised studies on the benefit of this approach have been published,” the investigators wrote. The study is in the European Journal of Cancer.
They drew data from the Danish Lymphoma Registry and three Southern Finland University Hospitals. Out of 235 patients diagnosed with T-DLBCL between 1987 and 2013, 192 (82%) were treated with curative anthracycline-based chemotherapy. As some cases dated back to 1987, about one-third (36%) were treated before rituximab was available. A slightly higher proportion received intravenous CNS-directed chemotherapy (40%). Due to data availability, 189 patients were included in the survival analysis.
Results of multivariate analyses showed that CNS-directed chemotherapy (intravenous methotrexate, high-dose AraC, or both), was associated with an approximately 58% decreased risk of death across the entire population (hazard ratio [HR] for overall survival, 0.419; 95% confidence interval, 0.256-0.686; P = .001), with elderly patients realizing the greatest benefit.
“[I]t is important to note that we did not observe reduction in the CNS recurrence rate, but rather a better control of the systemic disease, suggesting that R–CHOP alone may not be a sufficient therapy for the patients with testicular DLBCL involvement,” the investigators wrote.
Intrathecal CNS-targeted therapy did not correlate with improved survival in the study. Likewise, for the entire population, rituximab did not boost survival; however, for high risk patients (International Prognostic Index, 3-5), immunochemotherapy did provide a better rate of 5-year disease-specific survival than that of conventional chemotherapy (44% vs 14%; P = .019).
Treatment of the contralateral testis was worthwhile for the entire population, with a 46% decreased risk of death (HR for overall survival, 0.514, 95% CI, 0.338-0.782; P = .002).
Shortest overall survival times, regardless of treatment type, were reported among patients with poor performance status, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), primary T-DLBCL, more extranodal sites, higher International Prognostic Index, and patients older than 70 years.
“[O]ur results recommend aggressive chemotherapy with [intravenous high-dose methotrexate and/or high-dose AraC] for better control of systemic disease for eligible patients,” the investigators concluded. “In addition, treatment of the contralateral testis with either radiotherapy or orchiectomy should be included in the management strategy of patients with T-DLBCL.”
The study was funded by the Academy of Finland, the Finnish Cancer Foundation, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and others. The investigators reported additional relationships with Pfizer, Takeda, Roche, Sanofi, and others.
SOURCE: Mannisto S et al. Eur J Cancer. 2019 May 10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.004.
For patients with testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (T-DLBCL), intravenous central nervous system (CNS)–directed chemotherapy and prophylactic treatment of the contralateral testis offer the best survival outcomes, according to findings from a recent retrospective analysis.
In contrast, intrathecal chemotherapy offered no benefit, reported lead author Susanna Mannisto, MD, of Helsinki University Hospital in Finland, and her colleagues. Survival advantages gained by CNS-directed chemotherapy were generally due to control of systemic disease rather than prevention of CNS progression, they noted.
There have not been randomized trials conducted specifically in T-DLBCL and treatment guidelines are currently based on phase 2 trials. Treatment for T-DLBCL typically involves cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone plus rituximab (R–CHOP), with the addition of CNS prophylaxis with either intravenous or intrathecal methotrexate or cytarabine (AraC) in eligible patients. “Thus far, however, no prospective randomised studies on the benefit of this approach have been published,” the investigators wrote. The study is in the European Journal of Cancer.
They drew data from the Danish Lymphoma Registry and three Southern Finland University Hospitals. Out of 235 patients diagnosed with T-DLBCL between 1987 and 2013, 192 (82%) were treated with curative anthracycline-based chemotherapy. As some cases dated back to 1987, about one-third (36%) were treated before rituximab was available. A slightly higher proportion received intravenous CNS-directed chemotherapy (40%). Due to data availability, 189 patients were included in the survival analysis.
Results of multivariate analyses showed that CNS-directed chemotherapy (intravenous methotrexate, high-dose AraC, or both), was associated with an approximately 58% decreased risk of death across the entire population (hazard ratio [HR] for overall survival, 0.419; 95% confidence interval, 0.256-0.686; P = .001), with elderly patients realizing the greatest benefit.
“[I]t is important to note that we did not observe reduction in the CNS recurrence rate, but rather a better control of the systemic disease, suggesting that R–CHOP alone may not be a sufficient therapy for the patients with testicular DLBCL involvement,” the investigators wrote.
Intrathecal CNS-targeted therapy did not correlate with improved survival in the study. Likewise, for the entire population, rituximab did not boost survival; however, for high risk patients (International Prognostic Index, 3-5), immunochemotherapy did provide a better rate of 5-year disease-specific survival than that of conventional chemotherapy (44% vs 14%; P = .019).
Treatment of the contralateral testis was worthwhile for the entire population, with a 46% decreased risk of death (HR for overall survival, 0.514, 95% CI, 0.338-0.782; P = .002).
Shortest overall survival times, regardless of treatment type, were reported among patients with poor performance status, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), primary T-DLBCL, more extranodal sites, higher International Prognostic Index, and patients older than 70 years.
“[O]ur results recommend aggressive chemotherapy with [intravenous high-dose methotrexate and/or high-dose AraC] for better control of systemic disease for eligible patients,” the investigators concluded. “In addition, treatment of the contralateral testis with either radiotherapy or orchiectomy should be included in the management strategy of patients with T-DLBCL.”
The study was funded by the Academy of Finland, the Finnish Cancer Foundation, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and others. The investigators reported additional relationships with Pfizer, Takeda, Roche, Sanofi, and others.
SOURCE: Mannisto S et al. Eur J Cancer. 2019 May 10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.004.
For patients with testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (T-DLBCL), intravenous central nervous system (CNS)–directed chemotherapy and prophylactic treatment of the contralateral testis offer the best survival outcomes, according to findings from a recent retrospective analysis.
In contrast, intrathecal chemotherapy offered no benefit, reported lead author Susanna Mannisto, MD, of Helsinki University Hospital in Finland, and her colleagues. Survival advantages gained by CNS-directed chemotherapy were generally due to control of systemic disease rather than prevention of CNS progression, they noted.
There have not been randomized trials conducted specifically in T-DLBCL and treatment guidelines are currently based on phase 2 trials. Treatment for T-DLBCL typically involves cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone plus rituximab (R–CHOP), with the addition of CNS prophylaxis with either intravenous or intrathecal methotrexate or cytarabine (AraC) in eligible patients. “Thus far, however, no prospective randomised studies on the benefit of this approach have been published,” the investigators wrote. The study is in the European Journal of Cancer.
They drew data from the Danish Lymphoma Registry and three Southern Finland University Hospitals. Out of 235 patients diagnosed with T-DLBCL between 1987 and 2013, 192 (82%) were treated with curative anthracycline-based chemotherapy. As some cases dated back to 1987, about one-third (36%) were treated before rituximab was available. A slightly higher proportion received intravenous CNS-directed chemotherapy (40%). Due to data availability, 189 patients were included in the survival analysis.
Results of multivariate analyses showed that CNS-directed chemotherapy (intravenous methotrexate, high-dose AraC, or both), was associated with an approximately 58% decreased risk of death across the entire population (hazard ratio [HR] for overall survival, 0.419; 95% confidence interval, 0.256-0.686; P = .001), with elderly patients realizing the greatest benefit.
“[I]t is important to note that we did not observe reduction in the CNS recurrence rate, but rather a better control of the systemic disease, suggesting that R–CHOP alone may not be a sufficient therapy for the patients with testicular DLBCL involvement,” the investigators wrote.
Intrathecal CNS-targeted therapy did not correlate with improved survival in the study. Likewise, for the entire population, rituximab did not boost survival; however, for high risk patients (International Prognostic Index, 3-5), immunochemotherapy did provide a better rate of 5-year disease-specific survival than that of conventional chemotherapy (44% vs 14%; P = .019).
Treatment of the contralateral testis was worthwhile for the entire population, with a 46% decreased risk of death (HR for overall survival, 0.514, 95% CI, 0.338-0.782; P = .002).
Shortest overall survival times, regardless of treatment type, were reported among patients with poor performance status, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), primary T-DLBCL, more extranodal sites, higher International Prognostic Index, and patients older than 70 years.
“[O]ur results recommend aggressive chemotherapy with [intravenous high-dose methotrexate and/or high-dose AraC] for better control of systemic disease for eligible patients,” the investigators concluded. “In addition, treatment of the contralateral testis with either radiotherapy or orchiectomy should be included in the management strategy of patients with T-DLBCL.”
The study was funded by the Academy of Finland, the Finnish Cancer Foundation, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and others. The investigators reported additional relationships with Pfizer, Takeda, Roche, Sanofi, and others.
SOURCE: Mannisto S et al. Eur J Cancer. 2019 May 10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.004.
FROM EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
On second thought, lenalidomide does improve DLBCL outcomes
LUGANO, Switzerland – Hot on the heels of the phase 3 ROBUST study showing that adding lenalidomide to standard chemotherapy did not improve outcomes for patients with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma come results of a different study showing a significant benefit with the therapy.
Although, as previously reported, adding lenalidomide (Revlimid) to standard chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed ABC-type diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) – the so-called R2-CHOP regimen – did not significantly improve either progression-free or overall survival, compared with R-CHOP alone in ROBUST, results from the randomized phase 2 ECOG-ACRIN 1412 study showed that R2-CHOP was associated with a 34% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death, compared with R-CHOP alone.
“The efficacy endpoints are consistent, with trends toward higher PET complete response rate and improved overall survival with R-squared CHOP,” Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., said at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma.
So what’s behind the conflicting findings?
The differences between the results of the two studies may be accounted for by the higher lenalidomide dose used in ECOG-ACRIN 1412, the patient populations – all comers in ECOG-ACRIN versus only patients with activated B-cell (ABC) type DLBCL in ROBUST – and by a 10-day shorter median time to treatment in ECOG-ACRIN 1412, said invited discussant Margaret A. Shipp, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.
The rationale for adding lenalidomide to R-CHOP came from in vitro studies showing antiproliferative and immunomodulatory action of lenalidomide against DLBCL, as well as two proof-of-concept clinical studies (REAL07 and MC078E) indicating efficacy against non-germinal center-like B (GCB) type DLBCL.
In a subanalysis of patients enrolled in MC078E, Dr. Nowakowski and colleagues found that using classification of patients by cell of origin with the NanoString Lymphoma Subtype assay, the addition of lenalidomide to R-CHOP “appears to mitigate the negative impact of an ABC molecular subtype on the outcome.”
ECOG-ACRIN 1412 details
Goals of the ECOG-ACRIN 1412 study were to evaluate the effect of lenalidomide both in all DLBCL subtypes and in the ABC subtype, maximize the synergy of the immunomodulator with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) while maintaining R-CHOP dose intensity, and facilitate the enrollment of patients with rapidly progressive disease.
To accomplish the last goal, the study was designed to allow enrollment based on local laboratory findings, scans, and diagnostic pathology, without required identification of the cell of origin. Built in to the design was the plan for final eligibility to be based on central pathology review. In other words, the trial design took into account the likelihood that some enrolled patients would not qualify for eligibility based on later pathology review.
The investigators enrolled 349 adults aged 18 years or older with pathologically confirmed DLBCL (regardless of the cell of origin), stage II bulky to stage IV disease, International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores of 2 or greater, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores of 2 or less.
The patients were stratified by age (younger than 60 years vs. 60 years and older) and by IPI score (2/3 vs. 4/5), and then randomized to receive either six cycles of R-CHOP or R2-CHOP. Lenalidomide was given in a dose of 25 mg on days 1-10 of each cycle. In contrast, the dose used in ROBUST was 15 mg given on days 1-14 of each cycle.
In ECOG-ACRIN 1412, patients assigned to lenalidomide received mandatory neutropenia prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor.
The time from diagnosis to treatment was a median of 21 days, with only 61 of 280 evaluable patients starting treatment more than 31 days after diagnosis. In ROBUST, the median time to start therapy was 31 days.
Dr. Nowakowski and his colleagues had previously shown that time to treatment is an important prognostic factor in DLBCL.
The efficacy evaluation included 145 patients assigned to R2-CHOP, and 135 assigned to R-CHOP. Primary reasons for exclusion were ineligibity following central pathology review or lack of diagnostic material for review.
After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, R2-CHOP was associated with a 34% improvement in progression-free survival, the primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, P = .03). The 1-year progression-free survival rates were 83% with R2-CHOP and 73% with R-CHOP. Respective 2-year progression-free survival rates were 76% and 70%.
There was no significant difference, however, in the secondary overall survival endpoints with 1-year and 2-year overall survival of 93% vs. 87% and 86% vs. 80%, respectively.
Similarly, there was no difference in rates of PET-ascertained complete response, at 72% with R2-CHOP and 67% with R-CHOP.
R2-CHOP showed greater benefit across most subgroups, including patients with lower IPI score, patients with bulky disease, patients younger than 60 years, women, and patients with shorter time to treatment. There were also nonsignificant trends hinting at better outcomes with R2-CHOP, regardless of cell of origin.
Toxicities were typical for R-CHOP, although patients on R2-CHOP had significantly higher rates of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia.
In addition to the trial differences mentioned previously, the differences in outcomes might be explained by the possibility that lenalidomide activity is not restricted to ABC DLBCL, Dr. Shipp said.
“One of the things that’s important to remember about lenalidomide is that it’s an immunomodulating agent and it has also has effects on tumor-infiltrating T cells,” she said.
Differences in response to therapy may also be explained by recent findings showing genetic heterogeneity in transcription-defined ABC DLBCLs, she said.
ECOG-ACRIN 1412 was supported by the National Cancer Institute and by Celgene. Dr. Nowakowski reported consulting/advising for and research funding from Celgene and others. Dr. Shipp reported consulting/advising for Bristol-Myers Squibb, honoraria from BMS and AstraZeneca, and institutional research funding from BMS and Bayer.
SOURCE: Nowakowski GS et al. 15-ICML, Abstract 006.
LUGANO, Switzerland – Hot on the heels of the phase 3 ROBUST study showing that adding lenalidomide to standard chemotherapy did not improve outcomes for patients with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma come results of a different study showing a significant benefit with the therapy.
Although, as previously reported, adding lenalidomide (Revlimid) to standard chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed ABC-type diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) – the so-called R2-CHOP regimen – did not significantly improve either progression-free or overall survival, compared with R-CHOP alone in ROBUST, results from the randomized phase 2 ECOG-ACRIN 1412 study showed that R2-CHOP was associated with a 34% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death, compared with R-CHOP alone.
“The efficacy endpoints are consistent, with trends toward higher PET complete response rate and improved overall survival with R-squared CHOP,” Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., said at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma.
So what’s behind the conflicting findings?
The differences between the results of the two studies may be accounted for by the higher lenalidomide dose used in ECOG-ACRIN 1412, the patient populations – all comers in ECOG-ACRIN versus only patients with activated B-cell (ABC) type DLBCL in ROBUST – and by a 10-day shorter median time to treatment in ECOG-ACRIN 1412, said invited discussant Margaret A. Shipp, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.
The rationale for adding lenalidomide to R-CHOP came from in vitro studies showing antiproliferative and immunomodulatory action of lenalidomide against DLBCL, as well as two proof-of-concept clinical studies (REAL07 and MC078E) indicating efficacy against non-germinal center-like B (GCB) type DLBCL.
In a subanalysis of patients enrolled in MC078E, Dr. Nowakowski and colleagues found that using classification of patients by cell of origin with the NanoString Lymphoma Subtype assay, the addition of lenalidomide to R-CHOP “appears to mitigate the negative impact of an ABC molecular subtype on the outcome.”
ECOG-ACRIN 1412 details
Goals of the ECOG-ACRIN 1412 study were to evaluate the effect of lenalidomide both in all DLBCL subtypes and in the ABC subtype, maximize the synergy of the immunomodulator with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) while maintaining R-CHOP dose intensity, and facilitate the enrollment of patients with rapidly progressive disease.
To accomplish the last goal, the study was designed to allow enrollment based on local laboratory findings, scans, and diagnostic pathology, without required identification of the cell of origin. Built in to the design was the plan for final eligibility to be based on central pathology review. In other words, the trial design took into account the likelihood that some enrolled patients would not qualify for eligibility based on later pathology review.
The investigators enrolled 349 adults aged 18 years or older with pathologically confirmed DLBCL (regardless of the cell of origin), stage II bulky to stage IV disease, International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores of 2 or greater, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores of 2 or less.
The patients were stratified by age (younger than 60 years vs. 60 years and older) and by IPI score (2/3 vs. 4/5), and then randomized to receive either six cycles of R-CHOP or R2-CHOP. Lenalidomide was given in a dose of 25 mg on days 1-10 of each cycle. In contrast, the dose used in ROBUST was 15 mg given on days 1-14 of each cycle.
In ECOG-ACRIN 1412, patients assigned to lenalidomide received mandatory neutropenia prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor.
The time from diagnosis to treatment was a median of 21 days, with only 61 of 280 evaluable patients starting treatment more than 31 days after diagnosis. In ROBUST, the median time to start therapy was 31 days.
Dr. Nowakowski and his colleagues had previously shown that time to treatment is an important prognostic factor in DLBCL.
The efficacy evaluation included 145 patients assigned to R2-CHOP, and 135 assigned to R-CHOP. Primary reasons for exclusion were ineligibity following central pathology review or lack of diagnostic material for review.
After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, R2-CHOP was associated with a 34% improvement in progression-free survival, the primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, P = .03). The 1-year progression-free survival rates were 83% with R2-CHOP and 73% with R-CHOP. Respective 2-year progression-free survival rates were 76% and 70%.
There was no significant difference, however, in the secondary overall survival endpoints with 1-year and 2-year overall survival of 93% vs. 87% and 86% vs. 80%, respectively.
Similarly, there was no difference in rates of PET-ascertained complete response, at 72% with R2-CHOP and 67% with R-CHOP.
R2-CHOP showed greater benefit across most subgroups, including patients with lower IPI score, patients with bulky disease, patients younger than 60 years, women, and patients with shorter time to treatment. There were also nonsignificant trends hinting at better outcomes with R2-CHOP, regardless of cell of origin.
Toxicities were typical for R-CHOP, although patients on R2-CHOP had significantly higher rates of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia.
In addition to the trial differences mentioned previously, the differences in outcomes might be explained by the possibility that lenalidomide activity is not restricted to ABC DLBCL, Dr. Shipp said.
“One of the things that’s important to remember about lenalidomide is that it’s an immunomodulating agent and it has also has effects on tumor-infiltrating T cells,” she said.
Differences in response to therapy may also be explained by recent findings showing genetic heterogeneity in transcription-defined ABC DLBCLs, she said.
ECOG-ACRIN 1412 was supported by the National Cancer Institute and by Celgene. Dr. Nowakowski reported consulting/advising for and research funding from Celgene and others. Dr. Shipp reported consulting/advising for Bristol-Myers Squibb, honoraria from BMS and AstraZeneca, and institutional research funding from BMS and Bayer.
SOURCE: Nowakowski GS et al. 15-ICML, Abstract 006.
LUGANO, Switzerland – Hot on the heels of the phase 3 ROBUST study showing that adding lenalidomide to standard chemotherapy did not improve outcomes for patients with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma come results of a different study showing a significant benefit with the therapy.
Although, as previously reported, adding lenalidomide (Revlimid) to standard chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed ABC-type diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) – the so-called R2-CHOP regimen – did not significantly improve either progression-free or overall survival, compared with R-CHOP alone in ROBUST, results from the randomized phase 2 ECOG-ACRIN 1412 study showed that R2-CHOP was associated with a 34% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death, compared with R-CHOP alone.
“The efficacy endpoints are consistent, with trends toward higher PET complete response rate and improved overall survival with R-squared CHOP,” Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., said at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma.
So what’s behind the conflicting findings?
The differences between the results of the two studies may be accounted for by the higher lenalidomide dose used in ECOG-ACRIN 1412, the patient populations – all comers in ECOG-ACRIN versus only patients with activated B-cell (ABC) type DLBCL in ROBUST – and by a 10-day shorter median time to treatment in ECOG-ACRIN 1412, said invited discussant Margaret A. Shipp, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.
The rationale for adding lenalidomide to R-CHOP came from in vitro studies showing antiproliferative and immunomodulatory action of lenalidomide against DLBCL, as well as two proof-of-concept clinical studies (REAL07 and MC078E) indicating efficacy against non-germinal center-like B (GCB) type DLBCL.
In a subanalysis of patients enrolled in MC078E, Dr. Nowakowski and colleagues found that using classification of patients by cell of origin with the NanoString Lymphoma Subtype assay, the addition of lenalidomide to R-CHOP “appears to mitigate the negative impact of an ABC molecular subtype on the outcome.”
ECOG-ACRIN 1412 details
Goals of the ECOG-ACRIN 1412 study were to evaluate the effect of lenalidomide both in all DLBCL subtypes and in the ABC subtype, maximize the synergy of the immunomodulator with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) while maintaining R-CHOP dose intensity, and facilitate the enrollment of patients with rapidly progressive disease.
To accomplish the last goal, the study was designed to allow enrollment based on local laboratory findings, scans, and diagnostic pathology, without required identification of the cell of origin. Built in to the design was the plan for final eligibility to be based on central pathology review. In other words, the trial design took into account the likelihood that some enrolled patients would not qualify for eligibility based on later pathology review.
The investigators enrolled 349 adults aged 18 years or older with pathologically confirmed DLBCL (regardless of the cell of origin), stage II bulky to stage IV disease, International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores of 2 or greater, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores of 2 or less.
The patients were stratified by age (younger than 60 years vs. 60 years and older) and by IPI score (2/3 vs. 4/5), and then randomized to receive either six cycles of R-CHOP or R2-CHOP. Lenalidomide was given in a dose of 25 mg on days 1-10 of each cycle. In contrast, the dose used in ROBUST was 15 mg given on days 1-14 of each cycle.
In ECOG-ACRIN 1412, patients assigned to lenalidomide received mandatory neutropenia prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor.
The time from diagnosis to treatment was a median of 21 days, with only 61 of 280 evaluable patients starting treatment more than 31 days after diagnosis. In ROBUST, the median time to start therapy was 31 days.
Dr. Nowakowski and his colleagues had previously shown that time to treatment is an important prognostic factor in DLBCL.
The efficacy evaluation included 145 patients assigned to R2-CHOP, and 135 assigned to R-CHOP. Primary reasons for exclusion were ineligibity following central pathology review or lack of diagnostic material for review.
After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, R2-CHOP was associated with a 34% improvement in progression-free survival, the primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, P = .03). The 1-year progression-free survival rates were 83% with R2-CHOP and 73% with R-CHOP. Respective 2-year progression-free survival rates were 76% and 70%.
There was no significant difference, however, in the secondary overall survival endpoints with 1-year and 2-year overall survival of 93% vs. 87% and 86% vs. 80%, respectively.
Similarly, there was no difference in rates of PET-ascertained complete response, at 72% with R2-CHOP and 67% with R-CHOP.
R2-CHOP showed greater benefit across most subgroups, including patients with lower IPI score, patients with bulky disease, patients younger than 60 years, women, and patients with shorter time to treatment. There were also nonsignificant trends hinting at better outcomes with R2-CHOP, regardless of cell of origin.
Toxicities were typical for R-CHOP, although patients on R2-CHOP had significantly higher rates of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia.
In addition to the trial differences mentioned previously, the differences in outcomes might be explained by the possibility that lenalidomide activity is not restricted to ABC DLBCL, Dr. Shipp said.
“One of the things that’s important to remember about lenalidomide is that it’s an immunomodulating agent and it has also has effects on tumor-infiltrating T cells,” she said.
Differences in response to therapy may also be explained by recent findings showing genetic heterogeneity in transcription-defined ABC DLBCLs, she said.
ECOG-ACRIN 1412 was supported by the National Cancer Institute and by Celgene. Dr. Nowakowski reported consulting/advising for and research funding from Celgene and others. Dr. Shipp reported consulting/advising for Bristol-Myers Squibb, honoraria from BMS and AstraZeneca, and institutional research funding from BMS and Bayer.
SOURCE: Nowakowski GS et al. 15-ICML, Abstract 006.
REPORTING FROM 15-ICML
R2-CHOP doesn’t improve survival in DLBCL
LUGANO, Switzerland – Adding the immunomodulator lenalidomide (Revlimid) to standard chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed ABC-type diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) – the so-called R2-CHOP regimen – did not significantly improve either progression-free or overall survival, compared with R-CHOP alone, investigators in the phase 3 ROBUST trial found.
Among 570 patients with activated B-cell (ABC) type DLBCL followed for a median of 27.1 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) – the primary endpoint – had not been reached either for patients randomized to R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and prednisone) plus lenalidomide (R2-CHOP) or R-CHOP plus placebo.
The 1-year and 2-year PFS rate with R2-CHOP was 77%, compared with 75% for R-CHOP, and 2-year PFS rates were 67% and 64%, respectively, and neither comparison was statistically significant reported Umberto Vitolo, MD, from the Citta della Salute e della Scienzia Hospital and University in Turin, Italy.“The future direction is that promising preclinical data with next-generation immunomodulatory agents will be evaluated in future DLBCL clinical trials,” he said at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma.
The ROBUST trial is the latest in a long line of studies that failed to show improvement in outcomes with the addition of a novel agent to R-CHOP.
The rationale for adding lenalidomide to R-CHOP came from in-vitro studies showing antiproliferative and immunomodulatory action of lenalidomide against DLBCL, as well as two proof-of-concept clinical studies (REAL07 and MC078E) indicating efficacy against non–germinal center–like B (GCB) type DLBCL, Dr. Vitolo said.
In the ROBUST trial, investigators across 257 global sites enrolled 570 patients with ABC-type DLBCL, stratified them by International Prognostic Index (IPI) score (2 vs. 3 or greater), bulky disease (less than 7 cm vs. 7 cm or more), and age (younger than 65 years vs. 65 years and older) and randomly assigned them to receive R-CHOP with either oral lenalidomide 15 mg or placebo daily on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle for six cycles.
All patients were required to have neutropenia prophylaxis according to local practice, with either a granulocyte- or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.
The efficacy analysis was by intention-to-treat and included 285 patients in each arm.
The investigators found no significant difference in the primary endpoint of PFS. Overall response rates (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates were high in both arms. The ORR was 91% in each arm, and the CR rate was 69% for R2-CHOP and 65% for R-CHOP.
Event-free survival (EFS) – a composite of first disease progression, death, or relapse after CR or start of second-line therapy – also did not differ significantly between the groups. The 1-year and 2-year EFS rates were 68% vs. 71% and 59% vs. 61%, respectively. The median EFS was not reached in either arm.
Similarly, overall survival did not differ between the groups. At 48 months of follow-up, 57 patients in the R2-CHOP arm and 62 patients in the R-CHOP arm had died. Respective 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 91% vs. 90%, and 79% vs. 80%.
In the safety analysis, which included 283 patients in the R2-CHOP arm and 284 in the placebo/R-CHOP arm, there were no new safety signals observed. In all, 78% of patients in the lenalidomide arm and 71% in the placebo arm had at least one grade 3 or greater adverse events. The most common adverse events were hematologic, including neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia.
The ROBUST study was funded by Celgene. Dr. Vitolo reported consulting and speaker’s bureau fees and research funding from the company.
SOURCE: Vitolo U et al. 15-ICML, Abstract 005.
LUGANO, Switzerland – Adding the immunomodulator lenalidomide (Revlimid) to standard chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed ABC-type diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) – the so-called R2-CHOP regimen – did not significantly improve either progression-free or overall survival, compared with R-CHOP alone, investigators in the phase 3 ROBUST trial found.
Among 570 patients with activated B-cell (ABC) type DLBCL followed for a median of 27.1 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) – the primary endpoint – had not been reached either for patients randomized to R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and prednisone) plus lenalidomide (R2-CHOP) or R-CHOP plus placebo.
The 1-year and 2-year PFS rate with R2-CHOP was 77%, compared with 75% for R-CHOP, and 2-year PFS rates were 67% and 64%, respectively, and neither comparison was statistically significant reported Umberto Vitolo, MD, from the Citta della Salute e della Scienzia Hospital and University in Turin, Italy.“The future direction is that promising preclinical data with next-generation immunomodulatory agents will be evaluated in future DLBCL clinical trials,” he said at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma.
The ROBUST trial is the latest in a long line of studies that failed to show improvement in outcomes with the addition of a novel agent to R-CHOP.
The rationale for adding lenalidomide to R-CHOP came from in-vitro studies showing antiproliferative and immunomodulatory action of lenalidomide against DLBCL, as well as two proof-of-concept clinical studies (REAL07 and MC078E) indicating efficacy against non–germinal center–like B (GCB) type DLBCL, Dr. Vitolo said.
In the ROBUST trial, investigators across 257 global sites enrolled 570 patients with ABC-type DLBCL, stratified them by International Prognostic Index (IPI) score (2 vs. 3 or greater), bulky disease (less than 7 cm vs. 7 cm or more), and age (younger than 65 years vs. 65 years and older) and randomly assigned them to receive R-CHOP with either oral lenalidomide 15 mg or placebo daily on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle for six cycles.
All patients were required to have neutropenia prophylaxis according to local practice, with either a granulocyte- or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.
The efficacy analysis was by intention-to-treat and included 285 patients in each arm.
The investigators found no significant difference in the primary endpoint of PFS. Overall response rates (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates were high in both arms. The ORR was 91% in each arm, and the CR rate was 69% for R2-CHOP and 65% for R-CHOP.
Event-free survival (EFS) – a composite of first disease progression, death, or relapse after CR or start of second-line therapy – also did not differ significantly between the groups. The 1-year and 2-year EFS rates were 68% vs. 71% and 59% vs. 61%, respectively. The median EFS was not reached in either arm.
Similarly, overall survival did not differ between the groups. At 48 months of follow-up, 57 patients in the R2-CHOP arm and 62 patients in the R-CHOP arm had died. Respective 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 91% vs. 90%, and 79% vs. 80%.
In the safety analysis, which included 283 patients in the R2-CHOP arm and 284 in the placebo/R-CHOP arm, there were no new safety signals observed. In all, 78% of patients in the lenalidomide arm and 71% in the placebo arm had at least one grade 3 or greater adverse events. The most common adverse events were hematologic, including neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia.
The ROBUST study was funded by Celgene. Dr. Vitolo reported consulting and speaker’s bureau fees and research funding from the company.
SOURCE: Vitolo U et al. 15-ICML, Abstract 005.
LUGANO, Switzerland – Adding the immunomodulator lenalidomide (Revlimid) to standard chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed ABC-type diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) – the so-called R2-CHOP regimen – did not significantly improve either progression-free or overall survival, compared with R-CHOP alone, investigators in the phase 3 ROBUST trial found.
Among 570 patients with activated B-cell (ABC) type DLBCL followed for a median of 27.1 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) – the primary endpoint – had not been reached either for patients randomized to R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and prednisone) plus lenalidomide (R2-CHOP) or R-CHOP plus placebo.
The 1-year and 2-year PFS rate with R2-CHOP was 77%, compared with 75% for R-CHOP, and 2-year PFS rates were 67% and 64%, respectively, and neither comparison was statistically significant reported Umberto Vitolo, MD, from the Citta della Salute e della Scienzia Hospital and University in Turin, Italy.“The future direction is that promising preclinical data with next-generation immunomodulatory agents will be evaluated in future DLBCL clinical trials,” he said at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma.
The ROBUST trial is the latest in a long line of studies that failed to show improvement in outcomes with the addition of a novel agent to R-CHOP.
The rationale for adding lenalidomide to R-CHOP came from in-vitro studies showing antiproliferative and immunomodulatory action of lenalidomide against DLBCL, as well as two proof-of-concept clinical studies (REAL07 and MC078E) indicating efficacy against non–germinal center–like B (GCB) type DLBCL, Dr. Vitolo said.
In the ROBUST trial, investigators across 257 global sites enrolled 570 patients with ABC-type DLBCL, stratified them by International Prognostic Index (IPI) score (2 vs. 3 or greater), bulky disease (less than 7 cm vs. 7 cm or more), and age (younger than 65 years vs. 65 years and older) and randomly assigned them to receive R-CHOP with either oral lenalidomide 15 mg or placebo daily on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle for six cycles.
All patients were required to have neutropenia prophylaxis according to local practice, with either a granulocyte- or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.
The efficacy analysis was by intention-to-treat and included 285 patients in each arm.
The investigators found no significant difference in the primary endpoint of PFS. Overall response rates (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates were high in both arms. The ORR was 91% in each arm, and the CR rate was 69% for R2-CHOP and 65% for R-CHOP.
Event-free survival (EFS) – a composite of first disease progression, death, or relapse after CR or start of second-line therapy – also did not differ significantly between the groups. The 1-year and 2-year EFS rates were 68% vs. 71% and 59% vs. 61%, respectively. The median EFS was not reached in either arm.
Similarly, overall survival did not differ between the groups. At 48 months of follow-up, 57 patients in the R2-CHOP arm and 62 patients in the R-CHOP arm had died. Respective 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 91% vs. 90%, and 79% vs. 80%.
In the safety analysis, which included 283 patients in the R2-CHOP arm and 284 in the placebo/R-CHOP arm, there were no new safety signals observed. In all, 78% of patients in the lenalidomide arm and 71% in the placebo arm had at least one grade 3 or greater adverse events. The most common adverse events were hematologic, including neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia.
The ROBUST study was funded by Celgene. Dr. Vitolo reported consulting and speaker’s bureau fees and research funding from the company.
SOURCE: Vitolo U et al. 15-ICML, Abstract 005.
REPORTING FROM 15-ICML
CNS-directed therapy appears more effective for synDLBCL
Controlling CNS disease is “paramount” in treating diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with synchronous CNS and systemic disease (synDLBCL), according to researchers.
In a retrospective study, the CNS was the most common site of relapse in patients with synDLBCL, and patients had better outcomes when they received CNS-directed therapy.
The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 50% in patients who received CNS-intensive therapy and 31% in those who received CNS-conservative therapy. The 2-year overall survival rate was 54% and 44%, respectively.
Dr. Joel C. Wight, of Austin Health in Heidelberg, Australia, and colleagues conducted this study and recounted their findings in the British Journal of Haematology.
The researchers retrospectively analyzed 80 patients with synDLBCL treated at 10 centers in Australia and the United Kingdom. Patients had DLBCL not otherwise specified (n = 67); high-grade B-cell lymphoma, including double-hit lymphoma (n = 12); or T-cell histiocyte-rich DLBCL (n = 1).
At baseline, all patients were treatment-naive, they had a median age of 64 years (range, 18-87 years), and 68% were male. Seventy percent of patients had high-risk disease according to the CNS International Prognostic Index (IPI), and 96% had non-CNS extranodal disease. The median number of extranodal sites outside the CNS was 2 (range, 0 to more than 10).
Patients were divided into those who received CNS-intensive therapy (n = 38) and those given CNS-conservative therapy (n = 42). The CNS-conservative group was significantly older (P less than .001), significantly more likely to have high-risk disease according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network IPI (P = .009) or CNS IPI (P = .01) and significantly more likely to have leptomeningeal disease only (P less than .001).
Treatment
CNS-intensive therapy was defined as any established multiagent IV chemotherapy regimen with two or more CNS-penetrating drugs and cytarabine, with or without intrathecal chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
CNS-conservative therapy was defined as one or fewer IV CNS-penetrating chemotherapy agents in induction, with or without intrathecal chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
Systemic induction in the CNS-intensive group consisted of R-HyperCVAD (rituximab, hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with IV methotrexate and cytarabine) in 66% of patients and R-CODOX-M/IVAC (rituximab, hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, methotrexate/ifosfamide, etoposide, cytarabine) in 24% of patients.
The most common systemic induction regimens in the CNS-conservative group were R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) or CHOP-like regimens, given to 83% of patients.
CNS-directed IV therapy was given to 100% of the CNS-intensive group and 60% of the CNS-conservative group. This consisted of IV methotrexate plus cytarabine (97%) or MATRix (methotrexate, cytarabine, and thiotepa; 3%) in the CNS-intensive group and high-dose methotrexate in the conservative group.
Intrathecal chemotherapy was given to 97% of the CNS-intensive group and 60% of the CNS-conservative group. CNS-directed radiation was given to 32% and 19%, respectively.
Thirteen patients in the CNS-intensive group and one in the CNS-conservative group underwent autologous transplant as consolidation.
Outcomes
Dose reductions were more frequent in the CNS-conservative group than in the CNS-intensive group, at 48% and 18% (P = .009), as was early cessation of chemotherapy, at 52% and 18% (P = .002). Rates of treatment-related mortality were similar, at 13% in the CNS-intensive group and 12% in the CNS-conservative group.
At the end of induction, the complete response rate was 69% in the CNS-intensive group and 51% in the CNS-conservative group (P = .16). Primary refractory disease was observed in 19% and 38% of patients, respectively (P = .07).
The CNS was the most common site of relapse or progression (n = 28). CNS progression or relapse occurred in 25% of the CNS-intensive group and 49% of the CNS-conservative group (P = .03).
The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 50% for the CNS-intensive group and 31% for the CNS-conservative group (P = .006). The 2-year overall survival rate was 54% and 44%, respectively (P = .037).
When patients were matched for induction outcomes, consolidative transplant did not improve survival.
“The most significant factor affecting survival was the ability to control the CNS disease, which was improved by the addition of IV cytarabine to [high-dose methotrexate],” the researchers wrote.
“Whilst the younger age and more intensive systemic treatment of the CNS-intensive group may have contributed to the improved survival, it is clear that CNS disease control was substantially improved by the addition of cytarabine with lower rates of CNS relapse/progression observed.”
The researchers noted that “adequate control of the CNS disease is paramount and is best achieved by intensive CNS-directed induction.”
There was no formal funding for this study, and the researchers did not provide financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Wight JC et al. Br J Haematol. 2019 Jun 24. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16064.
Controlling CNS disease is “paramount” in treating diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with synchronous CNS and systemic disease (synDLBCL), according to researchers.
In a retrospective study, the CNS was the most common site of relapse in patients with synDLBCL, and patients had better outcomes when they received CNS-directed therapy.
The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 50% in patients who received CNS-intensive therapy and 31% in those who received CNS-conservative therapy. The 2-year overall survival rate was 54% and 44%, respectively.
Dr. Joel C. Wight, of Austin Health in Heidelberg, Australia, and colleagues conducted this study and recounted their findings in the British Journal of Haematology.
The researchers retrospectively analyzed 80 patients with synDLBCL treated at 10 centers in Australia and the United Kingdom. Patients had DLBCL not otherwise specified (n = 67); high-grade B-cell lymphoma, including double-hit lymphoma (n = 12); or T-cell histiocyte-rich DLBCL (n = 1).
At baseline, all patients were treatment-naive, they had a median age of 64 years (range, 18-87 years), and 68% were male. Seventy percent of patients had high-risk disease according to the CNS International Prognostic Index (IPI), and 96% had non-CNS extranodal disease. The median number of extranodal sites outside the CNS was 2 (range, 0 to more than 10).
Patients were divided into those who received CNS-intensive therapy (n = 38) and those given CNS-conservative therapy (n = 42). The CNS-conservative group was significantly older (P less than .001), significantly more likely to have high-risk disease according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network IPI (P = .009) or CNS IPI (P = .01) and significantly more likely to have leptomeningeal disease only (P less than .001).
Treatment
CNS-intensive therapy was defined as any established multiagent IV chemotherapy regimen with two or more CNS-penetrating drugs and cytarabine, with or without intrathecal chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
CNS-conservative therapy was defined as one or fewer IV CNS-penetrating chemotherapy agents in induction, with or without intrathecal chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
Systemic induction in the CNS-intensive group consisted of R-HyperCVAD (rituximab, hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with IV methotrexate and cytarabine) in 66% of patients and R-CODOX-M/IVAC (rituximab, hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, methotrexate/ifosfamide, etoposide, cytarabine) in 24% of patients.
The most common systemic induction regimens in the CNS-conservative group were R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) or CHOP-like regimens, given to 83% of patients.
CNS-directed IV therapy was given to 100% of the CNS-intensive group and 60% of the CNS-conservative group. This consisted of IV methotrexate plus cytarabine (97%) or MATRix (methotrexate, cytarabine, and thiotepa; 3%) in the CNS-intensive group and high-dose methotrexate in the conservative group.
Intrathecal chemotherapy was given to 97% of the CNS-intensive group and 60% of the CNS-conservative group. CNS-directed radiation was given to 32% and 19%, respectively.
Thirteen patients in the CNS-intensive group and one in the CNS-conservative group underwent autologous transplant as consolidation.
Outcomes
Dose reductions were more frequent in the CNS-conservative group than in the CNS-intensive group, at 48% and 18% (P = .009), as was early cessation of chemotherapy, at 52% and 18% (P = .002). Rates of treatment-related mortality were similar, at 13% in the CNS-intensive group and 12% in the CNS-conservative group.
At the end of induction, the complete response rate was 69% in the CNS-intensive group and 51% in the CNS-conservative group (P = .16). Primary refractory disease was observed in 19% and 38% of patients, respectively (P = .07).
The CNS was the most common site of relapse or progression (n = 28). CNS progression or relapse occurred in 25% of the CNS-intensive group and 49% of the CNS-conservative group (P = .03).
The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 50% for the CNS-intensive group and 31% for the CNS-conservative group (P = .006). The 2-year overall survival rate was 54% and 44%, respectively (P = .037).
When patients were matched for induction outcomes, consolidative transplant did not improve survival.
“The most significant factor affecting survival was the ability to control the CNS disease, which was improved by the addition of IV cytarabine to [high-dose methotrexate],” the researchers wrote.
“Whilst the younger age and more intensive systemic treatment of the CNS-intensive group may have contributed to the improved survival, it is clear that CNS disease control was substantially improved by the addition of cytarabine with lower rates of CNS relapse/progression observed.”
The researchers noted that “adequate control of the CNS disease is paramount and is best achieved by intensive CNS-directed induction.”
There was no formal funding for this study, and the researchers did not provide financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Wight JC et al. Br J Haematol. 2019 Jun 24. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16064.
Controlling CNS disease is “paramount” in treating diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with synchronous CNS and systemic disease (synDLBCL), according to researchers.
In a retrospective study, the CNS was the most common site of relapse in patients with synDLBCL, and patients had better outcomes when they received CNS-directed therapy.
The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 50% in patients who received CNS-intensive therapy and 31% in those who received CNS-conservative therapy. The 2-year overall survival rate was 54% and 44%, respectively.
Dr. Joel C. Wight, of Austin Health in Heidelberg, Australia, and colleagues conducted this study and recounted their findings in the British Journal of Haematology.
The researchers retrospectively analyzed 80 patients with synDLBCL treated at 10 centers in Australia and the United Kingdom. Patients had DLBCL not otherwise specified (n = 67); high-grade B-cell lymphoma, including double-hit lymphoma (n = 12); or T-cell histiocyte-rich DLBCL (n = 1).
At baseline, all patients were treatment-naive, they had a median age of 64 years (range, 18-87 years), and 68% were male. Seventy percent of patients had high-risk disease according to the CNS International Prognostic Index (IPI), and 96% had non-CNS extranodal disease. The median number of extranodal sites outside the CNS was 2 (range, 0 to more than 10).
Patients were divided into those who received CNS-intensive therapy (n = 38) and those given CNS-conservative therapy (n = 42). The CNS-conservative group was significantly older (P less than .001), significantly more likely to have high-risk disease according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network IPI (P = .009) or CNS IPI (P = .01) and significantly more likely to have leptomeningeal disease only (P less than .001).
Treatment
CNS-intensive therapy was defined as any established multiagent IV chemotherapy regimen with two or more CNS-penetrating drugs and cytarabine, with or without intrathecal chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
CNS-conservative therapy was defined as one or fewer IV CNS-penetrating chemotherapy agents in induction, with or without intrathecal chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
Systemic induction in the CNS-intensive group consisted of R-HyperCVAD (rituximab, hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with IV methotrexate and cytarabine) in 66% of patients and R-CODOX-M/IVAC (rituximab, hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, methotrexate/ifosfamide, etoposide, cytarabine) in 24% of patients.
The most common systemic induction regimens in the CNS-conservative group were R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) or CHOP-like regimens, given to 83% of patients.
CNS-directed IV therapy was given to 100% of the CNS-intensive group and 60% of the CNS-conservative group. This consisted of IV methotrexate plus cytarabine (97%) or MATRix (methotrexate, cytarabine, and thiotepa; 3%) in the CNS-intensive group and high-dose methotrexate in the conservative group.
Intrathecal chemotherapy was given to 97% of the CNS-intensive group and 60% of the CNS-conservative group. CNS-directed radiation was given to 32% and 19%, respectively.
Thirteen patients in the CNS-intensive group and one in the CNS-conservative group underwent autologous transplant as consolidation.
Outcomes
Dose reductions were more frequent in the CNS-conservative group than in the CNS-intensive group, at 48% and 18% (P = .009), as was early cessation of chemotherapy, at 52% and 18% (P = .002). Rates of treatment-related mortality were similar, at 13% in the CNS-intensive group and 12% in the CNS-conservative group.
At the end of induction, the complete response rate was 69% in the CNS-intensive group and 51% in the CNS-conservative group (P = .16). Primary refractory disease was observed in 19% and 38% of patients, respectively (P = .07).
The CNS was the most common site of relapse or progression (n = 28). CNS progression or relapse occurred in 25% of the CNS-intensive group and 49% of the CNS-conservative group (P = .03).
The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 50% for the CNS-intensive group and 31% for the CNS-conservative group (P = .006). The 2-year overall survival rate was 54% and 44%, respectively (P = .037).
When patients were matched for induction outcomes, consolidative transplant did not improve survival.
“The most significant factor affecting survival was the ability to control the CNS disease, which was improved by the addition of IV cytarabine to [high-dose methotrexate],” the researchers wrote.
“Whilst the younger age and more intensive systemic treatment of the CNS-intensive group may have contributed to the improved survival, it is clear that CNS disease control was substantially improved by the addition of cytarabine with lower rates of CNS relapse/progression observed.”
The researchers noted that “adequate control of the CNS disease is paramount and is best achieved by intensive CNS-directed induction.”
There was no formal funding for this study, and the researchers did not provide financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Wight JC et al. Br J Haematol. 2019 Jun 24. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16064.
FROM BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Dasatinib shows promise as a control agent for CAR T cells
The tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib was found to transiently inhibit CAR T-cell function in mice, suggesting applicability as an on-off control for CAR T-cell therapy, investigators report.
“In this study, we focused our efforts on evaluating dasatinib as a control drug for CAR T cells,” wrote Katrin Mestermann, PhD, of the University of Würzburg in Germany and colleagues in Science Translational Medicine.
The researchers explored the pharmacological effects of dasatinib on CAR T-cell function using a mouse xenograft model. In this model, dasatinib was administered every 6 hours to sustain serum levels above a mandatory threshold to ensure human pharmacokinetic equivalence.
The team observed that dasatinib interferes with several cellular mechanisms that effect CAR T-cell activity, including inhibition of protein phosphorylation and cytokine secretion, among others.
Short-term administration of dasatinib was shown to not alter antilymphoma activity of CD19-CAR T cells, according to data from in vivo experiments.
In addition, upon cessation of dasatinib, CAR T-cell antitumor activity was rapidly restored, based on in vitro experiment data.
Dr. Mestermann and her colleagues also noted that the dose of dasatinib was titratable to attain either partial or complete inhibition of CAR T-cell activity. These effects could be maintained for several days without altering T-cell survival.
“A short treatment course of dasatinib, administered early after CAR T-cell infusion, protects a proportion of mice from otherwise fatal cytokine release syndrome,” the researchers wrote.
Cytokine release syndrome is the most frequently seen acute toxicity linked to CAR T-cell therapy, they explained.
“Further studies are warranted to determine whether dasatinib is also effective in clinical situations with established cytokine release syndrome,” they concluded.
The study was funded by the Cluster Biotechnologie Bayern and Free State of Bavaria, the German Cancer Aid, and the University of Würzburg. The authors reported financial affiliations with Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda, and others.
SOURCE: Mestermann K et al. Sci Transl Med. 2019 Jul 3. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau5907.
The tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib was found to transiently inhibit CAR T-cell function in mice, suggesting applicability as an on-off control for CAR T-cell therapy, investigators report.
“In this study, we focused our efforts on evaluating dasatinib as a control drug for CAR T cells,” wrote Katrin Mestermann, PhD, of the University of Würzburg in Germany and colleagues in Science Translational Medicine.
The researchers explored the pharmacological effects of dasatinib on CAR T-cell function using a mouse xenograft model. In this model, dasatinib was administered every 6 hours to sustain serum levels above a mandatory threshold to ensure human pharmacokinetic equivalence.
The team observed that dasatinib interferes with several cellular mechanisms that effect CAR T-cell activity, including inhibition of protein phosphorylation and cytokine secretion, among others.
Short-term administration of dasatinib was shown to not alter antilymphoma activity of CD19-CAR T cells, according to data from in vivo experiments.
In addition, upon cessation of dasatinib, CAR T-cell antitumor activity was rapidly restored, based on in vitro experiment data.
Dr. Mestermann and her colleagues also noted that the dose of dasatinib was titratable to attain either partial or complete inhibition of CAR T-cell activity. These effects could be maintained for several days without altering T-cell survival.
“A short treatment course of dasatinib, administered early after CAR T-cell infusion, protects a proportion of mice from otherwise fatal cytokine release syndrome,” the researchers wrote.
Cytokine release syndrome is the most frequently seen acute toxicity linked to CAR T-cell therapy, they explained.
“Further studies are warranted to determine whether dasatinib is also effective in clinical situations with established cytokine release syndrome,” they concluded.
The study was funded by the Cluster Biotechnologie Bayern and Free State of Bavaria, the German Cancer Aid, and the University of Würzburg. The authors reported financial affiliations with Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda, and others.
SOURCE: Mestermann K et al. Sci Transl Med. 2019 Jul 3. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau5907.
The tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib was found to transiently inhibit CAR T-cell function in mice, suggesting applicability as an on-off control for CAR T-cell therapy, investigators report.
“In this study, we focused our efforts on evaluating dasatinib as a control drug for CAR T cells,” wrote Katrin Mestermann, PhD, of the University of Würzburg in Germany and colleagues in Science Translational Medicine.
The researchers explored the pharmacological effects of dasatinib on CAR T-cell function using a mouse xenograft model. In this model, dasatinib was administered every 6 hours to sustain serum levels above a mandatory threshold to ensure human pharmacokinetic equivalence.
The team observed that dasatinib interferes with several cellular mechanisms that effect CAR T-cell activity, including inhibition of protein phosphorylation and cytokine secretion, among others.
Short-term administration of dasatinib was shown to not alter antilymphoma activity of CD19-CAR T cells, according to data from in vivo experiments.
In addition, upon cessation of dasatinib, CAR T-cell antitumor activity was rapidly restored, based on in vitro experiment data.
Dr. Mestermann and her colleagues also noted that the dose of dasatinib was titratable to attain either partial or complete inhibition of CAR T-cell activity. These effects could be maintained for several days without altering T-cell survival.
“A short treatment course of dasatinib, administered early after CAR T-cell infusion, protects a proportion of mice from otherwise fatal cytokine release syndrome,” the researchers wrote.
Cytokine release syndrome is the most frequently seen acute toxicity linked to CAR T-cell therapy, they explained.
“Further studies are warranted to determine whether dasatinib is also effective in clinical situations with established cytokine release syndrome,” they concluded.
The study was funded by the Cluster Biotechnologie Bayern and Free State of Bavaria, the German Cancer Aid, and the University of Würzburg. The authors reported financial affiliations with Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda, and others.
SOURCE: Mestermann K et al. Sci Transl Med. 2019 Jul 3. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau5907.
FROM SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
No benefit with rituximab after first CR in DLBCL
AMSTERDAM – Rituximab maintenance therapy did not significantly prolong disease-free survival among patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in complete remission after induction chemotherapy, investigators in the HOVON-Nordic trial collaboration found.
Among 380 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in complete remission following induction chemotherapy with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), the median disease-free survival (DFS) after a median follow-up of 79.9 months had not been reached for patients randomized to either rituximab maintenance therapy or observation alone, reported Pieternella J. Lugtenburg, MD, PhD, from Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
“In patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in first complete remission after R-CHOP induction therapy, rituximab maintenance therapy does not prolong disease-free survival, and we could not identify a clinical subgroup that benefited,” she said at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association.
The randomized, phase 3 HOVON-Nordic LG trial compared R-CHOP-14 with rituximab delivered on day 1 for four cycles in one arm, and on days 1 and 8 in the comparison arm (R2-CHOP). Patients were assessed for response after four cycles, and those with progressive disease were taken off the study. The remaining patients continued on their assigned regimen for an additional four cycles and second assessment, and those who had complete responses then underwent a second randomization to rituximab maintenance or observation. Patients randomized to maintenance could receive up to 12 8-week cycles.
The second randomization was stratified by age (18-65 vs. 66-80 years), age-adjusted International Prognostic Index score, and R-CHOP regimen (one or two infusions per cycle in the first randomization).
The induction phase found no significant benefit for the additional rituximab infusion for the primary endpoint of progression-free survival, with 3-year PFS rates of 74% for R-CHOP and 71% for R2-CHOP. Respective 5-year PFS rates were 68% and 62%.
There were no differences between the arms by any of the stratification factors, and no difference in overall survival.
Dr. Lugtenburg presented results of the maintenance phase, which included all patients in complete remission at least 4 weeks after the last cycle of R-CHOP-14 who did not have rituximab-related adverse events or active infections.
A total of 195 patients were randomized to observation, and 185 to maintenance. Of this latter group, 149 patients received all 12 cycles, with a median duration of exposure of 22.5 months.
As noted, DFS, the primary endpoint for the maintenance phase, was not significantly different between the arms, with 136 events in the maintenance arm versus 134 in the observation arm. A total of 21 patients assigned to maintenance died, and 22 patients assigned to observation died during follow-up.
The respective 5-year DFS rates were 79% and 74%, a difference that was not statistically significant.
There were no significant differences between the arms in either time to relapse or death, and no difference in overall survival.
In the question-and-answer section following her talk, Marek Trnený, MD, from Charles University in Prague, pointed out that, in the NHL 13 study, which looked at rituximab maintenance for patients with DLBCL or follicular lymphoma in first remission, there was an apparent clinical benefit with rituximab maintenance for men with low International Prognostic Index scores, and asked whether Dr. Lugtenburg and colleagues had seen similar trends.
“We knew about this finding, and we really didn’t see any differences between males and females, not only in terms of efficacy, but also in terms of toxicity, they had actually the same rates of toxicity,” she said.
In NHL 13, women had a significantly higher incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events, compared with men.
The study was sponsored by HOVON, the HematoOncology Foundation for Adults in the Netherlands, with additional support from Roche. Dr. Lugtenburg reported consultancy for and research funding from Roche and others. Dr. Trnený reported advisory board activity, research support, and honoraria from Roche and others.
SOURCE: Lugtenburg PJ et al. EHA 2019, Abstract S1559.
AMSTERDAM – Rituximab maintenance therapy did not significantly prolong disease-free survival among patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in complete remission after induction chemotherapy, investigators in the HOVON-Nordic trial collaboration found.
Among 380 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in complete remission following induction chemotherapy with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), the median disease-free survival (DFS) after a median follow-up of 79.9 months had not been reached for patients randomized to either rituximab maintenance therapy or observation alone, reported Pieternella J. Lugtenburg, MD, PhD, from Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
“In patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in first complete remission after R-CHOP induction therapy, rituximab maintenance therapy does not prolong disease-free survival, and we could not identify a clinical subgroup that benefited,” she said at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association.
The randomized, phase 3 HOVON-Nordic LG trial compared R-CHOP-14 with rituximab delivered on day 1 for four cycles in one arm, and on days 1 and 8 in the comparison arm (R2-CHOP). Patients were assessed for response after four cycles, and those with progressive disease were taken off the study. The remaining patients continued on their assigned regimen for an additional four cycles and second assessment, and those who had complete responses then underwent a second randomization to rituximab maintenance or observation. Patients randomized to maintenance could receive up to 12 8-week cycles.
The second randomization was stratified by age (18-65 vs. 66-80 years), age-adjusted International Prognostic Index score, and R-CHOP regimen (one or two infusions per cycle in the first randomization).
The induction phase found no significant benefit for the additional rituximab infusion for the primary endpoint of progression-free survival, with 3-year PFS rates of 74% for R-CHOP and 71% for R2-CHOP. Respective 5-year PFS rates were 68% and 62%.
There were no differences between the arms by any of the stratification factors, and no difference in overall survival.
Dr. Lugtenburg presented results of the maintenance phase, which included all patients in complete remission at least 4 weeks after the last cycle of R-CHOP-14 who did not have rituximab-related adverse events or active infections.
A total of 195 patients were randomized to observation, and 185 to maintenance. Of this latter group, 149 patients received all 12 cycles, with a median duration of exposure of 22.5 months.
As noted, DFS, the primary endpoint for the maintenance phase, was not significantly different between the arms, with 136 events in the maintenance arm versus 134 in the observation arm. A total of 21 patients assigned to maintenance died, and 22 patients assigned to observation died during follow-up.
The respective 5-year DFS rates were 79% and 74%, a difference that was not statistically significant.
There were no significant differences between the arms in either time to relapse or death, and no difference in overall survival.
In the question-and-answer section following her talk, Marek Trnený, MD, from Charles University in Prague, pointed out that, in the NHL 13 study, which looked at rituximab maintenance for patients with DLBCL or follicular lymphoma in first remission, there was an apparent clinical benefit with rituximab maintenance for men with low International Prognostic Index scores, and asked whether Dr. Lugtenburg and colleagues had seen similar trends.
“We knew about this finding, and we really didn’t see any differences between males and females, not only in terms of efficacy, but also in terms of toxicity, they had actually the same rates of toxicity,” she said.
In NHL 13, women had a significantly higher incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events, compared with men.
The study was sponsored by HOVON, the HematoOncology Foundation for Adults in the Netherlands, with additional support from Roche. Dr. Lugtenburg reported consultancy for and research funding from Roche and others. Dr. Trnený reported advisory board activity, research support, and honoraria from Roche and others.
SOURCE: Lugtenburg PJ et al. EHA 2019, Abstract S1559.
AMSTERDAM – Rituximab maintenance therapy did not significantly prolong disease-free survival among patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in complete remission after induction chemotherapy, investigators in the HOVON-Nordic trial collaboration found.
Among 380 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in complete remission following induction chemotherapy with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), the median disease-free survival (DFS) after a median follow-up of 79.9 months had not been reached for patients randomized to either rituximab maintenance therapy or observation alone, reported Pieternella J. Lugtenburg, MD, PhD, from Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
“In patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in first complete remission after R-CHOP induction therapy, rituximab maintenance therapy does not prolong disease-free survival, and we could not identify a clinical subgroup that benefited,” she said at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association.
The randomized, phase 3 HOVON-Nordic LG trial compared R-CHOP-14 with rituximab delivered on day 1 for four cycles in one arm, and on days 1 and 8 in the comparison arm (R2-CHOP). Patients were assessed for response after four cycles, and those with progressive disease were taken off the study. The remaining patients continued on their assigned regimen for an additional four cycles and second assessment, and those who had complete responses then underwent a second randomization to rituximab maintenance or observation. Patients randomized to maintenance could receive up to 12 8-week cycles.
The second randomization was stratified by age (18-65 vs. 66-80 years), age-adjusted International Prognostic Index score, and R-CHOP regimen (one or two infusions per cycle in the first randomization).
The induction phase found no significant benefit for the additional rituximab infusion for the primary endpoint of progression-free survival, with 3-year PFS rates of 74% for R-CHOP and 71% for R2-CHOP. Respective 5-year PFS rates were 68% and 62%.
There were no differences between the arms by any of the stratification factors, and no difference in overall survival.
Dr. Lugtenburg presented results of the maintenance phase, which included all patients in complete remission at least 4 weeks after the last cycle of R-CHOP-14 who did not have rituximab-related adverse events or active infections.
A total of 195 patients were randomized to observation, and 185 to maintenance. Of this latter group, 149 patients received all 12 cycles, with a median duration of exposure of 22.5 months.
As noted, DFS, the primary endpoint for the maintenance phase, was not significantly different between the arms, with 136 events in the maintenance arm versus 134 in the observation arm. A total of 21 patients assigned to maintenance died, and 22 patients assigned to observation died during follow-up.
The respective 5-year DFS rates were 79% and 74%, a difference that was not statistically significant.
There were no significant differences between the arms in either time to relapse or death, and no difference in overall survival.
In the question-and-answer section following her talk, Marek Trnený, MD, from Charles University in Prague, pointed out that, in the NHL 13 study, which looked at rituximab maintenance for patients with DLBCL or follicular lymphoma in first remission, there was an apparent clinical benefit with rituximab maintenance for men with low International Prognostic Index scores, and asked whether Dr. Lugtenburg and colleagues had seen similar trends.
“We knew about this finding, and we really didn’t see any differences between males and females, not only in terms of efficacy, but also in terms of toxicity, they had actually the same rates of toxicity,” she said.
In NHL 13, women had a significantly higher incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events, compared with men.
The study was sponsored by HOVON, the HematoOncology Foundation for Adults in the Netherlands, with additional support from Roche. Dr. Lugtenburg reported consultancy for and research funding from Roche and others. Dr. Trnený reported advisory board activity, research support, and honoraria from Roche and others.
SOURCE: Lugtenburg PJ et al. EHA 2019, Abstract S1559.
REPORTING FROM EHA 2019
Radiation bridging with axi-cel appears safe in DLBCL
according to results from a case series.
“Effective bridging strategies may be needed to provide patients with aggressive disease access to CAR T therapy,” wrote Austin J. Sim MD, JD, of Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa and colleagues. The findings were reported in the International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.
The study included a total of 12 patients planned to receive bridging treatment with radiation prior to axicabtagene ciloleucel infusion. The cohort consisted of patients with highly aggressive disease, including six with double-hit lymphoma and six with disease 10 cm or greater in diameter.
Study participants received a radiation dose between 2 and 4 Gy per fraction to a median of 20 Gy (range, 6-36.5 Gy) and half of the participants received 20 Gy in 5 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Of the 12 patients, 7 were administered concomitant chemotherapy.
“One patient who underwent apheresis and radiation therapy ultimately did not proceed with CAR T infusion, but was still included in our analysis,” the researchers noted.
After analysis, the researchers reported that, during bridging radiation therapy, no patients had significant toxicities or in-field disease progression of disease prior to CAR T infusion.
Post CAR T infusion, 27% of patients experienced neurotoxicity or severe cytokine release syndrome.
At 30 days, the objective response rate was 81.8%, with 27% attaining complete response. At final follow-up, the best response rate was 81.8%, with complete response achieved in 45% of patients.
The researchers acknowledged that a key limitation of the study was the retrospective design. As a result, radiation dosing was not uniform and the optimal dose and fractionation remains unclear.
In addition, Dr. Sim and colleagues advised that caution should be taken if irradiation is initiated before T-cell apheresis, and if so, blood counts should be monitored closely.
“Future investigation is warranted to optimize the use of bridging radiation before CAR T therapy,” they concluded.
No funding sources were reported. The authors reported financial affiliations with Atara Biotherapeutics, AstraZeneca, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Precision Biosciences, and several others.
SOURCE: Sim AJ et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jun 5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.05.065.
according to results from a case series.
“Effective bridging strategies may be needed to provide patients with aggressive disease access to CAR T therapy,” wrote Austin J. Sim MD, JD, of Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa and colleagues. The findings were reported in the International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.
The study included a total of 12 patients planned to receive bridging treatment with radiation prior to axicabtagene ciloleucel infusion. The cohort consisted of patients with highly aggressive disease, including six with double-hit lymphoma and six with disease 10 cm or greater in diameter.
Study participants received a radiation dose between 2 and 4 Gy per fraction to a median of 20 Gy (range, 6-36.5 Gy) and half of the participants received 20 Gy in 5 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Of the 12 patients, 7 were administered concomitant chemotherapy.
“One patient who underwent apheresis and radiation therapy ultimately did not proceed with CAR T infusion, but was still included in our analysis,” the researchers noted.
After analysis, the researchers reported that, during bridging radiation therapy, no patients had significant toxicities or in-field disease progression of disease prior to CAR T infusion.
Post CAR T infusion, 27% of patients experienced neurotoxicity or severe cytokine release syndrome.
At 30 days, the objective response rate was 81.8%, with 27% attaining complete response. At final follow-up, the best response rate was 81.8%, with complete response achieved in 45% of patients.
The researchers acknowledged that a key limitation of the study was the retrospective design. As a result, radiation dosing was not uniform and the optimal dose and fractionation remains unclear.
In addition, Dr. Sim and colleagues advised that caution should be taken if irradiation is initiated before T-cell apheresis, and if so, blood counts should be monitored closely.
“Future investigation is warranted to optimize the use of bridging radiation before CAR T therapy,” they concluded.
No funding sources were reported. The authors reported financial affiliations with Atara Biotherapeutics, AstraZeneca, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Precision Biosciences, and several others.
SOURCE: Sim AJ et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jun 5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.05.065.
according to results from a case series.
“Effective bridging strategies may be needed to provide patients with aggressive disease access to CAR T therapy,” wrote Austin J. Sim MD, JD, of Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa and colleagues. The findings were reported in the International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.
The study included a total of 12 patients planned to receive bridging treatment with radiation prior to axicabtagene ciloleucel infusion. The cohort consisted of patients with highly aggressive disease, including six with double-hit lymphoma and six with disease 10 cm or greater in diameter.
Study participants received a radiation dose between 2 and 4 Gy per fraction to a median of 20 Gy (range, 6-36.5 Gy) and half of the participants received 20 Gy in 5 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Of the 12 patients, 7 were administered concomitant chemotherapy.
“One patient who underwent apheresis and radiation therapy ultimately did not proceed with CAR T infusion, but was still included in our analysis,” the researchers noted.
After analysis, the researchers reported that, during bridging radiation therapy, no patients had significant toxicities or in-field disease progression of disease prior to CAR T infusion.
Post CAR T infusion, 27% of patients experienced neurotoxicity or severe cytokine release syndrome.
At 30 days, the objective response rate was 81.8%, with 27% attaining complete response. At final follow-up, the best response rate was 81.8%, with complete response achieved in 45% of patients.
The researchers acknowledged that a key limitation of the study was the retrospective design. As a result, radiation dosing was not uniform and the optimal dose and fractionation remains unclear.
In addition, Dr. Sim and colleagues advised that caution should be taken if irradiation is initiated before T-cell apheresis, and if so, blood counts should be monitored closely.
“Future investigation is warranted to optimize the use of bridging radiation before CAR T therapy,” they concluded.
No funding sources were reported. The authors reported financial affiliations with Atara Biotherapeutics, AstraZeneca, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Precision Biosciences, and several others.
SOURCE: Sim AJ et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jun 5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.05.065.
FROM THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, BIOLOGY, PHYSICS