Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, Transplantation

Single-agent therapy with quizartinib slightly but significantly prolonged survival – compared with salvage chemotherapy – for patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) bearing the FLT3-ITD mutation, results of the phase 3 randomized QuANTUM-R trial showed.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

Median overall survival (OS), the trial’s primary endpoint, was 6.2 months for 245 patients randomized to quizartinib, compared with 4.7 months for 122 patients assigned to salvage chemotherapy, a difference that translated into a hazard ratio (HR) for death of 0.76 (P = .0177), reported Jorge E. Cortes, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“This study is the first study that demonstrates in a randomized fashion an overall survival benefit in the salvage setting for patients with FLT-3 mutated refractory or relapsed AML,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. “I will also add that these results you saw here are very consistent with all the trials previously with quizartinib with more than 1,000 patients treated.”

Quizartinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has previously been shown to be associated with higher response rates among patients with AML bearing the FLT3-ITD mutation than in patients with AML without the deleterious mutation.

Investigators in the QuANTUM-R trial enrolled 367 adults with FTL3-ITD mutated AML that was refractory to the most recent line of therapy or had relapsed within 6 months of first remission, with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

The patients had all received at least one cycle of standard-dose induction therapy containing an anthracycline or mitoxantrone, and had a 3% or greater FLT3-ITD allelic ratio in their AML cells.

The patients were randomly assigned on a 2:1 basis to receive either quizartinib or salvage chemotherapy. Quizartinib was dosed 30 mg per day for 15 days, which could be titrated upward to 60 mg daily if the corrected QT interval by Fredericia (QTcF) was 450 ms or less on day 16.

Chemotherapy was the investigator’s choice of one of three specified regimens: either low-dose cytarabine (LoDAC); mitoxantrone, etoposide, and intermediate-dose cytarabine (MEC); or fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) with idarubicin (FLAG-IDA). Up to two cycles of MEC or FLAG-IDA were permitted; quizartinib and LoDAC were given until lack of benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or until the patient went on to HSCT.

The analysis was by intention-to-treat. In the quizartinib arm, 241 of the 245 randomized patients (98.4%) received treatment. In the chemotherapy arm, 94 of 122 randomized patients (77%) received chemotherapy. Of this group, 22 received LoDAC, 25 received MEC, and 47 received FLAG-IDA.

The median treatment duration was 97 days in the quizartinib arm versus 28 days (one cycle) in the chemotherapy arm.

The 1-year overall survival rate was 27% for patients assigned to quizartinib, compared with 20% for patients assigned to chemotherapy.

An analysis of OS by subgroup indicated a trend or significant benefit for quizartinib in all categories, including age over or under 65 years, sex, low or high-intensity chemotherapy, response to prior therapy, FLT3 variant allele frequency, prior allogenic HSCT, and AML risk score.

For the secondary endpoint of event-free survival in the ITT population, there was no significant difference between the study arms. In a per-protocol analysis, however, median event-free survival was better with quizartinib, at 1.4 months versus 0.0 months (P = .006).

In all, 32% of patients assigned to quizartinib went on to HSCT, compared with 12% of patients randomized to chemotherapy.

Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar between the study arms, despite higher total drug exposure in patients randomized to quizartinib. The most frequent grade 3 or greater TEAEs in each arm were infections and cytopenia-related events.

Two patients discontinued quizartinib due to QTcF prolongation. Grade 3 QTcF (greater than 500 ms) occurred in 3% of patients treated with quizartinib, but no grade 4 cases were seen.

The adverse event profile for patients who resumed quizartinib following HSCT was similar to that of patients who received the drug pretransplant.

The combination of standard chemotherapy, with or without quizartinib, is currently being explored in the phase 3 QuANTUM-First trial, Dr. Cortes said.

Daiichi Sankyo sponsored the trial. Dr. Cortes reported financial relationships with Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Arog, Astellas Pharma, and Novartis.

SOURCE: Cortes JE et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 563.

Single-agent therapy with quizartinib slightly but significantly prolonged survival – compared with salvage chemotherapy – for patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) bearing the FLT3-ITD mutation, results of the phase 3 randomized QuANTUM-R trial showed.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

Median overall survival (OS), the trial’s primary endpoint, was 6.2 months for 245 patients randomized to quizartinib, compared with 4.7 months for 122 patients assigned to salvage chemotherapy, a difference that translated into a hazard ratio (HR) for death of 0.76 (P = .0177), reported Jorge E. Cortes, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“This study is the first study that demonstrates in a randomized fashion an overall survival benefit in the salvage setting for patients with FLT-3 mutated refractory or relapsed AML,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. “I will also add that these results you saw here are very consistent with all the trials previously with quizartinib with more than 1,000 patients treated.”

Quizartinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has previously been shown to be associated with higher response rates among patients with AML bearing the FLT3-ITD mutation than in patients with AML without the deleterious mutation.

Investigators in the QuANTUM-R trial enrolled 367 adults with FTL3-ITD mutated AML that was refractory to the most recent line of therapy or had relapsed within 6 months of first remission, with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

The patients had all received at least one cycle of standard-dose induction therapy containing an anthracycline or mitoxantrone, and had a 3% or greater FLT3-ITD allelic ratio in their AML cells.

The patients were randomly assigned on a 2:1 basis to receive either quizartinib or salvage chemotherapy. Quizartinib was dosed 30 mg per day for 15 days, which could be titrated upward to 60 mg daily if the corrected QT interval by Fredericia (QTcF) was 450 ms or less on day 16.

Chemotherapy was the investigator’s choice of one of three specified regimens: either low-dose cytarabine (LoDAC); mitoxantrone, etoposide, and intermediate-dose cytarabine (MEC); or fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) with idarubicin (FLAG-IDA). Up to two cycles of MEC or FLAG-IDA were permitted; quizartinib and LoDAC were given until lack of benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or until the patient went on to HSCT.

The analysis was by intention-to-treat. In the quizartinib arm, 241 of the 245 randomized patients (98.4%) received treatment. In the chemotherapy arm, 94 of 122 randomized patients (77%) received chemotherapy. Of this group, 22 received LoDAC, 25 received MEC, and 47 received FLAG-IDA.

The median treatment duration was 97 days in the quizartinib arm versus 28 days (one cycle) in the chemotherapy arm.

The 1-year overall survival rate was 27% for patients assigned to quizartinib, compared with 20% for patients assigned to chemotherapy.

An analysis of OS by subgroup indicated a trend or significant benefit for quizartinib in all categories, including age over or under 65 years, sex, low or high-intensity chemotherapy, response to prior therapy, FLT3 variant allele frequency, prior allogenic HSCT, and AML risk score.

For the secondary endpoint of event-free survival in the ITT population, there was no significant difference between the study arms. In a per-protocol analysis, however, median event-free survival was better with quizartinib, at 1.4 months versus 0.0 months (P = .006).

In all, 32% of patients assigned to quizartinib went on to HSCT, compared with 12% of patients randomized to chemotherapy.

Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar between the study arms, despite higher total drug exposure in patients randomized to quizartinib. The most frequent grade 3 or greater TEAEs in each arm were infections and cytopenia-related events.

Two patients discontinued quizartinib due to QTcF prolongation. Grade 3 QTcF (greater than 500 ms) occurred in 3% of patients treated with quizartinib, but no grade 4 cases were seen.

The adverse event profile for patients who resumed quizartinib following HSCT was similar to that of patients who received the drug pretransplant.

The combination of standard chemotherapy, with or without quizartinib, is currently being explored in the phase 3 QuANTUM-First trial, Dr. Cortes said.

Daiichi Sankyo sponsored the trial. Dr. Cortes reported financial relationships with Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Arog, Astellas Pharma, and Novartis.

SOURCE: Cortes JE et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 563.

Single-agent therapy with quizartinib slightly but significantly prolonged survival – compared with salvage chemotherapy – for patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) bearing the FLT3-ITD mutation, results of the phase 3 randomized QuANTUM-R trial showed.

Neil Osterweil/MDedge News

Median overall survival (OS), the trial’s primary endpoint, was 6.2 months for 245 patients randomized to quizartinib, compared with 4.7 months for 122 patients assigned to salvage chemotherapy, a difference that translated into a hazard ratio (HR) for death of 0.76 (P = .0177), reported Jorge E. Cortes, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“This study is the first study that demonstrates in a randomized fashion an overall survival benefit in the salvage setting for patients with FLT-3 mutated refractory or relapsed AML,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. “I will also add that these results you saw here are very consistent with all the trials previously with quizartinib with more than 1,000 patients treated.”

Quizartinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has previously been shown to be associated with higher response rates among patients with AML bearing the FLT3-ITD mutation than in patients with AML without the deleterious mutation.

Investigators in the QuANTUM-R trial enrolled 367 adults with FTL3-ITD mutated AML that was refractory to the most recent line of therapy or had relapsed within 6 months of first remission, with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

The patients had all received at least one cycle of standard-dose induction therapy containing an anthracycline or mitoxantrone, and had a 3% or greater FLT3-ITD allelic ratio in their AML cells.

The patients were randomly assigned on a 2:1 basis to receive either quizartinib or salvage chemotherapy. Quizartinib was dosed 30 mg per day for 15 days, which could be titrated upward to 60 mg daily if the corrected QT interval by Fredericia (QTcF) was 450 ms or less on day 16.

Chemotherapy was the investigator’s choice of one of three specified regimens: either low-dose cytarabine (LoDAC); mitoxantrone, etoposide, and intermediate-dose cytarabine (MEC); or fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) with idarubicin (FLAG-IDA). Up to two cycles of MEC or FLAG-IDA were permitted; quizartinib and LoDAC were given until lack of benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or until the patient went on to HSCT.

The analysis was by intention-to-treat. In the quizartinib arm, 241 of the 245 randomized patients (98.4%) received treatment. In the chemotherapy arm, 94 of 122 randomized patients (77%) received chemotherapy. Of this group, 22 received LoDAC, 25 received MEC, and 47 received FLAG-IDA.

The median treatment duration was 97 days in the quizartinib arm versus 28 days (one cycle) in the chemotherapy arm.

The 1-year overall survival rate was 27% for patients assigned to quizartinib, compared with 20% for patients assigned to chemotherapy.

An analysis of OS by subgroup indicated a trend or significant benefit for quizartinib in all categories, including age over or under 65 years, sex, low or high-intensity chemotherapy, response to prior therapy, FLT3 variant allele frequency, prior allogenic HSCT, and AML risk score.

For the secondary endpoint of event-free survival in the ITT population, there was no significant difference between the study arms. In a per-protocol analysis, however, median event-free survival was better with quizartinib, at 1.4 months versus 0.0 months (P = .006).

In all, 32% of patients assigned to quizartinib went on to HSCT, compared with 12% of patients randomized to chemotherapy.

Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar between the study arms, despite higher total drug exposure in patients randomized to quizartinib. The most frequent grade 3 or greater TEAEs in each arm were infections and cytopenia-related events.

Two patients discontinued quizartinib due to QTcF prolongation. Grade 3 QTcF (greater than 500 ms) occurred in 3% of patients treated with quizartinib, but no grade 4 cases were seen.

The adverse event profile for patients who resumed quizartinib following HSCT was similar to that of patients who received the drug pretransplant.

The combination of standard chemotherapy, with or without quizartinib, is currently being explored in the phase 3 QuANTUM-First trial, Dr. Cortes said.

Daiichi Sankyo sponsored the trial. Dr. Cortes reported financial relationships with Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Arog, Astellas Pharma, and Novartis.

SOURCE: Cortes JE et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 563.

Photo by Daniel Sone

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved tagraxofusp-erzs (Elzonris) to treat patients age 2 and older who have blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN).

Tagraxofusp-erzs (formerly SL-401) is a CD123-directed cytotoxin that is the first FDA-approved treatment for BPDCN.

Tagraxofusp-erzs will be commercially available in early 2019, according to Stemline Therapeutics, makers of the drug.

The prescribing information for tagraxofusp-erzs contains a boxed warning noting that the drug is associated with an increased risk of capillary leak syndrome (CLS), which may be life-threatening or fatal.

The FDA previously granted tagraxofusp-erzs breakthrough therapy and orphan drug designations and assessed the drug under priority review.

The FDA’s approval of tagraxofusp-erzs was based on a phase 1 trial (STML-401-0114; NCT02113982).

The trial enrolled 47 patients with BPDCN, including 32 who were treatment-naïve and 15 who were previously treated.

Patients received tagraxofusp-erzs intravenously on days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle for multiple consecutive cycles. The trial had a dose-escalation stage (stage 1), an expansion stage (stage 2), a confirmatory stage (stage 3), and a stage that enabled uninterrupted access to tagraxofusp-erzs (stage 4).

In the confirmatory stage, 13 patients with treatment-naïve BPDCN received tagraxofusp-erzs at the recommended dose and schedule—12 mcg/kg daily for 5 days of a 21-day cycle.

Efficacy was based on the rate of complete response (CR) or clinical complete response (CRc). CRc was defined as CR with residual skin abnormality not indicative of active disease.

The CR/CRc rate was 53.8% (7/13), and the median duration of CR/CRc was not reached (range, 3.9 to 12.2 months).

The safety of tagraxofusp-erzs was assessed in 94 adults with treatment-naïve or previously treated myeloid malignancies, including 58 patients with BPDCN, who were treated at the recommended dose and schedule.

There were two fatal adverse events—both CLS. Eleven percent of patients discontinued treatment with tagraxofusp-erzs due to an adverse event. The most common of these were hepatic toxicities and CLS.

The most common adverse events overall were CLS (55%), nausea (49%), fatigue (45%), peripheral edema (43%), pyrexia (43%), and weight increase (31%).

The most common laboratory abnormalities were decreases in albumin (77%), platelets (67%), hemoglobin (60%), calcium (57%), and sodium (50%), as well as increases in glucose (87%), alanine aminotransferase (82%), and aspartate aminotransferase (79%).

Photo by Daniel Sone

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved tagraxofusp-erzs (Elzonris) to treat patients age 2 and older who have blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN).

Tagraxofusp-erzs (formerly SL-401) is a CD123-directed cytotoxin that is the first FDA-approved treatment for BPDCN.

Tagraxofusp-erzs will be commercially available in early 2019, according to Stemline Therapeutics, makers of the drug.

The prescribing information for tagraxofusp-erzs contains a boxed warning noting that the drug is associated with an increased risk of capillary leak syndrome (CLS), which may be life-threatening or fatal.

The FDA previously granted tagraxofusp-erzs breakthrough therapy and orphan drug designations and assessed the drug under priority review.

The FDA’s approval of tagraxofusp-erzs was based on a phase 1 trial (STML-401-0114; NCT02113982).

The trial enrolled 47 patients with BPDCN, including 32 who were treatment-naïve and 15 who were previously treated.

Patients received tagraxofusp-erzs intravenously on days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle for multiple consecutive cycles. The trial had a dose-escalation stage (stage 1), an expansion stage (stage 2), a confirmatory stage (stage 3), and a stage that enabled uninterrupted access to tagraxofusp-erzs (stage 4).

In the confirmatory stage, 13 patients with treatment-naïve BPDCN received tagraxofusp-erzs at the recommended dose and schedule—12 mcg/kg daily for 5 days of a 21-day cycle.

Efficacy was based on the rate of complete response (CR) or clinical complete response (CRc). CRc was defined as CR with residual skin abnormality not indicative of active disease.

The CR/CRc rate was 53.8% (7/13), and the median duration of CR/CRc was not reached (range, 3.9 to 12.2 months).

The safety of tagraxofusp-erzs was assessed in 94 adults with treatment-naïve or previously treated myeloid malignancies, including 58 patients with BPDCN, who were treated at the recommended dose and schedule.

There were two fatal adverse events—both CLS. Eleven percent of patients discontinued treatment with tagraxofusp-erzs due to an adverse event. The most common of these were hepatic toxicities and CLS.

The most common adverse events overall were CLS (55%), nausea (49%), fatigue (45%), peripheral edema (43%), pyrexia (43%), and weight increase (31%).

The most common laboratory abnormalities were decreases in albumin (77%), platelets (67%), hemoglobin (60%), calcium (57%), and sodium (50%), as well as increases in glucose (87%), alanine aminotransferase (82%), and aspartate aminotransferase (79%).

Photo by Daniel Sone

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved tagraxofusp-erzs (Elzonris) to treat patients age 2 and older who have blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN).

Tagraxofusp-erzs (formerly SL-401) is a CD123-directed cytotoxin that is the first FDA-approved treatment for BPDCN.

Tagraxofusp-erzs will be commercially available in early 2019, according to Stemline Therapeutics, makers of the drug.

The prescribing information for tagraxofusp-erzs contains a boxed warning noting that the drug is associated with an increased risk of capillary leak syndrome (CLS), which may be life-threatening or fatal.

The FDA previously granted tagraxofusp-erzs breakthrough therapy and orphan drug designations and assessed the drug under priority review.

The FDA’s approval of tagraxofusp-erzs was based on a phase 1 trial (STML-401-0114; NCT02113982).

The trial enrolled 47 patients with BPDCN, including 32 who were treatment-naïve and 15 who were previously treated.

Patients received tagraxofusp-erzs intravenously on days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle for multiple consecutive cycles. The trial had a dose-escalation stage (stage 1), an expansion stage (stage 2), a confirmatory stage (stage 3), and a stage that enabled uninterrupted access to tagraxofusp-erzs (stage 4).

In the confirmatory stage, 13 patients with treatment-naïve BPDCN received tagraxofusp-erzs at the recommended dose and schedule—12 mcg/kg daily for 5 days of a 21-day cycle.

Efficacy was based on the rate of complete response (CR) or clinical complete response (CRc). CRc was defined as CR with residual skin abnormality not indicative of active disease.

The CR/CRc rate was 53.8% (7/13), and the median duration of CR/CRc was not reached (range, 3.9 to 12.2 months).

The safety of tagraxofusp-erzs was assessed in 94 adults with treatment-naïve or previously treated myeloid malignancies, including 58 patients with BPDCN, who were treated at the recommended dose and schedule.

There were two fatal adverse events—both CLS. Eleven percent of patients discontinued treatment with tagraxofusp-erzs due to an adverse event. The most common of these were hepatic toxicities and CLS.

The most common adverse events overall were CLS (55%), nausea (49%), fatigue (45%), peripheral edema (43%), pyrexia (43%), and weight increase (31%).

The most common laboratory abnormalities were decreases in albumin (77%), platelets (67%), hemoglobin (60%), calcium (57%), and sodium (50%), as well as increases in glucose (87%), alanine aminotransferase (82%), and aspartate aminotransferase (79%).

Photo by Bill Branson

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved calaspargase pegol-mknl (Asparlas) as a component of a multi-agent chemotherapeutic regimen to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in pediatric and young adult patients age 1 month to 21 years.

Calaspargase pegol-mknl is an asparagine-specific enzyme intended to provide a longer interval between doses compared to other available pegaspargase products.

The recommended dosage of calaspargase pegol-mknl is 2,500 U/m² given no more frequently than every 21 days.

The FDA said it approved calaspargase pegol-mknl because the drug maintained nadir serum asparaginase activity above the level of 0.1 U/mL when given at 2,500 U/m² every 3 weeks.

Calaspargase pegol-mknl was evaluated in Study DFCI 11-001, a trial of 237 children and adolescents with newly diagnosed ALL or lymphoblastic lymphoma. The patients’ median age was 5 years (range, 1 to 20 years).

They received calaspargase pegol-mknl at 2,500 U/m² (n=118) or pegaspargase at 2,500 U/m² (n=119) as part of a Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL Consortium backbone therapy.

The median duration of exposure was 8 months for both calaspargase pegol-mknl and pegaspargase.

Among the patients with B-cell lineage ALL, the complete remission rate was 98% in the calaspargase pegol-mknl arm and 99% in the pegaspargase arm. Estimated overall survival rates were comparable between the arms.

Common grade 3 or higher adverse events (in the calaspargase pegol-mknl and pegaspargase arms, respectively) included elevated transaminase (52% and 66%), bilirubin increase (20% and 25%), pancreatitis (18% and 24%), and abnormal clotting studies (14% and 21%).

There was one fatal adverse event among patients on calaspargase pegol-mknl—multi-organ failure in the setting of chronic pancreatitis associated with a pancreatic pseudocyst.

The safety of calaspargase pegol-mknl was also evaluated in Study AALL07P4, a trial of patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk B-precursor ALL.

The patients received calaspargase pegol-mknl at 2,500 U/m² (n=43) or 2,100 U/m² (n=68) or pegaspargase at 2,500 U/m² (n=52) as a component of an augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster regimen.

The patients’ median age was 11 years (range, 1 to 26 years). The median duration of exposure was 7 months for both calaspargase pegol-mknl and pegaspargase.

There were three induction deaths among the 111 patients who received calaspargase pegol-mknl (2.8%) but no induction deaths among the 52 patients treated with pegaspargase.

Additional details on these studies and calaspargase pegol-mknl can be found in the drug’s prescribing information.

Calaspargase pegol-mknl is a product of Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC.

Photo by Bill Branson

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved calaspargase pegol-mknl (Asparlas) as a component of a multi-agent chemotherapeutic regimen to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in pediatric and young adult patients age 1 month to 21 years.

Calaspargase pegol-mknl is an asparagine-specific enzyme intended to provide a longer interval between doses compared to other available pegaspargase products.

The recommended dosage of calaspargase pegol-mknl is 2,500 U/m² given no more frequently than every 21 days.

The FDA said it approved calaspargase pegol-mknl because the drug maintained nadir serum asparaginase activity above the level of 0.1 U/mL when given at 2,500 U/m² every 3 weeks.

Calaspargase pegol-mknl was evaluated in Study DFCI 11-001, a trial of 237 children and adolescents with newly diagnosed ALL or lymphoblastic lymphoma. The patients’ median age was 5 years (range, 1 to 20 years).

They received calaspargase pegol-mknl at 2,500 U/m² (n=118) or pegaspargase at 2,500 U/m² (n=119) as part of a Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL Consortium backbone therapy.

The median duration of exposure was 8 months for both calaspargase pegol-mknl and pegaspargase.

Among the patients with B-cell lineage ALL, the complete remission rate was 98% in the calaspargase pegol-mknl arm and 99% in the pegaspargase arm. Estimated overall survival rates were comparable between the arms.

Common grade 3 or higher adverse events (in the calaspargase pegol-mknl and pegaspargase arms, respectively) included elevated transaminase (52% and 66%), bilirubin increase (20% and 25%), pancreatitis (18% and 24%), and abnormal clotting studies (14% and 21%).

There was one fatal adverse event among patients on calaspargase pegol-mknl—multi-organ failure in the setting of chronic pancreatitis associated with a pancreatic pseudocyst.

The safety of calaspargase pegol-mknl was also evaluated in Study AALL07P4, a trial of patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk B-precursor ALL.

The patients received calaspargase pegol-mknl at 2,500 U/m² (n=43) or 2,100 U/m² (n=68) or pegaspargase at 2,500 U/m² (n=52) as a component of an augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster regimen.

The patients’ median age was 11 years (range, 1 to 26 years). The median duration of exposure was 7 months for both calaspargase pegol-mknl and pegaspargase.

There were three induction deaths among the 111 patients who received calaspargase pegol-mknl (2.8%) but no induction deaths among the 52 patients treated with pegaspargase.

Additional details on these studies and calaspargase pegol-mknl can be found in the drug’s prescribing information.

Calaspargase pegol-mknl is a product of Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC.

Photo by Bill Branson

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved calaspargase pegol-mknl (Asparlas) as a component of a multi-agent chemotherapeutic regimen to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in pediatric and young adult patients age 1 month to 21 years.

Calaspargase pegol-mknl is an asparagine-specific enzyme intended to provide a longer interval between doses compared to other available pegaspargase products.

The recommended dosage of calaspargase pegol-mknl is 2,500 U/m² given no more frequently than every 21 days.

The FDA said it approved calaspargase pegol-mknl because the drug maintained nadir serum asparaginase activity above the level of 0.1 U/mL when given at 2,500 U/m² every 3 weeks.

Calaspargase pegol-mknl was evaluated in Study DFCI 11-001, a trial of 237 children and adolescents with newly diagnosed ALL or lymphoblastic lymphoma. The patients’ median age was 5 years (range, 1 to 20 years).

They received calaspargase pegol-mknl at 2,500 U/m² (n=118) or pegaspargase at 2,500 U/m² (n=119) as part of a Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL Consortium backbone therapy.

The median duration of exposure was 8 months for both calaspargase pegol-mknl and pegaspargase.

Among the patients with B-cell lineage ALL, the complete remission rate was 98% in the calaspargase pegol-mknl arm and 99% in the pegaspargase arm. Estimated overall survival rates were comparable between the arms.

Common grade 3 or higher adverse events (in the calaspargase pegol-mknl and pegaspargase arms, respectively) included elevated transaminase (52% and 66%), bilirubin increase (20% and 25%), pancreatitis (18% and 24%), and abnormal clotting studies (14% and 21%).

There was one fatal adverse event among patients on calaspargase pegol-mknl—multi-organ failure in the setting of chronic pancreatitis associated with a pancreatic pseudocyst.

The safety of calaspargase pegol-mknl was also evaluated in Study AALL07P4, a trial of patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk B-precursor ALL.

The patients received calaspargase pegol-mknl at 2,500 U/m² (n=43) or 2,100 U/m² (n=68) or pegaspargase at 2,500 U/m² (n=52) as a component of an augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster regimen.

The patients’ median age was 11 years (range, 1 to 26 years). The median duration of exposure was 7 months for both calaspargase pegol-mknl and pegaspargase.

There were three induction deaths among the 111 patients who received calaspargase pegol-mknl (2.8%) but no induction deaths among the 52 patients treated with pegaspargase.

Additional details on these studies and calaspargase pegol-mknl can be found in the drug’s prescribing information.

Calaspargase pegol-mknl is a product of Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved tagraxofusp-erzs (Elzonris) infusion for the treatment of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) in adults and pediatric patients, 2 years of age and older.

Approval was based on efficacy in two cohorts of patients in a single-arm clinical trial. Seven patients (54%) out of 13 with untreated BPDCN achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with a skin abnormality not indicative of active disease (CRc) in the first cohort. In the second cohort of 15 patients, one patient achieved CR and one patient achieved CRc.

Common side effects for patients receiving tagraxofusp-erzs infusion were capillary leak syndrome, nausea, fatigue, peripheral edema, pyrexia, chills, and weight increase. Most common laboratory abnormalities were decreases in lymphocytes, albumin, platelets, hemoglobin, and calcium, and increases in glucose and liver enzymes (ALT and AST), the FDA said in a press statement.

The FDA placed a Boxed Warning on the drug to alert health care professionals and patients about the increased risk of capillary leak syndrome and recommends that health care providers monitor liver enzyme levels for signs of intolerance to the infusion.

BPDCN is an aggressive and rare disease of the bone marrow and blood that can affect multiple organs, including the lymph nodes and the skin. It often presents as leukemia or evolves into acute leukemia, the FDA said.

“Prior to today’s approval, there had been no FDA approved therapies for BPDCN. The standard of care has been intensive chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation. Many patients with BPDCN are unable to tolerate this intensive therapy, so there is an urgent need for alternative treatment options,” Richard Pazdur, MD, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence and acting director of the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in the statement.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved tagraxofusp-erzs (Elzonris) infusion for the treatment of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) in adults and pediatric patients, 2 years of age and older.

Approval was based on efficacy in two cohorts of patients in a single-arm clinical trial. Seven patients (54%) out of 13 with untreated BPDCN achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with a skin abnormality not indicative of active disease (CRc) in the first cohort. In the second cohort of 15 patients, one patient achieved CR and one patient achieved CRc.

Common side effects for patients receiving tagraxofusp-erzs infusion were capillary leak syndrome, nausea, fatigue, peripheral edema, pyrexia, chills, and weight increase. Most common laboratory abnormalities were decreases in lymphocytes, albumin, platelets, hemoglobin, and calcium, and increases in glucose and liver enzymes (ALT and AST), the FDA said in a press statement.

The FDA placed a Boxed Warning on the drug to alert health care professionals and patients about the increased risk of capillary leak syndrome and recommends that health care providers monitor liver enzyme levels for signs of intolerance to the infusion.

BPDCN is an aggressive and rare disease of the bone marrow and blood that can affect multiple organs, including the lymph nodes and the skin. It often presents as leukemia or evolves into acute leukemia, the FDA said.

“Prior to today’s approval, there had been no FDA approved therapies for BPDCN. The standard of care has been intensive chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation. Many patients with BPDCN are unable to tolerate this intensive therapy, so there is an urgent need for alternative treatment options,” Richard Pazdur, MD, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence and acting director of the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in the statement.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved tagraxofusp-erzs (Elzonris) infusion for the treatment of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) in adults and pediatric patients, 2 years of age and older.

Approval was based on efficacy in two cohorts of patients in a single-arm clinical trial. Seven patients (54%) out of 13 with untreated BPDCN achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with a skin abnormality not indicative of active disease (CRc) in the first cohort. In the second cohort of 15 patients, one patient achieved CR and one patient achieved CRc.

Common side effects for patients receiving tagraxofusp-erzs infusion were capillary leak syndrome, nausea, fatigue, peripheral edema, pyrexia, chills, and weight increase. Most common laboratory abnormalities were decreases in lymphocytes, albumin, platelets, hemoglobin, and calcium, and increases in glucose and liver enzymes (ALT and AST), the FDA said in a press statement.

The FDA placed a Boxed Warning on the drug to alert health care professionals and patients about the increased risk of capillary leak syndrome and recommends that health care providers monitor liver enzyme levels for signs of intolerance to the infusion.

BPDCN is an aggressive and rare disease of the bone marrow and blood that can affect multiple organs, including the lymph nodes and the skin. It often presents as leukemia or evolves into acute leukemia, the FDA said.

“Prior to today’s approval, there had been no FDA approved therapies for BPDCN. The standard of care has been intensive chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation. Many patients with BPDCN are unable to tolerate this intensive therapy, so there is an urgent need for alternative treatment options,” Richard Pazdur, MD, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence and acting director of the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in the statement.

[email protected]

Photo by Bill Branson

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended expanding the marketing authorization for dasatinib (Sprycel).

The CHMP’s recommendation is to approve dasatinib in combination with chemotherapy to treat pediatric patients with newly diagnosed, Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

The CHMP’s recommendation will be reviewed by the European Commission (EC), which has the authority to approve medicines for use in the European Union, Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein.

The EC usually makes a decision within 67 days of a CHMP recommendation.

Dasatinib is already EC-approved to treat:

• Adults with newly diagnosed, Ph+ chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase
• Adults with chronic, accelerated, or blast phase CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy including imatinib
• Adults with Ph+ ALL and lymphoid blast CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy
• Pediatric patients with newly diagnosed, Ph+ CML in chronic phase
• Pediatric patients with Ph+ CML in chronic phase that is resistant or intolerant to prior therapy including imatinib.

Phase 2 trial

The CHMP’s recommendation to approve dasatinib in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed, Ph+ ALL is based on data from a phase 2 trial (NCT01460160). In this trial, researchers are evaluating dasatinib in combination with a chemotherapy regimen modeled on a Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster high-risk backbone.

Results from the trial were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting.

At that time, 106 patients had been treated. They received continuous daily dasatinib (60 mg/m²) beginning at day 15 of induction chemotherapy. All treated patients achieved complete remission.

Patients who had evidence of minimal residual disease (MRD) ≥ 0.05% at the end of the first block of treatment (day 78) and those with MRD 0.005% to 0.05% who remained MRD-positive at any detectable level after three additional high-risk chemotherapy blocks were eligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in first remission.

Nineteen patients met these criteria, and 15 (14.2%) received HSCT. The remaining 85.8% of patients received dasatinib plus chemotherapy for two years.

The 3-year event-free survival rate was 65.5%, and the 3-year overall survival rate was 91.5%.

Two patients discontinued dasatinib due to toxicity—one due to allergy and one due to prolonged thrombocytopenia.

Grade 3/4 adverse events attributed to dasatinib included elevated alanine aminotransferase (21.7%), elevated aspartate transaminase (10.4%), pleural effusion (3.8%), edema (2.8%), hemorrhage (5.7%), and cardiac failure (0.8%).

Five patients died while receiving chemotherapy (three from sepsis, one due to pneumonia, and one of an unknown cause). Two deaths were HSCT-related.

This trial was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Photo by Bill Branson

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended expanding the marketing authorization for dasatinib (Sprycel).

The CHMP’s recommendation is to approve dasatinib in combination with chemotherapy to treat pediatric patients with newly diagnosed, Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

The CHMP’s recommendation will be reviewed by the European Commission (EC), which has the authority to approve medicines for use in the European Union, Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein.

The EC usually makes a decision within 67 days of a CHMP recommendation.

Dasatinib is already EC-approved to treat:

• Adults with newly diagnosed, Ph+ chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase
• Adults with chronic, accelerated, or blast phase CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy including imatinib
• Adults with Ph+ ALL and lymphoid blast CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy
• Pediatric patients with newly diagnosed, Ph+ CML in chronic phase
• Pediatric patients with Ph+ CML in chronic phase that is resistant or intolerant to prior therapy including imatinib.

Phase 2 trial

The CHMP’s recommendation to approve dasatinib in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed, Ph+ ALL is based on data from a phase 2 trial (NCT01460160). In this trial, researchers are evaluating dasatinib in combination with a chemotherapy regimen modeled on a Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster high-risk backbone.

Results from the trial were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting.

At that time, 106 patients had been treated. They received continuous daily dasatinib (60 mg/m²) beginning at day 15 of induction chemotherapy. All treated patients achieved complete remission.

Patients who had evidence of minimal residual disease (MRD) ≥ 0.05% at the end of the first block of treatment (day 78) and those with MRD 0.005% to 0.05% who remained MRD-positive at any detectable level after three additional high-risk chemotherapy blocks were eligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in first remission.

Nineteen patients met these criteria, and 15 (14.2%) received HSCT. The remaining 85.8% of patients received dasatinib plus chemotherapy for two years.

The 3-year event-free survival rate was 65.5%, and the 3-year overall survival rate was 91.5%.

Two patients discontinued dasatinib due to toxicity—one due to allergy and one due to prolonged thrombocytopenia.

Grade 3/4 adverse events attributed to dasatinib included elevated alanine aminotransferase (21.7%), elevated aspartate transaminase (10.4%), pleural effusion (3.8%), edema (2.8%), hemorrhage (5.7%), and cardiac failure (0.8%).

Five patients died while receiving chemotherapy (three from sepsis, one due to pneumonia, and one of an unknown cause). Two deaths were HSCT-related.

This trial was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Photo by Bill Branson

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended expanding the marketing authorization for dasatinib (Sprycel).

The CHMP’s recommendation is to approve dasatinib in combination with chemotherapy to treat pediatric patients with newly diagnosed, Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

The CHMP’s recommendation will be reviewed by the European Commission (EC), which has the authority to approve medicines for use in the European Union, Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein.

The EC usually makes a decision within 67 days of a CHMP recommendation.

Dasatinib is already EC-approved to treat:

• Adults with newly diagnosed, Ph+ chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase
• Adults with chronic, accelerated, or blast phase CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy including imatinib
• Adults with Ph+ ALL and lymphoid blast CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy
• Pediatric patients with newly diagnosed, Ph+ CML in chronic phase
• Pediatric patients with Ph+ CML in chronic phase that is resistant or intolerant to prior therapy including imatinib.

Phase 2 trial

The CHMP’s recommendation to approve dasatinib in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed, Ph+ ALL is based on data from a phase 2 trial (NCT01460160). In this trial, researchers are evaluating dasatinib in combination with a chemotherapy regimen modeled on a Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster high-risk backbone.

Results from the trial were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting.

At that time, 106 patients had been treated. They received continuous daily dasatinib (60 mg/m²) beginning at day 15 of induction chemotherapy. All treated patients achieved complete remission.

Patients who had evidence of minimal residual disease (MRD) ≥ 0.05% at the end of the first block of treatment (day 78) and those with MRD 0.005% to 0.05% who remained MRD-positive at any detectable level after three additional high-risk chemotherapy blocks were eligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in first remission.

Nineteen patients met these criteria, and 15 (14.2%) received HSCT. The remaining 85.8% of patients received dasatinib plus chemotherapy for two years.

The 3-year event-free survival rate was 65.5%, and the 3-year overall survival rate was 91.5%.

Two patients discontinued dasatinib due to toxicity—one due to allergy and one due to prolonged thrombocytopenia.

Grade 3/4 adverse events attributed to dasatinib included elevated alanine aminotransferase (21.7%), elevated aspartate transaminase (10.4%), pleural effusion (3.8%), edema (2.8%), hemorrhage (5.7%), and cardiac failure (0.8%).

Five patients died while receiving chemotherapy (three from sepsis, one due to pneumonia, and one of an unknown cause). Two deaths were HSCT-related.

This trial was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Photo courtesy of ASH

SAN DIEGO—An update of the ZUMA-3 trial showed that KTE-X19—an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy—can induce high rates of undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) and durable complete remissions (CRs) in adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

And this was particularly the case at the middle dose level of 1 x 10⁶ cells/kg.

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, presented the update at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 897*).

Dr. Wierda explained that KTE-X19 is a new name for KTE-C19, also known as axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta™), which is currently approved in the United States for the treatment of relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in adults and in Europe for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma.

“This approval was based on the ZUMA-1 clinical trial,” he said, “which showed a 54% complete remission rate and 82% overall response rate with durable remissions.”

ZUMA-3 (NCT02614066) is a phase 1/2 study of KTE-X19—a CAR T cell with CD3ζ signaling and CD28 costimulatory domains—for relapsed or refractory adults with ALL.

Dr. Wierda presented the phase 1 data available at the cutoff of August 16.

Study design

Patients underwent leukapheresis to collect their T cells for production and received bridging therapy selected by the treating physician from several prespecified regimens to maintain disease control.

Conditioning chemotherapy included fludarabine at 25 mg/m² on days -4, -3, and -2 and cyclophosphamide at 900 mg/m² on day -2.

Patients received KTE-X19 on day 0. They were monitored and released from the hospital on day 7 or upon resolution of any toxicities.

The investigators assessed response, including bone marrow evaluation, on day 28, week 8, month 3, and every 3 months for the first year as well as every 6 months for the second year of follow-up.

The dose-finding portion of the trial initially enrolled three patients. They received a dose of 2 x 10⁶ CAR T cells/kg and were monitored for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs).

If there were no DLTs in the first three patients, phase 2 could open or investigators could further expand the 2 x 10⁶ dose level or explore lower doses of the product (1 x 10⁶ cells/kg and 0.5 x 10⁶ cells/kg).

Investigators defined DLTs as:

• KTE-X19-related events in the first 28 days, including grade 4 hematologic toxicity lasting more than 30 days and not attributable to ALL
• Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities lasting more than 7 days
• Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities regardless of duration, excluding grade 4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) events lasting 7 days or less
• Neurologic events that resolve to grade 1 in 2 weeks or to baseline within 4 weeks.

Dr. Wierda said no DLTs occurred among the first 3 patients treated, and all dose levels were explored in phase 1.

Patients

As of the cutoff date, 54 patients were enrolled, confirmed eligible, and underwent leukapheresis. Six patients did not receive conditioning, three patients received conditioning but not KTE-X19, and one patient withdrew from the study after the first failed production of CAR T cells.

So 44 patients received KTE-X19. Six patients received the highest dose of CAR T cells (2 x 10⁶/kg), 22 received the middle dose (1 x 10⁶/kg), and 16 received the lowest dose (0.5 x 10⁶/kg).

The patients’ median age was 46 (range, 18 – 77). Almost half (48%) were male, and 68% had three or more prior treatment regimens. Forty-one percent had prior blinatumomab, and 14% had prior inotuzumab.

Patients had a median bone marrow blast percentage of 59% (n=44; range, 5% - 100%) at screening and 70% (n=40; range, 0 – 97%) prior to conditioning but after bridging therapy.

The safety analysis included all 44 treated patients, and the efficacy analysis included 36 patients.

“[T]he follow-up period was too short from dosing for the most recently treated eight patients,” Dr Wierda explained.

The median follow-up was 15.1 months for the 36 efficacy-evaluable patients.

Safety

All patients had a treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with 75% having grade 3/4 events.

Grade 5 TEAEs included three due to progressive disease, three due to infections, and one stroke 6 weeks after infusion.

Two patients died of KTE-X19-related AEs. One patient in the 2 x 10⁶ dose group had multiorgan failure secondary to CRS on study day 6. The other patient, in the 0.5 x 10⁶ dose group, had a stroke after infusion in the context of CRS and neurologic events (NEs) on day 7.

Investigators detected a higher incidence of grade 3 and greater CRS for the six patients treated at the highest dose. Half developed CRS of grade 3 or higher, compared with 18% in the 1 x 10⁶ dose cohort and 19% in the 0.5 x 10⁶ dose cohort.

Grade 3 or higher NEs were more common than CRS. The lowest incidence occurred in the lowest dose cohort, at 25%, compared with 45% in the 1 x 10⁶ dose cohort and 50% in the 2 x 10⁶ dose cohort.

Due to the incidence of grade 3 and greater NEs observed in the 1 x 10⁶ dose cohort, investigators revised the management guidelines for AEs. The revisions included using tocilizumab only for CRS—and not for NEs—and initiating steroids for grade 2 NEs instead of waiting for grade 3.

Eight patients were treated under the revised recommendations, and the incidence of grade 3 NEs was 13%, with no grade 4 or 5 NEs.

“This compared favorably with the 14 patients treated at the same dose level but prior to these changes," Dr. Wierda said.

In comparison, 57% developed grade 3 NEs and 7% grade 4 with the original AE management protocol.

The incidence of grade 3 CRS remained low, with no CRS events of grade 4 or greater with the revised recommendations.

Efficacy

The best overall response in the 36 efficacy-evaluable patients was 69% CR and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi).

Seventy-five percent of these patients had undetectable MRD in the bone marrow at 10^-4 sensitivity at 3 months of follow-up.

All patients in the 1 x 10⁶ dose cohort (n=14) responded. Ninety-three percent achieved a CR/CRi, 7% had a partial response, and all had undetectable MRD in the bone marrow.

The median duration of response was 12.9 months in the 1 x 10⁶ cohort. This was the dose selected for the phase 2 trial, which is now enrolling patients.

ZUMA-3 was sponsored by Kite, a Gilead Company.

Dr. Wierda disclosed research funding from AbbVie and Genentech. 

* Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

Photo courtesy of ASH

SAN DIEGO—An update of the ZUMA-3 trial showed that KTE-X19—an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy—can induce high rates of undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) and durable complete remissions (CRs) in adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

And this was particularly the case at the middle dose level of 1 x 10⁶ cells/kg.

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, presented the update at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 897*).

Dr. Wierda explained that KTE-X19 is a new name for KTE-C19, also known as axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta™), which is currently approved in the United States for the treatment of relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in adults and in Europe for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma.

“This approval was based on the ZUMA-1 clinical trial,” he said, “which showed a 54% complete remission rate and 82% overall response rate with durable remissions.”

ZUMA-3 (NCT02614066) is a phase 1/2 study of KTE-X19—a CAR T cell with CD3ζ signaling and CD28 costimulatory domains—for relapsed or refractory adults with ALL.

Dr. Wierda presented the phase 1 data available at the cutoff of August 16.

Study design

Patients underwent leukapheresis to collect their T cells for production and received bridging therapy selected by the treating physician from several prespecified regimens to maintain disease control.

Conditioning chemotherapy included fludarabine at 25 mg/m² on days -4, -3, and -2 and cyclophosphamide at 900 mg/m² on day -2.

Patients received KTE-X19 on day 0. They were monitored and released from the hospital on day 7 or upon resolution of any toxicities.

The investigators assessed response, including bone marrow evaluation, on day 28, week 8, month 3, and every 3 months for the first year as well as every 6 months for the second year of follow-up.

The dose-finding portion of the trial initially enrolled three patients. They received a dose of 2 x 10⁶ CAR T cells/kg and were monitored for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs).

If there were no DLTs in the first three patients, phase 2 could open or investigators could further expand the 2 x 10⁶ dose level or explore lower doses of the product (1 x 10⁶ cells/kg and 0.5 x 10⁶ cells/kg).

Investigators defined DLTs as:

• KTE-X19-related events in the first 28 days, including grade 4 hematologic toxicity lasting more than 30 days and not attributable to ALL
• Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities lasting more than 7 days
• Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities regardless of duration, excluding grade 4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) events lasting 7 days or less
• Neurologic events that resolve to grade 1 in 2 weeks or to baseline within 4 weeks.

Dr. Wierda said no DLTs occurred among the first 3 patients treated, and all dose levels were explored in phase 1.

Patients

As of the cutoff date, 54 patients were enrolled, confirmed eligible, and underwent leukapheresis. Six patients did not receive conditioning, three patients received conditioning but not KTE-X19, and one patient withdrew from the study after the first failed production of CAR T cells.

So 44 patients received KTE-X19. Six patients received the highest dose of CAR T cells (2 x 10⁶/kg), 22 received the middle dose (1 x 10⁶/kg), and 16 received the lowest dose (0.5 x 10⁶/kg).

The patients’ median age was 46 (range, 18 – 77). Almost half (48%) were male, and 68% had three or more prior treatment regimens. Forty-one percent had prior blinatumomab, and 14% had prior inotuzumab.

Patients had a median bone marrow blast percentage of 59% (n=44; range, 5% - 100%) at screening and 70% (n=40; range, 0 – 97%) prior to conditioning but after bridging therapy.

The safety analysis included all 44 treated patients, and the efficacy analysis included 36 patients.

“[T]he follow-up period was too short from dosing for the most recently treated eight patients,” Dr Wierda explained.

The median follow-up was 15.1 months for the 36 efficacy-evaluable patients.

Safety

All patients had a treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with 75% having grade 3/4 events.

Grade 5 TEAEs included three due to progressive disease, three due to infections, and one stroke 6 weeks after infusion.

Two patients died of KTE-X19-related AEs. One patient in the 2 x 10⁶ dose group had multiorgan failure secondary to CRS on study day 6. The other patient, in the 0.5 x 10⁶ dose group, had a stroke after infusion in the context of CRS and neurologic events (NEs) on day 7.

Investigators detected a higher incidence of grade 3 and greater CRS for the six patients treated at the highest dose. Half developed CRS of grade 3 or higher, compared with 18% in the 1 x 10⁶ dose cohort and 19% in the 0.5 x 10⁶ dose cohort.

Grade 3 or higher NEs were more common than CRS. The lowest incidence occurred in the lowest dose cohort, at 25%, compared with 45% in the 1 x 10⁶ dose cohort and 50% in the 2 x 10⁶ dose cohort.

Due to the incidence of grade 3 and greater NEs observed in the 1 x 10⁶ dose cohort, investigators revised the management guidelines for AEs. The revisions included using tocilizumab only for CRS—and not for NEs—and initiating steroids for grade 2 NEs instead of waiting for grade 3.

Eight patients were treated under the revised recommendations, and the incidence of grade 3 NEs was 13%, with no grade 4 or 5 NEs.

“This compared favorably with the 14 patients treated at the same dose level but prior to these changes," Dr. Wierda said.

In comparison, 57% developed grade 3 NEs and 7% grade 4 with the original AE management protocol.

The incidence of grade 3 CRS remained low, with no CRS events of grade 4 or greater with the revised recommendations.

Efficacy

The best overall response in the 36 efficacy-evaluable patients was 69% CR and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi).

Seventy-five percent of these patients had undetectable MRD in the bone marrow at 10^-4 sensitivity at 3 months of follow-up.

All patients in the 1 x 10⁶ dose cohort (n=14) responded. Ninety-three percent achieved a CR/CRi, 7% had a partial response, and all had undetectable MRD in the bone marrow.

The median duration of response was 12.9 months in the 1 x 10⁶ cohort. This was the dose selected for the phase 2 trial, which is now enrolling patients.

ZUMA-3 was sponsored by Kite, a Gilead Company.

Dr. Wierda disclosed research funding from AbbVie and Genentech. 

* Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

Photo courtesy of ASH

SAN DIEGO—An update of the ZUMA-3 trial showed that KTE-X19—an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy—can induce high rates of undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) and durable complete remissions (CRs) in adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

And this was particularly the case at the middle dose level of 1 x 10⁶ cells/kg.

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, presented the update at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 897*).

Dr. Wierda explained that KTE-X19 is a new name for KTE-C19, also known as axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta™), which is currently approved in the United States for the treatment of relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in adults and in Europe for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma.

“This approval was based on the ZUMA-1 clinical trial,” he said, “which showed a 54% complete remission rate and 82% overall response rate with durable remissions.”

ZUMA-3 (NCT02614066) is a phase 1/2 study of KTE-X19—a CAR T cell with CD3ζ signaling and CD28 costimulatory domains—for relapsed or refractory adults with ALL.

Dr. Wierda presented the phase 1 data available at the cutoff of August 16.

Study design

Patients underwent leukapheresis to collect their T cells for production and received bridging therapy selected by the treating physician from several prespecified regimens to maintain disease control.

Conditioning chemotherapy included fludarabine at 25 mg/m² on days -4, -3, and -2 and cyclophosphamide at 900 mg/m² on day -2.

Patients received KTE-X19 on day 0. They were monitored and released from the hospital on day 7 or upon resolution of any toxicities.

The investigators assessed response, including bone marrow evaluation, on day 28, week 8, month 3, and every 3 months for the first year as well as every 6 months for the second year of follow-up.

The dose-finding portion of the trial initially enrolled three patients. They received a dose of 2 x 10⁶ CAR T cells/kg and were monitored for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs).

If there were no DLTs in the first three patients, phase 2 could open or investigators could further expand the 2 x 10⁶ dose level or explore lower doses of the product (1 x 10⁶ cells/kg and 0.5 x 10⁶ cells/kg).

Investigators defined DLTs as:

• KTE-X19-related events in the first 28 days, including grade 4 hematologic toxicity lasting more than 30 days and not attributable to ALL
• Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities lasting more than 7 days
• Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities regardless of duration, excluding grade 4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) events lasting 7 days or less
• Neurologic events that resolve to grade 1 in 2 weeks or to baseline within 4 weeks.

Dr. Wierda said no DLTs occurred among the first 3 patients treated, and all dose levels were explored in phase 1.

Patients

As of the cutoff date, 54 patients were enrolled, confirmed eligible, and underwent leukapheresis. Six patients did not receive conditioning, three patients received conditioning but not KTE-X19, and one patient withdrew from the study after the first failed production of CAR T cells.

So 44 patients received KTE-X19. Six patients received the highest dose of CAR T cells (2 x 10⁶/kg), 22 received the middle dose (1 x 10⁶/kg), and 16 received the lowest dose (0.5 x 10⁶/kg).

The patients’ median age was 46 (range, 18 – 77). Almost half (48%) were male, and 68% had three or more prior treatment regimens. Forty-one percent had prior blinatumomab, and 14% had prior inotuzumab.

Patients had a median bone marrow blast percentage of 59% (n=44; range, 5% - 100%) at screening and 70% (n=40; range, 0 – 97%) prior to conditioning but after bridging therapy.

The safety analysis included all 44 treated patients, and the efficacy analysis included 36 patients.

“[T]he follow-up period was too short from dosing for the most recently treated eight patients,” Dr Wierda explained.

The median follow-up was 15.1 months for the 36 efficacy-evaluable patients.

Safety

All patients had a treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with 75% having grade 3/4 events.

Grade 5 TEAEs included three due to progressive disease, three due to infections, and one stroke 6 weeks after infusion.

Two patients died of KTE-X19-related AEs. One patient in the 2 x 10⁶ dose group had multiorgan failure secondary to CRS on study day 6. The other patient, in the 0.5 x 10⁶ dose group, had a stroke after infusion in the context of CRS and neurologic events (NEs) on day 7.

Investigators detected a higher incidence of grade 3 and greater CRS for the six patients treated at the highest dose. Half developed CRS of grade 3 or higher, compared with 18% in the 1 x 10⁶ dose cohort and 19% in the 0.5 x 10⁶ dose cohort.

Grade 3 or higher NEs were more common than CRS. The lowest incidence occurred in the lowest dose cohort, at 25%, compared with 45% in the 1 x 10⁶ dose cohort and 50% in the 2 x 10⁶ dose cohort.

Due to the incidence of grade 3 and greater NEs observed in the 1 x 10⁶ dose cohort, investigators revised the management guidelines for AEs. The revisions included using tocilizumab only for CRS—and not for NEs—and initiating steroids for grade 2 NEs instead of waiting for grade 3.

Eight patients were treated under the revised recommendations, and the incidence of grade 3 NEs was 13%, with no grade 4 or 5 NEs.

“This compared favorably with the 14 patients treated at the same dose level but prior to these changes," Dr. Wierda said.

In comparison, 57% developed grade 3 NEs and 7% grade 4 with the original AE management protocol.

The incidence of grade 3 CRS remained low, with no CRS events of grade 4 or greater with the revised recommendations.

Efficacy

The best overall response in the 36 efficacy-evaluable patients was 69% CR and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi).

Seventy-five percent of these patients had undetectable MRD in the bone marrow at 10^-4 sensitivity at 3 months of follow-up.

All patients in the 1 x 10⁶ dose cohort (n=14) responded. Ninety-three percent achieved a CR/CRi, 7% had a partial response, and all had undetectable MRD in the bone marrow.

The median duration of response was 12.9 months in the 1 x 10⁶ cohort. This was the dose selected for the phase 2 trial, which is now enrolling patients.

ZUMA-3 was sponsored by Kite, a Gilead Company.

Dr. Wierda disclosed research funding from AbbVie and Genentech. 

* Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

©ASH/Scott Morgan 2018

SAN DIEGO—In a phase 3 trial, ibrutinib plus rituximab (IR) improved survival when compared with standard chemoimmunotherapy in patients younger than 70 with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Patients who received IR had superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to patients who received fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR).

“This establishes ibrutinib-based therapy as the most effective treatment tested to date in this disease for untreated patients,” said Tait D. Shanafelt, MD, of Stanford University in California.

In fact, the study results are likely to dethrone FCR as the most active chemoimmunotherapy regimen against CLL, Dr. Shanafelt said.

He presented the results during the late-breaking abstract session at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract LBA-4*).

The trial (NCT02048813) included 529 patients age 70 or younger with previously untreated CLL. They were randomized on a 2:1 basis to either six cycles of FCR according to standard protocols (n=175) or IR (n=354).

IR consisted of ibrutinib given at 420 mg daily for each 28-day cycle and rituximab given at 50 mg/m² on day 1 of cycle 2, at 325 mg/m² on day 2 of cycle 2, and at 500 mg/m² on day 1 for cycles 3 to 7.

From cycle 8 on, patients in the IR arm received daily ibrutinib at 420 mg until disease progression.

Dr. Shanafelt said patient characteristics were well-balanced between the treatment arms.

He presented results from both an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis and a per-protocol analysis excluding 22 patients in the IR arm and nine patients in the FCR arm who were randomized but later found not to meet eligibility criteria.

PFS

In the ITT analysis, there were 37 cases of progression or death in the IR arm and 40 cases in the FCR arm. This difference translated into a hazard ratio (HR) for progression or death of 0.35 with IR (P<0.00001).

In the per-protocol analysis, there were 33 cases of progression or death in the IR arm and 39 cases in the FCR arm. The HR was 0.32 favoring IR (P<0.00001).

In a subgroup analysis of PFS, IR was superior to FCR regardless of patient age, sex, performance status, disease stage, or the presence or absence of the 11q23.3 deletion.

PFS was significantly better with IR in patients with unmutated IGHV (HR= 0.26, P<0.00001) but not in patients with mutated IGHV (HR=0.44, P=0.07).

Overall survival

In the ITT analysis, there were four deaths in the IR arm and 10 in the FCR arm (HR=0.17, P<0.0003).

In the per-protocol analysis, there were three deaths in the IR arm and 10 deaths in the FCR arm (HR=0.13, P<0.0001).

Dr. Shanafelt noted that, although the overall number of deaths was relatively small, there were twice as many patients enrolled in the IR arm as in the FCR arm, meaning the rate of death in the FCR arm was five-fold higher than in the IR arm.

Safety and cost

Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 58.5% of patients in the IR arm and 72.1% of patients in the FCR arm (P=0.004).

Specific AEs that occurred significantly less often with IR included neutropenia (22.7% vs. 43.7%), anemia (2.6% vs. 12.0%), thrombocytopenia (2.9% vs. 13.9%), any infection (7.1% vs. 19.0%), and neutropenic fever (2.3% vs. 15.8%; P<0.001 for all comparisons).

AEs that occurred more frequently with IR than FCR included atrial fibrillation (2.9% vs. 0%, P=0.04) and hypertension (7.4% vs. 1.9%, P=0.01).

Dr. Shanafelt acknowledged that one possible barrier to the IR regimen is cost. The monthly cost of ibrutinib maintenance is about $10,000, he said, although he noted that cost considerations were not studied in the trial.

“Future trials testing novel agent combinations to see if we can eliminate the need for chronic therapy should be pursued,” he said.

The trial was sponsored by the National Cancer Institute with additional support from Pharmacyclics. Dr. Shanafelt reported patents and royalties from the Mayo Clinic, and research funding from Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, AbbVie, Pharmacyclics, and Janssen.

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

©ASH/Scott Morgan 2018

SAN DIEGO—In a phase 3 trial, ibrutinib plus rituximab (IR) improved survival when compared with standard chemoimmunotherapy in patients younger than 70 with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Patients who received IR had superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to patients who received fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR).

“This establishes ibrutinib-based therapy as the most effective treatment tested to date in this disease for untreated patients,” said Tait D. Shanafelt, MD, of Stanford University in California.

In fact, the study results are likely to dethrone FCR as the most active chemoimmunotherapy regimen against CLL, Dr. Shanafelt said.

He presented the results during the late-breaking abstract session at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract LBA-4*).

The trial (NCT02048813) included 529 patients age 70 or younger with previously untreated CLL. They were randomized on a 2:1 basis to either six cycles of FCR according to standard protocols (n=175) or IR (n=354).

IR consisted of ibrutinib given at 420 mg daily for each 28-day cycle and rituximab given at 50 mg/m² on day 1 of cycle 2, at 325 mg/m² on day 2 of cycle 2, and at 500 mg/m² on day 1 for cycles 3 to 7.

From cycle 8 on, patients in the IR arm received daily ibrutinib at 420 mg until disease progression.

Dr. Shanafelt said patient characteristics were well-balanced between the treatment arms.

He presented results from both an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis and a per-protocol analysis excluding 22 patients in the IR arm and nine patients in the FCR arm who were randomized but later found not to meet eligibility criteria.

PFS

In the ITT analysis, there were 37 cases of progression or death in the IR arm and 40 cases in the FCR arm. This difference translated into a hazard ratio (HR) for progression or death of 0.35 with IR (P<0.00001).

In the per-protocol analysis, there were 33 cases of progression or death in the IR arm and 39 cases in the FCR arm. The HR was 0.32 favoring IR (P<0.00001).

In a subgroup analysis of PFS, IR was superior to FCR regardless of patient age, sex, performance status, disease stage, or the presence or absence of the 11q23.3 deletion.

PFS was significantly better with IR in patients with unmutated IGHV (HR= 0.26, P<0.00001) but not in patients with mutated IGHV (HR=0.44, P=0.07).

Overall survival

In the ITT analysis, there were four deaths in the IR arm and 10 in the FCR arm (HR=0.17, P<0.0003).

In the per-protocol analysis, there were three deaths in the IR arm and 10 deaths in the FCR arm (HR=0.13, P<0.0001).

Dr. Shanafelt noted that, although the overall number of deaths was relatively small, there were twice as many patients enrolled in the IR arm as in the FCR arm, meaning the rate of death in the FCR arm was five-fold higher than in the IR arm.

Safety and cost

Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 58.5% of patients in the IR arm and 72.1% of patients in the FCR arm (P=0.004).

Specific AEs that occurred significantly less often with IR included neutropenia (22.7% vs. 43.7%), anemia (2.6% vs. 12.0%), thrombocytopenia (2.9% vs. 13.9%), any infection (7.1% vs. 19.0%), and neutropenic fever (2.3% vs. 15.8%; P<0.001 for all comparisons).

AEs that occurred more frequently with IR than FCR included atrial fibrillation (2.9% vs. 0%, P=0.04) and hypertension (7.4% vs. 1.9%, P=0.01).

Dr. Shanafelt acknowledged that one possible barrier to the IR regimen is cost. The monthly cost of ibrutinib maintenance is about $10,000, he said, although he noted that cost considerations were not studied in the trial.

“Future trials testing novel agent combinations to see if we can eliminate the need for chronic therapy should be pursued,” he said.

The trial was sponsored by the National Cancer Institute with additional support from Pharmacyclics. Dr. Shanafelt reported patents and royalties from the Mayo Clinic, and research funding from Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, AbbVie, Pharmacyclics, and Janssen.

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

©ASH/Scott Morgan 2018

SAN DIEGO—In a phase 3 trial, ibrutinib plus rituximab (IR) improved survival when compared with standard chemoimmunotherapy in patients younger than 70 with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Patients who received IR had superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to patients who received fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR).

“This establishes ibrutinib-based therapy as the most effective treatment tested to date in this disease for untreated patients,” said Tait D. Shanafelt, MD, of Stanford University in California.

In fact, the study results are likely to dethrone FCR as the most active chemoimmunotherapy regimen against CLL, Dr. Shanafelt said.

He presented the results during the late-breaking abstract session at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract LBA-4*).

The trial (NCT02048813) included 529 patients age 70 or younger with previously untreated CLL. They were randomized on a 2:1 basis to either six cycles of FCR according to standard protocols (n=175) or IR (n=354).

IR consisted of ibrutinib given at 420 mg daily for each 28-day cycle and rituximab given at 50 mg/m² on day 1 of cycle 2, at 325 mg/m² on day 2 of cycle 2, and at 500 mg/m² on day 1 for cycles 3 to 7.

From cycle 8 on, patients in the IR arm received daily ibrutinib at 420 mg until disease progression.

Dr. Shanafelt said patient characteristics were well-balanced between the treatment arms.

He presented results from both an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis and a per-protocol analysis excluding 22 patients in the IR arm and nine patients in the FCR arm who were randomized but later found not to meet eligibility criteria.

PFS

In the ITT analysis, there were 37 cases of progression or death in the IR arm and 40 cases in the FCR arm. This difference translated into a hazard ratio (HR) for progression or death of 0.35 with IR (P<0.00001).

In the per-protocol analysis, there were 33 cases of progression or death in the IR arm and 39 cases in the FCR arm. The HR was 0.32 favoring IR (P<0.00001).

In a subgroup analysis of PFS, IR was superior to FCR regardless of patient age, sex, performance status, disease stage, or the presence or absence of the 11q23.3 deletion.

PFS was significantly better with IR in patients with unmutated IGHV (HR= 0.26, P<0.00001) but not in patients with mutated IGHV (HR=0.44, P=0.07).

Overall survival

In the ITT analysis, there were four deaths in the IR arm and 10 in the FCR arm (HR=0.17, P<0.0003).

In the per-protocol analysis, there were three deaths in the IR arm and 10 deaths in the FCR arm (HR=0.13, P<0.0001).

Dr. Shanafelt noted that, although the overall number of deaths was relatively small, there were twice as many patients enrolled in the IR arm as in the FCR arm, meaning the rate of death in the FCR arm was five-fold higher than in the IR arm.

Safety and cost

Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 58.5% of patients in the IR arm and 72.1% of patients in the FCR arm (P=0.004).

Specific AEs that occurred significantly less often with IR included neutropenia (22.7% vs. 43.7%), anemia (2.6% vs. 12.0%), thrombocytopenia (2.9% vs. 13.9%), any infection (7.1% vs. 19.0%), and neutropenic fever (2.3% vs. 15.8%; P<0.001 for all comparisons).

AEs that occurred more frequently with IR than FCR included atrial fibrillation (2.9% vs. 0%, P=0.04) and hypertension (7.4% vs. 1.9%, P=0.01).

Dr. Shanafelt acknowledged that one possible barrier to the IR regimen is cost. The monthly cost of ibrutinib maintenance is about $10,000, he said, although he noted that cost considerations were not studied in the trial.

“Future trials testing novel agent combinations to see if we can eliminate the need for chronic therapy should be pursued,” he said.

The trial was sponsored by the National Cancer Institute with additional support from Pharmacyclics. Dr. Shanafelt reported patents and royalties from the Mayo Clinic, and research funding from Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, AbbVie, Pharmacyclics, and Janssen.

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

Photo by Jen Smith

SAN DIEGO—Preliminary data on UCART19—the first off-the-shelf, anti-CD19, allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy—suggest it can produce complete responses (CRs) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, and side effects are manageable.

Investigators pooled data from the phase 1 pediatric (PALL) and adult (CALM) trials of UCART19 in patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and observed a 67% CR rate in the overall population and an 82% CR rate in patients who received a three-drug lymphodepleting regimen.

Additionally, investigators reported no instance of moderate or severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with UCART19.

“We’ve been blessed with the new treatments that have emerged in recent years,” said Reuben Benjamin, MD, PhD, “that include BiTEs, antibody-drug conjugates, and most excitingly, the autologous CAR T-cell therapies.”

Nevertheless, some logistical issues with the autologous CAR T cells leave an unmet need in this group of patients, he noted.

“So an off-the-shelf approach using a product like UCART19 may potentially overcome some of these hurdles that we see in the autologous CAR T-cell therapy field,” he said.

Dr. Benjamin, of King’s College Hospital in London, U.K., presented the analysis of PALL and CALM data at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting as abstract 896.*

UCART19 product

UCART19 is an allogeneic, genetically modified, CAR T-cell product (anti-CD19 scFv- 41BB-CD3ζ) manufactured from healthy donor T cells.

It has a safety switch—RQR8, which is a CD20 mimotope—that allows the CAR T cells to be targeted by rituximab.

“And importantly,” Dr. Benjamin explained, “the T-cell alpha gene has been knocked out using TALEN® gene-editing technology to prevent T-cell receptor-mediated graft-versus-host disease.”

The CD52 gene is also knocked out, which permits an anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, such as alemtuzumab, to be used in lymphodepletion.

Study design

The primary objective of both the adult (NCT02746952) and pediatric (NCT02808442) studies was to determine the safety and tolerability of UCART19. Also, the adult study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of UCART19 and the optimal lymphodepleting regimen.

A secondary objective of both studies was to determine the remission rate at day 28.

Eligible patients received a lymphodepleting regimen for 7 days, followed by a single infusion of UCART19.

Lymphodepletion in the pediatric trial consisted of fludarabine (F) at 150 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide (C) at 120 mg/kg, with or without alemtuzumab (A) at 1 mg/kg capped at 40 mg.

Adults received lower doses of each agent—90 mg/m², 1,500 mg/m², and (optionally) 1 mg/kg or 40 mg, respectively.

Investigators included alemtuzumab in the regimen to minimize viral infections.

The UCART19 dose was weight-banded in the pediatric trial and ranged from 1.1 to 2.3 x 10⁶ cells/kg.

The adult trial included three UCART19 dose levels:

• 6 x 10⁶ cells (≈1 x 10⁵ cells/kg)
• 6 or 8 x 10⁷ cells (≈1 x 10⁶ cells/kg)
• 8 or 2.4 x 10⁸ cells (≈3 x 10⁶ cells/kg).

Patients were assessed for safety and response at day 28 and regularly thereafter for up to 12 months. Patients had the option during the follow-up period to receive a second dose if they did not respond or lost their response.

Patient characteristics/status

Twenty-one patients were enrolled in the trials—seven children and 14 adults. Median ages were 2.7 years (PALL; range, 0.8–16.4) and 29.5 years (CALM; range, 18–62).

Both studies included high-risk, heavily pretreated populations, Dr. Benjamin noted.

The pooled population had a median of 4 prior lines of therapy (range, 1–6), and nine patients had a high-risk cytogenetics, including complex karyotypes, MLL rearrangements, and Ph+ disease.

Thirteen patients had prior allogeneic stem cell transplants.

Nine patients had a bone marrow tumor burden of more than 25% blasts prior to lymphodepletion.

As of the cutoff date of October 23, all patients had been treated with UCART19.

Four of the pediatric patients are still on the trial. Two are in remission, one has relapsed, and one is refractory.

Eight adult patients are still on trial. Three are in remission, three are relapsed, and two are refractory.

Safety

“UCART19 appears to show an acceptable safety profile based on the adverse events reported so far,” Dr. Benjamin said.

Nineteen patients experienced cytokine release syndrome (CRS), primarily grades 1 and 2. Eight patients had grade 1 and 2 neurotoxicity events, and two patients had grade 1 acute skin GVHD.

“In keeping with what is seen in some of the autologous CAR T-cell trials,” Dr. Benjamin explained, “prolonged cytopenias were seen, which we defined in these studies as grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia occurring at 42 days post-UCART infusion.”

Six of 21 patients developed prolonged cytopenia.

There was also an increased incidence of viral infections occurring in eight patients, including cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, BK virus, and metapneumovirus.

“Most of these infections, however, were manageable,” Dr. Benjamin said.

Two patients developed neutropenic sepsis, one grade 5, which was one of the treatment-related deaths in the CALM trial.

No treatment-related deaths occurred in the PALL study, but there were two in the CALM study—one from pulmonary hemorrhage and the other from neutropenic sepsis and grade 4 CRS.

Twelve patients are still alive, five of whom are in CR.

Efficacy

Of the patients who received FCA lymphodepletion, 82% (14/17) achieved CR/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), and 71% (10/14) achieved MRD negativity.

An additional patient gained MRD-negative status after the second dose of UCART19.

Of the 14 patients who achieved a CR/CRi, 78% (n=11) went on to receive an allogeneic transplant.

In the entire pooled population, 67% (14/21) achieved CR/CRi.

Three patients received a second UCART19 dose, and five patients remain in CR/CRi.

UCART19 expansion

UCART19 expansion, as measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in PALL and flow-based methods in CALM, occurred primarily in the first 28 days in the FCA-treated population.

Investigators observed expansion in 15 of 17 patients treated with FCA. None of the patients who received FC alone (n=4) had expansion detectable in blood or bone marrow, Dr. Benjamin noted.

“The response we’ve seen in the study so far,” Dr. Benjamin clarified, “is linked to the expansion observed within the first 28-day period.”

UCART cells persisted in three patients beyond day 42. In one patient, they persisted up to day 120.

“Of interest is the T-cell recovery seen in the study,” Dr. Benjamin elaborated. “We only have data from the adult study here—14 patients. And you’ll see that, in the FCA-treated arm (n=11), you have a deeper and more sustained lymphodepletion compared to the FC-treated patients (n=3). And this may play a role in the subsequent UCART19 expansion and disease response.”

Re-dosing

Of the three patients who were re-dosed, two achieved MRD negativity.

One patient achieved MRD-negative status at day 28 but relapsed and received a second infusion 3 months after the first dose. The second expansion was not as deep as the first, but the patient nevertheless achieved MRD negativity after the second dose.

The second patient received FC lymphodepletion and was refractory at day 28.

“The second time around, he received FCA, had a slightly better expansion, and achieved molecular remission,” Dr. Benjamin said.

And the third patient had FCA lymphodepletion but was refractory at day 28.

“We elected to give a second dose at 2.4 months later, but unfortunately, there wasn’t very much expansion, even the second time around, and the patient progressed,” Dr. Benjamin said.

FCA lymphodepletion appears to be required for UCART19 expansion. There was no UCART19 expansion and no response in all four patients lymphodepleted with FC.

The evaluation of UCART19 is ongoing in pediatric and adult B-cell ALL, and “there is a plan for moving into the lymphoma space as well,” Dr. Benjamin added.

Dr. Benjamin disclosed honoraria from Amgen, Takeda, Novartis, Gilead, and Celgene, and research funding from Servier and Pfizer.

Servier and Allogene are supporting the UCART19 trials. 

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

Photo by Jen Smith

SAN DIEGO—Preliminary data on UCART19—the first off-the-shelf, anti-CD19, allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy—suggest it can produce complete responses (CRs) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, and side effects are manageable.

Investigators pooled data from the phase 1 pediatric (PALL) and adult (CALM) trials of UCART19 in patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and observed a 67% CR rate in the overall population and an 82% CR rate in patients who received a three-drug lymphodepleting regimen.

Additionally, investigators reported no instance of moderate or severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with UCART19.

“We’ve been blessed with the new treatments that have emerged in recent years,” said Reuben Benjamin, MD, PhD, “that include BiTEs, antibody-drug conjugates, and most excitingly, the autologous CAR T-cell therapies.”

Nevertheless, some logistical issues with the autologous CAR T cells leave an unmet need in this group of patients, he noted.

“So an off-the-shelf approach using a product like UCART19 may potentially overcome some of these hurdles that we see in the autologous CAR T-cell therapy field,” he said.

Dr. Benjamin, of King’s College Hospital in London, U.K., presented the analysis of PALL and CALM data at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting as abstract 896.*

UCART19 product

UCART19 is an allogeneic, genetically modified, CAR T-cell product (anti-CD19 scFv- 41BB-CD3ζ) manufactured from healthy donor T cells.

It has a safety switch—RQR8, which is a CD20 mimotope—that allows the CAR T cells to be targeted by rituximab.

“And importantly,” Dr. Benjamin explained, “the T-cell alpha gene has been knocked out using TALEN® gene-editing technology to prevent T-cell receptor-mediated graft-versus-host disease.”

The CD52 gene is also knocked out, which permits an anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, such as alemtuzumab, to be used in lymphodepletion.

Study design

The primary objective of both the adult (NCT02746952) and pediatric (NCT02808442) studies was to determine the safety and tolerability of UCART19. Also, the adult study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of UCART19 and the optimal lymphodepleting regimen.

A secondary objective of both studies was to determine the remission rate at day 28.

Eligible patients received a lymphodepleting regimen for 7 days, followed by a single infusion of UCART19.

Lymphodepletion in the pediatric trial consisted of fludarabine (F) at 150 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide (C) at 120 mg/kg, with or without alemtuzumab (A) at 1 mg/kg capped at 40 mg.

Adults received lower doses of each agent—90 mg/m², 1,500 mg/m², and (optionally) 1 mg/kg or 40 mg, respectively.

Investigators included alemtuzumab in the regimen to minimize viral infections.

The UCART19 dose was weight-banded in the pediatric trial and ranged from 1.1 to 2.3 x 10⁶ cells/kg.

The adult trial included three UCART19 dose levels:

• 6 x 10⁶ cells (≈1 x 10⁵ cells/kg)
• 6 or 8 x 10⁷ cells (≈1 x 10⁶ cells/kg)
• 8 or 2.4 x 10⁸ cells (≈3 x 10⁶ cells/kg).

Patients were assessed for safety and response at day 28 and regularly thereafter for up to 12 months. Patients had the option during the follow-up period to receive a second dose if they did not respond or lost their response.

Patient characteristics/status

Twenty-one patients were enrolled in the trials—seven children and 14 adults. Median ages were 2.7 years (PALL; range, 0.8–16.4) and 29.5 years (CALM; range, 18–62).

Both studies included high-risk, heavily pretreated populations, Dr. Benjamin noted.

The pooled population had a median of 4 prior lines of therapy (range, 1–6), and nine patients had a high-risk cytogenetics, including complex karyotypes, MLL rearrangements, and Ph+ disease.

Thirteen patients had prior allogeneic stem cell transplants.

Nine patients had a bone marrow tumor burden of more than 25% blasts prior to lymphodepletion.

As of the cutoff date of October 23, all patients had been treated with UCART19.

Four of the pediatric patients are still on the trial. Two are in remission, one has relapsed, and one is refractory.

Eight adult patients are still on trial. Three are in remission, three are relapsed, and two are refractory.

Safety

“UCART19 appears to show an acceptable safety profile based on the adverse events reported so far,” Dr. Benjamin said.

Nineteen patients experienced cytokine release syndrome (CRS), primarily grades 1 and 2. Eight patients had grade 1 and 2 neurotoxicity events, and two patients had grade 1 acute skin GVHD.

“In keeping with what is seen in some of the autologous CAR T-cell trials,” Dr. Benjamin explained, “prolonged cytopenias were seen, which we defined in these studies as grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia occurring at 42 days post-UCART infusion.”

Six of 21 patients developed prolonged cytopenia.

There was also an increased incidence of viral infections occurring in eight patients, including cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, BK virus, and metapneumovirus.

“Most of these infections, however, were manageable,” Dr. Benjamin said.

Two patients developed neutropenic sepsis, one grade 5, which was one of the treatment-related deaths in the CALM trial.

No treatment-related deaths occurred in the PALL study, but there were two in the CALM study—one from pulmonary hemorrhage and the other from neutropenic sepsis and grade 4 CRS.

Twelve patients are still alive, five of whom are in CR.

Efficacy

Of the patients who received FCA lymphodepletion, 82% (14/17) achieved CR/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), and 71% (10/14) achieved MRD negativity.

An additional patient gained MRD-negative status after the second dose of UCART19.

Of the 14 patients who achieved a CR/CRi, 78% (n=11) went on to receive an allogeneic transplant.

In the entire pooled population, 67% (14/21) achieved CR/CRi.

Three patients received a second UCART19 dose, and five patients remain in CR/CRi.

UCART19 expansion

UCART19 expansion, as measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in PALL and flow-based methods in CALM, occurred primarily in the first 28 days in the FCA-treated population.

Investigators observed expansion in 15 of 17 patients treated with FCA. None of the patients who received FC alone (n=4) had expansion detectable in blood or bone marrow, Dr. Benjamin noted.

“The response we’ve seen in the study so far,” Dr. Benjamin clarified, “is linked to the expansion observed within the first 28-day period.”

UCART cells persisted in three patients beyond day 42. In one patient, they persisted up to day 120.

“Of interest is the T-cell recovery seen in the study,” Dr. Benjamin elaborated. “We only have data from the adult study here—14 patients. And you’ll see that, in the FCA-treated arm (n=11), you have a deeper and more sustained lymphodepletion compared to the FC-treated patients (n=3). And this may play a role in the subsequent UCART19 expansion and disease response.”

Re-dosing

Of the three patients who were re-dosed, two achieved MRD negativity.

One patient achieved MRD-negative status at day 28 but relapsed and received a second infusion 3 months after the first dose. The second expansion was not as deep as the first, but the patient nevertheless achieved MRD negativity after the second dose.

The second patient received FC lymphodepletion and was refractory at day 28.

“The second time around, he received FCA, had a slightly better expansion, and achieved molecular remission,” Dr. Benjamin said.

And the third patient had FCA lymphodepletion but was refractory at day 28.

“We elected to give a second dose at 2.4 months later, but unfortunately, there wasn’t very much expansion, even the second time around, and the patient progressed,” Dr. Benjamin said.

FCA lymphodepletion appears to be required for UCART19 expansion. There was no UCART19 expansion and no response in all four patients lymphodepleted with FC.

The evaluation of UCART19 is ongoing in pediatric and adult B-cell ALL, and “there is a plan for moving into the lymphoma space as well,” Dr. Benjamin added.

Dr. Benjamin disclosed honoraria from Amgen, Takeda, Novartis, Gilead, and Celgene, and research funding from Servier and Pfizer.

Servier and Allogene are supporting the UCART19 trials. 

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

Photo by Jen Smith

SAN DIEGO—Preliminary data on UCART19—the first off-the-shelf, anti-CD19, allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy—suggest it can produce complete responses (CRs) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, and side effects are manageable.

Investigators pooled data from the phase 1 pediatric (PALL) and adult (CALM) trials of UCART19 in patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and observed a 67% CR rate in the overall population and an 82% CR rate in patients who received a three-drug lymphodepleting regimen.

Additionally, investigators reported no instance of moderate or severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with UCART19.

“We’ve been blessed with the new treatments that have emerged in recent years,” said Reuben Benjamin, MD, PhD, “that include BiTEs, antibody-drug conjugates, and most excitingly, the autologous CAR T-cell therapies.”

Nevertheless, some logistical issues with the autologous CAR T cells leave an unmet need in this group of patients, he noted.

“So an off-the-shelf approach using a product like UCART19 may potentially overcome some of these hurdles that we see in the autologous CAR T-cell therapy field,” he said.

Dr. Benjamin, of King’s College Hospital in London, U.K., presented the analysis of PALL and CALM data at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting as abstract 896.*

UCART19 product

UCART19 is an allogeneic, genetically modified, CAR T-cell product (anti-CD19 scFv- 41BB-CD3ζ) manufactured from healthy donor T cells.

It has a safety switch—RQR8, which is a CD20 mimotope—that allows the CAR T cells to be targeted by rituximab.

“And importantly,” Dr. Benjamin explained, “the T-cell alpha gene has been knocked out using TALEN® gene-editing technology to prevent T-cell receptor-mediated graft-versus-host disease.”

The CD52 gene is also knocked out, which permits an anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, such as alemtuzumab, to be used in lymphodepletion.

Study design

The primary objective of both the adult (NCT02746952) and pediatric (NCT02808442) studies was to determine the safety and tolerability of UCART19. Also, the adult study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of UCART19 and the optimal lymphodepleting regimen.

A secondary objective of both studies was to determine the remission rate at day 28.

Eligible patients received a lymphodepleting regimen for 7 days, followed by a single infusion of UCART19.

Lymphodepletion in the pediatric trial consisted of fludarabine (F) at 150 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide (C) at 120 mg/kg, with or without alemtuzumab (A) at 1 mg/kg capped at 40 mg.

Adults received lower doses of each agent—90 mg/m², 1,500 mg/m², and (optionally) 1 mg/kg or 40 mg, respectively.

Investigators included alemtuzumab in the regimen to minimize viral infections.

The UCART19 dose was weight-banded in the pediatric trial and ranged from 1.1 to 2.3 x 10⁶ cells/kg.

The adult trial included three UCART19 dose levels:

• 6 x 10⁶ cells (≈1 x 10⁵ cells/kg)
• 6 or 8 x 10⁷ cells (≈1 x 10⁶ cells/kg)
• 8 or 2.4 x 10⁸ cells (≈3 x 10⁶ cells/kg).

Patients were assessed for safety and response at day 28 and regularly thereafter for up to 12 months. Patients had the option during the follow-up period to receive a second dose if they did not respond or lost their response.

Patient characteristics/status

Twenty-one patients were enrolled in the trials—seven children and 14 adults. Median ages were 2.7 years (PALL; range, 0.8–16.4) and 29.5 years (CALM; range, 18–62).

Both studies included high-risk, heavily pretreated populations, Dr. Benjamin noted.

The pooled population had a median of 4 prior lines of therapy (range, 1–6), and nine patients had a high-risk cytogenetics, including complex karyotypes, MLL rearrangements, and Ph+ disease.

Thirteen patients had prior allogeneic stem cell transplants.

Nine patients had a bone marrow tumor burden of more than 25% blasts prior to lymphodepletion.

As of the cutoff date of October 23, all patients had been treated with UCART19.

Four of the pediatric patients are still on the trial. Two are in remission, one has relapsed, and one is refractory.

Eight adult patients are still on trial. Three are in remission, three are relapsed, and two are refractory.

Safety

“UCART19 appears to show an acceptable safety profile based on the adverse events reported so far,” Dr. Benjamin said.

Nineteen patients experienced cytokine release syndrome (CRS), primarily grades 1 and 2. Eight patients had grade 1 and 2 neurotoxicity events, and two patients had grade 1 acute skin GVHD.

“In keeping with what is seen in some of the autologous CAR T-cell trials,” Dr. Benjamin explained, “prolonged cytopenias were seen, which we defined in these studies as grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia occurring at 42 days post-UCART infusion.”

Six of 21 patients developed prolonged cytopenia.

There was also an increased incidence of viral infections occurring in eight patients, including cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, BK virus, and metapneumovirus.

“Most of these infections, however, were manageable,” Dr. Benjamin said.

Two patients developed neutropenic sepsis, one grade 5, which was one of the treatment-related deaths in the CALM trial.

No treatment-related deaths occurred in the PALL study, but there were two in the CALM study—one from pulmonary hemorrhage and the other from neutropenic sepsis and grade 4 CRS.

Twelve patients are still alive, five of whom are in CR.

Efficacy

Of the patients who received FCA lymphodepletion, 82% (14/17) achieved CR/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), and 71% (10/14) achieved MRD negativity.

An additional patient gained MRD-negative status after the second dose of UCART19.

Of the 14 patients who achieved a CR/CRi, 78% (n=11) went on to receive an allogeneic transplant.

In the entire pooled population, 67% (14/21) achieved CR/CRi.

Three patients received a second UCART19 dose, and five patients remain in CR/CRi.

UCART19 expansion

UCART19 expansion, as measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in PALL and flow-based methods in CALM, occurred primarily in the first 28 days in the FCA-treated population.

Investigators observed expansion in 15 of 17 patients treated with FCA. None of the patients who received FC alone (n=4) had expansion detectable in blood or bone marrow, Dr. Benjamin noted.

“The response we’ve seen in the study so far,” Dr. Benjamin clarified, “is linked to the expansion observed within the first 28-day period.”

UCART cells persisted in three patients beyond day 42. In one patient, they persisted up to day 120.

“Of interest is the T-cell recovery seen in the study,” Dr. Benjamin elaborated. “We only have data from the adult study here—14 patients. And you’ll see that, in the FCA-treated arm (n=11), you have a deeper and more sustained lymphodepletion compared to the FC-treated patients (n=3). And this may play a role in the subsequent UCART19 expansion and disease response.”

Re-dosing

Of the three patients who were re-dosed, two achieved MRD negativity.

One patient achieved MRD-negative status at day 28 but relapsed and received a second infusion 3 months after the first dose. The second expansion was not as deep as the first, but the patient nevertheless achieved MRD negativity after the second dose.

The second patient received FC lymphodepletion and was refractory at day 28.

“The second time around, he received FCA, had a slightly better expansion, and achieved molecular remission,” Dr. Benjamin said.

And the third patient had FCA lymphodepletion but was refractory at day 28.

“We elected to give a second dose at 2.4 months later, but unfortunately, there wasn’t very much expansion, even the second time around, and the patient progressed,” Dr. Benjamin said.

FCA lymphodepletion appears to be required for UCART19 expansion. There was no UCART19 expansion and no response in all four patients lymphodepleted with FC.

The evaluation of UCART19 is ongoing in pediatric and adult B-cell ALL, and “there is a plan for moving into the lymphoma space as well,” Dr. Benjamin added.

Dr. Benjamin disclosed honoraria from Amgen, Takeda, Novartis, Gilead, and Celgene, and research funding from Servier and Pfizer.

Servier and Allogene are supporting the UCART19 trials. 

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

SAN DIEGO – The combination of ibrutinib and rituximab was associated with a two-thirds reduction in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) progression, compared with standard chemoimmunotherapy in patients younger than 70 years old, interim results of a phase 3 randomized trial showed.

Among 529 patients with previously untreated, symptomatic CLL randomly assigned to ibrutinib-rituximab (IR) or to chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR), the IR regimen was associated with a 65% reduction in risk for disease progression, which was the trial’s primary endpoint.

The IR regimen was also associated with better overall survival out to 4 years of follow-up, reported Tait D. Shanafelt, MD, of Stanford (Calif.) University.

“This establishes ibrutinib-based therapy as the most effective treatment tested to date in this disease for untreated patients,” he said at a media briefing prior at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The study results are likely to dethrone FCR as the most active chemoimmunotherapy regimen against CLL, Dr. Shanafelt said.

In the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group E1912 trial, 529 patients aged 70 or younger with previously untreated CLL were enrolled and randomly assigned on a 2:1 basis to either standard therapy with six cycles of FCR according to standard protocols (175 patients), or IR, with ibrutinib 420 mg daily for each cycle, and rituximab delivered 50 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 of cycle 2, and 325 mg/m² on day 2 of the same cycle, and 500 mg/m² on day 1 for all remaining cycles (354 patients).

From cycle 8 until progression, patients in the IR arm received daily ibrutinib 420 mg.

Dr. Shanafelt presented results from both an intention-to-treat analysis and a per-protocol analysis excluding 22 patients in the IR arm and 9 patients in the FCR arm who were randomized but later found not to meet eligibility criteria.

After a mean follow-up of 34 months, there were 37 PFS events in the IR arm, compared with 40 events in the FCR arm in an intention-to-treat analysis. The difference translated into a hazard ratio for progression of 0.35 with IR (P less than .00001).

The results were similar in the per-protocol analysis, with an HR of 0.32 favoring IR (P less than .00001).*

There were four deaths in the IR arm, compared with 10 in the FCR arm at the time of the data lock, translating into a hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival of 0.17 (P less than .0003) in the intention-to-treat analysis, and 0.13 in the per-protocol analysis (P less than .0001).

Dr. Shanafelt noted that although the overall number of deaths was relatively small, there were twice as many patients enrolled in the IR arm as in the FCR arm, meaning that the rate of deaths in the FCR arm was fivefold higher than in the IR arm.

In a subgroup analysis of PFS, IR was superior to FCR regardless of patient age, sex, performance status, disease stage, or the presence or absence of the 11q23.3 deletion.

PFS was also significantly better with IR in patients with unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) regions (HR 0.26, P less than .00001), but not in patients with mutated IGHV.*

Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events occurred in 58.5% of patients in the IR arm, compared with 72.1% of patients in the FCR arm. Specific events that occurred significantly less often with IR included neutropenia (22.7% vs. 43.7%), anemia (2.6% vs. 12.0%), thrombocytopenia (2.9% vs. 13.9%), any infection (7.1% vs. 19.0%), and neutropenic fever (2.3% vs. 15.8%; P less than .001 for all comparisons).

Events that occurred more frequently with IR than FCR included atrial fibrillation (2.9% vs. 0%, P = .04), and hypertension (7.4% vs. 1.9%, P = .01).

Dr. Shanafelt acknowledged that one possible barrier to the IR regimen is cost; the monthly cost of ibrutinib maintenance is about $10,000, he said, although he noted that cost considerations were not studied in the trial.

“Future trials testing novel agent combinations to see if we can eliminate the need for chronic therapy should be pursued,” he said.

The trial was sponsored by the National Cancer Institute with additional support from Pharmacyclics. Dr. Shanafelt reported patents and royalties from the Mayo Clinic, and research funding from Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Abbvie, Pharmacyclics, and Janssen.

SOURCE: Shanafelt TD et al. ASH 2018, Abstract LBA-4.

*Correction, 12/12/2018: An earlier version of this story misstated the P value in two comparisons.

SAN DIEGO – The combination of ibrutinib and rituximab was associated with a two-thirds reduction in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) progression, compared with standard chemoimmunotherapy in patients younger than 70 years old, interim results of a phase 3 randomized trial showed.

Among 529 patients with previously untreated, symptomatic CLL randomly assigned to ibrutinib-rituximab (IR) or to chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR), the IR regimen was associated with a 65% reduction in risk for disease progression, which was the trial’s primary endpoint.

The IR regimen was also associated with better overall survival out to 4 years of follow-up, reported Tait D. Shanafelt, MD, of Stanford (Calif.) University.

“This establishes ibrutinib-based therapy as the most effective treatment tested to date in this disease for untreated patients,” he said at a media briefing prior at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The study results are likely to dethrone FCR as the most active chemoimmunotherapy regimen against CLL, Dr. Shanafelt said.

In the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group E1912 trial, 529 patients aged 70 or younger with previously untreated CLL were enrolled and randomly assigned on a 2:1 basis to either standard therapy with six cycles of FCR according to standard protocols (175 patients), or IR, with ibrutinib 420 mg daily for each cycle, and rituximab delivered 50 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 of cycle 2, and 325 mg/m² on day 2 of the same cycle, and 500 mg/m² on day 1 for all remaining cycles (354 patients).

From cycle 8 until progression, patients in the IR arm received daily ibrutinib 420 mg.

Dr. Shanafelt presented results from both an intention-to-treat analysis and a per-protocol analysis excluding 22 patients in the IR arm and 9 patients in the FCR arm who were randomized but later found not to meet eligibility criteria.

After a mean follow-up of 34 months, there were 37 PFS events in the IR arm, compared with 40 events in the FCR arm in an intention-to-treat analysis. The difference translated into a hazard ratio for progression of 0.35 with IR (P less than .00001).

The results were similar in the per-protocol analysis, with an HR of 0.32 favoring IR (P less than .00001).*

There were four deaths in the IR arm, compared with 10 in the FCR arm at the time of the data lock, translating into a hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival of 0.17 (P less than .0003) in the intention-to-treat analysis, and 0.13 in the per-protocol analysis (P less than .0001).

Dr. Shanafelt noted that although the overall number of deaths was relatively small, there were twice as many patients enrolled in the IR arm as in the FCR arm, meaning that the rate of deaths in the FCR arm was fivefold higher than in the IR arm.

In a subgroup analysis of PFS, IR was superior to FCR regardless of patient age, sex, performance status, disease stage, or the presence or absence of the 11q23.3 deletion.

PFS was also significantly better with IR in patients with unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) regions (HR 0.26, P less than .00001), but not in patients with mutated IGHV.*

Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events occurred in 58.5% of patients in the IR arm, compared with 72.1% of patients in the FCR arm. Specific events that occurred significantly less often with IR included neutropenia (22.7% vs. 43.7%), anemia (2.6% vs. 12.0%), thrombocytopenia (2.9% vs. 13.9%), any infection (7.1% vs. 19.0%), and neutropenic fever (2.3% vs. 15.8%; P less than .001 for all comparisons).

Events that occurred more frequently with IR than FCR included atrial fibrillation (2.9% vs. 0%, P = .04), and hypertension (7.4% vs. 1.9%, P = .01).

Dr. Shanafelt acknowledged that one possible barrier to the IR regimen is cost; the monthly cost of ibrutinib maintenance is about $10,000, he said, although he noted that cost considerations were not studied in the trial.

“Future trials testing novel agent combinations to see if we can eliminate the need for chronic therapy should be pursued,” he said.

The trial was sponsored by the National Cancer Institute with additional support from Pharmacyclics. Dr. Shanafelt reported patents and royalties from the Mayo Clinic, and research funding from Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Abbvie, Pharmacyclics, and Janssen.

SOURCE: Shanafelt TD et al. ASH 2018, Abstract LBA-4.

*Correction, 12/12/2018: An earlier version of this story misstated the P value in two comparisons.

SAN DIEGO – The combination of ibrutinib and rituximab was associated with a two-thirds reduction in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) progression, compared with standard chemoimmunotherapy in patients younger than 70 years old, interim results of a phase 3 randomized trial showed.

Among 529 patients with previously untreated, symptomatic CLL randomly assigned to ibrutinib-rituximab (IR) or to chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR), the IR regimen was associated with a 65% reduction in risk for disease progression, which was the trial’s primary endpoint.

The IR regimen was also associated with better overall survival out to 4 years of follow-up, reported Tait D. Shanafelt, MD, of Stanford (Calif.) University.

“This establishes ibrutinib-based therapy as the most effective treatment tested to date in this disease for untreated patients,” he said at a media briefing prior at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The study results are likely to dethrone FCR as the most active chemoimmunotherapy regimen against CLL, Dr. Shanafelt said.

In the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group E1912 trial, 529 patients aged 70 or younger with previously untreated CLL were enrolled and randomly assigned on a 2:1 basis to either standard therapy with six cycles of FCR according to standard protocols (175 patients), or IR, with ibrutinib 420 mg daily for each cycle, and rituximab delivered 50 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 of cycle 2, and 325 mg/m² on day 2 of the same cycle, and 500 mg/m² on day 1 for all remaining cycles (354 patients).

From cycle 8 until progression, patients in the IR arm received daily ibrutinib 420 mg.

Dr. Shanafelt presented results from both an intention-to-treat analysis and a per-protocol analysis excluding 22 patients in the IR arm and 9 patients in the FCR arm who were randomized but later found not to meet eligibility criteria.

After a mean follow-up of 34 months, there were 37 PFS events in the IR arm, compared with 40 events in the FCR arm in an intention-to-treat analysis. The difference translated into a hazard ratio for progression of 0.35 with IR (P less than .00001).

The results were similar in the per-protocol analysis, with an HR of 0.32 favoring IR (P less than .00001).*

There were four deaths in the IR arm, compared with 10 in the FCR arm at the time of the data lock, translating into a hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival of 0.17 (P less than .0003) in the intention-to-treat analysis, and 0.13 in the per-protocol analysis (P less than .0001).

Dr. Shanafelt noted that although the overall number of deaths was relatively small, there were twice as many patients enrolled in the IR arm as in the FCR arm, meaning that the rate of deaths in the FCR arm was fivefold higher than in the IR arm.

In a subgroup analysis of PFS, IR was superior to FCR regardless of patient age, sex, performance status, disease stage, or the presence or absence of the 11q23.3 deletion.

PFS was also significantly better with IR in patients with unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) regions (HR 0.26, P less than .00001), but not in patients with mutated IGHV.*

Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events occurred in 58.5% of patients in the IR arm, compared with 72.1% of patients in the FCR arm. Specific events that occurred significantly less often with IR included neutropenia (22.7% vs. 43.7%), anemia (2.6% vs. 12.0%), thrombocytopenia (2.9% vs. 13.9%), any infection (7.1% vs. 19.0%), and neutropenic fever (2.3% vs. 15.8%; P less than .001 for all comparisons).

Events that occurred more frequently with IR than FCR included atrial fibrillation (2.9% vs. 0%, P = .04), and hypertension (7.4% vs. 1.9%, P = .01).

Dr. Shanafelt acknowledged that one possible barrier to the IR regimen is cost; the monthly cost of ibrutinib maintenance is about $10,000, he said, although he noted that cost considerations were not studied in the trial.

“Future trials testing novel agent combinations to see if we can eliminate the need for chronic therapy should be pursued,” he said.

The trial was sponsored by the National Cancer Institute with additional support from Pharmacyclics. Dr. Shanafelt reported patents and royalties from the Mayo Clinic, and research funding from Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Abbvie, Pharmacyclics, and Janssen.

SOURCE: Shanafelt TD et al. ASH 2018, Abstract LBA-4.

*Correction, 12/12/2018: An earlier version of this story misstated the P value in two comparisons.

Photo by Jen Smith

SAN DIEGO—Early results of the DASCERN trial indicate that patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase who have a suboptimal response to imatinib as a first-line treatment benefit from switching to dasatinib at 3 months.

Twenty-nine percent of dasatinib-treated patients achieved a major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months, compared to 13% of patients who remained on imatinib (P=0.005).

Dasatinib-treated patients also attained MMR much faster than those on imatinib, at a median of 14 months, compared to 20 months for those treated with imatinib.

DASCERN is the first study, according to investigators, to explore the significance of an early switch for patients who have not achieved an early molecular response (EMR) with imatinib.

“[EMRs] are important because they correlate with the outcome of patients, certainly with progression-free survival and overall survival,” explained Jorge E. Cortes, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“[T]he possibility of changing to dasatinib appears, with these early results, to suggest that there may be a benefit to switching these patients to achieve better long-term outcomes. But also, those patients that have these early molecular responses have a better probability of achieving deep molecular responses that we desire for treatment-free remission.”

Dr. Cortes elaborated on the DASCERN data at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 788*).

Study design

DASCERN (NCT01593254) is a randomized, open-label, international, phase 2b trial in adult patients with chronic-phase CML who had achieved a complete hematologic response but still had more than 10% BCR-ABL1 transcripts at 3 months.

Patients were initially treated with imatinib at 400 mg daily, and 1,126 patients had a molecular assessment at 3 months.

Those who did not achieve an MMR (n=260) were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to 100 mg daily of dasatinib (n=174) or 400 mg daily or twice daily of imatinib (n=86).

If patients subsequently failed imatinib treatment by European LeukemiaNet standards, they could cross over to dasatinib.

“Importantly, there was a window of enrollment up to 8 weeks after the 3-month assessment, allowing for time to get response results and screen and enroll patients onto the study,” Dr. Cortes clarified.

Patients were also stratified according to Sokal risk score and time from molecular assessment to randomization.

Dr. Cortes noted that about 40% of patients were started on treatment within 4 weeks of the 3-month assessment. And another 58% were enrolled between 4 and 8 weeks from the 3-month assessment.

The primary endpoint is the achievement of MMR at 12 months from the first day of imatinib treatment; that is, at about 9 months from the start of the protocol treatment, in both trial arms.

Patient characteristics

Seventy-eight percent of patients were male, and 95% were younger than 65.

“This is a relatively younger patient population,” Dr. Cortes noted. “This has to do with the fact that this was an international study with a significant representation of patients that were from Asia (73%).”

The Asian patients were primarily from China, Dr. Cortes said, “and we know that, in some parts of the world, including Asia, patients seem to be younger.”

“This is also associated with a higher percentage of patients with high-risk Sokal scores, more than 20%,” he added. “That is different than what’s seen, for example, in the U.S. or in Europe.”

The prevalence of male patients, he said, broadly represents the distribution of patients in other parts of the world.

Patient disposition

Patients were followed for a median of 30 months.

Of the randomized patients—the intent-to-treat (ITT) population—143 (84%) in the dasatinib arm and 72 (84%) in the imatinib arm continued on treatment.

Study drug toxicity was the most common reason for discontinuing treatment and occurred in 9 patients (5%) in the dasatinib arm and 3 (4%) in the imatinib arm.

Nearly half the imatinib patients (n=42, 49%) crossed over to dasatinib at a median of 9 months.

The median duration of treatment was 22 months (range, 1 – 44) for patients on imatinib who did not cross over and 15 months (range, <1 – 38) for patients on dasatinib after crossing over from imatinib.

Response

In the ITT population, the rate of MMR at 12 months was 29% in the dasatinib arm and 13% in the imatinib arm (P=0.005).

The median time to MMR was significantly shorter for patients who received dasatinib compared with imatinib—14 months and 20 months, respectively (P=0.053).

“Over 60% of patients on the dasatinib arm achieved a major molecular response,” Dr. Cortes said. “This compares to about 55% of patients on the imatinib arm, even when you consider the crossover of a significant number of these patients.”

A few patients achieved a molecular response of a 4.5-log reduction in BCR-ABL1 transcripts (MR4.5).

“Of course, the follow-up is short, but we had twice as many patients [on dasatinib] at 12 months with MR4.5— 5% with dasatinib versus 2% with imatinib,” Dr. Cortes said.

Survival outcomes

Both overall and progression-free survival “look very good with both treatment approaches,” Dr. Cortes pointed out.

At a median follow-up of 30 months, the overall survival in the ITT population was 98.8% in each treatment arm.

Progression-free survival was 96.9% in the dasatinib arm and 97.6% in the imatinib arm.

“It is important to note that no patient in either treatment arm has transformed to accelerated or blast phase,” Dr. Cortes said.

Safety

Treatment was well tolerated with both agents, Dr. Cortes observed, with very few grade 3 adverse events (AEs) noted to date.

“The one that stands out here, and it’s only 2% of patients, is headache with dasatinib,” he said.

The headache did not lead to treatment discontinuation, and the patients were managed with dose adjustments.

The investigators observed no new safety signals with either drug.

Treatment-emergent AEs of any grade occurring in 15% or fewer dasatinib- or imatinib-treated patients, respectively, in the ITT population included headache (15%, 9%), diarrhea (9%, 8%), nausea (9%, 8%), eyelid edema (1%, 9%), hypocalcemia (1%, 7%), and muscle spasms (1%, 8%).

Patients who crossed over to dasatinib had similar rates of AEs to those documented for imatinib.

“They are typical for what we know of both of these tyrosine kinase inhibitors,” Dr. Cortes stated.

Investigators observed pleural effusion in 9 (5%) patients on dasatinib, and only one grade 3. That patient discontinued therapy due to the AE.

Of the patients who were on imatinib and crossed over to dasatinib, 3 (7%) experienced pleural effusion, most of them grade 1 or 2. One patient with grade 4 discontinued therapy with dasatinib due to the AE.

“Hematologic toxicity has been mild,” Dr. Cortes said, and in keeping with the known toxicities of dasatinib and imatinib.

Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent AEs in the dasatinib and imatinib arms, respectively, in the ITT population included anemia (5%, 4%), neutropenia (11%, 16%), thrombocytopenia (11%, 11%), and leukopenia (1%, 1%).

Patients who crossed over to dasatinib experienced more of these AEs than patients who did not cross over, Dr. Cortes clarified, but they are still within the expected range with these agents.

“We acknowledge the results are early and we need to continue following for both safety and efficacy, as it will be important to see if those rates of MR4.5 continue to increase with the same difference in favor of dasatinib that we are starting to see very early on,” Dr. Cortes said.

He disclosed serving as a consultant for Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Astellas Pharma, Novartis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, and he received research funding from Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Arog Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma, Novartis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

The study was supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb. 

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

Photo by Jen Smith

SAN DIEGO—Early results of the DASCERN trial indicate that patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase who have a suboptimal response to imatinib as a first-line treatment benefit from switching to dasatinib at 3 months.

Twenty-nine percent of dasatinib-treated patients achieved a major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months, compared to 13% of patients who remained on imatinib (P=0.005).

Dasatinib-treated patients also attained MMR much faster than those on imatinib, at a median of 14 months, compared to 20 months for those treated with imatinib.

DASCERN is the first study, according to investigators, to explore the significance of an early switch for patients who have not achieved an early molecular response (EMR) with imatinib.

“[EMRs] are important because they correlate with the outcome of patients, certainly with progression-free survival and overall survival,” explained Jorge E. Cortes, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“[T]he possibility of changing to dasatinib appears, with these early results, to suggest that there may be a benefit to switching these patients to achieve better long-term outcomes. But also, those patients that have these early molecular responses have a better probability of achieving deep molecular responses that we desire for treatment-free remission.”

Dr. Cortes elaborated on the DASCERN data at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 788*).

Study design

DASCERN (NCT01593254) is a randomized, open-label, international, phase 2b trial in adult patients with chronic-phase CML who had achieved a complete hematologic response but still had more than 10% BCR-ABL1 transcripts at 3 months.

Patients were initially treated with imatinib at 400 mg daily, and 1,126 patients had a molecular assessment at 3 months.

Those who did not achieve an MMR (n=260) were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to 100 mg daily of dasatinib (n=174) or 400 mg daily or twice daily of imatinib (n=86).

If patients subsequently failed imatinib treatment by European LeukemiaNet standards, they could cross over to dasatinib.

“Importantly, there was a window of enrollment up to 8 weeks after the 3-month assessment, allowing for time to get response results and screen and enroll patients onto the study,” Dr. Cortes clarified.

Patients were also stratified according to Sokal risk score and time from molecular assessment to randomization.

Dr. Cortes noted that about 40% of patients were started on treatment within 4 weeks of the 3-month assessment. And another 58% were enrolled between 4 and 8 weeks from the 3-month assessment.

The primary endpoint is the achievement of MMR at 12 months from the first day of imatinib treatment; that is, at about 9 months from the start of the protocol treatment, in both trial arms.

Patient characteristics

Seventy-eight percent of patients were male, and 95% were younger than 65.

“This is a relatively younger patient population,” Dr. Cortes noted. “This has to do with the fact that this was an international study with a significant representation of patients that were from Asia (73%).”

The Asian patients were primarily from China, Dr. Cortes said, “and we know that, in some parts of the world, including Asia, patients seem to be younger.”

“This is also associated with a higher percentage of patients with high-risk Sokal scores, more than 20%,” he added. “That is different than what’s seen, for example, in the U.S. or in Europe.”

The prevalence of male patients, he said, broadly represents the distribution of patients in other parts of the world.

Patient disposition

Patients were followed for a median of 30 months.

Of the randomized patients—the intent-to-treat (ITT) population—143 (84%) in the dasatinib arm and 72 (84%) in the imatinib arm continued on treatment.

Study drug toxicity was the most common reason for discontinuing treatment and occurred in 9 patients (5%) in the dasatinib arm and 3 (4%) in the imatinib arm.

Nearly half the imatinib patients (n=42, 49%) crossed over to dasatinib at a median of 9 months.

The median duration of treatment was 22 months (range, 1 – 44) for patients on imatinib who did not cross over and 15 months (range, <1 – 38) for patients on dasatinib after crossing over from imatinib.

Response

In the ITT population, the rate of MMR at 12 months was 29% in the dasatinib arm and 13% in the imatinib arm (P=0.005).

The median time to MMR was significantly shorter for patients who received dasatinib compared with imatinib—14 months and 20 months, respectively (P=0.053).

“Over 60% of patients on the dasatinib arm achieved a major molecular response,” Dr. Cortes said. “This compares to about 55% of patients on the imatinib arm, even when you consider the crossover of a significant number of these patients.”

A few patients achieved a molecular response of a 4.5-log reduction in BCR-ABL1 transcripts (MR4.5).

“Of course, the follow-up is short, but we had twice as many patients [on dasatinib] at 12 months with MR4.5— 5% with dasatinib versus 2% with imatinib,” Dr. Cortes said.

Survival outcomes

Both overall and progression-free survival “look very good with both treatment approaches,” Dr. Cortes pointed out.

At a median follow-up of 30 months, the overall survival in the ITT population was 98.8% in each treatment arm.

Progression-free survival was 96.9% in the dasatinib arm and 97.6% in the imatinib arm.

“It is important to note that no patient in either treatment arm has transformed to accelerated or blast phase,” Dr. Cortes said.

Safety

Treatment was well tolerated with both agents, Dr. Cortes observed, with very few grade 3 adverse events (AEs) noted to date.

“The one that stands out here, and it’s only 2% of patients, is headache with dasatinib,” he said.

The headache did not lead to treatment discontinuation, and the patients were managed with dose adjustments.

The investigators observed no new safety signals with either drug.

Treatment-emergent AEs of any grade occurring in 15% or fewer dasatinib- or imatinib-treated patients, respectively, in the ITT population included headache (15%, 9%), diarrhea (9%, 8%), nausea (9%, 8%), eyelid edema (1%, 9%), hypocalcemia (1%, 7%), and muscle spasms (1%, 8%).

Patients who crossed over to dasatinib had similar rates of AEs to those documented for imatinib.

“They are typical for what we know of both of these tyrosine kinase inhibitors,” Dr. Cortes stated.

Investigators observed pleural effusion in 9 (5%) patients on dasatinib, and only one grade 3. That patient discontinued therapy due to the AE.

Of the patients who were on imatinib and crossed over to dasatinib, 3 (7%) experienced pleural effusion, most of them grade 1 or 2. One patient with grade 4 discontinued therapy with dasatinib due to the AE.

“Hematologic toxicity has been mild,” Dr. Cortes said, and in keeping with the known toxicities of dasatinib and imatinib.

Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent AEs in the dasatinib and imatinib arms, respectively, in the ITT population included anemia (5%, 4%), neutropenia (11%, 16%), thrombocytopenia (11%, 11%), and leukopenia (1%, 1%).

Patients who crossed over to dasatinib experienced more of these AEs than patients who did not cross over, Dr. Cortes clarified, but they are still within the expected range with these agents.

“We acknowledge the results are early and we need to continue following for both safety and efficacy, as it will be important to see if those rates of MR4.5 continue to increase with the same difference in favor of dasatinib that we are starting to see very early on,” Dr. Cortes said.

He disclosed serving as a consultant for Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Astellas Pharma, Novartis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, and he received research funding from Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Arog Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma, Novartis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

The study was supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb. 

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

Photo by Jen Smith

SAN DIEGO—Early results of the DASCERN trial indicate that patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase who have a suboptimal response to imatinib as a first-line treatment benefit from switching to dasatinib at 3 months.

Twenty-nine percent of dasatinib-treated patients achieved a major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months, compared to 13% of patients who remained on imatinib (P=0.005).

Dasatinib-treated patients also attained MMR much faster than those on imatinib, at a median of 14 months, compared to 20 months for those treated with imatinib.

DASCERN is the first study, according to investigators, to explore the significance of an early switch for patients who have not achieved an early molecular response (EMR) with imatinib.

“[EMRs] are important because they correlate with the outcome of patients, certainly with progression-free survival and overall survival,” explained Jorge E. Cortes, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“[T]he possibility of changing to dasatinib appears, with these early results, to suggest that there may be a benefit to switching these patients to achieve better long-term outcomes. But also, those patients that have these early molecular responses have a better probability of achieving deep molecular responses that we desire for treatment-free remission.”

Dr. Cortes elaborated on the DASCERN data at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 788*).

Study design

DASCERN (NCT01593254) is a randomized, open-label, international, phase 2b trial in adult patients with chronic-phase CML who had achieved a complete hematologic response but still had more than 10% BCR-ABL1 transcripts at 3 months.

Patients were initially treated with imatinib at 400 mg daily, and 1,126 patients had a molecular assessment at 3 months.

Those who did not achieve an MMR (n=260) were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to 100 mg daily of dasatinib (n=174) or 400 mg daily or twice daily of imatinib (n=86).

If patients subsequently failed imatinib treatment by European LeukemiaNet standards, they could cross over to dasatinib.

“Importantly, there was a window of enrollment up to 8 weeks after the 3-month assessment, allowing for time to get response results and screen and enroll patients onto the study,” Dr. Cortes clarified.

Patients were also stratified according to Sokal risk score and time from molecular assessment to randomization.

Dr. Cortes noted that about 40% of patients were started on treatment within 4 weeks of the 3-month assessment. And another 58% were enrolled between 4 and 8 weeks from the 3-month assessment.

The primary endpoint is the achievement of MMR at 12 months from the first day of imatinib treatment; that is, at about 9 months from the start of the protocol treatment, in both trial arms.

Patient characteristics

Seventy-eight percent of patients were male, and 95% were younger than 65.

“This is a relatively younger patient population,” Dr. Cortes noted. “This has to do with the fact that this was an international study with a significant representation of patients that were from Asia (73%).”

The Asian patients were primarily from China, Dr. Cortes said, “and we know that, in some parts of the world, including Asia, patients seem to be younger.”

“This is also associated with a higher percentage of patients with high-risk Sokal scores, more than 20%,” he added. “That is different than what’s seen, for example, in the U.S. or in Europe.”

The prevalence of male patients, he said, broadly represents the distribution of patients in other parts of the world.

Patient disposition

Patients were followed for a median of 30 months.

Of the randomized patients—the intent-to-treat (ITT) population—143 (84%) in the dasatinib arm and 72 (84%) in the imatinib arm continued on treatment.

Study drug toxicity was the most common reason for discontinuing treatment and occurred in 9 patients (5%) in the dasatinib arm and 3 (4%) in the imatinib arm.

Nearly half the imatinib patients (n=42, 49%) crossed over to dasatinib at a median of 9 months.

The median duration of treatment was 22 months (range, 1 – 44) for patients on imatinib who did not cross over and 15 months (range, <1 – 38) for patients on dasatinib after crossing over from imatinib.

Response

In the ITT population, the rate of MMR at 12 months was 29% in the dasatinib arm and 13% in the imatinib arm (P=0.005).

The median time to MMR was significantly shorter for patients who received dasatinib compared with imatinib—14 months and 20 months, respectively (P=0.053).

“Over 60% of patients on the dasatinib arm achieved a major molecular response,” Dr. Cortes said. “This compares to about 55% of patients on the imatinib arm, even when you consider the crossover of a significant number of these patients.”

A few patients achieved a molecular response of a 4.5-log reduction in BCR-ABL1 transcripts (MR4.5).

“Of course, the follow-up is short, but we had twice as many patients [on dasatinib] at 12 months with MR4.5— 5% with dasatinib versus 2% with imatinib,” Dr. Cortes said.

Survival outcomes

Both overall and progression-free survival “look very good with both treatment approaches,” Dr. Cortes pointed out.

At a median follow-up of 30 months, the overall survival in the ITT population was 98.8% in each treatment arm.

Progression-free survival was 96.9% in the dasatinib arm and 97.6% in the imatinib arm.

“It is important to note that no patient in either treatment arm has transformed to accelerated or blast phase,” Dr. Cortes said.

Safety

Treatment was well tolerated with both agents, Dr. Cortes observed, with very few grade 3 adverse events (AEs) noted to date.

“The one that stands out here, and it’s only 2% of patients, is headache with dasatinib,” he said.

The headache did not lead to treatment discontinuation, and the patients were managed with dose adjustments.

The investigators observed no new safety signals with either drug.

Treatment-emergent AEs of any grade occurring in 15% or fewer dasatinib- or imatinib-treated patients, respectively, in the ITT population included headache (15%, 9%), diarrhea (9%, 8%), nausea (9%, 8%), eyelid edema (1%, 9%), hypocalcemia (1%, 7%), and muscle spasms (1%, 8%).

Patients who crossed over to dasatinib had similar rates of AEs to those documented for imatinib.

“They are typical for what we know of both of these tyrosine kinase inhibitors,” Dr. Cortes stated.

Investigators observed pleural effusion in 9 (5%) patients on dasatinib, and only one grade 3. That patient discontinued therapy due to the AE.

Of the patients who were on imatinib and crossed over to dasatinib, 3 (7%) experienced pleural effusion, most of them grade 1 or 2. One patient with grade 4 discontinued therapy with dasatinib due to the AE.

“Hematologic toxicity has been mild,” Dr. Cortes said, and in keeping with the known toxicities of dasatinib and imatinib.

Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent AEs in the dasatinib and imatinib arms, respectively, in the ITT population included anemia (5%, 4%), neutropenia (11%, 16%), thrombocytopenia (11%, 11%), and leukopenia (1%, 1%).

Patients who crossed over to dasatinib experienced more of these AEs than patients who did not cross over, Dr. Cortes clarified, but they are still within the expected range with these agents.

“We acknowledge the results are early and we need to continue following for both safety and efficacy, as it will be important to see if those rates of MR4.5 continue to increase with the same difference in favor of dasatinib that we are starting to see very early on,” Dr. Cortes said.

He disclosed serving as a consultant for Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Astellas Pharma, Novartis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, and he received research funding from Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Arog Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma, Novartis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

The study was supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb. 

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.