Key clinical point: A diet containing red meat did not have any significant effect on most glycemic and insulinemic risk factors associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but it led to a significant reduction in postprandial glucose level compared with a diet containing less or no red meat.

Major finding: A diet with vs without or less meat had no significant effect on insulin sensitivity (standardized mean difference [SMD] −0.11; 95% CI −0.39 to 0.16), insulin resistance (SMD 0.11; 95% CI −0.24 to 0.45), fasting glucose level (SMD 0.13; 95% CI −0.04 to 0.29), and fasting insulin level (SMD 0.08; 95% CI −0.16 to 0.32), but it significantly reduced the postprandial glucose level (SMD −0.44; P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials that evaluated the association between red meat intake and T2D risk.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the Beef Checkoff. Three authors declared being employees of Midwest Biomedical Research (USA), which received research funding from Beef Checkoff and National Pork Board.

Source: Sanders LM et al. Red meat consumption and risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022 (May 5). Doi: 10.1038/s41430-022-01150-1

Key clinical point: A diet containing red meat did not have any significant effect on most glycemic and insulinemic risk factors associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but it led to a significant reduction in postprandial glucose level compared with a diet containing less or no red meat.

Major finding: A diet with vs without or less meat had no significant effect on insulin sensitivity (standardized mean difference [SMD] −0.11; 95% CI −0.39 to 0.16), insulin resistance (SMD 0.11; 95% CI −0.24 to 0.45), fasting glucose level (SMD 0.13; 95% CI −0.04 to 0.29), and fasting insulin level (SMD 0.08; 95% CI −0.16 to 0.32), but it significantly reduced the postprandial glucose level (SMD −0.44; P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials that evaluated the association between red meat intake and T2D risk.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the Beef Checkoff. Three authors declared being employees of Midwest Biomedical Research (USA), which received research funding from Beef Checkoff and National Pork Board.

Source: Sanders LM et al. Red meat consumption and risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022 (May 5). Doi: 10.1038/s41430-022-01150-1

Key clinical point: A diet containing red meat did not have any significant effect on most glycemic and insulinemic risk factors associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but it led to a significant reduction in postprandial glucose level compared with a diet containing less or no red meat.

Major finding: A diet with vs without or less meat had no significant effect on insulin sensitivity (standardized mean difference [SMD] −0.11; 95% CI −0.39 to 0.16), insulin resistance (SMD 0.11; 95% CI −0.24 to 0.45), fasting glucose level (SMD 0.13; 95% CI −0.04 to 0.29), and fasting insulin level (SMD 0.08; 95% CI −0.16 to 0.32), but it significantly reduced the postprandial glucose level (SMD −0.44; P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials that evaluated the association between red meat intake and T2D risk.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the Beef Checkoff. Three authors declared being employees of Midwest Biomedical Research (USA), which received research funding from Beef Checkoff and National Pork Board.

Source: Sanders LM et al. Red meat consumption and risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022 (May 5). Doi: 10.1038/s41430-022-01150-1

Key clinical point: Cotadutide vs placebo was safe and effective in reducing body weight, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level, and fasting plasma glucose level in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and overweight or obesity.

Major finding: Percent decrease in body weight (mean difference [MD] 3.31; 95% CI 2.76-3.38) and glucose area under the plasma concentration curve (MD 30.15; 95% CI 23.18-37.12) and reduction in HbA1c (MD 0.68; 95% CI 0.58-0.79) and fasting plasma glucose (MD 31.31 mg/dL; 95% CI 22.59-40.04) levels over time were higher with cotadutide than placebo. Treatment-emergent serious adverse events were not significantly different between the treatment groups.

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials including 1259 patients with T2D (body mass index 22-40 kg/m²) who received cotadutide (n = 890), placebo (n = 259), or other interventions (n = 110).

Disclosures: The study was funded by the Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Ali MM et al. Impact of Cotadutide drug on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Endocr Disord. 2022;22:113 (Apr 29). Doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01031-5

Key clinical point: Cotadutide vs placebo was safe and effective in reducing body weight, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level, and fasting plasma glucose level in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and overweight or obesity.

Major finding: Percent decrease in body weight (mean difference [MD] 3.31; 95% CI 2.76-3.38) and glucose area under the plasma concentration curve (MD 30.15; 95% CI 23.18-37.12) and reduction in HbA1c (MD 0.68; 95% CI 0.58-0.79) and fasting plasma glucose (MD 31.31 mg/dL; 95% CI 22.59-40.04) levels over time were higher with cotadutide than placebo. Treatment-emergent serious adverse events were not significantly different between the treatment groups.

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials including 1259 patients with T2D (body mass index 22-40 kg/m²) who received cotadutide (n = 890), placebo (n = 259), or other interventions (n = 110).

Disclosures: The study was funded by the Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Ali MM et al. Impact of Cotadutide drug on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Endocr Disord. 2022;22:113 (Apr 29). Doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01031-5

Key clinical point: Cotadutide vs placebo was safe and effective in reducing body weight, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level, and fasting plasma glucose level in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and overweight or obesity.

Major finding: Percent decrease in body weight (mean difference [MD] 3.31; 95% CI 2.76-3.38) and glucose area under the plasma concentration curve (MD 30.15; 95% CI 23.18-37.12) and reduction in HbA1c (MD 0.68; 95% CI 0.58-0.79) and fasting plasma glucose (MD 31.31 mg/dL; 95% CI 22.59-40.04) levels over time were higher with cotadutide than placebo. Treatment-emergent serious adverse events were not significantly different between the treatment groups.

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials including 1259 patients with T2D (body mass index 22-40 kg/m²) who received cotadutide (n = 890), placebo (n = 259), or other interventions (n = 110).

Disclosures: The study was funded by the Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Ali MM et al. Impact of Cotadutide drug on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Endocr Disord. 2022;22:113 (Apr 29). Doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01031-5

Key clinical point: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) for ≥10 years, metformin use vs no use was significantly associated with a lower risk for any and early age-related macular degeneration (AMD) but not late AMD.

Major finding: A significant association was observed between metformin use and any AMD (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.24) and early AMD (aOR 0.17; both P < .0001), but not late AMD (P = .0619). Prolonged use (>5 years) and high cumulative dose (>3500 g) of metformin reduced AMD risk (P_trend = .0007).

Study details: This retrospective study included 324 patients aged ≥50 years diagnosed with T2D for ≥10 years, of which 209 were metformin users and 115 were metformin nonusers.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Hospital Youth Research Fund of China-Japan

Friendship Hospital and Beijing University of Chemical Technology-China-Japan Friendship Hospital Biomedical Translational Engineering Research Center Joint Fund. The authors declared no competing interests.

Source: Jiang J et al. Association between metformin use and the risk of age-related macular degeneration in patients with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective study. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e054420 (Apr 26). Doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054420

Key clinical point: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) for ≥10 years, metformin use vs no use was significantly associated with a lower risk for any and early age-related macular degeneration (AMD) but not late AMD.

Major finding: A significant association was observed between metformin use and any AMD (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.24) and early AMD (aOR 0.17; both P < .0001), but not late AMD (P = .0619). Prolonged use (>5 years) and high cumulative dose (>3500 g) of metformin reduced AMD risk (P_trend = .0007).

Study details: This retrospective study included 324 patients aged ≥50 years diagnosed with T2D for ≥10 years, of which 209 were metformin users and 115 were metformin nonusers.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Hospital Youth Research Fund of China-Japan

Friendship Hospital and Beijing University of Chemical Technology-China-Japan Friendship Hospital Biomedical Translational Engineering Research Center Joint Fund. The authors declared no competing interests.

Source: Jiang J et al. Association between metformin use and the risk of age-related macular degeneration in patients with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective study. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e054420 (Apr 26). Doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054420

Key clinical point: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) for ≥10 years, metformin use vs no use was significantly associated with a lower risk for any and early age-related macular degeneration (AMD) but not late AMD.

Major finding: A significant association was observed between metformin use and any AMD (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.24) and early AMD (aOR 0.17; both P < .0001), but not late AMD (P = .0619). Prolonged use (>5 years) and high cumulative dose (>3500 g) of metformin reduced AMD risk (P_trend = .0007).

Study details: This retrospective study included 324 patients aged ≥50 years diagnosed with T2D for ≥10 years, of which 209 were metformin users and 115 were metformin nonusers.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Hospital Youth Research Fund of China-Japan

Friendship Hospital and Beijing University of Chemical Technology-China-Japan Friendship Hospital Biomedical Translational Engineering Research Center Joint Fund. The authors declared no competing interests.

Source: Jiang J et al. Association between metformin use and the risk of age-related macular degeneration in patients with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective study. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e054420 (Apr 26). Doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054420

Key clinical point: Patients with first-ever stroke and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) who receive metformin treatment (MT) show lower stroke severity, case fatality, and disability rates.

Major finding: MT vs non-MT group had a lower rate of in-hospital case fatality (odds ratio [OR] 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.84), 12-month case fatality (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.50-0.88), and 12-month disability (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.70-0.95).

Study details: The data come from a prospective, hospital-based cohort study including 7587 patients with first-ever stroke and T2D, of which 3593 (47.36%) received MT (MT group) and 3994 (52.64%) did not receive MT (non-MT group).

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Major Public Health Service Projects, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Science, Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, among others. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Tu WJ et al. Metformin use is associated with low risk of case fatality and disability rates in first-ever stroke patients with type 2 diabetes. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022 (Apr 19). Doi: 10.1177/20406223221076894

Key clinical point: Patients with first-ever stroke and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) who receive metformin treatment (MT) show lower stroke severity, case fatality, and disability rates.

Major finding: MT vs non-MT group had a lower rate of in-hospital case fatality (odds ratio [OR] 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.84), 12-month case fatality (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.50-0.88), and 12-month disability (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.70-0.95).

Study details: The data come from a prospective, hospital-based cohort study including 7587 patients with first-ever stroke and T2D, of which 3593 (47.36%) received MT (MT group) and 3994 (52.64%) did not receive MT (non-MT group).

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Major Public Health Service Projects, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Science, Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, among others. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Tu WJ et al. Metformin use is associated with low risk of case fatality and disability rates in first-ever stroke patients with type 2 diabetes. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022 (Apr 19). Doi: 10.1177/20406223221076894

Key clinical point: Patients with first-ever stroke and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) who receive metformin treatment (MT) show lower stroke severity, case fatality, and disability rates.

Major finding: MT vs non-MT group had a lower rate of in-hospital case fatality (odds ratio [OR] 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.84), 12-month case fatality (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.50-0.88), and 12-month disability (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.70-0.95).

Study details: The data come from a prospective, hospital-based cohort study including 7587 patients with first-ever stroke and T2D, of which 3593 (47.36%) received MT (MT group) and 3994 (52.64%) did not receive MT (non-MT group).

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Major Public Health Service Projects, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Science, Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, among others. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Tu WJ et al. Metformin use is associated with low risk of case fatality and disability rates in first-ever stroke patients with type 2 diabetes. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022 (Apr 19). Doi: 10.1177/20406223221076894

Key clinical point: Body weight gain and loss are significantly associated with a higher risk for hip fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), irrespective of the body mass index.

Major finding: Compared with stable weight, body weight loss of ≥10% (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.605; 95% CI 1.493-1.725) and 5%-10% (aHR 1.237; 95% CI 1.177-1.300) and gain of ≥10% (aHR 1.457; 95% CI 1.318-1.612) and 5%-≤10% (aHR 1.234; 95% CI 1.156-1.318) were associated with a higher risk for hip fracture.

Study details: Findings are from a nationwide cohort study including 1,447,579 patients aged >40 years with T2D who reported 11,848 hip fracture events.

Disclosures: The study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korean government. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Lee SW et al. Weight change and the risk of hip fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes: A nationwide cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 2022 (Apr 19). Doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06398-8

Key clinical point: Body weight gain and loss are significantly associated with a higher risk for hip fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), irrespective of the body mass index.

Major finding: Compared with stable weight, body weight loss of ≥10% (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.605; 95% CI 1.493-1.725) and 5%-10% (aHR 1.237; 95% CI 1.177-1.300) and gain of ≥10% (aHR 1.457; 95% CI 1.318-1.612) and 5%-≤10% (aHR 1.234; 95% CI 1.156-1.318) were associated with a higher risk for hip fracture.

Study details: Findings are from a nationwide cohort study including 1,447,579 patients aged >40 years with T2D who reported 11,848 hip fracture events.

Disclosures: The study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korean government. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Lee SW et al. Weight change and the risk of hip fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes: A nationwide cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 2022 (Apr 19). Doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06398-8

Key clinical point: Body weight gain and loss are significantly associated with a higher risk for hip fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), irrespective of the body mass index.

Major finding: Compared with stable weight, body weight loss of ≥10% (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.605; 95% CI 1.493-1.725) and 5%-10% (aHR 1.237; 95% CI 1.177-1.300) and gain of ≥10% (aHR 1.457; 95% CI 1.318-1.612) and 5%-≤10% (aHR 1.234; 95% CI 1.156-1.318) were associated with a higher risk for hip fracture.

Study details: Findings are from a nationwide cohort study including 1,447,579 patients aged >40 years with T2D who reported 11,848 hip fracture events.

Disclosures: The study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korean government. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Lee SW et al. Weight change and the risk of hip fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes: A nationwide cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 2022 (Apr 19). Doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06398-8

Key clinical point: Treatment intensification with quadruple therapy showed similar glucose lowering efficacy as once weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA)-based triple therapy in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). However, low C-peptide levels reduced the therapeutic efficacy of GLP-1RA therapy but not quadruple therapy.

Major finding: At 24 weeks, both quadruple and GLP-1RA-based triple therapies significantly reduced glycated hemoglobin level (both therapies: mean reduction −1.1%; P < .001); however, the glucose-lowering effects of GLP-1RA vs quadruple therapy were weaker in patients with low C-peptide levels (mean −0.1% vs −1.3%; P = .04).

Study details: Findings are from a real-world study including 96 patients with poorly controlled T2D refractory to triple oral therapy who underwent treatment intensification with quadruple oral therapy (n = 50) or once-weekly GLP-1RA-based triple therapy (n = 46).

Disclosures: The study received no specific funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kim M et al. the efficacy of treatment intensification by quadruple oral therapy compared to GLP-1RA therapy in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A real-world data study. Diabetes Metab J. 2022 (Apr 29). Doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0373

Key clinical point: Treatment intensification with quadruple therapy showed similar glucose lowering efficacy as once weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA)-based triple therapy in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). However, low C-peptide levels reduced the therapeutic efficacy of GLP-1RA therapy but not quadruple therapy.

Major finding: At 24 weeks, both quadruple and GLP-1RA-based triple therapies significantly reduced glycated hemoglobin level (both therapies: mean reduction −1.1%; P < .001); however, the glucose-lowering effects of GLP-1RA vs quadruple therapy were weaker in patients with low C-peptide levels (mean −0.1% vs −1.3%; P = .04).

Study details: Findings are from a real-world study including 96 patients with poorly controlled T2D refractory to triple oral therapy who underwent treatment intensification with quadruple oral therapy (n = 50) or once-weekly GLP-1RA-based triple therapy (n = 46).

Disclosures: The study received no specific funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kim M et al. the efficacy of treatment intensification by quadruple oral therapy compared to GLP-1RA therapy in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A real-world data study. Diabetes Metab J. 2022 (Apr 29). Doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0373

Key clinical point: Treatment intensification with quadruple therapy showed similar glucose lowering efficacy as once weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA)-based triple therapy in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). However, low C-peptide levels reduced the therapeutic efficacy of GLP-1RA therapy but not quadruple therapy.

Major finding: At 24 weeks, both quadruple and GLP-1RA-based triple therapies significantly reduced glycated hemoglobin level (both therapies: mean reduction −1.1%; P < .001); however, the glucose-lowering effects of GLP-1RA vs quadruple therapy were weaker in patients with low C-peptide levels (mean −0.1% vs −1.3%; P = .04).

Study details: Findings are from a real-world study including 96 patients with poorly controlled T2D refractory to triple oral therapy who underwent treatment intensification with quadruple oral therapy (n = 50) or once-weekly GLP-1RA-based triple therapy (n = 46).

Disclosures: The study received no specific funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kim M et al. the efficacy of treatment intensification by quadruple oral therapy compared to GLP-1RA therapy in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A real-world data study. Diabetes Metab J. 2022 (Apr 29). Doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0373

Key clinical point: Prolonged treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is associated with a higher risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D), thus unnecessary prescription, particularly for long-term use, should be avoided.

Major finding: The risk for T2D was higher among patients receiving PPI for 8 weeks to 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 1.19; 95% CI 1.15-1.24), 6 months to 2 years (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.38-1.49), and >2 years (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.49-1.64) than those receiving PPI for <8 weeks (P_trend < .001), particularly among younger patients and those with worse clinical complexity.

Study details: Findings are from a nested case-control study including 777,420 patients aged ≥40 years who received PPI, of which 50,535 were diagnosed with T2D and matched with control participants.

Disclosures: The study was funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research. G Corrao declared being an advisory board member, receiving research support, and participating in numerous projects funded by various sources.

Source: Ciardullo S et al. Prolonged use of proton pump inhibitors and risk of type 2 diabetes: Results from a large population-based nested case-control study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 (Apr 16). Doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac231

Key clinical point: Prolonged treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is associated with a higher risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D), thus unnecessary prescription, particularly for long-term use, should be avoided.

Major finding: The risk for T2D was higher among patients receiving PPI for 8 weeks to 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 1.19; 95% CI 1.15-1.24), 6 months to 2 years (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.38-1.49), and >2 years (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.49-1.64) than those receiving PPI for <8 weeks (P_trend < .001), particularly among younger patients and those with worse clinical complexity.

Study details: Findings are from a nested case-control study including 777,420 patients aged ≥40 years who received PPI, of which 50,535 were diagnosed with T2D and matched with control participants.

Disclosures: The study was funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research. G Corrao declared being an advisory board member, receiving research support, and participating in numerous projects funded by various sources.

Source: Ciardullo S et al. Prolonged use of proton pump inhibitors and risk of type 2 diabetes: Results from a large population-based nested case-control study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 (Apr 16). Doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac231

Key clinical point: Prolonged treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is associated with a higher risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D), thus unnecessary prescription, particularly for long-term use, should be avoided.

Major finding: The risk for T2D was higher among patients receiving PPI for 8 weeks to 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 1.19; 95% CI 1.15-1.24), 6 months to 2 years (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.38-1.49), and >2 years (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.49-1.64) than those receiving PPI for <8 weeks (P_trend < .001), particularly among younger patients and those with worse clinical complexity.

Study details: Findings are from a nested case-control study including 777,420 patients aged ≥40 years who received PPI, of which 50,535 were diagnosed with T2D and matched with control participants.

Disclosures: The study was funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research. G Corrao declared being an advisory board member, receiving research support, and participating in numerous projects funded by various sources.

Source: Ciardullo S et al. Prolonged use of proton pump inhibitors and risk of type 2 diabetes: Results from a large population-based nested case-control study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 (Apr 16). Doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac231

Key clinical point: Treatment intensification with 300 units/mL insulin glargine (Gla-300) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) receiving glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) significantly improved glycemic control without increasing the risk for hypoglycemia.

Major finding: Addition of Gla-300 to GLP-1 RA therapy significantly reduced glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level (mean change −0.97% ± 1.6%; P < .0001) and significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving glycemic control (HbA1c <7.0%: change 17.34%; HbA1c <8.0%: change 31.73%; both P < .001), with no significant changes in overall incidence or event rate of hypoglycemia.

Study details: The data come from a retrospective analysis of 271 insulin-naive patients with T2D receiving GLP-1 RA who underwent treatment intensification with Gla-300.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Sanofi. TS Bailey declared receiving research support and consulting and speaking honoraria from various sources, including Sanofi. C Nicholls, J Gill, and J Westerbacka declared being employees and stockholders of Sanofi.

Source: Bailey TS et al. Real-world outcomes of addition of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) to GLP-1 RA therapy in people with type 2 diabetes: The DELIVER-G study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 (May 1). Doi: 10.1111/dom.14739

Key clinical point: Treatment intensification with 300 units/mL insulin glargine (Gla-300) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) receiving glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) significantly improved glycemic control without increasing the risk for hypoglycemia.

Major finding: Addition of Gla-300 to GLP-1 RA therapy significantly reduced glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level (mean change −0.97% ± 1.6%; P < .0001) and significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving glycemic control (HbA1c <7.0%: change 17.34%; HbA1c <8.0%: change 31.73%; both P < .001), with no significant changes in overall incidence or event rate of hypoglycemia.

Study details: The data come from a retrospective analysis of 271 insulin-naive patients with T2D receiving GLP-1 RA who underwent treatment intensification with Gla-300.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Sanofi. TS Bailey declared receiving research support and consulting and speaking honoraria from various sources, including Sanofi. C Nicholls, J Gill, and J Westerbacka declared being employees and stockholders of Sanofi.

Source: Bailey TS et al. Real-world outcomes of addition of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) to GLP-1 RA therapy in people with type 2 diabetes: The DELIVER-G study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 (May 1). Doi: 10.1111/dom.14739

Key clinical point: Treatment intensification with 300 units/mL insulin glargine (Gla-300) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) receiving glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) significantly improved glycemic control without increasing the risk for hypoglycemia.

Major finding: Addition of Gla-300 to GLP-1 RA therapy significantly reduced glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level (mean change −0.97% ± 1.6%; P < .0001) and significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving glycemic control (HbA1c <7.0%: change 17.34%; HbA1c <8.0%: change 31.73%; both P < .001), with no significant changes in overall incidence or event rate of hypoglycemia.

Study details: The data come from a retrospective analysis of 271 insulin-naive patients with T2D receiving GLP-1 RA who underwent treatment intensification with Gla-300.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Sanofi. TS Bailey declared receiving research support and consulting and speaking honoraria from various sources, including Sanofi. C Nicholls, J Gill, and J Westerbacka declared being employees and stockholders of Sanofi.

Source: Bailey TS et al. Real-world outcomes of addition of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) to GLP-1 RA therapy in people with type 2 diabetes: The DELIVER-G study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 (May 1). Doi: 10.1111/dom.14739

Key clinical point: Severe hypoglycemia (SH) is associated with a greater risk for corrected QT (QTc) prolongation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), especially in younger participants (age <61.9 years), irrespective of other risk factors.

Major finding: Patients with T2D and SH had a higher risk for QTc prolongation (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.66; 95% CI 1.16-2.38), with the risk being higher in patients with 1 (aRR 1.57; 95% CI 1.04-2.39) and ≥2 (aRR 2.01; 95% CI 1.07-3.78) vs no SH episodes and the association remaining significant in younger (aRR 2.63; P = .001) but not in older (P = .170) patients.

Study details: This prospective cohort study included 8277 patients with T2D from the ACCORD study, of which 324 had ≥1 SH episodes and 517 developed QTc prolongation over a 5-year median follow-up.

Disclosures: The study received no specific funding. GC Fonarow reported being a consultant for various organizations.

Source: Kaze AD et al. Severe hypoglycemia and incidence of QT interval prolongation among adults with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 (Apr 9). Doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac195

Key clinical point: Severe hypoglycemia (SH) is associated with a greater risk for corrected QT (QTc) prolongation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), especially in younger participants (age <61.9 years), irrespective of other risk factors.

Major finding: Patients with T2D and SH had a higher risk for QTc prolongation (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.66; 95% CI 1.16-2.38), with the risk being higher in patients with 1 (aRR 1.57; 95% CI 1.04-2.39) and ≥2 (aRR 2.01; 95% CI 1.07-3.78) vs no SH episodes and the association remaining significant in younger (aRR 2.63; P = .001) but not in older (P = .170) patients.

Study details: This prospective cohort study included 8277 patients with T2D from the ACCORD study, of which 324 had ≥1 SH episodes and 517 developed QTc prolongation over a 5-year median follow-up.

Disclosures: The study received no specific funding. GC Fonarow reported being a consultant for various organizations.

Source: Kaze AD et al. Severe hypoglycemia and incidence of QT interval prolongation among adults with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 (Apr 9). Doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac195

Key clinical point: Severe hypoglycemia (SH) is associated with a greater risk for corrected QT (QTc) prolongation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), especially in younger participants (age <61.9 years), irrespective of other risk factors.

Major finding: Patients with T2D and SH had a higher risk for QTc prolongation (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.66; 95% CI 1.16-2.38), with the risk being higher in patients with 1 (aRR 1.57; 95% CI 1.04-2.39) and ≥2 (aRR 2.01; 95% CI 1.07-3.78) vs no SH episodes and the association remaining significant in younger (aRR 2.63; P = .001) but not in older (P = .170) patients.

Study details: This prospective cohort study included 8277 patients with T2D from the ACCORD study, of which 324 had ≥1 SH episodes and 517 developed QTc prolongation over a 5-year median follow-up.

Disclosures: The study received no specific funding. GC Fonarow reported being a consultant for various organizations.

Source: Kaze AD et al. Severe hypoglycemia and incidence of QT interval prolongation among adults with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 (Apr 9). Doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac195

Key clinical point: Once-weekly tirzepatide vs insulin degludec effectuates superior glycemic control, as measured by continuous glucose monitoring, in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on metformin with or without a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor.

Major finding: At 52 weeks, patients receiving 5 mg tirzepatide (estimated treatment difference [ETD] 12%; P = .031), 10 mg (ETD 24%; P < .0001), and 15 mg (ETD 25%; P < .0001) vs insulin degludec spent significantly more time in the tight target range (blood glucose concentration 71-140 mg/dL).

Study details: This substudy of the SURPASS-3 trial included 243 insulin-naive patients with type T2D inadequately controlled on metformin with or without an SGLT2 inhibitor who were randomly assigned to receive once-weekly tirzepatide (5, 10, or 15 mg; n = 188) or insulin degludec (n = 55).

Disclosures: The study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company. Two authors reported being consultants or receiving advisory board member or speaker honoraria from various sources, including Eli Lilly. The other authors are employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly.

Source: Battelino T et al. Efficacy of once-weekly tirzepatide versus once-daily insulin degludec on glycaemic control measured by continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-3 CGM): A substudy of the randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 SURPASS-3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022;10(6):407-417 (Apr 22). Doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00077-8

Key clinical point: Once-weekly tirzepatide vs insulin degludec effectuates superior glycemic control, as measured by continuous glucose monitoring, in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on metformin with or without a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor.

Major finding: At 52 weeks, patients receiving 5 mg tirzepatide (estimated treatment difference [ETD] 12%; P = .031), 10 mg (ETD 24%; P < .0001), and 15 mg (ETD 25%; P < .0001) vs insulin degludec spent significantly more time in the tight target range (blood glucose concentration 71-140 mg/dL).

Study details: This substudy of the SURPASS-3 trial included 243 insulin-naive patients with type T2D inadequately controlled on metformin with or without an SGLT2 inhibitor who were randomly assigned to receive once-weekly tirzepatide (5, 10, or 15 mg; n = 188) or insulin degludec (n = 55).

Disclosures: The study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company. Two authors reported being consultants or receiving advisory board member or speaker honoraria from various sources, including Eli Lilly. The other authors are employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly.

Source: Battelino T et al. Efficacy of once-weekly tirzepatide versus once-daily insulin degludec on glycaemic control measured by continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-3 CGM): A substudy of the randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 SURPASS-3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022;10(6):407-417 (Apr 22). Doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00077-8

Key clinical point: Once-weekly tirzepatide vs insulin degludec effectuates superior glycemic control, as measured by continuous glucose monitoring, in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on metformin with or without a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor.

Major finding: At 52 weeks, patients receiving 5 mg tirzepatide (estimated treatment difference [ETD] 12%; P = .031), 10 mg (ETD 24%; P < .0001), and 15 mg (ETD 25%; P < .0001) vs insulin degludec spent significantly more time in the tight target range (blood glucose concentration 71-140 mg/dL).

Study details: This substudy of the SURPASS-3 trial included 243 insulin-naive patients with type T2D inadequately controlled on metformin with or without an SGLT2 inhibitor who were randomly assigned to receive once-weekly tirzepatide (5, 10, or 15 mg; n = 188) or insulin degludec (n = 55).

Disclosures: The study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company. Two authors reported being consultants or receiving advisory board member or speaker honoraria from various sources, including Eli Lilly. The other authors are employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly.

Source: Battelino T et al. Efficacy of once-weekly tirzepatide versus once-daily insulin degludec on glycaemic control measured by continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-3 CGM): A substudy of the randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 SURPASS-3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022;10(6):407-417 (Apr 22). Doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00077-8