Contraception

Key clinical point: Hispanic patients with a higher level of English language acculturation were less likely to use birth control and may require a more detailed discussion of the options for family planning.

Major finding: Hispanic women who reported using birth control had significantly lower English language acculturation compared to those who reported no birth control

Study details: The data come from surveys of 225 Hispanic women that combined the number of years lived in the U.S., the Short Acculturation Scale for Hispanics, and questions about family planning behaviors.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Chamberlain R et al. Kans J Med. 2021 Apr 19. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol1414845.

Key clinical point: Hispanic patients with a higher level of English language acculturation were less likely to use birth control and may require a more detailed discussion of the options for family planning.

Major finding: Hispanic women who reported using birth control had significantly lower English language acculturation compared to those who reported no birth control

Study details: The data come from surveys of 225 Hispanic women that combined the number of years lived in the U.S., the Short Acculturation Scale for Hispanics, and questions about family planning behaviors.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Chamberlain R et al. Kans J Med. 2021 Apr 19. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol1414845.

Key clinical point: Hispanic patients with a higher level of English language acculturation were less likely to use birth control and may require a more detailed discussion of the options for family planning.

Major finding: Hispanic women who reported using birth control had significantly lower English language acculturation compared to those who reported no birth control

Study details: The data come from surveys of 225 Hispanic women that combined the number of years lived in the U.S., the Short Acculturation Scale for Hispanics, and questions about family planning behaviors.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Chamberlain R et al. Kans J Med. 2021 Apr 19. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol1414845.

Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) represents a safe and effective contraceptive strategy. Despite national guidelines recommending universal patient access, hospitals face significant barriers to offering inpatient LARCs. It is unclear why some hospitals successfully implement immediate postpartum LARCs, while others do not.

Moniz et al conducted a comparative, multiple case study of immediate postpartum LARC implementation at eleven “early adopter” U.S. hospitals and analyzed each hospital’s implementation strategy to produce generalizable knowledge about how and under what circumstances implementation of immediate postpartum LARCs unfold successfully. Between 2017-2018, the authors conducted single-day site visits and 78 semi-structured interviews with a variety of stakeholders (clinician champions, nurses, pharmacists, revenue cycle staff, and hospital administration). On average, sites used 18 (range 11-22) implementation strategies, including assessing institutional readiness for, and barriers to, implementation of immediate postpartum LARC, engaging reproductive justice experts and community resources to address social determinants of health, involving patients in implementation planning, and developing quality monitoring processes to evaluate clinical processes and outcomes. The researchers found that successful implementation of immediate postpartum LARC required three essential conditions: effective implementation champions who are supported by a multidisciplinary implementation team; creating an enabling financial environment; and engaging hospital administration. Additional findings from this study call for more support for individuals leading change in complex care settings, intentionally designing implementation interventions that take into account local contextual influences, and meaningfully engaging patients in the implementation process.

Of postpartum women, 61% in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) have an unmet contraceptive need and many face high rates of short interpregnancy intervals (Moore). Additionally, 51%-96% of postpartum women in LMIC use short-acting methods of contraception (Moore), further highlighting the need for increased access to immediate postpartum LARC in LMIC. Data on the use and continuation of immediate postpartum LARC in LMIC is limited. Marchin et al conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine 6-month continuation rates of immediate postpartum LARCs among women in 69 low-income countries that were enrolled in the Family Planning 2020 initiative. The meta-analysis ultimately focused on the copper IUD due to the absence of relevant studies on other LARC methods. The meta-analysis of 12 studies resulted in a pooled 6-month continuation rate for immediate postpartum copper IUDs of 87%, a rate comparable to continuation rates found in higher-income countries. This estimate had significant heterogeneity between studies. Secondary outcomes of expulsion, removal, and infection rates were low at 6%, 5%, and 0.2% respectively. High 6-month continuation rates and a low rate of adverse outcomes suggest immediate postpartum copper IUD insertion represents a feasible and acceptable postpartum contraceptive option for women living in LMIC.

In cases where contraception methods fail, are used incorrectly, or are not used at all, emergency contraception (EC) can be used after intercourse to prevent pregnancy. Timely access to, and accurate knowledge of, EC are especially important for rural women who are more likely to experience an unintended pregnancy resulting in a live birth compared to urban women. Milkowski et al analyzed publicly available data from the National Survey of Family Growth to estimate differences in oral EC use, access, and counseling by rural-urban county of residence among U.S. women aged 15-44 years. 10% of rural and 19% of urban women who had ever been sexually active reported ever using EC pills. Over the course of the study period (2006-2017), the percentage of women reporting ever-use of EC increased linearly in both rural and urban populations, with the prevalence of EC ever-use more than doubling in each group. This observation likely reflects an overall increase in EC use during a time period in which the federal government enacted several policies to improve access to EC. The study findings also highlight the need for improved patient counseling on EC. While the overall prevalence of EC counseling was low among all women, rural women were less likely to have received counseling on EC when compared to urban women.

Although many studies report weight gain in users of progestin-only hormonal contraception (POC), a recent Cochrane systematic review found that there was insufficient evidence to determine the effect of POCs on weight (Lopez). Beksinska et al conducted a secondary analysis of prospective weight change among women enrolled in the Evidence for Contraceptive options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) trial, which was an open label, prospective, randomized multicenter trial that compared the risk of HIV acquisition among women randomized to injectable contraception (DMPA), the copper IUD, or a second generation two rod levonorgestrel (LNG) implant Jadelle^Ò. This trial was conducted at 12 sites across four African countries between 2015 and 2018. Eligible study participants were nonpregnant, HIV negative, sexually active women aged 16-35 years who desired contraception. The final sample size included 7,014 women randomly assigned to receive DMPA (2,293), the LNG implant (2,372), or the copper IUD (2,349). Using a standardized protocol and calibrated equipment across all study sites, weight and height were measured at baseline and at study exit at 12, 15, or 18 months. The mean weight increased amongst all three contraceptive groups and was significantly different in magnitude, with the largest gain in the DMPA group (3.5 kg), 2.4 kg in the LNG implant group, and 1.5 kg in the copper IUD group. Unlike copper IUD users, women in the DMPA and LNG implant group continued to gain weight after 1 year of contraceptive use. It is noteworthy that, regardless of contraceptive method allocation, not all women gained weight and a small proportion of women lost weight. When choosing a contraceptive method, women using POCs should be counselled about the potential side effect of weight gain.

References:
Moniz MH, Bonawitz K, Wetmore MK, et al. Implementing immediate postpartum contraception: a comparative case study at 11 hospitals. Implement Sci Commun. 2021;2(1):42. Published 2021 Apr 12.

Moore Z, Pfitzer A, Gubin R, et al. Missed opportunities for family planning: an analysis of pregnancy risk and contraceptive method use among postpartum women in 21 low- and middle-income countries. Contraception 92 (2015): 31–39.
 

Marchin A, Moss A, Harrison M. A Meta-Analysis of Postpartum Copper IUD Continuation Rates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. J Womens Health Dev. 2021;4(1):36-46.

Milkowski CM, Ziller EC, Ahrens KA. Rural-urban residence and emergency contraception use, access, and counseling in the United States, 2006-2017. Contracept X. 2021;3:100061.

Lopez L.M., Ramesh S., Chen M. Progestin-only contraceptives: effects on weight. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008815.pub2.

Beksinska et al. “Weight change among women using intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, a copper intrauterine device, or a levonorgestrel implant for contraception: Findings from a randomised, multicentre, open-label trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;34:100800.

Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) represents a safe and effective contraceptive strategy. Despite national guidelines recommending universal patient access, hospitals face significant barriers to offering inpatient LARCs. It is unclear why some hospitals successfully implement immediate postpartum LARCs, while others do not.

Moniz et al conducted a comparative, multiple case study of immediate postpartum LARC implementation at eleven “early adopter” U.S. hospitals and analyzed each hospital’s implementation strategy to produce generalizable knowledge about how and under what circumstances implementation of immediate postpartum LARCs unfold successfully. Between 2017-2018, the authors conducted single-day site visits and 78 semi-structured interviews with a variety of stakeholders (clinician champions, nurses, pharmacists, revenue cycle staff, and hospital administration). On average, sites used 18 (range 11-22) implementation strategies, including assessing institutional readiness for, and barriers to, implementation of immediate postpartum LARC, engaging reproductive justice experts and community resources to address social determinants of health, involving patients in implementation planning, and developing quality monitoring processes to evaluate clinical processes and outcomes. The researchers found that successful implementation of immediate postpartum LARC required three essential conditions: effective implementation champions who are supported by a multidisciplinary implementation team; creating an enabling financial environment; and engaging hospital administration. Additional findings from this study call for more support for individuals leading change in complex care settings, intentionally designing implementation interventions that take into account local contextual influences, and meaningfully engaging patients in the implementation process.

Of postpartum women, 61% in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) have an unmet contraceptive need and many face high rates of short interpregnancy intervals (Moore). Additionally, 51%-96% of postpartum women in LMIC use short-acting methods of contraception (Moore), further highlighting the need for increased access to immediate postpartum LARC in LMIC. Data on the use and continuation of immediate postpartum LARC in LMIC is limited. Marchin et al conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine 6-month continuation rates of immediate postpartum LARCs among women in 69 low-income countries that were enrolled in the Family Planning 2020 initiative. The meta-analysis ultimately focused on the copper IUD due to the absence of relevant studies on other LARC methods. The meta-analysis of 12 studies resulted in a pooled 6-month continuation rate for immediate postpartum copper IUDs of 87%, a rate comparable to continuation rates found in higher-income countries. This estimate had significant heterogeneity between studies. Secondary outcomes of expulsion, removal, and infection rates were low at 6%, 5%, and 0.2% respectively. High 6-month continuation rates and a low rate of adverse outcomes suggest immediate postpartum copper IUD insertion represents a feasible and acceptable postpartum contraceptive option for women living in LMIC.

In cases where contraception methods fail, are used incorrectly, or are not used at all, emergency contraception (EC) can be used after intercourse to prevent pregnancy. Timely access to, and accurate knowledge of, EC are especially important for rural women who are more likely to experience an unintended pregnancy resulting in a live birth compared to urban women. Milkowski et al analyzed publicly available data from the National Survey of Family Growth to estimate differences in oral EC use, access, and counseling by rural-urban county of residence among U.S. women aged 15-44 years. 10% of rural and 19% of urban women who had ever been sexually active reported ever using EC pills. Over the course of the study period (2006-2017), the percentage of women reporting ever-use of EC increased linearly in both rural and urban populations, with the prevalence of EC ever-use more than doubling in each group. This observation likely reflects an overall increase in EC use during a time period in which the federal government enacted several policies to improve access to EC. The study findings also highlight the need for improved patient counseling on EC. While the overall prevalence of EC counseling was low among all women, rural women were less likely to have received counseling on EC when compared to urban women.

Although many studies report weight gain in users of progestin-only hormonal contraception (POC), a recent Cochrane systematic review found that there was insufficient evidence to determine the effect of POCs on weight (Lopez). Beksinska et al conducted a secondary analysis of prospective weight change among women enrolled in the Evidence for Contraceptive options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) trial, which was an open label, prospective, randomized multicenter trial that compared the risk of HIV acquisition among women randomized to injectable contraception (DMPA), the copper IUD, or a second generation two rod levonorgestrel (LNG) implant Jadelle^Ò. This trial was conducted at 12 sites across four African countries between 2015 and 2018. Eligible study participants were nonpregnant, HIV negative, sexually active women aged 16-35 years who desired contraception. The final sample size included 7,014 women randomly assigned to receive DMPA (2,293), the LNG implant (2,372), or the copper IUD (2,349). Using a standardized protocol and calibrated equipment across all study sites, weight and height were measured at baseline and at study exit at 12, 15, or 18 months. The mean weight increased amongst all three contraceptive groups and was significantly different in magnitude, with the largest gain in the DMPA group (3.5 kg), 2.4 kg in the LNG implant group, and 1.5 kg in the copper IUD group. Unlike copper IUD users, women in the DMPA and LNG implant group continued to gain weight after 1 year of contraceptive use. It is noteworthy that, regardless of contraceptive method allocation, not all women gained weight and a small proportion of women lost weight. When choosing a contraceptive method, women using POCs should be counselled about the potential side effect of weight gain.

References:
Moniz MH, Bonawitz K, Wetmore MK, et al. Implementing immediate postpartum contraception: a comparative case study at 11 hospitals. Implement Sci Commun. 2021;2(1):42. Published 2021 Apr 12.

Moore Z, Pfitzer A, Gubin R, et al. Missed opportunities for family planning: an analysis of pregnancy risk and contraceptive method use among postpartum women in 21 low- and middle-income countries. Contraception 92 (2015): 31–39.
 

Marchin A, Moss A, Harrison M. A Meta-Analysis of Postpartum Copper IUD Continuation Rates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. J Womens Health Dev. 2021;4(1):36-46.

Milkowski CM, Ziller EC, Ahrens KA. Rural-urban residence and emergency contraception use, access, and counseling in the United States, 2006-2017. Contracept X. 2021;3:100061.

Lopez L.M., Ramesh S., Chen M. Progestin-only contraceptives: effects on weight. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008815.pub2.

Beksinska et al. “Weight change among women using intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, a copper intrauterine device, or a levonorgestrel implant for contraception: Findings from a randomised, multicentre, open-label trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;34:100800.

Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) represents a safe and effective contraceptive strategy. Despite national guidelines recommending universal patient access, hospitals face significant barriers to offering inpatient LARCs. It is unclear why some hospitals successfully implement immediate postpartum LARCs, while others do not.

Moniz et al conducted a comparative, multiple case study of immediate postpartum LARC implementation at eleven “early adopter” U.S. hospitals and analyzed each hospital’s implementation strategy to produce generalizable knowledge about how and under what circumstances implementation of immediate postpartum LARCs unfold successfully. Between 2017-2018, the authors conducted single-day site visits and 78 semi-structured interviews with a variety of stakeholders (clinician champions, nurses, pharmacists, revenue cycle staff, and hospital administration). On average, sites used 18 (range 11-22) implementation strategies, including assessing institutional readiness for, and barriers to, implementation of immediate postpartum LARC, engaging reproductive justice experts and community resources to address social determinants of health, involving patients in implementation planning, and developing quality monitoring processes to evaluate clinical processes and outcomes. The researchers found that successful implementation of immediate postpartum LARC required three essential conditions: effective implementation champions who are supported by a multidisciplinary implementation team; creating an enabling financial environment; and engaging hospital administration. Additional findings from this study call for more support for individuals leading change in complex care settings, intentionally designing implementation interventions that take into account local contextual influences, and meaningfully engaging patients in the implementation process.

Of postpartum women, 61% in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) have an unmet contraceptive need and many face high rates of short interpregnancy intervals (Moore). Additionally, 51%-96% of postpartum women in LMIC use short-acting methods of contraception (Moore), further highlighting the need for increased access to immediate postpartum LARC in LMIC. Data on the use and continuation of immediate postpartum LARC in LMIC is limited. Marchin et al conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine 6-month continuation rates of immediate postpartum LARCs among women in 69 low-income countries that were enrolled in the Family Planning 2020 initiative. The meta-analysis ultimately focused on the copper IUD due to the absence of relevant studies on other LARC methods. The meta-analysis of 12 studies resulted in a pooled 6-month continuation rate for immediate postpartum copper IUDs of 87%, a rate comparable to continuation rates found in higher-income countries. This estimate had significant heterogeneity between studies. Secondary outcomes of expulsion, removal, and infection rates were low at 6%, 5%, and 0.2% respectively. High 6-month continuation rates and a low rate of adverse outcomes suggest immediate postpartum copper IUD insertion represents a feasible and acceptable postpartum contraceptive option for women living in LMIC.

In cases where contraception methods fail, are used incorrectly, or are not used at all, emergency contraception (EC) can be used after intercourse to prevent pregnancy. Timely access to, and accurate knowledge of, EC are especially important for rural women who are more likely to experience an unintended pregnancy resulting in a live birth compared to urban women. Milkowski et al analyzed publicly available data from the National Survey of Family Growth to estimate differences in oral EC use, access, and counseling by rural-urban county of residence among U.S. women aged 15-44 years. 10% of rural and 19% of urban women who had ever been sexually active reported ever using EC pills. Over the course of the study period (2006-2017), the percentage of women reporting ever-use of EC increased linearly in both rural and urban populations, with the prevalence of EC ever-use more than doubling in each group. This observation likely reflects an overall increase in EC use during a time period in which the federal government enacted several policies to improve access to EC. The study findings also highlight the need for improved patient counseling on EC. While the overall prevalence of EC counseling was low among all women, rural women were less likely to have received counseling on EC when compared to urban women.

Although many studies report weight gain in users of progestin-only hormonal contraception (POC), a recent Cochrane systematic review found that there was insufficient evidence to determine the effect of POCs on weight (Lopez). Beksinska et al conducted a secondary analysis of prospective weight change among women enrolled in the Evidence for Contraceptive options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) trial, which was an open label, prospective, randomized multicenter trial that compared the risk of HIV acquisition among women randomized to injectable contraception (DMPA), the copper IUD, or a second generation two rod levonorgestrel (LNG) implant Jadelle^Ò. This trial was conducted at 12 sites across four African countries between 2015 and 2018. Eligible study participants were nonpregnant, HIV negative, sexually active women aged 16-35 years who desired contraception. The final sample size included 7,014 women randomly assigned to receive DMPA (2,293), the LNG implant (2,372), or the copper IUD (2,349). Using a standardized protocol and calibrated equipment across all study sites, weight and height were measured at baseline and at study exit at 12, 15, or 18 months. The mean weight increased amongst all three contraceptive groups and was significantly different in magnitude, with the largest gain in the DMPA group (3.5 kg), 2.4 kg in the LNG implant group, and 1.5 kg in the copper IUD group. Unlike copper IUD users, women in the DMPA and LNG implant group continued to gain weight after 1 year of contraceptive use. It is noteworthy that, regardless of contraceptive method allocation, not all women gained weight and a small proportion of women lost weight. When choosing a contraceptive method, women using POCs should be counselled about the potential side effect of weight gain.

References:
Moniz MH, Bonawitz K, Wetmore MK, et al. Implementing immediate postpartum contraception: a comparative case study at 11 hospitals. Implement Sci Commun. 2021;2(1):42. Published 2021 Apr 12.

Moore Z, Pfitzer A, Gubin R, et al. Missed opportunities for family planning: an analysis of pregnancy risk and contraceptive method use among postpartum women in 21 low- and middle-income countries. Contraception 92 (2015): 31–39.
 

Marchin A, Moss A, Harrison M. A Meta-Analysis of Postpartum Copper IUD Continuation Rates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. J Womens Health Dev. 2021;4(1):36-46.

Milkowski CM, Ziller EC, Ahrens KA. Rural-urban residence and emergency contraception use, access, and counseling in the United States, 2006-2017. Contracept X. 2021;3:100061.

Lopez L.M., Ramesh S., Chen M. Progestin-only contraceptives: effects on weight. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008815.pub2.

Beksinska et al. “Weight change among women using intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, a copper intrauterine device, or a levonorgestrel implant for contraception: Findings from a randomised, multicentre, open-label trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;34:100800.

Patients receive the full range of contraception options when providers are educated on the proper use and spectrum of contraceptive options. When an educational intervention was introduced in three countries (Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia, and Pakistan), aimed at training providers on counseling and provision of immediate postpartum LARC, a significant number of women opted for LARC. This was in comparison to countries that did not implement this educational intervention (Rwanda, Syria, Yemen). The rate of LARC adoption was 10.01% versus 0.77%, respectively in countries providing the educational intervention versus those that did not. 

The copper IUD has long been utilized for emergency contraception, providing nearly 100% efficacy in pregnancy prevention, as well as long-acting, reversible contraception. Recently, the levonorgestrel (LNG) IUD was considered for similar use as emergency contraception. Turok et al studied the pregnancy rate of the LNG IUD compared the copper IUD and found that the LNG IUD was noninferior to the copper IUD when used for emergency contraception, with pregnancy rates of 1 in 317 (LNG) compared to 0 in 321 (copper). LNG IUDs are often more readily available in OBGYN offices and could improve access to higher efficacy emergency contraception compared to traditional emergency contraceptive pills.

When placing IUDs, providers have a range of devices to measure the length of the uterus for correct IUD placement, including endometrial biopsy pipelles, uterine sounds, both plastic and metal, as well as the device inserters. In a biomechanical ex vivo analysis, Duncan et al examined the maximum force generated for IUD placement with the levonorgestrel placement instrument, the copper IUD placement instrument, and a metal sound. Using their model, the investigators found that the metal sound caused uterine perforation, but the plastic IUD placement device did not. Although the study authors utilized the device inserters themselves, we recommend the use of plastic uterine sounds or biopsy pipelles over the device inserters in accordance with IUD packaging instructions.  IUD packaging should not be opened until both the ability to access the uterine cavity and appropriate uterine size are determined to avoid needing to discard the IUD.

Patients receive the full range of contraception options when providers are educated on the proper use and spectrum of contraceptive options. When an educational intervention was introduced in three countries (Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia, and Pakistan), aimed at training providers on counseling and provision of immediate postpartum LARC, a significant number of women opted for LARC. This was in comparison to countries that did not implement this educational intervention (Rwanda, Syria, Yemen). The rate of LARC adoption was 10.01% versus 0.77%, respectively in countries providing the educational intervention versus those that did not. 

The copper IUD has long been utilized for emergency contraception, providing nearly 100% efficacy in pregnancy prevention, as well as long-acting, reversible contraception. Recently, the levonorgestrel (LNG) IUD was considered for similar use as emergency contraception. Turok et al studied the pregnancy rate of the LNG IUD compared the copper IUD and found that the LNG IUD was noninferior to the copper IUD when used for emergency contraception, with pregnancy rates of 1 in 317 (LNG) compared to 0 in 321 (copper). LNG IUDs are often more readily available in OBGYN offices and could improve access to higher efficacy emergency contraception compared to traditional emergency contraceptive pills.

When placing IUDs, providers have a range of devices to measure the length of the uterus for correct IUD placement, including endometrial biopsy pipelles, uterine sounds, both plastic and metal, as well as the device inserters. In a biomechanical ex vivo analysis, Duncan et al examined the maximum force generated for IUD placement with the levonorgestrel placement instrument, the copper IUD placement instrument, and a metal sound. Using their model, the investigators found that the metal sound caused uterine perforation, but the plastic IUD placement device did not. Although the study authors utilized the device inserters themselves, we recommend the use of plastic uterine sounds or biopsy pipelles over the device inserters in accordance with IUD packaging instructions.  IUD packaging should not be opened until both the ability to access the uterine cavity and appropriate uterine size are determined to avoid needing to discard the IUD.

Patients receive the full range of contraception options when providers are educated on the proper use and spectrum of contraceptive options. When an educational intervention was introduced in three countries (Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia, and Pakistan), aimed at training providers on counseling and provision of immediate postpartum LARC, a significant number of women opted for LARC. This was in comparison to countries that did not implement this educational intervention (Rwanda, Syria, Yemen). The rate of LARC adoption was 10.01% versus 0.77%, respectively in countries providing the educational intervention versus those that did not. 

The copper IUD has long been utilized for emergency contraception, providing nearly 100% efficacy in pregnancy prevention, as well as long-acting, reversible contraception. Recently, the levonorgestrel (LNG) IUD was considered for similar use as emergency contraception. Turok et al studied the pregnancy rate of the LNG IUD compared the copper IUD and found that the LNG IUD was noninferior to the copper IUD when used for emergency contraception, with pregnancy rates of 1 in 317 (LNG) compared to 0 in 321 (copper). LNG IUDs are often more readily available in OBGYN offices and could improve access to higher efficacy emergency contraception compared to traditional emergency contraceptive pills.

When placing IUDs, providers have a range of devices to measure the length of the uterus for correct IUD placement, including endometrial biopsy pipelles, uterine sounds, both plastic and metal, as well as the device inserters. In a biomechanical ex vivo analysis, Duncan et al examined the maximum force generated for IUD placement with the levonorgestrel placement instrument, the copper IUD placement instrument, and a metal sound. Using their model, the investigators found that the metal sound caused uterine perforation, but the plastic IUD placement device did not. Although the study authors utilized the device inserters themselves, we recommend the use of plastic uterine sounds or biopsy pipelles over the device inserters in accordance with IUD packaging instructions.  IUD packaging should not be opened until both the ability to access the uterine cavity and appropriate uterine size are determined to avoid needing to discard the IUD.

With the introduction of new technology to vaccinate the world with the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines, I considered other health conditions that could benefit from new modalities. Unplanned pregnancies are a public health crisis, yet the burden falls solely on women to solve, burdening them with contraceptive practices to prevent unplanned pregnancy. With the insurrection of Row v. Wade and the new bills being pushed through states that are limiting abortion, perhaps the time has come for males to accept the responsibility for contraception to prevent unplanned pregnancy. The methods that currently exist for males are condoms and vasectomy. Other options are being explored – both nonhormonal and reversible contraception including daily pills, gels, and long-acting injections.

The pill for men has been under preliminary trials with promising results. This contraceptive pill contains dimethandrolone undecanoate, which is an androgen anabolic steroid progesterone once-daily pill that suppresses FSH and LH, causing a decrease in the production of testosterone and consequently sperm production.¹ (Long, Lee, & Blithe, 2019). This pill is in long-term trials to determine the efficacy and side effects, including the impact on libido, liver, and kidney disease.

The injectable male contraceptive in trials now includes two different options. The first was a long-acting progestin, testosterone, and androgen combination. The male participants received an intramuscular injection every 8 weeks. Although the results of the study were promising – sperm production was effectively reduced, the side effects were too severe for participants to continue use. Side effects much like those of the female Depo-Provera injections included acne and mood disorders. Men experienced erectile dysfunction while at the same time having an increase in sex drive.² (Em, 2018).

Recently, researchers in India have studied a nonhormonal injectable with promising outcomes. It prevented pregnancy in more than 97% of participants. This injectable polymer gel is placed into the male’s vas deferens to block sperm from leaving the body. This product inactivates sperm, essentially creating temporary sterilization for men. The benefit of this product, called RISUG (reversible inhibition of sperm under guidance), is a single injection that can be effective for 13 years. It can be reversed earlier if needed by injecting a dissolving gel into the male’s vas deferens.^1,2 In the United States, there is an identical product called Vasalgel – a polymer injected into the vas deferens – also being studied for temporary infertility.

Another synthetic implanted androgen product being studied is 7 alpha-methyl-19-nortestosterone (MENT), a synthetic steroid that resembles testosterone but does not convert into testosterone and, consequently, does not stimulate prostate growth. It is administered via two subdermal implants and is effective for 12 months. The first subdermal implant releases the synthetic androgen, which is more potent than testosterone, and the other emits LH-releasing hormone.³ Studies demonstrate that MENT suppresses sperm production.¹

Finally, studies are underway using transdermal gel applications to suppress sperm concentrations. The daily gel is absorbed through the skin after application to two different areas of the man’s body: the shoulders and upper arms. The daily application of the progestin product, Nestorone, and testosterone gel has been found to reduce sperm concentrations to < 1 x 10⁶/mL. Studies measured gonadal concentrations after 4 weeks.¹ Users were happy with the use of a topical gel, with minimal side effects such as lower libido, weight gain, and changes in cholesterol, yet inconsistent use of the product resulted in lower than anticipated results.⁴

Male contraceptive options are long overdue to dramatically reduce the rate of unplanned pregnancies and the burden of contraception placed on women. Getting these products to market will be half the battle – getting men to commit to using these options and women to trust male compliance may further impede acceptance. Men have not had to carry the burden and economics of single parenting. Men interested in casual sex may now need to accept more responsibility for unplanned pregnancy and be proactive with prevention, particularly as abortion laws are being challenged.

Ms. Thew is medical director of the department of pediatrics division of adolescent medicine at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee. She is a member of the editorial board for Pediatric News and has no relevant disclosures.

References

1. Long J E et al. Clin Chem. 2019;65(1):153-60.

2. Male birth control: Current options and new breakthroughs, SingleCare: Health Education. Aug. 6, 2018.

3. Sundaram K et al. Ann Med. 1993;25(2):199-205.

4. Anawalt BD et al. Andrology. 2019;7(6):878-87.

With the introduction of new technology to vaccinate the world with the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines, I considered other health conditions that could benefit from new modalities. Unplanned pregnancies are a public health crisis, yet the burden falls solely on women to solve, burdening them with contraceptive practices to prevent unplanned pregnancy. With the insurrection of Row v. Wade and the new bills being pushed through states that are limiting abortion, perhaps the time has come for males to accept the responsibility for contraception to prevent unplanned pregnancy. The methods that currently exist for males are condoms and vasectomy. Other options are being explored – both nonhormonal and reversible contraception including daily pills, gels, and long-acting injections.

The pill for men has been under preliminary trials with promising results. This contraceptive pill contains dimethandrolone undecanoate, which is an androgen anabolic steroid progesterone once-daily pill that suppresses FSH and LH, causing a decrease in the production of testosterone and consequently sperm production.¹ (Long, Lee, & Blithe, 2019). This pill is in long-term trials to determine the efficacy and side effects, including the impact on libido, liver, and kidney disease.

The injectable male contraceptive in trials now includes two different options. The first was a long-acting progestin, testosterone, and androgen combination. The male participants received an intramuscular injection every 8 weeks. Although the results of the study were promising – sperm production was effectively reduced, the side effects were too severe for participants to continue use. Side effects much like those of the female Depo-Provera injections included acne and mood disorders. Men experienced erectile dysfunction while at the same time having an increase in sex drive.² (Em, 2018).

Recently, researchers in India have studied a nonhormonal injectable with promising outcomes. It prevented pregnancy in more than 97% of participants. This injectable polymer gel is placed into the male’s vas deferens to block sperm from leaving the body. This product inactivates sperm, essentially creating temporary sterilization for men. The benefit of this product, called RISUG (reversible inhibition of sperm under guidance), is a single injection that can be effective for 13 years. It can be reversed earlier if needed by injecting a dissolving gel into the male’s vas deferens.^1,2 In the United States, there is an identical product called Vasalgel – a polymer injected into the vas deferens – also being studied for temporary infertility.

Another synthetic implanted androgen product being studied is 7 alpha-methyl-19-nortestosterone (MENT), a synthetic steroid that resembles testosterone but does not convert into testosterone and, consequently, does not stimulate prostate growth. It is administered via two subdermal implants and is effective for 12 months. The first subdermal implant releases the synthetic androgen, which is more potent than testosterone, and the other emits LH-releasing hormone.³ Studies demonstrate that MENT suppresses sperm production.¹

Finally, studies are underway using transdermal gel applications to suppress sperm concentrations. The daily gel is absorbed through the skin after application to two different areas of the man’s body: the shoulders and upper arms. The daily application of the progestin product, Nestorone, and testosterone gel has been found to reduce sperm concentrations to < 1 x 10⁶/mL. Studies measured gonadal concentrations after 4 weeks.¹ Users were happy with the use of a topical gel, with minimal side effects such as lower libido, weight gain, and changes in cholesterol, yet inconsistent use of the product resulted in lower than anticipated results.⁴

Male contraceptive options are long overdue to dramatically reduce the rate of unplanned pregnancies and the burden of contraception placed on women. Getting these products to market will be half the battle – getting men to commit to using these options and women to trust male compliance may further impede acceptance. Men have not had to carry the burden and economics of single parenting. Men interested in casual sex may now need to accept more responsibility for unplanned pregnancy and be proactive with prevention, particularly as abortion laws are being challenged.

Ms. Thew is medical director of the department of pediatrics division of adolescent medicine at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee. She is a member of the editorial board for Pediatric News and has no relevant disclosures.

References

1. Long J E et al. Clin Chem. 2019;65(1):153-60.

2. Male birth control: Current options and new breakthroughs, SingleCare: Health Education. Aug. 6, 2018.

3. Sundaram K et al. Ann Med. 1993;25(2):199-205.

4. Anawalt BD et al. Andrology. 2019;7(6):878-87.

With the introduction of new technology to vaccinate the world with the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines, I considered other health conditions that could benefit from new modalities. Unplanned pregnancies are a public health crisis, yet the burden falls solely on women to solve, burdening them with contraceptive practices to prevent unplanned pregnancy. With the insurrection of Row v. Wade and the new bills being pushed through states that are limiting abortion, perhaps the time has come for males to accept the responsibility for contraception to prevent unplanned pregnancy. The methods that currently exist for males are condoms and vasectomy. Other options are being explored – both nonhormonal and reversible contraception including daily pills, gels, and long-acting injections.

The pill for men has been under preliminary trials with promising results. This contraceptive pill contains dimethandrolone undecanoate, which is an androgen anabolic steroid progesterone once-daily pill that suppresses FSH and LH, causing a decrease in the production of testosterone and consequently sperm production.¹ (Long, Lee, & Blithe, 2019). This pill is in long-term trials to determine the efficacy and side effects, including the impact on libido, liver, and kidney disease.

The injectable male contraceptive in trials now includes two different options. The first was a long-acting progestin, testosterone, and androgen combination. The male participants received an intramuscular injection every 8 weeks. Although the results of the study were promising – sperm production was effectively reduced, the side effects were too severe for participants to continue use. Side effects much like those of the female Depo-Provera injections included acne and mood disorders. Men experienced erectile dysfunction while at the same time having an increase in sex drive.² (Em, 2018).

Recently, researchers in India have studied a nonhormonal injectable with promising outcomes. It prevented pregnancy in more than 97% of participants. This injectable polymer gel is placed into the male’s vas deferens to block sperm from leaving the body. This product inactivates sperm, essentially creating temporary sterilization for men. The benefit of this product, called RISUG (reversible inhibition of sperm under guidance), is a single injection that can be effective for 13 years. It can be reversed earlier if needed by injecting a dissolving gel into the male’s vas deferens.^1,2 In the United States, there is an identical product called Vasalgel – a polymer injected into the vas deferens – also being studied for temporary infertility.

Another synthetic implanted androgen product being studied is 7 alpha-methyl-19-nortestosterone (MENT), a synthetic steroid that resembles testosterone but does not convert into testosterone and, consequently, does not stimulate prostate growth. It is administered via two subdermal implants and is effective for 12 months. The first subdermal implant releases the synthetic androgen, which is more potent than testosterone, and the other emits LH-releasing hormone.³ Studies demonstrate that MENT suppresses sperm production.¹

Finally, studies are underway using transdermal gel applications to suppress sperm concentrations. The daily gel is absorbed through the skin after application to two different areas of the man’s body: the shoulders and upper arms. The daily application of the progestin product, Nestorone, and testosterone gel has been found to reduce sperm concentrations to < 1 x 10⁶/mL. Studies measured gonadal concentrations after 4 weeks.¹ Users were happy with the use of a topical gel, with minimal side effects such as lower libido, weight gain, and changes in cholesterol, yet inconsistent use of the product resulted in lower than anticipated results.⁴

Male contraceptive options are long overdue to dramatically reduce the rate of unplanned pregnancies and the burden of contraception placed on women. Getting these products to market will be half the battle – getting men to commit to using these options and women to trust male compliance may further impede acceptance. Men have not had to carry the burden and economics of single parenting. Men interested in casual sex may now need to accept more responsibility for unplanned pregnancy and be proactive with prevention, particularly as abortion laws are being challenged.

Ms. Thew is medical director of the department of pediatrics division of adolescent medicine at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee. She is a member of the editorial board for Pediatric News and has no relevant disclosures.

References

1. Long J E et al. Clin Chem. 2019;65(1):153-60.

2. Male birth control: Current options and new breakthroughs, SingleCare: Health Education. Aug. 6, 2018.

3. Sundaram K et al. Ann Med. 1993;25(2):199-205.

4. Anawalt BD et al. Andrology. 2019;7(6):878-87.

Key clinical point: Three countries that implemented an immediate postpartum family planning (IPPFP) intervention that focused on long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) showed a significant increase in the number of girls and women who opted for an IUD or implant within 48 hours of delivery. 

Major finding: The mean percentage of IPP LARC adoption among all deliveries in the countries that implemented the intervention programs was 10.01%, compared to 0.77% in countries providing standard postpartum care without the intervention.

Study details: The data come from a review of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (IPP LARC) from 2016 to 2019 in three countries that focused on LARC intervention (Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia, and Pakistan) including training delivery-room providers on counseling and provision of IPPFP; and three countries the did not implement this intervention (Rwanda, Syria, and Yemen).

Disclosures: The study was supported by an anonymous foundation. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Gallagher MC et al. Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Apr 6. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.613338.

Key clinical point: Three countries that implemented an immediate postpartum family planning (IPPFP) intervention that focused on long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) showed a significant increase in the number of girls and women who opted for an IUD or implant within 48 hours of delivery. 

Major finding: The mean percentage of IPP LARC adoption among all deliveries in the countries that implemented the intervention programs was 10.01%, compared to 0.77% in countries providing standard postpartum care without the intervention.

Study details: The data come from a review of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (IPP LARC) from 2016 to 2019 in three countries that focused on LARC intervention (Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia, and Pakistan) including training delivery-room providers on counseling and provision of IPPFP; and three countries the did not implement this intervention (Rwanda, Syria, and Yemen).

Disclosures: The study was supported by an anonymous foundation. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Gallagher MC et al. Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Apr 6. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.613338.

Key clinical point: Three countries that implemented an immediate postpartum family planning (IPPFP) intervention that focused on long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) showed a significant increase in the number of girls and women who opted for an IUD or implant within 48 hours of delivery. 

Major finding: The mean percentage of IPP LARC adoption among all deliveries in the countries that implemented the intervention programs was 10.01%, compared to 0.77% in countries providing standard postpartum care without the intervention.

Study details: The data come from a review of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (IPP LARC) from 2016 to 2019 in three countries that focused on LARC intervention (Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia, and Pakistan) including training delivery-room providers on counseling and provision of IPPFP; and three countries the did not implement this intervention (Rwanda, Syria, and Yemen).

Disclosures: The study was supported by an anonymous foundation. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Gallagher MC et al. Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Apr 6. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.613338.

Key clinical point: Contraceptive use among adolescents in the United States increased overall from 2006 to 2019, although consistent condom use declined.

Major finding: From 2006-2010 to 2015-2019, adolescents aged 15 to 19 years reported an 86% increased use of any contraception, a 26% increased use of multiple contraception methods, and a 3% increased use of IUDs or implants. 

Study details: The data come from a review of adolescents aged 15 to 19 years from the National Surveys of Family Growth, including 4,662 individuals from 2006-2010, 4,134 from 2011-2015, and 3,182 from 2015-2019.

Disclosures: The study was supported by an anonymous foundation. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Lindberg LD et al. Contraception: X. 2021 Apr 8. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2021.100064.

Key clinical point: Contraceptive use among adolescents in the United States increased overall from 2006 to 2019, although consistent condom use declined.

Major finding: From 2006-2010 to 2015-2019, adolescents aged 15 to 19 years reported an 86% increased use of any contraception, a 26% increased use of multiple contraception methods, and a 3% increased use of IUDs or implants. 

Study details: The data come from a review of adolescents aged 15 to 19 years from the National Surveys of Family Growth, including 4,662 individuals from 2006-2010, 4,134 from 2011-2015, and 3,182 from 2015-2019.

Disclosures: The study was supported by an anonymous foundation. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Lindberg LD et al. Contraception: X. 2021 Apr 8. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2021.100064.

Key clinical point: Contraceptive use among adolescents in the United States increased overall from 2006 to 2019, although consistent condom use declined.

Major finding: From 2006-2010 to 2015-2019, adolescents aged 15 to 19 years reported an 86% increased use of any contraception, a 26% increased use of multiple contraception methods, and a 3% increased use of IUDs or implants. 

Study details: The data come from a review of adolescents aged 15 to 19 years from the National Surveys of Family Growth, including 4,662 individuals from 2006-2010, 4,134 from 2011-2015, and 3,182 from 2015-2019.

Disclosures: The study was supported by an anonymous foundation. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Lindberg LD et al. Contraception: X. 2021 Apr 8. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2021.100064.

Key clinical point: The generally positive attitudes towards contraception but low levels of use highlight the need for greater communication about behavior change among health professionals and medical students to increase their roles as change agents in their communities.

Major finding: Although 58% of the respondents were sexually active, only 18% were using a contraceptive at the time of the survey; however, 83% of contraceptive users were satisfied with past use. In addition, approximately half of respondents discussed contraception with their partners and four-fifths said they would encourage others in contraceptive use, although only 18% were involved in providing family planning methods.

Study details: The data come from a cross-sectional survey of 400 health workers and clinical care medical students in Ghana between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2018.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Agbeno EK et al. Int J Reprod Med. 2021 Mar 22. doi: 10.1155/2021/6631790. 

Key clinical point: The generally positive attitudes towards contraception but low levels of use highlight the need for greater communication about behavior change among health professionals and medical students to increase their roles as change agents in their communities.

Major finding: Although 58% of the respondents were sexually active, only 18% were using a contraceptive at the time of the survey; however, 83% of contraceptive users were satisfied with past use. In addition, approximately half of respondents discussed contraception with their partners and four-fifths said they would encourage others in contraceptive use, although only 18% were involved in providing family planning methods.

Study details: The data come from a cross-sectional survey of 400 health workers and clinical care medical students in Ghana between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2018.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Agbeno EK et al. Int J Reprod Med. 2021 Mar 22. doi: 10.1155/2021/6631790. 

Key clinical point: The generally positive attitudes towards contraception but low levels of use highlight the need for greater communication about behavior change among health professionals and medical students to increase their roles as change agents in their communities.

Major finding: Although 58% of the respondents were sexually active, only 18% were using a contraceptive at the time of the survey; however, 83% of contraceptive users were satisfied with past use. In addition, approximately half of respondents discussed contraception with their partners and four-fifths said they would encourage others in contraceptive use, although only 18% were involved in providing family planning methods.

Study details: The data come from a cross-sectional survey of 400 health workers and clinical care medical students in Ghana between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2018.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Agbeno EK et al. Int J Reprod Med. 2021 Mar 22. doi: 10.1155/2021/6631790. 

Key clinical point: Levonorgestrel was noninferior to copper IUD for emergency contraception, with similar pregnancy rates and adverse events reported for both methods.

Major finding: Pregnancy rates were 1 in 317 (0.3%) in the levonorgestrel group and 0 in 321 (0%) in the copper IUD group in the modified intent-to-treat analysis.

Study details: The data come from a randomized trial of 317 women who received levonorgestrel IUD and 321 who received copper IUDs and provided 1-month outcome data.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD); the University of Utah, with funding in part from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Center for Research Resources and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; and grants to the lead author and several coauthors from the NIH Office of Research on Women’s Health and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD.

Source:  Turok DK et al.  N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022141.

Key clinical point: Levonorgestrel was noninferior to copper IUD for emergency contraception, with similar pregnancy rates and adverse events reported for both methods.

Major finding: Pregnancy rates were 1 in 317 (0.3%) in the levonorgestrel group and 0 in 321 (0%) in the copper IUD group in the modified intent-to-treat analysis.

Study details: The data come from a randomized trial of 317 women who received levonorgestrel IUD and 321 who received copper IUDs and provided 1-month outcome data.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD); the University of Utah, with funding in part from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Center for Research Resources and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; and grants to the lead author and several coauthors from the NIH Office of Research on Women’s Health and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD.

Source:  Turok DK et al.  N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022141.

Key clinical point: Levonorgestrel was noninferior to copper IUD for emergency contraception, with similar pregnancy rates and adverse events reported for both methods.

Major finding: Pregnancy rates were 1 in 317 (0.3%) in the levonorgestrel group and 0 in 321 (0%) in the copper IUD group in the modified intent-to-treat analysis.

Study details: The data come from a randomized trial of 317 women who received levonorgestrel IUD and 321 who received copper IUDs and provided 1-month outcome data.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD); the University of Utah, with funding in part from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Center for Research Resources and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; and grants to the lead author and several coauthors from the NIH Office of Research on Women’s Health and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD.

Source:  Turok DK et al.  N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022141.

Key clinical point: Use of progestin-only contraception was associated with greater breast hypertrophy and pain in adolescents with macromastia.

Major finding: Compared to controls, macromastia patients who used progestin-only contraceptives were 500% more likely to report breast pain (odds ratio 4.94); macromastia patients who used progestin-only contraception also had significantly more breast tissue resected during mammaplasty and greater musculoskeletal pain. 

Study details: The data come from a retrospective study of 378 macromastia patients aged 12 to 21 years and 378 controls; 5.3% of macromastia patients and 28.0% of controls used progestin-only contraception.

Disclosures: The study was supported in part by the Plastic Surgery Foundation. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Nuzzi LC et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Feb 12. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003421.

Key clinical point: Use of progestin-only contraception was associated with greater breast hypertrophy and pain in adolescents with macromastia.

Major finding: Compared to controls, macromastia patients who used progestin-only contraceptives were 500% more likely to report breast pain (odds ratio 4.94); macromastia patients who used progestin-only contraception also had significantly more breast tissue resected during mammaplasty and greater musculoskeletal pain. 

Study details: The data come from a retrospective study of 378 macromastia patients aged 12 to 21 years and 378 controls; 5.3% of macromastia patients and 28.0% of controls used progestin-only contraception.

Disclosures: The study was supported in part by the Plastic Surgery Foundation. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Nuzzi LC et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Feb 12. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003421.

Key clinical point: Use of progestin-only contraception was associated with greater breast hypertrophy and pain in adolescents with macromastia.

Major finding: Compared to controls, macromastia patients who used progestin-only contraceptives were 500% more likely to report breast pain (odds ratio 4.94); macromastia patients who used progestin-only contraception also had significantly more breast tissue resected during mammaplasty and greater musculoskeletal pain. 

Study details: The data come from a retrospective study of 378 macromastia patients aged 12 to 21 years and 378 controls; 5.3% of macromastia patients and 28.0% of controls used progestin-only contraception.

Disclosures: The study was supported in part by the Plastic Surgery Foundation. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Nuzzi LC et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Feb 12. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003421.

Key clinical point: Among healthy young women taking oral contraceptives, pulse wave velocity was lower in active women compared with inactive women, suggesting that physical activity may mitigate the risk of arterial stiffness associated with OC use.   

Major finding: Pulse wave velocity as an indicator of arterial stiffness was similar in oral contraceptive users and non-users, however, PWV was significantly lower in active women vs. inactive women (5.4 ms ^-1 vs. 6.3 ms ^-1).

Study details: The data come from a cross-sectional study of 49 healthy young women with an average age of 21.9 years, divided into four groups (inactive vs. active, OC use vs. non-OC use).

Disclosures: The study was supported in part by the European Union and the New Aquitaine region through the Habisan program (CPER-FEDER). The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Enea C et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 25. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073393.

Key clinical point: Among healthy young women taking oral contraceptives, pulse wave velocity was lower in active women compared with inactive women, suggesting that physical activity may mitigate the risk of arterial stiffness associated with OC use.   

Major finding: Pulse wave velocity as an indicator of arterial stiffness was similar in oral contraceptive users and non-users, however, PWV was significantly lower in active women vs. inactive women (5.4 ms ^-1 vs. 6.3 ms ^-1).

Study details: The data come from a cross-sectional study of 49 healthy young women with an average age of 21.9 years, divided into four groups (inactive vs. active, OC use vs. non-OC use).

Disclosures: The study was supported in part by the European Union and the New Aquitaine region through the Habisan program (CPER-FEDER). The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Enea C et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 25. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073393.

Key clinical point: Among healthy young women taking oral contraceptives, pulse wave velocity was lower in active women compared with inactive women, suggesting that physical activity may mitigate the risk of arterial stiffness associated with OC use.   

Major finding: Pulse wave velocity as an indicator of arterial stiffness was similar in oral contraceptive users and non-users, however, PWV was significantly lower in active women vs. inactive women (5.4 ms ^-1 vs. 6.3 ms ^-1).

Study details: The data come from a cross-sectional study of 49 healthy young women with an average age of 21.9 years, divided into four groups (inactive vs. active, OC use vs. non-OC use).

Disclosures: The study was supported in part by the European Union and the New Aquitaine region through the Habisan program (CPER-FEDER). The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Enea C et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 25. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073393.