User login
MRI is a critical part of the MS precision medicine toolkit
DALLAS – MRI has long been important in both diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis (MS). It’s more important than ever though, as perivenular demyelinating lesions emerge as a potential biomarker of the disease, and a key tool in precision medicine initiatives that target MS.
“The central vein sign is at the current time still a research tool that is being touted as an imaging finding that may be a very useful biomarker for diagnosis in MS,” said Jiwon Oh, MD, PhD, in an interview at the meeting presented by the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis.
It’s almost ready for “prime time,” she said, “because it can easily be acquired on most conventional 3 Tesla MRI scanners, the sequences that you use don’t require an inordinate amount of time [and] it doesn’t take too much training to be able to easily identify the sign.”
A number of groups have evaluated the central vein sign and are finding it “a very specific biomarker” for MS, Dr. Oh said.
“It would be very useful in very early stages of diagnosis because it would prevent people from being misdiagnosed” and being treated unnecessarily, she said.
In her own work, Dr. Oh and her collaborators are following a cohort of people with radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) discovered incidentally on brain imaging. “It’s a very valuable patient population to study because it may give us insight into the very earliest stages of MS,” as the lesions were not accompanied by any symptoms when they were first noticed.
Dr. Oh and her colleagues are finding that, among RIS patients, “the vast, vast majority of people have lesions with central veins; in our cohort, over 90% of patients met the 40% threshold that has been proposed to distinguish MS from other white matter changes.”
Dr. Oh said that the central vein sign may prove to be prognostic among RIS patients; they continue to follow the cohort being studied at the University of Toronto, where Dr. Oh is a neurologist.
DALLAS – MRI has long been important in both diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis (MS). It’s more important than ever though, as perivenular demyelinating lesions emerge as a potential biomarker of the disease, and a key tool in precision medicine initiatives that target MS.
“The central vein sign is at the current time still a research tool that is being touted as an imaging finding that may be a very useful biomarker for diagnosis in MS,” said Jiwon Oh, MD, PhD, in an interview at the meeting presented by the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis.
It’s almost ready for “prime time,” she said, “because it can easily be acquired on most conventional 3 Tesla MRI scanners, the sequences that you use don’t require an inordinate amount of time [and] it doesn’t take too much training to be able to easily identify the sign.”
A number of groups have evaluated the central vein sign and are finding it “a very specific biomarker” for MS, Dr. Oh said.
“It would be very useful in very early stages of diagnosis because it would prevent people from being misdiagnosed” and being treated unnecessarily, she said.
In her own work, Dr. Oh and her collaborators are following a cohort of people with radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) discovered incidentally on brain imaging. “It’s a very valuable patient population to study because it may give us insight into the very earliest stages of MS,” as the lesions were not accompanied by any symptoms when they were first noticed.
Dr. Oh and her colleagues are finding that, among RIS patients, “the vast, vast majority of people have lesions with central veins; in our cohort, over 90% of patients met the 40% threshold that has been proposed to distinguish MS from other white matter changes.”
Dr. Oh said that the central vein sign may prove to be prognostic among RIS patients; they continue to follow the cohort being studied at the University of Toronto, where Dr. Oh is a neurologist.
DALLAS – MRI has long been important in both diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis (MS). It’s more important than ever though, as perivenular demyelinating lesions emerge as a potential biomarker of the disease, and a key tool in precision medicine initiatives that target MS.
“The central vein sign is at the current time still a research tool that is being touted as an imaging finding that may be a very useful biomarker for diagnosis in MS,” said Jiwon Oh, MD, PhD, in an interview at the meeting presented by the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis.
It’s almost ready for “prime time,” she said, “because it can easily be acquired on most conventional 3 Tesla MRI scanners, the sequences that you use don’t require an inordinate amount of time [and] it doesn’t take too much training to be able to easily identify the sign.”
A number of groups have evaluated the central vein sign and are finding it “a very specific biomarker” for MS, Dr. Oh said.
“It would be very useful in very early stages of diagnosis because it would prevent people from being misdiagnosed” and being treated unnecessarily, she said.
In her own work, Dr. Oh and her collaborators are following a cohort of people with radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) discovered incidentally on brain imaging. “It’s a very valuable patient population to study because it may give us insight into the very earliest stages of MS,” as the lesions were not accompanied by any symptoms when they were first noticed.
Dr. Oh and her colleagues are finding that, among RIS patients, “the vast, vast majority of people have lesions with central veins; in our cohort, over 90% of patients met the 40% threshold that has been proposed to distinguish MS from other white matter changes.”
Dr. Oh said that the central vein sign may prove to be prognostic among RIS patients; they continue to follow the cohort being studied at the University of Toronto, where Dr. Oh is a neurologist.
REPORTING FROM ACTRIMS FORUM 2019
March 2019 Highlights
Food allergies and atopic dermatitis: What is the evidence?
WASHINGTON – The and brings up an interesting discussion, Peter Lio, MD, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Patients are often convinced that food is the main driver of their AD, or parents believe it is a trigger in their children with AD, according to Dr. Lio of the departments of dermatology and pediatrics at Northwestern University, Chicago.
There is an increased risk of true food allergy in patients with AD, which “seems to get worse with increasing severity of the disease,” he pointed out. However, he added, many patients believe that food allergy is what is driving their eczema, “and that’s the part we don’t really think bears out” in clinical trials.
In the interview, Dr. Lio reviewed some of the clinical trial data and discussed other issues, including foods that seem to have an inflammatory effect in the body, the concepts of “transcutaneous sensitization” in children with AD and the “leaky gut,” and why he tends to recommend probiotics for patients with AD.
Dr. Lio spoke on diet and AD during a session titled “Dietary Triggers and Modifications of Common Dermatologic Conditions – An Evidence Based Approach,” at the meeting, He had no relevant disclosures.
WASHINGTON – The and brings up an interesting discussion, Peter Lio, MD, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Patients are often convinced that food is the main driver of their AD, or parents believe it is a trigger in their children with AD, according to Dr. Lio of the departments of dermatology and pediatrics at Northwestern University, Chicago.
There is an increased risk of true food allergy in patients with AD, which “seems to get worse with increasing severity of the disease,” he pointed out. However, he added, many patients believe that food allergy is what is driving their eczema, “and that’s the part we don’t really think bears out” in clinical trials.
In the interview, Dr. Lio reviewed some of the clinical trial data and discussed other issues, including foods that seem to have an inflammatory effect in the body, the concepts of “transcutaneous sensitization” in children with AD and the “leaky gut,” and why he tends to recommend probiotics for patients with AD.
Dr. Lio spoke on diet and AD during a session titled “Dietary Triggers and Modifications of Common Dermatologic Conditions – An Evidence Based Approach,” at the meeting, He had no relevant disclosures.
WASHINGTON – The and brings up an interesting discussion, Peter Lio, MD, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Patients are often convinced that food is the main driver of their AD, or parents believe it is a trigger in their children with AD, according to Dr. Lio of the departments of dermatology and pediatrics at Northwestern University, Chicago.
There is an increased risk of true food allergy in patients with AD, which “seems to get worse with increasing severity of the disease,” he pointed out. However, he added, many patients believe that food allergy is what is driving their eczema, “and that’s the part we don’t really think bears out” in clinical trials.
In the interview, Dr. Lio reviewed some of the clinical trial data and discussed other issues, including foods that seem to have an inflammatory effect in the body, the concepts of “transcutaneous sensitization” in children with AD and the “leaky gut,” and why he tends to recommend probiotics for patients with AD.
Dr. Lio spoke on diet and AD during a session titled “Dietary Triggers and Modifications of Common Dermatologic Conditions – An Evidence Based Approach,” at the meeting, He had no relevant disclosures.
REPORTING FROM AAD 2019
SPD president discusses pediatric research, and more
WASHINGTON – in an interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Dr. Davis, a pediatric dermatologist at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., said that the SPD had a strategic retreat prior to the AAD annual meeting to look at goals attained over the last 3 years “and where we’re going for the next 3 years.” Goals that have been accomplished “move us forward as a society for patient advocacy, specialty advocacy, workforce strengthening, research advancement, patient care, and education,” she noted. The education arena, for example, includes not only educating patients and their families, so they can get the best health care possible, “but we want to educate the pipeline of trainees coming through medical school so ... they have exposure to pediatric dermatology and they can hopefully develop an interest in pediatric dermatology as a future career.”
The SPD now has more than 1,200 members, and has a research arm, the Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance (PeDRA), which has multiple projects, the largest of which is looking at the stigma of skin diseases, a study that involves patients with severe skin diseases and their families, said Dr. Davis. Watch the video above for more on PeDRA and SPD.
Dr. Davis disclosed that she is involved in a study for Regeneron but has not received any personal financial compensation.
WASHINGTON – in an interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Dr. Davis, a pediatric dermatologist at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., said that the SPD had a strategic retreat prior to the AAD annual meeting to look at goals attained over the last 3 years “and where we’re going for the next 3 years.” Goals that have been accomplished “move us forward as a society for patient advocacy, specialty advocacy, workforce strengthening, research advancement, patient care, and education,” she noted. The education arena, for example, includes not only educating patients and their families, so they can get the best health care possible, “but we want to educate the pipeline of trainees coming through medical school so ... they have exposure to pediatric dermatology and they can hopefully develop an interest in pediatric dermatology as a future career.”
The SPD now has more than 1,200 members, and has a research arm, the Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance (PeDRA), which has multiple projects, the largest of which is looking at the stigma of skin diseases, a study that involves patients with severe skin diseases and their families, said Dr. Davis. Watch the video above for more on PeDRA and SPD.
Dr. Davis disclosed that she is involved in a study for Regeneron but has not received any personal financial compensation.
WASHINGTON – in an interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Dr. Davis, a pediatric dermatologist at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., said that the SPD had a strategic retreat prior to the AAD annual meeting to look at goals attained over the last 3 years “and where we’re going for the next 3 years.” Goals that have been accomplished “move us forward as a society for patient advocacy, specialty advocacy, workforce strengthening, research advancement, patient care, and education,” she noted. The education arena, for example, includes not only educating patients and their families, so they can get the best health care possible, “but we want to educate the pipeline of trainees coming through medical school so ... they have exposure to pediatric dermatology and they can hopefully develop an interest in pediatric dermatology as a future career.”
The SPD now has more than 1,200 members, and has a research arm, the Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance (PeDRA), which has multiple projects, the largest of which is looking at the stigma of skin diseases, a study that involves patients with severe skin diseases and their families, said Dr. Davis. Watch the video above for more on PeDRA and SPD.
Dr. Davis disclosed that she is involved in a study for Regeneron but has not received any personal financial compensation.
REPORTING FROM AAD 2019
Dermatologists name isobornyl acrylate contact allergen of the year
WASHINGTON – The American Contact Dermatitis Society has selected isobornyl acrylate the contact allergen of the year. It is an acrylic monomer used as an adhesive.
Among other applications, isobornyl acrylate is often used in medical devices. The selection was made based in part on multiple case reports of diabetes patients developing contact allergies to their diabetes devices, such as insulin pumps, explained Golara Honari, MD, of Stanford (Calif.) University, who presented the selection at the ACDS annual meeting.
The significance of this allergen is that testing through routine panels does not identify it, so clinician awareness is especially important, Dr. Honari noted in a video interview at the meeting.
Most of the reported contact allergen cases have been in patients with diabetes, but clinicians should think about other possible sources, such as acrylic nails, she said. As for treatment, clinicians and patients can consider alternative diabetes devices without isobornyl acrylate, she said.
In the future, close collaboration between clinicians and the medical device industry to develop appropriate labeling can help increase awareness of the potential for allergic reactions, she added.
Dr. Honari had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
WASHINGTON – The American Contact Dermatitis Society has selected isobornyl acrylate the contact allergen of the year. It is an acrylic monomer used as an adhesive.
Among other applications, isobornyl acrylate is often used in medical devices. The selection was made based in part on multiple case reports of diabetes patients developing contact allergies to their diabetes devices, such as insulin pumps, explained Golara Honari, MD, of Stanford (Calif.) University, who presented the selection at the ACDS annual meeting.
The significance of this allergen is that testing through routine panels does not identify it, so clinician awareness is especially important, Dr. Honari noted in a video interview at the meeting.
Most of the reported contact allergen cases have been in patients with diabetes, but clinicians should think about other possible sources, such as acrylic nails, she said. As for treatment, clinicians and patients can consider alternative diabetes devices without isobornyl acrylate, she said.
In the future, close collaboration between clinicians and the medical device industry to develop appropriate labeling can help increase awareness of the potential for allergic reactions, she added.
Dr. Honari had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
WASHINGTON – The American Contact Dermatitis Society has selected isobornyl acrylate the contact allergen of the year. It is an acrylic monomer used as an adhesive.
Among other applications, isobornyl acrylate is often used in medical devices. The selection was made based in part on multiple case reports of diabetes patients developing contact allergies to their diabetes devices, such as insulin pumps, explained Golara Honari, MD, of Stanford (Calif.) University, who presented the selection at the ACDS annual meeting.
The significance of this allergen is that testing through routine panels does not identify it, so clinician awareness is especially important, Dr. Honari noted in a video interview at the meeting.
Most of the reported contact allergen cases have been in patients with diabetes, but clinicians should think about other possible sources, such as acrylic nails, she said. As for treatment, clinicians and patients can consider alternative diabetes devices without isobornyl acrylate, she said.
In the future, close collaboration between clinicians and the medical device industry to develop appropriate labeling can help increase awareness of the potential for allergic reactions, she added.
Dr. Honari had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
AT ACDS 2019
MS research: “Our patients can’t wait” for conventional techniques
DALLAS – The time is right to bring big data and high-horsepower computation to the thorniest problems in multiple sclerosis (MS) research, said Jennifer Graves, MD, who cochaired the closing session at the meeting held by the Americas Committee for Research and Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis. The session focused on harnessing machine learning, deep learning, and the newest noninvasive observational techniques to move research and clinical care forward.
“We’ve reached a point in MS research where we’re hitting some stumbling blocks. And a lot of those stumbling blocks are related to how well and how precisely we can measure phenotype in MS. The reason that’s important is that our next frontier is treating progressive MS – and what that requires is finding things that let us know what’s happening at the biological level, so that we can screen drugs faster. We can’t afford to have 3- to 5-year clinical trials. ... Because our patients can’t wait,” said Dr. Graves, an associate professor of neuroscience at the University of California, San Diego.
“We can use all sorts of big data sources, whether it’s the rich imaging data we get on patients when they go into the MRI scanner, whether it’s wearable sensors,” or even newer technology, Dr. Graves said. “We can use technology to give us the sensitivity that we’ve been missing.”
Wearable technology, including accelerometers, can track physical activity that tracks with outcomes in MS, she added. As the tech armament increases, so will data available for analysis and correlation.
However, the key to progress will be to focus on technology that measures change over time. “This is the key: sensitivity to change over time. A lot of things can be associated with disability,” said Dr. Graves, but the key is tracking what changes in an individual patient with disease progression, “so that we can detect treatment effects or side effects.”
DALLAS – The time is right to bring big data and high-horsepower computation to the thorniest problems in multiple sclerosis (MS) research, said Jennifer Graves, MD, who cochaired the closing session at the meeting held by the Americas Committee for Research and Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis. The session focused on harnessing machine learning, deep learning, and the newest noninvasive observational techniques to move research and clinical care forward.
“We’ve reached a point in MS research where we’re hitting some stumbling blocks. And a lot of those stumbling blocks are related to how well and how precisely we can measure phenotype in MS. The reason that’s important is that our next frontier is treating progressive MS – and what that requires is finding things that let us know what’s happening at the biological level, so that we can screen drugs faster. We can’t afford to have 3- to 5-year clinical trials. ... Because our patients can’t wait,” said Dr. Graves, an associate professor of neuroscience at the University of California, San Diego.
“We can use all sorts of big data sources, whether it’s the rich imaging data we get on patients when they go into the MRI scanner, whether it’s wearable sensors,” or even newer technology, Dr. Graves said. “We can use technology to give us the sensitivity that we’ve been missing.”
Wearable technology, including accelerometers, can track physical activity that tracks with outcomes in MS, she added. As the tech armament increases, so will data available for analysis and correlation.
However, the key to progress will be to focus on technology that measures change over time. “This is the key: sensitivity to change over time. A lot of things can be associated with disability,” said Dr. Graves, but the key is tracking what changes in an individual patient with disease progression, “so that we can detect treatment effects or side effects.”
DALLAS – The time is right to bring big data and high-horsepower computation to the thorniest problems in multiple sclerosis (MS) research, said Jennifer Graves, MD, who cochaired the closing session at the meeting held by the Americas Committee for Research and Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis. The session focused on harnessing machine learning, deep learning, and the newest noninvasive observational techniques to move research and clinical care forward.
“We’ve reached a point in MS research where we’re hitting some stumbling blocks. And a lot of those stumbling blocks are related to how well and how precisely we can measure phenotype in MS. The reason that’s important is that our next frontier is treating progressive MS – and what that requires is finding things that let us know what’s happening at the biological level, so that we can screen drugs faster. We can’t afford to have 3- to 5-year clinical trials. ... Because our patients can’t wait,” said Dr. Graves, an associate professor of neuroscience at the University of California, San Diego.
“We can use all sorts of big data sources, whether it’s the rich imaging data we get on patients when they go into the MRI scanner, whether it’s wearable sensors,” or even newer technology, Dr. Graves said. “We can use technology to give us the sensitivity that we’ve been missing.”
Wearable technology, including accelerometers, can track physical activity that tracks with outcomes in MS, she added. As the tech armament increases, so will data available for analysis and correlation.
However, the key to progress will be to focus on technology that measures change over time. “This is the key: sensitivity to change over time. A lot of things can be associated with disability,” said Dr. Graves, but the key is tracking what changes in an individual patient with disease progression, “so that we can detect treatment effects or side effects.”
REPORTING FROM ACTRIMS FORUM 2019
Medical tourism for MS stem cell therapy is common
DALLAS – “Stem cell therapy is something that has been a topic of interest for neurologists for a while,” said Wijdan Rai, MD, speaking at the meeting presented by the American Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis.
However, “stem cell tourism is notoriously difficult to study, because it’s not regulated; there’s no database we can access to try to figure out what exactly is going on in these clinics,” said Dr. Rai.
Dr. Rai, a neurology resident at the Ohio State University, Columbus, said that she and her colleagues had noticed patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) were asking more frequently about stem cell therapies, and mesenchymal stem cell therapy in particular.
To translate these anecdotal observations into more concrete data, Dr. Rai and her colleagues surveyed academic neurologists in the outpatient setting to see if their patients were asking them about medical tourism for stem cell therapy. Additionally, they were asked about patients who actually had sought out the therapy and if there were adverse reactions from stem cell therapy.
The 25-item questionnaire was sent to academic neurologists via an online survey tool called Synapse through the American Academy of Neurology. Dr. Rai and her colleagues found that over 90% of respondents had been asked about stem cell therapies and that 25% of respondents said their patients had some kind of complication from the treatment.
“Most commonly, it was some variation of an infection, like meningitis, encephalitis, or hepatitis C,” said Dr. Rai. Other physicians reported that their patients had spinal cord tumors, deterioration of MS, or stroke.
with this evidence in hand, she hopes that a fact sheet can be developed and hosted on a website so physicians can point their patients to evidence-based information about stem cell therapies in MS.
DALLAS – “Stem cell therapy is something that has been a topic of interest for neurologists for a while,” said Wijdan Rai, MD, speaking at the meeting presented by the American Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis.
However, “stem cell tourism is notoriously difficult to study, because it’s not regulated; there’s no database we can access to try to figure out what exactly is going on in these clinics,” said Dr. Rai.
Dr. Rai, a neurology resident at the Ohio State University, Columbus, said that she and her colleagues had noticed patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) were asking more frequently about stem cell therapies, and mesenchymal stem cell therapy in particular.
To translate these anecdotal observations into more concrete data, Dr. Rai and her colleagues surveyed academic neurologists in the outpatient setting to see if their patients were asking them about medical tourism for stem cell therapy. Additionally, they were asked about patients who actually had sought out the therapy and if there were adverse reactions from stem cell therapy.
The 25-item questionnaire was sent to academic neurologists via an online survey tool called Synapse through the American Academy of Neurology. Dr. Rai and her colleagues found that over 90% of respondents had been asked about stem cell therapies and that 25% of respondents said their patients had some kind of complication from the treatment.
“Most commonly, it was some variation of an infection, like meningitis, encephalitis, or hepatitis C,” said Dr. Rai. Other physicians reported that their patients had spinal cord tumors, deterioration of MS, or stroke.
with this evidence in hand, she hopes that a fact sheet can be developed and hosted on a website so physicians can point their patients to evidence-based information about stem cell therapies in MS.
DALLAS – “Stem cell therapy is something that has been a topic of interest for neurologists for a while,” said Wijdan Rai, MD, speaking at the meeting presented by the American Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis.
However, “stem cell tourism is notoriously difficult to study, because it’s not regulated; there’s no database we can access to try to figure out what exactly is going on in these clinics,” said Dr. Rai.
Dr. Rai, a neurology resident at the Ohio State University, Columbus, said that she and her colleagues had noticed patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) were asking more frequently about stem cell therapies, and mesenchymal stem cell therapy in particular.
To translate these anecdotal observations into more concrete data, Dr. Rai and her colleagues surveyed academic neurologists in the outpatient setting to see if their patients were asking them about medical tourism for stem cell therapy. Additionally, they were asked about patients who actually had sought out the therapy and if there were adverse reactions from stem cell therapy.
The 25-item questionnaire was sent to academic neurologists via an online survey tool called Synapse through the American Academy of Neurology. Dr. Rai and her colleagues found that over 90% of respondents had been asked about stem cell therapies and that 25% of respondents said their patients had some kind of complication from the treatment.
“Most commonly, it was some variation of an infection, like meningitis, encephalitis, or hepatitis C,” said Dr. Rai. Other physicians reported that their patients had spinal cord tumors, deterioration of MS, or stroke.
with this evidence in hand, she hopes that a fact sheet can be developed and hosted on a website so physicians can point their patients to evidence-based information about stem cell therapies in MS.
REPORTING FROM ACTRIMS FORUM 2019
Smartphone assessment of motor, cognitive function in MS extends clinicians’ reach
DALLAS –
Alexandra Boukhvalova, a medical student at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, and her collaborators developed an interactive smartphone app to assess some aspects of cognitive and motor function for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Their findings were reported during a poster session at the meeting held by the American Society for Prevention and Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis.
“The clinician assessment is an hour-long assessment; it requires a trained neurologist,” Ms. Boukhvalova pointed out. In thinking about how app-based assessment could augment the clinical exam, she and her collaborators realized that “a lot of the neurologic exam is still quite subjective – so is there a way that we can make that exam more objective and quantifiable and also add a little bit of ease with accessibility and mobility?
“We created a suite of test apps ... to assess different neurological systems, ranging from motor function, cognitive and visual dysfunction, general fatigue, and strength,” she said. The apps included tapping tests and balloon-popping tasks, along with measures to give some indication of spasticity by assessing the smoothness of movements.
Participants completed the testing both in the clinic and from home. “We did not need an investigator present for patients to be able to complete the tests,” said Ms. Boukhvalova.
Ms. Boukhvalova and her colleagues compared performance on the gamified tasks between patients with MS and healthy controls. For all tasks, the participants with MS could clearly be differentiated from the healthy participants.
A further plus was that “The patients almost viewed these tests as games.” They reported that they enjoyed completing them, said Ms. Boukhvalova, adding that app-based assessments also offer an additional point of connection between MS patients and specialists, whom they may only see annually or semiannually.
Further app development may focus on utilizing sensor and accelerometer functions in smartphones to perform more natural and sophisticated motor analysis to look at gait and gross motor functioning, she said.
DALLAS –
Alexandra Boukhvalova, a medical student at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, and her collaborators developed an interactive smartphone app to assess some aspects of cognitive and motor function for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Their findings were reported during a poster session at the meeting held by the American Society for Prevention and Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis.
“The clinician assessment is an hour-long assessment; it requires a trained neurologist,” Ms. Boukhvalova pointed out. In thinking about how app-based assessment could augment the clinical exam, she and her collaborators realized that “a lot of the neurologic exam is still quite subjective – so is there a way that we can make that exam more objective and quantifiable and also add a little bit of ease with accessibility and mobility?
“We created a suite of test apps ... to assess different neurological systems, ranging from motor function, cognitive and visual dysfunction, general fatigue, and strength,” she said. The apps included tapping tests and balloon-popping tasks, along with measures to give some indication of spasticity by assessing the smoothness of movements.
Participants completed the testing both in the clinic and from home. “We did not need an investigator present for patients to be able to complete the tests,” said Ms. Boukhvalova.
Ms. Boukhvalova and her colleagues compared performance on the gamified tasks between patients with MS and healthy controls. For all tasks, the participants with MS could clearly be differentiated from the healthy participants.
A further plus was that “The patients almost viewed these tests as games.” They reported that they enjoyed completing them, said Ms. Boukhvalova, adding that app-based assessments also offer an additional point of connection between MS patients and specialists, whom they may only see annually or semiannually.
Further app development may focus on utilizing sensor and accelerometer functions in smartphones to perform more natural and sophisticated motor analysis to look at gait and gross motor functioning, she said.
DALLAS –
Alexandra Boukhvalova, a medical student at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, and her collaborators developed an interactive smartphone app to assess some aspects of cognitive and motor function for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Their findings were reported during a poster session at the meeting held by the American Society for Prevention and Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis.
“The clinician assessment is an hour-long assessment; it requires a trained neurologist,” Ms. Boukhvalova pointed out. In thinking about how app-based assessment could augment the clinical exam, she and her collaborators realized that “a lot of the neurologic exam is still quite subjective – so is there a way that we can make that exam more objective and quantifiable and also add a little bit of ease with accessibility and mobility?
“We created a suite of test apps ... to assess different neurological systems, ranging from motor function, cognitive and visual dysfunction, general fatigue, and strength,” she said. The apps included tapping tests and balloon-popping tasks, along with measures to give some indication of spasticity by assessing the smoothness of movements.
Participants completed the testing both in the clinic and from home. “We did not need an investigator present for patients to be able to complete the tests,” said Ms. Boukhvalova.
Ms. Boukhvalova and her colleagues compared performance on the gamified tasks between patients with MS and healthy controls. For all tasks, the participants with MS could clearly be differentiated from the healthy participants.
A further plus was that “The patients almost viewed these tests as games.” They reported that they enjoyed completing them, said Ms. Boukhvalova, adding that app-based assessments also offer an additional point of connection between MS patients and specialists, whom they may only see annually or semiannually.
Further app development may focus on utilizing sensor and accelerometer functions in smartphones to perform more natural and sophisticated motor analysis to look at gait and gross motor functioning, she said.
REPORTING FROM ACTRIMS FORUM 2019
Don’t forget social determinants of health in minority MS patients
DALLAS – The way Lilyana Amezcua, MD, sees it, clinicians should view race and ethnicity as health disparities when assessing individuals with multiple sclerosis.
Whites are predominately affected with MS, “but we have seen changing demographics,” said Dr. Amezcua, of the University of Southern California MS Comprehensive Care and Research Group. “Why are African Americans now at higher risk ... and why do African Americans appear to have more severe disease? Is it a biological difference ... or is it because of poor access” to health care?
At the meeting held by the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, Dr. Amezcua delivered a presentation entitled “Effect of Race and Ethnicity on MS Presentation and Disease Course.” She called on researchers in the field “to not just take race and ethnicity as any small variable. We need to be cognizant and use the correct methodology, depending on what [question] we want to answer. We need to better define how we ascertain race, how we ascertain ethnicity.”
Dr. Amezcua, who is also the MS fellowship program director at the Keck School of Medicine, disclosed that she receives funding from the National MS Society, the National Institutes of Health, the California Community Foundation, and Biogen.
DALLAS – The way Lilyana Amezcua, MD, sees it, clinicians should view race and ethnicity as health disparities when assessing individuals with multiple sclerosis.
Whites are predominately affected with MS, “but we have seen changing demographics,” said Dr. Amezcua, of the University of Southern California MS Comprehensive Care and Research Group. “Why are African Americans now at higher risk ... and why do African Americans appear to have more severe disease? Is it a biological difference ... or is it because of poor access” to health care?
At the meeting held by the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, Dr. Amezcua delivered a presentation entitled “Effect of Race and Ethnicity on MS Presentation and Disease Course.” She called on researchers in the field “to not just take race and ethnicity as any small variable. We need to be cognizant and use the correct methodology, depending on what [question] we want to answer. We need to better define how we ascertain race, how we ascertain ethnicity.”
Dr. Amezcua, who is also the MS fellowship program director at the Keck School of Medicine, disclosed that she receives funding from the National MS Society, the National Institutes of Health, the California Community Foundation, and Biogen.
DALLAS – The way Lilyana Amezcua, MD, sees it, clinicians should view race and ethnicity as health disparities when assessing individuals with multiple sclerosis.
Whites are predominately affected with MS, “but we have seen changing demographics,” said Dr. Amezcua, of the University of Southern California MS Comprehensive Care and Research Group. “Why are African Americans now at higher risk ... and why do African Americans appear to have more severe disease? Is it a biological difference ... or is it because of poor access” to health care?
At the meeting held by the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, Dr. Amezcua delivered a presentation entitled “Effect of Race and Ethnicity on MS Presentation and Disease Course.” She called on researchers in the field “to not just take race and ethnicity as any small variable. We need to be cognizant and use the correct methodology, depending on what [question] we want to answer. We need to better define how we ascertain race, how we ascertain ethnicity.”
Dr. Amezcua, who is also the MS fellowship program director at the Keck School of Medicine, disclosed that she receives funding from the National MS Society, the National Institutes of Health, the California Community Foundation, and Biogen.
REPORTING FROM ACTRIMS FORUM 2019
Tanuja Chitnis: “It’s the right time” for precision medicine in MS
DALLAS – In an interview at the meeting held by the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, the conference’s cochair, Tanuja Chitnis, MD, explained why this is the right time to take a deep dive into what precision medicine means in MS, for patients and physicians alike.
“We chose the topic of precision medicine for this forum because it’s a really timely issue,” said Dr. Chitnis, noting that there are now over 16 approved treatments for MS, and an increasing recognition that “not every patient has the same disease course.”
“It’s the right time to think about individualized treatment, and not a one-size-fits-all approach,” she said, noting that clinicians and patients stand to benefit from guidance about treatment choices.
“In addition, we are aided by the number of biomarkers that are becoming available,” including quantitative MRI and serum biomarkers. “I think we – as a field – need to understand how to use these in clinical settings in order to guide treatment decisions,” said Dr. Chitnis, professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Advances in data science are allowing the connection of disparate kinds of data for discovery and hypothesis testing and validation, said Dr. Chitnis, who serves as medical director for the large longitudinal CLIMB study. The study follows about 2,000 patients who have yearly neurologic examinations and brain MRI; serum biomarkers and self-report data are also acquired annually.
“Network science can help in the precision medicine approach to multiple sclerosis, because we have a very clear understanding that MS is a complex disease. It is not one gene; it is not one modality,” she said.
Dr. Chitnis reported that she has received research funding from multiple pharmaceutical companies.
DALLAS – In an interview at the meeting held by the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, the conference’s cochair, Tanuja Chitnis, MD, explained why this is the right time to take a deep dive into what precision medicine means in MS, for patients and physicians alike.
“We chose the topic of precision medicine for this forum because it’s a really timely issue,” said Dr. Chitnis, noting that there are now over 16 approved treatments for MS, and an increasing recognition that “not every patient has the same disease course.”
“It’s the right time to think about individualized treatment, and not a one-size-fits-all approach,” she said, noting that clinicians and patients stand to benefit from guidance about treatment choices.
“In addition, we are aided by the number of biomarkers that are becoming available,” including quantitative MRI and serum biomarkers. “I think we – as a field – need to understand how to use these in clinical settings in order to guide treatment decisions,” said Dr. Chitnis, professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Advances in data science are allowing the connection of disparate kinds of data for discovery and hypothesis testing and validation, said Dr. Chitnis, who serves as medical director for the large longitudinal CLIMB study. The study follows about 2,000 patients who have yearly neurologic examinations and brain MRI; serum biomarkers and self-report data are also acquired annually.
“Network science can help in the precision medicine approach to multiple sclerosis, because we have a very clear understanding that MS is a complex disease. It is not one gene; it is not one modality,” she said.
Dr. Chitnis reported that she has received research funding from multiple pharmaceutical companies.
DALLAS – In an interview at the meeting held by the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, the conference’s cochair, Tanuja Chitnis, MD, explained why this is the right time to take a deep dive into what precision medicine means in MS, for patients and physicians alike.
“We chose the topic of precision medicine for this forum because it’s a really timely issue,” said Dr. Chitnis, noting that there are now over 16 approved treatments for MS, and an increasing recognition that “not every patient has the same disease course.”
“It’s the right time to think about individualized treatment, and not a one-size-fits-all approach,” she said, noting that clinicians and patients stand to benefit from guidance about treatment choices.
“In addition, we are aided by the number of biomarkers that are becoming available,” including quantitative MRI and serum biomarkers. “I think we – as a field – need to understand how to use these in clinical settings in order to guide treatment decisions,” said Dr. Chitnis, professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Advances in data science are allowing the connection of disparate kinds of data for discovery and hypothesis testing and validation, said Dr. Chitnis, who serves as medical director for the large longitudinal CLIMB study. The study follows about 2,000 patients who have yearly neurologic examinations and brain MRI; serum biomarkers and self-report data are also acquired annually.
“Network science can help in the precision medicine approach to multiple sclerosis, because we have a very clear understanding that MS is a complex disease. It is not one gene; it is not one modality,” she said.
Dr. Chitnis reported that she has received research funding from multiple pharmaceutical companies.
REPORTING FROM ACTRIMS FORUM 2019
