Psoriasis: Evolving treatment for a complex disease

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Psoriasis: Evolving treatment for a complex disease

Much has changed in our understanding of psoriasis over the past decade, which is having a major effect on its treatment.

Although topical corticosteroids and phototherapy remain mainstays of treatment, a variety of biologic agents have given new hope to those with the most severe forms of the disease. We are also beginning to understand that patients with psoriasis are at greater risk of cardiovascular disease, though the exact nature of that risk and how we should respond remains unclear. Finally, genome-wide association studies are just beginning to unravel the genetic basis of psoriasis.

In this paper, we review the epidemiology and impact of psoriasis, current views of its pathogenesis, its varied clinical forms, and its treatment.

PSORIASIS IMPOSES A GREAT BURDEN

Psoriasis is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from approximately 2%1 to 4.7%.2 It can manifest at any age, but it is most common in two age groups, ie, 20 to 30 years and 50 to 60 years.

For the patient, the burden is great, affecting physical, psychological, and occupational well-being. In fact, patients with psoriasis report quality-of-life impairment equal to or worse than that in patients with cancer or heart disease.3,4 Notably, functional disability secondary to psoriatic arthritis has been reported in up to 19% of psoriatic arthritis patients, and this negatively affects quality of life.5

In 2004, the annual direct medical costs of psoriasis in the United States were estimated to exceed $1 billion. Its indirect costs, measured as missed days and loss of productivity at work, are estimated to exceed the direct costs by $15 billion annually.6,7

Linked to cardiovascular and other diseases

Studies in the past 10 years have uncovered a link between psoriasis, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease.8–13 Specifically, patients with severe psoriasis are at higher risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death than control patients. Interestingly, the risk decreases with age; patients at greatest risk are young men with severe psoriasis.8–10

In a large cohort study in the United Kingdom7 comparing patients with and without psoriasis, the hazard ratio for cardiovascular death in patients with severe psoriasis was 1.57 (95% confidence interval 1.26–1.96). This translated to 3.5 excess deaths per 1,000 patient-years. These patients were also at higher risk of death from malignancies, chronic lower respiratory disease, diabetes, dementia, infection, kidney disease, and unknown causes.

How much of the risk is due to psoriasis itself, its treatments, associated behaviors, or other factors requires more study. However, some evidence points to the dysregulation of the immune system, notably chronic elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Psoriasis and its comorbid conditions are thought to arise from chronically elevated levels of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin 1 beta (IL-1 beta), and IL-17. These cytokines impair insulin signaling, deregulate lipid metabolism, and increase atherosclerotic changes in the coronary, cerebral, and peripheral arteries. In addition, several other diseases that involve the immune system occur more frequently with psoriasis, including Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis, lymphoma, obesity, and type 2 diabetes.1,8,14–18

In view of the prevalence of these comorbid conditions and the risks they pose, primary care physicians should consider screening patients with severe psoriasis for metabolic disorders and cardiovascular risk factors and promptly begin preventive therapies.19 Unfortunately, to date, there are no consensus guidelines as to the appropriate screening tests or secondary cardiovascular preventive measures for patients with severe psoriasis.

A VICIOUS CIRCLE OF INFLAMMATION AND KERATINOCYTE PROLIFERATION

The hallmark of plaque psoriasis is chronic inflammation in the skin, leading to keratinocyte proliferation.

External and internal triggers that have been identified include cutaneous injury (eg, sunburn, drug rash, viral exanthems), infections (eg, streptococcal), hypocalcemia, pregnancy, psychogenic stress, drugs (eg, lithium, interferon, beta-blockers, and antimalarials), alcohol, smoking, and obesity.20–23

As reviewed by Nestle et al,24 the initiation of lesion formation is still poorly understood but is thought to occur when a trigger (physical trauma, bacterial product, cellular stress) causes DNA to be released from keratinocytes. DNA forms a complex with the antimicrobial protein LL-37 and activates plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs) via toll-like receptor 9. Activated PDCs release type I interferons, which in turn activate myeloid dendritic cells. Myeloid dendritic cells release IL-20 locally, which speeds keratinocyte proliferation.

A subset of myeloid dendritic cells leaves the dermis and migrates to local lymph nodes, where they release IL-23 and activate naive T cells. T helper 1 (Th1) and Th17 cells are recruited to the lesions and begin producing numerous cytokines, including interferon gamma, IL-17, and IL-22. This cytokine milieu increases keratinocyte proliferation and causes the keratinocytes to secrete antimicrobial proteins (LL-37, beta defensins), chemokines, and S100 proteins. These soluble factors have three main functions: stimulation of dendritic cells to release more IL-23, recruitment of neutrophils to the epidermis, and activation of dermal fibroblasts.

This cycle of keratinocytes activating dendritic cells, dendritic cells activating T cells, and T cells activating keratinocytes appears to be the main force maintaining the disease.24 It is unclear, however, whether this applies to all forms of psoriasis or only to plaque psoriasis.

Genetic factors discovered

In recent years, genome-wide association studies have identified at least 10 psoriasis-susceptibility loci that involve functioning of the immune system.25 These genes include those of the major histocompatibility complex, cytokines, receptors, and beta-defensins.

Of specific interest, polymorphisms in the IL-12/IL-13 receptor, the p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23, and the p19 subunit of IL-23 strongly associate with psoriasis, supporting their critical role in the disease process and providing targets for medical therapy.26

 

 

PSORIASIS HAS SEVERAL CLINICAL PHENOTYPES

Psoriasis has several clinical variants, each with a distinct clinical course and response to treatment.27 Moreover, many patients present with more than one variant.

Plaque psoriasis

Figure 1. Well-demarcated erythematous, scaly plaques characteristic of plaque psoriasis on the elbow.
Plaque psoriasis (Figure 1) accounts for more than 80% of cases. It is characterized by well-demarcated, scaly, pink-to-red plaques of various sizes with a relatively symmetric distribution. Involvement of the extensor surfaces such as the elbows and knees and of the scalp, trunk, and intergluteal cleft is common.

Plaques can persist for several months to years, even in the same location, and only about 5% of patients report complete remission for up to 5 years.

Inverse psoriasis

Photo courtesy of Joseph C. English III, MD.
Figure 2. Patient with inverse psoriasis of the axilla.
Involvement of the skin folds, including the axillary, genital, perineal, intergluteal, and inframammary regions with pink-to-red plaques with minimal scale is the main clinical feature of inverse psoriasis (Figure 2). Absence of satellite pustules clinically distinguishes it from candidiasis.

Guttate psoriasis

Photo courtesy of Laura K. Ferris, MD, PhD.
Figure 3. Guttate psoriasis with characteristic erythematous, scaly papules and small plaques on the back.
Guttate psoriasis (named for its droplet-shaped lesions) presents abruptly with 1-mm to 10-mm pink papules with associated fine scale over the trunk and extremities (Figure 3). This variant occurs in fewer than 2% of patients with psoriasis, who are usually younger than 30 years. It is often preceded 2 to 3 weeks earlier by an upper respiratory tract infection with group A beta-hemolytic streptococci.

Erythrodermic psoriasis

Approximately 1% to 2.25% of all patients with psoriasis develop this severe form, affecting more than 75% of the body surface area. It presents as generalized erythema, which is the most prominent feature, and it is often associated with superficial desquamation, hair loss, nail dystrophy, and systemic symptoms such as fever, chills, malaise, or high-output cardiac failure. There may be a history of preceding characteristic psoriatic plaques, recent withdrawal of treatment (usually corticosteroids), phototoxicity, or infection.

Conversely, approximately 25% of all patients with erythroderma have underlying psoriasis.28

Pustular psoriasis

Photo courtesy of Joseph C. English III, MD.
Figure 4. Erythematous plaques studded with pustules and red-brown macules on the acral surface of the foot in palmoplantar pustulosis.
Pustular psoriasis (Figure 4) is uncommon. The predominant lesions are large collections of neutrophils in the stratum corneum that clinically present as sterile pustules. The pustules may be localized within or at the edge of existing psoriatic plaques or may present as a generalized eruption.

There are several forms of pustular psoriasis, including generalized pustular psoriasis, annular pustular psoriasis, impetigo herpetiformis (pustular psoriasis of pregnancy), and palmoplantar pustulosis. However, there is some evidence to suggest that palmoplantar pustulosis may be distinct from psoriasis.29

Several triggers have been identified, including pregnancy, rapid tapering of medications, hypocalcemia, infection, or topical irritants.

Generalized pustular psoriasis, annular pustular psoriasis, and impetigo herpetiformis often present in association with fever and other systemic symptoms and, if left untreated, can result in life-threatening complications including bacterial superinfection, sepsis, dehydration, and, in rare cases, acute respiratory distress secondary to aseptic pneumonitis.30

Placental insufficiency resulting in stillbirth or neonatal death and other fetal abnormalities can occur in severe pustular psoriasis of pregnancy.31

Psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis is a seronegative inflammatory spondyloarthropathy that can result in erosive arthritis in up to 57% of cases and functional disability in up to 19%.32 Although rare in the general population, it affects approximately 6% to 10% of psoriasis patients and up to 40% of patients with severe psoriasis.33 In 70% of cases, psoriasis precedes the onset of arthritis by about 10 years, and approximately 10% to 15% of patients simultaneously present with psoriasis and arthritis or develop arthritis before skin involvement.5,34

Patients complain of joint discomfort that is most prominent after periods of prolonged rest. Patterns of involvement are extremely variable but have been reported as an asymmetric oligoarthritis (involving four or fewer joints) or polyarthritis (involving more than four joints) in most patients. A rheumatoid arthritis-like presentation with a symmetric polyarthropathy involving the small and medium-sized joints has also been reported, making it difficult to clinically distinguish this from rheumatoid arthritis.

A distal interphalangeal-predominant pattern is reported in 5% to 10% of patients. Axial disease resembling ankylosing spondylitis occurs only in 5% of patients. Arthritis mutilans, characterized by severe, rapidly progressive joint inflammation, joint destruction, and deformity, occurs rarely. Enthesitis, ie, inflammation at the point of attachment of tendons or ligaments to bone, is present in up to 42% of patients.5,35

Nail disease

Photo courtesy of Joseph C. English III, MD.
Figure 5. Nail pitting and onycholysis with surrounding psoriatic plaques along the perionychium and proximal nail fold.
Nail psoriasis occurs in 35% to 50% of patients and can be seen with all forms of psoriasis.1 Involvement of the nail matrix can result in nail pitting and leukonychia. Oil spots, subungual hyperkeratosis, and distal onycholysis are the result of disease involvement of the nail bed (Figure 5). Up to 90% of patients with psoriatic arthritis have nail changes, especially patients with enthesitis.36

Disease severity also varies

Disease severity also differs among patients. An estimated 80% of patients have mild to moderate disease and 20% have moderate to severe disease, which includes disease involving more than 5% of the body surface or involvement of the face, hands, feet, or genitalia.1

The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is an objective measure used in clinical trials. It incorporates the amount of redness, scaling, and induration of each psoriatic lesion over the body surface involved. A 75% improvement in the PASI score (PASI-75) is regarded as clinically significant.37

 

 

PSORIASIS IS DIAGNOSED CLINICALLY

In most cases, the diagnosis of psoriasis is made clinically and is straightforward. However, in more difficult cases, biopsy may be needed. In particular:

  • The plaques of psoriasis may be confused with squamous cell carcinoma in situ, dermatophyte infection, or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, especially if they are treatment-resistant.
  • Guttate psoriasis may be difficult to distinguish from pityriasis rosea.
  • Erythrodermic psoriasis must be distinguished from other causes of erythroderma, including Sézary syndrome, pityriasis rubra pilaris, and drug reactions.
  • Intertrigo, candidiasis, extramammary Paget disease, squamous cell carcinoma, and contact dermatitis all may mimic inverse psoriasis.
  • Palmoplantar pustulosis may be difficult to differentiate from dyshidrotic eczema.
  • Generalized pustular psoriasis should be distinguished from a pustular drug eruption (acute generalized exanthematous pustular drug eruption or acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis), impetigo, candidiasis, or an autoimmune blistering disorder such as pemphigus.

TREATMENT OF LIMITED DISEASE

Topical corticosteroids

A topical corticosteroid, either by itself or combined with a steroid-sparing agent, is the first-line therapy for patients with limited disease. The potency required for treatment should be based on the extent of disease and on the location, the choice of vehicle, and the patient’s preference and age.

Several double-blind studies have assessed the efficacy of various topical corticosteroids in treating psoriasis. In general, super-potent (class I) and potent (class II) topical corticosteroids are more efficacious than mild or moderate corticosteroids.38 Class I and class II steroids include agents such as clobetasol propionate 0.05% (Temovate), betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% (Diprolene), fluocinonide 0.05% (Lidex), and desoximetasone 0.25% (Topicort).

Use of class I steroids should be limited to an initial treatment course of twice-daily application for 2 to 4 weeks in an effort to avoid some of the local toxicities such as skin atrophy, telangiectasia, and striae. Decreasing class I topical steroid use to 1 to 2 times per week with the gradual introduction of a steroid-sparing agent following the initial 2 to 4 weeks of treatment is advised.

Steroid-sparing agents

Steroid-sparing agents include vitamin D analogues, retinoids, and tacrolimus ointment (Protopic).

Vitamin D analogues and retinoids are thought to decrease keratinocyte proliferation and enhance keratinocyte differentiation.39 The vitamin D analogues are also considered first-line topical agents and include calcipotriol (Dovonex), calcipotriene (Dovonex), and calcitriol (Vectical). To prevent hypercalcemia, use of more than 100 g of vitamin D analogues per week should be avoided.39

Treatment of inverse psoriasis and scalp psoriasis may be challenging

The areas affected in inverse psoriasis, such as the genitalia and axillae, are more prone to side effects when potent topical steroids are used because of increased absorption and occlusion in these areas. Agents that minimize irritation and toxicity in sensitive areas, such as topical tacrolimus, less-potent topical steroids, or calcitriol, can be used.39

For scalp psoriasis, alternative vehicles such as shampoos, gels, solutions, oils, sprays, and foams have improved patient compliance and efficacy of treatment.40

PHOTOTHERAPY FOR SEVERE DISEASE

Narrow-band ultraviolet B

Narrow-band ultraviolet B, ie, light confined to wavelengths of 311 to 313 nm, is a first-line treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis, either as monotherapy or in combination with other treatments. It is an especially attractive option in patients who are on medications or who have comorbidities that may preclude treatment with other systemic agents.

The mechanism of action may be via immunosuppressive effects on Langerhans cells, alteration of cytokines and adhesion molecules that lead to an increase in Th2 cells, and induction of apoptosis of T lymphocytes. Additionally, ultraviolet light affects the proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes.41

Dosing is based on skin type, and treatment usually involves two or three visits per week for a total of 15 to 20 treatments, with additional therapy for maintenance. Adding acitretin (Soriatane), with close monitoring of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels and the patient’s lipid panel, can be considered in treatment-resistant cases.42

Psoralen combined with ultraviolet A

Psoralen combined with ultraviolet A is another option. It can be considered if narrow-band ultraviolet B treatment fails. It is also useful for dark-skinned patients and those with thicker plaques because ultraviolet A penetrates deeper than ultraviolet B. Oral or topical treatment with psoralen is followed by ultraviolet A treatment.

The duration of remission is much longer with psoralen plus ultraviolet A than with narrow-band ultraviolet B. However, this treatment caries a significant risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma, especially in light-skinned people and those who receive high doses of ultraviolet A (200 or more treatments) or cyclosporine.40,41,43–46 Long-term effects include photoaging, lentigines, and telangiectasias. As a consequence of these well-established side effects, this treatment is used less frequently.

Cautions with phototherapy

Careful screening and caution should be used in patients who have:

  • Fair skin that tends to burn easily
  • A history of arsenic intake or treatment with ionizing radiation
  • A history of use of photosensitizing medications (fluoroquinolone antibiotics, doxycycline, hydrochlorothiazide)
  • A history of melanoma or atypical nevi
  • Multiple risk factors for melanoma
  • A history of nonmelanoma skin cancer
  • Immunosuppression due to organ transplantation.
 

 

ORAL THERAPIES FOR SEVERE PSORIASIS

Patients who have severe psoriasis—ie, affecting more than 5% of the body surface or debilitating disease affecting the palms, soles, or genitalia—are best managed with systemic medications, especially if they do not have access to phototherapy.20

Methotrexate

In 1972, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved methotrexate for treating severe psoriasis.42 In studies of methotrexate at doses of 15 to 20 mg weekly, 36% to 68% of patients with severe plaque psoriasis achieved a PASI-75 score.40,42,47

Dosages of methotrexate for treating severe psoriasis range from 7.5 to 25 mg once a week. Patients should also receive a folate supplement of 1 to 5 mg every day except the day they take methotrexate. The folate is to protect against gastrointestinal side effects, bone marrow suppression, and hepatic toxicity associated with methotrexate.

Other side effects of methotrexate include pulmonary fibrosis and stomatitis. Pregnancy, nursing, alcoholism, chronic liver disease, immunodeficiency syndromes, bone-marrow hypoplasia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and hypersensitivity to methotrexate are all contraindications to methotrexate use.

The National Psoriasis Foundation, in its 2009 guidelines for the use of methotrexate in treating psoriasis,48 recommends obtaining a complete blood cell count with platelets, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and liver function tests at baseline and at 1- to 3-month intervals thereafter.

Liver biopsies were previously recommended for patients receiving methotrexate long-term when the cumulative dose of therapy reached 1.5 g. However, given the invasive nature of the liver biopsy procedure and the low incidence of methotrexate-induced hepatotoxicity, this recommendation has been revised.

For patients with no significant risk factors for hepatic toxicity (eg, obesity, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hepatitis, or history of or current alcohol consumption) and normal liver function tests, liver biopsy should be considered when a cumulative methotrexate dose of 3.5 to 4.0 g is reached. Alternatively, one may choose to continue to monitor the patient without liver biopsy or to switch to another medication, if possible.42,48

Patients at high risk should be monitored more carefully, and liver biopsy should be considered soon after starting methotrexate and repeated after every 1.0 to 1.5 g.48

No reliable noninvasive measures to evaluate for liver fibrosis are routinely available in the United States. Serial measurements of serum type III procollagen aminopeptide have been reported to correlate with the risk of developing liver fibrosis; however, this test is readily available only in Europe.49

Cyclosporine

Cyclosporine (Gengraf, Neoral, Sandimmune) is very effective for treating psoriasis, especially erythrodermic psoriasis. It is often used only short-term or as a bridge to other maintenance therapies because it has a rapid onset and because long-term therapy (3 to 5 years) is associated with a risk of glomerulosclerosis.50

Cyclosporine works by decreasing T-cell activation by binding cyclophilin, which leads to inhibition of transcription of calcineurin and nuclear factor of activated T cells.51 Given at doses of 2.5 to 5 mg/kg/day, cyclosporine has been shown to result in rapid improvement in up to 80% to 90% of psoriatic patients.52,53

The initial recommended dose of cyclosporine is usually 2.5 to 3 mg/kg/day in two divided doses, which is maintained for 4 weeks and then increased by 0.5 mg/kg/day until the disease is stable.42

Nephrotoxicity and hypertension are cyclosporine’s most serious side effects. Blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and blood pressure should be monitored at baseline and then twice a month for the first 3 months and once monthly thereafter. Liver function tests, complete blood cell count, lipid profile, magnesium, uric acid, and potassium should also be checked every month.

Cyclosporine also increases the risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, especially in patients who have received psoralen plus ultraviolet A treatment.42

Patients with hypersensitivity to cyclosporine, a history of chronic infection (eg, tuberculosis, hepatitis B, hepatitis C), renal insufficiency, or a history of systemic malignancy should not receive cyclosporine.

Acitretin

Acitretin, an oral retinoid, has been used for several years to treat psoriasis. Its onset is slow, typically ranging from 3 to 6 months, and its effects are dose-dependent. It is most effective as a maintenance therapy, usually after the disease has been stabilized by agents such as cyclosporine, or in combination with other treatments such as phototherapy.42 Acitretin has been shown to be effective in patients with pustular psoriasis.54

Acitretin does not alter the immune system and has not been shown to have significant cumulative toxicities. Serum triglycerides are monitored closely, since acitretin can lead to hypertriglyceridemia.

All retinoids, including acitretin, are in pregnancy category X and should therefore be avoided during pregnancy. Although its half-life is only 49 hours, acitretin may be transformed to etretinate either spontaneously or as a result of alcohol ingestion. Etretinate has a half-life of 168 days and can take up to 3 years to be eliminated from the body. Therefore, acitretin is contraindicated in women who plan to become pregnant or who do not agree to use adequate contraception for 3 years after the drug is discontinued.42

Biologic agents

Advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of psoriasis have resulted in more specific, targeted therapy.

Alefacept (Amevive) is a human Fc IgG1 receptor fused to the alpha subunit of LFA3. It binds to CD2, blocks costimulatory signaling, and induces apoptosis in activated memory T cells.

Alefacept was the first biologic agent approved by the FDA for the treatment of psoriasis and one of the few biologic agents to induce long-term remission.55 However, its use has declined because few patients achieved significant clearance of their psoriasis and its onset of action was much slower than that of other medications.56

The currently approved biologic therapies commonly used for moderate to severe psoriasis include the TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab (Stelara).

The TNF-alpha inhibitors include infliximab (Remicade), etanercept (Enbrel), and adalimumab (Humira). They are generally well tolerated and highly effective. However, TNF-alpha inhibitors and other biologic agents are contraindicated in patients with serious infection, a personal history or a family history in a first-degree relative of demyelinating disease, or class III or IV congestive heart failure. Patients should be screened for active infection, including tuberculosis and hepatitis B, since reactivation has been reported following initiation of TNF-alpha inhibitors.1

Adalimumab is a human monoclonal antibody against TNF-alpha. It binds to soluble and membrane-bound TNF-alpha and prevents it from binding to p55 and p75 cell-surface TNF receptors.

The dosing schedule for adalimumab is 80 mg subcutaneously for the first week, followed by 40 mg subcutaneously the next week, and then 40 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks thereafter.1

Etanercept is a recombinant human TNF-alpha receptor (p75) protein fused with the Fc portion of IgG1, which binds to soluble TNF-alpha.57 Dosing for etanercept is 50 mg subcutaneously twice weekly for the first 12 weeks, followed by 50 mg weekly thereafter.

Infliximab is a chimeric antibody composed of a human IgG1 constant region fused to a mouse variable region that binds to both soluble and membrane-bound TNF-alpha.58 Infliximab is given as an infusion at a dose of 5 mg/kg over 2 to 3 hours at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and then every 8 weeks thereafter.

Efficacy of TNF inhibitors. There are no specific guidelines for the sequence of initiation of TNF inhibitors because no studies have directly compared the efficacy of these medications. However, response to infliximab is relatively rapid compared with adalimumab and etanercept.

In a phase III clinical trial,59 as many as 80% of patients achieved PASI-75 clearance of their psoriasis after three doses of infliximab. Interestingly, only 61% of patients maintained PASI-75 clearance by week 50. This loss of efficacy of infliximab is also reported with other TNF-alpha inhibitors and is thought to be secondary to the development of antibodies to the drugs. For infliximab, this loss of efficacy is less when infliximab is given continuously rather than on an as-needed basis. Simultaneous treatment with methotrexate is also thought to decrease the development of antibodies to infliximab.60

Ustekinumab is an monoclonal antibody directed against the common p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23, which have been shown to be at increased levels in psoriatic lesions and important for the pathogenesis of psoriasis.

Between 66% and 76% of patients treated with ustekinumab achieved significant clearance of their disease after 12 weeks of treatment in two large phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.61,62

Dosing of ustekinumab is weight-based. For those weighing less than 100 kg, ustekinumab is given at 45 mg subcutaneously at baseline, at 4 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. The same dosing schedule is used for those weighing more than 100 kg, but the dose is increased to 90 mg.

Guidelines for monitoring patients while on ustekinumab are similar to those for other biologic agents. Information on long-term toxicities is still being collected. However, injection-site reactions, serious infections, malignancies, and a single case of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy have been reported.20

While biologic agents are significantly more expensive than the conventional therapies discussed above and insurance coverage for these agents varies, they have demonstrated superior efficacy and may be indicated for patients with recalcitrant moderate to severe psoriasis for whom multiple types of treatment have failed.

 

 

FOR PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: SYSTEMIC MEDICATIONS

For patients with known or questionable psoriatic arthritis, evaluation by a rheumatologist is highly recommended.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are usually first-line in the treatment of mild psoriatic arthritis. If after 2 to 3 months of therapy with NSAIDs no benefit is achieved, treatment with methotrexate as monotherapy is a practical consideration because of its low cost. However, methotrexate as a monotherapy has not been shown to prevent radiologic progression of disease.5,32

The TNF-alpha inhibitors have been shown to have similar efficacy when compared among each other in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis.32,63 Based on radiologic evidence, ustekinumab has not shown to be as efficacious as the TNF-alpha inhibitors for treating psoriatic arthritis. Therefore, TNF inhibitors should be considered first-line in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis.21,64

Few studies have been done on the efficacy or sequence of therapies that should be used in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. The American Academy of Dermatology’s Psoriasis Guidelines of Care recommend adding a TNF-alpha inhibitor or switching to a TNF-alpha inhibitor if no significant improvement is achieved after 12 to 16 weeks of treatment with oral methotrexate.20

FOR ERYTHRODERMIC PSORIASIS: MEDICATIONS THAT ACT PROMPTLY

The care of erythrodermic psoriatic patients is distinct from that of other psoriatic patients because of their associated systemic symptoms. Care should be taken to rule out sepsis, as this is a reported trigger of erythrodermic psoriasis.28

Systemic medications with a quick onset, such as oral cyclosporine, are recommended. Infliximab has also been reported to be beneficial because of its rapid onset.28

TREATMENT BASED ON THE TYPE AND THE SEVERITY OF PSORIASIS

The treatment of psoriasis can be as complex as the disease it itself and should be based on the type and the severity of psoriasis. Recognition of the various manifestations of psoriasis is important for effective treatment. However, in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, atypical presentations, or recalcitrant disease, referral to a specialist is recommended.

References
  1. Menter A, Gottlieb A, Feldman SR, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 1. Overview of psoriasis and guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58:826850.
  2. Christophers E. Psoriasis—epidemiology and clinical spectrum. Clin Exp Dermatol 2001; 26:314320.
  3. Rapp SR, Feldman SR, Exum ML, Fleischer AB, Reboussin DM. Psoriasis causes as much disability as other major medical diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41:401407.
  4. Weiss SC, Kimball AB, Liewehr DJ, Blauvelt A, Turner ML, Emanuel EJ. Quantifying the harmful effect of psoriasis on health-related quality of life. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 47:512518.
  5. Garg A, Gladman D. Recognizing psoriatic arthritis in the dermatology clinic. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63:733748.
  6. Kimball AB, Yu AP, Signorovitch J, et al. The effects of adalimumab treatment and psoriasis severity on self-reported work productivity and activity impairment for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 66:e67e76.
  7. Schmitt JM, Ford DE. Work limitations and productivity loss are associated with health-related quality of life but not with clinical severity in patients with psoriasis. Dermatology 2006; 213:102110.
  8. Gelfand JM, Neimann AL, Shin DB, Wang X, Margolis DJ, Troxel AB. Risk of myocardial infarction in patients with psoriasis. JAMA 2006; 296:17351741.
  9. Abuabara K, Azfar RS, Shin DB, Neimann AL, Troxel AB, Gelfand JM. Cause-specific mortality in patients with severe psoriasis: a population-based cohort study in the U.K. Br J Dermatol 2010; 163:586592.
  10. Ahlehoff O, Gislason GH, Charlot M, et al. Psoriasis is associated with clinically significant cardiovascular risk: a Danish nationwide cohort study. J Intern Med 2011; 270:147157.
  11. Lin HW, Wang KH, Lin HC, Lin HC. Increased risk of acute myocardial infarction in patients with psoriasis: a 5-year population-based study in Taiwan. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 64:495501.
  12. Bremmer S, Van Voorhees AS, Hsu S, et al; National Psoriasis Foundation. Obesity and psoriasis: from the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63:10581069.
  13. Tobin AM, Veale DJ, Fitzgerald O, et al. Cardiovascular disease and risk factors in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2010; 37:13861394.
  14. Najarian DJ, Gottlieb AB. Connections between psoriasis and Crohn’s disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48:805821.
  15. Neimann AL, Shin DB, Wang X, Margolis DJ, Troxel AB, Gelfand JM. Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55:829835.
  16. Shapiro J, Cohen AD, Weitzman D, Tal R, David M. Psoriasis and cardiovascular risk factors: a case-control study on inpatients comparing psoriasis to dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 66:252258.
  17. Gelfand JM, Shin DB, Neimann AL, Wang X, Margolis DJ, Troxel AB. The risk of lymphoma in patients with psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol 2006; 126:21942201.
  18. Chen YJ, Wu CY, Chen TJ, et al. The risk of cancer in patients with psoriasis: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 65:8491.
  19. Friedewald VE, Cather JC, Gelfand JM, et al. AJC editor’s consensus: psoriasis and coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2008; 102:16311643.
  20. American Academy of Dermatology Work Group; Menter A, Korman NJ, Elmets CA, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 6. Guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: case-based presentations and evidence-based conclusions. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 65:137174.
  21. Mallbris L, Larsson P, Bergqvist S, Vingård E, Granath F, Ståhle M. Psoriasis phenotype at disease onset: clinical characterization of 400 adult cases. J Invest Dermatol 2005; 124:499504.
  22. Armstrong AW, Armstrong EJ, Fuller EN, Sockolov ME, Voyles SV. Smoking and pathogenesis of psoriasis: a review of oxidative, inflammatory and genetic mechanisms. Br J Dermatol 2011; 165:11621168.
  23. Qureshi AA, Dominguez PL, Choi HK, Han J, Curhan G. Alcohol intake and risk of incident psoriasis in US women: a prospective study. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146:13641369.
  24. Nestle FO, Kaplan DH, Barker J. Psoriasis. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:496509.
  25. Genetic Analysis of Psoriasis Consortium & the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2; Strange A, Capon F, Spencer CC, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies new psoriasis susceptibility loci and an interaction between HLA-C and ERAP1. Nat Genet 2010; 42:985990.
  26. Nair RP, Duffin KC, Helms C, et al; Collaborative Association Study of Psoriasis. Genome-wide scan reveals association of psoriasis with IL-23 and NF-kappaB pathways. Nat Genet 2009; 41:199204.
  27. Griffiths CE, Christophers E, Barker JN, et al. A classification of psoriasis vulgaris according to phenotype. Br J Dermatol 2007; 156:258262.
  28. Rosenbach M, Hsu S, Korman NJ, et al; National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board. Treatment of erythrodermic psoriasis: from the medical board of the National Psoriasis Foundation. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 62:655662.
  29. Mrowietz U, van de Kerkhof PC. Management of palmoplantar pustulosis: do we need to change? Br J Dermatol 2011; 164:942946.
  30. Kluger N, Bessis D, Guillot B, Girard C. Acute respiratory distress syndrome complicating generalized pustular psoriasis (psoriasis-associated aseptic pneumonitis). J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 64:11541158.
  31. Roth MM. Pregnancy dermatoses: diagnosis, management, and controversies. Am J Clin Dermatol 2011; 12:2541.
  32. Gottlieb A, Korman NJ, Gordon KB, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 2. Psoriatic arthritis: overview and guidelines of care for treatment with an emphasis on the biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58:851864.
  33. Ogdie A, Gelfand JM. Identification of risk factors for psoriatic arthritis: scientific opportunity meets clinical need. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146:785788.
  34. Gelfand JM, Gladman DD, Mease PJ, et al. Epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis in the population of the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 53:573.
  35. Moll JM, Wright V. Psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1973; 3:5578.
  36. McGonagle D. Enthesitis: an autoinflammatory lesion linking nail and joint involvement in psoriatic disease. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2009; 23(suppl 1):913.
  37. Feldman SR, Krueger GG. Psoriasis assessment tools in clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64(suppl 2):ii65ii68.
  38. Mason J, Mason AR, Cork MJ. Topical preparations for the treatment of psoriasis: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 2002; 146:351364.
  39. Menter A, Korman NJ, Elmets CA, et al; American Academy of Dermatology. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Section 3. Guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 60:643659.
  40. Zivkovich AH, Feldman SR. Are ointments better than other vehicles for corticosteroid treatment of psoriasis? J Drugs Dermatol 2009; 8:570572.
  41. Menter A, Korman NJ, Elmets CA, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 5. Guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with phototherapy and photochemotherapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 62:114135.
  42. Menter A, Korman NJ, Elmets CA, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 4. Guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with traditional systemic agents. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 61:451485.
  43. Murase JE, Lee EE, Koo J. Effect of ethnicity on the risk of developing nonmelanoma skin cancer following long-term PUVA therapy. Int J Dermatol 2005; 44:10161021.
  44. Stern RS, Lunder EJ. Risk of squamous cell carcinoma and methoxsalen (psoralen) and UV-A radiation (PUVA). A meta-analysis. Arch Dermatol 1998; 134:15821585.
  45. Stern RS, Väkevä LH. Noncutaneous malignant tumors in the PUVA follow-up study: 1975–1996. J Invest Dermatol 1997; 108:897900.
  46. Patel RV, Clark LN, Lebwohl M, Weinberg JM. Treatments for psoriasis and the risk of malignancy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 60:10011017.
  47. Flytström I, Stenberg B, Svensson A, Bergbrant IM. Methotrexate vs. ciclosporin in psoriasis: effectiveness, quality of life and safety. A randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol 2008; 158:116121.
  48. Kalb RE, Strober B, Weinstein G, Lebwohl M. Methotrexate and psoriasis: 2009 National Psoriasis Foundation Consensus Conference. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 60:824837.
  49. Zachariae H, Heickendorff L, Søgaard H. The value of aminoterminal propeptide of type III procollagen in routine screening for methotrexate-induced liver fibrosis: a 10-year follow-up. Br J Dermatol 2001; 144:100103.
  50. Lowe NJ, Wieder JM, Rosenbach A, et al. Long-term low-dose cyclosporine therapy for severe psoriasis: effects on renal function and structure. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996; 35:710719.
  51. Gottlieb AB, Grossman RM, Khandke L, et al. Studies of the effect of cyclosporine in psoriasis in vivo: combined effects on activated T lymphocytes and epidermal regenerative maturation. J Invest Dermatol 1992; 98:302309.
  52. Ellis CN, Fradin MS, Messana JM, et al. Cyclosporine for plaque-type psoriasis. Results of a multidose, double-blind trial. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:277284.
  53. Faerber L, Braeutigam M, Weidinger G, et al. Cyclosporine in severe psoriasis. Results of a meta-analysis in 579 patients. Am J Clin Dermatol 2001; 2:4147.
  54. Ozawa A, Ohkido M, Haruki Y, et al. Treatments of generalized pustular psoriasis: a multicenter study in Japan. J Dermatol 1999; 26:141149.
  55. Krueger GG, Ellis CN. Alefacept therapy produces remission for patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 2003; 148:784788.
  56. Lebwohl M, Christophers E, Langley R, Ortonne JP, Roberts J, Griffiths CE; Alefacept Clinical Study Group. An international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of intramuscular alefacept in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139:719727.
  57. Gottlieb AB, Matheson RT, Lowe N, et al. A randomized trial of etanercept as monotherapy for psoriasis. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139:16271632.
  58. Gottlieb AB, Masud S, Ramamurthi R, et al. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic response to anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody (infliximab) treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48:6875.
  59. Reich K, Nestle FO, Papp K, et al; EXPRESS study investigators. Infliximab induction and maintenance therapy for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a phase III, multicentre, double-blind trial. Lancet 2005; 366:13671374.
  60. Menter A, Feldman SR, Weinstein GD, et al. A randomized comparison of continuous vs. intermittent infliximab maintenance regimens over 1 year in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56:31.e131.e15.
  61. Papp KA, Langley RG, Lebwohl M, et al; PHOENIX 2 study investigators. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 52-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 2). Lancet 2008; 371:16751684.
  62. Leonardi CL, Kimball AB, Papp KA, et al; PHOENIX 1 study investigators. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 76-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 1). Lancet 2008; 371:16651674.
  63. Griffiths CE, Strober BE, van de Kerkhof P, et al; ACCEPT Study Group. Comparison of ustekinumab and etanercept for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:118128.
  64. Gottlieb A, Menter A, Mendelsohn A, et al. Ustekinumab, a human interleukin 12/23 monoclonal antibody, for psoriatic arthritis: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Lancet. 2009; 373:633640.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Jennifer Villaseñor-Park, MD, PhD
University of Pittsburgh, Department of Dermatology, Pittsburgh, PA

David Wheeler, BS
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA

Lisa Grandinetti, MD, FAAD
University of Pittsburgh, Department of Dermatology, Pittsburgh, PA

Address: Lisa M. Grandinetti, MD, FAAD, Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh, Presby South Tower Suite 3880, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; e-mail [email protected]

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 79(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
413-423
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Jennifer Villaseñor-Park, MD, PhD
University of Pittsburgh, Department of Dermatology, Pittsburgh, PA

David Wheeler, BS
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA

Lisa Grandinetti, MD, FAAD
University of Pittsburgh, Department of Dermatology, Pittsburgh, PA

Address: Lisa M. Grandinetti, MD, FAAD, Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh, Presby South Tower Suite 3880, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; e-mail [email protected]

Author and Disclosure Information

Jennifer Villaseñor-Park, MD, PhD
University of Pittsburgh, Department of Dermatology, Pittsburgh, PA

David Wheeler, BS
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA

Lisa Grandinetti, MD, FAAD
University of Pittsburgh, Department of Dermatology, Pittsburgh, PA

Address: Lisa M. Grandinetti, MD, FAAD, Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh, Presby South Tower Suite 3880, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; e-mail [email protected]

Article PDF
Article PDF

Much has changed in our understanding of psoriasis over the past decade, which is having a major effect on its treatment.

Although topical corticosteroids and phototherapy remain mainstays of treatment, a variety of biologic agents have given new hope to those with the most severe forms of the disease. We are also beginning to understand that patients with psoriasis are at greater risk of cardiovascular disease, though the exact nature of that risk and how we should respond remains unclear. Finally, genome-wide association studies are just beginning to unravel the genetic basis of psoriasis.

In this paper, we review the epidemiology and impact of psoriasis, current views of its pathogenesis, its varied clinical forms, and its treatment.

PSORIASIS IMPOSES A GREAT BURDEN

Psoriasis is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from approximately 2%1 to 4.7%.2 It can manifest at any age, but it is most common in two age groups, ie, 20 to 30 years and 50 to 60 years.

For the patient, the burden is great, affecting physical, psychological, and occupational well-being. In fact, patients with psoriasis report quality-of-life impairment equal to or worse than that in patients with cancer or heart disease.3,4 Notably, functional disability secondary to psoriatic arthritis has been reported in up to 19% of psoriatic arthritis patients, and this negatively affects quality of life.5

In 2004, the annual direct medical costs of psoriasis in the United States were estimated to exceed $1 billion. Its indirect costs, measured as missed days and loss of productivity at work, are estimated to exceed the direct costs by $15 billion annually.6,7

Linked to cardiovascular and other diseases

Studies in the past 10 years have uncovered a link between psoriasis, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease.8–13 Specifically, patients with severe psoriasis are at higher risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death than control patients. Interestingly, the risk decreases with age; patients at greatest risk are young men with severe psoriasis.8–10

In a large cohort study in the United Kingdom7 comparing patients with and without psoriasis, the hazard ratio for cardiovascular death in patients with severe psoriasis was 1.57 (95% confidence interval 1.26–1.96). This translated to 3.5 excess deaths per 1,000 patient-years. These patients were also at higher risk of death from malignancies, chronic lower respiratory disease, diabetes, dementia, infection, kidney disease, and unknown causes.

How much of the risk is due to psoriasis itself, its treatments, associated behaviors, or other factors requires more study. However, some evidence points to the dysregulation of the immune system, notably chronic elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Psoriasis and its comorbid conditions are thought to arise from chronically elevated levels of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin 1 beta (IL-1 beta), and IL-17. These cytokines impair insulin signaling, deregulate lipid metabolism, and increase atherosclerotic changes in the coronary, cerebral, and peripheral arteries. In addition, several other diseases that involve the immune system occur more frequently with psoriasis, including Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis, lymphoma, obesity, and type 2 diabetes.1,8,14–18

In view of the prevalence of these comorbid conditions and the risks they pose, primary care physicians should consider screening patients with severe psoriasis for metabolic disorders and cardiovascular risk factors and promptly begin preventive therapies.19 Unfortunately, to date, there are no consensus guidelines as to the appropriate screening tests or secondary cardiovascular preventive measures for patients with severe psoriasis.

A VICIOUS CIRCLE OF INFLAMMATION AND KERATINOCYTE PROLIFERATION

The hallmark of plaque psoriasis is chronic inflammation in the skin, leading to keratinocyte proliferation.

External and internal triggers that have been identified include cutaneous injury (eg, sunburn, drug rash, viral exanthems), infections (eg, streptococcal), hypocalcemia, pregnancy, psychogenic stress, drugs (eg, lithium, interferon, beta-blockers, and antimalarials), alcohol, smoking, and obesity.20–23

As reviewed by Nestle et al,24 the initiation of lesion formation is still poorly understood but is thought to occur when a trigger (physical trauma, bacterial product, cellular stress) causes DNA to be released from keratinocytes. DNA forms a complex with the antimicrobial protein LL-37 and activates plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs) via toll-like receptor 9. Activated PDCs release type I interferons, which in turn activate myeloid dendritic cells. Myeloid dendritic cells release IL-20 locally, which speeds keratinocyte proliferation.

A subset of myeloid dendritic cells leaves the dermis and migrates to local lymph nodes, where they release IL-23 and activate naive T cells. T helper 1 (Th1) and Th17 cells are recruited to the lesions and begin producing numerous cytokines, including interferon gamma, IL-17, and IL-22. This cytokine milieu increases keratinocyte proliferation and causes the keratinocytes to secrete antimicrobial proteins (LL-37, beta defensins), chemokines, and S100 proteins. These soluble factors have three main functions: stimulation of dendritic cells to release more IL-23, recruitment of neutrophils to the epidermis, and activation of dermal fibroblasts.

This cycle of keratinocytes activating dendritic cells, dendritic cells activating T cells, and T cells activating keratinocytes appears to be the main force maintaining the disease.24 It is unclear, however, whether this applies to all forms of psoriasis or only to plaque psoriasis.

Genetic factors discovered

In recent years, genome-wide association studies have identified at least 10 psoriasis-susceptibility loci that involve functioning of the immune system.25 These genes include those of the major histocompatibility complex, cytokines, receptors, and beta-defensins.

Of specific interest, polymorphisms in the IL-12/IL-13 receptor, the p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23, and the p19 subunit of IL-23 strongly associate with psoriasis, supporting their critical role in the disease process and providing targets for medical therapy.26

 

 

PSORIASIS HAS SEVERAL CLINICAL PHENOTYPES

Psoriasis has several clinical variants, each with a distinct clinical course and response to treatment.27 Moreover, many patients present with more than one variant.

Plaque psoriasis

Figure 1. Well-demarcated erythematous, scaly plaques characteristic of plaque psoriasis on the elbow.
Plaque psoriasis (Figure 1) accounts for more than 80% of cases. It is characterized by well-demarcated, scaly, pink-to-red plaques of various sizes with a relatively symmetric distribution. Involvement of the extensor surfaces such as the elbows and knees and of the scalp, trunk, and intergluteal cleft is common.

Plaques can persist for several months to years, even in the same location, and only about 5% of patients report complete remission for up to 5 years.

Inverse psoriasis

Photo courtesy of Joseph C. English III, MD.
Figure 2. Patient with inverse psoriasis of the axilla.
Involvement of the skin folds, including the axillary, genital, perineal, intergluteal, and inframammary regions with pink-to-red plaques with minimal scale is the main clinical feature of inverse psoriasis (Figure 2). Absence of satellite pustules clinically distinguishes it from candidiasis.

Guttate psoriasis

Photo courtesy of Laura K. Ferris, MD, PhD.
Figure 3. Guttate psoriasis with characteristic erythematous, scaly papules and small plaques on the back.
Guttate psoriasis (named for its droplet-shaped lesions) presents abruptly with 1-mm to 10-mm pink papules with associated fine scale over the trunk and extremities (Figure 3). This variant occurs in fewer than 2% of patients with psoriasis, who are usually younger than 30 years. It is often preceded 2 to 3 weeks earlier by an upper respiratory tract infection with group A beta-hemolytic streptococci.

Erythrodermic psoriasis

Approximately 1% to 2.25% of all patients with psoriasis develop this severe form, affecting more than 75% of the body surface area. It presents as generalized erythema, which is the most prominent feature, and it is often associated with superficial desquamation, hair loss, nail dystrophy, and systemic symptoms such as fever, chills, malaise, or high-output cardiac failure. There may be a history of preceding characteristic psoriatic plaques, recent withdrawal of treatment (usually corticosteroids), phototoxicity, or infection.

Conversely, approximately 25% of all patients with erythroderma have underlying psoriasis.28

Pustular psoriasis

Photo courtesy of Joseph C. English III, MD.
Figure 4. Erythematous plaques studded with pustules and red-brown macules on the acral surface of the foot in palmoplantar pustulosis.
Pustular psoriasis (Figure 4) is uncommon. The predominant lesions are large collections of neutrophils in the stratum corneum that clinically present as sterile pustules. The pustules may be localized within or at the edge of existing psoriatic plaques or may present as a generalized eruption.

There are several forms of pustular psoriasis, including generalized pustular psoriasis, annular pustular psoriasis, impetigo herpetiformis (pustular psoriasis of pregnancy), and palmoplantar pustulosis. However, there is some evidence to suggest that palmoplantar pustulosis may be distinct from psoriasis.29

Several triggers have been identified, including pregnancy, rapid tapering of medications, hypocalcemia, infection, or topical irritants.

Generalized pustular psoriasis, annular pustular psoriasis, and impetigo herpetiformis often present in association with fever and other systemic symptoms and, if left untreated, can result in life-threatening complications including bacterial superinfection, sepsis, dehydration, and, in rare cases, acute respiratory distress secondary to aseptic pneumonitis.30

Placental insufficiency resulting in stillbirth or neonatal death and other fetal abnormalities can occur in severe pustular psoriasis of pregnancy.31

Psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis is a seronegative inflammatory spondyloarthropathy that can result in erosive arthritis in up to 57% of cases and functional disability in up to 19%.32 Although rare in the general population, it affects approximately 6% to 10% of psoriasis patients and up to 40% of patients with severe psoriasis.33 In 70% of cases, psoriasis precedes the onset of arthritis by about 10 years, and approximately 10% to 15% of patients simultaneously present with psoriasis and arthritis or develop arthritis before skin involvement.5,34

Patients complain of joint discomfort that is most prominent after periods of prolonged rest. Patterns of involvement are extremely variable but have been reported as an asymmetric oligoarthritis (involving four or fewer joints) or polyarthritis (involving more than four joints) in most patients. A rheumatoid arthritis-like presentation with a symmetric polyarthropathy involving the small and medium-sized joints has also been reported, making it difficult to clinically distinguish this from rheumatoid arthritis.

A distal interphalangeal-predominant pattern is reported in 5% to 10% of patients. Axial disease resembling ankylosing spondylitis occurs only in 5% of patients. Arthritis mutilans, characterized by severe, rapidly progressive joint inflammation, joint destruction, and deformity, occurs rarely. Enthesitis, ie, inflammation at the point of attachment of tendons or ligaments to bone, is present in up to 42% of patients.5,35

Nail disease

Photo courtesy of Joseph C. English III, MD.
Figure 5. Nail pitting and onycholysis with surrounding psoriatic plaques along the perionychium and proximal nail fold.
Nail psoriasis occurs in 35% to 50% of patients and can be seen with all forms of psoriasis.1 Involvement of the nail matrix can result in nail pitting and leukonychia. Oil spots, subungual hyperkeratosis, and distal onycholysis are the result of disease involvement of the nail bed (Figure 5). Up to 90% of patients with psoriatic arthritis have nail changes, especially patients with enthesitis.36

Disease severity also varies

Disease severity also differs among patients. An estimated 80% of patients have mild to moderate disease and 20% have moderate to severe disease, which includes disease involving more than 5% of the body surface or involvement of the face, hands, feet, or genitalia.1

The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is an objective measure used in clinical trials. It incorporates the amount of redness, scaling, and induration of each psoriatic lesion over the body surface involved. A 75% improvement in the PASI score (PASI-75) is regarded as clinically significant.37

 

 

PSORIASIS IS DIAGNOSED CLINICALLY

In most cases, the diagnosis of psoriasis is made clinically and is straightforward. However, in more difficult cases, biopsy may be needed. In particular:

  • The plaques of psoriasis may be confused with squamous cell carcinoma in situ, dermatophyte infection, or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, especially if they are treatment-resistant.
  • Guttate psoriasis may be difficult to distinguish from pityriasis rosea.
  • Erythrodermic psoriasis must be distinguished from other causes of erythroderma, including Sézary syndrome, pityriasis rubra pilaris, and drug reactions.
  • Intertrigo, candidiasis, extramammary Paget disease, squamous cell carcinoma, and contact dermatitis all may mimic inverse psoriasis.
  • Palmoplantar pustulosis may be difficult to differentiate from dyshidrotic eczema.
  • Generalized pustular psoriasis should be distinguished from a pustular drug eruption (acute generalized exanthematous pustular drug eruption or acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis), impetigo, candidiasis, or an autoimmune blistering disorder such as pemphigus.

TREATMENT OF LIMITED DISEASE

Topical corticosteroids

A topical corticosteroid, either by itself or combined with a steroid-sparing agent, is the first-line therapy for patients with limited disease. The potency required for treatment should be based on the extent of disease and on the location, the choice of vehicle, and the patient’s preference and age.

Several double-blind studies have assessed the efficacy of various topical corticosteroids in treating psoriasis. In general, super-potent (class I) and potent (class II) topical corticosteroids are more efficacious than mild or moderate corticosteroids.38 Class I and class II steroids include agents such as clobetasol propionate 0.05% (Temovate), betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% (Diprolene), fluocinonide 0.05% (Lidex), and desoximetasone 0.25% (Topicort).

Use of class I steroids should be limited to an initial treatment course of twice-daily application for 2 to 4 weeks in an effort to avoid some of the local toxicities such as skin atrophy, telangiectasia, and striae. Decreasing class I topical steroid use to 1 to 2 times per week with the gradual introduction of a steroid-sparing agent following the initial 2 to 4 weeks of treatment is advised.

Steroid-sparing agents

Steroid-sparing agents include vitamin D analogues, retinoids, and tacrolimus ointment (Protopic).

Vitamin D analogues and retinoids are thought to decrease keratinocyte proliferation and enhance keratinocyte differentiation.39 The vitamin D analogues are also considered first-line topical agents and include calcipotriol (Dovonex), calcipotriene (Dovonex), and calcitriol (Vectical). To prevent hypercalcemia, use of more than 100 g of vitamin D analogues per week should be avoided.39

Treatment of inverse psoriasis and scalp psoriasis may be challenging

The areas affected in inverse psoriasis, such as the genitalia and axillae, are more prone to side effects when potent topical steroids are used because of increased absorption and occlusion in these areas. Agents that minimize irritation and toxicity in sensitive areas, such as topical tacrolimus, less-potent topical steroids, or calcitriol, can be used.39

For scalp psoriasis, alternative vehicles such as shampoos, gels, solutions, oils, sprays, and foams have improved patient compliance and efficacy of treatment.40

PHOTOTHERAPY FOR SEVERE DISEASE

Narrow-band ultraviolet B

Narrow-band ultraviolet B, ie, light confined to wavelengths of 311 to 313 nm, is a first-line treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis, either as monotherapy or in combination with other treatments. It is an especially attractive option in patients who are on medications or who have comorbidities that may preclude treatment with other systemic agents.

The mechanism of action may be via immunosuppressive effects on Langerhans cells, alteration of cytokines and adhesion molecules that lead to an increase in Th2 cells, and induction of apoptosis of T lymphocytes. Additionally, ultraviolet light affects the proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes.41

Dosing is based on skin type, and treatment usually involves two or three visits per week for a total of 15 to 20 treatments, with additional therapy for maintenance. Adding acitretin (Soriatane), with close monitoring of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels and the patient’s lipid panel, can be considered in treatment-resistant cases.42

Psoralen combined with ultraviolet A

Psoralen combined with ultraviolet A is another option. It can be considered if narrow-band ultraviolet B treatment fails. It is also useful for dark-skinned patients and those with thicker plaques because ultraviolet A penetrates deeper than ultraviolet B. Oral or topical treatment with psoralen is followed by ultraviolet A treatment.

The duration of remission is much longer with psoralen plus ultraviolet A than with narrow-band ultraviolet B. However, this treatment caries a significant risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma, especially in light-skinned people and those who receive high doses of ultraviolet A (200 or more treatments) or cyclosporine.40,41,43–46 Long-term effects include photoaging, lentigines, and telangiectasias. As a consequence of these well-established side effects, this treatment is used less frequently.

Cautions with phototherapy

Careful screening and caution should be used in patients who have:

  • Fair skin that tends to burn easily
  • A history of arsenic intake or treatment with ionizing radiation
  • A history of use of photosensitizing medications (fluoroquinolone antibiotics, doxycycline, hydrochlorothiazide)
  • A history of melanoma or atypical nevi
  • Multiple risk factors for melanoma
  • A history of nonmelanoma skin cancer
  • Immunosuppression due to organ transplantation.
 

 

ORAL THERAPIES FOR SEVERE PSORIASIS

Patients who have severe psoriasis—ie, affecting more than 5% of the body surface or debilitating disease affecting the palms, soles, or genitalia—are best managed with systemic medications, especially if they do not have access to phototherapy.20

Methotrexate

In 1972, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved methotrexate for treating severe psoriasis.42 In studies of methotrexate at doses of 15 to 20 mg weekly, 36% to 68% of patients with severe plaque psoriasis achieved a PASI-75 score.40,42,47

Dosages of methotrexate for treating severe psoriasis range from 7.5 to 25 mg once a week. Patients should also receive a folate supplement of 1 to 5 mg every day except the day they take methotrexate. The folate is to protect against gastrointestinal side effects, bone marrow suppression, and hepatic toxicity associated with methotrexate.

Other side effects of methotrexate include pulmonary fibrosis and stomatitis. Pregnancy, nursing, alcoholism, chronic liver disease, immunodeficiency syndromes, bone-marrow hypoplasia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and hypersensitivity to methotrexate are all contraindications to methotrexate use.

The National Psoriasis Foundation, in its 2009 guidelines for the use of methotrexate in treating psoriasis,48 recommends obtaining a complete blood cell count with platelets, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and liver function tests at baseline and at 1- to 3-month intervals thereafter.

Liver biopsies were previously recommended for patients receiving methotrexate long-term when the cumulative dose of therapy reached 1.5 g. However, given the invasive nature of the liver biopsy procedure and the low incidence of methotrexate-induced hepatotoxicity, this recommendation has been revised.

For patients with no significant risk factors for hepatic toxicity (eg, obesity, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hepatitis, or history of or current alcohol consumption) and normal liver function tests, liver biopsy should be considered when a cumulative methotrexate dose of 3.5 to 4.0 g is reached. Alternatively, one may choose to continue to monitor the patient without liver biopsy or to switch to another medication, if possible.42,48

Patients at high risk should be monitored more carefully, and liver biopsy should be considered soon after starting methotrexate and repeated after every 1.0 to 1.5 g.48

No reliable noninvasive measures to evaluate for liver fibrosis are routinely available in the United States. Serial measurements of serum type III procollagen aminopeptide have been reported to correlate with the risk of developing liver fibrosis; however, this test is readily available only in Europe.49

Cyclosporine

Cyclosporine (Gengraf, Neoral, Sandimmune) is very effective for treating psoriasis, especially erythrodermic psoriasis. It is often used only short-term or as a bridge to other maintenance therapies because it has a rapid onset and because long-term therapy (3 to 5 years) is associated with a risk of glomerulosclerosis.50

Cyclosporine works by decreasing T-cell activation by binding cyclophilin, which leads to inhibition of transcription of calcineurin and nuclear factor of activated T cells.51 Given at doses of 2.5 to 5 mg/kg/day, cyclosporine has been shown to result in rapid improvement in up to 80% to 90% of psoriatic patients.52,53

The initial recommended dose of cyclosporine is usually 2.5 to 3 mg/kg/day in two divided doses, which is maintained for 4 weeks and then increased by 0.5 mg/kg/day until the disease is stable.42

Nephrotoxicity and hypertension are cyclosporine’s most serious side effects. Blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and blood pressure should be monitored at baseline and then twice a month for the first 3 months and once monthly thereafter. Liver function tests, complete blood cell count, lipid profile, magnesium, uric acid, and potassium should also be checked every month.

Cyclosporine also increases the risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, especially in patients who have received psoralen plus ultraviolet A treatment.42

Patients with hypersensitivity to cyclosporine, a history of chronic infection (eg, tuberculosis, hepatitis B, hepatitis C), renal insufficiency, or a history of systemic malignancy should not receive cyclosporine.

Acitretin

Acitretin, an oral retinoid, has been used for several years to treat psoriasis. Its onset is slow, typically ranging from 3 to 6 months, and its effects are dose-dependent. It is most effective as a maintenance therapy, usually after the disease has been stabilized by agents such as cyclosporine, or in combination with other treatments such as phototherapy.42 Acitretin has been shown to be effective in patients with pustular psoriasis.54

Acitretin does not alter the immune system and has not been shown to have significant cumulative toxicities. Serum triglycerides are monitored closely, since acitretin can lead to hypertriglyceridemia.

All retinoids, including acitretin, are in pregnancy category X and should therefore be avoided during pregnancy. Although its half-life is only 49 hours, acitretin may be transformed to etretinate either spontaneously or as a result of alcohol ingestion. Etretinate has a half-life of 168 days and can take up to 3 years to be eliminated from the body. Therefore, acitretin is contraindicated in women who plan to become pregnant or who do not agree to use adequate contraception for 3 years after the drug is discontinued.42

Biologic agents

Advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of psoriasis have resulted in more specific, targeted therapy.

Alefacept (Amevive) is a human Fc IgG1 receptor fused to the alpha subunit of LFA3. It binds to CD2, blocks costimulatory signaling, and induces apoptosis in activated memory T cells.

Alefacept was the first biologic agent approved by the FDA for the treatment of psoriasis and one of the few biologic agents to induce long-term remission.55 However, its use has declined because few patients achieved significant clearance of their psoriasis and its onset of action was much slower than that of other medications.56

The currently approved biologic therapies commonly used for moderate to severe psoriasis include the TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab (Stelara).

The TNF-alpha inhibitors include infliximab (Remicade), etanercept (Enbrel), and adalimumab (Humira). They are generally well tolerated and highly effective. However, TNF-alpha inhibitors and other biologic agents are contraindicated in patients with serious infection, a personal history or a family history in a first-degree relative of demyelinating disease, or class III or IV congestive heart failure. Patients should be screened for active infection, including tuberculosis and hepatitis B, since reactivation has been reported following initiation of TNF-alpha inhibitors.1

Adalimumab is a human monoclonal antibody against TNF-alpha. It binds to soluble and membrane-bound TNF-alpha and prevents it from binding to p55 and p75 cell-surface TNF receptors.

The dosing schedule for adalimumab is 80 mg subcutaneously for the first week, followed by 40 mg subcutaneously the next week, and then 40 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks thereafter.1

Etanercept is a recombinant human TNF-alpha receptor (p75) protein fused with the Fc portion of IgG1, which binds to soluble TNF-alpha.57 Dosing for etanercept is 50 mg subcutaneously twice weekly for the first 12 weeks, followed by 50 mg weekly thereafter.

Infliximab is a chimeric antibody composed of a human IgG1 constant region fused to a mouse variable region that binds to both soluble and membrane-bound TNF-alpha.58 Infliximab is given as an infusion at a dose of 5 mg/kg over 2 to 3 hours at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and then every 8 weeks thereafter.

Efficacy of TNF inhibitors. There are no specific guidelines for the sequence of initiation of TNF inhibitors because no studies have directly compared the efficacy of these medications. However, response to infliximab is relatively rapid compared with adalimumab and etanercept.

In a phase III clinical trial,59 as many as 80% of patients achieved PASI-75 clearance of their psoriasis after three doses of infliximab. Interestingly, only 61% of patients maintained PASI-75 clearance by week 50. This loss of efficacy of infliximab is also reported with other TNF-alpha inhibitors and is thought to be secondary to the development of antibodies to the drugs. For infliximab, this loss of efficacy is less when infliximab is given continuously rather than on an as-needed basis. Simultaneous treatment with methotrexate is also thought to decrease the development of antibodies to infliximab.60

Ustekinumab is an monoclonal antibody directed against the common p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23, which have been shown to be at increased levels in psoriatic lesions and important for the pathogenesis of psoriasis.

Between 66% and 76% of patients treated with ustekinumab achieved significant clearance of their disease after 12 weeks of treatment in two large phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.61,62

Dosing of ustekinumab is weight-based. For those weighing less than 100 kg, ustekinumab is given at 45 mg subcutaneously at baseline, at 4 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. The same dosing schedule is used for those weighing more than 100 kg, but the dose is increased to 90 mg.

Guidelines for monitoring patients while on ustekinumab are similar to those for other biologic agents. Information on long-term toxicities is still being collected. However, injection-site reactions, serious infections, malignancies, and a single case of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy have been reported.20

While biologic agents are significantly more expensive than the conventional therapies discussed above and insurance coverage for these agents varies, they have demonstrated superior efficacy and may be indicated for patients with recalcitrant moderate to severe psoriasis for whom multiple types of treatment have failed.

 

 

FOR PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: SYSTEMIC MEDICATIONS

For patients with known or questionable psoriatic arthritis, evaluation by a rheumatologist is highly recommended.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are usually first-line in the treatment of mild psoriatic arthritis. If after 2 to 3 months of therapy with NSAIDs no benefit is achieved, treatment with methotrexate as monotherapy is a practical consideration because of its low cost. However, methotrexate as a monotherapy has not been shown to prevent radiologic progression of disease.5,32

The TNF-alpha inhibitors have been shown to have similar efficacy when compared among each other in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis.32,63 Based on radiologic evidence, ustekinumab has not shown to be as efficacious as the TNF-alpha inhibitors for treating psoriatic arthritis. Therefore, TNF inhibitors should be considered first-line in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis.21,64

Few studies have been done on the efficacy or sequence of therapies that should be used in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. The American Academy of Dermatology’s Psoriasis Guidelines of Care recommend adding a TNF-alpha inhibitor or switching to a TNF-alpha inhibitor if no significant improvement is achieved after 12 to 16 weeks of treatment with oral methotrexate.20

FOR ERYTHRODERMIC PSORIASIS: MEDICATIONS THAT ACT PROMPTLY

The care of erythrodermic psoriatic patients is distinct from that of other psoriatic patients because of their associated systemic symptoms. Care should be taken to rule out sepsis, as this is a reported trigger of erythrodermic psoriasis.28

Systemic medications with a quick onset, such as oral cyclosporine, are recommended. Infliximab has also been reported to be beneficial because of its rapid onset.28

TREATMENT BASED ON THE TYPE AND THE SEVERITY OF PSORIASIS

The treatment of psoriasis can be as complex as the disease it itself and should be based on the type and the severity of psoriasis. Recognition of the various manifestations of psoriasis is important for effective treatment. However, in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, atypical presentations, or recalcitrant disease, referral to a specialist is recommended.

Much has changed in our understanding of psoriasis over the past decade, which is having a major effect on its treatment.

Although topical corticosteroids and phototherapy remain mainstays of treatment, a variety of biologic agents have given new hope to those with the most severe forms of the disease. We are also beginning to understand that patients with psoriasis are at greater risk of cardiovascular disease, though the exact nature of that risk and how we should respond remains unclear. Finally, genome-wide association studies are just beginning to unravel the genetic basis of psoriasis.

In this paper, we review the epidemiology and impact of psoriasis, current views of its pathogenesis, its varied clinical forms, and its treatment.

PSORIASIS IMPOSES A GREAT BURDEN

Psoriasis is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from approximately 2%1 to 4.7%.2 It can manifest at any age, but it is most common in two age groups, ie, 20 to 30 years and 50 to 60 years.

For the patient, the burden is great, affecting physical, psychological, and occupational well-being. In fact, patients with psoriasis report quality-of-life impairment equal to or worse than that in patients with cancer or heart disease.3,4 Notably, functional disability secondary to psoriatic arthritis has been reported in up to 19% of psoriatic arthritis patients, and this negatively affects quality of life.5

In 2004, the annual direct medical costs of psoriasis in the United States were estimated to exceed $1 billion. Its indirect costs, measured as missed days and loss of productivity at work, are estimated to exceed the direct costs by $15 billion annually.6,7

Linked to cardiovascular and other diseases

Studies in the past 10 years have uncovered a link between psoriasis, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease.8–13 Specifically, patients with severe psoriasis are at higher risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death than control patients. Interestingly, the risk decreases with age; patients at greatest risk are young men with severe psoriasis.8–10

In a large cohort study in the United Kingdom7 comparing patients with and without psoriasis, the hazard ratio for cardiovascular death in patients with severe psoriasis was 1.57 (95% confidence interval 1.26–1.96). This translated to 3.5 excess deaths per 1,000 patient-years. These patients were also at higher risk of death from malignancies, chronic lower respiratory disease, diabetes, dementia, infection, kidney disease, and unknown causes.

How much of the risk is due to psoriasis itself, its treatments, associated behaviors, or other factors requires more study. However, some evidence points to the dysregulation of the immune system, notably chronic elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Psoriasis and its comorbid conditions are thought to arise from chronically elevated levels of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin 1 beta (IL-1 beta), and IL-17. These cytokines impair insulin signaling, deregulate lipid metabolism, and increase atherosclerotic changes in the coronary, cerebral, and peripheral arteries. In addition, several other diseases that involve the immune system occur more frequently with psoriasis, including Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis, lymphoma, obesity, and type 2 diabetes.1,8,14–18

In view of the prevalence of these comorbid conditions and the risks they pose, primary care physicians should consider screening patients with severe psoriasis for metabolic disorders and cardiovascular risk factors and promptly begin preventive therapies.19 Unfortunately, to date, there are no consensus guidelines as to the appropriate screening tests or secondary cardiovascular preventive measures for patients with severe psoriasis.

A VICIOUS CIRCLE OF INFLAMMATION AND KERATINOCYTE PROLIFERATION

The hallmark of plaque psoriasis is chronic inflammation in the skin, leading to keratinocyte proliferation.

External and internal triggers that have been identified include cutaneous injury (eg, sunburn, drug rash, viral exanthems), infections (eg, streptococcal), hypocalcemia, pregnancy, psychogenic stress, drugs (eg, lithium, interferon, beta-blockers, and antimalarials), alcohol, smoking, and obesity.20–23

As reviewed by Nestle et al,24 the initiation of lesion formation is still poorly understood but is thought to occur when a trigger (physical trauma, bacterial product, cellular stress) causes DNA to be released from keratinocytes. DNA forms a complex with the antimicrobial protein LL-37 and activates plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs) via toll-like receptor 9. Activated PDCs release type I interferons, which in turn activate myeloid dendritic cells. Myeloid dendritic cells release IL-20 locally, which speeds keratinocyte proliferation.

A subset of myeloid dendritic cells leaves the dermis and migrates to local lymph nodes, where they release IL-23 and activate naive T cells. T helper 1 (Th1) and Th17 cells are recruited to the lesions and begin producing numerous cytokines, including interferon gamma, IL-17, and IL-22. This cytokine milieu increases keratinocyte proliferation and causes the keratinocytes to secrete antimicrobial proteins (LL-37, beta defensins), chemokines, and S100 proteins. These soluble factors have three main functions: stimulation of dendritic cells to release more IL-23, recruitment of neutrophils to the epidermis, and activation of dermal fibroblasts.

This cycle of keratinocytes activating dendritic cells, dendritic cells activating T cells, and T cells activating keratinocytes appears to be the main force maintaining the disease.24 It is unclear, however, whether this applies to all forms of psoriasis or only to plaque psoriasis.

Genetic factors discovered

In recent years, genome-wide association studies have identified at least 10 psoriasis-susceptibility loci that involve functioning of the immune system.25 These genes include those of the major histocompatibility complex, cytokines, receptors, and beta-defensins.

Of specific interest, polymorphisms in the IL-12/IL-13 receptor, the p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23, and the p19 subunit of IL-23 strongly associate with psoriasis, supporting their critical role in the disease process and providing targets for medical therapy.26

 

 

PSORIASIS HAS SEVERAL CLINICAL PHENOTYPES

Psoriasis has several clinical variants, each with a distinct clinical course and response to treatment.27 Moreover, many patients present with more than one variant.

Plaque psoriasis

Figure 1. Well-demarcated erythematous, scaly plaques characteristic of plaque psoriasis on the elbow.
Plaque psoriasis (Figure 1) accounts for more than 80% of cases. It is characterized by well-demarcated, scaly, pink-to-red plaques of various sizes with a relatively symmetric distribution. Involvement of the extensor surfaces such as the elbows and knees and of the scalp, trunk, and intergluteal cleft is common.

Plaques can persist for several months to years, even in the same location, and only about 5% of patients report complete remission for up to 5 years.

Inverse psoriasis

Photo courtesy of Joseph C. English III, MD.
Figure 2. Patient with inverse psoriasis of the axilla.
Involvement of the skin folds, including the axillary, genital, perineal, intergluteal, and inframammary regions with pink-to-red plaques with minimal scale is the main clinical feature of inverse psoriasis (Figure 2). Absence of satellite pustules clinically distinguishes it from candidiasis.

Guttate psoriasis

Photo courtesy of Laura K. Ferris, MD, PhD.
Figure 3. Guttate psoriasis with characteristic erythematous, scaly papules and small plaques on the back.
Guttate psoriasis (named for its droplet-shaped lesions) presents abruptly with 1-mm to 10-mm pink papules with associated fine scale over the trunk and extremities (Figure 3). This variant occurs in fewer than 2% of patients with psoriasis, who are usually younger than 30 years. It is often preceded 2 to 3 weeks earlier by an upper respiratory tract infection with group A beta-hemolytic streptococci.

Erythrodermic psoriasis

Approximately 1% to 2.25% of all patients with psoriasis develop this severe form, affecting more than 75% of the body surface area. It presents as generalized erythema, which is the most prominent feature, and it is often associated with superficial desquamation, hair loss, nail dystrophy, and systemic symptoms such as fever, chills, malaise, or high-output cardiac failure. There may be a history of preceding characteristic psoriatic plaques, recent withdrawal of treatment (usually corticosteroids), phototoxicity, or infection.

Conversely, approximately 25% of all patients with erythroderma have underlying psoriasis.28

Pustular psoriasis

Photo courtesy of Joseph C. English III, MD.
Figure 4. Erythematous plaques studded with pustules and red-brown macules on the acral surface of the foot in palmoplantar pustulosis.
Pustular psoriasis (Figure 4) is uncommon. The predominant lesions are large collections of neutrophils in the stratum corneum that clinically present as sterile pustules. The pustules may be localized within or at the edge of existing psoriatic plaques or may present as a generalized eruption.

There are several forms of pustular psoriasis, including generalized pustular psoriasis, annular pustular psoriasis, impetigo herpetiformis (pustular psoriasis of pregnancy), and palmoplantar pustulosis. However, there is some evidence to suggest that palmoplantar pustulosis may be distinct from psoriasis.29

Several triggers have been identified, including pregnancy, rapid tapering of medications, hypocalcemia, infection, or topical irritants.

Generalized pustular psoriasis, annular pustular psoriasis, and impetigo herpetiformis often present in association with fever and other systemic symptoms and, if left untreated, can result in life-threatening complications including bacterial superinfection, sepsis, dehydration, and, in rare cases, acute respiratory distress secondary to aseptic pneumonitis.30

Placental insufficiency resulting in stillbirth or neonatal death and other fetal abnormalities can occur in severe pustular psoriasis of pregnancy.31

Psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis is a seronegative inflammatory spondyloarthropathy that can result in erosive arthritis in up to 57% of cases and functional disability in up to 19%.32 Although rare in the general population, it affects approximately 6% to 10% of psoriasis patients and up to 40% of patients with severe psoriasis.33 In 70% of cases, psoriasis precedes the onset of arthritis by about 10 years, and approximately 10% to 15% of patients simultaneously present with psoriasis and arthritis or develop arthritis before skin involvement.5,34

Patients complain of joint discomfort that is most prominent after periods of prolonged rest. Patterns of involvement are extremely variable but have been reported as an asymmetric oligoarthritis (involving four or fewer joints) or polyarthritis (involving more than four joints) in most patients. A rheumatoid arthritis-like presentation with a symmetric polyarthropathy involving the small and medium-sized joints has also been reported, making it difficult to clinically distinguish this from rheumatoid arthritis.

A distal interphalangeal-predominant pattern is reported in 5% to 10% of patients. Axial disease resembling ankylosing spondylitis occurs only in 5% of patients. Arthritis mutilans, characterized by severe, rapidly progressive joint inflammation, joint destruction, and deformity, occurs rarely. Enthesitis, ie, inflammation at the point of attachment of tendons or ligaments to bone, is present in up to 42% of patients.5,35

Nail disease

Photo courtesy of Joseph C. English III, MD.
Figure 5. Nail pitting and onycholysis with surrounding psoriatic plaques along the perionychium and proximal nail fold.
Nail psoriasis occurs in 35% to 50% of patients and can be seen with all forms of psoriasis.1 Involvement of the nail matrix can result in nail pitting and leukonychia. Oil spots, subungual hyperkeratosis, and distal onycholysis are the result of disease involvement of the nail bed (Figure 5). Up to 90% of patients with psoriatic arthritis have nail changes, especially patients with enthesitis.36

Disease severity also varies

Disease severity also differs among patients. An estimated 80% of patients have mild to moderate disease and 20% have moderate to severe disease, which includes disease involving more than 5% of the body surface or involvement of the face, hands, feet, or genitalia.1

The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is an objective measure used in clinical trials. It incorporates the amount of redness, scaling, and induration of each psoriatic lesion over the body surface involved. A 75% improvement in the PASI score (PASI-75) is regarded as clinically significant.37

 

 

PSORIASIS IS DIAGNOSED CLINICALLY

In most cases, the diagnosis of psoriasis is made clinically and is straightforward. However, in more difficult cases, biopsy may be needed. In particular:

  • The plaques of psoriasis may be confused with squamous cell carcinoma in situ, dermatophyte infection, or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, especially if they are treatment-resistant.
  • Guttate psoriasis may be difficult to distinguish from pityriasis rosea.
  • Erythrodermic psoriasis must be distinguished from other causes of erythroderma, including Sézary syndrome, pityriasis rubra pilaris, and drug reactions.
  • Intertrigo, candidiasis, extramammary Paget disease, squamous cell carcinoma, and contact dermatitis all may mimic inverse psoriasis.
  • Palmoplantar pustulosis may be difficult to differentiate from dyshidrotic eczema.
  • Generalized pustular psoriasis should be distinguished from a pustular drug eruption (acute generalized exanthematous pustular drug eruption or acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis), impetigo, candidiasis, or an autoimmune blistering disorder such as pemphigus.

TREATMENT OF LIMITED DISEASE

Topical corticosteroids

A topical corticosteroid, either by itself or combined with a steroid-sparing agent, is the first-line therapy for patients with limited disease. The potency required for treatment should be based on the extent of disease and on the location, the choice of vehicle, and the patient’s preference and age.

Several double-blind studies have assessed the efficacy of various topical corticosteroids in treating psoriasis. In general, super-potent (class I) and potent (class II) topical corticosteroids are more efficacious than mild or moderate corticosteroids.38 Class I and class II steroids include agents such as clobetasol propionate 0.05% (Temovate), betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% (Diprolene), fluocinonide 0.05% (Lidex), and desoximetasone 0.25% (Topicort).

Use of class I steroids should be limited to an initial treatment course of twice-daily application for 2 to 4 weeks in an effort to avoid some of the local toxicities such as skin atrophy, telangiectasia, and striae. Decreasing class I topical steroid use to 1 to 2 times per week with the gradual introduction of a steroid-sparing agent following the initial 2 to 4 weeks of treatment is advised.

Steroid-sparing agents

Steroid-sparing agents include vitamin D analogues, retinoids, and tacrolimus ointment (Protopic).

Vitamin D analogues and retinoids are thought to decrease keratinocyte proliferation and enhance keratinocyte differentiation.39 The vitamin D analogues are also considered first-line topical agents and include calcipotriol (Dovonex), calcipotriene (Dovonex), and calcitriol (Vectical). To prevent hypercalcemia, use of more than 100 g of vitamin D analogues per week should be avoided.39

Treatment of inverse psoriasis and scalp psoriasis may be challenging

The areas affected in inverse psoriasis, such as the genitalia and axillae, are more prone to side effects when potent topical steroids are used because of increased absorption and occlusion in these areas. Agents that minimize irritation and toxicity in sensitive areas, such as topical tacrolimus, less-potent topical steroids, or calcitriol, can be used.39

For scalp psoriasis, alternative vehicles such as shampoos, gels, solutions, oils, sprays, and foams have improved patient compliance and efficacy of treatment.40

PHOTOTHERAPY FOR SEVERE DISEASE

Narrow-band ultraviolet B

Narrow-band ultraviolet B, ie, light confined to wavelengths of 311 to 313 nm, is a first-line treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis, either as monotherapy or in combination with other treatments. It is an especially attractive option in patients who are on medications or who have comorbidities that may preclude treatment with other systemic agents.

The mechanism of action may be via immunosuppressive effects on Langerhans cells, alteration of cytokines and adhesion molecules that lead to an increase in Th2 cells, and induction of apoptosis of T lymphocytes. Additionally, ultraviolet light affects the proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes.41

Dosing is based on skin type, and treatment usually involves two or three visits per week for a total of 15 to 20 treatments, with additional therapy for maintenance. Adding acitretin (Soriatane), with close monitoring of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels and the patient’s lipid panel, can be considered in treatment-resistant cases.42

Psoralen combined with ultraviolet A

Psoralen combined with ultraviolet A is another option. It can be considered if narrow-band ultraviolet B treatment fails. It is also useful for dark-skinned patients and those with thicker plaques because ultraviolet A penetrates deeper than ultraviolet B. Oral or topical treatment with psoralen is followed by ultraviolet A treatment.

The duration of remission is much longer with psoralen plus ultraviolet A than with narrow-band ultraviolet B. However, this treatment caries a significant risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma, especially in light-skinned people and those who receive high doses of ultraviolet A (200 or more treatments) or cyclosporine.40,41,43–46 Long-term effects include photoaging, lentigines, and telangiectasias. As a consequence of these well-established side effects, this treatment is used less frequently.

Cautions with phototherapy

Careful screening and caution should be used in patients who have:

  • Fair skin that tends to burn easily
  • A history of arsenic intake or treatment with ionizing radiation
  • A history of use of photosensitizing medications (fluoroquinolone antibiotics, doxycycline, hydrochlorothiazide)
  • A history of melanoma or atypical nevi
  • Multiple risk factors for melanoma
  • A history of nonmelanoma skin cancer
  • Immunosuppression due to organ transplantation.
 

 

ORAL THERAPIES FOR SEVERE PSORIASIS

Patients who have severe psoriasis—ie, affecting more than 5% of the body surface or debilitating disease affecting the palms, soles, or genitalia—are best managed with systemic medications, especially if they do not have access to phototherapy.20

Methotrexate

In 1972, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved methotrexate for treating severe psoriasis.42 In studies of methotrexate at doses of 15 to 20 mg weekly, 36% to 68% of patients with severe plaque psoriasis achieved a PASI-75 score.40,42,47

Dosages of methotrexate for treating severe psoriasis range from 7.5 to 25 mg once a week. Patients should also receive a folate supplement of 1 to 5 mg every day except the day they take methotrexate. The folate is to protect against gastrointestinal side effects, bone marrow suppression, and hepatic toxicity associated with methotrexate.

Other side effects of methotrexate include pulmonary fibrosis and stomatitis. Pregnancy, nursing, alcoholism, chronic liver disease, immunodeficiency syndromes, bone-marrow hypoplasia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and hypersensitivity to methotrexate are all contraindications to methotrexate use.

The National Psoriasis Foundation, in its 2009 guidelines for the use of methotrexate in treating psoriasis,48 recommends obtaining a complete blood cell count with platelets, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and liver function tests at baseline and at 1- to 3-month intervals thereafter.

Liver biopsies were previously recommended for patients receiving methotrexate long-term when the cumulative dose of therapy reached 1.5 g. However, given the invasive nature of the liver biopsy procedure and the low incidence of methotrexate-induced hepatotoxicity, this recommendation has been revised.

For patients with no significant risk factors for hepatic toxicity (eg, obesity, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hepatitis, or history of or current alcohol consumption) and normal liver function tests, liver biopsy should be considered when a cumulative methotrexate dose of 3.5 to 4.0 g is reached. Alternatively, one may choose to continue to monitor the patient without liver biopsy or to switch to another medication, if possible.42,48

Patients at high risk should be monitored more carefully, and liver biopsy should be considered soon after starting methotrexate and repeated after every 1.0 to 1.5 g.48

No reliable noninvasive measures to evaluate for liver fibrosis are routinely available in the United States. Serial measurements of serum type III procollagen aminopeptide have been reported to correlate with the risk of developing liver fibrosis; however, this test is readily available only in Europe.49

Cyclosporine

Cyclosporine (Gengraf, Neoral, Sandimmune) is very effective for treating psoriasis, especially erythrodermic psoriasis. It is often used only short-term or as a bridge to other maintenance therapies because it has a rapid onset and because long-term therapy (3 to 5 years) is associated with a risk of glomerulosclerosis.50

Cyclosporine works by decreasing T-cell activation by binding cyclophilin, which leads to inhibition of transcription of calcineurin and nuclear factor of activated T cells.51 Given at doses of 2.5 to 5 mg/kg/day, cyclosporine has been shown to result in rapid improvement in up to 80% to 90% of psoriatic patients.52,53

The initial recommended dose of cyclosporine is usually 2.5 to 3 mg/kg/day in two divided doses, which is maintained for 4 weeks and then increased by 0.5 mg/kg/day until the disease is stable.42

Nephrotoxicity and hypertension are cyclosporine’s most serious side effects. Blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and blood pressure should be monitored at baseline and then twice a month for the first 3 months and once monthly thereafter. Liver function tests, complete blood cell count, lipid profile, magnesium, uric acid, and potassium should also be checked every month.

Cyclosporine also increases the risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, especially in patients who have received psoralen plus ultraviolet A treatment.42

Patients with hypersensitivity to cyclosporine, a history of chronic infection (eg, tuberculosis, hepatitis B, hepatitis C), renal insufficiency, or a history of systemic malignancy should not receive cyclosporine.

Acitretin

Acitretin, an oral retinoid, has been used for several years to treat psoriasis. Its onset is slow, typically ranging from 3 to 6 months, and its effects are dose-dependent. It is most effective as a maintenance therapy, usually after the disease has been stabilized by agents such as cyclosporine, or in combination with other treatments such as phototherapy.42 Acitretin has been shown to be effective in patients with pustular psoriasis.54

Acitretin does not alter the immune system and has not been shown to have significant cumulative toxicities. Serum triglycerides are monitored closely, since acitretin can lead to hypertriglyceridemia.

All retinoids, including acitretin, are in pregnancy category X and should therefore be avoided during pregnancy. Although its half-life is only 49 hours, acitretin may be transformed to etretinate either spontaneously or as a result of alcohol ingestion. Etretinate has a half-life of 168 days and can take up to 3 years to be eliminated from the body. Therefore, acitretin is contraindicated in women who plan to become pregnant or who do not agree to use adequate contraception for 3 years after the drug is discontinued.42

Biologic agents

Advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of psoriasis have resulted in more specific, targeted therapy.

Alefacept (Amevive) is a human Fc IgG1 receptor fused to the alpha subunit of LFA3. It binds to CD2, blocks costimulatory signaling, and induces apoptosis in activated memory T cells.

Alefacept was the first biologic agent approved by the FDA for the treatment of psoriasis and one of the few biologic agents to induce long-term remission.55 However, its use has declined because few patients achieved significant clearance of their psoriasis and its onset of action was much slower than that of other medications.56

The currently approved biologic therapies commonly used for moderate to severe psoriasis include the TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab (Stelara).

The TNF-alpha inhibitors include infliximab (Remicade), etanercept (Enbrel), and adalimumab (Humira). They are generally well tolerated and highly effective. However, TNF-alpha inhibitors and other biologic agents are contraindicated in patients with serious infection, a personal history or a family history in a first-degree relative of demyelinating disease, or class III or IV congestive heart failure. Patients should be screened for active infection, including tuberculosis and hepatitis B, since reactivation has been reported following initiation of TNF-alpha inhibitors.1

Adalimumab is a human monoclonal antibody against TNF-alpha. It binds to soluble and membrane-bound TNF-alpha and prevents it from binding to p55 and p75 cell-surface TNF receptors.

The dosing schedule for adalimumab is 80 mg subcutaneously for the first week, followed by 40 mg subcutaneously the next week, and then 40 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks thereafter.1

Etanercept is a recombinant human TNF-alpha receptor (p75) protein fused with the Fc portion of IgG1, which binds to soluble TNF-alpha.57 Dosing for etanercept is 50 mg subcutaneously twice weekly for the first 12 weeks, followed by 50 mg weekly thereafter.

Infliximab is a chimeric antibody composed of a human IgG1 constant region fused to a mouse variable region that binds to both soluble and membrane-bound TNF-alpha.58 Infliximab is given as an infusion at a dose of 5 mg/kg over 2 to 3 hours at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and then every 8 weeks thereafter.

Efficacy of TNF inhibitors. There are no specific guidelines for the sequence of initiation of TNF inhibitors because no studies have directly compared the efficacy of these medications. However, response to infliximab is relatively rapid compared with adalimumab and etanercept.

In a phase III clinical trial,59 as many as 80% of patients achieved PASI-75 clearance of their psoriasis after three doses of infliximab. Interestingly, only 61% of patients maintained PASI-75 clearance by week 50. This loss of efficacy of infliximab is also reported with other TNF-alpha inhibitors and is thought to be secondary to the development of antibodies to the drugs. For infliximab, this loss of efficacy is less when infliximab is given continuously rather than on an as-needed basis. Simultaneous treatment with methotrexate is also thought to decrease the development of antibodies to infliximab.60

Ustekinumab is an monoclonal antibody directed against the common p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23, which have been shown to be at increased levels in psoriatic lesions and important for the pathogenesis of psoriasis.

Between 66% and 76% of patients treated with ustekinumab achieved significant clearance of their disease after 12 weeks of treatment in two large phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.61,62

Dosing of ustekinumab is weight-based. For those weighing less than 100 kg, ustekinumab is given at 45 mg subcutaneously at baseline, at 4 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. The same dosing schedule is used for those weighing more than 100 kg, but the dose is increased to 90 mg.

Guidelines for monitoring patients while on ustekinumab are similar to those for other biologic agents. Information on long-term toxicities is still being collected. However, injection-site reactions, serious infections, malignancies, and a single case of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy have been reported.20

While biologic agents are significantly more expensive than the conventional therapies discussed above and insurance coverage for these agents varies, they have demonstrated superior efficacy and may be indicated for patients with recalcitrant moderate to severe psoriasis for whom multiple types of treatment have failed.

 

 

FOR PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: SYSTEMIC MEDICATIONS

For patients with known or questionable psoriatic arthritis, evaluation by a rheumatologist is highly recommended.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are usually first-line in the treatment of mild psoriatic arthritis. If after 2 to 3 months of therapy with NSAIDs no benefit is achieved, treatment with methotrexate as monotherapy is a practical consideration because of its low cost. However, methotrexate as a monotherapy has not been shown to prevent radiologic progression of disease.5,32

The TNF-alpha inhibitors have been shown to have similar efficacy when compared among each other in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis.32,63 Based on radiologic evidence, ustekinumab has not shown to be as efficacious as the TNF-alpha inhibitors for treating psoriatic arthritis. Therefore, TNF inhibitors should be considered first-line in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis.21,64

Few studies have been done on the efficacy or sequence of therapies that should be used in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. The American Academy of Dermatology’s Psoriasis Guidelines of Care recommend adding a TNF-alpha inhibitor or switching to a TNF-alpha inhibitor if no significant improvement is achieved after 12 to 16 weeks of treatment with oral methotrexate.20

FOR ERYTHRODERMIC PSORIASIS: MEDICATIONS THAT ACT PROMPTLY

The care of erythrodermic psoriatic patients is distinct from that of other psoriatic patients because of their associated systemic symptoms. Care should be taken to rule out sepsis, as this is a reported trigger of erythrodermic psoriasis.28

Systemic medications with a quick onset, such as oral cyclosporine, are recommended. Infliximab has also been reported to be beneficial because of its rapid onset.28

TREATMENT BASED ON THE TYPE AND THE SEVERITY OF PSORIASIS

The treatment of psoriasis can be as complex as the disease it itself and should be based on the type and the severity of psoriasis. Recognition of the various manifestations of psoriasis is important for effective treatment. However, in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, atypical presentations, or recalcitrant disease, referral to a specialist is recommended.

References
  1. Menter A, Gottlieb A, Feldman SR, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 1. Overview of psoriasis and guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58:826850.
  2. Christophers E. Psoriasis—epidemiology and clinical spectrum. Clin Exp Dermatol 2001; 26:314320.
  3. Rapp SR, Feldman SR, Exum ML, Fleischer AB, Reboussin DM. Psoriasis causes as much disability as other major medical diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41:401407.
  4. Weiss SC, Kimball AB, Liewehr DJ, Blauvelt A, Turner ML, Emanuel EJ. Quantifying the harmful effect of psoriasis on health-related quality of life. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 47:512518.
  5. Garg A, Gladman D. Recognizing psoriatic arthritis in the dermatology clinic. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63:733748.
  6. Kimball AB, Yu AP, Signorovitch J, et al. The effects of adalimumab treatment and psoriasis severity on self-reported work productivity and activity impairment for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 66:e67e76.
  7. Schmitt JM, Ford DE. Work limitations and productivity loss are associated with health-related quality of life but not with clinical severity in patients with psoriasis. Dermatology 2006; 213:102110.
  8. Gelfand JM, Neimann AL, Shin DB, Wang X, Margolis DJ, Troxel AB. Risk of myocardial infarction in patients with psoriasis. JAMA 2006; 296:17351741.
  9. Abuabara K, Azfar RS, Shin DB, Neimann AL, Troxel AB, Gelfand JM. Cause-specific mortality in patients with severe psoriasis: a population-based cohort study in the U.K. Br J Dermatol 2010; 163:586592.
  10. Ahlehoff O, Gislason GH, Charlot M, et al. Psoriasis is associated with clinically significant cardiovascular risk: a Danish nationwide cohort study. J Intern Med 2011; 270:147157.
  11. Lin HW, Wang KH, Lin HC, Lin HC. Increased risk of acute myocardial infarction in patients with psoriasis: a 5-year population-based study in Taiwan. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 64:495501.
  12. Bremmer S, Van Voorhees AS, Hsu S, et al; National Psoriasis Foundation. Obesity and psoriasis: from the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63:10581069.
  13. Tobin AM, Veale DJ, Fitzgerald O, et al. Cardiovascular disease and risk factors in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2010; 37:13861394.
  14. Najarian DJ, Gottlieb AB. Connections between psoriasis and Crohn’s disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48:805821.
  15. Neimann AL, Shin DB, Wang X, Margolis DJ, Troxel AB, Gelfand JM. Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55:829835.
  16. Shapiro J, Cohen AD, Weitzman D, Tal R, David M. Psoriasis and cardiovascular risk factors: a case-control study on inpatients comparing psoriasis to dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 66:252258.
  17. Gelfand JM, Shin DB, Neimann AL, Wang X, Margolis DJ, Troxel AB. The risk of lymphoma in patients with psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol 2006; 126:21942201.
  18. Chen YJ, Wu CY, Chen TJ, et al. The risk of cancer in patients with psoriasis: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 65:8491.
  19. Friedewald VE, Cather JC, Gelfand JM, et al. AJC editor’s consensus: psoriasis and coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2008; 102:16311643.
  20. American Academy of Dermatology Work Group; Menter A, Korman NJ, Elmets CA, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 6. Guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: case-based presentations and evidence-based conclusions. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 65:137174.
  21. Mallbris L, Larsson P, Bergqvist S, Vingård E, Granath F, Ståhle M. Psoriasis phenotype at disease onset: clinical characterization of 400 adult cases. J Invest Dermatol 2005; 124:499504.
  22. Armstrong AW, Armstrong EJ, Fuller EN, Sockolov ME, Voyles SV. Smoking and pathogenesis of psoriasis: a review of oxidative, inflammatory and genetic mechanisms. Br J Dermatol 2011; 165:11621168.
  23. Qureshi AA, Dominguez PL, Choi HK, Han J, Curhan G. Alcohol intake and risk of incident psoriasis in US women: a prospective study. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146:13641369.
  24. Nestle FO, Kaplan DH, Barker J. Psoriasis. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:496509.
  25. Genetic Analysis of Psoriasis Consortium & the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2; Strange A, Capon F, Spencer CC, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies new psoriasis susceptibility loci and an interaction between HLA-C and ERAP1. Nat Genet 2010; 42:985990.
  26. Nair RP, Duffin KC, Helms C, et al; Collaborative Association Study of Psoriasis. Genome-wide scan reveals association of psoriasis with IL-23 and NF-kappaB pathways. Nat Genet 2009; 41:199204.
  27. Griffiths CE, Christophers E, Barker JN, et al. A classification of psoriasis vulgaris according to phenotype. Br J Dermatol 2007; 156:258262.
  28. Rosenbach M, Hsu S, Korman NJ, et al; National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board. Treatment of erythrodermic psoriasis: from the medical board of the National Psoriasis Foundation. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 62:655662.
  29. Mrowietz U, van de Kerkhof PC. Management of palmoplantar pustulosis: do we need to change? Br J Dermatol 2011; 164:942946.
  30. Kluger N, Bessis D, Guillot B, Girard C. Acute respiratory distress syndrome complicating generalized pustular psoriasis (psoriasis-associated aseptic pneumonitis). J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 64:11541158.
  31. Roth MM. Pregnancy dermatoses: diagnosis, management, and controversies. Am J Clin Dermatol 2011; 12:2541.
  32. Gottlieb A, Korman NJ, Gordon KB, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 2. Psoriatic arthritis: overview and guidelines of care for treatment with an emphasis on the biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58:851864.
  33. Ogdie A, Gelfand JM. Identification of risk factors for psoriatic arthritis: scientific opportunity meets clinical need. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146:785788.
  34. Gelfand JM, Gladman DD, Mease PJ, et al. Epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis in the population of the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 53:573.
  35. Moll JM, Wright V. Psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1973; 3:5578.
  36. McGonagle D. Enthesitis: an autoinflammatory lesion linking nail and joint involvement in psoriatic disease. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2009; 23(suppl 1):913.
  37. Feldman SR, Krueger GG. Psoriasis assessment tools in clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64(suppl 2):ii65ii68.
  38. Mason J, Mason AR, Cork MJ. Topical preparations for the treatment of psoriasis: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 2002; 146:351364.
  39. Menter A, Korman NJ, Elmets CA, et al; American Academy of Dermatology. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Section 3. Guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 60:643659.
  40. Zivkovich AH, Feldman SR. Are ointments better than other vehicles for corticosteroid treatment of psoriasis? J Drugs Dermatol 2009; 8:570572.
  41. Menter A, Korman NJ, Elmets CA, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 5. Guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with phototherapy and photochemotherapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 62:114135.
  42. Menter A, Korman NJ, Elmets CA, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 4. Guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with traditional systemic agents. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 61:451485.
  43. Murase JE, Lee EE, Koo J. Effect of ethnicity on the risk of developing nonmelanoma skin cancer following long-term PUVA therapy. Int J Dermatol 2005; 44:10161021.
  44. Stern RS, Lunder EJ. Risk of squamous cell carcinoma and methoxsalen (psoralen) and UV-A radiation (PUVA). A meta-analysis. Arch Dermatol 1998; 134:15821585.
  45. Stern RS, Väkevä LH. Noncutaneous malignant tumors in the PUVA follow-up study: 1975–1996. J Invest Dermatol 1997; 108:897900.
  46. Patel RV, Clark LN, Lebwohl M, Weinberg JM. Treatments for psoriasis and the risk of malignancy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 60:10011017.
  47. Flytström I, Stenberg B, Svensson A, Bergbrant IM. Methotrexate vs. ciclosporin in psoriasis: effectiveness, quality of life and safety. A randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol 2008; 158:116121.
  48. Kalb RE, Strober B, Weinstein G, Lebwohl M. Methotrexate and psoriasis: 2009 National Psoriasis Foundation Consensus Conference. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 60:824837.
  49. Zachariae H, Heickendorff L, Søgaard H. The value of aminoterminal propeptide of type III procollagen in routine screening for methotrexate-induced liver fibrosis: a 10-year follow-up. Br J Dermatol 2001; 144:100103.
  50. Lowe NJ, Wieder JM, Rosenbach A, et al. Long-term low-dose cyclosporine therapy for severe psoriasis: effects on renal function and structure. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996; 35:710719.
  51. Gottlieb AB, Grossman RM, Khandke L, et al. Studies of the effect of cyclosporine in psoriasis in vivo: combined effects on activated T lymphocytes and epidermal regenerative maturation. J Invest Dermatol 1992; 98:302309.
  52. Ellis CN, Fradin MS, Messana JM, et al. Cyclosporine for plaque-type psoriasis. Results of a multidose, double-blind trial. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:277284.
  53. Faerber L, Braeutigam M, Weidinger G, et al. Cyclosporine in severe psoriasis. Results of a meta-analysis in 579 patients. Am J Clin Dermatol 2001; 2:4147.
  54. Ozawa A, Ohkido M, Haruki Y, et al. Treatments of generalized pustular psoriasis: a multicenter study in Japan. J Dermatol 1999; 26:141149.
  55. Krueger GG, Ellis CN. Alefacept therapy produces remission for patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 2003; 148:784788.
  56. Lebwohl M, Christophers E, Langley R, Ortonne JP, Roberts J, Griffiths CE; Alefacept Clinical Study Group. An international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of intramuscular alefacept in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139:719727.
  57. Gottlieb AB, Matheson RT, Lowe N, et al. A randomized trial of etanercept as monotherapy for psoriasis. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139:16271632.
  58. Gottlieb AB, Masud S, Ramamurthi R, et al. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic response to anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody (infliximab) treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48:6875.
  59. Reich K, Nestle FO, Papp K, et al; EXPRESS study investigators. Infliximab induction and maintenance therapy for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a phase III, multicentre, double-blind trial. Lancet 2005; 366:13671374.
  60. Menter A, Feldman SR, Weinstein GD, et al. A randomized comparison of continuous vs. intermittent infliximab maintenance regimens over 1 year in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56:31.e131.e15.
  61. Papp KA, Langley RG, Lebwohl M, et al; PHOENIX 2 study investigators. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 52-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 2). Lancet 2008; 371:16751684.
  62. Leonardi CL, Kimball AB, Papp KA, et al; PHOENIX 1 study investigators. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 76-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 1). Lancet 2008; 371:16651674.
  63. Griffiths CE, Strober BE, van de Kerkhof P, et al; ACCEPT Study Group. Comparison of ustekinumab and etanercept for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:118128.
  64. Gottlieb A, Menter A, Mendelsohn A, et al. Ustekinumab, a human interleukin 12/23 monoclonal antibody, for psoriatic arthritis: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Lancet. 2009; 373:633640.
References
  1. Menter A, Gottlieb A, Feldman SR, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 1. Overview of psoriasis and guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58:826850.
  2. Christophers E. Psoriasis—epidemiology and clinical spectrum. Clin Exp Dermatol 2001; 26:314320.
  3. Rapp SR, Feldman SR, Exum ML, Fleischer AB, Reboussin DM. Psoriasis causes as much disability as other major medical diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41:401407.
  4. Weiss SC, Kimball AB, Liewehr DJ, Blauvelt A, Turner ML, Emanuel EJ. Quantifying the harmful effect of psoriasis on health-related quality of life. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 47:512518.
  5. Garg A, Gladman D. Recognizing psoriatic arthritis in the dermatology clinic. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63:733748.
  6. Kimball AB, Yu AP, Signorovitch J, et al. The effects of adalimumab treatment and psoriasis severity on self-reported work productivity and activity impairment for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 66:e67e76.
  7. Schmitt JM, Ford DE. Work limitations and productivity loss are associated with health-related quality of life but not with clinical severity in patients with psoriasis. Dermatology 2006; 213:102110.
  8. Gelfand JM, Neimann AL, Shin DB, Wang X, Margolis DJ, Troxel AB. Risk of myocardial infarction in patients with psoriasis. JAMA 2006; 296:17351741.
  9. Abuabara K, Azfar RS, Shin DB, Neimann AL, Troxel AB, Gelfand JM. Cause-specific mortality in patients with severe psoriasis: a population-based cohort study in the U.K. Br J Dermatol 2010; 163:586592.
  10. Ahlehoff O, Gislason GH, Charlot M, et al. Psoriasis is associated with clinically significant cardiovascular risk: a Danish nationwide cohort study. J Intern Med 2011; 270:147157.
  11. Lin HW, Wang KH, Lin HC, Lin HC. Increased risk of acute myocardial infarction in patients with psoriasis: a 5-year population-based study in Taiwan. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 64:495501.
  12. Bremmer S, Van Voorhees AS, Hsu S, et al; National Psoriasis Foundation. Obesity and psoriasis: from the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63:10581069.
  13. Tobin AM, Veale DJ, Fitzgerald O, et al. Cardiovascular disease and risk factors in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2010; 37:13861394.
  14. Najarian DJ, Gottlieb AB. Connections between psoriasis and Crohn’s disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48:805821.
  15. Neimann AL, Shin DB, Wang X, Margolis DJ, Troxel AB, Gelfand JM. Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55:829835.
  16. Shapiro J, Cohen AD, Weitzman D, Tal R, David M. Psoriasis and cardiovascular risk factors: a case-control study on inpatients comparing psoriasis to dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 66:252258.
  17. Gelfand JM, Shin DB, Neimann AL, Wang X, Margolis DJ, Troxel AB. The risk of lymphoma in patients with psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol 2006; 126:21942201.
  18. Chen YJ, Wu CY, Chen TJ, et al. The risk of cancer in patients with psoriasis: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 65:8491.
  19. Friedewald VE, Cather JC, Gelfand JM, et al. AJC editor’s consensus: psoriasis and coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2008; 102:16311643.
  20. American Academy of Dermatology Work Group; Menter A, Korman NJ, Elmets CA, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 6. Guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: case-based presentations and evidence-based conclusions. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 65:137174.
  21. Mallbris L, Larsson P, Bergqvist S, Vingård E, Granath F, Ståhle M. Psoriasis phenotype at disease onset: clinical characterization of 400 adult cases. J Invest Dermatol 2005; 124:499504.
  22. Armstrong AW, Armstrong EJ, Fuller EN, Sockolov ME, Voyles SV. Smoking and pathogenesis of psoriasis: a review of oxidative, inflammatory and genetic mechanisms. Br J Dermatol 2011; 165:11621168.
  23. Qureshi AA, Dominguez PL, Choi HK, Han J, Curhan G. Alcohol intake and risk of incident psoriasis in US women: a prospective study. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146:13641369.
  24. Nestle FO, Kaplan DH, Barker J. Psoriasis. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:496509.
  25. Genetic Analysis of Psoriasis Consortium & the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2; Strange A, Capon F, Spencer CC, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies new psoriasis susceptibility loci and an interaction between HLA-C and ERAP1. Nat Genet 2010; 42:985990.
  26. Nair RP, Duffin KC, Helms C, et al; Collaborative Association Study of Psoriasis. Genome-wide scan reveals association of psoriasis with IL-23 and NF-kappaB pathways. Nat Genet 2009; 41:199204.
  27. Griffiths CE, Christophers E, Barker JN, et al. A classification of psoriasis vulgaris according to phenotype. Br J Dermatol 2007; 156:258262.
  28. Rosenbach M, Hsu S, Korman NJ, et al; National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board. Treatment of erythrodermic psoriasis: from the medical board of the National Psoriasis Foundation. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 62:655662.
  29. Mrowietz U, van de Kerkhof PC. Management of palmoplantar pustulosis: do we need to change? Br J Dermatol 2011; 164:942946.
  30. Kluger N, Bessis D, Guillot B, Girard C. Acute respiratory distress syndrome complicating generalized pustular psoriasis (psoriasis-associated aseptic pneumonitis). J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 64:11541158.
  31. Roth MM. Pregnancy dermatoses: diagnosis, management, and controversies. Am J Clin Dermatol 2011; 12:2541.
  32. Gottlieb A, Korman NJ, Gordon KB, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 2. Psoriatic arthritis: overview and guidelines of care for treatment with an emphasis on the biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58:851864.
  33. Ogdie A, Gelfand JM. Identification of risk factors for psoriatic arthritis: scientific opportunity meets clinical need. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146:785788.
  34. Gelfand JM, Gladman DD, Mease PJ, et al. Epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis in the population of the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 53:573.
  35. Moll JM, Wright V. Psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1973; 3:5578.
  36. McGonagle D. Enthesitis: an autoinflammatory lesion linking nail and joint involvement in psoriatic disease. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2009; 23(suppl 1):913.
  37. Feldman SR, Krueger GG. Psoriasis assessment tools in clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64(suppl 2):ii65ii68.
  38. Mason J, Mason AR, Cork MJ. Topical preparations for the treatment of psoriasis: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 2002; 146:351364.
  39. Menter A, Korman NJ, Elmets CA, et al; American Academy of Dermatology. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Section 3. Guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 60:643659.
  40. Zivkovich AH, Feldman SR. Are ointments better than other vehicles for corticosteroid treatment of psoriasis? J Drugs Dermatol 2009; 8:570572.
  41. Menter A, Korman NJ, Elmets CA, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 5. Guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with phototherapy and photochemotherapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 62:114135.
  42. Menter A, Korman NJ, Elmets CA, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 4. Guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with traditional systemic agents. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 61:451485.
  43. Murase JE, Lee EE, Koo J. Effect of ethnicity on the risk of developing nonmelanoma skin cancer following long-term PUVA therapy. Int J Dermatol 2005; 44:10161021.
  44. Stern RS, Lunder EJ. Risk of squamous cell carcinoma and methoxsalen (psoralen) and UV-A radiation (PUVA). A meta-analysis. Arch Dermatol 1998; 134:15821585.
  45. Stern RS, Väkevä LH. Noncutaneous malignant tumors in the PUVA follow-up study: 1975–1996. J Invest Dermatol 1997; 108:897900.
  46. Patel RV, Clark LN, Lebwohl M, Weinberg JM. Treatments for psoriasis and the risk of malignancy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 60:10011017.
  47. Flytström I, Stenberg B, Svensson A, Bergbrant IM. Methotrexate vs. ciclosporin in psoriasis: effectiveness, quality of life and safety. A randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol 2008; 158:116121.
  48. Kalb RE, Strober B, Weinstein G, Lebwohl M. Methotrexate and psoriasis: 2009 National Psoriasis Foundation Consensus Conference. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 60:824837.
  49. Zachariae H, Heickendorff L, Søgaard H. The value of aminoterminal propeptide of type III procollagen in routine screening for methotrexate-induced liver fibrosis: a 10-year follow-up. Br J Dermatol 2001; 144:100103.
  50. Lowe NJ, Wieder JM, Rosenbach A, et al. Long-term low-dose cyclosporine therapy for severe psoriasis: effects on renal function and structure. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996; 35:710719.
  51. Gottlieb AB, Grossman RM, Khandke L, et al. Studies of the effect of cyclosporine in psoriasis in vivo: combined effects on activated T lymphocytes and epidermal regenerative maturation. J Invest Dermatol 1992; 98:302309.
  52. Ellis CN, Fradin MS, Messana JM, et al. Cyclosporine for plaque-type psoriasis. Results of a multidose, double-blind trial. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:277284.
  53. Faerber L, Braeutigam M, Weidinger G, et al. Cyclosporine in severe psoriasis. Results of a meta-analysis in 579 patients. Am J Clin Dermatol 2001; 2:4147.
  54. Ozawa A, Ohkido M, Haruki Y, et al. Treatments of generalized pustular psoriasis: a multicenter study in Japan. J Dermatol 1999; 26:141149.
  55. Krueger GG, Ellis CN. Alefacept therapy produces remission for patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 2003; 148:784788.
  56. Lebwohl M, Christophers E, Langley R, Ortonne JP, Roberts J, Griffiths CE; Alefacept Clinical Study Group. An international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of intramuscular alefacept in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139:719727.
  57. Gottlieb AB, Matheson RT, Lowe N, et al. A randomized trial of etanercept as monotherapy for psoriasis. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139:16271632.
  58. Gottlieb AB, Masud S, Ramamurthi R, et al. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic response to anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody (infliximab) treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48:6875.
  59. Reich K, Nestle FO, Papp K, et al; EXPRESS study investigators. Infliximab induction and maintenance therapy for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a phase III, multicentre, double-blind trial. Lancet 2005; 366:13671374.
  60. Menter A, Feldman SR, Weinstein GD, et al. A randomized comparison of continuous vs. intermittent infliximab maintenance regimens over 1 year in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56:31.e131.e15.
  61. Papp KA, Langley RG, Lebwohl M, et al; PHOENIX 2 study investigators. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 52-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 2). Lancet 2008; 371:16751684.
  62. Leonardi CL, Kimball AB, Papp KA, et al; PHOENIX 1 study investigators. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 76-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 1). Lancet 2008; 371:16651674.
  63. Griffiths CE, Strober BE, van de Kerkhof P, et al; ACCEPT Study Group. Comparison of ustekinumab and etanercept for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:118128.
  64. Gottlieb A, Menter A, Mendelsohn A, et al. Ustekinumab, a human interleukin 12/23 monoclonal antibody, for psoriatic arthritis: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Lancet. 2009; 373:633640.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 79(6)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 79(6)
Page Number
413-423
Page Number
413-423
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Psoriasis: Evolving treatment for a complex disease
Display Headline
Psoriasis: Evolving treatment for a complex disease
Sections
Inside the Article

KEY POINTS

  • Studies in the past 10 years have uncovered a link between psoriasis, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease. Interestingly, the risk grows less with age; patients at greatest risk are young men with severe psoriasis.
  • The most common presentation of psoriasis is plaque psoriasis. However, there are several other clinical variations of psoriasis, each of which has a distinct response to treatment and may be associated with significant systemic symptoms.
  • Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors should be considered first-line in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis.
  • Phototherapy and systemic medications including methotrexate, acitretin (Soriatane), cyclosporine (Gengraf, Neoral, Sandimmune), and biologic agents are the most effective treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis.
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Grand Rounds: Man, 65, With Heart Failure Symptoms

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Man, 65, With Heart Failure Symptoms

A black man, age 65, with no known history of cardiopulmonary disease presented with acute-onset exertional dyspnea and lower extremity edema. He also reported an episode of syncope, as well as occasional dizziness and abdominal bloating. He said he experienced exertional dyspnea while doing a routine step aerobic exercise. His exercise regimen included distance walking, yoga, and aerobics four to five days per week.

The patient’s medical history was remarkable for a single episode of a bleeding ulcer in previous years, low back pain, shoulder pain, and a septic arthritic hip. His social history was negative for use of tobacco, alcohol, or illegal drugs. He was married and had two biological daughters with fairly unremarkable medical histories. The patient had earned a master’s degree, worked full-time in the insurance business, and was an avid worldwide traveler. He reported diminished quality of life as a result of his acute-onset heart failure symptoms, which reduced his ability to exercise routinely, work full-time, or travel.

The patient’s sudden experience of exertional dyspnea prompted him to visit his primary care provider, who ordered an ECG that demonstrated low voltage patterns and a first-degree atrioventricular (AV) block. Subsequent stress echocardiography showed generalized thickening of the left ventricular myocardium. Posterior wall thickness measured 1.7 cm (normal range, 0.6 to 1.1 cm), septal thickness measured 1.9 cm (normal, 0.6 to 1.1 cm), and ejection fraction was 65%. The stress echocardiogram also showed a speckling pattern (brightly scattered spots) on the myocardium.

Although stress echocardiography results were negative for ischemic disease, the patient did experience dyspnea during the exam. He underwent cardiac catheterization, which indicated normal coronary arteries.

Additional diagnostic studies included cardiac MRI with and without contrast, which showed nulling of the heart muscle and delayed patchy hyperenhancement; this suggested myocardial tissue abnormality as result of amyloid fibril deposition.1 Both pulmonary and tricuspid aortic valves were normal, with no evidence of stenosis. No regional wall motion abnormalities were noted.

Laboratory findings during the work-up were lipid panel, unremarkable; complete blood count (CBC), mild anemia and leukopenia; and urinalysis, positive for proteinuria. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was measured at 686 pg/mL (normal, 0.0 to 100 pg/mL), indicating moderate heart failure. A peripheral blood smear was negative for monoclonal plasma cells.

The patient’s physical exam was unremarkable except for 2+ pedal edema bilaterally. In consideration of normal coronary arteries on cardiac catheterization, the patient’s heart failure symptoms, and stress echocardiography abnormalities, a heart biopsy was ordered. An endomyocardial biopsy with Congo Red stain demonstrated an apple-green birefringent pattern viewed under high-definition polarized light microscope, which was consistent with amyloid deposition.2

The patient was given a diagnosis of primary amyloidosis by his local cardiologist despite negative findings on the peripheral blood smear for monoclonal plasma cells (which are typically found in primary amyloidosis).3 He presented to an institution well-known for its expertise in amyloidosis, for a second opinion. There, the diagnosis was negated, based on reevaluation of the patient’s previous heart specimen through immunohistochemical studies. These studies were positive for serum amyloid P, which is suggestive of transthyretin (TTR) or familial amyloidosis.4 Genetic testing revealed a familial amyloidosis DNA sequence analysis with the Val122Ile variant (ie, isoleucine for valine at position 1225). With the correct diagnosis confirmed, the patient was referred to another highly regarded institution to begin a work-up for cardiac transplantation. Meanwhile, he was cautiously treated with the loop diuretic furosemide to manage his shortness of breath and peripheral edema.

Fifteen months later (13 weeks after being listed for transplant), the patient underwent successful cardiac transplantation.

On pathologic review of the patient’s extricated heart, the myocardium was found to be grossly thickened (see figure, above) and weighed 540 g; the average adult heart weighs 300 to 350 g, depending on the patient’s size.6 Congo Red staining showed extensive amyloid deposits with infiltration throughout the myocardium.

Ninety percent of the amyloid deposits were interstitial, 5% were in the vessels, and 5% were noted in a nodular pattern. The left ventricular cavity showed dilated and thickened walls. Intramural and extramural blood vessels were infiltrated with amyloid as well.

Six months after transplantation, the patient underwent diagnostic testing to assess the function and structure of his new heart. Cardiac catheterization was negative for coronary artery disease. Thirteen months posttransplantation, endomyocardial biopsy with Congo Red stain was negative for amyloid deposition or organ rejection.

About 24 months posttransplantation, the patient was taking tacrolimus, pravastatin, pantoprazole, dapsone, propanolol, colchicine, and donepezil. Stress echocardiography demonstrated normal right and left ventricular systolic function; no wall-motion abnormalities or left ventricular hypertrophy were detected, and the right atrium was of normal size. There was abnormal structural enlargement of the left atrium at the site of anastamosis—a common finding in cardiac transplant patients. The aortic, tricuspid, and mitral valves were all normal.

 

 

At that time, it was decided not to repeat endomyocardial biopsy because of normal results on molecular expression testing (a noninvasive technique called AlloMap®7-9), which is performed to assess for heart transplant rejection. The patient’s lipid panel remained within normal limits. CBC indicated persistent anemia and leukopenia. Urine protein and BNP test results were not available.

Since undergoing cardiac transplantation, the patient has resumed his normal routine activities, including some type of exercise five days per week. He said his diet is maintained in moderation. He denied shortness of breath, chest pain, dizziness, or edema. He has returned to full-time employment and has vacationed in Croatia, Italy, and Central America.

DISCUSSION
Familial amyloidosis is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by the production of mutated proteins, most commonly ATTR. Presence of the ATTR Val 122Ile allele has been reported in 3.9% of all black Americans, and in one study, 23% of black Americans diagnosed with cardiac amyloidosis at autopsy were heterozygous for this variant allele.10-12 ATTR Val122Ile usually manifests in the fifth

or sixth decade of life with its characteristic presentation of infiltrative/restrictive cardiomyopathy,13 resulting in heart failure and sometimes peripheral neuropathy.10,11,14

Pathophysiology
In patients with ATTR Val122Ile, cardiomyopathy results from the deposition of mutant protein fibrils in the cardiac muscle, leading to restricted heart wall motion10,15 and stiffening of the cardiac ventricles, with subsequent disruption of the diastolic filling properties of the cardiac muscle.16 Fluid overload and heart failure follow.3,10,17 The atrium of the heart dilates, and the walls of the ventricles become thickened and fibrous.18 Liepnieks and Benson6 reported that the cadaver heart of one Val122Ile patient infiltrated with amyloid protein fibrils weighed 725 g—more than double the weight of an average adult heart.

In patients with cardiac amyloidosis, ECG can detect arrhythmia, and echocardiography shows cardiac enlargement; however, as in the case patient, cardiac catheterization shows normal coronary arteries.15,16,19,20 Thus, previously healthy patients who present with heart failure and negative results on cardiac catheterization should undergo further work-up for cardiac amyloidosis.19

Amyloidosis affects all populations globally.10 In systemic amyloidosis, amyloid releases into the plasma, infiltrating and impairing multiple organs. Poor survival has been reported in patients with heart failure symptoms resulting from amyloid deposition.20,21

Types of Amyloidosis
Primary amyloidosis, the most common of the three amyloidosis types, can be systemic or localized.22 It occurs when protein fibrils, developed from immunoglobin light chains or monoclonal plasma cells and measuring 7 to 10 nm in diameter, adhere to the heart, kidneys, peripheral nerves, eyes, and other organs.5,11,20,23,24 Known for its relation to multiple myeloma,19 primary amyloidosis is associated with a poor prognosis.3,10

Secondary amyloidosis results from a chronic inflammatory disorder, such as rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis—conditions that trigger the production of amyloid proteins.3,10 This type has also been associated with substance abuse and AIDS.23

Familial or hereditary amyloidosis, according to Benson,10 is a group of diseases, each resulting from mutation in a specific protein. In the United States, the most common type of familial amyloidosis is ATTR.11 More than 100 mutant types of ATTR proteins have been identified, each involving a specific nationality or group of nationalities.10,11,23

Mutant ATTR amyloid, when deposited in specific organs, leads to their dysfunction and ultimate failure.6 ATTR may affect the cardiac, gastric, renal, ophthalmic, or nervous system. Depending on the ATTR variant, the resulting clinical features are age- and time-dependent, with onset most common between the third and fifth decade of life.10

Prevalence
The prevalence of ATTR Val 122Ile amyloidosis is reportedly high in West Africa, and in the US African-American population (3.9%).4,11,14,25,26 In a study conducted at a county hospital in Indianapolis, 3% of black newborns were found positive for ATTR Val122Ile through DNA sampling of umbilical cord blood.25 These statistics are of concern, as ATTR amyloidosis could be a significant health concern in a patient population that is already medically underserved.

Yamashita et al25 estimate that 1.35 million Americans of African-American descent may be affected by ATTR Val122Ile and vulnerable to restrictive cardiomyopathy–related heart failure and death. At the very least, this disorder can impair quality of life, especially in the presence of other comorbid conditions.

Clinical Presentation
The presence of exertional syncope at presentation is ominous, as it may be a marker of severe restrictive cardiomyopathy, postural hypotension due to excessive diuresis or autonomic neuropathy, ventricular arrhythmias from localized hypoperfusion, and rarely from cardiac tamponade due to pericardial involvement.27 Despite widespread involvement of the conduction system in specimens at autopsy, high-grade IV block is unusual.3

Diagnostic Studies
ECG. Both ECG and Holter monitoring can detect the arrhythmias and conduction disturbances (eg, first-degree AV block, low voltage patterns) associated with cardiac amyloidosis. Patients often experience syncopal and near-syncopal episodes as a result of conduction disturbances.28 Patients with conditions such as cardiac amyloidosis who present with severe heart failure are at high risk for sudden death secondary to conduction disturbances. Many have benefited from implanted defibrillators.29

 

 

Echocardiography. In patients with ATTR Val122Ile cardiac amyloidosis, echocardiography reveals thickened ventricular walls (ie, measuring ≥ 15 mm; normal, ≤ 11 mm).19 Amyloid-restrictive cardiomyopathy is associated with a marked dissociation between short- and long-axis systolic function, in cases in which left ventricular ejection fraction is normal.30

Echocardiography may demonstrate the characteristic specular or granular sparkling appearance that signifies advanced disease.15,21 Only a minority have this pattern in the myocardium, however, and changes in echocardiographic technology have made this finding less noticeable.30

MRI. Among more recently used diagnostic studies, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been reported to demonstrate late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in perhaps 80% of patients with familial amyloidosis and cardiac involvement (as determined through biopsy and Congo Red stain). LGE-CMR shows darkening of the cardiac tissue, a common occurrence in amyloidosis.31

LGE is associated with increased thickness of both left and right ventricles, lower ECG voltage patterns, elevated BNP, and elevated troponin T.31,32 Globally, LGE is associated with the worst prognosis in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. Use of LGE-CMR testing can help facilitate early detection of cardiac amyloidosis in patients who may be vulnerable to cardiac damage.31

Cardiac catheterization. In patients with cardiac amyloidosis, cardiac catheterization usually shows normal coronary arteries.3

Diagnosis
Early diagnosis of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis is crucial to the patient’s survival; it should be ruled out in any African-American patient with unexplained heart failure and echocardiography showing increased wall thickness with a nondilated left ventricular cavity. Additional clues include significant proteinuria, hepatomegaly disproportionate to the degree of heart failure, or corresponding neuropathy. Known family history of the disease, along with variant type, allows for a prompt and correct diagnosis.10

It has been reported that most clinicians who encounter heart failure, particularly in black patients, do not consider amyloidosis in the differential diagnosis, because of the high prevalence of hypertension and congestive heart failure in this population.10,15,19 As a result, amyloidosis often goes undiagnosed.19

Findings of enlarged and thickened cardiac walls on echocardiography but normal coronary arteries on cardiac catheterization should alert the treating clinician to further work-up for cardiac amyloidosis.19 In such a patient, according to Kristen et al,21 endomyocardial biopsy with Congo Red staining is the gold standard for diagnosis of amyloidosis.

In ATTR Val122Ile familial amyloidosis, it is unclear whether patients who are homozygous for the disease present with symptoms at earlier onset with more progressive illness or die sooner than those who are heterozygous.33 Nevertheless, once the diagnosis is confirmed, it is important to determine the patient’s specific variant type by DNA testing so that appropriate treatment can be initiated and the patient’s prognosis evaluated.5,10,13

Treatment
For familial amyloidosis in general, some researchers advocate liver transplantation to remove the source of mutant amyloid protein and stop all deposition of amyloid fibrils; this procedure can be followed later by transplantation of other affected organs (including the heart).5,23 Maurer et al34 have reported improved one-year survival rates among patients with ATTR amyloidosis who underwent both cardiac and liver transplantation: 75%, versus 23% in patients who did not receive transplanted organs.

Management of cardiac amyloidosis usually requires a twofold approach: treating associated congestive heart failure, and preventing further deposition of amyloid.24 In the case patient (as in most patients with ATTR amyloidosis), heart transplantation was deemed the only life-sustaining treatment option.11,19,33

Pharmacotherapeutic options are limited for patients with ATTR Val122Ile familial amyloidosis. Conventional heart failure agents (eg, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, digoxin, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers) can exacerbate heart failure symptoms, leading to a potentially life-threatening arrhythmia.3,11,19,24,35 Amyloid fibrils bind to digitalis, increasing susceptibility to digitalis toxicity; and to nifedipine, causing hemodynamic deterioration. Verapamil should be avoided, as it may induce severe left ventricular dysfunction. ACE inhibitors often provoke profound hypotension in primary amyloidosis.24,35

Diuretics, too (eg, furosemide, as was prescribed for the case patient), must be used with caution.3 These agents have been used to treat fluid overload and the resulting peripheral edema and shortness of breath found in ATTR Val122Ile patients who experience heart failure.36 According to Dubrey et al,5 cautious use of diuretics is necessary for management of heart failure symptoms in these patients.

Because the risk for intracardiac thrombus is high, anticoagulation (using agents other than β-blockers or calcium channel blockers) should be implemented unless compelling risks are involved.11,24 Amiodarone is relatively well tolerated for ventricular tachydysrhythmias and in atrial fibrillation if the goal is maintaining sinus rhythm.37

Regarding heart transplantation in patients with familial amyloidosis, Jacob et al33 hypothesize that since mutant amyloid protein is synthesized by the liver, it would take approximately 50 years for a transplanted heart to become affected by amyloid deposition. In a 59-year-old Afro-Caribbean man with familial amyloidosis who underwent cardiac transplantation, Hamour et al11 reported that the donor heart remained amyloid-free three years posttransplantation, as demonstrated by serial cardiac biopsy.

 

 

On the Horizon
Clinical trials are now under way to examine pharmacotherapeutic options for patients with ATTR amyloidosis. Now being examined in clinical trials, for example, is Fx-1006A, a drug that stabilizes ATTR and prevents the misfolding of the amyloid protein fibril, in turn preventing it from binding to the target organ.38 Similarly, ALN-TTR, a drug believed to prevent disease manifestation and possibly facilitate disease regression, is being investigated in early human trials.39

Additionally, the use of genetic testing is recommended in at-risk individuals to identify the TTR gene. Affected patients may benefit from prophylactic medical management, which would halt amyloidogenesis of TTR—and possibly treat the condition as well.35 Pharmacotherapeutic agents like diflunisal, an NSAID, antagonize the aggregation of TTR protein and hinder formation of the amyloid fibrils.40

CONCLUSION
ATTR Val122Ile familial amyloidosis is a rare disorder that causes abnormal synthesis of amyloid protein in the liver, which then infiltrates the cardiac structure, leading to restrictive cardiomyopathy and progressive heart failure. Patients who present with symptoms of heart failure, cardiac enlargement on echocardiography, and a finding of granular speckling patterns, though not specific on echocardiography, should prompt the health care provider to refer the patient to a cardiologist familiar with cardiac amyloidosis for further work-up.

Diagnosed patients must undergo genetic testing to determine the specific variant type so that prompt treatment can be initiated. In patients with ATTR Val122Ile familial amyloidosis, the treatment of choice is cardiac transplantation. Although the mutant amyloid protein continues to be synthesized in the liver, the donor heart is unlikely to become affected by this substance for many years. Appropriately treated patients can maintain good quality of life, free of heart failure.    

REFERENCES
1. Lim RP, Srichai MB, Lee VS. Non-ischemic causes of delayed myocardial hyperenhancement on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188 (6):1675-1681.

2. Sipe JD, Benson MD, Buxbaum JN, et al. Amyloid fibril protein nomenclature: 2010 recommendations from the nomenclature committee of the International Society of Amyloidosis. Amyloid. 2010;17(3-4):101-104.

3. Kendall H. Cardiac amyloidosis. Crit Care Nurse. 2010;30(2):16-23.

4. Eriksson M, Büttener J, Todorov T, et al. Prevalence of germline mutations in the TTR gene in a consecutive series of surgical pathology specimens with AATR amyloid. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(1):58-65.

5. Dubrey SW, Hawkins PN, Falk RH. Amyloid diseases of the heart: assessment, diagnosis, and referral. Heart. 2011;97(1):75-84.

6. Liepnieks JJ, Benson MD. Progression of cardiac amyloid deposition in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis patients after liver transplantation. Amyloid. 2007;14(4):277-282.

7. XDx Expression Diagnostics. Allomap®: molecular expression testing (2004). www.allomap.com. Accessed May 14, 2012.

8. Mandras SA, Crespo J, Patel HM. Innovative application of immunologic principles in heart transplantation. Ochsner J. 2010;10(4):231-235.

9. Yamani MH, Taylor DO, Rodriguez R, et al. Transplant vasculopathy is associated with increased AlloMap gene expression score. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007;26(4):403-406.

10. Benson MD. The hereditary amyloidoses. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003;17(6):909-927.

11. Hamour IM, Lachmann HJ, Goodman HJ, et al. Heart transplantation for homozygous familial transthyretin (TTR) V122I cardiac amyloidosis. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(5):1056-1059.

12. Jacobson DR, Pastore RD, Yaghoubian R, et al. Variant-sequence transthyretin (isoleucine 122) in late-onset cardiac amyloidosis in black Americans. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(7):466-473.

13. Falk RH, Dubrey SW. Amyloid heart disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;52(4):347-361.

14. Askanas V, Engel WK, McFerrin J, Vattemi G. Transthyretin Val122Ile, accumulated Abeta, and inclusion-body myositis aspects in cultured muscle. Neurology. 2003;61(2):257-260.

15. Hamidi Asl K, Nakamura M, Yamashita T, Benson MD. Cardiac amyloidoses associated with the transthyretin lle122 mutation in a Caucasian family. Amyloid. 2001;8(4):263-269.

16. Mogensen J, Arbustini E. Restrictive cardiomyopathy. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2009;24(3): 214-220.

17. Nihoyannopoulos P, Dawson D. Restrictive cardiomyopathies. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10 (8):iii23-iii33.

18. Bruce J. Getting to the heart of cardiomyopathies. Nursing. 2005;35(8):44-47.

19. Falk RH. The neglected entity of familial cardiac amyloidosis in African Americans. Ethn Dis. 2002;12(1):141-143.

20. Piper C, Butz T, Farr M, et al. How to diagnose cardiac amyloidosis early: impact of ECG, tissue Doppler echocardiography, and myocardial biopsy. Amyloid. 2010;17(1):1-9.

21. Kristen AV, Meyer FJ, Perz JB, et al. Risk stratification in cardiac amyloidosis: novel approaches. Transplantation. 2005;80(1 suppl):S151-S155.

22. Westermark P, Benson MD, Buxbaum JN, et al. A primer of amyloid nomenclature. Amyloid. 2007;14(3):179-183.

23. Picken MM. New insights into systemic amyloidosis: the importance of diagnosis of specific type. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2007; 16(3):196-203.

24. Falk RH. Cardiac amyloidosis: a treatable disease, often overlooked. Circulation. 2011;124(9):1079-1085.

25. Yamashita T, Asl KH, Yazaki M, Benson MD. A prospective evaluation of the transthyretin Ile 122 allele frequency in an African-American population. Amyloid. 2005;12(2):127-130.

26. Benson MD, Yazaki M, Magy N. Laboratory assessment of transthyretin amyloidosis. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2002;40(12):1262-1265.

 

 

27. Chamarthi B, Dubrey SW, Cha K, et al. Features and prognosis of exertional syncope in light-chain associated AL cardiac amyloidosis. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80(9):1242-1245.

28. Correia MJ, Coutinho CA, Conceiçao I, et al. Role of heart rate variability in the assessment of autonomic dysfunction in type I familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy. Folia Cardiol. 2005;12(suppl C):459-462.

29. Kadish A, Mehra M. Heart failure devices: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and biventricular pacing therapy. Circulation. 2005; 111(24):3327-3335.

30. Rahman JE, Helou EF, Gelzer-Bell R, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of biopsy-proven cardiac amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(3):410-415.

31. Syed IS, Glockner JF, Feng D, et al. Role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(2):155-164.

32. Fealey ME, Edwards WD, Buadi FK, et al. Echocardiographic features of cardiac amyloidosis presenting as endomyocardial disease in a 54-year-old male. J Cardiol. 2009;54(1):162-166.

33. Jacob EK, Edwards WD, Zucker M, et al. Homozygous transthyretin mutation in an African American male. J Mol Diagn. 2007; 9(1):127-131.

34. Maurer MS, Raina A, Hesdorffer C, et al. Cardiac transplantation using extended-donor criteria organs for systemic amyloidosis complicated by heart failure. Transplantation. 2007;83(5):539-545.

35. Buxbaum J, Alexander A, Koziol J, et al. Significance of the amyloidogenic transthyretin Val 122 Ile allele in African-Americans in the Arteriosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) and Cardiovascular Health (CHS) Studies. Am Heart J. 2010;159(5):864-870.

36. Rose BD, Colucci WS. Use of diuretics in heart failure (2010). www.uptodate.com/con tents/use-of-diuretics-in-patients-with-heart-failure. Accessed May 14, 2012.

37. Trappe H-J. Treating critical supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010;3(2):143-152.

38. Sekijima Y, Kelly JW, Ikeda S. Pathogenesis of and therapeutic strategies to ameliorate the transthyretin amyloidoses. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14(30):3219-3230.

39. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals. TTR Amyloidosis: ALN-TTR (2011). www.alnylam.com/Programs-and-Pipeline/Programs/index.php. Accessed May 14, 2012.

40. Adamski-Werner SL, Palaninathan SK, Sacchettini JC, Kelly JW. Diflunisal analogues stabilize the native state of transthyretin: potent inhibition of amyloidogenesis. J Med Chem. 2004;47(2):355-374.

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Tari L. Smith, DHSc, MPAS, PA-C, Lisa Wallace, PhD, Jeffrey Alexander, PhD, Elizabeth Funke, CWOCN, MSN, FNP-BC, BSN, RN

Issue
Clinician Reviews - 22(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
15-22
Legacy Keywords
familial amyloidosis, cardiomyopathy, transplantation, ATTR Val122Ile variant familial amyloidosis, cardiomyopathy, transplantation, ATTR Val122Ile variant
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Tari L. Smith, DHSc, MPAS, PA-C, Lisa Wallace, PhD, Jeffrey Alexander, PhD, Elizabeth Funke, CWOCN, MSN, FNP-BC, BSN, RN

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Tari L. Smith, DHSc, MPAS, PA-C, Lisa Wallace, PhD, Jeffrey Alexander, PhD, Elizabeth Funke, CWOCN, MSN, FNP-BC, BSN, RN

A black man, age 65, with no known history of cardiopulmonary disease presented with acute-onset exertional dyspnea and lower extremity edema. He also reported an episode of syncope, as well as occasional dizziness and abdominal bloating. He said he experienced exertional dyspnea while doing a routine step aerobic exercise. His exercise regimen included distance walking, yoga, and aerobics four to five days per week.

The patient’s medical history was remarkable for a single episode of a bleeding ulcer in previous years, low back pain, shoulder pain, and a septic arthritic hip. His social history was negative for use of tobacco, alcohol, or illegal drugs. He was married and had two biological daughters with fairly unremarkable medical histories. The patient had earned a master’s degree, worked full-time in the insurance business, and was an avid worldwide traveler. He reported diminished quality of life as a result of his acute-onset heart failure symptoms, which reduced his ability to exercise routinely, work full-time, or travel.

The patient’s sudden experience of exertional dyspnea prompted him to visit his primary care provider, who ordered an ECG that demonstrated low voltage patterns and a first-degree atrioventricular (AV) block. Subsequent stress echocardiography showed generalized thickening of the left ventricular myocardium. Posterior wall thickness measured 1.7 cm (normal range, 0.6 to 1.1 cm), septal thickness measured 1.9 cm (normal, 0.6 to 1.1 cm), and ejection fraction was 65%. The stress echocardiogram also showed a speckling pattern (brightly scattered spots) on the myocardium.

Although stress echocardiography results were negative for ischemic disease, the patient did experience dyspnea during the exam. He underwent cardiac catheterization, which indicated normal coronary arteries.

Additional diagnostic studies included cardiac MRI with and without contrast, which showed nulling of the heart muscle and delayed patchy hyperenhancement; this suggested myocardial tissue abnormality as result of amyloid fibril deposition.1 Both pulmonary and tricuspid aortic valves were normal, with no evidence of stenosis. No regional wall motion abnormalities were noted.

Laboratory findings during the work-up were lipid panel, unremarkable; complete blood count (CBC), mild anemia and leukopenia; and urinalysis, positive for proteinuria. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was measured at 686 pg/mL (normal, 0.0 to 100 pg/mL), indicating moderate heart failure. A peripheral blood smear was negative for monoclonal plasma cells.

The patient’s physical exam was unremarkable except for 2+ pedal edema bilaterally. In consideration of normal coronary arteries on cardiac catheterization, the patient’s heart failure symptoms, and stress echocardiography abnormalities, a heart biopsy was ordered. An endomyocardial biopsy with Congo Red stain demonstrated an apple-green birefringent pattern viewed under high-definition polarized light microscope, which was consistent with amyloid deposition.2

The patient was given a diagnosis of primary amyloidosis by his local cardiologist despite negative findings on the peripheral blood smear for monoclonal plasma cells (which are typically found in primary amyloidosis).3 He presented to an institution well-known for its expertise in amyloidosis, for a second opinion. There, the diagnosis was negated, based on reevaluation of the patient’s previous heart specimen through immunohistochemical studies. These studies were positive for serum amyloid P, which is suggestive of transthyretin (TTR) or familial amyloidosis.4 Genetic testing revealed a familial amyloidosis DNA sequence analysis with the Val122Ile variant (ie, isoleucine for valine at position 1225). With the correct diagnosis confirmed, the patient was referred to another highly regarded institution to begin a work-up for cardiac transplantation. Meanwhile, he was cautiously treated with the loop diuretic furosemide to manage his shortness of breath and peripheral edema.

Fifteen months later (13 weeks after being listed for transplant), the patient underwent successful cardiac transplantation.

On pathologic review of the patient’s extricated heart, the myocardium was found to be grossly thickened (see figure, above) and weighed 540 g; the average adult heart weighs 300 to 350 g, depending on the patient’s size.6 Congo Red staining showed extensive amyloid deposits with infiltration throughout the myocardium.

Ninety percent of the amyloid deposits were interstitial, 5% were in the vessels, and 5% were noted in a nodular pattern. The left ventricular cavity showed dilated and thickened walls. Intramural and extramural blood vessels were infiltrated with amyloid as well.

Six months after transplantation, the patient underwent diagnostic testing to assess the function and structure of his new heart. Cardiac catheterization was negative for coronary artery disease. Thirteen months posttransplantation, endomyocardial biopsy with Congo Red stain was negative for amyloid deposition or organ rejection.

About 24 months posttransplantation, the patient was taking tacrolimus, pravastatin, pantoprazole, dapsone, propanolol, colchicine, and donepezil. Stress echocardiography demonstrated normal right and left ventricular systolic function; no wall-motion abnormalities or left ventricular hypertrophy were detected, and the right atrium was of normal size. There was abnormal structural enlargement of the left atrium at the site of anastamosis—a common finding in cardiac transplant patients. The aortic, tricuspid, and mitral valves were all normal.

 

 

At that time, it was decided not to repeat endomyocardial biopsy because of normal results on molecular expression testing (a noninvasive technique called AlloMap®7-9), which is performed to assess for heart transplant rejection. The patient’s lipid panel remained within normal limits. CBC indicated persistent anemia and leukopenia. Urine protein and BNP test results were not available.

Since undergoing cardiac transplantation, the patient has resumed his normal routine activities, including some type of exercise five days per week. He said his diet is maintained in moderation. He denied shortness of breath, chest pain, dizziness, or edema. He has returned to full-time employment and has vacationed in Croatia, Italy, and Central America.

DISCUSSION
Familial amyloidosis is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by the production of mutated proteins, most commonly ATTR. Presence of the ATTR Val 122Ile allele has been reported in 3.9% of all black Americans, and in one study, 23% of black Americans diagnosed with cardiac amyloidosis at autopsy were heterozygous for this variant allele.10-12 ATTR Val122Ile usually manifests in the fifth

or sixth decade of life with its characteristic presentation of infiltrative/restrictive cardiomyopathy,13 resulting in heart failure and sometimes peripheral neuropathy.10,11,14

Pathophysiology
In patients with ATTR Val122Ile, cardiomyopathy results from the deposition of mutant protein fibrils in the cardiac muscle, leading to restricted heart wall motion10,15 and stiffening of the cardiac ventricles, with subsequent disruption of the diastolic filling properties of the cardiac muscle.16 Fluid overload and heart failure follow.3,10,17 The atrium of the heart dilates, and the walls of the ventricles become thickened and fibrous.18 Liepnieks and Benson6 reported that the cadaver heart of one Val122Ile patient infiltrated with amyloid protein fibrils weighed 725 g—more than double the weight of an average adult heart.

In patients with cardiac amyloidosis, ECG can detect arrhythmia, and echocardiography shows cardiac enlargement; however, as in the case patient, cardiac catheterization shows normal coronary arteries.15,16,19,20 Thus, previously healthy patients who present with heart failure and negative results on cardiac catheterization should undergo further work-up for cardiac amyloidosis.19

Amyloidosis affects all populations globally.10 In systemic amyloidosis, amyloid releases into the plasma, infiltrating and impairing multiple organs. Poor survival has been reported in patients with heart failure symptoms resulting from amyloid deposition.20,21

Types of Amyloidosis
Primary amyloidosis, the most common of the three amyloidosis types, can be systemic or localized.22 It occurs when protein fibrils, developed from immunoglobin light chains or monoclonal plasma cells and measuring 7 to 10 nm in diameter, adhere to the heart, kidneys, peripheral nerves, eyes, and other organs.5,11,20,23,24 Known for its relation to multiple myeloma,19 primary amyloidosis is associated with a poor prognosis.3,10

Secondary amyloidosis results from a chronic inflammatory disorder, such as rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis—conditions that trigger the production of amyloid proteins.3,10 This type has also been associated with substance abuse and AIDS.23

Familial or hereditary amyloidosis, according to Benson,10 is a group of diseases, each resulting from mutation in a specific protein. In the United States, the most common type of familial amyloidosis is ATTR.11 More than 100 mutant types of ATTR proteins have been identified, each involving a specific nationality or group of nationalities.10,11,23

Mutant ATTR amyloid, when deposited in specific organs, leads to their dysfunction and ultimate failure.6 ATTR may affect the cardiac, gastric, renal, ophthalmic, or nervous system. Depending on the ATTR variant, the resulting clinical features are age- and time-dependent, with onset most common between the third and fifth decade of life.10

Prevalence
The prevalence of ATTR Val 122Ile amyloidosis is reportedly high in West Africa, and in the US African-American population (3.9%).4,11,14,25,26 In a study conducted at a county hospital in Indianapolis, 3% of black newborns were found positive for ATTR Val122Ile through DNA sampling of umbilical cord blood.25 These statistics are of concern, as ATTR amyloidosis could be a significant health concern in a patient population that is already medically underserved.

Yamashita et al25 estimate that 1.35 million Americans of African-American descent may be affected by ATTR Val122Ile and vulnerable to restrictive cardiomyopathy–related heart failure and death. At the very least, this disorder can impair quality of life, especially in the presence of other comorbid conditions.

Clinical Presentation
The presence of exertional syncope at presentation is ominous, as it may be a marker of severe restrictive cardiomyopathy, postural hypotension due to excessive diuresis or autonomic neuropathy, ventricular arrhythmias from localized hypoperfusion, and rarely from cardiac tamponade due to pericardial involvement.27 Despite widespread involvement of the conduction system in specimens at autopsy, high-grade IV block is unusual.3

Diagnostic Studies
ECG. Both ECG and Holter monitoring can detect the arrhythmias and conduction disturbances (eg, first-degree AV block, low voltage patterns) associated with cardiac amyloidosis. Patients often experience syncopal and near-syncopal episodes as a result of conduction disturbances.28 Patients with conditions such as cardiac amyloidosis who present with severe heart failure are at high risk for sudden death secondary to conduction disturbances. Many have benefited from implanted defibrillators.29

 

 

Echocardiography. In patients with ATTR Val122Ile cardiac amyloidosis, echocardiography reveals thickened ventricular walls (ie, measuring ≥ 15 mm; normal, ≤ 11 mm).19 Amyloid-restrictive cardiomyopathy is associated with a marked dissociation between short- and long-axis systolic function, in cases in which left ventricular ejection fraction is normal.30

Echocardiography may demonstrate the characteristic specular or granular sparkling appearance that signifies advanced disease.15,21 Only a minority have this pattern in the myocardium, however, and changes in echocardiographic technology have made this finding less noticeable.30

MRI. Among more recently used diagnostic studies, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been reported to demonstrate late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in perhaps 80% of patients with familial amyloidosis and cardiac involvement (as determined through biopsy and Congo Red stain). LGE-CMR shows darkening of the cardiac tissue, a common occurrence in amyloidosis.31

LGE is associated with increased thickness of both left and right ventricles, lower ECG voltage patterns, elevated BNP, and elevated troponin T.31,32 Globally, LGE is associated with the worst prognosis in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. Use of LGE-CMR testing can help facilitate early detection of cardiac amyloidosis in patients who may be vulnerable to cardiac damage.31

Cardiac catheterization. In patients with cardiac amyloidosis, cardiac catheterization usually shows normal coronary arteries.3

Diagnosis
Early diagnosis of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis is crucial to the patient’s survival; it should be ruled out in any African-American patient with unexplained heart failure and echocardiography showing increased wall thickness with a nondilated left ventricular cavity. Additional clues include significant proteinuria, hepatomegaly disproportionate to the degree of heart failure, or corresponding neuropathy. Known family history of the disease, along with variant type, allows for a prompt and correct diagnosis.10

It has been reported that most clinicians who encounter heart failure, particularly in black patients, do not consider amyloidosis in the differential diagnosis, because of the high prevalence of hypertension and congestive heart failure in this population.10,15,19 As a result, amyloidosis often goes undiagnosed.19

Findings of enlarged and thickened cardiac walls on echocardiography but normal coronary arteries on cardiac catheterization should alert the treating clinician to further work-up for cardiac amyloidosis.19 In such a patient, according to Kristen et al,21 endomyocardial biopsy with Congo Red staining is the gold standard for diagnosis of amyloidosis.

In ATTR Val122Ile familial amyloidosis, it is unclear whether patients who are homozygous for the disease present with symptoms at earlier onset with more progressive illness or die sooner than those who are heterozygous.33 Nevertheless, once the diagnosis is confirmed, it is important to determine the patient’s specific variant type by DNA testing so that appropriate treatment can be initiated and the patient’s prognosis evaluated.5,10,13

Treatment
For familial amyloidosis in general, some researchers advocate liver transplantation to remove the source of mutant amyloid protein and stop all deposition of amyloid fibrils; this procedure can be followed later by transplantation of other affected organs (including the heart).5,23 Maurer et al34 have reported improved one-year survival rates among patients with ATTR amyloidosis who underwent both cardiac and liver transplantation: 75%, versus 23% in patients who did not receive transplanted organs.

Management of cardiac amyloidosis usually requires a twofold approach: treating associated congestive heart failure, and preventing further deposition of amyloid.24 In the case patient (as in most patients with ATTR amyloidosis), heart transplantation was deemed the only life-sustaining treatment option.11,19,33

Pharmacotherapeutic options are limited for patients with ATTR Val122Ile familial amyloidosis. Conventional heart failure agents (eg, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, digoxin, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers) can exacerbate heart failure symptoms, leading to a potentially life-threatening arrhythmia.3,11,19,24,35 Amyloid fibrils bind to digitalis, increasing susceptibility to digitalis toxicity; and to nifedipine, causing hemodynamic deterioration. Verapamil should be avoided, as it may induce severe left ventricular dysfunction. ACE inhibitors often provoke profound hypotension in primary amyloidosis.24,35

Diuretics, too (eg, furosemide, as was prescribed for the case patient), must be used with caution.3 These agents have been used to treat fluid overload and the resulting peripheral edema and shortness of breath found in ATTR Val122Ile patients who experience heart failure.36 According to Dubrey et al,5 cautious use of diuretics is necessary for management of heart failure symptoms in these patients.

Because the risk for intracardiac thrombus is high, anticoagulation (using agents other than β-blockers or calcium channel blockers) should be implemented unless compelling risks are involved.11,24 Amiodarone is relatively well tolerated for ventricular tachydysrhythmias and in atrial fibrillation if the goal is maintaining sinus rhythm.37

Regarding heart transplantation in patients with familial amyloidosis, Jacob et al33 hypothesize that since mutant amyloid protein is synthesized by the liver, it would take approximately 50 years for a transplanted heart to become affected by amyloid deposition. In a 59-year-old Afro-Caribbean man with familial amyloidosis who underwent cardiac transplantation, Hamour et al11 reported that the donor heart remained amyloid-free three years posttransplantation, as demonstrated by serial cardiac biopsy.

 

 

On the Horizon
Clinical trials are now under way to examine pharmacotherapeutic options for patients with ATTR amyloidosis. Now being examined in clinical trials, for example, is Fx-1006A, a drug that stabilizes ATTR and prevents the misfolding of the amyloid protein fibril, in turn preventing it from binding to the target organ.38 Similarly, ALN-TTR, a drug believed to prevent disease manifestation and possibly facilitate disease regression, is being investigated in early human trials.39

Additionally, the use of genetic testing is recommended in at-risk individuals to identify the TTR gene. Affected patients may benefit from prophylactic medical management, which would halt amyloidogenesis of TTR—and possibly treat the condition as well.35 Pharmacotherapeutic agents like diflunisal, an NSAID, antagonize the aggregation of TTR protein and hinder formation of the amyloid fibrils.40

CONCLUSION
ATTR Val122Ile familial amyloidosis is a rare disorder that causes abnormal synthesis of amyloid protein in the liver, which then infiltrates the cardiac structure, leading to restrictive cardiomyopathy and progressive heart failure. Patients who present with symptoms of heart failure, cardiac enlargement on echocardiography, and a finding of granular speckling patterns, though not specific on echocardiography, should prompt the health care provider to refer the patient to a cardiologist familiar with cardiac amyloidosis for further work-up.

Diagnosed patients must undergo genetic testing to determine the specific variant type so that prompt treatment can be initiated. In patients with ATTR Val122Ile familial amyloidosis, the treatment of choice is cardiac transplantation. Although the mutant amyloid protein continues to be synthesized in the liver, the donor heart is unlikely to become affected by this substance for many years. Appropriately treated patients can maintain good quality of life, free of heart failure.    

REFERENCES
1. Lim RP, Srichai MB, Lee VS. Non-ischemic causes of delayed myocardial hyperenhancement on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188 (6):1675-1681.

2. Sipe JD, Benson MD, Buxbaum JN, et al. Amyloid fibril protein nomenclature: 2010 recommendations from the nomenclature committee of the International Society of Amyloidosis. Amyloid. 2010;17(3-4):101-104.

3. Kendall H. Cardiac amyloidosis. Crit Care Nurse. 2010;30(2):16-23.

4. Eriksson M, Büttener J, Todorov T, et al. Prevalence of germline mutations in the TTR gene in a consecutive series of surgical pathology specimens with AATR amyloid. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(1):58-65.

5. Dubrey SW, Hawkins PN, Falk RH. Amyloid diseases of the heart: assessment, diagnosis, and referral. Heart. 2011;97(1):75-84.

6. Liepnieks JJ, Benson MD. Progression of cardiac amyloid deposition in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis patients after liver transplantation. Amyloid. 2007;14(4):277-282.

7. XDx Expression Diagnostics. Allomap®: molecular expression testing (2004). www.allomap.com. Accessed May 14, 2012.

8. Mandras SA, Crespo J, Patel HM. Innovative application of immunologic principles in heart transplantation. Ochsner J. 2010;10(4):231-235.

9. Yamani MH, Taylor DO, Rodriguez R, et al. Transplant vasculopathy is associated with increased AlloMap gene expression score. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007;26(4):403-406.

10. Benson MD. The hereditary amyloidoses. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003;17(6):909-927.

11. Hamour IM, Lachmann HJ, Goodman HJ, et al. Heart transplantation for homozygous familial transthyretin (TTR) V122I cardiac amyloidosis. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(5):1056-1059.

12. Jacobson DR, Pastore RD, Yaghoubian R, et al. Variant-sequence transthyretin (isoleucine 122) in late-onset cardiac amyloidosis in black Americans. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(7):466-473.

13. Falk RH, Dubrey SW. Amyloid heart disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;52(4):347-361.

14. Askanas V, Engel WK, McFerrin J, Vattemi G. Transthyretin Val122Ile, accumulated Abeta, and inclusion-body myositis aspects in cultured muscle. Neurology. 2003;61(2):257-260.

15. Hamidi Asl K, Nakamura M, Yamashita T, Benson MD. Cardiac amyloidoses associated with the transthyretin lle122 mutation in a Caucasian family. Amyloid. 2001;8(4):263-269.

16. Mogensen J, Arbustini E. Restrictive cardiomyopathy. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2009;24(3): 214-220.

17. Nihoyannopoulos P, Dawson D. Restrictive cardiomyopathies. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10 (8):iii23-iii33.

18. Bruce J. Getting to the heart of cardiomyopathies. Nursing. 2005;35(8):44-47.

19. Falk RH. The neglected entity of familial cardiac amyloidosis in African Americans. Ethn Dis. 2002;12(1):141-143.

20. Piper C, Butz T, Farr M, et al. How to diagnose cardiac amyloidosis early: impact of ECG, tissue Doppler echocardiography, and myocardial biopsy. Amyloid. 2010;17(1):1-9.

21. Kristen AV, Meyer FJ, Perz JB, et al. Risk stratification in cardiac amyloidosis: novel approaches. Transplantation. 2005;80(1 suppl):S151-S155.

22. Westermark P, Benson MD, Buxbaum JN, et al. A primer of amyloid nomenclature. Amyloid. 2007;14(3):179-183.

23. Picken MM. New insights into systemic amyloidosis: the importance of diagnosis of specific type. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2007; 16(3):196-203.

24. Falk RH. Cardiac amyloidosis: a treatable disease, often overlooked. Circulation. 2011;124(9):1079-1085.

25. Yamashita T, Asl KH, Yazaki M, Benson MD. A prospective evaluation of the transthyretin Ile 122 allele frequency in an African-American population. Amyloid. 2005;12(2):127-130.

26. Benson MD, Yazaki M, Magy N. Laboratory assessment of transthyretin amyloidosis. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2002;40(12):1262-1265.

 

 

27. Chamarthi B, Dubrey SW, Cha K, et al. Features and prognosis of exertional syncope in light-chain associated AL cardiac amyloidosis. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80(9):1242-1245.

28. Correia MJ, Coutinho CA, Conceiçao I, et al. Role of heart rate variability in the assessment of autonomic dysfunction in type I familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy. Folia Cardiol. 2005;12(suppl C):459-462.

29. Kadish A, Mehra M. Heart failure devices: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and biventricular pacing therapy. Circulation. 2005; 111(24):3327-3335.

30. Rahman JE, Helou EF, Gelzer-Bell R, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of biopsy-proven cardiac amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(3):410-415.

31. Syed IS, Glockner JF, Feng D, et al. Role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(2):155-164.

32. Fealey ME, Edwards WD, Buadi FK, et al. Echocardiographic features of cardiac amyloidosis presenting as endomyocardial disease in a 54-year-old male. J Cardiol. 2009;54(1):162-166.

33. Jacob EK, Edwards WD, Zucker M, et al. Homozygous transthyretin mutation in an African American male. J Mol Diagn. 2007; 9(1):127-131.

34. Maurer MS, Raina A, Hesdorffer C, et al. Cardiac transplantation using extended-donor criteria organs for systemic amyloidosis complicated by heart failure. Transplantation. 2007;83(5):539-545.

35. Buxbaum J, Alexander A, Koziol J, et al. Significance of the amyloidogenic transthyretin Val 122 Ile allele in African-Americans in the Arteriosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) and Cardiovascular Health (CHS) Studies. Am Heart J. 2010;159(5):864-870.

36. Rose BD, Colucci WS. Use of diuretics in heart failure (2010). www.uptodate.com/con tents/use-of-diuretics-in-patients-with-heart-failure. Accessed May 14, 2012.

37. Trappe H-J. Treating critical supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010;3(2):143-152.

38. Sekijima Y, Kelly JW, Ikeda S. Pathogenesis of and therapeutic strategies to ameliorate the transthyretin amyloidoses. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14(30):3219-3230.

39. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals. TTR Amyloidosis: ALN-TTR (2011). www.alnylam.com/Programs-and-Pipeline/Programs/index.php. Accessed May 14, 2012.

40. Adamski-Werner SL, Palaninathan SK, Sacchettini JC, Kelly JW. Diflunisal analogues stabilize the native state of transthyretin: potent inhibition of amyloidogenesis. J Med Chem. 2004;47(2):355-374.

A black man, age 65, with no known history of cardiopulmonary disease presented with acute-onset exertional dyspnea and lower extremity edema. He also reported an episode of syncope, as well as occasional dizziness and abdominal bloating. He said he experienced exertional dyspnea while doing a routine step aerobic exercise. His exercise regimen included distance walking, yoga, and aerobics four to five days per week.

The patient’s medical history was remarkable for a single episode of a bleeding ulcer in previous years, low back pain, shoulder pain, and a septic arthritic hip. His social history was negative for use of tobacco, alcohol, or illegal drugs. He was married and had two biological daughters with fairly unremarkable medical histories. The patient had earned a master’s degree, worked full-time in the insurance business, and was an avid worldwide traveler. He reported diminished quality of life as a result of his acute-onset heart failure symptoms, which reduced his ability to exercise routinely, work full-time, or travel.

The patient’s sudden experience of exertional dyspnea prompted him to visit his primary care provider, who ordered an ECG that demonstrated low voltage patterns and a first-degree atrioventricular (AV) block. Subsequent stress echocardiography showed generalized thickening of the left ventricular myocardium. Posterior wall thickness measured 1.7 cm (normal range, 0.6 to 1.1 cm), septal thickness measured 1.9 cm (normal, 0.6 to 1.1 cm), and ejection fraction was 65%. The stress echocardiogram also showed a speckling pattern (brightly scattered spots) on the myocardium.

Although stress echocardiography results were negative for ischemic disease, the patient did experience dyspnea during the exam. He underwent cardiac catheterization, which indicated normal coronary arteries.

Additional diagnostic studies included cardiac MRI with and without contrast, which showed nulling of the heart muscle and delayed patchy hyperenhancement; this suggested myocardial tissue abnormality as result of amyloid fibril deposition.1 Both pulmonary and tricuspid aortic valves were normal, with no evidence of stenosis. No regional wall motion abnormalities were noted.

Laboratory findings during the work-up were lipid panel, unremarkable; complete blood count (CBC), mild anemia and leukopenia; and urinalysis, positive for proteinuria. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was measured at 686 pg/mL (normal, 0.0 to 100 pg/mL), indicating moderate heart failure. A peripheral blood smear was negative for monoclonal plasma cells.

The patient’s physical exam was unremarkable except for 2+ pedal edema bilaterally. In consideration of normal coronary arteries on cardiac catheterization, the patient’s heart failure symptoms, and stress echocardiography abnormalities, a heart biopsy was ordered. An endomyocardial biopsy with Congo Red stain demonstrated an apple-green birefringent pattern viewed under high-definition polarized light microscope, which was consistent with amyloid deposition.2

The patient was given a diagnosis of primary amyloidosis by his local cardiologist despite negative findings on the peripheral blood smear for monoclonal plasma cells (which are typically found in primary amyloidosis).3 He presented to an institution well-known for its expertise in amyloidosis, for a second opinion. There, the diagnosis was negated, based on reevaluation of the patient’s previous heart specimen through immunohistochemical studies. These studies were positive for serum amyloid P, which is suggestive of transthyretin (TTR) or familial amyloidosis.4 Genetic testing revealed a familial amyloidosis DNA sequence analysis with the Val122Ile variant (ie, isoleucine for valine at position 1225). With the correct diagnosis confirmed, the patient was referred to another highly regarded institution to begin a work-up for cardiac transplantation. Meanwhile, he was cautiously treated with the loop diuretic furosemide to manage his shortness of breath and peripheral edema.

Fifteen months later (13 weeks after being listed for transplant), the patient underwent successful cardiac transplantation.

On pathologic review of the patient’s extricated heart, the myocardium was found to be grossly thickened (see figure, above) and weighed 540 g; the average adult heart weighs 300 to 350 g, depending on the patient’s size.6 Congo Red staining showed extensive amyloid deposits with infiltration throughout the myocardium.

Ninety percent of the amyloid deposits were interstitial, 5% were in the vessels, and 5% were noted in a nodular pattern. The left ventricular cavity showed dilated and thickened walls. Intramural and extramural blood vessels were infiltrated with amyloid as well.

Six months after transplantation, the patient underwent diagnostic testing to assess the function and structure of his new heart. Cardiac catheterization was negative for coronary artery disease. Thirteen months posttransplantation, endomyocardial biopsy with Congo Red stain was negative for amyloid deposition or organ rejection.

About 24 months posttransplantation, the patient was taking tacrolimus, pravastatin, pantoprazole, dapsone, propanolol, colchicine, and donepezil. Stress echocardiography demonstrated normal right and left ventricular systolic function; no wall-motion abnormalities or left ventricular hypertrophy were detected, and the right atrium was of normal size. There was abnormal structural enlargement of the left atrium at the site of anastamosis—a common finding in cardiac transplant patients. The aortic, tricuspid, and mitral valves were all normal.

 

 

At that time, it was decided not to repeat endomyocardial biopsy because of normal results on molecular expression testing (a noninvasive technique called AlloMap®7-9), which is performed to assess for heart transplant rejection. The patient’s lipid panel remained within normal limits. CBC indicated persistent anemia and leukopenia. Urine protein and BNP test results were not available.

Since undergoing cardiac transplantation, the patient has resumed his normal routine activities, including some type of exercise five days per week. He said his diet is maintained in moderation. He denied shortness of breath, chest pain, dizziness, or edema. He has returned to full-time employment and has vacationed in Croatia, Italy, and Central America.

DISCUSSION
Familial amyloidosis is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by the production of mutated proteins, most commonly ATTR. Presence of the ATTR Val 122Ile allele has been reported in 3.9% of all black Americans, and in one study, 23% of black Americans diagnosed with cardiac amyloidosis at autopsy were heterozygous for this variant allele.10-12 ATTR Val122Ile usually manifests in the fifth

or sixth decade of life with its characteristic presentation of infiltrative/restrictive cardiomyopathy,13 resulting in heart failure and sometimes peripheral neuropathy.10,11,14

Pathophysiology
In patients with ATTR Val122Ile, cardiomyopathy results from the deposition of mutant protein fibrils in the cardiac muscle, leading to restricted heart wall motion10,15 and stiffening of the cardiac ventricles, with subsequent disruption of the diastolic filling properties of the cardiac muscle.16 Fluid overload and heart failure follow.3,10,17 The atrium of the heart dilates, and the walls of the ventricles become thickened and fibrous.18 Liepnieks and Benson6 reported that the cadaver heart of one Val122Ile patient infiltrated with amyloid protein fibrils weighed 725 g—more than double the weight of an average adult heart.

In patients with cardiac amyloidosis, ECG can detect arrhythmia, and echocardiography shows cardiac enlargement; however, as in the case patient, cardiac catheterization shows normal coronary arteries.15,16,19,20 Thus, previously healthy patients who present with heart failure and negative results on cardiac catheterization should undergo further work-up for cardiac amyloidosis.19

Amyloidosis affects all populations globally.10 In systemic amyloidosis, amyloid releases into the plasma, infiltrating and impairing multiple organs. Poor survival has been reported in patients with heart failure symptoms resulting from amyloid deposition.20,21

Types of Amyloidosis
Primary amyloidosis, the most common of the three amyloidosis types, can be systemic or localized.22 It occurs when protein fibrils, developed from immunoglobin light chains or monoclonal plasma cells and measuring 7 to 10 nm in diameter, adhere to the heart, kidneys, peripheral nerves, eyes, and other organs.5,11,20,23,24 Known for its relation to multiple myeloma,19 primary amyloidosis is associated with a poor prognosis.3,10

Secondary amyloidosis results from a chronic inflammatory disorder, such as rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis—conditions that trigger the production of amyloid proteins.3,10 This type has also been associated with substance abuse and AIDS.23

Familial or hereditary amyloidosis, according to Benson,10 is a group of diseases, each resulting from mutation in a specific protein. In the United States, the most common type of familial amyloidosis is ATTR.11 More than 100 mutant types of ATTR proteins have been identified, each involving a specific nationality or group of nationalities.10,11,23

Mutant ATTR amyloid, when deposited in specific organs, leads to their dysfunction and ultimate failure.6 ATTR may affect the cardiac, gastric, renal, ophthalmic, or nervous system. Depending on the ATTR variant, the resulting clinical features are age- and time-dependent, with onset most common between the third and fifth decade of life.10

Prevalence
The prevalence of ATTR Val 122Ile amyloidosis is reportedly high in West Africa, and in the US African-American population (3.9%).4,11,14,25,26 In a study conducted at a county hospital in Indianapolis, 3% of black newborns were found positive for ATTR Val122Ile through DNA sampling of umbilical cord blood.25 These statistics are of concern, as ATTR amyloidosis could be a significant health concern in a patient population that is already medically underserved.

Yamashita et al25 estimate that 1.35 million Americans of African-American descent may be affected by ATTR Val122Ile and vulnerable to restrictive cardiomyopathy–related heart failure and death. At the very least, this disorder can impair quality of life, especially in the presence of other comorbid conditions.

Clinical Presentation
The presence of exertional syncope at presentation is ominous, as it may be a marker of severe restrictive cardiomyopathy, postural hypotension due to excessive diuresis or autonomic neuropathy, ventricular arrhythmias from localized hypoperfusion, and rarely from cardiac tamponade due to pericardial involvement.27 Despite widespread involvement of the conduction system in specimens at autopsy, high-grade IV block is unusual.3

Diagnostic Studies
ECG. Both ECG and Holter monitoring can detect the arrhythmias and conduction disturbances (eg, first-degree AV block, low voltage patterns) associated with cardiac amyloidosis. Patients often experience syncopal and near-syncopal episodes as a result of conduction disturbances.28 Patients with conditions such as cardiac amyloidosis who present with severe heart failure are at high risk for sudden death secondary to conduction disturbances. Many have benefited from implanted defibrillators.29

 

 

Echocardiography. In patients with ATTR Val122Ile cardiac amyloidosis, echocardiography reveals thickened ventricular walls (ie, measuring ≥ 15 mm; normal, ≤ 11 mm).19 Amyloid-restrictive cardiomyopathy is associated with a marked dissociation between short- and long-axis systolic function, in cases in which left ventricular ejection fraction is normal.30

Echocardiography may demonstrate the characteristic specular or granular sparkling appearance that signifies advanced disease.15,21 Only a minority have this pattern in the myocardium, however, and changes in echocardiographic technology have made this finding less noticeable.30

MRI. Among more recently used diagnostic studies, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been reported to demonstrate late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in perhaps 80% of patients with familial amyloidosis and cardiac involvement (as determined through biopsy and Congo Red stain). LGE-CMR shows darkening of the cardiac tissue, a common occurrence in amyloidosis.31

LGE is associated with increased thickness of both left and right ventricles, lower ECG voltage patterns, elevated BNP, and elevated troponin T.31,32 Globally, LGE is associated with the worst prognosis in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. Use of LGE-CMR testing can help facilitate early detection of cardiac amyloidosis in patients who may be vulnerable to cardiac damage.31

Cardiac catheterization. In patients with cardiac amyloidosis, cardiac catheterization usually shows normal coronary arteries.3

Diagnosis
Early diagnosis of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis is crucial to the patient’s survival; it should be ruled out in any African-American patient with unexplained heart failure and echocardiography showing increased wall thickness with a nondilated left ventricular cavity. Additional clues include significant proteinuria, hepatomegaly disproportionate to the degree of heart failure, or corresponding neuropathy. Known family history of the disease, along with variant type, allows for a prompt and correct diagnosis.10

It has been reported that most clinicians who encounter heart failure, particularly in black patients, do not consider amyloidosis in the differential diagnosis, because of the high prevalence of hypertension and congestive heart failure in this population.10,15,19 As a result, amyloidosis often goes undiagnosed.19

Findings of enlarged and thickened cardiac walls on echocardiography but normal coronary arteries on cardiac catheterization should alert the treating clinician to further work-up for cardiac amyloidosis.19 In such a patient, according to Kristen et al,21 endomyocardial biopsy with Congo Red staining is the gold standard for diagnosis of amyloidosis.

In ATTR Val122Ile familial amyloidosis, it is unclear whether patients who are homozygous for the disease present with symptoms at earlier onset with more progressive illness or die sooner than those who are heterozygous.33 Nevertheless, once the diagnosis is confirmed, it is important to determine the patient’s specific variant type by DNA testing so that appropriate treatment can be initiated and the patient’s prognosis evaluated.5,10,13

Treatment
For familial amyloidosis in general, some researchers advocate liver transplantation to remove the source of mutant amyloid protein and stop all deposition of amyloid fibrils; this procedure can be followed later by transplantation of other affected organs (including the heart).5,23 Maurer et al34 have reported improved one-year survival rates among patients with ATTR amyloidosis who underwent both cardiac and liver transplantation: 75%, versus 23% in patients who did not receive transplanted organs.

Management of cardiac amyloidosis usually requires a twofold approach: treating associated congestive heart failure, and preventing further deposition of amyloid.24 In the case patient (as in most patients with ATTR amyloidosis), heart transplantation was deemed the only life-sustaining treatment option.11,19,33

Pharmacotherapeutic options are limited for patients with ATTR Val122Ile familial amyloidosis. Conventional heart failure agents (eg, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, digoxin, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers) can exacerbate heart failure symptoms, leading to a potentially life-threatening arrhythmia.3,11,19,24,35 Amyloid fibrils bind to digitalis, increasing susceptibility to digitalis toxicity; and to nifedipine, causing hemodynamic deterioration. Verapamil should be avoided, as it may induce severe left ventricular dysfunction. ACE inhibitors often provoke profound hypotension in primary amyloidosis.24,35

Diuretics, too (eg, furosemide, as was prescribed for the case patient), must be used with caution.3 These agents have been used to treat fluid overload and the resulting peripheral edema and shortness of breath found in ATTR Val122Ile patients who experience heart failure.36 According to Dubrey et al,5 cautious use of diuretics is necessary for management of heart failure symptoms in these patients.

Because the risk for intracardiac thrombus is high, anticoagulation (using agents other than β-blockers or calcium channel blockers) should be implemented unless compelling risks are involved.11,24 Amiodarone is relatively well tolerated for ventricular tachydysrhythmias and in atrial fibrillation if the goal is maintaining sinus rhythm.37

Regarding heart transplantation in patients with familial amyloidosis, Jacob et al33 hypothesize that since mutant amyloid protein is synthesized by the liver, it would take approximately 50 years for a transplanted heart to become affected by amyloid deposition. In a 59-year-old Afro-Caribbean man with familial amyloidosis who underwent cardiac transplantation, Hamour et al11 reported that the donor heart remained amyloid-free three years posttransplantation, as demonstrated by serial cardiac biopsy.

 

 

On the Horizon
Clinical trials are now under way to examine pharmacotherapeutic options for patients with ATTR amyloidosis. Now being examined in clinical trials, for example, is Fx-1006A, a drug that stabilizes ATTR and prevents the misfolding of the amyloid protein fibril, in turn preventing it from binding to the target organ.38 Similarly, ALN-TTR, a drug believed to prevent disease manifestation and possibly facilitate disease regression, is being investigated in early human trials.39

Additionally, the use of genetic testing is recommended in at-risk individuals to identify the TTR gene. Affected patients may benefit from prophylactic medical management, which would halt amyloidogenesis of TTR—and possibly treat the condition as well.35 Pharmacotherapeutic agents like diflunisal, an NSAID, antagonize the aggregation of TTR protein and hinder formation of the amyloid fibrils.40

CONCLUSION
ATTR Val122Ile familial amyloidosis is a rare disorder that causes abnormal synthesis of amyloid protein in the liver, which then infiltrates the cardiac structure, leading to restrictive cardiomyopathy and progressive heart failure. Patients who present with symptoms of heart failure, cardiac enlargement on echocardiography, and a finding of granular speckling patterns, though not specific on echocardiography, should prompt the health care provider to refer the patient to a cardiologist familiar with cardiac amyloidosis for further work-up.

Diagnosed patients must undergo genetic testing to determine the specific variant type so that prompt treatment can be initiated. In patients with ATTR Val122Ile familial amyloidosis, the treatment of choice is cardiac transplantation. Although the mutant amyloid protein continues to be synthesized in the liver, the donor heart is unlikely to become affected by this substance for many years. Appropriately treated patients can maintain good quality of life, free of heart failure.    

REFERENCES
1. Lim RP, Srichai MB, Lee VS. Non-ischemic causes of delayed myocardial hyperenhancement on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188 (6):1675-1681.

2. Sipe JD, Benson MD, Buxbaum JN, et al. Amyloid fibril protein nomenclature: 2010 recommendations from the nomenclature committee of the International Society of Amyloidosis. Amyloid. 2010;17(3-4):101-104.

3. Kendall H. Cardiac amyloidosis. Crit Care Nurse. 2010;30(2):16-23.

4. Eriksson M, Büttener J, Todorov T, et al. Prevalence of germline mutations in the TTR gene in a consecutive series of surgical pathology specimens with AATR amyloid. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(1):58-65.

5. Dubrey SW, Hawkins PN, Falk RH. Amyloid diseases of the heart: assessment, diagnosis, and referral. Heart. 2011;97(1):75-84.

6. Liepnieks JJ, Benson MD. Progression of cardiac amyloid deposition in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis patients after liver transplantation. Amyloid. 2007;14(4):277-282.

7. XDx Expression Diagnostics. Allomap®: molecular expression testing (2004). www.allomap.com. Accessed May 14, 2012.

8. Mandras SA, Crespo J, Patel HM. Innovative application of immunologic principles in heart transplantation. Ochsner J. 2010;10(4):231-235.

9. Yamani MH, Taylor DO, Rodriguez R, et al. Transplant vasculopathy is associated with increased AlloMap gene expression score. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007;26(4):403-406.

10. Benson MD. The hereditary amyloidoses. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003;17(6):909-927.

11. Hamour IM, Lachmann HJ, Goodman HJ, et al. Heart transplantation for homozygous familial transthyretin (TTR) V122I cardiac amyloidosis. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(5):1056-1059.

12. Jacobson DR, Pastore RD, Yaghoubian R, et al. Variant-sequence transthyretin (isoleucine 122) in late-onset cardiac amyloidosis in black Americans. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(7):466-473.

13. Falk RH, Dubrey SW. Amyloid heart disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;52(4):347-361.

14. Askanas V, Engel WK, McFerrin J, Vattemi G. Transthyretin Val122Ile, accumulated Abeta, and inclusion-body myositis aspects in cultured muscle. Neurology. 2003;61(2):257-260.

15. Hamidi Asl K, Nakamura M, Yamashita T, Benson MD. Cardiac amyloidoses associated with the transthyretin lle122 mutation in a Caucasian family. Amyloid. 2001;8(4):263-269.

16. Mogensen J, Arbustini E. Restrictive cardiomyopathy. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2009;24(3): 214-220.

17. Nihoyannopoulos P, Dawson D. Restrictive cardiomyopathies. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10 (8):iii23-iii33.

18. Bruce J. Getting to the heart of cardiomyopathies. Nursing. 2005;35(8):44-47.

19. Falk RH. The neglected entity of familial cardiac amyloidosis in African Americans. Ethn Dis. 2002;12(1):141-143.

20. Piper C, Butz T, Farr M, et al. How to diagnose cardiac amyloidosis early: impact of ECG, tissue Doppler echocardiography, and myocardial biopsy. Amyloid. 2010;17(1):1-9.

21. Kristen AV, Meyer FJ, Perz JB, et al. Risk stratification in cardiac amyloidosis: novel approaches. Transplantation. 2005;80(1 suppl):S151-S155.

22. Westermark P, Benson MD, Buxbaum JN, et al. A primer of amyloid nomenclature. Amyloid. 2007;14(3):179-183.

23. Picken MM. New insights into systemic amyloidosis: the importance of diagnosis of specific type. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2007; 16(3):196-203.

24. Falk RH. Cardiac amyloidosis: a treatable disease, often overlooked. Circulation. 2011;124(9):1079-1085.

25. Yamashita T, Asl KH, Yazaki M, Benson MD. A prospective evaluation of the transthyretin Ile 122 allele frequency in an African-American population. Amyloid. 2005;12(2):127-130.

26. Benson MD, Yazaki M, Magy N. Laboratory assessment of transthyretin amyloidosis. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2002;40(12):1262-1265.

 

 

27. Chamarthi B, Dubrey SW, Cha K, et al. Features and prognosis of exertional syncope in light-chain associated AL cardiac amyloidosis. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80(9):1242-1245.

28. Correia MJ, Coutinho CA, Conceiçao I, et al. Role of heart rate variability in the assessment of autonomic dysfunction in type I familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy. Folia Cardiol. 2005;12(suppl C):459-462.

29. Kadish A, Mehra M. Heart failure devices: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and biventricular pacing therapy. Circulation. 2005; 111(24):3327-3335.

30. Rahman JE, Helou EF, Gelzer-Bell R, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of biopsy-proven cardiac amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(3):410-415.

31. Syed IS, Glockner JF, Feng D, et al. Role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(2):155-164.

32. Fealey ME, Edwards WD, Buadi FK, et al. Echocardiographic features of cardiac amyloidosis presenting as endomyocardial disease in a 54-year-old male. J Cardiol. 2009;54(1):162-166.

33. Jacob EK, Edwards WD, Zucker M, et al. Homozygous transthyretin mutation in an African American male. J Mol Diagn. 2007; 9(1):127-131.

34. Maurer MS, Raina A, Hesdorffer C, et al. Cardiac transplantation using extended-donor criteria organs for systemic amyloidosis complicated by heart failure. Transplantation. 2007;83(5):539-545.

35. Buxbaum J, Alexander A, Koziol J, et al. Significance of the amyloidogenic transthyretin Val 122 Ile allele in African-Americans in the Arteriosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) and Cardiovascular Health (CHS) Studies. Am Heart J. 2010;159(5):864-870.

36. Rose BD, Colucci WS. Use of diuretics in heart failure (2010). www.uptodate.com/con tents/use-of-diuretics-in-patients-with-heart-failure. Accessed May 14, 2012.

37. Trappe H-J. Treating critical supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010;3(2):143-152.

38. Sekijima Y, Kelly JW, Ikeda S. Pathogenesis of and therapeutic strategies to ameliorate the transthyretin amyloidoses. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14(30):3219-3230.

39. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals. TTR Amyloidosis: ALN-TTR (2011). www.alnylam.com/Programs-and-Pipeline/Programs/index.php. Accessed May 14, 2012.

40. Adamski-Werner SL, Palaninathan SK, Sacchettini JC, Kelly JW. Diflunisal analogues stabilize the native state of transthyretin: potent inhibition of amyloidogenesis. J Med Chem. 2004;47(2):355-374.

Issue
Clinician Reviews - 22(6)
Issue
Clinician Reviews - 22(6)
Page Number
15-22
Page Number
15-22
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Man, 65, With Heart Failure Symptoms
Display Headline
Man, 65, With Heart Failure Symptoms
Legacy Keywords
familial amyloidosis, cardiomyopathy, transplantation, ATTR Val122Ile variant familial amyloidosis, cardiomyopathy, transplantation, ATTR Val122Ile variant
Legacy Keywords
familial amyloidosis, cardiomyopathy, transplantation, ATTR Val122Ile variant familial amyloidosis, cardiomyopathy, transplantation, ATTR Val122Ile variant
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME

Measurement of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Angles in Single-Bundle Reconstruction Using the Anteromedial Portal

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Measurement of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Angles in Single-Bundle Reconstruction Using the Anteromedial Portal

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Xuesong Dai, MD, PhD, and Youzhi Cai, MD

Issue
The American Journal of Orthopedics - 41(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
268-272
Legacy Keywords
Anterior cruciate ligament; Anatomic; reconstruction; Arthroscopy; Femoral tunnel placement; anteromedial portal, graft, Measurement of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Angles in Single-Bundle Reconstruction Using the Anteromedial Portal; Xuesong Dai; Youzhi Cai; The American Journal of Orthopedics, AJO
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Xuesong Dai, MD, PhD, and Youzhi Cai, MD

Author and Disclosure Information

Xuesong Dai, MD, PhD, and Youzhi Cai, MD

Article PDF
Article PDF

Issue
The American Journal of Orthopedics - 41(6)
Issue
The American Journal of Orthopedics - 41(6)
Page Number
268-272
Page Number
268-272
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Measurement of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Angles in Single-Bundle Reconstruction Using the Anteromedial Portal
Display Headline
Measurement of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Angles in Single-Bundle Reconstruction Using the Anteromedial Portal
Legacy Keywords
Anterior cruciate ligament; Anatomic; reconstruction; Arthroscopy; Femoral tunnel placement; anteromedial portal, graft, Measurement of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Angles in Single-Bundle Reconstruction Using the Anteromedial Portal; Xuesong Dai; Youzhi Cai; The American Journal of Orthopedics, AJO
Legacy Keywords
Anterior cruciate ligament; Anatomic; reconstruction; Arthroscopy; Femoral tunnel placement; anteromedial portal, graft, Measurement of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Angles in Single-Bundle Reconstruction Using the Anteromedial Portal; Xuesong Dai; Youzhi Cai; The American Journal of Orthopedics, AJO
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

What Is Your Diagnosis? Urticaria Multiforme

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
What Is Your Diagnosis? Urticaria Multiforme

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Donnelly AFW, Tackett B

Issue
Cutis - 89(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
260, 262-263
Legacy Keywords
urticaria multiforme, erythema multiforme, herpes simplex virus, oral antihistamines
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Donnelly AFW, Tackett B

Author and Disclosure Information

Donnelly AFW, Tackett B

Article PDF
Article PDF

Issue
Cutis - 89(6)
Issue
Cutis - 89(6)
Page Number
260, 262-263
Page Number
260, 262-263
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
What Is Your Diagnosis? Urticaria Multiforme
Display Headline
What Is Your Diagnosis? Urticaria Multiforme
Legacy Keywords
urticaria multiforme, erythema multiforme, herpes simplex virus, oral antihistamines
Legacy Keywords
urticaria multiforme, erythema multiforme, herpes simplex virus, oral antihistamines
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Overwhelmed by side effects

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Overwhelmed by side effects

CASE: Medication sensitivity

Mrs. C, age 48, is admitted to a tertiary care inpatient mood disorder unit for evaluation of severe depression characterized by depressed mood, anhedonia, and insomnia. Her initial Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-Item (HRSD-17) score is 30, indicating severe depression. Her medications are fluoxetine, 10 mg/d, and diazepam, 0.5 mg/d.

Mrs. C describes a 10-month history of depression and extreme anxiety in the context of several psychosocial stressors. Her father recently died and she is having difficulty with the demands of administering her father’s estate. She is intensely obsessive and focused on nihilistic themes, her diagnosis, somatic themes, and medications side effects. Her husband confirms our observations. No history or current symptoms of typical compulsions (eg, washing hands or checking doors) are elicited. She has limited insight into her obsessive tendencies.

Mrs. C had no psychiatric history before her depressive and obsessive symptoms developed 10 months ago. However, in the past 10 months, she has been hospitalized in a psychiatric facility twice. She also received a series of 8 electroconvulsive therapy treatments, but reported minimal improvement of her depressive symptoms. Mrs. C had a few cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) sessions with a psychotherapist, but she said they didn’t help much.

Mrs. C has substantial difficulty adhering to medications, even at subtherapeutic doses. She states she is “extremely sensitive” to all medications. Mrs. C says she develops dizziness, increased anxiety, insomnia, nausea, and other vague reactions whenever she attempts to increase her psychotropics to therapeutic doses. She took sertraline, 10 mg/d, for 4 days, but discontinued it because of unspecified side effects. She then received escitalopram, 2.5 mg/d, for 10 days, but again stopped it because of vague side effects. She was taking paroxetine, 10 mg/d, for 2 days, but experienced vomiting and discontinued the drug. She tried venlafaxine at a low dose and also discontinued it because of vomiting. Mrs. C stayed on mirtazapine, 22.5 mg/d, for 3 months, but stopped it because of lack of efficacy and she was unwilling to increase the dose. Other unsuccessful trials include citalopram and doxepin. Mrs. C is hesitant to try another medication or increase to therapeutic doses any of the previous medications.

The authors’ observations

Before initiating another treatment, the treatment team considered Mrs. C’s pervasive medication intolerance. Her enzymatic activity may be genetically compromised, which could lead to high blood levels of medications and significant side effects when she takes very low doses. Individual variations in response to psychotropics are influenced by genetic factors.1 Variants in the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) genes produce enzymes with increased activity, normal activity, reduced activity, or no activity, creating phenotypes of ultrarapid metabolizers, extensive metabolizers, intermediate metabolizers, and poor metabolizers, respectively. These genetic variations can affect blood levels of medications that employ these enzymes in their metabolic pathways.2 Mrs. C could be a poor metabolizer of common CYP450 variant enzymes, which led to her exquisite sensitivity to psychotropics. We felt this was a reasonable hypothesis given her tumultuous 10-month course of psychiatric treatment and multiple failed medication trials.

An alternative hypothesis is that Mrs. C’s somatic obsessions about drug side effects were the primary clinical issue that led to her severe medication intolerance. Mrs. C spends hours questioning the inpatient staff about her diagnosis (eg, “Are you sure I don’t have bipolar disorder?”), medications (eg, “Are you sure this medication won’t make me sick?”), somatic themes (eg, “Are you sure I don’t have Meniere’s disease with all my dizziness?”), and nihilistic themes (eg, “What if I never get better?”). Mrs. C’s husband attested that she has spent hours researching her new medications on the Internet and reading the medication handouts from the pharmacy. She admits to mentally cycling through the DSM-IV-TR criteria for hours at a time to “figure out” if she has bipolar disorder (BD).

We initiated pharmacogenomic testing to help distinguish between these hypotheses. Mrs. C’s results are presented in Table 1. Genotype results were applied using an interpretive algorithm (Figure) in which 26 psychiatric medications were placed in categories of “use as directed” (green column), “use with caution” (yellow column), and “use with caution or more frequent monitoring” (red column). The algorithm incorporates the genetic information with the known pharmacologic profile for each of the medications in the panel. Highlights of Mrs. C’s interpretive report are shown in Table 2.

Table 1

Mrs. C’s genotype results

GeneAllelePredicted phenotype
CYP2D6*1/*4Intermediate metabolizer
CYP2C19*1/*1Extensive metabolizer
SLC6A4S/SLow activity
5HTR2AG/GReduced activity
 

 

Figure

Genotype-phenotype integration into Mrs. C’s interpretive report

  Table 2

Mrs. C’s pharmacogenomic-based interpretive report

Use as directedUse with cautionUse with caution and more frequent monitoring
Antidepressants: Duloxetine, mirtazapine
Antipsychotics: Clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone
Antidepressants: Amitriptyline,a,b bupropion,a citalopram,c clomipramine,a,b desipramine,a,b escitalopram,c fluoxetine,a fluvoxamine,c imipramine,a,b nortriptyline,a,b sertraline,c paroxetine,c trazodone,a venlafaxinea
Antipsychotics: Aripiprazole,a haloperidol,a perphenazine,a risperidonea
None
aSerum level may be too high, lower doses may be required
bSerum levels may be outside of optimal range
cGenotype suggests less than optimal response

The authors’ observations

Mrs. C’s genotype might explain some sensitivity to medications metabolized by CYP2D6 (eg, venlafaxine, paroxetine, fluoxetine), but does not explain her acute sensitivity to all of the medications she has taken. For example, she is an extensive metabolizer for CYP2C19, which metabolizes escitalopram; therefore, it is unlikely escitalopram, 2.5 mg/d, would result in high blood levels and side effects.3 Regardless of the next step in treatment, we deemed her somatic obsessions to be the most important clinical issue. It seems unlikely that Mrs. C would adhere to any medication regimen until this underlying problem was addressed.

The focus of treatment shifted to Mrs. C’s obsessions about her medications and their side effects. Mrs. C was fixated on the content of her obsessions (eg, medications, side effects) rather than the process of her obsessional thinking. The goal was to help Mrs. C identify, label, and ultimately create distance from her obsessive thoughts associated with side effects. The treatment team employed an acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) model of observing and defusing thoughts in the inpatient setting (Table 3).4 ACT is based on mindfulness and committed, values-based action.5 When patients are “fused” with their thoughts, they believe these thoughts are important and representative of reality. In Mrs. C’s case, she fused with the concept that her medications were making her sick and the idea that she may have BD. The treatment team thought these fused thoughts were the major problem that resulted in 10 months of protracted illness.

Conversely, in a “defused” state, patients can separate from their thoughts and observe them as disparate sounds, words, stories, or bits of language. The goal is to observe and allow the patient’s thoughts to simply be thoughts rather than trying to determine if they are “true.” Mrs. C was fused with the idea that her medications were making her ill, so this belief became the story underlying her obsessional thinking. Helping her disengage from this story became the focus of her treatment.

Table 3

6 core principles of acceptance and commitment therapy

DefusionLearning to step back and observe thoughts as separate from the self
AcceptanceAllowing unpleasant thoughts to come and go without trying to control them
Contact with the present momentFull awareness and engagement with present experiences
Observing the present selfAccessing a transcendent sense of self
ValuesClarifying what is most important to the patient
Committed actionSetting goals and taking action to achieve them
Source: Reference 4

Results guide pharmacotherapy

In addition to helping change the focus of Mrs. C’s psychotherapy, we used the pharmacogenomic results to guide medication treatment. We initially prescribed fluvoxamine, 50 mg/d, because her partially compromised CYP2D6 pathway probably would play only a minor role in metabolizing the drug.1 Smoking induces CYP1A2, which is fluvoxamine’s primary metabolic pathway; however, Mrs. C does not smoke.6 When we saw Mrs. C in January 2009, the author (JGW) was unaware of any available genetic testing for CYP1A2, although now such testing is clinically available.

Mirtazapine is in the “use as directed” category for Mrs. C’s genotype (Table 2) and was the only medication she had adhered to at a therapeutic dose for more than a few days. However, she indicated that she would not adhere to this medication if we prescribed it again. Duloxetine also is in the “use as directed” category; however, given the entire clinical picture, we chose fluvoxamine because of Mrs. C’s obsessive symptomatology and because she had never reached a therapeutic dose of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

OUTCOME: Obsessions abate

Given Mrs. C’s lack of insight, we initiate a family approach to help broach the topic of obsessions as the focus of treatment. With her husband’s help, she participates in defusion techniques as an inpatient and follows up with an acceptance-based psychotherapist after discharge. After we share the pharmacogenomic information with Mrs. C, she agrees to try fluvoxamine, which is titrated to 100 mg/d. She maintains this dose at her 4-week follow-up visit. Notably, this was only the second time Mrs. C adhered to a medication trial since illness onset. Upon admission, Mrs. C had an HRSD-17 score of 30, indicating severe depression; at 4 weeks, her HRSD-17 score is 8, indicating mild depression.

 

 

The authors’ observations

In a complementary case, the author (JGW) consulted on a patient who was taking paroxetine and experiencing anorgasmia, weight gain, and loss of libido. Pharmacogenomic testing revealed that the patient was a poor metabolizer of CYP2D6. Paroxetine is substantially metabolized by CYP2D6; therefore, it was likely that high blood levels were contributing to the side effects.3,7 The key clinical distinction is that although this patient was bothered by intrusive side effects, he was not fixated on them like Mrs. C. His pharmacogenomic test results were used to identify a metabolic issue that was causing the side effects. This is in contrast with Mrs. C, for whom the pharmacogenomic information ruled out a metabolic issue as the primary problem and helped guide the next step in treatment.

Mrs. C’s case illustrates how pharmacogenomics and ACT complemented each other to create a desirable outcome. Pharmacogenomic testing originally was developed as a safety mechanism for medication choice and dosing, but clinical applications have grown as astute clinicians utilize it to help care for their patients.8 ACT can be a powerful tool for patients who have difficulties creating distance from their thoughts. Both pharmacogenomic testing and ACT are noninvasive interventions that can be implemented as part of a multi-faceted treatment approach.

Related Resources

  • Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. 2nd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2011.
  • Mrazek DA. Psychiatric pharmacogenomics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010.

Drug Brand Names

  • Amitriptyline • Elavil
  • Aripiprazole • Abilify
  • Bupropion • Wellbutrin, Zyban
  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Clomipramine • Anafranil
  • Clozapine • Clozaril
  • Desipramine • Norpramin
  • Diazepam • Valium
  • Doxepin • Adapin, Silenor
  • Duloxetine • Cymbalta
  • Escitalopram • Lexapro
  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Fluvoxamine • Luvox
  • Haloperidol • Haldol
  • Imipramine • Tofranil
  • Lithium • Eskalith, Lithobid
  • Mirtazapine • Remeron
  • Olanzapine • Zyprexa
  • Nortriptyline • Pamelor
  • Paroxetine • Paxil
  • Perphenazine • Trilafon
  • Quetiapine • Seroquel
  • Risperidone • Risperdal
  • Sertraline • Zoloft
  • Trazodone • Desyrel, Oleptro
  • Venlafaxine • Effexor
  • Ziprasidone • Geodon

Disclosure

The authors are employed by AssureRx Health, Inc., the provider of the pharmacogenomic testing used in this article.

References

1. Mrazek DA. Psychiatric pharmacogenomics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010.

2. Kirchheiner J, Nickchen K, Bauer M, et al. Pharmacogenetics of antidepressants and antipsychotics: the contribution of allelic variations to the phenotype of drug response. Mol Psychiatry. 2004;9(5):442-473.

3. Kircheiner J, Brøsen K, Dahl ML, et al. CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype-based dose recommendations for antidepressants: a first step towards subpopulation-specific dosages. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001;104(3):173-192.

4. Harris R. Embracing your demons: an overview of acceptance and commitment therapy. Psychotherapy in Australia. 2006;12(4):2-8.

5. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2003.

6. Luvox CR [package insert] Palo Alto CA: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2011.

7. Kaneda Y, Kawamura I, Fujii A, et al. Serotonin syndrome– ‘potential’ role of the CYP2D6 genetic polymorphism in Asians. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2002;5(1):105-106.

8. Kung S, Li X. The clinical use of pharmacogenomic testing in treatment-resistant depression. Primary Psychiatry. 2010;17(5):46-51.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Joel G. Winner, MD
Dr. Winner is Assistant Clinical Professor, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI; Medical Director, AssureRx Health, Mason, OH; and President, Winner Psychiatry, PC, Boulder, CO
Josiah D. Allen, BA
Mr. Allen is Senior Clinical Research Associate, AssureRx Health, Mason, OH
Joshua P. Lorenz, PharmD, MBA
Dr. Lorenz is Medical Science Liaison, AssureRx Health, Mason, OH
C. Anthony Altar, PhD
Dr. Altar is Chief Science Officer, AssureRx Health, Mason, OH

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 11(06)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
54-58
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Joel G. Winner, MD
Dr. Winner is Assistant Clinical Professor, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI; Medical Director, AssureRx Health, Mason, OH; and President, Winner Psychiatry, PC, Boulder, CO
Josiah D. Allen, BA
Mr. Allen is Senior Clinical Research Associate, AssureRx Health, Mason, OH
Joshua P. Lorenz, PharmD, MBA
Dr. Lorenz is Medical Science Liaison, AssureRx Health, Mason, OH
C. Anthony Altar, PhD
Dr. Altar is Chief Science Officer, AssureRx Health, Mason, OH

Author and Disclosure Information

Joel G. Winner, MD
Dr. Winner is Assistant Clinical Professor, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI; Medical Director, AssureRx Health, Mason, OH; and President, Winner Psychiatry, PC, Boulder, CO
Josiah D. Allen, BA
Mr. Allen is Senior Clinical Research Associate, AssureRx Health, Mason, OH
Joshua P. Lorenz, PharmD, MBA
Dr. Lorenz is Medical Science Liaison, AssureRx Health, Mason, OH
C. Anthony Altar, PhD
Dr. Altar is Chief Science Officer, AssureRx Health, Mason, OH

Article PDF
Article PDF

CASE: Medication sensitivity

Mrs. C, age 48, is admitted to a tertiary care inpatient mood disorder unit for evaluation of severe depression characterized by depressed mood, anhedonia, and insomnia. Her initial Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-Item (HRSD-17) score is 30, indicating severe depression. Her medications are fluoxetine, 10 mg/d, and diazepam, 0.5 mg/d.

Mrs. C describes a 10-month history of depression and extreme anxiety in the context of several psychosocial stressors. Her father recently died and she is having difficulty with the demands of administering her father’s estate. She is intensely obsessive and focused on nihilistic themes, her diagnosis, somatic themes, and medications side effects. Her husband confirms our observations. No history or current symptoms of typical compulsions (eg, washing hands or checking doors) are elicited. She has limited insight into her obsessive tendencies.

Mrs. C had no psychiatric history before her depressive and obsessive symptoms developed 10 months ago. However, in the past 10 months, she has been hospitalized in a psychiatric facility twice. She also received a series of 8 electroconvulsive therapy treatments, but reported minimal improvement of her depressive symptoms. Mrs. C had a few cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) sessions with a psychotherapist, but she said they didn’t help much.

Mrs. C has substantial difficulty adhering to medications, even at subtherapeutic doses. She states she is “extremely sensitive” to all medications. Mrs. C says she develops dizziness, increased anxiety, insomnia, nausea, and other vague reactions whenever she attempts to increase her psychotropics to therapeutic doses. She took sertraline, 10 mg/d, for 4 days, but discontinued it because of unspecified side effects. She then received escitalopram, 2.5 mg/d, for 10 days, but again stopped it because of vague side effects. She was taking paroxetine, 10 mg/d, for 2 days, but experienced vomiting and discontinued the drug. She tried venlafaxine at a low dose and also discontinued it because of vomiting. Mrs. C stayed on mirtazapine, 22.5 mg/d, for 3 months, but stopped it because of lack of efficacy and she was unwilling to increase the dose. Other unsuccessful trials include citalopram and doxepin. Mrs. C is hesitant to try another medication or increase to therapeutic doses any of the previous medications.

The authors’ observations

Before initiating another treatment, the treatment team considered Mrs. C’s pervasive medication intolerance. Her enzymatic activity may be genetically compromised, which could lead to high blood levels of medications and significant side effects when she takes very low doses. Individual variations in response to psychotropics are influenced by genetic factors.1 Variants in the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) genes produce enzymes with increased activity, normal activity, reduced activity, or no activity, creating phenotypes of ultrarapid metabolizers, extensive metabolizers, intermediate metabolizers, and poor metabolizers, respectively. These genetic variations can affect blood levels of medications that employ these enzymes in their metabolic pathways.2 Mrs. C could be a poor metabolizer of common CYP450 variant enzymes, which led to her exquisite sensitivity to psychotropics. We felt this was a reasonable hypothesis given her tumultuous 10-month course of psychiatric treatment and multiple failed medication trials.

An alternative hypothesis is that Mrs. C’s somatic obsessions about drug side effects were the primary clinical issue that led to her severe medication intolerance. Mrs. C spends hours questioning the inpatient staff about her diagnosis (eg, “Are you sure I don’t have bipolar disorder?”), medications (eg, “Are you sure this medication won’t make me sick?”), somatic themes (eg, “Are you sure I don’t have Meniere’s disease with all my dizziness?”), and nihilistic themes (eg, “What if I never get better?”). Mrs. C’s husband attested that she has spent hours researching her new medications on the Internet and reading the medication handouts from the pharmacy. She admits to mentally cycling through the DSM-IV-TR criteria for hours at a time to “figure out” if she has bipolar disorder (BD).

We initiated pharmacogenomic testing to help distinguish between these hypotheses. Mrs. C’s results are presented in Table 1. Genotype results were applied using an interpretive algorithm (Figure) in which 26 psychiatric medications were placed in categories of “use as directed” (green column), “use with caution” (yellow column), and “use with caution or more frequent monitoring” (red column). The algorithm incorporates the genetic information with the known pharmacologic profile for each of the medications in the panel. Highlights of Mrs. C’s interpretive report are shown in Table 2.

Table 1

Mrs. C’s genotype results

GeneAllelePredicted phenotype
CYP2D6*1/*4Intermediate metabolizer
CYP2C19*1/*1Extensive metabolizer
SLC6A4S/SLow activity
5HTR2AG/GReduced activity
 

 

Figure

Genotype-phenotype integration into Mrs. C’s interpretive report

  Table 2

Mrs. C’s pharmacogenomic-based interpretive report

Use as directedUse with cautionUse with caution and more frequent monitoring
Antidepressants: Duloxetine, mirtazapine
Antipsychotics: Clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone
Antidepressants: Amitriptyline,a,b bupropion,a citalopram,c clomipramine,a,b desipramine,a,b escitalopram,c fluoxetine,a fluvoxamine,c imipramine,a,b nortriptyline,a,b sertraline,c paroxetine,c trazodone,a venlafaxinea
Antipsychotics: Aripiprazole,a haloperidol,a perphenazine,a risperidonea
None
aSerum level may be too high, lower doses may be required
bSerum levels may be outside of optimal range
cGenotype suggests less than optimal response

The authors’ observations

Mrs. C’s genotype might explain some sensitivity to medications metabolized by CYP2D6 (eg, venlafaxine, paroxetine, fluoxetine), but does not explain her acute sensitivity to all of the medications she has taken. For example, she is an extensive metabolizer for CYP2C19, which metabolizes escitalopram; therefore, it is unlikely escitalopram, 2.5 mg/d, would result in high blood levels and side effects.3 Regardless of the next step in treatment, we deemed her somatic obsessions to be the most important clinical issue. It seems unlikely that Mrs. C would adhere to any medication regimen until this underlying problem was addressed.

The focus of treatment shifted to Mrs. C’s obsessions about her medications and their side effects. Mrs. C was fixated on the content of her obsessions (eg, medications, side effects) rather than the process of her obsessional thinking. The goal was to help Mrs. C identify, label, and ultimately create distance from her obsessive thoughts associated with side effects. The treatment team employed an acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) model of observing and defusing thoughts in the inpatient setting (Table 3).4 ACT is based on mindfulness and committed, values-based action.5 When patients are “fused” with their thoughts, they believe these thoughts are important and representative of reality. In Mrs. C’s case, she fused with the concept that her medications were making her sick and the idea that she may have BD. The treatment team thought these fused thoughts were the major problem that resulted in 10 months of protracted illness.

Conversely, in a “defused” state, patients can separate from their thoughts and observe them as disparate sounds, words, stories, or bits of language. The goal is to observe and allow the patient’s thoughts to simply be thoughts rather than trying to determine if they are “true.” Mrs. C was fused with the idea that her medications were making her ill, so this belief became the story underlying her obsessional thinking. Helping her disengage from this story became the focus of her treatment.

Table 3

6 core principles of acceptance and commitment therapy

DefusionLearning to step back and observe thoughts as separate from the self
AcceptanceAllowing unpleasant thoughts to come and go without trying to control them
Contact with the present momentFull awareness and engagement with present experiences
Observing the present selfAccessing a transcendent sense of self
ValuesClarifying what is most important to the patient
Committed actionSetting goals and taking action to achieve them
Source: Reference 4

Results guide pharmacotherapy

In addition to helping change the focus of Mrs. C’s psychotherapy, we used the pharmacogenomic results to guide medication treatment. We initially prescribed fluvoxamine, 50 mg/d, because her partially compromised CYP2D6 pathway probably would play only a minor role in metabolizing the drug.1 Smoking induces CYP1A2, which is fluvoxamine’s primary metabolic pathway; however, Mrs. C does not smoke.6 When we saw Mrs. C in January 2009, the author (JGW) was unaware of any available genetic testing for CYP1A2, although now such testing is clinically available.

Mirtazapine is in the “use as directed” category for Mrs. C’s genotype (Table 2) and was the only medication she had adhered to at a therapeutic dose for more than a few days. However, she indicated that she would not adhere to this medication if we prescribed it again. Duloxetine also is in the “use as directed” category; however, given the entire clinical picture, we chose fluvoxamine because of Mrs. C’s obsessive symptomatology and because she had never reached a therapeutic dose of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

OUTCOME: Obsessions abate

Given Mrs. C’s lack of insight, we initiate a family approach to help broach the topic of obsessions as the focus of treatment. With her husband’s help, she participates in defusion techniques as an inpatient and follows up with an acceptance-based psychotherapist after discharge. After we share the pharmacogenomic information with Mrs. C, she agrees to try fluvoxamine, which is titrated to 100 mg/d. She maintains this dose at her 4-week follow-up visit. Notably, this was only the second time Mrs. C adhered to a medication trial since illness onset. Upon admission, Mrs. C had an HRSD-17 score of 30, indicating severe depression; at 4 weeks, her HRSD-17 score is 8, indicating mild depression.

 

 

The authors’ observations

In a complementary case, the author (JGW) consulted on a patient who was taking paroxetine and experiencing anorgasmia, weight gain, and loss of libido. Pharmacogenomic testing revealed that the patient was a poor metabolizer of CYP2D6. Paroxetine is substantially metabolized by CYP2D6; therefore, it was likely that high blood levels were contributing to the side effects.3,7 The key clinical distinction is that although this patient was bothered by intrusive side effects, he was not fixated on them like Mrs. C. His pharmacogenomic test results were used to identify a metabolic issue that was causing the side effects. This is in contrast with Mrs. C, for whom the pharmacogenomic information ruled out a metabolic issue as the primary problem and helped guide the next step in treatment.

Mrs. C’s case illustrates how pharmacogenomics and ACT complemented each other to create a desirable outcome. Pharmacogenomic testing originally was developed as a safety mechanism for medication choice and dosing, but clinical applications have grown as astute clinicians utilize it to help care for their patients.8 ACT can be a powerful tool for patients who have difficulties creating distance from their thoughts. Both pharmacogenomic testing and ACT are noninvasive interventions that can be implemented as part of a multi-faceted treatment approach.

Related Resources

  • Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. 2nd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2011.
  • Mrazek DA. Psychiatric pharmacogenomics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010.

Drug Brand Names

  • Amitriptyline • Elavil
  • Aripiprazole • Abilify
  • Bupropion • Wellbutrin, Zyban
  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Clomipramine • Anafranil
  • Clozapine • Clozaril
  • Desipramine • Norpramin
  • Diazepam • Valium
  • Doxepin • Adapin, Silenor
  • Duloxetine • Cymbalta
  • Escitalopram • Lexapro
  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Fluvoxamine • Luvox
  • Haloperidol • Haldol
  • Imipramine • Tofranil
  • Lithium • Eskalith, Lithobid
  • Mirtazapine • Remeron
  • Olanzapine • Zyprexa
  • Nortriptyline • Pamelor
  • Paroxetine • Paxil
  • Perphenazine • Trilafon
  • Quetiapine • Seroquel
  • Risperidone • Risperdal
  • Sertraline • Zoloft
  • Trazodone • Desyrel, Oleptro
  • Venlafaxine • Effexor
  • Ziprasidone • Geodon

Disclosure

The authors are employed by AssureRx Health, Inc., the provider of the pharmacogenomic testing used in this article.

CASE: Medication sensitivity

Mrs. C, age 48, is admitted to a tertiary care inpatient mood disorder unit for evaluation of severe depression characterized by depressed mood, anhedonia, and insomnia. Her initial Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-Item (HRSD-17) score is 30, indicating severe depression. Her medications are fluoxetine, 10 mg/d, and diazepam, 0.5 mg/d.

Mrs. C describes a 10-month history of depression and extreme anxiety in the context of several psychosocial stressors. Her father recently died and she is having difficulty with the demands of administering her father’s estate. She is intensely obsessive and focused on nihilistic themes, her diagnosis, somatic themes, and medications side effects. Her husband confirms our observations. No history or current symptoms of typical compulsions (eg, washing hands or checking doors) are elicited. She has limited insight into her obsessive tendencies.

Mrs. C had no psychiatric history before her depressive and obsessive symptoms developed 10 months ago. However, in the past 10 months, she has been hospitalized in a psychiatric facility twice. She also received a series of 8 electroconvulsive therapy treatments, but reported minimal improvement of her depressive symptoms. Mrs. C had a few cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) sessions with a psychotherapist, but she said they didn’t help much.

Mrs. C has substantial difficulty adhering to medications, even at subtherapeutic doses. She states she is “extremely sensitive” to all medications. Mrs. C says she develops dizziness, increased anxiety, insomnia, nausea, and other vague reactions whenever she attempts to increase her psychotropics to therapeutic doses. She took sertraline, 10 mg/d, for 4 days, but discontinued it because of unspecified side effects. She then received escitalopram, 2.5 mg/d, for 10 days, but again stopped it because of vague side effects. She was taking paroxetine, 10 mg/d, for 2 days, but experienced vomiting and discontinued the drug. She tried venlafaxine at a low dose and also discontinued it because of vomiting. Mrs. C stayed on mirtazapine, 22.5 mg/d, for 3 months, but stopped it because of lack of efficacy and she was unwilling to increase the dose. Other unsuccessful trials include citalopram and doxepin. Mrs. C is hesitant to try another medication or increase to therapeutic doses any of the previous medications.

The authors’ observations

Before initiating another treatment, the treatment team considered Mrs. C’s pervasive medication intolerance. Her enzymatic activity may be genetically compromised, which could lead to high blood levels of medications and significant side effects when she takes very low doses. Individual variations in response to psychotropics are influenced by genetic factors.1 Variants in the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) genes produce enzymes with increased activity, normal activity, reduced activity, or no activity, creating phenotypes of ultrarapid metabolizers, extensive metabolizers, intermediate metabolizers, and poor metabolizers, respectively. These genetic variations can affect blood levels of medications that employ these enzymes in their metabolic pathways.2 Mrs. C could be a poor metabolizer of common CYP450 variant enzymes, which led to her exquisite sensitivity to psychotropics. We felt this was a reasonable hypothesis given her tumultuous 10-month course of psychiatric treatment and multiple failed medication trials.

An alternative hypothesis is that Mrs. C’s somatic obsessions about drug side effects were the primary clinical issue that led to her severe medication intolerance. Mrs. C spends hours questioning the inpatient staff about her diagnosis (eg, “Are you sure I don’t have bipolar disorder?”), medications (eg, “Are you sure this medication won’t make me sick?”), somatic themes (eg, “Are you sure I don’t have Meniere’s disease with all my dizziness?”), and nihilistic themes (eg, “What if I never get better?”). Mrs. C’s husband attested that she has spent hours researching her new medications on the Internet and reading the medication handouts from the pharmacy. She admits to mentally cycling through the DSM-IV-TR criteria for hours at a time to “figure out” if she has bipolar disorder (BD).

We initiated pharmacogenomic testing to help distinguish between these hypotheses. Mrs. C’s results are presented in Table 1. Genotype results were applied using an interpretive algorithm (Figure) in which 26 psychiatric medications were placed in categories of “use as directed” (green column), “use with caution” (yellow column), and “use with caution or more frequent monitoring” (red column). The algorithm incorporates the genetic information with the known pharmacologic profile for each of the medications in the panel. Highlights of Mrs. C’s interpretive report are shown in Table 2.

Table 1

Mrs. C’s genotype results

GeneAllelePredicted phenotype
CYP2D6*1/*4Intermediate metabolizer
CYP2C19*1/*1Extensive metabolizer
SLC6A4S/SLow activity
5HTR2AG/GReduced activity
 

 

Figure

Genotype-phenotype integration into Mrs. C’s interpretive report

  Table 2

Mrs. C’s pharmacogenomic-based interpretive report

Use as directedUse with cautionUse with caution and more frequent monitoring
Antidepressants: Duloxetine, mirtazapine
Antipsychotics: Clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone
Antidepressants: Amitriptyline,a,b bupropion,a citalopram,c clomipramine,a,b desipramine,a,b escitalopram,c fluoxetine,a fluvoxamine,c imipramine,a,b nortriptyline,a,b sertraline,c paroxetine,c trazodone,a venlafaxinea
Antipsychotics: Aripiprazole,a haloperidol,a perphenazine,a risperidonea
None
aSerum level may be too high, lower doses may be required
bSerum levels may be outside of optimal range
cGenotype suggests less than optimal response

The authors’ observations

Mrs. C’s genotype might explain some sensitivity to medications metabolized by CYP2D6 (eg, venlafaxine, paroxetine, fluoxetine), but does not explain her acute sensitivity to all of the medications she has taken. For example, she is an extensive metabolizer for CYP2C19, which metabolizes escitalopram; therefore, it is unlikely escitalopram, 2.5 mg/d, would result in high blood levels and side effects.3 Regardless of the next step in treatment, we deemed her somatic obsessions to be the most important clinical issue. It seems unlikely that Mrs. C would adhere to any medication regimen until this underlying problem was addressed.

The focus of treatment shifted to Mrs. C’s obsessions about her medications and their side effects. Mrs. C was fixated on the content of her obsessions (eg, medications, side effects) rather than the process of her obsessional thinking. The goal was to help Mrs. C identify, label, and ultimately create distance from her obsessive thoughts associated with side effects. The treatment team employed an acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) model of observing and defusing thoughts in the inpatient setting (Table 3).4 ACT is based on mindfulness and committed, values-based action.5 When patients are “fused” with their thoughts, they believe these thoughts are important and representative of reality. In Mrs. C’s case, she fused with the concept that her medications were making her sick and the idea that she may have BD. The treatment team thought these fused thoughts were the major problem that resulted in 10 months of protracted illness.

Conversely, in a “defused” state, patients can separate from their thoughts and observe them as disparate sounds, words, stories, or bits of language. The goal is to observe and allow the patient’s thoughts to simply be thoughts rather than trying to determine if they are “true.” Mrs. C was fused with the idea that her medications were making her ill, so this belief became the story underlying her obsessional thinking. Helping her disengage from this story became the focus of her treatment.

Table 3

6 core principles of acceptance and commitment therapy

DefusionLearning to step back and observe thoughts as separate from the self
AcceptanceAllowing unpleasant thoughts to come and go without trying to control them
Contact with the present momentFull awareness and engagement with present experiences
Observing the present selfAccessing a transcendent sense of self
ValuesClarifying what is most important to the patient
Committed actionSetting goals and taking action to achieve them
Source: Reference 4

Results guide pharmacotherapy

In addition to helping change the focus of Mrs. C’s psychotherapy, we used the pharmacogenomic results to guide medication treatment. We initially prescribed fluvoxamine, 50 mg/d, because her partially compromised CYP2D6 pathway probably would play only a minor role in metabolizing the drug.1 Smoking induces CYP1A2, which is fluvoxamine’s primary metabolic pathway; however, Mrs. C does not smoke.6 When we saw Mrs. C in January 2009, the author (JGW) was unaware of any available genetic testing for CYP1A2, although now such testing is clinically available.

Mirtazapine is in the “use as directed” category for Mrs. C’s genotype (Table 2) and was the only medication she had adhered to at a therapeutic dose for more than a few days. However, she indicated that she would not adhere to this medication if we prescribed it again. Duloxetine also is in the “use as directed” category; however, given the entire clinical picture, we chose fluvoxamine because of Mrs. C’s obsessive symptomatology and because she had never reached a therapeutic dose of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

OUTCOME: Obsessions abate

Given Mrs. C’s lack of insight, we initiate a family approach to help broach the topic of obsessions as the focus of treatment. With her husband’s help, she participates in defusion techniques as an inpatient and follows up with an acceptance-based psychotherapist after discharge. After we share the pharmacogenomic information with Mrs. C, she agrees to try fluvoxamine, which is titrated to 100 mg/d. She maintains this dose at her 4-week follow-up visit. Notably, this was only the second time Mrs. C adhered to a medication trial since illness onset. Upon admission, Mrs. C had an HRSD-17 score of 30, indicating severe depression; at 4 weeks, her HRSD-17 score is 8, indicating mild depression.

 

 

The authors’ observations

In a complementary case, the author (JGW) consulted on a patient who was taking paroxetine and experiencing anorgasmia, weight gain, and loss of libido. Pharmacogenomic testing revealed that the patient was a poor metabolizer of CYP2D6. Paroxetine is substantially metabolized by CYP2D6; therefore, it was likely that high blood levels were contributing to the side effects.3,7 The key clinical distinction is that although this patient was bothered by intrusive side effects, he was not fixated on them like Mrs. C. His pharmacogenomic test results were used to identify a metabolic issue that was causing the side effects. This is in contrast with Mrs. C, for whom the pharmacogenomic information ruled out a metabolic issue as the primary problem and helped guide the next step in treatment.

Mrs. C’s case illustrates how pharmacogenomics and ACT complemented each other to create a desirable outcome. Pharmacogenomic testing originally was developed as a safety mechanism for medication choice and dosing, but clinical applications have grown as astute clinicians utilize it to help care for their patients.8 ACT can be a powerful tool for patients who have difficulties creating distance from their thoughts. Both pharmacogenomic testing and ACT are noninvasive interventions that can be implemented as part of a multi-faceted treatment approach.

Related Resources

  • Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. 2nd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2011.
  • Mrazek DA. Psychiatric pharmacogenomics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010.

Drug Brand Names

  • Amitriptyline • Elavil
  • Aripiprazole • Abilify
  • Bupropion • Wellbutrin, Zyban
  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Clomipramine • Anafranil
  • Clozapine • Clozaril
  • Desipramine • Norpramin
  • Diazepam • Valium
  • Doxepin • Adapin, Silenor
  • Duloxetine • Cymbalta
  • Escitalopram • Lexapro
  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Fluvoxamine • Luvox
  • Haloperidol • Haldol
  • Imipramine • Tofranil
  • Lithium • Eskalith, Lithobid
  • Mirtazapine • Remeron
  • Olanzapine • Zyprexa
  • Nortriptyline • Pamelor
  • Paroxetine • Paxil
  • Perphenazine • Trilafon
  • Quetiapine • Seroquel
  • Risperidone • Risperdal
  • Sertraline • Zoloft
  • Trazodone • Desyrel, Oleptro
  • Venlafaxine • Effexor
  • Ziprasidone • Geodon

Disclosure

The authors are employed by AssureRx Health, Inc., the provider of the pharmacogenomic testing used in this article.

References

1. Mrazek DA. Psychiatric pharmacogenomics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010.

2. Kirchheiner J, Nickchen K, Bauer M, et al. Pharmacogenetics of antidepressants and antipsychotics: the contribution of allelic variations to the phenotype of drug response. Mol Psychiatry. 2004;9(5):442-473.

3. Kircheiner J, Brøsen K, Dahl ML, et al. CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype-based dose recommendations for antidepressants: a first step towards subpopulation-specific dosages. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001;104(3):173-192.

4. Harris R. Embracing your demons: an overview of acceptance and commitment therapy. Psychotherapy in Australia. 2006;12(4):2-8.

5. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2003.

6. Luvox CR [package insert] Palo Alto CA: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2011.

7. Kaneda Y, Kawamura I, Fujii A, et al. Serotonin syndrome– ‘potential’ role of the CYP2D6 genetic polymorphism in Asians. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2002;5(1):105-106.

8. Kung S, Li X. The clinical use of pharmacogenomic testing in treatment-resistant depression. Primary Psychiatry. 2010;17(5):46-51.

References

1. Mrazek DA. Psychiatric pharmacogenomics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010.

2. Kirchheiner J, Nickchen K, Bauer M, et al. Pharmacogenetics of antidepressants and antipsychotics: the contribution of allelic variations to the phenotype of drug response. Mol Psychiatry. 2004;9(5):442-473.

3. Kircheiner J, Brøsen K, Dahl ML, et al. CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype-based dose recommendations for antidepressants: a first step towards subpopulation-specific dosages. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001;104(3):173-192.

4. Harris R. Embracing your demons: an overview of acceptance and commitment therapy. Psychotherapy in Australia. 2006;12(4):2-8.

5. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2003.

6. Luvox CR [package insert] Palo Alto CA: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2011.

7. Kaneda Y, Kawamura I, Fujii A, et al. Serotonin syndrome– ‘potential’ role of the CYP2D6 genetic polymorphism in Asians. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2002;5(1):105-106.

8. Kung S, Li X. The clinical use of pharmacogenomic testing in treatment-resistant depression. Primary Psychiatry. 2010;17(5):46-51.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 11(06)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 11(06)
Page Number
54-58
Page Number
54-58
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Overwhelmed by side effects
Display Headline
Overwhelmed by side effects
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Obstipation unresponsive to usual therapeutic maneuvers

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Obstipation unresponsive to usual therapeutic maneuvers

A 64-year-old woman came into our emergency department (ED) complaining of constipation and worsening rectal pain. In an attempt to promote her overall health, the patient had recently begun experimenting with healthy alternatives to her regular diet. Three days before her visit, she had ceased having stools and was experiencing intermittent abdominal cramping. She self-administered 2 bisacodyl suppositories, 2 sodium biphosphate enemas, one 10-ounce bottle of magnesium citrate, and 15 senna-containing laxative tablets without improvement.

She sought care at an urgent care clinic where she received 2 additional enemas and a trial of manual disimpaction—without results. She was sent home to rest and asked to return the next morning for another trial of disimpaction. When the patient’s efforts to manually disimpact herself at home were unsuccessful, she contacted her primary care physician, who arranged a house call. When his own protracted disimpaction procedure was unsuccessful, he referred her to our ED.

On presentation, the patient had lower abdominal and rectal discomfort. Her vital signs were normal except for a temperature of 38.8° C. Her abdomen was soft and nontender. Inspection of her perianal area revealed erythema and excoriations. On digital rectal exam (which was poorly tolerated because of pain), we noted a moderate amount of soft, clay-like feces in the rectal vault, with overflow liquid stool expulsion.

Computed tomography (CT) imaging of the abdomen was obtained to rule out rectal injury or colonic perforation (FIGURE 1).

FIGURE 1
CT scan reveals a speckled intraluminal mass


The patient had a markedly distended rectum and distal sigmoid colon caused by an intraluminal mass. Also present: circumferential wall thickening, perirectal edema without extraluminal gas, and generalized proximal colonic wall edema without a drainable collection.

WHAT IS YOUR DIAGNOSIS?
HOW WOULD YOU TREAT THIS PATIENT?

 

 

Diagnosis: Fecal impaction caused by a proctophytobezoar

CT imaging revealed a proctophytobezoar. On follow-up questioning, the patient recalled consuming approximately 10 ounces of cooked quinoa, a nutritious, gluten-free, high-protein seed, just prior to the onset of her constipation.

Constipation disproportionately affects the elderly and the young.1 Fecal impaction is a sequelae of constipation. Most commonly defined as hard, compacted feces in the rectum, fecal impaction can also include more proximal impactions due to fecal loading or retention.2

Causes of constipation and fecal impaction are similar and include low intake of dietary fiber, dehydration, immobility, alcohol ingestion, laxative abuse, medication adverse effects, depression, dementia, spinal cord dysfunction, diabetes, metabolic imbalances, and hypothyroidism.2,3 Insufficient hydration with consumption of a high-fiber food, as in this case, or with a bulk-forming laxative such as psyllium seed can result in fecal impaction.3

The many causes of a bezoar
A bezoar is a mass of poorly digested material that forms within the gastrointestinal tract—usually in the stomach—and less commonly in the small or large intestine.4 Trichobezoars (hair), lactobezoars (milk curd), phytobezoars (plant fiber), medication bezoars, and lithobezoars (small stones, pebbles, or gravel) are named after their contents. In keeping with this naming tradition, a gummi bear bezoar5 has also been described. Fecal impaction due to phytobezoars primarily composed of seeds has been associated with prickly pears, watermelons, sunflowers, pumpkins, pomegranates,6,7 and sesame seeds.4 Our patient’s experience adds quinoa seeds to this list.

Patients will complain of nausea and rectal urgency
Patients with fecal impaction may complain of nausea, rectal urgency, and rectalgia. A ball-valve effect of the fecal mass may allow paradoxical fecal incontinence and diarrhea.3 Digital rectal exam may demonstrate stool of any consistency, from rock hard pellets to soft clay-like stool.3 Absence of stool in the rectal vault does not rule out fecal impaction, and more proximal impactions may be revealed on plain abdominal radiography as bubbly, speckled masses of stool with associated signs of obstruction, such as colonic dilatation.

Fever, increased leukocyte count, and abdominal tenderness may indicate colonic perforation or ulceration. Signs of generalized peritonitis and free air on abdominal radiography warrant an immediate surgical consult.3

 

 

 

Complications from fecal impaction include bowel obstruction, sigmoid volvulus, and rectal prolapse.2 Stercoral ulceration and perforation due to pressure necrosis from a hard, inspissated fecal mass is an uncommon but life-threatening complication requiring resection of the affected colonic segment.8

What to look for on the CT. When the diagnosis is unclear or signs of complications are present, an abdominal CT is indicated. Concerning CT findings include ulceration, bowel wall enhancement and thickening (FIGURE 2), discontinuity of the bowel wall, presence of fecal material either protruding through the colonic wall or lying free within the intra-abdominal cavity, and extraluminal air.8

FIGURE 2
CT scan shows bowel wall thickening

Treatment begins with a pharmacologic approach

By the time a patient with a fecal impaction gets to your office, it’s likely that he or she will have already tried over-the-counter laxatives, stool softeners, and perhaps an enema.

When such pharmacologic management has failed, you’ll need to perform a manual fragmentation and extraction of the fecal mass. Apply topical 2% lidocaine jelly for analgesia and lubrication, and then gently and progressively dilate the anal sphincter with one and then 2 fingers. A scissoring action will fragment the impaction.3

Once fragmentation and partial expulsion has been achieved, you may want to try a lubricating mineral oil enema, bisacodyl suppository, or rectal lavage. If the impaction extends beyond the reach of the fingers, sigmoidoscopic visualization and lavage are indicated.

Adding water-soluble contrast material (Gastrografin) in 20% to 50% solutions directed by fluoroscopy draws water into the lumen, thus lubricating the fecal mass3,9 and helping it to pass spontaneously.

Our patient’s case resolved with a trip to the OR
Since conservative and comprehensive management to improve our patient’s condition failed, she was taken to the operating room for a proctosigmoidoscopic disimpaction. A beveled metal proctoscope was used to disimpact the distal-most 10 cm and then a rigid sigmoidoscope was used to clear the colon of quinoa-laden fecal material to a total distance of 18 cm. Bowel walls were ecchymotic, yet viable and without laceration. She made an uneventful recovery and was discharged on hospital Day 3.

CORRESPONDENCE George L. Higgins, III, MD, Maine Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, 47 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME 04102; [email protected]

References

1. Rao SS, Go JT. Update on the management of constipation in the elderly: new treatment options. Clin Interv Aging. 2010;5:163-171.

2. Creason N, Sparks D. Fecal impaction: a review. Nurs Diagn. 2000;11:15-23.

3. Wrenn K. Fecal impaction. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:658-662.

4. Shaw AG, Peacock O, Lund JN, et al. Large bowel obstruction due to sesame seed bezoar: a case report. J Med Case Reports. 2007;1:159.-

5. Barron MM, Steerman P. Gummi bear bezoar: a case report. J Emerg Med. 1989;7:143-144.

6. Eitan A, Bickel A, Katz IM. Fecal impaction in adults: report of 30 cases of seed bezoars in the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1768-1771.

7. Eitan A, Katz IM, Sweed Y, et al. Fecal impaction in children: report of 53 cases of rectal seed bezoars. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:1114-1117.

8. Kumar P, Pearce O, Higginson A. Imaging manifestations of faecal impaction and stercoral perforation. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:83-88.

9. Brenner BE, Simon RR. Anorectal emergencies. Ann Emerg Med. 1983;12:367-376.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Julie F. Pelletier, MD
Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Portland

George L. Higgins, III, MD
Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Portland
[email protected]

Samir A. Haydar, DO, MPH
Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Portland

DEPARTMENT EDITOR
Richard P. Usatine, MD
University of Texas, Health Science Center, at San Antonio

The authors reported no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 61(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
353-355
Legacy Keywords
Julie F. Pelletier;MD; George L. Higgins III;MD; Samir A. Haydar;DO;MPH; bowel health; obstipation; manual disimpaction; proctophytobezoar; bezoar; quinoa; insufficient hydration
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Julie F. Pelletier, MD
Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Portland

George L. Higgins, III, MD
Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Portland
[email protected]

Samir A. Haydar, DO, MPH
Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Portland

DEPARTMENT EDITOR
Richard P. Usatine, MD
University of Texas, Health Science Center, at San Antonio

The authors reported no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Author and Disclosure Information

Julie F. Pelletier, MD
Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Portland

George L. Higgins, III, MD
Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Portland
[email protected]

Samir A. Haydar, DO, MPH
Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Portland

DEPARTMENT EDITOR
Richard P. Usatine, MD
University of Texas, Health Science Center, at San Antonio

The authors reported no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Article PDF
Article PDF

A 64-year-old woman came into our emergency department (ED) complaining of constipation and worsening rectal pain. In an attempt to promote her overall health, the patient had recently begun experimenting with healthy alternatives to her regular diet. Three days before her visit, she had ceased having stools and was experiencing intermittent abdominal cramping. She self-administered 2 bisacodyl suppositories, 2 sodium biphosphate enemas, one 10-ounce bottle of magnesium citrate, and 15 senna-containing laxative tablets without improvement.

She sought care at an urgent care clinic where she received 2 additional enemas and a trial of manual disimpaction—without results. She was sent home to rest and asked to return the next morning for another trial of disimpaction. When the patient’s efforts to manually disimpact herself at home were unsuccessful, she contacted her primary care physician, who arranged a house call. When his own protracted disimpaction procedure was unsuccessful, he referred her to our ED.

On presentation, the patient had lower abdominal and rectal discomfort. Her vital signs were normal except for a temperature of 38.8° C. Her abdomen was soft and nontender. Inspection of her perianal area revealed erythema and excoriations. On digital rectal exam (which was poorly tolerated because of pain), we noted a moderate amount of soft, clay-like feces in the rectal vault, with overflow liquid stool expulsion.

Computed tomography (CT) imaging of the abdomen was obtained to rule out rectal injury or colonic perforation (FIGURE 1).

FIGURE 1
CT scan reveals a speckled intraluminal mass


The patient had a markedly distended rectum and distal sigmoid colon caused by an intraluminal mass. Also present: circumferential wall thickening, perirectal edema without extraluminal gas, and generalized proximal colonic wall edema without a drainable collection.

WHAT IS YOUR DIAGNOSIS?
HOW WOULD YOU TREAT THIS PATIENT?

 

 

Diagnosis: Fecal impaction caused by a proctophytobezoar

CT imaging revealed a proctophytobezoar. On follow-up questioning, the patient recalled consuming approximately 10 ounces of cooked quinoa, a nutritious, gluten-free, high-protein seed, just prior to the onset of her constipation.

Constipation disproportionately affects the elderly and the young.1 Fecal impaction is a sequelae of constipation. Most commonly defined as hard, compacted feces in the rectum, fecal impaction can also include more proximal impactions due to fecal loading or retention.2

Causes of constipation and fecal impaction are similar and include low intake of dietary fiber, dehydration, immobility, alcohol ingestion, laxative abuse, medication adverse effects, depression, dementia, spinal cord dysfunction, diabetes, metabolic imbalances, and hypothyroidism.2,3 Insufficient hydration with consumption of a high-fiber food, as in this case, or with a bulk-forming laxative such as psyllium seed can result in fecal impaction.3

The many causes of a bezoar
A bezoar is a mass of poorly digested material that forms within the gastrointestinal tract—usually in the stomach—and less commonly in the small or large intestine.4 Trichobezoars (hair), lactobezoars (milk curd), phytobezoars (plant fiber), medication bezoars, and lithobezoars (small stones, pebbles, or gravel) are named after their contents. In keeping with this naming tradition, a gummi bear bezoar5 has also been described. Fecal impaction due to phytobezoars primarily composed of seeds has been associated with prickly pears, watermelons, sunflowers, pumpkins, pomegranates,6,7 and sesame seeds.4 Our patient’s experience adds quinoa seeds to this list.

Patients will complain of nausea and rectal urgency
Patients with fecal impaction may complain of nausea, rectal urgency, and rectalgia. A ball-valve effect of the fecal mass may allow paradoxical fecal incontinence and diarrhea.3 Digital rectal exam may demonstrate stool of any consistency, from rock hard pellets to soft clay-like stool.3 Absence of stool in the rectal vault does not rule out fecal impaction, and more proximal impactions may be revealed on plain abdominal radiography as bubbly, speckled masses of stool with associated signs of obstruction, such as colonic dilatation.

Fever, increased leukocyte count, and abdominal tenderness may indicate colonic perforation or ulceration. Signs of generalized peritonitis and free air on abdominal radiography warrant an immediate surgical consult.3

 

 

 

Complications from fecal impaction include bowel obstruction, sigmoid volvulus, and rectal prolapse.2 Stercoral ulceration and perforation due to pressure necrosis from a hard, inspissated fecal mass is an uncommon but life-threatening complication requiring resection of the affected colonic segment.8

What to look for on the CT. When the diagnosis is unclear or signs of complications are present, an abdominal CT is indicated. Concerning CT findings include ulceration, bowel wall enhancement and thickening (FIGURE 2), discontinuity of the bowel wall, presence of fecal material either protruding through the colonic wall or lying free within the intra-abdominal cavity, and extraluminal air.8

FIGURE 2
CT scan shows bowel wall thickening

Treatment begins with a pharmacologic approach

By the time a patient with a fecal impaction gets to your office, it’s likely that he or she will have already tried over-the-counter laxatives, stool softeners, and perhaps an enema.

When such pharmacologic management has failed, you’ll need to perform a manual fragmentation and extraction of the fecal mass. Apply topical 2% lidocaine jelly for analgesia and lubrication, and then gently and progressively dilate the anal sphincter with one and then 2 fingers. A scissoring action will fragment the impaction.3

Once fragmentation and partial expulsion has been achieved, you may want to try a lubricating mineral oil enema, bisacodyl suppository, or rectal lavage. If the impaction extends beyond the reach of the fingers, sigmoidoscopic visualization and lavage are indicated.

Adding water-soluble contrast material (Gastrografin) in 20% to 50% solutions directed by fluoroscopy draws water into the lumen, thus lubricating the fecal mass3,9 and helping it to pass spontaneously.

Our patient’s case resolved with a trip to the OR
Since conservative and comprehensive management to improve our patient’s condition failed, she was taken to the operating room for a proctosigmoidoscopic disimpaction. A beveled metal proctoscope was used to disimpact the distal-most 10 cm and then a rigid sigmoidoscope was used to clear the colon of quinoa-laden fecal material to a total distance of 18 cm. Bowel walls were ecchymotic, yet viable and without laceration. She made an uneventful recovery and was discharged on hospital Day 3.

CORRESPONDENCE George L. Higgins, III, MD, Maine Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, 47 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME 04102; [email protected]

A 64-year-old woman came into our emergency department (ED) complaining of constipation and worsening rectal pain. In an attempt to promote her overall health, the patient had recently begun experimenting with healthy alternatives to her regular diet. Three days before her visit, she had ceased having stools and was experiencing intermittent abdominal cramping. She self-administered 2 bisacodyl suppositories, 2 sodium biphosphate enemas, one 10-ounce bottle of magnesium citrate, and 15 senna-containing laxative tablets without improvement.

She sought care at an urgent care clinic where she received 2 additional enemas and a trial of manual disimpaction—without results. She was sent home to rest and asked to return the next morning for another trial of disimpaction. When the patient’s efforts to manually disimpact herself at home were unsuccessful, she contacted her primary care physician, who arranged a house call. When his own protracted disimpaction procedure was unsuccessful, he referred her to our ED.

On presentation, the patient had lower abdominal and rectal discomfort. Her vital signs were normal except for a temperature of 38.8° C. Her abdomen was soft and nontender. Inspection of her perianal area revealed erythema and excoriations. On digital rectal exam (which was poorly tolerated because of pain), we noted a moderate amount of soft, clay-like feces in the rectal vault, with overflow liquid stool expulsion.

Computed tomography (CT) imaging of the abdomen was obtained to rule out rectal injury or colonic perforation (FIGURE 1).

FIGURE 1
CT scan reveals a speckled intraluminal mass


The patient had a markedly distended rectum and distal sigmoid colon caused by an intraluminal mass. Also present: circumferential wall thickening, perirectal edema without extraluminal gas, and generalized proximal colonic wall edema without a drainable collection.

WHAT IS YOUR DIAGNOSIS?
HOW WOULD YOU TREAT THIS PATIENT?

 

 

Diagnosis: Fecal impaction caused by a proctophytobezoar

CT imaging revealed a proctophytobezoar. On follow-up questioning, the patient recalled consuming approximately 10 ounces of cooked quinoa, a nutritious, gluten-free, high-protein seed, just prior to the onset of her constipation.

Constipation disproportionately affects the elderly and the young.1 Fecal impaction is a sequelae of constipation. Most commonly defined as hard, compacted feces in the rectum, fecal impaction can also include more proximal impactions due to fecal loading or retention.2

Causes of constipation and fecal impaction are similar and include low intake of dietary fiber, dehydration, immobility, alcohol ingestion, laxative abuse, medication adverse effects, depression, dementia, spinal cord dysfunction, diabetes, metabolic imbalances, and hypothyroidism.2,3 Insufficient hydration with consumption of a high-fiber food, as in this case, or with a bulk-forming laxative such as psyllium seed can result in fecal impaction.3

The many causes of a bezoar
A bezoar is a mass of poorly digested material that forms within the gastrointestinal tract—usually in the stomach—and less commonly in the small or large intestine.4 Trichobezoars (hair), lactobezoars (milk curd), phytobezoars (plant fiber), medication bezoars, and lithobezoars (small stones, pebbles, or gravel) are named after their contents. In keeping with this naming tradition, a gummi bear bezoar5 has also been described. Fecal impaction due to phytobezoars primarily composed of seeds has been associated with prickly pears, watermelons, sunflowers, pumpkins, pomegranates,6,7 and sesame seeds.4 Our patient’s experience adds quinoa seeds to this list.

Patients will complain of nausea and rectal urgency
Patients with fecal impaction may complain of nausea, rectal urgency, and rectalgia. A ball-valve effect of the fecal mass may allow paradoxical fecal incontinence and diarrhea.3 Digital rectal exam may demonstrate stool of any consistency, from rock hard pellets to soft clay-like stool.3 Absence of stool in the rectal vault does not rule out fecal impaction, and more proximal impactions may be revealed on plain abdominal radiography as bubbly, speckled masses of stool with associated signs of obstruction, such as colonic dilatation.

Fever, increased leukocyte count, and abdominal tenderness may indicate colonic perforation or ulceration. Signs of generalized peritonitis and free air on abdominal radiography warrant an immediate surgical consult.3

 

 

 

Complications from fecal impaction include bowel obstruction, sigmoid volvulus, and rectal prolapse.2 Stercoral ulceration and perforation due to pressure necrosis from a hard, inspissated fecal mass is an uncommon but life-threatening complication requiring resection of the affected colonic segment.8

What to look for on the CT. When the diagnosis is unclear or signs of complications are present, an abdominal CT is indicated. Concerning CT findings include ulceration, bowel wall enhancement and thickening (FIGURE 2), discontinuity of the bowel wall, presence of fecal material either protruding through the colonic wall or lying free within the intra-abdominal cavity, and extraluminal air.8

FIGURE 2
CT scan shows bowel wall thickening

Treatment begins with a pharmacologic approach

By the time a patient with a fecal impaction gets to your office, it’s likely that he or she will have already tried over-the-counter laxatives, stool softeners, and perhaps an enema.

When such pharmacologic management has failed, you’ll need to perform a manual fragmentation and extraction of the fecal mass. Apply topical 2% lidocaine jelly for analgesia and lubrication, and then gently and progressively dilate the anal sphincter with one and then 2 fingers. A scissoring action will fragment the impaction.3

Once fragmentation and partial expulsion has been achieved, you may want to try a lubricating mineral oil enema, bisacodyl suppository, or rectal lavage. If the impaction extends beyond the reach of the fingers, sigmoidoscopic visualization and lavage are indicated.

Adding water-soluble contrast material (Gastrografin) in 20% to 50% solutions directed by fluoroscopy draws water into the lumen, thus lubricating the fecal mass3,9 and helping it to pass spontaneously.

Our patient’s case resolved with a trip to the OR
Since conservative and comprehensive management to improve our patient’s condition failed, she was taken to the operating room for a proctosigmoidoscopic disimpaction. A beveled metal proctoscope was used to disimpact the distal-most 10 cm and then a rigid sigmoidoscope was used to clear the colon of quinoa-laden fecal material to a total distance of 18 cm. Bowel walls were ecchymotic, yet viable and without laceration. She made an uneventful recovery and was discharged on hospital Day 3.

CORRESPONDENCE George L. Higgins, III, MD, Maine Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, 47 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME 04102; [email protected]

References

1. Rao SS, Go JT. Update on the management of constipation in the elderly: new treatment options. Clin Interv Aging. 2010;5:163-171.

2. Creason N, Sparks D. Fecal impaction: a review. Nurs Diagn. 2000;11:15-23.

3. Wrenn K. Fecal impaction. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:658-662.

4. Shaw AG, Peacock O, Lund JN, et al. Large bowel obstruction due to sesame seed bezoar: a case report. J Med Case Reports. 2007;1:159.-

5. Barron MM, Steerman P. Gummi bear bezoar: a case report. J Emerg Med. 1989;7:143-144.

6. Eitan A, Bickel A, Katz IM. Fecal impaction in adults: report of 30 cases of seed bezoars in the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1768-1771.

7. Eitan A, Katz IM, Sweed Y, et al. Fecal impaction in children: report of 53 cases of rectal seed bezoars. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:1114-1117.

8. Kumar P, Pearce O, Higginson A. Imaging manifestations of faecal impaction and stercoral perforation. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:83-88.

9. Brenner BE, Simon RR. Anorectal emergencies. Ann Emerg Med. 1983;12:367-376.

References

1. Rao SS, Go JT. Update on the management of constipation in the elderly: new treatment options. Clin Interv Aging. 2010;5:163-171.

2. Creason N, Sparks D. Fecal impaction: a review. Nurs Diagn. 2000;11:15-23.

3. Wrenn K. Fecal impaction. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:658-662.

4. Shaw AG, Peacock O, Lund JN, et al. Large bowel obstruction due to sesame seed bezoar: a case report. J Med Case Reports. 2007;1:159.-

5. Barron MM, Steerman P. Gummi bear bezoar: a case report. J Emerg Med. 1989;7:143-144.

6. Eitan A, Bickel A, Katz IM. Fecal impaction in adults: report of 30 cases of seed bezoars in the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1768-1771.

7. Eitan A, Katz IM, Sweed Y, et al. Fecal impaction in children: report of 53 cases of rectal seed bezoars. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:1114-1117.

8. Kumar P, Pearce O, Higginson A. Imaging manifestations of faecal impaction and stercoral perforation. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:83-88.

9. Brenner BE, Simon RR. Anorectal emergencies. Ann Emerg Med. 1983;12:367-376.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 61(6)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 61(6)
Page Number
353-355
Page Number
353-355
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Obstipation unresponsive to usual therapeutic maneuvers
Display Headline
Obstipation unresponsive to usual therapeutic maneuvers
Legacy Keywords
Julie F. Pelletier;MD; George L. Higgins III;MD; Samir A. Haydar;DO;MPH; bowel health; obstipation; manual disimpaction; proctophytobezoar; bezoar; quinoa; insufficient hydration
Legacy Keywords
Julie F. Pelletier;MD; George L. Higgins III;MD; Samir A. Haydar;DO;MPH; bowel health; obstipation; manual disimpaction; proctophytobezoar; bezoar; quinoa; insufficient hydration
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Acute respiratory tract infection: A practice examines its antibiotic prescribing habits

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Acute respiratory tract infection: A practice examines its antibiotic prescribing habits

 

Abstract

Purpose We wanted to better understand our practice behaviors by measuring antibiotic prescribing patterns for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs), which would perhaps help us delineate goals for quality improvement interventions. We determined (1) the distribution of ARTI final diagnoses in our practice, (2) the frequency and types of antibiotics prescribed, and (3) the factors associated with antibiotic prescribing for patients with ARTI.

Methods We looked at office visits for adults with ARTI symptoms that occurred between December 14, 2009, and March 4, 2010. We compiled a convenience sample of 438 patient visits, collecting historical information, physical examination findings, diagnostic impressions, and treatment decisions.

Results Among the 438 patients, cough was the most common presenting complaint (58%). Acute sinusitis was the most frequently assigned final diagnosis (32%), followed by viral upper respiratory tract infection (29%), and acute bronchitis (24%). Sixty-nine percent of all ARTI patients (304/438) received antibiotic prescriptions, with macrolides being most commonly prescribed (167/304 [55%]). Prescribing antibiotics was associated with a complaint of sinus pain or shortness of breath, duration of illness ≥8 days, and specific abnormal physical exam findings. Prescribing rates did not vary based on patient age or presence of risk factors associated with complication. Variations in prescribing rates were noted between individual providers and groups of providers.

Conclusions We found that we prescribed antibiotics at high rates. Diagnoses of acute sinusitis and bronchitis may have been overused as false justification for antibiotic therapy. We used broad-spectrum antibiotics frequently. We have identified several gaps between current and desired performance to address in practice-based quality improvement interventions.

Most acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) are caused by viruses, do not require antibiotics, and resolve spontaneously.1,2 And yet, unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics for ARTIs continues—accounting for approximately half of all such prescriptions2—despite its well-known contribution to antimicrobial resistance, a public health threat as declared by the Institute of Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the World Health Organization (WHO).3-5

Even though the CDC has widely disseminated clinical guidelines for ARTI6-10 and annually publicizes recommendations for ARTI management during “Get Smart About Antibiotics Week,”11 it appears that providers have difficulty implementing the guidelines.12-14 Granted, antibiotic prescription rates in general have declined somewhat, but the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (macrolides and fluoroquinolones) and antibiotics for older Americans has increased.12

There are several plausible reasons for overprescribing. Patients have expectations for treatment based on prior experience or on a false assumption that their illness is bacterial in origin.14 Providers may be concerned that certain individuals are at risk of complications if not treated. Patient race, health maintenance organization membership, and insurance status have all been implicated as factors related to antimicrobial overutilization.12-16 It can be perceived as time consuming to educate patients about the likely viral nature of their illness and the lack of utility and increased risks in taking unneeded antibiotics.17 Furthermore, attempts at patient and physician education (eg, physician performance feedback) do not always reduce antibiotic overuse.18-20

We wanted to know the state of ARTI antibiotic use in our practice and whether we could identify goals for improvement through quality interventions. We sought to determine the distribution of ARTI final diagnoses in our practice, the frequency and types of antibiotics prescribed, and factors associated with antibiotic prescribing.

Methods

Setting and subjects
Subjects were adult patients seen at Mayo Clinic Family Medicine offices in Arizona between December 14, 2009, and March 4, 2010. We created a convenience sample from visits scheduled for patients with ARTI symptoms. We encouraged, but did not require, clinic staff to use a standardized data collection form to document symptoms, physical examination findings, diagnostic impressions, and prescription decisions that were then entered into an Excel spreadsheet. At one of our 2 sites, clinicians (attending physicians, nurse practitioners, and resident physicians) used the form at the point of care to enroll a portion of the sample population. A retrospective chart audit (with or without use of the form) was the means of selecting the remainder of the sample at this site and the entire sample at our second site. We obtained informed consent from all patients enrolled with the data collection form. The Mayo Foundation Institutional Review Board approved the project.

We defined an ARTI as a new illness occurring within the previous 3 weeks, associated with cough, sinus pain, nasal congestion or rhinorrhea, sore throat, or fever. We excluded patients who had a longer duration of symptoms, a previous evaluation, or a noninfectious diagnosis. We included ARTI patients with concomitant asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

 

 

We enrolled 438 patients. Two hundred thirty-one (53%) consented prospectively to data collection with our standardized form; 207 (47%) were reviewed by retrospective chart audit. The mean age of subjects was 54 years (range 18-94, intraquartile range 45-69). Cough was the most frequent chief complaint (58%).

Statistical analysis
We calculated the frequency of each ARTI final diagnosis and its associated antibiotic prescription rate. We also tested for associations between clinical features and the provision of antibiotics. We hypothesized that our providers would be more likely to prescribe antibiotics for patients of advanced age and in the presence of other risk factors for complications.

Results

We determined patient risks for ARTI complication in the prospective data collection group only. Of the 231 patients, 147 (64%) had at least one risk for complication, the most common being age ≥65 (37%). Other risks were employment as a health care worker (12%), asthma (11%), atherosclerotic heart disease (8%), COPD (7%), and tobacco use (5%).

Final diagnoses for all patients appear in TABLE 1. We allowed clinicians to report more than one diagnosis, resulting in 501 final diagnoses reported for 438 patients (63 received 2 final diagnoses). Sinusitis was diagnosed most frequently (32%). Other common diagnoses were viral upper respiratory infection (URI) and acute bronchitis (29% and 24%, respectively).

Antibiotics most often prescribed. Three hundred four ARTI patients (69%) received antibiotic prescriptions. Macrolides were most commonly prescribed (167/304 [55%]). Two hundred eight ARTI patients (68%) received broad-spectrum antibiotics (macrolides or fluoroquinolones); 96 (32%) received narrow-spectrum agents (penicillin, cephalosporin, sulfa, or tetracycline derivatives). TABLE 2 lists the frequency of antibiotic prescription and the antibiotic class most frequently prescribed for each ARTI diagnosis.

 

Factors associated with increased prescribing included specific history and physical exam findings (TABLE 3). A major determinant of treatment was duration of illness. Those who received antibiotics had a mean duration of illness of 8.3 days, compared with 7.0 days for those not receiving antibiotic therapy (P = .03).

The rate of antibiotic prescribing varied by provider type (TABLE 4). Four resident physicians (all of whom were investigators) prescribed least often, followed by attending physicians, then nurse practitioners. Investigators were significantly less likely to prescribe antimicrobials than noninvestigators (P<.001). We assessed whether use of our standardized data collection form affected prescribing rates. When we excluded patients whose data were entered with this form, no difference in rates was seen.

We also noted wide ranges of prescribing rates between individual providers. While all providers enrolled patients, numbers ranged from one to 51, with a mean of 18. For those who enrolled ≥10 subjects, prescribing rates ranged from a low of 29% (8/28) for a resident physician investigator to 93% (63/68) for 4 noninvestigator attending physicians.

Factors not associated with increased prescribing. We had hypothesized that specific patient characteristics (age and medical complication) would be associated with provision of antimicrobials. However, there was no correlation between patient age and rate of prescribing. The 304 patients who received an antibiotic had a mean age of 54 years (standard deviation [SD]=18), as did the 134 who did not receive one (mean age, 54; SD=20; P=.95). There was a nonsignificant trend for a reduced rate of prescribing for patients younger than age 30. For patients 18 to 29 years old, the rate was 60% (31/52); for those ≥30 years, it was 71% (273/386; odds ratio [OR]=1.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-2.97).

Similarly, presence of medical complication did not significantly affect antibiotic prescribing rates. Patients with any risk factor for complication (age >65, diabetes, atherosclerotic heart disease, heart failure, COPD, asthma, tobacco smoking, or active cancer treatment) had a 62% prescription rate (91/147), which was the same as that of patients without such risks (52/84 [62%]; P=1.0).

TABLE 1
Final diagnoses for 438 patients with ARTI

 

Diagnosisn (%)*
Acute sinusitis141 (32)
Viral URI125 (29)
Acute bronchitis104 (24)
Asthma31 (7)
Acute nonstrep pharyngitis28 (6)
Pneumonia17 (4)
COPD14 (3)
Influenza-like illness14 (3)
Acute otitis media14 (3)
Strep pharyngitis13 (3)
ARTI, acute respiratory tract infection; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; URI, upper respiratory infection.
*Percent total >100% due to 63 patients receiving 2 diagnoses and rounding

TABLE 2
Antibiotic use and type prescribed for ARTI varied by diagnosis

 

Diagnosis (total)Antibiotics prescribed*No antibiotics prescribedAntibiotic class most frequently prescribed
Acute sinusitis (141)139 (99%)2 (1%)Macrolide (53%)
Viral URI (125)45 (36%)80 (64%)Macrolide (24%)
Acute bronchitis (104)95 (91%)9 (9%)Macrolide (56%)
Acute nonstrep pharyngitis (28)16 (57%)12 (43%)Macrolide (36%)
Pneumonia (17)17 (100%)0Fluoroquinolone (53%)
ARTI, acute respiratory tract infection; URI, upper respiratory infection.
*Although 304 patients received prescriptions, some patients received more than one antibiotic.
 

 

TABLE 3
Historical features, exam findings associated with antibiotic prescribing

 

Historical featureP value
Sinus pain.0002
Duration of illness >8 days.0110
Shortness of breath.0427
Physical exam finding 
Abnormal sinus exam<.0001
Abnormal lung exam.0005
Abnormal tympanic membrane.0017
Abnormal pharynx.0026
Cervical lymphadenopathy.0141
Abnormal nasal exam.0363

TABLE 4
Antibiotic prescription rates for ARTI varied by provider type, investigator status

 

Antibiotic prescription rate
Attending physiciansNurse practitionersResidentsP value
153/225 (68%)97/115 (84%)54/98 (55%)<.001*
InvestigatorNoninvestigatorP value
110/192 (57%)194/246 (79%)<.001
ARTI, acute respiratory tract infection.
*The rate for residents is significantly lower than that for attending physicians and nurse practitioners. The rate for attending physicians is significantly lower than that for nurse practitioners. The P value applies to both rate comparisons among provider types.

Discussion

Providers in our practice had surprisingly high rates of antibiotic prescribing for ARTIs (69% overall). By comparison, the overall antibiotic use rate for ARTIs in the most recent National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) analysis (1995-2006) was 58%.12 The prescribing rate for office settings alone was just 52%. Steinman’s analysis of NAMCS data from 1997-1999 revealed an overall rate of 63%.13

Data analyzed from >4200 Medicare enrollees seen for ARTI visits revealed great variation in prescribing rates by office site: 21% to 88%, with a median rate of 54%.20 The rate varied by final diagnoses: sinusitis, 69%; bronchitis, 59%; pharyngitis, 50%; and URI, 26%. A rate of 77% was recently reported in a Veterans Administration office setting.21 Those with sinusitis and bronchitis similarly received more prescriptions than those with acute pharyngitis and URI.

 

In addition to our high overall rate, we also diagnosed patients with sinusitis and bronchitis frequently (32% and 24% of all patients, respectively), perhaps as false justification for prescribing antibiotics (provided for 99% and 91%, respectively). Also noteworthy is that more than one-third of URI patients in our practice received antibiotics.

We had expected, but did not see, differences in prescribing rates between older and younger patients, as well as those with and without risk factors for complications. Our expectations were based on NAMCS data, which have demonstrated increasing use of antibiotics in older patients.2

 

Treatment for those with bronchitis was surprisingly frequent; 91% received antibiotics. A Cochrane systematic review attributes slight symptom benefit to antibiotic use (improvement in cough by about one day).22 This benefit, however, is rarely seen in patients who have been ill for <1 week. The magnitude of this benefit must be weighed against the cost and adverse effects of antibiotics and the potential for promoting antimicrobial resistance. Most patients’ symptoms are mild and self-limited, and risks may exceed benefits.

Guidelines state, “The widespread use of antibiotics for the treatment of acute bronchitis is not justified and vigorous efforts to curtail their use should be encouraged.”23 The CDC agrees, noting that “routine antibiotic treatment of uncomplicated acute bronchitis is not recommended, regardless of duration of cough.”10

As observed in another study,14 a clinical factor associated with prescribing decisions at our practice was the duration of illness. Patients in our practice had been ill, on average, 8 days before presenting to the office. Over time, our encounters with regular patients may have taught them to wait until their symptoms are prolonged or progressive before seeking evaluation.

We saw large differences in prescribing rates between providers, and hope this means there is room for improvement by addressing reasons for variability. Education about individual prescribing behaviors may motivate those with the highest rates of use to improve.

 

We noted high rates of broad-spectrum antibiotic use. This is consistent with other research findings of a shift away from narrow-spectrum agents.12 We did not determine the frequency of allergies to narrow-spectrum agents. Anecdotally, the opinion of some patients was that narrow-spectrum medicines “just don’t work,” given their experience of persistent cold symptoms when using such agents.

Quality-improvement processes such as DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) or PDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act) require collection of baseline data so that interventions can be tailored to meet the root causes identified.24 This project determined preintervention practice behaviors and allowed us to create quality metrics that could define our future success.

Study limitations. One obvious reason for the prescribing variability noted above is that those who helped plan and implement the project knew their practice behaviors were being reviewed and had studied the relevant practice guidelines. Whether non-investigator providers were up to date with recommendations and could carefully select appropriate treatment candidates is unclear.

 

 

This study was of our practice alone, and findings may not be generalizable to other practices. We encourage physicians to similarly examine their own prescribing habits in order to set practice-improvement goals.

CORRESPONDENCE Michael L. Grover, DO, Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 13737 N 92nd Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85260; [email protected]

References

 

1. Fendrick AM, Monto AS, Nightengale B, et al. The economic burden of non-influenza related viral respiratory tract infection in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:487-494.

2. Werner K, Deasy J. Acute respiratory tract infections: when are antibiotics indicated? JAAPA. 2009;22:22–26.

3. US Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing emerging infectious diseases: a strategy for the 21st century. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998;47(RR-15). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/MMWR/pdf/rr/rr4715.pdf. Accessed July 16, 2011.

4. Drug resistance threatens to reverse medical progress [press release]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (WHO); June 12, 2000. Available at: http://www.who.int/inf-pr-2000/en/pr2000-41.html. Accessed July 16, 2011.

5. Smolinski MS, Hamburg MA, Lederberg J. eds. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Emerging Microbial Threats to Health in the 21st Century. Microbial Threats to Health: Emergence, Detection, and Response. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/CMS/3783/3919/5381/6146.aspx. Accessed July 16, 2011.

6. Gonzales R, Bartlett JG, Besser RE, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in adults: background, specific aims, and methods. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:479-486.

7. Gonzales R, Bartlett JG, Besser RE, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for treatment of nonspecific upper respiratory tract infections in adults: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:490-494.

8. Hickner JM, Bartlett JG, Besser RE, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for acute rhinosinusitis in adults: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:498-505.

9. Cooper RJ, Hoffman JR, Bartlett JG, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for acute pharyngitis in adults: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:509-517.

10. Gonzales R, Bartlett JG, Bessnar RE, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for treatment of uncomplicated acute bronchitis: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:521-529.

11. CDC. Get smart: know when antibiotics work. Adult appropriate antibiotic use summary: physician information sheets (adult). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/getsmart/campaign-materials/adult-treatment.html. Accessed July 16, 2011.

12. Grijalva CG, Nuorti JP, Griffin M. Antibiotic prescription rates for acute respiratory tract infections in US ambulatory settings. JAMA. 2009;302:758-766.

13. Steinman MA, Landefeld CS, Gonzales R. Predictors of broad spectrum antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in adult primary care. JAMA. 2003;289:719-725.

14. Wigton RS, Darr CA, Corbett KK, et al. How do community practitioners decide whether to prescribe antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections? J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:1615-1620.

15. Macfarlane J, Holmes W, Macfarlane R, et al. Influence of patients’ expectations on antibiotic management of acute lower respiratory tract illness in general practice: questionnaire study. BMJ. 1997;315:1211-1214.

16. Colgan R, Powers JH. Appropriate antimicrobial prescribing: approaches that limit antibiotic resistance. Am Fam Physician. 2001;64:999-1004.

17. Coco A, Mainous AG. Relation of time spent in an encounter with the use of antibiotics in pediatric office visits for viral respiratory infections. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:1145-1149.

18. Arnold SR, Straus SE. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in ambulatory care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(4):CD003539-

19. Mainous AG, Hueston WJ, Love MM, et al. An evaluation of statewide strategies to reduce antibiotic overuse. Fam Med. 2000;32:22-29.

20. Gonzales R, Sauaia A, Corbett KK, et al. Antibiotic treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in the elderly: effect of a multidimensional educational intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:39-45.

21. Franck A, Smith R. Antibiotic use for acute respiratory tract infections in a veteran population. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2010;50:726-729.

22. Smucny J, Fahey T, Becker L, et al. Antibiotics for acute bronchitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(4):CD000245-

23. Bramen SS. Chronic cough due to acute bronchitis: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2006;129 (1 suppl):95S-103S.

24. Snee RD. Use DMAIC to make improvement part of “the way we work.” Quality Progress Web site. September 2007. Available at: http://asq.org/quality-progress/2007/09/process-managementment/use-dmaic-to-make-improvement-part-of-the-way-we-work.html. Accessed July 16, 2011.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Michael L. Grover, DO
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz
[email protected]

Martina Mookadam, MD
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

Richard H. Rutkowski, MD
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

Allison M. Cullan, MD
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

Destin E. Hill, MD
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

David C. Patchett, DO
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

Esan O. Simon, MD
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

MariLynn Mulheron, NP
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

Brie N. Noble, BS
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

The authors reported no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Statistical analysis for this project was supported by a Small Project Grant, Mayo Clinic, 09-007664. This manuscript was presented as a poster at the annual spring meeting of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine on May 2, 2010, in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 61(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
330-335
Legacy Keywords
Michael L. Grover;DO; Martina Mookadam;MD; Richard H. Rutkowski;MD; antibiotic prescribing; respiratory tract infection; ARTIs; prescribing habits;quality improvement; final diagnoses; factors associated;
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Michael L. Grover, DO
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz
[email protected]

Martina Mookadam, MD
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

Richard H. Rutkowski, MD
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

Allison M. Cullan, MD
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

Destin E. Hill, MD
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

David C. Patchett, DO
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

Esan O. Simon, MD
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

MariLynn Mulheron, NP
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

Brie N. Noble, BS
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

The authors reported no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Statistical analysis for this project was supported by a Small Project Grant, Mayo Clinic, 09-007664. This manuscript was presented as a poster at the annual spring meeting of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine on May 2, 2010, in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Michael L. Grover, DO
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz
[email protected]

Martina Mookadam, MD
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

Richard H. Rutkowski, MD
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

Allison M. Cullan, MD
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

Destin E. Hill, MD
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

David C. Patchett, DO
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

Esan O. Simon, MD
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

MariLynn Mulheron, NP
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

Brie N. Noble, BS
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz

The authors reported no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Statistical analysis for this project was supported by a Small Project Grant, Mayo Clinic, 09-007664. This manuscript was presented as a poster at the annual spring meeting of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine on May 2, 2010, in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Article PDF
Article PDF

 

Abstract

Purpose We wanted to better understand our practice behaviors by measuring antibiotic prescribing patterns for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs), which would perhaps help us delineate goals for quality improvement interventions. We determined (1) the distribution of ARTI final diagnoses in our practice, (2) the frequency and types of antibiotics prescribed, and (3) the factors associated with antibiotic prescribing for patients with ARTI.

Methods We looked at office visits for adults with ARTI symptoms that occurred between December 14, 2009, and March 4, 2010. We compiled a convenience sample of 438 patient visits, collecting historical information, physical examination findings, diagnostic impressions, and treatment decisions.

Results Among the 438 patients, cough was the most common presenting complaint (58%). Acute sinusitis was the most frequently assigned final diagnosis (32%), followed by viral upper respiratory tract infection (29%), and acute bronchitis (24%). Sixty-nine percent of all ARTI patients (304/438) received antibiotic prescriptions, with macrolides being most commonly prescribed (167/304 [55%]). Prescribing antibiotics was associated with a complaint of sinus pain or shortness of breath, duration of illness ≥8 days, and specific abnormal physical exam findings. Prescribing rates did not vary based on patient age or presence of risk factors associated with complication. Variations in prescribing rates were noted between individual providers and groups of providers.

Conclusions We found that we prescribed antibiotics at high rates. Diagnoses of acute sinusitis and bronchitis may have been overused as false justification for antibiotic therapy. We used broad-spectrum antibiotics frequently. We have identified several gaps between current and desired performance to address in practice-based quality improvement interventions.

Most acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) are caused by viruses, do not require antibiotics, and resolve spontaneously.1,2 And yet, unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics for ARTIs continues—accounting for approximately half of all such prescriptions2—despite its well-known contribution to antimicrobial resistance, a public health threat as declared by the Institute of Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the World Health Organization (WHO).3-5

Even though the CDC has widely disseminated clinical guidelines for ARTI6-10 and annually publicizes recommendations for ARTI management during “Get Smart About Antibiotics Week,”11 it appears that providers have difficulty implementing the guidelines.12-14 Granted, antibiotic prescription rates in general have declined somewhat, but the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (macrolides and fluoroquinolones) and antibiotics for older Americans has increased.12

There are several plausible reasons for overprescribing. Patients have expectations for treatment based on prior experience or on a false assumption that their illness is bacterial in origin.14 Providers may be concerned that certain individuals are at risk of complications if not treated. Patient race, health maintenance organization membership, and insurance status have all been implicated as factors related to antimicrobial overutilization.12-16 It can be perceived as time consuming to educate patients about the likely viral nature of their illness and the lack of utility and increased risks in taking unneeded antibiotics.17 Furthermore, attempts at patient and physician education (eg, physician performance feedback) do not always reduce antibiotic overuse.18-20

We wanted to know the state of ARTI antibiotic use in our practice and whether we could identify goals for improvement through quality interventions. We sought to determine the distribution of ARTI final diagnoses in our practice, the frequency and types of antibiotics prescribed, and factors associated with antibiotic prescribing.

Methods

Setting and subjects
Subjects were adult patients seen at Mayo Clinic Family Medicine offices in Arizona between December 14, 2009, and March 4, 2010. We created a convenience sample from visits scheduled for patients with ARTI symptoms. We encouraged, but did not require, clinic staff to use a standardized data collection form to document symptoms, physical examination findings, diagnostic impressions, and prescription decisions that were then entered into an Excel spreadsheet. At one of our 2 sites, clinicians (attending physicians, nurse practitioners, and resident physicians) used the form at the point of care to enroll a portion of the sample population. A retrospective chart audit (with or without use of the form) was the means of selecting the remainder of the sample at this site and the entire sample at our second site. We obtained informed consent from all patients enrolled with the data collection form. The Mayo Foundation Institutional Review Board approved the project.

We defined an ARTI as a new illness occurring within the previous 3 weeks, associated with cough, sinus pain, nasal congestion or rhinorrhea, sore throat, or fever. We excluded patients who had a longer duration of symptoms, a previous evaluation, or a noninfectious diagnosis. We included ARTI patients with concomitant asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

 

 

We enrolled 438 patients. Two hundred thirty-one (53%) consented prospectively to data collection with our standardized form; 207 (47%) were reviewed by retrospective chart audit. The mean age of subjects was 54 years (range 18-94, intraquartile range 45-69). Cough was the most frequent chief complaint (58%).

Statistical analysis
We calculated the frequency of each ARTI final diagnosis and its associated antibiotic prescription rate. We also tested for associations between clinical features and the provision of antibiotics. We hypothesized that our providers would be more likely to prescribe antibiotics for patients of advanced age and in the presence of other risk factors for complications.

Results

We determined patient risks for ARTI complication in the prospective data collection group only. Of the 231 patients, 147 (64%) had at least one risk for complication, the most common being age ≥65 (37%). Other risks were employment as a health care worker (12%), asthma (11%), atherosclerotic heart disease (8%), COPD (7%), and tobacco use (5%).

Final diagnoses for all patients appear in TABLE 1. We allowed clinicians to report more than one diagnosis, resulting in 501 final diagnoses reported for 438 patients (63 received 2 final diagnoses). Sinusitis was diagnosed most frequently (32%). Other common diagnoses were viral upper respiratory infection (URI) and acute bronchitis (29% and 24%, respectively).

Antibiotics most often prescribed. Three hundred four ARTI patients (69%) received antibiotic prescriptions. Macrolides were most commonly prescribed (167/304 [55%]). Two hundred eight ARTI patients (68%) received broad-spectrum antibiotics (macrolides or fluoroquinolones); 96 (32%) received narrow-spectrum agents (penicillin, cephalosporin, sulfa, or tetracycline derivatives). TABLE 2 lists the frequency of antibiotic prescription and the antibiotic class most frequently prescribed for each ARTI diagnosis.

 

Factors associated with increased prescribing included specific history and physical exam findings (TABLE 3). A major determinant of treatment was duration of illness. Those who received antibiotics had a mean duration of illness of 8.3 days, compared with 7.0 days for those not receiving antibiotic therapy (P = .03).

The rate of antibiotic prescribing varied by provider type (TABLE 4). Four resident physicians (all of whom were investigators) prescribed least often, followed by attending physicians, then nurse practitioners. Investigators were significantly less likely to prescribe antimicrobials than noninvestigators (P<.001). We assessed whether use of our standardized data collection form affected prescribing rates. When we excluded patients whose data were entered with this form, no difference in rates was seen.

We also noted wide ranges of prescribing rates between individual providers. While all providers enrolled patients, numbers ranged from one to 51, with a mean of 18. For those who enrolled ≥10 subjects, prescribing rates ranged from a low of 29% (8/28) for a resident physician investigator to 93% (63/68) for 4 noninvestigator attending physicians.

Factors not associated with increased prescribing. We had hypothesized that specific patient characteristics (age and medical complication) would be associated with provision of antimicrobials. However, there was no correlation between patient age and rate of prescribing. The 304 patients who received an antibiotic had a mean age of 54 years (standard deviation [SD]=18), as did the 134 who did not receive one (mean age, 54; SD=20; P=.95). There was a nonsignificant trend for a reduced rate of prescribing for patients younger than age 30. For patients 18 to 29 years old, the rate was 60% (31/52); for those ≥30 years, it was 71% (273/386; odds ratio [OR]=1.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-2.97).

Similarly, presence of medical complication did not significantly affect antibiotic prescribing rates. Patients with any risk factor for complication (age >65, diabetes, atherosclerotic heart disease, heart failure, COPD, asthma, tobacco smoking, or active cancer treatment) had a 62% prescription rate (91/147), which was the same as that of patients without such risks (52/84 [62%]; P=1.0).

TABLE 1
Final diagnoses for 438 patients with ARTI

 

Diagnosisn (%)*
Acute sinusitis141 (32)
Viral URI125 (29)
Acute bronchitis104 (24)
Asthma31 (7)
Acute nonstrep pharyngitis28 (6)
Pneumonia17 (4)
COPD14 (3)
Influenza-like illness14 (3)
Acute otitis media14 (3)
Strep pharyngitis13 (3)
ARTI, acute respiratory tract infection; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; URI, upper respiratory infection.
*Percent total >100% due to 63 patients receiving 2 diagnoses and rounding

TABLE 2
Antibiotic use and type prescribed for ARTI varied by diagnosis

 

Diagnosis (total)Antibiotics prescribed*No antibiotics prescribedAntibiotic class most frequently prescribed
Acute sinusitis (141)139 (99%)2 (1%)Macrolide (53%)
Viral URI (125)45 (36%)80 (64%)Macrolide (24%)
Acute bronchitis (104)95 (91%)9 (9%)Macrolide (56%)
Acute nonstrep pharyngitis (28)16 (57%)12 (43%)Macrolide (36%)
Pneumonia (17)17 (100%)0Fluoroquinolone (53%)
ARTI, acute respiratory tract infection; URI, upper respiratory infection.
*Although 304 patients received prescriptions, some patients received more than one antibiotic.
 

 

TABLE 3
Historical features, exam findings associated with antibiotic prescribing

 

Historical featureP value
Sinus pain.0002
Duration of illness >8 days.0110
Shortness of breath.0427
Physical exam finding 
Abnormal sinus exam<.0001
Abnormal lung exam.0005
Abnormal tympanic membrane.0017
Abnormal pharynx.0026
Cervical lymphadenopathy.0141
Abnormal nasal exam.0363

TABLE 4
Antibiotic prescription rates for ARTI varied by provider type, investigator status

 

Antibiotic prescription rate
Attending physiciansNurse practitionersResidentsP value
153/225 (68%)97/115 (84%)54/98 (55%)<.001*
InvestigatorNoninvestigatorP value
110/192 (57%)194/246 (79%)<.001
ARTI, acute respiratory tract infection.
*The rate for residents is significantly lower than that for attending physicians and nurse practitioners. The rate for attending physicians is significantly lower than that for nurse practitioners. The P value applies to both rate comparisons among provider types.

Discussion

Providers in our practice had surprisingly high rates of antibiotic prescribing for ARTIs (69% overall). By comparison, the overall antibiotic use rate for ARTIs in the most recent National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) analysis (1995-2006) was 58%.12 The prescribing rate for office settings alone was just 52%. Steinman’s analysis of NAMCS data from 1997-1999 revealed an overall rate of 63%.13

Data analyzed from >4200 Medicare enrollees seen for ARTI visits revealed great variation in prescribing rates by office site: 21% to 88%, with a median rate of 54%.20 The rate varied by final diagnoses: sinusitis, 69%; bronchitis, 59%; pharyngitis, 50%; and URI, 26%. A rate of 77% was recently reported in a Veterans Administration office setting.21 Those with sinusitis and bronchitis similarly received more prescriptions than those with acute pharyngitis and URI.

 

In addition to our high overall rate, we also diagnosed patients with sinusitis and bronchitis frequently (32% and 24% of all patients, respectively), perhaps as false justification for prescribing antibiotics (provided for 99% and 91%, respectively). Also noteworthy is that more than one-third of URI patients in our practice received antibiotics.

We had expected, but did not see, differences in prescribing rates between older and younger patients, as well as those with and without risk factors for complications. Our expectations were based on NAMCS data, which have demonstrated increasing use of antibiotics in older patients.2

 

Treatment for those with bronchitis was surprisingly frequent; 91% received antibiotics. A Cochrane systematic review attributes slight symptom benefit to antibiotic use (improvement in cough by about one day).22 This benefit, however, is rarely seen in patients who have been ill for <1 week. The magnitude of this benefit must be weighed against the cost and adverse effects of antibiotics and the potential for promoting antimicrobial resistance. Most patients’ symptoms are mild and self-limited, and risks may exceed benefits.

Guidelines state, “The widespread use of antibiotics for the treatment of acute bronchitis is not justified and vigorous efforts to curtail their use should be encouraged.”23 The CDC agrees, noting that “routine antibiotic treatment of uncomplicated acute bronchitis is not recommended, regardless of duration of cough.”10

As observed in another study,14 a clinical factor associated with prescribing decisions at our practice was the duration of illness. Patients in our practice had been ill, on average, 8 days before presenting to the office. Over time, our encounters with regular patients may have taught them to wait until their symptoms are prolonged or progressive before seeking evaluation.

We saw large differences in prescribing rates between providers, and hope this means there is room for improvement by addressing reasons for variability. Education about individual prescribing behaviors may motivate those with the highest rates of use to improve.

 

We noted high rates of broad-spectrum antibiotic use. This is consistent with other research findings of a shift away from narrow-spectrum agents.12 We did not determine the frequency of allergies to narrow-spectrum agents. Anecdotally, the opinion of some patients was that narrow-spectrum medicines “just don’t work,” given their experience of persistent cold symptoms when using such agents.

Quality-improvement processes such as DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) or PDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act) require collection of baseline data so that interventions can be tailored to meet the root causes identified.24 This project determined preintervention practice behaviors and allowed us to create quality metrics that could define our future success.

Study limitations. One obvious reason for the prescribing variability noted above is that those who helped plan and implement the project knew their practice behaviors were being reviewed and had studied the relevant practice guidelines. Whether non-investigator providers were up to date with recommendations and could carefully select appropriate treatment candidates is unclear.

 

 

This study was of our practice alone, and findings may not be generalizable to other practices. We encourage physicians to similarly examine their own prescribing habits in order to set practice-improvement goals.

CORRESPONDENCE Michael L. Grover, DO, Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 13737 N 92nd Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85260; [email protected]

 

Abstract

Purpose We wanted to better understand our practice behaviors by measuring antibiotic prescribing patterns for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs), which would perhaps help us delineate goals for quality improvement interventions. We determined (1) the distribution of ARTI final diagnoses in our practice, (2) the frequency and types of antibiotics prescribed, and (3) the factors associated with antibiotic prescribing for patients with ARTI.

Methods We looked at office visits for adults with ARTI symptoms that occurred between December 14, 2009, and March 4, 2010. We compiled a convenience sample of 438 patient visits, collecting historical information, physical examination findings, diagnostic impressions, and treatment decisions.

Results Among the 438 patients, cough was the most common presenting complaint (58%). Acute sinusitis was the most frequently assigned final diagnosis (32%), followed by viral upper respiratory tract infection (29%), and acute bronchitis (24%). Sixty-nine percent of all ARTI patients (304/438) received antibiotic prescriptions, with macrolides being most commonly prescribed (167/304 [55%]). Prescribing antibiotics was associated with a complaint of sinus pain or shortness of breath, duration of illness ≥8 days, and specific abnormal physical exam findings. Prescribing rates did not vary based on patient age or presence of risk factors associated with complication. Variations in prescribing rates were noted between individual providers and groups of providers.

Conclusions We found that we prescribed antibiotics at high rates. Diagnoses of acute sinusitis and bronchitis may have been overused as false justification for antibiotic therapy. We used broad-spectrum antibiotics frequently. We have identified several gaps between current and desired performance to address in practice-based quality improvement interventions.

Most acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) are caused by viruses, do not require antibiotics, and resolve spontaneously.1,2 And yet, unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics for ARTIs continues—accounting for approximately half of all such prescriptions2—despite its well-known contribution to antimicrobial resistance, a public health threat as declared by the Institute of Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the World Health Organization (WHO).3-5

Even though the CDC has widely disseminated clinical guidelines for ARTI6-10 and annually publicizes recommendations for ARTI management during “Get Smart About Antibiotics Week,”11 it appears that providers have difficulty implementing the guidelines.12-14 Granted, antibiotic prescription rates in general have declined somewhat, but the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (macrolides and fluoroquinolones) and antibiotics for older Americans has increased.12

There are several plausible reasons for overprescribing. Patients have expectations for treatment based on prior experience or on a false assumption that their illness is bacterial in origin.14 Providers may be concerned that certain individuals are at risk of complications if not treated. Patient race, health maintenance organization membership, and insurance status have all been implicated as factors related to antimicrobial overutilization.12-16 It can be perceived as time consuming to educate patients about the likely viral nature of their illness and the lack of utility and increased risks in taking unneeded antibiotics.17 Furthermore, attempts at patient and physician education (eg, physician performance feedback) do not always reduce antibiotic overuse.18-20

We wanted to know the state of ARTI antibiotic use in our practice and whether we could identify goals for improvement through quality interventions. We sought to determine the distribution of ARTI final diagnoses in our practice, the frequency and types of antibiotics prescribed, and factors associated with antibiotic prescribing.

Methods

Setting and subjects
Subjects were adult patients seen at Mayo Clinic Family Medicine offices in Arizona between December 14, 2009, and March 4, 2010. We created a convenience sample from visits scheduled for patients with ARTI symptoms. We encouraged, but did not require, clinic staff to use a standardized data collection form to document symptoms, physical examination findings, diagnostic impressions, and prescription decisions that were then entered into an Excel spreadsheet. At one of our 2 sites, clinicians (attending physicians, nurse practitioners, and resident physicians) used the form at the point of care to enroll a portion of the sample population. A retrospective chart audit (with or without use of the form) was the means of selecting the remainder of the sample at this site and the entire sample at our second site. We obtained informed consent from all patients enrolled with the data collection form. The Mayo Foundation Institutional Review Board approved the project.

We defined an ARTI as a new illness occurring within the previous 3 weeks, associated with cough, sinus pain, nasal congestion or rhinorrhea, sore throat, or fever. We excluded patients who had a longer duration of symptoms, a previous evaluation, or a noninfectious diagnosis. We included ARTI patients with concomitant asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

 

 

We enrolled 438 patients. Two hundred thirty-one (53%) consented prospectively to data collection with our standardized form; 207 (47%) were reviewed by retrospective chart audit. The mean age of subjects was 54 years (range 18-94, intraquartile range 45-69). Cough was the most frequent chief complaint (58%).

Statistical analysis
We calculated the frequency of each ARTI final diagnosis and its associated antibiotic prescription rate. We also tested for associations between clinical features and the provision of antibiotics. We hypothesized that our providers would be more likely to prescribe antibiotics for patients of advanced age and in the presence of other risk factors for complications.

Results

We determined patient risks for ARTI complication in the prospective data collection group only. Of the 231 patients, 147 (64%) had at least one risk for complication, the most common being age ≥65 (37%). Other risks were employment as a health care worker (12%), asthma (11%), atherosclerotic heart disease (8%), COPD (7%), and tobacco use (5%).

Final diagnoses for all patients appear in TABLE 1. We allowed clinicians to report more than one diagnosis, resulting in 501 final diagnoses reported for 438 patients (63 received 2 final diagnoses). Sinusitis was diagnosed most frequently (32%). Other common diagnoses were viral upper respiratory infection (URI) and acute bronchitis (29% and 24%, respectively).

Antibiotics most often prescribed. Three hundred four ARTI patients (69%) received antibiotic prescriptions. Macrolides were most commonly prescribed (167/304 [55%]). Two hundred eight ARTI patients (68%) received broad-spectrum antibiotics (macrolides or fluoroquinolones); 96 (32%) received narrow-spectrum agents (penicillin, cephalosporin, sulfa, or tetracycline derivatives). TABLE 2 lists the frequency of antibiotic prescription and the antibiotic class most frequently prescribed for each ARTI diagnosis.

 

Factors associated with increased prescribing included specific history and physical exam findings (TABLE 3). A major determinant of treatment was duration of illness. Those who received antibiotics had a mean duration of illness of 8.3 days, compared with 7.0 days for those not receiving antibiotic therapy (P = .03).

The rate of antibiotic prescribing varied by provider type (TABLE 4). Four resident physicians (all of whom were investigators) prescribed least often, followed by attending physicians, then nurse practitioners. Investigators were significantly less likely to prescribe antimicrobials than noninvestigators (P<.001). We assessed whether use of our standardized data collection form affected prescribing rates. When we excluded patients whose data were entered with this form, no difference in rates was seen.

We also noted wide ranges of prescribing rates between individual providers. While all providers enrolled patients, numbers ranged from one to 51, with a mean of 18. For those who enrolled ≥10 subjects, prescribing rates ranged from a low of 29% (8/28) for a resident physician investigator to 93% (63/68) for 4 noninvestigator attending physicians.

Factors not associated with increased prescribing. We had hypothesized that specific patient characteristics (age and medical complication) would be associated with provision of antimicrobials. However, there was no correlation between patient age and rate of prescribing. The 304 patients who received an antibiotic had a mean age of 54 years (standard deviation [SD]=18), as did the 134 who did not receive one (mean age, 54; SD=20; P=.95). There was a nonsignificant trend for a reduced rate of prescribing for patients younger than age 30. For patients 18 to 29 years old, the rate was 60% (31/52); for those ≥30 years, it was 71% (273/386; odds ratio [OR]=1.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-2.97).

Similarly, presence of medical complication did not significantly affect antibiotic prescribing rates. Patients with any risk factor for complication (age >65, diabetes, atherosclerotic heart disease, heart failure, COPD, asthma, tobacco smoking, or active cancer treatment) had a 62% prescription rate (91/147), which was the same as that of patients without such risks (52/84 [62%]; P=1.0).

TABLE 1
Final diagnoses for 438 patients with ARTI

 

Diagnosisn (%)*
Acute sinusitis141 (32)
Viral URI125 (29)
Acute bronchitis104 (24)
Asthma31 (7)
Acute nonstrep pharyngitis28 (6)
Pneumonia17 (4)
COPD14 (3)
Influenza-like illness14 (3)
Acute otitis media14 (3)
Strep pharyngitis13 (3)
ARTI, acute respiratory tract infection; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; URI, upper respiratory infection.
*Percent total >100% due to 63 patients receiving 2 diagnoses and rounding

TABLE 2
Antibiotic use and type prescribed for ARTI varied by diagnosis

 

Diagnosis (total)Antibiotics prescribed*No antibiotics prescribedAntibiotic class most frequently prescribed
Acute sinusitis (141)139 (99%)2 (1%)Macrolide (53%)
Viral URI (125)45 (36%)80 (64%)Macrolide (24%)
Acute bronchitis (104)95 (91%)9 (9%)Macrolide (56%)
Acute nonstrep pharyngitis (28)16 (57%)12 (43%)Macrolide (36%)
Pneumonia (17)17 (100%)0Fluoroquinolone (53%)
ARTI, acute respiratory tract infection; URI, upper respiratory infection.
*Although 304 patients received prescriptions, some patients received more than one antibiotic.
 

 

TABLE 3
Historical features, exam findings associated with antibiotic prescribing

 

Historical featureP value
Sinus pain.0002
Duration of illness >8 days.0110
Shortness of breath.0427
Physical exam finding 
Abnormal sinus exam<.0001
Abnormal lung exam.0005
Abnormal tympanic membrane.0017
Abnormal pharynx.0026
Cervical lymphadenopathy.0141
Abnormal nasal exam.0363

TABLE 4
Antibiotic prescription rates for ARTI varied by provider type, investigator status

 

Antibiotic prescription rate
Attending physiciansNurse practitionersResidentsP value
153/225 (68%)97/115 (84%)54/98 (55%)<.001*
InvestigatorNoninvestigatorP value
110/192 (57%)194/246 (79%)<.001
ARTI, acute respiratory tract infection.
*The rate for residents is significantly lower than that for attending physicians and nurse practitioners. The rate for attending physicians is significantly lower than that for nurse practitioners. The P value applies to both rate comparisons among provider types.

Discussion

Providers in our practice had surprisingly high rates of antibiotic prescribing for ARTIs (69% overall). By comparison, the overall antibiotic use rate for ARTIs in the most recent National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) analysis (1995-2006) was 58%.12 The prescribing rate for office settings alone was just 52%. Steinman’s analysis of NAMCS data from 1997-1999 revealed an overall rate of 63%.13

Data analyzed from >4200 Medicare enrollees seen for ARTI visits revealed great variation in prescribing rates by office site: 21% to 88%, with a median rate of 54%.20 The rate varied by final diagnoses: sinusitis, 69%; bronchitis, 59%; pharyngitis, 50%; and URI, 26%. A rate of 77% was recently reported in a Veterans Administration office setting.21 Those with sinusitis and bronchitis similarly received more prescriptions than those with acute pharyngitis and URI.

 

In addition to our high overall rate, we also diagnosed patients with sinusitis and bronchitis frequently (32% and 24% of all patients, respectively), perhaps as false justification for prescribing antibiotics (provided for 99% and 91%, respectively). Also noteworthy is that more than one-third of URI patients in our practice received antibiotics.

We had expected, but did not see, differences in prescribing rates between older and younger patients, as well as those with and without risk factors for complications. Our expectations were based on NAMCS data, which have demonstrated increasing use of antibiotics in older patients.2

 

Treatment for those with bronchitis was surprisingly frequent; 91% received antibiotics. A Cochrane systematic review attributes slight symptom benefit to antibiotic use (improvement in cough by about one day).22 This benefit, however, is rarely seen in patients who have been ill for <1 week. The magnitude of this benefit must be weighed against the cost and adverse effects of antibiotics and the potential for promoting antimicrobial resistance. Most patients’ symptoms are mild and self-limited, and risks may exceed benefits.

Guidelines state, “The widespread use of antibiotics for the treatment of acute bronchitis is not justified and vigorous efforts to curtail their use should be encouraged.”23 The CDC agrees, noting that “routine antibiotic treatment of uncomplicated acute bronchitis is not recommended, regardless of duration of cough.”10

As observed in another study,14 a clinical factor associated with prescribing decisions at our practice was the duration of illness. Patients in our practice had been ill, on average, 8 days before presenting to the office. Over time, our encounters with regular patients may have taught them to wait until their symptoms are prolonged or progressive before seeking evaluation.

We saw large differences in prescribing rates between providers, and hope this means there is room for improvement by addressing reasons for variability. Education about individual prescribing behaviors may motivate those with the highest rates of use to improve.

 

We noted high rates of broad-spectrum antibiotic use. This is consistent with other research findings of a shift away from narrow-spectrum agents.12 We did not determine the frequency of allergies to narrow-spectrum agents. Anecdotally, the opinion of some patients was that narrow-spectrum medicines “just don’t work,” given their experience of persistent cold symptoms when using such agents.

Quality-improvement processes such as DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) or PDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act) require collection of baseline data so that interventions can be tailored to meet the root causes identified.24 This project determined preintervention practice behaviors and allowed us to create quality metrics that could define our future success.

Study limitations. One obvious reason for the prescribing variability noted above is that those who helped plan and implement the project knew their practice behaviors were being reviewed and had studied the relevant practice guidelines. Whether non-investigator providers were up to date with recommendations and could carefully select appropriate treatment candidates is unclear.

 

 

This study was of our practice alone, and findings may not be generalizable to other practices. We encourage physicians to similarly examine their own prescribing habits in order to set practice-improvement goals.

CORRESPONDENCE Michael L. Grover, DO, Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 13737 N 92nd Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85260; [email protected]

References

 

1. Fendrick AM, Monto AS, Nightengale B, et al. The economic burden of non-influenza related viral respiratory tract infection in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:487-494.

2. Werner K, Deasy J. Acute respiratory tract infections: when are antibiotics indicated? JAAPA. 2009;22:22–26.

3. US Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing emerging infectious diseases: a strategy for the 21st century. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998;47(RR-15). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/MMWR/pdf/rr/rr4715.pdf. Accessed July 16, 2011.

4. Drug resistance threatens to reverse medical progress [press release]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (WHO); June 12, 2000. Available at: http://www.who.int/inf-pr-2000/en/pr2000-41.html. Accessed July 16, 2011.

5. Smolinski MS, Hamburg MA, Lederberg J. eds. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Emerging Microbial Threats to Health in the 21st Century. Microbial Threats to Health: Emergence, Detection, and Response. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/CMS/3783/3919/5381/6146.aspx. Accessed July 16, 2011.

6. Gonzales R, Bartlett JG, Besser RE, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in adults: background, specific aims, and methods. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:479-486.

7. Gonzales R, Bartlett JG, Besser RE, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for treatment of nonspecific upper respiratory tract infections in adults: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:490-494.

8. Hickner JM, Bartlett JG, Besser RE, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for acute rhinosinusitis in adults: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:498-505.

9. Cooper RJ, Hoffman JR, Bartlett JG, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for acute pharyngitis in adults: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:509-517.

10. Gonzales R, Bartlett JG, Bessnar RE, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for treatment of uncomplicated acute bronchitis: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:521-529.

11. CDC. Get smart: know when antibiotics work. Adult appropriate antibiotic use summary: physician information sheets (adult). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/getsmart/campaign-materials/adult-treatment.html. Accessed July 16, 2011.

12. Grijalva CG, Nuorti JP, Griffin M. Antibiotic prescription rates for acute respiratory tract infections in US ambulatory settings. JAMA. 2009;302:758-766.

13. Steinman MA, Landefeld CS, Gonzales R. Predictors of broad spectrum antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in adult primary care. JAMA. 2003;289:719-725.

14. Wigton RS, Darr CA, Corbett KK, et al. How do community practitioners decide whether to prescribe antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections? J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:1615-1620.

15. Macfarlane J, Holmes W, Macfarlane R, et al. Influence of patients’ expectations on antibiotic management of acute lower respiratory tract illness in general practice: questionnaire study. BMJ. 1997;315:1211-1214.

16. Colgan R, Powers JH. Appropriate antimicrobial prescribing: approaches that limit antibiotic resistance. Am Fam Physician. 2001;64:999-1004.

17. Coco A, Mainous AG. Relation of time spent in an encounter with the use of antibiotics in pediatric office visits for viral respiratory infections. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:1145-1149.

18. Arnold SR, Straus SE. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in ambulatory care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(4):CD003539-

19. Mainous AG, Hueston WJ, Love MM, et al. An evaluation of statewide strategies to reduce antibiotic overuse. Fam Med. 2000;32:22-29.

20. Gonzales R, Sauaia A, Corbett KK, et al. Antibiotic treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in the elderly: effect of a multidimensional educational intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:39-45.

21. Franck A, Smith R. Antibiotic use for acute respiratory tract infections in a veteran population. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2010;50:726-729.

22. Smucny J, Fahey T, Becker L, et al. Antibiotics for acute bronchitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(4):CD000245-

23. Bramen SS. Chronic cough due to acute bronchitis: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2006;129 (1 suppl):95S-103S.

24. Snee RD. Use DMAIC to make improvement part of “the way we work.” Quality Progress Web site. September 2007. Available at: http://asq.org/quality-progress/2007/09/process-managementment/use-dmaic-to-make-improvement-part-of-the-way-we-work.html. Accessed July 16, 2011.

References

 

1. Fendrick AM, Monto AS, Nightengale B, et al. The economic burden of non-influenza related viral respiratory tract infection in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:487-494.

2. Werner K, Deasy J. Acute respiratory tract infections: when are antibiotics indicated? JAAPA. 2009;22:22–26.

3. US Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing emerging infectious diseases: a strategy for the 21st century. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998;47(RR-15). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/MMWR/pdf/rr/rr4715.pdf. Accessed July 16, 2011.

4. Drug resistance threatens to reverse medical progress [press release]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (WHO); June 12, 2000. Available at: http://www.who.int/inf-pr-2000/en/pr2000-41.html. Accessed July 16, 2011.

5. Smolinski MS, Hamburg MA, Lederberg J. eds. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Emerging Microbial Threats to Health in the 21st Century. Microbial Threats to Health: Emergence, Detection, and Response. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/CMS/3783/3919/5381/6146.aspx. Accessed July 16, 2011.

6. Gonzales R, Bartlett JG, Besser RE, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in adults: background, specific aims, and methods. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:479-486.

7. Gonzales R, Bartlett JG, Besser RE, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for treatment of nonspecific upper respiratory tract infections in adults: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:490-494.

8. Hickner JM, Bartlett JG, Besser RE, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for acute rhinosinusitis in adults: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:498-505.

9. Cooper RJ, Hoffman JR, Bartlett JG, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for acute pharyngitis in adults: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:509-517.

10. Gonzales R, Bartlett JG, Bessnar RE, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for treatment of uncomplicated acute bronchitis: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:521-529.

11. CDC. Get smart: know when antibiotics work. Adult appropriate antibiotic use summary: physician information sheets (adult). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/getsmart/campaign-materials/adult-treatment.html. Accessed July 16, 2011.

12. Grijalva CG, Nuorti JP, Griffin M. Antibiotic prescription rates for acute respiratory tract infections in US ambulatory settings. JAMA. 2009;302:758-766.

13. Steinman MA, Landefeld CS, Gonzales R. Predictors of broad spectrum antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in adult primary care. JAMA. 2003;289:719-725.

14. Wigton RS, Darr CA, Corbett KK, et al. How do community practitioners decide whether to prescribe antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections? J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:1615-1620.

15. Macfarlane J, Holmes W, Macfarlane R, et al. Influence of patients’ expectations on antibiotic management of acute lower respiratory tract illness in general practice: questionnaire study. BMJ. 1997;315:1211-1214.

16. Colgan R, Powers JH. Appropriate antimicrobial prescribing: approaches that limit antibiotic resistance. Am Fam Physician. 2001;64:999-1004.

17. Coco A, Mainous AG. Relation of time spent in an encounter with the use of antibiotics in pediatric office visits for viral respiratory infections. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:1145-1149.

18. Arnold SR, Straus SE. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in ambulatory care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(4):CD003539-

19. Mainous AG, Hueston WJ, Love MM, et al. An evaluation of statewide strategies to reduce antibiotic overuse. Fam Med. 2000;32:22-29.

20. Gonzales R, Sauaia A, Corbett KK, et al. Antibiotic treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in the elderly: effect of a multidimensional educational intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:39-45.

21. Franck A, Smith R. Antibiotic use for acute respiratory tract infections in a veteran population. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2010;50:726-729.

22. Smucny J, Fahey T, Becker L, et al. Antibiotics for acute bronchitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(4):CD000245-

23. Bramen SS. Chronic cough due to acute bronchitis: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2006;129 (1 suppl):95S-103S.

24. Snee RD. Use DMAIC to make improvement part of “the way we work.” Quality Progress Web site. September 2007. Available at: http://asq.org/quality-progress/2007/09/process-managementment/use-dmaic-to-make-improvement-part-of-the-way-we-work.html. Accessed July 16, 2011.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 61(6)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 61(6)
Page Number
330-335
Page Number
330-335
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Acute respiratory tract infection: A practice examines its antibiotic prescribing habits
Display Headline
Acute respiratory tract infection: A practice examines its antibiotic prescribing habits
Legacy Keywords
Michael L. Grover;DO; Martina Mookadam;MD; Richard H. Rutkowski;MD; antibiotic prescribing; respiratory tract infection; ARTIs; prescribing habits;quality improvement; final diagnoses; factors associated;
Legacy Keywords
Michael L. Grover;DO; Martina Mookadam;MD; Richard H. Rutkowski;MD; antibiotic prescribing; respiratory tract infection; ARTIs; prescribing habits;quality improvement; final diagnoses; factors associated;
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Undiluted acid used for vulvar surgery … and more

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Undiluted acid used for vulvar surgery … and more

Undiluted acid used for vulvar surgery

WIDE LOCAL EXCISION was performed on a 42-year-old woman with vulvar intraepithelial neoplasm, VIN II, with moderate dysplasia. Her ObGyn performed the surgery.

Instead of applying a diluted solution of acetic acid wash to delineate the borders of the dysplastic area, a highly concentrated acetic acid or trichloroacetic acid was used. The patient suffered severe chemical burns of the vulva that took several months to heal. She has permanent scarring of the vulvar area, severe tenderness, discoloration, and atrophy of the vaginal opening, with a band of thick scar tissue at the posterior fourchette. The perineum, extending to the anal area, is scarred, including a 2-mm plaque layer.

PATIENT’S CLAIM Sexual intercourse is extremely painful, and therefore impossible. She suffers discomfort at all times. Additional surgery has been recommended to alleviate her condition.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE The case was settled before trial.

VERDICT A $600,000 Ohio settlement was reached.

Large baby with cervical spine injury

A WOMAN WAS IN LABOR with her third child. Her first baby was born by cesarean delivery. During the vaginal birth of her second child, shoulder dystocia was encountered; this child weighed 8 lb 4 oz at birth.

Using ultrasonography, the ObGyn determined vaginal birth was appropriate. Shoulder dystocia was encountered and the infant suffered injuries to the cervical spine and right arm. The newborn weighed 9 lb 13 oz.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The baby’s weight was grossly underestimated prior to delivery; ultrasonography was not properly performed or evaluated. The mother’s history, large fundal height, estimated fetal weight, and the mother’s request for a cesarean delivery should have resulted in the performance of a cesarean delivery.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE Shoulder dystocia was not reasonably foreseeable. Injuries to the baby were due to the forces of labor.

VERDICT A confidential Texas settlement was reached.

Suture causes nerve damage

PELVIC PROLAPSE RECONSTRUCTION was performed; surgery included a pubovaginal sling procedure with graft, and repairs of Grade 2 cystocele and Grade 3 rectocele. The gynecologist used transvaginal sutures to attach the mesh to the sacrospinous ligament.

The patient immediately reported pain, tingling, and weakness in her buttocks and legs. The gynecologist diagnosed a hematoma and continued conservative treatment while waiting for the hematoma to resorb.

After 10 days, the patient terminated the gynecologist’s services and left the hospital. She saw a neurologist, who diagnosed proximal sciatic nerve irritation secondary to suturing. When a suture was removed from the sacral spinous ligament plexus, many of the patient’s neurologic symptoms immediately resolved. She still has pain and walks with a noticeable limp using a cane.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The gynecologist failed to determine that a suture was causing nerve damage. Removal of the suture within the first 3 days would have avoided neurologic injury.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE Postsurgical care was proper. A neurologist was consulted, and a sonogram had ruled out deep vein thrombosis.

VERDICT A $1.58 million Illinois verdict was returned.

Colon damage after embolization

UTERINE FIBROID EMBOLIZATION was performed on a 51-year-old woman. The next day, she reported severe abdominal pain and was readmitted. A uterine infection was suspected, and she underwent a hysterectomy. Necrosis of the colon was found; a surgeon removed one-third of the colon and performed a colostomy. She underwent several operations, including rectal-vaginal fistula repair, before the colostomy was corrected.

PATIENT’S CLAIM Misdirected embolization injured an artery supplying the colon. She continues to suffer ongoing fecal urgency and frequency.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE An anomalous connection between the patient’s uterine artery and mesenteric artery was impossible for the physician to have known prior to the embolization procedure.

VERDICT A California defense verdict was returned.

$1.18 M verdict set aside because of Facebook   postings

SEVERAL HOURS AFTER A WOMAN’S LABOR BEGAN, fetal bradycardia developed precipitously. The on-call ObGyn arrived after 10 minutes and ordered an immediate cesarean delivery, which occurred 22 minutes later. The child suffered a catastrophic, irreversible brain injury. He lived for 39 days before life support was removed and he died.

ESTATE’S CLAIM The nurses did not report decelerations to the ObGyn, and they were slow to notify him of the fetal bradycardia. The child would not have been injured if the nursing staff had reacted appropriately.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE Isolated heart-rate decelerations during labor are not troubling. A cord accident occurred, which could not be predicted nor avoided. The ObGyn was called promptly; the emergency cesarean delivery was performed quickly. However, the injury already had occurred and was irreparable.

VERDICT A $1.18 million Kentucky verdict was returned. The hospital sought a mistrial because Facebook postings by a juror proved the case had been discussed and prejudged. The court found in favor of the hospital on its post-trial motion.

 

 

Bilateral mastectomy: nipples not spared

A 46-YEAR-OLD WOMAN UNDERWENT prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. A plastic surgeon drew presurgical markings on the day of surgery; the breast surgeon removed the nipples.

PATIENT’S CLAIM All parties had agreed the nipples would be spared. The plastic surgeon drew improper markings and failed to remind the breast surgeon prior to surgery that the nipples would be preserved.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE The breast surgeon was at fault for misinterpreting the markings.

VERDICT The patient reached a pretrial settlement with the breast surgeon. The case proceeded against the plastic surgeon. A Maryland defense verdict was returned for the plastic surgeon.

Signs of intrauterine growth restriction; stillborn child

AT 24 WEEKS’ GESTATION, a 17-year-old woman who smoked reported spotting. An ultrasound demonstrated significant fetal growth restriction. The mother was hospitalized to assess the spotting; no testing was ordered to assess fetal growth. When blood was not found in the birth canal, she was discharged. During the next month, she saw the ObGyn three times; testing indicated that the fetus was at least 3 weeks behind the stage of pregnancy. The ObGyn did not order additional testing nor consult a specialist. At 31 weeks’ gestation, ultrasonography found no fetal heart tones. The stillborn was delivered by cesarean section.

ESTATE’S CLAIM A wrongful death suit was filed by the parents, who also claimed lack of informed consent concerning the risk of stillbirth in the presence of intrauterine growth restriction.

PHYSICIANS’ DEFENSE The mother’s smoking was mentioned at trial as a possible explanation of why fetal development was delayed. The ObGyn denied negligence.

VERDICT A $800,000 Maryland verdict was awarded to the parents.

Three BrCa patients share $72.6 M

THREE MENOPAUSAL WOMEN took Premarin (conjugated estrogens) plus Provera (medroxyprogesterone), and/or Prempro (conjugated estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate). Each discontinued hormone therapy after being diagnosed with hormone-positive breast cancer.

PATIENTS’ CLAIM The only source of hormonal stimulation for their cancer was the use of estrogen plus progestin.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE Science is currently unable to determine precisely what causes breast cancer. Each plaintiff had risk factors.

VERDICT The three cases were consolidated to a reverse-bifurcated trial, with causation and damages assessed first. The Pennsylvania jury found the Wyeth Pharmaceutical products to be factual causes of the patients’ cancer, and awarded a total of $72.6 million in compensatory damages. The parties settled for confidential amounts before the liability phase began.

References

These cases were selected by the editors of OBG Management from Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts, with permission of the editor, Lewis Laska (www.verdictslaska.com). The information available to the editors about the cases presented here is sometimes incomplete. Moreover, the cases may or may not have merit. Nevertheless, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation and are meant to illustrate nationwide variation in jury verdicts and awards.

We want to hear from you! Tell us what you think.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
OBG Management - 24(06)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
46-47
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

Undiluted acid used for vulvar surgery

WIDE LOCAL EXCISION was performed on a 42-year-old woman with vulvar intraepithelial neoplasm, VIN II, with moderate dysplasia. Her ObGyn performed the surgery.

Instead of applying a diluted solution of acetic acid wash to delineate the borders of the dysplastic area, a highly concentrated acetic acid or trichloroacetic acid was used. The patient suffered severe chemical burns of the vulva that took several months to heal. She has permanent scarring of the vulvar area, severe tenderness, discoloration, and atrophy of the vaginal opening, with a band of thick scar tissue at the posterior fourchette. The perineum, extending to the anal area, is scarred, including a 2-mm plaque layer.

PATIENT’S CLAIM Sexual intercourse is extremely painful, and therefore impossible. She suffers discomfort at all times. Additional surgery has been recommended to alleviate her condition.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE The case was settled before trial.

VERDICT A $600,000 Ohio settlement was reached.

Large baby with cervical spine injury

A WOMAN WAS IN LABOR with her third child. Her first baby was born by cesarean delivery. During the vaginal birth of her second child, shoulder dystocia was encountered; this child weighed 8 lb 4 oz at birth.

Using ultrasonography, the ObGyn determined vaginal birth was appropriate. Shoulder dystocia was encountered and the infant suffered injuries to the cervical spine and right arm. The newborn weighed 9 lb 13 oz.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The baby’s weight was grossly underestimated prior to delivery; ultrasonography was not properly performed or evaluated. The mother’s history, large fundal height, estimated fetal weight, and the mother’s request for a cesarean delivery should have resulted in the performance of a cesarean delivery.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE Shoulder dystocia was not reasonably foreseeable. Injuries to the baby were due to the forces of labor.

VERDICT A confidential Texas settlement was reached.

Suture causes nerve damage

PELVIC PROLAPSE RECONSTRUCTION was performed; surgery included a pubovaginal sling procedure with graft, and repairs of Grade 2 cystocele and Grade 3 rectocele. The gynecologist used transvaginal sutures to attach the mesh to the sacrospinous ligament.

The patient immediately reported pain, tingling, and weakness in her buttocks and legs. The gynecologist diagnosed a hematoma and continued conservative treatment while waiting for the hematoma to resorb.

After 10 days, the patient terminated the gynecologist’s services and left the hospital. She saw a neurologist, who diagnosed proximal sciatic nerve irritation secondary to suturing. When a suture was removed from the sacral spinous ligament plexus, many of the patient’s neurologic symptoms immediately resolved. She still has pain and walks with a noticeable limp using a cane.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The gynecologist failed to determine that a suture was causing nerve damage. Removal of the suture within the first 3 days would have avoided neurologic injury.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE Postsurgical care was proper. A neurologist was consulted, and a sonogram had ruled out deep vein thrombosis.

VERDICT A $1.58 million Illinois verdict was returned.

Colon damage after embolization

UTERINE FIBROID EMBOLIZATION was performed on a 51-year-old woman. The next day, she reported severe abdominal pain and was readmitted. A uterine infection was suspected, and she underwent a hysterectomy. Necrosis of the colon was found; a surgeon removed one-third of the colon and performed a colostomy. She underwent several operations, including rectal-vaginal fistula repair, before the colostomy was corrected.

PATIENT’S CLAIM Misdirected embolization injured an artery supplying the colon. She continues to suffer ongoing fecal urgency and frequency.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE An anomalous connection between the patient’s uterine artery and mesenteric artery was impossible for the physician to have known prior to the embolization procedure.

VERDICT A California defense verdict was returned.

$1.18 M verdict set aside because of Facebook   postings

SEVERAL HOURS AFTER A WOMAN’S LABOR BEGAN, fetal bradycardia developed precipitously. The on-call ObGyn arrived after 10 minutes and ordered an immediate cesarean delivery, which occurred 22 minutes later. The child suffered a catastrophic, irreversible brain injury. He lived for 39 days before life support was removed and he died.

ESTATE’S CLAIM The nurses did not report decelerations to the ObGyn, and they were slow to notify him of the fetal bradycardia. The child would not have been injured if the nursing staff had reacted appropriately.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE Isolated heart-rate decelerations during labor are not troubling. A cord accident occurred, which could not be predicted nor avoided. The ObGyn was called promptly; the emergency cesarean delivery was performed quickly. However, the injury already had occurred and was irreparable.

VERDICT A $1.18 million Kentucky verdict was returned. The hospital sought a mistrial because Facebook postings by a juror proved the case had been discussed and prejudged. The court found in favor of the hospital on its post-trial motion.

 

 

Bilateral mastectomy: nipples not spared

A 46-YEAR-OLD WOMAN UNDERWENT prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. A plastic surgeon drew presurgical markings on the day of surgery; the breast surgeon removed the nipples.

PATIENT’S CLAIM All parties had agreed the nipples would be spared. The plastic surgeon drew improper markings and failed to remind the breast surgeon prior to surgery that the nipples would be preserved.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE The breast surgeon was at fault for misinterpreting the markings.

VERDICT The patient reached a pretrial settlement with the breast surgeon. The case proceeded against the plastic surgeon. A Maryland defense verdict was returned for the plastic surgeon.

Signs of intrauterine growth restriction; stillborn child

AT 24 WEEKS’ GESTATION, a 17-year-old woman who smoked reported spotting. An ultrasound demonstrated significant fetal growth restriction. The mother was hospitalized to assess the spotting; no testing was ordered to assess fetal growth. When blood was not found in the birth canal, she was discharged. During the next month, she saw the ObGyn three times; testing indicated that the fetus was at least 3 weeks behind the stage of pregnancy. The ObGyn did not order additional testing nor consult a specialist. At 31 weeks’ gestation, ultrasonography found no fetal heart tones. The stillborn was delivered by cesarean section.

ESTATE’S CLAIM A wrongful death suit was filed by the parents, who also claimed lack of informed consent concerning the risk of stillbirth in the presence of intrauterine growth restriction.

PHYSICIANS’ DEFENSE The mother’s smoking was mentioned at trial as a possible explanation of why fetal development was delayed. The ObGyn denied negligence.

VERDICT A $800,000 Maryland verdict was awarded to the parents.

Three BrCa patients share $72.6 M

THREE MENOPAUSAL WOMEN took Premarin (conjugated estrogens) plus Provera (medroxyprogesterone), and/or Prempro (conjugated estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate). Each discontinued hormone therapy after being diagnosed with hormone-positive breast cancer.

PATIENTS’ CLAIM The only source of hormonal stimulation for their cancer was the use of estrogen plus progestin.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE Science is currently unable to determine precisely what causes breast cancer. Each plaintiff had risk factors.

VERDICT The three cases were consolidated to a reverse-bifurcated trial, with causation and damages assessed first. The Pennsylvania jury found the Wyeth Pharmaceutical products to be factual causes of the patients’ cancer, and awarded a total of $72.6 million in compensatory damages. The parties settled for confidential amounts before the liability phase began.

Undiluted acid used for vulvar surgery

WIDE LOCAL EXCISION was performed on a 42-year-old woman with vulvar intraepithelial neoplasm, VIN II, with moderate dysplasia. Her ObGyn performed the surgery.

Instead of applying a diluted solution of acetic acid wash to delineate the borders of the dysplastic area, a highly concentrated acetic acid or trichloroacetic acid was used. The patient suffered severe chemical burns of the vulva that took several months to heal. She has permanent scarring of the vulvar area, severe tenderness, discoloration, and atrophy of the vaginal opening, with a band of thick scar tissue at the posterior fourchette. The perineum, extending to the anal area, is scarred, including a 2-mm plaque layer.

PATIENT’S CLAIM Sexual intercourse is extremely painful, and therefore impossible. She suffers discomfort at all times. Additional surgery has been recommended to alleviate her condition.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE The case was settled before trial.

VERDICT A $600,000 Ohio settlement was reached.

Large baby with cervical spine injury

A WOMAN WAS IN LABOR with her third child. Her first baby was born by cesarean delivery. During the vaginal birth of her second child, shoulder dystocia was encountered; this child weighed 8 lb 4 oz at birth.

Using ultrasonography, the ObGyn determined vaginal birth was appropriate. Shoulder dystocia was encountered and the infant suffered injuries to the cervical spine and right arm. The newborn weighed 9 lb 13 oz.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The baby’s weight was grossly underestimated prior to delivery; ultrasonography was not properly performed or evaluated. The mother’s history, large fundal height, estimated fetal weight, and the mother’s request for a cesarean delivery should have resulted in the performance of a cesarean delivery.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE Shoulder dystocia was not reasonably foreseeable. Injuries to the baby were due to the forces of labor.

VERDICT A confidential Texas settlement was reached.

Suture causes nerve damage

PELVIC PROLAPSE RECONSTRUCTION was performed; surgery included a pubovaginal sling procedure with graft, and repairs of Grade 2 cystocele and Grade 3 rectocele. The gynecologist used transvaginal sutures to attach the mesh to the sacrospinous ligament.

The patient immediately reported pain, tingling, and weakness in her buttocks and legs. The gynecologist diagnosed a hematoma and continued conservative treatment while waiting for the hematoma to resorb.

After 10 days, the patient terminated the gynecologist’s services and left the hospital. She saw a neurologist, who diagnosed proximal sciatic nerve irritation secondary to suturing. When a suture was removed from the sacral spinous ligament plexus, many of the patient’s neurologic symptoms immediately resolved. She still has pain and walks with a noticeable limp using a cane.

PATIENT’S CLAIM The gynecologist failed to determine that a suture was causing nerve damage. Removal of the suture within the first 3 days would have avoided neurologic injury.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE Postsurgical care was proper. A neurologist was consulted, and a sonogram had ruled out deep vein thrombosis.

VERDICT A $1.58 million Illinois verdict was returned.

Colon damage after embolization

UTERINE FIBROID EMBOLIZATION was performed on a 51-year-old woman. The next day, she reported severe abdominal pain and was readmitted. A uterine infection was suspected, and she underwent a hysterectomy. Necrosis of the colon was found; a surgeon removed one-third of the colon and performed a colostomy. She underwent several operations, including rectal-vaginal fistula repair, before the colostomy was corrected.

PATIENT’S CLAIM Misdirected embolization injured an artery supplying the colon. She continues to suffer ongoing fecal urgency and frequency.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE An anomalous connection between the patient’s uterine artery and mesenteric artery was impossible for the physician to have known prior to the embolization procedure.

VERDICT A California defense verdict was returned.

$1.18 M verdict set aside because of Facebook   postings

SEVERAL HOURS AFTER A WOMAN’S LABOR BEGAN, fetal bradycardia developed precipitously. The on-call ObGyn arrived after 10 minutes and ordered an immediate cesarean delivery, which occurred 22 minutes later. The child suffered a catastrophic, irreversible brain injury. He lived for 39 days before life support was removed and he died.

ESTATE’S CLAIM The nurses did not report decelerations to the ObGyn, and they were slow to notify him of the fetal bradycardia. The child would not have been injured if the nursing staff had reacted appropriately.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE Isolated heart-rate decelerations during labor are not troubling. A cord accident occurred, which could not be predicted nor avoided. The ObGyn was called promptly; the emergency cesarean delivery was performed quickly. However, the injury already had occurred and was irreparable.

VERDICT A $1.18 million Kentucky verdict was returned. The hospital sought a mistrial because Facebook postings by a juror proved the case had been discussed and prejudged. The court found in favor of the hospital on its post-trial motion.

 

 

Bilateral mastectomy: nipples not spared

A 46-YEAR-OLD WOMAN UNDERWENT prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. A plastic surgeon drew presurgical markings on the day of surgery; the breast surgeon removed the nipples.

PATIENT’S CLAIM All parties had agreed the nipples would be spared. The plastic surgeon drew improper markings and failed to remind the breast surgeon prior to surgery that the nipples would be preserved.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE The breast surgeon was at fault for misinterpreting the markings.

VERDICT The patient reached a pretrial settlement with the breast surgeon. The case proceeded against the plastic surgeon. A Maryland defense verdict was returned for the plastic surgeon.

Signs of intrauterine growth restriction; stillborn child

AT 24 WEEKS’ GESTATION, a 17-year-old woman who smoked reported spotting. An ultrasound demonstrated significant fetal growth restriction. The mother was hospitalized to assess the spotting; no testing was ordered to assess fetal growth. When blood was not found in the birth canal, she was discharged. During the next month, she saw the ObGyn three times; testing indicated that the fetus was at least 3 weeks behind the stage of pregnancy. The ObGyn did not order additional testing nor consult a specialist. At 31 weeks’ gestation, ultrasonography found no fetal heart tones. The stillborn was delivered by cesarean section.

ESTATE’S CLAIM A wrongful death suit was filed by the parents, who also claimed lack of informed consent concerning the risk of stillbirth in the presence of intrauterine growth restriction.

PHYSICIANS’ DEFENSE The mother’s smoking was mentioned at trial as a possible explanation of why fetal development was delayed. The ObGyn denied negligence.

VERDICT A $800,000 Maryland verdict was awarded to the parents.

Three BrCa patients share $72.6 M

THREE MENOPAUSAL WOMEN took Premarin (conjugated estrogens) plus Provera (medroxyprogesterone), and/or Prempro (conjugated estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate). Each discontinued hormone therapy after being diagnosed with hormone-positive breast cancer.

PATIENTS’ CLAIM The only source of hormonal stimulation for their cancer was the use of estrogen plus progestin.

DEFENDANTS’ DEFENSE Science is currently unable to determine precisely what causes breast cancer. Each plaintiff had risk factors.

VERDICT The three cases were consolidated to a reverse-bifurcated trial, with causation and damages assessed first. The Pennsylvania jury found the Wyeth Pharmaceutical products to be factual causes of the patients’ cancer, and awarded a total of $72.6 million in compensatory damages. The parties settled for confidential amounts before the liability phase began.

References

These cases were selected by the editors of OBG Management from Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts, with permission of the editor, Lewis Laska (www.verdictslaska.com). The information available to the editors about the cases presented here is sometimes incomplete. Moreover, the cases may or may not have merit. Nevertheless, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation and are meant to illustrate nationwide variation in jury verdicts and awards.

We want to hear from you! Tell us what you think.

References

These cases were selected by the editors of OBG Management from Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts, with permission of the editor, Lewis Laska (www.verdictslaska.com). The information available to the editors about the cases presented here is sometimes incomplete. Moreover, the cases may or may not have merit. Nevertheless, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation and are meant to illustrate nationwide variation in jury verdicts and awards.

We want to hear from you! Tell us what you think.

Issue
OBG Management - 24(06)
Issue
OBG Management - 24(06)
Page Number
46-47
Page Number
46-47
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Undiluted acid used for vulvar surgery … and more
Display Headline
Undiluted acid used for vulvar surgery … and more
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

A stepwise approach to cervical cerclage

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
A stepwise approach to cervical cerclage

RELATED ARTICLES

Does vaginal progesterone reduce preterm delivery among asymptomatic women who have a short cervix in the midtrimester?
John T. Repke, MD (Examining the Evidence, April 2012)

Update on obstetrics
John T. Repke, MD, and Jaimey M. Pauli, MD (January 2012)

Placement of a suture around an incompetent cervix to prevent premature pregnancy loss was first described more than 50 years ago1,2—but the few randomized studies that have been published (all of them in the past decade) devote very little attention to technique.3-7

Are we to assume, then, that over more than 50 years, no modifications to technique have been devised?

Are we to assume as well that in the two largest randomized studies to date, which involved 266 cerclages inserted in 27 different medical centers over more than 4 years,5,7 all cerclages were inserted in an identical manner using the same technique originated more than half a century ago?

In this article, we lay out five principles to achieve effective cerclage and describe a stepwise approach to technique. This technique is based on our experience with approximately 2,000 cerclages performed in a single medical center. We emphasize anatomic landmarks and surgical principles that are based on the published literature as well as our personal experience.

Five principles of effective cerclage

Place the cerclage as high as possible

In the original paper on cerclage, McDonald emphasized the need to place the suture as high as possible to be as close as possible to the level of the internal cervical os.2

Zilianti and colleagues elegantly described how—in the absence of cerclage—cervical tissue begins to change at the level of the internal os, forming a funnel that advances downward in the shape of the letters “Y,” “V,” and “U.”8 If we accept this notion, then the only way to prevent further shortening from the top down is by placing a high cerclage.

Studies have demonstrated improved pregnancy outcomes after placement of a high cervico-isthmic cerclage following failure of a “conventional” low cerclage.9,10

Place the cerclage adjacent to the cervical stroma

Macroscopic and microscopic visualization of the cervix reveals the following main layers:

  • epithelium/mucosa, which covers the deeper connective tissue known as cervical stroma
  • cervical stroma, which may be divided into two zones: 1) a superficial, subepithelial zone that appears histologically as loose stromal bands and 2) a deeper, dense collagen layer.

It is the dense collagen layer of the cervical stroma that affords most of the resistance to forces of deformation, whereas the loose stromal layer and the epithelium above it slide easily over the deeper stroma. Including too great a proportion of these “slippery” components within the cerclage could increase the risk of displacement and failure.11,12

Shirodkar was the first to suggest that the mucosa and submucosa be excluded from cerclage,1 and a detailed submucosal cerclage insertion was described by Fahmy more than 30 years ago.13 We support his recommendation that cerclage placement be as close to the inner cervical stroma as possible and that it include as little as possible of the surrounding tissue.

Take three encircling cervical “bites”

In his original publication, McDonald described “five or six bites with the needle” to encircle the cervix.2 Later authors usually described four encircling steps, but no reliable study has challenged the original dogma.

Although we lack science to favor one approach over another, common sense suggests that three bites (versus four or five) offer the following advantages. They:

  • produce less penetrating injury
  • require less manipulation of the cervix
  • are simpler and quicker to perform
  • offer less opportunity for the cerclage tape to get twisted (a flat tape provides for better distribution of the load)
  • permit a small gap between the two final exit points of the tape (at 5 o’clock and 7 o’clock), which allows for easier cinching and tightening of the cerclage (FIGURE 1).


FIGURE 1 A small gap between the ends of the cerclage tape, which exit at 5 o’clock and 7 o’clock, allows for easier cinching and tightening.

Place the knot at 6 o’clock

Both Shirodkar1 and McDonald2 described placement of the knot (or approximation of the “ends”) at 12 o’clock, anteriorly. However, this approach can complicate removal if strong pressure is applied to the cerclage or if it is covered by tissue. Attempts to remove the cerclage can result in bladder injury.

For these reasons, we prefer the approach described by Caspi and colleagues, who placed the knot in the back of the cervix at 6 o’clock.14 In that location, the surgeon can reach as high as desired, and there is no risk of organ injury during removal.

 

 

That said, it should be noted that removal of a cerclage with a knot at 6 o’clock is more difficult than removal of one with a knot at 12 o’clock—but the convenience of the operator should be secondary to safety and efficacy of the cerclage.

Place a figure of 8 around the cerclage knot

Because of the proximity of the bladder anteriorly, there is a limit to how high one can place the cerclage anteriorly. However, in the back of the cervix, one can place the cerclage much higher without risk of injury. This approach sometimes will result in downward forces on the posterior part (where the knot is) and occasionally may cover the knot with tissue from the posterior vaginal fornix.

For these reasons, we propose securing the knot of the cerclage tape to the posterior surface of the cervical “core” by placing a figure of 8 using bright blue Prolene #1 (Ethicon) to prevent slippage and help call attention to the knot when the time for removal comes.

Stepwise surgical technique

1. Use a weighted speculum to retract the posterior-inferior vaginal wall. Have an assistant hold one or two right-angle retractors to retract the other aspects of the vaginal wall, including the bladder anteriorly, as needed.

2. Clamp the anterior and posterior lips of the cervix and tug them lightly—at all times—in an outward direction (FIGURE 2).


FIGURE 2 Clamping of the cervix
Clamp the anterior and posterior lips of the cervix and tug them lightly and steadily in an outward direction.

3. Retract and release the bladder several times using a right-angle retractor for more accurate identification of the cervico-vesical fold (FIGURE 3 and FIGURE 4). Note the distance from the external os to the cervico-vesical fold; it should be 2 cm or farther. (If it is less than 2 cm, another type of cerclage may be preferable.)


FIGURE 3 Anatomic landmarks
Cerclage is facilitated by orientation to the following landmarks; A. cervico-vesical fold; B. posterior fornix; C. cervical stroma; D. cervical mucosa.

FIGURE 4 Cervico-vesical fold
The black line indicates the location of the fold.

4. Identify the roof of the posterior fornix (FIGURE 3 and FIGURE 5).


FIGURE 5 Roof of the posterior fornix
This landmark is delineated in black.

5. Using Allis clamps bilaterally, clamp the soft tissue covering the cervical core (stroma), between the cervico-vesical junction anteriorly and the superior point of the posterior fornix posteriorly. This is a cardinal step because it separates the core from the mucosal/ submucosal elements (FIGURE 6). (Helpful hint: To achieve optimal placement of the lateral Allis clamps, place the open clamp ever so slightly to one side of the middle of the cervix. As you close the instrument, let the clamp slide off the cervical core until it is locked adjacent to it. This takes the soft tissue and supporting blood vessels out of the operative field.)


FIGURE 6 Anterolateral view
The pericervical mucosa (black arrow) after application of an Allis clamp.

6. Take three bites, 1 mm in depth, through the cervical core using a 5-mm Mersilene tape and a blunt-tipped needle (RS21; Ethicon). One bite should encompass 12:30 to 11:30 anteriorly. Another bite should go in at 3 o’clock and out at 5 o’clock, and another bite should go in at 9 o’clock and out at 7 o’clock (FIGURE 1). (Helpful hint: Ensure that the direction of the pull always is a direct extension of the passage through tissue in small steps and not an outward direction toward the operator. An instrument such as a curved Mayo clamp should be placed at the point of the needle’s exit to reduce the risk of injury. At the conclusion of the three bites, the Mersilene tape should be the same length on each side, exiting at 5 o’clock and 7 o’clock, as stated earlier [FIGURE 7].)


FIGURE 7 Ensure equal distribution of the tape
After taking three bites of tissue, ensure that the ends of the Mersilene tape are of equal length on each side.

7. Once the tape is of equal length on both sides, closely encircling three sides of the cervical core, empty the bladder with a catheter to ensure the presence of clear urine. Bloody urine could be an indication for cystoscopy to rule out bladder injury.

8. Cut the needles off of the tape and tie the cerclage in three ties, the first one being a surgical tie. After tying the first tie, ensure proper tension by pressing gently with the index finger up and down on the knot; if it is properly tensioned, it will not be displaced by this movement. (Helpful hint: There is no clear indication of how tight a cerclage should be tied. We suggest making the first tie as close as possible to the cervical core to create a visible, and palpable, depression in the soft tissue at the area of the knot [FIGURE 8]).


 

 

FIGURE 8 Tying the cerclage
Make the first tie as close as possible to the cervical core so that it creates a visible, and palpable, depression in the soft tissue at the area of the knot. Inset: Cerclage tie secured by a figure of 8.

9. Trim the ends of the tape to 3 cm to facilitate easy identification and manipulation at the time of removal. Place a figure of 8, using bright blue Prolene #1 (Ethicon), around the knot, securing it to the posterior surface of the cervical core (FIGURE 9). The tape should encircle the firm part of the cervix near the internal os, as shown by transvaginal ultrasonography in FIGURE 10. (Helpful hint: Place surgical gauze under pressure around the cervix to support hemostasis after removal of the clamps. Remove the gauze approximately 30 minutes after the procedure.)


FIGURE 9 Mark the cerclage
Place a figure of 8, using bright blue Prolene #1, around the knot of the cerclage, securing it to the posterior surface of the cervical core.


FIGURE 10 Final placement
The cerclage tape should encircle the firm part of the cervix near the internal os, as shown by transvaginal ultrasonography.

Technique is applicable to most cerclage procedures

One potential limitation of this technique is the fact that it is based on surgical experience in a single center, although it includes more than 2,000 operations performed at that center. Therefore, we lack data on the ease of teaching and reproducing this technique. Nevertheless, our approach incorporates various elements that previously were proposed to enhance the effectiveness of cerclage. It likely will be applicable to most cerclage procedures, with the exception of a few unique cases. These unique cases—most of them involving the failure of conventional cerclage—may require more elaborate technique.

As for data on the location of biomechanical stresses on cervical tissue during pregnancy, the literature indicates that the forces of maximum deformation begin internally at the level of the cervico-uterine junction.12 If not successfully resisted, these forces will proceed down along the cervical canal and could lead to premature pregnancy loss.

Although the superiority of a high cerclage has not yet been proven clinically, it appears to be more effective than low placement because it is more likely to provide support at the right location.

As pregnancy progresses, the challenge to the cervix increases—not only because of increasing uterine volume but also because of greater uterine activity. Both raise the risk of cerclage slippage and displacement.15 To address these issues, several investigators proposed an approach that excludes the slippery mucosal layer.1,13,14

The original Shirodkar cerclage and its modifications—but not the McDonald cerclage and its subsequent modifications—included an “anchor” suture attaching the cerclage band to the firm cervical stromal layer as a means to prevent downward slippage and displacement.1 It remains to be seen whether this addition of a figure of 8 using nonabsorbable suture, as proposed here, is indeed effective.

We believe that, if a standardized way to perform effective cerclage can be agreed upon, we also might devise a better way to compare results based on proper patient selection.

We want to hear from you! Tell us what you think.

References

1. Shirodkar VN. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic. 1955;52:299.-

2. McDonald IA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1957;64(3):346-350.

3. Rust OA, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, Benham BN, Balducci J. A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(4):830-835.

4. Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, Bekedam DJ, van Geijn HP. Final Results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(5):1106-1112.

5. To MS, Alfirevic Z, Heath VC, et al. Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;363(9424):1849-1853.

6. Berghella V, Odibo AO, Tolosa JE. Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(4):1311-1317.

7. Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(4):375.e1-8.

8. Zilianti M, Azuaga A, Calderon F, Pagés G, Mendoza G. Monitoring the effacement of the uterine cervix by transperineal sonography: a new perspective. J Ultrasound Med. 1995;14(10):719-724.

9. Herron MA, Parer JT. Transabdominal cerclage for fetal wastage due to cervical incompetence. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;71(6 Pt 1):865-868.

10. Katz M, Abrahams C. Transvaginal placement of cervicoisthmic cerclage: Report on pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(6):1989-1992.

11. Ferenczy A. Ultrastructure of the uterine cervix. In: Huszar G ed. The Physiology and Biochemistry of the Uterus in Pregnancy and Labor. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2000: 239–260.

12. Heaps RH, House M, Socrate S, Leppert P, Strauss JF, III. Matrix biology and preterm birth. In: Petraglia F Strauss JF III, Gabbe SG, Weiss G, eds. Preterm Birth: Mechanisms, Mediators, Prediction, Prevention, and Interventions. United Kingdom: Informa; 2007:71–93.

13. Fahmy K. A closed submucous cervical suture for the incompetent cervix. Int Surg. 1978;63(2):77-80.

14. Caspi E, Schneider DF, Mor Z, Langer R, Weinraub Z, Bukovsky I. Cervical internal os cerclage: description of a new technique and comparison with Shirodkar operation. Am J Perinatol. 1990;7(4):347-349.

15. Harger JH. Cerclage and cervical insufficiency: an evidence-based analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:1313-1327.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Katz explains why high placement of the cerclage is a key to success

Katrin Karl, MD
Dr. Karl practices in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Ludwig Maximilians University in Munich, Germany.

Michael Katz, MD
Dr. Katz is Chief of Obstetrics in the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, at California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco, California.

The authors report no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Issue
OBG Management - 24(06)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
30-37
Legacy Keywords
Katrin Karl MD;Michael Katz MD;cervical cerclage;cerclage;cervix;cervico-vesical fold;incompetent cervix;premature pregnancy loss;high cervico-isthmic cerclage;cervical stroma;Shirodkar;McDonald cerclage;cerclage tape;placement of knot;bladder;vaginal fornix;blue Prolene #1;Ethicon;weighted speculum;external os;blunt-tipped needle;hemostasis;transvaginal ultrasonography;biomechanical stresses;figure of 8 knot;catheter;cystoscopy;curved Mayo clamp;surgical techniques;epithelium;collagen layer;
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Katz explains why high placement of the cerclage is a key to success

Katrin Karl, MD
Dr. Karl practices in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Ludwig Maximilians University in Munich, Germany.

Michael Katz, MD
Dr. Katz is Chief of Obstetrics in the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, at California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco, California.

The authors report no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Katz explains why high placement of the cerclage is a key to success

Katrin Karl, MD
Dr. Karl practices in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Ludwig Maximilians University in Munich, Germany.

Michael Katz, MD
Dr. Katz is Chief of Obstetrics in the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, at California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco, California.

The authors report no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Article PDF
Article PDF

RELATED ARTICLES

Does vaginal progesterone reduce preterm delivery among asymptomatic women who have a short cervix in the midtrimester?
John T. Repke, MD (Examining the Evidence, April 2012)

Update on obstetrics
John T. Repke, MD, and Jaimey M. Pauli, MD (January 2012)

Placement of a suture around an incompetent cervix to prevent premature pregnancy loss was first described more than 50 years ago1,2—but the few randomized studies that have been published (all of them in the past decade) devote very little attention to technique.3-7

Are we to assume, then, that over more than 50 years, no modifications to technique have been devised?

Are we to assume as well that in the two largest randomized studies to date, which involved 266 cerclages inserted in 27 different medical centers over more than 4 years,5,7 all cerclages were inserted in an identical manner using the same technique originated more than half a century ago?

In this article, we lay out five principles to achieve effective cerclage and describe a stepwise approach to technique. This technique is based on our experience with approximately 2,000 cerclages performed in a single medical center. We emphasize anatomic landmarks and surgical principles that are based on the published literature as well as our personal experience.

Five principles of effective cerclage

Place the cerclage as high as possible

In the original paper on cerclage, McDonald emphasized the need to place the suture as high as possible to be as close as possible to the level of the internal cervical os.2

Zilianti and colleagues elegantly described how—in the absence of cerclage—cervical tissue begins to change at the level of the internal os, forming a funnel that advances downward in the shape of the letters “Y,” “V,” and “U.”8 If we accept this notion, then the only way to prevent further shortening from the top down is by placing a high cerclage.

Studies have demonstrated improved pregnancy outcomes after placement of a high cervico-isthmic cerclage following failure of a “conventional” low cerclage.9,10

Place the cerclage adjacent to the cervical stroma

Macroscopic and microscopic visualization of the cervix reveals the following main layers:

  • epithelium/mucosa, which covers the deeper connective tissue known as cervical stroma
  • cervical stroma, which may be divided into two zones: 1) a superficial, subepithelial zone that appears histologically as loose stromal bands and 2) a deeper, dense collagen layer.

It is the dense collagen layer of the cervical stroma that affords most of the resistance to forces of deformation, whereas the loose stromal layer and the epithelium above it slide easily over the deeper stroma. Including too great a proportion of these “slippery” components within the cerclage could increase the risk of displacement and failure.11,12

Shirodkar was the first to suggest that the mucosa and submucosa be excluded from cerclage,1 and a detailed submucosal cerclage insertion was described by Fahmy more than 30 years ago.13 We support his recommendation that cerclage placement be as close to the inner cervical stroma as possible and that it include as little as possible of the surrounding tissue.

Take three encircling cervical “bites”

In his original publication, McDonald described “five or six bites with the needle” to encircle the cervix.2 Later authors usually described four encircling steps, but no reliable study has challenged the original dogma.

Although we lack science to favor one approach over another, common sense suggests that three bites (versus four or five) offer the following advantages. They:

  • produce less penetrating injury
  • require less manipulation of the cervix
  • are simpler and quicker to perform
  • offer less opportunity for the cerclage tape to get twisted (a flat tape provides for better distribution of the load)
  • permit a small gap between the two final exit points of the tape (at 5 o’clock and 7 o’clock), which allows for easier cinching and tightening of the cerclage (FIGURE 1).


FIGURE 1 A small gap between the ends of the cerclage tape, which exit at 5 o’clock and 7 o’clock, allows for easier cinching and tightening.

Place the knot at 6 o’clock

Both Shirodkar1 and McDonald2 described placement of the knot (or approximation of the “ends”) at 12 o’clock, anteriorly. However, this approach can complicate removal if strong pressure is applied to the cerclage or if it is covered by tissue. Attempts to remove the cerclage can result in bladder injury.

For these reasons, we prefer the approach described by Caspi and colleagues, who placed the knot in the back of the cervix at 6 o’clock.14 In that location, the surgeon can reach as high as desired, and there is no risk of organ injury during removal.

 

 

That said, it should be noted that removal of a cerclage with a knot at 6 o’clock is more difficult than removal of one with a knot at 12 o’clock—but the convenience of the operator should be secondary to safety and efficacy of the cerclage.

Place a figure of 8 around the cerclage knot

Because of the proximity of the bladder anteriorly, there is a limit to how high one can place the cerclage anteriorly. However, in the back of the cervix, one can place the cerclage much higher without risk of injury. This approach sometimes will result in downward forces on the posterior part (where the knot is) and occasionally may cover the knot with tissue from the posterior vaginal fornix.

For these reasons, we propose securing the knot of the cerclage tape to the posterior surface of the cervical “core” by placing a figure of 8 using bright blue Prolene #1 (Ethicon) to prevent slippage and help call attention to the knot when the time for removal comes.

Stepwise surgical technique

1. Use a weighted speculum to retract the posterior-inferior vaginal wall. Have an assistant hold one or two right-angle retractors to retract the other aspects of the vaginal wall, including the bladder anteriorly, as needed.

2. Clamp the anterior and posterior lips of the cervix and tug them lightly—at all times—in an outward direction (FIGURE 2).


FIGURE 2 Clamping of the cervix
Clamp the anterior and posterior lips of the cervix and tug them lightly and steadily in an outward direction.

3. Retract and release the bladder several times using a right-angle retractor for more accurate identification of the cervico-vesical fold (FIGURE 3 and FIGURE 4). Note the distance from the external os to the cervico-vesical fold; it should be 2 cm or farther. (If it is less than 2 cm, another type of cerclage may be preferable.)


FIGURE 3 Anatomic landmarks
Cerclage is facilitated by orientation to the following landmarks; A. cervico-vesical fold; B. posterior fornix; C. cervical stroma; D. cervical mucosa.

FIGURE 4 Cervico-vesical fold
The black line indicates the location of the fold.

4. Identify the roof of the posterior fornix (FIGURE 3 and FIGURE 5).


FIGURE 5 Roof of the posterior fornix
This landmark is delineated in black.

5. Using Allis clamps bilaterally, clamp the soft tissue covering the cervical core (stroma), between the cervico-vesical junction anteriorly and the superior point of the posterior fornix posteriorly. This is a cardinal step because it separates the core from the mucosal/ submucosal elements (FIGURE 6). (Helpful hint: To achieve optimal placement of the lateral Allis clamps, place the open clamp ever so slightly to one side of the middle of the cervix. As you close the instrument, let the clamp slide off the cervical core until it is locked adjacent to it. This takes the soft tissue and supporting blood vessels out of the operative field.)


FIGURE 6 Anterolateral view
The pericervical mucosa (black arrow) after application of an Allis clamp.

6. Take three bites, 1 mm in depth, through the cervical core using a 5-mm Mersilene tape and a blunt-tipped needle (RS21; Ethicon). One bite should encompass 12:30 to 11:30 anteriorly. Another bite should go in at 3 o’clock and out at 5 o’clock, and another bite should go in at 9 o’clock and out at 7 o’clock (FIGURE 1). (Helpful hint: Ensure that the direction of the pull always is a direct extension of the passage through tissue in small steps and not an outward direction toward the operator. An instrument such as a curved Mayo clamp should be placed at the point of the needle’s exit to reduce the risk of injury. At the conclusion of the three bites, the Mersilene tape should be the same length on each side, exiting at 5 o’clock and 7 o’clock, as stated earlier [FIGURE 7].)


FIGURE 7 Ensure equal distribution of the tape
After taking three bites of tissue, ensure that the ends of the Mersilene tape are of equal length on each side.

7. Once the tape is of equal length on both sides, closely encircling three sides of the cervical core, empty the bladder with a catheter to ensure the presence of clear urine. Bloody urine could be an indication for cystoscopy to rule out bladder injury.

8. Cut the needles off of the tape and tie the cerclage in three ties, the first one being a surgical tie. After tying the first tie, ensure proper tension by pressing gently with the index finger up and down on the knot; if it is properly tensioned, it will not be displaced by this movement. (Helpful hint: There is no clear indication of how tight a cerclage should be tied. We suggest making the first tie as close as possible to the cervical core to create a visible, and palpable, depression in the soft tissue at the area of the knot [FIGURE 8]).


 

 

FIGURE 8 Tying the cerclage
Make the first tie as close as possible to the cervical core so that it creates a visible, and palpable, depression in the soft tissue at the area of the knot. Inset: Cerclage tie secured by a figure of 8.

9. Trim the ends of the tape to 3 cm to facilitate easy identification and manipulation at the time of removal. Place a figure of 8, using bright blue Prolene #1 (Ethicon), around the knot, securing it to the posterior surface of the cervical core (FIGURE 9). The tape should encircle the firm part of the cervix near the internal os, as shown by transvaginal ultrasonography in FIGURE 10. (Helpful hint: Place surgical gauze under pressure around the cervix to support hemostasis after removal of the clamps. Remove the gauze approximately 30 minutes after the procedure.)


FIGURE 9 Mark the cerclage
Place a figure of 8, using bright blue Prolene #1, around the knot of the cerclage, securing it to the posterior surface of the cervical core.


FIGURE 10 Final placement
The cerclage tape should encircle the firm part of the cervix near the internal os, as shown by transvaginal ultrasonography.

Technique is applicable to most cerclage procedures

One potential limitation of this technique is the fact that it is based on surgical experience in a single center, although it includes more than 2,000 operations performed at that center. Therefore, we lack data on the ease of teaching and reproducing this technique. Nevertheless, our approach incorporates various elements that previously were proposed to enhance the effectiveness of cerclage. It likely will be applicable to most cerclage procedures, with the exception of a few unique cases. These unique cases—most of them involving the failure of conventional cerclage—may require more elaborate technique.

As for data on the location of biomechanical stresses on cervical tissue during pregnancy, the literature indicates that the forces of maximum deformation begin internally at the level of the cervico-uterine junction.12 If not successfully resisted, these forces will proceed down along the cervical canal and could lead to premature pregnancy loss.

Although the superiority of a high cerclage has not yet been proven clinically, it appears to be more effective than low placement because it is more likely to provide support at the right location.

As pregnancy progresses, the challenge to the cervix increases—not only because of increasing uterine volume but also because of greater uterine activity. Both raise the risk of cerclage slippage and displacement.15 To address these issues, several investigators proposed an approach that excludes the slippery mucosal layer.1,13,14

The original Shirodkar cerclage and its modifications—but not the McDonald cerclage and its subsequent modifications—included an “anchor” suture attaching the cerclage band to the firm cervical stromal layer as a means to prevent downward slippage and displacement.1 It remains to be seen whether this addition of a figure of 8 using nonabsorbable suture, as proposed here, is indeed effective.

We believe that, if a standardized way to perform effective cerclage can be agreed upon, we also might devise a better way to compare results based on proper patient selection.

We want to hear from you! Tell us what you think.

RELATED ARTICLES

Does vaginal progesterone reduce preterm delivery among asymptomatic women who have a short cervix in the midtrimester?
John T. Repke, MD (Examining the Evidence, April 2012)

Update on obstetrics
John T. Repke, MD, and Jaimey M. Pauli, MD (January 2012)

Placement of a suture around an incompetent cervix to prevent premature pregnancy loss was first described more than 50 years ago1,2—but the few randomized studies that have been published (all of them in the past decade) devote very little attention to technique.3-7

Are we to assume, then, that over more than 50 years, no modifications to technique have been devised?

Are we to assume as well that in the two largest randomized studies to date, which involved 266 cerclages inserted in 27 different medical centers over more than 4 years,5,7 all cerclages were inserted in an identical manner using the same technique originated more than half a century ago?

In this article, we lay out five principles to achieve effective cerclage and describe a stepwise approach to technique. This technique is based on our experience with approximately 2,000 cerclages performed in a single medical center. We emphasize anatomic landmarks and surgical principles that are based on the published literature as well as our personal experience.

Five principles of effective cerclage

Place the cerclage as high as possible

In the original paper on cerclage, McDonald emphasized the need to place the suture as high as possible to be as close as possible to the level of the internal cervical os.2

Zilianti and colleagues elegantly described how—in the absence of cerclage—cervical tissue begins to change at the level of the internal os, forming a funnel that advances downward in the shape of the letters “Y,” “V,” and “U.”8 If we accept this notion, then the only way to prevent further shortening from the top down is by placing a high cerclage.

Studies have demonstrated improved pregnancy outcomes after placement of a high cervico-isthmic cerclage following failure of a “conventional” low cerclage.9,10

Place the cerclage adjacent to the cervical stroma

Macroscopic and microscopic visualization of the cervix reveals the following main layers:

  • epithelium/mucosa, which covers the deeper connective tissue known as cervical stroma
  • cervical stroma, which may be divided into two zones: 1) a superficial, subepithelial zone that appears histologically as loose stromal bands and 2) a deeper, dense collagen layer.

It is the dense collagen layer of the cervical stroma that affords most of the resistance to forces of deformation, whereas the loose stromal layer and the epithelium above it slide easily over the deeper stroma. Including too great a proportion of these “slippery” components within the cerclage could increase the risk of displacement and failure.11,12

Shirodkar was the first to suggest that the mucosa and submucosa be excluded from cerclage,1 and a detailed submucosal cerclage insertion was described by Fahmy more than 30 years ago.13 We support his recommendation that cerclage placement be as close to the inner cervical stroma as possible and that it include as little as possible of the surrounding tissue.

Take three encircling cervical “bites”

In his original publication, McDonald described “five or six bites with the needle” to encircle the cervix.2 Later authors usually described four encircling steps, but no reliable study has challenged the original dogma.

Although we lack science to favor one approach over another, common sense suggests that three bites (versus four or five) offer the following advantages. They:

  • produce less penetrating injury
  • require less manipulation of the cervix
  • are simpler and quicker to perform
  • offer less opportunity for the cerclage tape to get twisted (a flat tape provides for better distribution of the load)
  • permit a small gap between the two final exit points of the tape (at 5 o’clock and 7 o’clock), which allows for easier cinching and tightening of the cerclage (FIGURE 1).


FIGURE 1 A small gap between the ends of the cerclage tape, which exit at 5 o’clock and 7 o’clock, allows for easier cinching and tightening.

Place the knot at 6 o’clock

Both Shirodkar1 and McDonald2 described placement of the knot (or approximation of the “ends”) at 12 o’clock, anteriorly. However, this approach can complicate removal if strong pressure is applied to the cerclage or if it is covered by tissue. Attempts to remove the cerclage can result in bladder injury.

For these reasons, we prefer the approach described by Caspi and colleagues, who placed the knot in the back of the cervix at 6 o’clock.14 In that location, the surgeon can reach as high as desired, and there is no risk of organ injury during removal.

 

 

That said, it should be noted that removal of a cerclage with a knot at 6 o’clock is more difficult than removal of one with a knot at 12 o’clock—but the convenience of the operator should be secondary to safety and efficacy of the cerclage.

Place a figure of 8 around the cerclage knot

Because of the proximity of the bladder anteriorly, there is a limit to how high one can place the cerclage anteriorly. However, in the back of the cervix, one can place the cerclage much higher without risk of injury. This approach sometimes will result in downward forces on the posterior part (where the knot is) and occasionally may cover the knot with tissue from the posterior vaginal fornix.

For these reasons, we propose securing the knot of the cerclage tape to the posterior surface of the cervical “core” by placing a figure of 8 using bright blue Prolene #1 (Ethicon) to prevent slippage and help call attention to the knot when the time for removal comes.

Stepwise surgical technique

1. Use a weighted speculum to retract the posterior-inferior vaginal wall. Have an assistant hold one or two right-angle retractors to retract the other aspects of the vaginal wall, including the bladder anteriorly, as needed.

2. Clamp the anterior and posterior lips of the cervix and tug them lightly—at all times—in an outward direction (FIGURE 2).


FIGURE 2 Clamping of the cervix
Clamp the anterior and posterior lips of the cervix and tug them lightly and steadily in an outward direction.

3. Retract and release the bladder several times using a right-angle retractor for more accurate identification of the cervico-vesical fold (FIGURE 3 and FIGURE 4). Note the distance from the external os to the cervico-vesical fold; it should be 2 cm or farther. (If it is less than 2 cm, another type of cerclage may be preferable.)


FIGURE 3 Anatomic landmarks
Cerclage is facilitated by orientation to the following landmarks; A. cervico-vesical fold; B. posterior fornix; C. cervical stroma; D. cervical mucosa.

FIGURE 4 Cervico-vesical fold
The black line indicates the location of the fold.

4. Identify the roof of the posterior fornix (FIGURE 3 and FIGURE 5).


FIGURE 5 Roof of the posterior fornix
This landmark is delineated in black.

5. Using Allis clamps bilaterally, clamp the soft tissue covering the cervical core (stroma), between the cervico-vesical junction anteriorly and the superior point of the posterior fornix posteriorly. This is a cardinal step because it separates the core from the mucosal/ submucosal elements (FIGURE 6). (Helpful hint: To achieve optimal placement of the lateral Allis clamps, place the open clamp ever so slightly to one side of the middle of the cervix. As you close the instrument, let the clamp slide off the cervical core until it is locked adjacent to it. This takes the soft tissue and supporting blood vessels out of the operative field.)


FIGURE 6 Anterolateral view
The pericervical mucosa (black arrow) after application of an Allis clamp.

6. Take three bites, 1 mm in depth, through the cervical core using a 5-mm Mersilene tape and a blunt-tipped needle (RS21; Ethicon). One bite should encompass 12:30 to 11:30 anteriorly. Another bite should go in at 3 o’clock and out at 5 o’clock, and another bite should go in at 9 o’clock and out at 7 o’clock (FIGURE 1). (Helpful hint: Ensure that the direction of the pull always is a direct extension of the passage through tissue in small steps and not an outward direction toward the operator. An instrument such as a curved Mayo clamp should be placed at the point of the needle’s exit to reduce the risk of injury. At the conclusion of the three bites, the Mersilene tape should be the same length on each side, exiting at 5 o’clock and 7 o’clock, as stated earlier [FIGURE 7].)


FIGURE 7 Ensure equal distribution of the tape
After taking three bites of tissue, ensure that the ends of the Mersilene tape are of equal length on each side.

7. Once the tape is of equal length on both sides, closely encircling three sides of the cervical core, empty the bladder with a catheter to ensure the presence of clear urine. Bloody urine could be an indication for cystoscopy to rule out bladder injury.

8. Cut the needles off of the tape and tie the cerclage in three ties, the first one being a surgical tie. After tying the first tie, ensure proper tension by pressing gently with the index finger up and down on the knot; if it is properly tensioned, it will not be displaced by this movement. (Helpful hint: There is no clear indication of how tight a cerclage should be tied. We suggest making the first tie as close as possible to the cervical core to create a visible, and palpable, depression in the soft tissue at the area of the knot [FIGURE 8]).


 

 

FIGURE 8 Tying the cerclage
Make the first tie as close as possible to the cervical core so that it creates a visible, and palpable, depression in the soft tissue at the area of the knot. Inset: Cerclage tie secured by a figure of 8.

9. Trim the ends of the tape to 3 cm to facilitate easy identification and manipulation at the time of removal. Place a figure of 8, using bright blue Prolene #1 (Ethicon), around the knot, securing it to the posterior surface of the cervical core (FIGURE 9). The tape should encircle the firm part of the cervix near the internal os, as shown by transvaginal ultrasonography in FIGURE 10. (Helpful hint: Place surgical gauze under pressure around the cervix to support hemostasis after removal of the clamps. Remove the gauze approximately 30 minutes after the procedure.)


FIGURE 9 Mark the cerclage
Place a figure of 8, using bright blue Prolene #1, around the knot of the cerclage, securing it to the posterior surface of the cervical core.


FIGURE 10 Final placement
The cerclage tape should encircle the firm part of the cervix near the internal os, as shown by transvaginal ultrasonography.

Technique is applicable to most cerclage procedures

One potential limitation of this technique is the fact that it is based on surgical experience in a single center, although it includes more than 2,000 operations performed at that center. Therefore, we lack data on the ease of teaching and reproducing this technique. Nevertheless, our approach incorporates various elements that previously were proposed to enhance the effectiveness of cerclage. It likely will be applicable to most cerclage procedures, with the exception of a few unique cases. These unique cases—most of them involving the failure of conventional cerclage—may require more elaborate technique.

As for data on the location of biomechanical stresses on cervical tissue during pregnancy, the literature indicates that the forces of maximum deformation begin internally at the level of the cervico-uterine junction.12 If not successfully resisted, these forces will proceed down along the cervical canal and could lead to premature pregnancy loss.

Although the superiority of a high cerclage has not yet been proven clinically, it appears to be more effective than low placement because it is more likely to provide support at the right location.

As pregnancy progresses, the challenge to the cervix increases—not only because of increasing uterine volume but also because of greater uterine activity. Both raise the risk of cerclage slippage and displacement.15 To address these issues, several investigators proposed an approach that excludes the slippery mucosal layer.1,13,14

The original Shirodkar cerclage and its modifications—but not the McDonald cerclage and its subsequent modifications—included an “anchor” suture attaching the cerclage band to the firm cervical stromal layer as a means to prevent downward slippage and displacement.1 It remains to be seen whether this addition of a figure of 8 using nonabsorbable suture, as proposed here, is indeed effective.

We believe that, if a standardized way to perform effective cerclage can be agreed upon, we also might devise a better way to compare results based on proper patient selection.

We want to hear from you! Tell us what you think.

References

1. Shirodkar VN. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic. 1955;52:299.-

2. McDonald IA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1957;64(3):346-350.

3. Rust OA, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, Benham BN, Balducci J. A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(4):830-835.

4. Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, Bekedam DJ, van Geijn HP. Final Results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(5):1106-1112.

5. To MS, Alfirevic Z, Heath VC, et al. Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;363(9424):1849-1853.

6. Berghella V, Odibo AO, Tolosa JE. Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(4):1311-1317.

7. Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(4):375.e1-8.

8. Zilianti M, Azuaga A, Calderon F, Pagés G, Mendoza G. Monitoring the effacement of the uterine cervix by transperineal sonography: a new perspective. J Ultrasound Med. 1995;14(10):719-724.

9. Herron MA, Parer JT. Transabdominal cerclage for fetal wastage due to cervical incompetence. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;71(6 Pt 1):865-868.

10. Katz M, Abrahams C. Transvaginal placement of cervicoisthmic cerclage: Report on pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(6):1989-1992.

11. Ferenczy A. Ultrastructure of the uterine cervix. In: Huszar G ed. The Physiology and Biochemistry of the Uterus in Pregnancy and Labor. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2000: 239–260.

12. Heaps RH, House M, Socrate S, Leppert P, Strauss JF, III. Matrix biology and preterm birth. In: Petraglia F Strauss JF III, Gabbe SG, Weiss G, eds. Preterm Birth: Mechanisms, Mediators, Prediction, Prevention, and Interventions. United Kingdom: Informa; 2007:71–93.

13. Fahmy K. A closed submucous cervical suture for the incompetent cervix. Int Surg. 1978;63(2):77-80.

14. Caspi E, Schneider DF, Mor Z, Langer R, Weinraub Z, Bukovsky I. Cervical internal os cerclage: description of a new technique and comparison with Shirodkar operation. Am J Perinatol. 1990;7(4):347-349.

15. Harger JH. Cerclage and cervical insufficiency: an evidence-based analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:1313-1327.

References

1. Shirodkar VN. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic. 1955;52:299.-

2. McDonald IA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1957;64(3):346-350.

3. Rust OA, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, Benham BN, Balducci J. A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(4):830-835.

4. Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, Bekedam DJ, van Geijn HP. Final Results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(5):1106-1112.

5. To MS, Alfirevic Z, Heath VC, et al. Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;363(9424):1849-1853.

6. Berghella V, Odibo AO, Tolosa JE. Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(4):1311-1317.

7. Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(4):375.e1-8.

8. Zilianti M, Azuaga A, Calderon F, Pagés G, Mendoza G. Monitoring the effacement of the uterine cervix by transperineal sonography: a new perspective. J Ultrasound Med. 1995;14(10):719-724.

9. Herron MA, Parer JT. Transabdominal cerclage for fetal wastage due to cervical incompetence. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;71(6 Pt 1):865-868.

10. Katz M, Abrahams C. Transvaginal placement of cervicoisthmic cerclage: Report on pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(6):1989-1992.

11. Ferenczy A. Ultrastructure of the uterine cervix. In: Huszar G ed. The Physiology and Biochemistry of the Uterus in Pregnancy and Labor. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2000: 239–260.

12. Heaps RH, House M, Socrate S, Leppert P, Strauss JF, III. Matrix biology and preterm birth. In: Petraglia F Strauss JF III, Gabbe SG, Weiss G, eds. Preterm Birth: Mechanisms, Mediators, Prediction, Prevention, and Interventions. United Kingdom: Informa; 2007:71–93.

13. Fahmy K. A closed submucous cervical suture for the incompetent cervix. Int Surg. 1978;63(2):77-80.

14. Caspi E, Schneider DF, Mor Z, Langer R, Weinraub Z, Bukovsky I. Cervical internal os cerclage: description of a new technique and comparison with Shirodkar operation. Am J Perinatol. 1990;7(4):347-349.

15. Harger JH. Cerclage and cervical insufficiency: an evidence-based analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:1313-1327.

Issue
OBG Management - 24(06)
Issue
OBG Management - 24(06)
Page Number
30-37
Page Number
30-37
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
A stepwise approach to cervical cerclage
Display Headline
A stepwise approach to cervical cerclage
Legacy Keywords
Katrin Karl MD;Michael Katz MD;cervical cerclage;cerclage;cervix;cervico-vesical fold;incompetent cervix;premature pregnancy loss;high cervico-isthmic cerclage;cervical stroma;Shirodkar;McDonald cerclage;cerclage tape;placement of knot;bladder;vaginal fornix;blue Prolene #1;Ethicon;weighted speculum;external os;blunt-tipped needle;hemostasis;transvaginal ultrasonography;biomechanical stresses;figure of 8 knot;catheter;cystoscopy;curved Mayo clamp;surgical techniques;epithelium;collagen layer;
Legacy Keywords
Katrin Karl MD;Michael Katz MD;cervical cerclage;cerclage;cervix;cervico-vesical fold;incompetent cervix;premature pregnancy loss;high cervico-isthmic cerclage;cervical stroma;Shirodkar;McDonald cerclage;cerclage tape;placement of knot;bladder;vaginal fornix;blue Prolene #1;Ethicon;weighted speculum;external os;blunt-tipped needle;hemostasis;transvaginal ultrasonography;biomechanical stresses;figure of 8 knot;catheter;cystoscopy;curved Mayo clamp;surgical techniques;epithelium;collagen layer;
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article
Article PDF Media

In women who have stress incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency, which midurethral sling produces the best long-term results?

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
In women who have stress incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency, which midurethral sling produces the best long-term results?

RELATED ARTICLE WITH VIDEOS

3 video clips illustrating midurethral sling procedures

These videos were selected by Dr. Walters and presented courtesy of the International Academy of Pelvic Surgery (IAPS)

When ISD is present, the urethra cannot coaptate and loses its ability to maintain a watertight seal. Women who have this condition often are severely incontinent, leaking urine at low volumes and pressures and with minimal exertion.

In this randomized trial, Schierlitz and colleagues hypothesized that TOT would produce higher objective and subjective failure rates than the TVT. This was confirmed by 6-month data published in 2008.

Details of the trial

Women who had SUI were included in the trial if they had ISD based on urodynamic findings (i.e., maximum urethral closure pressure ≤20 cm H2O or Valsalva leak-point pressure ≤60 cm H2O, or both) and were randomly assigned to TVT or TOT. The primary endpoint was symptomatic SUI (confirmed by repeat urodynamic testing) that required a second procedure upon patient request.

Participants were followed for 3 years. If a patient reported symptoms, urodynamic testing was repeated. In addition, the patient was offered another surgery, usually involving placement of a TVT sling.

Schierlitz and colleagues concluded that, if TVT were used in all patients, repeat surgery would be avoided in one in every six patients. The risk of repeat surgery was 15 times greater for TOT, compared with the TVT sling. The median time to failure was 15.6 months for the TOT sling, compared with 43.7 months for the TVT.

Of the 16 patients who underwent repeat surgery, 56% were cured, 25% reported minimal leakage, and 19% remained unchanged.

Quality-of-life scores were similar between groups at the 6-month follow-up.

Why did the TVT outperform the TOT in this population?

Investigators theorized that there is a difference in sling axis, with the TVT placed at a more acute angle than the TOT sling. In addition, the location of the TOT sling is more distal than that of the TVT, based on ultrasonographic imaging. As a result, more effective urethral kinking and support are likely with the TVT sling, improving continence rates.

Strengths and limitations of the trial

The randomization of participants and long-term follow-up bolster the trial’s credibility.

Weaknesses include unblinded participation and postoperative surgical assessment.

Although the sample size was underpowered, there was a significant difference in the primary outcome between the two groups.

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE

Long-term success is more likely with placement of a TVT sling in women who have SUI with ISD.

Urodynamic assessment still serves an important role in the diagnosis of ISD, and aids in preoperative planning.

LADIN A. YURTERI-KAPLAN, MD, AND AMY J. PARK, MD

We want to hear from you! Tell us what you think.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

The TVT sling. Among 164 women who had urodynamically confirmed stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD), the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) produced significantly greater long-term cure rates, compared with the transobturator tape (TOT). After 3 years, 15 of 75 women (20%) in the TOT group underwent repeat surgery to correct SUI, compared with one woman of 72 (1.4%) in the TVT group (P<.001).

Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al. Three-year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape in women with stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(2 Part 1):321–327.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Ladin A. Yurteri-Kaplan, MD
Clinical Fellow, Section of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC

Amy J. Park, MD
Assistant Professor, Section of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center and Georgetown University School of Medicine.

Issue
OBG Management - 24(06)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
52-51
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

The TVT sling. Among 164 women who had urodynamically confirmed stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD), the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) produced significantly greater long-term cure rates, compared with the transobturator tape (TOT). After 3 years, 15 of 75 women (20%) in the TOT group underwent repeat surgery to correct SUI, compared with one woman of 72 (1.4%) in the TVT group (P<.001).

Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al. Three-year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape in women with stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(2 Part 1):321–327.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Ladin A. Yurteri-Kaplan, MD
Clinical Fellow, Section of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC

Amy J. Park, MD
Assistant Professor, Section of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center and Georgetown University School of Medicine.

Author and Disclosure Information

The TVT sling. Among 164 women who had urodynamically confirmed stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD), the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) produced significantly greater long-term cure rates, compared with the transobturator tape (TOT). After 3 years, 15 of 75 women (20%) in the TOT group underwent repeat surgery to correct SUI, compared with one woman of 72 (1.4%) in the TVT group (P<.001).

Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al. Three-year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape in women with stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(2 Part 1):321–327.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Ladin A. Yurteri-Kaplan, MD
Clinical Fellow, Section of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC

Amy J. Park, MD
Assistant Professor, Section of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center and Georgetown University School of Medicine.

Article PDF
Article PDF

RELATED ARTICLE WITH VIDEOS

3 video clips illustrating midurethral sling procedures

These videos were selected by Dr. Walters and presented courtesy of the International Academy of Pelvic Surgery (IAPS)

When ISD is present, the urethra cannot coaptate and loses its ability to maintain a watertight seal. Women who have this condition often are severely incontinent, leaking urine at low volumes and pressures and with minimal exertion.

In this randomized trial, Schierlitz and colleagues hypothesized that TOT would produce higher objective and subjective failure rates than the TVT. This was confirmed by 6-month data published in 2008.

Details of the trial

Women who had SUI were included in the trial if they had ISD based on urodynamic findings (i.e., maximum urethral closure pressure ≤20 cm H2O or Valsalva leak-point pressure ≤60 cm H2O, or both) and were randomly assigned to TVT or TOT. The primary endpoint was symptomatic SUI (confirmed by repeat urodynamic testing) that required a second procedure upon patient request.

Participants were followed for 3 years. If a patient reported symptoms, urodynamic testing was repeated. In addition, the patient was offered another surgery, usually involving placement of a TVT sling.

Schierlitz and colleagues concluded that, if TVT were used in all patients, repeat surgery would be avoided in one in every six patients. The risk of repeat surgery was 15 times greater for TOT, compared with the TVT sling. The median time to failure was 15.6 months for the TOT sling, compared with 43.7 months for the TVT.

Of the 16 patients who underwent repeat surgery, 56% were cured, 25% reported minimal leakage, and 19% remained unchanged.

Quality-of-life scores were similar between groups at the 6-month follow-up.

Why did the TVT outperform the TOT in this population?

Investigators theorized that there is a difference in sling axis, with the TVT placed at a more acute angle than the TOT sling. In addition, the location of the TOT sling is more distal than that of the TVT, based on ultrasonographic imaging. As a result, more effective urethral kinking and support are likely with the TVT sling, improving continence rates.

Strengths and limitations of the trial

The randomization of participants and long-term follow-up bolster the trial’s credibility.

Weaknesses include unblinded participation and postoperative surgical assessment.

Although the sample size was underpowered, there was a significant difference in the primary outcome between the two groups.

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE

Long-term success is more likely with placement of a TVT sling in women who have SUI with ISD.

Urodynamic assessment still serves an important role in the diagnosis of ISD, and aids in preoperative planning.

LADIN A. YURTERI-KAPLAN, MD, AND AMY J. PARK, MD

We want to hear from you! Tell us what you think.

RELATED ARTICLE WITH VIDEOS

3 video clips illustrating midurethral sling procedures

These videos were selected by Dr. Walters and presented courtesy of the International Academy of Pelvic Surgery (IAPS)

When ISD is present, the urethra cannot coaptate and loses its ability to maintain a watertight seal. Women who have this condition often are severely incontinent, leaking urine at low volumes and pressures and with minimal exertion.

In this randomized trial, Schierlitz and colleagues hypothesized that TOT would produce higher objective and subjective failure rates than the TVT. This was confirmed by 6-month data published in 2008.

Details of the trial

Women who had SUI were included in the trial if they had ISD based on urodynamic findings (i.e., maximum urethral closure pressure ≤20 cm H2O or Valsalva leak-point pressure ≤60 cm H2O, or both) and were randomly assigned to TVT or TOT. The primary endpoint was symptomatic SUI (confirmed by repeat urodynamic testing) that required a second procedure upon patient request.

Participants were followed for 3 years. If a patient reported symptoms, urodynamic testing was repeated. In addition, the patient was offered another surgery, usually involving placement of a TVT sling.

Schierlitz and colleagues concluded that, if TVT were used in all patients, repeat surgery would be avoided in one in every six patients. The risk of repeat surgery was 15 times greater for TOT, compared with the TVT sling. The median time to failure was 15.6 months for the TOT sling, compared with 43.7 months for the TVT.

Of the 16 patients who underwent repeat surgery, 56% were cured, 25% reported minimal leakage, and 19% remained unchanged.

Quality-of-life scores were similar between groups at the 6-month follow-up.

Why did the TVT outperform the TOT in this population?

Investigators theorized that there is a difference in sling axis, with the TVT placed at a more acute angle than the TOT sling. In addition, the location of the TOT sling is more distal than that of the TVT, based on ultrasonographic imaging. As a result, more effective urethral kinking and support are likely with the TVT sling, improving continence rates.

Strengths and limitations of the trial

The randomization of participants and long-term follow-up bolster the trial’s credibility.

Weaknesses include unblinded participation and postoperative surgical assessment.

Although the sample size was underpowered, there was a significant difference in the primary outcome between the two groups.

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE

Long-term success is more likely with placement of a TVT sling in women who have SUI with ISD.

Urodynamic assessment still serves an important role in the diagnosis of ISD, and aids in preoperative planning.

LADIN A. YURTERI-KAPLAN, MD, AND AMY J. PARK, MD

We want to hear from you! Tell us what you think.

Issue
OBG Management - 24(06)
Issue
OBG Management - 24(06)
Page Number
52-51
Page Number
52-51
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
In women who have stress incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency, which midurethral sling produces the best long-term results?
Display Headline
In women who have stress incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency, which midurethral sling produces the best long-term results?
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media