User login
Hybrid procedures may be better option for LVOTO in lower-weight neonates
Little outcomes data have been published comparing hybrid and Norwood stage 1 procedures for newborns with critical left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO), but a prospective analysis of more than 500 operations over 9 years reported that while the Norwood has better survival rates overall, hybrid procedures may improve survival in low-birth-weight newborns.
“Although lower birth weight was identified as an important risk factor for death for the entire cohort, the detrimental impact of low birth weight was mitigated, to some degree, for patients who underwent a hybrid procedure,” said Travis Wilder, MD, of the Congenital Heart Surgeons’ Society (CHSS) Data Center, and his coauthors. They reported their findings in the January 2017 issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (153:163-72).
Norwood operations involve major surgical reconstruction along with exposure to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), with either deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) or regional cerebral perfusion, during aortic arch reconstruction. Previous reports have linked CPB to postoperative hemodynamic instability, complications, and death (Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jun;87:1885-92). “In addition, the early physiological stress imposed on neonates after Norwood operations raises concerns regarding adverse neurodevelopment,” Dr. Wilder and his coauthors wrote.
Dr. Wilder and his coauthors pointed out that the hybrid procedure has emerged to avoid CPB and DHCA or regional cerebral perfusion and the potential resulting physiologic instability. “In this light, hybrid palliation may be perceived as a lower-risk alternative to Norwood operations, especially for patients considered at high risk for mortality,” the researchers said. Despite that perception, the actual survival “remains incompletely defined,” they said.
The overall average 4-year unadjusted survival for the entire study population was 65%, but those who had the NW-RVPA procedure had significantly improved survival (73%) vs. both the NW-BT (61%) and the hybrid groups (60%).
Those who had the hybrid procedure were older at stage 1 (12 days vs. 8 and 6 days, respectively for NW-BT and NW-RVPA) and had lower birth weight (2.9 kg vs. 3.2 kg and 3.15 kg, respectively). Hybrid patients also had a higher prevalence of baseline right ventricle dysfunction, were more likely to have baseline tricuspid valve regurgitation, and had a lower prevalence of aortic and mitral valve atresia.
For all patients, birth weight of 2.0-2.5 kg had a strong association with poor survival, Dr. Wilder and his coauthors reported, but the drop-off in survival for low-birth-weight neonates was greater in the Norwood group than in the hybrid group. “This finding suggests that hybrid procedures may offer a modest survival advantage over NW-RVPA at birth weight less than or equal to 2.0 kg and over NW-BT at birth weight less than or equal to 3.0 kg,” the researchers said.
Dr. Wilder and his coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.
While the study by Dr. Wilder and his coauthors may have drawn an accurate conclusion about low-birth-weight newborns possibly benefiting from a hybrid procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome, the number of patients in each strategy was small, Carlos M. Mery, MD, MPH, of Texas Children’s Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, said in his invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jan;153:173-4).
Dr. Mery noted other limitations of the study, namely the heterogeneity of procedures by participating center. “Of the 20 centers, only 11 performed any hybrid procedures, and 1 center accounted for 42% of all hybrid procedures performed,” he said. “Because centers may be associated with possibly unaccounted risk factors and different learning curves, the conclusions may not be easily generalizable.”
The conclusion that newborns of lower birth weight may benefit from the hybrid procedure helps to bring clarity for which patients may benefit from a specific procedure, Dr. Mery said. “We seem to be getting closer to the ultimate goal of being able to offer each individual patient the management strategy that will lead to the best possible outcome, not only for quantity but also for quality of life,” Dr. Mery said.
Dr. Mery had no financial relationships to disclose.
While the study by Dr. Wilder and his coauthors may have drawn an accurate conclusion about low-birth-weight newborns possibly benefiting from a hybrid procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome, the number of patients in each strategy was small, Carlos M. Mery, MD, MPH, of Texas Children’s Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, said in his invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jan;153:173-4).
Dr. Mery noted other limitations of the study, namely the heterogeneity of procedures by participating center. “Of the 20 centers, only 11 performed any hybrid procedures, and 1 center accounted for 42% of all hybrid procedures performed,” he said. “Because centers may be associated with possibly unaccounted risk factors and different learning curves, the conclusions may not be easily generalizable.”
The conclusion that newborns of lower birth weight may benefit from the hybrid procedure helps to bring clarity for which patients may benefit from a specific procedure, Dr. Mery said. “We seem to be getting closer to the ultimate goal of being able to offer each individual patient the management strategy that will lead to the best possible outcome, not only for quantity but also for quality of life,” Dr. Mery said.
Dr. Mery had no financial relationships to disclose.
While the study by Dr. Wilder and his coauthors may have drawn an accurate conclusion about low-birth-weight newborns possibly benefiting from a hybrid procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome, the number of patients in each strategy was small, Carlos M. Mery, MD, MPH, of Texas Children’s Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, said in his invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jan;153:173-4).
Dr. Mery noted other limitations of the study, namely the heterogeneity of procedures by participating center. “Of the 20 centers, only 11 performed any hybrid procedures, and 1 center accounted for 42% of all hybrid procedures performed,” he said. “Because centers may be associated with possibly unaccounted risk factors and different learning curves, the conclusions may not be easily generalizable.”
The conclusion that newborns of lower birth weight may benefit from the hybrid procedure helps to bring clarity for which patients may benefit from a specific procedure, Dr. Mery said. “We seem to be getting closer to the ultimate goal of being able to offer each individual patient the management strategy that will lead to the best possible outcome, not only for quantity but also for quality of life,” Dr. Mery said.
Dr. Mery had no financial relationships to disclose.
Little outcomes data have been published comparing hybrid and Norwood stage 1 procedures for newborns with critical left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO), but a prospective analysis of more than 500 operations over 9 years reported that while the Norwood has better survival rates overall, hybrid procedures may improve survival in low-birth-weight newborns.
“Although lower birth weight was identified as an important risk factor for death for the entire cohort, the detrimental impact of low birth weight was mitigated, to some degree, for patients who underwent a hybrid procedure,” said Travis Wilder, MD, of the Congenital Heart Surgeons’ Society (CHSS) Data Center, and his coauthors. They reported their findings in the January 2017 issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (153:163-72).
Norwood operations involve major surgical reconstruction along with exposure to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), with either deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) or regional cerebral perfusion, during aortic arch reconstruction. Previous reports have linked CPB to postoperative hemodynamic instability, complications, and death (Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jun;87:1885-92). “In addition, the early physiological stress imposed on neonates after Norwood operations raises concerns regarding adverse neurodevelopment,” Dr. Wilder and his coauthors wrote.
Dr. Wilder and his coauthors pointed out that the hybrid procedure has emerged to avoid CPB and DHCA or regional cerebral perfusion and the potential resulting physiologic instability. “In this light, hybrid palliation may be perceived as a lower-risk alternative to Norwood operations, especially for patients considered at high risk for mortality,” the researchers said. Despite that perception, the actual survival “remains incompletely defined,” they said.
The overall average 4-year unadjusted survival for the entire study population was 65%, but those who had the NW-RVPA procedure had significantly improved survival (73%) vs. both the NW-BT (61%) and the hybrid groups (60%).
Those who had the hybrid procedure were older at stage 1 (12 days vs. 8 and 6 days, respectively for NW-BT and NW-RVPA) and had lower birth weight (2.9 kg vs. 3.2 kg and 3.15 kg, respectively). Hybrid patients also had a higher prevalence of baseline right ventricle dysfunction, were more likely to have baseline tricuspid valve regurgitation, and had a lower prevalence of aortic and mitral valve atresia.
For all patients, birth weight of 2.0-2.5 kg had a strong association with poor survival, Dr. Wilder and his coauthors reported, but the drop-off in survival for low-birth-weight neonates was greater in the Norwood group than in the hybrid group. “This finding suggests that hybrid procedures may offer a modest survival advantage over NW-RVPA at birth weight less than or equal to 2.0 kg and over NW-BT at birth weight less than or equal to 3.0 kg,” the researchers said.
Dr. Wilder and his coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.
Little outcomes data have been published comparing hybrid and Norwood stage 1 procedures for newborns with critical left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO), but a prospective analysis of more than 500 operations over 9 years reported that while the Norwood has better survival rates overall, hybrid procedures may improve survival in low-birth-weight newborns.
“Although lower birth weight was identified as an important risk factor for death for the entire cohort, the detrimental impact of low birth weight was mitigated, to some degree, for patients who underwent a hybrid procedure,” said Travis Wilder, MD, of the Congenital Heart Surgeons’ Society (CHSS) Data Center, and his coauthors. They reported their findings in the January 2017 issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (153:163-72).
Norwood operations involve major surgical reconstruction along with exposure to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), with either deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) or regional cerebral perfusion, during aortic arch reconstruction. Previous reports have linked CPB to postoperative hemodynamic instability, complications, and death (Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jun;87:1885-92). “In addition, the early physiological stress imposed on neonates after Norwood operations raises concerns regarding adverse neurodevelopment,” Dr. Wilder and his coauthors wrote.
Dr. Wilder and his coauthors pointed out that the hybrid procedure has emerged to avoid CPB and DHCA or regional cerebral perfusion and the potential resulting physiologic instability. “In this light, hybrid palliation may be perceived as a lower-risk alternative to Norwood operations, especially for patients considered at high risk for mortality,” the researchers said. Despite that perception, the actual survival “remains incompletely defined,” they said.
The overall average 4-year unadjusted survival for the entire study population was 65%, but those who had the NW-RVPA procedure had significantly improved survival (73%) vs. both the NW-BT (61%) and the hybrid groups (60%).
Those who had the hybrid procedure were older at stage 1 (12 days vs. 8 and 6 days, respectively for NW-BT and NW-RVPA) and had lower birth weight (2.9 kg vs. 3.2 kg and 3.15 kg, respectively). Hybrid patients also had a higher prevalence of baseline right ventricle dysfunction, were more likely to have baseline tricuspid valve regurgitation, and had a lower prevalence of aortic and mitral valve atresia.
For all patients, birth weight of 2.0-2.5 kg had a strong association with poor survival, Dr. Wilder and his coauthors reported, but the drop-off in survival for low-birth-weight neonates was greater in the Norwood group than in the hybrid group. “This finding suggests that hybrid procedures may offer a modest survival advantage over NW-RVPA at birth weight less than or equal to 2.0 kg and over NW-BT at birth weight less than or equal to 3.0 kg,” the researchers said.
Dr. Wilder and his coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.
FROM THE JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Key clinical point: Norwood procedures have the best survival rates for neonates with critical left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, but hybrid procedures may improve survival for those with lower birth weight.
Major finding: Risk-adjusted 4-year survival was 76% for the Norwood operation with a right ventricle–to-pulmonary artery conduit, 61% for Norwood with a modified Blalock-Taussig shunt and 60% for the hybrid procedure.
Data source: Prospective observational cohort study of 564 neonates admitted to 21 Congenital Heart Surgeons’ Society institutions from 2005 to 2014.
Disclosures: Dr. Wilder and his coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.
Sleeve lobectomy appears better than pneumonectomy for NSCLC
Guidelines that recommend sleeve lobectomy as a means of avoiding pneumonectomy for lung cancer have been based on a limited retrospective series, but a large series drawn from a nationwide database in France has confirmed the preference for sleeve lobectomy because it leads to higher rates of survival, despite an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications.
“Whenever it is technically possible, surgeons must perform sleeve lobectomy to provide more long-term survival benefits to patients, even with the risk of more postoperative pulmonary complications,” said Pierre-Benoit Pagès, MD, PhD, and his coauthors in the January 2017 issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2017;153:184-95). Dr. Pagès is with the department of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery at the University Hospital Center Dijon (France) and Bocage Hospital.
Three-year overall survival was 71.9% for the sleeve lobectomy group vs. 60.8% for the pneumonectomy group. Three-year disease-free survival was 46.4% for the sleeve lobectomy group and 31.6% for the pneumonectomy group. In addition, compared with the sleeve lobectomy group, the pneumonectomy group had an increased risk of recurrence by matching (hazard ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.1-2).
The researchers performed a propensity-matched analysis that favored sleeve lobectomy for early overall and disease-free survival, but the weighted analysis did not. Patients in the sleeve lobectomy group vs. the pneumonectomy group were younger (60.9 years vs. 61.9), had higher body mass index (25.6 vs. 25.1), had higher average forced expiratory volume (74.1% vs. 62.9%), and had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (73.7% with scores of 1 and 2 vs. 70.8%). Sleeve lobectomy patients also were more likely to have right-sided surgery (69.6% vs. 41%) and squamous cell carcinoma (54.6% vs. 48.3%), and lower T and N stages (T1 and T2, 60.5% vs. 40.6%; N0, 40.9% vs. 26.2%).
Overall mortality after surgery was 5% in the sleeve lobectomy group vs. 5.9% in the pneumonectomy group, but propensity scoring showed far fewer postoperative pulmonary complications in the pneumonectomy group, with an odds ratio of 0.4, Dr. Pagès and his coauthors said. However, with other significant complications – arrhythmia, bronchopleural fistula, empyema, and hemorrhage – pneumonectomy had a propensity-matched odds ratio ranging from 1.6 to 7. “We found no significant difference regarding postoperative mortality in the sleeve lobectomy and pneumonectomy groups, whatever the statistical method used,” Dr. Pagès and his coauthors wrote.
The investigators had no financial relationships to disclose.
The study by Dr. Pagès and his colleagues is unique in the field of surgery for non–small cell lung cancer in that it drew on a nationwide database using data from 103 centers, Betty C. Tong, MD, MHS, of Duke University Medical Center, Durham, said in her invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:196). “These results are likely as close to real life as possible,” she said.
She acknowledged that no prospective, randomized controlled trials have compared sleeve lobectomy to pneumonectomy, but she added, “it is unlikely that such a trial could be successfully executed.” The 5:1 ratio of patients having pneumonectomy vs. sleeve lobectomy in this study is similar to findings from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery database (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;132:247-54), Dr. Tong pointed out, “and likely reflects the fact that sleeve lobectomy can be technically more difficult to perform.”
The findings of the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery group “should strongly encourage thoracic surgeons to perform pneumonectomy as sparingly as possible,” and consider sleeve lobectomy the standard for patients with central tumors, Dr. Tong said.
She had no financial relationships to disclose.
The study by Dr. Pagès and his colleagues is unique in the field of surgery for non–small cell lung cancer in that it drew on a nationwide database using data from 103 centers, Betty C. Tong, MD, MHS, of Duke University Medical Center, Durham, said in her invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:196). “These results are likely as close to real life as possible,” she said.
She acknowledged that no prospective, randomized controlled trials have compared sleeve lobectomy to pneumonectomy, but she added, “it is unlikely that such a trial could be successfully executed.” The 5:1 ratio of patients having pneumonectomy vs. sleeve lobectomy in this study is similar to findings from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery database (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;132:247-54), Dr. Tong pointed out, “and likely reflects the fact that sleeve lobectomy can be technically more difficult to perform.”
The findings of the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery group “should strongly encourage thoracic surgeons to perform pneumonectomy as sparingly as possible,” and consider sleeve lobectomy the standard for patients with central tumors, Dr. Tong said.
She had no financial relationships to disclose.
The study by Dr. Pagès and his colleagues is unique in the field of surgery for non–small cell lung cancer in that it drew on a nationwide database using data from 103 centers, Betty C. Tong, MD, MHS, of Duke University Medical Center, Durham, said in her invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:196). “These results are likely as close to real life as possible,” she said.
She acknowledged that no prospective, randomized controlled trials have compared sleeve lobectomy to pneumonectomy, but she added, “it is unlikely that such a trial could be successfully executed.” The 5:1 ratio of patients having pneumonectomy vs. sleeve lobectomy in this study is similar to findings from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery database (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;132:247-54), Dr. Tong pointed out, “and likely reflects the fact that sleeve lobectomy can be technically more difficult to perform.”
The findings of the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery group “should strongly encourage thoracic surgeons to perform pneumonectomy as sparingly as possible,” and consider sleeve lobectomy the standard for patients with central tumors, Dr. Tong said.
She had no financial relationships to disclose.
Guidelines that recommend sleeve lobectomy as a means of avoiding pneumonectomy for lung cancer have been based on a limited retrospective series, but a large series drawn from a nationwide database in France has confirmed the preference for sleeve lobectomy because it leads to higher rates of survival, despite an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications.
“Whenever it is technically possible, surgeons must perform sleeve lobectomy to provide more long-term survival benefits to patients, even with the risk of more postoperative pulmonary complications,” said Pierre-Benoit Pagès, MD, PhD, and his coauthors in the January 2017 issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2017;153:184-95). Dr. Pagès is with the department of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery at the University Hospital Center Dijon (France) and Bocage Hospital.
Three-year overall survival was 71.9% for the sleeve lobectomy group vs. 60.8% for the pneumonectomy group. Three-year disease-free survival was 46.4% for the sleeve lobectomy group and 31.6% for the pneumonectomy group. In addition, compared with the sleeve lobectomy group, the pneumonectomy group had an increased risk of recurrence by matching (hazard ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.1-2).
The researchers performed a propensity-matched analysis that favored sleeve lobectomy for early overall and disease-free survival, but the weighted analysis did not. Patients in the sleeve lobectomy group vs. the pneumonectomy group were younger (60.9 years vs. 61.9), had higher body mass index (25.6 vs. 25.1), had higher average forced expiratory volume (74.1% vs. 62.9%), and had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (73.7% with scores of 1 and 2 vs. 70.8%). Sleeve lobectomy patients also were more likely to have right-sided surgery (69.6% vs. 41%) and squamous cell carcinoma (54.6% vs. 48.3%), and lower T and N stages (T1 and T2, 60.5% vs. 40.6%; N0, 40.9% vs. 26.2%).
Overall mortality after surgery was 5% in the sleeve lobectomy group vs. 5.9% in the pneumonectomy group, but propensity scoring showed far fewer postoperative pulmonary complications in the pneumonectomy group, with an odds ratio of 0.4, Dr. Pagès and his coauthors said. However, with other significant complications – arrhythmia, bronchopleural fistula, empyema, and hemorrhage – pneumonectomy had a propensity-matched odds ratio ranging from 1.6 to 7. “We found no significant difference regarding postoperative mortality in the sleeve lobectomy and pneumonectomy groups, whatever the statistical method used,” Dr. Pagès and his coauthors wrote.
The investigators had no financial relationships to disclose.
Guidelines that recommend sleeve lobectomy as a means of avoiding pneumonectomy for lung cancer have been based on a limited retrospective series, but a large series drawn from a nationwide database in France has confirmed the preference for sleeve lobectomy because it leads to higher rates of survival, despite an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications.
“Whenever it is technically possible, surgeons must perform sleeve lobectomy to provide more long-term survival benefits to patients, even with the risk of more postoperative pulmonary complications,” said Pierre-Benoit Pagès, MD, PhD, and his coauthors in the January 2017 issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2017;153:184-95). Dr. Pagès is with the department of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery at the University Hospital Center Dijon (France) and Bocage Hospital.
Three-year overall survival was 71.9% for the sleeve lobectomy group vs. 60.8% for the pneumonectomy group. Three-year disease-free survival was 46.4% for the sleeve lobectomy group and 31.6% for the pneumonectomy group. In addition, compared with the sleeve lobectomy group, the pneumonectomy group had an increased risk of recurrence by matching (hazard ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.1-2).
The researchers performed a propensity-matched analysis that favored sleeve lobectomy for early overall and disease-free survival, but the weighted analysis did not. Patients in the sleeve lobectomy group vs. the pneumonectomy group were younger (60.9 years vs. 61.9), had higher body mass index (25.6 vs. 25.1), had higher average forced expiratory volume (74.1% vs. 62.9%), and had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (73.7% with scores of 1 and 2 vs. 70.8%). Sleeve lobectomy patients also were more likely to have right-sided surgery (69.6% vs. 41%) and squamous cell carcinoma (54.6% vs. 48.3%), and lower T and N stages (T1 and T2, 60.5% vs. 40.6%; N0, 40.9% vs. 26.2%).
Overall mortality after surgery was 5% in the sleeve lobectomy group vs. 5.9% in the pneumonectomy group, but propensity scoring showed far fewer postoperative pulmonary complications in the pneumonectomy group, with an odds ratio of 0.4, Dr. Pagès and his coauthors said. However, with other significant complications – arrhythmia, bronchopleural fistula, empyema, and hemorrhage – pneumonectomy had a propensity-matched odds ratio ranging from 1.6 to 7. “We found no significant difference regarding postoperative mortality in the sleeve lobectomy and pneumonectomy groups, whatever the statistical method used,” Dr. Pagès and his coauthors wrote.
The investigators had no financial relationships to disclose.
Key clinical point: Sleeve lobectomy for non–small cell lung cancer may lead to higher rates of overall and disease-free survival vs. pneumonectomy.
Major finding: Overall postoperative mortality was 5% in the sleeve lobectomy group vs. 5.9% in the pneumonectomy group.
Data source: An analysis of 941 sleeve lobectomy and 5,318 pneumonectomy procedures from 2005 to 2014 in the nationwide French database Epithor.
Disclosures: Dr. Pagès has received research grants from the Nuovo-Soldati Foundation for Cancer Research and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, on whose behalf the study was performed. Dr. Pagès and his coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.
How to limit radiation in endovascular procedures
CHICAGO – Applying the key principles for limiting radiation exposure for vascular surgeons and staff – not to mention patients – during endovascular procedures involves a thorough understanding of dose metrics as well as risk factors for high-dose interventions, according to recent findings reported at a symposium on vascular surgery sponsored by Northwestern University.
Melissa Kirkwood, MD, of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, reported on her institution’s experience with limiting radiation exposure in typically high-dose cases. “What we found was that even though we had a substantial amount of dose in these cases – they included a significant proportion of 5- to 10-Gy and greater than 10-Gy cases – there were still no skin injuries detected in these patients,” she said, referencing retrospective and prospective analyses (J Vasc Surg. 2014;60:742-8; J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:902-6).
Vigilance regarding these principles for vascular surgeons is paramount, Dr. Kirkwood said, noting that the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements threshold for substantial radiation dose is 5 Gy or greater. “When you’re doing complex endovascular work, your doses can get that high,” she said.
As a means of measuring dose, Dr. Kirkwood called fluoroscopy time a “universally poor indicator” because in current practice vascular surgeons use digital acquisition mode in addition to fluoroscopy. “The digital acquisitions generate 10-100 times more dose than fluoroscopy, so if you’re only looking at fluoroscopy time, your potentially missing the majority of the dose for that case,” she said.
More applicable dose measures, she said, are kerma area product that measures total radiation beam output from the x-ray tube, which she called “a better reflection of operator exposure,” and reference air kerma (RAK), a measure of the dose at a reference point 15 cm along the beam axis toward the focal spot from the isocenter, which she said is the best approximation for patient peak skin dose exposure. However, the latter does not account for angle of the x-ray tube or patient position, which can vary based on the type of procedure or the patient’s size.
Dr. Kirkwood’s work at UTSW also determined that operator exposure during an endovascular procedure depends on where they stand. “Doubling the distance from the source can decrease the radiation level by a factor of four,” she said. For femoral access in the right groin, the operator is at greatest risk for exposure followed by the assistant when the assistant is standing to the right of the operator. The left brachial access site carries an even higher exposure for the operator, she said.
The table-mounted lead skirt plays a key role in limiting operator exposure, Dr. Kirkwood said. “It can be cumbersome, but it is very important in lowering your lower-body dose,” she said, because it will block radiation scatter coming off the bottom of the table.
At UTSW, the endovascular operators had a tutorial with the staff medical physicist on best practices to limit radiation exposure. “What we found was that we were significantly able to decrease the dose across all cases by simply going over a few principles,” she said.
Among those principles: “Always be aware when you’re on the fluoroscopy pedal and always use the lowest fluoroscopy mode possible,” she said. However, she noted that in difficult-to-visualize cases, a short-duration boost in fluoroscopy level might reduce overall fluoroscopy time and hence limit exposure. To limit digital acquisition mode, the use of fluoroscopic looping can allow for review of images during the procedure with a fraction of the dose that would be needed for a digital acquisition run.
Limiting magnification and using collimation can be complementary, Dr. Kirkwood said. “If you really have to magnify to see the area of interest, make sure you have tight collimation to try to decrease the scatter to you and your colleagues in the OR,” she said.
Dr. Kirkwood noted that raising the angio table as high as is comfortable and decreasing the distance between the source and image detector can limit patient exposure. Operators should avoid steep angulations of the x-ray tube, she said, but when angulations are necessary, operators should stand on the opposite side of the x-ray tube. “The best operating practice if you know you’re going to have a high-dose case with a lot of gantry angulation would be to tightly collimate to the area of interest and minimize the magnification,” she said.
Though not necessarily a principle, keeping up with software advances for imaging devices can also prove valuable for limiting radiation exposure, Dr. Kirkwood said. “It’s important to know about them because if you are purchasing new equipment, they are not necessarily included if you’re institution is looking to hold down costs,” she said.
Dr. Kirkwood had no relevant financial disclosures.
CHICAGO – Applying the key principles for limiting radiation exposure for vascular surgeons and staff – not to mention patients – during endovascular procedures involves a thorough understanding of dose metrics as well as risk factors for high-dose interventions, according to recent findings reported at a symposium on vascular surgery sponsored by Northwestern University.
Melissa Kirkwood, MD, of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, reported on her institution’s experience with limiting radiation exposure in typically high-dose cases. “What we found was that even though we had a substantial amount of dose in these cases – they included a significant proportion of 5- to 10-Gy and greater than 10-Gy cases – there were still no skin injuries detected in these patients,” she said, referencing retrospective and prospective analyses (J Vasc Surg. 2014;60:742-8; J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:902-6).
Vigilance regarding these principles for vascular surgeons is paramount, Dr. Kirkwood said, noting that the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements threshold for substantial radiation dose is 5 Gy or greater. “When you’re doing complex endovascular work, your doses can get that high,” she said.
As a means of measuring dose, Dr. Kirkwood called fluoroscopy time a “universally poor indicator” because in current practice vascular surgeons use digital acquisition mode in addition to fluoroscopy. “The digital acquisitions generate 10-100 times more dose than fluoroscopy, so if you’re only looking at fluoroscopy time, your potentially missing the majority of the dose for that case,” she said.
More applicable dose measures, she said, are kerma area product that measures total radiation beam output from the x-ray tube, which she called “a better reflection of operator exposure,” and reference air kerma (RAK), a measure of the dose at a reference point 15 cm along the beam axis toward the focal spot from the isocenter, which she said is the best approximation for patient peak skin dose exposure. However, the latter does not account for angle of the x-ray tube or patient position, which can vary based on the type of procedure or the patient’s size.
Dr. Kirkwood’s work at UTSW also determined that operator exposure during an endovascular procedure depends on where they stand. “Doubling the distance from the source can decrease the radiation level by a factor of four,” she said. For femoral access in the right groin, the operator is at greatest risk for exposure followed by the assistant when the assistant is standing to the right of the operator. The left brachial access site carries an even higher exposure for the operator, she said.
The table-mounted lead skirt plays a key role in limiting operator exposure, Dr. Kirkwood said. “It can be cumbersome, but it is very important in lowering your lower-body dose,” she said, because it will block radiation scatter coming off the bottom of the table.
At UTSW, the endovascular operators had a tutorial with the staff medical physicist on best practices to limit radiation exposure. “What we found was that we were significantly able to decrease the dose across all cases by simply going over a few principles,” she said.
Among those principles: “Always be aware when you’re on the fluoroscopy pedal and always use the lowest fluoroscopy mode possible,” she said. However, she noted that in difficult-to-visualize cases, a short-duration boost in fluoroscopy level might reduce overall fluoroscopy time and hence limit exposure. To limit digital acquisition mode, the use of fluoroscopic looping can allow for review of images during the procedure with a fraction of the dose that would be needed for a digital acquisition run.
Limiting magnification and using collimation can be complementary, Dr. Kirkwood said. “If you really have to magnify to see the area of interest, make sure you have tight collimation to try to decrease the scatter to you and your colleagues in the OR,” she said.
Dr. Kirkwood noted that raising the angio table as high as is comfortable and decreasing the distance between the source and image detector can limit patient exposure. Operators should avoid steep angulations of the x-ray tube, she said, but when angulations are necessary, operators should stand on the opposite side of the x-ray tube. “The best operating practice if you know you’re going to have a high-dose case with a lot of gantry angulation would be to tightly collimate to the area of interest and minimize the magnification,” she said.
Though not necessarily a principle, keeping up with software advances for imaging devices can also prove valuable for limiting radiation exposure, Dr. Kirkwood said. “It’s important to know about them because if you are purchasing new equipment, they are not necessarily included if you’re institution is looking to hold down costs,” she said.
Dr. Kirkwood had no relevant financial disclosures.
CHICAGO – Applying the key principles for limiting radiation exposure for vascular surgeons and staff – not to mention patients – during endovascular procedures involves a thorough understanding of dose metrics as well as risk factors for high-dose interventions, according to recent findings reported at a symposium on vascular surgery sponsored by Northwestern University.
Melissa Kirkwood, MD, of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, reported on her institution’s experience with limiting radiation exposure in typically high-dose cases. “What we found was that even though we had a substantial amount of dose in these cases – they included a significant proportion of 5- to 10-Gy and greater than 10-Gy cases – there were still no skin injuries detected in these patients,” she said, referencing retrospective and prospective analyses (J Vasc Surg. 2014;60:742-8; J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:902-6).
Vigilance regarding these principles for vascular surgeons is paramount, Dr. Kirkwood said, noting that the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements threshold for substantial radiation dose is 5 Gy or greater. “When you’re doing complex endovascular work, your doses can get that high,” she said.
As a means of measuring dose, Dr. Kirkwood called fluoroscopy time a “universally poor indicator” because in current practice vascular surgeons use digital acquisition mode in addition to fluoroscopy. “The digital acquisitions generate 10-100 times more dose than fluoroscopy, so if you’re only looking at fluoroscopy time, your potentially missing the majority of the dose for that case,” she said.
More applicable dose measures, she said, are kerma area product that measures total radiation beam output from the x-ray tube, which she called “a better reflection of operator exposure,” and reference air kerma (RAK), a measure of the dose at a reference point 15 cm along the beam axis toward the focal spot from the isocenter, which she said is the best approximation for patient peak skin dose exposure. However, the latter does not account for angle of the x-ray tube or patient position, which can vary based on the type of procedure or the patient’s size.
Dr. Kirkwood’s work at UTSW also determined that operator exposure during an endovascular procedure depends on where they stand. “Doubling the distance from the source can decrease the radiation level by a factor of four,” she said. For femoral access in the right groin, the operator is at greatest risk for exposure followed by the assistant when the assistant is standing to the right of the operator. The left brachial access site carries an even higher exposure for the operator, she said.
The table-mounted lead skirt plays a key role in limiting operator exposure, Dr. Kirkwood said. “It can be cumbersome, but it is very important in lowering your lower-body dose,” she said, because it will block radiation scatter coming off the bottom of the table.
At UTSW, the endovascular operators had a tutorial with the staff medical physicist on best practices to limit radiation exposure. “What we found was that we were significantly able to decrease the dose across all cases by simply going over a few principles,” she said.
Among those principles: “Always be aware when you’re on the fluoroscopy pedal and always use the lowest fluoroscopy mode possible,” she said. However, she noted that in difficult-to-visualize cases, a short-duration boost in fluoroscopy level might reduce overall fluoroscopy time and hence limit exposure. To limit digital acquisition mode, the use of fluoroscopic looping can allow for review of images during the procedure with a fraction of the dose that would be needed for a digital acquisition run.
Limiting magnification and using collimation can be complementary, Dr. Kirkwood said. “If you really have to magnify to see the area of interest, make sure you have tight collimation to try to decrease the scatter to you and your colleagues in the OR,” she said.
Dr. Kirkwood noted that raising the angio table as high as is comfortable and decreasing the distance between the source and image detector can limit patient exposure. Operators should avoid steep angulations of the x-ray tube, she said, but when angulations are necessary, operators should stand on the opposite side of the x-ray tube. “The best operating practice if you know you’re going to have a high-dose case with a lot of gantry angulation would be to tightly collimate to the area of interest and minimize the magnification,” she said.
Though not necessarily a principle, keeping up with software advances for imaging devices can also prove valuable for limiting radiation exposure, Dr. Kirkwood said. “It’s important to know about them because if you are purchasing new equipment, they are not necessarily included if you’re institution is looking to hold down costs,” she said.
Dr. Kirkwood had no relevant financial disclosures.
AT THE NORTHWESTERN VASCULAR SYMPOSIUM
Key clinical point: Vascular surgeons can lower their radiation exposure during endovascular procedures by employing key principles like appropriate shielding.
Major finding: Familiarity with dose terminology and metrics, possible radiation-induced injuries, and techniques to lower radiation dosing are keys to limiting radiation exposure.
Data source: Review of literature, including National Council on Radiation and Protection guidelines and National Cancer Institute grades of skin toxicity for radiation dermatitis.
Disclosures: Dr. Kirkwood had no financial relationships to disclose.
New data signal paradigm shift in FMD and arterial disease
CHICAGO – New data have shown that fibromuscular dysplasia is associated with high rates of dissection and/or aneurysm, and emerging recommendations call for routine imaging early on in the diagnosis of FMD to monitor for these vascular events, a researcher who developed those recommendations reported at a symposium on vascular surgery sponsored by Northwestern University.
“Given the very high rate of aneurysms in this population, it is now recommended that all patients with FMD should undergo at least one-time head-to pelvis imaging with CT angiography or MR angiography to screen for the presence of an aneurysm or to identify other areas of FMD involvement,” said Daniella Kadian-Dodov, MD, of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:176-85).
First described in 1938, FMD is a non-atherosclerotic, noninflammatory disease that had been thought to be a rare cause of renovascular hypertension with a classic “string-of-beads” appearance upon imaging, Dr. Kadian-Dodov noted. However, recent data from the Fibromuscular Dysplasia Society of America–sponsored U.S. registry has changed that thinking. “We now know it occurs more frequently in the carotid and renal arteries, although it has been observed in almost every artery,” she said. “The pathogenesis is still unknown but up to 10% of cases are familial.”
And manifestations of disease now extend beyond the “string-of-beads” appearance to include aneurysm, dissection, and arterial tortuosity, she said (Circulation. 2012;125:3182-90; Circulation. 2014;129:1048-78; J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:176-85). The classification system for FMD has also undergone a recent change, according to Dr. Kadian-Dodov. “Traditionally, a histopathologic scheme was used to classify FMD,” she said. “Nowadays, fewer and fewer patients are undergoing surgical procedures, so the classification has changed to an angiographic system,” the most common of which is the American Heart Association system adopted in 2014 that distinguishes between multifocal, characterized by the classic “string-of-beads” appearance, and focal FMD with a single area of stenosis.
But the diagnosis of either variant of FMD is not exclusive. “Patients may have multiple areas of disease involvement and the same patient may have both focal and multifocal FMD findings,” Dr. Kadian-Dodov said.
The U.S. registry has helped clarify the thinking on FMD, Dr. Kadian-Dodov said. More than 1,400 patients are in the registry, 90% of whom are women with multifocal disease. The average age of onset of symptoms is 47 years, but 52 is the average age for diagnosis. “So these patients are experiencing several years delay to FMD diagnosis,” she said.
Manifestations depend on the vascular bed involved. “In the case of cervical artery FMD, headaches and pulsatile tinnitus are commonly reported, whereas with renal artery involvement hypertension is the most common symptom,” she said. A recent analysis showed 41.7% of the FMD population have either aneurysm and dissection or both (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:176-185).
But no specific guidelines for treatment of FMD yet exist, Dr. Kadian-Dodov said. “General guidelines should be applied for the management of dissection and aneurysm in patients with FMD,” she said. For patients with arterial dissection, that means conservative therapy comprising either anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents for 3-6 months followed by daily low-dose aspirin therapy. “Revascularization is rarely required for these patients,” she said. “Endovascular or surgical modalities should be reserved for those with continued ischemia despite conservative management or more complicated pseudoaneurysm formations.”
Daily aspirin therapy is likewise the recommendation for patients with cervical artery multifocal or focal FMD involvement without dissection or aneurysms. “We follow up with imaging every 6 months for 2 years,” Dr. Kadian-Dodov said. “If they’re stable, we switch over to annual surveillance; and if the patient has an aneurysm or dissection, that might alter the imaging and surveillance program.”
During angioplasty, determining the severity of stenosis upon visual inspection is difficult, especially in multifocal FMD. She advised measuring the gradient across the area of FMD involvement with a pressure wire to determine if angioplasty has adequately treated the lesion. “You should see obliteration of the gradient with successful treatment; you don’t have to target your therapy to a perfect angiographic result,” she said.
In patients with FMD and hypertension, she recommended renal artery angioplasty for hypertension of less than 5 years duration or in resistant or labile hypertension. “In this setting, stents are only reserved for complicated or refractory cases; angioplasty alone is sufficient,” Dr. Kadian-Dodov said. Cure rates decline with age, and hypertension in focal disease has a higher cure rate than does multifocal disease, she said (Hypertension. 2010;56:525-32).
Dr. Kadian-Dodov had no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
CHICAGO – New data have shown that fibromuscular dysplasia is associated with high rates of dissection and/or aneurysm, and emerging recommendations call for routine imaging early on in the diagnosis of FMD to monitor for these vascular events, a researcher who developed those recommendations reported at a symposium on vascular surgery sponsored by Northwestern University.
“Given the very high rate of aneurysms in this population, it is now recommended that all patients with FMD should undergo at least one-time head-to pelvis imaging with CT angiography or MR angiography to screen for the presence of an aneurysm or to identify other areas of FMD involvement,” said Daniella Kadian-Dodov, MD, of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:176-85).
First described in 1938, FMD is a non-atherosclerotic, noninflammatory disease that had been thought to be a rare cause of renovascular hypertension with a classic “string-of-beads” appearance upon imaging, Dr. Kadian-Dodov noted. However, recent data from the Fibromuscular Dysplasia Society of America–sponsored U.S. registry has changed that thinking. “We now know it occurs more frequently in the carotid and renal arteries, although it has been observed in almost every artery,” she said. “The pathogenesis is still unknown but up to 10% of cases are familial.”
And manifestations of disease now extend beyond the “string-of-beads” appearance to include aneurysm, dissection, and arterial tortuosity, she said (Circulation. 2012;125:3182-90; Circulation. 2014;129:1048-78; J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:176-85). The classification system for FMD has also undergone a recent change, according to Dr. Kadian-Dodov. “Traditionally, a histopathologic scheme was used to classify FMD,” she said. “Nowadays, fewer and fewer patients are undergoing surgical procedures, so the classification has changed to an angiographic system,” the most common of which is the American Heart Association system adopted in 2014 that distinguishes between multifocal, characterized by the classic “string-of-beads” appearance, and focal FMD with a single area of stenosis.
But the diagnosis of either variant of FMD is not exclusive. “Patients may have multiple areas of disease involvement and the same patient may have both focal and multifocal FMD findings,” Dr. Kadian-Dodov said.
The U.S. registry has helped clarify the thinking on FMD, Dr. Kadian-Dodov said. More than 1,400 patients are in the registry, 90% of whom are women with multifocal disease. The average age of onset of symptoms is 47 years, but 52 is the average age for diagnosis. “So these patients are experiencing several years delay to FMD diagnosis,” she said.
Manifestations depend on the vascular bed involved. “In the case of cervical artery FMD, headaches and pulsatile tinnitus are commonly reported, whereas with renal artery involvement hypertension is the most common symptom,” she said. A recent analysis showed 41.7% of the FMD population have either aneurysm and dissection or both (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:176-185).
But no specific guidelines for treatment of FMD yet exist, Dr. Kadian-Dodov said. “General guidelines should be applied for the management of dissection and aneurysm in patients with FMD,” she said. For patients with arterial dissection, that means conservative therapy comprising either anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents for 3-6 months followed by daily low-dose aspirin therapy. “Revascularization is rarely required for these patients,” she said. “Endovascular or surgical modalities should be reserved for those with continued ischemia despite conservative management or more complicated pseudoaneurysm formations.”
Daily aspirin therapy is likewise the recommendation for patients with cervical artery multifocal or focal FMD involvement without dissection or aneurysms. “We follow up with imaging every 6 months for 2 years,” Dr. Kadian-Dodov said. “If they’re stable, we switch over to annual surveillance; and if the patient has an aneurysm or dissection, that might alter the imaging and surveillance program.”
During angioplasty, determining the severity of stenosis upon visual inspection is difficult, especially in multifocal FMD. She advised measuring the gradient across the area of FMD involvement with a pressure wire to determine if angioplasty has adequately treated the lesion. “You should see obliteration of the gradient with successful treatment; you don’t have to target your therapy to a perfect angiographic result,” she said.
In patients with FMD and hypertension, she recommended renal artery angioplasty for hypertension of less than 5 years duration or in resistant or labile hypertension. “In this setting, stents are only reserved for complicated or refractory cases; angioplasty alone is sufficient,” Dr. Kadian-Dodov said. Cure rates decline with age, and hypertension in focal disease has a higher cure rate than does multifocal disease, she said (Hypertension. 2010;56:525-32).
Dr. Kadian-Dodov had no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
CHICAGO – New data have shown that fibromuscular dysplasia is associated with high rates of dissection and/or aneurysm, and emerging recommendations call for routine imaging early on in the diagnosis of FMD to monitor for these vascular events, a researcher who developed those recommendations reported at a symposium on vascular surgery sponsored by Northwestern University.
“Given the very high rate of aneurysms in this population, it is now recommended that all patients with FMD should undergo at least one-time head-to pelvis imaging with CT angiography or MR angiography to screen for the presence of an aneurysm or to identify other areas of FMD involvement,” said Daniella Kadian-Dodov, MD, of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:176-85).
First described in 1938, FMD is a non-atherosclerotic, noninflammatory disease that had been thought to be a rare cause of renovascular hypertension with a classic “string-of-beads” appearance upon imaging, Dr. Kadian-Dodov noted. However, recent data from the Fibromuscular Dysplasia Society of America–sponsored U.S. registry has changed that thinking. “We now know it occurs more frequently in the carotid and renal arteries, although it has been observed in almost every artery,” she said. “The pathogenesis is still unknown but up to 10% of cases are familial.”
And manifestations of disease now extend beyond the “string-of-beads” appearance to include aneurysm, dissection, and arterial tortuosity, she said (Circulation. 2012;125:3182-90; Circulation. 2014;129:1048-78; J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:176-85). The classification system for FMD has also undergone a recent change, according to Dr. Kadian-Dodov. “Traditionally, a histopathologic scheme was used to classify FMD,” she said. “Nowadays, fewer and fewer patients are undergoing surgical procedures, so the classification has changed to an angiographic system,” the most common of which is the American Heart Association system adopted in 2014 that distinguishes between multifocal, characterized by the classic “string-of-beads” appearance, and focal FMD with a single area of stenosis.
But the diagnosis of either variant of FMD is not exclusive. “Patients may have multiple areas of disease involvement and the same patient may have both focal and multifocal FMD findings,” Dr. Kadian-Dodov said.
The U.S. registry has helped clarify the thinking on FMD, Dr. Kadian-Dodov said. More than 1,400 patients are in the registry, 90% of whom are women with multifocal disease. The average age of onset of symptoms is 47 years, but 52 is the average age for diagnosis. “So these patients are experiencing several years delay to FMD diagnosis,” she said.
Manifestations depend on the vascular bed involved. “In the case of cervical artery FMD, headaches and pulsatile tinnitus are commonly reported, whereas with renal artery involvement hypertension is the most common symptom,” she said. A recent analysis showed 41.7% of the FMD population have either aneurysm and dissection or both (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:176-185).
But no specific guidelines for treatment of FMD yet exist, Dr. Kadian-Dodov said. “General guidelines should be applied for the management of dissection and aneurysm in patients with FMD,” she said. For patients with arterial dissection, that means conservative therapy comprising either anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents for 3-6 months followed by daily low-dose aspirin therapy. “Revascularization is rarely required for these patients,” she said. “Endovascular or surgical modalities should be reserved for those with continued ischemia despite conservative management or more complicated pseudoaneurysm formations.”
Daily aspirin therapy is likewise the recommendation for patients with cervical artery multifocal or focal FMD involvement without dissection or aneurysms. “We follow up with imaging every 6 months for 2 years,” Dr. Kadian-Dodov said. “If they’re stable, we switch over to annual surveillance; and if the patient has an aneurysm or dissection, that might alter the imaging and surveillance program.”
During angioplasty, determining the severity of stenosis upon visual inspection is difficult, especially in multifocal FMD. She advised measuring the gradient across the area of FMD involvement with a pressure wire to determine if angioplasty has adequately treated the lesion. “You should see obliteration of the gradient with successful treatment; you don’t have to target your therapy to a perfect angiographic result,” she said.
In patients with FMD and hypertension, she recommended renal artery angioplasty for hypertension of less than 5 years duration or in resistant or labile hypertension. “In this setting, stents are only reserved for complicated or refractory cases; angioplasty alone is sufficient,” Dr. Kadian-Dodov said. Cure rates decline with age, and hypertension in focal disease has a higher cure rate than does multifocal disease, she said (Hypertension. 2010;56:525-32).
Dr. Kadian-Dodov had no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
Key clinical point: Fibromuscular dysplasia was thought to be a rare cause of renovascular hypertension, but new data has challenged this thinking.
Major finding: FMD accounts for 15%-20% of patients with spontaneous carotid or vertebral artery dissection and 45%-86% of patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection.
Data source: U.S. Registry for FMD maintained by the Fibromuscular Dystrophy Society of America.
Disclosures: Dr. Kadian-Dodov reported having no financial disclosures.
How to reduce readmissions after vascular procedures
CHICAGO – As Medicare ratchets up penalties for readmissions and hospitals scrutinize procedures such as carotid interventions and lower extremity bypass that have traditionally high readmission rates, a four-phase model that assesses readmission risks could help vascular surgeons and their institutions keep patients from returning after vascular procedures, according to a presentation at a symposium on vascular surgery sponsored by Northwestern University.
“The rate of readmissions for vascular surgery is 50% higher than all other surgical interventions,” said Karen Ho, MD, of Northwestern University, Chicago. She noted that the reported readmission rates for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair were 13.3% for endovascular and 12.8% for open (Ann Surg. 2012;256:595-605). For carotid endarterectomy (CEA), a large study reported a readmission rate of 9.6% (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:1398-1408), while a sampling of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database showed a 30-day readmission rate of 16.5% for lower extremity bypass (J Vasc Surg. 2014;60:1266-74).
Dr. Ho said one model vascular specialists and hospitals could employ to curtail readmissions was first reported in 2012 by Benjamin S. Brooke, MD, of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H., and his colleagues (J Vasc Surg. 2012;56:556-62). This model focuses on the following four phases: 1) develop a deeper understanding of the patient’s preexisting health conditions before surgery; 2) target the in-hospital postoperative period for possible intervention; 3) focus on discharge planning; and 4) determine at the actual readmission event itself if the patient should go to an alternative setting.
“I think as surgeons we often focus on the patients, the procedure, and what goes on in the hospital, but discharge planning and execution is potentially just as important in preventing readmissions,” Dr. Ho said. “This includes things like medication reconciliation, involvement of family, the primary care doctor, the nursing home or rehab facility, and the timing and scheduling of follow-up visits.”
However, she noted that unaccounted factors can also contribute to readmission risk. These can include availability of family to provide support; history of substance abuse; functional status; socioeconomic status; and medical history.
Dr. Ho noted that understanding the reasons for readmission can help vascular specialists gain a deeper understanding of their underlying causes. For example, wound complications top the list in readmissions of numerous vascular procedures, including AAA repair and lower extremity revascularization, but other causes are linked to specific procedures. “If you look at the endovascular repair group in AAA repairs, aneurysm and graft complications were the third most common reason for unplanned 30-day readmission,” she said. A multivariate analysis showed that while preoperative comorbidities had a modest effect on readmission rates after AAA repair, postoperative factors such as complications extending patients’ length of stay and discharge to a setting other than home had a profound effect (Ann Surg. 2012;256:595-605).
In carotid procedures, Dr. Ho noted that carotid artery stenting and CEA had 30-day readmission rates of around 10% (Stroke. 2012;43:2408-16), although CEA seemed to have a slight advantage. Cardiac complications, headache, and bleeding were the top reasons for readmissions for carotid procedures, Dr. Ho said. “In a multivariate analysis, a history of coronary artery bypass and any postoperative complication were associated with readmission,” she said (Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2014;48:217-23).
However, many risk factors for readmission are nonmodifiable, such as patient age 80 and up, or a history of renal failure, heart failure, or diabetes – all characteristics that made patients more prone to readmission after carotid procedures.
Likewise in lower extremity revascularization, nonmodifiable risk factors – end-stage renal disease, heart failure, or tissue loss indication – were prime culprits for readmissions, Dr. Ho noted (J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:955-62). “But also the strongest predictors for readmission included surgical site infections postoperatively as well as graft complications,” she said.
“Risk prediction models for readmissions perform poorly, which makes it difficult to identify high risk and to implement clinically actionable plans to reduce readmissions,” Dr. Ho said. “It also raises the question of whether other important variables, such as social determinants, which may disproportionately affect disadvantaged patients, maybe should be included in these risk prevention models to increase their predicative value.”
Until or if Medicare adjusts its risk evaluation measures accordingly to more accurately reflect the influence of underlying variables such as socioeconomic status and medical history, vascular specialists and their institutions will be pressed to develop programs to reduce readmissions.
Dr. Ho had no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
CHICAGO – As Medicare ratchets up penalties for readmissions and hospitals scrutinize procedures such as carotid interventions and lower extremity bypass that have traditionally high readmission rates, a four-phase model that assesses readmission risks could help vascular surgeons and their institutions keep patients from returning after vascular procedures, according to a presentation at a symposium on vascular surgery sponsored by Northwestern University.
“The rate of readmissions for vascular surgery is 50% higher than all other surgical interventions,” said Karen Ho, MD, of Northwestern University, Chicago. She noted that the reported readmission rates for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair were 13.3% for endovascular and 12.8% for open (Ann Surg. 2012;256:595-605). For carotid endarterectomy (CEA), a large study reported a readmission rate of 9.6% (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:1398-1408), while a sampling of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database showed a 30-day readmission rate of 16.5% for lower extremity bypass (J Vasc Surg. 2014;60:1266-74).
Dr. Ho said one model vascular specialists and hospitals could employ to curtail readmissions was first reported in 2012 by Benjamin S. Brooke, MD, of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H., and his colleagues (J Vasc Surg. 2012;56:556-62). This model focuses on the following four phases: 1) develop a deeper understanding of the patient’s preexisting health conditions before surgery; 2) target the in-hospital postoperative period for possible intervention; 3) focus on discharge planning; and 4) determine at the actual readmission event itself if the patient should go to an alternative setting.
“I think as surgeons we often focus on the patients, the procedure, and what goes on in the hospital, but discharge planning and execution is potentially just as important in preventing readmissions,” Dr. Ho said. “This includes things like medication reconciliation, involvement of family, the primary care doctor, the nursing home or rehab facility, and the timing and scheduling of follow-up visits.”
However, she noted that unaccounted factors can also contribute to readmission risk. These can include availability of family to provide support; history of substance abuse; functional status; socioeconomic status; and medical history.
Dr. Ho noted that understanding the reasons for readmission can help vascular specialists gain a deeper understanding of their underlying causes. For example, wound complications top the list in readmissions of numerous vascular procedures, including AAA repair and lower extremity revascularization, but other causes are linked to specific procedures. “If you look at the endovascular repair group in AAA repairs, aneurysm and graft complications were the third most common reason for unplanned 30-day readmission,” she said. A multivariate analysis showed that while preoperative comorbidities had a modest effect on readmission rates after AAA repair, postoperative factors such as complications extending patients’ length of stay and discharge to a setting other than home had a profound effect (Ann Surg. 2012;256:595-605).
In carotid procedures, Dr. Ho noted that carotid artery stenting and CEA had 30-day readmission rates of around 10% (Stroke. 2012;43:2408-16), although CEA seemed to have a slight advantage. Cardiac complications, headache, and bleeding were the top reasons for readmissions for carotid procedures, Dr. Ho said. “In a multivariate analysis, a history of coronary artery bypass and any postoperative complication were associated with readmission,” she said (Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2014;48:217-23).
However, many risk factors for readmission are nonmodifiable, such as patient age 80 and up, or a history of renal failure, heart failure, or diabetes – all characteristics that made patients more prone to readmission after carotid procedures.
Likewise in lower extremity revascularization, nonmodifiable risk factors – end-stage renal disease, heart failure, or tissue loss indication – were prime culprits for readmissions, Dr. Ho noted (J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:955-62). “But also the strongest predictors for readmission included surgical site infections postoperatively as well as graft complications,” she said.
“Risk prediction models for readmissions perform poorly, which makes it difficult to identify high risk and to implement clinically actionable plans to reduce readmissions,” Dr. Ho said. “It also raises the question of whether other important variables, such as social determinants, which may disproportionately affect disadvantaged patients, maybe should be included in these risk prevention models to increase their predicative value.”
Until or if Medicare adjusts its risk evaluation measures accordingly to more accurately reflect the influence of underlying variables such as socioeconomic status and medical history, vascular specialists and their institutions will be pressed to develop programs to reduce readmissions.
Dr. Ho had no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
CHICAGO – As Medicare ratchets up penalties for readmissions and hospitals scrutinize procedures such as carotid interventions and lower extremity bypass that have traditionally high readmission rates, a four-phase model that assesses readmission risks could help vascular surgeons and their institutions keep patients from returning after vascular procedures, according to a presentation at a symposium on vascular surgery sponsored by Northwestern University.
“The rate of readmissions for vascular surgery is 50% higher than all other surgical interventions,” said Karen Ho, MD, of Northwestern University, Chicago. She noted that the reported readmission rates for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair were 13.3% for endovascular and 12.8% for open (Ann Surg. 2012;256:595-605). For carotid endarterectomy (CEA), a large study reported a readmission rate of 9.6% (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:1398-1408), while a sampling of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database showed a 30-day readmission rate of 16.5% for lower extremity bypass (J Vasc Surg. 2014;60:1266-74).
Dr. Ho said one model vascular specialists and hospitals could employ to curtail readmissions was first reported in 2012 by Benjamin S. Brooke, MD, of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H., and his colleagues (J Vasc Surg. 2012;56:556-62). This model focuses on the following four phases: 1) develop a deeper understanding of the patient’s preexisting health conditions before surgery; 2) target the in-hospital postoperative period for possible intervention; 3) focus on discharge planning; and 4) determine at the actual readmission event itself if the patient should go to an alternative setting.
“I think as surgeons we often focus on the patients, the procedure, and what goes on in the hospital, but discharge planning and execution is potentially just as important in preventing readmissions,” Dr. Ho said. “This includes things like medication reconciliation, involvement of family, the primary care doctor, the nursing home or rehab facility, and the timing and scheduling of follow-up visits.”
However, she noted that unaccounted factors can also contribute to readmission risk. These can include availability of family to provide support; history of substance abuse; functional status; socioeconomic status; and medical history.
Dr. Ho noted that understanding the reasons for readmission can help vascular specialists gain a deeper understanding of their underlying causes. For example, wound complications top the list in readmissions of numerous vascular procedures, including AAA repair and lower extremity revascularization, but other causes are linked to specific procedures. “If you look at the endovascular repair group in AAA repairs, aneurysm and graft complications were the third most common reason for unplanned 30-day readmission,” she said. A multivariate analysis showed that while preoperative comorbidities had a modest effect on readmission rates after AAA repair, postoperative factors such as complications extending patients’ length of stay and discharge to a setting other than home had a profound effect (Ann Surg. 2012;256:595-605).
In carotid procedures, Dr. Ho noted that carotid artery stenting and CEA had 30-day readmission rates of around 10% (Stroke. 2012;43:2408-16), although CEA seemed to have a slight advantage. Cardiac complications, headache, and bleeding were the top reasons for readmissions for carotid procedures, Dr. Ho said. “In a multivariate analysis, a history of coronary artery bypass and any postoperative complication were associated with readmission,” she said (Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2014;48:217-23).
However, many risk factors for readmission are nonmodifiable, such as patient age 80 and up, or a history of renal failure, heart failure, or diabetes – all characteristics that made patients more prone to readmission after carotid procedures.
Likewise in lower extremity revascularization, nonmodifiable risk factors – end-stage renal disease, heart failure, or tissue loss indication – were prime culprits for readmissions, Dr. Ho noted (J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:955-62). “But also the strongest predictors for readmission included surgical site infections postoperatively as well as graft complications,” she said.
“Risk prediction models for readmissions perform poorly, which makes it difficult to identify high risk and to implement clinically actionable plans to reduce readmissions,” Dr. Ho said. “It also raises the question of whether other important variables, such as social determinants, which may disproportionately affect disadvantaged patients, maybe should be included in these risk prevention models to increase their predicative value.”
Until or if Medicare adjusts its risk evaluation measures accordingly to more accurately reflect the influence of underlying variables such as socioeconomic status and medical history, vascular specialists and their institutions will be pressed to develop programs to reduce readmissions.
Dr. Ho had no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
AT THE NORTHWESTERN VASCULAR SYMPOSIUM
Key clinical point: A four-phase model that assesses readmission risks could help vascular surgeons and their institutions keep patients from returning after procedures.
Major finding: Readmission rates for cardiac and vascular interventions range from around 13% for aortic aneurysm repair to 20% after lower extremity revascularization.
Data source: Literature review.
Disclosures: Dr. Ho reported having no financial disclosures.
‘Stepping’ up robotic lobectomy instruction
Teaching minimally invasive robotic surgery to residents can be difficult in a health care environment obsessed with quality outcome measures and under scrutiny by hospital administrators and payers, but researchers at the University of Alabama at Birmingham may have devised a method to instruct residents in robotic lobectomy without compromising patient outcomes, according to a study published in the October issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016;152:991-7).
Robert J. Cerfolio, MD, MBA, FCCP, and his coauthors divided the procedure into 19 sequential, teachable steps and allowed residents to perform selected steps during operations that Dr. Cerfolio directed.
“We then applied simulation training, coaching techniques, and video review of each step to help improve the steps that residents could not complete,” Dr. Cerfolio and his coauthors said.
Surgeons in academic centers face the challenge of teaching “the art and science of surgery,” Dr. Cerfolio and his colleagues said, while maintaining quality outcomes. “Teaching minimally invasive surgery, especially robotic surgery, is challenging given the risks and the limited availability of the robot.”
The researchers acknowledged that other groups have taken a similar approach to training, but this is the first study that included video review, coaching, and instruction tied to time constraints, they said.
“A major concern is that while teaching robotic surgery, patients can be injured, care is worse, and metrics that are increasingly used as surrogates for quality outcomes suffer,” they noted.
They allotted each step in the procedure a set amount of time in which the resident had to complete it, totaling 80 minutes for all 19 steps and ranging from 1 minute to inspect the pleura after placing ports (9 minutes) to 20 minutes to close the five incisions. If the resident completed the task in the allotted time, it was recorded as “performed.”
Between February 2010 and December 2010 Dr. Cerfolio performed 520 robotic lobectomies, and over time the percentage of successful steps per resident improved.
For example, in the first year, 50% of thoracic surgery residents completed the first five steps (mark and place ports, inspect pleura, resect the inferior pulmonary ligament, and remove three lymph nodes), but by the last year of the study 90% of them successfully completed the five steps.
Dr. Cerfolio and coauthors acknowledged “many flaws” in their study, but the study also had strengths: It involved only one operation and corroborated the database with each resident’s own surgical logs.
“Operations such as robotic lobectomy can be successfully taught by dividing them into a series of surgical maneuvers or steps,” the researchers noted. Recording what residents can and can’t do, reviewing video, and coaching contribute to the process to improve their skills. “Further studies that scientifically measure ‘ways to teach’ and ways to coach and mentor are needed,” they said.
Dr. Cerfolio disclosed relationships with Intuitive Surgical, Ethicon, Community Health Services, KCL, Bovie and C-SATS. Coauthor Douglas Minnich, MD, is a consultant to Medtronic. The other co-authors had no financial relationships to disclose.
This in an interesting and clinically relevant study given the emphasis many institutions have placed on becoming “robotic” centers of excellence. The overall cost effectiveness of robotic surgery from a public policy standpoint remains a matter of intense study given the scarcity of resources in many health-care settings.
This in an interesting and clinically relevant study given the emphasis many institutions have placed on becoming “robotic” centers of excellence. The overall cost effectiveness of robotic surgery from a public policy standpoint remains a matter of intense study given the scarcity of resources in many health-care settings.
This in an interesting and clinically relevant study given the emphasis many institutions have placed on becoming “robotic” centers of excellence. The overall cost effectiveness of robotic surgery from a public policy standpoint remains a matter of intense study given the scarcity of resources in many health-care settings.
Teaching minimally invasive robotic surgery to residents can be difficult in a health care environment obsessed with quality outcome measures and under scrutiny by hospital administrators and payers, but researchers at the University of Alabama at Birmingham may have devised a method to instruct residents in robotic lobectomy without compromising patient outcomes, according to a study published in the October issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016;152:991-7).
Robert J. Cerfolio, MD, MBA, FCCP, and his coauthors divided the procedure into 19 sequential, teachable steps and allowed residents to perform selected steps during operations that Dr. Cerfolio directed.
“We then applied simulation training, coaching techniques, and video review of each step to help improve the steps that residents could not complete,” Dr. Cerfolio and his coauthors said.
Surgeons in academic centers face the challenge of teaching “the art and science of surgery,” Dr. Cerfolio and his colleagues said, while maintaining quality outcomes. “Teaching minimally invasive surgery, especially robotic surgery, is challenging given the risks and the limited availability of the robot.”
The researchers acknowledged that other groups have taken a similar approach to training, but this is the first study that included video review, coaching, and instruction tied to time constraints, they said.
“A major concern is that while teaching robotic surgery, patients can be injured, care is worse, and metrics that are increasingly used as surrogates for quality outcomes suffer,” they noted.
They allotted each step in the procedure a set amount of time in which the resident had to complete it, totaling 80 minutes for all 19 steps and ranging from 1 minute to inspect the pleura after placing ports (9 minutes) to 20 minutes to close the five incisions. If the resident completed the task in the allotted time, it was recorded as “performed.”
Between February 2010 and December 2010 Dr. Cerfolio performed 520 robotic lobectomies, and over time the percentage of successful steps per resident improved.
For example, in the first year, 50% of thoracic surgery residents completed the first five steps (mark and place ports, inspect pleura, resect the inferior pulmonary ligament, and remove three lymph nodes), but by the last year of the study 90% of them successfully completed the five steps.
Dr. Cerfolio and coauthors acknowledged “many flaws” in their study, but the study also had strengths: It involved only one operation and corroborated the database with each resident’s own surgical logs.
“Operations such as robotic lobectomy can be successfully taught by dividing them into a series of surgical maneuvers or steps,” the researchers noted. Recording what residents can and can’t do, reviewing video, and coaching contribute to the process to improve their skills. “Further studies that scientifically measure ‘ways to teach’ and ways to coach and mentor are needed,” they said.
Dr. Cerfolio disclosed relationships with Intuitive Surgical, Ethicon, Community Health Services, KCL, Bovie and C-SATS. Coauthor Douglas Minnich, MD, is a consultant to Medtronic. The other co-authors had no financial relationships to disclose.
Teaching minimally invasive robotic surgery to residents can be difficult in a health care environment obsessed with quality outcome measures and under scrutiny by hospital administrators and payers, but researchers at the University of Alabama at Birmingham may have devised a method to instruct residents in robotic lobectomy without compromising patient outcomes, according to a study published in the October issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016;152:991-7).
Robert J. Cerfolio, MD, MBA, FCCP, and his coauthors divided the procedure into 19 sequential, teachable steps and allowed residents to perform selected steps during operations that Dr. Cerfolio directed.
“We then applied simulation training, coaching techniques, and video review of each step to help improve the steps that residents could not complete,” Dr. Cerfolio and his coauthors said.
Surgeons in academic centers face the challenge of teaching “the art and science of surgery,” Dr. Cerfolio and his colleagues said, while maintaining quality outcomes. “Teaching minimally invasive surgery, especially robotic surgery, is challenging given the risks and the limited availability of the robot.”
The researchers acknowledged that other groups have taken a similar approach to training, but this is the first study that included video review, coaching, and instruction tied to time constraints, they said.
“A major concern is that while teaching robotic surgery, patients can be injured, care is worse, and metrics that are increasingly used as surrogates for quality outcomes suffer,” they noted.
They allotted each step in the procedure a set amount of time in which the resident had to complete it, totaling 80 minutes for all 19 steps and ranging from 1 minute to inspect the pleura after placing ports (9 minutes) to 20 minutes to close the five incisions. If the resident completed the task in the allotted time, it was recorded as “performed.”
Between February 2010 and December 2010 Dr. Cerfolio performed 520 robotic lobectomies, and over time the percentage of successful steps per resident improved.
For example, in the first year, 50% of thoracic surgery residents completed the first five steps (mark and place ports, inspect pleura, resect the inferior pulmonary ligament, and remove three lymph nodes), but by the last year of the study 90% of them successfully completed the five steps.
Dr. Cerfolio and coauthors acknowledged “many flaws” in their study, but the study also had strengths: It involved only one operation and corroborated the database with each resident’s own surgical logs.
“Operations such as robotic lobectomy can be successfully taught by dividing them into a series of surgical maneuvers or steps,” the researchers noted. Recording what residents can and can’t do, reviewing video, and coaching contribute to the process to improve their skills. “Further studies that scientifically measure ‘ways to teach’ and ways to coach and mentor are needed,” they said.
Dr. Cerfolio disclosed relationships with Intuitive Surgical, Ethicon, Community Health Services, KCL, Bovie and C-SATS. Coauthor Douglas Minnich, MD, is a consultant to Medtronic. The other co-authors had no financial relationships to disclose.
Noncancerous disease has a significant impact on lung cancer surgery survival
After older patients undergo lung resection for stage I non–small-cell lung cancer, they are actually at greater risk of death from something other than lung cancer for up to 2.5 years, according to researchers at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York. The findings were published online in the Journal of Clinical Oncology (2016;34: doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.0834).
“As age increases, the risk of competing events increases, such as death from noncancer diseases,” wrote Takashi Eguchi, MD, and coauthors. “In this era of personalized cancer therapy, important to the stratification of individualized treatments is the determination of how both cancer and noncancer risk factors – specifically, comorbidities associated with increasing age – contribute to the risk of death.”
The researchers examined outcomes in three different age groups: younger than 65, 65-74, and 75 and older. The study focused on 2,186 patients with pathologic stage I non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among a population of 5,371 consecutive patients who had resection for primary lung cancer from 2000 to 2011. Seventy percent of patients in the study group were 65 and older, and 29.2% were 75 and older.
In all age groups, the calculated 5-year cumulative incidence of death (CID) for lung cancer–specific causes exceeded that for noncancer causes, but at significant intervals the 65-and-over groups were more likely to die from the latter. For the overall study group, noncancer-specific causes accounted for a higher CID through 18 months after surgery, when the CID for both cancer and noncancer causes crossed at around 2.9. At 5 years, the overall lung cancer–specific CID was 10.4 vs. 5.3 for noncancer specific causes.
However, in the older age groups, those trends were more pronounced. In those aged 65-74, CID for both causes met at around 3.15 at 18 months (10.7 for lung cancer–specific and 4.9 for noncancer specific at 5 years), whereas for those 75 and older, CID for noncancer causes exceeded that for lung cancer–related causes for 2.5 years, when both were around 6; reaching 13.2 for lung cancer–specific and 9 for noncancer-specific at 5 years.
In the 65-and-younger group, lung cancer– and noncancer-specific CIDs were equal for about 3 months after surgery, when the lung cancer deaths tracked upward and the trends diverged (at 5 years, CID was 7.5 for lung cancer–specific and 1 for noncancer specific).
“We have shown that in patients with stage I NSCLC, the majority of postoperative severe morbidity, 1-year mortality, and 5-year noncancer-specific mortality were attributable to cardiorespiratory diseases,” Dr. Eguchi and colleagues said.
“We have also shown that short-term mortality is primarily attributable to noncancer-specific diseases.” The findings underscore the importance of screening older patients for noncancer-specific diseases that could alter outcomes, the researchers said.
Of the 2,186 stage I NSCLC patients in the study, 167 developed severe morbidities after surgery; 68.3% developed respiratory problems and 18.6% went on to develop cardiovascular problems. Patients who had lobectomy were more likely to develop respiratory problems than were those who had sublobar resection, Dr. Eguchi and coauthors said.
Respiratory and cardiovascular diseases were the most frequent causes of death early after surgery. At 30 days, respiratory disease accounted for 5 deaths and cardiovascular disease 7 of 15 total deaths at 30 days; and at 90 days, 11 and 7, respectively, of 27 overall deaths. Even at 1 year, noncancer issues were the leading cause of death (50%), followed by lung cancer–specific causes (27.8%) and other cancer specific disease (13.3%).
“Noncancer-specific mortality represents a significant competing event for lung cancer–specific mortality, with an increasing impact as age increases,” Dr. Eguchi and coauthors said. “These findings can provide patients with more accurate information on survivorship on the basis of their individual preoperative status and help determine patients’ optimal treatment options.”
The study received financial support from coauthor Prasad S. Adusumilli, MD. Dr. Eguchi and Dr. Adusumilli and the other coauthors had no relevant financial disclosures.
Every surgeon performing lung resection comes across elderly patients who are at a higher risk than usual for a formal lung resection. In this era of screening and the abundant use of CT scans, this is increasingly common. Selection of the optimal treatment approach is often done intuitively, balancing the increased risk of surgery vs. the improved cancer-specific survival and the baseline life expectancy of the patient. This manuscript provides more quantitative estimates of this balance and draws attention, through a competing risks analysis, to the importance of non–cancer-related mortality in elderly patients.
The authors point out that non–cancer-related mortality is more common than cancer-related mortality for up to 2.5 years after surgery in patients greater than 75 years of age. This way of examining a situation is different from the usual emphasis on 30-day (and more recently the 90-day) perioperative mortality. The manuscript significantly adds to the decision-making framework of this increasingly important population and is a useful read for all lung cancer surgeons.
Sai Yendamuri, MD, is an attending surgeon in the department of thoracic surgery, the director, Thoracic Surgery Research Laboratory, and associate professor of oncology at Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, N.Y. He is associate medical editor for Thoracic Surgery News.
Every surgeon performing lung resection comes across elderly patients who are at a higher risk than usual for a formal lung resection. In this era of screening and the abundant use of CT scans, this is increasingly common. Selection of the optimal treatment approach is often done intuitively, balancing the increased risk of surgery vs. the improved cancer-specific survival and the baseline life expectancy of the patient. This manuscript provides more quantitative estimates of this balance and draws attention, through a competing risks analysis, to the importance of non–cancer-related mortality in elderly patients.
The authors point out that non–cancer-related mortality is more common than cancer-related mortality for up to 2.5 years after surgery in patients greater than 75 years of age. This way of examining a situation is different from the usual emphasis on 30-day (and more recently the 90-day) perioperative mortality. The manuscript significantly adds to the decision-making framework of this increasingly important population and is a useful read for all lung cancer surgeons.
Sai Yendamuri, MD, is an attending surgeon in the department of thoracic surgery, the director, Thoracic Surgery Research Laboratory, and associate professor of oncology at Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, N.Y. He is associate medical editor for Thoracic Surgery News.
Every surgeon performing lung resection comes across elderly patients who are at a higher risk than usual for a formal lung resection. In this era of screening and the abundant use of CT scans, this is increasingly common. Selection of the optimal treatment approach is often done intuitively, balancing the increased risk of surgery vs. the improved cancer-specific survival and the baseline life expectancy of the patient. This manuscript provides more quantitative estimates of this balance and draws attention, through a competing risks analysis, to the importance of non–cancer-related mortality in elderly patients.
The authors point out that non–cancer-related mortality is more common than cancer-related mortality for up to 2.5 years after surgery in patients greater than 75 years of age. This way of examining a situation is different from the usual emphasis on 30-day (and more recently the 90-day) perioperative mortality. The manuscript significantly adds to the decision-making framework of this increasingly important population and is a useful read for all lung cancer surgeons.
Sai Yendamuri, MD, is an attending surgeon in the department of thoracic surgery, the director, Thoracic Surgery Research Laboratory, and associate professor of oncology at Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, N.Y. He is associate medical editor for Thoracic Surgery News.
After older patients undergo lung resection for stage I non–small-cell lung cancer, they are actually at greater risk of death from something other than lung cancer for up to 2.5 years, according to researchers at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York. The findings were published online in the Journal of Clinical Oncology (2016;34: doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.0834).
“As age increases, the risk of competing events increases, such as death from noncancer diseases,” wrote Takashi Eguchi, MD, and coauthors. “In this era of personalized cancer therapy, important to the stratification of individualized treatments is the determination of how both cancer and noncancer risk factors – specifically, comorbidities associated with increasing age – contribute to the risk of death.”
The researchers examined outcomes in three different age groups: younger than 65, 65-74, and 75 and older. The study focused on 2,186 patients with pathologic stage I non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among a population of 5,371 consecutive patients who had resection for primary lung cancer from 2000 to 2011. Seventy percent of patients in the study group were 65 and older, and 29.2% were 75 and older.
In all age groups, the calculated 5-year cumulative incidence of death (CID) for lung cancer–specific causes exceeded that for noncancer causes, but at significant intervals the 65-and-over groups were more likely to die from the latter. For the overall study group, noncancer-specific causes accounted for a higher CID through 18 months after surgery, when the CID for both cancer and noncancer causes crossed at around 2.9. At 5 years, the overall lung cancer–specific CID was 10.4 vs. 5.3 for noncancer specific causes.
However, in the older age groups, those trends were more pronounced. In those aged 65-74, CID for both causes met at around 3.15 at 18 months (10.7 for lung cancer–specific and 4.9 for noncancer specific at 5 years), whereas for those 75 and older, CID for noncancer causes exceeded that for lung cancer–related causes for 2.5 years, when both were around 6; reaching 13.2 for lung cancer–specific and 9 for noncancer-specific at 5 years.
In the 65-and-younger group, lung cancer– and noncancer-specific CIDs were equal for about 3 months after surgery, when the lung cancer deaths tracked upward and the trends diverged (at 5 years, CID was 7.5 for lung cancer–specific and 1 for noncancer specific).
“We have shown that in patients with stage I NSCLC, the majority of postoperative severe morbidity, 1-year mortality, and 5-year noncancer-specific mortality were attributable to cardiorespiratory diseases,” Dr. Eguchi and colleagues said.
“We have also shown that short-term mortality is primarily attributable to noncancer-specific diseases.” The findings underscore the importance of screening older patients for noncancer-specific diseases that could alter outcomes, the researchers said.
Of the 2,186 stage I NSCLC patients in the study, 167 developed severe morbidities after surgery; 68.3% developed respiratory problems and 18.6% went on to develop cardiovascular problems. Patients who had lobectomy were more likely to develop respiratory problems than were those who had sublobar resection, Dr. Eguchi and coauthors said.
Respiratory and cardiovascular diseases were the most frequent causes of death early after surgery. At 30 days, respiratory disease accounted for 5 deaths and cardiovascular disease 7 of 15 total deaths at 30 days; and at 90 days, 11 and 7, respectively, of 27 overall deaths. Even at 1 year, noncancer issues were the leading cause of death (50%), followed by lung cancer–specific causes (27.8%) and other cancer specific disease (13.3%).
“Noncancer-specific mortality represents a significant competing event for lung cancer–specific mortality, with an increasing impact as age increases,” Dr. Eguchi and coauthors said. “These findings can provide patients with more accurate information on survivorship on the basis of their individual preoperative status and help determine patients’ optimal treatment options.”
The study received financial support from coauthor Prasad S. Adusumilli, MD. Dr. Eguchi and Dr. Adusumilli and the other coauthors had no relevant financial disclosures.
After older patients undergo lung resection for stage I non–small-cell lung cancer, they are actually at greater risk of death from something other than lung cancer for up to 2.5 years, according to researchers at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York. The findings were published online in the Journal of Clinical Oncology (2016;34: doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.0834).
“As age increases, the risk of competing events increases, such as death from noncancer diseases,” wrote Takashi Eguchi, MD, and coauthors. “In this era of personalized cancer therapy, important to the stratification of individualized treatments is the determination of how both cancer and noncancer risk factors – specifically, comorbidities associated with increasing age – contribute to the risk of death.”
The researchers examined outcomes in three different age groups: younger than 65, 65-74, and 75 and older. The study focused on 2,186 patients with pathologic stage I non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among a population of 5,371 consecutive patients who had resection for primary lung cancer from 2000 to 2011. Seventy percent of patients in the study group were 65 and older, and 29.2% were 75 and older.
In all age groups, the calculated 5-year cumulative incidence of death (CID) for lung cancer–specific causes exceeded that for noncancer causes, but at significant intervals the 65-and-over groups were more likely to die from the latter. For the overall study group, noncancer-specific causes accounted for a higher CID through 18 months after surgery, when the CID for both cancer and noncancer causes crossed at around 2.9. At 5 years, the overall lung cancer–specific CID was 10.4 vs. 5.3 for noncancer specific causes.
However, in the older age groups, those trends were more pronounced. In those aged 65-74, CID for both causes met at around 3.15 at 18 months (10.7 for lung cancer–specific and 4.9 for noncancer specific at 5 years), whereas for those 75 and older, CID for noncancer causes exceeded that for lung cancer–related causes for 2.5 years, when both were around 6; reaching 13.2 for lung cancer–specific and 9 for noncancer-specific at 5 years.
In the 65-and-younger group, lung cancer– and noncancer-specific CIDs were equal for about 3 months after surgery, when the lung cancer deaths tracked upward and the trends diverged (at 5 years, CID was 7.5 for lung cancer–specific and 1 for noncancer specific).
“We have shown that in patients with stage I NSCLC, the majority of postoperative severe morbidity, 1-year mortality, and 5-year noncancer-specific mortality were attributable to cardiorespiratory diseases,” Dr. Eguchi and colleagues said.
“We have also shown that short-term mortality is primarily attributable to noncancer-specific diseases.” The findings underscore the importance of screening older patients for noncancer-specific diseases that could alter outcomes, the researchers said.
Of the 2,186 stage I NSCLC patients in the study, 167 developed severe morbidities after surgery; 68.3% developed respiratory problems and 18.6% went on to develop cardiovascular problems. Patients who had lobectomy were more likely to develop respiratory problems than were those who had sublobar resection, Dr. Eguchi and coauthors said.
Respiratory and cardiovascular diseases were the most frequent causes of death early after surgery. At 30 days, respiratory disease accounted for 5 deaths and cardiovascular disease 7 of 15 total deaths at 30 days; and at 90 days, 11 and 7, respectively, of 27 overall deaths. Even at 1 year, noncancer issues were the leading cause of death (50%), followed by lung cancer–specific causes (27.8%) and other cancer specific disease (13.3%).
“Noncancer-specific mortality represents a significant competing event for lung cancer–specific mortality, with an increasing impact as age increases,” Dr. Eguchi and coauthors said. “These findings can provide patients with more accurate information on survivorship on the basis of their individual preoperative status and help determine patients’ optimal treatment options.”
The study received financial support from coauthor Prasad S. Adusumilli, MD. Dr. Eguchi and Dr. Adusumilli and the other coauthors had no relevant financial disclosures.
FROM THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Key clinical point: Risk of non-cancer death after curative resection of stage 1 non–small-call lung cancer (NSCLC) exceeded that of lung-cancer deaths 1.5 to 2.5 years after surgery in older patients.
Major finding: In patients aged 75 and older the risk of non–lung-cancer–related death exceeded the risk of death from lung cancer for 2.5 years after surgery, whereas in patients 65 and younger the risk of non–lung cancer death exceeded that of lung-cancer death for 3 months after surgery.
Data Source: Single-center analysis of 5,371 consecutive patients who had curative lung cancer resection from 2000 to 2011, 2,186 of whom had stage 1 NSCLC.
Disclosures: The study received financial support from coauthor Prasad S. Adusumilli, MD. Dr. Eguchi and Dr. Adusumilli and the other coauthors had no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
Expandable cardiac valve in children found feasible
Young children and infants who require cardiac valve replacement are limited to fixed-diameter prostheses that cannot accommodate their growth, but researchers at Boston Children’s Hospital have reinforced an expandable bovine jugular vein graft using an external stent and implanted it in 42 patients with acceptable short-term results, according to a report in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.
In 4 years, the modified Melody valve (Medtronic) has proved amenable to enlargement via catheterization as the child grows, Sitaram M. Emani, MD, and coauthors said. “The valve was competent with low gradient acutely postoperatively in all patients,” Dr. Emani and his coauthors said (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Dec;152[6]:1514-23).
The Melody valve is approved for transcatheter implantation into the RVOT and can be modified for the semilunar or AV positions, Dr. Emani and his coauthors said. The valve has achieved competence within a size range of 10-22 mm.
The researchers implanted the valve in four positions: RVOT (14), mitral (24), aortic (one), or tricuspid (three). The median age at implantation was 10 months, with a range of 3 weeks to 5.8 years. The patients had an average of one previous valve replacement or repair procedure.
Six deaths occurred in the study population; three before discharge. Those three patients had replacement to salvage a moribund circulation in the setting of mechanical circulatory support and severely depressed ventricular function. The other three patients who died were able to demonstrate adequate valve function, and autopsy did not show any signs of valvular thrombosis or deterioration, the researchers said.
Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, Dr. Emani and his coauthors estimated the freedom from death or transplantation was 83% at 12 months and 77% at 24 months.
The average time between catheter-based dilations was around 10 months, they wrote, “but this might be increased by more aggressive dilation.” Early in the study, the researchers were not aggressive with dilations because of concerns about valve injury, but then they found that patients tolerated increases in valve diameter by as much as 4 mm.
“Further investigation is needed to determine whether the device retains expandability over the long term after multiple dilations,” Dr. Emani and his coauthors said.
Further refinements in valve design and implantation techniques may lead to prevention of reoperation and perivalvular complications, they suggested.
The researchers did note a couple limitations of their study: the heterogeneous cohort prohibits any generalization of the outcomes, particularly mortality, and concomitant procedures performed during the valve replacement would affect mortality.
Dr. Emani and his colleagues had no financial relationships to disclose.
In his invited commentary, Carl L. Backer, MD, of Northwestern University, Chicago, noted three advantages of the use of the stent-expandable bovine valve for infants and children: It can be used when no prosthetic is small enough to fit in the annulus, it does not require anticoagulation with warfarin after placement, and it can be dilated as the child grows (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Dec:152[6];1524-5).
But, Dr. Backer added, “one note of caution that I would raise relates to the late complications noted in previous trials with tissue valves on the left side of the heart in children.” He noted such experience had been reported with the Mitroflow bovine pericardial bioprosthesis (LivaNova) (Circulation. 2014;130[1];51-60) and the Perimount Magna (Edwards Lifesciences) (Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102[1];308-11). “The follow-up of Emani and colleagues at two years is good; however, there is always the possibility that premature calcification and stenosis of these valves, particularly those placed on the left side of the heart, could lead to the need for early explantation,” Dr. Backer said.
Nonetheless, the findings of Dr. Emani and his colleagues showed that the concept of implanting a stented jugular vein graft valve in infants and young children “is proving to be safe and efficacious,” Dr. Backer said. “In these children for whom there are limited options, this appears to be an important addition to our surgical strategies,” he concluded.
Dr. Backer had no financial relationships to disclose.
In his invited commentary, Carl L. Backer, MD, of Northwestern University, Chicago, noted three advantages of the use of the stent-expandable bovine valve for infants and children: It can be used when no prosthetic is small enough to fit in the annulus, it does not require anticoagulation with warfarin after placement, and it can be dilated as the child grows (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Dec:152[6];1524-5).
But, Dr. Backer added, “one note of caution that I would raise relates to the late complications noted in previous trials with tissue valves on the left side of the heart in children.” He noted such experience had been reported with the Mitroflow bovine pericardial bioprosthesis (LivaNova) (Circulation. 2014;130[1];51-60) and the Perimount Magna (Edwards Lifesciences) (Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102[1];308-11). “The follow-up of Emani and colleagues at two years is good; however, there is always the possibility that premature calcification and stenosis of these valves, particularly those placed on the left side of the heart, could lead to the need for early explantation,” Dr. Backer said.
Nonetheless, the findings of Dr. Emani and his colleagues showed that the concept of implanting a stented jugular vein graft valve in infants and young children “is proving to be safe and efficacious,” Dr. Backer said. “In these children for whom there are limited options, this appears to be an important addition to our surgical strategies,” he concluded.
Dr. Backer had no financial relationships to disclose.
In his invited commentary, Carl L. Backer, MD, of Northwestern University, Chicago, noted three advantages of the use of the stent-expandable bovine valve for infants and children: It can be used when no prosthetic is small enough to fit in the annulus, it does not require anticoagulation with warfarin after placement, and it can be dilated as the child grows (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Dec:152[6];1524-5).
But, Dr. Backer added, “one note of caution that I would raise relates to the late complications noted in previous trials with tissue valves on the left side of the heart in children.” He noted such experience had been reported with the Mitroflow bovine pericardial bioprosthesis (LivaNova) (Circulation. 2014;130[1];51-60) and the Perimount Magna (Edwards Lifesciences) (Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102[1];308-11). “The follow-up of Emani and colleagues at two years is good; however, there is always the possibility that premature calcification and stenosis of these valves, particularly those placed on the left side of the heart, could lead to the need for early explantation,” Dr. Backer said.
Nonetheless, the findings of Dr. Emani and his colleagues showed that the concept of implanting a stented jugular vein graft valve in infants and young children “is proving to be safe and efficacious,” Dr. Backer said. “In these children for whom there are limited options, this appears to be an important addition to our surgical strategies,” he concluded.
Dr. Backer had no financial relationships to disclose.
Young children and infants who require cardiac valve replacement are limited to fixed-diameter prostheses that cannot accommodate their growth, but researchers at Boston Children’s Hospital have reinforced an expandable bovine jugular vein graft using an external stent and implanted it in 42 patients with acceptable short-term results, according to a report in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.
In 4 years, the modified Melody valve (Medtronic) has proved amenable to enlargement via catheterization as the child grows, Sitaram M. Emani, MD, and coauthors said. “The valve was competent with low gradient acutely postoperatively in all patients,” Dr. Emani and his coauthors said (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Dec;152[6]:1514-23).
The Melody valve is approved for transcatheter implantation into the RVOT and can be modified for the semilunar or AV positions, Dr. Emani and his coauthors said. The valve has achieved competence within a size range of 10-22 mm.
The researchers implanted the valve in four positions: RVOT (14), mitral (24), aortic (one), or tricuspid (three). The median age at implantation was 10 months, with a range of 3 weeks to 5.8 years. The patients had an average of one previous valve replacement or repair procedure.
Six deaths occurred in the study population; three before discharge. Those three patients had replacement to salvage a moribund circulation in the setting of mechanical circulatory support and severely depressed ventricular function. The other three patients who died were able to demonstrate adequate valve function, and autopsy did not show any signs of valvular thrombosis or deterioration, the researchers said.
Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, Dr. Emani and his coauthors estimated the freedom from death or transplantation was 83% at 12 months and 77% at 24 months.
The average time between catheter-based dilations was around 10 months, they wrote, “but this might be increased by more aggressive dilation.” Early in the study, the researchers were not aggressive with dilations because of concerns about valve injury, but then they found that patients tolerated increases in valve diameter by as much as 4 mm.
“Further investigation is needed to determine whether the device retains expandability over the long term after multiple dilations,” Dr. Emani and his coauthors said.
Further refinements in valve design and implantation techniques may lead to prevention of reoperation and perivalvular complications, they suggested.
The researchers did note a couple limitations of their study: the heterogeneous cohort prohibits any generalization of the outcomes, particularly mortality, and concomitant procedures performed during the valve replacement would affect mortality.
Dr. Emani and his colleagues had no financial relationships to disclose.
Young children and infants who require cardiac valve replacement are limited to fixed-diameter prostheses that cannot accommodate their growth, but researchers at Boston Children’s Hospital have reinforced an expandable bovine jugular vein graft using an external stent and implanted it in 42 patients with acceptable short-term results, according to a report in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.
In 4 years, the modified Melody valve (Medtronic) has proved amenable to enlargement via catheterization as the child grows, Sitaram M. Emani, MD, and coauthors said. “The valve was competent with low gradient acutely postoperatively in all patients,” Dr. Emani and his coauthors said (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Dec;152[6]:1514-23).
The Melody valve is approved for transcatheter implantation into the RVOT and can be modified for the semilunar or AV positions, Dr. Emani and his coauthors said. The valve has achieved competence within a size range of 10-22 mm.
The researchers implanted the valve in four positions: RVOT (14), mitral (24), aortic (one), or tricuspid (three). The median age at implantation was 10 months, with a range of 3 weeks to 5.8 years. The patients had an average of one previous valve replacement or repair procedure.
Six deaths occurred in the study population; three before discharge. Those three patients had replacement to salvage a moribund circulation in the setting of mechanical circulatory support and severely depressed ventricular function. The other three patients who died were able to demonstrate adequate valve function, and autopsy did not show any signs of valvular thrombosis or deterioration, the researchers said.
Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, Dr. Emani and his coauthors estimated the freedom from death or transplantation was 83% at 12 months and 77% at 24 months.
The average time between catheter-based dilations was around 10 months, they wrote, “but this might be increased by more aggressive dilation.” Early in the study, the researchers were not aggressive with dilations because of concerns about valve injury, but then they found that patients tolerated increases in valve diameter by as much as 4 mm.
“Further investigation is needed to determine whether the device retains expandability over the long term after multiple dilations,” Dr. Emani and his coauthors said.
Further refinements in valve design and implantation techniques may lead to prevention of reoperation and perivalvular complications, they suggested.
The researchers did note a couple limitations of their study: the heterogeneous cohort prohibits any generalization of the outcomes, particularly mortality, and concomitant procedures performed during the valve replacement would affect mortality.
Dr. Emani and his colleagues had no financial relationships to disclose.
FROM THE JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Key clinical point: An expandable cardiac valve adapted for infants and children demonstrates acceptable function and can accommodate the child’s growth.
Major finding: At 12 months after implantation of a bovine jugular vein graft reinforced with an external stent modified for surgical valve replacement in pediatric patients, Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that 83% of those surviving would be free from reoperation at 12 months.
Data source: Single-center study of 42 patients who underwent implantation between 2010 and 2014.
Disclosures: Dr. Emani and his coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.
Lower-risk approach for aortic arch repair
In newborns with a borderline hypoplastic aortic arch, the type of operation and surgical approach can be critical in determining the risk of recurrent obstruction, but aortic arch reconstruction through a median sternotomy on bypass may carry a lower risk of recurrence than use of a thoracotomy.
In a study of 183 newborns and infants (median age of 15 days) who had surgery for coarctation and hypoplastic aortic arch over a 17-year period, researchers led by Andreas Tulzer, MD, of Children’s Heart Center, Linz, Austria, found that resection and extended end-to-end anastomosis (REEEA) as well as end-to-side anastomosis (ESA) yielded low mortality. The findings were published in the December 2016 issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016;152:1506-13).
In the study, 72 patients had a median sternotomy – 71 with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) – and the remaining 111 had a lateral thoracotomy. Fifty-two patients (28.4%) had an additional ventricular septal defect closure. In the 71 patients who had median sternotomy with CPB, 41 had REEEA and 30 had ESA.
One patient who had median sternotomy with CPB had complications whereas 10 who had undergone primary repair with REEEA through a lateral thoracotomy had complications, for complications rates of 1.4% and 9%, respectively.
“Access through a median sternotomy with the use of CPB was superior to a lateral thoracotomy in terms of necessary reinterventions,” noted Dr. Tulzer and coauthors.
Of the 131 patients who had isolated repair of coarctation of the aorta with associated hypoplastic aortic arch, 116 had REEEA and 15 had ESA. There were no in-hospital deaths in this group and one patient needed an early reintervention. One patient had a severe neurologic complication.
On long-term follow-up of 139 patients at a median duration of 6.3 years, no late deaths were reported. “The calculated freedom from mortality (early and late) at 10 years for the entire group was 99.27%,” the researchers said. “In none of the patients of the follow-up population did we notice any signs of permanent left laryngeal nerve injury, bronchial compression, or left pulmonary artery stenosis.”
Lateral thoracotomy as access was a significant risk factor for recurrent obstruction at P = .03.
In the study, an experienced pediatric cardiologist and a pediatric cardiac surgeon determined which of three procedures to use – ESA on bypass, REEEA with a median sternotomy on CPB, or REEEA with a lateral thoracotomy without CPB – based on the size and anatomy of the proximal transverse aortic arch. In the early study period, cut-off values were proximal transverse arch diameters of 4 mm or less in newborns and young infants, but in the later study period the cut-off was z scores of –4.5 or less.
Adverse outcomes were minimal. There was one death within 30 days of surgery in the overall population (0.54%). The one severe complication consisted of paraplegia and cerebral hypoxemia after REEEA. At 10 years, 99.27% of all patients survived and 90.12% were free from intervention.
Either approach with REEEA and ESA is safe and effective, Dr. Tulzer and colleagues said, but they did determine a suitable population for the median sternotomy using CPB. “In patients with proximal transverse aortic arch, z scores of less than –4.59, arch repair should be performed through a median sternotomy using CPB, rather than through a lateral thoracotomy to reduce the risk for recurrent arch obstructions,” the researchers concluded.
Dr. Tulzer and coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.
While the outcomes that Dr. Tulzer and colleagues reported are “remarkable,” the findings raise a question if mortality and risk of interventions are the sole determinants in selecting a surgical strategy, Petros V. Anagnostopoulos, MD, said in his invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:1475-6). “The mortality should be low irrespective of approach,” Dr. Anagnostopoulos said.
He said that even if the surgeon pursues repair for coarctation and hypoplastic aortic arch through a thoracotomy instead of the median sternotomy the Austrian authors advocate and coarctation should recur, most of these cases can be treated with catheterization at low risk. “Will such a suboptimal outcome prove to be superior to that of a patient who has perfect anatomic repair but potentially faces adverse neurodevelopmental consequences of a neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass run?” he asked.
But the long-term outcomes are “poorly defined” as clinical investigators continue to “push the limits” to avoid deep hypothermia by using perfusion modifications to perform arch reconstruction, said Dr. Anagnostopoulos of the division of pediatric cardiothoracic surgery, American Family Children’s Hospital, University of Wisconsin, Madison. “It may be time to start taking into account not only survival and accuracy of repair, but also long-term sequelae of our therapies,” he concluded.
Dr. Anagnostopoulos had no financial relationships to disclose.
While the outcomes that Dr. Tulzer and colleagues reported are “remarkable,” the findings raise a question if mortality and risk of interventions are the sole determinants in selecting a surgical strategy, Petros V. Anagnostopoulos, MD, said in his invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:1475-6). “The mortality should be low irrespective of approach,” Dr. Anagnostopoulos said.
He said that even if the surgeon pursues repair for coarctation and hypoplastic aortic arch through a thoracotomy instead of the median sternotomy the Austrian authors advocate and coarctation should recur, most of these cases can be treated with catheterization at low risk. “Will such a suboptimal outcome prove to be superior to that of a patient who has perfect anatomic repair but potentially faces adverse neurodevelopmental consequences of a neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass run?” he asked.
But the long-term outcomes are “poorly defined” as clinical investigators continue to “push the limits” to avoid deep hypothermia by using perfusion modifications to perform arch reconstruction, said Dr. Anagnostopoulos of the division of pediatric cardiothoracic surgery, American Family Children’s Hospital, University of Wisconsin, Madison. “It may be time to start taking into account not only survival and accuracy of repair, but also long-term sequelae of our therapies,” he concluded.
Dr. Anagnostopoulos had no financial relationships to disclose.
While the outcomes that Dr. Tulzer and colleagues reported are “remarkable,” the findings raise a question if mortality and risk of interventions are the sole determinants in selecting a surgical strategy, Petros V. Anagnostopoulos, MD, said in his invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:1475-6). “The mortality should be low irrespective of approach,” Dr. Anagnostopoulos said.
He said that even if the surgeon pursues repair for coarctation and hypoplastic aortic arch through a thoracotomy instead of the median sternotomy the Austrian authors advocate and coarctation should recur, most of these cases can be treated with catheterization at low risk. “Will such a suboptimal outcome prove to be superior to that of a patient who has perfect anatomic repair but potentially faces adverse neurodevelopmental consequences of a neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass run?” he asked.
But the long-term outcomes are “poorly defined” as clinical investigators continue to “push the limits” to avoid deep hypothermia by using perfusion modifications to perform arch reconstruction, said Dr. Anagnostopoulos of the division of pediatric cardiothoracic surgery, American Family Children’s Hospital, University of Wisconsin, Madison. “It may be time to start taking into account not only survival and accuracy of repair, but also long-term sequelae of our therapies,” he concluded.
Dr. Anagnostopoulos had no financial relationships to disclose.
In newborns with a borderline hypoplastic aortic arch, the type of operation and surgical approach can be critical in determining the risk of recurrent obstruction, but aortic arch reconstruction through a median sternotomy on bypass may carry a lower risk of recurrence than use of a thoracotomy.
In a study of 183 newborns and infants (median age of 15 days) who had surgery for coarctation and hypoplastic aortic arch over a 17-year period, researchers led by Andreas Tulzer, MD, of Children’s Heart Center, Linz, Austria, found that resection and extended end-to-end anastomosis (REEEA) as well as end-to-side anastomosis (ESA) yielded low mortality. The findings were published in the December 2016 issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016;152:1506-13).
In the study, 72 patients had a median sternotomy – 71 with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) – and the remaining 111 had a lateral thoracotomy. Fifty-two patients (28.4%) had an additional ventricular septal defect closure. In the 71 patients who had median sternotomy with CPB, 41 had REEEA and 30 had ESA.
One patient who had median sternotomy with CPB had complications whereas 10 who had undergone primary repair with REEEA through a lateral thoracotomy had complications, for complications rates of 1.4% and 9%, respectively.
“Access through a median sternotomy with the use of CPB was superior to a lateral thoracotomy in terms of necessary reinterventions,” noted Dr. Tulzer and coauthors.
Of the 131 patients who had isolated repair of coarctation of the aorta with associated hypoplastic aortic arch, 116 had REEEA and 15 had ESA. There were no in-hospital deaths in this group and one patient needed an early reintervention. One patient had a severe neurologic complication.
On long-term follow-up of 139 patients at a median duration of 6.3 years, no late deaths were reported. “The calculated freedom from mortality (early and late) at 10 years for the entire group was 99.27%,” the researchers said. “In none of the patients of the follow-up population did we notice any signs of permanent left laryngeal nerve injury, bronchial compression, or left pulmonary artery stenosis.”
Lateral thoracotomy as access was a significant risk factor for recurrent obstruction at P = .03.
In the study, an experienced pediatric cardiologist and a pediatric cardiac surgeon determined which of three procedures to use – ESA on bypass, REEEA with a median sternotomy on CPB, or REEEA with a lateral thoracotomy without CPB – based on the size and anatomy of the proximal transverse aortic arch. In the early study period, cut-off values were proximal transverse arch diameters of 4 mm or less in newborns and young infants, but in the later study period the cut-off was z scores of –4.5 or less.
Adverse outcomes were minimal. There was one death within 30 days of surgery in the overall population (0.54%). The one severe complication consisted of paraplegia and cerebral hypoxemia after REEEA. At 10 years, 99.27% of all patients survived and 90.12% were free from intervention.
Either approach with REEEA and ESA is safe and effective, Dr. Tulzer and colleagues said, but they did determine a suitable population for the median sternotomy using CPB. “In patients with proximal transverse aortic arch, z scores of less than –4.59, arch repair should be performed through a median sternotomy using CPB, rather than through a lateral thoracotomy to reduce the risk for recurrent arch obstructions,” the researchers concluded.
Dr. Tulzer and coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.
In newborns with a borderline hypoplastic aortic arch, the type of operation and surgical approach can be critical in determining the risk of recurrent obstruction, but aortic arch reconstruction through a median sternotomy on bypass may carry a lower risk of recurrence than use of a thoracotomy.
In a study of 183 newborns and infants (median age of 15 days) who had surgery for coarctation and hypoplastic aortic arch over a 17-year period, researchers led by Andreas Tulzer, MD, of Children’s Heart Center, Linz, Austria, found that resection and extended end-to-end anastomosis (REEEA) as well as end-to-side anastomosis (ESA) yielded low mortality. The findings were published in the December 2016 issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016;152:1506-13).
In the study, 72 patients had a median sternotomy – 71 with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) – and the remaining 111 had a lateral thoracotomy. Fifty-two patients (28.4%) had an additional ventricular septal defect closure. In the 71 patients who had median sternotomy with CPB, 41 had REEEA and 30 had ESA.
One patient who had median sternotomy with CPB had complications whereas 10 who had undergone primary repair with REEEA through a lateral thoracotomy had complications, for complications rates of 1.4% and 9%, respectively.
“Access through a median sternotomy with the use of CPB was superior to a lateral thoracotomy in terms of necessary reinterventions,” noted Dr. Tulzer and coauthors.
Of the 131 patients who had isolated repair of coarctation of the aorta with associated hypoplastic aortic arch, 116 had REEEA and 15 had ESA. There were no in-hospital deaths in this group and one patient needed an early reintervention. One patient had a severe neurologic complication.
On long-term follow-up of 139 patients at a median duration of 6.3 years, no late deaths were reported. “The calculated freedom from mortality (early and late) at 10 years for the entire group was 99.27%,” the researchers said. “In none of the patients of the follow-up population did we notice any signs of permanent left laryngeal nerve injury, bronchial compression, or left pulmonary artery stenosis.”
Lateral thoracotomy as access was a significant risk factor for recurrent obstruction at P = .03.
In the study, an experienced pediatric cardiologist and a pediatric cardiac surgeon determined which of three procedures to use – ESA on bypass, REEEA with a median sternotomy on CPB, or REEEA with a lateral thoracotomy without CPB – based on the size and anatomy of the proximal transverse aortic arch. In the early study period, cut-off values were proximal transverse arch diameters of 4 mm or less in newborns and young infants, but in the later study period the cut-off was z scores of –4.5 or less.
Adverse outcomes were minimal. There was one death within 30 days of surgery in the overall population (0.54%). The one severe complication consisted of paraplegia and cerebral hypoxemia after REEEA. At 10 years, 99.27% of all patients survived and 90.12% were free from intervention.
Either approach with REEEA and ESA is safe and effective, Dr. Tulzer and colleagues said, but they did determine a suitable population for the median sternotomy using CPB. “In patients with proximal transverse aortic arch, z scores of less than –4.59, arch repair should be performed through a median sternotomy using CPB, rather than through a lateral thoracotomy to reduce the risk for recurrent arch obstructions,” the researchers concluded.
Dr. Tulzer and coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.
FROM THE JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Key clinical point: Aortic arch reconstruction through a median sternotomy on bypass in newborns and infants had lower rates for recurrent obstruction than did a thoracotomy approach.
Major finding: Of 11 patients who required reintervention, one had a median sternotomy and 10 had a lateral thoracotomy.
Data source: Retrospective review of 183 consecutive newborns and infants with coarctation and hypoplastic aortic arch from 1996 to 2013.
Disclosures: Dr. Tulzer and coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.
Can bioprosthetics work for large airway defects?
Large and complex airway defects that primary repair cannot fully close require alternative surgical approaches and techniques that are far more difficult to perform, but bioprosthetic materials may be an option to repair large tracheal and bronchial defects that has achieved good results, without postoperative death or defect recurrence, in a small cohort of patients at Massachusetts General Hospital, in Boston.
Brooks Udelsman, MD, and his coauthors reported their results of bioprosthetic repair of central airway defects in eight patients in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016 Nov;152:1388-97). “Although our results are derived from a limited number of heterogeneous patients, they suggest that closure of noncircumferential large airway defects with bioprosthetic materials is feasible, safe and reliable,” Dr. Udelsman said. He previously reported the results at the annual meeting of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, May 14-18, 2016, in Baltimore.
These complex defects typically exceed 5 cm and can involve communication with the esophagus. For repair of smaller defects, surgeons can use a more conventional approach that involves neck flexion, laryngeal release, airway mobilization, and hilar release, but in larger defects, these techniques increase the risk of too much tension on the anastomosis and dehiscence along with airway failure. Large and complex defects occur in patients who have had a previous airway operation or radiation exposure, requiring alternative strategies, the researchers wrote. “Patients in this rare category should be referred to a high-volume center for careful evaluation by a surgeon experienced in complex airway reconstruction before the decision to abandon primary repair is made,” he said. Among the advantages that bioprosthetic materials have over synthetic materials for airway defect repair are easier handling, minimal immunogenic response, and potential for tissue ingrowth, Dr. Udelsman and his coauthors said.
All eight patients in this study, who underwent repair from 2008 to 2015, had significant comorbidities, including previous surgery of the trachea, esophagus, or thyroid. The etiology of the airway defect included HIV-AIDS–associated esophagitis, malignancy, mesh erosion, and complications from extended intubation. Three patients had previous radiation therapy to the neck or chest. Five patients had defects localized to the membranous tracheal wall, two had defects of the mainstem bronchus or bronchus intermedius, and one patient had a defect of the anterior wall of the trachea.
Dr. Udelsman and his coauthors used both aortic homograft and acellular dermal matrix to repair large defects. Their experience confirmed previous reports of the formation of granulation tissue with aortic autografts, underscoring the importance of frequent bronchoscopy and debridement when necessary. And while previous reports have claimed human acellular dermis resists granulation formation, that wasn’t the case in this study. “The exact histologic basis of bioprosthetic incorporation and reepithelialization in these patients is still elusive and will require further study,” the researchers said.
This study also employed the controversial muscle buttress repair in six patients, which helped, at least theoretically, to secure the repairs when leaks occur, to separate suture lines when both the airway and esophagus were repaired and to support the bioprosthetic material to prevent tissue softening, Dr. Udelsman and his coauthors said.
Postoperative examinations confirmed that the operations successfully closed the airway defects in all eight patients. Long term, most resumed oral intake, but three did not for various reasons: one had a pharyngostomy; another had neurocognitive issues preoperatively; and a third with a tracheoesophageal fistula repair and cervical esophagostomy could resume oral intake but depended on tube feeds to meet caloric needs.
All patients developed granulation at the repair site, two of whom required further debridement and one who underwent balloon dilation. Pneumonia was the most common complication within 30 days of surgery, occurring in two patients. Three patients died within 120 days from metastatic disease, and a fourth patient progressed to end-stage AIDS 6 years after the operation and eventually died.
Dr. Udelsman and his coauthors reported having no financial disclosures.
In his invited commentary, Raja Flores, MD, of Mount Sinai Health System in New York said this study demonstrated “modest success” with bioprosthetic materials for repair of large airway deficits – the same level of success he ascribes to human studies of other surgical approaches to large airway deficits (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Nov;152:1233-4).
But progress has been slow and animal studies of large airway deficit repair have been “wastefully repetitive” without any advances. “We must build on what these human studies have taught us and not continue unsuccessfully to reinvent the same malfunctioning [airways],” Dr. Flores said.
When surgeons encounter such patients, surgery isn’t necessary for their survival, Dr. Flores said. “T-tubes work just fine.” The goal is to improve their quality of life. “Unless we can provide a reliable, long-lasting solution, an unpredictable life-threatening experimental surgical intervention is not justified to treat a stable, functional patient,” he said.
And while Dr. Udelsman and his colleagues have shown “some progress” in their study, he cautioned surgeons to heed the words of a tracheal surgery pioneer Hermes Grillo, MD, at Boston’s Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School: “Success has been announced episodically over the decades in each of these categories, but thus far no one replacement method has held for the long term in any safe and practicable manner.” Dr. Flores added: “This still holds true today.”
Dr. Flores reported having no financial disclosures.
In his invited commentary, Raja Flores, MD, of Mount Sinai Health System in New York said this study demonstrated “modest success” with bioprosthetic materials for repair of large airway deficits – the same level of success he ascribes to human studies of other surgical approaches to large airway deficits (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Nov;152:1233-4).
But progress has been slow and animal studies of large airway deficit repair have been “wastefully repetitive” without any advances. “We must build on what these human studies have taught us and not continue unsuccessfully to reinvent the same malfunctioning [airways],” Dr. Flores said.
When surgeons encounter such patients, surgery isn’t necessary for their survival, Dr. Flores said. “T-tubes work just fine.” The goal is to improve their quality of life. “Unless we can provide a reliable, long-lasting solution, an unpredictable life-threatening experimental surgical intervention is not justified to treat a stable, functional patient,” he said.
And while Dr. Udelsman and his colleagues have shown “some progress” in their study, he cautioned surgeons to heed the words of a tracheal surgery pioneer Hermes Grillo, MD, at Boston’s Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School: “Success has been announced episodically over the decades in each of these categories, but thus far no one replacement method has held for the long term in any safe and practicable manner.” Dr. Flores added: “This still holds true today.”
Dr. Flores reported having no financial disclosures.
In his invited commentary, Raja Flores, MD, of Mount Sinai Health System in New York said this study demonstrated “modest success” with bioprosthetic materials for repair of large airway deficits – the same level of success he ascribes to human studies of other surgical approaches to large airway deficits (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Nov;152:1233-4).
But progress has been slow and animal studies of large airway deficit repair have been “wastefully repetitive” without any advances. “We must build on what these human studies have taught us and not continue unsuccessfully to reinvent the same malfunctioning [airways],” Dr. Flores said.
When surgeons encounter such patients, surgery isn’t necessary for their survival, Dr. Flores said. “T-tubes work just fine.” The goal is to improve their quality of life. “Unless we can provide a reliable, long-lasting solution, an unpredictable life-threatening experimental surgical intervention is not justified to treat a stable, functional patient,” he said.
And while Dr. Udelsman and his colleagues have shown “some progress” in their study, he cautioned surgeons to heed the words of a tracheal surgery pioneer Hermes Grillo, MD, at Boston’s Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School: “Success has been announced episodically over the decades in each of these categories, but thus far no one replacement method has held for the long term in any safe and practicable manner.” Dr. Flores added: “This still holds true today.”
Dr. Flores reported having no financial disclosures.
Large and complex airway defects that primary repair cannot fully close require alternative surgical approaches and techniques that are far more difficult to perform, but bioprosthetic materials may be an option to repair large tracheal and bronchial defects that has achieved good results, without postoperative death or defect recurrence, in a small cohort of patients at Massachusetts General Hospital, in Boston.
Brooks Udelsman, MD, and his coauthors reported their results of bioprosthetic repair of central airway defects in eight patients in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016 Nov;152:1388-97). “Although our results are derived from a limited number of heterogeneous patients, they suggest that closure of noncircumferential large airway defects with bioprosthetic materials is feasible, safe and reliable,” Dr. Udelsman said. He previously reported the results at the annual meeting of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, May 14-18, 2016, in Baltimore.
These complex defects typically exceed 5 cm and can involve communication with the esophagus. For repair of smaller defects, surgeons can use a more conventional approach that involves neck flexion, laryngeal release, airway mobilization, and hilar release, but in larger defects, these techniques increase the risk of too much tension on the anastomosis and dehiscence along with airway failure. Large and complex defects occur in patients who have had a previous airway operation or radiation exposure, requiring alternative strategies, the researchers wrote. “Patients in this rare category should be referred to a high-volume center for careful evaluation by a surgeon experienced in complex airway reconstruction before the decision to abandon primary repair is made,” he said. Among the advantages that bioprosthetic materials have over synthetic materials for airway defect repair are easier handling, minimal immunogenic response, and potential for tissue ingrowth, Dr. Udelsman and his coauthors said.
All eight patients in this study, who underwent repair from 2008 to 2015, had significant comorbidities, including previous surgery of the trachea, esophagus, or thyroid. The etiology of the airway defect included HIV-AIDS–associated esophagitis, malignancy, mesh erosion, and complications from extended intubation. Three patients had previous radiation therapy to the neck or chest. Five patients had defects localized to the membranous tracheal wall, two had defects of the mainstem bronchus or bronchus intermedius, and one patient had a defect of the anterior wall of the trachea.
Dr. Udelsman and his coauthors used both aortic homograft and acellular dermal matrix to repair large defects. Their experience confirmed previous reports of the formation of granulation tissue with aortic autografts, underscoring the importance of frequent bronchoscopy and debridement when necessary. And while previous reports have claimed human acellular dermis resists granulation formation, that wasn’t the case in this study. “The exact histologic basis of bioprosthetic incorporation and reepithelialization in these patients is still elusive and will require further study,” the researchers said.
This study also employed the controversial muscle buttress repair in six patients, which helped, at least theoretically, to secure the repairs when leaks occur, to separate suture lines when both the airway and esophagus were repaired and to support the bioprosthetic material to prevent tissue softening, Dr. Udelsman and his coauthors said.
Postoperative examinations confirmed that the operations successfully closed the airway defects in all eight patients. Long term, most resumed oral intake, but three did not for various reasons: one had a pharyngostomy; another had neurocognitive issues preoperatively; and a third with a tracheoesophageal fistula repair and cervical esophagostomy could resume oral intake but depended on tube feeds to meet caloric needs.
All patients developed granulation at the repair site, two of whom required further debridement and one who underwent balloon dilation. Pneumonia was the most common complication within 30 days of surgery, occurring in two patients. Three patients died within 120 days from metastatic disease, and a fourth patient progressed to end-stage AIDS 6 years after the operation and eventually died.
Dr. Udelsman and his coauthors reported having no financial disclosures.
Large and complex airway defects that primary repair cannot fully close require alternative surgical approaches and techniques that are far more difficult to perform, but bioprosthetic materials may be an option to repair large tracheal and bronchial defects that has achieved good results, without postoperative death or defect recurrence, in a small cohort of patients at Massachusetts General Hospital, in Boston.
Brooks Udelsman, MD, and his coauthors reported their results of bioprosthetic repair of central airway defects in eight patients in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016 Nov;152:1388-97). “Although our results are derived from a limited number of heterogeneous patients, they suggest that closure of noncircumferential large airway defects with bioprosthetic materials is feasible, safe and reliable,” Dr. Udelsman said. He previously reported the results at the annual meeting of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, May 14-18, 2016, in Baltimore.
These complex defects typically exceed 5 cm and can involve communication with the esophagus. For repair of smaller defects, surgeons can use a more conventional approach that involves neck flexion, laryngeal release, airway mobilization, and hilar release, but in larger defects, these techniques increase the risk of too much tension on the anastomosis and dehiscence along with airway failure. Large and complex defects occur in patients who have had a previous airway operation or radiation exposure, requiring alternative strategies, the researchers wrote. “Patients in this rare category should be referred to a high-volume center for careful evaluation by a surgeon experienced in complex airway reconstruction before the decision to abandon primary repair is made,” he said. Among the advantages that bioprosthetic materials have over synthetic materials for airway defect repair are easier handling, minimal immunogenic response, and potential for tissue ingrowth, Dr. Udelsman and his coauthors said.
All eight patients in this study, who underwent repair from 2008 to 2015, had significant comorbidities, including previous surgery of the trachea, esophagus, or thyroid. The etiology of the airway defect included HIV-AIDS–associated esophagitis, malignancy, mesh erosion, and complications from extended intubation. Three patients had previous radiation therapy to the neck or chest. Five patients had defects localized to the membranous tracheal wall, two had defects of the mainstem bronchus or bronchus intermedius, and one patient had a defect of the anterior wall of the trachea.
Dr. Udelsman and his coauthors used both aortic homograft and acellular dermal matrix to repair large defects. Their experience confirmed previous reports of the formation of granulation tissue with aortic autografts, underscoring the importance of frequent bronchoscopy and debridement when necessary. And while previous reports have claimed human acellular dermis resists granulation formation, that wasn’t the case in this study. “The exact histologic basis of bioprosthetic incorporation and reepithelialization in these patients is still elusive and will require further study,” the researchers said.
This study also employed the controversial muscle buttress repair in six patients, which helped, at least theoretically, to secure the repairs when leaks occur, to separate suture lines when both the airway and esophagus were repaired and to support the bioprosthetic material to prevent tissue softening, Dr. Udelsman and his coauthors said.
Postoperative examinations confirmed that the operations successfully closed the airway defects in all eight patients. Long term, most resumed oral intake, but three did not for various reasons: one had a pharyngostomy; another had neurocognitive issues preoperatively; and a third with a tracheoesophageal fistula repair and cervical esophagostomy could resume oral intake but depended on tube feeds to meet caloric needs.
All patients developed granulation at the repair site, two of whom required further debridement and one who underwent balloon dilation. Pneumonia was the most common complication within 30 days of surgery, occurring in two patients. Three patients died within 120 days from metastatic disease, and a fourth patient progressed to end-stage AIDS 6 years after the operation and eventually died.
Dr. Udelsman and his coauthors reported having no financial disclosures.
FROM THE JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Key clinical point: Bioprosthetic materials show progress for reconstruction of large airway defects.
Major finding: Airway defects were successfully closed in all patients, with no postoperative deaths or recurrence of airway defect.
Data source: Eight patients who underwent closure of complex central airway defects with bioprosthetic materials between 2008 and 2015.
Disclosures: Dr. Udelsman and coauthors reported having no relevant financial disclosures.