Amy Karon

Increased donor liver perfusate levels of an underglycosylated glycoprotein predicted primary transplant nonfunction with 100% accuracy in two prospective cohorts, researchers reported in Gastroenterology.

SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

Glycomic alterations of immunoglobulin G “represent inflammatory disturbances in the liver that [mean it] will fail after transplantation,” wrote Xavier Verhelst, MD, of Ghent (Belgium) University Hospital, and his associates. The new glycomarker “could be a tool to safely select high-risk organs for liver transplantation that otherwise would be discarded from the donor pool based on a conventional clinical assessment,” and also could help prevent engraftment failures. “To our knowledge, not a single biomarker has demonstrated the same accuracy today,” they wrote in the April issue of Gastroenterology.

Chronic shortages of donor livers contribute to morbidity and death worldwide. However, relaxing donor criteria is controversial because of the increased risk of primary nonfunction, which affects some 2%-10% of liver transplantation patients, and early allograft dysfunction, which is even more common. Although no reliable scoring systems or biomarkers have been able to predict these outcomes prior to transplantation, clinical glycomics of serum has proven useful for diagnosing hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma, and for distinguishing hepatic steatosis from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. “Perfusate biomarkers are an attractive alternative [to] liver biopsy or serum markers, because perfusate is believed to represent the condition of the entire liver parenchyma and is easy to collect in large volumes,” the researchers wrote.

Accordingly, they studied 66 patients who underwent liver transplantation at a single center in Belgium and a separate validation cohort of 56 transplantation recipients from two centers. The most common reason for liver transplantation was decompensated cirrhosis secondary to alcoholism, followed by chronic hepatitis C or B virus infection, acute liver failure, and polycystic liver disease. Donor grafts were transported using cold static storage (21° C), and hepatic veins were flushed to collect perfusate before transplantation. Protein-linked N-glycans was isolated from these perfusate samples and analyzed with a multicapillary electrophoresis-based ABI3130 sequencer.

The four patients in the primary study cohort who developed primary nonfunction resembled the others in terms of all clinical and demographic parameters except that they had a markedly increased concentration (P less than .0001) of a single-glycan, agalacto core-alpha-1,6-fucosylated biantennary glycan, dubbed NGA2F. The single patient in the validation cohort who developed primary nonfunction also had a significantly increased concentration of NGA2F (P = .037). There were no false positives in either cohort, and a 13% cutoff for perfusate NGA2F level identified primary nonfunction with 100% accuracy, the researchers said. In a multivariable model of donor risk index and perfusate markers, only NGA2F was prognostic for developing primary nonfunction (P less than .0001).

The researchers found no specific glycomic signature for early allograft dysfunction, perhaps because it is more complex and multifactorial, they wrote. Although electrophoresis testing took 48 hours, work is underway to shorten this to a “clinically acceptable time frame,” they added. They recommended multicenter studies to validate their findings.

Funders included the Research Fund – Flanders and Ghent University. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Verhelst X et al. Gastroenterology 2018 Jan 6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.12.027.

Increased donor liver perfusate levels of an underglycosylated glycoprotein predicted primary transplant nonfunction with 100% accuracy in two prospective cohorts, researchers reported in Gastroenterology.

SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

Glycomic alterations of immunoglobulin G “represent inflammatory disturbances in the liver that [mean it] will fail after transplantation,” wrote Xavier Verhelst, MD, of Ghent (Belgium) University Hospital, and his associates. The new glycomarker “could be a tool to safely select high-risk organs for liver transplantation that otherwise would be discarded from the donor pool based on a conventional clinical assessment,” and also could help prevent engraftment failures. “To our knowledge, not a single biomarker has demonstrated the same accuracy today,” they wrote in the April issue of Gastroenterology.

Chronic shortages of donor livers contribute to morbidity and death worldwide. However, relaxing donor criteria is controversial because of the increased risk of primary nonfunction, which affects some 2%-10% of liver transplantation patients, and early allograft dysfunction, which is even more common. Although no reliable scoring systems or biomarkers have been able to predict these outcomes prior to transplantation, clinical glycomics of serum has proven useful for diagnosing hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma, and for distinguishing hepatic steatosis from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. “Perfusate biomarkers are an attractive alternative [to] liver biopsy or serum markers, because perfusate is believed to represent the condition of the entire liver parenchyma and is easy to collect in large volumes,” the researchers wrote.

Accordingly, they studied 66 patients who underwent liver transplantation at a single center in Belgium and a separate validation cohort of 56 transplantation recipients from two centers. The most common reason for liver transplantation was decompensated cirrhosis secondary to alcoholism, followed by chronic hepatitis C or B virus infection, acute liver failure, and polycystic liver disease. Donor grafts were transported using cold static storage (21° C), and hepatic veins were flushed to collect perfusate before transplantation. Protein-linked N-glycans was isolated from these perfusate samples and analyzed with a multicapillary electrophoresis-based ABI3130 sequencer.

The four patients in the primary study cohort who developed primary nonfunction resembled the others in terms of all clinical and demographic parameters except that they had a markedly increased concentration (P less than .0001) of a single-glycan, agalacto core-alpha-1,6-fucosylated biantennary glycan, dubbed NGA2F. The single patient in the validation cohort who developed primary nonfunction also had a significantly increased concentration of NGA2F (P = .037). There were no false positives in either cohort, and a 13% cutoff for perfusate NGA2F level identified primary nonfunction with 100% accuracy, the researchers said. In a multivariable model of donor risk index and perfusate markers, only NGA2F was prognostic for developing primary nonfunction (P less than .0001).

The researchers found no specific glycomic signature for early allograft dysfunction, perhaps because it is more complex and multifactorial, they wrote. Although electrophoresis testing took 48 hours, work is underway to shorten this to a “clinically acceptable time frame,” they added. They recommended multicenter studies to validate their findings.

Funders included the Research Fund – Flanders and Ghent University. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Verhelst X et al. Gastroenterology 2018 Jan 6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.12.027.

Increased donor liver perfusate levels of an underglycosylated glycoprotein predicted primary transplant nonfunction with 100% accuracy in two prospective cohorts, researchers reported in Gastroenterology.

SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

Glycomic alterations of immunoglobulin G “represent inflammatory disturbances in the liver that [mean it] will fail after transplantation,” wrote Xavier Verhelst, MD, of Ghent (Belgium) University Hospital, and his associates. The new glycomarker “could be a tool to safely select high-risk organs for liver transplantation that otherwise would be discarded from the donor pool based on a conventional clinical assessment,” and also could help prevent engraftment failures. “To our knowledge, not a single biomarker has demonstrated the same accuracy today,” they wrote in the April issue of Gastroenterology.

Chronic shortages of donor livers contribute to morbidity and death worldwide. However, relaxing donor criteria is controversial because of the increased risk of primary nonfunction, which affects some 2%-10% of liver transplantation patients, and early allograft dysfunction, which is even more common. Although no reliable scoring systems or biomarkers have been able to predict these outcomes prior to transplantation, clinical glycomics of serum has proven useful for diagnosing hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma, and for distinguishing hepatic steatosis from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. “Perfusate biomarkers are an attractive alternative [to] liver biopsy or serum markers, because perfusate is believed to represent the condition of the entire liver parenchyma and is easy to collect in large volumes,” the researchers wrote.

Accordingly, they studied 66 patients who underwent liver transplantation at a single center in Belgium and a separate validation cohort of 56 transplantation recipients from two centers. The most common reason for liver transplantation was decompensated cirrhosis secondary to alcoholism, followed by chronic hepatitis C or B virus infection, acute liver failure, and polycystic liver disease. Donor grafts were transported using cold static storage (21° C), and hepatic veins were flushed to collect perfusate before transplantation. Protein-linked N-glycans was isolated from these perfusate samples and analyzed with a multicapillary electrophoresis-based ABI3130 sequencer.

The four patients in the primary study cohort who developed primary nonfunction resembled the others in terms of all clinical and demographic parameters except that they had a markedly increased concentration (P less than .0001) of a single-glycan, agalacto core-alpha-1,6-fucosylated biantennary glycan, dubbed NGA2F. The single patient in the validation cohort who developed primary nonfunction also had a significantly increased concentration of NGA2F (P = .037). There were no false positives in either cohort, and a 13% cutoff for perfusate NGA2F level identified primary nonfunction with 100% accuracy, the researchers said. In a multivariable model of donor risk index and perfusate markers, only NGA2F was prognostic for developing primary nonfunction (P less than .0001).

The researchers found no specific glycomic signature for early allograft dysfunction, perhaps because it is more complex and multifactorial, they wrote. Although electrophoresis testing took 48 hours, work is underway to shorten this to a “clinically acceptable time frame,” they added. They recommended multicenter studies to validate their findings.

Funders included the Research Fund – Flanders and Ghent University. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Verhelst X et al. Gastroenterology 2018 Jan 6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.12.027.

Pioglitazone therapy given for 18 months benefited patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) similarly regardless of whether they had type 2 diabetes mellitus or prediabetes, according to the results of a randomized prospective trial.

SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

The primary outcome, at least a 2-point reduction in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score compared with placebo, without worsening fibrosis, was met by 48% of NASH patients with T2DM and by 46% of those with prediabetes, reported Fernando Bril, MD, of the division of endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism at the University of Florida, Gainesville, and his associates. The report was published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
 

NASH resolved completely in 44% with T2DM and 26% of patients without it, respectively, perhaps indicating that pioglitazone acts slightly differently when patients with NASH have T2DM, according to the investigators. “Although the effects on fibrosis appear to be similar in both groups, pioglitazone may contribute to halting [its] rapid progression [in T2DM],” they wrote. “These differences will deserve further exploration in larger clinical trials.”

The trial (NCT00994682) enrolled 101 patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH, of whom 52 had T2DM and 49 had prediabetes based on clinical history, baseline fasting plasma glucose, hemoglobin A_1c, and an oral glucose tolerance test, as per American Diabetes Association guidelines. After a 4-week run-in period, patients were randomly assigned to receive either pioglitazone (45 mg per day) or placebo for 18 months. All patients received lifestyle counseling and a hypocaloric (500-kcal reduced) diet.

Compared with placebo, pioglitazone improved most secondary outcomes similarly regardless of whether patients were T2DM or prediabetes. The two exceptions were fibrosis and insulin sensitivity of adipose tissue. Patients with T2DM only experienced improved fibrosis in the setting of pioglitazone therapy (P = .035 vs. baseline). In prediabetic patients, fibrosis lessened moderately over time, regardless of whether they received pioglitazone or placebo. Insulin sensitivity of adipose tissue improved much more markedly with treatment in patients with T2DM (P less than .001 vs. baseline) than in those with prediabetes (P = .002 for T2DM vs. prediabetes).

Compared with placebo, pioglitazone improved hepatic and skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity similarly, regardless of diabetes status. Likewise, intrahepatic triglyceride content, as measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, fell by 11% in pioglitazone recipients with T2DM and by 9% of those with prediabetes, a nonsignificant difference. Pioglitazone also led to a statistically similar decrease in plasma alanine aminotransferase level regardless of whether patients had T2DM (50 U/L) or were prediabetic (36 U/L).

This trial’s key takeaway is that pioglitazone improves liver histology in NASH whether or not patients are diabetic, said the researchers. “We believed that it was essential to compare its efficacy in patients with [and] without T2DM because of the vast number of patients with prediabetes and NASH and given the significant metabolic and cardioprotective effects of pioglitazone among patients without T2DM,” they wrote. The natural history of NASH is worse in the presence of T2DM, which might explain pioglitazone’s superior effects on fibrosis and insulin sensitivity of adipose tissue in this population, they added.

The Burroughs Wellcome Fund, the American Diabetes Association, and the Veteran’s Affairs Merit Award supported the work. Senior author Kenneth Cusi, MD, disclosed nonfinancial support from Takeda Pharmaceuticals, grants from Novartis and Janssen Research and Development, and consulting relationships with Eli Lilly, Tobira Therapeutics, and Pfizer. The other authors had no conflicts.

Source: Bril F, et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb 24. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.12.001.

Pioglitazone therapy given for 18 months benefited patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) similarly regardless of whether they had type 2 diabetes mellitus or prediabetes, according to the results of a randomized prospective trial.

SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

The primary outcome, at least a 2-point reduction in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score compared with placebo, without worsening fibrosis, was met by 48% of NASH patients with T2DM and by 46% of those with prediabetes, reported Fernando Bril, MD, of the division of endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism at the University of Florida, Gainesville, and his associates. The report was published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
 

NASH resolved completely in 44% with T2DM and 26% of patients without it, respectively, perhaps indicating that pioglitazone acts slightly differently when patients with NASH have T2DM, according to the investigators. “Although the effects on fibrosis appear to be similar in both groups, pioglitazone may contribute to halting [its] rapid progression [in T2DM],” they wrote. “These differences will deserve further exploration in larger clinical trials.”

The trial (NCT00994682) enrolled 101 patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH, of whom 52 had T2DM and 49 had prediabetes based on clinical history, baseline fasting plasma glucose, hemoglobin A_1c, and an oral glucose tolerance test, as per American Diabetes Association guidelines. After a 4-week run-in period, patients were randomly assigned to receive either pioglitazone (45 mg per day) or placebo for 18 months. All patients received lifestyle counseling and a hypocaloric (500-kcal reduced) diet.

Compared with placebo, pioglitazone improved most secondary outcomes similarly regardless of whether patients were T2DM or prediabetes. The two exceptions were fibrosis and insulin sensitivity of adipose tissue. Patients with T2DM only experienced improved fibrosis in the setting of pioglitazone therapy (P = .035 vs. baseline). In prediabetic patients, fibrosis lessened moderately over time, regardless of whether they received pioglitazone or placebo. Insulin sensitivity of adipose tissue improved much more markedly with treatment in patients with T2DM (P less than .001 vs. baseline) than in those with prediabetes (P = .002 for T2DM vs. prediabetes).

Compared with placebo, pioglitazone improved hepatic and skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity similarly, regardless of diabetes status. Likewise, intrahepatic triglyceride content, as measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, fell by 11% in pioglitazone recipients with T2DM and by 9% of those with prediabetes, a nonsignificant difference. Pioglitazone also led to a statistically similar decrease in plasma alanine aminotransferase level regardless of whether patients had T2DM (50 U/L) or were prediabetic (36 U/L).

This trial’s key takeaway is that pioglitazone improves liver histology in NASH whether or not patients are diabetic, said the researchers. “We believed that it was essential to compare its efficacy in patients with [and] without T2DM because of the vast number of patients with prediabetes and NASH and given the significant metabolic and cardioprotective effects of pioglitazone among patients without T2DM,” they wrote. The natural history of NASH is worse in the presence of T2DM, which might explain pioglitazone’s superior effects on fibrosis and insulin sensitivity of adipose tissue in this population, they added.

The Burroughs Wellcome Fund, the American Diabetes Association, and the Veteran’s Affairs Merit Award supported the work. Senior author Kenneth Cusi, MD, disclosed nonfinancial support from Takeda Pharmaceuticals, grants from Novartis and Janssen Research and Development, and consulting relationships with Eli Lilly, Tobira Therapeutics, and Pfizer. The other authors had no conflicts.

Source: Bril F, et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb 24. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.12.001.

Pioglitazone therapy given for 18 months benefited patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) similarly regardless of whether they had type 2 diabetes mellitus or prediabetes, according to the results of a randomized prospective trial.

SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

The primary outcome, at least a 2-point reduction in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score compared with placebo, without worsening fibrosis, was met by 48% of NASH patients with T2DM and by 46% of those with prediabetes, reported Fernando Bril, MD, of the division of endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism at the University of Florida, Gainesville, and his associates. The report was published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
 

NASH resolved completely in 44% with T2DM and 26% of patients without it, respectively, perhaps indicating that pioglitazone acts slightly differently when patients with NASH have T2DM, according to the investigators. “Although the effects on fibrosis appear to be similar in both groups, pioglitazone may contribute to halting [its] rapid progression [in T2DM],” they wrote. “These differences will deserve further exploration in larger clinical trials.”

The trial (NCT00994682) enrolled 101 patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH, of whom 52 had T2DM and 49 had prediabetes based on clinical history, baseline fasting plasma glucose, hemoglobin A_1c, and an oral glucose tolerance test, as per American Diabetes Association guidelines. After a 4-week run-in period, patients were randomly assigned to receive either pioglitazone (45 mg per day) or placebo for 18 months. All patients received lifestyle counseling and a hypocaloric (500-kcal reduced) diet.

Compared with placebo, pioglitazone improved most secondary outcomes similarly regardless of whether patients were T2DM or prediabetes. The two exceptions were fibrosis and insulin sensitivity of adipose tissue. Patients with T2DM only experienced improved fibrosis in the setting of pioglitazone therapy (P = .035 vs. baseline). In prediabetic patients, fibrosis lessened moderately over time, regardless of whether they received pioglitazone or placebo. Insulin sensitivity of adipose tissue improved much more markedly with treatment in patients with T2DM (P less than .001 vs. baseline) than in those with prediabetes (P = .002 for T2DM vs. prediabetes).

Compared with placebo, pioglitazone improved hepatic and skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity similarly, regardless of diabetes status. Likewise, intrahepatic triglyceride content, as measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, fell by 11% in pioglitazone recipients with T2DM and by 9% of those with prediabetes, a nonsignificant difference. Pioglitazone also led to a statistically similar decrease in plasma alanine aminotransferase level regardless of whether patients had T2DM (50 U/L) or were prediabetic (36 U/L).

This trial’s key takeaway is that pioglitazone improves liver histology in NASH whether or not patients are diabetic, said the researchers. “We believed that it was essential to compare its efficacy in patients with [and] without T2DM because of the vast number of patients with prediabetes and NASH and given the significant metabolic and cardioprotective effects of pioglitazone among patients without T2DM,” they wrote. The natural history of NASH is worse in the presence of T2DM, which might explain pioglitazone’s superior effects on fibrosis and insulin sensitivity of adipose tissue in this population, they added.

The Burroughs Wellcome Fund, the American Diabetes Association, and the Veteran’s Affairs Merit Award supported the work. Senior author Kenneth Cusi, MD, disclosed nonfinancial support from Takeda Pharmaceuticals, grants from Novartis and Janssen Research and Development, and consulting relationships with Eli Lilly, Tobira Therapeutics, and Pfizer. The other authors had no conflicts.

Source: Bril F, et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb 24. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.12.001.

Among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), opioid prescriptions tripled during a recent 20-year period, and heavy use of strong opioids was a significant predictor of all-cause mortality, according to a large cohort study reported in the April issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Because this study was retrospective, it could not establish causality, said Nicholas E. Burr, MD, of the University of Leeds (England) and his associates. But “[de]signing and conducting a large-scale randomized controlled trial may not be feasible,” they wrote. “Despite the limitations of observational data, population data sets may be the best method to investigate a potential effect.”

Liderina/Thinkstock

The gastrointestinal side effects of many analgesics complicate pain management for patients with IBD, who not only live with chronic abdominal pain but also can develop arthropathy-related musculoskeletal pain, chronic widespread pain, and fibromyalgia. In addition to the risk of narcotic bowel associated with opioid use in IBD, opioids can mask flares in IBD or can cause toxic dilatation if administered during acute flares, the researchers noted. Because few studies had examined opioid use in IBD, the investigators retrospectively studied 3,517 individuals with Crohn’s disease and 5,349 patients with ulcerative colitis from ResearchOne, a primary care electronic health records database that covers about 10% of patients in England. The data set excluded patients with indeterminate colitis or who underwent colectomy for ulcerative colitis.

From 1990 through 1993, only 10% of patients with IBD were prescribed opioids, vs. 30% from 2010 through 2013 (P less than .005). After the investigators controlled for numerous demographic and clinical variables, being prescribed a strong opioid (morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, buprenorphine, methadone, hydromorphone, or pethidine) more than three times per year significantly correlated with all-cause mortality in both Crohn’s disease (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.0) and ulcerative colitis (HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.8-6.2), the researchers reported.Among patients with ulcerative colitis, more moderate use of strong opioids (one to three prescriptions annually) also significantly correlated with all-cause mortality (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-5.2), as did heavy use of codeine (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1), but these associations did not reach statistical significance among patients with Crohn’s disease. Tramadol was not linked to mortality in either IBD subtype when used alone or in combination with codeine.

Dr. Burr and his associates said they could not control for several important potential confounders, including fistulating disease, quality of life, mental illness, substance abuse, and history of abuse, all of which have been linked to opioid use in IBD. Nonetheless, they found dose-dependent correlations with mortality that highlight a need for pharmacovigilance of opioids in IBD, particularly given dramatic increases in prescriptions, they said. These were primary care data, which tend to accurately reflect long-term medication use, they noted.

Crohn’s and Colitis U.K. and the Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Charitable Foundation provided funding. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Burr NE et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.022.

Among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), opioid prescriptions tripled during a recent 20-year period, and heavy use of strong opioids was a significant predictor of all-cause mortality, according to a large cohort study reported in the April issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Because this study was retrospective, it could not establish causality, said Nicholas E. Burr, MD, of the University of Leeds (England) and his associates. But “[de]signing and conducting a large-scale randomized controlled trial may not be feasible,” they wrote. “Despite the limitations of observational data, population data sets may be the best method to investigate a potential effect.”

Liderina/Thinkstock

The gastrointestinal side effects of many analgesics complicate pain management for patients with IBD, who not only live with chronic abdominal pain but also can develop arthropathy-related musculoskeletal pain, chronic widespread pain, and fibromyalgia. In addition to the risk of narcotic bowel associated with opioid use in IBD, opioids can mask flares in IBD or can cause toxic dilatation if administered during acute flares, the researchers noted. Because few studies had examined opioid use in IBD, the investigators retrospectively studied 3,517 individuals with Crohn’s disease and 5,349 patients with ulcerative colitis from ResearchOne, a primary care electronic health records database that covers about 10% of patients in England. The data set excluded patients with indeterminate colitis or who underwent colectomy for ulcerative colitis.

From 1990 through 1993, only 10% of patients with IBD were prescribed opioids, vs. 30% from 2010 through 2013 (P less than .005). After the investigators controlled for numerous demographic and clinical variables, being prescribed a strong opioid (morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, buprenorphine, methadone, hydromorphone, or pethidine) more than three times per year significantly correlated with all-cause mortality in both Crohn’s disease (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.0) and ulcerative colitis (HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.8-6.2), the researchers reported.Among patients with ulcerative colitis, more moderate use of strong opioids (one to three prescriptions annually) also significantly correlated with all-cause mortality (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-5.2), as did heavy use of codeine (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1), but these associations did not reach statistical significance among patients with Crohn’s disease. Tramadol was not linked to mortality in either IBD subtype when used alone or in combination with codeine.

Dr. Burr and his associates said they could not control for several important potential confounders, including fistulating disease, quality of life, mental illness, substance abuse, and history of abuse, all of which have been linked to opioid use in IBD. Nonetheless, they found dose-dependent correlations with mortality that highlight a need for pharmacovigilance of opioids in IBD, particularly given dramatic increases in prescriptions, they said. These were primary care data, which tend to accurately reflect long-term medication use, they noted.

Crohn’s and Colitis U.K. and the Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Charitable Foundation provided funding. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Burr NE et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.022.

Among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), opioid prescriptions tripled during a recent 20-year period, and heavy use of strong opioids was a significant predictor of all-cause mortality, according to a large cohort study reported in the April issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Because this study was retrospective, it could not establish causality, said Nicholas E. Burr, MD, of the University of Leeds (England) and his associates. But “[de]signing and conducting a large-scale randomized controlled trial may not be feasible,” they wrote. “Despite the limitations of observational data, population data sets may be the best method to investigate a potential effect.”

Liderina/Thinkstock

The gastrointestinal side effects of many analgesics complicate pain management for patients with IBD, who not only live with chronic abdominal pain but also can develop arthropathy-related musculoskeletal pain, chronic widespread pain, and fibromyalgia. In addition to the risk of narcotic bowel associated with opioid use in IBD, opioids can mask flares in IBD or can cause toxic dilatation if administered during acute flares, the researchers noted. Because few studies had examined opioid use in IBD, the investigators retrospectively studied 3,517 individuals with Crohn’s disease and 5,349 patients with ulcerative colitis from ResearchOne, a primary care electronic health records database that covers about 10% of patients in England. The data set excluded patients with indeterminate colitis or who underwent colectomy for ulcerative colitis.

From 1990 through 1993, only 10% of patients with IBD were prescribed opioids, vs. 30% from 2010 through 2013 (P less than .005). After the investigators controlled for numerous demographic and clinical variables, being prescribed a strong opioid (morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, buprenorphine, methadone, hydromorphone, or pethidine) more than three times per year significantly correlated with all-cause mortality in both Crohn’s disease (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.0) and ulcerative colitis (HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.8-6.2), the researchers reported.Among patients with ulcerative colitis, more moderate use of strong opioids (one to three prescriptions annually) also significantly correlated with all-cause mortality (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-5.2), as did heavy use of codeine (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1), but these associations did not reach statistical significance among patients with Crohn’s disease. Tramadol was not linked to mortality in either IBD subtype when used alone or in combination with codeine.

Dr. Burr and his associates said they could not control for several important potential confounders, including fistulating disease, quality of life, mental illness, substance abuse, and history of abuse, all of which have been linked to opioid use in IBD. Nonetheless, they found dose-dependent correlations with mortality that highlight a need for pharmacovigilance of opioids in IBD, particularly given dramatic increases in prescriptions, they said. These were primary care data, which tend to accurately reflect long-term medication use, they noted.

Crohn’s and Colitis U.K. and the Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Charitable Foundation provided funding. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Burr NE et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.022.

Evacetrapib missed its primary MACE endpoint compared with placebo among patients with high-risk vascular disease, including those who were homozygous (AA) for polymorphism rs1967309 of the ADCY gene, in a large nested case-control analysis of the ACCELERATE trial.
The results contradict those for another cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor – dalcetrapib –  which has shown significant cardiovascular benefits only among AA patients.

“Although directionally similar to the dalcetrapib analysis, there was no significant interaction between genotype and cardiovascular outcome with evacetrapib,” Steven E. Nissen, MD, and his associates wrote simultaneously in JAMA Cardiology and reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

Four CETP inhibitors have reached full-scale development: evacetrapib, dalcetrapib, torcetrapib, and anacetrapib. They all markedly increase circulating HDL, and all except dalcetrapib cut circulating LDL. But those benefits largely haven’t extended to the key endpoint, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). In large trials, torcetrapib increased MACE, anacetrapib reduced MACE by such a small amount that its maker did not file for FDA approval, and evacetrapib and dalcetrapib had no effect on MACE. 

But there was a caveat for dalcetrapib. In a post-hoc analysis of its placebo-controlled trial, the CETP inhibitor reduced MACE by 39% among AA individuals and increased MACE by 27% among GG individuals, those homozygous negative for the SNP rs1967309. 

These findings could make sense because ADCY gene variants have been linked to carotid intimal medial thickness, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and cholesterol efflux capacity, wrote Dr. Nissen of the department of cardiovascular medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Mar 11. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0569). 

To explore whether ADCY genotypep also affects evacetrapib response, he and his associates compared 1,427 cases with MACE with 1,532 matched controls from the international, randomized, double-blind ACCELERATE (Assessment of Clinical Effects of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibition with Evacetrapib in Patients at a High Risk for Vascular Outcomes) trial (NCT01687998). Participants had cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease, peripheral arterial disease, coronary artery disease with diabetes, or recent acute coronary syndrome. They received oral evacetrapib (130 mg) or placebo, and the primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina.

Evacetrapib missed this primary endpoint in all genetic subgroups. Odds ratios for evacetrapib compared with placebo were 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 1.12) among AA patients, 1.04 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.21) among heterozygous (AG) patients, and 1.18 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.41) among GG patients. A test for interaction also was insignificant (P = .17). A test for trend nearly reached significance (P = .06), but weakened when the investigators controlled for cardiovascular risk factors or looked only at hard cardiovascular outcomes, they said.

Thus, the relationship between evacetrapib response and AA genotype “was far less in magnitude than observed in the pharmacogenetic study with dalcetrapib,” they wrote. Dalcetrapib is a weaker CETP inhibitor than evacetrapib, the study populations weren’t identical, and the trials used different statistical methods, all of which could explain the discrepant findings, they added. “The completion of the dalcetrapib pharmacogenetics outcome trial should clarify whether this is a false signal or a paradigm-shifting discovery.”

Eli Lilly provided funding, helped design and conduct the study, and helped write the manuscript. Dr. Nissen reported receiving grants and nonfinancial support from Eli Lilly while conducting the study. Several coinvestigators also disclosed ties to Eli Lilly and six reported being employees of the company.

Source: JAMA Cardiol. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0569.

Evacetrapib missed its primary MACE endpoint compared with placebo among patients with high-risk vascular disease, including those who were homozygous (AA) for polymorphism rs1967309 of the ADCY gene, in a large nested case-control analysis of the ACCELERATE trial.
The results contradict those for another cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor – dalcetrapib –  which has shown significant cardiovascular benefits only among AA patients.

“Although directionally similar to the dalcetrapib analysis, there was no significant interaction between genotype and cardiovascular outcome with evacetrapib,” Steven E. Nissen, MD, and his associates wrote simultaneously in JAMA Cardiology and reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

Four CETP inhibitors have reached full-scale development: evacetrapib, dalcetrapib, torcetrapib, and anacetrapib. They all markedly increase circulating HDL, and all except dalcetrapib cut circulating LDL. But those benefits largely haven’t extended to the key endpoint, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). In large trials, torcetrapib increased MACE, anacetrapib reduced MACE by such a small amount that its maker did not file for FDA approval, and evacetrapib and dalcetrapib had no effect on MACE. 

But there was a caveat for dalcetrapib. In a post-hoc analysis of its placebo-controlled trial, the CETP inhibitor reduced MACE by 39% among AA individuals and increased MACE by 27% among GG individuals, those homozygous negative for the SNP rs1967309. 

These findings could make sense because ADCY gene variants have been linked to carotid intimal medial thickness, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and cholesterol efflux capacity, wrote Dr. Nissen of the department of cardiovascular medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Mar 11. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0569). 

To explore whether ADCY genotypep also affects evacetrapib response, he and his associates compared 1,427 cases with MACE with 1,532 matched controls from the international, randomized, double-blind ACCELERATE (Assessment of Clinical Effects of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibition with Evacetrapib in Patients at a High Risk for Vascular Outcomes) trial (NCT01687998). Participants had cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease, peripheral arterial disease, coronary artery disease with diabetes, or recent acute coronary syndrome. They received oral evacetrapib (130 mg) or placebo, and the primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina.

Evacetrapib missed this primary endpoint in all genetic subgroups. Odds ratios for evacetrapib compared with placebo were 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 1.12) among AA patients, 1.04 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.21) among heterozygous (AG) patients, and 1.18 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.41) among GG patients. A test for interaction also was insignificant (P = .17). A test for trend nearly reached significance (P = .06), but weakened when the investigators controlled for cardiovascular risk factors or looked only at hard cardiovascular outcomes, they said.

Thus, the relationship between evacetrapib response and AA genotype “was far less in magnitude than observed in the pharmacogenetic study with dalcetrapib,” they wrote. Dalcetrapib is a weaker CETP inhibitor than evacetrapib, the study populations weren’t identical, and the trials used different statistical methods, all of which could explain the discrepant findings, they added. “The completion of the dalcetrapib pharmacogenetics outcome trial should clarify whether this is a false signal or a paradigm-shifting discovery.”

Eli Lilly provided funding, helped design and conduct the study, and helped write the manuscript. Dr. Nissen reported receiving grants and nonfinancial support from Eli Lilly while conducting the study. Several coinvestigators also disclosed ties to Eli Lilly and six reported being employees of the company.

Source: JAMA Cardiol. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0569.

Evacetrapib missed its primary MACE endpoint compared with placebo among patients with high-risk vascular disease, including those who were homozygous (AA) for polymorphism rs1967309 of the ADCY gene, in a large nested case-control analysis of the ACCELERATE trial.
The results contradict those for another cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor – dalcetrapib –  which has shown significant cardiovascular benefits only among AA patients.

“Although directionally similar to the dalcetrapib analysis, there was no significant interaction between genotype and cardiovascular outcome with evacetrapib,” Steven E. Nissen, MD, and his associates wrote simultaneously in JAMA Cardiology and reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

Four CETP inhibitors have reached full-scale development: evacetrapib, dalcetrapib, torcetrapib, and anacetrapib. They all markedly increase circulating HDL, and all except dalcetrapib cut circulating LDL. But those benefits largely haven’t extended to the key endpoint, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). In large trials, torcetrapib increased MACE, anacetrapib reduced MACE by such a small amount that its maker did not file for FDA approval, and evacetrapib and dalcetrapib had no effect on MACE. 

But there was a caveat for dalcetrapib. In a post-hoc analysis of its placebo-controlled trial, the CETP inhibitor reduced MACE by 39% among AA individuals and increased MACE by 27% among GG individuals, those homozygous negative for the SNP rs1967309. 

These findings could make sense because ADCY gene variants have been linked to carotid intimal medial thickness, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and cholesterol efflux capacity, wrote Dr. Nissen of the department of cardiovascular medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Mar 11. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0569). 

To explore whether ADCY genotypep also affects evacetrapib response, he and his associates compared 1,427 cases with MACE with 1,532 matched controls from the international, randomized, double-blind ACCELERATE (Assessment of Clinical Effects of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibition with Evacetrapib in Patients at a High Risk for Vascular Outcomes) trial (NCT01687998). Participants had cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease, peripheral arterial disease, coronary artery disease with diabetes, or recent acute coronary syndrome. They received oral evacetrapib (130 mg) or placebo, and the primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina.

Evacetrapib missed this primary endpoint in all genetic subgroups. Odds ratios for evacetrapib compared with placebo were 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 1.12) among AA patients, 1.04 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.21) among heterozygous (AG) patients, and 1.18 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.41) among GG patients. A test for interaction also was insignificant (P = .17). A test for trend nearly reached significance (P = .06), but weakened when the investigators controlled for cardiovascular risk factors or looked only at hard cardiovascular outcomes, they said.

Thus, the relationship between evacetrapib response and AA genotype “was far less in magnitude than observed in the pharmacogenetic study with dalcetrapib,” they wrote. Dalcetrapib is a weaker CETP inhibitor than evacetrapib, the study populations weren’t identical, and the trials used different statistical methods, all of which could explain the discrepant findings, they added. “The completion of the dalcetrapib pharmacogenetics outcome trial should clarify whether this is a false signal or a paradigm-shifting discovery.”

Eli Lilly provided funding, helped design and conduct the study, and helped write the manuscript. Dr. Nissen reported receiving grants and nonfinancial support from Eli Lilly while conducting the study. Several coinvestigators also disclosed ties to Eli Lilly and six reported being employees of the company.

Source: JAMA Cardiol. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0569.

For patients under age 75 years with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor was noninferior to continuing clopidogrel in terms of 30-day rates of major bleeding, investigators reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

Catherine Hackett/Frontline Medical News

Rates of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding through 30 days were 0.73% in the ticagrelor group and 0.69% in the clopidogrel group, for an absolute difference of 0.04% (95% confidence interval, −0.49% to 0.58%; P less than .001 for noninferiority). “However, minor bleeding was increased with ticagrelor, and there was no benefit on efficacy outcomes,” Otavio Berwanger, MD, PhD, wrote simultaneously in JAMA Cardiology, on behalf of the writing committee for the randomized, phase 3, open-label TREAT trial.

Abundant, robust data support prompt revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but the real world doesn’t always meet this standard, and lytics remain in wide use in many countries, noted Dr. Berwanger, Director of the Research Institute at the Heart Hospital of Sao Paulo (Brazil). In the early 2000s, two large trials showed that dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel reduced major adverse cardiovascular events in patients receiving fibrinolytics for STEMI. More recently, the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) study favored ticagrelor over clopidogrel for reducing cardiovascular or stroke-related death, with no increase in the risk of major bleeding, despite ticagrelor’s boxed warning.  

However, PLATO excluded patients who received fibrinolytics in the 24 hours before treatment because of concerns that ticagrelor might contribute to serious or fatal bleeding. To assess this risk, Dr. Berwanger and his associates from 10 countries randomly assigned 3,799 patients with STEMI to receive either ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose; 90 mg twice daily thereafter) or clopidogrel (300-mg to 600-mg loading dose; 75 mg daily thereafter) a median of 11.4 hours after fibrinolysis. Patients averaged 58 years in age (standard deviation, 9.5 years), 77% were men, and 57% were white. 

Because about 90% of patients had been pretreated with clopidogrel, the study primarily compared the effect of staying on clopidogrel with switching to ticagrelor, the investigators noted. “Our trial was an investigator- initiated trial with limited funding that did not allow a double-dummy design,” they added. “We attempted to minimize the risk of bias associated with the open-label nature of the study by performing blinded outcome adjudication.”

In terms of secondary endpoints, 23 patients (1.2%) on ticagrelor developed major bleeding according to PLATO criteria and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria, as did 26 patients (1.4%) on clopidogrel at 30-day follow-up (absolute difference, −0.18%; 95% CI, −0.89% to 0.54; P = .001 for noninferiority). Ticagrelor and clopidogrel also resembled each other in terms of fatal bleeds (0.16% versus 0.11%, respectively; P = .67) and intracranial bleeds (0.42% versus 0.37%; P = .82).

However, minimal PLATO bleeding was significantly more common with ticagrelor (3.2%) than with clopidogrel (2%; P = .02), the researchers reported. Clinically significant TIMI bleeding requiring medical attention occurred in 2% of the ticagrelor group and 1.2% of the clopidogrel group (P = .06), and ticagrelor was no more effective than clopidogrel in terms of preventing death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke, with a composite rate of 4% in each arm and a statistically insignificant hazard ratio of (0.91; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.25; P = .57). 

Additionally, while similar proportions of patients stopped treatment because of adverse events, dyspnea was more common with ticagrelor (13.9%) than clopidogrel (7.6%). “Based on our findings, patients with STEMI younger than 75 years who initially received clopidogrel can be safely switched to ticagrelor in the first 24 hours after fibrinolysis,” the researchers wrote. “Whether this strategy will result in fewer cardiovascular events in the long term remains to be determined.”

AstraZeneca makes ticagrelor and funded the trial. Dr. Berwanger disclosed grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca and several other pharmaceutical companies.

Source: JAMA Cardiol. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0612

For patients under age 75 years with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor was noninferior to continuing clopidogrel in terms of 30-day rates of major bleeding, investigators reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

Catherine Hackett/Frontline Medical News

Rates of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding through 30 days were 0.73% in the ticagrelor group and 0.69% in the clopidogrel group, for an absolute difference of 0.04% (95% confidence interval, −0.49% to 0.58%; P less than .001 for noninferiority). “However, minor bleeding was increased with ticagrelor, and there was no benefit on efficacy outcomes,” Otavio Berwanger, MD, PhD, wrote simultaneously in JAMA Cardiology, on behalf of the writing committee for the randomized, phase 3, open-label TREAT trial.

Abundant, robust data support prompt revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but the real world doesn’t always meet this standard, and lytics remain in wide use in many countries, noted Dr. Berwanger, Director of the Research Institute at the Heart Hospital of Sao Paulo (Brazil). In the early 2000s, two large trials showed that dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel reduced major adverse cardiovascular events in patients receiving fibrinolytics for STEMI. More recently, the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) study favored ticagrelor over clopidogrel for reducing cardiovascular or stroke-related death, with no increase in the risk of major bleeding, despite ticagrelor’s boxed warning.  

However, PLATO excluded patients who received fibrinolytics in the 24 hours before treatment because of concerns that ticagrelor might contribute to serious or fatal bleeding. To assess this risk, Dr. Berwanger and his associates from 10 countries randomly assigned 3,799 patients with STEMI to receive either ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose; 90 mg twice daily thereafter) or clopidogrel (300-mg to 600-mg loading dose; 75 mg daily thereafter) a median of 11.4 hours after fibrinolysis. Patients averaged 58 years in age (standard deviation, 9.5 years), 77% were men, and 57% were white. 

Because about 90% of patients had been pretreated with clopidogrel, the study primarily compared the effect of staying on clopidogrel with switching to ticagrelor, the investigators noted. “Our trial was an investigator- initiated trial with limited funding that did not allow a double-dummy design,” they added. “We attempted to minimize the risk of bias associated with the open-label nature of the study by performing blinded outcome adjudication.”

In terms of secondary endpoints, 23 patients (1.2%) on ticagrelor developed major bleeding according to PLATO criteria and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria, as did 26 patients (1.4%) on clopidogrel at 30-day follow-up (absolute difference, −0.18%; 95% CI, −0.89% to 0.54; P = .001 for noninferiority). Ticagrelor and clopidogrel also resembled each other in terms of fatal bleeds (0.16% versus 0.11%, respectively; P = .67) and intracranial bleeds (0.42% versus 0.37%; P = .82).

However, minimal PLATO bleeding was significantly more common with ticagrelor (3.2%) than with clopidogrel (2%; P = .02), the researchers reported. Clinically significant TIMI bleeding requiring medical attention occurred in 2% of the ticagrelor group and 1.2% of the clopidogrel group (P = .06), and ticagrelor was no more effective than clopidogrel in terms of preventing death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke, with a composite rate of 4% in each arm and a statistically insignificant hazard ratio of (0.91; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.25; P = .57). 

Additionally, while similar proportions of patients stopped treatment because of adverse events, dyspnea was more common with ticagrelor (13.9%) than clopidogrel (7.6%). “Based on our findings, patients with STEMI younger than 75 years who initially received clopidogrel can be safely switched to ticagrelor in the first 24 hours after fibrinolysis,” the researchers wrote. “Whether this strategy will result in fewer cardiovascular events in the long term remains to be determined.”

AstraZeneca makes ticagrelor and funded the trial. Dr. Berwanger disclosed grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca and several other pharmaceutical companies.

Source: JAMA Cardiol. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0612

For patients under age 75 years with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor was noninferior to continuing clopidogrel in terms of 30-day rates of major bleeding, investigators reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

Catherine Hackett/Frontline Medical News

Rates of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding through 30 days were 0.73% in the ticagrelor group and 0.69% in the clopidogrel group, for an absolute difference of 0.04% (95% confidence interval, −0.49% to 0.58%; P less than .001 for noninferiority). “However, minor bleeding was increased with ticagrelor, and there was no benefit on efficacy outcomes,” Otavio Berwanger, MD, PhD, wrote simultaneously in JAMA Cardiology, on behalf of the writing committee for the randomized, phase 3, open-label TREAT trial.

Abundant, robust data support prompt revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but the real world doesn’t always meet this standard, and lytics remain in wide use in many countries, noted Dr. Berwanger, Director of the Research Institute at the Heart Hospital of Sao Paulo (Brazil). In the early 2000s, two large trials showed that dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel reduced major adverse cardiovascular events in patients receiving fibrinolytics for STEMI. More recently, the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) study favored ticagrelor over clopidogrel for reducing cardiovascular or stroke-related death, with no increase in the risk of major bleeding, despite ticagrelor’s boxed warning.  

However, PLATO excluded patients who received fibrinolytics in the 24 hours before treatment because of concerns that ticagrelor might contribute to serious or fatal bleeding. To assess this risk, Dr. Berwanger and his associates from 10 countries randomly assigned 3,799 patients with STEMI to receive either ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose; 90 mg twice daily thereafter) or clopidogrel (300-mg to 600-mg loading dose; 75 mg daily thereafter) a median of 11.4 hours after fibrinolysis. Patients averaged 58 years in age (standard deviation, 9.5 years), 77% were men, and 57% were white. 

Because about 90% of patients had been pretreated with clopidogrel, the study primarily compared the effect of staying on clopidogrel with switching to ticagrelor, the investigators noted. “Our trial was an investigator- initiated trial with limited funding that did not allow a double-dummy design,” they added. “We attempted to minimize the risk of bias associated with the open-label nature of the study by performing blinded outcome adjudication.”

In terms of secondary endpoints, 23 patients (1.2%) on ticagrelor developed major bleeding according to PLATO criteria and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria, as did 26 patients (1.4%) on clopidogrel at 30-day follow-up (absolute difference, −0.18%; 95% CI, −0.89% to 0.54; P = .001 for noninferiority). Ticagrelor and clopidogrel also resembled each other in terms of fatal bleeds (0.16% versus 0.11%, respectively; P = .67) and intracranial bleeds (0.42% versus 0.37%; P = .82).

However, minimal PLATO bleeding was significantly more common with ticagrelor (3.2%) than with clopidogrel (2%; P = .02), the researchers reported. Clinically significant TIMI bleeding requiring medical attention occurred in 2% of the ticagrelor group and 1.2% of the clopidogrel group (P = .06), and ticagrelor was no more effective than clopidogrel in terms of preventing death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke, with a composite rate of 4% in each arm and a statistically insignificant hazard ratio of (0.91; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.25; P = .57). 

Additionally, while similar proportions of patients stopped treatment because of adverse events, dyspnea was more common with ticagrelor (13.9%) than clopidogrel (7.6%). “Based on our findings, patients with STEMI younger than 75 years who initially received clopidogrel can be safely switched to ticagrelor in the first 24 hours after fibrinolysis,” the researchers wrote. “Whether this strategy will result in fewer cardiovascular events in the long term remains to be determined.”

AstraZeneca makes ticagrelor and funded the trial. Dr. Berwanger disclosed grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca and several other pharmaceutical companies.

Source: JAMA Cardiol. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0612

Endoscopic treatment of T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma outperformed esophagectomy across a range of ages and comorbidity levels in a Markov model.

Esophagectomy produced 0.16 more unadjusted life-years, but led to 0.27 fewer quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), in the hypothetical case of a 75-year-old man with T1aN0M0 esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and a Charlson comorbidity index score of 0, reported Jacqueline N. Chu, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and her associates. “[We] believe QALYs are a more important endpoint because of the significant morbidity associated with esophagectomy,” they wrote in the March issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

In contrast, the model portrayed the management of T1b EAC as “an individualized decision” – esophagectomy was preferable in 60- to 70-year-old patients with T1b EAC, but serial endoscopic treatment was better when patients were older, with more comorbidities, the researchers said. “For the sickest patients, those aged 80 and older with comorbidity index of 2, endoscopic treatment not only provided more QALYs but more unadjusted life years as well.”

Treatment of T1a EAC is transitioning from esophagectomy to serial endoscopic resection, which physicians still tend to regard as too risky in T1b EAC. The Markov model evaluated the efficacy and cost efficacy of the two approaches in hypothetical T1a and T1b patients of various ages and comorbidities, using cancer death data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare database and published cost data converted to 2017 U.S. dollars based on the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index.

SOURCE: Chu JN et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov 24. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.024.

Endoscopic treatment of T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma outperformed esophagectomy across a range of ages and comorbidity levels in a Markov model.

Esophagectomy produced 0.16 more unadjusted life-years, but led to 0.27 fewer quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), in the hypothetical case of a 75-year-old man with T1aN0M0 esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and a Charlson comorbidity index score of 0, reported Jacqueline N. Chu, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and her associates. “[We] believe QALYs are a more important endpoint because of the significant morbidity associated with esophagectomy,” they wrote in the March issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

In contrast, the model portrayed the management of T1b EAC as “an individualized decision” – esophagectomy was preferable in 60- to 70-year-old patients with T1b EAC, but serial endoscopic treatment was better when patients were older, with more comorbidities, the researchers said. “For the sickest patients, those aged 80 and older with comorbidity index of 2, endoscopic treatment not only provided more QALYs but more unadjusted life years as well.”

Treatment of T1a EAC is transitioning from esophagectomy to serial endoscopic resection, which physicians still tend to regard as too risky in T1b EAC. The Markov model evaluated the efficacy and cost efficacy of the two approaches in hypothetical T1a and T1b patients of various ages and comorbidities, using cancer death data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare database and published cost data converted to 2017 U.S. dollars based on the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index.

SOURCE: Chu JN et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov 24. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.024.

Endoscopic treatment of T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma outperformed esophagectomy across a range of ages and comorbidity levels in a Markov model.

Esophagectomy produced 0.16 more unadjusted life-years, but led to 0.27 fewer quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), in the hypothetical case of a 75-year-old man with T1aN0M0 esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and a Charlson comorbidity index score of 0, reported Jacqueline N. Chu, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and her associates. “[We] believe QALYs are a more important endpoint because of the significant morbidity associated with esophagectomy,” they wrote in the March issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

In contrast, the model portrayed the management of T1b EAC as “an individualized decision” – esophagectomy was preferable in 60- to 70-year-old patients with T1b EAC, but serial endoscopic treatment was better when patients were older, with more comorbidities, the researchers said. “For the sickest patients, those aged 80 and older with comorbidity index of 2, endoscopic treatment not only provided more QALYs but more unadjusted life years as well.”

Treatment of T1a EAC is transitioning from esophagectomy to serial endoscopic resection, which physicians still tend to regard as too risky in T1b EAC. The Markov model evaluated the efficacy and cost efficacy of the two approaches in hypothetical T1a and T1b patients of various ages and comorbidities, using cancer death data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare database and published cost data converted to 2017 U.S. dollars based on the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index.

SOURCE: Chu JN et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov 24. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.024.

Between 70% and 80% of patients with ulcerative colitis relapsed within 10 years of diagnosis and 10%-15% had aggressive disease in a meta-analysis of 17 population-based cohorts spanning 1935 to 2016.

However, “contemporary population-based cohorts of patients diagnosed in the biologic era are lacking,” [and they] “may inform us of the population-level impact of paradigm shifts in approach to ulcerative colitis management during the last decade, such as early use of disease-modifying biologic therapy and treat-to-target [strategies],” wrote Mathurin Fumery, MD, of the University of California San Diego, La Jolla. The report was published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2017 Jun 16. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.016).

Population-based observational cohort studies follow an entire group in a geographic area over an extended time, which better characterizes the true natural history of disease outside highly controlled settings of clinical trials, the reviewers noted. They searched MEDLINE for population-based longitudinal studies of adults with newly diagnosed ulcerative colitis, whose medical records were reviewed, and who were followed for at least a year. They identified 60 such studies of 17 cohorts that included 15,316 patients in southern and northern Europe, Australia, Israel, the United States, Canada, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Macau, Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand.

Left-sided colitis was most common (median, 40%; interquartile range, 33%-45%) and about 10%-30% of patients had disease extension. Patients tended to have mild to moderate disease that was most active at diagnosis and subsequently alternated between remission and mild activity. However, nearly half of patients were hospitalized at some point because of ulcerative colitis, and about half of that subgroup was rehospitalized within 5 years. Furthermore, up to 15% of patients with ulcerative colitis underwent colectomy within 10 years, a risk that mucosal healing helped mitigate. Use of corticosteroids dropped over time as the prevalence of immunomodulators and anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy rose.

SOURCE: Fumery M et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jun 16. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.016.

Between 70% and 80% of patients with ulcerative colitis relapsed within 10 years of diagnosis and 10%-15% had aggressive disease in a meta-analysis of 17 population-based cohorts spanning 1935 to 2016.

However, “contemporary population-based cohorts of patients diagnosed in the biologic era are lacking,” [and they] “may inform us of the population-level impact of paradigm shifts in approach to ulcerative colitis management during the last decade, such as early use of disease-modifying biologic therapy and treat-to-target [strategies],” wrote Mathurin Fumery, MD, of the University of California San Diego, La Jolla. The report was published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2017 Jun 16. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.016).

Population-based observational cohort studies follow an entire group in a geographic area over an extended time, which better characterizes the true natural history of disease outside highly controlled settings of clinical trials, the reviewers noted. They searched MEDLINE for population-based longitudinal studies of adults with newly diagnosed ulcerative colitis, whose medical records were reviewed, and who were followed for at least a year. They identified 60 such studies of 17 cohorts that included 15,316 patients in southern and northern Europe, Australia, Israel, the United States, Canada, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Macau, Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand.

Left-sided colitis was most common (median, 40%; interquartile range, 33%-45%) and about 10%-30% of patients had disease extension. Patients tended to have mild to moderate disease that was most active at diagnosis and subsequently alternated between remission and mild activity. However, nearly half of patients were hospitalized at some point because of ulcerative colitis, and about half of that subgroup was rehospitalized within 5 years. Furthermore, up to 15% of patients with ulcerative colitis underwent colectomy within 10 years, a risk that mucosal healing helped mitigate. Use of corticosteroids dropped over time as the prevalence of immunomodulators and anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy rose.

SOURCE: Fumery M et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jun 16. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.016.

Between 70% and 80% of patients with ulcerative colitis relapsed within 10 years of diagnosis and 10%-15% had aggressive disease in a meta-analysis of 17 population-based cohorts spanning 1935 to 2016.

However, “contemporary population-based cohorts of patients diagnosed in the biologic era are lacking,” [and they] “may inform us of the population-level impact of paradigm shifts in approach to ulcerative colitis management during the last decade, such as early use of disease-modifying biologic therapy and treat-to-target [strategies],” wrote Mathurin Fumery, MD, of the University of California San Diego, La Jolla. The report was published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2017 Jun 16. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.016).

Population-based observational cohort studies follow an entire group in a geographic area over an extended time, which better characterizes the true natural history of disease outside highly controlled settings of clinical trials, the reviewers noted. They searched MEDLINE for population-based longitudinal studies of adults with newly diagnosed ulcerative colitis, whose medical records were reviewed, and who were followed for at least a year. They identified 60 such studies of 17 cohorts that included 15,316 patients in southern and northern Europe, Australia, Israel, the United States, Canada, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Macau, Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand.

Left-sided colitis was most common (median, 40%; interquartile range, 33%-45%) and about 10%-30% of patients had disease extension. Patients tended to have mild to moderate disease that was most active at diagnosis and subsequently alternated between remission and mild activity. However, nearly half of patients were hospitalized at some point because of ulcerative colitis, and about half of that subgroup was rehospitalized within 5 years. Furthermore, up to 15% of patients with ulcerative colitis underwent colectomy within 10 years, a risk that mucosal healing helped mitigate. Use of corticosteroids dropped over time as the prevalence of immunomodulators and anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy rose.

SOURCE: Fumery M et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jun 16. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.016.

Starting a prescription proton pump inhibitor (PPI) conferred no short-term increase in risk for myocardial infarction in a large retrospective insurance claims study.

SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

Over a median follow-up of 2-3 months, estimated weighted risks of first-ever MI were low and similar regardless of whether patients started PPIs or histamine₂ receptor antagonists (H₂RAs), reported Suzanne N. Landi of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and her associates. “Contrary to prior literature, our analyses do not indicate increased risk of MI in PPI initiators compared to histamine₂-receptor antagonist initiators,” they wrote in the March issue of Gastroenterology.

Epidemiologic studies have produced mixed findings on PPI use and MI risk. Animal models and ex vivo studies of human tissue indicate that PPIs might harm coronary vessels by increasing plasma levels of asymmetrical dimethylarginine, which counteracts the vasoprotective activity of endothelial nitrous oxide synthase, the investigators noted. To further assess PPIs and risk of MI while minimizing potential confounding, they studied new users of either prescription PPIs or an active comparator, prescription H₂RAs. The dataset included administrative claims for more than 5 million patients with no MI history who were enrolled in commercial insurance plans or Medicare Supplemental Insurance plans. The study data spanned from 2001 to 2014, and patients were followed from their initial antacid prescription until they either developed a first-ever MI, stopped their medication, or left their insurance plan. Median follow-up times were 60 days in patients with commercial insurance and 96 days in patients with Medicare Supplemental Insurance, which employers provide for individuals who are at least 65 years old.

After controlling for numerous measurable clinical and demographic confounders, the estimated 12-month risk of MI was about 2 cases per 1,000 commercially insured patients and about 8 cases per 1,000 Medicare Supplemental Insurance enrollees. The estimated 12-month risk of MI did not significantly differ between users of PPIs and H₂RAs, regardless of whether they were enrolled in commercial insurance plans (weighted risk difference per 1,000 users, –0.08; 95% confidence interval, –0.51 to 0.36) or Medicare Supplemental Insurance (weighted risk difference per 1,000 users, –0.45; 95% CI, –1.53 to 0.58) plans.

The researchers received no grant support for this study. Ms. Landi disclosed a student fellowship from UCB Biosciences.

SOURCE: Source: Landi SN et al. Gastroenterology. 2017 Nov 6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.042.

Starting a prescription proton pump inhibitor (PPI) conferred no short-term increase in risk for myocardial infarction in a large retrospective insurance claims study.

SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

Over a median follow-up of 2-3 months, estimated weighted risks of first-ever MI were low and similar regardless of whether patients started PPIs or histamine₂ receptor antagonists (H₂RAs), reported Suzanne N. Landi of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and her associates. “Contrary to prior literature, our analyses do not indicate increased risk of MI in PPI initiators compared to histamine₂-receptor antagonist initiators,” they wrote in the March issue of Gastroenterology.

Epidemiologic studies have produced mixed findings on PPI use and MI risk. Animal models and ex vivo studies of human tissue indicate that PPIs might harm coronary vessels by increasing plasma levels of asymmetrical dimethylarginine, which counteracts the vasoprotective activity of endothelial nitrous oxide synthase, the investigators noted. To further assess PPIs and risk of MI while minimizing potential confounding, they studied new users of either prescription PPIs or an active comparator, prescription H₂RAs. The dataset included administrative claims for more than 5 million patients with no MI history who were enrolled in commercial insurance plans or Medicare Supplemental Insurance plans. The study data spanned from 2001 to 2014, and patients were followed from their initial antacid prescription until they either developed a first-ever MI, stopped their medication, or left their insurance plan. Median follow-up times were 60 days in patients with commercial insurance and 96 days in patients with Medicare Supplemental Insurance, which employers provide for individuals who are at least 65 years old.

After controlling for numerous measurable clinical and demographic confounders, the estimated 12-month risk of MI was about 2 cases per 1,000 commercially insured patients and about 8 cases per 1,000 Medicare Supplemental Insurance enrollees. The estimated 12-month risk of MI did not significantly differ between users of PPIs and H₂RAs, regardless of whether they were enrolled in commercial insurance plans (weighted risk difference per 1,000 users, –0.08; 95% confidence interval, –0.51 to 0.36) or Medicare Supplemental Insurance (weighted risk difference per 1,000 users, –0.45; 95% CI, –1.53 to 0.58) plans.

The researchers received no grant support for this study. Ms. Landi disclosed a student fellowship from UCB Biosciences.

SOURCE: Source: Landi SN et al. Gastroenterology. 2017 Nov 6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.042.

Starting a prescription proton pump inhibitor (PPI) conferred no short-term increase in risk for myocardial infarction in a large retrospective insurance claims study.

SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

Over a median follow-up of 2-3 months, estimated weighted risks of first-ever MI were low and similar regardless of whether patients started PPIs or histamine₂ receptor antagonists (H₂RAs), reported Suzanne N. Landi of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and her associates. “Contrary to prior literature, our analyses do not indicate increased risk of MI in PPI initiators compared to histamine₂-receptor antagonist initiators,” they wrote in the March issue of Gastroenterology.

Epidemiologic studies have produced mixed findings on PPI use and MI risk. Animal models and ex vivo studies of human tissue indicate that PPIs might harm coronary vessels by increasing plasma levels of asymmetrical dimethylarginine, which counteracts the vasoprotective activity of endothelial nitrous oxide synthase, the investigators noted. To further assess PPIs and risk of MI while minimizing potential confounding, they studied new users of either prescription PPIs or an active comparator, prescription H₂RAs. The dataset included administrative claims for more than 5 million patients with no MI history who were enrolled in commercial insurance plans or Medicare Supplemental Insurance plans. The study data spanned from 2001 to 2014, and patients were followed from their initial antacid prescription until they either developed a first-ever MI, stopped their medication, or left their insurance plan. Median follow-up times were 60 days in patients with commercial insurance and 96 days in patients with Medicare Supplemental Insurance, which employers provide for individuals who are at least 65 years old.

After controlling for numerous measurable clinical and demographic confounders, the estimated 12-month risk of MI was about 2 cases per 1,000 commercially insured patients and about 8 cases per 1,000 Medicare Supplemental Insurance enrollees. The estimated 12-month risk of MI did not significantly differ between users of PPIs and H₂RAs, regardless of whether they were enrolled in commercial insurance plans (weighted risk difference per 1,000 users, –0.08; 95% confidence interval, –0.51 to 0.36) or Medicare Supplemental Insurance (weighted risk difference per 1,000 users, –0.45; 95% CI, –1.53 to 0.58) plans.

The researchers received no grant support for this study. Ms. Landi disclosed a student fellowship from UCB Biosciences.

SOURCE: Source: Landi SN et al. Gastroenterology. 2017 Nov 6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.042.

Patients with acute pancreatitis should receive “goal-directed” fluid therapy with normal saline or Ringer’s lactate solution rather than hydroxyethyl starch (HES) fluids, states a new guideline from the AGA Institute.

In a single-center randomized trial, hydroxyethyl starch fluids conferred a 3.9-fold increase in the odds of multiorgan failure (95% confidence interval for odds ratio, 1.2-12.0) compared with normal saline in patients with acute pancreatitis, wrote guideline authors Seth D. Crockett, MD, MPH, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and his associates. This trial and another randomized study found no mortality benefit for HES compared with fluid resuscitation. The evidence is “very low quality” but mirrors the critical care literature, according to the experts. So far, Ringer’s lactate solution and normal saline have shown similar effects on the risk of organ failure, necrosis, and mortality, but ongoing trials should better clarify this choice, they noted (Gastroenterology. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.032).

The guideline addresses the initial 2-week period of treating acute pancreatitis. It defines goal-directed fluid therapy as titration based on meaningful targets, such as heart rate, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, urine output, blood urea nitrogen concentration, and hematocrit. Studies of goal-directed fluid therapy in acute pancreatitis have been unblinded, have used inconsistent outcome measures, and have found no definite benefits over nontargeted fluid therapy, note the guideline authors. Nevertheless, they conditionally recommend goal-directed fluid therapy, partly because a randomized, blinded trial of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock (which physiologically resembles acute pancreatitis) had in-hospital mortality rates of 31% when they received goal-directed fluid therapy and 47% when they received standard fluid therapy (P = .0009).

The guideline recommends against routine use of two interventions: prophylactic antibiotics and urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for patients with acute pancreatitis. The authors note that no evidence supports routine prophylactic antibiotics for acute pancreatitis patients without cholangitis, and that urgent ERCP did not significantly affect the risk of mortality, multiorgan failure, single-organ failure, infected pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis, or necrotizing pancreatitis in eight randomized controlled trials of patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis.

Source: Crockett SD et al. Gastroenterology. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.032.

Patients with acute pancreatitis should receive “goal-directed” fluid therapy with normal saline or Ringer’s lactate solution rather than hydroxyethyl starch (HES) fluids, states a new guideline from the AGA Institute.

In a single-center randomized trial, hydroxyethyl starch fluids conferred a 3.9-fold increase in the odds of multiorgan failure (95% confidence interval for odds ratio, 1.2-12.0) compared with normal saline in patients with acute pancreatitis, wrote guideline authors Seth D. Crockett, MD, MPH, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and his associates. This trial and another randomized study found no mortality benefit for HES compared with fluid resuscitation. The evidence is “very low quality” but mirrors the critical care literature, according to the experts. So far, Ringer’s lactate solution and normal saline have shown similar effects on the risk of organ failure, necrosis, and mortality, but ongoing trials should better clarify this choice, they noted (Gastroenterology. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.032).

The guideline addresses the initial 2-week period of treating acute pancreatitis. It defines goal-directed fluid therapy as titration based on meaningful targets, such as heart rate, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, urine output, blood urea nitrogen concentration, and hematocrit. Studies of goal-directed fluid therapy in acute pancreatitis have been unblinded, have used inconsistent outcome measures, and have found no definite benefits over nontargeted fluid therapy, note the guideline authors. Nevertheless, they conditionally recommend goal-directed fluid therapy, partly because a randomized, blinded trial of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock (which physiologically resembles acute pancreatitis) had in-hospital mortality rates of 31% when they received goal-directed fluid therapy and 47% when they received standard fluid therapy (P = .0009).

The guideline recommends against routine use of two interventions: prophylactic antibiotics and urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for patients with acute pancreatitis. The authors note that no evidence supports routine prophylactic antibiotics for acute pancreatitis patients without cholangitis, and that urgent ERCP did not significantly affect the risk of mortality, multiorgan failure, single-organ failure, infected pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis, or necrotizing pancreatitis in eight randomized controlled trials of patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis.

Source: Crockett SD et al. Gastroenterology. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.032.

Patients with acute pancreatitis should receive “goal-directed” fluid therapy with normal saline or Ringer’s lactate solution rather than hydroxyethyl starch (HES) fluids, states a new guideline from the AGA Institute.

In a single-center randomized trial, hydroxyethyl starch fluids conferred a 3.9-fold increase in the odds of multiorgan failure (95% confidence interval for odds ratio, 1.2-12.0) compared with normal saline in patients with acute pancreatitis, wrote guideline authors Seth D. Crockett, MD, MPH, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and his associates. This trial and another randomized study found no mortality benefit for HES compared with fluid resuscitation. The evidence is “very low quality” but mirrors the critical care literature, according to the experts. So far, Ringer’s lactate solution and normal saline have shown similar effects on the risk of organ failure, necrosis, and mortality, but ongoing trials should better clarify this choice, they noted (Gastroenterology. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.032).

The guideline addresses the initial 2-week period of treating acute pancreatitis. It defines goal-directed fluid therapy as titration based on meaningful targets, such as heart rate, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, urine output, blood urea nitrogen concentration, and hematocrit. Studies of goal-directed fluid therapy in acute pancreatitis have been unblinded, have used inconsistent outcome measures, and have found no definite benefits over nontargeted fluid therapy, note the guideline authors. Nevertheless, they conditionally recommend goal-directed fluid therapy, partly because a randomized, blinded trial of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock (which physiologically resembles acute pancreatitis) had in-hospital mortality rates of 31% when they received goal-directed fluid therapy and 47% when they received standard fluid therapy (P = .0009).

The guideline recommends against routine use of two interventions: prophylactic antibiotics and urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for patients with acute pancreatitis. The authors note that no evidence supports routine prophylactic antibiotics for acute pancreatitis patients without cholangitis, and that urgent ERCP did not significantly affect the risk of mortality, multiorgan failure, single-organ failure, infected pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis, or necrotizing pancreatitis in eight randomized controlled trials of patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis.

Source: Crockett SD et al. Gastroenterology. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.032.