Society News

SVS and the SVS Community Practice Committee will hold a webinar for SVS members on April 30 on “Negotiating Physician Employment Agreements.” The 75-minute webinar will begin at 8 p.m. Eastern time. Topics will include current trends, regulatory overview and key contractual provisions. Learn more here. Register here.

SVS and the SVS Community Practice Committee will hold a webinar for SVS members on April 30 on “Negotiating Physician Employment Agreements.” The 75-minute webinar will begin at 8 p.m. Eastern time. Topics will include current trends, regulatory overview and key contractual provisions. Learn more here. Register here.

SVS and the SVS Community Practice Committee will hold a webinar for SVS members on April 30 on “Negotiating Physician Employment Agreements.” The 75-minute webinar will begin at 8 p.m. Eastern time. Topics will include current trends, regulatory overview and key contractual provisions. Learn more here. Register here.

The Third Annual "UCLA / SVS Symposium: A Comprehensive Review and Update of What's New in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery," is set for Aug. 25 to 27 in California. This course is offered by the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery at UCLA and the Society for Vascular Surgery. It provides an in-depth review of our specialty for those preparing to take the vascular board examinations as well as providing the basic didactic education for vascular residents and fellows in training.

The Third Annual "UCLA / SVS Symposium: A Comprehensive Review and Update of What's New in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery," is set for Aug. 25 to 27 in California. This course is offered by the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery at UCLA and the Society for Vascular Surgery. It provides an in-depth review of our specialty for those preparing to take the vascular board examinations as well as providing the basic didactic education for vascular residents and fellows in training.

The Third Annual "UCLA / SVS Symposium: A Comprehensive Review and Update of What's New in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery," is set for Aug. 25 to 27 in California. This course is offered by the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery at UCLA and the Society for Vascular Surgery. It provides an in-depth review of our specialty for those preparing to take the vascular board examinations as well as providing the basic didactic education for vascular residents and fellows in training.

SVS is accepting applications for Medical Editor of "Vascular Specialist," the monthly news periodical produced by SVS. The editor can expect to spend approximately 10-20 hours each month in the three weeks leading up to publication. A modest annual honorarium is provided. Previous editorial experience will be helpful. Please send letters of interest by April 15 to Kenneth M. Slaw, Ph.D., at [email protected]. He will forward your interest to the SVS Publications Committee for consideration. More information is in the March 29 issue of Pulse.

SVS is accepting applications for Medical Editor of "Vascular Specialist," the monthly news periodical produced by SVS. The editor can expect to spend approximately 10-20 hours each month in the three weeks leading up to publication. A modest annual honorarium is provided. Previous editorial experience will be helpful. Please send letters of interest by April 15 to Kenneth M. Slaw, Ph.D., at [email protected]. He will forward your interest to the SVS Publications Committee for consideration. More information is in the March 29 issue of Pulse.

SVS is accepting applications for Medical Editor of "Vascular Specialist," the monthly news periodical produced by SVS. The editor can expect to spend approximately 10-20 hours each month in the three weeks leading up to publication. A modest annual honorarium is provided. Previous editorial experience will be helpful. Please send letters of interest by April 15 to Kenneth M. Slaw, Ph.D., at [email protected]. He will forward your interest to the SVS Publications Committee for consideration. More information is in the March 29 issue of Pulse.

AGA has a new clinical guideline on the initial management of acute pancreatitis, published in Gastroenterology. In the U.S., acute pancreatitis (AP) is a leading cause of inpatient care among gastrointestinal conditions with more than 275,000 patients hospitalized annually, at an aggregate cost of over $2.6 billion per year. The guideline focuses on patient care within the first 48-72 hours of admission when management decisions can alter the course of disease and duration of hospitalization.

Guideline recommendations

AGA’s new guideline aims to reduce practice variation and promote high-quality and high-value care for patients suffering from acute pancreatitis. It addresses questions on the benefits of goal-directed fluid resuscitation, early oral feeding, enteral vs. parenteral nutrition, the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics, and routine ERCP in all patients with AP.

The guideline is accompanied by a technical review, a new spotlight (infographic) and a patient companion infographic, which provides key points and important information directly to patients.


 

AGA has a new clinical guideline on the initial management of acute pancreatitis, published in Gastroenterology. In the U.S., acute pancreatitis (AP) is a leading cause of inpatient care among gastrointestinal conditions with more than 275,000 patients hospitalized annually, at an aggregate cost of over $2.6 billion per year. The guideline focuses on patient care within the first 48-72 hours of admission when management decisions can alter the course of disease and duration of hospitalization.

Guideline recommendations

AGA’s new guideline aims to reduce practice variation and promote high-quality and high-value care for patients suffering from acute pancreatitis. It addresses questions on the benefits of goal-directed fluid resuscitation, early oral feeding, enteral vs. parenteral nutrition, the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics, and routine ERCP in all patients with AP.

The guideline is accompanied by a technical review, a new spotlight (infographic) and a patient companion infographic, which provides key points and important information directly to patients.


 

AGA has a new clinical guideline on the initial management of acute pancreatitis, published in Gastroenterology. In the U.S., acute pancreatitis (AP) is a leading cause of inpatient care among gastrointestinal conditions with more than 275,000 patients hospitalized annually, at an aggregate cost of over $2.6 billion per year. The guideline focuses on patient care within the first 48-72 hours of admission when management decisions can alter the course of disease and duration of hospitalization.

Guideline recommendations

AGA’s new guideline aims to reduce practice variation and promote high-quality and high-value care for patients suffering from acute pancreatitis. It addresses questions on the benefits of goal-directed fluid resuscitation, early oral feeding, enteral vs. parenteral nutrition, the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics, and routine ERCP in all patients with AP.

The guideline is accompanied by a technical review, a new spotlight (infographic) and a patient companion infographic, which provides key points and important information directly to patients.


 

A 2018 study published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Lack of association between proton pump inhibitor use and cognitive decline,” found no association between PPI use and cognitive decline in analyzing data from two large population-based studies in Denmark. While this data is reassuring, clinicians should continue to anticipate questions from their patients about the risks associated with PPI therapy. AGA recommends the following tips for talking with your patients.

•  Reassure patients that you prescribed a PPI for a clear-cut indication, in the lowest possible dose, and for an appropriate period of time (lowest dose, shortest time). This advice echoes that offered by AGA and ABIM in the Choosing Wisely campaign.
•  Educate patients not to ask “what side effects do PPIs have?” but rather “is it really indicated?” Reassure patients that, when PPIs are indicated, benefits outweigh risks.
• Keep conversation channels open with patients. When patients require long-term use of PPIs, the medication should not be stopped without a discussion with you about the risks and benefits.
• Recommend that patients also consider life-style modifications that may reduce or eliminate the need for PPIs for long-term use.

[email protected]

A 2018 study published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Lack of association between proton pump inhibitor use and cognitive decline,” found no association between PPI use and cognitive decline in analyzing data from two large population-based studies in Denmark. While this data is reassuring, clinicians should continue to anticipate questions from their patients about the risks associated with PPI therapy. AGA recommends the following tips for talking with your patients.

•  Reassure patients that you prescribed a PPI for a clear-cut indication, in the lowest possible dose, and for an appropriate period of time (lowest dose, shortest time). This advice echoes that offered by AGA and ABIM in the Choosing Wisely campaign.
•  Educate patients not to ask “what side effects do PPIs have?” but rather “is it really indicated?” Reassure patients that, when PPIs are indicated, benefits outweigh risks.
• Keep conversation channels open with patients. When patients require long-term use of PPIs, the medication should not be stopped without a discussion with you about the risks and benefits.
• Recommend that patients also consider life-style modifications that may reduce or eliminate the need for PPIs for long-term use.

[email protected]

A 2018 study published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Lack of association between proton pump inhibitor use and cognitive decline,” found no association between PPI use and cognitive decline in analyzing data from two large population-based studies in Denmark. While this data is reassuring, clinicians should continue to anticipate questions from their patients about the risks associated with PPI therapy. AGA recommends the following tips for talking with your patients.

•  Reassure patients that you prescribed a PPI for a clear-cut indication, in the lowest possible dose, and for an appropriate period of time (lowest dose, shortest time). This advice echoes that offered by AGA and ABIM in the Choosing Wisely campaign.
•  Educate patients not to ask “what side effects do PPIs have?” but rather “is it really indicated?” Reassure patients that, when PPIs are indicated, benefits outweigh risks.
• Keep conversation channels open with patients. When patients require long-term use of PPIs, the medication should not be stopped without a discussion with you about the risks and benefits.
• Recommend that patients also consider life-style modifications that may reduce or eliminate the need for PPIs for long-term use.

[email protected]

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a vibrant area of clinical research. Many of the 250+ abstracts presented at the inaugural Crohn’s & Colitis Congress — a partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and AGA — looked at the efficacy and safety of IBD therapies. Below is a summary of four noteworthy drug studies from the Congress, as determined by the Congress organizing committee. You can review all abstracts presented at the Crohn’s & Colitis Congress in Gastroenterology.

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial to evaluate induction of clinical response in patients with moderate-severe Crohn’s disease treated with rifaximin

By Scott D. Lee, University of Washington Medicine, et al.

Significance: It is now known that the intestinal microbiome is integral to the pathogenesis of IBD. However, antibiotic treatments for IBD have previously shown limited effectiveness. In this 8-week clinical trial, there was a fourfold greater response to the antibiotic rifaximin in Crohn’s disease treatment, compared with placebo. The positive impact on clinical disease activity was seen even in patients with a significant disease burden and prior exposure to one or more biologic therapies. Quality of life and laboratory measurements were numerically improved. No new safety concerns were identified. These results offer renewed hope for the use of antibiotics in treating Crohn’s disease.

Post-hoc analysis of tofacitinib Crohn’s disease phase 2 induction efficacy in subgroups with baseline endoscopic or biomarker evidence of inflammation

By Bruce E. Sands, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, et al.

Significance: Tofacitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is under investigation for treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. To date, response rates in ulcerative colitis have been higher than for Crohn’s disease. In this report, investigators performed post-hoc analysis studies using objective baseline criteria of disease activity. Their findings showed a greater proportion of patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease were in remission with tofacitinib compared to placebo. These results provide evidence of JAK inhibition for the treatment of Crohn’s disease and support further investigation.

Refined population pharmacokinetic model for infliximab precision dosing in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

By Laura E. Bauman, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, et al.

Significance: Long-term clinical remission from IBD with anti-TNF therapies has generally been limited to less than half of the treated patients. Improved outcomes are seen with optimal pre-infusion trough drug levels, a measurement of the level of drugs in the patient’s bloodstream. However, standard weight-based dosing for pediatric patients has provided widely varying trough drug levels. The investigators report the development of a multifactorial pharmacokinetic model for predicting infliximab trough levels during maintenance therapy for IBD. Such dynamic approaches to treatment address a specific gap in pediatric IBD therapeutic strategies.

Primary nonresponse to tumor necrosis factor antagonists is associated with inferior response to second-line biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

By Siddharth Singh, University of California San Diego Health, et al.

Significance: Primary nonresponse to anti-TNF therapy is seen in 35%-65% of IBD patients and another 40%-60% lose responsiveness during the first year of treatment. Physicians struggle with what treatments to recommend for these patients. The investigators in this study performed a literature search and identified eight randomized controlled trials of biologics in patients with prior exposure to anti-TNF and compared outcomes based on their prior responses to anti-TNF. The analysis reveals a 24% decrease in likelihood to achieve remission in patients who changed medications because of immediate nonresponse compared to loss of responsiveness or intolerance during the treatment. These findings raise important questions about the biology of IBD, including the pharmacology of anti-TNF in a subset of patients.

[email protected]

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a vibrant area of clinical research. Many of the 250+ abstracts presented at the inaugural Crohn’s & Colitis Congress — a partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and AGA — looked at the efficacy and safety of IBD therapies. Below is a summary of four noteworthy drug studies from the Congress, as determined by the Congress organizing committee. You can review all abstracts presented at the Crohn’s & Colitis Congress in Gastroenterology.

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial to evaluate induction of clinical response in patients with moderate-severe Crohn’s disease treated with rifaximin

By Scott D. Lee, University of Washington Medicine, et al.

Significance: It is now known that the intestinal microbiome is integral to the pathogenesis of IBD. However, antibiotic treatments for IBD have previously shown limited effectiveness. In this 8-week clinical trial, there was a fourfold greater response to the antibiotic rifaximin in Crohn’s disease treatment, compared with placebo. The positive impact on clinical disease activity was seen even in patients with a significant disease burden and prior exposure to one or more biologic therapies. Quality of life and laboratory measurements were numerically improved. No new safety concerns were identified. These results offer renewed hope for the use of antibiotics in treating Crohn’s disease.

Post-hoc analysis of tofacitinib Crohn’s disease phase 2 induction efficacy in subgroups with baseline endoscopic or biomarker evidence of inflammation

By Bruce E. Sands, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, et al.

Significance: Tofacitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is under investigation for treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. To date, response rates in ulcerative colitis have been higher than for Crohn’s disease. In this report, investigators performed post-hoc analysis studies using objective baseline criteria of disease activity. Their findings showed a greater proportion of patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease were in remission with tofacitinib compared to placebo. These results provide evidence of JAK inhibition for the treatment of Crohn’s disease and support further investigation.

Refined population pharmacokinetic model for infliximab precision dosing in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

By Laura E. Bauman, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, et al.

Significance: Long-term clinical remission from IBD with anti-TNF therapies has generally been limited to less than half of the treated patients. Improved outcomes are seen with optimal pre-infusion trough drug levels, a measurement of the level of drugs in the patient’s bloodstream. However, standard weight-based dosing for pediatric patients has provided widely varying trough drug levels. The investigators report the development of a multifactorial pharmacokinetic model for predicting infliximab trough levels during maintenance therapy for IBD. Such dynamic approaches to treatment address a specific gap in pediatric IBD therapeutic strategies.

Primary nonresponse to tumor necrosis factor antagonists is associated with inferior response to second-line biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

By Siddharth Singh, University of California San Diego Health, et al.

Significance: Primary nonresponse to anti-TNF therapy is seen in 35%-65% of IBD patients and another 40%-60% lose responsiveness during the first year of treatment. Physicians struggle with what treatments to recommend for these patients. The investigators in this study performed a literature search and identified eight randomized controlled trials of biologics in patients with prior exposure to anti-TNF and compared outcomes based on their prior responses to anti-TNF. The analysis reveals a 24% decrease in likelihood to achieve remission in patients who changed medications because of immediate nonresponse compared to loss of responsiveness or intolerance during the treatment. These findings raise important questions about the biology of IBD, including the pharmacology of anti-TNF in a subset of patients.

[email protected]

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a vibrant area of clinical research. Many of the 250+ abstracts presented at the inaugural Crohn’s & Colitis Congress — a partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and AGA — looked at the efficacy and safety of IBD therapies. Below is a summary of four noteworthy drug studies from the Congress, as determined by the Congress organizing committee. You can review all abstracts presented at the Crohn’s & Colitis Congress in Gastroenterology.

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial to evaluate induction of clinical response in patients with moderate-severe Crohn’s disease treated with rifaximin

By Scott D. Lee, University of Washington Medicine, et al.

Significance: It is now known that the intestinal microbiome is integral to the pathogenesis of IBD. However, antibiotic treatments for IBD have previously shown limited effectiveness. In this 8-week clinical trial, there was a fourfold greater response to the antibiotic rifaximin in Crohn’s disease treatment, compared with placebo. The positive impact on clinical disease activity was seen even in patients with a significant disease burden and prior exposure to one or more biologic therapies. Quality of life and laboratory measurements were numerically improved. No new safety concerns were identified. These results offer renewed hope for the use of antibiotics in treating Crohn’s disease.

Post-hoc analysis of tofacitinib Crohn’s disease phase 2 induction efficacy in subgroups with baseline endoscopic or biomarker evidence of inflammation

By Bruce E. Sands, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, et al.

Significance: Tofacitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is under investigation for treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. To date, response rates in ulcerative colitis have been higher than for Crohn’s disease. In this report, investigators performed post-hoc analysis studies using objective baseline criteria of disease activity. Their findings showed a greater proportion of patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease were in remission with tofacitinib compared to placebo. These results provide evidence of JAK inhibition for the treatment of Crohn’s disease and support further investigation.

Refined population pharmacokinetic model for infliximab precision dosing in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

By Laura E. Bauman, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, et al.

Significance: Long-term clinical remission from IBD with anti-TNF therapies has generally been limited to less than half of the treated patients. Improved outcomes are seen with optimal pre-infusion trough drug levels, a measurement of the level of drugs in the patient’s bloodstream. However, standard weight-based dosing for pediatric patients has provided widely varying trough drug levels. The investigators report the development of a multifactorial pharmacokinetic model for predicting infliximab trough levels during maintenance therapy for IBD. Such dynamic approaches to treatment address a specific gap in pediatric IBD therapeutic strategies.

Primary nonresponse to tumor necrosis factor antagonists is associated with inferior response to second-line biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

By Siddharth Singh, University of California San Diego Health, et al.

Significance: Primary nonresponse to anti-TNF therapy is seen in 35%-65% of IBD patients and another 40%-60% lose responsiveness during the first year of treatment. Physicians struggle with what treatments to recommend for these patients. The investigators in this study performed a literature search and identified eight randomized controlled trials of biologics in patients with prior exposure to anti-TNF and compared outcomes based on their prior responses to anti-TNF. The analysis reveals a 24% decrease in likelihood to achieve remission in patients who changed medications because of immediate nonresponse compared to loss of responsiveness or intolerance during the treatment. These findings raise important questions about the biology of IBD, including the pharmacology of anti-TNF in a subset of patients.

[email protected]

What if all you had to do to ensure that the AGA Research Foundation can have an impact for years to come is to write a simple sentence? Sound impossible?

The AGA Research Foundation provides a key source of funding at a critical juncture in a young investigators’ career. Securing the future of the talented investigators we serve really is as simple as one sentence. By including a gift to the AGA Research Foundation in your will, you can support our mission tomorrow without giving away any of your assets today.

Including the AGA Research Foundation in your will is a popular gift to give because it is:

• • Affordable. The actual giving of your gift occurs after your lifetime, so your current income is not affected.
• • Flexible. Until your will goes into effect, you are free to alter your plans or change your mind.
• • Versatile. You can give a specific item, a set amount of money, or a percentage of your estate. You can also make your gift contingent upon certain events.

We hope you’ll consider including a gift to the AGA Research Foundation in your will or living trust. It’s simple – just a few sentences in your will or trust are all that is needed. The official bequest language for the AGA Research Foundation is: “I, [name], of [city, state, ZIP], give, devise and bequeath to the AGA Research Foundation [written amount or percentage of the estate or description of property] for its unrestricted use and purpose.”

[email protected]

What if all you had to do to ensure that the AGA Research Foundation can have an impact for years to come is to write a simple sentence? Sound impossible?

The AGA Research Foundation provides a key source of funding at a critical juncture in a young investigators’ career. Securing the future of the talented investigators we serve really is as simple as one sentence. By including a gift to the AGA Research Foundation in your will, you can support our mission tomorrow without giving away any of your assets today.

Including the AGA Research Foundation in your will is a popular gift to give because it is:

• • Affordable. The actual giving of your gift occurs after your lifetime, so your current income is not affected.
• • Flexible. Until your will goes into effect, you are free to alter your plans or change your mind.
• • Versatile. You can give a specific item, a set amount of money, or a percentage of your estate. You can also make your gift contingent upon certain events.

We hope you’ll consider including a gift to the AGA Research Foundation in your will or living trust. It’s simple – just a few sentences in your will or trust are all that is needed. The official bequest language for the AGA Research Foundation is: “I, [name], of [city, state, ZIP], give, devise and bequeath to the AGA Research Foundation [written amount or percentage of the estate or description of property] for its unrestricted use and purpose.”

[email protected]

What if all you had to do to ensure that the AGA Research Foundation can have an impact for years to come is to write a simple sentence? Sound impossible?

The AGA Research Foundation provides a key source of funding at a critical juncture in a young investigators’ career. Securing the future of the talented investigators we serve really is as simple as one sentence. By including a gift to the AGA Research Foundation in your will, you can support our mission tomorrow without giving away any of your assets today.

Including the AGA Research Foundation in your will is a popular gift to give because it is:

• • Affordable. The actual giving of your gift occurs after your lifetime, so your current income is not affected.
• • Flexible. Until your will goes into effect, you are free to alter your plans or change your mind.
• • Versatile. You can give a specific item, a set amount of money, or a percentage of your estate. You can also make your gift contingent upon certain events.

We hope you’ll consider including a gift to the AGA Research Foundation in your will or living trust. It’s simple – just a few sentences in your will or trust are all that is needed. The official bequest language for the AGA Research Foundation is: “I, [name], of [city, state, ZIP], give, devise and bequeath to the AGA Research Foundation [written amount or percentage of the estate or description of property] for its unrestricted use and purpose.”

[email protected]

AGA spends a lot of time on Capitol Hill advocating to help gastroenterologists in practice better care for their patients and receive fair reimbursement. Therefore, we were pleased that the budget deal passed by Congress and signed by the president in February included several policy victories that AGA has been working diligently on for many years.

IPAB repeal

AGA, and all of organized medicine, have long opposed the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) that was created as part of the Affordable Care Act. IPAB is an unelected, unaccountable board whose sole purpose is to cut Medicare spending from providers should Medicare reach a certain threshold of spending. Since hospitals are exempt from their purview, physicians would be particularly vulnerable to cuts. However, repealing IPAB has had bipartisan support over the years, and we applaud Congress for listening to us and the medical community and taking action.

Misvalued codes

AGA and the physician community were also successful in removing a provision that would have extended the misvalued codes initiative for the next two years to reallocate savings from potentially overvalued codes. AGA, the Alliance of Specialty Medicine and the AMA opposed the original provision expanding the misvalued codes initiative and have argued that virtually all codes under the fee schedule, including gastroenterology, have been reevaluated and have already faced significant cuts. In the final agreement, Congress eliminated recapturing savings from the misvalued codes initiative and instead lowered overall updates for physician reimbursement under Medicare by .25 percent for 1 year. Although AGA would prefer this reduction not be included, it is much better than the misvalued codes provision, which disproportionately impacts specialties, like gastroenterology.

Geographic Practice Cost Index

The budget agreement extends the work for the Geographic Practice Cost Index (GPCI) floor for two additional years, which avoids a decrease in Medicare reimbursement for physicians that practice in rural areas. The work GPCI is a variable that Medicare uses to adjust the work component of physician payment based on where they live. A work GPCI floor of 1.0 protects physicians in low-cost, often rural areas, from being paid less for the work they do.

Meaningful use standards

The package addresses electronic health record (EHR) standards and eases requirements for physicians. The language removes the mandate that meaningful use standards become more stringent over time, which is a major financial burden for physician practices. The language also gives physicians more time to submit and receive a hardship exemption from the current EHR standards that would apply to meaningful use and the Quality Payment Program’s advancing care information performance category.

Biosimilars coverage under Medicare Part D

The agreement also levels the playing field between biologics and biosimilars by adding biosimilars to the Medicare Coverage Gap Discount Program. Additionally, by providing the 50 percent discount equally, beneficiary out-of-pocket costs will be reduced and the Medicare program will save money as a result of covering the less expensive medication.

AGA and the medical community have fought long and hard for these provisions and are happy to see them finally being implemented. We thank all of our members who have worked along with us to ensure that the voice of gastroenterology continues to be heard on Capitol Hill.

AGA spends a lot of time on Capitol Hill advocating to help gastroenterologists in practice better care for their patients and receive fair reimbursement. Therefore, we were pleased that the budget deal passed by Congress and signed by the president in February included several policy victories that AGA has been working diligently on for many years.

IPAB repeal

AGA, and all of organized medicine, have long opposed the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) that was created as part of the Affordable Care Act. IPAB is an unelected, unaccountable board whose sole purpose is to cut Medicare spending from providers should Medicare reach a certain threshold of spending. Since hospitals are exempt from their purview, physicians would be particularly vulnerable to cuts. However, repealing IPAB has had bipartisan support over the years, and we applaud Congress for listening to us and the medical community and taking action.

Misvalued codes

AGA and the physician community were also successful in removing a provision that would have extended the misvalued codes initiative for the next two years to reallocate savings from potentially overvalued codes. AGA, the Alliance of Specialty Medicine and the AMA opposed the original provision expanding the misvalued codes initiative and have argued that virtually all codes under the fee schedule, including gastroenterology, have been reevaluated and have already faced significant cuts. In the final agreement, Congress eliminated recapturing savings from the misvalued codes initiative and instead lowered overall updates for physician reimbursement under Medicare by .25 percent for 1 year. Although AGA would prefer this reduction not be included, it is much better than the misvalued codes provision, which disproportionately impacts specialties, like gastroenterology.

Geographic Practice Cost Index

The budget agreement extends the work for the Geographic Practice Cost Index (GPCI) floor for two additional years, which avoids a decrease in Medicare reimbursement for physicians that practice in rural areas. The work GPCI is a variable that Medicare uses to adjust the work component of physician payment based on where they live. A work GPCI floor of 1.0 protects physicians in low-cost, often rural areas, from being paid less for the work they do.

Meaningful use standards

The package addresses electronic health record (EHR) standards and eases requirements for physicians. The language removes the mandate that meaningful use standards become more stringent over time, which is a major financial burden for physician practices. The language also gives physicians more time to submit and receive a hardship exemption from the current EHR standards that would apply to meaningful use and the Quality Payment Program’s advancing care information performance category.

Biosimilars coverage under Medicare Part D

The agreement also levels the playing field between biologics and biosimilars by adding biosimilars to the Medicare Coverage Gap Discount Program. Additionally, by providing the 50 percent discount equally, beneficiary out-of-pocket costs will be reduced and the Medicare program will save money as a result of covering the less expensive medication.

AGA and the medical community have fought long and hard for these provisions and are happy to see them finally being implemented. We thank all of our members who have worked along with us to ensure that the voice of gastroenterology continues to be heard on Capitol Hill.

AGA spends a lot of time on Capitol Hill advocating to help gastroenterologists in practice better care for their patients and receive fair reimbursement. Therefore, we were pleased that the budget deal passed by Congress and signed by the president in February included several policy victories that AGA has been working diligently on for many years.

IPAB repeal

AGA, and all of organized medicine, have long opposed the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) that was created as part of the Affordable Care Act. IPAB is an unelected, unaccountable board whose sole purpose is to cut Medicare spending from providers should Medicare reach a certain threshold of spending. Since hospitals are exempt from their purview, physicians would be particularly vulnerable to cuts. However, repealing IPAB has had bipartisan support over the years, and we applaud Congress for listening to us and the medical community and taking action.

Misvalued codes

AGA and the physician community were also successful in removing a provision that would have extended the misvalued codes initiative for the next two years to reallocate savings from potentially overvalued codes. AGA, the Alliance of Specialty Medicine and the AMA opposed the original provision expanding the misvalued codes initiative and have argued that virtually all codes under the fee schedule, including gastroenterology, have been reevaluated and have already faced significant cuts. In the final agreement, Congress eliminated recapturing savings from the misvalued codes initiative and instead lowered overall updates for physician reimbursement under Medicare by .25 percent for 1 year. Although AGA would prefer this reduction not be included, it is much better than the misvalued codes provision, which disproportionately impacts specialties, like gastroenterology.

Geographic Practice Cost Index

The budget agreement extends the work for the Geographic Practice Cost Index (GPCI) floor for two additional years, which avoids a decrease in Medicare reimbursement for physicians that practice in rural areas. The work GPCI is a variable that Medicare uses to adjust the work component of physician payment based on where they live. A work GPCI floor of 1.0 protects physicians in low-cost, often rural areas, from being paid less for the work they do.

Meaningful use standards

The package addresses electronic health record (EHR) standards and eases requirements for physicians. The language removes the mandate that meaningful use standards become more stringent over time, which is a major financial burden for physician practices. The language also gives physicians more time to submit and receive a hardship exemption from the current EHR standards that would apply to meaningful use and the Quality Payment Program’s advancing care information performance category.

Biosimilars coverage under Medicare Part D

The agreement also levels the playing field between biologics and biosimilars by adding biosimilars to the Medicare Coverage Gap Discount Program. Additionally, by providing the 50 percent discount equally, beneficiary out-of-pocket costs will be reduced and the Medicare program will save money as a result of covering the less expensive medication.

AGA and the medical community have fought long and hard for these provisions and are happy to see them finally being implemented. We thank all of our members who have worked along with us to ensure that the voice of gastroenterology continues to be heard on Capitol Hill.

The American Board of Surgery has announced the details of its new Continuous Certification Program, shaped by surgeon feedback and designed to provide greater value, flexibility and convenience in maintaining ABS board certification. Instead of taking one recertification exam every 10 years, surgeons will use the new program to demonstrate their surgical knowledge on a continual basis. General surgeons will follow the new assessment this year; members of other ABS specialties will do so over the next few years.

The American Board of Surgery has announced the details of its new Continuous Certification Program, shaped by surgeon feedback and designed to provide greater value, flexibility and convenience in maintaining ABS board certification. Instead of taking one recertification exam every 10 years, surgeons will use the new program to demonstrate their surgical knowledge on a continual basis. General surgeons will follow the new assessment this year; members of other ABS specialties will do so over the next few years.

The American Board of Surgery has announced the details of its new Continuous Certification Program, shaped by surgeon feedback and designed to provide greater value, flexibility and convenience in maintaining ABS board certification. Instead of taking one recertification exam every 10 years, surgeons will use the new program to demonstrate their surgical knowledge on a continual basis. General surgeons will follow the new assessment this year; members of other ABS specialties will do so over the next few years.

SVS members who want to serve on an SVS Council or Committee must complete the brief application by Friday, March 30, 2018. Please note: Members must create a new account; SVS log-in credentials will not work.

SVS members who want to serve on an SVS Council or Committee must complete the brief application by Friday, March 30, 2018. Please note: Members must create a new account; SVS log-in credentials will not work.

SVS members who want to serve on an SVS Council or Committee must complete the brief application by Friday, March 30, 2018. Please note: Members must create a new account; SVS log-in credentials will not work.