User login
Doug Brunk is a San Diego-based award-winning reporter who began covering health care in 1991. Before joining the company, he wrote for the health sciences division of Columbia University and was an associate editor at Contemporary Long Term Care magazine when it won a Jesse H. Neal Award. His work has been syndicated by the Los Angeles Times and he is the author of two books related to the University of Kentucky Wildcats men's basketball program. Doug has a master’s degree in magazine journalism from the S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University. Follow him on Twitter @dougbrunk.
Novel hydrogel holds promise for skin regeneration
CARLSBAD, CALIF. – For the estimated 10 million wounds that clinicians treat in the United States each year resulting from surgical procedures, trauma, burns, and other causes, the best outcome is a scar, a fibrotic dermis with a flattened epidermis that contains no sweat glands, no pilosebaceous units, and impaired nerve function.
But what if the outcome was skin regeneration instead of scar formation? At the annual symposium of the California Society of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery, Philip O. Scumpia, MD, PhD, described the .
“We’re preprogrammed to undergo scarring,” said Dr. Scumpia, associate professor of dermatology at the University of California, Los Angeles. “Tissue fibrosis is an evolutionary process” where a fibrotic matrix is deposited “as quickly as possible to close the gap caused by an injury,” he noted. “All of the cues in the normal wound healing process result in fibrosis, but we want to move from scarring to tissue regeneration. The goal is to make something that can shift from this evolutionary process, and it’s proven to be inherently difficult.”
Common approaches to wound treatment include simple and advanced dressings, negative pressure, and hyperbaric oxygen. For wounds that persist beyond 30 days, advanced treatment options include decellularized grafts such as placental membranes, amniotic membranes, and acellular dermal matrices. “There are also cellularized grafts such as dressings that contain neonatal dermal fibroblasts,” which are expensive, said Dr. Scumpia, director of dermatopathology at the West Los Angeles VA Medical Center. “There are also semi-synthetic grafts such as single or double layer dermal replacement templates and synthetic dermal substitutes in the form of sheets or foam. All of these can help with wound coverage and help chronic wounds close on their own.”
Meanwhile, tissue regeneration – or efforts to restore tissue to its original functionality – include growth factors, stem cells, or replacement extracellular matrix (skin substitutes), or a combination. “Bioengineered dressings and bioengineered skin substitutes have shown modest improvement in wound healing but not tissue regeneration,” Dr. Scumpia said. “At best, we can accelerate scar formation and close the wound quicker, but nothing has been shown to regenerate tissue.”
Approaches to skin regeneration
Studies from the embryology literature have helped researchers develop better approaches to skin regeneration. For example, fetal skin heals without scarring when injured. “Hairs form from placodes, then sebaceous glands form, and fibroblasts that are part of the papillary mesenchymal body expressing special factors such as engrailed or CRABP1 drive hair follicle formation,” he said. “Many studies have shown that sonic hedgehog signaling, and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling can play a role in the development of new hair follicles. Also, fibroblasts in the dermis can drive hair follicle formation.”
Researchers are also learning about tissue regeneration from mouse models. For example, African spiny mice have been shown to heal regeneratively. “If you make wounds large enough on lab mice, the center heals regeneratively,” Dr. Scumpia said. “What’s interesting is that these same signals are present in embryonic hair follicle development. Why is this important? Who wants a hairy scar? It’s an organized structure that develops in the wound. That can help us understand what we need to put in so that our body regenerates on its own. In mouse models, the immune system has been shown to play a role in regeneration.”
Expanding on initial work conducted at UCLA, Dr. Scumpia and his colleagues founded San Diego-based Tempo Therapeutics, which is commercializing the MAP hydrogel to mimic the natural porosity and stiffness of skin. They sought to develop a new biomaterial, he said, noting that “the skin is porous on a microscale level, allowing cells to infiltrate different areas.” And the problem with existing biomaterials “is that they don’t incorporate into the skin very well,” he explained. “They’re usually stiff and rubbery and can cause a foreign body reaction, which can result in fibrous encapsulation and inflammation.”
The MAP hydrogel is composed of randomly packed “microsphere building blocks,” including an amino acid that promotes an immune response. When injected into a wound, the hydrogel forms a porous matrix in the tissue. Surface annealing locks in porosity and tissue grows into porous spaces, which avoids scar formation pathways and enables critical organs to regain function.
During in vivo tests, researchers observed decreases in inflammation compared with traditional hydrogels in the first 48 hours. “In mouse models, we found that if you inject in a hydrogel that has no porosity, the body tries to spit it out, and you have an immune reaction,” Dr. Scumpia said. “But when we used the MAP hydrogel, we found that cells can migrate through it, which allows wounds to heal quicker. When we added an antigen in the hydrogel trying to allow the hydrogel to degrade slower, it actually degraded more rapidly, but we found that new hair follicles formed in the center of these wounds, a hallmark of skin regeneration. My lab has been studying why this occurs and trying to use this to our advantage in other models.”
In an unpublished mouse burn wound model study, he and his colleagues excised a wound, but it never healed with regeneration in the center. “We don’t understand why,” he said. But when the researchers used the MAP gel in wounds of hairless mice, they observed the formation of sebaceous glands and hair follicles over the wound beds. “It’s an exciting finding to see hair follicles develop in the center of a wound,” Dr. Scumpia said. He noted that to date, use of the MAP hydrogel has demonstrated tissue regeneration in some of the 27 veterinary cases that have been performed, including for wounds following traumatic injuries or following tumor resections on paws that allowed the pets to avoid amputation.
Clinical trials planned
The first clinical trials of the MAP hydrogel are planned for treating complex diabetic wounds in early 2024 but will likely expand to other difficult-to-treat wounds, including venous stasis ulcers, decubitus ulcers, and use following large surgical resections. Dr. Scumpia and colleagues will also examine the regenerative biomaterial for tissue aesthetics, including dermal and deep tissue filler applications. The next steps in his laboratory, he said, are to combine biomaterials with stem cells, immune factors, or small molecular activators/inhibitors to improve sweat gland, nerve, or hair follicle regeneration.
Dr. Scumpia disclosed that he is a cofounder and shareholder in Tempo Therapeutics. He has also received grant support from the National Institutes of Health, Department of Veteran Affairs, and the LEO Foundation.
CARLSBAD, CALIF. – For the estimated 10 million wounds that clinicians treat in the United States each year resulting from surgical procedures, trauma, burns, and other causes, the best outcome is a scar, a fibrotic dermis with a flattened epidermis that contains no sweat glands, no pilosebaceous units, and impaired nerve function.
But what if the outcome was skin regeneration instead of scar formation? At the annual symposium of the California Society of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery, Philip O. Scumpia, MD, PhD, described the .
“We’re preprogrammed to undergo scarring,” said Dr. Scumpia, associate professor of dermatology at the University of California, Los Angeles. “Tissue fibrosis is an evolutionary process” where a fibrotic matrix is deposited “as quickly as possible to close the gap caused by an injury,” he noted. “All of the cues in the normal wound healing process result in fibrosis, but we want to move from scarring to tissue regeneration. The goal is to make something that can shift from this evolutionary process, and it’s proven to be inherently difficult.”
Common approaches to wound treatment include simple and advanced dressings, negative pressure, and hyperbaric oxygen. For wounds that persist beyond 30 days, advanced treatment options include decellularized grafts such as placental membranes, amniotic membranes, and acellular dermal matrices. “There are also cellularized grafts such as dressings that contain neonatal dermal fibroblasts,” which are expensive, said Dr. Scumpia, director of dermatopathology at the West Los Angeles VA Medical Center. “There are also semi-synthetic grafts such as single or double layer dermal replacement templates and synthetic dermal substitutes in the form of sheets or foam. All of these can help with wound coverage and help chronic wounds close on their own.”
Meanwhile, tissue regeneration – or efforts to restore tissue to its original functionality – include growth factors, stem cells, or replacement extracellular matrix (skin substitutes), or a combination. “Bioengineered dressings and bioengineered skin substitutes have shown modest improvement in wound healing but not tissue regeneration,” Dr. Scumpia said. “At best, we can accelerate scar formation and close the wound quicker, but nothing has been shown to regenerate tissue.”
Approaches to skin regeneration
Studies from the embryology literature have helped researchers develop better approaches to skin regeneration. For example, fetal skin heals without scarring when injured. “Hairs form from placodes, then sebaceous glands form, and fibroblasts that are part of the papillary mesenchymal body expressing special factors such as engrailed or CRABP1 drive hair follicle formation,” he said. “Many studies have shown that sonic hedgehog signaling, and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling can play a role in the development of new hair follicles. Also, fibroblasts in the dermis can drive hair follicle formation.”
Researchers are also learning about tissue regeneration from mouse models. For example, African spiny mice have been shown to heal regeneratively. “If you make wounds large enough on lab mice, the center heals regeneratively,” Dr. Scumpia said. “What’s interesting is that these same signals are present in embryonic hair follicle development. Why is this important? Who wants a hairy scar? It’s an organized structure that develops in the wound. That can help us understand what we need to put in so that our body regenerates on its own. In mouse models, the immune system has been shown to play a role in regeneration.”
Expanding on initial work conducted at UCLA, Dr. Scumpia and his colleagues founded San Diego-based Tempo Therapeutics, which is commercializing the MAP hydrogel to mimic the natural porosity and stiffness of skin. They sought to develop a new biomaterial, he said, noting that “the skin is porous on a microscale level, allowing cells to infiltrate different areas.” And the problem with existing biomaterials “is that they don’t incorporate into the skin very well,” he explained. “They’re usually stiff and rubbery and can cause a foreign body reaction, which can result in fibrous encapsulation and inflammation.”
The MAP hydrogel is composed of randomly packed “microsphere building blocks,” including an amino acid that promotes an immune response. When injected into a wound, the hydrogel forms a porous matrix in the tissue. Surface annealing locks in porosity and tissue grows into porous spaces, which avoids scar formation pathways and enables critical organs to regain function.
During in vivo tests, researchers observed decreases in inflammation compared with traditional hydrogels in the first 48 hours. “In mouse models, we found that if you inject in a hydrogel that has no porosity, the body tries to spit it out, and you have an immune reaction,” Dr. Scumpia said. “But when we used the MAP hydrogel, we found that cells can migrate through it, which allows wounds to heal quicker. When we added an antigen in the hydrogel trying to allow the hydrogel to degrade slower, it actually degraded more rapidly, but we found that new hair follicles formed in the center of these wounds, a hallmark of skin regeneration. My lab has been studying why this occurs and trying to use this to our advantage in other models.”
In an unpublished mouse burn wound model study, he and his colleagues excised a wound, but it never healed with regeneration in the center. “We don’t understand why,” he said. But when the researchers used the MAP gel in wounds of hairless mice, they observed the formation of sebaceous glands and hair follicles over the wound beds. “It’s an exciting finding to see hair follicles develop in the center of a wound,” Dr. Scumpia said. He noted that to date, use of the MAP hydrogel has demonstrated tissue regeneration in some of the 27 veterinary cases that have been performed, including for wounds following traumatic injuries or following tumor resections on paws that allowed the pets to avoid amputation.
Clinical trials planned
The first clinical trials of the MAP hydrogel are planned for treating complex diabetic wounds in early 2024 but will likely expand to other difficult-to-treat wounds, including venous stasis ulcers, decubitus ulcers, and use following large surgical resections. Dr. Scumpia and colleagues will also examine the regenerative biomaterial for tissue aesthetics, including dermal and deep tissue filler applications. The next steps in his laboratory, he said, are to combine biomaterials with stem cells, immune factors, or small molecular activators/inhibitors to improve sweat gland, nerve, or hair follicle regeneration.
Dr. Scumpia disclosed that he is a cofounder and shareholder in Tempo Therapeutics. He has also received grant support from the National Institutes of Health, Department of Veteran Affairs, and the LEO Foundation.
CARLSBAD, CALIF. – For the estimated 10 million wounds that clinicians treat in the United States each year resulting from surgical procedures, trauma, burns, and other causes, the best outcome is a scar, a fibrotic dermis with a flattened epidermis that contains no sweat glands, no pilosebaceous units, and impaired nerve function.
But what if the outcome was skin regeneration instead of scar formation? At the annual symposium of the California Society of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery, Philip O. Scumpia, MD, PhD, described the .
“We’re preprogrammed to undergo scarring,” said Dr. Scumpia, associate professor of dermatology at the University of California, Los Angeles. “Tissue fibrosis is an evolutionary process” where a fibrotic matrix is deposited “as quickly as possible to close the gap caused by an injury,” he noted. “All of the cues in the normal wound healing process result in fibrosis, but we want to move from scarring to tissue regeneration. The goal is to make something that can shift from this evolutionary process, and it’s proven to be inherently difficult.”
Common approaches to wound treatment include simple and advanced dressings, negative pressure, and hyperbaric oxygen. For wounds that persist beyond 30 days, advanced treatment options include decellularized grafts such as placental membranes, amniotic membranes, and acellular dermal matrices. “There are also cellularized grafts such as dressings that contain neonatal dermal fibroblasts,” which are expensive, said Dr. Scumpia, director of dermatopathology at the West Los Angeles VA Medical Center. “There are also semi-synthetic grafts such as single or double layer dermal replacement templates and synthetic dermal substitutes in the form of sheets or foam. All of these can help with wound coverage and help chronic wounds close on their own.”
Meanwhile, tissue regeneration – or efforts to restore tissue to its original functionality – include growth factors, stem cells, or replacement extracellular matrix (skin substitutes), or a combination. “Bioengineered dressings and bioengineered skin substitutes have shown modest improvement in wound healing but not tissue regeneration,” Dr. Scumpia said. “At best, we can accelerate scar formation and close the wound quicker, but nothing has been shown to regenerate tissue.”
Approaches to skin regeneration
Studies from the embryology literature have helped researchers develop better approaches to skin regeneration. For example, fetal skin heals without scarring when injured. “Hairs form from placodes, then sebaceous glands form, and fibroblasts that are part of the papillary mesenchymal body expressing special factors such as engrailed or CRABP1 drive hair follicle formation,” he said. “Many studies have shown that sonic hedgehog signaling, and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling can play a role in the development of new hair follicles. Also, fibroblasts in the dermis can drive hair follicle formation.”
Researchers are also learning about tissue regeneration from mouse models. For example, African spiny mice have been shown to heal regeneratively. “If you make wounds large enough on lab mice, the center heals regeneratively,” Dr. Scumpia said. “What’s interesting is that these same signals are present in embryonic hair follicle development. Why is this important? Who wants a hairy scar? It’s an organized structure that develops in the wound. That can help us understand what we need to put in so that our body regenerates on its own. In mouse models, the immune system has been shown to play a role in regeneration.”
Expanding on initial work conducted at UCLA, Dr. Scumpia and his colleagues founded San Diego-based Tempo Therapeutics, which is commercializing the MAP hydrogel to mimic the natural porosity and stiffness of skin. They sought to develop a new biomaterial, he said, noting that “the skin is porous on a microscale level, allowing cells to infiltrate different areas.” And the problem with existing biomaterials “is that they don’t incorporate into the skin very well,” he explained. “They’re usually stiff and rubbery and can cause a foreign body reaction, which can result in fibrous encapsulation and inflammation.”
The MAP hydrogel is composed of randomly packed “microsphere building blocks,” including an amino acid that promotes an immune response. When injected into a wound, the hydrogel forms a porous matrix in the tissue. Surface annealing locks in porosity and tissue grows into porous spaces, which avoids scar formation pathways and enables critical organs to regain function.
During in vivo tests, researchers observed decreases in inflammation compared with traditional hydrogels in the first 48 hours. “In mouse models, we found that if you inject in a hydrogel that has no porosity, the body tries to spit it out, and you have an immune reaction,” Dr. Scumpia said. “But when we used the MAP hydrogel, we found that cells can migrate through it, which allows wounds to heal quicker. When we added an antigen in the hydrogel trying to allow the hydrogel to degrade slower, it actually degraded more rapidly, but we found that new hair follicles formed in the center of these wounds, a hallmark of skin regeneration. My lab has been studying why this occurs and trying to use this to our advantage in other models.”
In an unpublished mouse burn wound model study, he and his colleagues excised a wound, but it never healed with regeneration in the center. “We don’t understand why,” he said. But when the researchers used the MAP gel in wounds of hairless mice, they observed the formation of sebaceous glands and hair follicles over the wound beds. “It’s an exciting finding to see hair follicles develop in the center of a wound,” Dr. Scumpia said. He noted that to date, use of the MAP hydrogel has demonstrated tissue regeneration in some of the 27 veterinary cases that have been performed, including for wounds following traumatic injuries or following tumor resections on paws that allowed the pets to avoid amputation.
Clinical trials planned
The first clinical trials of the MAP hydrogel are planned for treating complex diabetic wounds in early 2024 but will likely expand to other difficult-to-treat wounds, including venous stasis ulcers, decubitus ulcers, and use following large surgical resections. Dr. Scumpia and colleagues will also examine the regenerative biomaterial for tissue aesthetics, including dermal and deep tissue filler applications. The next steps in his laboratory, he said, are to combine biomaterials with stem cells, immune factors, or small molecular activators/inhibitors to improve sweat gland, nerve, or hair follicle regeneration.
Dr. Scumpia disclosed that he is a cofounder and shareholder in Tempo Therapeutics. He has also received grant support from the National Institutes of Health, Department of Veteran Affairs, and the LEO Foundation.
AT CALDERM 2023
Ready to start engaging on social media? A dermatologist shares tips
CARLSBAD, CALIF. – In the opinion of Swati Kannan, MD, deciding whether or not to establish a presence on social media starts with a gut-check about your intentions.
“Why use it?” Dr. Kannan, a dermatologist and Mohs surgeon at the University of California, San Diego, asked attendees at the annual symposium of the California Society of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery. “Isn’t being an MD or DO enough? Not anymore. and differentiates us from other nondermatology providers.”
Her favorite part about using Instagram and other social media platforms, she said, is connecting with other dermatologists and other specialists. “I’ve learned a lot from communicating with other dermatologists on different platforms, not just for social media but for changing how I practice as well.”
Dr. Kannan offered the following tips and considerations for building and maintaining a presence on social media:
Know the demographics of your practice and your target audience. In general, individuals in their 20s have a presence on many platforms, mainly TikTok for entertainment. Those in their 30s and 40s mainly use Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube, and those in their 40s-60s primarily use Facebook and YouTube. “Men tend to use YouTube, Twitter (X), Reddit, and LinkedIn, while women prefer more photo or video content platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook,” she said. In addition, knowing your target audience will help select which social media platforms to be active on.
Think about your goal. Is it a side hustle? Is it to raise awareness of various dermatologic conditions? Is it to grow your business? “Knowing this goal will help you determine how much time you’re going to commit to it.”
Do you have the time? To be effective, being active on social media can take 10-15 hours a week, especially for beginners, “so it’s like another job,” she said.
Devise a social media strategy. “Ideally, pick one to three social media platforms that you are going to be active on,” Dr. Kannan advised. “I’m active on Instagram and YouTube, and I cross-post on TikTok and Facebook. That means when I’m making content, it’s geared toward the audience on Instagram. If it hits a few people on TikTok, that’s fine, too, but the TikTok audience is not my target.”
Stick to a posting schedule. Ideally, post three to five times per week.
Create a content strategy. This includes a variety of photos, diagrams, videos, “and you want to use relevant hashtags,” she said.
Find your niche and style. This comes with time. If you specialize in a specific dermatologic condition such as psoriasis, hair loss, or vitiligo, emphasize that in your content.
Find your voice. This also comes with time. But be a professional version of yourself.
Have a plan for how to handle complaints or bad comments. “Avoid posting content that would make you a target,” she advised. “When I get a rude comment, I delete it. If the comment is racist or sexist, I will report it.”
Learn how to review the stats on your accounts. This will provide information on which posts or videos are being well received, which can serve as the basis of creating content that’s similar going forward.
Follow certain social media strategists. This can help grow followers and learn how to find trending audio or music to accompany your content. On Instagram, for example, Dr. Kannan follows @creators and @instagramforbusiness. On YouTube, she follows the Think Media channel.
Avoid posting content that would make you a target. Limit photos about partying/alcohol consumption or anything considered unprofessional. “If you can’t say it or do it in front of a patient, then you shouldn’t post it on your professional social media page,” she said.
Protect yourself. Don’t provide individual medical advice. “All of my home pages contain the statement, ‘this page is not for medical advice,’” Dr. Kannan said. “Get photo and video consent from all patients, even if you’re posting a zoomed-in version of their face. Deidentify patients as much as possible, and watermark your before and after photos and videos so that they’re not easily used by others.”
Be consistent and patient as you engage on social media platforms. Being a good digital citizen includes networking with other creators by liking and commenting on their posts, and responding to and liking comments that people make to your posts. “Remember: it’s not just about the number of followers, but also about engagement,” she said.
Dr. Kannan reported having no relevant disclosures.
CARLSBAD, CALIF. – In the opinion of Swati Kannan, MD, deciding whether or not to establish a presence on social media starts with a gut-check about your intentions.
“Why use it?” Dr. Kannan, a dermatologist and Mohs surgeon at the University of California, San Diego, asked attendees at the annual symposium of the California Society of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery. “Isn’t being an MD or DO enough? Not anymore. and differentiates us from other nondermatology providers.”
Her favorite part about using Instagram and other social media platforms, she said, is connecting with other dermatologists and other specialists. “I’ve learned a lot from communicating with other dermatologists on different platforms, not just for social media but for changing how I practice as well.”
Dr. Kannan offered the following tips and considerations for building and maintaining a presence on social media:
Know the demographics of your practice and your target audience. In general, individuals in their 20s have a presence on many platforms, mainly TikTok for entertainment. Those in their 30s and 40s mainly use Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube, and those in their 40s-60s primarily use Facebook and YouTube. “Men tend to use YouTube, Twitter (X), Reddit, and LinkedIn, while women prefer more photo or video content platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook,” she said. In addition, knowing your target audience will help select which social media platforms to be active on.
Think about your goal. Is it a side hustle? Is it to raise awareness of various dermatologic conditions? Is it to grow your business? “Knowing this goal will help you determine how much time you’re going to commit to it.”
Do you have the time? To be effective, being active on social media can take 10-15 hours a week, especially for beginners, “so it’s like another job,” she said.
Devise a social media strategy. “Ideally, pick one to three social media platforms that you are going to be active on,” Dr. Kannan advised. “I’m active on Instagram and YouTube, and I cross-post on TikTok and Facebook. That means when I’m making content, it’s geared toward the audience on Instagram. If it hits a few people on TikTok, that’s fine, too, but the TikTok audience is not my target.”
Stick to a posting schedule. Ideally, post three to five times per week.
Create a content strategy. This includes a variety of photos, diagrams, videos, “and you want to use relevant hashtags,” she said.
Find your niche and style. This comes with time. If you specialize in a specific dermatologic condition such as psoriasis, hair loss, or vitiligo, emphasize that in your content.
Find your voice. This also comes with time. But be a professional version of yourself.
Have a plan for how to handle complaints or bad comments. “Avoid posting content that would make you a target,” she advised. “When I get a rude comment, I delete it. If the comment is racist or sexist, I will report it.”
Learn how to review the stats on your accounts. This will provide information on which posts or videos are being well received, which can serve as the basis of creating content that’s similar going forward.
Follow certain social media strategists. This can help grow followers and learn how to find trending audio or music to accompany your content. On Instagram, for example, Dr. Kannan follows @creators and @instagramforbusiness. On YouTube, she follows the Think Media channel.
Avoid posting content that would make you a target. Limit photos about partying/alcohol consumption or anything considered unprofessional. “If you can’t say it or do it in front of a patient, then you shouldn’t post it on your professional social media page,” she said.
Protect yourself. Don’t provide individual medical advice. “All of my home pages contain the statement, ‘this page is not for medical advice,’” Dr. Kannan said. “Get photo and video consent from all patients, even if you’re posting a zoomed-in version of their face. Deidentify patients as much as possible, and watermark your before and after photos and videos so that they’re not easily used by others.”
Be consistent and patient as you engage on social media platforms. Being a good digital citizen includes networking with other creators by liking and commenting on their posts, and responding to and liking comments that people make to your posts. “Remember: it’s not just about the number of followers, but also about engagement,” she said.
Dr. Kannan reported having no relevant disclosures.
CARLSBAD, CALIF. – In the opinion of Swati Kannan, MD, deciding whether or not to establish a presence on social media starts with a gut-check about your intentions.
“Why use it?” Dr. Kannan, a dermatologist and Mohs surgeon at the University of California, San Diego, asked attendees at the annual symposium of the California Society of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery. “Isn’t being an MD or DO enough? Not anymore. and differentiates us from other nondermatology providers.”
Her favorite part about using Instagram and other social media platforms, she said, is connecting with other dermatologists and other specialists. “I’ve learned a lot from communicating with other dermatologists on different platforms, not just for social media but for changing how I practice as well.”
Dr. Kannan offered the following tips and considerations for building and maintaining a presence on social media:
Know the demographics of your practice and your target audience. In general, individuals in their 20s have a presence on many platforms, mainly TikTok for entertainment. Those in their 30s and 40s mainly use Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube, and those in their 40s-60s primarily use Facebook and YouTube. “Men tend to use YouTube, Twitter (X), Reddit, and LinkedIn, while women prefer more photo or video content platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook,” she said. In addition, knowing your target audience will help select which social media platforms to be active on.
Think about your goal. Is it a side hustle? Is it to raise awareness of various dermatologic conditions? Is it to grow your business? “Knowing this goal will help you determine how much time you’re going to commit to it.”
Do you have the time? To be effective, being active on social media can take 10-15 hours a week, especially for beginners, “so it’s like another job,” she said.
Devise a social media strategy. “Ideally, pick one to three social media platforms that you are going to be active on,” Dr. Kannan advised. “I’m active on Instagram and YouTube, and I cross-post on TikTok and Facebook. That means when I’m making content, it’s geared toward the audience on Instagram. If it hits a few people on TikTok, that’s fine, too, but the TikTok audience is not my target.”
Stick to a posting schedule. Ideally, post three to five times per week.
Create a content strategy. This includes a variety of photos, diagrams, videos, “and you want to use relevant hashtags,” she said.
Find your niche and style. This comes with time. If you specialize in a specific dermatologic condition such as psoriasis, hair loss, or vitiligo, emphasize that in your content.
Find your voice. This also comes with time. But be a professional version of yourself.
Have a plan for how to handle complaints or bad comments. “Avoid posting content that would make you a target,” she advised. “When I get a rude comment, I delete it. If the comment is racist or sexist, I will report it.”
Learn how to review the stats on your accounts. This will provide information on which posts or videos are being well received, which can serve as the basis of creating content that’s similar going forward.
Follow certain social media strategists. This can help grow followers and learn how to find trending audio or music to accompany your content. On Instagram, for example, Dr. Kannan follows @creators and @instagramforbusiness. On YouTube, she follows the Think Media channel.
Avoid posting content that would make you a target. Limit photos about partying/alcohol consumption or anything considered unprofessional. “If you can’t say it or do it in front of a patient, then you shouldn’t post it on your professional social media page,” she said.
Protect yourself. Don’t provide individual medical advice. “All of my home pages contain the statement, ‘this page is not for medical advice,’” Dr. Kannan said. “Get photo and video consent from all patients, even if you’re posting a zoomed-in version of their face. Deidentify patients as much as possible, and watermark your before and after photos and videos so that they’re not easily used by others.”
Be consistent and patient as you engage on social media platforms. Being a good digital citizen includes networking with other creators by liking and commenting on their posts, and responding to and liking comments that people make to your posts. “Remember: it’s not just about the number of followers, but also about engagement,” she said.
Dr. Kannan reported having no relevant disclosures.
AT CALDERM 2023
Multicenter study aims to find new treatments for hidradenitis suppurativa
When Haley Naik, MD, joined the University of California, San Francisco, as a dermatologist in 2015, she was struck by the dearth of data in the medical literature about hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).
“For decades there were no datasets to begin to understand HS – its clinical course, how patients respond to medications, and how quality of life improves for patients with therapy,” Dr. Naik, who directs the HS program at UCSF, said in an interview. Inspired to improve the bleak HS knowledge landscape, she began to systematically collect information from HS patient visits, “to try to better understand how treatments were helping them or not and also to better understand their quality-of-life impact,” she said. “This also facilitated research in HS, but over time it became clear that there was a growing need for a larger effort.”
But in 2020, Dr. Naik teamed up with investigative dermatologist Michelle Lowes, MBBS, PhD, to . To date, more than 500 patients are enrolled at 12 participating sites, and 4 more sites plan to join the consortium by the end of 2023. The goal is to enroll a total of 8,000 patients, which will make it the largest dataset of its kind.
“Each site investigator is a physician who specializes in taking care of HS patients,” said Dr. Naik, who is the study’s principal investigator. “These are people who are conducting active research in various aspects of HS, and they’re trusted members of the medical community.”
She highlighted the three main objectives of HS PROGRESS. The first objective is to develop a longitudinal cohort of HS patients so that investigators can understand the clinical course of HS and effectiveness of treatments. The second is to collect biospecimens from patients with HS for translational studies “that can help to drive drug development, help us identify biomarkers that can help us predict disease course and predict patient response to therapies, so we know exactly what to give them,” she explained. The third objective is to provide patients with HS with the opportunity to be recruited for clinical trials, “so they have access to cutting-edge therapies and know what’s happening in this space.”
Collecting biospecimens
The goal of collecting biospecimens is to provide them to multiple investigators to improve the understanding of HS biology and treatment. “Our thought is to apply next generation techniques to these biospecimens to get metagenomic, transcriptomic, and genomic data to better understand HS biology so that we can identify targets for novel therapy,” Dr. Naik said.
Although HS is estimated to affect 1% of Western populations, the tumor necrosis alpha (TNF)-inhibitor adalimumab remains the only Food and Drug Administration-approved therapy for the condition.
However, Dr. Naik said that there are many promising drugs on the horizon for HS, especially interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors. “One of the most exciting things about these drugs is that they set the bar higher for what we can expect out of therapies for HS, such as reporting a HiSCR (HS Clinical Response) score 75, which is the equivalent of 75% improvement in inflammatory HS lesions without an increase in draining tunnels,” she said. “This is well beyond what adalimumab had demonstrated in landmark trials in 2015. The safety profile on IL-17 inhibitors looks great, too.”
JAK inhibitors also hold promise for HS. “It’s going to be key to see how these drugs perform in the real-world setting in our average HS patients who may have comorbidities,” Dr. Naik said. “This is where an effort like HS PROGRESS will carry weight, because in a dataset like this, we’re going to be able to ask questions like, is there a class of drugs that works better for one specific phenotype of HS, or for patients who have a younger age of onset, or who are earlier in their disease course? These are questions we can’t ask in the context of a clinical trial, but we can ask in the context of real-world data from many practices.”
In addition to USCF, the 11 study locations participating in HS PROGRESS are the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Mayo Clinic; Penn State University, Hershey; University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Washington University in St. Louis; University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Henry Ford Health, Detroit; University of Minnesota; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Duke University, Durham, N.C.; and University of Miami.
Dr. Naik disclosed that she has received grant support from AbbVie; consulting fees from 23andme, AbbVie, Aristea Therapeutics, Nimbus Therapeutics, Medscape, Sonoma Biotherapeutics, DAVA Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, UCB, and Novartis; and investigator fees from Pfizer; and holds shares in Radera. She is also an associate editor for JAMA Dermatology and a board member of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation.
When Haley Naik, MD, joined the University of California, San Francisco, as a dermatologist in 2015, she was struck by the dearth of data in the medical literature about hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).
“For decades there were no datasets to begin to understand HS – its clinical course, how patients respond to medications, and how quality of life improves for patients with therapy,” Dr. Naik, who directs the HS program at UCSF, said in an interview. Inspired to improve the bleak HS knowledge landscape, she began to systematically collect information from HS patient visits, “to try to better understand how treatments were helping them or not and also to better understand their quality-of-life impact,” she said. “This also facilitated research in HS, but over time it became clear that there was a growing need for a larger effort.”
But in 2020, Dr. Naik teamed up with investigative dermatologist Michelle Lowes, MBBS, PhD, to . To date, more than 500 patients are enrolled at 12 participating sites, and 4 more sites plan to join the consortium by the end of 2023. The goal is to enroll a total of 8,000 patients, which will make it the largest dataset of its kind.
“Each site investigator is a physician who specializes in taking care of HS patients,” said Dr. Naik, who is the study’s principal investigator. “These are people who are conducting active research in various aspects of HS, and they’re trusted members of the medical community.”
She highlighted the three main objectives of HS PROGRESS. The first objective is to develop a longitudinal cohort of HS patients so that investigators can understand the clinical course of HS and effectiveness of treatments. The second is to collect biospecimens from patients with HS for translational studies “that can help to drive drug development, help us identify biomarkers that can help us predict disease course and predict patient response to therapies, so we know exactly what to give them,” she explained. The third objective is to provide patients with HS with the opportunity to be recruited for clinical trials, “so they have access to cutting-edge therapies and know what’s happening in this space.”
Collecting biospecimens
The goal of collecting biospecimens is to provide them to multiple investigators to improve the understanding of HS biology and treatment. “Our thought is to apply next generation techniques to these biospecimens to get metagenomic, transcriptomic, and genomic data to better understand HS biology so that we can identify targets for novel therapy,” Dr. Naik said.
Although HS is estimated to affect 1% of Western populations, the tumor necrosis alpha (TNF)-inhibitor adalimumab remains the only Food and Drug Administration-approved therapy for the condition.
However, Dr. Naik said that there are many promising drugs on the horizon for HS, especially interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors. “One of the most exciting things about these drugs is that they set the bar higher for what we can expect out of therapies for HS, such as reporting a HiSCR (HS Clinical Response) score 75, which is the equivalent of 75% improvement in inflammatory HS lesions without an increase in draining tunnels,” she said. “This is well beyond what adalimumab had demonstrated in landmark trials in 2015. The safety profile on IL-17 inhibitors looks great, too.”
JAK inhibitors also hold promise for HS. “It’s going to be key to see how these drugs perform in the real-world setting in our average HS patients who may have comorbidities,” Dr. Naik said. “This is where an effort like HS PROGRESS will carry weight, because in a dataset like this, we’re going to be able to ask questions like, is there a class of drugs that works better for one specific phenotype of HS, or for patients who have a younger age of onset, or who are earlier in their disease course? These are questions we can’t ask in the context of a clinical trial, but we can ask in the context of real-world data from many practices.”
In addition to USCF, the 11 study locations participating in HS PROGRESS are the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Mayo Clinic; Penn State University, Hershey; University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Washington University in St. Louis; University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Henry Ford Health, Detroit; University of Minnesota; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Duke University, Durham, N.C.; and University of Miami.
Dr. Naik disclosed that she has received grant support from AbbVie; consulting fees from 23andme, AbbVie, Aristea Therapeutics, Nimbus Therapeutics, Medscape, Sonoma Biotherapeutics, DAVA Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, UCB, and Novartis; and investigator fees from Pfizer; and holds shares in Radera. She is also an associate editor for JAMA Dermatology and a board member of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation.
When Haley Naik, MD, joined the University of California, San Francisco, as a dermatologist in 2015, she was struck by the dearth of data in the medical literature about hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).
“For decades there were no datasets to begin to understand HS – its clinical course, how patients respond to medications, and how quality of life improves for patients with therapy,” Dr. Naik, who directs the HS program at UCSF, said in an interview. Inspired to improve the bleak HS knowledge landscape, she began to systematically collect information from HS patient visits, “to try to better understand how treatments were helping them or not and also to better understand their quality-of-life impact,” she said. “This also facilitated research in HS, but over time it became clear that there was a growing need for a larger effort.”
But in 2020, Dr. Naik teamed up with investigative dermatologist Michelle Lowes, MBBS, PhD, to . To date, more than 500 patients are enrolled at 12 participating sites, and 4 more sites plan to join the consortium by the end of 2023. The goal is to enroll a total of 8,000 patients, which will make it the largest dataset of its kind.
“Each site investigator is a physician who specializes in taking care of HS patients,” said Dr. Naik, who is the study’s principal investigator. “These are people who are conducting active research in various aspects of HS, and they’re trusted members of the medical community.”
She highlighted the three main objectives of HS PROGRESS. The first objective is to develop a longitudinal cohort of HS patients so that investigators can understand the clinical course of HS and effectiveness of treatments. The second is to collect biospecimens from patients with HS for translational studies “that can help to drive drug development, help us identify biomarkers that can help us predict disease course and predict patient response to therapies, so we know exactly what to give them,” she explained. The third objective is to provide patients with HS with the opportunity to be recruited for clinical trials, “so they have access to cutting-edge therapies and know what’s happening in this space.”
Collecting biospecimens
The goal of collecting biospecimens is to provide them to multiple investigators to improve the understanding of HS biology and treatment. “Our thought is to apply next generation techniques to these biospecimens to get metagenomic, transcriptomic, and genomic data to better understand HS biology so that we can identify targets for novel therapy,” Dr. Naik said.
Although HS is estimated to affect 1% of Western populations, the tumor necrosis alpha (TNF)-inhibitor adalimumab remains the only Food and Drug Administration-approved therapy for the condition.
However, Dr. Naik said that there are many promising drugs on the horizon for HS, especially interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors. “One of the most exciting things about these drugs is that they set the bar higher for what we can expect out of therapies for HS, such as reporting a HiSCR (HS Clinical Response) score 75, which is the equivalent of 75% improvement in inflammatory HS lesions without an increase in draining tunnels,” she said. “This is well beyond what adalimumab had demonstrated in landmark trials in 2015. The safety profile on IL-17 inhibitors looks great, too.”
JAK inhibitors also hold promise for HS. “It’s going to be key to see how these drugs perform in the real-world setting in our average HS patients who may have comorbidities,” Dr. Naik said. “This is where an effort like HS PROGRESS will carry weight, because in a dataset like this, we’re going to be able to ask questions like, is there a class of drugs that works better for one specific phenotype of HS, or for patients who have a younger age of onset, or who are earlier in their disease course? These are questions we can’t ask in the context of a clinical trial, but we can ask in the context of real-world data from many practices.”
In addition to USCF, the 11 study locations participating in HS PROGRESS are the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Mayo Clinic; Penn State University, Hershey; University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Washington University in St. Louis; University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Henry Ford Health, Detroit; University of Minnesota; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Duke University, Durham, N.C.; and University of Miami.
Dr. Naik disclosed that she has received grant support from AbbVie; consulting fees from 23andme, AbbVie, Aristea Therapeutics, Nimbus Therapeutics, Medscape, Sonoma Biotherapeutics, DAVA Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, UCB, and Novartis; and investigator fees from Pfizer; and holds shares in Radera. She is also an associate editor for JAMA Dermatology and a board member of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation.
Systematic review spotlights the use of nutraceuticals for acne
.
“While many topical and systemic prescription options are available for the treatment of acne, some patients may be interested in natural and complementary therapies as either an adjunctive or an alternative to prescription medications,” researchers led by John S. Barbieri, MD, MBA, of the department of dermatology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, wrote in their study, which was published online in JAMA Dermatology. The researchers defined nutraceuticals as products derived from food sources that provide both nutritional and medicinal benefits, such as vitamins, dietary supplements, and herbal products. “Although patients may be interested in nutraceuticals as a potential treatment option for acne, there is uncertainty regarding the efficacy and safety of these products,” they wrote.
For the systematic review, they searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases from inception through January 30, 2023, to identify randomized clinical trials that evaluated oral nutraceutical interventions such as vitamins and minerals, botanical extracts, prebiotics, and probiotics in individuals with acne. They extracted clinician-reported outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse events from the included studies, and used the Cochrane Risk of Bias checklist tool to assess the quality of evidence in randomized clinical trials. Based on this tool, they used Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality standards to categorize the articles as good, fair, or poor quality.
The search yielded 42 unique studies with 3,346 participants. Of these 42 studies, 27 were considered poor quality, 11 were considered fair quality, and 4 were considered good quality. The good-quality studies separately evaluated four interventions: vitamin D, green tea extract, probiotics, and cheongsangbangpoong-tang, an herbal formula approved for use in acne by the Korea Food and Drug Administration.
The 11 fair-quality studies suggested potential effectiveness for pantothenic acid (vitamin B5), the fatty acids omega-3 (eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] and/or docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]) and omega-6 (gamma-linoleic acid), and probiotics.
Zinc was the most studied nutraceutical identified in the review, but “there was substantial heterogeneity in the results, with only slightly greater than one-half of studies finding zinc to be efficacious,” the authors noted. “Studies using higher doses more often found zinc to be efficacious,” they said, adding that zinc “had the highest rate of adverse effect reporting of any nutraceuticals assessed in this review.”
Dr. Barbieri and colleagues acknowledged limitations of their analysis, including the fact that few of the nutraceuticals considered to have good or fair evidence for their use were evaluated in more than one study. “In addition, some studies had inconsistent results depending on the outcome measure assessed,” they wrote. “For instance, although green tea extract led to statistically significant improvements in lesion counts, it did not result in statistically significant improvements in quality of life, suggesting the observed lesion count differences may not be clinically meaningful to patients.”
And while probiotics had the most studies supporting their efficacy, they were generally of very small sample size.
Asked to comment on the study, Jonette Keri, MD, PhD, a dermatologist who directs the Acne and Rosacea Treatment Center at the University of Miami, who was not involved with the study, said that while the review was exhaustive, more research is needed to better determine the efficacy and side effects of the products studied. “The real strength of this wonderful review is now we have all of this information in one place, and this will serve as a great patient care resource,” she told this news organization.
Dr. Barbieri reported personal fees from Dexcel Pharma for consulting outside the submitted work. Dr. Keri disclosed that she is a consultant for L’Oréal.
.
“While many topical and systemic prescription options are available for the treatment of acne, some patients may be interested in natural and complementary therapies as either an adjunctive or an alternative to prescription medications,” researchers led by John S. Barbieri, MD, MBA, of the department of dermatology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, wrote in their study, which was published online in JAMA Dermatology. The researchers defined nutraceuticals as products derived from food sources that provide both nutritional and medicinal benefits, such as vitamins, dietary supplements, and herbal products. “Although patients may be interested in nutraceuticals as a potential treatment option for acne, there is uncertainty regarding the efficacy and safety of these products,” they wrote.
For the systematic review, they searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases from inception through January 30, 2023, to identify randomized clinical trials that evaluated oral nutraceutical interventions such as vitamins and minerals, botanical extracts, prebiotics, and probiotics in individuals with acne. They extracted clinician-reported outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse events from the included studies, and used the Cochrane Risk of Bias checklist tool to assess the quality of evidence in randomized clinical trials. Based on this tool, they used Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality standards to categorize the articles as good, fair, or poor quality.
The search yielded 42 unique studies with 3,346 participants. Of these 42 studies, 27 were considered poor quality, 11 were considered fair quality, and 4 were considered good quality. The good-quality studies separately evaluated four interventions: vitamin D, green tea extract, probiotics, and cheongsangbangpoong-tang, an herbal formula approved for use in acne by the Korea Food and Drug Administration.
The 11 fair-quality studies suggested potential effectiveness for pantothenic acid (vitamin B5), the fatty acids omega-3 (eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] and/or docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]) and omega-6 (gamma-linoleic acid), and probiotics.
Zinc was the most studied nutraceutical identified in the review, but “there was substantial heterogeneity in the results, with only slightly greater than one-half of studies finding zinc to be efficacious,” the authors noted. “Studies using higher doses more often found zinc to be efficacious,” they said, adding that zinc “had the highest rate of adverse effect reporting of any nutraceuticals assessed in this review.”
Dr. Barbieri and colleagues acknowledged limitations of their analysis, including the fact that few of the nutraceuticals considered to have good or fair evidence for their use were evaluated in more than one study. “In addition, some studies had inconsistent results depending on the outcome measure assessed,” they wrote. “For instance, although green tea extract led to statistically significant improvements in lesion counts, it did not result in statistically significant improvements in quality of life, suggesting the observed lesion count differences may not be clinically meaningful to patients.”
And while probiotics had the most studies supporting their efficacy, they were generally of very small sample size.
Asked to comment on the study, Jonette Keri, MD, PhD, a dermatologist who directs the Acne and Rosacea Treatment Center at the University of Miami, who was not involved with the study, said that while the review was exhaustive, more research is needed to better determine the efficacy and side effects of the products studied. “The real strength of this wonderful review is now we have all of this information in one place, and this will serve as a great patient care resource,” she told this news organization.
Dr. Barbieri reported personal fees from Dexcel Pharma for consulting outside the submitted work. Dr. Keri disclosed that she is a consultant for L’Oréal.
.
“While many topical and systemic prescription options are available for the treatment of acne, some patients may be interested in natural and complementary therapies as either an adjunctive or an alternative to prescription medications,” researchers led by John S. Barbieri, MD, MBA, of the department of dermatology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, wrote in their study, which was published online in JAMA Dermatology. The researchers defined nutraceuticals as products derived from food sources that provide both nutritional and medicinal benefits, such as vitamins, dietary supplements, and herbal products. “Although patients may be interested in nutraceuticals as a potential treatment option for acne, there is uncertainty regarding the efficacy and safety of these products,” they wrote.
For the systematic review, they searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases from inception through January 30, 2023, to identify randomized clinical trials that evaluated oral nutraceutical interventions such as vitamins and minerals, botanical extracts, prebiotics, and probiotics in individuals with acne. They extracted clinician-reported outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse events from the included studies, and used the Cochrane Risk of Bias checklist tool to assess the quality of evidence in randomized clinical trials. Based on this tool, they used Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality standards to categorize the articles as good, fair, or poor quality.
The search yielded 42 unique studies with 3,346 participants. Of these 42 studies, 27 were considered poor quality, 11 were considered fair quality, and 4 were considered good quality. The good-quality studies separately evaluated four interventions: vitamin D, green tea extract, probiotics, and cheongsangbangpoong-tang, an herbal formula approved for use in acne by the Korea Food and Drug Administration.
The 11 fair-quality studies suggested potential effectiveness for pantothenic acid (vitamin B5), the fatty acids omega-3 (eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] and/or docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]) and omega-6 (gamma-linoleic acid), and probiotics.
Zinc was the most studied nutraceutical identified in the review, but “there was substantial heterogeneity in the results, with only slightly greater than one-half of studies finding zinc to be efficacious,” the authors noted. “Studies using higher doses more often found zinc to be efficacious,” they said, adding that zinc “had the highest rate of adverse effect reporting of any nutraceuticals assessed in this review.”
Dr. Barbieri and colleagues acknowledged limitations of their analysis, including the fact that few of the nutraceuticals considered to have good or fair evidence for their use were evaluated in more than one study. “In addition, some studies had inconsistent results depending on the outcome measure assessed,” they wrote. “For instance, although green tea extract led to statistically significant improvements in lesion counts, it did not result in statistically significant improvements in quality of life, suggesting the observed lesion count differences may not be clinically meaningful to patients.”
And while probiotics had the most studies supporting their efficacy, they were generally of very small sample size.
Asked to comment on the study, Jonette Keri, MD, PhD, a dermatologist who directs the Acne and Rosacea Treatment Center at the University of Miami, who was not involved with the study, said that while the review was exhaustive, more research is needed to better determine the efficacy and side effects of the products studied. “The real strength of this wonderful review is now we have all of this information in one place, and this will serve as a great patient care resource,” she told this news organization.
Dr. Barbieri reported personal fees from Dexcel Pharma for consulting outside the submitted work. Dr. Keri disclosed that she is a consultant for L’Oréal.
FROM JAMA DERMATOLOGY
Adolescents with atopic dermatitis more likely to have experienced bullying, study finds
TOPLINE:
METHODOLOGY:
- Adolescents with AD have reported appearance-based bullying.
- To evaluate the association between AD and the prevalence and frequency of bullying, researchers analyzed cross-sectional data from adult caregivers of U.S. adolescents aged 12-17 years who participated in the 2021 National Health Interview Survey.
- Logistic regression and ordinal logistic regression were used to compare the prevalence of experiencing one or more bullying encounters during the previous 12 months and the frequency of bullying between adolescents with and those without AD.
TAKEAWAY:
- A total of 3,207 adolescents were included in the analysis. The mean age of the participants was 14.5 years, and 11.9% currently had AD. The prevalence of experiencing bullying was significantly higher among adolescents with AD, compared with those without AD (33.2% vs. 19%; P < .001), as was the prevalence of cyberbullying (9.1% vs. 5.8%; P = .04).
- Following adjustment for demographics and atopic comorbidities, adolescents with AD were at increased odds of bullying, compared with their peers without AD (adjusted odds ratio, 1.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-2.73).
- Following adjustment for demographics, adolescents with AD were also at increased odds of cyberbullying, compared with their peers without AD (AOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.04-2.62), but no association was observed following adjustment for atopic comorbidities (AOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.82-1.96).
- Following ordinal logistic regression that was adjusted for demographics and atopic comorbidities, adolescents with AD were at greater odds of being bullied at a higher frequency, compared with their peers without AD (AOR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.44-2.68).
IN PRACTICE:
“Larger, future studies using clinical AD diagnoses and adolescent self-report can advance understanding of bullying and AD,” the researchers wrote. “Clinicians, families, and schools should address and monitor bullying among adolescents.”
SOURCE:
Howa Yeung, MD, of the department of dermatology at Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, led the research. The study was published online in JAMA Dermatology.
LIMITATIONS:
Limitations include the study’s cross-sectional design. In addition, the investigators could not directly attribute bullying to skin-specific findings, and it was a caregiver report.
DISCLOSURES:
The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. One of the authors, Joy Wan, MD, received grants from Pfizer and personal fees from Janssen and Sun Pharmaceuticals outside of the submitted work.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
METHODOLOGY:
- Adolescents with AD have reported appearance-based bullying.
- To evaluate the association between AD and the prevalence and frequency of bullying, researchers analyzed cross-sectional data from adult caregivers of U.S. adolescents aged 12-17 years who participated in the 2021 National Health Interview Survey.
- Logistic regression and ordinal logistic regression were used to compare the prevalence of experiencing one or more bullying encounters during the previous 12 months and the frequency of bullying between adolescents with and those without AD.
TAKEAWAY:
- A total of 3,207 adolescents were included in the analysis. The mean age of the participants was 14.5 years, and 11.9% currently had AD. The prevalence of experiencing bullying was significantly higher among adolescents with AD, compared with those without AD (33.2% vs. 19%; P < .001), as was the prevalence of cyberbullying (9.1% vs. 5.8%; P = .04).
- Following adjustment for demographics and atopic comorbidities, adolescents with AD were at increased odds of bullying, compared with their peers without AD (adjusted odds ratio, 1.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-2.73).
- Following adjustment for demographics, adolescents with AD were also at increased odds of cyberbullying, compared with their peers without AD (AOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.04-2.62), but no association was observed following adjustment for atopic comorbidities (AOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.82-1.96).
- Following ordinal logistic regression that was adjusted for demographics and atopic comorbidities, adolescents with AD were at greater odds of being bullied at a higher frequency, compared with their peers without AD (AOR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.44-2.68).
IN PRACTICE:
“Larger, future studies using clinical AD diagnoses and adolescent self-report can advance understanding of bullying and AD,” the researchers wrote. “Clinicians, families, and schools should address and monitor bullying among adolescents.”
SOURCE:
Howa Yeung, MD, of the department of dermatology at Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, led the research. The study was published online in JAMA Dermatology.
LIMITATIONS:
Limitations include the study’s cross-sectional design. In addition, the investigators could not directly attribute bullying to skin-specific findings, and it was a caregiver report.
DISCLOSURES:
The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. One of the authors, Joy Wan, MD, received grants from Pfizer and personal fees from Janssen and Sun Pharmaceuticals outside of the submitted work.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
METHODOLOGY:
- Adolescents with AD have reported appearance-based bullying.
- To evaluate the association between AD and the prevalence and frequency of bullying, researchers analyzed cross-sectional data from adult caregivers of U.S. adolescents aged 12-17 years who participated in the 2021 National Health Interview Survey.
- Logistic regression and ordinal logistic regression were used to compare the prevalence of experiencing one or more bullying encounters during the previous 12 months and the frequency of bullying between adolescents with and those without AD.
TAKEAWAY:
- A total of 3,207 adolescents were included in the analysis. The mean age of the participants was 14.5 years, and 11.9% currently had AD. The prevalence of experiencing bullying was significantly higher among adolescents with AD, compared with those without AD (33.2% vs. 19%; P < .001), as was the prevalence of cyberbullying (9.1% vs. 5.8%; P = .04).
- Following adjustment for demographics and atopic comorbidities, adolescents with AD were at increased odds of bullying, compared with their peers without AD (adjusted odds ratio, 1.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-2.73).
- Following adjustment for demographics, adolescents with AD were also at increased odds of cyberbullying, compared with their peers without AD (AOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.04-2.62), but no association was observed following adjustment for atopic comorbidities (AOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.82-1.96).
- Following ordinal logistic regression that was adjusted for demographics and atopic comorbidities, adolescents with AD were at greater odds of being bullied at a higher frequency, compared with their peers without AD (AOR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.44-2.68).
IN PRACTICE:
“Larger, future studies using clinical AD diagnoses and adolescent self-report can advance understanding of bullying and AD,” the researchers wrote. “Clinicians, families, and schools should address and monitor bullying among adolescents.”
SOURCE:
Howa Yeung, MD, of the department of dermatology at Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, led the research. The study was published online in JAMA Dermatology.
LIMITATIONS:
Limitations include the study’s cross-sectional design. In addition, the investigators could not directly attribute bullying to skin-specific findings, and it was a caregiver report.
DISCLOSURES:
The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. One of the authors, Joy Wan, MD, received grants from Pfizer and personal fees from Janssen and Sun Pharmaceuticals outside of the submitted work.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Treatment options for vitiligo reviewed
CARLSBAD, CALIF. – According to Delphine J. Lee, MD, PhD, some patients report that their dermatologists tell them there are no effective treatments for vitiligo.
However, this is not supported by the ongoing level of research on vitiligo, with more than 100 randomized controlled trials published over the last 5 years, Dr. Lee, chief of dermatology at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, said at the annual symposium of the California Society of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery. And, in 2022, ruxolitinib cream became the first FDA-approved treatment for vitiligo. “There’s a lot of research happening now, and I’m pleased to say that despite the fact that some of these medications are not all brand new and exciting, they’re still new in that we have new evidence for them,” she said. “Of the 100 randomized, controlled trials, UV therapy remains a strong part of our armamentarium.”
Stabilizing disease
Dr. Lee underscored the importance of stabilizing existing vitiligo and arresting progressive disease, which may be indicated by four key signs: koebnerization; trichrome lesions; inflammation, which can appear as erythema, scaling, and pruritus; and confetti-like macules that are typically 1 mm to 5 mm in size. Key principles of vitiligo treatment are to stop immune destruction and to stimulate melanocyte differentiation, migration, and melanin production, which is “probably why phototherapy is so important and helpful,” she said.
Managing patients’ expectations is also important, added Dr. Lee, who shows patients photos from published clinical trials “so they can see what excellent repigmentation really means.”
Dexamethasone vs. mycophenolate
In a randomized, controlled trial published in 2021, researchers compared dexamethasone oral mini-pulse (OMP), 2.5 mg, on two successive days a week, with oral mycophenolate mofetil, 500 mg b.i.d., up to 2 g every day, for 180 days as a stabilizing treatment for patients with progressive, nonsegmental vitiligo, with 90 days of treatment-free follow-up. Assessments included the vitiligo disease activity (VIDA) score, the number of new lesions in the past 30 days, and the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI). Arrest of disease progression was defined as the absence of any new lesions in the previous 30 days.
Over the treatment and follow-up period, both groups showed a significant trend for reduction in VIDA and in the number of new lesions in the previous 30 days, compared with baseline (P < .001). The difference between VASI at baseline and VASI at 180 and at 270 days was not significant in both groups.
Adverse side effects reported with dexamethasone included acne, weight gain, headache, insomnia, and menstrual irregularity. “The misconception is that because we only give patients a tiny dose of steroids – 2.5 mg two days per week – that they aren’t going to have any side effects,” Dr. Lee commented. “But in fact, they do.” The most common side effects with mycophenolate were nausea and diarrhea. Two patients on mycophenolate discontinued treatment: one for leukopenia and one for transaminitis, but both conditions resolved after treatment was stopped.
The researchers concluded that both dexamethasone OMP and mycophenolate mofetil halt actively spreading vitiligo. “Relapse occurred earlier with mycophenolate, and the relapse rate was higher than with dexamethasone OMP, but this was not statistically significant,” said Dr. Lee, who also leads an immunology research team at The Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center.
Other vitiligo treatment options she discussed included the following:
Betamethasone OMP and oral azathioprine. In a comparative study, researchers compared betamethasone OMP with oral azathioprine in arresting disease progression and inducing repigmentation in adults with vitiligo. Significantly more patients in the betamethasone OMP group achieved arrest of progression at 2 months than those in the azathioprine group, but at 6 months the difference was not significant. At 6 months, of the 19 patients who completed 6 months of betamethasone OMP, 2, 2, and 9 patients had more than 20%, 10%-20%, and 5%-10% repigmentation, respectively; and of the 18 patients who completed 6 months of azathioprine, 2 patients had 10%-20% repigmentation, with the remaining patients having no repigmentation or less than 5% repigmentation.
One patient in the azathioprine group developed acute pancreatitis but none developed transaminitis or leukopenia. “Azathioprine is another agent to add to our toolbox,” Dr. Lee said of the study findings. “Both betamethasone OMP and daily azathioprine are effective” in halting disease progression.
Low-dose cyclosporine. In a comparative study, 50 patients with active vitiligo were randomized into two groups: 25 to dexamethasone OMP 2.5 mg on two consecutive days/week for 4 months, and 25 to cyclosporine 3 mg/kg per day for 4 months, stopped treatment, and were then followed up for another 2 months. After 6 months, 84% of patients in the dexamethasone OMP group and 88% of patients in the cyclosporine group achieved arrest of disease progression (P = 1.00), but the mean time to achieve that endpoint was shorter for those in the cyclosporine group, compared with those in the dexamethasone OMP group (a mean of 3.92 weeks vs. 4.12 weeks, respectively; P = .01).
The list of adverse side effects for cyclosporine was “quite lengthy compared to the usual you would expect for dexamethasone,” said Dr. Lee, who was not involved with the study. “This is something we want to take seriously and discuss with our patients. Still, I would say that low-dose cyclosporine is another possibility to add to our toolbox.”
Phototherapy combined with polypodium leucotomos. Dr. Lee highlighted a randomized, controlled trial in which 21 patients with generalized vitiligo received narrow band (NB)-UVB phototherapy plus polypodium leucotomos extract (480 mg b.i.d.) and 21 patients received NB-UVB phototherapy plus placebo. After 6 months of treatment, patients in the NB-UVB plus oral polypodium leucotomos extract group had a better response rate, compared with those in the NB-UVB plus placebo group (47.8% vs. 22%). “We know from studies of polypodium leucotomos that it seems to have an impact on adaptive immunity as well as helps to decrease oxidative stress, so that may help with melanocyte stability in vitiligo,” said Dr. Lee, who was not affiliated with the study. “As with all treatments, the head and neck is very responsive to this combination treatment. The next most responsive area would be the trunk, followed by the extremities, and hands, and feet.”
Topical treatments
What about topical options for vitiligo? In a randomized, double-blind, comparative study, researchers evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination treatment with 308-nm excimer light and topical calcipotriol or topical clobetasol ointment for acral vitiligo. Combination treatment (excimer light and topical medication) was applied in the first 12 weeks, followed by topical medication alone for 12 weeks. Calcipotriol 0.005% ointment was applied on one hand vs. clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment on the other for 24 weeks.
Of the hands treated with excimer light and calcipotriol, 7.7% achieved excellent repigmentation at the end of the combination treatment period and 23% achieved good to excellent improvement after 12 weeks of calcipotriol monotherapy. More than 85% and 77% of the hands treated with calcipotriol-based and clobetasol-based regimens showed some repigmentation at the end of the study, respectively (P < .05). However, no significant difference was found between the two treatments. “The evaluation from study participants was similar in that they felt that there was clearly a difference from baseline, but there was no difference across the two-hand therapy,” Dr. Lee said.
Adverse side effects included the development of blisters in some of patients who received clobetasol. “The take-home here is that you get excellent repigmentation with calcipotriol, though it’s a small percentage, 7.7%,” Dr. Lee said. “No excellent repigmentation was observed with excimer light and topical clobetasol. These data support two possible topical regimens that could be added to phototherapy or excimer light therapy to improve results.”
In another study of 42 patients, researchers compared twice-daily tacrolimus 0.1% ointment with vehicle for facial vitiligo through 24 weeks of intervention and 24 weeks of follow-up. The researchers defined treatment success as a change of 75% or greater in repigmentation of the target lesion between baseline and week 24, as measured by computer imaging software.
They found that 65% of tacrolimus-treated patients achieved therapeutic success, compared with none of the vehicle-treated patients at week 24 (P < .0001). “Tacrolimus is thought to be an old drug, but it does deserve to have continued proper study based on much anecdotal evidence I hear,” Dr. Lee said. “There was also efficacy over vehicle during the 24 weeks of follow-up. I find that tacrolimus works very well on the face. I’ve had very good results in children.”
Another topical option is the cream formulation of the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib (Opzelura), approved in 2022 for the treatment of nonsegmental vitiligo in patients ages 12 and older, the first FDA-approved treatment for vitiligo. “As with the tacrolimus study, there are patients who achieve 100% repigmentation [with ruxolitinib], but others who may not,” Dr. Lee said. In addition, she noted that the combination of JAK inhibitors with phototherapy is emerging as another possible treatment choice, referring to a recently published systematic review suggesting that concurrent UVB phototherapy appears to improve efficacy of JAK inhibitors for vitiligo.
Dr. Lee reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
CARLSBAD, CALIF. – According to Delphine J. Lee, MD, PhD, some patients report that their dermatologists tell them there are no effective treatments for vitiligo.
However, this is not supported by the ongoing level of research on vitiligo, with more than 100 randomized controlled trials published over the last 5 years, Dr. Lee, chief of dermatology at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, said at the annual symposium of the California Society of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery. And, in 2022, ruxolitinib cream became the first FDA-approved treatment for vitiligo. “There’s a lot of research happening now, and I’m pleased to say that despite the fact that some of these medications are not all brand new and exciting, they’re still new in that we have new evidence for them,” she said. “Of the 100 randomized, controlled trials, UV therapy remains a strong part of our armamentarium.”
Stabilizing disease
Dr. Lee underscored the importance of stabilizing existing vitiligo and arresting progressive disease, which may be indicated by four key signs: koebnerization; trichrome lesions; inflammation, which can appear as erythema, scaling, and pruritus; and confetti-like macules that are typically 1 mm to 5 mm in size. Key principles of vitiligo treatment are to stop immune destruction and to stimulate melanocyte differentiation, migration, and melanin production, which is “probably why phototherapy is so important and helpful,” she said.
Managing patients’ expectations is also important, added Dr. Lee, who shows patients photos from published clinical trials “so they can see what excellent repigmentation really means.”
Dexamethasone vs. mycophenolate
In a randomized, controlled trial published in 2021, researchers compared dexamethasone oral mini-pulse (OMP), 2.5 mg, on two successive days a week, with oral mycophenolate mofetil, 500 mg b.i.d., up to 2 g every day, for 180 days as a stabilizing treatment for patients with progressive, nonsegmental vitiligo, with 90 days of treatment-free follow-up. Assessments included the vitiligo disease activity (VIDA) score, the number of new lesions in the past 30 days, and the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI). Arrest of disease progression was defined as the absence of any new lesions in the previous 30 days.
Over the treatment and follow-up period, both groups showed a significant trend for reduction in VIDA and in the number of new lesions in the previous 30 days, compared with baseline (P < .001). The difference between VASI at baseline and VASI at 180 and at 270 days was not significant in both groups.
Adverse side effects reported with dexamethasone included acne, weight gain, headache, insomnia, and menstrual irregularity. “The misconception is that because we only give patients a tiny dose of steroids – 2.5 mg two days per week – that they aren’t going to have any side effects,” Dr. Lee commented. “But in fact, they do.” The most common side effects with mycophenolate were nausea and diarrhea. Two patients on mycophenolate discontinued treatment: one for leukopenia and one for transaminitis, but both conditions resolved after treatment was stopped.
The researchers concluded that both dexamethasone OMP and mycophenolate mofetil halt actively spreading vitiligo. “Relapse occurred earlier with mycophenolate, and the relapse rate was higher than with dexamethasone OMP, but this was not statistically significant,” said Dr. Lee, who also leads an immunology research team at The Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center.
Other vitiligo treatment options she discussed included the following:
Betamethasone OMP and oral azathioprine. In a comparative study, researchers compared betamethasone OMP with oral azathioprine in arresting disease progression and inducing repigmentation in adults with vitiligo. Significantly more patients in the betamethasone OMP group achieved arrest of progression at 2 months than those in the azathioprine group, but at 6 months the difference was not significant. At 6 months, of the 19 patients who completed 6 months of betamethasone OMP, 2, 2, and 9 patients had more than 20%, 10%-20%, and 5%-10% repigmentation, respectively; and of the 18 patients who completed 6 months of azathioprine, 2 patients had 10%-20% repigmentation, with the remaining patients having no repigmentation or less than 5% repigmentation.
One patient in the azathioprine group developed acute pancreatitis but none developed transaminitis or leukopenia. “Azathioprine is another agent to add to our toolbox,” Dr. Lee said of the study findings. “Both betamethasone OMP and daily azathioprine are effective” in halting disease progression.
Low-dose cyclosporine. In a comparative study, 50 patients with active vitiligo were randomized into two groups: 25 to dexamethasone OMP 2.5 mg on two consecutive days/week for 4 months, and 25 to cyclosporine 3 mg/kg per day for 4 months, stopped treatment, and were then followed up for another 2 months. After 6 months, 84% of patients in the dexamethasone OMP group and 88% of patients in the cyclosporine group achieved arrest of disease progression (P = 1.00), but the mean time to achieve that endpoint was shorter for those in the cyclosporine group, compared with those in the dexamethasone OMP group (a mean of 3.92 weeks vs. 4.12 weeks, respectively; P = .01).
The list of adverse side effects for cyclosporine was “quite lengthy compared to the usual you would expect for dexamethasone,” said Dr. Lee, who was not involved with the study. “This is something we want to take seriously and discuss with our patients. Still, I would say that low-dose cyclosporine is another possibility to add to our toolbox.”
Phototherapy combined with polypodium leucotomos. Dr. Lee highlighted a randomized, controlled trial in which 21 patients with generalized vitiligo received narrow band (NB)-UVB phototherapy plus polypodium leucotomos extract (480 mg b.i.d.) and 21 patients received NB-UVB phototherapy plus placebo. After 6 months of treatment, patients in the NB-UVB plus oral polypodium leucotomos extract group had a better response rate, compared with those in the NB-UVB plus placebo group (47.8% vs. 22%). “We know from studies of polypodium leucotomos that it seems to have an impact on adaptive immunity as well as helps to decrease oxidative stress, so that may help with melanocyte stability in vitiligo,” said Dr. Lee, who was not affiliated with the study. “As with all treatments, the head and neck is very responsive to this combination treatment. The next most responsive area would be the trunk, followed by the extremities, and hands, and feet.”
Topical treatments
What about topical options for vitiligo? In a randomized, double-blind, comparative study, researchers evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination treatment with 308-nm excimer light and topical calcipotriol or topical clobetasol ointment for acral vitiligo. Combination treatment (excimer light and topical medication) was applied in the first 12 weeks, followed by topical medication alone for 12 weeks. Calcipotriol 0.005% ointment was applied on one hand vs. clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment on the other for 24 weeks.
Of the hands treated with excimer light and calcipotriol, 7.7% achieved excellent repigmentation at the end of the combination treatment period and 23% achieved good to excellent improvement after 12 weeks of calcipotriol monotherapy. More than 85% and 77% of the hands treated with calcipotriol-based and clobetasol-based regimens showed some repigmentation at the end of the study, respectively (P < .05). However, no significant difference was found between the two treatments. “The evaluation from study participants was similar in that they felt that there was clearly a difference from baseline, but there was no difference across the two-hand therapy,” Dr. Lee said.
Adverse side effects included the development of blisters in some of patients who received clobetasol. “The take-home here is that you get excellent repigmentation with calcipotriol, though it’s a small percentage, 7.7%,” Dr. Lee said. “No excellent repigmentation was observed with excimer light and topical clobetasol. These data support two possible topical regimens that could be added to phototherapy or excimer light therapy to improve results.”
In another study of 42 patients, researchers compared twice-daily tacrolimus 0.1% ointment with vehicle for facial vitiligo through 24 weeks of intervention and 24 weeks of follow-up. The researchers defined treatment success as a change of 75% or greater in repigmentation of the target lesion between baseline and week 24, as measured by computer imaging software.
They found that 65% of tacrolimus-treated patients achieved therapeutic success, compared with none of the vehicle-treated patients at week 24 (P < .0001). “Tacrolimus is thought to be an old drug, but it does deserve to have continued proper study based on much anecdotal evidence I hear,” Dr. Lee said. “There was also efficacy over vehicle during the 24 weeks of follow-up. I find that tacrolimus works very well on the face. I’ve had very good results in children.”
Another topical option is the cream formulation of the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib (Opzelura), approved in 2022 for the treatment of nonsegmental vitiligo in patients ages 12 and older, the first FDA-approved treatment for vitiligo. “As with the tacrolimus study, there are patients who achieve 100% repigmentation [with ruxolitinib], but others who may not,” Dr. Lee said. In addition, she noted that the combination of JAK inhibitors with phototherapy is emerging as another possible treatment choice, referring to a recently published systematic review suggesting that concurrent UVB phototherapy appears to improve efficacy of JAK inhibitors for vitiligo.
Dr. Lee reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
CARLSBAD, CALIF. – According to Delphine J. Lee, MD, PhD, some patients report that their dermatologists tell them there are no effective treatments for vitiligo.
However, this is not supported by the ongoing level of research on vitiligo, with more than 100 randomized controlled trials published over the last 5 years, Dr. Lee, chief of dermatology at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, said at the annual symposium of the California Society of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery. And, in 2022, ruxolitinib cream became the first FDA-approved treatment for vitiligo. “There’s a lot of research happening now, and I’m pleased to say that despite the fact that some of these medications are not all brand new and exciting, they’re still new in that we have new evidence for them,” she said. “Of the 100 randomized, controlled trials, UV therapy remains a strong part of our armamentarium.”
Stabilizing disease
Dr. Lee underscored the importance of stabilizing existing vitiligo and arresting progressive disease, which may be indicated by four key signs: koebnerization; trichrome lesions; inflammation, which can appear as erythema, scaling, and pruritus; and confetti-like macules that are typically 1 mm to 5 mm in size. Key principles of vitiligo treatment are to stop immune destruction and to stimulate melanocyte differentiation, migration, and melanin production, which is “probably why phototherapy is so important and helpful,” she said.
Managing patients’ expectations is also important, added Dr. Lee, who shows patients photos from published clinical trials “so they can see what excellent repigmentation really means.”
Dexamethasone vs. mycophenolate
In a randomized, controlled trial published in 2021, researchers compared dexamethasone oral mini-pulse (OMP), 2.5 mg, on two successive days a week, with oral mycophenolate mofetil, 500 mg b.i.d., up to 2 g every day, for 180 days as a stabilizing treatment for patients with progressive, nonsegmental vitiligo, with 90 days of treatment-free follow-up. Assessments included the vitiligo disease activity (VIDA) score, the number of new lesions in the past 30 days, and the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI). Arrest of disease progression was defined as the absence of any new lesions in the previous 30 days.
Over the treatment and follow-up period, both groups showed a significant trend for reduction in VIDA and in the number of new lesions in the previous 30 days, compared with baseline (P < .001). The difference between VASI at baseline and VASI at 180 and at 270 days was not significant in both groups.
Adverse side effects reported with dexamethasone included acne, weight gain, headache, insomnia, and menstrual irregularity. “The misconception is that because we only give patients a tiny dose of steroids – 2.5 mg two days per week – that they aren’t going to have any side effects,” Dr. Lee commented. “But in fact, they do.” The most common side effects with mycophenolate were nausea and diarrhea. Two patients on mycophenolate discontinued treatment: one for leukopenia and one for transaminitis, but both conditions resolved after treatment was stopped.
The researchers concluded that both dexamethasone OMP and mycophenolate mofetil halt actively spreading vitiligo. “Relapse occurred earlier with mycophenolate, and the relapse rate was higher than with dexamethasone OMP, but this was not statistically significant,” said Dr. Lee, who also leads an immunology research team at The Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center.
Other vitiligo treatment options she discussed included the following:
Betamethasone OMP and oral azathioprine. In a comparative study, researchers compared betamethasone OMP with oral azathioprine in arresting disease progression and inducing repigmentation in adults with vitiligo. Significantly more patients in the betamethasone OMP group achieved arrest of progression at 2 months than those in the azathioprine group, but at 6 months the difference was not significant. At 6 months, of the 19 patients who completed 6 months of betamethasone OMP, 2, 2, and 9 patients had more than 20%, 10%-20%, and 5%-10% repigmentation, respectively; and of the 18 patients who completed 6 months of azathioprine, 2 patients had 10%-20% repigmentation, with the remaining patients having no repigmentation or less than 5% repigmentation.
One patient in the azathioprine group developed acute pancreatitis but none developed transaminitis or leukopenia. “Azathioprine is another agent to add to our toolbox,” Dr. Lee said of the study findings. “Both betamethasone OMP and daily azathioprine are effective” in halting disease progression.
Low-dose cyclosporine. In a comparative study, 50 patients with active vitiligo were randomized into two groups: 25 to dexamethasone OMP 2.5 mg on two consecutive days/week for 4 months, and 25 to cyclosporine 3 mg/kg per day for 4 months, stopped treatment, and were then followed up for another 2 months. After 6 months, 84% of patients in the dexamethasone OMP group and 88% of patients in the cyclosporine group achieved arrest of disease progression (P = 1.00), but the mean time to achieve that endpoint was shorter for those in the cyclosporine group, compared with those in the dexamethasone OMP group (a mean of 3.92 weeks vs. 4.12 weeks, respectively; P = .01).
The list of adverse side effects for cyclosporine was “quite lengthy compared to the usual you would expect for dexamethasone,” said Dr. Lee, who was not involved with the study. “This is something we want to take seriously and discuss with our patients. Still, I would say that low-dose cyclosporine is another possibility to add to our toolbox.”
Phototherapy combined with polypodium leucotomos. Dr. Lee highlighted a randomized, controlled trial in which 21 patients with generalized vitiligo received narrow band (NB)-UVB phototherapy plus polypodium leucotomos extract (480 mg b.i.d.) and 21 patients received NB-UVB phototherapy plus placebo. After 6 months of treatment, patients in the NB-UVB plus oral polypodium leucotomos extract group had a better response rate, compared with those in the NB-UVB plus placebo group (47.8% vs. 22%). “We know from studies of polypodium leucotomos that it seems to have an impact on adaptive immunity as well as helps to decrease oxidative stress, so that may help with melanocyte stability in vitiligo,” said Dr. Lee, who was not affiliated with the study. “As with all treatments, the head and neck is very responsive to this combination treatment. The next most responsive area would be the trunk, followed by the extremities, and hands, and feet.”
Topical treatments
What about topical options for vitiligo? In a randomized, double-blind, comparative study, researchers evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination treatment with 308-nm excimer light and topical calcipotriol or topical clobetasol ointment for acral vitiligo. Combination treatment (excimer light and topical medication) was applied in the first 12 weeks, followed by topical medication alone for 12 weeks. Calcipotriol 0.005% ointment was applied on one hand vs. clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment on the other for 24 weeks.
Of the hands treated with excimer light and calcipotriol, 7.7% achieved excellent repigmentation at the end of the combination treatment period and 23% achieved good to excellent improvement after 12 weeks of calcipotriol monotherapy. More than 85% and 77% of the hands treated with calcipotriol-based and clobetasol-based regimens showed some repigmentation at the end of the study, respectively (P < .05). However, no significant difference was found between the two treatments. “The evaluation from study participants was similar in that they felt that there was clearly a difference from baseline, but there was no difference across the two-hand therapy,” Dr. Lee said.
Adverse side effects included the development of blisters in some of patients who received clobetasol. “The take-home here is that you get excellent repigmentation with calcipotriol, though it’s a small percentage, 7.7%,” Dr. Lee said. “No excellent repigmentation was observed with excimer light and topical clobetasol. These data support two possible topical regimens that could be added to phototherapy or excimer light therapy to improve results.”
In another study of 42 patients, researchers compared twice-daily tacrolimus 0.1% ointment with vehicle for facial vitiligo through 24 weeks of intervention and 24 weeks of follow-up. The researchers defined treatment success as a change of 75% or greater in repigmentation of the target lesion between baseline and week 24, as measured by computer imaging software.
They found that 65% of tacrolimus-treated patients achieved therapeutic success, compared with none of the vehicle-treated patients at week 24 (P < .0001). “Tacrolimus is thought to be an old drug, but it does deserve to have continued proper study based on much anecdotal evidence I hear,” Dr. Lee said. “There was also efficacy over vehicle during the 24 weeks of follow-up. I find that tacrolimus works very well on the face. I’ve had very good results in children.”
Another topical option is the cream formulation of the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib (Opzelura), approved in 2022 for the treatment of nonsegmental vitiligo in patients ages 12 and older, the first FDA-approved treatment for vitiligo. “As with the tacrolimus study, there are patients who achieve 100% repigmentation [with ruxolitinib], but others who may not,” Dr. Lee said. In addition, she noted that the combination of JAK inhibitors with phototherapy is emerging as another possible treatment choice, referring to a recently published systematic review suggesting that concurrent UVB phototherapy appears to improve efficacy of JAK inhibitors for vitiligo.
Dr. Lee reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
AT CALDERM 2023
Once-weekly topical therapy shows promise for moderate to severe acne
TOPLINE:
METHODOLOGY:
- Poor patient compliance with topical acne therapies is a common clinical challenge.
- In a 12-week, randomized, controlled, phase 2b trial of 181 patients 12 years of age and older, researchers investigated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of DMT310, a powdered mixture of Spongilla lacustris for treating moderate to severe acne. (In vitro studies have found that components of S. lacustris, a freshwater sponge, have effects that include antimicrobial activity against Cutibacterium acnes and anti-inflammatory activity in human keratinocytes).
- The study’s primary efficacy endpoint was the absolute change in inflammatory lesion count from baseline to week 12.
- Endpoint success was defined as an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 and at least a two-grade improvement from baseline at week 12.
TAKEAWAY:
- Of the 181 patients, 91 received DMT310 (applied once a week to the face and washed off after 10-15 minutes), and 90 received placebo.
- Patients in the DMT310 arm showed a significantly greater mean reduction in the number of inflammatory lesions at week 12, compared with those in the placebo arm (–15.64 vs. –10.84, respectively; P < .001).
- Similarly, patients in the DMT310 arm showed a significantly greater mean reduction in the number of noninflammatory lesions at week 12, compared with those in the placebo arm (–18.26 vs. –12.41, respectively; P < .001).
- At week 12, endpoint success based on IGA scores also significantly favored patients in the DMT310 arm, compared with those in the placebo arm (44.40% vs. 17.78%; P < .001).
IN PRACTICE:
This study is too preliminary to have practice application. The researchers concluded that the findings “support further study of DMT310 in larger, confirmatory phase 3 trials.”
SOURCE:
Lawrence F. Eichenfield, MD, professor of dermatology and pediatrics at the University of California, San Diego, led the research. The study was published online June 7 in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
LIMITATIONS:
The analysis did not include an active comparator group and it enrolled a limited number of Asian patients.
DISCLOSURES:
Dr. Eichenfield disclosed that he is a consultant to Dermata, which is developing DMT310, as were three other authors of the study. One author is a company employee. The remaining authors disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
METHODOLOGY:
- Poor patient compliance with topical acne therapies is a common clinical challenge.
- In a 12-week, randomized, controlled, phase 2b trial of 181 patients 12 years of age and older, researchers investigated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of DMT310, a powdered mixture of Spongilla lacustris for treating moderate to severe acne. (In vitro studies have found that components of S. lacustris, a freshwater sponge, have effects that include antimicrobial activity against Cutibacterium acnes and anti-inflammatory activity in human keratinocytes).
- The study’s primary efficacy endpoint was the absolute change in inflammatory lesion count from baseline to week 12.
- Endpoint success was defined as an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 and at least a two-grade improvement from baseline at week 12.
TAKEAWAY:
- Of the 181 patients, 91 received DMT310 (applied once a week to the face and washed off after 10-15 minutes), and 90 received placebo.
- Patients in the DMT310 arm showed a significantly greater mean reduction in the number of inflammatory lesions at week 12, compared with those in the placebo arm (–15.64 vs. –10.84, respectively; P < .001).
- Similarly, patients in the DMT310 arm showed a significantly greater mean reduction in the number of noninflammatory lesions at week 12, compared with those in the placebo arm (–18.26 vs. –12.41, respectively; P < .001).
- At week 12, endpoint success based on IGA scores also significantly favored patients in the DMT310 arm, compared with those in the placebo arm (44.40% vs. 17.78%; P < .001).
IN PRACTICE:
This study is too preliminary to have practice application. The researchers concluded that the findings “support further study of DMT310 in larger, confirmatory phase 3 trials.”
SOURCE:
Lawrence F. Eichenfield, MD, professor of dermatology and pediatrics at the University of California, San Diego, led the research. The study was published online June 7 in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
LIMITATIONS:
The analysis did not include an active comparator group and it enrolled a limited number of Asian patients.
DISCLOSURES:
Dr. Eichenfield disclosed that he is a consultant to Dermata, which is developing DMT310, as were three other authors of the study. One author is a company employee. The remaining authors disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
METHODOLOGY:
- Poor patient compliance with topical acne therapies is a common clinical challenge.
- In a 12-week, randomized, controlled, phase 2b trial of 181 patients 12 years of age and older, researchers investigated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of DMT310, a powdered mixture of Spongilla lacustris for treating moderate to severe acne. (In vitro studies have found that components of S. lacustris, a freshwater sponge, have effects that include antimicrobial activity against Cutibacterium acnes and anti-inflammatory activity in human keratinocytes).
- The study’s primary efficacy endpoint was the absolute change in inflammatory lesion count from baseline to week 12.
- Endpoint success was defined as an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 and at least a two-grade improvement from baseline at week 12.
TAKEAWAY:
- Of the 181 patients, 91 received DMT310 (applied once a week to the face and washed off after 10-15 minutes), and 90 received placebo.
- Patients in the DMT310 arm showed a significantly greater mean reduction in the number of inflammatory lesions at week 12, compared with those in the placebo arm (–15.64 vs. –10.84, respectively; P < .001).
- Similarly, patients in the DMT310 arm showed a significantly greater mean reduction in the number of noninflammatory lesions at week 12, compared with those in the placebo arm (–18.26 vs. –12.41, respectively; P < .001).
- At week 12, endpoint success based on IGA scores also significantly favored patients in the DMT310 arm, compared with those in the placebo arm (44.40% vs. 17.78%; P < .001).
IN PRACTICE:
This study is too preliminary to have practice application. The researchers concluded that the findings “support further study of DMT310 in larger, confirmatory phase 3 trials.”
SOURCE:
Lawrence F. Eichenfield, MD, professor of dermatology and pediatrics at the University of California, San Diego, led the research. The study was published online June 7 in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
LIMITATIONS:
The analysis did not include an active comparator group and it enrolled a limited number of Asian patients.
DISCLOSURES:
Dr. Eichenfield disclosed that he is a consultant to Dermata, which is developing DMT310, as were three other authors of the study. One author is a company employee. The remaining authors disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
3-D stereophotogrammetry helps detect progression of craniofacial morphea
TOPLINE:
over time.
METHODOLOGY:
- Existing tools that detect disease progression in patients with CM are limited.
- In a prospective cohort study, researchers evaluated the use of 3-D stereophotogrammetry, a noninvasive, radiation-free imaging modality, to detect disease progression in 27 consecutive patients with CM seen at Boston Children’s Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital from April 1, 2019, to March 1, 2023.
- After clinical and 3-D stereophotogrammetry assessments were performed at 2- to 12-month intervals, the 3-D images were rated by an expert (a board-certified plastic craniofacial surgeon) and a nonexpert (a board-certified dermatologist) as demonstrating progression or no progression.
- Kappa coefficients were used to calculate inter-rater reliability.
TAKEAWAY:
- Most of the study participants (73%) were female, their median age was 14 years (range, 5-40 years), and each underwent 3-D stereophotogrammetry imaging at least two times spaced a median of 3 months apart.
- On the basis of clinical assessments during the 48-month study period, 10 patients (37%) experienced progression of their disease.
- 3-D stereophotogrammetry not only corroborated clinical impressions of disease progression with strong inter-rater reliability (kappa = 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.99), but it also detected occult progression of asymmetry not noted on clinical examination in three additional patients.
- In subgroup analyses, assessment of 3-D images demonstrated substantial to near-perfect inter-rater reliability in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI.
IN PRACTICE:
“Further work is necessary to validate this measure in a larger cohort and to guide its incorporation into medical decision-making for patients with CM,” the researchers wrote.
SOURCE:
Katharina S. Shaw, MD, of the department of dermatology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, led the research. The study was published online in JAMA Dermatology.
LIMITATIONS:
The sample was small, and a criterion standard for assessing CM was lacking.
DISCLOSURES:
The researchers reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
over time.
METHODOLOGY:
- Existing tools that detect disease progression in patients with CM are limited.
- In a prospective cohort study, researchers evaluated the use of 3-D stereophotogrammetry, a noninvasive, radiation-free imaging modality, to detect disease progression in 27 consecutive patients with CM seen at Boston Children’s Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital from April 1, 2019, to March 1, 2023.
- After clinical and 3-D stereophotogrammetry assessments were performed at 2- to 12-month intervals, the 3-D images were rated by an expert (a board-certified plastic craniofacial surgeon) and a nonexpert (a board-certified dermatologist) as demonstrating progression or no progression.
- Kappa coefficients were used to calculate inter-rater reliability.
TAKEAWAY:
- Most of the study participants (73%) were female, their median age was 14 years (range, 5-40 years), and each underwent 3-D stereophotogrammetry imaging at least two times spaced a median of 3 months apart.
- On the basis of clinical assessments during the 48-month study period, 10 patients (37%) experienced progression of their disease.
- 3-D stereophotogrammetry not only corroborated clinical impressions of disease progression with strong inter-rater reliability (kappa = 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.99), but it also detected occult progression of asymmetry not noted on clinical examination in three additional patients.
- In subgroup analyses, assessment of 3-D images demonstrated substantial to near-perfect inter-rater reliability in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI.
IN PRACTICE:
“Further work is necessary to validate this measure in a larger cohort and to guide its incorporation into medical decision-making for patients with CM,” the researchers wrote.
SOURCE:
Katharina S. Shaw, MD, of the department of dermatology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, led the research. The study was published online in JAMA Dermatology.
LIMITATIONS:
The sample was small, and a criterion standard for assessing CM was lacking.
DISCLOSURES:
The researchers reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
over time.
METHODOLOGY:
- Existing tools that detect disease progression in patients with CM are limited.
- In a prospective cohort study, researchers evaluated the use of 3-D stereophotogrammetry, a noninvasive, radiation-free imaging modality, to detect disease progression in 27 consecutive patients with CM seen at Boston Children’s Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital from April 1, 2019, to March 1, 2023.
- After clinical and 3-D stereophotogrammetry assessments were performed at 2- to 12-month intervals, the 3-D images were rated by an expert (a board-certified plastic craniofacial surgeon) and a nonexpert (a board-certified dermatologist) as demonstrating progression or no progression.
- Kappa coefficients were used to calculate inter-rater reliability.
TAKEAWAY:
- Most of the study participants (73%) were female, their median age was 14 years (range, 5-40 years), and each underwent 3-D stereophotogrammetry imaging at least two times spaced a median of 3 months apart.
- On the basis of clinical assessments during the 48-month study period, 10 patients (37%) experienced progression of their disease.
- 3-D stereophotogrammetry not only corroborated clinical impressions of disease progression with strong inter-rater reliability (kappa = 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.99), but it also detected occult progression of asymmetry not noted on clinical examination in three additional patients.
- In subgroup analyses, assessment of 3-D images demonstrated substantial to near-perfect inter-rater reliability in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI.
IN PRACTICE:
“Further work is necessary to validate this measure in a larger cohort and to guide its incorporation into medical decision-making for patients with CM,” the researchers wrote.
SOURCE:
Katharina S. Shaw, MD, of the department of dermatology at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, led the research. The study was published online in JAMA Dermatology.
LIMITATIONS:
The sample was small, and a criterion standard for assessing CM was lacking.
DISCLOSURES:
The researchers reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Analysis spotlights economic burden of vitiligo in the U.S.
TOPLINE:
METHODOLOGY:
- No published studies have quantified the medical costs and health care resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with vitiligo in the United States, compared with the general population.
- Drawing from the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database, researchers reviewed the records of 49,512 patients diagnosed with vitiligo between Jan. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2020, and those of 99,024 matched control persons who did not have vitiligo.
- Costs were in 2021 dollars during a 1-year postindex period. The student t test and chi square analysis were used to determine P values.
TAKEAWAY:
- In both cohorts, the median age of patients was 43 years, 79.2% were female, and most (39%) were from the southern region of the United States.
- All-cause total health care costs for patients with vitiligo were significantly higher than those of matched controls ($15,551 vs. $7,735; P < .0001).
- Similarly, medical costs for patients with vitiligo were significantly higher than those of control persons ($11,953 vs. $5,722), as were pharmacy costs ($3,598 vs. $2,014; P < .001 for both associations).
- A significantly greater proportion of patients with vitiligo had higher all-cause HCRU, compared with matched control persons. That included at least one ED visit (17.5% vs 13.4%), at least one inpatient visit (12.9% vs 6.8%), and at least one outpatient visit (99.8% vs. 88.3%; P < .0001 for all associations).
IN PRACTICE:
“These findings reveal an unmet need for cost-effective treatments and highlight the importance of fully identifying the drivers of economic burden for patients with vitiligo,” the authors concluded.
SOURCE:
Khaled Ezzedine, MD, PhD, of the department of dermatology at the Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France, led the study, which was published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.
LIMITATIONS:
The investigators did not evaluate indirect medical costs of vitiligo, such as work productivity, early retirement, and lost opportunities. Also, the results may not be generalizable to populations outside of the United States.
DISCLOSURES:
Dr. Ezzedine has received honoraria as a consultant for AbbVie, Incyte, La Roche–Posay, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Viela Bio. One author is an investigator for Incyte and is a consultant for several pharmaceutical companies. Three authors are AbbVie employees.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
METHODOLOGY:
- No published studies have quantified the medical costs and health care resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with vitiligo in the United States, compared with the general population.
- Drawing from the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database, researchers reviewed the records of 49,512 patients diagnosed with vitiligo between Jan. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2020, and those of 99,024 matched control persons who did not have vitiligo.
- Costs were in 2021 dollars during a 1-year postindex period. The student t test and chi square analysis were used to determine P values.
TAKEAWAY:
- In both cohorts, the median age of patients was 43 years, 79.2% were female, and most (39%) were from the southern region of the United States.
- All-cause total health care costs for patients with vitiligo were significantly higher than those of matched controls ($15,551 vs. $7,735; P < .0001).
- Similarly, medical costs for patients with vitiligo were significantly higher than those of control persons ($11,953 vs. $5,722), as were pharmacy costs ($3,598 vs. $2,014; P < .001 for both associations).
- A significantly greater proportion of patients with vitiligo had higher all-cause HCRU, compared with matched control persons. That included at least one ED visit (17.5% vs 13.4%), at least one inpatient visit (12.9% vs 6.8%), and at least one outpatient visit (99.8% vs. 88.3%; P < .0001 for all associations).
IN PRACTICE:
“These findings reveal an unmet need for cost-effective treatments and highlight the importance of fully identifying the drivers of economic burden for patients with vitiligo,” the authors concluded.
SOURCE:
Khaled Ezzedine, MD, PhD, of the department of dermatology at the Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France, led the study, which was published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.
LIMITATIONS:
The investigators did not evaluate indirect medical costs of vitiligo, such as work productivity, early retirement, and lost opportunities. Also, the results may not be generalizable to populations outside of the United States.
DISCLOSURES:
Dr. Ezzedine has received honoraria as a consultant for AbbVie, Incyte, La Roche–Posay, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Viela Bio. One author is an investigator for Incyte and is a consultant for several pharmaceutical companies. Three authors are AbbVie employees.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
METHODOLOGY:
- No published studies have quantified the medical costs and health care resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with vitiligo in the United States, compared with the general population.
- Drawing from the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database, researchers reviewed the records of 49,512 patients diagnosed with vitiligo between Jan. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2020, and those of 99,024 matched control persons who did not have vitiligo.
- Costs were in 2021 dollars during a 1-year postindex period. The student t test and chi square analysis were used to determine P values.
TAKEAWAY:
- In both cohorts, the median age of patients was 43 years, 79.2% were female, and most (39%) were from the southern region of the United States.
- All-cause total health care costs for patients with vitiligo were significantly higher than those of matched controls ($15,551 vs. $7,735; P < .0001).
- Similarly, medical costs for patients with vitiligo were significantly higher than those of control persons ($11,953 vs. $5,722), as were pharmacy costs ($3,598 vs. $2,014; P < .001 for both associations).
- A significantly greater proportion of patients with vitiligo had higher all-cause HCRU, compared with matched control persons. That included at least one ED visit (17.5% vs 13.4%), at least one inpatient visit (12.9% vs 6.8%), and at least one outpatient visit (99.8% vs. 88.3%; P < .0001 for all associations).
IN PRACTICE:
“These findings reveal an unmet need for cost-effective treatments and highlight the importance of fully identifying the drivers of economic burden for patients with vitiligo,” the authors concluded.
SOURCE:
Khaled Ezzedine, MD, PhD, of the department of dermatology at the Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France, led the study, which was published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.
LIMITATIONS:
The investigators did not evaluate indirect medical costs of vitiligo, such as work productivity, early retirement, and lost opportunities. Also, the results may not be generalizable to populations outside of the United States.
DISCLOSURES:
Dr. Ezzedine has received honoraria as a consultant for AbbVie, Incyte, La Roche–Posay, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Viela Bio. One author is an investigator for Incyte and is a consultant for several pharmaceutical companies. Three authors are AbbVie employees.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Choosing which biologic to prescribe for psoriasis
CARLSBAD, CALIF. –
“When you look at the list of options it can be confusing to many clinicians in deciding which one to choose,” April W. Armstrong, MD, MPH, professor and chief of dermatology at the University of California, Los Angeles, said at the annual symposium of the California Society of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery.
One approach is to consider how the biologics compare in short- and long-term efficacy. “Several different meta-analyses of biologics have been conducted,” which include some head-to head studies, Dr. Armstrong said. “In terms of efficacy, [biologics] are similar at the population level,” she said.
In a meta-analysis of 71 randomized, controlled trials through July 2020, Dr. Armstrong and colleagues found that in the short-term, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 response rates at 10-16 weeks from baseline were highest for ixekizumab (72.9%), risankizumab (72.5%), and brodalumab (72%). These PASI 90 responses were significantly higher than among patients on guselkumab (65%), secukinumab (65%), infliximab (56.8%), certolizumab (400 mg: 49.6%; 200 mg: 42.2%), ustekinumab (90 mg: 47.9%; weight-based: 45.7%; 45 mg: 44.6%), adalimumab (43%), tildrakizumab (200 mg: 39.7%; 100 mg: 37.2%), etanercept (18.0%), apremilast (12.4%), and dimethyl fumarate (12.2%).
In a more recent meta-analysis, Dr. Armstrong and coauthors used area under the curve (AUC) analyses to compare the cumulative clinical benefits of biologics over 1 year. They found that the placebo-adjusted normalized maximum AUC for a PASI 100 response was greatest for ixekizumab (0.436), risankizumab (0.423), and brodalumab (0.378), followed by guselkumab (0.358), secukinumab (0.324), ustekinumab (0.201), adalimumab (0.183), and etanercept (0.087).
In Dr. Armstrong’s opinion, the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab “have served their purpose for plaque psoriasis over time, but these days I would probably choose either an IL [interleukin]-17 inhibitor or an IL-23 inhibitor first,” she said. Still, TNF inhibitors “are certainly good for psoriatic arthritis, and certolizumab is appropriate for patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding,” she said. “Avoid them in patients with demyelinating disease and in those with hepatitis B. They are not preferred in patients with latent TB or advanced CHF.”
Dr. Armstrong said that there are robust efficacy data for the IL-17 inhibitors ixekizumab, secukinumab, and brodalumab in psoriasis and in the peripheral and axial forms of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). “Avoid using them in patients with a personal history of inflammatory bowel disease,” she advised.
Low rates of oral candidiasis have been reported in the literature, “but this has not been issue with our approved IL-17 inhibitors so far,” she said.
The IL-23 inhibitors guselkumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab, and ustekinumab have robust data for psoriasis efficacy, she said, and three – guselkumab, risankizumab, and ustekinumab – are also approved for PsA. “These agents have the advantage of fewer injections, and the evidence [of efficacy] for IL-23 inhibitors continues to evolve, such as in patients with psoriatic arthritis involving the spine,” Dr. Armstrong said.
She also shared how she deals with patients who fail to respond to biologics. “Do you switch drugs, or do you dose escalate?” she asked. “In most cases, the strategy for dose escalation is to shorten the interval between the injections so the dosing is delivered more frequently.” In a case of primary failure, which Dr. Armstrong defined as a patient who has never responded optimally to a biologic, consider revisiting the diagnosis. “Maybe it’s cutaneous T-cell lymphoma or some other condition, because our current IL-17 and IL-23 medications work extremely well,” she said. “So, if you have a patient who is not responding at all, I would question the diagnosis and consider a biopsy.”
She generally waits about 6 months before switching a patient to another biologic, “to see if they’re one of the late bloomers who may catch up in efficacy,” she explained. “Switching the class of biologic is another consideration.”
If a patient had responded to the biologic for a long time and then lost response – known as secondary failure – Dr. Armstrong considers dose escalation or a switch to another agent within the same class “if it helps to address comorbidities such as PsA,” she said. “You can also try across-class switching.”
Dr. Armstrong disclosed ties with AbbVie, Arcutis, ASLAN, Beiersdorf, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dermira, Dermavant, EPI, Galderma, InCyte, Janssen, Leo, Lilly, Meiji, Modmed, Nimbus, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Parexel, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Suna, UCB, and Ventyx.
CARLSBAD, CALIF. –
“When you look at the list of options it can be confusing to many clinicians in deciding which one to choose,” April W. Armstrong, MD, MPH, professor and chief of dermatology at the University of California, Los Angeles, said at the annual symposium of the California Society of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery.
One approach is to consider how the biologics compare in short- and long-term efficacy. “Several different meta-analyses of biologics have been conducted,” which include some head-to head studies, Dr. Armstrong said. “In terms of efficacy, [biologics] are similar at the population level,” she said.
In a meta-analysis of 71 randomized, controlled trials through July 2020, Dr. Armstrong and colleagues found that in the short-term, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 response rates at 10-16 weeks from baseline were highest for ixekizumab (72.9%), risankizumab (72.5%), and brodalumab (72%). These PASI 90 responses were significantly higher than among patients on guselkumab (65%), secukinumab (65%), infliximab (56.8%), certolizumab (400 mg: 49.6%; 200 mg: 42.2%), ustekinumab (90 mg: 47.9%; weight-based: 45.7%; 45 mg: 44.6%), adalimumab (43%), tildrakizumab (200 mg: 39.7%; 100 mg: 37.2%), etanercept (18.0%), apremilast (12.4%), and dimethyl fumarate (12.2%).
In a more recent meta-analysis, Dr. Armstrong and coauthors used area under the curve (AUC) analyses to compare the cumulative clinical benefits of biologics over 1 year. They found that the placebo-adjusted normalized maximum AUC for a PASI 100 response was greatest for ixekizumab (0.436), risankizumab (0.423), and brodalumab (0.378), followed by guselkumab (0.358), secukinumab (0.324), ustekinumab (0.201), adalimumab (0.183), and etanercept (0.087).
In Dr. Armstrong’s opinion, the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab “have served their purpose for plaque psoriasis over time, but these days I would probably choose either an IL [interleukin]-17 inhibitor or an IL-23 inhibitor first,” she said. Still, TNF inhibitors “are certainly good for psoriatic arthritis, and certolizumab is appropriate for patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding,” she said. “Avoid them in patients with demyelinating disease and in those with hepatitis B. They are not preferred in patients with latent TB or advanced CHF.”
Dr. Armstrong said that there are robust efficacy data for the IL-17 inhibitors ixekizumab, secukinumab, and brodalumab in psoriasis and in the peripheral and axial forms of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). “Avoid using them in patients with a personal history of inflammatory bowel disease,” she advised.
Low rates of oral candidiasis have been reported in the literature, “but this has not been issue with our approved IL-17 inhibitors so far,” she said.
The IL-23 inhibitors guselkumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab, and ustekinumab have robust data for psoriasis efficacy, she said, and three – guselkumab, risankizumab, and ustekinumab – are also approved for PsA. “These agents have the advantage of fewer injections, and the evidence [of efficacy] for IL-23 inhibitors continues to evolve, such as in patients with psoriatic arthritis involving the spine,” Dr. Armstrong said.
She also shared how she deals with patients who fail to respond to biologics. “Do you switch drugs, or do you dose escalate?” she asked. “In most cases, the strategy for dose escalation is to shorten the interval between the injections so the dosing is delivered more frequently.” In a case of primary failure, which Dr. Armstrong defined as a patient who has never responded optimally to a biologic, consider revisiting the diagnosis. “Maybe it’s cutaneous T-cell lymphoma or some other condition, because our current IL-17 and IL-23 medications work extremely well,” she said. “So, if you have a patient who is not responding at all, I would question the diagnosis and consider a biopsy.”
She generally waits about 6 months before switching a patient to another biologic, “to see if they’re one of the late bloomers who may catch up in efficacy,” she explained. “Switching the class of biologic is another consideration.”
If a patient had responded to the biologic for a long time and then lost response – known as secondary failure – Dr. Armstrong considers dose escalation or a switch to another agent within the same class “if it helps to address comorbidities such as PsA,” she said. “You can also try across-class switching.”
Dr. Armstrong disclosed ties with AbbVie, Arcutis, ASLAN, Beiersdorf, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dermira, Dermavant, EPI, Galderma, InCyte, Janssen, Leo, Lilly, Meiji, Modmed, Nimbus, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Parexel, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Suna, UCB, and Ventyx.
CARLSBAD, CALIF. –
“When you look at the list of options it can be confusing to many clinicians in deciding which one to choose,” April W. Armstrong, MD, MPH, professor and chief of dermatology at the University of California, Los Angeles, said at the annual symposium of the California Society of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery.
One approach is to consider how the biologics compare in short- and long-term efficacy. “Several different meta-analyses of biologics have been conducted,” which include some head-to head studies, Dr. Armstrong said. “In terms of efficacy, [biologics] are similar at the population level,” she said.
In a meta-analysis of 71 randomized, controlled trials through July 2020, Dr. Armstrong and colleagues found that in the short-term, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 response rates at 10-16 weeks from baseline were highest for ixekizumab (72.9%), risankizumab (72.5%), and brodalumab (72%). These PASI 90 responses were significantly higher than among patients on guselkumab (65%), secukinumab (65%), infliximab (56.8%), certolizumab (400 mg: 49.6%; 200 mg: 42.2%), ustekinumab (90 mg: 47.9%; weight-based: 45.7%; 45 mg: 44.6%), adalimumab (43%), tildrakizumab (200 mg: 39.7%; 100 mg: 37.2%), etanercept (18.0%), apremilast (12.4%), and dimethyl fumarate (12.2%).
In a more recent meta-analysis, Dr. Armstrong and coauthors used area under the curve (AUC) analyses to compare the cumulative clinical benefits of biologics over 1 year. They found that the placebo-adjusted normalized maximum AUC for a PASI 100 response was greatest for ixekizumab (0.436), risankizumab (0.423), and brodalumab (0.378), followed by guselkumab (0.358), secukinumab (0.324), ustekinumab (0.201), adalimumab (0.183), and etanercept (0.087).
In Dr. Armstrong’s opinion, the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab “have served their purpose for plaque psoriasis over time, but these days I would probably choose either an IL [interleukin]-17 inhibitor or an IL-23 inhibitor first,” she said. Still, TNF inhibitors “are certainly good for psoriatic arthritis, and certolizumab is appropriate for patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding,” she said. “Avoid them in patients with demyelinating disease and in those with hepatitis B. They are not preferred in patients with latent TB or advanced CHF.”
Dr. Armstrong said that there are robust efficacy data for the IL-17 inhibitors ixekizumab, secukinumab, and brodalumab in psoriasis and in the peripheral and axial forms of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). “Avoid using them in patients with a personal history of inflammatory bowel disease,” she advised.
Low rates of oral candidiasis have been reported in the literature, “but this has not been issue with our approved IL-17 inhibitors so far,” she said.
The IL-23 inhibitors guselkumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab, and ustekinumab have robust data for psoriasis efficacy, she said, and three – guselkumab, risankizumab, and ustekinumab – are also approved for PsA. “These agents have the advantage of fewer injections, and the evidence [of efficacy] for IL-23 inhibitors continues to evolve, such as in patients with psoriatic arthritis involving the spine,” Dr. Armstrong said.
She also shared how she deals with patients who fail to respond to biologics. “Do you switch drugs, or do you dose escalate?” she asked. “In most cases, the strategy for dose escalation is to shorten the interval between the injections so the dosing is delivered more frequently.” In a case of primary failure, which Dr. Armstrong defined as a patient who has never responded optimally to a biologic, consider revisiting the diagnosis. “Maybe it’s cutaneous T-cell lymphoma or some other condition, because our current IL-17 and IL-23 medications work extremely well,” she said. “So, if you have a patient who is not responding at all, I would question the diagnosis and consider a biopsy.”
She generally waits about 6 months before switching a patient to another biologic, “to see if they’re one of the late bloomers who may catch up in efficacy,” she explained. “Switching the class of biologic is another consideration.”
If a patient had responded to the biologic for a long time and then lost response – known as secondary failure – Dr. Armstrong considers dose escalation or a switch to another agent within the same class “if it helps to address comorbidities such as PsA,” she said. “You can also try across-class switching.”
Dr. Armstrong disclosed ties with AbbVie, Arcutis, ASLAN, Beiersdorf, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dermira, Dermavant, EPI, Galderma, InCyte, Janssen, Leo, Lilly, Meiji, Modmed, Nimbus, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Parexel, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Suna, UCB, and Ventyx.
AT CALDERM 2023