Key clinical point: The coexistence of obesity and family history of cancer significantly increased the risk for breast cancer (BC) in women, suggesting that weight management is important in women with a family history of cancer.

Major finding: The risk for BC was significantly higher in women with vs without a family history of BC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.63; 95% CI 1.22-2.49). The risk was further elevated in women with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24 kg/m² and a family history of cancer vs women with BMI < 24 kg/m² and no family history of cancer (adjusted hazard ratio 2.06; 95% CI 1.39-3.06).

Study details: Findings are from a population-based prospective cohort study that included 15,055 women, of which 4210 women had a family history of cancer.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Nature Science Foundation of Minhang district, Shanghai, China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Cao J, Li J, Zhang Z, et al. Interaction between body mass index and family history of cancer on the risk of female breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2024;14:4927 (Feb 28). doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54762-x Source

Key clinical point: The coexistence of obesity and family history of cancer significantly increased the risk for breast cancer (BC) in women, suggesting that weight management is important in women with a family history of cancer.

Major finding: The risk for BC was significantly higher in women with vs without a family history of BC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.63; 95% CI 1.22-2.49). The risk was further elevated in women with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24 kg/m² and a family history of cancer vs women with BMI < 24 kg/m² and no family history of cancer (adjusted hazard ratio 2.06; 95% CI 1.39-3.06).

Study details: Findings are from a population-based prospective cohort study that included 15,055 women, of which 4210 women had a family history of cancer.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Nature Science Foundation of Minhang district, Shanghai, China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Cao J, Li J, Zhang Z, et al. Interaction between body mass index and family history of cancer on the risk of female breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2024;14:4927 (Feb 28). doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54762-x Source

Key clinical point: The coexistence of obesity and family history of cancer significantly increased the risk for breast cancer (BC) in women, suggesting that weight management is important in women with a family history of cancer.

Major finding: The risk for BC was significantly higher in women with vs without a family history of BC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.63; 95% CI 1.22-2.49). The risk was further elevated in women with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24 kg/m² and a family history of cancer vs women with BMI < 24 kg/m² and no family history of cancer (adjusted hazard ratio 2.06; 95% CI 1.39-3.06).

Study details: Findings are from a population-based prospective cohort study that included 15,055 women, of which 4210 women had a family history of cancer.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Nature Science Foundation of Minhang district, Shanghai, China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Cao J, Li J, Zhang Z, et al. Interaction between body mass index and family history of cancer on the risk of female breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2024;14:4927 (Feb 28). doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54762-x Source

Key clinical point: Compared with mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) led to comparable locoregional recurrence (LRR; the first relapse site) events along with improved survival outcomes in patients with early-stage node-negative triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Major finding: BCS vs mastectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase LRR (P = .5209) and was significantly associated with improved disease-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.51; P < .001) and overall survival (aHR 0.43; P < .001). Absence of pathologic complete response was the only determinant for worsened LRR risk (HR 2.22; P = .001).

Study details: This retrospective analysis of eight prospective trials included 1074 neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated patients with early-stage node-negative TNBC and available surgery data.

Disclosures: This study received financial support from Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within the funding program Open Access Publikationskosten. Three authors declared being employees of GBG Forschungs GmbH. Ninel authors declared receiving honoraria, grants, consulting fees, or personal fees or having other ties with various sources. The other authors had no conflicts to declare.

Source: Krug D, Vladimirova V, Untch M, et al. Breast-conserving surgery is not associated with increased local recurrence in patients with early-stage node-negative triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast. 2024;74:103701 (Feb 24). doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103701 Source

Key clinical point: Compared with mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) led to comparable locoregional recurrence (LRR; the first relapse site) events along with improved survival outcomes in patients with early-stage node-negative triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Major finding: BCS vs mastectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase LRR (P = .5209) and was significantly associated with improved disease-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.51; P < .001) and overall survival (aHR 0.43; P < .001). Absence of pathologic complete response was the only determinant for worsened LRR risk (HR 2.22; P = .001).

Study details: This retrospective analysis of eight prospective trials included 1074 neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated patients with early-stage node-negative TNBC and available surgery data.

Disclosures: This study received financial support from Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within the funding program Open Access Publikationskosten. Three authors declared being employees of GBG Forschungs GmbH. Ninel authors declared receiving honoraria, grants, consulting fees, or personal fees or having other ties with various sources. The other authors had no conflicts to declare.

Source: Krug D, Vladimirova V, Untch M, et al. Breast-conserving surgery is not associated with increased local recurrence in patients with early-stage node-negative triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast. 2024;74:103701 (Feb 24). doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103701 Source

Key clinical point: Compared with mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) led to comparable locoregional recurrence (LRR; the first relapse site) events along with improved survival outcomes in patients with early-stage node-negative triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Major finding: BCS vs mastectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase LRR (P = .5209) and was significantly associated with improved disease-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.51; P < .001) and overall survival (aHR 0.43; P < .001). Absence of pathologic complete response was the only determinant for worsened LRR risk (HR 2.22; P = .001).

Study details: This retrospective analysis of eight prospective trials included 1074 neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated patients with early-stage node-negative TNBC and available surgery data.

Disclosures: This study received financial support from Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within the funding program Open Access Publikationskosten. Three authors declared being employees of GBG Forschungs GmbH. Ninel authors declared receiving honoraria, grants, consulting fees, or personal fees or having other ties with various sources. The other authors had no conflicts to declare.

Source: Krug D, Vladimirova V, Untch M, et al. Breast-conserving surgery is not associated with increased local recurrence in patients with early-stage node-negative triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast. 2024;74:103701 (Feb 24). doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103701 Source

Key clinical point: The risk for breast cancer (BC) was significantly elevated in female 5-year survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) who were treated with doxorubicin between the ages of 15 and 50 years.

Major finding: The risk for BC was 1.4 times higher (95% CI 1.04-1.9) in survivors of HL who did vs did not receive doxorubicin, with the risk increasing further in survivors who received a cumulative doxorubicin dose > 200 mg/m² (adjusted hazard ratio 1.5; 95% CI 1.08-2.1). In fact, every 100 mg/m² increase in doxorubicin dose increased the risk for BC by 1.18 times (95% CI 1.05-1.32).

Study details: Findings are from a cohort study including 5-year survivors of HL (n = 1964) who received treatment between the ages of 15 and 50 years, of whom 1113 patients received doxorubicin.

Disclosures: This study was supported by grants from the Dutch Cancer Society, Netherlands. Five authors declared receiving honoraria, research funding, travel, accommodations, or other expenses from or serving in consulting or advisory roles or as speakers' bureau members for various sources.

Source: Neppelenbroek SIM, Geurts YM, Aleman BMP, et al. Doxorubicin exposure and breast cancer risk in survivors of adolescent and adult Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2024 (Feb 15). doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01386 Source

Key clinical point: The risk for breast cancer (BC) was significantly elevated in female 5-year survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) who were treated with doxorubicin between the ages of 15 and 50 years.

Major finding: The risk for BC was 1.4 times higher (95% CI 1.04-1.9) in survivors of HL who did vs did not receive doxorubicin, with the risk increasing further in survivors who received a cumulative doxorubicin dose > 200 mg/m² (adjusted hazard ratio 1.5; 95% CI 1.08-2.1). In fact, every 100 mg/m² increase in doxorubicin dose increased the risk for BC by 1.18 times (95% CI 1.05-1.32).

Study details: Findings are from a cohort study including 5-year survivors of HL (n = 1964) who received treatment between the ages of 15 and 50 years, of whom 1113 patients received doxorubicin.

Disclosures: This study was supported by grants from the Dutch Cancer Society, Netherlands. Five authors declared receiving honoraria, research funding, travel, accommodations, or other expenses from or serving in consulting or advisory roles or as speakers' bureau members for various sources.

Source: Neppelenbroek SIM, Geurts YM, Aleman BMP, et al. Doxorubicin exposure and breast cancer risk in survivors of adolescent and adult Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2024 (Feb 15). doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01386 Source

Key clinical point: The risk for breast cancer (BC) was significantly elevated in female 5-year survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) who were treated with doxorubicin between the ages of 15 and 50 years.

Major finding: The risk for BC was 1.4 times higher (95% CI 1.04-1.9) in survivors of HL who did vs did not receive doxorubicin, with the risk increasing further in survivors who received a cumulative doxorubicin dose > 200 mg/m² (adjusted hazard ratio 1.5; 95% CI 1.08-2.1). In fact, every 100 mg/m² increase in doxorubicin dose increased the risk for BC by 1.18 times (95% CI 1.05-1.32).

Study details: Findings are from a cohort study including 5-year survivors of HL (n = 1964) who received treatment between the ages of 15 and 50 years, of whom 1113 patients received doxorubicin.

Disclosures: This study was supported by grants from the Dutch Cancer Society, Netherlands. Five authors declared receiving honoraria, research funding, travel, accommodations, or other expenses from or serving in consulting or advisory roles or as speakers' bureau members for various sources.

Source: Neppelenbroek SIM, Geurts YM, Aleman BMP, et al. Doxorubicin exposure and breast cancer risk in survivors of adolescent and adult Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2024 (Feb 15). doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01386 Source

Key clinical point: Enobosarm, a selective androgen receptor modulator, showed antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in pretreated women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), androgen receptor-positive (AR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: The clinical benefit rate was ~30% at 24 weeks, with 32% and 29% of patients showing clinical benefits with 9 mg and 18 mg enobosarm, respectively. Grades 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported by 8% and 16% of patients in the 9 mg and 18 mg enobosarm groups, respectively.

Study details: Findings are from a phase 2 study that included 136 pretreated postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2− locally advanced or metastatic BC who were randomly assigned to receive 9 mg or 18 mg enobosarm daily, of whom 102 women had AR+ BC.

Disclosures: This study was funded by GTx. Several authors declared receiving grants or honoraria from; serving in consulting, leadership, or advisory roles for; owning patents with or stocks of; or having other ties with various sources, including GTx.

Source: Palmieri C, Linden H, Birrell SN, et al. Activity and safety of enobosarm, a novel, oral, selective androgen receptor modulator, in androgen receptor-positive, oestrogen receptor-positive, and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (Study G200802): A randomised, open-label, multicentre, multinational, parallel design, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25(3):317-325 (Feb 8). doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00004-4 Source

Key clinical point: Enobosarm, a selective androgen receptor modulator, showed antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in pretreated women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), androgen receptor-positive (AR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: The clinical benefit rate was ~30% at 24 weeks, with 32% and 29% of patients showing clinical benefits with 9 mg and 18 mg enobosarm, respectively. Grades 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported by 8% and 16% of patients in the 9 mg and 18 mg enobosarm groups, respectively.

Study details: Findings are from a phase 2 study that included 136 pretreated postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2− locally advanced or metastatic BC who were randomly assigned to receive 9 mg or 18 mg enobosarm daily, of whom 102 women had AR+ BC.

Disclosures: This study was funded by GTx. Several authors declared receiving grants or honoraria from; serving in consulting, leadership, or advisory roles for; owning patents with or stocks of; or having other ties with various sources, including GTx.

Source: Palmieri C, Linden H, Birrell SN, et al. Activity and safety of enobosarm, a novel, oral, selective androgen receptor modulator, in androgen receptor-positive, oestrogen receptor-positive, and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (Study G200802): A randomised, open-label, multicentre, multinational, parallel design, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25(3):317-325 (Feb 8). doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00004-4 Source

Key clinical point: Enobosarm, a selective androgen receptor modulator, showed antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in pretreated women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), androgen receptor-positive (AR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: The clinical benefit rate was ~30% at 24 weeks, with 32% and 29% of patients showing clinical benefits with 9 mg and 18 mg enobosarm, respectively. Grades 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported by 8% and 16% of patients in the 9 mg and 18 mg enobosarm groups, respectively.

Study details: Findings are from a phase 2 study that included 136 pretreated postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2− locally advanced or metastatic BC who were randomly assigned to receive 9 mg or 18 mg enobosarm daily, of whom 102 women had AR+ BC.

Disclosures: This study was funded by GTx. Several authors declared receiving grants or honoraria from; serving in consulting, leadership, or advisory roles for; owning patents with or stocks of; or having other ties with various sources, including GTx.

Source: Palmieri C, Linden H, Birrell SN, et al. Activity and safety of enobosarm, a novel, oral, selective androgen receptor modulator, in androgen receptor-positive, oestrogen receptor-positive, and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (Study G200802): A randomised, open-label, multicentre, multinational, parallel design, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25(3):317-325 (Feb 8). doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00004-4 Source

Key clinical point: Women who received adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer (BC) reported a significant reduction in pain and fibrosis upon completing hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT).

Major finding: Only 25% of women accepted and completed HBOT treatment. A smaller proportion of women who completed HBOT vs those who would have completed HBOT if offered reported moderate or severe pain in breast, chest wall, or shoulder (32% vs 75%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.34; P = .01) and moderate or severe fibrosis (17% vs 86%; aOR 0.14; P = .001).

Study details: Findings are from the phase 3 HONEY trial which included 189 women with invasive BC or ductal carcinoma in situ who reported late local toxic effects after adjuvant radiotherapy and were randomly assigned to receive HBOT (n = 125) or usual follow-up care (n = 61).

Disclosures: This study was partially funded by The Da Vinci Clinic, the Netherlands. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Mink van der Molen DR, Batenburg MCT, Maarse W, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and late local toxic effects in patients with irradiated breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2024 (Feb 8). doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6776 Source

Key clinical point: Women who received adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer (BC) reported a significant reduction in pain and fibrosis upon completing hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT).

Major finding: Only 25% of women accepted and completed HBOT treatment. A smaller proportion of women who completed HBOT vs those who would have completed HBOT if offered reported moderate or severe pain in breast, chest wall, or shoulder (32% vs 75%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.34; P = .01) and moderate or severe fibrosis (17% vs 86%; aOR 0.14; P = .001).

Study details: Findings are from the phase 3 HONEY trial which included 189 women with invasive BC or ductal carcinoma in situ who reported late local toxic effects after adjuvant radiotherapy and were randomly assigned to receive HBOT (n = 125) or usual follow-up care (n = 61).

Disclosures: This study was partially funded by The Da Vinci Clinic, the Netherlands. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Mink van der Molen DR, Batenburg MCT, Maarse W, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and late local toxic effects in patients with irradiated breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2024 (Feb 8). doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6776 Source

Key clinical point: Women who received adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer (BC) reported a significant reduction in pain and fibrosis upon completing hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT).

Major finding: Only 25% of women accepted and completed HBOT treatment. A smaller proportion of women who completed HBOT vs those who would have completed HBOT if offered reported moderate or severe pain in breast, chest wall, or shoulder (32% vs 75%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.34; P = .01) and moderate or severe fibrosis (17% vs 86%; aOR 0.14; P = .001).

Study details: Findings are from the phase 3 HONEY trial which included 189 women with invasive BC or ductal carcinoma in situ who reported late local toxic effects after adjuvant radiotherapy and were randomly assigned to receive HBOT (n = 125) or usual follow-up care (n = 61).

Disclosures: This study was partially funded by The Da Vinci Clinic, the Netherlands. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Mink van der Molen DR, Batenburg MCT, Maarse W, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and late local toxic effects in patients with irradiated breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2024 (Feb 8). doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6776 Source

Key clinical point: Among women with BRCA1 sequence variation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance reduces the risk for breast cancer (BC) mortality by 80% and can be offered to those aged 30 years or older.

Major finding: After a mean follow-up of 9.2 years, 344 women developed BC and 35 died due to BC. Among women who did vs did not undergo MRI surveillance, the reduction in BC mortality risk was 80% among those with BRCA1 sequence variation (hazard ratio [HR] 0.20; P < .001) but was not significant among those with BRCA2 sequence variation.

Study details: This cohort study included 2488 women (age ≥ 30 years) with BRCA1 or BRCA2 sequence variation, of which 1756 women underwent at least one MRI screening.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others. Several authors declared receiving grants or personal fees or having other ties with various sources.

Source: Lubinski J, Kotsopoulos J, Moller P, et al, for the Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. MRI surveillance and breast cancer mortality in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence variations. JAMA Oncol. 2024 (Feb 29). doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6944 Source

Key clinical point: Among women with BRCA1 sequence variation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance reduces the risk for breast cancer (BC) mortality by 80% and can be offered to those aged 30 years or older.

Major finding: After a mean follow-up of 9.2 years, 344 women developed BC and 35 died due to BC. Among women who did vs did not undergo MRI surveillance, the reduction in BC mortality risk was 80% among those with BRCA1 sequence variation (hazard ratio [HR] 0.20; P < .001) but was not significant among those with BRCA2 sequence variation.

Study details: This cohort study included 2488 women (age ≥ 30 years) with BRCA1 or BRCA2 sequence variation, of which 1756 women underwent at least one MRI screening.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others. Several authors declared receiving grants or personal fees or having other ties with various sources.

Source: Lubinski J, Kotsopoulos J, Moller P, et al, for the Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. MRI surveillance and breast cancer mortality in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence variations. JAMA Oncol. 2024 (Feb 29). doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6944 Source

Key clinical point: Among women with BRCA1 sequence variation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance reduces the risk for breast cancer (BC) mortality by 80% and can be offered to those aged 30 years or older.

Major finding: After a mean follow-up of 9.2 years, 344 women developed BC and 35 died due to BC. Among women who did vs did not undergo MRI surveillance, the reduction in BC mortality risk was 80% among those with BRCA1 sequence variation (hazard ratio [HR] 0.20; P < .001) but was not significant among those with BRCA2 sequence variation.

Study details: This cohort study included 2488 women (age ≥ 30 years) with BRCA1 or BRCA2 sequence variation, of which 1756 women underwent at least one MRI screening.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others. Several authors declared receiving grants or personal fees or having other ties with various sources.

Source: Lubinski J, Kotsopoulos J, Moller P, et al, for the Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. MRI surveillance and breast cancer mortality in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence variations. JAMA Oncol. 2024 (Feb 29). doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6944 Source

While the increased risk of cancer in patients with metabolic syndrome is well established by research, the authors of a new study delve deeper by examining metabolic syndrome trajectories.

The new research finds that adults with persistent metabolic syndrome that worsens over time are at increased risk for any type of cancer.

The conditions that make up metabolic syndrome (high blood pressure, high blood sugar, increased abdominal adiposity, and high cholesterol and triglycerides) have been associated with an increased risk of diseases, including heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes, wrote Li Deng, PhD, of Capital Medical University, Beijing, and colleagues.

However, a single assessment of metabolic syndrome at one point in time is inadequate to show an association with cancer risk over time, they said. In the current study, the researchers used models to examine the association between trajectory patterns of metabolic syndrome over time and the risk of overall and specific cancer types. They also examined the impact of chronic inflammation concurrent with metabolic syndrome.
 

What We Know About Metabolic Syndrome and Cancer Risk

A systematic review and meta-analysis published in Diabetes Care in 2012 showed an association between the presence of metabolic syndrome and an increased risk of various cancers including liver, bladder, pancreatic, breast, and colorectal.

More recently, a 2020 study published in Diabetes showed evidence of increased risk for certain cancers (pancreatic, kidney, uterine, cervical) but no increased risk for cancer overall.

In addition, a 2022 study by some of the current study researchers of the same Chinese cohort focused on the role of inflammation in combination with metabolic syndrome on colorectal cancer specifically, and found an increased risk for cancer when both metabolic syndrome and inflammation were present.

However, the reasons for this association between metabolic syndrome and cancer remain unclear, and the effect of the fluctuating nature of metabolic syndrome over time on long-term cancer risk has not been explored, the researchers wrote.

“There is emerging evidence that even normal weight individuals who are metabolically unhealthy may be at an elevated cancer risk, and we need better metrics to define the underlying metabolic dysfunction in obesity,” Sheetal Hardikar, MBBS, PhD, MPH, an investigator at the Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, said in an interview.

Dr. Hardikar, who serves as assistant professor in the department of population health sciences at the University of Utah, was not involved in the current study. She and her colleagues published a research paper on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2023 that showed an increased risk of obesity-related cancer.
 

What New Study Adds to Related Research

Previous studies have consistently reported an approximately 30% increased risk of cancer with metabolic syndrome, Dr. Hardikar said. “What is unique about this study is the examination of metabolic syndrome trajectories over four years, and not just the presence of metabolic syndrome at one point in time,” she said.

In the new study, published in Cancer on March 11 (doi: 10.1002/cncr.35235), 44,115 adults in China were separated into four trajectories based on metabolic syndrome scores for the period from 2006 to 2010. The scores were based on clinical evidence of metabolic syndrome, defined using the International Diabetes Federation criteria of central obesity and the presence of at least two other factors including increased triglycerides, decreased HDL cholesterol, high blood pressure (or treatment for previously diagnosed hypertension), and increased fasting plasma glucose (or previous diagnosis of type 2 diabetes).

The average age of the participants was 49 years; the mean body mass index ranged from approximately 22 kg/m² in the low-stable group to approximately 28 kg/m² in the elevated-increasing group.

The four trajectories of metabolic syndrome were low-stable (10.56% of participants), moderate-low (40.84%), moderate-high (41.46%), and elevated-increasing (7.14%), based on trends from the individuals’ initial physical exams on entering the study.

Over a median follow-up period of 9.4 years (from 2010 to 2021), 2,271 cancer diagnoses were reported in the study population. Those with an elevated-increasing metabolic syndrome trajectory had 1.3 times the risk of any cancer compared with those in the low-stable group. Risk for breast cancer, endometrial cancer, kidney cancer, colorectal cancer, and liver cancer in the highest trajectory group were 2.1, 3.3, 4.5, 2.5, and 1.6 times higher, respectively, compared to the lowest group. The increased risk in the elevated-trajectory group for all cancer types persisted when the low-stable, moderate-low, and moderate-high trajectory pattern groups were combined.

The researchers also examined the impact of chronic inflammation and found that individuals with persistently high metabolic syndrome scores and concurrent chronic inflammation had the highest risks of breast, endometrial, colon, and liver cancer. However, individuals with persistently high metabolic syndrome scores and no concurrent chronic inflammation had the highest risk of kidney cancer.
 

What Are the Limitations of This Research?

The researchers of the current study acknowledged the lack of information on other causes of cancer, including dietary habits, hepatitis C infection, and Helicobacter pylori infection. Other limitations include the focus only on individuals from a single community of mainly middle-aged men in China that may not generalize to other populations.

Also, the metabolic syndrome trajectories did not change much over time, which may be related to the short 4-year study period.

Using the International Diabetes Federation criteria was another limitation, because it prevented the assessment of cancer risk in normal weight individuals with metabolic dysfunction, Dr. Hardikar noted.
 

Does Metabolic Syndrome Cause Cancer?

“This research suggests that proactive and continuous management of metabolic syndrome may serve as an essential strategy in preventing cancer,” senior author Han-Ping Shi, MD, PhD, of Capital Medical University in Beijing, noted in a statement on the study.

More research is needed to assess the impact of these interventions on cancer risk. However, the data from the current study can guide future research that may lead to more targeted treatments and more effective preventive strategies, he continued.

“Current evidence based on this study and many other reports strongly suggests an increased risk for cancer associated with metabolic syndrome,” Dr. Hardikar said in an interview. The data serve as a reminder to clinicians to look beyond BMI as the only measure of obesity, and to consider metabolic factors together to identify individuals at increased risk for cancer, she said.

“We must continue to educate patients about obesity and all the chronic conditions it may lead to, but we cannot ignore this emerging phenotype of being of normal weight but metabolically unhealthy,” Dr. Hardikar emphasized.
 

What Additional Research is Needed?

Looking ahead, “we need well-designed interventions to test causality for metabolic syndrome and cancer risk, though the evidence from the observational studies is very strong,” Dr. Hardikar said.

In addition, a consensus is needed to better define metabolic dysfunction,and to explore cancer risk in normal weight but metabolically unhealthy individuals, she said.

The study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China. The researchers and Dr. Hardikar had no financial conflicts to disclose.

While the increased risk of cancer in patients with metabolic syndrome is well established by research, the authors of a new study delve deeper by examining metabolic syndrome trajectories.

The new research finds that adults with persistent metabolic syndrome that worsens over time are at increased risk for any type of cancer.

The conditions that make up metabolic syndrome (high blood pressure, high blood sugar, increased abdominal adiposity, and high cholesterol and triglycerides) have been associated with an increased risk of diseases, including heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes, wrote Li Deng, PhD, of Capital Medical University, Beijing, and colleagues.

However, a single assessment of metabolic syndrome at one point in time is inadequate to show an association with cancer risk over time, they said. In the current study, the researchers used models to examine the association between trajectory patterns of metabolic syndrome over time and the risk of overall and specific cancer types. They also examined the impact of chronic inflammation concurrent with metabolic syndrome.
 

What We Know About Metabolic Syndrome and Cancer Risk

A systematic review and meta-analysis published in Diabetes Care in 2012 showed an association between the presence of metabolic syndrome and an increased risk of various cancers including liver, bladder, pancreatic, breast, and colorectal.

More recently, a 2020 study published in Diabetes showed evidence of increased risk for certain cancers (pancreatic, kidney, uterine, cervical) but no increased risk for cancer overall.

In addition, a 2022 study by some of the current study researchers of the same Chinese cohort focused on the role of inflammation in combination with metabolic syndrome on colorectal cancer specifically, and found an increased risk for cancer when both metabolic syndrome and inflammation were present.

However, the reasons for this association between metabolic syndrome and cancer remain unclear, and the effect of the fluctuating nature of metabolic syndrome over time on long-term cancer risk has not been explored, the researchers wrote.

“There is emerging evidence that even normal weight individuals who are metabolically unhealthy may be at an elevated cancer risk, and we need better metrics to define the underlying metabolic dysfunction in obesity,” Sheetal Hardikar, MBBS, PhD, MPH, an investigator at the Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, said in an interview.

Dr. Hardikar, who serves as assistant professor in the department of population health sciences at the University of Utah, was not involved in the current study. She and her colleagues published a research paper on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2023 that showed an increased risk of obesity-related cancer.
 

What New Study Adds to Related Research

Previous studies have consistently reported an approximately 30% increased risk of cancer with metabolic syndrome, Dr. Hardikar said. “What is unique about this study is the examination of metabolic syndrome trajectories over four years, and not just the presence of metabolic syndrome at one point in time,” she said.

In the new study, published in Cancer on March 11 (doi: 10.1002/cncr.35235), 44,115 adults in China were separated into four trajectories based on metabolic syndrome scores for the period from 2006 to 2010. The scores were based on clinical evidence of metabolic syndrome, defined using the International Diabetes Federation criteria of central obesity and the presence of at least two other factors including increased triglycerides, decreased HDL cholesterol, high blood pressure (or treatment for previously diagnosed hypertension), and increased fasting plasma glucose (or previous diagnosis of type 2 diabetes).

The average age of the participants was 49 years; the mean body mass index ranged from approximately 22 kg/m² in the low-stable group to approximately 28 kg/m² in the elevated-increasing group.

The four trajectories of metabolic syndrome were low-stable (10.56% of participants), moderate-low (40.84%), moderate-high (41.46%), and elevated-increasing (7.14%), based on trends from the individuals’ initial physical exams on entering the study.

Over a median follow-up period of 9.4 years (from 2010 to 2021), 2,271 cancer diagnoses were reported in the study population. Those with an elevated-increasing metabolic syndrome trajectory had 1.3 times the risk of any cancer compared with those in the low-stable group. Risk for breast cancer, endometrial cancer, kidney cancer, colorectal cancer, and liver cancer in the highest trajectory group were 2.1, 3.3, 4.5, 2.5, and 1.6 times higher, respectively, compared to the lowest group. The increased risk in the elevated-trajectory group for all cancer types persisted when the low-stable, moderate-low, and moderate-high trajectory pattern groups were combined.

The researchers also examined the impact of chronic inflammation and found that individuals with persistently high metabolic syndrome scores and concurrent chronic inflammation had the highest risks of breast, endometrial, colon, and liver cancer. However, individuals with persistently high metabolic syndrome scores and no concurrent chronic inflammation had the highest risk of kidney cancer.
 

What Are the Limitations of This Research?

The researchers of the current study acknowledged the lack of information on other causes of cancer, including dietary habits, hepatitis C infection, and Helicobacter pylori infection. Other limitations include the focus only on individuals from a single community of mainly middle-aged men in China that may not generalize to other populations.

Also, the metabolic syndrome trajectories did not change much over time, which may be related to the short 4-year study period.

Using the International Diabetes Federation criteria was another limitation, because it prevented the assessment of cancer risk in normal weight individuals with metabolic dysfunction, Dr. Hardikar noted.
 

Does Metabolic Syndrome Cause Cancer?

“This research suggests that proactive and continuous management of metabolic syndrome may serve as an essential strategy in preventing cancer,” senior author Han-Ping Shi, MD, PhD, of Capital Medical University in Beijing, noted in a statement on the study.

More research is needed to assess the impact of these interventions on cancer risk. However, the data from the current study can guide future research that may lead to more targeted treatments and more effective preventive strategies, he continued.

“Current evidence based on this study and many other reports strongly suggests an increased risk for cancer associated with metabolic syndrome,” Dr. Hardikar said in an interview. The data serve as a reminder to clinicians to look beyond BMI as the only measure of obesity, and to consider metabolic factors together to identify individuals at increased risk for cancer, she said.

“We must continue to educate patients about obesity and all the chronic conditions it may lead to, but we cannot ignore this emerging phenotype of being of normal weight but metabolically unhealthy,” Dr. Hardikar emphasized.
 

What Additional Research is Needed?

Looking ahead, “we need well-designed interventions to test causality for metabolic syndrome and cancer risk, though the evidence from the observational studies is very strong,” Dr. Hardikar said.

In addition, a consensus is needed to better define metabolic dysfunction,and to explore cancer risk in normal weight but metabolically unhealthy individuals, she said.

The study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China. The researchers and Dr. Hardikar had no financial conflicts to disclose.

While the increased risk of cancer in patients with metabolic syndrome is well established by research, the authors of a new study delve deeper by examining metabolic syndrome trajectories.

The new research finds that adults with persistent metabolic syndrome that worsens over time are at increased risk for any type of cancer.

The conditions that make up metabolic syndrome (high blood pressure, high blood sugar, increased abdominal adiposity, and high cholesterol and triglycerides) have been associated with an increased risk of diseases, including heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes, wrote Li Deng, PhD, of Capital Medical University, Beijing, and colleagues.

However, a single assessment of metabolic syndrome at one point in time is inadequate to show an association with cancer risk over time, they said. In the current study, the researchers used models to examine the association between trajectory patterns of metabolic syndrome over time and the risk of overall and specific cancer types. They also examined the impact of chronic inflammation concurrent with metabolic syndrome.
 

What We Know About Metabolic Syndrome and Cancer Risk

A systematic review and meta-analysis published in Diabetes Care in 2012 showed an association between the presence of metabolic syndrome and an increased risk of various cancers including liver, bladder, pancreatic, breast, and colorectal.

More recently, a 2020 study published in Diabetes showed evidence of increased risk for certain cancers (pancreatic, kidney, uterine, cervical) but no increased risk for cancer overall.

In addition, a 2022 study by some of the current study researchers of the same Chinese cohort focused on the role of inflammation in combination with metabolic syndrome on colorectal cancer specifically, and found an increased risk for cancer when both metabolic syndrome and inflammation were present.

However, the reasons for this association between metabolic syndrome and cancer remain unclear, and the effect of the fluctuating nature of metabolic syndrome over time on long-term cancer risk has not been explored, the researchers wrote.

“There is emerging evidence that even normal weight individuals who are metabolically unhealthy may be at an elevated cancer risk, and we need better metrics to define the underlying metabolic dysfunction in obesity,” Sheetal Hardikar, MBBS, PhD, MPH, an investigator at the Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, said in an interview.

Dr. Hardikar, who serves as assistant professor in the department of population health sciences at the University of Utah, was not involved in the current study. She and her colleagues published a research paper on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2023 that showed an increased risk of obesity-related cancer.
 

What New Study Adds to Related Research

Previous studies have consistently reported an approximately 30% increased risk of cancer with metabolic syndrome, Dr. Hardikar said. “What is unique about this study is the examination of metabolic syndrome trajectories over four years, and not just the presence of metabolic syndrome at one point in time,” she said.

In the new study, published in Cancer on March 11 (doi: 10.1002/cncr.35235), 44,115 adults in China were separated into four trajectories based on metabolic syndrome scores for the period from 2006 to 2010. The scores were based on clinical evidence of metabolic syndrome, defined using the International Diabetes Federation criteria of central obesity and the presence of at least two other factors including increased triglycerides, decreased HDL cholesterol, high blood pressure (or treatment for previously diagnosed hypertension), and increased fasting plasma glucose (or previous diagnosis of type 2 diabetes).

The average age of the participants was 49 years; the mean body mass index ranged from approximately 22 kg/m² in the low-stable group to approximately 28 kg/m² in the elevated-increasing group.

The four trajectories of metabolic syndrome were low-stable (10.56% of participants), moderate-low (40.84%), moderate-high (41.46%), and elevated-increasing (7.14%), based on trends from the individuals’ initial physical exams on entering the study.

Over a median follow-up period of 9.4 years (from 2010 to 2021), 2,271 cancer diagnoses were reported in the study population. Those with an elevated-increasing metabolic syndrome trajectory had 1.3 times the risk of any cancer compared with those in the low-stable group. Risk for breast cancer, endometrial cancer, kidney cancer, colorectal cancer, and liver cancer in the highest trajectory group were 2.1, 3.3, 4.5, 2.5, and 1.6 times higher, respectively, compared to the lowest group. The increased risk in the elevated-trajectory group for all cancer types persisted when the low-stable, moderate-low, and moderate-high trajectory pattern groups were combined.

The researchers also examined the impact of chronic inflammation and found that individuals with persistently high metabolic syndrome scores and concurrent chronic inflammation had the highest risks of breast, endometrial, colon, and liver cancer. However, individuals with persistently high metabolic syndrome scores and no concurrent chronic inflammation had the highest risk of kidney cancer.
 

What Are the Limitations of This Research?

The researchers of the current study acknowledged the lack of information on other causes of cancer, including dietary habits, hepatitis C infection, and Helicobacter pylori infection. Other limitations include the focus only on individuals from a single community of mainly middle-aged men in China that may not generalize to other populations.

Also, the metabolic syndrome trajectories did not change much over time, which may be related to the short 4-year study period.

Using the International Diabetes Federation criteria was another limitation, because it prevented the assessment of cancer risk in normal weight individuals with metabolic dysfunction, Dr. Hardikar noted.
 

Does Metabolic Syndrome Cause Cancer?

“This research suggests that proactive and continuous management of metabolic syndrome may serve as an essential strategy in preventing cancer,” senior author Han-Ping Shi, MD, PhD, of Capital Medical University in Beijing, noted in a statement on the study.

More research is needed to assess the impact of these interventions on cancer risk. However, the data from the current study can guide future research that may lead to more targeted treatments and more effective preventive strategies, he continued.

“Current evidence based on this study and many other reports strongly suggests an increased risk for cancer associated with metabolic syndrome,” Dr. Hardikar said in an interview. The data serve as a reminder to clinicians to look beyond BMI as the only measure of obesity, and to consider metabolic factors together to identify individuals at increased risk for cancer, she said.

“We must continue to educate patients about obesity and all the chronic conditions it may lead to, but we cannot ignore this emerging phenotype of being of normal weight but metabolically unhealthy,” Dr. Hardikar emphasized.
 

What Additional Research is Needed?

Looking ahead, “we need well-designed interventions to test causality for metabolic syndrome and cancer risk, though the evidence from the observational studies is very strong,” Dr. Hardikar said.

In addition, a consensus is needed to better define metabolic dysfunction,and to explore cancer risk in normal weight but metabolically unhealthy individuals, she said.

The study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China. The researchers and Dr. Hardikar had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Key clinical point: Increased cytokine S100A8/9 expression on the skin surface in infants with a high risk for atopic dermatitis (AD) at 2 months with filaggrin wild genotype (FLGwt), but not filaggrin loss-of-function mutations (FLGmut), is predictive of AD development and persistence in the first year of life.

Major finding: Increased S100A8/9 titers detected in skin swabs of the antecubital fossa at 8 weeks in infants with FLGwt, but not in those with FLGmut, were associated with AD development in the first year of life (P = .033) and AD persistence of between 6 and 12 months of age (P < .001).

Study details: This single-center study included 86 infants from the STOP AD trial who had at least one parent with a history of AD, asthma, or allergic rhinitis and had either FLGwt or FLGmut.

Disclosures: The cost of the sample analysis was funded by Janssen R&D and Johnson & Johnson Santé Beauté France and the product used in the study was provided by Johnson & Johnson Santé Beauté France. Six authors declared being employees of or having other ties with the Johnson & Johnson family of companies and others. Two authors are coauthors on a patent application in relation to the STOP-AD study. No declaration of conflicting interests was made by CNC.

Source: Stamatas GN, Sato T, Ni Chaoimh C, et al. Early skin inflammatory biomarker is predictive of development and persistence of atopic dermatitis in infants. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 (Mar 7). doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.02.018 Source

Key clinical point: Increased cytokine S100A8/9 expression on the skin surface in infants with a high risk for atopic dermatitis (AD) at 2 months with filaggrin wild genotype (FLGwt), but not filaggrin loss-of-function mutations (FLGmut), is predictive of AD development and persistence in the first year of life.

Major finding: Increased S100A8/9 titers detected in skin swabs of the antecubital fossa at 8 weeks in infants with FLGwt, but not in those with FLGmut, were associated with AD development in the first year of life (P = .033) and AD persistence of between 6 and 12 months of age (P < .001).

Study details: This single-center study included 86 infants from the STOP AD trial who had at least one parent with a history of AD, asthma, or allergic rhinitis and had either FLGwt or FLGmut.

Disclosures: The cost of the sample analysis was funded by Janssen R&D and Johnson & Johnson Santé Beauté France and the product used in the study was provided by Johnson & Johnson Santé Beauté France. Six authors declared being employees of or having other ties with the Johnson & Johnson family of companies and others. Two authors are coauthors on a patent application in relation to the STOP-AD study. No declaration of conflicting interests was made by CNC.

Source: Stamatas GN, Sato T, Ni Chaoimh C, et al. Early skin inflammatory biomarker is predictive of development and persistence of atopic dermatitis in infants. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 (Mar 7). doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.02.018 Source

Key clinical point: Increased cytokine S100A8/9 expression on the skin surface in infants with a high risk for atopic dermatitis (AD) at 2 months with filaggrin wild genotype (FLGwt), but not filaggrin loss-of-function mutations (FLGmut), is predictive of AD development and persistence in the first year of life.

Major finding: Increased S100A8/9 titers detected in skin swabs of the antecubital fossa at 8 weeks in infants with FLGwt, but not in those with FLGmut, were associated with AD development in the first year of life (P = .033) and AD persistence of between 6 and 12 months of age (P < .001).

Study details: This single-center study included 86 infants from the STOP AD trial who had at least one parent with a history of AD, asthma, or allergic rhinitis and had either FLGwt or FLGmut.

Disclosures: The cost of the sample analysis was funded by Janssen R&D and Johnson & Johnson Santé Beauté France and the product used in the study was provided by Johnson & Johnson Santé Beauté France. Six authors declared being employees of or having other ties with the Johnson & Johnson family of companies and others. Two authors are coauthors on a patent application in relation to the STOP-AD study. No declaration of conflicting interests was made by CNC.

Source: Stamatas GN, Sato T, Ni Chaoimh C, et al. Early skin inflammatory biomarker is predictive of development and persistence of atopic dermatitis in infants. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 (Mar 7). doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.02.018 Source

Key clinical point: Safety is the most valued treatment attribute for adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), followed by the mode of administration, whereas monitoring requirements is the least critical attribute.

Major finding: The risk for severe adverse events emerged as the most important attribute (coefficient 0.42; 95% CI 0.36-0.49), followed by the ease of treatment administration with daily oral pills vs biweekly injections (coefficient 0.41, 95% CI 0.35-0.48). Avoiding monitoring for severe adverse events was the least critical attribute (coefficient 0.02; 95% CI −0.03 to 0.07).

Study details: This study included 713 adults with moderate-to-severe AD having Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure scores > 7 or current or prior exposure to systemic treatment who completed the online discrete choice experiment survey for treatment preferences in AD.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by LEO Pharma. Five authors declared being employees of LEO Pharma or EY Economics Denmark, a paid vendor of LEO Pharma. Some authors declared serving as advisors, consultants, etc., for or receiving research grants, etc., from LEO Pharma and others.

Source: Ameen M, Alhusayen R, Brandi H, et al. Patient preferences in the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 (Feb 21). doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.19454 Source

Key clinical point: Safety is the most valued treatment attribute for adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), followed by the mode of administration, whereas monitoring requirements is the least critical attribute.

Major finding: The risk for severe adverse events emerged as the most important attribute (coefficient 0.42; 95% CI 0.36-0.49), followed by the ease of treatment administration with daily oral pills vs biweekly injections (coefficient 0.41, 95% CI 0.35-0.48). Avoiding monitoring for severe adverse events was the least critical attribute (coefficient 0.02; 95% CI −0.03 to 0.07).

Study details: This study included 713 adults with moderate-to-severe AD having Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure scores > 7 or current or prior exposure to systemic treatment who completed the online discrete choice experiment survey for treatment preferences in AD.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by LEO Pharma. Five authors declared being employees of LEO Pharma or EY Economics Denmark, a paid vendor of LEO Pharma. Some authors declared serving as advisors, consultants, etc., for or receiving research grants, etc., from LEO Pharma and others.

Source: Ameen M, Alhusayen R, Brandi H, et al. Patient preferences in the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 (Feb 21). doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.19454 Source

Key clinical point: Safety is the most valued treatment attribute for adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), followed by the mode of administration, whereas monitoring requirements is the least critical attribute.

Major finding: The risk for severe adverse events emerged as the most important attribute (coefficient 0.42; 95% CI 0.36-0.49), followed by the ease of treatment administration with daily oral pills vs biweekly injections (coefficient 0.41, 95% CI 0.35-0.48). Avoiding monitoring for severe adverse events was the least critical attribute (coefficient 0.02; 95% CI −0.03 to 0.07).

Study details: This study included 713 adults with moderate-to-severe AD having Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure scores > 7 or current or prior exposure to systemic treatment who completed the online discrete choice experiment survey for treatment preferences in AD.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by LEO Pharma. Five authors declared being employees of LEO Pharma or EY Economics Denmark, a paid vendor of LEO Pharma. Some authors declared serving as advisors, consultants, etc., for or receiving research grants, etc., from LEO Pharma and others.

Source: Ameen M, Alhusayen R, Brandi H, et al. Patient preferences in the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 (Feb 21). doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.19454 Source

Key clinical point: Abrocitinib is safe and effective in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) in daily practice, regardless of their previous inadequate response to upadacitinib or dupilumab.

Major finding: At week 28, 57.6% of patients achieved a ≥75% reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores. At week 16, no significant difference was observed in the EASI scores between nonresponders and patients naive or responsive to upadacitinib or dupilumab (all P > .05). Most adverse events (81.6%) were mild in severity.

Study details: This multicenter prospective study included 103 patients with AD from the BioDay registry who did or did not exhibit adequate response to previous dupilumab or upadacitinib treatment and received abrocitinib for ≤28 weeks.

Disclosures: The BioDay registry was sponsored by Eli Lilly, Sanofi Genzyme, Leo Pharma, AbbVie, and Pfizer. Seven authors reported being consultants, speakers, etc., for or having other ties with various sources, including the aforementioned organizations. The other authors had nothing to disclose.

Source: Kamphuis E, Boesjes CM, Loman L, et al. Real-world experience of abrocitinib treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis and hand eczema: Up to 28-week results from the BioDay Registry. Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 (Feb 7). Doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.19454 Source

Key clinical point: Abrocitinib is safe and effective in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) in daily practice, regardless of their previous inadequate response to upadacitinib or dupilumab.

Major finding: At week 28, 57.6% of patients achieved a ≥75% reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores. At week 16, no significant difference was observed in the EASI scores between nonresponders and patients naive or responsive to upadacitinib or dupilumab (all P > .05). Most adverse events (81.6%) were mild in severity.

Study details: This multicenter prospective study included 103 patients with AD from the BioDay registry who did or did not exhibit adequate response to previous dupilumab or upadacitinib treatment and received abrocitinib for ≤28 weeks.

Disclosures: The BioDay registry was sponsored by Eli Lilly, Sanofi Genzyme, Leo Pharma, AbbVie, and Pfizer. Seven authors reported being consultants, speakers, etc., for or having other ties with various sources, including the aforementioned organizations. The other authors had nothing to disclose.

Source: Kamphuis E, Boesjes CM, Loman L, et al. Real-world experience of abrocitinib treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis and hand eczema: Up to 28-week results from the BioDay Registry. Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 (Feb 7). Doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.19454 Source

Key clinical point: Abrocitinib is safe and effective in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) in daily practice, regardless of their previous inadequate response to upadacitinib or dupilumab.

Major finding: At week 28, 57.6% of patients achieved a ≥75% reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores. At week 16, no significant difference was observed in the EASI scores between nonresponders and patients naive or responsive to upadacitinib or dupilumab (all P > .05). Most adverse events (81.6%) were mild in severity.

Study details: This multicenter prospective study included 103 patients with AD from the BioDay registry who did or did not exhibit adequate response to previous dupilumab or upadacitinib treatment and received abrocitinib for ≤28 weeks.

Disclosures: The BioDay registry was sponsored by Eli Lilly, Sanofi Genzyme, Leo Pharma, AbbVie, and Pfizer. Seven authors reported being consultants, speakers, etc., for or having other ties with various sources, including the aforementioned organizations. The other authors had nothing to disclose.

Source: Kamphuis E, Boesjes CM, Loman L, et al. Real-world experience of abrocitinib treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis and hand eczema: Up to 28-week results from the BioDay Registry. Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 (Feb 7). Doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.19454 Source