Amy Karon

Here are 5 articles in the January issue of Clinician Reviews (individual articles are valid for one year from date of publication—expiration dates below):

1. Gluten-free Adherence Triples While Celiac Disease Prevalence Remains Stable

To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/2h2LFDu
Expires September 6, 2017

2. Fluoxetine Appears Safer  for Bone Health in At-risk Older Patients

To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/2he1FTD
Expires September 15, 2017

3. High Free T4 Levels Linked to Sudden Cardiac Death

To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/2gMJqUz
Expires September 16, 2017

4. Morning Sickness Linked to Lower Risk for Pregnancy Loss

To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/2uaWMkH
Expires September 26, 2017

5. Anxiety, Depression May Precede Parkinson's by 25 Years

To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/2gMFQtr
Expires September 27, 2017

Here are 5 articles in the January issue of Clinician Reviews (individual articles are valid for one year from date of publication—expiration dates below):

1. Gluten-free Adherence Triples While Celiac Disease Prevalence Remains Stable

To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/2h2LFDu
Expires September 6, 2017

2. Fluoxetine Appears Safer  for Bone Health in At-risk Older Patients

To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/2he1FTD
Expires September 15, 2017

3. High Free T4 Levels Linked to Sudden Cardiac Death

To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/2gMJqUz
Expires September 16, 2017

4. Morning Sickness Linked to Lower Risk for Pregnancy Loss

To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/2uaWMkH
Expires September 26, 2017

5. Anxiety, Depression May Precede Parkinson's by 25 Years

To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/2gMFQtr
Expires September 27, 2017

Here are 5 articles in the January issue of Clinician Reviews (individual articles are valid for one year from date of publication—expiration dates below):

1. Gluten-free Adherence Triples While Celiac Disease Prevalence Remains Stable

To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/2h2LFDu
Expires September 6, 2017

2. Fluoxetine Appears Safer  for Bone Health in At-risk Older Patients

To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/2he1FTD
Expires September 15, 2017

3. High Free T4 Levels Linked to Sudden Cardiac Death

To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/2gMJqUz
Expires September 16, 2017

4. Morning Sickness Linked to Lower Risk for Pregnancy Loss

To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/2uaWMkH
Expires September 26, 2017

5. Anxiety, Depression May Precede Parkinson's by 25 Years

To take the posttest, go to: http://bit.ly/2gMFQtr
Expires September 27, 2017

SAN DIEGO – A multi-arm clinical trial aims to transform the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia, a deadly blood cancer whose standard of care has remained essentially unchanged for 4 decades.

Launched in October 2016, the multicenter BEAT AML Master Trial is based on a simple but radical goal – turn around genomic tests of bone marrow biopsies within 7 days to allow targeted therapy, said lead investigator Brian Druker, MD, of Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute in Portland.

SAN DIEGO – A multi-arm clinical trial aims to transform the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia, a deadly blood cancer whose standard of care has remained essentially unchanged for 4 decades.

Launched in October 2016, the multicenter BEAT AML Master Trial is based on a simple but radical goal – turn around genomic tests of bone marrow biopsies within 7 days to allow targeted therapy, said lead investigator Brian Druker, MD, of Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute in Portland.

SAN DIEGO – A multi-arm clinical trial aims to transform the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia, a deadly blood cancer whose standard of care has remained essentially unchanged for 4 decades.

Launched in October 2016, the multicenter BEAT AML Master Trial is based on a simple but radical goal – turn around genomic tests of bone marrow biopsies within 7 days to allow targeted therapy, said lead investigator Brian Druker, MD, of Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute in Portland.

SAN DIEGO – Autologous stem cell transplantation outperformed bortezomib-based intensification in fit patients younger than 66 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, based on a prespecified interim analysis of 1,192 patients from a randomized phase III trial.

After a median follow-up of 32 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) had not been reached among patients who received high-dose melphalan plus single or double autologous stem cell transplantation, but was 42.5 months among patients who instead received standard-dose bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP), Michele Cavo, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. Three-year rates of progression free survival were 65% with ASCT and 57% with VMP (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.88; P = .001), he reported.

There was a trend toward better outcomes with double ASCT instead of single ASCT, said Dr. Cavo of Bologna (Italy) University. At 3 years, PFS rates were 74% with double ASCT and 62% with single ASCT (HR, 0.7; P = .05).

The effect was stronger among patients with high-risk cytogenetics, for whom 3-year PFS rates were 65% and 41% (HR, 0.49; P = .046). Those patients had median PFS times of 47 months and 27 months, respectively, Dr. Cavo said. In a multivariable analysis, double ASCT also reduced the chances of death or progression by about 35% compared with single ASCT, even after controlling for high-risk cytogenetics, age, and other risk factors for poor prognosis (HR, 0.65; P = .03).

This is the first trial of its type to prospectively compare single and double ASCT with a novel myeloma regimen, according to Dr. Cavo. The data are not yet mature enough to support firm conclusions, but do highlight the role of ASCT in the bortezomib era and the potential for double ASCT to benefit patients with poor prognostic risk factors, particularly high-risk cytogenetics, he said.

The EMN02/HO95 trial enrolled more than 1,500 patients aged 18-65 years with symptomatic, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Patients underwent induction therapy with three to four cycles of bortezomib plus cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD), and then were randomly assigned to either high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m²) plus single or double ASCT, or to four cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m²), melphalan (9 mg/m²), and prednisone (60 mg/m²; VMP). Patients were then re-randomized to receive lenalidomide maintenance alone or after consolidation with two cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD).

This prespecified analysis was triggered in early November 2016, when 33% of required events occurred. Future analyses will examine the effects of consolidation as well as safety, toxicity, and quality of life, Dr. Cavo noted.

Celgene and Janssen provided funding for the study. Dr. Cavo disclosed ties to Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Amgen.

SAN DIEGO – Autologous stem cell transplantation outperformed bortezomib-based intensification in fit patients younger than 66 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, based on a prespecified interim analysis of 1,192 patients from a randomized phase III trial.

After a median follow-up of 32 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) had not been reached among patients who received high-dose melphalan plus single or double autologous stem cell transplantation, but was 42.5 months among patients who instead received standard-dose bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP), Michele Cavo, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. Three-year rates of progression free survival were 65% with ASCT and 57% with VMP (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.88; P = .001), he reported.

There was a trend toward better outcomes with double ASCT instead of single ASCT, said Dr. Cavo of Bologna (Italy) University. At 3 years, PFS rates were 74% with double ASCT and 62% with single ASCT (HR, 0.7; P = .05).

The effect was stronger among patients with high-risk cytogenetics, for whom 3-year PFS rates were 65% and 41% (HR, 0.49; P = .046). Those patients had median PFS times of 47 months and 27 months, respectively, Dr. Cavo said. In a multivariable analysis, double ASCT also reduced the chances of death or progression by about 35% compared with single ASCT, even after controlling for high-risk cytogenetics, age, and other risk factors for poor prognosis (HR, 0.65; P = .03).

This is the first trial of its type to prospectively compare single and double ASCT with a novel myeloma regimen, according to Dr. Cavo. The data are not yet mature enough to support firm conclusions, but do highlight the role of ASCT in the bortezomib era and the potential for double ASCT to benefit patients with poor prognostic risk factors, particularly high-risk cytogenetics, he said.

The EMN02/HO95 trial enrolled more than 1,500 patients aged 18-65 years with symptomatic, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Patients underwent induction therapy with three to four cycles of bortezomib plus cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD), and then were randomly assigned to either high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m²) plus single or double ASCT, or to four cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m²), melphalan (9 mg/m²), and prednisone (60 mg/m²; VMP). Patients were then re-randomized to receive lenalidomide maintenance alone or after consolidation with two cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD).

This prespecified analysis was triggered in early November 2016, when 33% of required events occurred. Future analyses will examine the effects of consolidation as well as safety, toxicity, and quality of life, Dr. Cavo noted.

Celgene and Janssen provided funding for the study. Dr. Cavo disclosed ties to Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Amgen.

SAN DIEGO – Autologous stem cell transplantation outperformed bortezomib-based intensification in fit patients younger than 66 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, based on a prespecified interim analysis of 1,192 patients from a randomized phase III trial.

After a median follow-up of 32 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) had not been reached among patients who received high-dose melphalan plus single or double autologous stem cell transplantation, but was 42.5 months among patients who instead received standard-dose bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP), Michele Cavo, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. Three-year rates of progression free survival were 65% with ASCT and 57% with VMP (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.88; P = .001), he reported.

There was a trend toward better outcomes with double ASCT instead of single ASCT, said Dr. Cavo of Bologna (Italy) University. At 3 years, PFS rates were 74% with double ASCT and 62% with single ASCT (HR, 0.7; P = .05).

The effect was stronger among patients with high-risk cytogenetics, for whom 3-year PFS rates were 65% and 41% (HR, 0.49; P = .046). Those patients had median PFS times of 47 months and 27 months, respectively, Dr. Cavo said. In a multivariable analysis, double ASCT also reduced the chances of death or progression by about 35% compared with single ASCT, even after controlling for high-risk cytogenetics, age, and other risk factors for poor prognosis (HR, 0.65; P = .03).

This is the first trial of its type to prospectively compare single and double ASCT with a novel myeloma regimen, according to Dr. Cavo. The data are not yet mature enough to support firm conclusions, but do highlight the role of ASCT in the bortezomib era and the potential for double ASCT to benefit patients with poor prognostic risk factors, particularly high-risk cytogenetics, he said.

The EMN02/HO95 trial enrolled more than 1,500 patients aged 18-65 years with symptomatic, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Patients underwent induction therapy with three to four cycles of bortezomib plus cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD), and then were randomly assigned to either high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m²) plus single or double ASCT, or to four cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m²), melphalan (9 mg/m²), and prednisone (60 mg/m²; VMP). Patients were then re-randomized to receive lenalidomide maintenance alone or after consolidation with two cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD).

This prespecified analysis was triggered in early November 2016, when 33% of required events occurred. Future analyses will examine the effects of consolidation as well as safety, toxicity, and quality of life, Dr. Cavo noted.

Celgene and Janssen provided funding for the study. Dr. Cavo disclosed ties to Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Amgen.

SAN DIEGO – Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells engineered with a “safety switch” yielded high rates of complete response and an acceptable toxicity profile in chemotherapy-resistant B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, according to a multicenter phase I/II trial.

Importantly, high tumor burden did not increase the risk of cytokine release syndrome, said Lung-Ji Chang, PhD, of Shenzhen (China) Genoimmune Medical Institute and the University of Florida in Gainesville. “This reliable, standardized CAR T-cell preparation protocol has now served more than 30 major medical centers in China,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Anti-CD19 CAR T cells have shown dramatic potential for treating B-cell malignancies, but toxicities have been a concern. One potentially serious adverse reaction is cytokine release syndrome, in which patients develop marked rises in blood levels of several types of cytokines. Another problem is that anti-CD19 CAR T cells can trigger loss of CD19 B cells, ultimately leading to humoral deficiencies, Dr. Chang noted. Consequently, researchers have searched for ways to continue controlling the activity of CAR T cells even after infusing them into patients.

As part of that effort, Dr. Chang and his associates developed a standardized protocol for engineering next-generation anti-CD19 CAR T cells based on the established concept of a “safety switch.” After collecting T cells from patients with chemotherapy-resistant ALL, they used a lentiviral vector to transform them into CAR T cells with fusion proteins consisting of a proapoptotic molecule called caspase-9 that is linked to modified human FK506-binding proteins, or FKBP. The addition of iCaspase9-FKBP enables clinicians to induce CAR T cell apoptosis by treating patients with a synthetic dimerizer called AP1903.

Apoptosis occurs about 45 minutes after this drug is given, according to Dr. Chang. This “safety switch” also enables clinicians to eliminate anti-CD19 CAR T cells after tumor cells are eradicated so that patients can recover their humoral immunity. He and his associates further modified these anti-CD19 CAR T cells by introducing four intracellular signaling domains that are associated with T-cell activation, survival, and longevity, he said.

A total of 22 treatment centers helped test this approach in a phase I/II trial of 110 leukemia patients, about half of whom were children with a median age of 9 years. The median age of adults was 37 years, and the oldest patient was 70. Cancer types included Philadelphia chromosome–positive ALL, Philadelphia chromosome–negative ALL, and chronic myeloid leukemia with blast crisis. About a third of patients had bone marrow samples with at least 50% blasts, and a similar proportion had already undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Cytokine release syndrome affected 86% of patients with low or no tumor burden, but only 53% of patients with bone marrow blasts exceeding 5%, Dr. Chang reported. He emphasized that patients with high tumor burden were no more likely to develop moderate or severe cytokine release syndrome than were patients with little or no tumor burden (P = .3). Furthermore, among 17 patients with more than 80% bone marrow involvement, only three developed grade 3-4 cytokine release syndrome, while eight developed grade 1 cytokine release syndrome.

A total of 96 patients (87%) had a complete response to this CAR T cell regimen, including 51 children and 45 adults, Dr. Chang reported. Median overall survival was 222 days (range, 23-1,041 days), and 60% of patients lived at least 400 days after treatment. Patients survived a median of 115 days without relapsing (range, 0-455 days), and 55% ultimately relapsed. Age did not appear to predict relapse, he noted.

Kaplan-Meier curves revealed no major differences in rates of overall survival (OS) between adults and children at 400-day data cutoff, Dr. Chang said. However, patients with more than 50% blast cells in their bone marrow had significantly lower rates of survival (P = .02) than did patients with less advanced ALL. A lower T-cell dose predicted lower survival in children (P = .04), but not in adults. Dr. Chang and his colleagues now dose patients of all ages with 106 cells per kilogram, he said.

Survival was significantly more likely when CAR T cell recipients went on to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (P = .0002) than otherwise. Based on the findings, Dr. Chang particularly recommends this approach for highly chemotherapy-resistant disease with a high tumor burden. Among patients who relapsed, repeating CAR T cell therapy led to better survival than administering combination chemotherapy-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (P = .01).

These safety and efficacy results suggest that CAR T cell immunotherapy can benefit patients if they have very high-burden leukemia, Dr. Chang concluded. Patients outcomes remained consistent across centers due to a “highly standardized CAR T cell preparation profile,” he said.

Dr. Chang did not report funding sources. He reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

SAN DIEGO – Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells engineered with a “safety switch” yielded high rates of complete response and an acceptable toxicity profile in chemotherapy-resistant B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, according to a multicenter phase I/II trial.

Importantly, high tumor burden did not increase the risk of cytokine release syndrome, said Lung-Ji Chang, PhD, of Shenzhen (China) Genoimmune Medical Institute and the University of Florida in Gainesville. “This reliable, standardized CAR T-cell preparation protocol has now served more than 30 major medical centers in China,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Anti-CD19 CAR T cells have shown dramatic potential for treating B-cell malignancies, but toxicities have been a concern. One potentially serious adverse reaction is cytokine release syndrome, in which patients develop marked rises in blood levels of several types of cytokines. Another problem is that anti-CD19 CAR T cells can trigger loss of CD19 B cells, ultimately leading to humoral deficiencies, Dr. Chang noted. Consequently, researchers have searched for ways to continue controlling the activity of CAR T cells even after infusing them into patients.

As part of that effort, Dr. Chang and his associates developed a standardized protocol for engineering next-generation anti-CD19 CAR T cells based on the established concept of a “safety switch.” After collecting T cells from patients with chemotherapy-resistant ALL, they used a lentiviral vector to transform them into CAR T cells with fusion proteins consisting of a proapoptotic molecule called caspase-9 that is linked to modified human FK506-binding proteins, or FKBP. The addition of iCaspase9-FKBP enables clinicians to induce CAR T cell apoptosis by treating patients with a synthetic dimerizer called AP1903.

Apoptosis occurs about 45 minutes after this drug is given, according to Dr. Chang. This “safety switch” also enables clinicians to eliminate anti-CD19 CAR T cells after tumor cells are eradicated so that patients can recover their humoral immunity. He and his associates further modified these anti-CD19 CAR T cells by introducing four intracellular signaling domains that are associated with T-cell activation, survival, and longevity, he said.

A total of 22 treatment centers helped test this approach in a phase I/II trial of 110 leukemia patients, about half of whom were children with a median age of 9 years. The median age of adults was 37 years, and the oldest patient was 70. Cancer types included Philadelphia chromosome–positive ALL, Philadelphia chromosome–negative ALL, and chronic myeloid leukemia with blast crisis. About a third of patients had bone marrow samples with at least 50% blasts, and a similar proportion had already undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Cytokine release syndrome affected 86% of patients with low or no tumor burden, but only 53% of patients with bone marrow blasts exceeding 5%, Dr. Chang reported. He emphasized that patients with high tumor burden were no more likely to develop moderate or severe cytokine release syndrome than were patients with little or no tumor burden (P = .3). Furthermore, among 17 patients with more than 80% bone marrow involvement, only three developed grade 3-4 cytokine release syndrome, while eight developed grade 1 cytokine release syndrome.

A total of 96 patients (87%) had a complete response to this CAR T cell regimen, including 51 children and 45 adults, Dr. Chang reported. Median overall survival was 222 days (range, 23-1,041 days), and 60% of patients lived at least 400 days after treatment. Patients survived a median of 115 days without relapsing (range, 0-455 days), and 55% ultimately relapsed. Age did not appear to predict relapse, he noted.

Kaplan-Meier curves revealed no major differences in rates of overall survival (OS) between adults and children at 400-day data cutoff, Dr. Chang said. However, patients with more than 50% blast cells in their bone marrow had significantly lower rates of survival (P = .02) than did patients with less advanced ALL. A lower T-cell dose predicted lower survival in children (P = .04), but not in adults. Dr. Chang and his colleagues now dose patients of all ages with 106 cells per kilogram, he said.

Survival was significantly more likely when CAR T cell recipients went on to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (P = .0002) than otherwise. Based on the findings, Dr. Chang particularly recommends this approach for highly chemotherapy-resistant disease with a high tumor burden. Among patients who relapsed, repeating CAR T cell therapy led to better survival than administering combination chemotherapy-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (P = .01).

These safety and efficacy results suggest that CAR T cell immunotherapy can benefit patients if they have very high-burden leukemia, Dr. Chang concluded. Patients outcomes remained consistent across centers due to a “highly standardized CAR T cell preparation profile,” he said.

Dr. Chang did not report funding sources. He reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

SAN DIEGO – Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells engineered with a “safety switch” yielded high rates of complete response and an acceptable toxicity profile in chemotherapy-resistant B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, according to a multicenter phase I/II trial.

Importantly, high tumor burden did not increase the risk of cytokine release syndrome, said Lung-Ji Chang, PhD, of Shenzhen (China) Genoimmune Medical Institute and the University of Florida in Gainesville. “This reliable, standardized CAR T-cell preparation protocol has now served more than 30 major medical centers in China,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Anti-CD19 CAR T cells have shown dramatic potential for treating B-cell malignancies, but toxicities have been a concern. One potentially serious adverse reaction is cytokine release syndrome, in which patients develop marked rises in blood levels of several types of cytokines. Another problem is that anti-CD19 CAR T cells can trigger loss of CD19 B cells, ultimately leading to humoral deficiencies, Dr. Chang noted. Consequently, researchers have searched for ways to continue controlling the activity of CAR T cells even after infusing them into patients.

As part of that effort, Dr. Chang and his associates developed a standardized protocol for engineering next-generation anti-CD19 CAR T cells based on the established concept of a “safety switch.” After collecting T cells from patients with chemotherapy-resistant ALL, they used a lentiviral vector to transform them into CAR T cells with fusion proteins consisting of a proapoptotic molecule called caspase-9 that is linked to modified human FK506-binding proteins, or FKBP. The addition of iCaspase9-FKBP enables clinicians to induce CAR T cell apoptosis by treating patients with a synthetic dimerizer called AP1903.

Apoptosis occurs about 45 minutes after this drug is given, according to Dr. Chang. This “safety switch” also enables clinicians to eliminate anti-CD19 CAR T cells after tumor cells are eradicated so that patients can recover their humoral immunity. He and his associates further modified these anti-CD19 CAR T cells by introducing four intracellular signaling domains that are associated with T-cell activation, survival, and longevity, he said.

A total of 22 treatment centers helped test this approach in a phase I/II trial of 110 leukemia patients, about half of whom were children with a median age of 9 years. The median age of adults was 37 years, and the oldest patient was 70. Cancer types included Philadelphia chromosome–positive ALL, Philadelphia chromosome–negative ALL, and chronic myeloid leukemia with blast crisis. About a third of patients had bone marrow samples with at least 50% blasts, and a similar proportion had already undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Cytokine release syndrome affected 86% of patients with low or no tumor burden, but only 53% of patients with bone marrow blasts exceeding 5%, Dr. Chang reported. He emphasized that patients with high tumor burden were no more likely to develop moderate or severe cytokine release syndrome than were patients with little or no tumor burden (P = .3). Furthermore, among 17 patients with more than 80% bone marrow involvement, only three developed grade 3-4 cytokine release syndrome, while eight developed grade 1 cytokine release syndrome.

A total of 96 patients (87%) had a complete response to this CAR T cell regimen, including 51 children and 45 adults, Dr. Chang reported. Median overall survival was 222 days (range, 23-1,041 days), and 60% of patients lived at least 400 days after treatment. Patients survived a median of 115 days without relapsing (range, 0-455 days), and 55% ultimately relapsed. Age did not appear to predict relapse, he noted.

Kaplan-Meier curves revealed no major differences in rates of overall survival (OS) between adults and children at 400-day data cutoff, Dr. Chang said. However, patients with more than 50% blast cells in their bone marrow had significantly lower rates of survival (P = .02) than did patients with less advanced ALL. A lower T-cell dose predicted lower survival in children (P = .04), but not in adults. Dr. Chang and his colleagues now dose patients of all ages with 106 cells per kilogram, he said.

Survival was significantly more likely when CAR T cell recipients went on to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (P = .0002) than otherwise. Based on the findings, Dr. Chang particularly recommends this approach for highly chemotherapy-resistant disease with a high tumor burden. Among patients who relapsed, repeating CAR T cell therapy led to better survival than administering combination chemotherapy-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (P = .01).

These safety and efficacy results suggest that CAR T cell immunotherapy can benefit patients if they have very high-burden leukemia, Dr. Chang concluded. Patients outcomes remained consistent across centers due to a “highly standardized CAR T cell preparation profile,” he said.

Dr. Chang did not report funding sources. He reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

SAN DIEGO – Maintenance therapy with lenalidomide significantly improved progression-free survival in patients of all ages with myeloma, regardless of their risk or response status at the end of induction, Gareth Morgan, MD, PhD, said during an oral session at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“The very important point is that maintenance therapy with lenalidomide worked across a range of different risk groups,” said Dr. Morgan, director of the Myeloma Institute at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock. “It worked independent of gender, age, [International Staging System] disease stage, and response at baseline,” he added. ‘It also worked irrespective of genetic risk status, which is contrary to what you hear very frequently. All of the curves are consistent with better outcomes if you continue lenalidomide long-term.”

Amy Karon/Frontline Medical News

SAN DIEGO – Maintenance therapy with lenalidomide significantly improved progression-free survival in patients of all ages with myeloma, regardless of their risk or response status at the end of induction, Gareth Morgan, MD, PhD, said during an oral session at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“The very important point is that maintenance therapy with lenalidomide worked across a range of different risk groups,” said Dr. Morgan, director of the Myeloma Institute at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock. “It worked independent of gender, age, [International Staging System] disease stage, and response at baseline,” he added. ‘It also worked irrespective of genetic risk status, which is contrary to what you hear very frequently. All of the curves are consistent with better outcomes if you continue lenalidomide long-term.”

Amy Karon/Frontline Medical News

SAN DIEGO – Maintenance therapy with lenalidomide significantly improved progression-free survival in patients of all ages with myeloma, regardless of their risk or response status at the end of induction, Gareth Morgan, MD, PhD, said during an oral session at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“The very important point is that maintenance therapy with lenalidomide worked across a range of different risk groups,” said Dr. Morgan, director of the Myeloma Institute at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock. “It worked independent of gender, age, [International Staging System] disease stage, and response at baseline,” he added. ‘It also worked irrespective of genetic risk status, which is contrary to what you hear very frequently. All of the curves are consistent with better outcomes if you continue lenalidomide long-term.”

Amy Karon/Frontline Medical News

Patients whose Crohn’s disease fully remits after resection should not wait for endoscopic recurrence to start tumor-necrosis-factor inhibitors or thiopurines, according to a new guideline from the American Gastroenterological Association.

Patients who are low risk or worried about side effects, however, “may reasonably select endoscopy-guided pharmacological treatment,” the guidelines state (doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.038).

The AGA made a conditional recommendation against the prophylactic use of budesonide, probiotics, and 5-aminosalicylates such as mesalamine. Only low-quality evidence supports their efficacy after resection, and by using these agents, clinicians may inadvertently boost the risk of recurrence by forgoing better therapies, the guideline states.

The initial endoscopy should be timed for 6-12 months after resection, regardless of whether patients are receiving pharmacologic prophylaxis, the guideline states. If there is endoscopic recurrence, then anti-TNF or thiopurine therapy should be started or optimized.

In the Postoperative Crohn’s Endoscopic Recurrence (POCER) trial, endoscopic monitoring and treatment escalation in the face of endoscopic recurrence cut the risk of subsequent clinical and endoscopic recurrence by about 18% and 27%, respectively, compared with continuing the original treatment regimen. Most patients received azathioprine or adalimumab with 3 months of metronidazole postoperatively, so “even [those] who were already on postoperative prophylaxis benefited from endoscopic monitoring with colonoscopy at 6-12 months,” the guideline notes. However, patients who elect early prophylaxis after resection can reasonably forego colonoscopy if endoscopic recurrence is unlikely to affect their treatment plan, the AGA states. The guideline strongly recommends ongoing surveillance endoscopies if patients decide against early postresection prophylaxis, but notes a lack of evidence on how far to space out these procedures.

None of the authors had relevant financial disclosures.

Patients whose Crohn’s disease fully remits after resection should not wait for endoscopic recurrence to start tumor-necrosis-factor inhibitors or thiopurines, according to a new guideline from the American Gastroenterological Association.

Patients who are low risk or worried about side effects, however, “may reasonably select endoscopy-guided pharmacological treatment,” the guidelines state (doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.038).

The AGA made a conditional recommendation against the prophylactic use of budesonide, probiotics, and 5-aminosalicylates such as mesalamine. Only low-quality evidence supports their efficacy after resection, and by using these agents, clinicians may inadvertently boost the risk of recurrence by forgoing better therapies, the guideline states.

The initial endoscopy should be timed for 6-12 months after resection, regardless of whether patients are receiving pharmacologic prophylaxis, the guideline states. If there is endoscopic recurrence, then anti-TNF or thiopurine therapy should be started or optimized.

In the Postoperative Crohn’s Endoscopic Recurrence (POCER) trial, endoscopic monitoring and treatment escalation in the face of endoscopic recurrence cut the risk of subsequent clinical and endoscopic recurrence by about 18% and 27%, respectively, compared with continuing the original treatment regimen. Most patients received azathioprine or adalimumab with 3 months of metronidazole postoperatively, so “even [those] who were already on postoperative prophylaxis benefited from endoscopic monitoring with colonoscopy at 6-12 months,” the guideline notes. However, patients who elect early prophylaxis after resection can reasonably forego colonoscopy if endoscopic recurrence is unlikely to affect their treatment plan, the AGA states. The guideline strongly recommends ongoing surveillance endoscopies if patients decide against early postresection prophylaxis, but notes a lack of evidence on how far to space out these procedures.

None of the authors had relevant financial disclosures.

Patients whose Crohn’s disease fully remits after resection should not wait for endoscopic recurrence to start tumor-necrosis-factor inhibitors or thiopurines, according to a new guideline from the American Gastroenterological Association.

Patients who are low risk or worried about side effects, however, “may reasonably select endoscopy-guided pharmacological treatment,” the guidelines state (doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.038).

The AGA made a conditional recommendation against the prophylactic use of budesonide, probiotics, and 5-aminosalicylates such as mesalamine. Only low-quality evidence supports their efficacy after resection, and by using these agents, clinicians may inadvertently boost the risk of recurrence by forgoing better therapies, the guideline states.

The initial endoscopy should be timed for 6-12 months after resection, regardless of whether patients are receiving pharmacologic prophylaxis, the guideline states. If there is endoscopic recurrence, then anti-TNF or thiopurine therapy should be started or optimized.

In the Postoperative Crohn’s Endoscopic Recurrence (POCER) trial, endoscopic monitoring and treatment escalation in the face of endoscopic recurrence cut the risk of subsequent clinical and endoscopic recurrence by about 18% and 27%, respectively, compared with continuing the original treatment regimen. Most patients received azathioprine or adalimumab with 3 months of metronidazole postoperatively, so “even [those] who were already on postoperative prophylaxis benefited from endoscopic monitoring with colonoscopy at 6-12 months,” the guideline notes. However, patients who elect early prophylaxis after resection can reasonably forego colonoscopy if endoscopic recurrence is unlikely to affect their treatment plan, the AGA states. The guideline strongly recommends ongoing surveillance endoscopies if patients decide against early postresection prophylaxis, but notes a lack of evidence on how far to space out these procedures.

None of the authors had relevant financial disclosures.

SAN DIEGO – Using less than a drop of blood, a portable microsensor provided a comprehensive coagulation profile in minutes and perfectly distinguished various coagulopathies from normal blood samples – handily beating both activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT).

Dubbed ClotChip, the disposable device detects coagulation factors and platelet activity by using a technique called dielectric spectroscopy, Evi X. Stavrou, MD, of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. It points the way for comprehensive, rapid, point-of-care assessment of critically ill or severely injured patients and those who need ongoing monitoring to evaluate response to anticoagulant therapy, she added.

By plotting rates of true positives (patients with coagulopathies) against rates of true negatives (controls), the researchers obtained areas under the receiver operating curves of 100% for ClotChip, 78% for aPTT, and 57% for PT. In other words, ClotChip correctly identified all cases and controls in this small patient cohort, which neither aPTT or PT did.

Dr. Stavrou and her coinvestigators had no relevant financial disclosures.

SAN DIEGO – Using less than a drop of blood, a portable microsensor provided a comprehensive coagulation profile in minutes and perfectly distinguished various coagulopathies from normal blood samples – handily beating both activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT).

Dubbed ClotChip, the disposable device detects coagulation factors and platelet activity by using a technique called dielectric spectroscopy, Evi X. Stavrou, MD, of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. It points the way for comprehensive, rapid, point-of-care assessment of critically ill or severely injured patients and those who need ongoing monitoring to evaluate response to anticoagulant therapy, she added.

By plotting rates of true positives (patients with coagulopathies) against rates of true negatives (controls), the researchers obtained areas under the receiver operating curves of 100% for ClotChip, 78% for aPTT, and 57% for PT. In other words, ClotChip correctly identified all cases and controls in this small patient cohort, which neither aPTT or PT did.

Dr. Stavrou and her coinvestigators had no relevant financial disclosures.

SAN DIEGO – Using less than a drop of blood, a portable microsensor provided a comprehensive coagulation profile in minutes and perfectly distinguished various coagulopathies from normal blood samples – handily beating both activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT).

Dubbed ClotChip, the disposable device detects coagulation factors and platelet activity by using a technique called dielectric spectroscopy, Evi X. Stavrou, MD, of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. It points the way for comprehensive, rapid, point-of-care assessment of critically ill or severely injured patients and those who need ongoing monitoring to evaluate response to anticoagulant therapy, she added.

By plotting rates of true positives (patients with coagulopathies) against rates of true negatives (controls), the researchers obtained areas under the receiver operating curves of 100% for ClotChip, 78% for aPTT, and 57% for PT. In other words, ClotChip correctly identified all cases and controls in this small patient cohort, which neither aPTT or PT did.

Dr. Stavrou and her coinvestigators had no relevant financial disclosures.

SAN DIEGO – For patients with CD30 expressing cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, antibody-drug conjugate therapy with brentuximab vedotin significantly outperformed two standard regimens in the phase III ALCANZA trial.

After a median of 17.5 months of follow-up, 56% of patients receiving brentuximab vedotin had an objective response lasting at least 4 months, versus 13% of patients treated with physician’s choice of methotrexate or bexarotene (P less than .0001), Youn H. Kim, MD, said during an oral presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

As in past studies, brentuximab vedotin caused high rates of peripheral neuropathy, but more than 80% of cases improved or resolved over time, she said.

This is the first reported phase III trial to convincingly show that a new systemic agent outperformed standard therapies for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), which tend to have inadequate and short-lived efficacy, stated Dr. Kim, of Stanford (Calif.) University. Brentuximab vedotin not only met the primary endpoint, but all other predefined endpoints, including progression-free survival and a quality-of-life measure, she said.

“These compelling results have potential practice-changing implications,” she concluded.

Brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) targets CD30, which is expressed in skin lesions of about half of patients with CTCL. A protease-cleavable linker attaches an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody to monomethyl auristatin E, which disrupts microtubules when released into CD30-positive tumor cells (Blood. 2013;122:367). The agent showed clinical activity against CTCL in two previous phase II trials of CTCL.

Accordingly, the international, open-label phase III ALCANZA study enrolled 128 treatment-experienced patients with CD30-expressing mycosis fungoides or primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Patients were randomly assigned to receive brentuximab vedotin (1.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) or physician’s choice of either methotrexate (5 to 50 mg once weekly) or bexarotene (300 mg/m² once daily) for up to 16 3-week cycles, or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Methotrexate or bexarotene were designated “physician’s choice” because they are used worldwide for treating CTCL, according to Dr. Kim.

To capture both the rate and duration of response, researchers defined objective response lasting at least 4 months as the primary endpoint. Brentuximab vedotin more than quadrupled the likelihood of this outcome when compared with the standard CTCL regimens, a trend that spanned key demographic and clinical subgroups, Dr. Kim said.

“All endpoints were highly [statistically] significant,” she further reported. For example, the objective response rate with brentuximab vedotin was 67%, versus 20% for methotrexate or bexarotene. Respective rates of complete response were 16% and 2%, and median durations of progression-free survival were 17 and 4 months, translating to a 73% lower risk of progression or death with brentuximab vedotin (95% confidence interval, 57%-83%). Patients who received brentuximab vedotin also reported about a three-fold greater improvement on the Skindex-29 symptom domain, compared with the physician’s choice group (–29 vs. –9 points; P less than .0001).

The safety profile of brentuximab vedotin resembled that seen in previous studies, Dr. Kim said. Most notably, 67% of patients developed peripheral neuropathy, and 9% developed grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. This usually improved or resolved over about the next 22 months. Diarrhea, fatigue, and vomiting affected about a third of patients on brentuximab vedotin, and about one in four stopped treatment because of adverse events, compared with 8% of the physician’s choice arm. Rates of serious adverse events were 41% and 47%, respectively. One brentuximab vedotin recipient died of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome that investigators attributed to treatment-associated necrosis of peripheral tumors. They identified no other treatment-related deaths.

Seattle Genetics and Takeda funded the trial. Dr. Kim disclosed ties to Takeda and Seattle Genetics, as well as several other pharmaceutical companies.

SAN DIEGO – For patients with CD30 expressing cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, antibody-drug conjugate therapy with brentuximab vedotin significantly outperformed two standard regimens in the phase III ALCANZA trial.

After a median of 17.5 months of follow-up, 56% of patients receiving brentuximab vedotin had an objective response lasting at least 4 months, versus 13% of patients treated with physician’s choice of methotrexate or bexarotene (P less than .0001), Youn H. Kim, MD, said during an oral presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

As in past studies, brentuximab vedotin caused high rates of peripheral neuropathy, but more than 80% of cases improved or resolved over time, she said.

This is the first reported phase III trial to convincingly show that a new systemic agent outperformed standard therapies for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), which tend to have inadequate and short-lived efficacy, stated Dr. Kim, of Stanford (Calif.) University. Brentuximab vedotin not only met the primary endpoint, but all other predefined endpoints, including progression-free survival and a quality-of-life measure, she said.

“These compelling results have potential practice-changing implications,” she concluded.

Brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) targets CD30, which is expressed in skin lesions of about half of patients with CTCL. A protease-cleavable linker attaches an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody to monomethyl auristatin E, which disrupts microtubules when released into CD30-positive tumor cells (Blood. 2013;122:367). The agent showed clinical activity against CTCL in two previous phase II trials of CTCL.

Accordingly, the international, open-label phase III ALCANZA study enrolled 128 treatment-experienced patients with CD30-expressing mycosis fungoides or primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Patients were randomly assigned to receive brentuximab vedotin (1.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) or physician’s choice of either methotrexate (5 to 50 mg once weekly) or bexarotene (300 mg/m² once daily) for up to 16 3-week cycles, or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Methotrexate or bexarotene were designated “physician’s choice” because they are used worldwide for treating CTCL, according to Dr. Kim.

To capture both the rate and duration of response, researchers defined objective response lasting at least 4 months as the primary endpoint. Brentuximab vedotin more than quadrupled the likelihood of this outcome when compared with the standard CTCL regimens, a trend that spanned key demographic and clinical subgroups, Dr. Kim said.

“All endpoints were highly [statistically] significant,” she further reported. For example, the objective response rate with brentuximab vedotin was 67%, versus 20% for methotrexate or bexarotene. Respective rates of complete response were 16% and 2%, and median durations of progression-free survival were 17 and 4 months, translating to a 73% lower risk of progression or death with brentuximab vedotin (95% confidence interval, 57%-83%). Patients who received brentuximab vedotin also reported about a three-fold greater improvement on the Skindex-29 symptom domain, compared with the physician’s choice group (–29 vs. –9 points; P less than .0001).

The safety profile of brentuximab vedotin resembled that seen in previous studies, Dr. Kim said. Most notably, 67% of patients developed peripheral neuropathy, and 9% developed grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. This usually improved or resolved over about the next 22 months. Diarrhea, fatigue, and vomiting affected about a third of patients on brentuximab vedotin, and about one in four stopped treatment because of adverse events, compared with 8% of the physician’s choice arm. Rates of serious adverse events were 41% and 47%, respectively. One brentuximab vedotin recipient died of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome that investigators attributed to treatment-associated necrosis of peripheral tumors. They identified no other treatment-related deaths.

Seattle Genetics and Takeda funded the trial. Dr. Kim disclosed ties to Takeda and Seattle Genetics, as well as several other pharmaceutical companies.

SAN DIEGO – For patients with CD30 expressing cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, antibody-drug conjugate therapy with brentuximab vedotin significantly outperformed two standard regimens in the phase III ALCANZA trial.

After a median of 17.5 months of follow-up, 56% of patients receiving brentuximab vedotin had an objective response lasting at least 4 months, versus 13% of patients treated with physician’s choice of methotrexate or bexarotene (P less than .0001), Youn H. Kim, MD, said during an oral presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

As in past studies, brentuximab vedotin caused high rates of peripheral neuropathy, but more than 80% of cases improved or resolved over time, she said.

This is the first reported phase III trial to convincingly show that a new systemic agent outperformed standard therapies for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), which tend to have inadequate and short-lived efficacy, stated Dr. Kim, of Stanford (Calif.) University. Brentuximab vedotin not only met the primary endpoint, but all other predefined endpoints, including progression-free survival and a quality-of-life measure, she said.

“These compelling results have potential practice-changing implications,” she concluded.

Brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) targets CD30, which is expressed in skin lesions of about half of patients with CTCL. A protease-cleavable linker attaches an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody to monomethyl auristatin E, which disrupts microtubules when released into CD30-positive tumor cells (Blood. 2013;122:367). The agent showed clinical activity against CTCL in two previous phase II trials of CTCL.

Accordingly, the international, open-label phase III ALCANZA study enrolled 128 treatment-experienced patients with CD30-expressing mycosis fungoides or primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Patients were randomly assigned to receive brentuximab vedotin (1.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) or physician’s choice of either methotrexate (5 to 50 mg once weekly) or bexarotene (300 mg/m² once daily) for up to 16 3-week cycles, or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Methotrexate or bexarotene were designated “physician’s choice” because they are used worldwide for treating CTCL, according to Dr. Kim.

To capture both the rate and duration of response, researchers defined objective response lasting at least 4 months as the primary endpoint. Brentuximab vedotin more than quadrupled the likelihood of this outcome when compared with the standard CTCL regimens, a trend that spanned key demographic and clinical subgroups, Dr. Kim said.

“All endpoints were highly [statistically] significant,” she further reported. For example, the objective response rate with brentuximab vedotin was 67%, versus 20% for methotrexate or bexarotene. Respective rates of complete response were 16% and 2%, and median durations of progression-free survival were 17 and 4 months, translating to a 73% lower risk of progression or death with brentuximab vedotin (95% confidence interval, 57%-83%). Patients who received brentuximab vedotin also reported about a three-fold greater improvement on the Skindex-29 symptom domain, compared with the physician’s choice group (–29 vs. –9 points; P less than .0001).

The safety profile of brentuximab vedotin resembled that seen in previous studies, Dr. Kim said. Most notably, 67% of patients developed peripheral neuropathy, and 9% developed grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. This usually improved or resolved over about the next 22 months. Diarrhea, fatigue, and vomiting affected about a third of patients on brentuximab vedotin, and about one in four stopped treatment because of adverse events, compared with 8% of the physician’s choice arm. Rates of serious adverse events were 41% and 47%, respectively. One brentuximab vedotin recipient died of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome that investigators attributed to treatment-associated necrosis of peripheral tumors. They identified no other treatment-related deaths.

Seattle Genetics and Takeda funded the trial. Dr. Kim disclosed ties to Takeda and Seattle Genetics, as well as several other pharmaceutical companies.

SAN DIEGO – Rising rates of pediatric venous thromboembolism in the United States underscore the need to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of placing central lines, Julie Jaffray, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are especially likely to lead to deep vein thrombosis in children, said Dr. Jaffray of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California. Children and adolescents who received PICCs had about fourfold the rate of this outcome in the next 6 months as did those who received tunneled lines, based on interim results from her first-in-kind, prospective multicenter observational study.

Amy Karon

Earlier research has shown that the placement of PICCs approximately doubled at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles between 2005 and 2012, while the use of tunneled lines remained constant at a much-lower rate, Dr. Jaffray noted.

To better understand how central lines contribute to pediatric thrombotic events, she and her associates at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Texas Children’s Hospital in Houston are studying patients aged 6 months to 18 years who had these devices placed at their centers starting in 2013. To parse out risk factors, the investigators are analyzing numerous relevant keywords from nursing notes and other parts of electronic health records.

As of October 2016, the study included 1,096 patients who received a total of 1,233 central lines related to the treatment of cancer, infection, and other serious conditions. Among 827 PICC recipients, the 6-month cumulative rate of venous thromboembolism was 7.5%. In contrast, only 406 patients received tunneled lines, and only 2% developed venous thromboembolism (P = .004).

But tunneled lines had their own risks. About 16% of recipients developed CLABSI within 6 months, compared with 9% of children who received PICCs (P = .005). The overall rate of CLABSI was 12%, Dr. Jaffray noted.

Thromboses were identified a median of 15 days after PICC placement and 40 days after tunneled line placement, she said. Children with leukemia, other cancers, and congenital heart disease were at significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism, as were children who received multilumen catheters, she noted.

Ongoing analyses should lead to new guidelines on pediatric catheter selection, insertion techniques, and the prophylactic use of anticoagulation or antiseptics, Dr. Jaffray said. She also is planning a separate study of children younger than 6 months, to examine their unique coagulation systems, she added.

The conclusion at this point is that two-thirds of this cohort received PICCs instead of tunneled lines, and 85% of venous thromboembolism episodes occurred in PICC recipients, Dr. Jaffray emphasized. “Due to their ease of insertion, PICCs are being placed at increasing rates in some pediatric centers, [and] this may be the leading factor for the increasing incidence of pediatric venous thromboembolism,” she commented. “A lot of us pediatric treaters aren’t necessarily giving anticoagulation for an incidental clot, but I think this is something we certainly need to look at. And maybe if we can choose the patients who are at highest risk of VTE, we can consider prophylactic anticoagulation in those kids.”

Dr. Jaffray did not report funding sources and had no relevant financial disclosures.

SAN DIEGO – Rising rates of pediatric venous thromboembolism in the United States underscore the need to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of placing central lines, Julie Jaffray, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are especially likely to lead to deep vein thrombosis in children, said Dr. Jaffray of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California. Children and adolescents who received PICCs had about fourfold the rate of this outcome in the next 6 months as did those who received tunneled lines, based on interim results from her first-in-kind, prospective multicenter observational study.

Amy Karon

Earlier research has shown that the placement of PICCs approximately doubled at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles between 2005 and 2012, while the use of tunneled lines remained constant at a much-lower rate, Dr. Jaffray noted.

To better understand how central lines contribute to pediatric thrombotic events, she and her associates at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Texas Children’s Hospital in Houston are studying patients aged 6 months to 18 years who had these devices placed at their centers starting in 2013. To parse out risk factors, the investigators are analyzing numerous relevant keywords from nursing notes and other parts of electronic health records.

As of October 2016, the study included 1,096 patients who received a total of 1,233 central lines related to the treatment of cancer, infection, and other serious conditions. Among 827 PICC recipients, the 6-month cumulative rate of venous thromboembolism was 7.5%. In contrast, only 406 patients received tunneled lines, and only 2% developed venous thromboembolism (P = .004).

But tunneled lines had their own risks. About 16% of recipients developed CLABSI within 6 months, compared with 9% of children who received PICCs (P = .005). The overall rate of CLABSI was 12%, Dr. Jaffray noted.

Thromboses were identified a median of 15 days after PICC placement and 40 days after tunneled line placement, she said. Children with leukemia, other cancers, and congenital heart disease were at significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism, as were children who received multilumen catheters, she noted.

Ongoing analyses should lead to new guidelines on pediatric catheter selection, insertion techniques, and the prophylactic use of anticoagulation or antiseptics, Dr. Jaffray said. She also is planning a separate study of children younger than 6 months, to examine their unique coagulation systems, she added.

The conclusion at this point is that two-thirds of this cohort received PICCs instead of tunneled lines, and 85% of venous thromboembolism episodes occurred in PICC recipients, Dr. Jaffray emphasized. “Due to their ease of insertion, PICCs are being placed at increasing rates in some pediatric centers, [and] this may be the leading factor for the increasing incidence of pediatric venous thromboembolism,” she commented. “A lot of us pediatric treaters aren’t necessarily giving anticoagulation for an incidental clot, but I think this is something we certainly need to look at. And maybe if we can choose the patients who are at highest risk of VTE, we can consider prophylactic anticoagulation in those kids.”

Dr. Jaffray did not report funding sources and had no relevant financial disclosures.

SAN DIEGO – Rising rates of pediatric venous thromboembolism in the United States underscore the need to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of placing central lines, Julie Jaffray, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are especially likely to lead to deep vein thrombosis in children, said Dr. Jaffray of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California. Children and adolescents who received PICCs had about fourfold the rate of this outcome in the next 6 months as did those who received tunneled lines, based on interim results from her first-in-kind, prospective multicenter observational study.

Amy Karon

Earlier research has shown that the placement of PICCs approximately doubled at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles between 2005 and 2012, while the use of tunneled lines remained constant at a much-lower rate, Dr. Jaffray noted.

To better understand how central lines contribute to pediatric thrombotic events, she and her associates at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Texas Children’s Hospital in Houston are studying patients aged 6 months to 18 years who had these devices placed at their centers starting in 2013. To parse out risk factors, the investigators are analyzing numerous relevant keywords from nursing notes and other parts of electronic health records.

As of October 2016, the study included 1,096 patients who received a total of 1,233 central lines related to the treatment of cancer, infection, and other serious conditions. Among 827 PICC recipients, the 6-month cumulative rate of venous thromboembolism was 7.5%. In contrast, only 406 patients received tunneled lines, and only 2% developed venous thromboembolism (P = .004).

But tunneled lines had their own risks. About 16% of recipients developed CLABSI within 6 months, compared with 9% of children who received PICCs (P = .005). The overall rate of CLABSI was 12%, Dr. Jaffray noted.

Thromboses were identified a median of 15 days after PICC placement and 40 days after tunneled line placement, she said. Children with leukemia, other cancers, and congenital heart disease were at significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism, as were children who received multilumen catheters, she noted.

Ongoing analyses should lead to new guidelines on pediatric catheter selection, insertion techniques, and the prophylactic use of anticoagulation or antiseptics, Dr. Jaffray said. She also is planning a separate study of children younger than 6 months, to examine their unique coagulation systems, she added.

The conclusion at this point is that two-thirds of this cohort received PICCs instead of tunneled lines, and 85% of venous thromboembolism episodes occurred in PICC recipients, Dr. Jaffray emphasized. “Due to their ease of insertion, PICCs are being placed at increasing rates in some pediatric centers, [and] this may be the leading factor for the increasing incidence of pediatric venous thromboembolism,” she commented. “A lot of us pediatric treaters aren’t necessarily giving anticoagulation for an incidental clot, but I think this is something we certainly need to look at. And maybe if we can choose the patients who are at highest risk of VTE, we can consider prophylactic anticoagulation in those kids.”

Dr. Jaffray did not report funding sources and had no relevant financial disclosures.

SAN DIEGO – A new multi-arm clinical trial aims to transform the treatment of de novo acute myeloid leukemia, a deadly blood cancer whose standard of care has remained essentially stagnant for 40 years.

Launched in October 2016, the multicenter BEAT AML Master Trial provides genomic results of bone marrow biopsies in just 7 days, according to Brian J. Druker, MD, director of the Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland. With results that fast, patients can quickly receive whichever therapy targets the mutation shared by most or all their leukemia cells, Dr. Druker and other researchers said at a press briefing at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Patients who lack targetable markers will be offered investigational therapies that have shown broad activity in AML, the researchers said. The goal is for all participants to receive optimized treatment – whether or not that leads to an FDA approval, they emphasized.

Centers now participating in this trial include Memorial Sloan Kettering, Ohio State University, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Oregon Health and Science University. More centers will join soon, according to the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, which is sponsoring the trial. Researchers designed the trial with input from the FDA and pharmaceutical companies, they said.

In a video interview, Dr. Druker discussed key aspects of the trial and how it could advance treatment options for AML. Dr. Druker, whose work on imatinib helped pioneer precision medicine in cancer, disclosed ties to a number of pharmaceutical companies.

SAN DIEGO – A new multi-arm clinical trial aims to transform the treatment of de novo acute myeloid leukemia, a deadly blood cancer whose standard of care has remained essentially stagnant for 40 years.

Launched in October 2016, the multicenter BEAT AML Master Trial provides genomic results of bone marrow biopsies in just 7 days, according to Brian J. Druker, MD, director of the Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland. With results that fast, patients can quickly receive whichever therapy targets the mutation shared by most or all their leukemia cells, Dr. Druker and other researchers said at a press briefing at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Patients who lack targetable markers will be offered investigational therapies that have shown broad activity in AML, the researchers said. The goal is for all participants to receive optimized treatment – whether or not that leads to an FDA approval, they emphasized.

Centers now participating in this trial include Memorial Sloan Kettering, Ohio State University, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Oregon Health and Science University. More centers will join soon, according to the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, which is sponsoring the trial. Researchers designed the trial with input from the FDA and pharmaceutical companies, they said.

In a video interview, Dr. Druker discussed key aspects of the trial and how it could advance treatment options for AML. Dr. Druker, whose work on imatinib helped pioneer precision medicine in cancer, disclosed ties to a number of pharmaceutical companies.

SAN DIEGO – A new multi-arm clinical trial aims to transform the treatment of de novo acute myeloid leukemia, a deadly blood cancer whose standard of care has remained essentially stagnant for 40 years.

Launched in October 2016, the multicenter BEAT AML Master Trial provides genomic results of bone marrow biopsies in just 7 days, according to Brian J. Druker, MD, director of the Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland. With results that fast, patients can quickly receive whichever therapy targets the mutation shared by most or all their leukemia cells, Dr. Druker and other researchers said at a press briefing at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Patients who lack targetable markers will be offered investigational therapies that have shown broad activity in AML, the researchers said. The goal is for all participants to receive optimized treatment – whether or not that leads to an FDA approval, they emphasized.

Centers now participating in this trial include Memorial Sloan Kettering, Ohio State University, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Oregon Health and Science University. More centers will join soon, according to the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, which is sponsoring the trial. Researchers designed the trial with input from the FDA and pharmaceutical companies, they said.

In a video interview, Dr. Druker discussed key aspects of the trial and how it could advance treatment options for AML. Dr. Druker, whose work on imatinib helped pioneer precision medicine in cancer, disclosed ties to a number of pharmaceutical companies.