Maternal serum sST2 and NT-proBNP levels associated with preeclampsia occurrence in twin pregnancies

Article Type
Changed
Sat, 10/29/2022 - 15:55

Key clinical point: A significant and independent association was observed between the serum soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels during the second or early-third trimester and the onset of preeclampsia in women with twin pregnancies.

 

Major finding: Twin pregnancies with vs without preeclampsia were associated with significantly higher maternal serum levels of sST2 and NT-proBNP in the second and early-third trimesters (both P < .001), with a serum sST2 level of ≥30.7 ng/mL (odds ratio [OR] 8.13; P < .001) and NT-proBNP level of ≥282.2 pg/mL (OR 7.20; P < .001) being independently associated with the occurrence of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies.

 

Study details: Findings are from a longitudinal nested case-control study that included women with dichorionic twin pregnancies from a prospective cohort and compared women with (n = 78) and without (n = 78) preeclampsia.

 

Disclosures: This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Xiang Q et al. The correlation between maternal serum sST2, IL-33 and NT-proBNP concentrations and occurrence of pre-eclampsia in twin pregnancies: A longitudinal study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 (Sep 23). Doi: 10.1111/jch.14579

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: A significant and independent association was observed between the serum soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels during the second or early-third trimester and the onset of preeclampsia in women with twin pregnancies.

 

Major finding: Twin pregnancies with vs without preeclampsia were associated with significantly higher maternal serum levels of sST2 and NT-proBNP in the second and early-third trimesters (both P < .001), with a serum sST2 level of ≥30.7 ng/mL (odds ratio [OR] 8.13; P < .001) and NT-proBNP level of ≥282.2 pg/mL (OR 7.20; P < .001) being independently associated with the occurrence of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies.

 

Study details: Findings are from a longitudinal nested case-control study that included women with dichorionic twin pregnancies from a prospective cohort and compared women with (n = 78) and without (n = 78) preeclampsia.

 

Disclosures: This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Xiang Q et al. The correlation between maternal serum sST2, IL-33 and NT-proBNP concentrations and occurrence of pre-eclampsia in twin pregnancies: A longitudinal study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 (Sep 23). Doi: 10.1111/jch.14579

 

Key clinical point: A significant and independent association was observed between the serum soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels during the second or early-third trimester and the onset of preeclampsia in women with twin pregnancies.

 

Major finding: Twin pregnancies with vs without preeclampsia were associated with significantly higher maternal serum levels of sST2 and NT-proBNP in the second and early-third trimesters (both P < .001), with a serum sST2 level of ≥30.7 ng/mL (odds ratio [OR] 8.13; P < .001) and NT-proBNP level of ≥282.2 pg/mL (OR 7.20; P < .001) being independently associated with the occurrence of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies.

 

Study details: Findings are from a longitudinal nested case-control study that included women with dichorionic twin pregnancies from a prospective cohort and compared women with (n = 78) and without (n = 78) preeclampsia.

 

Disclosures: This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Xiang Q et al. The correlation between maternal serum sST2, IL-33 and NT-proBNP concentrations and occurrence of pre-eclampsia in twin pregnancies: A longitudinal study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 (Sep 23). Doi: 10.1111/jch.14579

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Obstetric Emergencies November 2022
Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

No neonatal hypothyroidism risk in newborns from mothers investigated for suspected PE using CTPA

Article Type
Changed
Sat, 10/29/2022 - 15:55

Key clinical point: Exposure to computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in pregnant women with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) did not lead to neonatal hypothyroidism among newborns.

 

Major finding: In newborns from pregnant women with suspected PE who underwent CTPA, all reported Guthrie levels were below 15 U/mL, with no newborns with neonatal hypothyroidism (0.0%, 95% CI 0.0%-2.5%).

 

Study details: The data come from a prospective management outcome study that evaluated 149 pregnant women (including 14 with twin pregnancies) with suspected PE who underwent CTPA.

 

Disclosures: This study was supported by grants from the Swiss National Foundation for scientific research, Groupe d'Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale, and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Presidential Grant. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Righini M et al for the CT-PE-Pregnancy group. Risk of neonatal hypothyroidism in newborns from mothers exposed to CTPA during pregnancy: Ancillary data from a prospective outcome study. J Thromb Haemost. 2022 (Aug 11). Doi: 10.1111/jth.15843

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Exposure to computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in pregnant women with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) did not lead to neonatal hypothyroidism among newborns.

 

Major finding: In newborns from pregnant women with suspected PE who underwent CTPA, all reported Guthrie levels were below 15 U/mL, with no newborns with neonatal hypothyroidism (0.0%, 95% CI 0.0%-2.5%).

 

Study details: The data come from a prospective management outcome study that evaluated 149 pregnant women (including 14 with twin pregnancies) with suspected PE who underwent CTPA.

 

Disclosures: This study was supported by grants from the Swiss National Foundation for scientific research, Groupe d'Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale, and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Presidential Grant. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Righini M et al for the CT-PE-Pregnancy group. Risk of neonatal hypothyroidism in newborns from mothers exposed to CTPA during pregnancy: Ancillary data from a prospective outcome study. J Thromb Haemost. 2022 (Aug 11). Doi: 10.1111/jth.15843

 

Key clinical point: Exposure to computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in pregnant women with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) did not lead to neonatal hypothyroidism among newborns.

 

Major finding: In newborns from pregnant women with suspected PE who underwent CTPA, all reported Guthrie levels were below 15 U/mL, with no newborns with neonatal hypothyroidism (0.0%, 95% CI 0.0%-2.5%).

 

Study details: The data come from a prospective management outcome study that evaluated 149 pregnant women (including 14 with twin pregnancies) with suspected PE who underwent CTPA.

 

Disclosures: This study was supported by grants from the Swiss National Foundation for scientific research, Groupe d'Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale, and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Presidential Grant. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Righini M et al for the CT-PE-Pregnancy group. Risk of neonatal hypothyroidism in newborns from mothers exposed to CTPA during pregnancy: Ancillary data from a prospective outcome study. J Thromb Haemost. 2022 (Aug 11). Doi: 10.1111/jth.15843

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Obstetric Emergencies November 2022
Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Postpartum hemorrhage: Most common maternal morbidity after MTOP at ≥20 weeks’ gestation

Article Type
Changed
Sat, 10/29/2022 - 15:55

Key clinical point: Majority of women undergoing medical termination of pregnancy (MTOP) for fetal anomaly at 20 weeks’ gestation had successful unassisted deliveries, but a quarter had common or severe morbidities, with the most common morbidities being postpartum hemorrhage and manual removal of retained placental tissue.

 

Major finding: Overall, 99.0% of women undergoing MTOP for fetal anomaly at ≥20 weeks' gestation had spontaneous vaginal deliveries and 25.5% had a common or severe morbidity, with the most common maternal morbidities being manual removal of retained placental tissue (16.0%) and postpartum hemorrhage (11.1%). Severe maternal morbidity occurred in 1.3% of cases and included amniotic fluid embolism. No maternal deaths were reported.

 

Study details: Findings are from a 10-year retrospective cohort study including 407 women with singleton pregnancies undergoing MTOP for fetal structure or chromosomal anomaly at ≥20 weeks' gestation.

 

Disclosures: This study did not report the source of funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Stewart B et al. Medical termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly at or beyond 20 weeks' gestation-What are the maternal risks? Prenat Diagn. 2022 (Sep 25). Doi: 10.1002/pd.6241

 

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Majority of women undergoing medical termination of pregnancy (MTOP) for fetal anomaly at 20 weeks’ gestation had successful unassisted deliveries, but a quarter had common or severe morbidities, with the most common morbidities being postpartum hemorrhage and manual removal of retained placental tissue.

 

Major finding: Overall, 99.0% of women undergoing MTOP for fetal anomaly at ≥20 weeks' gestation had spontaneous vaginal deliveries and 25.5% had a common or severe morbidity, with the most common maternal morbidities being manual removal of retained placental tissue (16.0%) and postpartum hemorrhage (11.1%). Severe maternal morbidity occurred in 1.3% of cases and included amniotic fluid embolism. No maternal deaths were reported.

 

Study details: Findings are from a 10-year retrospective cohort study including 407 women with singleton pregnancies undergoing MTOP for fetal structure or chromosomal anomaly at ≥20 weeks' gestation.

 

Disclosures: This study did not report the source of funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Stewart B et al. Medical termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly at or beyond 20 weeks' gestation-What are the maternal risks? Prenat Diagn. 2022 (Sep 25). Doi: 10.1002/pd.6241

 

 

Key clinical point: Majority of women undergoing medical termination of pregnancy (MTOP) for fetal anomaly at 20 weeks’ gestation had successful unassisted deliveries, but a quarter had common or severe morbidities, with the most common morbidities being postpartum hemorrhage and manual removal of retained placental tissue.

 

Major finding: Overall, 99.0% of women undergoing MTOP for fetal anomaly at ≥20 weeks' gestation had spontaneous vaginal deliveries and 25.5% had a common or severe morbidity, with the most common maternal morbidities being manual removal of retained placental tissue (16.0%) and postpartum hemorrhage (11.1%). Severe maternal morbidity occurred in 1.3% of cases and included amniotic fluid embolism. No maternal deaths were reported.

 

Study details: Findings are from a 10-year retrospective cohort study including 407 women with singleton pregnancies undergoing MTOP for fetal structure or chromosomal anomaly at ≥20 weeks' gestation.

 

Disclosures: This study did not report the source of funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Stewart B et al. Medical termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly at or beyond 20 weeks' gestation-What are the maternal risks? Prenat Diagn. 2022 (Sep 25). Doi: 10.1002/pd.6241

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Obstetric Emergencies November 2022
Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Risk for early-onset preeclampsia with gestational use of antihistamines in allergic women

Article Type
Changed
Sat, 10/29/2022 - 15:55

Key clinical point: The use vs non-use of antihistamines during later stages (20-36 weeks) of pregnancy increased the risk for early-onset preeclampsia in women with allergy, whereas the risk was insignificant with antihistamine use before (<6 months) or during early stages of (<20 weeks) pregnancy.

 

Major finding: Compared with no antihistamine use, the risk for early-onset preeclampsia (<34 weeks in pregnancy) was high among women with allergy who used antihistamines during late pregnancy (odds ratio [OR] 1.8; 95% CI 1.5-2.2), but was insignificant among those who used antihistamines before or during early pregnancy.

 

Study details: Findings are from a population-based cohort study including 692,487 pregnancies in women with allergy; 101,287 women used antihistamines either before or during early or late pregnancy.

 

Disclosures: This study was funded by the University of Bergen. No conflicts of interest were declared.

 

Source: Sande AK et al. Use of antihistamines before or during pregnancy and risk of early-onset pre-eclampsia in allergic women: A population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(10):e061837 (Oct 7). Doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061837

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: The use vs non-use of antihistamines during later stages (20-36 weeks) of pregnancy increased the risk for early-onset preeclampsia in women with allergy, whereas the risk was insignificant with antihistamine use before (<6 months) or during early stages of (<20 weeks) pregnancy.

 

Major finding: Compared with no antihistamine use, the risk for early-onset preeclampsia (<34 weeks in pregnancy) was high among women with allergy who used antihistamines during late pregnancy (odds ratio [OR] 1.8; 95% CI 1.5-2.2), but was insignificant among those who used antihistamines before or during early pregnancy.

 

Study details: Findings are from a population-based cohort study including 692,487 pregnancies in women with allergy; 101,287 women used antihistamines either before or during early or late pregnancy.

 

Disclosures: This study was funded by the University of Bergen. No conflicts of interest were declared.

 

Source: Sande AK et al. Use of antihistamines before or during pregnancy and risk of early-onset pre-eclampsia in allergic women: A population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(10):e061837 (Oct 7). Doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061837

 

Key clinical point: The use vs non-use of antihistamines during later stages (20-36 weeks) of pregnancy increased the risk for early-onset preeclampsia in women with allergy, whereas the risk was insignificant with antihistamine use before (<6 months) or during early stages of (<20 weeks) pregnancy.

 

Major finding: Compared with no antihistamine use, the risk for early-onset preeclampsia (<34 weeks in pregnancy) was high among women with allergy who used antihistamines during late pregnancy (odds ratio [OR] 1.8; 95% CI 1.5-2.2), but was insignificant among those who used antihistamines before or during early pregnancy.

 

Study details: Findings are from a population-based cohort study including 692,487 pregnancies in women with allergy; 101,287 women used antihistamines either before or during early or late pregnancy.

 

Disclosures: This study was funded by the University of Bergen. No conflicts of interest were declared.

 

Source: Sande AK et al. Use of antihistamines before or during pregnancy and risk of early-onset pre-eclampsia in allergic women: A population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(10):e061837 (Oct 7). Doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061837

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Obstetric Emergencies November 2022
Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Maternal cardiomyopathy tied to adverse perinatal outcomes

Article Type
Changed
Sat, 10/29/2022 - 15:55

Key clinical point: Pregnancies complicated by cardiomyopathy are more likely to result in adverse perinatal outcomes, including stillbirth, neonatal mortality, preterm birth, and small-for-gestational age neonates compared to healthy pregnancies or those with no other cardiac diseases.

 

Major finding: Pregnancies complicated by cardiomyopathy vs healthy pregnancies were more likely to result in stillbirth (odds ratio [OR] 20.82; P < .00001), neonatal mortality (OR 6.75; P < .00001), preterm birth (OR 5.95; P < .00001), and small-for-gestational age neonates (OR 6.74; P < .00001), with outcomes being similar when compared with pregnancies complicated by other forms of cardiac disease.

 

Study details: Findings are from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 observational cohort, case-control, and case-cohort studies including 2,291,024 pregnancies either complicated by cardiomyopathy or other forms of cardiac diseases and those with no cardiac diseases.

 

Disclosures: CE Aiken was supported by the UK Medical Research Council New Investigator Grant and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, UK. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Eggleton EJ et al. Perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by maternal cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 (Sep 20). Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.025

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Pregnancies complicated by cardiomyopathy are more likely to result in adverse perinatal outcomes, including stillbirth, neonatal mortality, preterm birth, and small-for-gestational age neonates compared to healthy pregnancies or those with no other cardiac diseases.

 

Major finding: Pregnancies complicated by cardiomyopathy vs healthy pregnancies were more likely to result in stillbirth (odds ratio [OR] 20.82; P < .00001), neonatal mortality (OR 6.75; P < .00001), preterm birth (OR 5.95; P < .00001), and small-for-gestational age neonates (OR 6.74; P < .00001), with outcomes being similar when compared with pregnancies complicated by other forms of cardiac disease.

 

Study details: Findings are from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 observational cohort, case-control, and case-cohort studies including 2,291,024 pregnancies either complicated by cardiomyopathy or other forms of cardiac diseases and those with no cardiac diseases.

 

Disclosures: CE Aiken was supported by the UK Medical Research Council New Investigator Grant and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, UK. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Eggleton EJ et al. Perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by maternal cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 (Sep 20). Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.025

 

Key clinical point: Pregnancies complicated by cardiomyopathy are more likely to result in adverse perinatal outcomes, including stillbirth, neonatal mortality, preterm birth, and small-for-gestational age neonates compared to healthy pregnancies or those with no other cardiac diseases.

 

Major finding: Pregnancies complicated by cardiomyopathy vs healthy pregnancies were more likely to result in stillbirth (odds ratio [OR] 20.82; P < .00001), neonatal mortality (OR 6.75; P < .00001), preterm birth (OR 5.95; P < .00001), and small-for-gestational age neonates (OR 6.74; P < .00001), with outcomes being similar when compared with pregnancies complicated by other forms of cardiac disease.

 

Study details: Findings are from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 observational cohort, case-control, and case-cohort studies including 2,291,024 pregnancies either complicated by cardiomyopathy or other forms of cardiac diseases and those with no cardiac diseases.

 

Disclosures: CE Aiken was supported by the UK Medical Research Council New Investigator Grant and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, UK. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Eggleton EJ et al. Perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by maternal cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 (Sep 20). Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.025

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Obstetric Emergencies November 2022
Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

FM during shoulder dystocia management associated with higher rates for severe maternal morbidity

Article Type
Changed
Sat, 10/29/2022 - 15:55

Key clinical point: Management of shoulder dystocia with fetal manipulation (FM) increased the risk for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), with FM being associated with an increased risk for OASI and severe neonatal morbidity.

 

Major finding: Shoulder dystocia managed with vs without FM resulted in significantly higher rates of OASI (21.1% vs 3.8%; odds ratio [OR] 6.72; 95% CI 2.7-15.8) but similar rates of severe neonatal morbidity. FM was associated with the occurrence of OASI (adjusted OR [aOR] 5.3; 95% CI 2.2-12.8) and was the only factor associated with severe neonatal morbidity (aOR 2.3; 95% CI 1.1-4.8).

 

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective observational study including 602 vaginal vertex deliveries in singleton pregnancies, which encountered shoulder dystocia that was managed with (n = 52) or without (n = 550) FM.

 

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Diack B et al. Impact of fetal manipulation on maternal and neonatal severe morbidity during shoulder dystocia management. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 (Sep 23). Doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06783-y

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Management of shoulder dystocia with fetal manipulation (FM) increased the risk for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), with FM being associated with an increased risk for OASI and severe neonatal morbidity.

 

Major finding: Shoulder dystocia managed with vs without FM resulted in significantly higher rates of OASI (21.1% vs 3.8%; odds ratio [OR] 6.72; 95% CI 2.7-15.8) but similar rates of severe neonatal morbidity. FM was associated with the occurrence of OASI (adjusted OR [aOR] 5.3; 95% CI 2.2-12.8) and was the only factor associated with severe neonatal morbidity (aOR 2.3; 95% CI 1.1-4.8).

 

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective observational study including 602 vaginal vertex deliveries in singleton pregnancies, which encountered shoulder dystocia that was managed with (n = 52) or without (n = 550) FM.

 

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Diack B et al. Impact of fetal manipulation on maternal and neonatal severe morbidity during shoulder dystocia management. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 (Sep 23). Doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06783-y

 

Key clinical point: Management of shoulder dystocia with fetal manipulation (FM) increased the risk for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), with FM being associated with an increased risk for OASI and severe neonatal morbidity.

 

Major finding: Shoulder dystocia managed with vs without FM resulted in significantly higher rates of OASI (21.1% vs 3.8%; odds ratio [OR] 6.72; 95% CI 2.7-15.8) but similar rates of severe neonatal morbidity. FM was associated with the occurrence of OASI (adjusted OR [aOR] 5.3; 95% CI 2.2-12.8) and was the only factor associated with severe neonatal morbidity (aOR 2.3; 95% CI 1.1-4.8).

 

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective observational study including 602 vaginal vertex deliveries in singleton pregnancies, which encountered shoulder dystocia that was managed with (n = 52) or without (n = 550) FM.

 

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Diack B et al. Impact of fetal manipulation on maternal and neonatal severe morbidity during shoulder dystocia management. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 (Sep 23). Doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06783-y

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Obstetric Emergencies November 2022
Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

ER-Nifedipine prevents severe hypertension in preeclampsia with severe features

Article Type
Changed
Sat, 10/29/2022 - 15:55

Key clinical point: A dose of 30 mg oral extended-release nifedipine (ER-nifedipine) every 24 hours until delivery effectively reduced the receipt of treatment for acute severe hypertension in individuals with preeclampsia with severe features.

 

Major finding: A significantly lower proportion of individuals who received 30 mg ER-nifedipine vs placebo required 1 dose of acute hypertension therapy for severe blood pressure that sustained for 10 minutes (34.0% vs 55.1%; relative risk 0.62; 95% CI 0.39-0.97). ER-nifedipine vs placebo use led to numerically lower cesarean deliveries (20.8% vs 34.7%) and neonatal intensive care unit admissions (29.1% vs 47.1%).

 

Study details: Findings are from a phase 4 trial including 110 individuals with singleton or twin gestation undergoing labor induction for preeclampsia with severe features who were randomly assigned to receive 30 mg oral ER-nifedipine or placebo every 24 hours until delivery.

 

Disclosures: This study was funded by The Ohio State University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. No conflicts of interest were declared.

 

Source: Cleary EM et al. Trial of intrapartum extended-release nifedipine to prevent severe hypertension among pregnant individuals with preeclampsia with severe features. Hypertension. 2022 (Oct 3). Doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.19751

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: A dose of 30 mg oral extended-release nifedipine (ER-nifedipine) every 24 hours until delivery effectively reduced the receipt of treatment for acute severe hypertension in individuals with preeclampsia with severe features.

 

Major finding: A significantly lower proportion of individuals who received 30 mg ER-nifedipine vs placebo required 1 dose of acute hypertension therapy for severe blood pressure that sustained for 10 minutes (34.0% vs 55.1%; relative risk 0.62; 95% CI 0.39-0.97). ER-nifedipine vs placebo use led to numerically lower cesarean deliveries (20.8% vs 34.7%) and neonatal intensive care unit admissions (29.1% vs 47.1%).

 

Study details: Findings are from a phase 4 trial including 110 individuals with singleton or twin gestation undergoing labor induction for preeclampsia with severe features who were randomly assigned to receive 30 mg oral ER-nifedipine or placebo every 24 hours until delivery.

 

Disclosures: This study was funded by The Ohio State University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. No conflicts of interest were declared.

 

Source: Cleary EM et al. Trial of intrapartum extended-release nifedipine to prevent severe hypertension among pregnant individuals with preeclampsia with severe features. Hypertension. 2022 (Oct 3). Doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.19751

 

Key clinical point: A dose of 30 mg oral extended-release nifedipine (ER-nifedipine) every 24 hours until delivery effectively reduced the receipt of treatment for acute severe hypertension in individuals with preeclampsia with severe features.

 

Major finding: A significantly lower proportion of individuals who received 30 mg ER-nifedipine vs placebo required 1 dose of acute hypertension therapy for severe blood pressure that sustained for 10 minutes (34.0% vs 55.1%; relative risk 0.62; 95% CI 0.39-0.97). ER-nifedipine vs placebo use led to numerically lower cesarean deliveries (20.8% vs 34.7%) and neonatal intensive care unit admissions (29.1% vs 47.1%).

 

Study details: Findings are from a phase 4 trial including 110 individuals with singleton or twin gestation undergoing labor induction for preeclampsia with severe features who were randomly assigned to receive 30 mg oral ER-nifedipine or placebo every 24 hours until delivery.

 

Disclosures: This study was funded by The Ohio State University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. No conflicts of interest were declared.

 

Source: Cleary EM et al. Trial of intrapartum extended-release nifedipine to prevent severe hypertension among pregnant individuals with preeclampsia with severe features. Hypertension. 2022 (Oct 3). Doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.19751

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Obstetric Emergencies November 2022
Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Slowly improving glycemic control following gestational diabetes increases risk for shoulder dystocia

Article Type
Changed
Sat, 10/29/2022 - 15:55

Key clinical point: Risk for shoulder dystocia was higher among women with gestational diabetes who showed a slowly improving glycemic control trajectory, highlighting the need for interventions that help achieve glycemic targets early after the diagnosis of gestational diabetes.

 

Major finding: Compared with women showing rapid improvements to attain optimal glycemic control, the risk for shoulder dystocia was higher among women showing slow improvements to attain suboptimal glycemic control (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.41; 95% CI 1.12-1.78) and was lower among women with stably optimal glycemic control from diagnosis to delivery (aRR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.92).

 

Study details: Findings are from a population-based longitudinal cohort study including 26,774 women with gestational diabetes who received prenatal care.

 

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and other sources. The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Chehab RF et al. Glycemic control trajectories and risk of perinatal complications among individuals with gestational diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(9):e2233955 (Sep 29). Doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33955

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Risk for shoulder dystocia was higher among women with gestational diabetes who showed a slowly improving glycemic control trajectory, highlighting the need for interventions that help achieve glycemic targets early after the diagnosis of gestational diabetes.

 

Major finding: Compared with women showing rapid improvements to attain optimal glycemic control, the risk for shoulder dystocia was higher among women showing slow improvements to attain suboptimal glycemic control (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.41; 95% CI 1.12-1.78) and was lower among women with stably optimal glycemic control from diagnosis to delivery (aRR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.92).

 

Study details: Findings are from a population-based longitudinal cohort study including 26,774 women with gestational diabetes who received prenatal care.

 

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and other sources. The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Chehab RF et al. Glycemic control trajectories and risk of perinatal complications among individuals with gestational diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(9):e2233955 (Sep 29). Doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33955

 

Key clinical point: Risk for shoulder dystocia was higher among women with gestational diabetes who showed a slowly improving glycemic control trajectory, highlighting the need for interventions that help achieve glycemic targets early after the diagnosis of gestational diabetes.

 

Major finding: Compared with women showing rapid improvements to attain optimal glycemic control, the risk for shoulder dystocia was higher among women showing slow improvements to attain suboptimal glycemic control (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.41; 95% CI 1.12-1.78) and was lower among women with stably optimal glycemic control from diagnosis to delivery (aRR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.92).

 

Study details: Findings are from a population-based longitudinal cohort study including 26,774 women with gestational diabetes who received prenatal care.

 

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and other sources. The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Chehab RF et al. Glycemic control trajectories and risk of perinatal complications among individuals with gestational diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(9):e2233955 (Sep 29). Doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33955

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Obstetric Emergencies November 2022
Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Slowly improving glycemic control following gestational diabetes increases risk for shoulder dystocia

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 10/24/2022 - 14:34

Key clinical point: Risk for shoulder dystocia was higher among women with gestational diabetes who showed a slowly improving glycemic control trajectory, highlighting the need for interventions that help achieve glycemic targets early after the diagnosis of gestational diabetes.

 

Major finding: Compared with women showing rapid improvements to attain optimal glycemic control, the risk for shoulder dystocia was higher among women showing slow improvements to attain suboptimal glycemic control (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.41; 95% CI 1.12-1.78) and was lower among women with stably optimal glycemic control from diagnosis to delivery (aRR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.92).

 

Study details: Findings are from a population-based longitudinal cohort study including 26,774 women with gestational diabetes who received prenatal care.

 

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and other sources. The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Chehab RF et al. Glycemic control trajectories and risk of perinatal complications among individuals with gestational diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(9):e2233955 (Sep 29). Doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33955

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Risk for shoulder dystocia was higher among women with gestational diabetes who showed a slowly improving glycemic control trajectory, highlighting the need for interventions that help achieve glycemic targets early after the diagnosis of gestational diabetes.

 

Major finding: Compared with women showing rapid improvements to attain optimal glycemic control, the risk for shoulder dystocia was higher among women showing slow improvements to attain suboptimal glycemic control (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.41; 95% CI 1.12-1.78) and was lower among women with stably optimal glycemic control from diagnosis to delivery (aRR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.92).

 

Study details: Findings are from a population-based longitudinal cohort study including 26,774 women with gestational diabetes who received prenatal care.

 

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and other sources. The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Chehab RF et al. Glycemic control trajectories and risk of perinatal complications among individuals with gestational diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(9):e2233955 (Sep 29). Doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33955

 

Key clinical point: Risk for shoulder dystocia was higher among women with gestational diabetes who showed a slowly improving glycemic control trajectory, highlighting the need for interventions that help achieve glycemic targets early after the diagnosis of gestational diabetes.

 

Major finding: Compared with women showing rapid improvements to attain optimal glycemic control, the risk for shoulder dystocia was higher among women showing slow improvements to attain suboptimal glycemic control (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.41; 95% CI 1.12-1.78) and was lower among women with stably optimal glycemic control from diagnosis to delivery (aRR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.92).

 

Study details: Findings are from a population-based longitudinal cohort study including 26,774 women with gestational diabetes who received prenatal care.

 

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and other sources. The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Chehab RF et al. Glycemic control trajectories and risk of perinatal complications among individuals with gestational diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(9):e2233955 (Sep 29). Doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33955

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Obstetric Emergencies October 2022
Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Reduction in preterm birth justifies continued use of aspirin prophylaxis in women with chronic hypertension

Article Type
Changed
Sat, 10/29/2022 - 15:55

Key clinical point: Use of low-dose aspirin significantly reduced preterm birth rates but had no significant effect on the risk for preeclampsia in pregnant women with chronic hypertension.

 

Major finding: In women with chronic hypertension, the use of low-dose aspirin vs placebo during pregnancy was associated with a significant reduction in preterm birth rates (22.2% vs 31.1%; odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI 0.45-0.89) but a nonsignificant reduction in the risk for superimposed or preterm preeclampsia.

 

Study details: Findings are from a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine studies (retrospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials) including 2150 women with chronic hypertension who received low-dose aspirin or placebo during pregnancy.

 

Disclosures: This study did not receive any specific funding. V Giorgione’s PhD was supported by a Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant unrelated to this study. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Richards EMF et al. Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of superimposed pre-eclampsia in women with chronic hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 (Oct 6). Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.046

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Use of low-dose aspirin significantly reduced preterm birth rates but had no significant effect on the risk for preeclampsia in pregnant women with chronic hypertension.

 

Major finding: In women with chronic hypertension, the use of low-dose aspirin vs placebo during pregnancy was associated with a significant reduction in preterm birth rates (22.2% vs 31.1%; odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI 0.45-0.89) but a nonsignificant reduction in the risk for superimposed or preterm preeclampsia.

 

Study details: Findings are from a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine studies (retrospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials) including 2150 women with chronic hypertension who received low-dose aspirin or placebo during pregnancy.

 

Disclosures: This study did not receive any specific funding. V Giorgione’s PhD was supported by a Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant unrelated to this study. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Richards EMF et al. Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of superimposed pre-eclampsia in women with chronic hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 (Oct 6). Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.046

 

Key clinical point: Use of low-dose aspirin significantly reduced preterm birth rates but had no significant effect on the risk for preeclampsia in pregnant women with chronic hypertension.

 

Major finding: In women with chronic hypertension, the use of low-dose aspirin vs placebo during pregnancy was associated with a significant reduction in preterm birth rates (22.2% vs 31.1%; odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI 0.45-0.89) but a nonsignificant reduction in the risk for superimposed or preterm preeclampsia.

 

Study details: Findings are from a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine studies (retrospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials) including 2150 women with chronic hypertension who received low-dose aspirin or placebo during pregnancy.

 

Disclosures: This study did not receive any specific funding. V Giorgione’s PhD was supported by a Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant unrelated to this study. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Source: Richards EMF et al. Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of superimposed pre-eclampsia in women with chronic hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 (Oct 6). Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.046

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Obstetric Emergencies November 2022
Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article