Can topiramate reduce nightmares in posttraumatic stress disorder?

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:03
Display Headline
Can topiramate reduce nightmares in posttraumatic stress disorder?

Re-experiencing a previous life-threatening stress through nightmares or recurrent memories is a hallmark of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In the United States, the lifetime risk of PTSD is 10.1% and the 12-month prevalence is 3.7%.1 The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) sertraline and paroxetine are FDA-approved for treating PTSD; clinicians commonly use any SSRI for this disorder. Although SSRIs can alleviate many PTSD symptoms, at times patients experience only a partial response, which necessitates other interventions.

Rationale for using topiramate

The anticonvulsant topiramate blocks voltage-sensitive sodium channels, augments γ-aminobutyric acid type A, antagonizes the glutamate receptor, and inhibits carbonic anhydrase. Researchers have hypothesized that limbic nuclei become sensitized and “kindled” after exposure to a traumatic event. Anticonvulsants such as topiramate may help mitigate stress-activated kindling in PTSD.2,3

What does the evidence say?

Although less compelling than double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, small open-label studies and some case reports indicate a potential role for topiramate in PTSD for specific populations.4,5 In an 8-week open- label study, Alderman et al6 found adjunctive topiramate led to a statistically significant reduction in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) scores and nightmares in 43 male veterans with combat-related PTSD. There was a nonsignificant decrease in high-risk alcohol use.

In a 2002 retrospective case series, Berlant et al7 found topiramate as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy reduced nightmares in 35 patients with chronic, non-combat PTSD. Nightmares decreased in 79% of patients and flashbacks decreased in 86%, with symptom improvement in a median of 4 days. Limitations of this study included lack of placebo control, a low number of participants, and a high dropout rate (9/35).

Two years later, Berlant8 used the PTSD Checklist-Civilian version (PCL-C) to assess response to topiramate in an open-label study of 33 patients with chronic, non-hallucinatory PTSD. Twenty-eight patients used topiramate as add-on therapy. PCL-C scores decreased by ≥30% in 77% of patients in 4 weeks, with a median dose of 50 mg/d and a median response time of 9 days.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Tucker et al9 assessed 38 civilian patients who took topiramate monotherapy for PTSD. Using the CAPS, researchers concluded that topiramate reduced re-experiencing symptoms, but the effect was not statistically significant.9

Lindley et al10 conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to study the effect of add-on topiramate in 40 patients with chronic, combat-related PTSD. Because many patients in this study had a history of depression and substance use disorders, topiramate was added to antidepressants; no anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, or benzodiazepines were used. Similar to previous studies, researchers found no statistically significant effect on PTSD symptom severity or global symptom improvement. However, the small number of participants and a high dropout rate limited this study.10

In a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 35 men and women age 18 to 62 with PTSD, Yeh et al11 found that topiramate (mean dose: 102.94 mg/d) lead to a statistically significant overall CAPS score reduction, with significant improvements in re-experiencing symptoms, such as nightmares.

Our opinion

FDA-approved treatments such as SSRIs should be the first pharmacologic intervention for PTSD. If a patient’s response is partial or inadequate, consider additional treatment options. For patients with persistent re-experiencing symptoms, evidence and experience with prazosin and trazodone are more robust than that for topiramate.12

Using topiramate to reduce re-experiencing symptoms such as nightmares in PTSD is not supported by statistically significant evidence from double-blind, placebo- controlled trials. However, numerous open-label studies and case reports suggest that there may be a role for topiramate in PTSD patients who do not respond to other treatments. Data indicate that topiramate may be helpful for PTSD patients who have high-risk alcohol use6 or migraine headaches.13 Because some patients who take topiramate lose weight, the medication may be useful for PTSD patients who are overweight.13

Disclosure

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Related Resource

Drug Brand Names

  • Paroxetine • Paxil
  • Sertraline • Zoloft
  • Prazosin • Minipress
  • Topiramate • Topamax
  • Trazodone • Desyrel, Oleptro
References

1. Kessler RC, Petukhova M, Sampson NA, et al. Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United States. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012;21(3):169-184.

2. Berlin HA. Antiepileptic drugs for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2007;9(4):291-300.

3. Khan S, Liberzon I. Topiramate attenuates exaggerated acoustic startle in an animal model of PTSD. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004;172(2):225-229.

4. Berlant JL. Topiramate in posttraumatic stress disorder: preliminary clinical observations. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(suppl 17):60-63.

5. Tucker P, Masters B, Nawar O. Topiramate in the treatment of comorbid night eating syndrome and PTSD: a case study. Eat Disord. 2004;12(1):75-78.

6. Alderman CP, McCarthy LC, Condon JT, et al. Topiramate in combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43(4):635-641.

7. Berlant J, van Kammen DP. Open-label topiramate as primary or adjunctive therapy in chronic civilian posttraumatic stress disorder: a preliminary report. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63(1):15-20.

8. Berlant JL. Prospective open-label study of add-on and monotherapy topiramate in civilians with chronic nonhallucinatory posttraumatic stress disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2004;4:24.-

9. Tucker P, Trautman RP, Wyatt DB, et al. Efficacy and safety of topiramate monotherapy in civilian posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68(2):201-206.

10. Lindley SE, Carlson EB, Hill K. A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of augmentation topiramate for chronic combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007;27(6):677-681.

11. Yeh MS, Mari JJ, Costa MC, et al. A double-blind randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy of topiramate in a civilian sample of PTSD. CNW Neurosci Ther. 2011;17(5):305-310.

12. Bajor LA, Ticlea AN, Osser DN. The Psychopharmacology Algorithm Project at the Harvard South Shore Program: an update on posttraumatic stress disorder. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2011;19(5):240-258.

13. Topax [package insert]. Titusville NJ: Janssen Pharmaceuticals; 2009.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Courtney Nemeth Wiseman, MD, MPH
Instructor, Clinical, Contributing Services Faculty, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
Jessica L. Gören, PharmD, BCPP
Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI; Senior Clinical Pharmacist Specialist, Department of Pharmacy, Cambridge Health Alliance; and Instructor in Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 12(03)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E1-E2
Legacy Keywords
topiramate; nightmares; reduce; PTSD; posttraumatic stress disorder
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Courtney Nemeth Wiseman, MD, MPH
Instructor, Clinical, Contributing Services Faculty, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
Jessica L. Gören, PharmD, BCPP
Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI; Senior Clinical Pharmacist Specialist, Department of Pharmacy, Cambridge Health Alliance; and Instructor in Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Author and Disclosure Information

Courtney Nemeth Wiseman, MD, MPH
Instructor, Clinical, Contributing Services Faculty, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
Jessica L. Gören, PharmD, BCPP
Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI; Senior Clinical Pharmacist Specialist, Department of Pharmacy, Cambridge Health Alliance; and Instructor in Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Article PDF
Article PDF

Re-experiencing a previous life-threatening stress through nightmares or recurrent memories is a hallmark of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In the United States, the lifetime risk of PTSD is 10.1% and the 12-month prevalence is 3.7%.1 The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) sertraline and paroxetine are FDA-approved for treating PTSD; clinicians commonly use any SSRI for this disorder. Although SSRIs can alleviate many PTSD symptoms, at times patients experience only a partial response, which necessitates other interventions.

Rationale for using topiramate

The anticonvulsant topiramate blocks voltage-sensitive sodium channels, augments γ-aminobutyric acid type A, antagonizes the glutamate receptor, and inhibits carbonic anhydrase. Researchers have hypothesized that limbic nuclei become sensitized and “kindled” after exposure to a traumatic event. Anticonvulsants such as topiramate may help mitigate stress-activated kindling in PTSD.2,3

What does the evidence say?

Although less compelling than double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, small open-label studies and some case reports indicate a potential role for topiramate in PTSD for specific populations.4,5 In an 8-week open- label study, Alderman et al6 found adjunctive topiramate led to a statistically significant reduction in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) scores and nightmares in 43 male veterans with combat-related PTSD. There was a nonsignificant decrease in high-risk alcohol use.

In a 2002 retrospective case series, Berlant et al7 found topiramate as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy reduced nightmares in 35 patients with chronic, non-combat PTSD. Nightmares decreased in 79% of patients and flashbacks decreased in 86%, with symptom improvement in a median of 4 days. Limitations of this study included lack of placebo control, a low number of participants, and a high dropout rate (9/35).

Two years later, Berlant8 used the PTSD Checklist-Civilian version (PCL-C) to assess response to topiramate in an open-label study of 33 patients with chronic, non-hallucinatory PTSD. Twenty-eight patients used topiramate as add-on therapy. PCL-C scores decreased by ≥30% in 77% of patients in 4 weeks, with a median dose of 50 mg/d and a median response time of 9 days.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Tucker et al9 assessed 38 civilian patients who took topiramate monotherapy for PTSD. Using the CAPS, researchers concluded that topiramate reduced re-experiencing symptoms, but the effect was not statistically significant.9

Lindley et al10 conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to study the effect of add-on topiramate in 40 patients with chronic, combat-related PTSD. Because many patients in this study had a history of depression and substance use disorders, topiramate was added to antidepressants; no anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, or benzodiazepines were used. Similar to previous studies, researchers found no statistically significant effect on PTSD symptom severity or global symptom improvement. However, the small number of participants and a high dropout rate limited this study.10

In a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 35 men and women age 18 to 62 with PTSD, Yeh et al11 found that topiramate (mean dose: 102.94 mg/d) lead to a statistically significant overall CAPS score reduction, with significant improvements in re-experiencing symptoms, such as nightmares.

Our opinion

FDA-approved treatments such as SSRIs should be the first pharmacologic intervention for PTSD. If a patient’s response is partial or inadequate, consider additional treatment options. For patients with persistent re-experiencing symptoms, evidence and experience with prazosin and trazodone are more robust than that for topiramate.12

Using topiramate to reduce re-experiencing symptoms such as nightmares in PTSD is not supported by statistically significant evidence from double-blind, placebo- controlled trials. However, numerous open-label studies and case reports suggest that there may be a role for topiramate in PTSD patients who do not respond to other treatments. Data indicate that topiramate may be helpful for PTSD patients who have high-risk alcohol use6 or migraine headaches.13 Because some patients who take topiramate lose weight, the medication may be useful for PTSD patients who are overweight.13

Disclosure

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Related Resource

Drug Brand Names

  • Paroxetine • Paxil
  • Sertraline • Zoloft
  • Prazosin • Minipress
  • Topiramate • Topamax
  • Trazodone • Desyrel, Oleptro

Re-experiencing a previous life-threatening stress through nightmares or recurrent memories is a hallmark of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In the United States, the lifetime risk of PTSD is 10.1% and the 12-month prevalence is 3.7%.1 The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) sertraline and paroxetine are FDA-approved for treating PTSD; clinicians commonly use any SSRI for this disorder. Although SSRIs can alleviate many PTSD symptoms, at times patients experience only a partial response, which necessitates other interventions.

Rationale for using topiramate

The anticonvulsant topiramate blocks voltage-sensitive sodium channels, augments γ-aminobutyric acid type A, antagonizes the glutamate receptor, and inhibits carbonic anhydrase. Researchers have hypothesized that limbic nuclei become sensitized and “kindled” after exposure to a traumatic event. Anticonvulsants such as topiramate may help mitigate stress-activated kindling in PTSD.2,3

What does the evidence say?

Although less compelling than double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, small open-label studies and some case reports indicate a potential role for topiramate in PTSD for specific populations.4,5 In an 8-week open- label study, Alderman et al6 found adjunctive topiramate led to a statistically significant reduction in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) scores and nightmares in 43 male veterans with combat-related PTSD. There was a nonsignificant decrease in high-risk alcohol use.

In a 2002 retrospective case series, Berlant et al7 found topiramate as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy reduced nightmares in 35 patients with chronic, non-combat PTSD. Nightmares decreased in 79% of patients and flashbacks decreased in 86%, with symptom improvement in a median of 4 days. Limitations of this study included lack of placebo control, a low number of participants, and a high dropout rate (9/35).

Two years later, Berlant8 used the PTSD Checklist-Civilian version (PCL-C) to assess response to topiramate in an open-label study of 33 patients with chronic, non-hallucinatory PTSD. Twenty-eight patients used topiramate as add-on therapy. PCL-C scores decreased by ≥30% in 77% of patients in 4 weeks, with a median dose of 50 mg/d and a median response time of 9 days.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Tucker et al9 assessed 38 civilian patients who took topiramate monotherapy for PTSD. Using the CAPS, researchers concluded that topiramate reduced re-experiencing symptoms, but the effect was not statistically significant.9

Lindley et al10 conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to study the effect of add-on topiramate in 40 patients with chronic, combat-related PTSD. Because many patients in this study had a history of depression and substance use disorders, topiramate was added to antidepressants; no anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, or benzodiazepines were used. Similar to previous studies, researchers found no statistically significant effect on PTSD symptom severity or global symptom improvement. However, the small number of participants and a high dropout rate limited this study.10

In a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 35 men and women age 18 to 62 with PTSD, Yeh et al11 found that topiramate (mean dose: 102.94 mg/d) lead to a statistically significant overall CAPS score reduction, with significant improvements in re-experiencing symptoms, such as nightmares.

Our opinion

FDA-approved treatments such as SSRIs should be the first pharmacologic intervention for PTSD. If a patient’s response is partial or inadequate, consider additional treatment options. For patients with persistent re-experiencing symptoms, evidence and experience with prazosin and trazodone are more robust than that for topiramate.12

Using topiramate to reduce re-experiencing symptoms such as nightmares in PTSD is not supported by statistically significant evidence from double-blind, placebo- controlled trials. However, numerous open-label studies and case reports suggest that there may be a role for topiramate in PTSD patients who do not respond to other treatments. Data indicate that topiramate may be helpful for PTSD patients who have high-risk alcohol use6 or migraine headaches.13 Because some patients who take topiramate lose weight, the medication may be useful for PTSD patients who are overweight.13

Disclosure

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Related Resource

Drug Brand Names

  • Paroxetine • Paxil
  • Sertraline • Zoloft
  • Prazosin • Minipress
  • Topiramate • Topamax
  • Trazodone • Desyrel, Oleptro
References

1. Kessler RC, Petukhova M, Sampson NA, et al. Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United States. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012;21(3):169-184.

2. Berlin HA. Antiepileptic drugs for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2007;9(4):291-300.

3. Khan S, Liberzon I. Topiramate attenuates exaggerated acoustic startle in an animal model of PTSD. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004;172(2):225-229.

4. Berlant JL. Topiramate in posttraumatic stress disorder: preliminary clinical observations. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(suppl 17):60-63.

5. Tucker P, Masters B, Nawar O. Topiramate in the treatment of comorbid night eating syndrome and PTSD: a case study. Eat Disord. 2004;12(1):75-78.

6. Alderman CP, McCarthy LC, Condon JT, et al. Topiramate in combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43(4):635-641.

7. Berlant J, van Kammen DP. Open-label topiramate as primary or adjunctive therapy in chronic civilian posttraumatic stress disorder: a preliminary report. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63(1):15-20.

8. Berlant JL. Prospective open-label study of add-on and monotherapy topiramate in civilians with chronic nonhallucinatory posttraumatic stress disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2004;4:24.-

9. Tucker P, Trautman RP, Wyatt DB, et al. Efficacy and safety of topiramate monotherapy in civilian posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68(2):201-206.

10. Lindley SE, Carlson EB, Hill K. A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of augmentation topiramate for chronic combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007;27(6):677-681.

11. Yeh MS, Mari JJ, Costa MC, et al. A double-blind randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy of topiramate in a civilian sample of PTSD. CNW Neurosci Ther. 2011;17(5):305-310.

12. Bajor LA, Ticlea AN, Osser DN. The Psychopharmacology Algorithm Project at the Harvard South Shore Program: an update on posttraumatic stress disorder. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2011;19(5):240-258.

13. Topax [package insert]. Titusville NJ: Janssen Pharmaceuticals; 2009.

References

1. Kessler RC, Petukhova M, Sampson NA, et al. Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United States. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012;21(3):169-184.

2. Berlin HA. Antiepileptic drugs for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2007;9(4):291-300.

3. Khan S, Liberzon I. Topiramate attenuates exaggerated acoustic startle in an animal model of PTSD. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004;172(2):225-229.

4. Berlant JL. Topiramate in posttraumatic stress disorder: preliminary clinical observations. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(suppl 17):60-63.

5. Tucker P, Masters B, Nawar O. Topiramate in the treatment of comorbid night eating syndrome and PTSD: a case study. Eat Disord. 2004;12(1):75-78.

6. Alderman CP, McCarthy LC, Condon JT, et al. Topiramate in combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43(4):635-641.

7. Berlant J, van Kammen DP. Open-label topiramate as primary or adjunctive therapy in chronic civilian posttraumatic stress disorder: a preliminary report. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63(1):15-20.

8. Berlant JL. Prospective open-label study of add-on and monotherapy topiramate in civilians with chronic nonhallucinatory posttraumatic stress disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2004;4:24.-

9. Tucker P, Trautman RP, Wyatt DB, et al. Efficacy and safety of topiramate monotherapy in civilian posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68(2):201-206.

10. Lindley SE, Carlson EB, Hill K. A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of augmentation topiramate for chronic combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007;27(6):677-681.

11. Yeh MS, Mari JJ, Costa MC, et al. A double-blind randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy of topiramate in a civilian sample of PTSD. CNW Neurosci Ther. 2011;17(5):305-310.

12. Bajor LA, Ticlea AN, Osser DN. The Psychopharmacology Algorithm Project at the Harvard South Shore Program: an update on posttraumatic stress disorder. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2011;19(5):240-258.

13. Topax [package insert]. Titusville NJ: Janssen Pharmaceuticals; 2009.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 12(03)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 12(03)
Page Number
E1-E2
Page Number
E1-E2
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Can topiramate reduce nightmares in posttraumatic stress disorder?
Display Headline
Can topiramate reduce nightmares in posttraumatic stress disorder?
Legacy Keywords
topiramate; nightmares; reduce; PTSD; posttraumatic stress disorder
Legacy Keywords
topiramate; nightmares; reduce; PTSD; posttraumatic stress disorder
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Does bupropion exacerbate anxiety?

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/24/2020 - 11:00
Display Headline
Does bupropion exacerbate anxiety?

For many clinicians, bupropion is the “go-to” medication for treating depressed patients who smoke, have concerns about sexual dysfunction side effects, and/or worry about weight gain. Bupropion is FDA-approved for preventing seasonal major depressive episodes in patients with seasonal affective disorder and is indicated as a smoking cessation aid.

“Anxious depression”—defined as depression with high levels of anxiety—is associated with poorer outcomes than “non-anxious” depression.1 Prescribing medications for these patients can be challenging. Some clinicians believe that bupropion exacerbates anxiety and should not be used to treat patients who experience both anxiety and depression.

Reports from our patients and our cumulative clinical experience are key factors in developing expertise in selecting appropriate medications. When informing our patients about what to expect from medications, however, it can be useful to combine anecdotal evidence with knowledge of the facts or lack thereof. Are there data to support or contradict the idea that bupropion can cause anxiety while treating depression?

What the research shows

The drug manufacturer reports a “substantial proportion of patients treated with Wellbutrin experience some degree of increased restlessness, agitation, anxiety, and insomnia, especially shortly after initiation of treatment.”2

In 2001, Rush et al3 published the results of a 16-week study (n=248) assessing pre-treatment anxiety levels and response to sertraline or bupropion. The authors concluded that anxious and depressed patients who received sertraline didn’t experience a superior anxiolytic or antidepressant response compared with bupropion.3 The same authors came to similar conclusions in a retrospective analysis of a pair of 8-week randomized, controlled, double-blind trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and bupropion.4

In 2001, Nieuwstraten et al5 compared bupropion with SSRIs for treating depression by reviewing several randomized, double-blind, controlled trials. The relative risk of developing “anxiety/agitation” was 1.32 (95% confidence interval, 0.85 to 2.04), which was not statistically significant.

In a 2008 meta-analysis, Papakostas et al6 pooled individual patient data from 10 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Their aim was to compare the efficacy of bupropion to SSRIs in treating “anxious depression.” They found no difference in timing or degree of improvement in anxiety symptoms between groups based on Hamilton Anxiety Scale or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale—Anxiety-Somatization (HDRS-AS) scores. The authors recommended that antidepressant choice should not be based on concerns about worsening anxiety symptoms in depressed patients.6

Another meta-analysis by Papakostas et al7 of the same 10 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials suggested SSRIs may confer an advantage over bupropion in treating a subset of patients with “anxious depression,” which they defined as a HDRS-AS score ≥7. The authors noted the advantage was statistically significant, although “modest.”

Other smaller studies suggest that bupropion does not increase anxiety.8,9 A pilot study (N = 24, no placebo control) concluded that bupropion XL was comparable to escitalopram in treating anxiety in outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder.8

Because designing and executing drug trials can be expensive, it is not surprising that most of the evidence cited above derives from pharmaceutical company-sponsored or industry-affiliated work. As such, we should evaluate available evidence within the context of what we hear from and observe in our patients.

Our opinion

When assessing patients with depression and anxiety, we must carefully evaluate symptoms to distinguish between depression with associated anxiety symptoms and depression with a comorbid anxiety disorder.

If a patient suffers from depression with associated anxiety symptoms (“anxious depression”), keep in mind that although some data demonstrate a superior response to SSRIs, other studies show no difference in effect. Some research—albeit smaller, less compelling studies—suggests that bupropion may decrease anxiety.

If your patient suffers from comorbid depression and an anxiety disorder, bupropion would not be a first-line choice because it is not FDA-approved to treat anxiety disorders. Although it is possible that anxiety/agitation could result from bupropion use, there is not sufficient data to support its reputation as ”anxiogenic.”

What is your experience?

Do you agree with the authors? Send comments to [email protected] or share your thoughts on http://www.facebook.com/CurrentPsychiatry.

 

Related Resource

 

  • American Psychiatric Association. Mixed anxiety-depressive disorder. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000:780-781.

Drug Brand Names

 

  • Bupropion • Wellbutrin, Zyban
  • Escitalopram • Lexapro
  • Sertraline • Zoloft

Disclosure

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

 

1. Fava M, Rush AJ, Alpert JE, et al. Difference in treatment outcome in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(3):342-351.

2. Wellbutrin [package insert]. Research Triangle Park NC: GlaxoSmithKline; 2008.

3. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Carmody TJ, et al. Response in relation to baseline anxiety levels in major depressive disorder treated with bupropion sustained release or sertraline. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;25(1):131-138.

4. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Carmody TJ, et al. Do bupropion SR and sertraline differ in their effects on anxiety in depressed patients? J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(10):776-781.

5. Nieuwstraten CE, Dolovich LR. Bupropion versus selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors for treatment of depression. Ann Pharmacother. 2001;35(12):1608-1613.

6. Papakostas GI, Trivedi MH, Alpert JE, et al. Efficacy of bupropion and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of anxiety symptoms in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from 10 double-blind, randomized clinical trials. J Psychiatr Res. 2008;42(2):134-140.

7. Papakostas GI, Stahl SM, Krishen A, et al. Efficacy of bupropion and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of major depressive disorder with high levels of anxiety (anxious depression): a pooled analysis of 10 studies. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(8):1287-1292.

8. Bystritsky A, Kerwin L, Feusner JD, et al. A pilot controlled trial of bupropion XL versus escitalopram in generalized anxiety disorder. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2008;41(1):46-51.

9. Feighner JP, Gardner EA, Johnston JA, et al. Double-blind comparison of bupropion and fluoxetine in depressed outpatients. J Clin Psychiatry. 1991;52(8):329-335.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Courtney Nemeth Wiseman, MD, MPH
Dr. Wiseman is Instructor, Clinical, Contributing Services Faculty, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

Jessica L. Gören, PharmD, BCPP
Dr. Gören is Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI; Senior Clinical Pharmacist Specialist, Department of Pharmacy, Cambridge Health Alliance; and Instructor in Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 11(06)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E3-E4
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Courtney Nemeth Wiseman, MD, MPH
Dr. Wiseman is Instructor, Clinical, Contributing Services Faculty, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

Jessica L. Gören, PharmD, BCPP
Dr. Gören is Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI; Senior Clinical Pharmacist Specialist, Department of Pharmacy, Cambridge Health Alliance; and Instructor in Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Courtney Nemeth Wiseman, MD, MPH
Dr. Wiseman is Instructor, Clinical, Contributing Services Faculty, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

Jessica L. Gören, PharmD, BCPP
Dr. Gören is Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI; Senior Clinical Pharmacist Specialist, Department of Pharmacy, Cambridge Health Alliance; and Instructor in Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Article PDF
Article PDF

For many clinicians, bupropion is the “go-to” medication for treating depressed patients who smoke, have concerns about sexual dysfunction side effects, and/or worry about weight gain. Bupropion is FDA-approved for preventing seasonal major depressive episodes in patients with seasonal affective disorder and is indicated as a smoking cessation aid.

“Anxious depression”—defined as depression with high levels of anxiety—is associated with poorer outcomes than “non-anxious” depression.1 Prescribing medications for these patients can be challenging. Some clinicians believe that bupropion exacerbates anxiety and should not be used to treat patients who experience both anxiety and depression.

Reports from our patients and our cumulative clinical experience are key factors in developing expertise in selecting appropriate medications. When informing our patients about what to expect from medications, however, it can be useful to combine anecdotal evidence with knowledge of the facts or lack thereof. Are there data to support or contradict the idea that bupropion can cause anxiety while treating depression?

What the research shows

The drug manufacturer reports a “substantial proportion of patients treated with Wellbutrin experience some degree of increased restlessness, agitation, anxiety, and insomnia, especially shortly after initiation of treatment.”2

In 2001, Rush et al3 published the results of a 16-week study (n=248) assessing pre-treatment anxiety levels and response to sertraline or bupropion. The authors concluded that anxious and depressed patients who received sertraline didn’t experience a superior anxiolytic or antidepressant response compared with bupropion.3 The same authors came to similar conclusions in a retrospective analysis of a pair of 8-week randomized, controlled, double-blind trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and bupropion.4

In 2001, Nieuwstraten et al5 compared bupropion with SSRIs for treating depression by reviewing several randomized, double-blind, controlled trials. The relative risk of developing “anxiety/agitation” was 1.32 (95% confidence interval, 0.85 to 2.04), which was not statistically significant.

In a 2008 meta-analysis, Papakostas et al6 pooled individual patient data from 10 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Their aim was to compare the efficacy of bupropion to SSRIs in treating “anxious depression.” They found no difference in timing or degree of improvement in anxiety symptoms between groups based on Hamilton Anxiety Scale or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale—Anxiety-Somatization (HDRS-AS) scores. The authors recommended that antidepressant choice should not be based on concerns about worsening anxiety symptoms in depressed patients.6

Another meta-analysis by Papakostas et al7 of the same 10 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials suggested SSRIs may confer an advantage over bupropion in treating a subset of patients with “anxious depression,” which they defined as a HDRS-AS score ≥7. The authors noted the advantage was statistically significant, although “modest.”

Other smaller studies suggest that bupropion does not increase anxiety.8,9 A pilot study (N = 24, no placebo control) concluded that bupropion XL was comparable to escitalopram in treating anxiety in outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder.8

Because designing and executing drug trials can be expensive, it is not surprising that most of the evidence cited above derives from pharmaceutical company-sponsored or industry-affiliated work. As such, we should evaluate available evidence within the context of what we hear from and observe in our patients.

Our opinion

When assessing patients with depression and anxiety, we must carefully evaluate symptoms to distinguish between depression with associated anxiety symptoms and depression with a comorbid anxiety disorder.

If a patient suffers from depression with associated anxiety symptoms (“anxious depression”), keep in mind that although some data demonstrate a superior response to SSRIs, other studies show no difference in effect. Some research—albeit smaller, less compelling studies—suggests that bupropion may decrease anxiety.

If your patient suffers from comorbid depression and an anxiety disorder, bupropion would not be a first-line choice because it is not FDA-approved to treat anxiety disorders. Although it is possible that anxiety/agitation could result from bupropion use, there is not sufficient data to support its reputation as ”anxiogenic.”

What is your experience?

Do you agree with the authors? Send comments to [email protected] or share your thoughts on http://www.facebook.com/CurrentPsychiatry.

 

Related Resource

 

  • American Psychiatric Association. Mixed anxiety-depressive disorder. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000:780-781.

Drug Brand Names

 

  • Bupropion • Wellbutrin, Zyban
  • Escitalopram • Lexapro
  • Sertraline • Zoloft

Disclosure

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

For many clinicians, bupropion is the “go-to” medication for treating depressed patients who smoke, have concerns about sexual dysfunction side effects, and/or worry about weight gain. Bupropion is FDA-approved for preventing seasonal major depressive episodes in patients with seasonal affective disorder and is indicated as a smoking cessation aid.

“Anxious depression”—defined as depression with high levels of anxiety—is associated with poorer outcomes than “non-anxious” depression.1 Prescribing medications for these patients can be challenging. Some clinicians believe that bupropion exacerbates anxiety and should not be used to treat patients who experience both anxiety and depression.

Reports from our patients and our cumulative clinical experience are key factors in developing expertise in selecting appropriate medications. When informing our patients about what to expect from medications, however, it can be useful to combine anecdotal evidence with knowledge of the facts or lack thereof. Are there data to support or contradict the idea that bupropion can cause anxiety while treating depression?

What the research shows

The drug manufacturer reports a “substantial proportion of patients treated with Wellbutrin experience some degree of increased restlessness, agitation, anxiety, and insomnia, especially shortly after initiation of treatment.”2

In 2001, Rush et al3 published the results of a 16-week study (n=248) assessing pre-treatment anxiety levels and response to sertraline or bupropion. The authors concluded that anxious and depressed patients who received sertraline didn’t experience a superior anxiolytic or antidepressant response compared with bupropion.3 The same authors came to similar conclusions in a retrospective analysis of a pair of 8-week randomized, controlled, double-blind trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and bupropion.4

In 2001, Nieuwstraten et al5 compared bupropion with SSRIs for treating depression by reviewing several randomized, double-blind, controlled trials. The relative risk of developing “anxiety/agitation” was 1.32 (95% confidence interval, 0.85 to 2.04), which was not statistically significant.

In a 2008 meta-analysis, Papakostas et al6 pooled individual patient data from 10 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Their aim was to compare the efficacy of bupropion to SSRIs in treating “anxious depression.” They found no difference in timing or degree of improvement in anxiety symptoms between groups based on Hamilton Anxiety Scale or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale—Anxiety-Somatization (HDRS-AS) scores. The authors recommended that antidepressant choice should not be based on concerns about worsening anxiety symptoms in depressed patients.6

Another meta-analysis by Papakostas et al7 of the same 10 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials suggested SSRIs may confer an advantage over bupropion in treating a subset of patients with “anxious depression,” which they defined as a HDRS-AS score ≥7. The authors noted the advantage was statistically significant, although “modest.”

Other smaller studies suggest that bupropion does not increase anxiety.8,9 A pilot study (N = 24, no placebo control) concluded that bupropion XL was comparable to escitalopram in treating anxiety in outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder.8

Because designing and executing drug trials can be expensive, it is not surprising that most of the evidence cited above derives from pharmaceutical company-sponsored or industry-affiliated work. As such, we should evaluate available evidence within the context of what we hear from and observe in our patients.

Our opinion

When assessing patients with depression and anxiety, we must carefully evaluate symptoms to distinguish between depression with associated anxiety symptoms and depression with a comorbid anxiety disorder.

If a patient suffers from depression with associated anxiety symptoms (“anxious depression”), keep in mind that although some data demonstrate a superior response to SSRIs, other studies show no difference in effect. Some research—albeit smaller, less compelling studies—suggests that bupropion may decrease anxiety.

If your patient suffers from comorbid depression and an anxiety disorder, bupropion would not be a first-line choice because it is not FDA-approved to treat anxiety disorders. Although it is possible that anxiety/agitation could result from bupropion use, there is not sufficient data to support its reputation as ”anxiogenic.”

What is your experience?

Do you agree with the authors? Send comments to [email protected] or share your thoughts on http://www.facebook.com/CurrentPsychiatry.

 

Related Resource

 

  • American Psychiatric Association. Mixed anxiety-depressive disorder. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000:780-781.

Drug Brand Names

 

  • Bupropion • Wellbutrin, Zyban
  • Escitalopram • Lexapro
  • Sertraline • Zoloft

Disclosure

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

 

1. Fava M, Rush AJ, Alpert JE, et al. Difference in treatment outcome in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(3):342-351.

2. Wellbutrin [package insert]. Research Triangle Park NC: GlaxoSmithKline; 2008.

3. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Carmody TJ, et al. Response in relation to baseline anxiety levels in major depressive disorder treated with bupropion sustained release or sertraline. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;25(1):131-138.

4. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Carmody TJ, et al. Do bupropion SR and sertraline differ in their effects on anxiety in depressed patients? J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(10):776-781.

5. Nieuwstraten CE, Dolovich LR. Bupropion versus selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors for treatment of depression. Ann Pharmacother. 2001;35(12):1608-1613.

6. Papakostas GI, Trivedi MH, Alpert JE, et al. Efficacy of bupropion and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of anxiety symptoms in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from 10 double-blind, randomized clinical trials. J Psychiatr Res. 2008;42(2):134-140.

7. Papakostas GI, Stahl SM, Krishen A, et al. Efficacy of bupropion and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of major depressive disorder with high levels of anxiety (anxious depression): a pooled analysis of 10 studies. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(8):1287-1292.

8. Bystritsky A, Kerwin L, Feusner JD, et al. A pilot controlled trial of bupropion XL versus escitalopram in generalized anxiety disorder. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2008;41(1):46-51.

9. Feighner JP, Gardner EA, Johnston JA, et al. Double-blind comparison of bupropion and fluoxetine in depressed outpatients. J Clin Psychiatry. 1991;52(8):329-335.

References

 

1. Fava M, Rush AJ, Alpert JE, et al. Difference in treatment outcome in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(3):342-351.

2. Wellbutrin [package insert]. Research Triangle Park NC: GlaxoSmithKline; 2008.

3. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Carmody TJ, et al. Response in relation to baseline anxiety levels in major depressive disorder treated with bupropion sustained release or sertraline. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;25(1):131-138.

4. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Carmody TJ, et al. Do bupropion SR and sertraline differ in their effects on anxiety in depressed patients? J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(10):776-781.

5. Nieuwstraten CE, Dolovich LR. Bupropion versus selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors for treatment of depression. Ann Pharmacother. 2001;35(12):1608-1613.

6. Papakostas GI, Trivedi MH, Alpert JE, et al. Efficacy of bupropion and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of anxiety symptoms in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from 10 double-blind, randomized clinical trials. J Psychiatr Res. 2008;42(2):134-140.

7. Papakostas GI, Stahl SM, Krishen A, et al. Efficacy of bupropion and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of major depressive disorder with high levels of anxiety (anxious depression): a pooled analysis of 10 studies. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(8):1287-1292.

8. Bystritsky A, Kerwin L, Feusner JD, et al. A pilot controlled trial of bupropion XL versus escitalopram in generalized anxiety disorder. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2008;41(1):46-51.

9. Feighner JP, Gardner EA, Johnston JA, et al. Double-blind comparison of bupropion and fluoxetine in depressed outpatients. J Clin Psychiatry. 1991;52(8):329-335.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 11(06)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 11(06)
Page Number
E3-E4
Page Number
E3-E4
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Does bupropion exacerbate anxiety?
Display Headline
Does bupropion exacerbate anxiety?
Sections
PURLs Copyright

Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Article PDF Media

From Persephone to psychiatry: Busting psychopharmacology myths

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:20
Display Headline
From Persephone to psychiatry: Busting psychopharmacology myths

Myths describe a legendary story and explain a model of behavior or natural event. For example, the story of Persephone’s abduction by Hades and subsequent return from the Underworld has described the changing of seasons and the cycle of growth and rebirth.

A clinical psychopharmacology practice that may—or may not—be evidence-based also can be considered a myth. We offer principles to help “bust” or prove this type of myth.

Factors to consider

When initially evaluating a specific pharmacologic practice, ask yourself:

  • Is this an FDA-approved indication?
  • Is this an evidence-based practice?
  • Does the medication have a plausible pharmacologic mechanism in the context of its use?
  • What is the source of the information that led to this prescribing practice?
  • How many different treatments have you tried?
  • What is the clinician’s and/or patient’s experience?

Ideally, prescribing practices are steeped in solid evidence. For myriad reasons, data regarding medication use in some psychiatric disorders are sparse. In these cases— or when evidence-based approaches to patient care are inadequate—prescribers can rely on only theoretical postulates and clinical experience.

Clinical experience differs among providers and within a practice, which renders it difficult to operationalize. A knowledge base derives from the accumulated day-to-day work with real world patients and should not be undermined. However, examining the extent to which your practice is related to experience and/or evidence-based information may help to avoid errors in medical decision-making,1 including:

  • availability bias: judging events by the ease to which examples come to mind
  • confirmation bias: confirming what you expect to find
  • anchoring: not thinking through multiple possibilities
  • commission bias: tendency toward action vs inaction.

Re-examining a prescribing practice is not time-consuming. Techniques include:

  1. Using a database such as Dynamed (www.ebscohost.com/dynamed) or UpToDate (www.uptodate.com) to obtain summarized information regarding levels of evidence. This can be done easily with the patient in the room.
  2. Performing a quick PubMed or MED-LINE search and reviewing the list of journal articles, assessing quantity of information and quality of studies (ie, looking for reputable journals and studies with good research methodology, a large number of subjects, and independent funding).
  3. Reviewing abstracts with relevant information, and reading full articles if compelling.
  4. Searching specifically for pertinent reviews or meta-analyses. Many databases allow you to filter articles by type. After reading a review, examine the references, and pull articles for further reading if relevant.

‘Busting’ a psychopharmacology myth doesn’t preclude its use. However, in an era when evidence-based medicine is highlighted and treatments are developed on a regular basis, it pays to think twice when prescribing, and to review the literature routinely. When engaging in shared decision making with patients, it is valuable to summarize what exists—or doesn’t—as evidence in literature and differentiate it from clinical experience.

The myth of Persephone describes the cyclical nature of the harvest; crops grow from seeds, mature in sunlight, and are harvested, then recycled during winter to grow again. Similarly, a prescribing practice should be seeded in evidence, cultivated with clinical experience, and habitually re-examined.

References

1. Groopman J. How doctors think. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2007.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Courtney Nemeth Wiseman, MD, MPH
At the time this article was written Dr. Nemeth Wiseman was instructor in psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and staff psychiatrist, Cambridge Health Alliance.
Jessica L. Gören, PharmD, BCPP
Dr. Gören is instructor in psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and clinical pharmacist specialist, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 09(09)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
40-41
Legacy Keywords
psychopharmacology; myths; prescribing practice; evidence; clinical experience; Nemeth Wiseman; Gören
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Courtney Nemeth Wiseman, MD, MPH
At the time this article was written Dr. Nemeth Wiseman was instructor in psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and staff psychiatrist, Cambridge Health Alliance.
Jessica L. Gören, PharmD, BCPP
Dr. Gören is instructor in psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and clinical pharmacist specialist, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA.

Author and Disclosure Information

Courtney Nemeth Wiseman, MD, MPH
At the time this article was written Dr. Nemeth Wiseman was instructor in psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and staff psychiatrist, Cambridge Health Alliance.
Jessica L. Gören, PharmD, BCPP
Dr. Gören is instructor in psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and clinical pharmacist specialist, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA.

Article PDF
Article PDF

Myths describe a legendary story and explain a model of behavior or natural event. For example, the story of Persephone’s abduction by Hades and subsequent return from the Underworld has described the changing of seasons and the cycle of growth and rebirth.

A clinical psychopharmacology practice that may—or may not—be evidence-based also can be considered a myth. We offer principles to help “bust” or prove this type of myth.

Factors to consider

When initially evaluating a specific pharmacologic practice, ask yourself:

  • Is this an FDA-approved indication?
  • Is this an evidence-based practice?
  • Does the medication have a plausible pharmacologic mechanism in the context of its use?
  • What is the source of the information that led to this prescribing practice?
  • How many different treatments have you tried?
  • What is the clinician’s and/or patient’s experience?

Ideally, prescribing practices are steeped in solid evidence. For myriad reasons, data regarding medication use in some psychiatric disorders are sparse. In these cases— or when evidence-based approaches to patient care are inadequate—prescribers can rely on only theoretical postulates and clinical experience.

Clinical experience differs among providers and within a practice, which renders it difficult to operationalize. A knowledge base derives from the accumulated day-to-day work with real world patients and should not be undermined. However, examining the extent to which your practice is related to experience and/or evidence-based information may help to avoid errors in medical decision-making,1 including:

  • availability bias: judging events by the ease to which examples come to mind
  • confirmation bias: confirming what you expect to find
  • anchoring: not thinking through multiple possibilities
  • commission bias: tendency toward action vs inaction.

Re-examining a prescribing practice is not time-consuming. Techniques include:

  1. Using a database such as Dynamed (www.ebscohost.com/dynamed) or UpToDate (www.uptodate.com) to obtain summarized information regarding levels of evidence. This can be done easily with the patient in the room.
  2. Performing a quick PubMed or MED-LINE search and reviewing the list of journal articles, assessing quantity of information and quality of studies (ie, looking for reputable journals and studies with good research methodology, a large number of subjects, and independent funding).
  3. Reviewing abstracts with relevant information, and reading full articles if compelling.
  4. Searching specifically for pertinent reviews or meta-analyses. Many databases allow you to filter articles by type. After reading a review, examine the references, and pull articles for further reading if relevant.

‘Busting’ a psychopharmacology myth doesn’t preclude its use. However, in an era when evidence-based medicine is highlighted and treatments are developed on a regular basis, it pays to think twice when prescribing, and to review the literature routinely. When engaging in shared decision making with patients, it is valuable to summarize what exists—or doesn’t—as evidence in literature and differentiate it from clinical experience.

The myth of Persephone describes the cyclical nature of the harvest; crops grow from seeds, mature in sunlight, and are harvested, then recycled during winter to grow again. Similarly, a prescribing practice should be seeded in evidence, cultivated with clinical experience, and habitually re-examined.

Myths describe a legendary story and explain a model of behavior or natural event. For example, the story of Persephone’s abduction by Hades and subsequent return from the Underworld has described the changing of seasons and the cycle of growth and rebirth.

A clinical psychopharmacology practice that may—or may not—be evidence-based also can be considered a myth. We offer principles to help “bust” or prove this type of myth.

Factors to consider

When initially evaluating a specific pharmacologic practice, ask yourself:

  • Is this an FDA-approved indication?
  • Is this an evidence-based practice?
  • Does the medication have a plausible pharmacologic mechanism in the context of its use?
  • What is the source of the information that led to this prescribing practice?
  • How many different treatments have you tried?
  • What is the clinician’s and/or patient’s experience?

Ideally, prescribing practices are steeped in solid evidence. For myriad reasons, data regarding medication use in some psychiatric disorders are sparse. In these cases— or when evidence-based approaches to patient care are inadequate—prescribers can rely on only theoretical postulates and clinical experience.

Clinical experience differs among providers and within a practice, which renders it difficult to operationalize. A knowledge base derives from the accumulated day-to-day work with real world patients and should not be undermined. However, examining the extent to which your practice is related to experience and/or evidence-based information may help to avoid errors in medical decision-making,1 including:

  • availability bias: judging events by the ease to which examples come to mind
  • confirmation bias: confirming what you expect to find
  • anchoring: not thinking through multiple possibilities
  • commission bias: tendency toward action vs inaction.

Re-examining a prescribing practice is not time-consuming. Techniques include:

  1. Using a database such as Dynamed (www.ebscohost.com/dynamed) or UpToDate (www.uptodate.com) to obtain summarized information regarding levels of evidence. This can be done easily with the patient in the room.
  2. Performing a quick PubMed or MED-LINE search and reviewing the list of journal articles, assessing quantity of information and quality of studies (ie, looking for reputable journals and studies with good research methodology, a large number of subjects, and independent funding).
  3. Reviewing abstracts with relevant information, and reading full articles if compelling.
  4. Searching specifically for pertinent reviews or meta-analyses. Many databases allow you to filter articles by type. After reading a review, examine the references, and pull articles for further reading if relevant.

‘Busting’ a psychopharmacology myth doesn’t preclude its use. However, in an era when evidence-based medicine is highlighted and treatments are developed on a regular basis, it pays to think twice when prescribing, and to review the literature routinely. When engaging in shared decision making with patients, it is valuable to summarize what exists—or doesn’t—as evidence in literature and differentiate it from clinical experience.

The myth of Persephone describes the cyclical nature of the harvest; crops grow from seeds, mature in sunlight, and are harvested, then recycled during winter to grow again. Similarly, a prescribing practice should be seeded in evidence, cultivated with clinical experience, and habitually re-examined.

References

1. Groopman J. How doctors think. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2007.

References

1. Groopman J. How doctors think. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2007.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 09(09)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 09(09)
Page Number
40-41
Page Number
40-41
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
From Persephone to psychiatry: Busting psychopharmacology myths
Display Headline
From Persephone to psychiatry: Busting psychopharmacology myths
Legacy Keywords
psychopharmacology; myths; prescribing practice; evidence; clinical experience; Nemeth Wiseman; Gören
Legacy Keywords
psychopharmacology; myths; prescribing practice; evidence; clinical experience; Nemeth Wiseman; Gören
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media