User login
Dr. Lisa Christopher-Stine: Polymyositis? It’s more likely something else
“When someone refers you [a patient with suspected] polymyositis, I want you to do a checklist in your head and say, ‘Have I thought about these five things?’ ” Dr. Christopher-Stine, director of the Johns Hopkins Myositis Center, Baltimore, said at the Winter Rheumatology Symposium sponsored by the American College of Rheumatology.
The five most common diagnoses in patients labeled as having polymyositis are immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), overlap with other rheumatologic conditions, antisynthetase syndrome, inclusion body myositis (IBM), and muscular dystrophy, she explained.
“You may say, ‘look, it’s all what you call it,’ but I think we need to be a little bit more careful in what we call it,” she said.
IMNM
Patients with IMNM present with clinical symptoms similar to those seen in polymyositis and dermatomyositis – mainly proximal muscle weakness.
However, there are some important differences, both clinically and histologically, Dr. Christopher-Stine said.
“Look for higher [creatine kinase (CK)] levels,” she said. “In the thousands, usually multiple thousands ... like 5,000, 10,000, 2,000 ... that’s when you’re thinking about a necrotizing phenotype before you even look at the biopsy.”
CK levels will usually be under 30,000 U/L in IMNM, she noted, adding that data increasingly suggest that the extensive muscle necrosis in IMNM explains the elevated CK levels versus those seen in other myopathies.
Myalgias also tend to be more prominent in IMNM than in polymyositis.
“These folks hurt,” she said, noting that IMNM patients tend to have more extensive muscle atrophy and functional disability. “Many will be wheelchair bound within 9 months of diagnosis; it’s not subtle.”
The most important tool for making an IMNM diagnosis is muscle biopsy; look for prominent myocyte necrosis and a relative paucity of lymphocytes, she advised.
Overlap
Sometimes patients with polymyositis also have other rheumatologic conditions that shouldn’t be overlooked, therefore “overlap is its own category,” she said.
“In our experience, the most common overlap is scleroderma,” she noted, adding that the scleroderma is often, but not always, subtle, and that there may be overlapping autoantibodies.
Overt sclerodactyly is rarely seen, although a small amount may be present, but significant Raynaud’s phenomenon is common in these patients, and tiny telangiectasias across the neck are a tell-tale sign.
“Why does that matter? It’s not an esoteric argument; those are the folks that go on to have pulmonary hypertension,” she said. “They can have the same [interstitial lung disease] and all of the other internal scleroderma manifestations.”
Think about overlap and “look close phenotypically and with antibodies,” she advised.
There is also “the typical RA seropositive overlap,” she said, but lupus only rarely overlaps with myositis.
“However, the next diagnosis on the list – antisynthetase syndrome – can be a forme fruste where you first see a seronegative RA-like picture, and it’s important to think about that as well,” she said.
Antisynthetase syndrome
In patients referred for polymyositis, it’s also important to evaluate for antisynthetase syndrome, Dr. Christopher-Stine said.
The arthritis seen in the extramuscular phenotype of the syndrome is rarely deforming, but despite what many physicians were taught, “it absolutely can be erosive,” she said.
In fact, 40% of people with this syndrome present with an isolated forme fruste seronegative rheumatoid arthritis, she said.
Roughening and desquamation of the skin on the radial surface of fingers or palms – a sign known as mechanic’s hands – that doesn’t have another identifiable cause suggests this diagnosis in patients with this type of arthritis, as does interstitial lung disease and Raynaud’s phenomenon.
The Raynaud’s can be “fairly significant in the sense that it is bothersome,” but it usually doesn’t lead to ulceration or digital necrosis.
This is different from what is seen with the scleroderma phenotype, she said, adding that “if you’re starting to see gangrene and digital loss, think of something else.”
IBM
IBM is “probably the No. 1 most-missed diagnosis” among patients referred for what is initially believed to be polymyositis, Dr. Christopher-Stine said.
“I used to think that this was missed at entry, that everybody [with IBM] had all of these criteria and that rheumatologists really didn’t understand this phenotype ... but some people morph into this,” she said, explaining that they often start out looking like they have polymyositis with proximal muscle weakness.
“They may even initially respond to steroids. And then they get this phenotype,” she said.
Older men are more likely to present with the phenotype from the beginning; women, in her experience, tend to present with what appears to be polymyositis, and then develop the phenotype over time, she noted.
An IBM diagnosis requires age over 30 years, but most patients are over 50, she said.
“This is the only one of the myopathies that is preferential to men,” she added, noting that it affects men twice as often as it does women.
The syndrome is characterized by proximal strength loss and muscle atrophy. Also, a finding that a patient’s knee extensors are weaker than their hip flexors is “a fantastic bedside sign” differentiating IBM from polymyositis, she said.
That’s not to say IBM patients don’t have hip flexor weakness, but their knee extensors usually are “considerably weaker by a grade strength or more” versus their hip flexors, she explained.
“It’s a very easy bedside test. In typical other myopathies we have this, but the knee extensors aren’t that weak in general, or they’re not as weak as the hip flexors,” she added.
Another sign is distal strength loss, particularly in the forearm and finger flexors.
“I was taught to have them make a fist; don’t have them make a fist,” she said, explaining that this recruits intrinsic muscles which basically allows cheating that may mask weakness.
Instead, ask them to flex just their distal interphalangeal joints by making a claw and using the fingers to pull against your fingers, she suggested.
Mixed myopathic and neuropathic features on electromyography also indicate IBM, she said.
Muscle biopsy may be helpful, but inclusions are seen in less than one-third of IBM patients.
“At times, we have had to biopsy three times to see them at all, and some people never show them, so you have to rely on your clinical acumen if you don’t see them,” she said.
Also, keep in mind that these patients are often labeled as having treatment-resistant polymyositis.
“Please, when somebody refers to you somebody that’s treatment resistant, that may be the case, but I want you to think maybe they’re treatment resistant because they don’t have that disease.”
Muscular dystrophy
Some cases of myositis mimic certain types of muscular dystrophy, Dr. Christopher-Stine said, providing a checklist of muscular dystrophies that can look “clinically completely indistinguishable from a typical inflammatory myopathy,” and should therefore be considered in these patients.
The checklist includes Duchenne’s manifesting carrier, limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2b, myotonic dystrophy (usually type 2), and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.
Dr. Christopher-Stine reported having intellectual property interest in a novel Inova Diagnostics autoantibody assay detection for anti-HMGCR. She was also the safety officer for the JBT-101 Trial sponsored by Corbus and funded by the National Institutes of Health.
“When someone refers you [a patient with suspected] polymyositis, I want you to do a checklist in your head and say, ‘Have I thought about these five things?’ ” Dr. Christopher-Stine, director of the Johns Hopkins Myositis Center, Baltimore, said at the Winter Rheumatology Symposium sponsored by the American College of Rheumatology.
The five most common diagnoses in patients labeled as having polymyositis are immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), overlap with other rheumatologic conditions, antisynthetase syndrome, inclusion body myositis (IBM), and muscular dystrophy, she explained.
“You may say, ‘look, it’s all what you call it,’ but I think we need to be a little bit more careful in what we call it,” she said.
IMNM
Patients with IMNM present with clinical symptoms similar to those seen in polymyositis and dermatomyositis – mainly proximal muscle weakness.
However, there are some important differences, both clinically and histologically, Dr. Christopher-Stine said.
“Look for higher [creatine kinase (CK)] levels,” she said. “In the thousands, usually multiple thousands ... like 5,000, 10,000, 2,000 ... that’s when you’re thinking about a necrotizing phenotype before you even look at the biopsy.”
CK levels will usually be under 30,000 U/L in IMNM, she noted, adding that data increasingly suggest that the extensive muscle necrosis in IMNM explains the elevated CK levels versus those seen in other myopathies.
Myalgias also tend to be more prominent in IMNM than in polymyositis.
“These folks hurt,” she said, noting that IMNM patients tend to have more extensive muscle atrophy and functional disability. “Many will be wheelchair bound within 9 months of diagnosis; it’s not subtle.”
The most important tool for making an IMNM diagnosis is muscle biopsy; look for prominent myocyte necrosis and a relative paucity of lymphocytes, she advised.
Overlap
Sometimes patients with polymyositis also have other rheumatologic conditions that shouldn’t be overlooked, therefore “overlap is its own category,” she said.
“In our experience, the most common overlap is scleroderma,” she noted, adding that the scleroderma is often, but not always, subtle, and that there may be overlapping autoantibodies.
Overt sclerodactyly is rarely seen, although a small amount may be present, but significant Raynaud’s phenomenon is common in these patients, and tiny telangiectasias across the neck are a tell-tale sign.
“Why does that matter? It’s not an esoteric argument; those are the folks that go on to have pulmonary hypertension,” she said. “They can have the same [interstitial lung disease] and all of the other internal scleroderma manifestations.”
Think about overlap and “look close phenotypically and with antibodies,” she advised.
There is also “the typical RA seropositive overlap,” she said, but lupus only rarely overlaps with myositis.
“However, the next diagnosis on the list – antisynthetase syndrome – can be a forme fruste where you first see a seronegative RA-like picture, and it’s important to think about that as well,” she said.
Antisynthetase syndrome
In patients referred for polymyositis, it’s also important to evaluate for antisynthetase syndrome, Dr. Christopher-Stine said.
The arthritis seen in the extramuscular phenotype of the syndrome is rarely deforming, but despite what many physicians were taught, “it absolutely can be erosive,” she said.
In fact, 40% of people with this syndrome present with an isolated forme fruste seronegative rheumatoid arthritis, she said.
Roughening and desquamation of the skin on the radial surface of fingers or palms – a sign known as mechanic’s hands – that doesn’t have another identifiable cause suggests this diagnosis in patients with this type of arthritis, as does interstitial lung disease and Raynaud’s phenomenon.
The Raynaud’s can be “fairly significant in the sense that it is bothersome,” but it usually doesn’t lead to ulceration or digital necrosis.
This is different from what is seen with the scleroderma phenotype, she said, adding that “if you’re starting to see gangrene and digital loss, think of something else.”
IBM
IBM is “probably the No. 1 most-missed diagnosis” among patients referred for what is initially believed to be polymyositis, Dr. Christopher-Stine said.
“I used to think that this was missed at entry, that everybody [with IBM] had all of these criteria and that rheumatologists really didn’t understand this phenotype ... but some people morph into this,” she said, explaining that they often start out looking like they have polymyositis with proximal muscle weakness.
“They may even initially respond to steroids. And then they get this phenotype,” she said.
Older men are more likely to present with the phenotype from the beginning; women, in her experience, tend to present with what appears to be polymyositis, and then develop the phenotype over time, she noted.
An IBM diagnosis requires age over 30 years, but most patients are over 50, she said.
“This is the only one of the myopathies that is preferential to men,” she added, noting that it affects men twice as often as it does women.
The syndrome is characterized by proximal strength loss and muscle atrophy. Also, a finding that a patient’s knee extensors are weaker than their hip flexors is “a fantastic bedside sign” differentiating IBM from polymyositis, she said.
That’s not to say IBM patients don’t have hip flexor weakness, but their knee extensors usually are “considerably weaker by a grade strength or more” versus their hip flexors, she explained.
“It’s a very easy bedside test. In typical other myopathies we have this, but the knee extensors aren’t that weak in general, or they’re not as weak as the hip flexors,” she added.
Another sign is distal strength loss, particularly in the forearm and finger flexors.
“I was taught to have them make a fist; don’t have them make a fist,” she said, explaining that this recruits intrinsic muscles which basically allows cheating that may mask weakness.
Instead, ask them to flex just their distal interphalangeal joints by making a claw and using the fingers to pull against your fingers, she suggested.
Mixed myopathic and neuropathic features on electromyography also indicate IBM, she said.
Muscle biopsy may be helpful, but inclusions are seen in less than one-third of IBM patients.
“At times, we have had to biopsy three times to see them at all, and some people never show them, so you have to rely on your clinical acumen if you don’t see them,” she said.
Also, keep in mind that these patients are often labeled as having treatment-resistant polymyositis.
“Please, when somebody refers to you somebody that’s treatment resistant, that may be the case, but I want you to think maybe they’re treatment resistant because they don’t have that disease.”
Muscular dystrophy
Some cases of myositis mimic certain types of muscular dystrophy, Dr. Christopher-Stine said, providing a checklist of muscular dystrophies that can look “clinically completely indistinguishable from a typical inflammatory myopathy,” and should therefore be considered in these patients.
The checklist includes Duchenne’s manifesting carrier, limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2b, myotonic dystrophy (usually type 2), and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.
Dr. Christopher-Stine reported having intellectual property interest in a novel Inova Diagnostics autoantibody assay detection for anti-HMGCR. She was also the safety officer for the JBT-101 Trial sponsored by Corbus and funded by the National Institutes of Health.
“When someone refers you [a patient with suspected] polymyositis, I want you to do a checklist in your head and say, ‘Have I thought about these five things?’ ” Dr. Christopher-Stine, director of the Johns Hopkins Myositis Center, Baltimore, said at the Winter Rheumatology Symposium sponsored by the American College of Rheumatology.
The five most common diagnoses in patients labeled as having polymyositis are immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), overlap with other rheumatologic conditions, antisynthetase syndrome, inclusion body myositis (IBM), and muscular dystrophy, she explained.
“You may say, ‘look, it’s all what you call it,’ but I think we need to be a little bit more careful in what we call it,” she said.
IMNM
Patients with IMNM present with clinical symptoms similar to those seen in polymyositis and dermatomyositis – mainly proximal muscle weakness.
However, there are some important differences, both clinically and histologically, Dr. Christopher-Stine said.
“Look for higher [creatine kinase (CK)] levels,” she said. “In the thousands, usually multiple thousands ... like 5,000, 10,000, 2,000 ... that’s when you’re thinking about a necrotizing phenotype before you even look at the biopsy.”
CK levels will usually be under 30,000 U/L in IMNM, she noted, adding that data increasingly suggest that the extensive muscle necrosis in IMNM explains the elevated CK levels versus those seen in other myopathies.
Myalgias also tend to be more prominent in IMNM than in polymyositis.
“These folks hurt,” she said, noting that IMNM patients tend to have more extensive muscle atrophy and functional disability. “Many will be wheelchair bound within 9 months of diagnosis; it’s not subtle.”
The most important tool for making an IMNM diagnosis is muscle biopsy; look for prominent myocyte necrosis and a relative paucity of lymphocytes, she advised.
Overlap
Sometimes patients with polymyositis also have other rheumatologic conditions that shouldn’t be overlooked, therefore “overlap is its own category,” she said.
“In our experience, the most common overlap is scleroderma,” she noted, adding that the scleroderma is often, but not always, subtle, and that there may be overlapping autoantibodies.
Overt sclerodactyly is rarely seen, although a small amount may be present, but significant Raynaud’s phenomenon is common in these patients, and tiny telangiectasias across the neck are a tell-tale sign.
“Why does that matter? It’s not an esoteric argument; those are the folks that go on to have pulmonary hypertension,” she said. “They can have the same [interstitial lung disease] and all of the other internal scleroderma manifestations.”
Think about overlap and “look close phenotypically and with antibodies,” she advised.
There is also “the typical RA seropositive overlap,” she said, but lupus only rarely overlaps with myositis.
“However, the next diagnosis on the list – antisynthetase syndrome – can be a forme fruste where you first see a seronegative RA-like picture, and it’s important to think about that as well,” she said.
Antisynthetase syndrome
In patients referred for polymyositis, it’s also important to evaluate for antisynthetase syndrome, Dr. Christopher-Stine said.
The arthritis seen in the extramuscular phenotype of the syndrome is rarely deforming, but despite what many physicians were taught, “it absolutely can be erosive,” she said.
In fact, 40% of people with this syndrome present with an isolated forme fruste seronegative rheumatoid arthritis, she said.
Roughening and desquamation of the skin on the radial surface of fingers or palms – a sign known as mechanic’s hands – that doesn’t have another identifiable cause suggests this diagnosis in patients with this type of arthritis, as does interstitial lung disease and Raynaud’s phenomenon.
The Raynaud’s can be “fairly significant in the sense that it is bothersome,” but it usually doesn’t lead to ulceration or digital necrosis.
This is different from what is seen with the scleroderma phenotype, she said, adding that “if you’re starting to see gangrene and digital loss, think of something else.”
IBM
IBM is “probably the No. 1 most-missed diagnosis” among patients referred for what is initially believed to be polymyositis, Dr. Christopher-Stine said.
“I used to think that this was missed at entry, that everybody [with IBM] had all of these criteria and that rheumatologists really didn’t understand this phenotype ... but some people morph into this,” she said, explaining that they often start out looking like they have polymyositis with proximal muscle weakness.
“They may even initially respond to steroids. And then they get this phenotype,” she said.
Older men are more likely to present with the phenotype from the beginning; women, in her experience, tend to present with what appears to be polymyositis, and then develop the phenotype over time, she noted.
An IBM diagnosis requires age over 30 years, but most patients are over 50, she said.
“This is the only one of the myopathies that is preferential to men,” she added, noting that it affects men twice as often as it does women.
The syndrome is characterized by proximal strength loss and muscle atrophy. Also, a finding that a patient’s knee extensors are weaker than their hip flexors is “a fantastic bedside sign” differentiating IBM from polymyositis, she said.
That’s not to say IBM patients don’t have hip flexor weakness, but their knee extensors usually are “considerably weaker by a grade strength or more” versus their hip flexors, she explained.
“It’s a very easy bedside test. In typical other myopathies we have this, but the knee extensors aren’t that weak in general, or they’re not as weak as the hip flexors,” she added.
Another sign is distal strength loss, particularly in the forearm and finger flexors.
“I was taught to have them make a fist; don’t have them make a fist,” she said, explaining that this recruits intrinsic muscles which basically allows cheating that may mask weakness.
Instead, ask them to flex just their distal interphalangeal joints by making a claw and using the fingers to pull against your fingers, she suggested.
Mixed myopathic and neuropathic features on electromyography also indicate IBM, she said.
Muscle biopsy may be helpful, but inclusions are seen in less than one-third of IBM patients.
“At times, we have had to biopsy three times to see them at all, and some people never show them, so you have to rely on your clinical acumen if you don’t see them,” she said.
Also, keep in mind that these patients are often labeled as having treatment-resistant polymyositis.
“Please, when somebody refers to you somebody that’s treatment resistant, that may be the case, but I want you to think maybe they’re treatment resistant because they don’t have that disease.”
Muscular dystrophy
Some cases of myositis mimic certain types of muscular dystrophy, Dr. Christopher-Stine said, providing a checklist of muscular dystrophies that can look “clinically completely indistinguishable from a typical inflammatory myopathy,” and should therefore be considered in these patients.
The checklist includes Duchenne’s manifesting carrier, limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2b, myotonic dystrophy (usually type 2), and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.
Dr. Christopher-Stine reported having intellectual property interest in a novel Inova Diagnostics autoantibody assay detection for anti-HMGCR. She was also the safety officer for the JBT-101 Trial sponsored by Corbus and funded by the National Institutes of Health.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM THE WINTER RHEUMATOLOGY SYMPOSIUM
Clinical benefits persist 5 years after thymectomy for myasthenia gravis
Thymectomy may continue to benefit patients with myasthenia gravis 5 years after the procedure, according to an extension study published in Lancet Neurology.
The study evaluated the clinical status, medication requirements, and adverse events of patients with myasthenia gravis who completed a randomized controlled trial of thymectomy plus prednisone versus prednisone alone and agreed to participate in a rater-blinded 2-year extension.
“Thymectomy within the first few years of the disease course in addition to prednisone therapy confers benefits that persist for 5 years ... in patients with generalized nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis,” said lead study author Gil I. Wolfe, MD, chair of the department of neurology at the University at Buffalo in New York, and his research colleagues. “Results from the extension study provide further support for the use of thymectomy in management of myasthenia gravis and should encourage serious consideration of this treatment option in discussions between clinicians and their patients,” they wrote. “Our results should lead to revision of clinical guidelines in favor of thymectomy and could potentially reverse downward trends in the use of thymectomy in overall management of myasthenia gravis.”
The main 3-year results of the Thymectomy Trial in Nonthymomatous Myasthenia Gravis Patients Receiving Prednisone (MGTX) were reported in 2016; the international trial found that thymectomy plus prednisone was superior to prednisone alone at 3 years (N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 11;375[6]:511-22). The extension study aimed to assess the durability of the treatment response.
MGTX enrolled patients aged 18-65 years who had generalized nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis of less than 5 years’ duration and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Clinical Classification Class II-IV disease. Of 111 patients who completed MGTX, 68 entered the extension study, and 50 completed the 60-month assessment (24 patients in the prednisone alone group and 26 patients in the prednisone plus thymectomy group).
At 5 years, patients in the thymectomy plus prednisone group had significantly lower time-weighted average Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores (5.47 vs. 9.34) and mean alternate-day prednisone doses (24 mg vs. 48 mg), compared with patients who received prednisone alone. Twelve of 35 patients in the thymectomy group and 14 of 33 patients in the prednisone group had at least one adverse event by month 60. No treatment-related deaths occurred in the extension phase.
At 5 years, significantly more patients who underwent thymectomy had minimal manifestation status (i.e., no functional limitations from the disease other than some muscle weakness) – 88% versus 58%. The corresponding figures at 3 years were 67% and 47%.
In addition, 3-year and 5-year data indicate that the need for hospitalization is reduced after surgery, compared with medical therapy alone, Dr. Wolfe said.
Two patients in each treatment arm had an increase of 2 points or more in the QMG score, indicating clinical worsening.
“Our current findings reinforce the benefit of thymectomy seen in [MGTX], dispelling doubts about the procedure’s benefits and how long those benefits last,” said Dr. Wolfe. “We do hope that the new findings help reverse the apparent reluctance to do thymectomy and that the proportion of patients with myasthenia gravis who undergo thymectomy will increase.”
The authors noted that the small sample size of the extension study may limit its generalizability.
The study received funding from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Wolfe reported grants from the NIH, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America, CSL-Behring, and ArgenX, as well as personal fees from Grifols, Shire, and Alexion Pharmaceuticals. Coauthors reported working with and receiving funds from agencies, foundations, and pharmaceutical companies.
SOURCE: Wolfe GI et al. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30392-2.
Thymectomy may continue to benefit patients with myasthenia gravis 5 years after the procedure, according to an extension study published in Lancet Neurology.
The study evaluated the clinical status, medication requirements, and adverse events of patients with myasthenia gravis who completed a randomized controlled trial of thymectomy plus prednisone versus prednisone alone and agreed to participate in a rater-blinded 2-year extension.
“Thymectomy within the first few years of the disease course in addition to prednisone therapy confers benefits that persist for 5 years ... in patients with generalized nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis,” said lead study author Gil I. Wolfe, MD, chair of the department of neurology at the University at Buffalo in New York, and his research colleagues. “Results from the extension study provide further support for the use of thymectomy in management of myasthenia gravis and should encourage serious consideration of this treatment option in discussions between clinicians and their patients,” they wrote. “Our results should lead to revision of clinical guidelines in favor of thymectomy and could potentially reverse downward trends in the use of thymectomy in overall management of myasthenia gravis.”
The main 3-year results of the Thymectomy Trial in Nonthymomatous Myasthenia Gravis Patients Receiving Prednisone (MGTX) were reported in 2016; the international trial found that thymectomy plus prednisone was superior to prednisone alone at 3 years (N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 11;375[6]:511-22). The extension study aimed to assess the durability of the treatment response.
MGTX enrolled patients aged 18-65 years who had generalized nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis of less than 5 years’ duration and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Clinical Classification Class II-IV disease. Of 111 patients who completed MGTX, 68 entered the extension study, and 50 completed the 60-month assessment (24 patients in the prednisone alone group and 26 patients in the prednisone plus thymectomy group).
At 5 years, patients in the thymectomy plus prednisone group had significantly lower time-weighted average Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores (5.47 vs. 9.34) and mean alternate-day prednisone doses (24 mg vs. 48 mg), compared with patients who received prednisone alone. Twelve of 35 patients in the thymectomy group and 14 of 33 patients in the prednisone group had at least one adverse event by month 60. No treatment-related deaths occurred in the extension phase.
At 5 years, significantly more patients who underwent thymectomy had minimal manifestation status (i.e., no functional limitations from the disease other than some muscle weakness) – 88% versus 58%. The corresponding figures at 3 years were 67% and 47%.
In addition, 3-year and 5-year data indicate that the need for hospitalization is reduced after surgery, compared with medical therapy alone, Dr. Wolfe said.
Two patients in each treatment arm had an increase of 2 points or more in the QMG score, indicating clinical worsening.
“Our current findings reinforce the benefit of thymectomy seen in [MGTX], dispelling doubts about the procedure’s benefits and how long those benefits last,” said Dr. Wolfe. “We do hope that the new findings help reverse the apparent reluctance to do thymectomy and that the proportion of patients with myasthenia gravis who undergo thymectomy will increase.”
The authors noted that the small sample size of the extension study may limit its generalizability.
The study received funding from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Wolfe reported grants from the NIH, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America, CSL-Behring, and ArgenX, as well as personal fees from Grifols, Shire, and Alexion Pharmaceuticals. Coauthors reported working with and receiving funds from agencies, foundations, and pharmaceutical companies.
SOURCE: Wolfe GI et al. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30392-2.
Thymectomy may continue to benefit patients with myasthenia gravis 5 years after the procedure, according to an extension study published in Lancet Neurology.
The study evaluated the clinical status, medication requirements, and adverse events of patients with myasthenia gravis who completed a randomized controlled trial of thymectomy plus prednisone versus prednisone alone and agreed to participate in a rater-blinded 2-year extension.
“Thymectomy within the first few years of the disease course in addition to prednisone therapy confers benefits that persist for 5 years ... in patients with generalized nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis,” said lead study author Gil I. Wolfe, MD, chair of the department of neurology at the University at Buffalo in New York, and his research colleagues. “Results from the extension study provide further support for the use of thymectomy in management of myasthenia gravis and should encourage serious consideration of this treatment option in discussions between clinicians and their patients,” they wrote. “Our results should lead to revision of clinical guidelines in favor of thymectomy and could potentially reverse downward trends in the use of thymectomy in overall management of myasthenia gravis.”
The main 3-year results of the Thymectomy Trial in Nonthymomatous Myasthenia Gravis Patients Receiving Prednisone (MGTX) were reported in 2016; the international trial found that thymectomy plus prednisone was superior to prednisone alone at 3 years (N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 11;375[6]:511-22). The extension study aimed to assess the durability of the treatment response.
MGTX enrolled patients aged 18-65 years who had generalized nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis of less than 5 years’ duration and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Clinical Classification Class II-IV disease. Of 111 patients who completed MGTX, 68 entered the extension study, and 50 completed the 60-month assessment (24 patients in the prednisone alone group and 26 patients in the prednisone plus thymectomy group).
At 5 years, patients in the thymectomy plus prednisone group had significantly lower time-weighted average Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores (5.47 vs. 9.34) and mean alternate-day prednisone doses (24 mg vs. 48 mg), compared with patients who received prednisone alone. Twelve of 35 patients in the thymectomy group and 14 of 33 patients in the prednisone group had at least one adverse event by month 60. No treatment-related deaths occurred in the extension phase.
At 5 years, significantly more patients who underwent thymectomy had minimal manifestation status (i.e., no functional limitations from the disease other than some muscle weakness) – 88% versus 58%. The corresponding figures at 3 years were 67% and 47%.
In addition, 3-year and 5-year data indicate that the need for hospitalization is reduced after surgery, compared with medical therapy alone, Dr. Wolfe said.
Two patients in each treatment arm had an increase of 2 points or more in the QMG score, indicating clinical worsening.
“Our current findings reinforce the benefit of thymectomy seen in [MGTX], dispelling doubts about the procedure’s benefits and how long those benefits last,” said Dr. Wolfe. “We do hope that the new findings help reverse the apparent reluctance to do thymectomy and that the proportion of patients with myasthenia gravis who undergo thymectomy will increase.”
The authors noted that the small sample size of the extension study may limit its generalizability.
The study received funding from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Wolfe reported grants from the NIH, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America, CSL-Behring, and ArgenX, as well as personal fees from Grifols, Shire, and Alexion Pharmaceuticals. Coauthors reported working with and receiving funds from agencies, foundations, and pharmaceutical companies.
SOURCE: Wolfe GI et al. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30392-2.
FROM LANCET NEUROLOGY
Key clinical point: The benefits of thymectomy for myasthenia gravis persist 5 years after the procedure.
Major finding: Patients who undergo thymectomy and receive prednisone have lower time-weighted average Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis scores (5.47 vs. 9.34) and mean alternate-day prednisone doses (24 mg vs. 48 mg), compared with patients who receive prednisone alone.
Study details: A rater-blinded 2-year extension study that enrolled 68 patients who had completed a 3-year randomized controlled trial.
Disclosures: The study received funding from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Wolfe reported grants from the NIH, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America, CSL-Behring, and ArgenX, as well as personal fees from Grifols, Shire, and Alexion Pharmaceuticals. Other authors reported working with and receiving funds from various agencies, foundations, and pharmaceutical companies.
Source: Wolfe GI et al. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30392-2.
Nuedexta mainly prescribed for dementia, Parkinson’s
Only 15% of patients prescribed dextromethorphan hydrobromide plus quinidine sulfate had pseudobulbar affect due to multiple sclerosis or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, the condition for which this drug is labeled, according to an analysis of two national commercial insurance claims databases published online Jan. 7 in JAMA Internal Medicine.
Conversely, 57% of patients prescribed dextromethorphan-quinidine (Nuedexta) had a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease or dementia. Furthermore, according to Medicare Part D data, prescriptions for dextromethorphan-quinidine rose 15-fold during a recent 6-year period, with a concurrent 50-fold rise in reimbursement. “In response to findings such as ours, further attention should be paid to educating prescribers about the actual benefits and risks of this costly drug combination,” Michael Fralick, MD, and his associates at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, wrote in their paper.
The Food and Drug Administration approved Nuedexta in 2010 for the treatment of pseudobulbar affect after it produced modest improvements in laughing or crying episodes in a 12-week, placebo-controlled trial of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The initial FDA label noted: “Nuedexta has not been shown to be safe or effective in other types of emotional lability that can commonly occur, for example, in Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias.” Then, in 2015, patients with Alzheimer’s disease showed modest improvements in agitation scores when they received dextromethorphan-quinidine in a 10-week, placebo-controlled, industry-designed and sponsored trial. Although the dextromethorphan-quinidine arm also had higher rates of falls, urinary tract infections, and serious adverse events, the prescribing information was updated in 2015 to remove the statement about patients with dementia.
To assess real-world prescribing patterns for dextromethorphan-quinidine, Dr. Fralick and his associates analyzed data from 12,858 patients who filled a prescription for this medication between 2010 and 2017 and were recorded in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart or Truven Health MarketScan databases. Only 8.4% of patients had a diagnosis of MS and only 6.8% had ALS, while 57% had dementia and/or Parkinson’s disease and 28% had an unknown diagnosis. The number of patients prescribed dextromethorphan-quinidine rose from nearly 3,300 in 2011 to more than 50,000 in 2016, while spending on this medication by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services increased from $3.9 million to $200.4 million during the same time period.
Current treatments for behavioral symptoms of dementia “are largely ineffective, and thus clinicians may want to prescribe dextromethorphan-quinidine to see if it helps their patients,” the researchers wrote. “Yet the absence of data showing efficacy, coupled with the demonstrated risks of falls and possible cardiac effects, calls this strategy into question.
“Further studies should be required to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this medication as it is currently being used,” the authors suggested.
Study funders included the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, the Harvard Program in Therapeutic Science, the Engelberg Foundation, and the University of Toronto Clinician Scientist Training Program. One author disclosed grants from the Food and Drug Administration Office of Generic Drugs and Division of Health Communication unrelated to the study topic.
SOURCE: Fralick M et al. JAMA Inter Med. 2019 Jan 7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6112
Only 15% of patients prescribed dextromethorphan hydrobromide plus quinidine sulfate had pseudobulbar affect due to multiple sclerosis or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, the condition for which this drug is labeled, according to an analysis of two national commercial insurance claims databases published online Jan. 7 in JAMA Internal Medicine.
Conversely, 57% of patients prescribed dextromethorphan-quinidine (Nuedexta) had a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease or dementia. Furthermore, according to Medicare Part D data, prescriptions for dextromethorphan-quinidine rose 15-fold during a recent 6-year period, with a concurrent 50-fold rise in reimbursement. “In response to findings such as ours, further attention should be paid to educating prescribers about the actual benefits and risks of this costly drug combination,” Michael Fralick, MD, and his associates at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, wrote in their paper.
The Food and Drug Administration approved Nuedexta in 2010 for the treatment of pseudobulbar affect after it produced modest improvements in laughing or crying episodes in a 12-week, placebo-controlled trial of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The initial FDA label noted: “Nuedexta has not been shown to be safe or effective in other types of emotional lability that can commonly occur, for example, in Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias.” Then, in 2015, patients with Alzheimer’s disease showed modest improvements in agitation scores when they received dextromethorphan-quinidine in a 10-week, placebo-controlled, industry-designed and sponsored trial. Although the dextromethorphan-quinidine arm also had higher rates of falls, urinary tract infections, and serious adverse events, the prescribing information was updated in 2015 to remove the statement about patients with dementia.
To assess real-world prescribing patterns for dextromethorphan-quinidine, Dr. Fralick and his associates analyzed data from 12,858 patients who filled a prescription for this medication between 2010 and 2017 and were recorded in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart or Truven Health MarketScan databases. Only 8.4% of patients had a diagnosis of MS and only 6.8% had ALS, while 57% had dementia and/or Parkinson’s disease and 28% had an unknown diagnosis. The number of patients prescribed dextromethorphan-quinidine rose from nearly 3,300 in 2011 to more than 50,000 in 2016, while spending on this medication by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services increased from $3.9 million to $200.4 million during the same time period.
Current treatments for behavioral symptoms of dementia “are largely ineffective, and thus clinicians may want to prescribe dextromethorphan-quinidine to see if it helps their patients,” the researchers wrote. “Yet the absence of data showing efficacy, coupled with the demonstrated risks of falls and possible cardiac effects, calls this strategy into question.
“Further studies should be required to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this medication as it is currently being used,” the authors suggested.
Study funders included the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, the Harvard Program in Therapeutic Science, the Engelberg Foundation, and the University of Toronto Clinician Scientist Training Program. One author disclosed grants from the Food and Drug Administration Office of Generic Drugs and Division of Health Communication unrelated to the study topic.
SOURCE: Fralick M et al. JAMA Inter Med. 2019 Jan 7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6112
Only 15% of patients prescribed dextromethorphan hydrobromide plus quinidine sulfate had pseudobulbar affect due to multiple sclerosis or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, the condition for which this drug is labeled, according to an analysis of two national commercial insurance claims databases published online Jan. 7 in JAMA Internal Medicine.
Conversely, 57% of patients prescribed dextromethorphan-quinidine (Nuedexta) had a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease or dementia. Furthermore, according to Medicare Part D data, prescriptions for dextromethorphan-quinidine rose 15-fold during a recent 6-year period, with a concurrent 50-fold rise in reimbursement. “In response to findings such as ours, further attention should be paid to educating prescribers about the actual benefits and risks of this costly drug combination,” Michael Fralick, MD, and his associates at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, wrote in their paper.
The Food and Drug Administration approved Nuedexta in 2010 for the treatment of pseudobulbar affect after it produced modest improvements in laughing or crying episodes in a 12-week, placebo-controlled trial of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The initial FDA label noted: “Nuedexta has not been shown to be safe or effective in other types of emotional lability that can commonly occur, for example, in Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias.” Then, in 2015, patients with Alzheimer’s disease showed modest improvements in agitation scores when they received dextromethorphan-quinidine in a 10-week, placebo-controlled, industry-designed and sponsored trial. Although the dextromethorphan-quinidine arm also had higher rates of falls, urinary tract infections, and serious adverse events, the prescribing information was updated in 2015 to remove the statement about patients with dementia.
To assess real-world prescribing patterns for dextromethorphan-quinidine, Dr. Fralick and his associates analyzed data from 12,858 patients who filled a prescription for this medication between 2010 and 2017 and were recorded in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart or Truven Health MarketScan databases. Only 8.4% of patients had a diagnosis of MS and only 6.8% had ALS, while 57% had dementia and/or Parkinson’s disease and 28% had an unknown diagnosis. The number of patients prescribed dextromethorphan-quinidine rose from nearly 3,300 in 2011 to more than 50,000 in 2016, while spending on this medication by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services increased from $3.9 million to $200.4 million during the same time period.
Current treatments for behavioral symptoms of dementia “are largely ineffective, and thus clinicians may want to prescribe dextromethorphan-quinidine to see if it helps their patients,” the researchers wrote. “Yet the absence of data showing efficacy, coupled with the demonstrated risks of falls and possible cardiac effects, calls this strategy into question.
“Further studies should be required to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this medication as it is currently being used,” the authors suggested.
Study funders included the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, the Harvard Program in Therapeutic Science, the Engelberg Foundation, and the University of Toronto Clinician Scientist Training Program. One author disclosed grants from the Food and Drug Administration Office of Generic Drugs and Division of Health Communication unrelated to the study topic.
SOURCE: Fralick M et al. JAMA Inter Med. 2019 Jan 7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6112
FROM JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Only 8.4% of patients had a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and only 6.8% had amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, while 57% had dementia and/or Parkinson’s disease and 28% had an unknown diagnosis.
Study details: Population-based cohort study of 12,858 patients prescribed dextromethorphan-quinidine between 2010 and 2017.
Disclosures: Study funders included the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, the Harvard Program in Therapeutic Science, the Engelberg Foundation, and the University of Toronto Clinician Scientist Training Program. One author disclosed grants from the Food and Drug Administration Office of Generic Drugs and Division of Health Communication unrelated to the study topic.
Source: Fralick M et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jan 7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6112.
Motor neuron disease spasticity improved with cannabis-based oral spray, antispasticity drugs
Nabiximols, a cannabis-based oral spray containing delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol, significantly improved spasticity symptoms in combination with antispasticity drugs in patients with motor neuron disease in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2 clinical trial.
Nabiximols proved superior to a placebo spray when both were given to patients with either amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or primary lateral sclerosis as part of an antispasticity regimen in the 6-week, CANALS (Cannabis Sativa Extract in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and other Motor Neuron Disease) study at four Italian centers, Nilo Riva, MD, PhD, of the San Raffaele Scientific Institute in Milan and his colleagues reported in The Lancet Neurology. Nabiximols is approved for the treatment of spasticity due to multiple sclerosis in multiple countries, but not in the United States.
“There is no cure for motor neuron disease, so improved symptom control and quality of life are important for patients,” Dr. Riva stated in a press release. “Our proof-of-concept trial showed a beneficial effect of THC-CBD [delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol] spray in people on treatment-resistant spasticity and pain.
“Despite these encouraging findings, we must first confirm that THC-CBD spray is effective and safe in larger, longer-term phase 3 trials,” Dr. Riva added.
The patients enrolled in the phase 2 trial between January 2013 and December 2014 and were between 18 and 80 years old with a probable diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or primary lateral sclerosis, were on an antispasticity regimen for at least 30 days, and had a spasticity score of at least 1 in two muscle groups on the 5-point Modified Ashworth Scale. Participants titrated for the first 2 weeks before maintaining their treatment for 4 weeks.
Of 59 participants at final follow-up, Modified Ashworth Scale scores improved in the nabiximols group (29 participants) by a mean of –0.11 points, compared with worsening by a mean of 0.16 points in the placebo group (30 participants). The researchers noted that there were no participants who withdrew from the study, nabiximols was well-tolerated, and there were no serious adverse events in the nabiximols group; however, there were 22 participants in the nabiximols group and 8 participants in the placebo group who experienced an adverse event from any cause.
“This study is, to our knowledge, the first randomized controlled trial of safety and efficacy of a pharmacological treatment for spasticity and the first trial of nabiximols in motor neuron disease,” Dr. Riva and his colleagues wrote. “Our results suggest that the study drug is well tolerated and provides first evidence of efficacy in terms of controlling spasticity in patients with motor neuron disease.”
The study was funded by the Italian Research Foundation for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. GW Pharma, which developed nabiximols, provided the study drug and placebo. Many of the authors reported financial disclosures with pharmaceutical companies.
SOURCE: Riva N et al. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Dec 13. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30406-X.
Although the results of Riva et al. are encouraging, the study had several major limitations and future research in the form of larger, multicenter, randomized controlled trials is needed, Marianne de Visser, MD, PhD, wrote in a related editorial.
Dr. de Visser noted a bias in the study as it randomized 16 patients with predominantly upper motor neuron involvement to the nabiximols group. The treatment could potentially have benefited those patients, for whom spasticity is the prevailing symptom, more than the 13 patients randomized to the nabiximols group who had classic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis involving both upper and lower neurons. In addition, Riva et al. did not differentiate between patients with upper and lower limb spasticity or patients with bulbar spasticity and those without, she said.
The use of the Modified Ashworth Scale was also a potential issue, because while it has been used in previous studies examining antispastic treatment efficacy, “it lacked sensitivity in studies of the efficacy of cannabinoids in patients with multiple sclerosis–related spasticity, and new spasticity numeric rating or visual analogue scales are being adopted,” Dr. de Visser wrote.
The number of adverse effects in the treatment group could have also unblinded researchers, which may have affected the significant findings, she said.
“Before asking for approval of cannabinoids for symptomatic treatment of spasticity in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, further studies are needed to establish the frequency of spasticity in the various presentations of motor neuron disease, and also whether reductions in spasticity improve quality of life,” Dr. de Visser said in a press release. “Natural history studies including all subtypes of motor neuron disease and better outcome measures aimed at assessment of spasticity are required. Dr. Riva and colleagues’ data are encouraging, and larger multicenter, randomized controlled trials should be done to identify which subgroups of patients derive clinically significant benefits from nabiximols.”
Marianne de Visser, MD, PhD, is with the department of neurology at Amsterdam University Medical Center. She reported no relevant conflicts of interest. Her remarks are taken from an editorial accompanying the study by Dr. Riva and associates (Lancet Neurol. 2018 Dec 13. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422[18]30493-9 ).
Although the results of Riva et al. are encouraging, the study had several major limitations and future research in the form of larger, multicenter, randomized controlled trials is needed, Marianne de Visser, MD, PhD, wrote in a related editorial.
Dr. de Visser noted a bias in the study as it randomized 16 patients with predominantly upper motor neuron involvement to the nabiximols group. The treatment could potentially have benefited those patients, for whom spasticity is the prevailing symptom, more than the 13 patients randomized to the nabiximols group who had classic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis involving both upper and lower neurons. In addition, Riva et al. did not differentiate between patients with upper and lower limb spasticity or patients with bulbar spasticity and those without, she said.
The use of the Modified Ashworth Scale was also a potential issue, because while it has been used in previous studies examining antispastic treatment efficacy, “it lacked sensitivity in studies of the efficacy of cannabinoids in patients with multiple sclerosis–related spasticity, and new spasticity numeric rating or visual analogue scales are being adopted,” Dr. de Visser wrote.
The number of adverse effects in the treatment group could have also unblinded researchers, which may have affected the significant findings, she said.
“Before asking for approval of cannabinoids for symptomatic treatment of spasticity in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, further studies are needed to establish the frequency of spasticity in the various presentations of motor neuron disease, and also whether reductions in spasticity improve quality of life,” Dr. de Visser said in a press release. “Natural history studies including all subtypes of motor neuron disease and better outcome measures aimed at assessment of spasticity are required. Dr. Riva and colleagues’ data are encouraging, and larger multicenter, randomized controlled trials should be done to identify which subgroups of patients derive clinically significant benefits from nabiximols.”
Marianne de Visser, MD, PhD, is with the department of neurology at Amsterdam University Medical Center. She reported no relevant conflicts of interest. Her remarks are taken from an editorial accompanying the study by Dr. Riva and associates (Lancet Neurol. 2018 Dec 13. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422[18]30493-9 ).
Although the results of Riva et al. are encouraging, the study had several major limitations and future research in the form of larger, multicenter, randomized controlled trials is needed, Marianne de Visser, MD, PhD, wrote in a related editorial.
Dr. de Visser noted a bias in the study as it randomized 16 patients with predominantly upper motor neuron involvement to the nabiximols group. The treatment could potentially have benefited those patients, for whom spasticity is the prevailing symptom, more than the 13 patients randomized to the nabiximols group who had classic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis involving both upper and lower neurons. In addition, Riva et al. did not differentiate between patients with upper and lower limb spasticity or patients with bulbar spasticity and those without, she said.
The use of the Modified Ashworth Scale was also a potential issue, because while it has been used in previous studies examining antispastic treatment efficacy, “it lacked sensitivity in studies of the efficacy of cannabinoids in patients with multiple sclerosis–related spasticity, and new spasticity numeric rating or visual analogue scales are being adopted,” Dr. de Visser wrote.
The number of adverse effects in the treatment group could have also unblinded researchers, which may have affected the significant findings, she said.
“Before asking for approval of cannabinoids for symptomatic treatment of spasticity in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, further studies are needed to establish the frequency of spasticity in the various presentations of motor neuron disease, and also whether reductions in spasticity improve quality of life,” Dr. de Visser said in a press release. “Natural history studies including all subtypes of motor neuron disease and better outcome measures aimed at assessment of spasticity are required. Dr. Riva and colleagues’ data are encouraging, and larger multicenter, randomized controlled trials should be done to identify which subgroups of patients derive clinically significant benefits from nabiximols.”
Marianne de Visser, MD, PhD, is with the department of neurology at Amsterdam University Medical Center. She reported no relevant conflicts of interest. Her remarks are taken from an editorial accompanying the study by Dr. Riva and associates (Lancet Neurol. 2018 Dec 13. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422[18]30493-9 ).
Nabiximols, a cannabis-based oral spray containing delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol, significantly improved spasticity symptoms in combination with antispasticity drugs in patients with motor neuron disease in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2 clinical trial.
Nabiximols proved superior to a placebo spray when both were given to patients with either amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or primary lateral sclerosis as part of an antispasticity regimen in the 6-week, CANALS (Cannabis Sativa Extract in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and other Motor Neuron Disease) study at four Italian centers, Nilo Riva, MD, PhD, of the San Raffaele Scientific Institute in Milan and his colleagues reported in The Lancet Neurology. Nabiximols is approved for the treatment of spasticity due to multiple sclerosis in multiple countries, but not in the United States.
“There is no cure for motor neuron disease, so improved symptom control and quality of life are important for patients,” Dr. Riva stated in a press release. “Our proof-of-concept trial showed a beneficial effect of THC-CBD [delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol] spray in people on treatment-resistant spasticity and pain.
“Despite these encouraging findings, we must first confirm that THC-CBD spray is effective and safe in larger, longer-term phase 3 trials,” Dr. Riva added.
The patients enrolled in the phase 2 trial between January 2013 and December 2014 and were between 18 and 80 years old with a probable diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or primary lateral sclerosis, were on an antispasticity regimen for at least 30 days, and had a spasticity score of at least 1 in two muscle groups on the 5-point Modified Ashworth Scale. Participants titrated for the first 2 weeks before maintaining their treatment for 4 weeks.
Of 59 participants at final follow-up, Modified Ashworth Scale scores improved in the nabiximols group (29 participants) by a mean of –0.11 points, compared with worsening by a mean of 0.16 points in the placebo group (30 participants). The researchers noted that there were no participants who withdrew from the study, nabiximols was well-tolerated, and there were no serious adverse events in the nabiximols group; however, there were 22 participants in the nabiximols group and 8 participants in the placebo group who experienced an adverse event from any cause.
“This study is, to our knowledge, the first randomized controlled trial of safety and efficacy of a pharmacological treatment for spasticity and the first trial of nabiximols in motor neuron disease,” Dr. Riva and his colleagues wrote. “Our results suggest that the study drug is well tolerated and provides first evidence of efficacy in terms of controlling spasticity in patients with motor neuron disease.”
The study was funded by the Italian Research Foundation for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. GW Pharma, which developed nabiximols, provided the study drug and placebo. Many of the authors reported financial disclosures with pharmaceutical companies.
SOURCE: Riva N et al. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Dec 13. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30406-X.
Nabiximols, a cannabis-based oral spray containing delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol, significantly improved spasticity symptoms in combination with antispasticity drugs in patients with motor neuron disease in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2 clinical trial.
Nabiximols proved superior to a placebo spray when both were given to patients with either amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or primary lateral sclerosis as part of an antispasticity regimen in the 6-week, CANALS (Cannabis Sativa Extract in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and other Motor Neuron Disease) study at four Italian centers, Nilo Riva, MD, PhD, of the San Raffaele Scientific Institute in Milan and his colleagues reported in The Lancet Neurology. Nabiximols is approved for the treatment of spasticity due to multiple sclerosis in multiple countries, but not in the United States.
“There is no cure for motor neuron disease, so improved symptom control and quality of life are important for patients,” Dr. Riva stated in a press release. “Our proof-of-concept trial showed a beneficial effect of THC-CBD [delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol] spray in people on treatment-resistant spasticity and pain.
“Despite these encouraging findings, we must first confirm that THC-CBD spray is effective and safe in larger, longer-term phase 3 trials,” Dr. Riva added.
The patients enrolled in the phase 2 trial between January 2013 and December 2014 and were between 18 and 80 years old with a probable diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or primary lateral sclerosis, were on an antispasticity regimen for at least 30 days, and had a spasticity score of at least 1 in two muscle groups on the 5-point Modified Ashworth Scale. Participants titrated for the first 2 weeks before maintaining their treatment for 4 weeks.
Of 59 participants at final follow-up, Modified Ashworth Scale scores improved in the nabiximols group (29 participants) by a mean of –0.11 points, compared with worsening by a mean of 0.16 points in the placebo group (30 participants). The researchers noted that there were no participants who withdrew from the study, nabiximols was well-tolerated, and there were no serious adverse events in the nabiximols group; however, there were 22 participants in the nabiximols group and 8 participants in the placebo group who experienced an adverse event from any cause.
“This study is, to our knowledge, the first randomized controlled trial of safety and efficacy of a pharmacological treatment for spasticity and the first trial of nabiximols in motor neuron disease,” Dr. Riva and his colleagues wrote. “Our results suggest that the study drug is well tolerated and provides first evidence of efficacy in terms of controlling spasticity in patients with motor neuron disease.”
The study was funded by the Italian Research Foundation for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. GW Pharma, which developed nabiximols, provided the study drug and placebo. Many of the authors reported financial disclosures with pharmaceutical companies.
SOURCE: Riva N et al. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Dec 13. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30406-X.
FROM THE LANCET NEUROLOGY
Key clinical point:
Major finding: In the nabiximols group, Modified Ashworth Scale scores improved by mean of –0.11 points, compared with worsening by a mean of 0.16 points in the placebo group.
Study details: A multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial of 59 participants with spasticity symptoms from motor neuron disease from four tertiary motor neuron centers in Italy.
Disclosures: The study was funded by the Italian Research Foundation for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. GW Pharma, which developed nabiximols, provided the study drug and placebo. Many of the authors reported financial disclosures with pharmaceutical companies.
Source: Riva N et al. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Dec 13. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30406-X
CDC: Acute flaccid myelitis on the decline for 2018
, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Through Nov. 30, 134 cases of AFM in 33 states have been confirmed out of the 299 reported to the CDC. That represents “an increase of 18 confirmed cases from the previous week, but most of the latest confirmed AFM cases occurred in September and October,” the CDC reported Dec. 3.
There has been a pattern of increased AFM cases every other year for the previous 4 years: 120 cases in 2014, 22 cases in 2015, 149 cases in 2016, and 33 cases in 2017. “Most cases are reported between August and October, and a marked reduction in cases is seen in November. That pattern appears to be repeating in 2018 because states have reported fewer [persons under investigation] over the past couple of weeks. CDC expects this decline to continue,” the statement said.
The 16 confirmed cases in Texas are the most for any state this year, followed by Colorado with 15; Ohio with 10; and Illinois, New Jersey, and Washington with 9 each. California and Florida have not had any confirmed cases as of Nov. 30. Since 2014, over 90% of all confirmed AFM cases have occurred in children, the CDC noted.
More information on AFM is available at a CDC website for health care professionals.
, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Through Nov. 30, 134 cases of AFM in 33 states have been confirmed out of the 299 reported to the CDC. That represents “an increase of 18 confirmed cases from the previous week, but most of the latest confirmed AFM cases occurred in September and October,” the CDC reported Dec. 3.
There has been a pattern of increased AFM cases every other year for the previous 4 years: 120 cases in 2014, 22 cases in 2015, 149 cases in 2016, and 33 cases in 2017. “Most cases are reported between August and October, and a marked reduction in cases is seen in November. That pattern appears to be repeating in 2018 because states have reported fewer [persons under investigation] over the past couple of weeks. CDC expects this decline to continue,” the statement said.
The 16 confirmed cases in Texas are the most for any state this year, followed by Colorado with 15; Ohio with 10; and Illinois, New Jersey, and Washington with 9 each. California and Florida have not had any confirmed cases as of Nov. 30. Since 2014, over 90% of all confirmed AFM cases have occurred in children, the CDC noted.
More information on AFM is available at a CDC website for health care professionals.
, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Through Nov. 30, 134 cases of AFM in 33 states have been confirmed out of the 299 reported to the CDC. That represents “an increase of 18 confirmed cases from the previous week, but most of the latest confirmed AFM cases occurred in September and October,” the CDC reported Dec. 3.
There has been a pattern of increased AFM cases every other year for the previous 4 years: 120 cases in 2014, 22 cases in 2015, 149 cases in 2016, and 33 cases in 2017. “Most cases are reported between August and October, and a marked reduction in cases is seen in November. That pattern appears to be repeating in 2018 because states have reported fewer [persons under investigation] over the past couple of weeks. CDC expects this decline to continue,” the statement said.
The 16 confirmed cases in Texas are the most for any state this year, followed by Colorado with 15; Ohio with 10; and Illinois, New Jersey, and Washington with 9 each. California and Florida have not had any confirmed cases as of Nov. 30. Since 2014, over 90% of all confirmed AFM cases have occurred in children, the CDC noted.
More information on AFM is available at a CDC website for health care professionals.
Firdapse approved: First treatment for rare autoimmune disorder
The Food and Drug Administration has approved amifampridine (Firdapse) as the first treatment for the rare autoimmune disorder known as Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, which causes the immune system to attack the neuromuscular junction and thereby disrupts the nerves’ ability to send signals to muscle cells. This causes fatigue and weakness in those affected, so they can experience difficulties with activities of daily living as a result.
The most common side effects included prickling sensation, upper respiratory tract infection, abdominal pain, and muscle spasms.
More information can be found in the FDA’s press announcement.
The Food and Drug Administration has approved amifampridine (Firdapse) as the first treatment for the rare autoimmune disorder known as Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, which causes the immune system to attack the neuromuscular junction and thereby disrupts the nerves’ ability to send signals to muscle cells. This causes fatigue and weakness in those affected, so they can experience difficulties with activities of daily living as a result.
The most common side effects included prickling sensation, upper respiratory tract infection, abdominal pain, and muscle spasms.
More information can be found in the FDA’s press announcement.
The Food and Drug Administration has approved amifampridine (Firdapse) as the first treatment for the rare autoimmune disorder known as Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, which causes the immune system to attack the neuromuscular junction and thereby disrupts the nerves’ ability to send signals to muscle cells. This causes fatigue and weakness in those affected, so they can experience difficulties with activities of daily living as a result.
The most common side effects included prickling sensation, upper respiratory tract infection, abdominal pain, and muscle spasms.
More information can be found in the FDA’s press announcement.
CDC: No medical therapy can yet be recommended for acute flaccid myelitis
The updated guidance on managing acute flaccid myelitis is unlikely to relieve the frustrations of physicians struggling to treat the condition.
After reviewing the extant data on the baffling disorder, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found no evidence that corticosteroids, interferon, antivirals, or any other immunologic or biologic therapy is an effective treatment.
All of the treatments mentioned in the guidance have been used anecdotally, and often for cases proven to be associated with enterovirus-related cases. However, there are no well validated studies confirming benefit for any of these approaches, the agency said in its clinical management document.
Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) has stricken 90 patients in the United States this year and another 252 cases are being investigated, according to new data from the CDC. The number of confirmed cases is triple that seen in 2017. Whether the disease is an infectious or autoimmune process, or something else entirely, remains unknown.
In response to the outbreak – the largest since 2014 – an expert panel of 4 CDC staff physicians reviewed the literature to find what, if any, treatments were effective; another 14 external experts provided input on the recommendations. At this point, nothing can be officially recommended, the agency said.
Corticosteroids
Corticosteroids should not be administered to most patients with AFM. In addition to “a theoretical concern” about the potential adverse effects of these drugs in acute infections, there is some hard evidence that they are associated with worse outcomes in enteroviral neuroinvasive diseases, particularly those caused by EV-71.
This observation, following a 2012 outbreak in Cambodia, led a World Health Organization commission to conclude that corticosteroids were contraindicated in the management of EV-71–associated neuroinvasive disease. This year, there has been an uptick in EV-A71-associated neurologic disease.
The CDC did hedge its advice on corticosteroids a bit in the setting of AFM, however. “There may be theoretical benefit for steroids in the setting of severe cord swelling or long tract signs suggesting white matter involvement, where steroids may salvage tissue that may be harmed due to an ongoing immune/inflammatory response. While AFM is clinically and radiographically defined by the predominance of gray matter damage in the spinal cord, some patients may have some white matter involvement. It is not clear if these different patterns are important relative to therapeutic considerations.”
Nevertheless, the agency does not recommend corticosteroid use for these patients. “The possible benefits of the use of corticosteroids to manage spinal cord edema or white matter involvement in AFM should be balanced with the possible harm due to immunosuppression in the setting of possible viral infection.”
IVIG
While IVIG holds some theoretical benefit for AFM, there are no high-level human data, the guidelines state. The treatment is generally safe and well tolerated, but the few reports of its use in AFM did not show clear benefit. These include two case series. One suggested an acute improvement of neurologic status, but no long-term resolution of deficits. The other indicated neither significant improvement nor deterioration.
However, current practice at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia is to initiate IVIG therapy at AFM diagnosis in hopes of boosting humoral immunity.
Nevertheless, the CDC said, “For IVIG to modify disease in an active viral infectious process, early administration is likely required, and possibly prior to exposure,” and the treatment cannot be recommended.
Plasma exchange
Plasma exchange in combination with IVIG and corticosteroids was ineffective in a case series of four Argentinian children, although a single case published last year found that the combination was associated with significant improvement. However, there are not enough data to recommend this approach.
Fluoxetine
Fluoxetine’s antiviral potential turned up in a high-throughput screening project to identify novel compounds with antiviral efficacy against enteroviruses. In 2012, researchers from the University of California, Los Angeles, tested more than 1,000 compounds and found that the SSRI is a potent inhibitor of coxsackievirus. A later project at the National Institutes of Health replicated this finding, and determined that fluoxetine inhibited several enteroviruses, including the AFM suspect, EV-D68.
Fluoxetine concentrates more highly in the central nervous system than it does in plasma, but its antiviral properties have nothing to do with neurotransmitter activity. Rather, it appears to inhibit protein 2C, a highly conserved nonstructural protein that’s crucial to the assembly of RNA into virion particles.
In early November, a retrospective study examined fluoxetine’s use in 30 AFM patients, compared with 26 who did not receive it. The primary outcome was change in summative limb strength score. The study did little to clarify any benefit, however. The authors concluded that fluoxetine was preferentially given to patients with EDV-68 infections. They had more severe impairment at nadir, and at the last follow-up of about 1 year, they had worse outcomes.
“There is no clear human evidence for efficacy of fluoxetine in the treatment of AFM based on a single retrospective evaluation conducted in patients with AFM, and data from a mouse model also did not support efficacy,” the CDC said.
Antiviral medications
The CDC is quite clear on its recommendation that these drugs are not indicated in AFM, since it is not yet proven to be an infectious process.
“Any guidance regarding antiviral medications should be interpreted with great caution, given the unknowns about the pathogenesis of this illness at present ... Testing has been conducted at CDC for antiviral activity of compounds pleconaril, pocapavir, and vapendavir and none have significant activity against currently circulating strains of EV-D68 at clinically relevant concentrations.”
Interferon
There is some anecdotal evidence that interferon alpha-2b was beneficial in treating a polio-like syndrome associated with West Nile virus and Saint Louis encephalitis. “Although there are limited in vitro, animal, and anecdotal human data suggesting activity of some interferons against viral infections, sufficient data are lacking in the setting of AFM,” the agency said. “There is no indication that interferon should be used for the treatment of AFM, and there is concern about the potential for harm from the use of interferon given the immunomodulatory effects in the setting of possible ongoing viral replication.”
SOURCE: CDC Acute Flaccid Myelitis: Interim Considerations for Clinical Management
The updated guidance on managing acute flaccid myelitis is unlikely to relieve the frustrations of physicians struggling to treat the condition.
After reviewing the extant data on the baffling disorder, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found no evidence that corticosteroids, interferon, antivirals, or any other immunologic or biologic therapy is an effective treatment.
All of the treatments mentioned in the guidance have been used anecdotally, and often for cases proven to be associated with enterovirus-related cases. However, there are no well validated studies confirming benefit for any of these approaches, the agency said in its clinical management document.
Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) has stricken 90 patients in the United States this year and another 252 cases are being investigated, according to new data from the CDC. The number of confirmed cases is triple that seen in 2017. Whether the disease is an infectious or autoimmune process, or something else entirely, remains unknown.
In response to the outbreak – the largest since 2014 – an expert panel of 4 CDC staff physicians reviewed the literature to find what, if any, treatments were effective; another 14 external experts provided input on the recommendations. At this point, nothing can be officially recommended, the agency said.
Corticosteroids
Corticosteroids should not be administered to most patients with AFM. In addition to “a theoretical concern” about the potential adverse effects of these drugs in acute infections, there is some hard evidence that they are associated with worse outcomes in enteroviral neuroinvasive diseases, particularly those caused by EV-71.
This observation, following a 2012 outbreak in Cambodia, led a World Health Organization commission to conclude that corticosteroids were contraindicated in the management of EV-71–associated neuroinvasive disease. This year, there has been an uptick in EV-A71-associated neurologic disease.
The CDC did hedge its advice on corticosteroids a bit in the setting of AFM, however. “There may be theoretical benefit for steroids in the setting of severe cord swelling or long tract signs suggesting white matter involvement, where steroids may salvage tissue that may be harmed due to an ongoing immune/inflammatory response. While AFM is clinically and radiographically defined by the predominance of gray matter damage in the spinal cord, some patients may have some white matter involvement. It is not clear if these different patterns are important relative to therapeutic considerations.”
Nevertheless, the agency does not recommend corticosteroid use for these patients. “The possible benefits of the use of corticosteroids to manage spinal cord edema or white matter involvement in AFM should be balanced with the possible harm due to immunosuppression in the setting of possible viral infection.”
IVIG
While IVIG holds some theoretical benefit for AFM, there are no high-level human data, the guidelines state. The treatment is generally safe and well tolerated, but the few reports of its use in AFM did not show clear benefit. These include two case series. One suggested an acute improvement of neurologic status, but no long-term resolution of deficits. The other indicated neither significant improvement nor deterioration.
However, current practice at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia is to initiate IVIG therapy at AFM diagnosis in hopes of boosting humoral immunity.
Nevertheless, the CDC said, “For IVIG to modify disease in an active viral infectious process, early administration is likely required, and possibly prior to exposure,” and the treatment cannot be recommended.
Plasma exchange
Plasma exchange in combination with IVIG and corticosteroids was ineffective in a case series of four Argentinian children, although a single case published last year found that the combination was associated with significant improvement. However, there are not enough data to recommend this approach.
Fluoxetine
Fluoxetine’s antiviral potential turned up in a high-throughput screening project to identify novel compounds with antiviral efficacy against enteroviruses. In 2012, researchers from the University of California, Los Angeles, tested more than 1,000 compounds and found that the SSRI is a potent inhibitor of coxsackievirus. A later project at the National Institutes of Health replicated this finding, and determined that fluoxetine inhibited several enteroviruses, including the AFM suspect, EV-D68.
Fluoxetine concentrates more highly in the central nervous system than it does in plasma, but its antiviral properties have nothing to do with neurotransmitter activity. Rather, it appears to inhibit protein 2C, a highly conserved nonstructural protein that’s crucial to the assembly of RNA into virion particles.
In early November, a retrospective study examined fluoxetine’s use in 30 AFM patients, compared with 26 who did not receive it. The primary outcome was change in summative limb strength score. The study did little to clarify any benefit, however. The authors concluded that fluoxetine was preferentially given to patients with EDV-68 infections. They had more severe impairment at nadir, and at the last follow-up of about 1 year, they had worse outcomes.
“There is no clear human evidence for efficacy of fluoxetine in the treatment of AFM based on a single retrospective evaluation conducted in patients with AFM, and data from a mouse model also did not support efficacy,” the CDC said.
Antiviral medications
The CDC is quite clear on its recommendation that these drugs are not indicated in AFM, since it is not yet proven to be an infectious process.
“Any guidance regarding antiviral medications should be interpreted with great caution, given the unknowns about the pathogenesis of this illness at present ... Testing has been conducted at CDC for antiviral activity of compounds pleconaril, pocapavir, and vapendavir and none have significant activity against currently circulating strains of EV-D68 at clinically relevant concentrations.”
Interferon
There is some anecdotal evidence that interferon alpha-2b was beneficial in treating a polio-like syndrome associated with West Nile virus and Saint Louis encephalitis. “Although there are limited in vitro, animal, and anecdotal human data suggesting activity of some interferons against viral infections, sufficient data are lacking in the setting of AFM,” the agency said. “There is no indication that interferon should be used for the treatment of AFM, and there is concern about the potential for harm from the use of interferon given the immunomodulatory effects in the setting of possible ongoing viral replication.”
SOURCE: CDC Acute Flaccid Myelitis: Interim Considerations for Clinical Management
The updated guidance on managing acute flaccid myelitis is unlikely to relieve the frustrations of physicians struggling to treat the condition.
After reviewing the extant data on the baffling disorder, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found no evidence that corticosteroids, interferon, antivirals, or any other immunologic or biologic therapy is an effective treatment.
All of the treatments mentioned in the guidance have been used anecdotally, and often for cases proven to be associated with enterovirus-related cases. However, there are no well validated studies confirming benefit for any of these approaches, the agency said in its clinical management document.
Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) has stricken 90 patients in the United States this year and another 252 cases are being investigated, according to new data from the CDC. The number of confirmed cases is triple that seen in 2017. Whether the disease is an infectious or autoimmune process, or something else entirely, remains unknown.
In response to the outbreak – the largest since 2014 – an expert panel of 4 CDC staff physicians reviewed the literature to find what, if any, treatments were effective; another 14 external experts provided input on the recommendations. At this point, nothing can be officially recommended, the agency said.
Corticosteroids
Corticosteroids should not be administered to most patients with AFM. In addition to “a theoretical concern” about the potential adverse effects of these drugs in acute infections, there is some hard evidence that they are associated with worse outcomes in enteroviral neuroinvasive diseases, particularly those caused by EV-71.
This observation, following a 2012 outbreak in Cambodia, led a World Health Organization commission to conclude that corticosteroids were contraindicated in the management of EV-71–associated neuroinvasive disease. This year, there has been an uptick in EV-A71-associated neurologic disease.
The CDC did hedge its advice on corticosteroids a bit in the setting of AFM, however. “There may be theoretical benefit for steroids in the setting of severe cord swelling or long tract signs suggesting white matter involvement, where steroids may salvage tissue that may be harmed due to an ongoing immune/inflammatory response. While AFM is clinically and radiographically defined by the predominance of gray matter damage in the spinal cord, some patients may have some white matter involvement. It is not clear if these different patterns are important relative to therapeutic considerations.”
Nevertheless, the agency does not recommend corticosteroid use for these patients. “The possible benefits of the use of corticosteroids to manage spinal cord edema or white matter involvement in AFM should be balanced with the possible harm due to immunosuppression in the setting of possible viral infection.”
IVIG
While IVIG holds some theoretical benefit for AFM, there are no high-level human data, the guidelines state. The treatment is generally safe and well tolerated, but the few reports of its use in AFM did not show clear benefit. These include two case series. One suggested an acute improvement of neurologic status, but no long-term resolution of deficits. The other indicated neither significant improvement nor deterioration.
However, current practice at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia is to initiate IVIG therapy at AFM diagnosis in hopes of boosting humoral immunity.
Nevertheless, the CDC said, “For IVIG to modify disease in an active viral infectious process, early administration is likely required, and possibly prior to exposure,” and the treatment cannot be recommended.
Plasma exchange
Plasma exchange in combination with IVIG and corticosteroids was ineffective in a case series of four Argentinian children, although a single case published last year found that the combination was associated with significant improvement. However, there are not enough data to recommend this approach.
Fluoxetine
Fluoxetine’s antiviral potential turned up in a high-throughput screening project to identify novel compounds with antiviral efficacy against enteroviruses. In 2012, researchers from the University of California, Los Angeles, tested more than 1,000 compounds and found that the SSRI is a potent inhibitor of coxsackievirus. A later project at the National Institutes of Health replicated this finding, and determined that fluoxetine inhibited several enteroviruses, including the AFM suspect, EV-D68.
Fluoxetine concentrates more highly in the central nervous system than it does in plasma, but its antiviral properties have nothing to do with neurotransmitter activity. Rather, it appears to inhibit protein 2C, a highly conserved nonstructural protein that’s crucial to the assembly of RNA into virion particles.
In early November, a retrospective study examined fluoxetine’s use in 30 AFM patients, compared with 26 who did not receive it. The primary outcome was change in summative limb strength score. The study did little to clarify any benefit, however. The authors concluded that fluoxetine was preferentially given to patients with EDV-68 infections. They had more severe impairment at nadir, and at the last follow-up of about 1 year, they had worse outcomes.
“There is no clear human evidence for efficacy of fluoxetine in the treatment of AFM based on a single retrospective evaluation conducted in patients with AFM, and data from a mouse model also did not support efficacy,” the CDC said.
Antiviral medications
The CDC is quite clear on its recommendation that these drugs are not indicated in AFM, since it is not yet proven to be an infectious process.
“Any guidance regarding antiviral medications should be interpreted with great caution, given the unknowns about the pathogenesis of this illness at present ... Testing has been conducted at CDC for antiviral activity of compounds pleconaril, pocapavir, and vapendavir and none have significant activity against currently circulating strains of EV-D68 at clinically relevant concentrations.”
Interferon
There is some anecdotal evidence that interferon alpha-2b was beneficial in treating a polio-like syndrome associated with West Nile virus and Saint Louis encephalitis. “Although there are limited in vitro, animal, and anecdotal human data suggesting activity of some interferons against viral infections, sufficient data are lacking in the setting of AFM,” the agency said. “There is no indication that interferon should be used for the treatment of AFM, and there is concern about the potential for harm from the use of interferon given the immunomodulatory effects in the setting of possible ongoing viral replication.”
SOURCE: CDC Acute Flaccid Myelitis: Interim Considerations for Clinical Management
Conference News Roundup—American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine
Does Thymectomy Benefit Patients With Anti-MuSK Myasthenia Gravis?
Among patients with anti-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) myasthenia gravis, thymectomy is not associated with greater likelihood of clinical improvement, according to an analysis of data from a multicenter cohort study.
Although a randomized trial has demonstrated benefit from thymectomy in nonthymomatous antiacetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive generalized myasthenia gravis, observational studies suggest that thymectomy may not be efficacious in anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis. Histologic studies have found that patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis have less hyperplastic thymic tissue, compared with patients with anti-AChR myasthenia gravis.
To evaluate the therapeutic impact of thymectomy in patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis, Katherine Clifford, a medical student at the University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine in Burlington, and colleagues analyzed data from a multicenter, retrospective, blinded review of rituximab treatment in patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis. The primary outcome was favorable outcome on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Post-Intervention Status (PIS). The researchers defined a favorable outcome as an MGFA PIS score of minimal manifestations or better.
Secondary outcomes included prednisone dose; use of other immunosuppressant medications, IV immunoglobulin (IVIG), or plasma exchange (PLEX) treatment; and Myasthenia Gravis Status and Treatment Intensity (MGSTI).
Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis who received thymectomy (n = 26) and those who did not (n = 29), including treatment with rituximab (42% vs 45%). Median follow-up was more than three years.
At last visit, 35% (nine of 26) of patients who received thymectomy had a favorable outcome, compared with 55% (16 of 29) of patients who did not receive thymectomy. In addition, 69% of patients who received thymectomy were taking prednisone, compared with 41% of patients who did not receive thymectomy (median dose, 10 mg/day vs 0 mg/day).
“After controlling for rituximab, baseline prednisone, and final IVIG/PLEX treatment, thymectomy was not associated with greater likelihood of favorable clinical outcome, but broad confidence intervals cannot exclude therapeutic effect (odds ratio, 0.43),” the investigators reported.
“The recent MGTX trial clearly demonstrated the benefit of thymectomy for patients with AChR antibody positive myasthenia gravis,” said A. Gordon Smith, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee. “Ms. Clifford and her colleagues now provide compelling data suggesting thymectomy may not be effective in MuSK-positive myasthenia gravis.”
The study’s follow-up is long enough for the findings to be clinically “relevant to all physicians treating myasthenia gravis,” said Robert W. Irwin, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee.
What Are the Clinical, Laboratory, and Electrodiagnostic Features of Zinc Deficiency-InducedPeripheral Neuropathy?
Patients with zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy may present with paresthesia, gait abnormalities, sensory deficits, reduced tendon reflexes, an abnormal Romberg test, and increased CSF protein, according to a study.
Recognition of the features of zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy may help neurologists diagnose the disorder and manage patients, researchers said.
“Zinc, an essential trace element, plays a critical role in maintaining normal structural and functional conditions in the body,” said lead author Favio C. Bumanlag, Chief Technologist in the Department of Neurology at the Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University in Philadelphia. “Peripheral nerves are susceptible to damage when zinc deficiency occurs.... Recognition of [zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy] will help physicians and technologists effectively manage patients.”
To study the clinical and electrophysiologic features of zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy, Mr. Bumanlag and Jin Luo, MD, PhD, Professor of Neurology and Pharmacology at Temple University, retrospectively reviewed charts in their neuromuscular clinic and EMG laboratory database to identify patients with peripheral neuropathy and zinc deficiency. They included charts from between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017, in their review. They excluded patients with abnormal copper levels.
Mr. Bumanlag and Dr. Luo obtained information about patients’ clinical presentations, past medical histories, BMI, neurologic examinations, and laboratory results. They also examined patients’ needle electromyograms and nerve conduction studies.
In all, they identified 12 patients with peripheral neuropathy and zinc deficiency. Patients had a mean age of 55.1. Six were female. Patients’ mean zinc level was 52.5 μg/dL, with a range of 37 μg/dL to 58 μg/dL (reference, 56–134 μg/dL). Mean copper level was 107.6 μg/dL, with a range of 84 μg/dL to 173 μg/dL (reference, 72–166
Notable findings in presentation included paresthesia in 75 and gait abnormalities in 42%. One patient was obese (8%), and three patients had diarrhea (25%). Neurologic examination showed sensory deficits in 83%, reduced tendon reflexes in 67%, and an abnormal Romberg test in 67%. Four of five patients had increased CSF protein. Electrophysiologic evaluations showed features of demyelinating peripheral neuropathy (28%) and distally active denervation in the lower extremities.
“Zinc participates in more than 200 enzymatic reactions,” said the researchers. “Unfortunately, zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy is often misdiagnosed or delayed in diagnosis. Literature on zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy is sparse.”
Disability in Patients With Stiff Person Syndrome May Progress Faster Than Thought
Stiff person syndrome leads to disability if therapy is not initiated early in the disease course, according to a prospective study. In addition, patients with stiff person syndrome may have “faster progression of disablement than originally reported and believed,” said lead study author Goran Rakocevic, MD. Dr. Rakocevic is Associate Professor of Neurology, Director of the Neuromuscular Electrodiagnostic Laboratory, Clinical Director of the Jefferson Weinberg ALS Center, and Director of the Neuromuscular Medicine Fellowship Program at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia.
Stiff person syndrome is a disorder characterized by muscle rigidity and episodic spasms in axial and limb musculature, as well as heightened sensitivity to external stimuli. To describe the natural history of stiff person syndrome, the extent of accumulated disability, and associated clinical features, Dr. Rakocevic and his research colleagues conducted a prospective cohort study in patients followed for up to eight years in a single center.
The cohort included 57 patients with mean age at disease onset of 42 (range, 22 to 60). Of these, 32 patients were examined every six months for two years without receiving immune therapies. The investigators assessed disease progression using quantitative scales of stiffness and heightened sensitivity.
Patients’ most frequent initial symptoms were leg stiffness, paraspinal muscle rigidity, and painful spasms. Although no patients required assistance for ambulation during the first two years of the disease, 46 patients (80%) lost the ability to walk independently during follow-up, despite symptomatic medications. In the longitudinal cohort, the number of stiff areas increased, which was consistent with worsening functional status and quality of life. The researchers confirmed a strong association between stiff person syndrome and the HLA-DR and DQ haplotypes.
The study is the largest prospective study of patients with stiff person syndrome and the first to provide longitudinal data on the natural course of the disorder in a large patient subgroup using objective clinical measures, Dr. Rakocevic and colleagues said. “The study shows that stiff person syndrome is a progressive autoimmune disease that leads to disability if ... immunotherapy is not applied,” said the investigators.
“Early diagnosis and management of stiff person syndrome can be challenging,” said A. Gordon Smith, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee. The study by Dr. Rakocevic’s team demonstrates “that stiff person syndrome causes progressive stiffness and functional decline, with 80% [of patients] becoming unable to walk independently,” he said. “Their research emphasizes the need to treat early and will help clinicians recognize stiff person syndrome earlier in its course.”
The study adds to neurologists’ understanding of the rare disorder, and its strengths include the length of follow-up and the number of patients, said Robert W. Irwin, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee.
Does Thymectomy Benefit Patients With Anti-MuSK Myasthenia Gravis?
Among patients with anti-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) myasthenia gravis, thymectomy is not associated with greater likelihood of clinical improvement, according to an analysis of data from a multicenter cohort study.
Although a randomized trial has demonstrated benefit from thymectomy in nonthymomatous antiacetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive generalized myasthenia gravis, observational studies suggest that thymectomy may not be efficacious in anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis. Histologic studies have found that patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis have less hyperplastic thymic tissue, compared with patients with anti-AChR myasthenia gravis.
To evaluate the therapeutic impact of thymectomy in patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis, Katherine Clifford, a medical student at the University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine in Burlington, and colleagues analyzed data from a multicenter, retrospective, blinded review of rituximab treatment in patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis. The primary outcome was favorable outcome on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Post-Intervention Status (PIS). The researchers defined a favorable outcome as an MGFA PIS score of minimal manifestations or better.
Secondary outcomes included prednisone dose; use of other immunosuppressant medications, IV immunoglobulin (IVIG), or plasma exchange (PLEX) treatment; and Myasthenia Gravis Status and Treatment Intensity (MGSTI).
Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis who received thymectomy (n = 26) and those who did not (n = 29), including treatment with rituximab (42% vs 45%). Median follow-up was more than three years.
At last visit, 35% (nine of 26) of patients who received thymectomy had a favorable outcome, compared with 55% (16 of 29) of patients who did not receive thymectomy. In addition, 69% of patients who received thymectomy were taking prednisone, compared with 41% of patients who did not receive thymectomy (median dose, 10 mg/day vs 0 mg/day).
“After controlling for rituximab, baseline prednisone, and final IVIG/PLEX treatment, thymectomy was not associated with greater likelihood of favorable clinical outcome, but broad confidence intervals cannot exclude therapeutic effect (odds ratio, 0.43),” the investigators reported.
“The recent MGTX trial clearly demonstrated the benefit of thymectomy for patients with AChR antibody positive myasthenia gravis,” said A. Gordon Smith, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee. “Ms. Clifford and her colleagues now provide compelling data suggesting thymectomy may not be effective in MuSK-positive myasthenia gravis.”
The study’s follow-up is long enough for the findings to be clinically “relevant to all physicians treating myasthenia gravis,” said Robert W. Irwin, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee.
What Are the Clinical, Laboratory, and Electrodiagnostic Features of Zinc Deficiency-InducedPeripheral Neuropathy?
Patients with zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy may present with paresthesia, gait abnormalities, sensory deficits, reduced tendon reflexes, an abnormal Romberg test, and increased CSF protein, according to a study.
Recognition of the features of zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy may help neurologists diagnose the disorder and manage patients, researchers said.
“Zinc, an essential trace element, plays a critical role in maintaining normal structural and functional conditions in the body,” said lead author Favio C. Bumanlag, Chief Technologist in the Department of Neurology at the Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University in Philadelphia. “Peripheral nerves are susceptible to damage when zinc deficiency occurs.... Recognition of [zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy] will help physicians and technologists effectively manage patients.”
To study the clinical and electrophysiologic features of zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy, Mr. Bumanlag and Jin Luo, MD, PhD, Professor of Neurology and Pharmacology at Temple University, retrospectively reviewed charts in their neuromuscular clinic and EMG laboratory database to identify patients with peripheral neuropathy and zinc deficiency. They included charts from between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017, in their review. They excluded patients with abnormal copper levels.
Mr. Bumanlag and Dr. Luo obtained information about patients’ clinical presentations, past medical histories, BMI, neurologic examinations, and laboratory results. They also examined patients’ needle electromyograms and nerve conduction studies.
In all, they identified 12 patients with peripheral neuropathy and zinc deficiency. Patients had a mean age of 55.1. Six were female. Patients’ mean zinc level was 52.5 μg/dL, with a range of 37 μg/dL to 58 μg/dL (reference, 56–134 μg/dL). Mean copper level was 107.6 μg/dL, with a range of 84 μg/dL to 173 μg/dL (reference, 72–166
Notable findings in presentation included paresthesia in 75 and gait abnormalities in 42%. One patient was obese (8%), and three patients had diarrhea (25%). Neurologic examination showed sensory deficits in 83%, reduced tendon reflexes in 67%, and an abnormal Romberg test in 67%. Four of five patients had increased CSF protein. Electrophysiologic evaluations showed features of demyelinating peripheral neuropathy (28%) and distally active denervation in the lower extremities.
“Zinc participates in more than 200 enzymatic reactions,” said the researchers. “Unfortunately, zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy is often misdiagnosed or delayed in diagnosis. Literature on zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy is sparse.”
Disability in Patients With Stiff Person Syndrome May Progress Faster Than Thought
Stiff person syndrome leads to disability if therapy is not initiated early in the disease course, according to a prospective study. In addition, patients with stiff person syndrome may have “faster progression of disablement than originally reported and believed,” said lead study author Goran Rakocevic, MD. Dr. Rakocevic is Associate Professor of Neurology, Director of the Neuromuscular Electrodiagnostic Laboratory, Clinical Director of the Jefferson Weinberg ALS Center, and Director of the Neuromuscular Medicine Fellowship Program at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia.
Stiff person syndrome is a disorder characterized by muscle rigidity and episodic spasms in axial and limb musculature, as well as heightened sensitivity to external stimuli. To describe the natural history of stiff person syndrome, the extent of accumulated disability, and associated clinical features, Dr. Rakocevic and his research colleagues conducted a prospective cohort study in patients followed for up to eight years in a single center.
The cohort included 57 patients with mean age at disease onset of 42 (range, 22 to 60). Of these, 32 patients were examined every six months for two years without receiving immune therapies. The investigators assessed disease progression using quantitative scales of stiffness and heightened sensitivity.
Patients’ most frequent initial symptoms were leg stiffness, paraspinal muscle rigidity, and painful spasms. Although no patients required assistance for ambulation during the first two years of the disease, 46 patients (80%) lost the ability to walk independently during follow-up, despite symptomatic medications. In the longitudinal cohort, the number of stiff areas increased, which was consistent with worsening functional status and quality of life. The researchers confirmed a strong association between stiff person syndrome and the HLA-DR and DQ haplotypes.
The study is the largest prospective study of patients with stiff person syndrome and the first to provide longitudinal data on the natural course of the disorder in a large patient subgroup using objective clinical measures, Dr. Rakocevic and colleagues said. “The study shows that stiff person syndrome is a progressive autoimmune disease that leads to disability if ... immunotherapy is not applied,” said the investigators.
“Early diagnosis and management of stiff person syndrome can be challenging,” said A. Gordon Smith, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee. The study by Dr. Rakocevic’s team demonstrates “that stiff person syndrome causes progressive stiffness and functional decline, with 80% [of patients] becoming unable to walk independently,” he said. “Their research emphasizes the need to treat early and will help clinicians recognize stiff person syndrome earlier in its course.”
The study adds to neurologists’ understanding of the rare disorder, and its strengths include the length of follow-up and the number of patients, said Robert W. Irwin, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee.
Does Thymectomy Benefit Patients With Anti-MuSK Myasthenia Gravis?
Among patients with anti-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) myasthenia gravis, thymectomy is not associated with greater likelihood of clinical improvement, according to an analysis of data from a multicenter cohort study.
Although a randomized trial has demonstrated benefit from thymectomy in nonthymomatous antiacetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive generalized myasthenia gravis, observational studies suggest that thymectomy may not be efficacious in anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis. Histologic studies have found that patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis have less hyperplastic thymic tissue, compared with patients with anti-AChR myasthenia gravis.
To evaluate the therapeutic impact of thymectomy in patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis, Katherine Clifford, a medical student at the University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine in Burlington, and colleagues analyzed data from a multicenter, retrospective, blinded review of rituximab treatment in patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis. The primary outcome was favorable outcome on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Post-Intervention Status (PIS). The researchers defined a favorable outcome as an MGFA PIS score of minimal manifestations or better.
Secondary outcomes included prednisone dose; use of other immunosuppressant medications, IV immunoglobulin (IVIG), or plasma exchange (PLEX) treatment; and Myasthenia Gravis Status and Treatment Intensity (MGSTI).
Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis who received thymectomy (n = 26) and those who did not (n = 29), including treatment with rituximab (42% vs 45%). Median follow-up was more than three years.
At last visit, 35% (nine of 26) of patients who received thymectomy had a favorable outcome, compared with 55% (16 of 29) of patients who did not receive thymectomy. In addition, 69% of patients who received thymectomy were taking prednisone, compared with 41% of patients who did not receive thymectomy (median dose, 10 mg/day vs 0 mg/day).
“After controlling for rituximab, baseline prednisone, and final IVIG/PLEX treatment, thymectomy was not associated with greater likelihood of favorable clinical outcome, but broad confidence intervals cannot exclude therapeutic effect (odds ratio, 0.43),” the investigators reported.
“The recent MGTX trial clearly demonstrated the benefit of thymectomy for patients with AChR antibody positive myasthenia gravis,” said A. Gordon Smith, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee. “Ms. Clifford and her colleagues now provide compelling data suggesting thymectomy may not be effective in MuSK-positive myasthenia gravis.”
The study’s follow-up is long enough for the findings to be clinically “relevant to all physicians treating myasthenia gravis,” said Robert W. Irwin, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee.
What Are the Clinical, Laboratory, and Electrodiagnostic Features of Zinc Deficiency-InducedPeripheral Neuropathy?
Patients with zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy may present with paresthesia, gait abnormalities, sensory deficits, reduced tendon reflexes, an abnormal Romberg test, and increased CSF protein, according to a study.
Recognition of the features of zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy may help neurologists diagnose the disorder and manage patients, researchers said.
“Zinc, an essential trace element, plays a critical role in maintaining normal structural and functional conditions in the body,” said lead author Favio C. Bumanlag, Chief Technologist in the Department of Neurology at the Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University in Philadelphia. “Peripheral nerves are susceptible to damage when zinc deficiency occurs.... Recognition of [zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy] will help physicians and technologists effectively manage patients.”
To study the clinical and electrophysiologic features of zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy, Mr. Bumanlag and Jin Luo, MD, PhD, Professor of Neurology and Pharmacology at Temple University, retrospectively reviewed charts in their neuromuscular clinic and EMG laboratory database to identify patients with peripheral neuropathy and zinc deficiency. They included charts from between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017, in their review. They excluded patients with abnormal copper levels.
Mr. Bumanlag and Dr. Luo obtained information about patients’ clinical presentations, past medical histories, BMI, neurologic examinations, and laboratory results. They also examined patients’ needle electromyograms and nerve conduction studies.
In all, they identified 12 patients with peripheral neuropathy and zinc deficiency. Patients had a mean age of 55.1. Six were female. Patients’ mean zinc level was 52.5 μg/dL, with a range of 37 μg/dL to 58 μg/dL (reference, 56–134 μg/dL). Mean copper level was 107.6 μg/dL, with a range of 84 μg/dL to 173 μg/dL (reference, 72–166
Notable findings in presentation included paresthesia in 75 and gait abnormalities in 42%. One patient was obese (8%), and three patients had diarrhea (25%). Neurologic examination showed sensory deficits in 83%, reduced tendon reflexes in 67%, and an abnormal Romberg test in 67%. Four of five patients had increased CSF protein. Electrophysiologic evaluations showed features of demyelinating peripheral neuropathy (28%) and distally active denervation in the lower extremities.
“Zinc participates in more than 200 enzymatic reactions,” said the researchers. “Unfortunately, zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy is often misdiagnosed or delayed in diagnosis. Literature on zinc deficiency-induced peripheral neuropathy is sparse.”
Disability in Patients With Stiff Person Syndrome May Progress Faster Than Thought
Stiff person syndrome leads to disability if therapy is not initiated early in the disease course, according to a prospective study. In addition, patients with stiff person syndrome may have “faster progression of disablement than originally reported and believed,” said lead study author Goran Rakocevic, MD. Dr. Rakocevic is Associate Professor of Neurology, Director of the Neuromuscular Electrodiagnostic Laboratory, Clinical Director of the Jefferson Weinberg ALS Center, and Director of the Neuromuscular Medicine Fellowship Program at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia.
Stiff person syndrome is a disorder characterized by muscle rigidity and episodic spasms in axial and limb musculature, as well as heightened sensitivity to external stimuli. To describe the natural history of stiff person syndrome, the extent of accumulated disability, and associated clinical features, Dr. Rakocevic and his research colleagues conducted a prospective cohort study in patients followed for up to eight years in a single center.
The cohort included 57 patients with mean age at disease onset of 42 (range, 22 to 60). Of these, 32 patients were examined every six months for two years without receiving immune therapies. The investigators assessed disease progression using quantitative scales of stiffness and heightened sensitivity.
Patients’ most frequent initial symptoms were leg stiffness, paraspinal muscle rigidity, and painful spasms. Although no patients required assistance for ambulation during the first two years of the disease, 46 patients (80%) lost the ability to walk independently during follow-up, despite symptomatic medications. In the longitudinal cohort, the number of stiff areas increased, which was consistent with worsening functional status and quality of life. The researchers confirmed a strong association between stiff person syndrome and the HLA-DR and DQ haplotypes.
The study is the largest prospective study of patients with stiff person syndrome and the first to provide longitudinal data on the natural course of the disorder in a large patient subgroup using objective clinical measures, Dr. Rakocevic and colleagues said. “The study shows that stiff person syndrome is a progressive autoimmune disease that leads to disability if ... immunotherapy is not applied,” said the investigators.
“Early diagnosis and management of stiff person syndrome can be challenging,” said A. Gordon Smith, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee. The study by Dr. Rakocevic’s team demonstrates “that stiff person syndrome causes progressive stiffness and functional decline, with 80% [of patients] becoming unable to walk independently,” he said. “Their research emphasizes the need to treat early and will help clinicians recognize stiff person syndrome earlier in its course.”
The study adds to neurologists’ understanding of the rare disorder, and its strengths include the length of follow-up and the number of patients, said Robert W. Irwin, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee.
Does Thymectomy Benefit Patients With Anti-MuSK Myasthenia Gravis?
Favorable clinical outcomes are not more likely in patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis who undergo thymectomy versus patients who do not.
WASHINGTON, DC—Among patients with anti-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) myasthenia gravis, thymectomy is not associated with greater likelihood of clinical improvement, according to an analysis of data from a multicenter cohort study. The results were presented at the 2018 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM).
Although a randomized trial has demonstrated benefit from thymectomy in nonthymomatous antiacetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive generalized myasthenia gravis, observational studies suggest that thymectomy may not be efficacious in anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis. Histologic studies have found that patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis have less hyperplastic thymic tissue, compared with patients with anti-AChR myasthenia gravis.
To evaluate the therapeutic impact of thymectomy in patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis, Katherine Clifford, a medical student at the University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine in Burlington, and colleagues analyzed data from a multicenter, retrospective, blinded review of rituximab treatment in patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis. The primary outcome was favorable outcome on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Post-Intervention Status (PIS). The researchers defined a favorable outcome as an MGFA PIS score of minimal manifestations or better.
Secondary outcomes included prednisone dose; use of other immunosuppressant medications, IV immunoglobulin (IVIG), or plasma exchange (PLEX) treatment; and Myasthenia Gravis Status and Treatment Intensity (MGSTI).
Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis who underwent thymectomy (n = 26) and those who did not (n = 29), including treatment with rituximab (42% vs 45%). Median follow-up was more than three years.
At last visit, 35% (nine of 26) of patients who underwent thymectomy had a favorable outcome, compared with 55% (16 of 29) of patients who did not undergo thymectomy. In addition, 69% of patients who underwent thymectomy were taking prednisone, compared with 41% of patients who did not undergo thymectomy (median dose, 10 mg/day vs 0 mg/day).
“After controlling for rituximab, baseline prednisone, and final IVIG/PLEX treatment, thymectomy was not associated with greater likelihood of favorable clinical outcome, but broad confidence intervals cannot exclude therapeutic effect (odds ratio, 0.43),” the investigators reported. 
“The recent MGTX trial clearly demonstrated the benefit of thymectomy for patients with AChR antibody positive myasthenia gravis,” said A. Gordon Smith, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee. “Ms. Clifford and her colleagues now provide compelling data suggesting thymectomy may not be effective in MuSK-positive myasthenia gravis.”
The study’s follow-up is long enough for the findings to be clinically “relevant to all physicians treating myasthenia gravis,” said Robert W. Irwin, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee.
Favorable clinical outcomes are not more likely in patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis who undergo thymectomy versus patients who do not.
Favorable clinical outcomes are not more likely in patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis who undergo thymectomy versus patients who do not.
WASHINGTON, DC—Among patients with anti-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) myasthenia gravis, thymectomy is not associated with greater likelihood of clinical improvement, according to an analysis of data from a multicenter cohort study. The results were presented at the 2018 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM).
Although a randomized trial has demonstrated benefit from thymectomy in nonthymomatous antiacetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive generalized myasthenia gravis, observational studies suggest that thymectomy may not be efficacious in anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis. Histologic studies have found that patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis have less hyperplastic thymic tissue, compared with patients with anti-AChR myasthenia gravis.
To evaluate the therapeutic impact of thymectomy in patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis, Katherine Clifford, a medical student at the University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine in Burlington, and colleagues analyzed data from a multicenter, retrospective, blinded review of rituximab treatment in patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis. The primary outcome was favorable outcome on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Post-Intervention Status (PIS). The researchers defined a favorable outcome as an MGFA PIS score of minimal manifestations or better.
Secondary outcomes included prednisone dose; use of other immunosuppressant medications, IV immunoglobulin (IVIG), or plasma exchange (PLEX) treatment; and Myasthenia Gravis Status and Treatment Intensity (MGSTI).
Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis who underwent thymectomy (n = 26) and those who did not (n = 29), including treatment with rituximab (42% vs 45%). Median follow-up was more than three years.
At last visit, 35% (nine of 26) of patients who underwent thymectomy had a favorable outcome, compared with 55% (16 of 29) of patients who did not undergo thymectomy. In addition, 69% of patients who underwent thymectomy were taking prednisone, compared with 41% of patients who did not undergo thymectomy (median dose, 10 mg/day vs 0 mg/day).
“After controlling for rituximab, baseline prednisone, and final IVIG/PLEX treatment, thymectomy was not associated with greater likelihood of favorable clinical outcome, but broad confidence intervals cannot exclude therapeutic effect (odds ratio, 0.43),” the investigators reported.
“The recent MGTX trial clearly demonstrated the benefit of thymectomy for patients with AChR antibody positive myasthenia gravis,” said A. Gordon Smith, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee. “Ms. Clifford and her colleagues now provide compelling data suggesting thymectomy may not be effective in MuSK-positive myasthenia gravis.”
The study’s follow-up is long enough for the findings to be clinically “relevant to all physicians treating myasthenia gravis,” said Robert W. Irwin, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee.
WASHINGTON, DC—Among patients with anti-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) myasthenia gravis, thymectomy is not associated with greater likelihood of clinical improvement, according to an analysis of data from a multicenter cohort study. The results were presented at the 2018 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM).
Although a randomized trial has demonstrated benefit from thymectomy in nonthymomatous antiacetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive generalized myasthenia gravis, observational studies suggest that thymectomy may not be efficacious in anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis. Histologic studies have found that patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis have less hyperplastic thymic tissue, compared with patients with anti-AChR myasthenia gravis.
To evaluate the therapeutic impact of thymectomy in patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis, Katherine Clifford, a medical student at the University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine in Burlington, and colleagues analyzed data from a multicenter, retrospective, blinded review of rituximab treatment in patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis. The primary outcome was favorable outcome on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Post-Intervention Status (PIS). The researchers defined a favorable outcome as an MGFA PIS score of minimal manifestations or better.
Secondary outcomes included prednisone dose; use of other immunosuppressant medications, IV immunoglobulin (IVIG), or plasma exchange (PLEX) treatment; and Myasthenia Gravis Status and Treatment Intensity (MGSTI).
Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis who underwent thymectomy (n = 26) and those who did not (n = 29), including treatment with rituximab (42% vs 45%). Median follow-up was more than three years.
At last visit, 35% (nine of 26) of patients who underwent thymectomy had a favorable outcome, compared with 55% (16 of 29) of patients who did not undergo thymectomy. In addition, 69% of patients who underwent thymectomy were taking prednisone, compared with 41% of patients who did not undergo thymectomy (median dose, 10 mg/day vs 0 mg/day).
“After controlling for rituximab, baseline prednisone, and final IVIG/PLEX treatment, thymectomy was not associated with greater likelihood of favorable clinical outcome, but broad confidence intervals cannot exclude therapeutic effect (odds ratio, 0.43),” the investigators reported.
“The recent MGTX trial clearly demonstrated the benefit of thymectomy for patients with AChR antibody positive myasthenia gravis,” said A. Gordon Smith, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee. “Ms. Clifford and her colleagues now provide compelling data suggesting thymectomy may not be effective in MuSK-positive myasthenia gravis.”
The study’s follow-up is long enough for the findings to be clinically “relevant to all physicians treating myasthenia gravis,” said Robert W. Irwin, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee.
Disability in Patients With Stiff Person Syndrome May Progress Faster Than Thought
A study emphasizes the importance of early treatment.
WASHINGTON, DC—Stiff person syndrome leads to disability if therapy is not initiated early in the disease course, according to a prospective study presented at the 2018 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM). In addition, patients with stiff person syndrome may have “faster progression of disablement than originally reported and believed,” said lead study author Goran Rakocevic, MD. Dr. Rakocevic is Associate Professor of Neurology, Director of the Neuromuscular Electrodiagnostic Laboratory, Clinical Director of the Jefferson Weinberg ALS Center, and Director of the Neuromuscular Medicine Fellowship Program at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia. 
Stiff person syndrome is a disorder characterized by muscle rigidity and episodic spasms in axial and limb musculature, as well as heightened sensitivity to external stimuli. To describe the natural history of stiff person syndrome, the extent of accumulated disability, and associated clinical features, Dr. Rakocevic and his research colleagues conducted a prospective cohort study in patients followed for up to eight years in a single center.
The cohort included 57 patients with mean age at disease onset of 42 (range, 22 to 60). Of these, 32 patients were examined every six months for two years without receiving immune therapies. The investigators assessed disease progression using quantitative scales of stiffness and heightened sensitivity.
Patients’ most frequent initial symptoms were leg stiffness, paraspinal muscle rigidity, and painful spasms. Although no patients required assistance for ambulation during the first two years of the disease, 46 patients (80%) lost the ability to walk independently during follow-up, despite symptomatic medications. In the longitudinal cohort, the number of stiff areas increased, which was consistent with worsening functional status and quality of life. The researchers confirmed a strong association between stiff person syndrome and the HLA-DR and DQ haplotypes.
The study is the largest prospective study of patients with stiff person syndrome and the first to provide longitudinal data on the natural course of the disorder in a large patient subgroup using objective clinical measures, Dr. Rakocevic and colleagues said. “The study shows that stiff person syndrome is a progressive autoimmune disease that leads to disability if ... immunotherapy is not applied,” said the investigators.
“Early diagnosis and management of stiff person syndrome can be challenging,” said A. Gordon Smith, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee. The study by Dr. Rakocevic’s team demonstrates “that stiff person syndrome causes progressive stiffness and functional decline, with 80% [of patients] becoming unable to walk independently,” he said. “Their research emphasizes the need to treat early and will help clinicians recognize stiff person syndrome earlier in its course.”
The study adds to neurologists’ understanding of the rare disorder, and its strengths include the length of follow-up and the number of patients, said Robert W. Irwin, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee.
A study emphasizes the importance of early treatment.
A study emphasizes the importance of early treatment.
WASHINGTON, DC—Stiff person syndrome leads to disability if therapy is not initiated early in the disease course, according to a prospective study presented at the 2018 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM). In addition, patients with stiff person syndrome may have “faster progression of disablement than originally reported and believed,” said lead study author Goran Rakocevic, MD. Dr. Rakocevic is Associate Professor of Neurology, Director of the Neuromuscular Electrodiagnostic Laboratory, Clinical Director of the Jefferson Weinberg ALS Center, and Director of the Neuromuscular Medicine Fellowship Program at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia.
Stiff person syndrome is a disorder characterized by muscle rigidity and episodic spasms in axial and limb musculature, as well as heightened sensitivity to external stimuli. To describe the natural history of stiff person syndrome, the extent of accumulated disability, and associated clinical features, Dr. Rakocevic and his research colleagues conducted a prospective cohort study in patients followed for up to eight years in a single center.
The cohort included 57 patients with mean age at disease onset of 42 (range, 22 to 60). Of these, 32 patients were examined every six months for two years without receiving immune therapies. The investigators assessed disease progression using quantitative scales of stiffness and heightened sensitivity.
Patients’ most frequent initial symptoms were leg stiffness, paraspinal muscle rigidity, and painful spasms. Although no patients required assistance for ambulation during the first two years of the disease, 46 patients (80%) lost the ability to walk independently during follow-up, despite symptomatic medications. In the longitudinal cohort, the number of stiff areas increased, which was consistent with worsening functional status and quality of life. The researchers confirmed a strong association between stiff person syndrome and the HLA-DR and DQ haplotypes.
The study is the largest prospective study of patients with stiff person syndrome and the first to provide longitudinal data on the natural course of the disorder in a large patient subgroup using objective clinical measures, Dr. Rakocevic and colleagues said. “The study shows that stiff person syndrome is a progressive autoimmune disease that leads to disability if ... immunotherapy is not applied,” said the investigators.
“Early diagnosis and management of stiff person syndrome can be challenging,” said A. Gordon Smith, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee. The study by Dr. Rakocevic’s team demonstrates “that stiff person syndrome causes progressive stiffness and functional decline, with 80% [of patients] becoming unable to walk independently,” he said. “Their research emphasizes the need to treat early and will help clinicians recognize stiff person syndrome earlier in its course.”
The study adds to neurologists’ understanding of the rare disorder, and its strengths include the length of follow-up and the number of patients, said Robert W. Irwin, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee.
WASHINGTON, DC—Stiff person syndrome leads to disability if therapy is not initiated early in the disease course, according to a prospective study presented at the 2018 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM). In addition, patients with stiff person syndrome may have “faster progression of disablement than originally reported and believed,” said lead study author Goran Rakocevic, MD. Dr. Rakocevic is Associate Professor of Neurology, Director of the Neuromuscular Electrodiagnostic Laboratory, Clinical Director of the Jefferson Weinberg ALS Center, and Director of the Neuromuscular Medicine Fellowship Program at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia.
Stiff person syndrome is a disorder characterized by muscle rigidity and episodic spasms in axial and limb musculature, as well as heightened sensitivity to external stimuli. To describe the natural history of stiff person syndrome, the extent of accumulated disability, and associated clinical features, Dr. Rakocevic and his research colleagues conducted a prospective cohort study in patients followed for up to eight years in a single center.
The cohort included 57 patients with mean age at disease onset of 42 (range, 22 to 60). Of these, 32 patients were examined every six months for two years without receiving immune therapies. The investigators assessed disease progression using quantitative scales of stiffness and heightened sensitivity.
Patients’ most frequent initial symptoms were leg stiffness, paraspinal muscle rigidity, and painful spasms. Although no patients required assistance for ambulation during the first two years of the disease, 46 patients (80%) lost the ability to walk independently during follow-up, despite symptomatic medications. In the longitudinal cohort, the number of stiff areas increased, which was consistent with worsening functional status and quality of life. The researchers confirmed a strong association between stiff person syndrome and the HLA-DR and DQ haplotypes.
The study is the largest prospective study of patients with stiff person syndrome and the first to provide longitudinal data on the natural course of the disorder in a large patient subgroup using objective clinical measures, Dr. Rakocevic and colleagues said. “The study shows that stiff person syndrome is a progressive autoimmune disease that leads to disability if ... immunotherapy is not applied,” said the investigators.
“Early diagnosis and management of stiff person syndrome can be challenging,” said A. Gordon Smith, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee. The study by Dr. Rakocevic’s team demonstrates “that stiff person syndrome causes progressive stiffness and functional decline, with 80% [of patients] becoming unable to walk independently,” he said. “Their research emphasizes the need to treat early and will help clinicians recognize stiff person syndrome earlier in its course.”
The study adds to neurologists’ understanding of the rare disorder, and its strengths include the length of follow-up and the number of patients, said Robert W. Irwin, MD, Cochair of the AANEM Annual Meeting Program Committee.