User login
Researchers characterize new subtype of high-grade DLBCL
(DLBCL)
Patients with this subtype, dubbed “molecular high-grade” (MHG) DLBCL, were more likely to have germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) DLBCL, MYC rearrangements, and double-hit lymphoma.
When compared to other DLBCL patients, those with MHG DLBCL had inferior progression-free and overall survival.
Chulin Sha, PhD, of the University of Leeds (England), and colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The findings were published alongside a related editorial and a similar study from another group.
Dr. Sha and colleagues began their study by applying a previously developed gene expression classifier (Genome Med. 2015 Jul 1;7[1]:64) to 928 DLBCL patients enrolled in the REMoDL-B trial. REMoDL-B was designed to compare rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) to R-CHOP plus bortezomib (Hematol Oncol. 2017;35:130-1).
Dr. Sha and colleagues looked for somatic mutations in 400 REMoDL-B patient samples that were sequenced for a 70-gene panel.
The team also tested 360 samples for MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 chromosomal rearrangements using fluorescent in situ hybridization, and they tested 355 samples for MYC and BCL2 protein expression with immunohistochemistry.
Characteristics of MHG DLBCL
The researchers identified 83 REMoDL-B patients as having MHG DLBCL (9%). Most of the MHG patients had GCB DLBCL (90%), 48.6% had MYC rearrangements, and 36.1% had double-hit lymphoma.
Patients with MHG DLBCL had higher International Prognostic Index scores (P = .004), greater tumor bulk (P = .007), higher disease stage (P = .06), and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels (P less than .001) than patients with non-MHG DLBCL.
Although most MHG patients had GCB DLBCL, the researchers found key differences between patients with MHG DLBCL and non-MHG GCB DLBCL. MHG patients were significantly more likely than patients with non-MHG GCB DLBCL to have mutations in KMT2D, BCL2, MYC, and DDX3X. Additionally, some genes frequently mutated in GCB DLBCL — such as B2M, SGK1, and NFKBIA — were rare in MHG DLBCL.
Dr. Sha and colleagues also compared the MHG patients to 70 patients with Burkitt lymphoma (BL) who had been analyzed in a previous study (Genome Med. 2015 Jul 1;7[1]:64).
The researchers found that BL has more upregulated genes than GCB (2,483 genes) and MHG DLBCL (1,784 genes), and MHG DLBCL has more upregulated genes than GCB DLBCL (382 genes). The team observed a similar pattern with downregulated genes and said this suggests “MHG is an intermediate group but closer to GCB than to BL.”
The researchers also found, however, that “MHG and BL share high expression of signatures that contain cell-cycle genes, ribosome biogenesis, MYC overexpression, and TCF3 targets, which suggests a shared proliferative phenotype.”
The team determined that MHG has “a highly proliferative phenotype and shares features with centroblasts of the germinal center dark zone.”
Another discovery was that MHG patients in the REMoDL-B trial had worse progression-free survival (PFS) than their peers.
Among patients who received R-CHOP, the estimated 3-year PFS was:
- 37% for MHG patients
- 78% for patients with GCB DLBCL
- 64% for patients with activated B-cell like (ABC) DLBCL
- 65% for patients with unclassified DLBCL.
Among patients who received bortezomib plus R-CHOP, there was a trend toward improved PFS for patients with MHG DLBCL (58%; P = .08).
Validation cohort
Dr. Sha and colleagues validated their initial findings using RNA sequencing data from another group of DLBCL patients (Cell. 2017 Oct 5;171[2]:481-94.e15). This data set included 624 patients who received rituximab-based therapy.
Seventy-two patients in this group had MHG DLBCL (11.5%), and most MHG patients had GCB DLBCL (82%).
The researchers said the MHG group in this cohort “showed similar associations with clinical variables” and a “similar mutation spectrum” as the MHG group in the REMoDL-B cohort. Additionally, MHG patients in the validation cohort had inferior overall survival (P less than .001) compared to patients with non-MHG GCB DLBCL.
Dr. Sha and colleagues said the poor prognosis in MHG patients in both cohorts suggests a need for different treatment approaches in this group.
In the related editorial, Wing C. Chan, MD, of City of Hope Medical Center in Duarte, Calif., echoed that sentiment and said it will be important to include patients with high-risk DLBCL in clinical trials.
“Their tumors should be comprehensively characterize[d] for correlative analysis to determine the molecular lesions that underlie their biology and response to treatment,” Dr. Chan wrote.
Dr. Chan disclosed a patent for a diagnostic algorithm on GCB/ABC-type DLBCL and a patent on a diagnostic algorithm for peripheral T-cell lymphoma.
Dr. Sha and colleagues disclosed relationships with a range of pharmaceutical companies. The team’s research was supported by a grant from Bloodwise.
The REMoDL-B trial was endorsed by Cancer Research UK and was funded by Janssen-Cillag.
SOURCES: Sha C et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 20;37(3):202-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01314; Chan WC. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 20;37(3):175-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01910; Ennishi D et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 20;37(3):190-201. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01583
(DLBCL)
Patients with this subtype, dubbed “molecular high-grade” (MHG) DLBCL, were more likely to have germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) DLBCL, MYC rearrangements, and double-hit lymphoma.
When compared to other DLBCL patients, those with MHG DLBCL had inferior progression-free and overall survival.
Chulin Sha, PhD, of the University of Leeds (England), and colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The findings were published alongside a related editorial and a similar study from another group.
Dr. Sha and colleagues began their study by applying a previously developed gene expression classifier (Genome Med. 2015 Jul 1;7[1]:64) to 928 DLBCL patients enrolled in the REMoDL-B trial. REMoDL-B was designed to compare rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) to R-CHOP plus bortezomib (Hematol Oncol. 2017;35:130-1).
Dr. Sha and colleagues looked for somatic mutations in 400 REMoDL-B patient samples that were sequenced for a 70-gene panel.
The team also tested 360 samples for MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 chromosomal rearrangements using fluorescent in situ hybridization, and they tested 355 samples for MYC and BCL2 protein expression with immunohistochemistry.
Characteristics of MHG DLBCL
The researchers identified 83 REMoDL-B patients as having MHG DLBCL (9%). Most of the MHG patients had GCB DLBCL (90%), 48.6% had MYC rearrangements, and 36.1% had double-hit lymphoma.
Patients with MHG DLBCL had higher International Prognostic Index scores (P = .004), greater tumor bulk (P = .007), higher disease stage (P = .06), and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels (P less than .001) than patients with non-MHG DLBCL.
Although most MHG patients had GCB DLBCL, the researchers found key differences between patients with MHG DLBCL and non-MHG GCB DLBCL. MHG patients were significantly more likely than patients with non-MHG GCB DLBCL to have mutations in KMT2D, BCL2, MYC, and DDX3X. Additionally, some genes frequently mutated in GCB DLBCL — such as B2M, SGK1, and NFKBIA — were rare in MHG DLBCL.
Dr. Sha and colleagues also compared the MHG patients to 70 patients with Burkitt lymphoma (BL) who had been analyzed in a previous study (Genome Med. 2015 Jul 1;7[1]:64).
The researchers found that BL has more upregulated genes than GCB (2,483 genes) and MHG DLBCL (1,784 genes), and MHG DLBCL has more upregulated genes than GCB DLBCL (382 genes). The team observed a similar pattern with downregulated genes and said this suggests “MHG is an intermediate group but closer to GCB than to BL.”
The researchers also found, however, that “MHG and BL share high expression of signatures that contain cell-cycle genes, ribosome biogenesis, MYC overexpression, and TCF3 targets, which suggests a shared proliferative phenotype.”
The team determined that MHG has “a highly proliferative phenotype and shares features with centroblasts of the germinal center dark zone.”
Another discovery was that MHG patients in the REMoDL-B trial had worse progression-free survival (PFS) than their peers.
Among patients who received R-CHOP, the estimated 3-year PFS was:
- 37% for MHG patients
- 78% for patients with GCB DLBCL
- 64% for patients with activated B-cell like (ABC) DLBCL
- 65% for patients with unclassified DLBCL.
Among patients who received bortezomib plus R-CHOP, there was a trend toward improved PFS for patients with MHG DLBCL (58%; P = .08).
Validation cohort
Dr. Sha and colleagues validated their initial findings using RNA sequencing data from another group of DLBCL patients (Cell. 2017 Oct 5;171[2]:481-94.e15). This data set included 624 patients who received rituximab-based therapy.
Seventy-two patients in this group had MHG DLBCL (11.5%), and most MHG patients had GCB DLBCL (82%).
The researchers said the MHG group in this cohort “showed similar associations with clinical variables” and a “similar mutation spectrum” as the MHG group in the REMoDL-B cohort. Additionally, MHG patients in the validation cohort had inferior overall survival (P less than .001) compared to patients with non-MHG GCB DLBCL.
Dr. Sha and colleagues said the poor prognosis in MHG patients in both cohorts suggests a need for different treatment approaches in this group.
In the related editorial, Wing C. Chan, MD, of City of Hope Medical Center in Duarte, Calif., echoed that sentiment and said it will be important to include patients with high-risk DLBCL in clinical trials.
“Their tumors should be comprehensively characterize[d] for correlative analysis to determine the molecular lesions that underlie their biology and response to treatment,” Dr. Chan wrote.
Dr. Chan disclosed a patent for a diagnostic algorithm on GCB/ABC-type DLBCL and a patent on a diagnostic algorithm for peripheral T-cell lymphoma.
Dr. Sha and colleagues disclosed relationships with a range of pharmaceutical companies. The team’s research was supported by a grant from Bloodwise.
The REMoDL-B trial was endorsed by Cancer Research UK and was funded by Janssen-Cillag.
SOURCES: Sha C et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 20;37(3):202-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01314; Chan WC. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 20;37(3):175-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01910; Ennishi D et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 20;37(3):190-201. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01583
(DLBCL)
Patients with this subtype, dubbed “molecular high-grade” (MHG) DLBCL, were more likely to have germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) DLBCL, MYC rearrangements, and double-hit lymphoma.
When compared to other DLBCL patients, those with MHG DLBCL had inferior progression-free and overall survival.
Chulin Sha, PhD, of the University of Leeds (England), and colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The findings were published alongside a related editorial and a similar study from another group.
Dr. Sha and colleagues began their study by applying a previously developed gene expression classifier (Genome Med. 2015 Jul 1;7[1]:64) to 928 DLBCL patients enrolled in the REMoDL-B trial. REMoDL-B was designed to compare rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) to R-CHOP plus bortezomib (Hematol Oncol. 2017;35:130-1).
Dr. Sha and colleagues looked for somatic mutations in 400 REMoDL-B patient samples that were sequenced for a 70-gene panel.
The team also tested 360 samples for MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 chromosomal rearrangements using fluorescent in situ hybridization, and they tested 355 samples for MYC and BCL2 protein expression with immunohistochemistry.
Characteristics of MHG DLBCL
The researchers identified 83 REMoDL-B patients as having MHG DLBCL (9%). Most of the MHG patients had GCB DLBCL (90%), 48.6% had MYC rearrangements, and 36.1% had double-hit lymphoma.
Patients with MHG DLBCL had higher International Prognostic Index scores (P = .004), greater tumor bulk (P = .007), higher disease stage (P = .06), and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels (P less than .001) than patients with non-MHG DLBCL.
Although most MHG patients had GCB DLBCL, the researchers found key differences between patients with MHG DLBCL and non-MHG GCB DLBCL. MHG patients were significantly more likely than patients with non-MHG GCB DLBCL to have mutations in KMT2D, BCL2, MYC, and DDX3X. Additionally, some genes frequently mutated in GCB DLBCL — such as B2M, SGK1, and NFKBIA — were rare in MHG DLBCL.
Dr. Sha and colleagues also compared the MHG patients to 70 patients with Burkitt lymphoma (BL) who had been analyzed in a previous study (Genome Med. 2015 Jul 1;7[1]:64).
The researchers found that BL has more upregulated genes than GCB (2,483 genes) and MHG DLBCL (1,784 genes), and MHG DLBCL has more upregulated genes than GCB DLBCL (382 genes). The team observed a similar pattern with downregulated genes and said this suggests “MHG is an intermediate group but closer to GCB than to BL.”
The researchers also found, however, that “MHG and BL share high expression of signatures that contain cell-cycle genes, ribosome biogenesis, MYC overexpression, and TCF3 targets, which suggests a shared proliferative phenotype.”
The team determined that MHG has “a highly proliferative phenotype and shares features with centroblasts of the germinal center dark zone.”
Another discovery was that MHG patients in the REMoDL-B trial had worse progression-free survival (PFS) than their peers.
Among patients who received R-CHOP, the estimated 3-year PFS was:
- 37% for MHG patients
- 78% for patients with GCB DLBCL
- 64% for patients with activated B-cell like (ABC) DLBCL
- 65% for patients with unclassified DLBCL.
Among patients who received bortezomib plus R-CHOP, there was a trend toward improved PFS for patients with MHG DLBCL (58%; P = .08).
Validation cohort
Dr. Sha and colleagues validated their initial findings using RNA sequencing data from another group of DLBCL patients (Cell. 2017 Oct 5;171[2]:481-94.e15). This data set included 624 patients who received rituximab-based therapy.
Seventy-two patients in this group had MHG DLBCL (11.5%), and most MHG patients had GCB DLBCL (82%).
The researchers said the MHG group in this cohort “showed similar associations with clinical variables” and a “similar mutation spectrum” as the MHG group in the REMoDL-B cohort. Additionally, MHG patients in the validation cohort had inferior overall survival (P less than .001) compared to patients with non-MHG GCB DLBCL.
Dr. Sha and colleagues said the poor prognosis in MHG patients in both cohorts suggests a need for different treatment approaches in this group.
In the related editorial, Wing C. Chan, MD, of City of Hope Medical Center in Duarte, Calif., echoed that sentiment and said it will be important to include patients with high-risk DLBCL in clinical trials.
“Their tumors should be comprehensively characterize[d] for correlative analysis to determine the molecular lesions that underlie their biology and response to treatment,” Dr. Chan wrote.
Dr. Chan disclosed a patent for a diagnostic algorithm on GCB/ABC-type DLBCL and a patent on a diagnostic algorithm for peripheral T-cell lymphoma.
Dr. Sha and colleagues disclosed relationships with a range of pharmaceutical companies. The team’s research was supported by a grant from Bloodwise.
The REMoDL-B trial was endorsed by Cancer Research UK and was funded by Janssen-Cillag.
SOURCES: Sha C et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 20;37(3):202-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01314; Chan WC. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 20;37(3):175-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01910; Ennishi D et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 20;37(3):190-201. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01583
FROM THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
CAR T-cell therapies difficult to compare
One chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy may appear better than another, but confounding factors make it difficult to compare these therapies effectively, according to a review published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Caron A. Jacobson, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, reviewed results from three trials of CAR T-cell therapies in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL).
She noted that cross-trial comparisons are always limited, but such comparisons of CAR T-cell therapies are hindered by several confounding factors.
Dr. Jacobson said differences in manufacturing procedures and turnaround time, differences in patient eligibility and management, and the complexity of CAR T-cell therapies make it difficult to compare results from three CAR-T trials in B-NHL:
• The ZUMA-1 trial (NCT02348216) of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel, Yescarta)
• The JULIET trial (NCT02445248) of tisagenlecleucel (t-cel, Kymriah)
• The TRANSCEND-NHL-001 trial (NCT02631044) of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel, JCAR017).
Looking at response rates alone, axi-cel appears the most promising. The overall response rate (ORR) was 82% with axi-cel, 75% with liso-cel, and 52% with t-cel.
When considering cytokine release syndrome (CRS), liso-cel appears the safest. The rate of CRS was 93% with axi-cel (13% grade 3 or higher), 58% with t-cel (22% grade 3 or higher), and 39% with liso-cel (1% grade 3 or higher).
However, as Dr. Jacobson pointed out, it’s impossible to know if these differences in efficacy and toxicity are “statistically meaningful.”
Dr. Jacobson also noted that bridging therapy may have affected these results, as it might reduce tumor burden and increase toxicity, but bridging therapy was not used uniformly across these trials.
Most patients received bridging therapy before t-cel, none received it before axi-cel, and the use of bridging therapy was not reported in the trial of liso-cel.
“It is not possible to know whether patients treated on the ZUMA-1 trial, who were more likely to receive their CAR T cells, were healthier and more fit than patients on other studies or, because they were not allowed to receive bridging therapy, were actually sicker with a higher tumor burden and were therefore at risk for greater toxicity,” Dr. Jacobson wrote.
The fact that ZUMA-1 patients were more likely to receive CAR T cells brings up another issue—the difference between the reported results and the intent-to-treat (ITT) results in these trials. Since most patients on ZUMA-1 received the study treatment, there isn't much difference between the reported results and ITT results. However, about a third of patients who underwent apheresis on the JULIET trial did not ultimately receive CAR T cells, which means a bigger difference between the reported results and ITT results.
In ZUMA-1, 111 patients underwent leukapheresis, and 101 received treatment with axi-cel and were evaluable for efficacy. So the ORR was 75% (83/111) in the ITT population, compared to 82% in the population evaluable for efficacy.
In JULIET, 165 patients underwent leukapheresis, 111 received t-cel, and 93 were evaluable. The ORR was 30% (48/161) in the ITT population, compared to 52% in the evaluable population.
In TRANSCEND-NHL-001, 134 patients underwent leukapheresis, 114 patients received liso-cel, and 102 were evaluable. The ORR was 63% (77/122) in the ITT population, compared to 75% in the evaluable population.
Dr. Jacobson said these differences can be explained, in part, by differences in manufacturing. The time to manufacture cells was longer on the JULIET trial than on ZUMA-1, which may have been due to differences in transfection and manufacturing procedures as well as manufacturing ability.
In addition, differences in patient eligibility may have played a role, as healthier patients might be able to tolerate a longer manufacturing period than sicker patients.
Unfortunately, these differences cannot be accounted for without a randomized trial, but Dr. Jacobson said a randomized trial of these therapies is unlikely to occur.
“[S]o perhaps the best answers will come from institutions that have experience with all three products,” she wrote. “And in these cases, physicians and institutions will have to decide to what extent they would sacrifice efficacy for improved safety or sacrifice safety for improved reliability and consistency of treatment delivery.”
Dr. Jacobson disclosed relationships with Kite Pharma/Gilead Sciences, Bayer AG, Pfizer, Precision BioSciences, Novartis, Celgene, and Cowen.
SOURCE: Jacobson CA. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;37(4):328-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01457
One chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy may appear better than another, but confounding factors make it difficult to compare these therapies effectively, according to a review published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Caron A. Jacobson, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, reviewed results from three trials of CAR T-cell therapies in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL).
She noted that cross-trial comparisons are always limited, but such comparisons of CAR T-cell therapies are hindered by several confounding factors.
Dr. Jacobson said differences in manufacturing procedures and turnaround time, differences in patient eligibility and management, and the complexity of CAR T-cell therapies make it difficult to compare results from three CAR-T trials in B-NHL:
• The ZUMA-1 trial (NCT02348216) of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel, Yescarta)
• The JULIET trial (NCT02445248) of tisagenlecleucel (t-cel, Kymriah)
• The TRANSCEND-NHL-001 trial (NCT02631044) of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel, JCAR017).
Looking at response rates alone, axi-cel appears the most promising. The overall response rate (ORR) was 82% with axi-cel, 75% with liso-cel, and 52% with t-cel.
When considering cytokine release syndrome (CRS), liso-cel appears the safest. The rate of CRS was 93% with axi-cel (13% grade 3 or higher), 58% with t-cel (22% grade 3 or higher), and 39% with liso-cel (1% grade 3 or higher).
However, as Dr. Jacobson pointed out, it’s impossible to know if these differences in efficacy and toxicity are “statistically meaningful.”
Dr. Jacobson also noted that bridging therapy may have affected these results, as it might reduce tumor burden and increase toxicity, but bridging therapy was not used uniformly across these trials.
Most patients received bridging therapy before t-cel, none received it before axi-cel, and the use of bridging therapy was not reported in the trial of liso-cel.
“It is not possible to know whether patients treated on the ZUMA-1 trial, who were more likely to receive their CAR T cells, were healthier and more fit than patients on other studies or, because they were not allowed to receive bridging therapy, were actually sicker with a higher tumor burden and were therefore at risk for greater toxicity,” Dr. Jacobson wrote.
The fact that ZUMA-1 patients were more likely to receive CAR T cells brings up another issue—the difference between the reported results and the intent-to-treat (ITT) results in these trials. Since most patients on ZUMA-1 received the study treatment, there isn't much difference between the reported results and ITT results. However, about a third of patients who underwent apheresis on the JULIET trial did not ultimately receive CAR T cells, which means a bigger difference between the reported results and ITT results.
In ZUMA-1, 111 patients underwent leukapheresis, and 101 received treatment with axi-cel and were evaluable for efficacy. So the ORR was 75% (83/111) in the ITT population, compared to 82% in the population evaluable for efficacy.
In JULIET, 165 patients underwent leukapheresis, 111 received t-cel, and 93 were evaluable. The ORR was 30% (48/161) in the ITT population, compared to 52% in the evaluable population.
In TRANSCEND-NHL-001, 134 patients underwent leukapheresis, 114 patients received liso-cel, and 102 were evaluable. The ORR was 63% (77/122) in the ITT population, compared to 75% in the evaluable population.
Dr. Jacobson said these differences can be explained, in part, by differences in manufacturing. The time to manufacture cells was longer on the JULIET trial than on ZUMA-1, which may have been due to differences in transfection and manufacturing procedures as well as manufacturing ability.
In addition, differences in patient eligibility may have played a role, as healthier patients might be able to tolerate a longer manufacturing period than sicker patients.
Unfortunately, these differences cannot be accounted for without a randomized trial, but Dr. Jacobson said a randomized trial of these therapies is unlikely to occur.
“[S]o perhaps the best answers will come from institutions that have experience with all three products,” she wrote. “And in these cases, physicians and institutions will have to decide to what extent they would sacrifice efficacy for improved safety or sacrifice safety for improved reliability and consistency of treatment delivery.”
Dr. Jacobson disclosed relationships with Kite Pharma/Gilead Sciences, Bayer AG, Pfizer, Precision BioSciences, Novartis, Celgene, and Cowen.
SOURCE: Jacobson CA. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;37(4):328-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01457
One chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy may appear better than another, but confounding factors make it difficult to compare these therapies effectively, according to a review published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Caron A. Jacobson, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, reviewed results from three trials of CAR T-cell therapies in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL).
She noted that cross-trial comparisons are always limited, but such comparisons of CAR T-cell therapies are hindered by several confounding factors.
Dr. Jacobson said differences in manufacturing procedures and turnaround time, differences in patient eligibility and management, and the complexity of CAR T-cell therapies make it difficult to compare results from three CAR-T trials in B-NHL:
• The ZUMA-1 trial (NCT02348216) of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel, Yescarta)
• The JULIET trial (NCT02445248) of tisagenlecleucel (t-cel, Kymriah)
• The TRANSCEND-NHL-001 trial (NCT02631044) of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel, JCAR017).
Looking at response rates alone, axi-cel appears the most promising. The overall response rate (ORR) was 82% with axi-cel, 75% with liso-cel, and 52% with t-cel.
When considering cytokine release syndrome (CRS), liso-cel appears the safest. The rate of CRS was 93% with axi-cel (13% grade 3 or higher), 58% with t-cel (22% grade 3 or higher), and 39% with liso-cel (1% grade 3 or higher).
However, as Dr. Jacobson pointed out, it’s impossible to know if these differences in efficacy and toxicity are “statistically meaningful.”
Dr. Jacobson also noted that bridging therapy may have affected these results, as it might reduce tumor burden and increase toxicity, but bridging therapy was not used uniformly across these trials.
Most patients received bridging therapy before t-cel, none received it before axi-cel, and the use of bridging therapy was not reported in the trial of liso-cel.
“It is not possible to know whether patients treated on the ZUMA-1 trial, who were more likely to receive their CAR T cells, were healthier and more fit than patients on other studies or, because they were not allowed to receive bridging therapy, were actually sicker with a higher tumor burden and were therefore at risk for greater toxicity,” Dr. Jacobson wrote.
The fact that ZUMA-1 patients were more likely to receive CAR T cells brings up another issue—the difference between the reported results and the intent-to-treat (ITT) results in these trials. Since most patients on ZUMA-1 received the study treatment, there isn't much difference between the reported results and ITT results. However, about a third of patients who underwent apheresis on the JULIET trial did not ultimately receive CAR T cells, which means a bigger difference between the reported results and ITT results.
In ZUMA-1, 111 patients underwent leukapheresis, and 101 received treatment with axi-cel and were evaluable for efficacy. So the ORR was 75% (83/111) in the ITT population, compared to 82% in the population evaluable for efficacy.
In JULIET, 165 patients underwent leukapheresis, 111 received t-cel, and 93 were evaluable. The ORR was 30% (48/161) in the ITT population, compared to 52% in the evaluable population.
In TRANSCEND-NHL-001, 134 patients underwent leukapheresis, 114 patients received liso-cel, and 102 were evaluable. The ORR was 63% (77/122) in the ITT population, compared to 75% in the evaluable population.
Dr. Jacobson said these differences can be explained, in part, by differences in manufacturing. The time to manufacture cells was longer on the JULIET trial than on ZUMA-1, which may have been due to differences in transfection and manufacturing procedures as well as manufacturing ability.
In addition, differences in patient eligibility may have played a role, as healthier patients might be able to tolerate a longer manufacturing period than sicker patients.
Unfortunately, these differences cannot be accounted for without a randomized trial, but Dr. Jacobson said a randomized trial of these therapies is unlikely to occur.
“[S]o perhaps the best answers will come from institutions that have experience with all three products,” she wrote. “And in these cases, physicians and institutions will have to decide to what extent they would sacrifice efficacy for improved safety or sacrifice safety for improved reliability and consistency of treatment delivery.”
Dr. Jacobson disclosed relationships with Kite Pharma/Gilead Sciences, Bayer AG, Pfizer, Precision BioSciences, Novartis, Celgene, and Cowen.
SOURCE: Jacobson CA. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;37(4):328-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01457
FROM JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Adding palbociclib upped responses in previously treated MCL
An early study adding palbociclib to ibrutinib in previously treated patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) showed a higher complete response rate than what has previously been reported for single-agent ibrutinib, according to investigators.
Results from the phase 1 trial (NCT02159755) support preclinical models, suggesting that the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib may be able to help overcome resistance to ibrutinib, an inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK).
These findings set the stage for an ongoing phase 2 multicenter study, reported lead author Peter Martin, MD, of Weill Cornell Medicine in New York and his colleagues.
The present study involved 27 patients with previously treated MCL, the investigators wrote in Blood. Of these, 21 were men and 6 were women, all of whom had adequate organ and bone marrow function, good performance status, and no previous treatment with CDK4/6 or BTK inhibitors.
Patients were randomly grouped into five dose levels of each drug: Ibrutinib doses ranged from 280-560 mg, and palbociclib from 75-125 mg. Ibrutinib was given daily and palbociclib was administered for 21 out of 28 days per cycle. Therapy continued until withdrawal, unacceptable toxicity, or disease progression.
The primary objective was to determine phase 2 dose. Secondarily, the investigators sought to determine activity and toxicity profiles. The maximum tolerated doses were ibrutinib 560 mg daily plus palbociclib 100 mg on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle.
Across all patients, the complete response rate was 37%, compared with 21% for ibrutinib monotherapy in a previous trial. About two-thirds of patients had a response of any kind, which aligns closely with the overall response rate previously reported for ibrutinib alone (67% vs. 68%). After a median follow-up of 25.6 months in survivors, the 2-year progression free survival was 59.4%. The two-year overall survival rate was 60.6%.
The dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 rash, which occurred in two out of five patients treated at the highest doses. The most common grade 3 or higher toxicities were neutropenia (41%) and thrombocytopenia (30%), followed by hypertension (15%), febrile neutropenia (15%), lung infection (11%), fatigue (7%), upper respiratory tract infection (7%), hyperglycemia (7%), rash (7%), myalgia (7%), and increased alanine transaminase/aspartate aminotransferase (7%).
“Although BTK-inhibitor-based combinations appear promising, the degree to which they improve upon single-agent ibrutinib is unclear,” the investigators wrote, noting that a phase 2 trial (NCT03478514) is currently underway and uses the maximum tolerated doses.
The phase 1 trial was sponsored by the National Cancer Institute. Study funding was provided by the Sarah Cannon Fund at the HCA Foundation. The investigators reported financial relationships with Janssen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Karyopharm, and others.
SOURCE: Martin P et al. Blood. 2019 Jan 28. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-11-886457.
An early study adding palbociclib to ibrutinib in previously treated patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) showed a higher complete response rate than what has previously been reported for single-agent ibrutinib, according to investigators.
Results from the phase 1 trial (NCT02159755) support preclinical models, suggesting that the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib may be able to help overcome resistance to ibrutinib, an inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK).
These findings set the stage for an ongoing phase 2 multicenter study, reported lead author Peter Martin, MD, of Weill Cornell Medicine in New York and his colleagues.
The present study involved 27 patients with previously treated MCL, the investigators wrote in Blood. Of these, 21 were men and 6 were women, all of whom had adequate organ and bone marrow function, good performance status, and no previous treatment with CDK4/6 or BTK inhibitors.
Patients were randomly grouped into five dose levels of each drug: Ibrutinib doses ranged from 280-560 mg, and palbociclib from 75-125 mg. Ibrutinib was given daily and palbociclib was administered for 21 out of 28 days per cycle. Therapy continued until withdrawal, unacceptable toxicity, or disease progression.
The primary objective was to determine phase 2 dose. Secondarily, the investigators sought to determine activity and toxicity profiles. The maximum tolerated doses were ibrutinib 560 mg daily plus palbociclib 100 mg on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle.
Across all patients, the complete response rate was 37%, compared with 21% for ibrutinib monotherapy in a previous trial. About two-thirds of patients had a response of any kind, which aligns closely with the overall response rate previously reported for ibrutinib alone (67% vs. 68%). After a median follow-up of 25.6 months in survivors, the 2-year progression free survival was 59.4%. The two-year overall survival rate was 60.6%.
The dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 rash, which occurred in two out of five patients treated at the highest doses. The most common grade 3 or higher toxicities were neutropenia (41%) and thrombocytopenia (30%), followed by hypertension (15%), febrile neutropenia (15%), lung infection (11%), fatigue (7%), upper respiratory tract infection (7%), hyperglycemia (7%), rash (7%), myalgia (7%), and increased alanine transaminase/aspartate aminotransferase (7%).
“Although BTK-inhibitor-based combinations appear promising, the degree to which they improve upon single-agent ibrutinib is unclear,” the investigators wrote, noting that a phase 2 trial (NCT03478514) is currently underway and uses the maximum tolerated doses.
The phase 1 trial was sponsored by the National Cancer Institute. Study funding was provided by the Sarah Cannon Fund at the HCA Foundation. The investigators reported financial relationships with Janssen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Karyopharm, and others.
SOURCE: Martin P et al. Blood. 2019 Jan 28. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-11-886457.
An early study adding palbociclib to ibrutinib in previously treated patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) showed a higher complete response rate than what has previously been reported for single-agent ibrutinib, according to investigators.
Results from the phase 1 trial (NCT02159755) support preclinical models, suggesting that the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib may be able to help overcome resistance to ibrutinib, an inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK).
These findings set the stage for an ongoing phase 2 multicenter study, reported lead author Peter Martin, MD, of Weill Cornell Medicine in New York and his colleagues.
The present study involved 27 patients with previously treated MCL, the investigators wrote in Blood. Of these, 21 were men and 6 were women, all of whom had adequate organ and bone marrow function, good performance status, and no previous treatment with CDK4/6 or BTK inhibitors.
Patients were randomly grouped into five dose levels of each drug: Ibrutinib doses ranged from 280-560 mg, and palbociclib from 75-125 mg. Ibrutinib was given daily and palbociclib was administered for 21 out of 28 days per cycle. Therapy continued until withdrawal, unacceptable toxicity, or disease progression.
The primary objective was to determine phase 2 dose. Secondarily, the investigators sought to determine activity and toxicity profiles. The maximum tolerated doses were ibrutinib 560 mg daily plus palbociclib 100 mg on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle.
Across all patients, the complete response rate was 37%, compared with 21% for ibrutinib monotherapy in a previous trial. About two-thirds of patients had a response of any kind, which aligns closely with the overall response rate previously reported for ibrutinib alone (67% vs. 68%). After a median follow-up of 25.6 months in survivors, the 2-year progression free survival was 59.4%. The two-year overall survival rate was 60.6%.
The dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 rash, which occurred in two out of five patients treated at the highest doses. The most common grade 3 or higher toxicities were neutropenia (41%) and thrombocytopenia (30%), followed by hypertension (15%), febrile neutropenia (15%), lung infection (11%), fatigue (7%), upper respiratory tract infection (7%), hyperglycemia (7%), rash (7%), myalgia (7%), and increased alanine transaminase/aspartate aminotransferase (7%).
“Although BTK-inhibitor-based combinations appear promising, the degree to which they improve upon single-agent ibrutinib is unclear,” the investigators wrote, noting that a phase 2 trial (NCT03478514) is currently underway and uses the maximum tolerated doses.
The phase 1 trial was sponsored by the National Cancer Institute. Study funding was provided by the Sarah Cannon Fund at the HCA Foundation. The investigators reported financial relationships with Janssen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Karyopharm, and others.
SOURCE: Martin P et al. Blood. 2019 Jan 28. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-11-886457.
FROM BLOOD
Key clinical point:
Major finding: The complete response rate for the combination treatment was 37%.
Study details: A prospective, phase 1 trial of 27 patients with previously treated MCL.
Disclosures: The trial was sponsored by the National Cancer Institute. Funding was provided by the Sarah Cannon Fund at the HCA Foundation. The investigators reported financial relationships with Janssen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Karyopharm, and others.
Source: Martin P et al. Blood. 2019 Jan 28. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-11-886457.
Few DLBCL patients benefit from nivolumab
Nivolumab may provide a benefit for a small group of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have failed a transplant or are ineligible for one, according to researchers.
Nivolumab produced a response in 10 of 121 DLBCL patients studied. Three patients achieved a complete response (CR) lasting 11 months or more.
Why this small group responded to nivolumab isn’t clear, according to Stephen M. Ansell, MD, PhD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and his colleagues.
Some responders did have 9p24.1 alterations, but others did not. None of the responders had tumor cells positive for programmed death–ligand 1 (PD-L1), and only one responder had detectable PD-L2 expression in malignant cells.
Dr. Ansell and his colleagues described these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
The researchers evaluated nivolumab in a phase 2 trial (NCT02038933) of patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. Of the 121 patients, 87 had failed autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and 34 were ineligible for autologous HSCT. The patients received nivolumab at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study withdrawal.
HSCT failures
The patients who had failed HSCT had a median age of 62 years (range, 24-75 years). They had received a median of three prior systemic therapies (range, 1-11), and 28% were refractory to their most recent therapy.
About 40% of patients had germinal center B-cell–like (GCB) DLBCL, 32% had non-GCB disease, and data on disease subtype were missing for the rest of the group.
The patients received a median of four nivolumab doses (range, 1-44) and were followed for a median of 9 months (range, 0.1-25 months).
Nine patients (10%) achieved a response, and the median duration of response was 11 months. Responses occurred in patients with GCB and non-GCB DLBCL.
Three patients achieved a CR. Two of them were still on treatment and in CR at the data cutoff. Their responses had lasted 11 months and 14 months, respectively. The third complete responder did not progress on nivolumab but developed myelodysplastic syndrome, which was unrelated to the drug, and died.
Among all patients who had failed HSCT, the median progression-free survival was 1.9 months, and the median overall survival was 12.2 months.
Seven patients in this group were still receiving nivolumab at the data cutoff. Two of them were in CR, two had a partial response, and three had stable disease.
HSCT-ineligible group
The patients who were ineligible for HSCT had a median age of 68 years (range, 28-86 years). They had received a median of three prior systemic therapies (range, 1-7), and 59% were refractory to their most recent therapy.
About 56% of these patients had GCB DLBCL, 18% had non-GCB disease, and data on subtype were missing for the rest of the group.
The patients received a median of three nivolumab doses (range, 1-22) and were followed for a median of 6 months (range, 0.2-24 months). One patient (3%) achieved a partial response, which lasted 8.3 months.
The median progression-free survival in this group was 1.4 months, and the median overall survival was 5.8 months.
None of the patients in this group were still taking nivolumab at the data cutoff.
Biomarkers of response
Dr. Ansell and his colleagues were able to look for 9p24.1 alterations in archival tumor biopsy specimens from 74 patients. The team reported that 9p24.1 alterations were “infrequent,” but they were found in some responders.
Among the three complete responders, one patient had high-level 9p24.1 amplification, one had normal 9p24.1 copy number, and one did not have a biopsy available.
Among the seven patients who achieved a partial response, five had biopsy specimens. Three patients had low-level polysomy, one had copy gain, and one patient had normal 9p24.1.
None of the responders had PD-L1 expression in their tumor cells, but one complete responder had PD-L2–positive malignant cells.
Dr. Ansell and his colleagues wrote that the “biologic basis for response in the other two [complete responders] is unclear,” and the researchers were unable to assess associations between response and c-myc expression or double-hit lymphoma.
Safety
Of all 121 patients, 62% had a treatment-related adverse event (AE) and 24% had a grade 3/4–related AE.
The most common related AEs of any grade were nausea (17%), fatigue (17%), diarrhea (10%), neutropenia (7%), thrombocytopenia (6%), decreased appetite (6%), lipase increase (5%), rash (5%), and pyrexia (5%).
Four patients (3%) stopped taking nivolumab because of treatment-related AEs, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, pancreatitis, lipase increase, and psoriasiform dermatitis. There were no fatal treatment-related AEs.
This research was supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb and other groups. The study authors reported relationships with Bristol-Myers Squibb and other companies.
SOURCE: Ansell SM et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00766.
Nivolumab may provide a benefit for a small group of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have failed a transplant or are ineligible for one, according to researchers.
Nivolumab produced a response in 10 of 121 DLBCL patients studied. Three patients achieved a complete response (CR) lasting 11 months or more.
Why this small group responded to nivolumab isn’t clear, according to Stephen M. Ansell, MD, PhD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and his colleagues.
Some responders did have 9p24.1 alterations, but others did not. None of the responders had tumor cells positive for programmed death–ligand 1 (PD-L1), and only one responder had detectable PD-L2 expression in malignant cells.
Dr. Ansell and his colleagues described these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
The researchers evaluated nivolumab in a phase 2 trial (NCT02038933) of patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. Of the 121 patients, 87 had failed autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and 34 were ineligible for autologous HSCT. The patients received nivolumab at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study withdrawal.
HSCT failures
The patients who had failed HSCT had a median age of 62 years (range, 24-75 years). They had received a median of three prior systemic therapies (range, 1-11), and 28% were refractory to their most recent therapy.
About 40% of patients had germinal center B-cell–like (GCB) DLBCL, 32% had non-GCB disease, and data on disease subtype were missing for the rest of the group.
The patients received a median of four nivolumab doses (range, 1-44) and were followed for a median of 9 months (range, 0.1-25 months).
Nine patients (10%) achieved a response, and the median duration of response was 11 months. Responses occurred in patients with GCB and non-GCB DLBCL.
Three patients achieved a CR. Two of them were still on treatment and in CR at the data cutoff. Their responses had lasted 11 months and 14 months, respectively. The third complete responder did not progress on nivolumab but developed myelodysplastic syndrome, which was unrelated to the drug, and died.
Among all patients who had failed HSCT, the median progression-free survival was 1.9 months, and the median overall survival was 12.2 months.
Seven patients in this group were still receiving nivolumab at the data cutoff. Two of them were in CR, two had a partial response, and three had stable disease.
HSCT-ineligible group
The patients who were ineligible for HSCT had a median age of 68 years (range, 28-86 years). They had received a median of three prior systemic therapies (range, 1-7), and 59% were refractory to their most recent therapy.
About 56% of these patients had GCB DLBCL, 18% had non-GCB disease, and data on subtype were missing for the rest of the group.
The patients received a median of three nivolumab doses (range, 1-22) and were followed for a median of 6 months (range, 0.2-24 months). One patient (3%) achieved a partial response, which lasted 8.3 months.
The median progression-free survival in this group was 1.4 months, and the median overall survival was 5.8 months.
None of the patients in this group were still taking nivolumab at the data cutoff.
Biomarkers of response
Dr. Ansell and his colleagues were able to look for 9p24.1 alterations in archival tumor biopsy specimens from 74 patients. The team reported that 9p24.1 alterations were “infrequent,” but they were found in some responders.
Among the three complete responders, one patient had high-level 9p24.1 amplification, one had normal 9p24.1 copy number, and one did not have a biopsy available.
Among the seven patients who achieved a partial response, five had biopsy specimens. Three patients had low-level polysomy, one had copy gain, and one patient had normal 9p24.1.
None of the responders had PD-L1 expression in their tumor cells, but one complete responder had PD-L2–positive malignant cells.
Dr. Ansell and his colleagues wrote that the “biologic basis for response in the other two [complete responders] is unclear,” and the researchers were unable to assess associations between response and c-myc expression or double-hit lymphoma.
Safety
Of all 121 patients, 62% had a treatment-related adverse event (AE) and 24% had a grade 3/4–related AE.
The most common related AEs of any grade were nausea (17%), fatigue (17%), diarrhea (10%), neutropenia (7%), thrombocytopenia (6%), decreased appetite (6%), lipase increase (5%), rash (5%), and pyrexia (5%).
Four patients (3%) stopped taking nivolumab because of treatment-related AEs, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, pancreatitis, lipase increase, and psoriasiform dermatitis. There were no fatal treatment-related AEs.
This research was supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb and other groups. The study authors reported relationships with Bristol-Myers Squibb and other companies.
SOURCE: Ansell SM et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00766.
Nivolumab may provide a benefit for a small group of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have failed a transplant or are ineligible for one, according to researchers.
Nivolumab produced a response in 10 of 121 DLBCL patients studied. Three patients achieved a complete response (CR) lasting 11 months or more.
Why this small group responded to nivolumab isn’t clear, according to Stephen M. Ansell, MD, PhD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and his colleagues.
Some responders did have 9p24.1 alterations, but others did not. None of the responders had tumor cells positive for programmed death–ligand 1 (PD-L1), and only one responder had detectable PD-L2 expression in malignant cells.
Dr. Ansell and his colleagues described these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
The researchers evaluated nivolumab in a phase 2 trial (NCT02038933) of patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. Of the 121 patients, 87 had failed autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and 34 were ineligible for autologous HSCT. The patients received nivolumab at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study withdrawal.
HSCT failures
The patients who had failed HSCT had a median age of 62 years (range, 24-75 years). They had received a median of three prior systemic therapies (range, 1-11), and 28% were refractory to their most recent therapy.
About 40% of patients had germinal center B-cell–like (GCB) DLBCL, 32% had non-GCB disease, and data on disease subtype were missing for the rest of the group.
The patients received a median of four nivolumab doses (range, 1-44) and were followed for a median of 9 months (range, 0.1-25 months).
Nine patients (10%) achieved a response, and the median duration of response was 11 months. Responses occurred in patients with GCB and non-GCB DLBCL.
Three patients achieved a CR. Two of them were still on treatment and in CR at the data cutoff. Their responses had lasted 11 months and 14 months, respectively. The third complete responder did not progress on nivolumab but developed myelodysplastic syndrome, which was unrelated to the drug, and died.
Among all patients who had failed HSCT, the median progression-free survival was 1.9 months, and the median overall survival was 12.2 months.
Seven patients in this group were still receiving nivolumab at the data cutoff. Two of them were in CR, two had a partial response, and three had stable disease.
HSCT-ineligible group
The patients who were ineligible for HSCT had a median age of 68 years (range, 28-86 years). They had received a median of three prior systemic therapies (range, 1-7), and 59% were refractory to their most recent therapy.
About 56% of these patients had GCB DLBCL, 18% had non-GCB disease, and data on subtype were missing for the rest of the group.
The patients received a median of three nivolumab doses (range, 1-22) and were followed for a median of 6 months (range, 0.2-24 months). One patient (3%) achieved a partial response, which lasted 8.3 months.
The median progression-free survival in this group was 1.4 months, and the median overall survival was 5.8 months.
None of the patients in this group were still taking nivolumab at the data cutoff.
Biomarkers of response
Dr. Ansell and his colleagues were able to look for 9p24.1 alterations in archival tumor biopsy specimens from 74 patients. The team reported that 9p24.1 alterations were “infrequent,” but they were found in some responders.
Among the three complete responders, one patient had high-level 9p24.1 amplification, one had normal 9p24.1 copy number, and one did not have a biopsy available.
Among the seven patients who achieved a partial response, five had biopsy specimens. Three patients had low-level polysomy, one had copy gain, and one patient had normal 9p24.1.
None of the responders had PD-L1 expression in their tumor cells, but one complete responder had PD-L2–positive malignant cells.
Dr. Ansell and his colleagues wrote that the “biologic basis for response in the other two [complete responders] is unclear,” and the researchers were unable to assess associations between response and c-myc expression or double-hit lymphoma.
Safety
Of all 121 patients, 62% had a treatment-related adverse event (AE) and 24% had a grade 3/4–related AE.
The most common related AEs of any grade were nausea (17%), fatigue (17%), diarrhea (10%), neutropenia (7%), thrombocytopenia (6%), decreased appetite (6%), lipase increase (5%), rash (5%), and pyrexia (5%).
Four patients (3%) stopped taking nivolumab because of treatment-related AEs, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, pancreatitis, lipase increase, and psoriasiform dermatitis. There were no fatal treatment-related AEs.
This research was supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb and other groups. The study authors reported relationships with Bristol-Myers Squibb and other companies.
SOURCE: Ansell SM et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00766.
FROM THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Nivolumab produced a response in 10 of 121 patients, including three complete responses.
Study details: A phase 2 study of 121 patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Disclosures: This research was supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb and other organizations. The study authors reported relationships with Bristol-Myers Squibb and other companies.
Source: Ansell SM et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00766.
Does adherence to a Mediterranean diet reduce the risk of Parkinson’s disease?
Among older adults, adherence to a Mediterranean diet is associated with lower probability of prodromal Parkinson’s disease, according to research published in Movement Disorders.
“Recommending the Mediterranean diet pattern, either to reduce the risk or lessen the effects ... of prodromal Parkinson’s disease, needs to be considered and further explored,” said lead author Maria I. Maraki, PhD, of the department of nutrition and dietetics at Harokopio University in Athens, Greece, and her research colleagues.
Evidence regarding the effect of a Mediterranean diet on Parkinson’s disease risk remains limited, however, and physicians should be cautious in interpreting the data, researchers noted in accompanying editorials.
“There is a puzzling constellation of information and data that cannot be reconciled with a simple model accounting for the role of diet, vascular risk factors, and the neurodegenerative process and mechanisms underlying Parkinson’s disease,” Connie Marras, MD, PhD, and Jose A. Obeso, MD, PhD, said in an editorial. Given Maraki et al.’s findings, “most of us would be glad to accept that such a causal inverse association exists and can therefore be strongly recommended to our patients,” but “further work is needed before definitive conclusions can be reached,” Dr. Marras and Dr. Obeso wrote. Dr. Marras is affiliated with the University Health Network and the University of Toronto. Dr. Obeso is affiliated with University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, CEU San Pablo University, Móstoles, Spain.
The role of diet
Prior research has suggested that adherence to the Mediterranean diet – characterized by consumption of nonrefined cereals, fruits, vegetables, legumes, potatoes, fish, and olive oil – may be associated with reduced risk of Parkinson’s disease. In addition, studies have found that adherence to the Mediterranean diet may be protective in other diseases, including dementia and cardiovascular disease. Dr. Maraki and her colleagues sought to assess whether adherence to the Mediterranean diet is associated with the likelihood of prodromal Parkinson’s disease or its manifestations. To calculate the probability of prodromal Parkinson’s disease, the investigators used a tool created by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS) that takes into account baseline risk factors as well as prodromal markers such as constipation and motor slowing.
They analyzed data from 1,731 participants in the population-based Hellenic Longitudinal Investigation of Aging and Diet (HELIAD) cohort in Greece. Participants, 41% of whom were male, were aged 65 years or older and did not have Parkinson’s disease. They completed a detailed food frequency questionnaire, and the researchers calculated how closely each participant’s diet adhered to the Mediterranean diet. Diet adherence scores ranged from 0 to 55, with higher scores indicating greater adherence.
The median probability of prodromal Parkinson’s disease was 1.9% (range, 0.2%-96.7%), and the probability was lower among those with greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet. This difference was “driven mostly by nonmotor markers of prodromal Parkinson’s disease,” including depression, constipation, urinary dysfunction, and daytime somnolence, the researchers said. “Each unit increase in Mediterranean diet score was associated with a 2% decreased probability for prodromal Parkinson’s disease.” Compared with participants in the lowest quartile of Mediterranean diet adherence, those in the highest quartile had an approximately 21% lower probability for prodromal Parkinson’s disease.
Potential confounding
“This study pushes the prodromal criteria into performing a job they were never designed to do,” which presents potential pitfalls, Ronald B. Postuma, MD, of the department of neurology at Montreal General Hospital in Quebec, said in an accompanying editorial.
While the MDS criteria were designed to assess the likelihood that any person over age 50 years is in a state of prodromal Parkinson’s disease, the present study aimed to evaluate whether a single putative risk factor for Parkinson’s disease is associated with the likelihood of its prodromal state.
In addition, the analysis did not include some of the prodromal markers that are part of the MDS criteria, including olfaction, polysomnographic-proven REM sleep behavior disorder, and dopaminergic functional neuroimaging.
“As pointed out by the researchers, many of the risk factors in the prodromal criteria are potentially confounded by factors other than Parkinson’s disease; for example, one could imagine that older people, men, or farmers (with their higher pesticide exposure) are less likely to follow the Mediterranean diet simply because of different cultural lifestyle patterns,” Dr. Postuma said.
It is also possible that the Mediterranean diet affects prodromal markers such as constipation, sleep, or depression without affecting underlying neurodegenerative disease. In any case, the effect sizes observed in the study were small, and there was no evidence that participants who adhered most closely to a Mediterranean diet had less parkinsonism, Dr. Postuma said.
These limitations do not preclude physicians from recommending the diet for other reasons. “Numerous studies, reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials consistently rank the Mediterranean diet as among the healthiest diets available,” Dr. Postuma said. “So, one can clearly recommend diets such as these, even if not necessarily for Parkinson’s disease prevention.”
Adding insights
The researchers used a Mediterranean diet score that was developed in a population of adults from metropolitan Athens, “an area not unlike the one in which the score is being applied in the HELIAD study,” Christy C. Tangney, PhD, professor of clinical nutrition and preventive medicine and associate dean for research at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, said in a separate editorial. As expected, the average Mediterranean diet adherence score in this study was higher than that in the Chicago Health and Aging Project (33.2 vs. 28.2).
“If we can identify differences in diet or lifestyle patterns and risk of this latent phase of Parkinson’s disease neurodegeneration, we may be one step closer to identifying preventive measures,” she said. Follow-up reports from HELIAD and other cohorts may allow researchers to assess how changes in dietary patterns relate to changes in Parkinson’s disease markers, the probability of prodromal Parkinson’s disease, and incident Parkinson’s disease, Dr. Tangney said.
The study authors had no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures. The study was supported by a grant from the Alzheimer’s Association, an ESPA‐EU grant cofunded by the European Social Fund and Greek National resources, and a grant from the Ministry for Health and Social Solidarity (Greece). Dr. Maraki and a coauthor have received financial support from the Greek State Scholarships Foundation. Dr. Tangney and Dr. Postuma had no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Maraki MI et al. Mov Disord. 2018 Oct 10. doi: 10.1002/mds.27489.
Among older adults, adherence to a Mediterranean diet is associated with lower probability of prodromal Parkinson’s disease, according to research published in Movement Disorders.
“Recommending the Mediterranean diet pattern, either to reduce the risk or lessen the effects ... of prodromal Parkinson’s disease, needs to be considered and further explored,” said lead author Maria I. Maraki, PhD, of the department of nutrition and dietetics at Harokopio University in Athens, Greece, and her research colleagues.
Evidence regarding the effect of a Mediterranean diet on Parkinson’s disease risk remains limited, however, and physicians should be cautious in interpreting the data, researchers noted in accompanying editorials.
“There is a puzzling constellation of information and data that cannot be reconciled with a simple model accounting for the role of diet, vascular risk factors, and the neurodegenerative process and mechanisms underlying Parkinson’s disease,” Connie Marras, MD, PhD, and Jose A. Obeso, MD, PhD, said in an editorial. Given Maraki et al.’s findings, “most of us would be glad to accept that such a causal inverse association exists and can therefore be strongly recommended to our patients,” but “further work is needed before definitive conclusions can be reached,” Dr. Marras and Dr. Obeso wrote. Dr. Marras is affiliated with the University Health Network and the University of Toronto. Dr. Obeso is affiliated with University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, CEU San Pablo University, Móstoles, Spain.
The role of diet
Prior research has suggested that adherence to the Mediterranean diet – characterized by consumption of nonrefined cereals, fruits, vegetables, legumes, potatoes, fish, and olive oil – may be associated with reduced risk of Parkinson’s disease. In addition, studies have found that adherence to the Mediterranean diet may be protective in other diseases, including dementia and cardiovascular disease. Dr. Maraki and her colleagues sought to assess whether adherence to the Mediterranean diet is associated with the likelihood of prodromal Parkinson’s disease or its manifestations. To calculate the probability of prodromal Parkinson’s disease, the investigators used a tool created by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS) that takes into account baseline risk factors as well as prodromal markers such as constipation and motor slowing.
They analyzed data from 1,731 participants in the population-based Hellenic Longitudinal Investigation of Aging and Diet (HELIAD) cohort in Greece. Participants, 41% of whom were male, were aged 65 years or older and did not have Parkinson’s disease. They completed a detailed food frequency questionnaire, and the researchers calculated how closely each participant’s diet adhered to the Mediterranean diet. Diet adherence scores ranged from 0 to 55, with higher scores indicating greater adherence.
The median probability of prodromal Parkinson’s disease was 1.9% (range, 0.2%-96.7%), and the probability was lower among those with greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet. This difference was “driven mostly by nonmotor markers of prodromal Parkinson’s disease,” including depression, constipation, urinary dysfunction, and daytime somnolence, the researchers said. “Each unit increase in Mediterranean diet score was associated with a 2% decreased probability for prodromal Parkinson’s disease.” Compared with participants in the lowest quartile of Mediterranean diet adherence, those in the highest quartile had an approximately 21% lower probability for prodromal Parkinson’s disease.
Potential confounding
“This study pushes the prodromal criteria into performing a job they were never designed to do,” which presents potential pitfalls, Ronald B. Postuma, MD, of the department of neurology at Montreal General Hospital in Quebec, said in an accompanying editorial.
While the MDS criteria were designed to assess the likelihood that any person over age 50 years is in a state of prodromal Parkinson’s disease, the present study aimed to evaluate whether a single putative risk factor for Parkinson’s disease is associated with the likelihood of its prodromal state.
In addition, the analysis did not include some of the prodromal markers that are part of the MDS criteria, including olfaction, polysomnographic-proven REM sleep behavior disorder, and dopaminergic functional neuroimaging.
“As pointed out by the researchers, many of the risk factors in the prodromal criteria are potentially confounded by factors other than Parkinson’s disease; for example, one could imagine that older people, men, or farmers (with their higher pesticide exposure) are less likely to follow the Mediterranean diet simply because of different cultural lifestyle patterns,” Dr. Postuma said.
It is also possible that the Mediterranean diet affects prodromal markers such as constipation, sleep, or depression without affecting underlying neurodegenerative disease. In any case, the effect sizes observed in the study were small, and there was no evidence that participants who adhered most closely to a Mediterranean diet had less parkinsonism, Dr. Postuma said.
These limitations do not preclude physicians from recommending the diet for other reasons. “Numerous studies, reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials consistently rank the Mediterranean diet as among the healthiest diets available,” Dr. Postuma said. “So, one can clearly recommend diets such as these, even if not necessarily for Parkinson’s disease prevention.”
Adding insights
The researchers used a Mediterranean diet score that was developed in a population of adults from metropolitan Athens, “an area not unlike the one in which the score is being applied in the HELIAD study,” Christy C. Tangney, PhD, professor of clinical nutrition and preventive medicine and associate dean for research at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, said in a separate editorial. As expected, the average Mediterranean diet adherence score in this study was higher than that in the Chicago Health and Aging Project (33.2 vs. 28.2).
“If we can identify differences in diet or lifestyle patterns and risk of this latent phase of Parkinson’s disease neurodegeneration, we may be one step closer to identifying preventive measures,” she said. Follow-up reports from HELIAD and other cohorts may allow researchers to assess how changes in dietary patterns relate to changes in Parkinson’s disease markers, the probability of prodromal Parkinson’s disease, and incident Parkinson’s disease, Dr. Tangney said.
The study authors had no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures. The study was supported by a grant from the Alzheimer’s Association, an ESPA‐EU grant cofunded by the European Social Fund and Greek National resources, and a grant from the Ministry for Health and Social Solidarity (Greece). Dr. Maraki and a coauthor have received financial support from the Greek State Scholarships Foundation. Dr. Tangney and Dr. Postuma had no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Maraki MI et al. Mov Disord. 2018 Oct 10. doi: 10.1002/mds.27489.
Among older adults, adherence to a Mediterranean diet is associated with lower probability of prodromal Parkinson’s disease, according to research published in Movement Disorders.
“Recommending the Mediterranean diet pattern, either to reduce the risk or lessen the effects ... of prodromal Parkinson’s disease, needs to be considered and further explored,” said lead author Maria I. Maraki, PhD, of the department of nutrition and dietetics at Harokopio University in Athens, Greece, and her research colleagues.
Evidence regarding the effect of a Mediterranean diet on Parkinson’s disease risk remains limited, however, and physicians should be cautious in interpreting the data, researchers noted in accompanying editorials.
“There is a puzzling constellation of information and data that cannot be reconciled with a simple model accounting for the role of diet, vascular risk factors, and the neurodegenerative process and mechanisms underlying Parkinson’s disease,” Connie Marras, MD, PhD, and Jose A. Obeso, MD, PhD, said in an editorial. Given Maraki et al.’s findings, “most of us would be glad to accept that such a causal inverse association exists and can therefore be strongly recommended to our patients,” but “further work is needed before definitive conclusions can be reached,” Dr. Marras and Dr. Obeso wrote. Dr. Marras is affiliated with the University Health Network and the University of Toronto. Dr. Obeso is affiliated with University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, CEU San Pablo University, Móstoles, Spain.
The role of diet
Prior research has suggested that adherence to the Mediterranean diet – characterized by consumption of nonrefined cereals, fruits, vegetables, legumes, potatoes, fish, and olive oil – may be associated with reduced risk of Parkinson’s disease. In addition, studies have found that adherence to the Mediterranean diet may be protective in other diseases, including dementia and cardiovascular disease. Dr. Maraki and her colleagues sought to assess whether adherence to the Mediterranean diet is associated with the likelihood of prodromal Parkinson’s disease or its manifestations. To calculate the probability of prodromal Parkinson’s disease, the investigators used a tool created by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS) that takes into account baseline risk factors as well as prodromal markers such as constipation and motor slowing.
They analyzed data from 1,731 participants in the population-based Hellenic Longitudinal Investigation of Aging and Diet (HELIAD) cohort in Greece. Participants, 41% of whom were male, were aged 65 years or older and did not have Parkinson’s disease. They completed a detailed food frequency questionnaire, and the researchers calculated how closely each participant’s diet adhered to the Mediterranean diet. Diet adherence scores ranged from 0 to 55, with higher scores indicating greater adherence.
The median probability of prodromal Parkinson’s disease was 1.9% (range, 0.2%-96.7%), and the probability was lower among those with greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet. This difference was “driven mostly by nonmotor markers of prodromal Parkinson’s disease,” including depression, constipation, urinary dysfunction, and daytime somnolence, the researchers said. “Each unit increase in Mediterranean diet score was associated with a 2% decreased probability for prodromal Parkinson’s disease.” Compared with participants in the lowest quartile of Mediterranean diet adherence, those in the highest quartile had an approximately 21% lower probability for prodromal Parkinson’s disease.
Potential confounding
“This study pushes the prodromal criteria into performing a job they were never designed to do,” which presents potential pitfalls, Ronald B. Postuma, MD, of the department of neurology at Montreal General Hospital in Quebec, said in an accompanying editorial.
While the MDS criteria were designed to assess the likelihood that any person over age 50 years is in a state of prodromal Parkinson’s disease, the present study aimed to evaluate whether a single putative risk factor for Parkinson’s disease is associated with the likelihood of its prodromal state.
In addition, the analysis did not include some of the prodromal markers that are part of the MDS criteria, including olfaction, polysomnographic-proven REM sleep behavior disorder, and dopaminergic functional neuroimaging.
“As pointed out by the researchers, many of the risk factors in the prodromal criteria are potentially confounded by factors other than Parkinson’s disease; for example, one could imagine that older people, men, or farmers (with their higher pesticide exposure) are less likely to follow the Mediterranean diet simply because of different cultural lifestyle patterns,” Dr. Postuma said.
It is also possible that the Mediterranean diet affects prodromal markers such as constipation, sleep, or depression without affecting underlying neurodegenerative disease. In any case, the effect sizes observed in the study were small, and there was no evidence that participants who adhered most closely to a Mediterranean diet had less parkinsonism, Dr. Postuma said.
These limitations do not preclude physicians from recommending the diet for other reasons. “Numerous studies, reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials consistently rank the Mediterranean diet as among the healthiest diets available,” Dr. Postuma said. “So, one can clearly recommend diets such as these, even if not necessarily for Parkinson’s disease prevention.”
Adding insights
The researchers used a Mediterranean diet score that was developed in a population of adults from metropolitan Athens, “an area not unlike the one in which the score is being applied in the HELIAD study,” Christy C. Tangney, PhD, professor of clinical nutrition and preventive medicine and associate dean for research at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, said in a separate editorial. As expected, the average Mediterranean diet adherence score in this study was higher than that in the Chicago Health and Aging Project (33.2 vs. 28.2).
“If we can identify differences in diet or lifestyle patterns and risk of this latent phase of Parkinson’s disease neurodegeneration, we may be one step closer to identifying preventive measures,” she said. Follow-up reports from HELIAD and other cohorts may allow researchers to assess how changes in dietary patterns relate to changes in Parkinson’s disease markers, the probability of prodromal Parkinson’s disease, and incident Parkinson’s disease, Dr. Tangney said.
The study authors had no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures. The study was supported by a grant from the Alzheimer’s Association, an ESPA‐EU grant cofunded by the European Social Fund and Greek National resources, and a grant from the Ministry for Health and Social Solidarity (Greece). Dr. Maraki and a coauthor have received financial support from the Greek State Scholarships Foundation. Dr. Tangney and Dr. Postuma had no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Maraki MI et al. Mov Disord. 2018 Oct 10. doi: 10.1002/mds.27489.
FROM MOVEMENT DISORDERS
Key clinical point: Adherence to a Mediterranean diet is associated with lower probability of prodromal Parkinson’s disease.
Major finding: Each 1-unit increase in Mediterranean diet score was associated with a 2% decreased probability for prodromal Parkinson’s disease.
Study details: A study of 1,731 older adults in the population-based Hellenic Longitudinal Investigation of Aging and Diet (HELIAD) cohort in Greece.
Disclosures: The study authors had no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures. The study was supported by a grant from the Alzheimer’s Association, an ESPA‐EU grant cofunded by the European Social Fund and Greek National resources, and a grant from the Ministry for Health and Social Solidarity (Greece). Dr. Maraki and a coauthor have received financial support from the Greek State Scholarships Foundation.
Source: Maraki MI et al. Mov Disord. 2018 Oct 10. doi:10.1002/mds.27489.
Targeted triplet shows potential for B-cell cancers
A triplet combination of targeted agents ublituximab, umbralisib, and ibrutinib may be a safe and effective regimen for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and other B-cell malignancies, according to early study results.
The phase 1 trial had an overall response rate of 84% and a favorable safety profile, reported lead author Loretta J. Nastoupil, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and her colleagues. The results suggest that the regimen could eventually serve as a nonchemotherapeutic option for patients with B-cell malignancies.
“Therapeutic targeting of the B-cell receptor signaling pathway has revolutionized the management of B-cell lymphomas,” the investigators wrote in the Lancet Haematology. “Optimum combinations that result in longer periods of remission, possibly allowing for discontinuation of therapy, are needed.”
The present triplet combination included ublituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody; ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor; and umbralisib, a phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta inhibitor.
A total of 46 patients with CLL/SLL or relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma received at least one dose of the combination in dose-escalation or dose-expansion study sections.
In the dose-escalation group (n = 24), ublituximab was given intravenously at 900 mg, ibrutinib was given orally at 420 mg for CLL and 560 mg for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and umbralisib was given orally at three dose levels: 400 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg.
In the dose-expansion group (n = 22), umbralisib was set at 800 mg while the other agents remained at the previous doses; treatment continued until intolerance or disease progression occurred. The investigators monitored efficacy and safety at defined intervals.
Results showed that 37 out of 44 evaluable patients (84%) had partial or complete responses to therapy.
Among the 22 CLL/SLL patients, there was a 100% overall response rate for both previously treated and untreated patients. Similarly, all three of the patients with marginal zone lymphoma responded, all six of the patients with mantle cell lymphoma responded, and five of seven patients with follicular lymphoma responded. However, only one of the six patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma had even a partial response.
The most common adverse events of any kind were diarrhea (59%), fatigue (50%), infusion-related reaction (43%), dizziness (37%), nausea (37%), and cough (35%). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (22%) and cellulitis (13%).
Serious adverse events were reported in 24% of patients; pneumonia, rash, sepsis, atrial fibrillation, and syncope occurred in two patients each; abdominal pain, pneumonitis, cellulitis, headache, skin infection, pleural effusion, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, pericardial effusion, weakness, and diarrhea occurred in one patient each. No adverse event–related deaths were reported.
“The findings of this study establish the tolerable safety profile of the ublituximab, umbralisib, and ibrutinib triplet regimen in chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma and relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma,” the investigators wrote. “This triplet combination is expected to be investigated further in future clinical trials in different patient populations.”
The study was funded by TG Therapeutics. The authors reported financial relationships with TG Therapeutics and other companies.
SOURCE: Nastoupil LJ et al. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Feb;6(2):e100-9.
A triplet combination of targeted agents ublituximab, umbralisib, and ibrutinib may be a safe and effective regimen for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and other B-cell malignancies, according to early study results.
The phase 1 trial had an overall response rate of 84% and a favorable safety profile, reported lead author Loretta J. Nastoupil, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and her colleagues. The results suggest that the regimen could eventually serve as a nonchemotherapeutic option for patients with B-cell malignancies.
“Therapeutic targeting of the B-cell receptor signaling pathway has revolutionized the management of B-cell lymphomas,” the investigators wrote in the Lancet Haematology. “Optimum combinations that result in longer periods of remission, possibly allowing for discontinuation of therapy, are needed.”
The present triplet combination included ublituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody; ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor; and umbralisib, a phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta inhibitor.
A total of 46 patients with CLL/SLL or relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma received at least one dose of the combination in dose-escalation or dose-expansion study sections.
In the dose-escalation group (n = 24), ublituximab was given intravenously at 900 mg, ibrutinib was given orally at 420 mg for CLL and 560 mg for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and umbralisib was given orally at three dose levels: 400 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg.
In the dose-expansion group (n = 22), umbralisib was set at 800 mg while the other agents remained at the previous doses; treatment continued until intolerance or disease progression occurred. The investigators monitored efficacy and safety at defined intervals.
Results showed that 37 out of 44 evaluable patients (84%) had partial or complete responses to therapy.
Among the 22 CLL/SLL patients, there was a 100% overall response rate for both previously treated and untreated patients. Similarly, all three of the patients with marginal zone lymphoma responded, all six of the patients with mantle cell lymphoma responded, and five of seven patients with follicular lymphoma responded. However, only one of the six patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma had even a partial response.
The most common adverse events of any kind were diarrhea (59%), fatigue (50%), infusion-related reaction (43%), dizziness (37%), nausea (37%), and cough (35%). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (22%) and cellulitis (13%).
Serious adverse events were reported in 24% of patients; pneumonia, rash, sepsis, atrial fibrillation, and syncope occurred in two patients each; abdominal pain, pneumonitis, cellulitis, headache, skin infection, pleural effusion, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, pericardial effusion, weakness, and diarrhea occurred in one patient each. No adverse event–related deaths were reported.
“The findings of this study establish the tolerable safety profile of the ublituximab, umbralisib, and ibrutinib triplet regimen in chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma and relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma,” the investigators wrote. “This triplet combination is expected to be investigated further in future clinical trials in different patient populations.”
The study was funded by TG Therapeutics. The authors reported financial relationships with TG Therapeutics and other companies.
SOURCE: Nastoupil LJ et al. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Feb;6(2):e100-9.
A triplet combination of targeted agents ublituximab, umbralisib, and ibrutinib may be a safe and effective regimen for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and other B-cell malignancies, according to early study results.
The phase 1 trial had an overall response rate of 84% and a favorable safety profile, reported lead author Loretta J. Nastoupil, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and her colleagues. The results suggest that the regimen could eventually serve as a nonchemotherapeutic option for patients with B-cell malignancies.
“Therapeutic targeting of the B-cell receptor signaling pathway has revolutionized the management of B-cell lymphomas,” the investigators wrote in the Lancet Haematology. “Optimum combinations that result in longer periods of remission, possibly allowing for discontinuation of therapy, are needed.”
The present triplet combination included ublituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody; ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor; and umbralisib, a phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta inhibitor.
A total of 46 patients with CLL/SLL or relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma received at least one dose of the combination in dose-escalation or dose-expansion study sections.
In the dose-escalation group (n = 24), ublituximab was given intravenously at 900 mg, ibrutinib was given orally at 420 mg for CLL and 560 mg for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and umbralisib was given orally at three dose levels: 400 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg.
In the dose-expansion group (n = 22), umbralisib was set at 800 mg while the other agents remained at the previous doses; treatment continued until intolerance or disease progression occurred. The investigators monitored efficacy and safety at defined intervals.
Results showed that 37 out of 44 evaluable patients (84%) had partial or complete responses to therapy.
Among the 22 CLL/SLL patients, there was a 100% overall response rate for both previously treated and untreated patients. Similarly, all three of the patients with marginal zone lymphoma responded, all six of the patients with mantle cell lymphoma responded, and five of seven patients with follicular lymphoma responded. However, only one of the six patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma had even a partial response.
The most common adverse events of any kind were diarrhea (59%), fatigue (50%), infusion-related reaction (43%), dizziness (37%), nausea (37%), and cough (35%). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (22%) and cellulitis (13%).
Serious adverse events were reported in 24% of patients; pneumonia, rash, sepsis, atrial fibrillation, and syncope occurred in two patients each; abdominal pain, pneumonitis, cellulitis, headache, skin infection, pleural effusion, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, pericardial effusion, weakness, and diarrhea occurred in one patient each. No adverse event–related deaths were reported.
“The findings of this study establish the tolerable safety profile of the ublituximab, umbralisib, and ibrutinib triplet regimen in chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma and relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma,” the investigators wrote. “This triplet combination is expected to be investigated further in future clinical trials in different patient populations.”
The study was funded by TG Therapeutics. The authors reported financial relationships with TG Therapeutics and other companies.
SOURCE: Nastoupil LJ et al. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Feb;6(2):e100-9.
FROM LANCET HAEMATOLOGY
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Out of 44 patients, 37 (84%) achieved a partial or complete response to therapy.
Study details: A phase 1, multicenter, dose-escalation and dose-expansion trial involving 46 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic leukemia, or relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Disclosures: The study was funded by TG Therapeutics. The authors reported financial relationships with TG Therapeutics and other companies.
Source: Nastoupil LJ et al. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Feb;6(2):e100-9.
International survey probes oxygen’s efficacy for cluster headache
According to the results, triptans also are highly effective, with some side effects. Newer medications deserve further study, the researchers said.
To assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of acute cluster headache medications in a large international sample, Stuart M. Pearson, a researcher in the department of psychology at the University of West Georgia in Carrollton, and his coauthors analyzed data from the Cluster Headache Questionnaire. Respondents from more than 50 countries completed the online survey; most were from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. The survey included questions about cluster headache diagnostic criteria and medication effectiveness, complications, and access to medications.
In all, 3,251 subjects participated in the questionnaire, and 2,193 respondents met criteria for the study; 1,604 had cluster headache, and 589 had probable cluster headache. Among the respondents with cluster headache, 68.8% were male, 78.0% had episodic cluster headache, and the average age was 46 years. More than half of respondents reported complete or very effective treatment for triptans (54%) and oxygen (also 54%). The proportion of respondents who reported that ergot derivatives, caffeine or energy drinks, and intranasal ketamine were completely or very effective ranged from 14% to 25%. Patients were less likely to report high levels of efficacy for opioids (6%), intranasal capsaicin (5%), and intranasal lidocaine (2%).
Participants experienced few complications from oxygen, with 99% reporting no or minimal physical and medical complications, and 97% reporting no or minimal psychological and emotional complications. Patients also reported few complications from intranasal lidocaine, intranasal ketamine, intranasal capsaicin, and caffeine and energy drinks. For triptans, 74% of respondents reported no or minimal physical and medical complications, and 85% reported no or minimal psychological and emotional complications.
Among the 139 participants with cluster headache who were aged 65 years or older, responses were similar to those for the entire population. In addition, the 589 respondents with probable cluster headache reported similar efficacy data, compared with respondents with a full diagnosis of cluster headache.
“Oxygen in particular had a high rate of complete effectiveness, a low rate of ineffectiveness, and a low rate of physical, medical, emotional, and psychological side effects,” the investigators said. “However, respondents reported that it was difficult to obtain.”
Limited insurance coverage of oxygen may affect access, even though the treatment has a Level A recommendation for the acute treatment of cluster headache in the American Headache Society guidelines, the authors said. Physicians also may pose a barrier. A prior study found that 12% of providers did not prescribe oxygen for cluster headache because they doubted its efficacy or did not know about it. In addition, there may be concerns that the treatment could be a fire hazard in a patient population that has high rates of smoking, the researchers said.
Limitations of the study include the survey’s use of nonvalidated questions, the lack of a formal clinical diagnosis of cluster headache, and the grouping of all triptans, rather than assessing individual triptan medications, such as sumatriptan subcutaneous, alone.
The study received funding from Autonomic Technologies and Clusterbusters. One of the authors has served as a paid consultant to Eli Lilly as a member of the data monitoring committee for clinical trials of galcanezumab for cluster headache and migraine.
This article was updated 3/7/2019.
SOURCE: Pearson SM et al. Headache. 2019 Jan 11. doi: 10.1111/head.13473.
According to the results, triptans also are highly effective, with some side effects. Newer medications deserve further study, the researchers said.
To assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of acute cluster headache medications in a large international sample, Stuart M. Pearson, a researcher in the department of psychology at the University of West Georgia in Carrollton, and his coauthors analyzed data from the Cluster Headache Questionnaire. Respondents from more than 50 countries completed the online survey; most were from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. The survey included questions about cluster headache diagnostic criteria and medication effectiveness, complications, and access to medications.
In all, 3,251 subjects participated in the questionnaire, and 2,193 respondents met criteria for the study; 1,604 had cluster headache, and 589 had probable cluster headache. Among the respondents with cluster headache, 68.8% were male, 78.0% had episodic cluster headache, and the average age was 46 years. More than half of respondents reported complete or very effective treatment for triptans (54%) and oxygen (also 54%). The proportion of respondents who reported that ergot derivatives, caffeine or energy drinks, and intranasal ketamine were completely or very effective ranged from 14% to 25%. Patients were less likely to report high levels of efficacy for opioids (6%), intranasal capsaicin (5%), and intranasal lidocaine (2%).
Participants experienced few complications from oxygen, with 99% reporting no or minimal physical and medical complications, and 97% reporting no or minimal psychological and emotional complications. Patients also reported few complications from intranasal lidocaine, intranasal ketamine, intranasal capsaicin, and caffeine and energy drinks. For triptans, 74% of respondents reported no or minimal physical and medical complications, and 85% reported no or minimal psychological and emotional complications.
Among the 139 participants with cluster headache who were aged 65 years or older, responses were similar to those for the entire population. In addition, the 589 respondents with probable cluster headache reported similar efficacy data, compared with respondents with a full diagnosis of cluster headache.
“Oxygen in particular had a high rate of complete effectiveness, a low rate of ineffectiveness, and a low rate of physical, medical, emotional, and psychological side effects,” the investigators said. “However, respondents reported that it was difficult to obtain.”
Limited insurance coverage of oxygen may affect access, even though the treatment has a Level A recommendation for the acute treatment of cluster headache in the American Headache Society guidelines, the authors said. Physicians also may pose a barrier. A prior study found that 12% of providers did not prescribe oxygen for cluster headache because they doubted its efficacy or did not know about it. In addition, there may be concerns that the treatment could be a fire hazard in a patient population that has high rates of smoking, the researchers said.
Limitations of the study include the survey’s use of nonvalidated questions, the lack of a formal clinical diagnosis of cluster headache, and the grouping of all triptans, rather than assessing individual triptan medications, such as sumatriptan subcutaneous, alone.
The study received funding from Autonomic Technologies and Clusterbusters. One of the authors has served as a paid consultant to Eli Lilly as a member of the data monitoring committee for clinical trials of galcanezumab for cluster headache and migraine.
This article was updated 3/7/2019.
SOURCE: Pearson SM et al. Headache. 2019 Jan 11. doi: 10.1111/head.13473.
According to the results, triptans also are highly effective, with some side effects. Newer medications deserve further study, the researchers said.
To assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of acute cluster headache medications in a large international sample, Stuart M. Pearson, a researcher in the department of psychology at the University of West Georgia in Carrollton, and his coauthors analyzed data from the Cluster Headache Questionnaire. Respondents from more than 50 countries completed the online survey; most were from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. The survey included questions about cluster headache diagnostic criteria and medication effectiveness, complications, and access to medications.
In all, 3,251 subjects participated in the questionnaire, and 2,193 respondents met criteria for the study; 1,604 had cluster headache, and 589 had probable cluster headache. Among the respondents with cluster headache, 68.8% were male, 78.0% had episodic cluster headache, and the average age was 46 years. More than half of respondents reported complete or very effective treatment for triptans (54%) and oxygen (also 54%). The proportion of respondents who reported that ergot derivatives, caffeine or energy drinks, and intranasal ketamine were completely or very effective ranged from 14% to 25%. Patients were less likely to report high levels of efficacy for opioids (6%), intranasal capsaicin (5%), and intranasal lidocaine (2%).
Participants experienced few complications from oxygen, with 99% reporting no or minimal physical and medical complications, and 97% reporting no or minimal psychological and emotional complications. Patients also reported few complications from intranasal lidocaine, intranasal ketamine, intranasal capsaicin, and caffeine and energy drinks. For triptans, 74% of respondents reported no or minimal physical and medical complications, and 85% reported no or minimal psychological and emotional complications.
Among the 139 participants with cluster headache who were aged 65 years or older, responses were similar to those for the entire population. In addition, the 589 respondents with probable cluster headache reported similar efficacy data, compared with respondents with a full diagnosis of cluster headache.
“Oxygen in particular had a high rate of complete effectiveness, a low rate of ineffectiveness, and a low rate of physical, medical, emotional, and psychological side effects,” the investigators said. “However, respondents reported that it was difficult to obtain.”
Limited insurance coverage of oxygen may affect access, even though the treatment has a Level A recommendation for the acute treatment of cluster headache in the American Headache Society guidelines, the authors said. Physicians also may pose a barrier. A prior study found that 12% of providers did not prescribe oxygen for cluster headache because they doubted its efficacy or did not know about it. In addition, there may be concerns that the treatment could be a fire hazard in a patient population that has high rates of smoking, the researchers said.
Limitations of the study include the survey’s use of nonvalidated questions, the lack of a formal clinical diagnosis of cluster headache, and the grouping of all triptans, rather than assessing individual triptan medications, such as sumatriptan subcutaneous, alone.
The study received funding from Autonomic Technologies and Clusterbusters. One of the authors has served as a paid consultant to Eli Lilly as a member of the data monitoring committee for clinical trials of galcanezumab for cluster headache and migraine.
This article was updated 3/7/2019.
SOURCE: Pearson SM et al. Headache. 2019 Jan 11. doi: 10.1111/head.13473.
FROM HEADACHE
Key clinical point: Oxygen is a highly effective treatment for cluster headache with few complications.
Major finding: More than half of respondents (54%) reported that triptans and oxygen were completely or very effective.
Study details: Analysis of data from 1,604 people with cluster headache who completed the online Cluster Headache Questionnaire.
Disclosures: The study received funding from Autonomic Technologies and Clusterbusters. One of the authors has served as a paid consultant to Eli Lilly as a member of the data monitoring committee for clinical trials of galcanezumab for cluster headache and migraine.
Source: Pearson SM et al. Headache. 2019 Jan 11. doi: 10.1111/head.13473.
Anthracyclines, bendamustine are options for grade 3A follicular lymphoma
While optimal treatment for grade 3A follicular lymphoma remains in question, either anthracycline-based chemotherapy or bendamustine appear to be preferable to cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP), results of a recent analysis suggest.
Time to progression with anthracycline-based chemotherapy was superior to that of CVP in the retrospective, multicenter study.
At the same time, clinical outcomes were comparable between anthracycline-based chemotherapy and bendamustine, according to Nirav N. Shah, MD, of the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, and his coinvestigators.
“Both remain appropriate frontline options for this patient population,” Dr. Shah and his colleagues wrote in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia.
Frontline therapy for follicular lymphoma has evolved, and recently shifted toward bendamustine-based chemotherapy regimens in light of two large randomized trials, according to the investigators. However, optimal therapy – specifically for grade 3A follicular lymphoma – has been debated for more than 20 years, they added.
“While some approach it as an aggressive malignancy, others treat it as an indolent lymphoma,” they wrote.
Accordingly, Dr. Shah and his colleagues sought to evaluate treatment outcomes with these regimens in 103 advanced stage 3/4 follicular lymphoma patients from six centers seen over a 10-year period.
Of those patients, 65 had received anthracycline-based chemotherapy, 30 received bendamustine, and 8 received CVP. All received either rituximab or ofatumumab in combination with the chemotherapy, and about one-third went on to receive maintenance treatment with one of those two anti-CD20 antibodies.
The proportion of patients not experiencing disease progression at 24 months from the initiation of treatment was significantly different between arms, at 72% for those receiving anthracyclines, 79% for bendamustine, and 50% for CVP (P = .01).
Patients who received CVP had a significantly poorer time-to-progression outcomes versus anthracycline-based chemotherapy, an adjusted analysis showed (hazard ratio, 3.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-8.25; P = .01), while by contrast, there was no significant difference between bendamustine and anthracyclines on this endpoint.
Progression-free survival was likewise worse for CVP compared with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, but there was no significant difference in overall survival for either CVP or bendamustine compared with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, the investigators said.
The 5-year overall survival was estimated to be 82% for anthracycline-based chemotherapy, 74% for bendamustine, and 58% for CVP (P = .23).
Optimal treatment of grade 3A follicular lymphoma remains controversial despite these findings, the investigators noted.
“Unfortunately, this specific histology was excluded from pivotal trials comparing anthracycline-based chemotherapy to bendamustine, leaving the question of optimal frontline treatment unanswered in this subset,” they wrote.
The situation could change with a subgroup analysis of GALLIUM, which might provide some prospective data for this histology. Beyond that, it would be helpful to have prospective, randomized studies specifically enrolling grade 3A disease, Dr. Shah and his coauthors wrote.
Dr. Shah reported disclosures related to Exelixis, Oncosec, Geron, Jazz, Kite, Juno, and Lentigen Technology. Coauthors provided disclosures related to Sanofi-Genzyme, Celgene, Takeda, Otsuka, Spectrum, Merck, and Astellas, among others.
SOURCE: Shah NN et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Feb;19(2):95-102.
While optimal treatment for grade 3A follicular lymphoma remains in question, either anthracycline-based chemotherapy or bendamustine appear to be preferable to cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP), results of a recent analysis suggest.
Time to progression with anthracycline-based chemotherapy was superior to that of CVP in the retrospective, multicenter study.
At the same time, clinical outcomes were comparable between anthracycline-based chemotherapy and bendamustine, according to Nirav N. Shah, MD, of the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, and his coinvestigators.
“Both remain appropriate frontline options for this patient population,” Dr. Shah and his colleagues wrote in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia.
Frontline therapy for follicular lymphoma has evolved, and recently shifted toward bendamustine-based chemotherapy regimens in light of two large randomized trials, according to the investigators. However, optimal therapy – specifically for grade 3A follicular lymphoma – has been debated for more than 20 years, they added.
“While some approach it as an aggressive malignancy, others treat it as an indolent lymphoma,” they wrote.
Accordingly, Dr. Shah and his colleagues sought to evaluate treatment outcomes with these regimens in 103 advanced stage 3/4 follicular lymphoma patients from six centers seen over a 10-year period.
Of those patients, 65 had received anthracycline-based chemotherapy, 30 received bendamustine, and 8 received CVP. All received either rituximab or ofatumumab in combination with the chemotherapy, and about one-third went on to receive maintenance treatment with one of those two anti-CD20 antibodies.
The proportion of patients not experiencing disease progression at 24 months from the initiation of treatment was significantly different between arms, at 72% for those receiving anthracyclines, 79% for bendamustine, and 50% for CVP (P = .01).
Patients who received CVP had a significantly poorer time-to-progression outcomes versus anthracycline-based chemotherapy, an adjusted analysis showed (hazard ratio, 3.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-8.25; P = .01), while by contrast, there was no significant difference between bendamustine and anthracyclines on this endpoint.
Progression-free survival was likewise worse for CVP compared with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, but there was no significant difference in overall survival for either CVP or bendamustine compared with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, the investigators said.
The 5-year overall survival was estimated to be 82% for anthracycline-based chemotherapy, 74% for bendamustine, and 58% for CVP (P = .23).
Optimal treatment of grade 3A follicular lymphoma remains controversial despite these findings, the investigators noted.
“Unfortunately, this specific histology was excluded from pivotal trials comparing anthracycline-based chemotherapy to bendamustine, leaving the question of optimal frontline treatment unanswered in this subset,” they wrote.
The situation could change with a subgroup analysis of GALLIUM, which might provide some prospective data for this histology. Beyond that, it would be helpful to have prospective, randomized studies specifically enrolling grade 3A disease, Dr. Shah and his coauthors wrote.
Dr. Shah reported disclosures related to Exelixis, Oncosec, Geron, Jazz, Kite, Juno, and Lentigen Technology. Coauthors provided disclosures related to Sanofi-Genzyme, Celgene, Takeda, Otsuka, Spectrum, Merck, and Astellas, among others.
SOURCE: Shah NN et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Feb;19(2):95-102.
While optimal treatment for grade 3A follicular lymphoma remains in question, either anthracycline-based chemotherapy or bendamustine appear to be preferable to cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP), results of a recent analysis suggest.
Time to progression with anthracycline-based chemotherapy was superior to that of CVP in the retrospective, multicenter study.
At the same time, clinical outcomes were comparable between anthracycline-based chemotherapy and bendamustine, according to Nirav N. Shah, MD, of the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, and his coinvestigators.
“Both remain appropriate frontline options for this patient population,” Dr. Shah and his colleagues wrote in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia.
Frontline therapy for follicular lymphoma has evolved, and recently shifted toward bendamustine-based chemotherapy regimens in light of two large randomized trials, according to the investigators. However, optimal therapy – specifically for grade 3A follicular lymphoma – has been debated for more than 20 years, they added.
“While some approach it as an aggressive malignancy, others treat it as an indolent lymphoma,” they wrote.
Accordingly, Dr. Shah and his colleagues sought to evaluate treatment outcomes with these regimens in 103 advanced stage 3/4 follicular lymphoma patients from six centers seen over a 10-year period.
Of those patients, 65 had received anthracycline-based chemotherapy, 30 received bendamustine, and 8 received CVP. All received either rituximab or ofatumumab in combination with the chemotherapy, and about one-third went on to receive maintenance treatment with one of those two anti-CD20 antibodies.
The proportion of patients not experiencing disease progression at 24 months from the initiation of treatment was significantly different between arms, at 72% for those receiving anthracyclines, 79% for bendamustine, and 50% for CVP (P = .01).
Patients who received CVP had a significantly poorer time-to-progression outcomes versus anthracycline-based chemotherapy, an adjusted analysis showed (hazard ratio, 3.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-8.25; P = .01), while by contrast, there was no significant difference between bendamustine and anthracyclines on this endpoint.
Progression-free survival was likewise worse for CVP compared with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, but there was no significant difference in overall survival for either CVP or bendamustine compared with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, the investigators said.
The 5-year overall survival was estimated to be 82% for anthracycline-based chemotherapy, 74% for bendamustine, and 58% for CVP (P = .23).
Optimal treatment of grade 3A follicular lymphoma remains controversial despite these findings, the investigators noted.
“Unfortunately, this specific histology was excluded from pivotal trials comparing anthracycline-based chemotherapy to bendamustine, leaving the question of optimal frontline treatment unanswered in this subset,” they wrote.
The situation could change with a subgroup analysis of GALLIUM, which might provide some prospective data for this histology. Beyond that, it would be helpful to have prospective, randomized studies specifically enrolling grade 3A disease, Dr. Shah and his coauthors wrote.
Dr. Shah reported disclosures related to Exelixis, Oncosec, Geron, Jazz, Kite, Juno, and Lentigen Technology. Coauthors provided disclosures related to Sanofi-Genzyme, Celgene, Takeda, Otsuka, Spectrum, Merck, and Astellas, among others.
SOURCE: Shah NN et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Feb;19(2):95-102.
FROM CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Patients who received CVP had a significantly poorer time-to-progression outcome versus anthracycline-based chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.26-8.25; P = .01), while there was no significant difference between bendamustine and anthracyclines.
Study details: A multicenter analysis including 103 patients with advanced stage grade 3A follicular lymphoma.
Disclosures: The authors reported disclosures related to Exelixis, OncoSec, Geron, Jazz, Kite, Juno, Lentigen Technology, Sanofi-Genzyme, Celgene, Takeda, Otsuka, Spectrum, Merck, and Astellas, among others.
Source: Shah NN et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Feb;19(2):95-102.
Ibrutinib-MTX-rituximab combo shows promise in CNS lymphoma
The three-drug combination of ibrutinib, high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX), and rituximab showed positive safety and clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent/refractory primary/secondary CNS lymphoma, according to results from a phase 1b trial.
Ibrutinib has already shown single-agent activity in recurrent/refractory CNS lymphoma, Christian Grommes, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, and his colleagues, wrote in Blood. “The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of ibrutinib in combination with HD-MTX alone and ibrutinib in combination with HD-MTX and rituximab.”
With respect to ibrutinib dosing, the initial cohort was started at 560 mg daily, which was increased to 840 mg daily in successive cohorts using a 3+3 design. HD-MTX was administered every 2 weeks at 3.5 g/m2 for a total of eight infusions, or four cycles, with each cycle lasting of 28 days.
After no dose-limiting adverse effects were seen with the ibrutinib-MTX combination, the researchers added rituximab at 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks, for a total of eight infusions, which completed the induction phase. The three-agent induction therapy was followed by daily ibrutinib monotherapy, which was maintained until discontinuation caused by malignancy progression, intolerable adverse events, or death.
“To minimize the risk of adverse events, we held ibrutinib on days of HD-MTX infusion and resumed 5 days after HD-MTX infusion or after MTX clearance,” they wrote.
After analysis, Dr. Grommes and his colleagues reported that no dose-limiting or grade 5 toxicities were detected. At a median follow-up of 19.7 months, they saw an 80% overall response rate in study patients treated with combination therapy. The median progression free survival for all 15 patients was 9.2 months and the median overall survival was not reached, with 11 of 15 patients alive.
The researchers proposed an 840-mg dose of ibrutinib for future studies.
The most frequent adverse events were lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and transaminase elevations. No fungal infections were seen during the study.
The researchers noted that two key limitations of the study were the nonrandomized design and small sample size. As a result, they reported that the degree of ibrutinib-specific activity in the three-drug combination remains unknown.
The study was supported by grant funding from Pharmacyclics to Memorial Sloan Kettering. The authors reported financial ties to AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, BTH, Kite Pharma, Pfizer, and others.
SOURCE: Grommes C et al. Blood. 2019;133(5):436-45.
The three-drug combination of ibrutinib, high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX), and rituximab showed positive safety and clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent/refractory primary/secondary CNS lymphoma, according to results from a phase 1b trial.
Ibrutinib has already shown single-agent activity in recurrent/refractory CNS lymphoma, Christian Grommes, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, and his colleagues, wrote in Blood. “The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of ibrutinib in combination with HD-MTX alone and ibrutinib in combination with HD-MTX and rituximab.”
With respect to ibrutinib dosing, the initial cohort was started at 560 mg daily, which was increased to 840 mg daily in successive cohorts using a 3+3 design. HD-MTX was administered every 2 weeks at 3.5 g/m2 for a total of eight infusions, or four cycles, with each cycle lasting of 28 days.
After no dose-limiting adverse effects were seen with the ibrutinib-MTX combination, the researchers added rituximab at 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks, for a total of eight infusions, which completed the induction phase. The three-agent induction therapy was followed by daily ibrutinib monotherapy, which was maintained until discontinuation caused by malignancy progression, intolerable adverse events, or death.
“To minimize the risk of adverse events, we held ibrutinib on days of HD-MTX infusion and resumed 5 days after HD-MTX infusion or after MTX clearance,” they wrote.
After analysis, Dr. Grommes and his colleagues reported that no dose-limiting or grade 5 toxicities were detected. At a median follow-up of 19.7 months, they saw an 80% overall response rate in study patients treated with combination therapy. The median progression free survival for all 15 patients was 9.2 months and the median overall survival was not reached, with 11 of 15 patients alive.
The researchers proposed an 840-mg dose of ibrutinib for future studies.
The most frequent adverse events were lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and transaminase elevations. No fungal infections were seen during the study.
The researchers noted that two key limitations of the study were the nonrandomized design and small sample size. As a result, they reported that the degree of ibrutinib-specific activity in the three-drug combination remains unknown.
The study was supported by grant funding from Pharmacyclics to Memorial Sloan Kettering. The authors reported financial ties to AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, BTH, Kite Pharma, Pfizer, and others.
SOURCE: Grommes C et al. Blood. 2019;133(5):436-45.
The three-drug combination of ibrutinib, high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX), and rituximab showed positive safety and clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent/refractory primary/secondary CNS lymphoma, according to results from a phase 1b trial.
Ibrutinib has already shown single-agent activity in recurrent/refractory CNS lymphoma, Christian Grommes, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, and his colleagues, wrote in Blood. “The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of ibrutinib in combination with HD-MTX alone and ibrutinib in combination with HD-MTX and rituximab.”
With respect to ibrutinib dosing, the initial cohort was started at 560 mg daily, which was increased to 840 mg daily in successive cohorts using a 3+3 design. HD-MTX was administered every 2 weeks at 3.5 g/m2 for a total of eight infusions, or four cycles, with each cycle lasting of 28 days.
After no dose-limiting adverse effects were seen with the ibrutinib-MTX combination, the researchers added rituximab at 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks, for a total of eight infusions, which completed the induction phase. The three-agent induction therapy was followed by daily ibrutinib monotherapy, which was maintained until discontinuation caused by malignancy progression, intolerable adverse events, or death.
“To minimize the risk of adverse events, we held ibrutinib on days of HD-MTX infusion and resumed 5 days after HD-MTX infusion or after MTX clearance,” they wrote.
After analysis, Dr. Grommes and his colleagues reported that no dose-limiting or grade 5 toxicities were detected. At a median follow-up of 19.7 months, they saw an 80% overall response rate in study patients treated with combination therapy. The median progression free survival for all 15 patients was 9.2 months and the median overall survival was not reached, with 11 of 15 patients alive.
The researchers proposed an 840-mg dose of ibrutinib for future studies.
The most frequent adverse events were lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and transaminase elevations. No fungal infections were seen during the study.
The researchers noted that two key limitations of the study were the nonrandomized design and small sample size. As a result, they reported that the degree of ibrutinib-specific activity in the three-drug combination remains unknown.
The study was supported by grant funding from Pharmacyclics to Memorial Sloan Kettering. The authors reported financial ties to AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, BTH, Kite Pharma, Pfizer, and others.
SOURCE: Grommes C et al. Blood. 2019;133(5):436-45.
FROM BLOOD
Key clinical point:
Major finding: The ibrutinib-based regimen showed an 80% overall response rate; no grade 5 adverse events were reported.
Study details: A phase 1b study of 15 patients with recurrent/refractory CNS lymphoma.
Disclosures: The study was supported by grant funding from Pharmacyclics to Memorial Sloan Kettering. The authors reported financial ties to AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, BTH, Kite Pharma, Pfizer, and others.
Source: Grommes C et al. Blood. 2019;133(5):436-45.
Daratumumab disappoints in non-Hodgkin lymphoma trial
Daratumumab is safe but ineffective for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and CD38 expression of at least 50%, according to findings from a recent phase 2 trial.
Unfortunately, the study met headwinds early on, when initial screening of 112 patients with available tumor samples showed that only about half (56%) had CD38 expression of at least 50%, reported lead author Giles Salles, MD, PhD, of Claude Bernard University in Lyon, France, and his colleagues. The cutoff was based on preclinical models, suggesting that daratumumab-induced cytotoxicity depends on a high level of CD38 expression.
“Only 36 [patients] were eligible for study enrollment, questioning the generalizability of the study population,” the investigators wrote in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia.
Of these 36 patients, 15 had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 16 had follicular lymphoma (FL), and 5 had mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Median CD38 expression was 70%. Patients were given 16 mg/kg of IV daratumumab once a week for two cycles, then every 2 weeks for four cycles, and finally on a monthly basis. Cycles were 28 days long. The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Safety and pharmacokinetics were also evaluated.
Results were generally disappointing, with ORR occurring in two patients (12.5%) with FL and one patient (6.7%) with DLBCL. No patients with MCL responded before the study was terminated. On a more encouraging note, 10 of 16 patients with FL maintained stable disease.
“All 16 patients in the FL cohort had progressed/relapsed on their prior treatment regimen; therefore, the maintenance of stable disease in the FL cohort may suggest some clinical benefit of daratumumab in this subset of NHL,” the investigators wrote.
Pharmacokinetics and safety data were similar to those from multiple myeloma studies of daratumumab; no new safety signals or instances of immunogenicity were encountered. The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse event was thrombocytopenia, which occurred in 11.1% of patients. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 72.2% of patients, but none were grade 4 and only three reactions were grade 3.
The investigators suggested that daratumumab may still play a role in NHL treatment, but not as a single agent.
“It is possible that daratumumab-based combination therapy would have allowed for more responses to be achieved within the current study,” the investigators wrote. “NHL is an extremely heterogeneous disease and the identification of predictive biomarkers and molecular genetics may provide new personalized therapies.”
The study was funded by Janssen Research & Development; two study authors reported employment by Janssen. Others reported financial ties to Janssen, Celgene, Roche, Gilead, Novartis, Amgen, and others.
SOURCE: Salles G et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Jan 2. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.12.013.
Daratumumab is safe but ineffective for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and CD38 expression of at least 50%, according to findings from a recent phase 2 trial.
Unfortunately, the study met headwinds early on, when initial screening of 112 patients with available tumor samples showed that only about half (56%) had CD38 expression of at least 50%, reported lead author Giles Salles, MD, PhD, of Claude Bernard University in Lyon, France, and his colleagues. The cutoff was based on preclinical models, suggesting that daratumumab-induced cytotoxicity depends on a high level of CD38 expression.
“Only 36 [patients] were eligible for study enrollment, questioning the generalizability of the study population,” the investigators wrote in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia.
Of these 36 patients, 15 had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 16 had follicular lymphoma (FL), and 5 had mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Median CD38 expression was 70%. Patients were given 16 mg/kg of IV daratumumab once a week for two cycles, then every 2 weeks for four cycles, and finally on a monthly basis. Cycles were 28 days long. The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Safety and pharmacokinetics were also evaluated.
Results were generally disappointing, with ORR occurring in two patients (12.5%) with FL and one patient (6.7%) with DLBCL. No patients with MCL responded before the study was terminated. On a more encouraging note, 10 of 16 patients with FL maintained stable disease.
“All 16 patients in the FL cohort had progressed/relapsed on their prior treatment regimen; therefore, the maintenance of stable disease in the FL cohort may suggest some clinical benefit of daratumumab in this subset of NHL,” the investigators wrote.
Pharmacokinetics and safety data were similar to those from multiple myeloma studies of daratumumab; no new safety signals or instances of immunogenicity were encountered. The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse event was thrombocytopenia, which occurred in 11.1% of patients. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 72.2% of patients, but none were grade 4 and only three reactions were grade 3.
The investigators suggested that daratumumab may still play a role in NHL treatment, but not as a single agent.
“It is possible that daratumumab-based combination therapy would have allowed for more responses to be achieved within the current study,” the investigators wrote. “NHL is an extremely heterogeneous disease and the identification of predictive biomarkers and molecular genetics may provide new personalized therapies.”
The study was funded by Janssen Research & Development; two study authors reported employment by Janssen. Others reported financial ties to Janssen, Celgene, Roche, Gilead, Novartis, Amgen, and others.
SOURCE: Salles G et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Jan 2. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.12.013.
Daratumumab is safe but ineffective for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and CD38 expression of at least 50%, according to findings from a recent phase 2 trial.
Unfortunately, the study met headwinds early on, when initial screening of 112 patients with available tumor samples showed that only about half (56%) had CD38 expression of at least 50%, reported lead author Giles Salles, MD, PhD, of Claude Bernard University in Lyon, France, and his colleagues. The cutoff was based on preclinical models, suggesting that daratumumab-induced cytotoxicity depends on a high level of CD38 expression.
“Only 36 [patients] were eligible for study enrollment, questioning the generalizability of the study population,” the investigators wrote in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia.
Of these 36 patients, 15 had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 16 had follicular lymphoma (FL), and 5 had mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Median CD38 expression was 70%. Patients were given 16 mg/kg of IV daratumumab once a week for two cycles, then every 2 weeks for four cycles, and finally on a monthly basis. Cycles were 28 days long. The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Safety and pharmacokinetics were also evaluated.
Results were generally disappointing, with ORR occurring in two patients (12.5%) with FL and one patient (6.7%) with DLBCL. No patients with MCL responded before the study was terminated. On a more encouraging note, 10 of 16 patients with FL maintained stable disease.
“All 16 patients in the FL cohort had progressed/relapsed on their prior treatment regimen; therefore, the maintenance of stable disease in the FL cohort may suggest some clinical benefit of daratumumab in this subset of NHL,” the investigators wrote.
Pharmacokinetics and safety data were similar to those from multiple myeloma studies of daratumumab; no new safety signals or instances of immunogenicity were encountered. The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse event was thrombocytopenia, which occurred in 11.1% of patients. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 72.2% of patients, but none were grade 4 and only three reactions were grade 3.
The investigators suggested that daratumumab may still play a role in NHL treatment, but not as a single agent.
“It is possible that daratumumab-based combination therapy would have allowed for more responses to be achieved within the current study,” the investigators wrote. “NHL is an extremely heterogeneous disease and the identification of predictive biomarkers and molecular genetics may provide new personalized therapies.”
The study was funded by Janssen Research & Development; two study authors reported employment by Janssen. Others reported financial ties to Janssen, Celgene, Roche, Gilead, Novartis, Amgen, and others.
SOURCE: Salles G et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Jan 2. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.12.013.
FROM CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA
Key clinical point:
Major finding: The overall response rate was 12.5% for patients with follicular lymphoma and 6.7% for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). There were no responders in the mantle cell lymphoma cohort.
Study details: An open-label, phase 2 trial involving 15 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 16 patients with follicular lymphoma, and 5 patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
Disclosures: The study was funded by Janssen Research & Development; two study authors reported employment by Janssen. Others reported financial ties to Janssen, Celgene, Roche, Gilead, Novartis, Amgen, and others.
Source: Salles G et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Jan 2. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.12.013.