Will Pass

FROM HAEMOPHILIA

Some patients with severe hemophilia A can be managed with weekly injections of the recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) product turoctocog alfa pegol (N8-GP), based on results from an extension of the pathfinder 2 trial.

Crystal/Wikimedia Commons/Creative Commons Attribution 2.0

In patients who had two or fewer bleeding episodes during the preceding 6 months, N8-GP was effective for prophylaxis and treating bleeding episodes without causing inhibitor development, reported lead author Nicola Curry, MD, of the Oxford (England) Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre at Churchill Hospital and her colleagues.

The trial exemplifies an ongoing effort to reduce frequency of prophylaxis in hemophilia A.

N8-GP, given every 4 days (or twice weekly in children), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in February 2019; however, the investigators hypothesized that dose frequency could be stepped down in those who responded well to initial treatment.

“Many patients struggle to integrate prophylactic schedules into their daily lives, leading to missed injections and increased bleeding episodes,” the investigators wrote in a Haemophilia. “Therefore, prophylactic strategies offering effective haemostatic coverage with more convenient administration schedules are needed.”

To this end, the investigators identified 55 patients (at least 12 years old) from the pathfinder 2 trial who had two or fewer bleeding episodes during the preceding 6 months. From this group, 17 patients continued to receive 50 IU/kg of N8-GP every 4 days, as they had done during the main trial, while 38 patients received a higher dose – 75 IU/kg – every 7 days.

When necessary, N8-GP was used to treat bleeding episodes. Primary coendpoints were immunogenicity and efficacy, while all secondary endpoints were safety measures.

For both cohorts, median annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was 0.00 days, and greater than 50% of patients experienced no bleeds (53% every 4 days vs. 58% weekly). No inhibitors developed during the extension phase of the trial.

Along with strong support for weekly prophylaxis, N8-GP demonstrated efficiency in treating bleeding episodes; 87.5% of episodes were controlled with just one injection. This rate increased to 94.7% when including two or fewer injections.

During the study, 108 adverse events were reported in 65.5% of patients, although almost all were mild or moderate in severity, and unrelated to N8-GP. Five adverse events in five patients were related to treatment, including rash, headache, purpura, increased aspartate aminotransferase, and thrombocytopenia. No thromboembolic events were reported.

“These findings suggest that weekly N8-GP may provide effective prophylaxis with a reduced treatment burden for a selected subset of low-bleeding patients with severe haemophilia A,” the investigators wrote.

The study was funded by Novo Nordisk. The investigators reported financial relationships with Bayer, CSL, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Genentech, Shire, and others.

SOURCE: Curry N et al. Haemophilia. 2019 Feb 28. doi: 10.1111/hae.13712.

FROM HAEMOPHILIA

Some patients with severe hemophilia A can be managed with weekly injections of the recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) product turoctocog alfa pegol (N8-GP), based on results from an extension of the pathfinder 2 trial.

Crystal/Wikimedia Commons/Creative Commons Attribution 2.0

In patients who had two or fewer bleeding episodes during the preceding 6 months, N8-GP was effective for prophylaxis and treating bleeding episodes without causing inhibitor development, reported lead author Nicola Curry, MD, of the Oxford (England) Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre at Churchill Hospital and her colleagues.

The trial exemplifies an ongoing effort to reduce frequency of prophylaxis in hemophilia A.

N8-GP, given every 4 days (or twice weekly in children), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in February 2019; however, the investigators hypothesized that dose frequency could be stepped down in those who responded well to initial treatment.

“Many patients struggle to integrate prophylactic schedules into their daily lives, leading to missed injections and increased bleeding episodes,” the investigators wrote in a Haemophilia. “Therefore, prophylactic strategies offering effective haemostatic coverage with more convenient administration schedules are needed.”

To this end, the investigators identified 55 patients (at least 12 years old) from the pathfinder 2 trial who had two or fewer bleeding episodes during the preceding 6 months. From this group, 17 patients continued to receive 50 IU/kg of N8-GP every 4 days, as they had done during the main trial, while 38 patients received a higher dose – 75 IU/kg – every 7 days.

When necessary, N8-GP was used to treat bleeding episodes. Primary coendpoints were immunogenicity and efficacy, while all secondary endpoints were safety measures.

For both cohorts, median annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was 0.00 days, and greater than 50% of patients experienced no bleeds (53% every 4 days vs. 58% weekly). No inhibitors developed during the extension phase of the trial.

Along with strong support for weekly prophylaxis, N8-GP demonstrated efficiency in treating bleeding episodes; 87.5% of episodes were controlled with just one injection. This rate increased to 94.7% when including two or fewer injections.

During the study, 108 adverse events were reported in 65.5% of patients, although almost all were mild or moderate in severity, and unrelated to N8-GP. Five adverse events in five patients were related to treatment, including rash, headache, purpura, increased aspartate aminotransferase, and thrombocytopenia. No thromboembolic events were reported.

“These findings suggest that weekly N8-GP may provide effective prophylaxis with a reduced treatment burden for a selected subset of low-bleeding patients with severe haemophilia A,” the investigators wrote.

The study was funded by Novo Nordisk. The investigators reported financial relationships with Bayer, CSL, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Genentech, Shire, and others.

SOURCE: Curry N et al. Haemophilia. 2019 Feb 28. doi: 10.1111/hae.13712.

FROM HAEMOPHILIA

Some patients with severe hemophilia A can be managed with weekly injections of the recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) product turoctocog alfa pegol (N8-GP), based on results from an extension of the pathfinder 2 trial.

Crystal/Wikimedia Commons/Creative Commons Attribution 2.0

In patients who had two or fewer bleeding episodes during the preceding 6 months, N8-GP was effective for prophylaxis and treating bleeding episodes without causing inhibitor development, reported lead author Nicola Curry, MD, of the Oxford (England) Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre at Churchill Hospital and her colleagues.

The trial exemplifies an ongoing effort to reduce frequency of prophylaxis in hemophilia A.

N8-GP, given every 4 days (or twice weekly in children), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in February 2019; however, the investigators hypothesized that dose frequency could be stepped down in those who responded well to initial treatment.

“Many patients struggle to integrate prophylactic schedules into their daily lives, leading to missed injections and increased bleeding episodes,” the investigators wrote in a Haemophilia. “Therefore, prophylactic strategies offering effective haemostatic coverage with more convenient administration schedules are needed.”

To this end, the investigators identified 55 patients (at least 12 years old) from the pathfinder 2 trial who had two or fewer bleeding episodes during the preceding 6 months. From this group, 17 patients continued to receive 50 IU/kg of N8-GP every 4 days, as they had done during the main trial, while 38 patients received a higher dose – 75 IU/kg – every 7 days.

When necessary, N8-GP was used to treat bleeding episodes. Primary coendpoints were immunogenicity and efficacy, while all secondary endpoints were safety measures.

For both cohorts, median annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was 0.00 days, and greater than 50% of patients experienced no bleeds (53% every 4 days vs. 58% weekly). No inhibitors developed during the extension phase of the trial.

Along with strong support for weekly prophylaxis, N8-GP demonstrated efficiency in treating bleeding episodes; 87.5% of episodes were controlled with just one injection. This rate increased to 94.7% when including two or fewer injections.

During the study, 108 adverse events were reported in 65.5% of patients, although almost all were mild or moderate in severity, and unrelated to N8-GP. Five adverse events in five patients were related to treatment, including rash, headache, purpura, increased aspartate aminotransferase, and thrombocytopenia. No thromboembolic events were reported.

“These findings suggest that weekly N8-GP may provide effective prophylaxis with a reduced treatment burden for a selected subset of low-bleeding patients with severe haemophilia A,” the investigators wrote.

The study was funded by Novo Nordisk. The investigators reported financial relationships with Bayer, CSL, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Genentech, Shire, and others.

SOURCE: Curry N et al. Haemophilia. 2019 Feb 28. doi: 10.1111/hae.13712.

Erectile dysfunction (ED) appears prevalent among men with hemophilia and becomes increasingly common with age, according to results from a recent survey.

Although the findings may not be generalizable because of small sample size (44 respondents), the survey offers a general sense of the sexual health of patients with hemophilia, which is a minimally researched topic, reported lead author Ming Yang, PhD, of the British Columbia Provincial Bleeding Disorders Program at St. Paul’s Hospital in Vancouver and colleagues.

Such data become increasingly important as new hemophilia therapies further extend the lifespan of patients, which thereby exposes them to diseases of old age, the investigators noted in Haemophilia.

Additionally, ED is considered an early sign of endothelial dysfunction in the general population, but data are lacking for patients with hemophilia.

Among the 56 men with hemophilia A or B who were surveyed with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, 44 completed the survey (median age, 49 years). Specifically, respondents completed the “erectile function” component of the questionnaire because this is the only domain that has been validated.

To assess associations between ED and well-established risk factors, the investigators recorded prior surgeries, medications, atherosclerotic diseases, viral infections, and hemophilia-specific factors. To better characterize the population and look for other associations, the investigators had patients undergo baseline laboratory testing and measurements of blood pressure, anthropomorphic indexes, and endothelial function.

According to the IIEF, 38.6% of patients had ED, which was subcategorized as mild and mild to moderate in 4.5% of patients, moderate in 18.2%, and severe in 15.9%.

The investigators found significant associations between ED and coronary artery disease, hypertension, smoking, higher waist/hip ratio, homocysteine level, and age. However, on multivariable analysis, only age was correlated with ED domain score (P = .03). No associations between ED and endothelial dysfunction were reported.

While the findings may offer a rare look at ED rates in patients with hemophilia, they are insufficient for comparisons and generalizations, the investigators cautioned.

“Without comparative studies within the haemophilia population in Canada or elsewhere and due to limited sample size and non‐normalized distribution of our age group, this prevalence cannot reasonably be generalized to the entire haemophilia population,” the investigators wrote.

Instead, the investigators suggested that more studies are needed, especially ones involving customized questionnaires.

The study was funded by Pfizer. Dr. Yang reported having no conflicts of interest. One coauthor reported an unrestricted educational award from the Association of Hemophilia Clinic Directors of Canada/Baxter Canadian Hemostasis Fellowship, and another coauthor reported research funding from Pfizer.

SOURCE: Yang M et al. Haemophilia. 2019 Feb 28. doi: 10.1111/hae.13707.

Erectile dysfunction (ED) appears prevalent among men with hemophilia and becomes increasingly common with age, according to results from a recent survey.

Although the findings may not be generalizable because of small sample size (44 respondents), the survey offers a general sense of the sexual health of patients with hemophilia, which is a minimally researched topic, reported lead author Ming Yang, PhD, of the British Columbia Provincial Bleeding Disorders Program at St. Paul’s Hospital in Vancouver and colleagues.

Such data become increasingly important as new hemophilia therapies further extend the lifespan of patients, which thereby exposes them to diseases of old age, the investigators noted in Haemophilia.

Additionally, ED is considered an early sign of endothelial dysfunction in the general population, but data are lacking for patients with hemophilia.

Among the 56 men with hemophilia A or B who were surveyed with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, 44 completed the survey (median age, 49 years). Specifically, respondents completed the “erectile function” component of the questionnaire because this is the only domain that has been validated.

To assess associations between ED and well-established risk factors, the investigators recorded prior surgeries, medications, atherosclerotic diseases, viral infections, and hemophilia-specific factors. To better characterize the population and look for other associations, the investigators had patients undergo baseline laboratory testing and measurements of blood pressure, anthropomorphic indexes, and endothelial function.

According to the IIEF, 38.6% of patients had ED, which was subcategorized as mild and mild to moderate in 4.5% of patients, moderate in 18.2%, and severe in 15.9%.

The investigators found significant associations between ED and coronary artery disease, hypertension, smoking, higher waist/hip ratio, homocysteine level, and age. However, on multivariable analysis, only age was correlated with ED domain score (P = .03). No associations between ED and endothelial dysfunction were reported.

While the findings may offer a rare look at ED rates in patients with hemophilia, they are insufficient for comparisons and generalizations, the investigators cautioned.

“Without comparative studies within the haemophilia population in Canada or elsewhere and due to limited sample size and non‐normalized distribution of our age group, this prevalence cannot reasonably be generalized to the entire haemophilia population,” the investigators wrote.

Instead, the investigators suggested that more studies are needed, especially ones involving customized questionnaires.

The study was funded by Pfizer. Dr. Yang reported having no conflicts of interest. One coauthor reported an unrestricted educational award from the Association of Hemophilia Clinic Directors of Canada/Baxter Canadian Hemostasis Fellowship, and another coauthor reported research funding from Pfizer.

SOURCE: Yang M et al. Haemophilia. 2019 Feb 28. doi: 10.1111/hae.13707.

Erectile dysfunction (ED) appears prevalent among men with hemophilia and becomes increasingly common with age, according to results from a recent survey.

Although the findings may not be generalizable because of small sample size (44 respondents), the survey offers a general sense of the sexual health of patients with hemophilia, which is a minimally researched topic, reported lead author Ming Yang, PhD, of the British Columbia Provincial Bleeding Disorders Program at St. Paul’s Hospital in Vancouver and colleagues.

Such data become increasingly important as new hemophilia therapies further extend the lifespan of patients, which thereby exposes them to diseases of old age, the investigators noted in Haemophilia.

Additionally, ED is considered an early sign of endothelial dysfunction in the general population, but data are lacking for patients with hemophilia.

Among the 56 men with hemophilia A or B who were surveyed with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, 44 completed the survey (median age, 49 years). Specifically, respondents completed the “erectile function” component of the questionnaire because this is the only domain that has been validated.

To assess associations between ED and well-established risk factors, the investigators recorded prior surgeries, medications, atherosclerotic diseases, viral infections, and hemophilia-specific factors. To better characterize the population and look for other associations, the investigators had patients undergo baseline laboratory testing and measurements of blood pressure, anthropomorphic indexes, and endothelial function.

According to the IIEF, 38.6% of patients had ED, which was subcategorized as mild and mild to moderate in 4.5% of patients, moderate in 18.2%, and severe in 15.9%.

The investigators found significant associations between ED and coronary artery disease, hypertension, smoking, higher waist/hip ratio, homocysteine level, and age. However, on multivariable analysis, only age was correlated with ED domain score (P = .03). No associations between ED and endothelial dysfunction were reported.

While the findings may offer a rare look at ED rates in patients with hemophilia, they are insufficient for comparisons and generalizations, the investigators cautioned.

“Without comparative studies within the haemophilia population in Canada or elsewhere and due to limited sample size and non‐normalized distribution of our age group, this prevalence cannot reasonably be generalized to the entire haemophilia population,” the investigators wrote.

Instead, the investigators suggested that more studies are needed, especially ones involving customized questionnaires.

The study was funded by Pfizer. Dr. Yang reported having no conflicts of interest. One coauthor reported an unrestricted educational award from the Association of Hemophilia Clinic Directors of Canada/Baxter Canadian Hemostasis Fellowship, and another coauthor reported research funding from Pfizer.

SOURCE: Yang M et al. Haemophilia. 2019 Feb 28. doi: 10.1111/hae.13707.

Patients with textured silicone gluteal implants could be at risk of anaplastic large cell lymphoma, based on a possible case of ALCL in a patient diagnosed 1 year after implant placement.

The 49-year-old woman was initially diagnosed with anaplastic lymphoma kinase–negative ALCL via a lung mass and pleural fluid before bilateral gluteal ulceration occurred 1 month later, reported Orr Shauly of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, and his colleagues.

Soft-tissue disease and fluid accumulation around the gluteal implants suggested that the lung mass had metastasized from primary neoplasia in the gluteal region. If ALCL did originate at the site of the gluteal implants, it would represent a first for silicone implant–associated ALCL, which has historically been associated exclusively with breast implants.

“As many as 200 cases of [breast implant-associated ALCL] have been described worldwide, with a majority in the context of cosmetic primary breast augmentation or cancer-related breast reconstruction with the use of a textured implant (57% of all cases),” the investigators wrote in Aesthetic Surgery Journal. “Recently however, it has been hypothesized that the relationship of ALCL with the placement of textured silicone implants may not [be] limited to the breast due to its multifactorial nature and association with texturization of the implant surface.”

During the initial work-up, a CT showed fluid collection and enhancement around the gluteal implants. Following ALCL diagnosis via lung mass biopsy and histopathology, the patient was transferred to a different facility for chemotherapy. When the patient presented 1 month later to the original facility with gluteal ulceration, the oncology team suspected infection; however, all cultures from fluid around the implants were negative.

Because of the possibility of false-negative tests, the patient was started on a regimen of acyclovir, vancomycin, metronidazole, and isavuconazole. Explantation was planned, but before this could occur, the patient deteriorated rapidly and died of respiratory and renal failure.

ALCL was not confirmed via cytology or histopathology in the gluteal region, and the patient’s family did not consent to autopsy, so a definitive diagnosis of gluteal implant–associated ALCL remained elusive.

“In this instance, it can only be concluded that the patient’s condition may have been associated with placement of textured silicone gluteal implants, but [we] still lack evidence of causation,” the investigators wrote. “It should also be noted that ALCL does not typically present with skin ulceration, and this may be a unique disease process in this patient or as a result of her bedridden state given the late stage of her disease. Furthermore, this presentation was uniquely aggressive and presented extremely quickly after placement of the gluteal implants. In most patients, ALCL develops and presents approximately 10 years after implantation.”

The investigators cautioned that “care should be taken to avoid sensationalizing all implant-associated ALCL.”

The authors reported having no conflicts of interest and the study did not receive funding.

SOURCE: Shauly O et al. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Feb 15. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz044.

Patients with textured silicone gluteal implants could be at risk of anaplastic large cell lymphoma, based on a possible case of ALCL in a patient diagnosed 1 year after implant placement.

The 49-year-old woman was initially diagnosed with anaplastic lymphoma kinase–negative ALCL via a lung mass and pleural fluid before bilateral gluteal ulceration occurred 1 month later, reported Orr Shauly of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, and his colleagues.

Soft-tissue disease and fluid accumulation around the gluteal implants suggested that the lung mass had metastasized from primary neoplasia in the gluteal region. If ALCL did originate at the site of the gluteal implants, it would represent a first for silicone implant–associated ALCL, which has historically been associated exclusively with breast implants.

“As many as 200 cases of [breast implant-associated ALCL] have been described worldwide, with a majority in the context of cosmetic primary breast augmentation or cancer-related breast reconstruction with the use of a textured implant (57% of all cases),” the investigators wrote in Aesthetic Surgery Journal. “Recently however, it has been hypothesized that the relationship of ALCL with the placement of textured silicone implants may not [be] limited to the breast due to its multifactorial nature and association with texturization of the implant surface.”

During the initial work-up, a CT showed fluid collection and enhancement around the gluteal implants. Following ALCL diagnosis via lung mass biopsy and histopathology, the patient was transferred to a different facility for chemotherapy. When the patient presented 1 month later to the original facility with gluteal ulceration, the oncology team suspected infection; however, all cultures from fluid around the implants were negative.

Because of the possibility of false-negative tests, the patient was started on a regimen of acyclovir, vancomycin, metronidazole, and isavuconazole. Explantation was planned, but before this could occur, the patient deteriorated rapidly and died of respiratory and renal failure.

ALCL was not confirmed via cytology or histopathology in the gluteal region, and the patient’s family did not consent to autopsy, so a definitive diagnosis of gluteal implant–associated ALCL remained elusive.

“In this instance, it can only be concluded that the patient’s condition may have been associated with placement of textured silicone gluteal implants, but [we] still lack evidence of causation,” the investigators wrote. “It should also be noted that ALCL does not typically present with skin ulceration, and this may be a unique disease process in this patient or as a result of her bedridden state given the late stage of her disease. Furthermore, this presentation was uniquely aggressive and presented extremely quickly after placement of the gluteal implants. In most patients, ALCL develops and presents approximately 10 years after implantation.”

The investigators cautioned that “care should be taken to avoid sensationalizing all implant-associated ALCL.”

The authors reported having no conflicts of interest and the study did not receive funding.

SOURCE: Shauly O et al. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Feb 15. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz044.

Patients with textured silicone gluteal implants could be at risk of anaplastic large cell lymphoma, based on a possible case of ALCL in a patient diagnosed 1 year after implant placement.

The 49-year-old woman was initially diagnosed with anaplastic lymphoma kinase–negative ALCL via a lung mass and pleural fluid before bilateral gluteal ulceration occurred 1 month later, reported Orr Shauly of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, and his colleagues.

Soft-tissue disease and fluid accumulation around the gluteal implants suggested that the lung mass had metastasized from primary neoplasia in the gluteal region. If ALCL did originate at the site of the gluteal implants, it would represent a first for silicone implant–associated ALCL, which has historically been associated exclusively with breast implants.

“As many as 200 cases of [breast implant-associated ALCL] have been described worldwide, with a majority in the context of cosmetic primary breast augmentation or cancer-related breast reconstruction with the use of a textured implant (57% of all cases),” the investigators wrote in Aesthetic Surgery Journal. “Recently however, it has been hypothesized that the relationship of ALCL with the placement of textured silicone implants may not [be] limited to the breast due to its multifactorial nature and association with texturization of the implant surface.”

During the initial work-up, a CT showed fluid collection and enhancement around the gluteal implants. Following ALCL diagnosis via lung mass biopsy and histopathology, the patient was transferred to a different facility for chemotherapy. When the patient presented 1 month later to the original facility with gluteal ulceration, the oncology team suspected infection; however, all cultures from fluid around the implants were negative.

Because of the possibility of false-negative tests, the patient was started on a regimen of acyclovir, vancomycin, metronidazole, and isavuconazole. Explantation was planned, but before this could occur, the patient deteriorated rapidly and died of respiratory and renal failure.

ALCL was not confirmed via cytology or histopathology in the gluteal region, and the patient’s family did not consent to autopsy, so a definitive diagnosis of gluteal implant–associated ALCL remained elusive.

“In this instance, it can only be concluded that the patient’s condition may have been associated with placement of textured silicone gluteal implants, but [we] still lack evidence of causation,” the investigators wrote. “It should also be noted that ALCL does not typically present with skin ulceration, and this may be a unique disease process in this patient or as a result of her bedridden state given the late stage of her disease. Furthermore, this presentation was uniquely aggressive and presented extremely quickly after placement of the gluteal implants. In most patients, ALCL develops and presents approximately 10 years after implantation.”

The investigators cautioned that “care should be taken to avoid sensationalizing all implant-associated ALCL.”

The authors reported having no conflicts of interest and the study did not receive funding.

SOURCE: Shauly O et al. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Feb 15. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz044.

Weak evidence suggests that prophylactic use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may reduce the risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), according to a recent Cochrane review.

However, other uses of MSCs with HSCT – such as prophylaxis with MSCs for acute GVHD or treatment of GVHD – lack evidence of efficacy, reported lead author Sheila A. Fisher, PhD, of National Health Service Blood and Transplant in Oxford (England), and her colleagues.

The investigators noted that most studies included in the review had low-quality evidence.

“[R]andomization methods were poorly reported and several of the included studies were subject to a high risk of performance bias and reporting bias,” the investigators wrote in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. “One trial which started in 2008 has not been published and the progress of this trial is unknown, leading to potential publication bias. The quality of evidence was therefore low or very low for all outcomes due to a high risk of bias as well as imprecision due to the low number of overall participants, and in some cases, evidence based on a single study.”

The investigators identified 25 randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) involving MSCs for GVHD, of which 12 were completed (879 participants) and 13 were ongoing (1,532 planned participants). Out of the 12 completed trials, 2 compared different doses of MSCs, while 10 compared MSCs with no MSCs. Five trials investigated treatment with MSCs and seven investigated prophylactic use.

The one finding that was supportive of MSCs, albeit based on low-quality evidence, showed that prophylactic use reduced the risk of chronic GVHD, compared with no prophylaxis (risk ratio, 0.66). Other findings were less supportive or unsupportive of MSCs.

Prophylactic use of MSCs had little or no impact on risk of acute GVHD (RR, 0.86; low-quality evidence), risk of relapse of malignant disease (RR, 1.08; low-quality evidence), or all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.85; low-quality evidence).

Treatment with MSCs was disappointing across the board. Risk of all-cause mortality was unaffected (HR, 1.12; very low–quality evidence) and a minimal impact was found for complete responses in acute GVHD (RR, 1.16; very low–quality evidence).

Although treatment of chronic GVHD with MSCs was associated with an improved complete response rate (RR, 5.00), the investigators noted that this finding came from a single trial with 40 participants that was deemed to have very low–quality evidence. The two trials comparing doses of MSCs found no differences between treatment groups.

“Despite a number of reports of positive outcomes from the use of MSCs for treating acute GVHD, the evidence to date from RCTs has not supported the conclusion that they are an effective therapy,” the investigators wrote.

The study was funded by NHS Blood and Transplant. Dr. Fischer reported having no financial disclosures. One coauthor reported research funding from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Research charity and the National Institute for Health Research.

SOURCE: Fisher SA et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 30. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009768.pub2.

Weak evidence suggests that prophylactic use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may reduce the risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), according to a recent Cochrane review.

However, other uses of MSCs with HSCT – such as prophylaxis with MSCs for acute GVHD or treatment of GVHD – lack evidence of efficacy, reported lead author Sheila A. Fisher, PhD, of National Health Service Blood and Transplant in Oxford (England), and her colleagues.

The investigators noted that most studies included in the review had low-quality evidence.

“[R]andomization methods were poorly reported and several of the included studies were subject to a high risk of performance bias and reporting bias,” the investigators wrote in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. “One trial which started in 2008 has not been published and the progress of this trial is unknown, leading to potential publication bias. The quality of evidence was therefore low or very low for all outcomes due to a high risk of bias as well as imprecision due to the low number of overall participants, and in some cases, evidence based on a single study.”

The investigators identified 25 randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) involving MSCs for GVHD, of which 12 were completed (879 participants) and 13 were ongoing (1,532 planned participants). Out of the 12 completed trials, 2 compared different doses of MSCs, while 10 compared MSCs with no MSCs. Five trials investigated treatment with MSCs and seven investigated prophylactic use.

The one finding that was supportive of MSCs, albeit based on low-quality evidence, showed that prophylactic use reduced the risk of chronic GVHD, compared with no prophylaxis (risk ratio, 0.66). Other findings were less supportive or unsupportive of MSCs.

Prophylactic use of MSCs had little or no impact on risk of acute GVHD (RR, 0.86; low-quality evidence), risk of relapse of malignant disease (RR, 1.08; low-quality evidence), or all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.85; low-quality evidence).

Treatment with MSCs was disappointing across the board. Risk of all-cause mortality was unaffected (HR, 1.12; very low–quality evidence) and a minimal impact was found for complete responses in acute GVHD (RR, 1.16; very low–quality evidence).

Although treatment of chronic GVHD with MSCs was associated with an improved complete response rate (RR, 5.00), the investigators noted that this finding came from a single trial with 40 participants that was deemed to have very low–quality evidence. The two trials comparing doses of MSCs found no differences between treatment groups.

“Despite a number of reports of positive outcomes from the use of MSCs for treating acute GVHD, the evidence to date from RCTs has not supported the conclusion that they are an effective therapy,” the investigators wrote.

The study was funded by NHS Blood and Transplant. Dr. Fischer reported having no financial disclosures. One coauthor reported research funding from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Research charity and the National Institute for Health Research.

SOURCE: Fisher SA et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 30. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009768.pub2.

Weak evidence suggests that prophylactic use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may reduce the risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), according to a recent Cochrane review.

However, other uses of MSCs with HSCT – such as prophylaxis with MSCs for acute GVHD or treatment of GVHD – lack evidence of efficacy, reported lead author Sheila A. Fisher, PhD, of National Health Service Blood and Transplant in Oxford (England), and her colleagues.

The investigators noted that most studies included in the review had low-quality evidence.

“[R]andomization methods were poorly reported and several of the included studies were subject to a high risk of performance bias and reporting bias,” the investigators wrote in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. “One trial which started in 2008 has not been published and the progress of this trial is unknown, leading to potential publication bias. The quality of evidence was therefore low or very low for all outcomes due to a high risk of bias as well as imprecision due to the low number of overall participants, and in some cases, evidence based on a single study.”

The investigators identified 25 randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) involving MSCs for GVHD, of which 12 were completed (879 participants) and 13 were ongoing (1,532 planned participants). Out of the 12 completed trials, 2 compared different doses of MSCs, while 10 compared MSCs with no MSCs. Five trials investigated treatment with MSCs and seven investigated prophylactic use.

The one finding that was supportive of MSCs, albeit based on low-quality evidence, showed that prophylactic use reduced the risk of chronic GVHD, compared with no prophylaxis (risk ratio, 0.66). Other findings were less supportive or unsupportive of MSCs.

Prophylactic use of MSCs had little or no impact on risk of acute GVHD (RR, 0.86; low-quality evidence), risk of relapse of malignant disease (RR, 1.08; low-quality evidence), or all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.85; low-quality evidence).

Treatment with MSCs was disappointing across the board. Risk of all-cause mortality was unaffected (HR, 1.12; very low–quality evidence) and a minimal impact was found for complete responses in acute GVHD (RR, 1.16; very low–quality evidence).

Although treatment of chronic GVHD with MSCs was associated with an improved complete response rate (RR, 5.00), the investigators noted that this finding came from a single trial with 40 participants that was deemed to have very low–quality evidence. The two trials comparing doses of MSCs found no differences between treatment groups.

“Despite a number of reports of positive outcomes from the use of MSCs for treating acute GVHD, the evidence to date from RCTs has not supported the conclusion that they are an effective therapy,” the investigators wrote.

The study was funded by NHS Blood and Transplant. Dr. Fischer reported having no financial disclosures. One coauthor reported research funding from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Research charity and the National Institute for Health Research.

SOURCE: Fisher SA et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 30. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009768.pub2.

A high-calorie diet may cause earlier onset of more severe Wilson disease, according to a rodent study.

If translatable to humans, the results could explain “striking phenotype-genotype discrepancies” between patients with Wilson disease, and may give reason to monitor nutrition more closely, particularly dietary levels of fat and sugar, reported lead author Claudia Einer, a PhD candidate at the German Research Center for Environmental Health in Neuherberg, Germany, and her colleagues. Their findings clarify an association between impaired copper metabolism, which defines Wilson disease, and liver steatosis, a common finding in affected patients.

“Indeed, Wilson disease often may be misdiagnosed as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD),” the investigators wrote in Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology. They noted that previous reports showed similar mitochondrial alterations in the livers of patients with NAFLD and those with Wilson disease. Furthermore, in a case report of two twins with Wilson disease, the twin with bulimia nervosa developed severe liver disease, whereas the other twin, who was undernourished, had mild liver disease. Considering these observations and other supportive evidence, the investigators tested this apparent relationship between a high-fat diet and liver damage in Wilson disease.

“The rationale of this study was that both enriched copper and fatty acids cause bioenergetic defects and therefore synergistically and detrimentally may coincide on hepatic mitochondria, which was found to be dramatically the case,” the investigators wrote.

The study involved homozygous Atp7b–/– rats, which mirror Wilson disease, and heterozygous Atp7b+/– rats, which served as control subjects because they lack copper accumulation. The high-calorie diet contained high fat and sugar levels to mirror “the eating habits in Western society, causing the ‘American-lifestyle-induced-obesity syndrome.’ ”

Within several weeks of starting the high-calorie diet, both control and Wilson disease rats showed higher liver triglyceride levels and visceral fat mass compared with rats on the normal diet, with liver histology also showing macrosteatosis and increased NAFLD Activity Score (NAS). Control rats maintained similar body and liver weights regardless of diet; in contrast, Wilson disease rats on the high-calorie diet showed increased liver weight, compared with Wilson disease rats on the normal diet. In addition, Wilson disease rats fed the high-calorie diet had clinical liver injury, supported by elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels and gross hepatic damage. Under the microscope, histology revealed widespread necrosis, apoptosis, inflammation, and fibrosis; findings were sufficient to constitute nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in all Wilson disease rats fed the high-calorie diet, compared with just one-third of the control rats receiving high calories. Additional testing showed that Wilson disease rats fed the high-calorie diet had disease onset 20 days sooner than did Wilson disease rats fed the normal diet.

“This is a remarkable disease acceleration,” the investigators noted, highlighting the median survival of 106 days in Wilson disease rats fed a normal diet.

SOURCE: Einer et al. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan 11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.12.005.

A high-calorie diet may cause earlier onset of more severe Wilson disease, according to a rodent study.

If translatable to humans, the results could explain “striking phenotype-genotype discrepancies” between patients with Wilson disease, and may give reason to monitor nutrition more closely, particularly dietary levels of fat and sugar, reported lead author Claudia Einer, a PhD candidate at the German Research Center for Environmental Health in Neuherberg, Germany, and her colleagues. Their findings clarify an association between impaired copper metabolism, which defines Wilson disease, and liver steatosis, a common finding in affected patients.

“Indeed, Wilson disease often may be misdiagnosed as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD),” the investigators wrote in Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology. They noted that previous reports showed similar mitochondrial alterations in the livers of patients with NAFLD and those with Wilson disease. Furthermore, in a case report of two twins with Wilson disease, the twin with bulimia nervosa developed severe liver disease, whereas the other twin, who was undernourished, had mild liver disease. Considering these observations and other supportive evidence, the investigators tested this apparent relationship between a high-fat diet and liver damage in Wilson disease.

“The rationale of this study was that both enriched copper and fatty acids cause bioenergetic defects and therefore synergistically and detrimentally may coincide on hepatic mitochondria, which was found to be dramatically the case,” the investigators wrote.

The study involved homozygous Atp7b–/– rats, which mirror Wilson disease, and heterozygous Atp7b+/– rats, which served as control subjects because they lack copper accumulation. The high-calorie diet contained high fat and sugar levels to mirror “the eating habits in Western society, causing the ‘American-lifestyle-induced-obesity syndrome.’ ”

Within several weeks of starting the high-calorie diet, both control and Wilson disease rats showed higher liver triglyceride levels and visceral fat mass compared with rats on the normal diet, with liver histology also showing macrosteatosis and increased NAFLD Activity Score (NAS). Control rats maintained similar body and liver weights regardless of diet; in contrast, Wilson disease rats on the high-calorie diet showed increased liver weight, compared with Wilson disease rats on the normal diet. In addition, Wilson disease rats fed the high-calorie diet had clinical liver injury, supported by elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels and gross hepatic damage. Under the microscope, histology revealed widespread necrosis, apoptosis, inflammation, and fibrosis; findings were sufficient to constitute nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in all Wilson disease rats fed the high-calorie diet, compared with just one-third of the control rats receiving high calories. Additional testing showed that Wilson disease rats fed the high-calorie diet had disease onset 20 days sooner than did Wilson disease rats fed the normal diet.

“This is a remarkable disease acceleration,” the investigators noted, highlighting the median survival of 106 days in Wilson disease rats fed a normal diet.

SOURCE: Einer et al. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan 11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.12.005.

A high-calorie diet may cause earlier onset of more severe Wilson disease, according to a rodent study.

If translatable to humans, the results could explain “striking phenotype-genotype discrepancies” between patients with Wilson disease, and may give reason to monitor nutrition more closely, particularly dietary levels of fat and sugar, reported lead author Claudia Einer, a PhD candidate at the German Research Center for Environmental Health in Neuherberg, Germany, and her colleagues. Their findings clarify an association between impaired copper metabolism, which defines Wilson disease, and liver steatosis, a common finding in affected patients.

“Indeed, Wilson disease often may be misdiagnosed as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD),” the investigators wrote in Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology. They noted that previous reports showed similar mitochondrial alterations in the livers of patients with NAFLD and those with Wilson disease. Furthermore, in a case report of two twins with Wilson disease, the twin with bulimia nervosa developed severe liver disease, whereas the other twin, who was undernourished, had mild liver disease. Considering these observations and other supportive evidence, the investigators tested this apparent relationship between a high-fat diet and liver damage in Wilson disease.

“The rationale of this study was that both enriched copper and fatty acids cause bioenergetic defects and therefore synergistically and detrimentally may coincide on hepatic mitochondria, which was found to be dramatically the case,” the investigators wrote.

The study involved homozygous Atp7b–/– rats, which mirror Wilson disease, and heterozygous Atp7b+/– rats, which served as control subjects because they lack copper accumulation. The high-calorie diet contained high fat and sugar levels to mirror “the eating habits in Western society, causing the ‘American-lifestyle-induced-obesity syndrome.’ ”

Within several weeks of starting the high-calorie diet, both control and Wilson disease rats showed higher liver triglyceride levels and visceral fat mass compared with rats on the normal diet, with liver histology also showing macrosteatosis and increased NAFLD Activity Score (NAS). Control rats maintained similar body and liver weights regardless of diet; in contrast, Wilson disease rats on the high-calorie diet showed increased liver weight, compared with Wilson disease rats on the normal diet. In addition, Wilson disease rats fed the high-calorie diet had clinical liver injury, supported by elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels and gross hepatic damage. Under the microscope, histology revealed widespread necrosis, apoptosis, inflammation, and fibrosis; findings were sufficient to constitute nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in all Wilson disease rats fed the high-calorie diet, compared with just one-third of the control rats receiving high calories. Additional testing showed that Wilson disease rats fed the high-calorie diet had disease onset 20 days sooner than did Wilson disease rats fed the normal diet.

“This is a remarkable disease acceleration,” the investigators noted, highlighting the median survival of 106 days in Wilson disease rats fed a normal diet.

SOURCE: Einer et al. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan 11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.12.005.

Women hospitalized with cirrhosis are less likely to die in the hospital than are men, according to a retrospective analysis of more than half a million patients.

Although women more often had infections and comorbidities, men more often had liver decompensation, which contributed most significantly to their higher mortality rate, reported lead author Jessica Rubin, MD, of the University of California, San Francisco, and her colleagues.

Their findings add to an existing body of knowledge about sex-related differences in chronic liver disease. Women are less likely to develop chronic liver disease; however, when women do develop disease, it often follows a unique clinical course, with milder early disease followed by more severe end-stage disease, meaning many women are too sick for a transplant, or die on the waiting list.

“The reasons behind this ‘reversal’ in [sex] disparities is unknown,” the investigators wrote in Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.

Considering recent findings that showed a correlation between hospitalization and mortality rates in chronic liver disease, the investigators believed that a comparison of hospital-related outcomes in men and women could explain why women apparently fare worse when dealing with end-stage disease.

The retrospective, cross-sectional study involved 553,017 patients (median age, 57 years) who were hospitalized for cirrhosis between 2009 and 2013. Data were drawn from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Inpatient mortality was the primary outcome.

In agreement with previous findings, the minority of patients were women (39%). Against expectations, however, women had a significantly lower mortality rate than that of men (5.7% vs. 6.4%; multivariable analysis odds ratio, 0.86). Better survival was associated with lower rates of decompensation (Baveno IV criteria; 34% vs. 38.8%) and other cirrhosis complications, such as hepatorenal syndrome, variceal bleeding, ascites, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. The only cirrhosis complication more common in women than men was hepatic encephalopathy (17.8% vs. 16.8%). Owing to fewer complications, fewer women required liver-related interventions, including transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (0.8% vs. 1.0%), upper endoscopy (12.8% vs. 13.0%), or paracentesis (17.6% vs. 20.6%).

While less frequent complications and a lower mortality rate might suggest that women were admitted with better overall clinical pictures, not all data supported this conclusion. For instance, women were more likely to have noncirrhosis comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, stroke, and cancer. Furthermore, women had a higher rate of acute bacterial infection than that of men (34.9% vs. 28.2%), although this disparity should be considered in light of urinary tract infections (UTIs), which were significantly more common among women (18.8% vs. 8.0%).

“Interestingly, infections were a stronger predictor of inpatient mortality in women than men,” the investigators wrote. “Despite this, women in our cohort were less likely to die in the hospital than men.”

Additional analysis revealed etiological differences that may have contributed to differences in mortality rates. For instance, women less often had liver disease due to viral hepatitis (27.6% vs. 35.2%) or alcohol (24.1% vs. 38.7%). In contrast, women more often had autoimmune hepatitis (2.5% vs. 0.4%) or cirrhosis due to unspecified or miscellaneous reasons (45.7% vs. 25.7%).

“Our data suggest that differential rates of ongoing liver injury – including by cofactors such as active alcohol use – explain some but not all of the [sex] difference we observed in hepatic decompensation,” the investigators wrote, before redirecting focus to a clearer clinical finding. “The poor prognosis of decompensated cirrhosis ... provides a reasonable explanation for the higher rates of in-hospital mortality seen among men versus women,” they concluded.

Considering the surprising findings and previously known sex disparities, Dr. Rubin and her colleagues suggested that more research in this area is needed, along with efforts to deliver sex-appropriate care.

“The development of [sex]-specific cirrhosis management programs – focused on interventions to manage the interaction between cirrhosis and other common comorbidities, improving physical function both before and during hospitalization, and postacute discharge programs to facilitate resumption of independent living – would target differential needs of women and men living with cirrhosis, with the ultimate goal of improving long-term outcomes in these patients,” the investigators wrote.

The study was funded by a National Institute on Aging Paul B. Beeson Career Development Award in Aging and a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases National Research Service Award hepatology training grant. The investigators declared no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Rubin et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 22. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001192.

Women hospitalized with cirrhosis are less likely to die in the hospital than are men, according to a retrospective analysis of more than half a million patients.

Although women more often had infections and comorbidities, men more often had liver decompensation, which contributed most significantly to their higher mortality rate, reported lead author Jessica Rubin, MD, of the University of California, San Francisco, and her colleagues.

Their findings add to an existing body of knowledge about sex-related differences in chronic liver disease. Women are less likely to develop chronic liver disease; however, when women do develop disease, it often follows a unique clinical course, with milder early disease followed by more severe end-stage disease, meaning many women are too sick for a transplant, or die on the waiting list.

“The reasons behind this ‘reversal’ in [sex] disparities is unknown,” the investigators wrote in Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.

Considering recent findings that showed a correlation between hospitalization and mortality rates in chronic liver disease, the investigators believed that a comparison of hospital-related outcomes in men and women could explain why women apparently fare worse when dealing with end-stage disease.

The retrospective, cross-sectional study involved 553,017 patients (median age, 57 years) who were hospitalized for cirrhosis between 2009 and 2013. Data were drawn from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Inpatient mortality was the primary outcome.

In agreement with previous findings, the minority of patients were women (39%). Against expectations, however, women had a significantly lower mortality rate than that of men (5.7% vs. 6.4%; multivariable analysis odds ratio, 0.86). Better survival was associated with lower rates of decompensation (Baveno IV criteria; 34% vs. 38.8%) and other cirrhosis complications, such as hepatorenal syndrome, variceal bleeding, ascites, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. The only cirrhosis complication more common in women than men was hepatic encephalopathy (17.8% vs. 16.8%). Owing to fewer complications, fewer women required liver-related interventions, including transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (0.8% vs. 1.0%), upper endoscopy (12.8% vs. 13.0%), or paracentesis (17.6% vs. 20.6%).

While less frequent complications and a lower mortality rate might suggest that women were admitted with better overall clinical pictures, not all data supported this conclusion. For instance, women were more likely to have noncirrhosis comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, stroke, and cancer. Furthermore, women had a higher rate of acute bacterial infection than that of men (34.9% vs. 28.2%), although this disparity should be considered in light of urinary tract infections (UTIs), which were significantly more common among women (18.8% vs. 8.0%).

“Interestingly, infections were a stronger predictor of inpatient mortality in women than men,” the investigators wrote. “Despite this, women in our cohort were less likely to die in the hospital than men.”

Additional analysis revealed etiological differences that may have contributed to differences in mortality rates. For instance, women less often had liver disease due to viral hepatitis (27.6% vs. 35.2%) or alcohol (24.1% vs. 38.7%). In contrast, women more often had autoimmune hepatitis (2.5% vs. 0.4%) or cirrhosis due to unspecified or miscellaneous reasons (45.7% vs. 25.7%).

“Our data suggest that differential rates of ongoing liver injury – including by cofactors such as active alcohol use – explain some but not all of the [sex] difference we observed in hepatic decompensation,” the investigators wrote, before redirecting focus to a clearer clinical finding. “The poor prognosis of decompensated cirrhosis ... provides a reasonable explanation for the higher rates of in-hospital mortality seen among men versus women,” they concluded.

Considering the surprising findings and previously known sex disparities, Dr. Rubin and her colleagues suggested that more research in this area is needed, along with efforts to deliver sex-appropriate care.

“The development of [sex]-specific cirrhosis management programs – focused on interventions to manage the interaction between cirrhosis and other common comorbidities, improving physical function both before and during hospitalization, and postacute discharge programs to facilitate resumption of independent living – would target differential needs of women and men living with cirrhosis, with the ultimate goal of improving long-term outcomes in these patients,” the investigators wrote.

The study was funded by a National Institute on Aging Paul B. Beeson Career Development Award in Aging and a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases National Research Service Award hepatology training grant. The investigators declared no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Rubin et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 22. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001192.

Women hospitalized with cirrhosis are less likely to die in the hospital than are men, according to a retrospective analysis of more than half a million patients.

Although women more often had infections and comorbidities, men more often had liver decompensation, which contributed most significantly to their higher mortality rate, reported lead author Jessica Rubin, MD, of the University of California, San Francisco, and her colleagues.

Their findings add to an existing body of knowledge about sex-related differences in chronic liver disease. Women are less likely to develop chronic liver disease; however, when women do develop disease, it often follows a unique clinical course, with milder early disease followed by more severe end-stage disease, meaning many women are too sick for a transplant, or die on the waiting list.

“The reasons behind this ‘reversal’ in [sex] disparities is unknown,” the investigators wrote in Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.

Considering recent findings that showed a correlation between hospitalization and mortality rates in chronic liver disease, the investigators believed that a comparison of hospital-related outcomes in men and women could explain why women apparently fare worse when dealing with end-stage disease.

The retrospective, cross-sectional study involved 553,017 patients (median age, 57 years) who were hospitalized for cirrhosis between 2009 and 2013. Data were drawn from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Inpatient mortality was the primary outcome.

In agreement with previous findings, the minority of patients were women (39%). Against expectations, however, women had a significantly lower mortality rate than that of men (5.7% vs. 6.4%; multivariable analysis odds ratio, 0.86). Better survival was associated with lower rates of decompensation (Baveno IV criteria; 34% vs. 38.8%) and other cirrhosis complications, such as hepatorenal syndrome, variceal bleeding, ascites, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. The only cirrhosis complication more common in women than men was hepatic encephalopathy (17.8% vs. 16.8%). Owing to fewer complications, fewer women required liver-related interventions, including transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (0.8% vs. 1.0%), upper endoscopy (12.8% vs. 13.0%), or paracentesis (17.6% vs. 20.6%).

While less frequent complications and a lower mortality rate might suggest that women were admitted with better overall clinical pictures, not all data supported this conclusion. For instance, women were more likely to have noncirrhosis comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, stroke, and cancer. Furthermore, women had a higher rate of acute bacterial infection than that of men (34.9% vs. 28.2%), although this disparity should be considered in light of urinary tract infections (UTIs), which were significantly more common among women (18.8% vs. 8.0%).

“Interestingly, infections were a stronger predictor of inpatient mortality in women than men,” the investigators wrote. “Despite this, women in our cohort were less likely to die in the hospital than men.”

Additional analysis revealed etiological differences that may have contributed to differences in mortality rates. For instance, women less often had liver disease due to viral hepatitis (27.6% vs. 35.2%) or alcohol (24.1% vs. 38.7%). In contrast, women more often had autoimmune hepatitis (2.5% vs. 0.4%) or cirrhosis due to unspecified or miscellaneous reasons (45.7% vs. 25.7%).

“Our data suggest that differential rates of ongoing liver injury – including by cofactors such as active alcohol use – explain some but not all of the [sex] difference we observed in hepatic decompensation,” the investigators wrote, before redirecting focus to a clearer clinical finding. “The poor prognosis of decompensated cirrhosis ... provides a reasonable explanation for the higher rates of in-hospital mortality seen among men versus women,” they concluded.

Considering the surprising findings and previously known sex disparities, Dr. Rubin and her colleagues suggested that more research in this area is needed, along with efforts to deliver sex-appropriate care.

“The development of [sex]-specific cirrhosis management programs – focused on interventions to manage the interaction between cirrhosis and other common comorbidities, improving physical function both before and during hospitalization, and postacute discharge programs to facilitate resumption of independent living – would target differential needs of women and men living with cirrhosis, with the ultimate goal of improving long-term outcomes in these patients,” the investigators wrote.

The study was funded by a National Institute on Aging Paul B. Beeson Career Development Award in Aging and a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases National Research Service Award hepatology training grant. The investigators declared no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Rubin et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 22. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001192.

Single-patient use (SPU) of investigational therapies via the Food and Drug Administration’s Expanded Access program is an option worth considering for heavily pretreated cancer patients, according to a retrospective analysis of SPUs at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Although approximately 2% of cancer cases at Kettering are pediatric, 34.1% of SPUs were for children, reported lead author Noah Z. Feit of Cornell University, New York, and his colleagues.

Therefore, “SPUs may provide an important means of pediatric drug access,” the investigators wrote in a JAMA Oncology letter.

The analysis involved 179 patients with 43 cancer types; these were more often solid tumors than hematologic malignancies (57.9% vs. 42.1%). The most common solid tumor type was neuroblastoma (15.3%), followed by lung (7.9%), primary brain (7.9%), and breast (5.9%). Sixty-six investigational products were given; the top three types were kinase inhibitors (28.8%), naked antibodies (12.5%), and allogeneic cell therapy (12.0%). Therapies were in various stages of development, including phase 3 (39.4%), phase 2 (36.1%), and phase 1 (18.8%). SPU approval was most often based on previous clinical experience (61.5%), although genomic data (38.0%) and preclinical evidence (30.8%) were also cited. The median number of prior treatments was four, suggesting a heavily pretreated patient population.

Analysis showed that the overall response rate to SPU agents was 20.1%, and patients with hematologic cancers responded more often than did those with solid tumors (30.4% vs. 12.2%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.9 months and 11.4 months, respectively. About one-third of patients (29.7%) had at least one serious treatment-related adverse event, with adults more often affected than children (35.3% vs. 19.1%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

“In summary, our data provide an initial evidence basis to evaluate the FDA Expanded Access mechanism. We find its use is broad, involving a wide variety of patients and products, and clinical benefit was observed,” the investigators concluded. “Routine prospective collection of key safety and efficacy metrics should be considered moving forward.”

The study was funded by National Institutes of Health, the St. Baldrick’s Foundation, and the Nonna’s Garden Foundation Initiative in Precision Oncology. The investigators reported financial relationships with Mylan, Atara Biotherapeutics, Chugai Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, and others.

SOURCE: Feit et al. JAMA Onc. 2019 Feb 28. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.7002.

Single-patient use (SPU) of investigational therapies via the Food and Drug Administration’s Expanded Access program is an option worth considering for heavily pretreated cancer patients, according to a retrospective analysis of SPUs at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Although approximately 2% of cancer cases at Kettering are pediatric, 34.1% of SPUs were for children, reported lead author Noah Z. Feit of Cornell University, New York, and his colleagues.

Therefore, “SPUs may provide an important means of pediatric drug access,” the investigators wrote in a JAMA Oncology letter.

The analysis involved 179 patients with 43 cancer types; these were more often solid tumors than hematologic malignancies (57.9% vs. 42.1%). The most common solid tumor type was neuroblastoma (15.3%), followed by lung (7.9%), primary brain (7.9%), and breast (5.9%). Sixty-six investigational products were given; the top three types were kinase inhibitors (28.8%), naked antibodies (12.5%), and allogeneic cell therapy (12.0%). Therapies were in various stages of development, including phase 3 (39.4%), phase 2 (36.1%), and phase 1 (18.8%). SPU approval was most often based on previous clinical experience (61.5%), although genomic data (38.0%) and preclinical evidence (30.8%) were also cited. The median number of prior treatments was four, suggesting a heavily pretreated patient population.

Analysis showed that the overall response rate to SPU agents was 20.1%, and patients with hematologic cancers responded more often than did those with solid tumors (30.4% vs. 12.2%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.9 months and 11.4 months, respectively. About one-third of patients (29.7%) had at least one serious treatment-related adverse event, with adults more often affected than children (35.3% vs. 19.1%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

“In summary, our data provide an initial evidence basis to evaluate the FDA Expanded Access mechanism. We find its use is broad, involving a wide variety of patients and products, and clinical benefit was observed,” the investigators concluded. “Routine prospective collection of key safety and efficacy metrics should be considered moving forward.”

The study was funded by National Institutes of Health, the St. Baldrick’s Foundation, and the Nonna’s Garden Foundation Initiative in Precision Oncology. The investigators reported financial relationships with Mylan, Atara Biotherapeutics, Chugai Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, and others.

SOURCE: Feit et al. JAMA Onc. 2019 Feb 28. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.7002.

Single-patient use (SPU) of investigational therapies via the Food and Drug Administration’s Expanded Access program is an option worth considering for heavily pretreated cancer patients, according to a retrospective analysis of SPUs at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Although approximately 2% of cancer cases at Kettering are pediatric, 34.1% of SPUs were for children, reported lead author Noah Z. Feit of Cornell University, New York, and his colleagues.

Therefore, “SPUs may provide an important means of pediatric drug access,” the investigators wrote in a JAMA Oncology letter.

The analysis involved 179 patients with 43 cancer types; these were more often solid tumors than hematologic malignancies (57.9% vs. 42.1%). The most common solid tumor type was neuroblastoma (15.3%), followed by lung (7.9%), primary brain (7.9%), and breast (5.9%). Sixty-six investigational products were given; the top three types were kinase inhibitors (28.8%), naked antibodies (12.5%), and allogeneic cell therapy (12.0%). Therapies were in various stages of development, including phase 3 (39.4%), phase 2 (36.1%), and phase 1 (18.8%). SPU approval was most often based on previous clinical experience (61.5%), although genomic data (38.0%) and preclinical evidence (30.8%) were also cited. The median number of prior treatments was four, suggesting a heavily pretreated patient population.

Analysis showed that the overall response rate to SPU agents was 20.1%, and patients with hematologic cancers responded more often than did those with solid tumors (30.4% vs. 12.2%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.9 months and 11.4 months, respectively. About one-third of patients (29.7%) had at least one serious treatment-related adverse event, with adults more often affected than children (35.3% vs. 19.1%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

“In summary, our data provide an initial evidence basis to evaluate the FDA Expanded Access mechanism. We find its use is broad, involving a wide variety of patients and products, and clinical benefit was observed,” the investigators concluded. “Routine prospective collection of key safety and efficacy metrics should be considered moving forward.”

The study was funded by National Institutes of Health, the St. Baldrick’s Foundation, and the Nonna’s Garden Foundation Initiative in Precision Oncology. The investigators reported financial relationships with Mylan, Atara Biotherapeutics, Chugai Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, and others.

SOURCE: Feit et al. JAMA Onc. 2019 Feb 28. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.7002.

PRAGUE – Adeno-associated virus (AAV)–based gene therapy is probably not the “endgame” in gene therapy for hemophilia, according to John Pasi, MD, PhD, director of the Haemophilia Centre at the Royal London Hospital.

Will Pass/MDedge News

“Gene therapy today is essentially gene therapy version 1.0,” Dr. Pasi said, kicking off the third day at the annual congress of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders.

Interwoven with a summary of recent research and upcoming trends, Dr. Pasi reflected upon the medical community’s expectations for gene therapy, both past and present.

“For years,” Dr. Pasi said, “gene therapy has been regarded, essentially, as the Holy Grail of treatment for hemophilia.” This sentiment has been supported by the fact that hemophilia “is a single-gene disorder with a cause and effect relationship that is extremely clear and straightforward for us to recognize.”

A small increase in clotting factor can significantly reduce bleeding while providing a measurable efficacy outcome, making it a strong research candidate.


Looking back, however, when gene therapy research began in the early 1990s, it “really did go through a peak of inflated expectations,” Dr. Pasi said. “We thought for years it was just around the corner. But there were abject failures; there were learning curves we had to go through to understand many of the issues that gene therapy threw up, which we didn’t understand at the beginning.”

When this early excitement was met with tough realities, a period of disillusionment began and persisted through the early 2000s. Dr. Pasi suggested that this period of disillusionment may be reaching an end because of a “huge amount of steady work” that has ushered in a new period of productivity.

Dr. Pasi cited two 2017 studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine by Savita Rangarajan, MBBS, and colleagues and Lindsey A. George, MD, and colleagues for hemophilia A and B, respectively (N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:2519-30; N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:2215-27).

In contrast with previous studies showing factor levels in the single digits, recent studies have achieved normal-range values. Seeing such improvements in hemophilia A, is a particular source of optimism; historically, gene therapy for hemophilia A has lagged behind hemophilia B because of a larger gene that is more difficult to work with.

“This has stepped up the game hugely,” Dr. Pasi said.

The elements of gene therapy for hemophilia may change over time. For instance, lentiviruses could be used instead of AAV-based methods, and ex vivo techniques could make a comeback, potentially using different tissue sources. These changes are likely on the distant horizon, however.

Gene modification is also not coming anytime soon.

“Gene replacement, gene editing, and gene repair are something that we hear a lot about in the general field of gene therapy,” Dr. Pasi said, “But in practical terms for our patients, we probably are a significant way off from this at the moment, and this is because we know and we all recognize that there are a wide range of mutations causing hemophilia, and many of these are highly specific; we will need specific gene therapies to address specific mutations.”

Dr. Pasi likened the current state of gene therapy to that of the self-driving car, suggesting that “we still have strides to make, and there are still things we can improve on beyond what we have today.

“The biggest question for gene therapy today is durability,” Dr. Pasi said. “How long are these things going to last?”

Patients from earlier studies are now crossing the half-decade mark, albeit with relatively low factor levels, compared with recent techniques. One such study, presented at the 2018 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology by Amit C. Nathwani, MD, PhD, and colleagues, is “very critical to our understanding,” Dr. Pasi said, referring to patients who are now 6-8 years post treatment. “What we see is … continued, stable expression of factor IX,” he said.

Alongside questions of durability, safety remains paramount in the quest for better methods of gene therapy.

“We are seeing liver function abnormalities,” Dr. Pasi said, noting that these tend to be transient elevations of ALT. “We know that many patients now have to receive steroid treatment, which very effectively reduces the immune response, but it is something that we are increasingly having to bear in mind.”

The latest techniques are using liver-specific promoters in novel synthetic capsids, and more capsids are under development.

Dr. Pasi also emphasized safety and caution. “We must never forget that gene therapy is a completely new approach to treatment, and we’ve got to think about safety. It is the number one priority when we are investigating new treatments.”

Safety remains untested in several key patient subpopulations, including children and those with comorbidities or inhibitors.

“For gene therapy in 2019,” he said, “we’ve made massive strides, but we’re not quite there yet.”

PRAGUE – Adeno-associated virus (AAV)–based gene therapy is probably not the “endgame” in gene therapy for hemophilia, according to John Pasi, MD, PhD, director of the Haemophilia Centre at the Royal London Hospital.

Will Pass/MDedge News

“Gene therapy today is essentially gene therapy version 1.0,” Dr. Pasi said, kicking off the third day at the annual congress of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders.

Interwoven with a summary of recent research and upcoming trends, Dr. Pasi reflected upon the medical community’s expectations for gene therapy, both past and present.

“For years,” Dr. Pasi said, “gene therapy has been regarded, essentially, as the Holy Grail of treatment for hemophilia.” This sentiment has been supported by the fact that hemophilia “is a single-gene disorder with a cause and effect relationship that is extremely clear and straightforward for us to recognize.”

A small increase in clotting factor can significantly reduce bleeding while providing a measurable efficacy outcome, making it a strong research candidate.


Looking back, however, when gene therapy research began in the early 1990s, it “really did go through a peak of inflated expectations,” Dr. Pasi said. “We thought for years it was just around the corner. But there were abject failures; there were learning curves we had to go through to understand many of the issues that gene therapy threw up, which we didn’t understand at the beginning.”

When this early excitement was met with tough realities, a period of disillusionment began and persisted through the early 2000s. Dr. Pasi suggested that this period of disillusionment may be reaching an end because of a “huge amount of steady work” that has ushered in a new period of productivity.

Dr. Pasi cited two 2017 studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine by Savita Rangarajan, MBBS, and colleagues and Lindsey A. George, MD, and colleagues for hemophilia A and B, respectively (N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:2519-30; N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:2215-27).

In contrast with previous studies showing factor levels in the single digits, recent studies have achieved normal-range values. Seeing such improvements in hemophilia A, is a particular source of optimism; historically, gene therapy for hemophilia A has lagged behind hemophilia B because of a larger gene that is more difficult to work with.

“This has stepped up the game hugely,” Dr. Pasi said.

The elements of gene therapy for hemophilia may change over time. For instance, lentiviruses could be used instead of AAV-based methods, and ex vivo techniques could make a comeback, potentially using different tissue sources. These changes are likely on the distant horizon, however.

Gene modification is also not coming anytime soon.

“Gene replacement, gene editing, and gene repair are something that we hear a lot about in the general field of gene therapy,” Dr. Pasi said, “But in practical terms for our patients, we probably are a significant way off from this at the moment, and this is because we know and we all recognize that there are a wide range of mutations causing hemophilia, and many of these are highly specific; we will need specific gene therapies to address specific mutations.”

Dr. Pasi likened the current state of gene therapy to that of the self-driving car, suggesting that “we still have strides to make, and there are still things we can improve on beyond what we have today.

“The biggest question for gene therapy today is durability,” Dr. Pasi said. “How long are these things going to last?”

Patients from earlier studies are now crossing the half-decade mark, albeit with relatively low factor levels, compared with recent techniques. One such study, presented at the 2018 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology by Amit C. Nathwani, MD, PhD, and colleagues, is “very critical to our understanding,” Dr. Pasi said, referring to patients who are now 6-8 years post treatment. “What we see is … continued, stable expression of factor IX,” he said.

Alongside questions of durability, safety remains paramount in the quest for better methods of gene therapy.

“We are seeing liver function abnormalities,” Dr. Pasi said, noting that these tend to be transient elevations of ALT. “We know that many patients now have to receive steroid treatment, which very effectively reduces the immune response, but it is something that we are increasingly having to bear in mind.”

The latest techniques are using liver-specific promoters in novel synthetic capsids, and more capsids are under development.

Dr. Pasi also emphasized safety and caution. “We must never forget that gene therapy is a completely new approach to treatment, and we’ve got to think about safety. It is the number one priority when we are investigating new treatments.”

Safety remains untested in several key patient subpopulations, including children and those with comorbidities or inhibitors.

“For gene therapy in 2019,” he said, “we’ve made massive strides, but we’re not quite there yet.”

PRAGUE – Adeno-associated virus (AAV)–based gene therapy is probably not the “endgame” in gene therapy for hemophilia, according to John Pasi, MD, PhD, director of the Haemophilia Centre at the Royal London Hospital.

Will Pass/MDedge News

“Gene therapy today is essentially gene therapy version 1.0,” Dr. Pasi said, kicking off the third day at the annual congress of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders.

Interwoven with a summary of recent research and upcoming trends, Dr. Pasi reflected upon the medical community’s expectations for gene therapy, both past and present.

“For years,” Dr. Pasi said, “gene therapy has been regarded, essentially, as the Holy Grail of treatment for hemophilia.” This sentiment has been supported by the fact that hemophilia “is a single-gene disorder with a cause and effect relationship that is extremely clear and straightforward for us to recognize.”

A small increase in clotting factor can significantly reduce bleeding while providing a measurable efficacy outcome, making it a strong research candidate.


Looking back, however, when gene therapy research began in the early 1990s, it “really did go through a peak of inflated expectations,” Dr. Pasi said. “We thought for years it was just around the corner. But there were abject failures; there were learning curves we had to go through to understand many of the issues that gene therapy threw up, which we didn’t understand at the beginning.”

When this early excitement was met with tough realities, a period of disillusionment began and persisted through the early 2000s. Dr. Pasi suggested that this period of disillusionment may be reaching an end because of a “huge amount of steady work” that has ushered in a new period of productivity.

Dr. Pasi cited two 2017 studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine by Savita Rangarajan, MBBS, and colleagues and Lindsey A. George, MD, and colleagues for hemophilia A and B, respectively (N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:2519-30; N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:2215-27).

In contrast with previous studies showing factor levels in the single digits, recent studies have achieved normal-range values. Seeing such improvements in hemophilia A, is a particular source of optimism; historically, gene therapy for hemophilia A has lagged behind hemophilia B because of a larger gene that is more difficult to work with.

“This has stepped up the game hugely,” Dr. Pasi said.

The elements of gene therapy for hemophilia may change over time. For instance, lentiviruses could be used instead of AAV-based methods, and ex vivo techniques could make a comeback, potentially using different tissue sources. These changes are likely on the distant horizon, however.

Gene modification is also not coming anytime soon.

“Gene replacement, gene editing, and gene repair are something that we hear a lot about in the general field of gene therapy,” Dr. Pasi said, “But in practical terms for our patients, we probably are a significant way off from this at the moment, and this is because we know and we all recognize that there are a wide range of mutations causing hemophilia, and many of these are highly specific; we will need specific gene therapies to address specific mutations.”

Dr. Pasi likened the current state of gene therapy to that of the self-driving car, suggesting that “we still have strides to make, and there are still things we can improve on beyond what we have today.

“The biggest question for gene therapy today is durability,” Dr. Pasi said. “How long are these things going to last?”

Patients from earlier studies are now crossing the half-decade mark, albeit with relatively low factor levels, compared with recent techniques. One such study, presented at the 2018 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology by Amit C. Nathwani, MD, PhD, and colleagues, is “very critical to our understanding,” Dr. Pasi said, referring to patients who are now 6-8 years post treatment. “What we see is … continued, stable expression of factor IX,” he said.

Alongside questions of durability, safety remains paramount in the quest for better methods of gene therapy.

“We are seeing liver function abnormalities,” Dr. Pasi said, noting that these tend to be transient elevations of ALT. “We know that many patients now have to receive steroid treatment, which very effectively reduces the immune response, but it is something that we are increasingly having to bear in mind.”

The latest techniques are using liver-specific promoters in novel synthetic capsids, and more capsids are under development.

Dr. Pasi also emphasized safety and caution. “We must never forget that gene therapy is a completely new approach to treatment, and we’ve got to think about safety. It is the number one priority when we are investigating new treatments.”

Safety remains untested in several key patient subpopulations, including children and those with comorbidities or inhibitors.

“For gene therapy in 2019,” he said, “we’ve made massive strides, but we’re not quite there yet.”

PRAGUE – Clinicians should prioritize treatment duration with factors or bypassing agents – not dose level – when managing breakthrough bleeds in patients with hemophilia who are on non–factor replacement therapy, according to a leading expert.

Will Pass/MDedge News

Duration of treatment is more strongly associated with thromboembolism than dose magnitude, said Andreas Tiede, MD, PhD, head of hemostaseology at Hannover (Germany) Medical School in Germany, noting that recommendations vary by non–factor replacement agent.

These remarks were part of a presentation about novel agents for treatment of hemophilia with inhibitors delivered at the annual congress of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders.

“Concomitant use of factor products, both factor VIII and IX, and the bypassing agents, have usually preceded thromboembolic events in clinical trials [for non–factor replacement therapies] so this [topic] is crucial,” Dr. Tiede said.

Other experts recommend lower doses and shorter treatment durations. “I think that’s reasonable, but with some question mark behind the low doses,” he said. “I think it depends a little bit on the interaction between the non–factor replacement therapy and the bypassing agent in your patient.”

With a busy pipeline of non–factor replacement agents for hemophilia, such interactions are becoming increasingly relevant for clinicians and their patients.

Emicizumab, for instance, which is now approved for hemophilia with or without inhibitors, has synergistic activity with activated prothrombin complex concentrates (APCC). This was demonstrated by an emicizumab prophylaxis trial in which five out of eight patients with breakthrough bleeding who were treated with APPC at a dose higher than 100 IU/kg per day for more than 24 hours developed thrombotic microangiopathy. (N Engl J Med. 2017;377:809-18).

Other patients who received multiple infusions of APCC developed skin necrosis, cavernous vein thrombosis, and thrombophlebitis. Consequently, it is now recommended that APCC be avoided in patients taking emicizumab, and if unavoidable, given at the lowest dose possible. However, Dr. Tiede advised that this recommendation for APCC should not be extrapolated to encompass all factors and bypassing agents, based on existing data.

“Regarding higher or lower doses for initial treatment, I would be a little bit more careful,” he said. “That obviously depends on [whether] there is a synergistic effect with the non–factor replacement therapy and the bypassing agent. Synergistic effects have clearly been shown for the interaction of emicizumab and APCC, but when it comes to the interaction between emicizumab and VIIa, I’m not so sure. I don’t think that we have enough evidence to recommend lower doses of VIIa.”

Dr. Tiede also suggested that lower doses of factor VIII are probably unnecessary. “At high doses or high concentrations of factor VIII, emicizumab’s low affinity to the targets will not result in any significant action anymore,” he said. “So I think we have to wait for more data from basic research and also more clinical data.”

Regarding concern for duration of therapy, Dr. Tiede explained that, when treating breakthrough bleeding in a patient on non–factor replacement therapy, “the patient’s hemostatic protection level will never fall to zero, as it would have done in a patient treated previously, on demand with bypassing agents only.” Since hemostatic protection levels never return to zero, it is easier to enter the thromboembolic danger zone.

This risk was recently demonstrated by an emerging non-factor replacement therapy. In a phase 3 trial for fitusiran – a small interfering RNA therapy that targets antithrombin – a patient with hemophilia A developed a breakthrough bleed and 31-46 IU/kg of factor VIII was given, resulting in fatal cerebral sinus thrombosis. After a temporary hold, the study restarted with new limits on factor and bypassing agent doses.

Dr. Tiede reported financial relationships with Bayer, Biotest, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and other companies.

PRAGUE – Clinicians should prioritize treatment duration with factors or bypassing agents – not dose level – when managing breakthrough bleeds in patients with hemophilia who are on non–factor replacement therapy, according to a leading expert.

Will Pass/MDedge News

Duration of treatment is more strongly associated with thromboembolism than dose magnitude, said Andreas Tiede, MD, PhD, head of hemostaseology at Hannover (Germany) Medical School in Germany, noting that recommendations vary by non–factor replacement agent.

These remarks were part of a presentation about novel agents for treatment of hemophilia with inhibitors delivered at the annual congress of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders.

“Concomitant use of factor products, both factor VIII and IX, and the bypassing agents, have usually preceded thromboembolic events in clinical trials [for non–factor replacement therapies] so this [topic] is crucial,” Dr. Tiede said.

Other experts recommend lower doses and shorter treatment durations. “I think that’s reasonable, but with some question mark behind the low doses,” he said. “I think it depends a little bit on the interaction between the non–factor replacement therapy and the bypassing agent in your patient.”

With a busy pipeline of non–factor replacement agents for hemophilia, such interactions are becoming increasingly relevant for clinicians and their patients.

Emicizumab, for instance, which is now approved for hemophilia with or without inhibitors, has synergistic activity with activated prothrombin complex concentrates (APCC). This was demonstrated by an emicizumab prophylaxis trial in which five out of eight patients with breakthrough bleeding who were treated with APPC at a dose higher than 100 IU/kg per day for more than 24 hours developed thrombotic microangiopathy. (N Engl J Med. 2017;377:809-18).

Other patients who received multiple infusions of APCC developed skin necrosis, cavernous vein thrombosis, and thrombophlebitis. Consequently, it is now recommended that APCC be avoided in patients taking emicizumab, and if unavoidable, given at the lowest dose possible. However, Dr. Tiede advised that this recommendation for APCC should not be extrapolated to encompass all factors and bypassing agents, based on existing data.

“Regarding higher or lower doses for initial treatment, I would be a little bit more careful,” he said. “That obviously depends on [whether] there is a synergistic effect with the non–factor replacement therapy and the bypassing agent. Synergistic effects have clearly been shown for the interaction of emicizumab and APCC, but when it comes to the interaction between emicizumab and VIIa, I’m not so sure. I don’t think that we have enough evidence to recommend lower doses of VIIa.”

Dr. Tiede also suggested that lower doses of factor VIII are probably unnecessary. “At high doses or high concentrations of factor VIII, emicizumab’s low affinity to the targets will not result in any significant action anymore,” he said. “So I think we have to wait for more data from basic research and also more clinical data.”

Regarding concern for duration of therapy, Dr. Tiede explained that, when treating breakthrough bleeding in a patient on non–factor replacement therapy, “the patient’s hemostatic protection level will never fall to zero, as it would have done in a patient treated previously, on demand with bypassing agents only.” Since hemostatic protection levels never return to zero, it is easier to enter the thromboembolic danger zone.

This risk was recently demonstrated by an emerging non-factor replacement therapy. In a phase 3 trial for fitusiran – a small interfering RNA therapy that targets antithrombin – a patient with hemophilia A developed a breakthrough bleed and 31-46 IU/kg of factor VIII was given, resulting in fatal cerebral sinus thrombosis. After a temporary hold, the study restarted with new limits on factor and bypassing agent doses.

Dr. Tiede reported financial relationships with Bayer, Biotest, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and other companies.

PRAGUE – Clinicians should prioritize treatment duration with factors or bypassing agents – not dose level – when managing breakthrough bleeds in patients with hemophilia who are on non–factor replacement therapy, according to a leading expert.

Will Pass/MDedge News

Duration of treatment is more strongly associated with thromboembolism than dose magnitude, said Andreas Tiede, MD, PhD, head of hemostaseology at Hannover (Germany) Medical School in Germany, noting that recommendations vary by non–factor replacement agent.

These remarks were part of a presentation about novel agents for treatment of hemophilia with inhibitors delivered at the annual congress of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders.

“Concomitant use of factor products, both factor VIII and IX, and the bypassing agents, have usually preceded thromboembolic events in clinical trials [for non–factor replacement therapies] so this [topic] is crucial,” Dr. Tiede said.

Other experts recommend lower doses and shorter treatment durations. “I think that’s reasonable, but with some question mark behind the low doses,” he said. “I think it depends a little bit on the interaction between the non–factor replacement therapy and the bypassing agent in your patient.”

With a busy pipeline of non–factor replacement agents for hemophilia, such interactions are becoming increasingly relevant for clinicians and their patients.

Emicizumab, for instance, which is now approved for hemophilia with or without inhibitors, has synergistic activity with activated prothrombin complex concentrates (APCC). This was demonstrated by an emicizumab prophylaxis trial in which five out of eight patients with breakthrough bleeding who were treated with APPC at a dose higher than 100 IU/kg per day for more than 24 hours developed thrombotic microangiopathy. (N Engl J Med. 2017;377:809-18).

Other patients who received multiple infusions of APCC developed skin necrosis, cavernous vein thrombosis, and thrombophlebitis. Consequently, it is now recommended that APCC be avoided in patients taking emicizumab, and if unavoidable, given at the lowest dose possible. However, Dr. Tiede advised that this recommendation for APCC should not be extrapolated to encompass all factors and bypassing agents, based on existing data.

“Regarding higher or lower doses for initial treatment, I would be a little bit more careful,” he said. “That obviously depends on [whether] there is a synergistic effect with the non–factor replacement therapy and the bypassing agent. Synergistic effects have clearly been shown for the interaction of emicizumab and APCC, but when it comes to the interaction between emicizumab and VIIa, I’m not so sure. I don’t think that we have enough evidence to recommend lower doses of VIIa.”

Dr. Tiede also suggested that lower doses of factor VIII are probably unnecessary. “At high doses or high concentrations of factor VIII, emicizumab’s low affinity to the targets will not result in any significant action anymore,” he said. “So I think we have to wait for more data from basic research and also more clinical data.”

Regarding concern for duration of therapy, Dr. Tiede explained that, when treating breakthrough bleeding in a patient on non–factor replacement therapy, “the patient’s hemostatic protection level will never fall to zero, as it would have done in a patient treated previously, on demand with bypassing agents only.” Since hemostatic protection levels never return to zero, it is easier to enter the thromboembolic danger zone.

This risk was recently demonstrated by an emerging non-factor replacement therapy. In a phase 3 trial for fitusiran – a small interfering RNA therapy that targets antithrombin – a patient with hemophilia A developed a breakthrough bleed and 31-46 IU/kg of factor VIII was given, resulting in fatal cerebral sinus thrombosis. After a temporary hold, the study restarted with new limits on factor and bypassing agent doses.

Dr. Tiede reported financial relationships with Bayer, Biotest, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and other companies.

PRAGUE – Emicizumab appears safe and effective for patients with hemophilia A undergoing surgical procedures, based on experience with a subpopulation of HAVEN 3 trial participants.

Out of 28 minor procedures performed without preventive factor VIII (FVIII), only 2 were associated with postoperative bleeds requiring treatment, reported lead author Elena Santagostino, MD, PhD, of Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico in Milan, and her colleagues.

All events requiring bleeding treatment were associated with dental procedures, highlighting an area where clinicians and dentists may need to exercise caution. Still, overall results supported emicizumab in a surgical setting.

“There were no thrombotic complications or other unexpected events, including inhibitor development,” Dr. Santagostino said at the annual congress of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders.

The findings were drawn from 30 patients who underwent 50 surgeries (46 minor, 4 major) during HAVEN 3, a previously reported phase 3 trial investigating the use of emicizumab, a humanized bispecific monoclonal antibody for patients with hemophilia A without inhibitors.

The minor surgeries included dental or orthopedic procedures, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, or colonoscopy. The four major procedures were all orthopedic (knee arthroscopic synovectomy, biceps femoris tear repair, total ankle arthroplasty, and total hip replacement). The investigators analyzed surgery-related bleeds and the nature of FVIII usage.

Preventive FVIII was used in 18 procedures; infusion duration was 24 hours or less in 14 procedures, between 25 hours and 48 hours in 2 procedures, and more than 72 hours in 2 procedures. The median cumulative preventive FVIII dose per procedure was 30 IU/kg.

Of the 46 minor procedures, 28 (61%) were performed without preventive FVIII, and 2 (7.1%) were associated with bleeding requiring treatment, both after dental procedures. Two other participants who received preventive FVIII also needed postoperative bleeding treatment. Of note, these events were also after dental procedures, meaning all four instances of bleeding requiring treatment during the trial were associated with dentistry.

“[I]n this experience, dental procedures were somewhat tricky because the bleeding complications were mainly there,” Dr. Santagostino said.

When asked by an audience member if this trend was unique to mucosal bleeding, Dr. Santagostino said it was too early to draw such a conclusion but offered some insight. “To control and prevent bleeding during a dental procedure is not trivial, because … sometimes if you stop factor VIII treatment quite early, you may have late bleeding, mainly due to local reasons, because … dental procedures are very heterogenous.”

Among three other participants who had postoperative bleeding but did not require treatment, two underwent dental procedures, further supporting this association. Although the study numbers are relatively small, the findings may at least support caution, if not preventive FVIII in the dental setting, Dr. Santagostino said.

The four major procedures – all orthopedic – were knee arthroscopic synovectomy, biceps femoris tear repair, total ankle arthroplasty, and total hip replacement. Along with preoperative preventive FVIII, three of four patients undergoing major surgery received preventive FVIII for 14-18 days postoperatively. Doses ranged from 99-522 IU/kg. No postoperative bleeds occurred in this subgroup.

Study funding was provided by F. Hoffmann–La Roche and Chugai Pharmaceutical. The investigators reported financial relationships with Bayer, Shire, Pfizer, Novo Nordisk, and others.

SOURCE: Santagostino E et al. EAHAD 2019, Abstract OR15.

PRAGUE – Emicizumab appears safe and effective for patients with hemophilia A undergoing surgical procedures, based on experience with a subpopulation of HAVEN 3 trial participants.

Out of 28 minor procedures performed without preventive factor VIII (FVIII), only 2 were associated with postoperative bleeds requiring treatment, reported lead author Elena Santagostino, MD, PhD, of Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico in Milan, and her colleagues.

All events requiring bleeding treatment were associated with dental procedures, highlighting an area where clinicians and dentists may need to exercise caution. Still, overall results supported emicizumab in a surgical setting.

“There were no thrombotic complications or other unexpected events, including inhibitor development,” Dr. Santagostino said at the annual congress of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders.

The findings were drawn from 30 patients who underwent 50 surgeries (46 minor, 4 major) during HAVEN 3, a previously reported phase 3 trial investigating the use of emicizumab, a humanized bispecific monoclonal antibody for patients with hemophilia A without inhibitors.

The minor surgeries included dental or orthopedic procedures, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, or colonoscopy. The four major procedures were all orthopedic (knee arthroscopic synovectomy, biceps femoris tear repair, total ankle arthroplasty, and total hip replacement). The investigators analyzed surgery-related bleeds and the nature of FVIII usage.

Preventive FVIII was used in 18 procedures; infusion duration was 24 hours or less in 14 procedures, between 25 hours and 48 hours in 2 procedures, and more than 72 hours in 2 procedures. The median cumulative preventive FVIII dose per procedure was 30 IU/kg.

Of the 46 minor procedures, 28 (61%) were performed without preventive FVIII, and 2 (7.1%) were associated with bleeding requiring treatment, both after dental procedures. Two other participants who received preventive FVIII also needed postoperative bleeding treatment. Of note, these events were also after dental procedures, meaning all four instances of bleeding requiring treatment during the trial were associated with dentistry.

“[I]n this experience, dental procedures were somewhat tricky because the bleeding complications were mainly there,” Dr. Santagostino said.

When asked by an audience member if this trend was unique to mucosal bleeding, Dr. Santagostino said it was too early to draw such a conclusion but offered some insight. “To control and prevent bleeding during a dental procedure is not trivial, because … sometimes if you stop factor VIII treatment quite early, you may have late bleeding, mainly due to local reasons, because … dental procedures are very heterogenous.”

Among three other participants who had postoperative bleeding but did not require treatment, two underwent dental procedures, further supporting this association. Although the study numbers are relatively small, the findings may at least support caution, if not preventive FVIII in the dental setting, Dr. Santagostino said.

The four major procedures – all orthopedic – were knee arthroscopic synovectomy, biceps femoris tear repair, total ankle arthroplasty, and total hip replacement. Along with preoperative preventive FVIII, three of four patients undergoing major surgery received preventive FVIII for 14-18 days postoperatively. Doses ranged from 99-522 IU/kg. No postoperative bleeds occurred in this subgroup.

Study funding was provided by F. Hoffmann–La Roche and Chugai Pharmaceutical. The investigators reported financial relationships with Bayer, Shire, Pfizer, Novo Nordisk, and others.

SOURCE: Santagostino E et al. EAHAD 2019, Abstract OR15.

PRAGUE – Emicizumab appears safe and effective for patients with hemophilia A undergoing surgical procedures, based on experience with a subpopulation of HAVEN 3 trial participants.

Out of 28 minor procedures performed without preventive factor VIII (FVIII), only 2 were associated with postoperative bleeds requiring treatment, reported lead author Elena Santagostino, MD, PhD, of Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico in Milan, and her colleagues.

All events requiring bleeding treatment were associated with dental procedures, highlighting an area where clinicians and dentists may need to exercise caution. Still, overall results supported emicizumab in a surgical setting.

“There were no thrombotic complications or other unexpected events, including inhibitor development,” Dr. Santagostino said at the annual congress of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders.

The findings were drawn from 30 patients who underwent 50 surgeries (46 minor, 4 major) during HAVEN 3, a previously reported phase 3 trial investigating the use of emicizumab, a humanized bispecific monoclonal antibody for patients with hemophilia A without inhibitors.

The minor surgeries included dental or orthopedic procedures, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, or colonoscopy. The four major procedures were all orthopedic (knee arthroscopic synovectomy, biceps femoris tear repair, total ankle arthroplasty, and total hip replacement). The investigators analyzed surgery-related bleeds and the nature of FVIII usage.

Preventive FVIII was used in 18 procedures; infusion duration was 24 hours or less in 14 procedures, between 25 hours and 48 hours in 2 procedures, and more than 72 hours in 2 procedures. The median cumulative preventive FVIII dose per procedure was 30 IU/kg.

Of the 46 minor procedures, 28 (61%) were performed without preventive FVIII, and 2 (7.1%) were associated with bleeding requiring treatment, both after dental procedures. Two other participants who received preventive FVIII also needed postoperative bleeding treatment. Of note, these events were also after dental procedures, meaning all four instances of bleeding requiring treatment during the trial were associated with dentistry.

“[I]n this experience, dental procedures were somewhat tricky because the bleeding complications were mainly there,” Dr. Santagostino said.

When asked by an audience member if this trend was unique to mucosal bleeding, Dr. Santagostino said it was too early to draw such a conclusion but offered some insight. “To control and prevent bleeding during a dental procedure is not trivial, because … sometimes if you stop factor VIII treatment quite early, you may have late bleeding, mainly due to local reasons, because … dental procedures are very heterogenous.”

Among three other participants who had postoperative bleeding but did not require treatment, two underwent dental procedures, further supporting this association. Although the study numbers are relatively small, the findings may at least support caution, if not preventive FVIII in the dental setting, Dr. Santagostino said.

The four major procedures – all orthopedic – were knee arthroscopic synovectomy, biceps femoris tear repair, total ankle arthroplasty, and total hip replacement. Along with preoperative preventive FVIII, three of four patients undergoing major surgery received preventive FVIII for 14-18 days postoperatively. Doses ranged from 99-522 IU/kg. No postoperative bleeds occurred in this subgroup.

Study funding was provided by F. Hoffmann–La Roche and Chugai Pharmaceutical. The investigators reported financial relationships with Bayer, Shire, Pfizer, Novo Nordisk, and others.

SOURCE: Santagostino E et al. EAHAD 2019, Abstract OR15.