LayerRx Mapping ID
293
Slot System
Featured Buckets
Featured Buckets Admin
Medscape Lead Concept
921

Novel cEEG-based scoring system predicts inpatient seizure risk

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/07/2019 - 13:16

– A novel scoring system based on six readily available seizure risk factors from a patient’s history and continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring appears to accurately predict seizures in acutely ill hospitalized patients.

Dr. Aaron Struck

The final model of the system, dubbed the 2HELPS2B score, has an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.821, suggesting a “good overall fit,” Aaron Struck, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

However, more relevant than the AUC and suggestive of high classification accuracy is the low calibration error of 2.7%, which shows that the actual incidence of seizures within a particular risk group is, on average, within 2.7% of predicted incidence, Dr. Struck of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, explained in an interview.

The use of cEEG has expanded, largely because of a high incidence of subclinical seizures in hospitalized patients with encephalopathy; EEG features believed to predict seizures include epileptiform discharges and periodic discharges, but the ways in which these variables may jointly affect seizure risk have not been studied, he said.

He and his colleagues used a prospective database to derive a dataset containing 24 clinical and electroencephalographic variables for 5,427 cEEG sessions of at least 24 hours each, and then, using a machine-learning method known as RiskSLIM, created a scoring system model to estimate seizure risk in patients undergoing cEEG.

The name of the scoring system – 2HELPS2B – represents the six variables included in the final model:

  • 2 H is for frequency greater than 2.0 Hz for any periodic rhythmic pattern (1 point).
  • E is for sporadic epileptiform discharges (1 point).
  • L is for the presence of lateralized periodic discharges, lateralized rhythmic delta activity, or bilateral independent periodic discharges (1 point).
  • P is for the presence of “plus” features, including superimposed, rhythmic, sharp, or fast activity (1 point).
  • S is for prior seizure (1 point).
  • 2B is for brief, potentially ictal, rhythmic discharges (2 points).

The predicted seizure risk rose with score, such that the seizure risk was less than 5% for a score of 0, 12% for 1, 27% for 2, 50% for 3, 73% for 4, 88% for 5, and greater than 95% for 6-7, Dr. Struck said. “Really, anything over 2 points, you’re at substantial risk for having seizures.”

Limitations of the study, which are being addressed in an ongoing, multicenter, prospective validation trial through the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium, are mainly related to the constraints of the database; the duration of EEG needed to accurately calculate the 2HELPS2B score wasn’t defined, and cEEGs were of varying length.

“So in our validation study moving forward, these are two things we will address,” he said. “We also want to show that this is something that’s useful on a day-to-day basis – that it accurately gauges the degree of variability or potential severity of the ictal-interictal continuum pattern.”

With validation, Dr. Struck said that the 2HELPS2B score could ultimately be used to rapidly communicate seizure potential based on EEG severity and to guide decision making with respect to initiation of empiric antiseizure medication.

Findings from the validation study are “trending in the right direction,” but the confidence intervals are wide, as only 404 patients have been included at this point, Dr. Struck said.

This study was supported by a research infrastructure award from the American Epilepsy Society and the Epilepsy Foundation.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Struck A et al. Neurology. 2018 Apr 90(15 Suppl.):S11.002.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Related Articles

– A novel scoring system based on six readily available seizure risk factors from a patient’s history and continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring appears to accurately predict seizures in acutely ill hospitalized patients.

Dr. Aaron Struck

The final model of the system, dubbed the 2HELPS2B score, has an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.821, suggesting a “good overall fit,” Aaron Struck, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

However, more relevant than the AUC and suggestive of high classification accuracy is the low calibration error of 2.7%, which shows that the actual incidence of seizures within a particular risk group is, on average, within 2.7% of predicted incidence, Dr. Struck of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, explained in an interview.

The use of cEEG has expanded, largely because of a high incidence of subclinical seizures in hospitalized patients with encephalopathy; EEG features believed to predict seizures include epileptiform discharges and periodic discharges, but the ways in which these variables may jointly affect seizure risk have not been studied, he said.

He and his colleagues used a prospective database to derive a dataset containing 24 clinical and electroencephalographic variables for 5,427 cEEG sessions of at least 24 hours each, and then, using a machine-learning method known as RiskSLIM, created a scoring system model to estimate seizure risk in patients undergoing cEEG.

The name of the scoring system – 2HELPS2B – represents the six variables included in the final model:

  • 2 H is for frequency greater than 2.0 Hz for any periodic rhythmic pattern (1 point).
  • E is for sporadic epileptiform discharges (1 point).
  • L is for the presence of lateralized periodic discharges, lateralized rhythmic delta activity, or bilateral independent periodic discharges (1 point).
  • P is for the presence of “plus” features, including superimposed, rhythmic, sharp, or fast activity (1 point).
  • S is for prior seizure (1 point).
  • 2B is for brief, potentially ictal, rhythmic discharges (2 points).

The predicted seizure risk rose with score, such that the seizure risk was less than 5% for a score of 0, 12% for 1, 27% for 2, 50% for 3, 73% for 4, 88% for 5, and greater than 95% for 6-7, Dr. Struck said. “Really, anything over 2 points, you’re at substantial risk for having seizures.”

Limitations of the study, which are being addressed in an ongoing, multicenter, prospective validation trial through the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium, are mainly related to the constraints of the database; the duration of EEG needed to accurately calculate the 2HELPS2B score wasn’t defined, and cEEGs were of varying length.

“So in our validation study moving forward, these are two things we will address,” he said. “We also want to show that this is something that’s useful on a day-to-day basis – that it accurately gauges the degree of variability or potential severity of the ictal-interictal continuum pattern.”

With validation, Dr. Struck said that the 2HELPS2B score could ultimately be used to rapidly communicate seizure potential based on EEG severity and to guide decision making with respect to initiation of empiric antiseizure medication.

Findings from the validation study are “trending in the right direction,” but the confidence intervals are wide, as only 404 patients have been included at this point, Dr. Struck said.

This study was supported by a research infrastructure award from the American Epilepsy Society and the Epilepsy Foundation.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Struck A et al. Neurology. 2018 Apr 90(15 Suppl.):S11.002.

– A novel scoring system based on six readily available seizure risk factors from a patient’s history and continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring appears to accurately predict seizures in acutely ill hospitalized patients.

Dr. Aaron Struck

The final model of the system, dubbed the 2HELPS2B score, has an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.821, suggesting a “good overall fit,” Aaron Struck, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

However, more relevant than the AUC and suggestive of high classification accuracy is the low calibration error of 2.7%, which shows that the actual incidence of seizures within a particular risk group is, on average, within 2.7% of predicted incidence, Dr. Struck of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, explained in an interview.

The use of cEEG has expanded, largely because of a high incidence of subclinical seizures in hospitalized patients with encephalopathy; EEG features believed to predict seizures include epileptiform discharges and periodic discharges, but the ways in which these variables may jointly affect seizure risk have not been studied, he said.

He and his colleagues used a prospective database to derive a dataset containing 24 clinical and electroencephalographic variables for 5,427 cEEG sessions of at least 24 hours each, and then, using a machine-learning method known as RiskSLIM, created a scoring system model to estimate seizure risk in patients undergoing cEEG.

The name of the scoring system – 2HELPS2B – represents the six variables included in the final model:

  • 2 H is for frequency greater than 2.0 Hz for any periodic rhythmic pattern (1 point).
  • E is for sporadic epileptiform discharges (1 point).
  • L is for the presence of lateralized periodic discharges, lateralized rhythmic delta activity, or bilateral independent periodic discharges (1 point).
  • P is for the presence of “plus” features, including superimposed, rhythmic, sharp, or fast activity (1 point).
  • S is for prior seizure (1 point).
  • 2B is for brief, potentially ictal, rhythmic discharges (2 points).

The predicted seizure risk rose with score, such that the seizure risk was less than 5% for a score of 0, 12% for 1, 27% for 2, 50% for 3, 73% for 4, 88% for 5, and greater than 95% for 6-7, Dr. Struck said. “Really, anything over 2 points, you’re at substantial risk for having seizures.”

Limitations of the study, which are being addressed in an ongoing, multicenter, prospective validation trial through the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium, are mainly related to the constraints of the database; the duration of EEG needed to accurately calculate the 2HELPS2B score wasn’t defined, and cEEGs were of varying length.

“So in our validation study moving forward, these are two things we will address,” he said. “We also want to show that this is something that’s useful on a day-to-day basis – that it accurately gauges the degree of variability or potential severity of the ictal-interictal continuum pattern.”

With validation, Dr. Struck said that the 2HELPS2B score could ultimately be used to rapidly communicate seizure potential based on EEG severity and to guide decision making with respect to initiation of empiric antiseizure medication.

Findings from the validation study are “trending in the right direction,” but the confidence intervals are wide, as only 404 patients have been included at this point, Dr. Struck said.

This study was supported by a research infrastructure award from the American Epilepsy Society and the Epilepsy Foundation.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Struck A et al. Neurology. 2018 Apr 90(15 Suppl.):S11.002.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM AAN 2018

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: A novel scoring system appears to predict EEG seizure risk in acutely ill hospitalized patients.

Major finding: The 2HELPS2B score has an AUC of 0.821 and calibration error of 2.7%.

Study details: An analysis of 5,427 cEEG sessions to develop a risk scoring system model.

Disclosures: This study was supported by a research infrastructure award from the American Epilepsy Society and the Epilepsy Foundation.

Source: Struck A et al. Neurology. 2018 Apr 90(15 Suppl.):S11.002.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Data support universal adoption of neuroimaging in early-life epilepsy

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:51

 

There is broad acceptance for the use of guideline-endorsed neuroimaging studies as the standard of care in evaluating early-life epilepsy across U.S pediatric centers, an observational study shows.

Zerbor/Thinkstock

Furthermore, the study authors reported, the use of neuroimaging is supported by their data, which showed that a brain MRI obtained up to 1 year after an early-life epilepsy (ELE) diagnosis provides a high diagnostic yield, regardless of clinical factors – including seizure type or development.

“Neuroimaging, and MRI in particular, frequently identifies an etiology for ELE, enhancing the ability of neurologists to provide a precise diagnosis, offer anticipatory guidance, and consider the full array of available therapies,” wrote Jason Coryell, MD, a child neurologist, and his colleagues Aug. 8 in Pediatrics.

Early childhood epilepsy occurs in 1-2 out of every 1,000 children under age 3, Dr. Coryell and his colleagues said. Consensus guidelines recommend MRI for the evaluation of ELE, but no data evaluate whether it is being used in clinical practice, said Dr. Coryell of the Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, and his colleagues. The research team, therefore, set out to identify the yield and findings of neuroimaging in incident cases of epilepsy in 775 children with newly diagnosed ELE (diagnosed before age 3 years) seen at 17 U.S. pediatric epilepsy centers between 2012 and 2015.

They found that the use of neuroimaging was high, with 725 children (93.5%) having had a neuroimaging study. Of those, 714 had an MRI as recommended in current guidelines (87% with seizure protocols), and 11 had computed tomography or ultrasound only.

According to Dr. Coryell and his colleagues, the high use of MRI in the cohort likely could be attributed to three factors: neuroimaging is recommended in guidelines, the improved accessibility of imaging, and increased physician familiarity with the role of MRI in epilepsy.

Overall, 40% of the children (n = 290) had etiologically relevant abnormalities, a rate that the authors noted was higher than previous estimates. These included an acquired injury in 97 (13.4%), malformations of cortical development in 56 (7.7%), and other diffuse disorders of brain development in 51 (7.0%).

Neuroimaging was abnormal in 61% (160 of 262) of children with abnormal development at diagnosis, compared with 24% (113 of 463) with typical development.

Structural abnormalities also were high and most common in children with focal seizure semiology (40%), spasms (47%), or unclear semiology (42%).

In children without spasms or focal semiology with typical development, 16% (29 of 185 children) had imaging abnormalities. Pathogenic genetic variants were identified in 44% (53 of 121) of children with abnormal neuroimaging in whom genetic testing was performed.

The research team concluded that their data supported the universal adoption of imaging guidelines for ELE, because the yield was substantially high – even in the lowest-risk group.

“In our cohort 1 in 6 children presenting with typical development and without either focal seizures or spasms still had abnormal neuroimaging,” Dr. Coryell and his coauthors wrote. “This supports the continued adherence to guidelines.”

They advised that next steps include standardization of ELE MRI protocol. “Although there has been widespread adoption of epilepsy protocols, these have been geared toward identification of hippocampal abnormalities in older children and adults rather than toward the young, myelinating brain,” the researchers added.

The team noted several limitations. One limitation cited is the study’s identification of patients by using tertiary centers that might provide care for children who are more severely affected than those in the general population.

The Pediatric Epilepsy Research Foundation in Dallas funded the research. Dr. Coryell and his colleagues said they have no financial disclosures. Several of the researchers declared potential conflicts of interest relating to consulting fees.

SOURCE: Coryell J et al. Pediatrics. 2018 Aug 8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018.0672.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

There is broad acceptance for the use of guideline-endorsed neuroimaging studies as the standard of care in evaluating early-life epilepsy across U.S pediatric centers, an observational study shows.

Zerbor/Thinkstock

Furthermore, the study authors reported, the use of neuroimaging is supported by their data, which showed that a brain MRI obtained up to 1 year after an early-life epilepsy (ELE) diagnosis provides a high diagnostic yield, regardless of clinical factors – including seizure type or development.

“Neuroimaging, and MRI in particular, frequently identifies an etiology for ELE, enhancing the ability of neurologists to provide a precise diagnosis, offer anticipatory guidance, and consider the full array of available therapies,” wrote Jason Coryell, MD, a child neurologist, and his colleagues Aug. 8 in Pediatrics.

Early childhood epilepsy occurs in 1-2 out of every 1,000 children under age 3, Dr. Coryell and his colleagues said. Consensus guidelines recommend MRI for the evaluation of ELE, but no data evaluate whether it is being used in clinical practice, said Dr. Coryell of the Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, and his colleagues. The research team, therefore, set out to identify the yield and findings of neuroimaging in incident cases of epilepsy in 775 children with newly diagnosed ELE (diagnosed before age 3 years) seen at 17 U.S. pediatric epilepsy centers between 2012 and 2015.

They found that the use of neuroimaging was high, with 725 children (93.5%) having had a neuroimaging study. Of those, 714 had an MRI as recommended in current guidelines (87% with seizure protocols), and 11 had computed tomography or ultrasound only.

According to Dr. Coryell and his colleagues, the high use of MRI in the cohort likely could be attributed to three factors: neuroimaging is recommended in guidelines, the improved accessibility of imaging, and increased physician familiarity with the role of MRI in epilepsy.

Overall, 40% of the children (n = 290) had etiologically relevant abnormalities, a rate that the authors noted was higher than previous estimates. These included an acquired injury in 97 (13.4%), malformations of cortical development in 56 (7.7%), and other diffuse disorders of brain development in 51 (7.0%).

Neuroimaging was abnormal in 61% (160 of 262) of children with abnormal development at diagnosis, compared with 24% (113 of 463) with typical development.

Structural abnormalities also were high and most common in children with focal seizure semiology (40%), spasms (47%), or unclear semiology (42%).

In children without spasms or focal semiology with typical development, 16% (29 of 185 children) had imaging abnormalities. Pathogenic genetic variants were identified in 44% (53 of 121) of children with abnormal neuroimaging in whom genetic testing was performed.

The research team concluded that their data supported the universal adoption of imaging guidelines for ELE, because the yield was substantially high – even in the lowest-risk group.

“In our cohort 1 in 6 children presenting with typical development and without either focal seizures or spasms still had abnormal neuroimaging,” Dr. Coryell and his coauthors wrote. “This supports the continued adherence to guidelines.”

They advised that next steps include standardization of ELE MRI protocol. “Although there has been widespread adoption of epilepsy protocols, these have been geared toward identification of hippocampal abnormalities in older children and adults rather than toward the young, myelinating brain,” the researchers added.

The team noted several limitations. One limitation cited is the study’s identification of patients by using tertiary centers that might provide care for children who are more severely affected than those in the general population.

The Pediatric Epilepsy Research Foundation in Dallas funded the research. Dr. Coryell and his colleagues said they have no financial disclosures. Several of the researchers declared potential conflicts of interest relating to consulting fees.

SOURCE: Coryell J et al. Pediatrics. 2018 Aug 8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018.0672.

 

There is broad acceptance for the use of guideline-endorsed neuroimaging studies as the standard of care in evaluating early-life epilepsy across U.S pediatric centers, an observational study shows.

Zerbor/Thinkstock

Furthermore, the study authors reported, the use of neuroimaging is supported by their data, which showed that a brain MRI obtained up to 1 year after an early-life epilepsy (ELE) diagnosis provides a high diagnostic yield, regardless of clinical factors – including seizure type or development.

“Neuroimaging, and MRI in particular, frequently identifies an etiology for ELE, enhancing the ability of neurologists to provide a precise diagnosis, offer anticipatory guidance, and consider the full array of available therapies,” wrote Jason Coryell, MD, a child neurologist, and his colleagues Aug. 8 in Pediatrics.

Early childhood epilepsy occurs in 1-2 out of every 1,000 children under age 3, Dr. Coryell and his colleagues said. Consensus guidelines recommend MRI for the evaluation of ELE, but no data evaluate whether it is being used in clinical practice, said Dr. Coryell of the Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, and his colleagues. The research team, therefore, set out to identify the yield and findings of neuroimaging in incident cases of epilepsy in 775 children with newly diagnosed ELE (diagnosed before age 3 years) seen at 17 U.S. pediatric epilepsy centers between 2012 and 2015.

They found that the use of neuroimaging was high, with 725 children (93.5%) having had a neuroimaging study. Of those, 714 had an MRI as recommended in current guidelines (87% with seizure protocols), and 11 had computed tomography or ultrasound only.

According to Dr. Coryell and his colleagues, the high use of MRI in the cohort likely could be attributed to three factors: neuroimaging is recommended in guidelines, the improved accessibility of imaging, and increased physician familiarity with the role of MRI in epilepsy.

Overall, 40% of the children (n = 290) had etiologically relevant abnormalities, a rate that the authors noted was higher than previous estimates. These included an acquired injury in 97 (13.4%), malformations of cortical development in 56 (7.7%), and other diffuse disorders of brain development in 51 (7.0%).

Neuroimaging was abnormal in 61% (160 of 262) of children with abnormal development at diagnosis, compared with 24% (113 of 463) with typical development.

Structural abnormalities also were high and most common in children with focal seizure semiology (40%), spasms (47%), or unclear semiology (42%).

In children without spasms or focal semiology with typical development, 16% (29 of 185 children) had imaging abnormalities. Pathogenic genetic variants were identified in 44% (53 of 121) of children with abnormal neuroimaging in whom genetic testing was performed.

The research team concluded that their data supported the universal adoption of imaging guidelines for ELE, because the yield was substantially high – even in the lowest-risk group.

“In our cohort 1 in 6 children presenting with typical development and without either focal seizures or spasms still had abnormal neuroimaging,” Dr. Coryell and his coauthors wrote. “This supports the continued adherence to guidelines.”

They advised that next steps include standardization of ELE MRI protocol. “Although there has been widespread adoption of epilepsy protocols, these have been geared toward identification of hippocampal abnormalities in older children and adults rather than toward the young, myelinating brain,” the researchers added.

The team noted several limitations. One limitation cited is the study’s identification of patients by using tertiary centers that might provide care for children who are more severely affected than those in the general population.

The Pediatric Epilepsy Research Foundation in Dallas funded the research. Dr. Coryell and his colleagues said they have no financial disclosures. Several of the researchers declared potential conflicts of interest relating to consulting fees.

SOURCE: Coryell J et al. Pediatrics. 2018 Aug 8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018.0672.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM PEDIATRICS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Brain MRI obtained up to 1 year after early-life epilepsy diagnosis provides a high diagnostic yield regardless of clinical factors, including seizure type or development.

Major finding: Most (93.5%) of the study cohort of 775 children with ELE underwent neuroimaging. A 40% rate of etiologically related abnormalities was observed, and structural abnormalities were high and most common in children with focal seizure semiology (40%), spasms (47%), or unclear semiology (42%).

Study details: Prospective study of 775 children (under 3 years old at onset) with a new diagnosis of epilepsy seen at 17 U.S. pediatric epilepsy centers.

Disclosures: The research was funded by the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Foundation in Dallas. Dr. Coryell and the other authors said they have no financial disclosures. Several of the researchers declared potential conflicts of interest relating to consulting fees.

Source: Coryell J et al. Pediatrics. 2018 Aug 8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0672.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Status Epilepticus in Pregnancy

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 14:45

Andrew N. Wilner, MD, FAAN, FACP

Angels Neurological Centers

Abington, MA

 

Clinical History

A 37-year-old pregnant African American woman with a history of epilepsy and polysubstance abuse was found unresponsive in a hotel room. She had four convulsions en route to the hospital. In transit, she received levetiracetam and phenytoin, resulting in the cessation of the clinical seizures.

According to her mother, seizures began at age 16 during her first pregnancy, which was complicated by hypertension. She was prescribed medications for hypertension and phenytoin for seizures. The patient provided a different history, claiming that her seizures began 2 years ago. She denied taking medication for seizures or other health problems.

The patient has two children, ages 22 and 11 years. Past medical history is otherwise unremarkable. She has no allergies. Social history includes cigarette smoking, and alcohol and substance abuse. She lives with her boyfriend and does not work. She is 25 weeks pregnant. Family history was notable only for migraine in her mother and grandmother.

 

Physical Examination    

In the emergency department, blood pressure was 135/65, pulse 121 beats per minute, and oxygen saturation was 97%. She was oriented only to self and did not follow commands. Pupils were equal and reactive. There was no facial asymmetry. She moved all 4 extremities spontaneously. Reflexes were brisk. Oral mucosa was dry. She had no edema in the lower extremities.

 

Laboratories

Chest x-ray was normal. EKG revealed tachycardia and nonspecific ST changes. Hemoglobin was 11.1 g/dl, hematocrit 32%, white blood cell count 10,900, and platelets 181,000. Electrolytes were normal except for a low sodium of 132 mmol/l (135-145) and bicarbonate of 17 mmol/l (21-31). Glucose was initially 67 mg/dl and dropped to 46 mg/dl. Total protein was 6 g/dl (6.7-8.2) and albumin was 2.7 g/dl (3.2-5.5). Metabolic panel was otherwise normal. Urinalysis was positive for glucose, ketones, and a small amount of blood and protein. There were no bacteria. Blood and urine cultures were negative. Phenytoin level was undetectable. Urine drug screen was positive for cannabinoids and cocaine.

 

Hospital Course

Hypoglycemia was treated with an ampule of D50 and intravenous fluids. On the obstetrics ward, nurses observed several episodes of head and eye deviation to the right accompanied by decreased responsiveness that lasted approximately 30 seconds. The patient was sent to the electrophysiology lab where an EEG revealed a diffusely slow background (Figure 1).

 

Figure 1. Generalized Slowing

 

During the 20-minute EEG recording, the patient had six clinical seizures similar to those described by the nurses. These events correlated with an ictal pattern consisting of 11 HZ_sharp activity in the right occipital temporal region that spread to the right parietal and left occipital temporal regions (Figure 2). Head CT revealed mild generalized atrophy and an enlarged right occipital horn, but no acute lesions (Figure 3).

 

Figure 2. Partial seizure originating in right occipital temporal region

Figure 3. Mild generalized arophy, greater in right hemisphere

The patient was transferred to intensive care and received fosphenytoin. No further clinical and /or electrographic seizures were identified. The following day, an EEG revealed diffuse slowing without focal seizures (Figure 4). The patient gradually became more alert and cooperative over the next 24 hours. However, the next day no fetal heartbeat was detected. Labor was induced and a stillborn baby delivered. The pathology report indicated that the placenta was between the 5th and 10th percentile for gestational age.

Figure 4. Improved generalized slowing

 

Discussion

Status epilepticus is associated with significant morbidity and mortality (Claassen et al. 2002). This 37-year-old pregnant woman had an episode of focal status epilepticus with impaired awareness likely provoked by nonadherence to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Cocaine may have contributed to the episode of status epilepticus (Majlesi et al. 2010). The obstetric service did not diagnose preeclampsia.

 

The patient’s seizures started in the right occipital region, which was abnormal on neuroimaging. An MRI might have revealed more subtle structural abnormalities such as cortical dysplasia as the etiology of her epilepsy, but she refused the scan.

 

Women with epilepsy are at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia, preterm labor, and stillbirth and should be considered high risk (MacDonald et al. 2015). Serum levels of AEDs such as lamotrigine, levetiracetam and phenytoin may decrease during pregnancy and contribute to breakthrough seizures. Accordingly, monthly measurements of serum levels of AEDs during the entire course of the pregnancy are strongly recommended. These measurements allow for a timely adjustment of AED doses to prevent significant drop in their serum concentrations and minimize the occurrence of breakthrough seizures. In the case of phenytoin, measurement of free and total serum concentrations are recommended. Supplementation with at least 0.4 mg/day to 1 mg /day of folic acid (and up to 4 mg /day) has been recommended (Harden et al. 2009a). Of note, there is no increase in the incidence of status epilepticus due to pregnancy per se (Harden et al. 2009b).

 

Although the patient survived this episode of status epilepticus, her fetus did not. Antiseizure drug nonadherence and polysubstance abuse probably contributed to fetal demise.

 

References

Claassen J, Lokin JK, Fitzsimons BFM et al. Predictors of functional disability and mortality after status epilepticus. Neurology. 2002;58:139-142.

 

Harden CL, Pennell PB, Koppel BS et al. Practice Parameter update: Management issues for women with epilepsy Focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): Vitamin K, folic acid, blood levels, and breastfeeding: Neurology 2009a;73:142-149.

 

Harden CL, Hopp J, Ting TY et al. Practice Parameter update: Management issues for women with epilepsy-focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): Obstetrical complications and change in seizure frequency. Neurology 2009b;50(5):1229-36.

 

 

MacDonald SC, Bateman BT, McElrath TF, Hernandez-Diaz S. Mortality and morbidity during delivery hospitalization among pregnant women with epilepsy in the United States. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(9):981-988.

 

Majlesi N, Shih R, Fiesseler FW et al. Cocaine-associated seizures and incidence of status epilepticus. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2010;XI(2):157-160.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Andrew N. Wilner, MD, FAAN, FACP

Angels Neurological Centers

Abington, MA

 

Clinical History

A 37-year-old pregnant African American woman with a history of epilepsy and polysubstance abuse was found unresponsive in a hotel room. She had four convulsions en route to the hospital. In transit, she received levetiracetam and phenytoin, resulting in the cessation of the clinical seizures.

According to her mother, seizures began at age 16 during her first pregnancy, which was complicated by hypertension. She was prescribed medications for hypertension and phenytoin for seizures. The patient provided a different history, claiming that her seizures began 2 years ago. She denied taking medication for seizures or other health problems.

The patient has two children, ages 22 and 11 years. Past medical history is otherwise unremarkable. She has no allergies. Social history includes cigarette smoking, and alcohol and substance abuse. She lives with her boyfriend and does not work. She is 25 weeks pregnant. Family history was notable only for migraine in her mother and grandmother.

 

Physical Examination    

In the emergency department, blood pressure was 135/65, pulse 121 beats per minute, and oxygen saturation was 97%. She was oriented only to self and did not follow commands. Pupils were equal and reactive. There was no facial asymmetry. She moved all 4 extremities spontaneously. Reflexes were brisk. Oral mucosa was dry. She had no edema in the lower extremities.

 

Laboratories

Chest x-ray was normal. EKG revealed tachycardia and nonspecific ST changes. Hemoglobin was 11.1 g/dl, hematocrit 32%, white blood cell count 10,900, and platelets 181,000. Electrolytes were normal except for a low sodium of 132 mmol/l (135-145) and bicarbonate of 17 mmol/l (21-31). Glucose was initially 67 mg/dl and dropped to 46 mg/dl. Total protein was 6 g/dl (6.7-8.2) and albumin was 2.7 g/dl (3.2-5.5). Metabolic panel was otherwise normal. Urinalysis was positive for glucose, ketones, and a small amount of blood and protein. There were no bacteria. Blood and urine cultures were negative. Phenytoin level was undetectable. Urine drug screen was positive for cannabinoids and cocaine.

 

Hospital Course

Hypoglycemia was treated with an ampule of D50 and intravenous fluids. On the obstetrics ward, nurses observed several episodes of head and eye deviation to the right accompanied by decreased responsiveness that lasted approximately 30 seconds. The patient was sent to the electrophysiology lab where an EEG revealed a diffusely slow background (Figure 1).

 

Figure 1. Generalized Slowing

 

During the 20-minute EEG recording, the patient had six clinical seizures similar to those described by the nurses. These events correlated with an ictal pattern consisting of 11 HZ_sharp activity in the right occipital temporal region that spread to the right parietal and left occipital temporal regions (Figure 2). Head CT revealed mild generalized atrophy and an enlarged right occipital horn, but no acute lesions (Figure 3).

 

Figure 2. Partial seizure originating in right occipital temporal region

Figure 3. Mild generalized arophy, greater in right hemisphere

The patient was transferred to intensive care and received fosphenytoin. No further clinical and /or electrographic seizures were identified. The following day, an EEG revealed diffuse slowing without focal seizures (Figure 4). The patient gradually became more alert and cooperative over the next 24 hours. However, the next day no fetal heartbeat was detected. Labor was induced and a stillborn baby delivered. The pathology report indicated that the placenta was between the 5th and 10th percentile for gestational age.

Figure 4. Improved generalized slowing

 

Discussion

Status epilepticus is associated with significant morbidity and mortality (Claassen et al. 2002). This 37-year-old pregnant woman had an episode of focal status epilepticus with impaired awareness likely provoked by nonadherence to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Cocaine may have contributed to the episode of status epilepticus (Majlesi et al. 2010). The obstetric service did not diagnose preeclampsia.

 

The patient’s seizures started in the right occipital region, which was abnormal on neuroimaging. An MRI might have revealed more subtle structural abnormalities such as cortical dysplasia as the etiology of her epilepsy, but she refused the scan.

 

Women with epilepsy are at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia, preterm labor, and stillbirth and should be considered high risk (MacDonald et al. 2015). Serum levels of AEDs such as lamotrigine, levetiracetam and phenytoin may decrease during pregnancy and contribute to breakthrough seizures. Accordingly, monthly measurements of serum levels of AEDs during the entire course of the pregnancy are strongly recommended. These measurements allow for a timely adjustment of AED doses to prevent significant drop in their serum concentrations and minimize the occurrence of breakthrough seizures. In the case of phenytoin, measurement of free and total serum concentrations are recommended. Supplementation with at least 0.4 mg/day to 1 mg /day of folic acid (and up to 4 mg /day) has been recommended (Harden et al. 2009a). Of note, there is no increase in the incidence of status epilepticus due to pregnancy per se (Harden et al. 2009b).

 

Although the patient survived this episode of status epilepticus, her fetus did not. Antiseizure drug nonadherence and polysubstance abuse probably contributed to fetal demise.

 

References

Claassen J, Lokin JK, Fitzsimons BFM et al. Predictors of functional disability and mortality after status epilepticus. Neurology. 2002;58:139-142.

 

Harden CL, Pennell PB, Koppel BS et al. Practice Parameter update: Management issues for women with epilepsy Focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): Vitamin K, folic acid, blood levels, and breastfeeding: Neurology 2009a;73:142-149.

 

Harden CL, Hopp J, Ting TY et al. Practice Parameter update: Management issues for women with epilepsy-focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): Obstetrical complications and change in seizure frequency. Neurology 2009b;50(5):1229-36.

 

 

MacDonald SC, Bateman BT, McElrath TF, Hernandez-Diaz S. Mortality and morbidity during delivery hospitalization among pregnant women with epilepsy in the United States. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(9):981-988.

 

Majlesi N, Shih R, Fiesseler FW et al. Cocaine-associated seizures and incidence of status epilepticus. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2010;XI(2):157-160.

Andrew N. Wilner, MD, FAAN, FACP

Angels Neurological Centers

Abington, MA

 

Clinical History

A 37-year-old pregnant African American woman with a history of epilepsy and polysubstance abuse was found unresponsive in a hotel room. She had four convulsions en route to the hospital. In transit, she received levetiracetam and phenytoin, resulting in the cessation of the clinical seizures.

According to her mother, seizures began at age 16 during her first pregnancy, which was complicated by hypertension. She was prescribed medications for hypertension and phenytoin for seizures. The patient provided a different history, claiming that her seizures began 2 years ago. She denied taking medication for seizures or other health problems.

The patient has two children, ages 22 and 11 years. Past medical history is otherwise unremarkable. She has no allergies. Social history includes cigarette smoking, and alcohol and substance abuse. She lives with her boyfriend and does not work. She is 25 weeks pregnant. Family history was notable only for migraine in her mother and grandmother.

 

Physical Examination    

In the emergency department, blood pressure was 135/65, pulse 121 beats per minute, and oxygen saturation was 97%. She was oriented only to self and did not follow commands. Pupils were equal and reactive. There was no facial asymmetry. She moved all 4 extremities spontaneously. Reflexes were brisk. Oral mucosa was dry. She had no edema in the lower extremities.

 

Laboratories

Chest x-ray was normal. EKG revealed tachycardia and nonspecific ST changes. Hemoglobin was 11.1 g/dl, hematocrit 32%, white blood cell count 10,900, and platelets 181,000. Electrolytes were normal except for a low sodium of 132 mmol/l (135-145) and bicarbonate of 17 mmol/l (21-31). Glucose was initially 67 mg/dl and dropped to 46 mg/dl. Total protein was 6 g/dl (6.7-8.2) and albumin was 2.7 g/dl (3.2-5.5). Metabolic panel was otherwise normal. Urinalysis was positive for glucose, ketones, and a small amount of blood and protein. There were no bacteria. Blood and urine cultures were negative. Phenytoin level was undetectable. Urine drug screen was positive for cannabinoids and cocaine.

 

Hospital Course

Hypoglycemia was treated with an ampule of D50 and intravenous fluids. On the obstetrics ward, nurses observed several episodes of head and eye deviation to the right accompanied by decreased responsiveness that lasted approximately 30 seconds. The patient was sent to the electrophysiology lab where an EEG revealed a diffusely slow background (Figure 1).

 

Figure 1. Generalized Slowing

 

During the 20-minute EEG recording, the patient had six clinical seizures similar to those described by the nurses. These events correlated with an ictal pattern consisting of 11 HZ_sharp activity in the right occipital temporal region that spread to the right parietal and left occipital temporal regions (Figure 2). Head CT revealed mild generalized atrophy and an enlarged right occipital horn, but no acute lesions (Figure 3).

 

Figure 2. Partial seizure originating in right occipital temporal region

Figure 3. Mild generalized arophy, greater in right hemisphere

The patient was transferred to intensive care and received fosphenytoin. No further clinical and /or electrographic seizures were identified. The following day, an EEG revealed diffuse slowing without focal seizures (Figure 4). The patient gradually became more alert and cooperative over the next 24 hours. However, the next day no fetal heartbeat was detected. Labor was induced and a stillborn baby delivered. The pathology report indicated that the placenta was between the 5th and 10th percentile for gestational age.

Figure 4. Improved generalized slowing

 

Discussion

Status epilepticus is associated with significant morbidity and mortality (Claassen et al. 2002). This 37-year-old pregnant woman had an episode of focal status epilepticus with impaired awareness likely provoked by nonadherence to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Cocaine may have contributed to the episode of status epilepticus (Majlesi et al. 2010). The obstetric service did not diagnose preeclampsia.

 

The patient’s seizures started in the right occipital region, which was abnormal on neuroimaging. An MRI might have revealed more subtle structural abnormalities such as cortical dysplasia as the etiology of her epilepsy, but she refused the scan.

 

Women with epilepsy are at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia, preterm labor, and stillbirth and should be considered high risk (MacDonald et al. 2015). Serum levels of AEDs such as lamotrigine, levetiracetam and phenytoin may decrease during pregnancy and contribute to breakthrough seizures. Accordingly, monthly measurements of serum levels of AEDs during the entire course of the pregnancy are strongly recommended. These measurements allow for a timely adjustment of AED doses to prevent significant drop in their serum concentrations and minimize the occurrence of breakthrough seizures. In the case of phenytoin, measurement of free and total serum concentrations are recommended. Supplementation with at least 0.4 mg/day to 1 mg /day of folic acid (and up to 4 mg /day) has been recommended (Harden et al. 2009a). Of note, there is no increase in the incidence of status epilepticus due to pregnancy per se (Harden et al. 2009b).

 

Although the patient survived this episode of status epilepticus, her fetus did not. Antiseizure drug nonadherence and polysubstance abuse probably contributed to fetal demise.

 

References

Claassen J, Lokin JK, Fitzsimons BFM et al. Predictors of functional disability and mortality after status epilepticus. Neurology. 2002;58:139-142.

 

Harden CL, Pennell PB, Koppel BS et al. Practice Parameter update: Management issues for women with epilepsy Focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): Vitamin K, folic acid, blood levels, and breastfeeding: Neurology 2009a;73:142-149.

 

Harden CL, Hopp J, Ting TY et al. Practice Parameter update: Management issues for women with epilepsy-focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): Obstetrical complications and change in seizure frequency. Neurology 2009b;50(5):1229-36.

 

 

MacDonald SC, Bateman BT, McElrath TF, Hernandez-Diaz S. Mortality and morbidity during delivery hospitalization among pregnant women with epilepsy in the United States. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(9):981-988.

 

Majlesi N, Shih R, Fiesseler FW et al. Cocaine-associated seizures and incidence of status epilepticus. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2010;XI(2):157-160.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Thu, 08/02/2018 - 12:00
Un-Gate On Date
Thu, 08/02/2018 - 12:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Thu, 08/02/2018 - 12:00

Role of Astrocyte Glutamine Synthetase in Epilepsy

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 15:19
Display Headline
Role of Astrocyte Glutamine Synthetase in Epilepsy
J Neurosci Res; ePub 2018 Jul 18; Eid et al.

Astrocyte glutamine synthetase may play an important role in the etiology of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy suggests a recent review in the Journal of Neuroscience Research.

  • Investigators from the Yale School of Medicine and Southern Illinois School of Medicine believe that inhibition, loss, or dysfunction of the enzyme in astrocytes may be one of the causative factors responsible for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.
  • Their review of the scientific evidence included a study of astrocyte abnormalities related to aquaporin 4, potassium channel Kir4.1, monocarboxylate transporters MCT1 and MCT2, amino acid transporters EAAT1 and EAA2, and glutamine synthetase.
  • Their theory on the role of glutamine synthetase prompted the researchers to suggest that the mechanisms that control the enzyme may be worth consideration as targets for new antiepileptic drugs.

 

Eid T, Lee TW, Patrylo P, Zaveri HP. Astrocytes and glutamine synthetase in epileptogenesis [published online ahead of print July 18, 2018]. J Neurosci Res. 2018: doi: 10.1002/jnr.24267.   

Publications
Topics
Sections
J Neurosci Res; ePub 2018 Jul 18; Eid et al.
J Neurosci Res; ePub 2018 Jul 18; Eid et al.

Astrocyte glutamine synthetase may play an important role in the etiology of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy suggests a recent review in the Journal of Neuroscience Research.

  • Investigators from the Yale School of Medicine and Southern Illinois School of Medicine believe that inhibition, loss, or dysfunction of the enzyme in astrocytes may be one of the causative factors responsible for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.
  • Their review of the scientific evidence included a study of astrocyte abnormalities related to aquaporin 4, potassium channel Kir4.1, monocarboxylate transporters MCT1 and MCT2, amino acid transporters EAAT1 and EAA2, and glutamine synthetase.
  • Their theory on the role of glutamine synthetase prompted the researchers to suggest that the mechanisms that control the enzyme may be worth consideration as targets for new antiepileptic drugs.

 

Eid T, Lee TW, Patrylo P, Zaveri HP. Astrocytes and glutamine synthetase in epileptogenesis [published online ahead of print July 18, 2018]. J Neurosci Res. 2018: doi: 10.1002/jnr.24267.   

Astrocyte glutamine synthetase may play an important role in the etiology of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy suggests a recent review in the Journal of Neuroscience Research.

  • Investigators from the Yale School of Medicine and Southern Illinois School of Medicine believe that inhibition, loss, or dysfunction of the enzyme in astrocytes may be one of the causative factors responsible for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.
  • Their review of the scientific evidence included a study of astrocyte abnormalities related to aquaporin 4, potassium channel Kir4.1, monocarboxylate transporters MCT1 and MCT2, amino acid transporters EAAT1 and EAA2, and glutamine synthetase.
  • Their theory on the role of glutamine synthetase prompted the researchers to suggest that the mechanisms that control the enzyme may be worth consideration as targets for new antiepileptic drugs.

 

Eid T, Lee TW, Patrylo P, Zaveri HP. Astrocytes and glutamine synthetase in epileptogenesis [published online ahead of print July 18, 2018]. J Neurosci Res. 2018: doi: 10.1002/jnr.24267.   

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Role of Astrocyte Glutamine Synthetase in Epilepsy
Display Headline
Role of Astrocyte Glutamine Synthetase in Epilepsy
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 15:15
Un-Gate On Date
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 15:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 15:15

Interictal Ripples Predict Surgical Outcomes

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 15:14
Display Headline
Interictal Ripples Predict Surgical Outcomes
Ann Neurol; ePub 2018 Jul 18; Tamilia et al.

The presence of interictal ripples in an intracranial EEG may serve as useful biomarkers suggests an analysis of data from 27 children who underwent epilepsy surgery.

  • The average rate of onset ripples located inside a resected area of the brain predicted a patient’s outcome (odds ratio, 5.37, P=.02)
  • Mean onset ripple rate was associated with the Engel class metric for measuring outcomes.
  • Resection of the onset ripple zone was linked to good surgical outcomes (P=.047).
  • On the other hand, there was no correlation between spread ripple zone, isolated-ripple zone, or spike zones and outcomes.

 

Tamilia E, Park EH, Percivati S, et al. Surgical resection of ripple onset predicts outcome in pediatric epilepsy [published online ahead of print July 18, 2018]. Ann Neurol.  2018: doi: 10.1002/ana.25295

Publications
Topics
Sections
Ann Neurol; ePub 2018 Jul 18; Tamilia et al.
Ann Neurol; ePub 2018 Jul 18; Tamilia et al.

The presence of interictal ripples in an intracranial EEG may serve as useful biomarkers suggests an analysis of data from 27 children who underwent epilepsy surgery.

  • The average rate of onset ripples located inside a resected area of the brain predicted a patient’s outcome (odds ratio, 5.37, P=.02)
  • Mean onset ripple rate was associated with the Engel class metric for measuring outcomes.
  • Resection of the onset ripple zone was linked to good surgical outcomes (P=.047).
  • On the other hand, there was no correlation between spread ripple zone, isolated-ripple zone, or spike zones and outcomes.

 

Tamilia E, Park EH, Percivati S, et al. Surgical resection of ripple onset predicts outcome in pediatric epilepsy [published online ahead of print July 18, 2018]. Ann Neurol.  2018: doi: 10.1002/ana.25295

The presence of interictal ripples in an intracranial EEG may serve as useful biomarkers suggests an analysis of data from 27 children who underwent epilepsy surgery.

  • The average rate of onset ripples located inside a resected area of the brain predicted a patient’s outcome (odds ratio, 5.37, P=.02)
  • Mean onset ripple rate was associated with the Engel class metric for measuring outcomes.
  • Resection of the onset ripple zone was linked to good surgical outcomes (P=.047).
  • On the other hand, there was no correlation between spread ripple zone, isolated-ripple zone, or spike zones and outcomes.

 

Tamilia E, Park EH, Percivati S, et al. Surgical resection of ripple onset predicts outcome in pediatric epilepsy [published online ahead of print July 18, 2018]. Ann Neurol.  2018: doi: 10.1002/ana.25295

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Interictal Ripples Predict Surgical Outcomes
Display Headline
Interictal Ripples Predict Surgical Outcomes
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 15:15
Un-Gate On Date
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 15:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 15:15

Magnetoencephalography Offers Clues in Absence Seizures

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 15:14
Display Headline
Magnetoencephalography Offers Clues in Absence Seizures
Epilepsy Res; 2018 Sept; Youssofzadeh et al.

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and network-based analyses can help characterize absence epilepsy in children according to a study that looked at 16 patients between ages 6 and 12 years who had absence epilepsy.

  • Researchers found functional/anatomical hubs in a network that contained bilateral precuneus, left thalamus, three anterior cerebellar subunits of lobule IV-V, vermis, and lobule III.
  • Their analysis suggests that these hubs, which are highly connected brain areas, exist in focal cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar areas during absence seizures.
  • The existence of hubs in thalami, precuneus and cingulate cortex suggest bilaterally distributed networks of cortical and subcortical regions that may be responsible for seizures.
  • Hubs in the anterior cerebellum may be related to terminating motor automatism seen in absence seizures.

 

Youssofzadeh, V, Agler W, Tenney JF, Kadis DS. Whole-brain MEG connectivity-based analyses reveals critical hubs in childhood absence epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2018;145:102-109.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Epilepsy Res; 2018 Sept; Youssofzadeh et al.
Epilepsy Res; 2018 Sept; Youssofzadeh et al.

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and network-based analyses can help characterize absence epilepsy in children according to a study that looked at 16 patients between ages 6 and 12 years who had absence epilepsy.

  • Researchers found functional/anatomical hubs in a network that contained bilateral precuneus, left thalamus, three anterior cerebellar subunits of lobule IV-V, vermis, and lobule III.
  • Their analysis suggests that these hubs, which are highly connected brain areas, exist in focal cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar areas during absence seizures.
  • The existence of hubs in thalami, precuneus and cingulate cortex suggest bilaterally distributed networks of cortical and subcortical regions that may be responsible for seizures.
  • Hubs in the anterior cerebellum may be related to terminating motor automatism seen in absence seizures.

 

Youssofzadeh, V, Agler W, Tenney JF, Kadis DS. Whole-brain MEG connectivity-based analyses reveals critical hubs in childhood absence epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2018;145:102-109.

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and network-based analyses can help characterize absence epilepsy in children according to a study that looked at 16 patients between ages 6 and 12 years who had absence epilepsy.

  • Researchers found functional/anatomical hubs in a network that contained bilateral precuneus, left thalamus, three anterior cerebellar subunits of lobule IV-V, vermis, and lobule III.
  • Their analysis suggests that these hubs, which are highly connected brain areas, exist in focal cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar areas during absence seizures.
  • The existence of hubs in thalami, precuneus and cingulate cortex suggest bilaterally distributed networks of cortical and subcortical regions that may be responsible for seizures.
  • Hubs in the anterior cerebellum may be related to terminating motor automatism seen in absence seizures.

 

Youssofzadeh, V, Agler W, Tenney JF, Kadis DS. Whole-brain MEG connectivity-based analyses reveals critical hubs in childhood absence epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2018;145:102-109.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Magnetoencephalography Offers Clues in Absence Seizures
Display Headline
Magnetoencephalography Offers Clues in Absence Seizures
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 15:15
Un-Gate On Date
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 15:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 15:15

FDA Approves Deep Brain Stimulation System

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 16:40
Display Headline
FDA Approves Deep Brain Stimulation System
JAMA; 2018 June 5; Voelker

The Food and Drug Administration has approved a deep brain stimulation system that has been shown to reduce seizures in a select group of patients with epilepsy.

  • Medtronics DBS System for Epilepsy has been cleared as adjunct treatment for patients with partial onset seizures with or without secondary generalization.
  • The system is only indicated for patients who have not responded to 3 or more antiepileptic drugs and who have experienced an average of 6 or more seizures each month for the last 3 months.
  • The FDA approval also stipulates that the patients’ seizures be no more than 30 days apart.
  • The DBS System includes a pulse generator that is implanted in a patient’s chest and 2 lead wires implanted in the brain.

Voelker R. Electrical stimulation for epilepsy. JAMA; 2018;319(21):2164.

Publications
Topics
Sections
JAMA; 2018 June 5; Voelker
JAMA; 2018 June 5; Voelker

The Food and Drug Administration has approved a deep brain stimulation system that has been shown to reduce seizures in a select group of patients with epilepsy.

  • Medtronics DBS System for Epilepsy has been cleared as adjunct treatment for patients with partial onset seizures with or without secondary generalization.
  • The system is only indicated for patients who have not responded to 3 or more antiepileptic drugs and who have experienced an average of 6 or more seizures each month for the last 3 months.
  • The FDA approval also stipulates that the patients’ seizures be no more than 30 days apart.
  • The DBS System includes a pulse generator that is implanted in a patient’s chest and 2 lead wires implanted in the brain.

Voelker R. Electrical stimulation for epilepsy. JAMA; 2018;319(21):2164.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved a deep brain stimulation system that has been shown to reduce seizures in a select group of patients with epilepsy.

  • Medtronics DBS System for Epilepsy has been cleared as adjunct treatment for patients with partial onset seizures with or without secondary generalization.
  • The system is only indicated for patients who have not responded to 3 or more antiepileptic drugs and who have experienced an average of 6 or more seizures each month for the last 3 months.
  • The FDA approval also stipulates that the patients’ seizures be no more than 30 days apart.
  • The DBS System includes a pulse generator that is implanted in a patient’s chest and 2 lead wires implanted in the brain.

Voelker R. Electrical stimulation for epilepsy. JAMA; 2018;319(21):2164.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
FDA Approves Deep Brain Stimulation System
Display Headline
FDA Approves Deep Brain Stimulation System
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 16:45
Un-Gate On Date
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 16:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 16:45

Psychiatric Interventions Important for Patients with Epilepsy

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 16:39
Display Headline
Psychiatric Interventions Important for Patients with Epilepsy
Epilepsia. 2018 Jun 19; Michaelis et al.

Clinicians need to pay more attention to the psychological impact of epilepsy and its treatment according to a report from the International League Against Epilepsy Psychology Task Force.

  • The task force identified the best interventions for depression, neurocognitive problems, and medication adherence.
  • Several psychological strategies are worth consideration according to the task force, including cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based treatment.
  • These interventions have the potential to improve health-related quality of life among adults and children.
  • The recommendations outlined by the League are based primarily on evidence discussed in a recent Cochrane review of randomized clinical trials that evaluated psychological treatment of patients with epilepsy.

Michaelis R, Tang V, Goldstein LH, et al. Psychological treatments for adults and children with epilepsy: Evidence-based recommendations by the International League Against Epilepsy Psychology Task Force. Epilepsia. 2018;59(7):1282-1302.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Epilepsia. 2018 Jun 19; Michaelis et al.
Epilepsia. 2018 Jun 19; Michaelis et al.

Clinicians need to pay more attention to the psychological impact of epilepsy and its treatment according to a report from the International League Against Epilepsy Psychology Task Force.

  • The task force identified the best interventions for depression, neurocognitive problems, and medication adherence.
  • Several psychological strategies are worth consideration according to the task force, including cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based treatment.
  • These interventions have the potential to improve health-related quality of life among adults and children.
  • The recommendations outlined by the League are based primarily on evidence discussed in a recent Cochrane review of randomized clinical trials that evaluated psychological treatment of patients with epilepsy.

Michaelis R, Tang V, Goldstein LH, et al. Psychological treatments for adults and children with epilepsy: Evidence-based recommendations by the International League Against Epilepsy Psychology Task Force. Epilepsia. 2018;59(7):1282-1302.

Clinicians need to pay more attention to the psychological impact of epilepsy and its treatment according to a report from the International League Against Epilepsy Psychology Task Force.

  • The task force identified the best interventions for depression, neurocognitive problems, and medication adherence.
  • Several psychological strategies are worth consideration according to the task force, including cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based treatment.
  • These interventions have the potential to improve health-related quality of life among adults and children.
  • The recommendations outlined by the League are based primarily on evidence discussed in a recent Cochrane review of randomized clinical trials that evaluated psychological treatment of patients with epilepsy.

Michaelis R, Tang V, Goldstein LH, et al. Psychological treatments for adults and children with epilepsy: Evidence-based recommendations by the International League Against Epilepsy Psychology Task Force. Epilepsia. 2018;59(7):1282-1302.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Psychiatric Interventions Important for Patients with Epilepsy
Display Headline
Psychiatric Interventions Important for Patients with Epilepsy
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 16:45
Un-Gate On Date
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 16:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 16:45

No Differences Found Between Generic/Brand Name Epileptic Medication

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 16:39
Display Headline
No Differences Found Between Generic/Brand Name Epileptic Medication
Epilepsia; 2018 Jun 18; Holtkamp et al

Switching patients from brand name antiepileptic drugs to generics is generally safe and cost effective according to an analysis published in Epilepsia.

  • Researchers looked at data on bioequivalence, health care utilization, and clinical studies on the safety of antiepileptic agents, including a comparison of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration.
  • For most of the drugs that were evaluated, there were negligible differences in AUC and peak plasma concentration between generic drugs and brand name equivalents.
  • There were significant increases in health care usage when patients were switched from brand name to generic versions.
  • Clinical studies were unable to detect differences in seizure frequency or tolerability.

 

Holtkamp M, Theodore WH. Generic antiepileptic drugs—safe or harmful in patients with epilepsy? Epilepsia. 2018;59(7):1273-1281.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Epilepsia; 2018 Jun 18; Holtkamp et al
Epilepsia; 2018 Jun 18; Holtkamp et al

Switching patients from brand name antiepileptic drugs to generics is generally safe and cost effective according to an analysis published in Epilepsia.

  • Researchers looked at data on bioequivalence, health care utilization, and clinical studies on the safety of antiepileptic agents, including a comparison of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration.
  • For most of the drugs that were evaluated, there were negligible differences in AUC and peak plasma concentration between generic drugs and brand name equivalents.
  • There were significant increases in health care usage when patients were switched from brand name to generic versions.
  • Clinical studies were unable to detect differences in seizure frequency or tolerability.

 

Holtkamp M, Theodore WH. Generic antiepileptic drugs—safe or harmful in patients with epilepsy? Epilepsia. 2018;59(7):1273-1281.

Switching patients from brand name antiepileptic drugs to generics is generally safe and cost effective according to an analysis published in Epilepsia.

  • Researchers looked at data on bioequivalence, health care utilization, and clinical studies on the safety of antiepileptic agents, including a comparison of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration.
  • For most of the drugs that were evaluated, there were negligible differences in AUC and peak plasma concentration between generic drugs and brand name equivalents.
  • There were significant increases in health care usage when patients were switched from brand name to generic versions.
  • Clinical studies were unable to detect differences in seizure frequency or tolerability.

 

Holtkamp M, Theodore WH. Generic antiepileptic drugs—safe or harmful in patients with epilepsy? Epilepsia. 2018;59(7):1273-1281.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
No Differences Found Between Generic/Brand Name Epileptic Medication
Display Headline
No Differences Found Between Generic/Brand Name Epileptic Medication
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 16:45
Un-Gate On Date
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 16:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 16:45

Questions abound about availability, legality of new cannabis-derived epilepsy drug

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/07/2019 - 13:15

 

The first-ever federal approval of a marijuana-derived drug, Epidiolex (cannabidiol), comes with a cloud of complications.

Dr. Jacqueline A. French
The drug, approved by the Food and Drug Administration in June to treat Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome in patients aged 2 years or older, is expected to be so expensive that those seeking it for off-label uses may join those who buy unregulated cannabis products on the open market. And legal complications could prevent some neurologists from prescribing Epidiolex at its planned fall launch.

Epidiolex is an oral solution of purified cannabidiol (CBD), a component of the marijuana plant that does not make people high.

According to the results of a phase 3 trial in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome published earlier this year, median monthly drop seizures fell by 43.9% in a Epidiolex group compared with 21.8% in a placebo group (Lancet. 2018;391[10125]:1085-96). A 2017 study found that patients with Dravet syndrome who took the drug had fewer median convulsive seizures per month, dropping from 12.4 to 5.9, while there was barely a difference for the placebo group (N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2011-20). In both trials, patients received Epidiolex as an add-on treatment.

“There definitely are side effects such as sleepiness, abnormal liver function values, and other things that people will have to watch out for, such as interactions with other drugs,” Jacqueline A. French, MD, professor of neurology at New York University and chief scientific officer of the Epilepsy Foundation, said in an interview. “But it will definitely be a great benefit to some and a benefit to many.”

It’s not clear how the drug works, she said.

Greenwich Biosciences, the U.S. subsidiary of British drug maker GW Pharmaceuticals, plans to market Epidiolex this fall, spokesman Steve Schultz said in an interview. First, however, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency must reschedule the drug so it doesn’t fall under federal antimarijuana laws. It has 90 days after the FDA approval to do so, and its rescheduling is expected.

Then the focus will turn to the states, which have a crazy quilt of laws about marijuana and its medical use. “We’ve worked with the state legislators to enact laws or to modify laws to allow for our medicine to be made available,” Mr. Schultz said. “There may be one or two that we’re still working on.”

At issue: States and the District of Columbia have a wide variety of laws that appear to affect the sale of Epidiolex.

According to the website procon.org, 30 states and the District of Columbia allow medical marijuana, although the laws vary regarding what is allowed and do not address cannabis-derived pharmaceuticals.

Another 17 states have laws that address CBD specifically, often with language that allows its use to treat epilepsy in all or specific cases, according to procon.org.

Rod Kight
The Kentucky law, for instance, only allows prescriptions by hospitals and clinics linked to public universities. A law in Missouri, according to procon.org, only allows the use of certain kinds of “cannabis oil” for intractable epilepsy and “requires a neurologist to determine that the patient did not respond to at least three treatment options to be eligible to use the marijuana extract.”

 

 


In Oklahoma, an anticannabis law excludes “from the definition of marijuana ‘any federal Food and Drug Administration–approved cannabidiol drug or substance.’ ”

North Carolina attorney Rod Kight, who represents businesses in the cannabis industry, predicts that “once the federal government [via the DEA] changes the law, the states will fall in line. The only thing that would prevent them would be a lack of understanding of what’s going on.”

Meanwhile, many sellers of CBD-based products continue to promote their use as treatments for epilepsy and many other conditions.

Legal exceptions made by states for FDA-approved CBD-based drugs could affect access to unapproved CBD-based products. It’s also possible that Epidiolex could hurt sellers of cannabis products in other ways. “They’ll now have to compete with a drug made to a specific strength and purity, and that’s probably going to have some impact on their business,” William J. McNichol, adjunct professor at Rutgers Law School, Camden, N.J., said in an interview. “If you have a choice, are you going to choose aspirin I made myself in my artisan aspirin factory that the FDA never saw? Or aspirin made by Bayer?”

William J. McNichol
But there’s a big obstacle to the widespread use of Epidiolex, especially for off-label uses for other types of epilepsy: It’s expected to cost $25,000 a year.

What’s next? For one, the FDA’s approval of Epidiolex seems likely to open the door for more cannabis-based medications. “The FDA is quite open to evaluating cannabinoid-based medicines as long as they go through their process,” said Mr. Schultz, the Greenwich Biosciences spokesman.

As for the legal front, Mr. Kight said potential changes in federal law could expand the legality of cannabis-based products by allowing them when they’re derived from “industrial hemp.” This could mean that patients with epilepsy will have more legal ways to buy CBD products.



Regardless of the legal situation, Mr. Kight said, “a physician can explain to patients across the board about how CBD might benefit them. The physician can say there are extract products that are out there and available over the counter.”

As for the maker of Epidiolex, GW Pharmaceuticals is recruiting for a phase 3 trial of a cannabinoid treatment for tuberous sclerosis complex, Mr. Schultz said. The results are due in the first half of 2019.

The company is also conducting cannabinoid research in the areas of autism and Rett syndrome, Mr. Schultz said, adding: “We also have done work in schizophrenia and in oncology and glioblastoma.”

Mr. Kight disclosed that he represents companies in the cannabis industry. Dr. French is president of the Epilepsy Study Consortium and disclosed working with multiple drug makers in the epilepsy field, including GW Pharmaceuticals. Dr. French receives fixed compensation by the consortium and is not paid by any pharmaceutical company. Mr. McNichol reported no relevant disclosures.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The first-ever federal approval of a marijuana-derived drug, Epidiolex (cannabidiol), comes with a cloud of complications.

Dr. Jacqueline A. French
The drug, approved by the Food and Drug Administration in June to treat Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome in patients aged 2 years or older, is expected to be so expensive that those seeking it for off-label uses may join those who buy unregulated cannabis products on the open market. And legal complications could prevent some neurologists from prescribing Epidiolex at its planned fall launch.

Epidiolex is an oral solution of purified cannabidiol (CBD), a component of the marijuana plant that does not make people high.

According to the results of a phase 3 trial in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome published earlier this year, median monthly drop seizures fell by 43.9% in a Epidiolex group compared with 21.8% in a placebo group (Lancet. 2018;391[10125]:1085-96). A 2017 study found that patients with Dravet syndrome who took the drug had fewer median convulsive seizures per month, dropping from 12.4 to 5.9, while there was barely a difference for the placebo group (N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2011-20). In both trials, patients received Epidiolex as an add-on treatment.

“There definitely are side effects such as sleepiness, abnormal liver function values, and other things that people will have to watch out for, such as interactions with other drugs,” Jacqueline A. French, MD, professor of neurology at New York University and chief scientific officer of the Epilepsy Foundation, said in an interview. “But it will definitely be a great benefit to some and a benefit to many.”

It’s not clear how the drug works, she said.

Greenwich Biosciences, the U.S. subsidiary of British drug maker GW Pharmaceuticals, plans to market Epidiolex this fall, spokesman Steve Schultz said in an interview. First, however, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency must reschedule the drug so it doesn’t fall under federal antimarijuana laws. It has 90 days after the FDA approval to do so, and its rescheduling is expected.

Then the focus will turn to the states, which have a crazy quilt of laws about marijuana and its medical use. “We’ve worked with the state legislators to enact laws or to modify laws to allow for our medicine to be made available,” Mr. Schultz said. “There may be one or two that we’re still working on.”

At issue: States and the District of Columbia have a wide variety of laws that appear to affect the sale of Epidiolex.

According to the website procon.org, 30 states and the District of Columbia allow medical marijuana, although the laws vary regarding what is allowed and do not address cannabis-derived pharmaceuticals.

Another 17 states have laws that address CBD specifically, often with language that allows its use to treat epilepsy in all or specific cases, according to procon.org.

Rod Kight
The Kentucky law, for instance, only allows prescriptions by hospitals and clinics linked to public universities. A law in Missouri, according to procon.org, only allows the use of certain kinds of “cannabis oil” for intractable epilepsy and “requires a neurologist to determine that the patient did not respond to at least three treatment options to be eligible to use the marijuana extract.”

 

 


In Oklahoma, an anticannabis law excludes “from the definition of marijuana ‘any federal Food and Drug Administration–approved cannabidiol drug or substance.’ ”

North Carolina attorney Rod Kight, who represents businesses in the cannabis industry, predicts that “once the federal government [via the DEA] changes the law, the states will fall in line. The only thing that would prevent them would be a lack of understanding of what’s going on.”

Meanwhile, many sellers of CBD-based products continue to promote their use as treatments for epilepsy and many other conditions.

Legal exceptions made by states for FDA-approved CBD-based drugs could affect access to unapproved CBD-based products. It’s also possible that Epidiolex could hurt sellers of cannabis products in other ways. “They’ll now have to compete with a drug made to a specific strength and purity, and that’s probably going to have some impact on their business,” William J. McNichol, adjunct professor at Rutgers Law School, Camden, N.J., said in an interview. “If you have a choice, are you going to choose aspirin I made myself in my artisan aspirin factory that the FDA never saw? Or aspirin made by Bayer?”

William J. McNichol
But there’s a big obstacle to the widespread use of Epidiolex, especially for off-label uses for other types of epilepsy: It’s expected to cost $25,000 a year.

What’s next? For one, the FDA’s approval of Epidiolex seems likely to open the door for more cannabis-based medications. “The FDA is quite open to evaluating cannabinoid-based medicines as long as they go through their process,” said Mr. Schultz, the Greenwich Biosciences spokesman.

As for the legal front, Mr. Kight said potential changes in federal law could expand the legality of cannabis-based products by allowing them when they’re derived from “industrial hemp.” This could mean that patients with epilepsy will have more legal ways to buy CBD products.



Regardless of the legal situation, Mr. Kight said, “a physician can explain to patients across the board about how CBD might benefit them. The physician can say there are extract products that are out there and available over the counter.”

As for the maker of Epidiolex, GW Pharmaceuticals is recruiting for a phase 3 trial of a cannabinoid treatment for tuberous sclerosis complex, Mr. Schultz said. The results are due in the first half of 2019.

The company is also conducting cannabinoid research in the areas of autism and Rett syndrome, Mr. Schultz said, adding: “We also have done work in schizophrenia and in oncology and glioblastoma.”

Mr. Kight disclosed that he represents companies in the cannabis industry. Dr. French is president of the Epilepsy Study Consortium and disclosed working with multiple drug makers in the epilepsy field, including GW Pharmaceuticals. Dr. French receives fixed compensation by the consortium and is not paid by any pharmaceutical company. Mr. McNichol reported no relevant disclosures.

 

The first-ever federal approval of a marijuana-derived drug, Epidiolex (cannabidiol), comes with a cloud of complications.

Dr. Jacqueline A. French
The drug, approved by the Food and Drug Administration in June to treat Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome in patients aged 2 years or older, is expected to be so expensive that those seeking it for off-label uses may join those who buy unregulated cannabis products on the open market. And legal complications could prevent some neurologists from prescribing Epidiolex at its planned fall launch.

Epidiolex is an oral solution of purified cannabidiol (CBD), a component of the marijuana plant that does not make people high.

According to the results of a phase 3 trial in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome published earlier this year, median monthly drop seizures fell by 43.9% in a Epidiolex group compared with 21.8% in a placebo group (Lancet. 2018;391[10125]:1085-96). A 2017 study found that patients with Dravet syndrome who took the drug had fewer median convulsive seizures per month, dropping from 12.4 to 5.9, while there was barely a difference for the placebo group (N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2011-20). In both trials, patients received Epidiolex as an add-on treatment.

“There definitely are side effects such as sleepiness, abnormal liver function values, and other things that people will have to watch out for, such as interactions with other drugs,” Jacqueline A. French, MD, professor of neurology at New York University and chief scientific officer of the Epilepsy Foundation, said in an interview. “But it will definitely be a great benefit to some and a benefit to many.”

It’s not clear how the drug works, she said.

Greenwich Biosciences, the U.S. subsidiary of British drug maker GW Pharmaceuticals, plans to market Epidiolex this fall, spokesman Steve Schultz said in an interview. First, however, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency must reschedule the drug so it doesn’t fall under federal antimarijuana laws. It has 90 days after the FDA approval to do so, and its rescheduling is expected.

Then the focus will turn to the states, which have a crazy quilt of laws about marijuana and its medical use. “We’ve worked with the state legislators to enact laws or to modify laws to allow for our medicine to be made available,” Mr. Schultz said. “There may be one or two that we’re still working on.”

At issue: States and the District of Columbia have a wide variety of laws that appear to affect the sale of Epidiolex.

According to the website procon.org, 30 states and the District of Columbia allow medical marijuana, although the laws vary regarding what is allowed and do not address cannabis-derived pharmaceuticals.

Another 17 states have laws that address CBD specifically, often with language that allows its use to treat epilepsy in all or specific cases, according to procon.org.

Rod Kight
The Kentucky law, for instance, only allows prescriptions by hospitals and clinics linked to public universities. A law in Missouri, according to procon.org, only allows the use of certain kinds of “cannabis oil” for intractable epilepsy and “requires a neurologist to determine that the patient did not respond to at least three treatment options to be eligible to use the marijuana extract.”

 

 


In Oklahoma, an anticannabis law excludes “from the definition of marijuana ‘any federal Food and Drug Administration–approved cannabidiol drug or substance.’ ”

North Carolina attorney Rod Kight, who represents businesses in the cannabis industry, predicts that “once the federal government [via the DEA] changes the law, the states will fall in line. The only thing that would prevent them would be a lack of understanding of what’s going on.”

Meanwhile, many sellers of CBD-based products continue to promote their use as treatments for epilepsy and many other conditions.

Legal exceptions made by states for FDA-approved CBD-based drugs could affect access to unapproved CBD-based products. It’s also possible that Epidiolex could hurt sellers of cannabis products in other ways. “They’ll now have to compete with a drug made to a specific strength and purity, and that’s probably going to have some impact on their business,” William J. McNichol, adjunct professor at Rutgers Law School, Camden, N.J., said in an interview. “If you have a choice, are you going to choose aspirin I made myself in my artisan aspirin factory that the FDA never saw? Or aspirin made by Bayer?”

William J. McNichol
But there’s a big obstacle to the widespread use of Epidiolex, especially for off-label uses for other types of epilepsy: It’s expected to cost $25,000 a year.

What’s next? For one, the FDA’s approval of Epidiolex seems likely to open the door for more cannabis-based medications. “The FDA is quite open to evaluating cannabinoid-based medicines as long as they go through their process,” said Mr. Schultz, the Greenwich Biosciences spokesman.

As for the legal front, Mr. Kight said potential changes in federal law could expand the legality of cannabis-based products by allowing them when they’re derived from “industrial hemp.” This could mean that patients with epilepsy will have more legal ways to buy CBD products.



Regardless of the legal situation, Mr. Kight said, “a physician can explain to patients across the board about how CBD might benefit them. The physician can say there are extract products that are out there and available over the counter.”

As for the maker of Epidiolex, GW Pharmaceuticals is recruiting for a phase 3 trial of a cannabinoid treatment for tuberous sclerosis complex, Mr. Schultz said. The results are due in the first half of 2019.

The company is also conducting cannabinoid research in the areas of autism and Rett syndrome, Mr. Schultz said, adding: “We also have done work in schizophrenia and in oncology and glioblastoma.”

Mr. Kight disclosed that he represents companies in the cannabis industry. Dr. French is president of the Epilepsy Study Consortium and disclosed working with multiple drug makers in the epilepsy field, including GW Pharmaceuticals. Dr. French receives fixed compensation by the consortium and is not paid by any pharmaceutical company. Mr. McNichol reported no relevant disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica