CLL

CD49d was a strong predictor of overall survival in a cohort of 778 unselected patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, reported Michele Dal Bo, MD, of Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, in Aviano, Italy, and colleagues.

©Ed Uthman/Flickr

[email protected]

CD49d was a strong predictor of overall survival in a cohort of 778 unselected patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, reported Michele Dal Bo, MD, of Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, in Aviano, Italy, and colleagues.

©Ed Uthman/Flickr

[email protected]

CD49d was a strong predictor of overall survival in a cohort of 778 unselected patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, reported Michele Dal Bo, MD, of Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, in Aviano, Italy, and colleagues.

©Ed Uthman/Flickr

[email protected]

The presence or absence of minimal residual disease predicted progression-free and, to a lesser degree, overall survival among chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients who achieved complete or partial remission with six courses of chemoimmunotherapy, based on two randomized phase III trials.

These findings underscore the value of measuring minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients who respond to a defined period of CLL therapy, Dr. Gabor Kovacs of the University of Cologne (Germany) and his associates wrote Aug. 29 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The investigators examined the predictive value of measuring MRD in peripheral blood by using four-color flow cytometry at a threshold of 10^-4 by analyzing data from 554 adult CLL patients who achieved complete or partial remission during two phase III trials – one (CLL8) comparing fludarabine and cyclophosphamide with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) and a second (CLL10) comparing FCR with bendamustine plus rituximab (J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 29. doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1305).

The median progression-free survival (PFS) after the end of treatment was 61 months for the 34% (186 patients) who attained MRD-negative complete remission (CR), 54 months for the 29% of patients who attained MRD-negative partial remission (PR), 35 months for the 7% of patients who attained MRD-positive CR, and 21 months for the 30% of patients who attained MRD-positive PR. Progression-free survival did not differ significantly between MRD-negative CR and MRD-negative PR patients, but was significantly longer for MRD-negative PR patients than for MRD-positive CR patients (P = .048).

Progression-free survival was even more distinct for MRD-positive CR patients, compared with those who attained MRD-positive PR (P = .002). Overall survival was significantly shorter only when patients had MRD-positive PR rather than MRD-negative CR (72 months vs. not reached, P = .001).

Among the MRD-negative PR patients, 16% had only residual lymphadenopathy, 11% had only bone marrow involvement, 48% had only splenomegaly, and 25% had more than one organ system affected, the researchers noted. Importantly, PFS for MRD-negative PR with residual splenomegaly (63 months) was similar to that for MRD-negative CR (61 months, P = .354).

In contrast, patients with MRD-negative PR and residual lymphadenopathy had shorter PFS than did MRD-negative CR patients (31 months, P = .001). “We hypothesize that residual splenomegaly after chemoimmunotherapy often represents tissue that does not contribute to a subsequent clinical progression,” the researchers commented.

They also noted an important caveat – their findings are only valid for patients who received a defined period of CLL treatment followed by observation (without maintenance), not for patients who are treated indefinitely until progression.

The CLL8 and CLL10 trials were funded by Roche, Mundipharma, and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Dr. Kavocs disclosed support for travel, accommodations, and expenses from Roche and Celgene.

The presence or absence of minimal residual disease predicted progression-free and, to a lesser degree, overall survival among chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients who achieved complete or partial remission with six courses of chemoimmunotherapy, based on two randomized phase III trials.

These findings underscore the value of measuring minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients who respond to a defined period of CLL therapy, Dr. Gabor Kovacs of the University of Cologne (Germany) and his associates wrote Aug. 29 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The investigators examined the predictive value of measuring MRD in peripheral blood by using four-color flow cytometry at a threshold of 10^-4 by analyzing data from 554 adult CLL patients who achieved complete or partial remission during two phase III trials – one (CLL8) comparing fludarabine and cyclophosphamide with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) and a second (CLL10) comparing FCR with bendamustine plus rituximab (J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 29. doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1305).

The median progression-free survival (PFS) after the end of treatment was 61 months for the 34% (186 patients) who attained MRD-negative complete remission (CR), 54 months for the 29% of patients who attained MRD-negative partial remission (PR), 35 months for the 7% of patients who attained MRD-positive CR, and 21 months for the 30% of patients who attained MRD-positive PR. Progression-free survival did not differ significantly between MRD-negative CR and MRD-negative PR patients, but was significantly longer for MRD-negative PR patients than for MRD-positive CR patients (P = .048).

Progression-free survival was even more distinct for MRD-positive CR patients, compared with those who attained MRD-positive PR (P = .002). Overall survival was significantly shorter only when patients had MRD-positive PR rather than MRD-negative CR (72 months vs. not reached, P = .001).

Among the MRD-negative PR patients, 16% had only residual lymphadenopathy, 11% had only bone marrow involvement, 48% had only splenomegaly, and 25% had more than one organ system affected, the researchers noted. Importantly, PFS for MRD-negative PR with residual splenomegaly (63 months) was similar to that for MRD-negative CR (61 months, P = .354).

In contrast, patients with MRD-negative PR and residual lymphadenopathy had shorter PFS than did MRD-negative CR patients (31 months, P = .001). “We hypothesize that residual splenomegaly after chemoimmunotherapy often represents tissue that does not contribute to a subsequent clinical progression,” the researchers commented.

They also noted an important caveat – their findings are only valid for patients who received a defined period of CLL treatment followed by observation (without maintenance), not for patients who are treated indefinitely until progression.

The CLL8 and CLL10 trials were funded by Roche, Mundipharma, and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Dr. Kavocs disclosed support for travel, accommodations, and expenses from Roche and Celgene.

The presence or absence of minimal residual disease predicted progression-free and, to a lesser degree, overall survival among chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients who achieved complete or partial remission with six courses of chemoimmunotherapy, based on two randomized phase III trials.

These findings underscore the value of measuring minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients who respond to a defined period of CLL therapy, Dr. Gabor Kovacs of the University of Cologne (Germany) and his associates wrote Aug. 29 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The investigators examined the predictive value of measuring MRD in peripheral blood by using four-color flow cytometry at a threshold of 10^-4 by analyzing data from 554 adult CLL patients who achieved complete or partial remission during two phase III trials – one (CLL8) comparing fludarabine and cyclophosphamide with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) and a second (CLL10) comparing FCR with bendamustine plus rituximab (J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 29. doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1305).

The median progression-free survival (PFS) after the end of treatment was 61 months for the 34% (186 patients) who attained MRD-negative complete remission (CR), 54 months for the 29% of patients who attained MRD-negative partial remission (PR), 35 months for the 7% of patients who attained MRD-positive CR, and 21 months for the 30% of patients who attained MRD-positive PR. Progression-free survival did not differ significantly between MRD-negative CR and MRD-negative PR patients, but was significantly longer for MRD-negative PR patients than for MRD-positive CR patients (P = .048).

Progression-free survival was even more distinct for MRD-positive CR patients, compared with those who attained MRD-positive PR (P = .002). Overall survival was significantly shorter only when patients had MRD-positive PR rather than MRD-negative CR (72 months vs. not reached, P = .001).

Among the MRD-negative PR patients, 16% had only residual lymphadenopathy, 11% had only bone marrow involvement, 48% had only splenomegaly, and 25% had more than one organ system affected, the researchers noted. Importantly, PFS for MRD-negative PR with residual splenomegaly (63 months) was similar to that for MRD-negative CR (61 months, P = .354).

In contrast, patients with MRD-negative PR and residual lymphadenopathy had shorter PFS than did MRD-negative CR patients (31 months, P = .001). “We hypothesize that residual splenomegaly after chemoimmunotherapy often represents tissue that does not contribute to a subsequent clinical progression,” the researchers commented.

They also noted an important caveat – their findings are only valid for patients who received a defined period of CLL treatment followed by observation (without maintenance), not for patients who are treated indefinitely until progression.

The CLL8 and CLL10 trials were funded by Roche, Mundipharma, and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Dr. Kavocs disclosed support for travel, accommodations, and expenses from Roche and Celgene.

In elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, complex karyotype abnormalities, certain KRAS and POT1 mutations, and newly discovered mutations in genes involved in the DNA damage response were found to predict a poor response to chlorambucil-based chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy and poor survival, according to a report in Blood.

These findings are from what the investigators described as the first comprehensive prospective analysis of chromosomal aberrations (including complex karyotype abnormalities), gene mutations, and clinical and biological features in elderly CLL patients who had multiple comorbidities. This patient population is generally considered ineligible for aggressive first-line agents such as fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, said Carmen Diana Herling, MD, of the Laboratory of Functional Genomics in Lymphoid Malignancies, University of Cologne (Germany), and her associates.

For their analysis, investigators studied 161 such patients enrolled in a clinical trial in which all were treated with chlorambucil alone, chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab, or chlorambucil plus rituximab. The median patient age was 75 years. Comprehensive genetic analyses were performed using peripheral blood drawn before the patients underwent treatment.

Karyotyping detected chromosomal aberrations in 68.68% of patients, while 31.2% carried translocations and 19.5% showed complex karyotypes. Gene sequencing detected 198 missense/nonsense mutations and other abnormalities in 76.4% of patients.

Dr. Herling and her associates found that complex karyotype abnormalities independently predicted poor response to chlorambucil and poor survival. “Thus, global karyotyping (i.e., by chromosome banding analysis) seems to substantially contribute to the identification of CLL patients with most adverse prognoses and should be considered a standard assessment in future CLL trials,” they said (Blood. 2016;128:395-404).

In addition, KRAS mutations correlated with a poor treatment response, particularly to rituximab. Targeting such patients for MEK, BRAF, or ERK inhibitors “might offer personalized treatment strategies to be investigated in such cases.”

Mutations in the POT1 gene also correlated with shorter survival after chlorambucil treatment. And finally, poor treatment response also correlated with previously unknown mutations in genes involved with the response to DNA damage. This “might contribute to the accumulation of genomic alterations and clonal evolution of CLL,” Dr. Herling and her associates said.

In elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, complex karyotype abnormalities, certain KRAS and POT1 mutations, and newly discovered mutations in genes involved in the DNA damage response were found to predict a poor response to chlorambucil-based chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy and poor survival, according to a report in Blood.

These findings are from what the investigators described as the first comprehensive prospective analysis of chromosomal aberrations (including complex karyotype abnormalities), gene mutations, and clinical and biological features in elderly CLL patients who had multiple comorbidities. This patient population is generally considered ineligible for aggressive first-line agents such as fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, said Carmen Diana Herling, MD, of the Laboratory of Functional Genomics in Lymphoid Malignancies, University of Cologne (Germany), and her associates.

For their analysis, investigators studied 161 such patients enrolled in a clinical trial in which all were treated with chlorambucil alone, chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab, or chlorambucil plus rituximab. The median patient age was 75 years. Comprehensive genetic analyses were performed using peripheral blood drawn before the patients underwent treatment.

Karyotyping detected chromosomal aberrations in 68.68% of patients, while 31.2% carried translocations and 19.5% showed complex karyotypes. Gene sequencing detected 198 missense/nonsense mutations and other abnormalities in 76.4% of patients.

Dr. Herling and her associates found that complex karyotype abnormalities independently predicted poor response to chlorambucil and poor survival. “Thus, global karyotyping (i.e., by chromosome banding analysis) seems to substantially contribute to the identification of CLL patients with most adverse prognoses and should be considered a standard assessment in future CLL trials,” they said (Blood. 2016;128:395-404).

In addition, KRAS mutations correlated with a poor treatment response, particularly to rituximab. Targeting such patients for MEK, BRAF, or ERK inhibitors “might offer personalized treatment strategies to be investigated in such cases.”

Mutations in the POT1 gene also correlated with shorter survival after chlorambucil treatment. And finally, poor treatment response also correlated with previously unknown mutations in genes involved with the response to DNA damage. This “might contribute to the accumulation of genomic alterations and clonal evolution of CLL,” Dr. Herling and her associates said.

In elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, complex karyotype abnormalities, certain KRAS and POT1 mutations, and newly discovered mutations in genes involved in the DNA damage response were found to predict a poor response to chlorambucil-based chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy and poor survival, according to a report in Blood.

These findings are from what the investigators described as the first comprehensive prospective analysis of chromosomal aberrations (including complex karyotype abnormalities), gene mutations, and clinical and biological features in elderly CLL patients who had multiple comorbidities. This patient population is generally considered ineligible for aggressive first-line agents such as fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, said Carmen Diana Herling, MD, of the Laboratory of Functional Genomics in Lymphoid Malignancies, University of Cologne (Germany), and her associates.

For their analysis, investigators studied 161 such patients enrolled in a clinical trial in which all were treated with chlorambucil alone, chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab, or chlorambucil plus rituximab. The median patient age was 75 years. Comprehensive genetic analyses were performed using peripheral blood drawn before the patients underwent treatment.

Karyotyping detected chromosomal aberrations in 68.68% of patients, while 31.2% carried translocations and 19.5% showed complex karyotypes. Gene sequencing detected 198 missense/nonsense mutations and other abnormalities in 76.4% of patients.

Dr. Herling and her associates found that complex karyotype abnormalities independently predicted poor response to chlorambucil and poor survival. “Thus, global karyotyping (i.e., by chromosome banding analysis) seems to substantially contribute to the identification of CLL patients with most adverse prognoses and should be considered a standard assessment in future CLL trials,” they said (Blood. 2016;128:395-404).

In addition, KRAS mutations correlated with a poor treatment response, particularly to rituximab. Targeting such patients for MEK, BRAF, or ERK inhibitors “might offer personalized treatment strategies to be investigated in such cases.”

Mutations in the POT1 gene also correlated with shorter survival after chlorambucil treatment. And finally, poor treatment response also correlated with previously unknown mutations in genes involved with the response to DNA damage. This “might contribute to the accumulation of genomic alterations and clonal evolution of CLL,” Dr. Herling and her associates said.

Four of eight patients with residual chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) following initial chemotherapy had complete or partial responses to an outpatient therapy that used autologous T cells genetically targeted to the B cell–specific antigen CD19, Mark Blaine Geyer, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The therapy employing T cells genetically modified to express CD19-targeted 19-28z chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) was well tolerated but had limited observed efficacy, especially in patients with enlarged lymph nodes. The study goal was to find a safe dose of modified T cells for patients who have disease remaining after initial chemotherapy.

VashiDonsk/Wikimedia Commons/Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0

For the phase I dose escalation study (NCT01416974), Dr. Geyer and his associates enrolled eight CLL patients who had residual disease after upfront therapy consisting of six cycles of pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab.

Five patients had clearly enlarged lymph nodes prior to T cell infusion.

Patients received cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² followed 2 days later by escalating doses of 19-28z T cells. Four of the five patients who received at least a 1 × 10⁷ dose of 19-28z T cells/kg were admitted with fevers and mild cytokine release syndrome.

Maximal levels of CAR T cell persistence were detected at 8 weeks. With a median patient follow-up of 32 months, clinical complete response has been seen in two patients, partial response in two patients, and stable disease in one patient. Disease has progressed in three patients: one had a rising absolute lymphocyte count by the time of infusion and two had marrow response with progressive disease in lymph nodes. The median time to disease progression was 13.6 months, Dr. Geyer said.

Five of seven evaluable patients have received further CLL-directed therapy.

The researchers speculated that low-dose cyclophosphamide monotherapy, used before the CAR T-cell therapy, may be insufficient for lymphodepletion. Additionally, CAR T cell expansion and antitumor efficacy may be limited by a hostile CLL microenvironment. Strategies to enhance CAR T cell expansion and efficacy in patients with CLL are in preparation, Dr. Geyer reported.

Dr. Geyer had no financial disclosures. His colleagues reported various financial relationships with Juno Therapeutics, a developer of CAR technology.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Four of eight patients with residual chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) following initial chemotherapy had complete or partial responses to an outpatient therapy that used autologous T cells genetically targeted to the B cell–specific antigen CD19, Mark Blaine Geyer, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The therapy employing T cells genetically modified to express CD19-targeted 19-28z chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) was well tolerated but had limited observed efficacy, especially in patients with enlarged lymph nodes. The study goal was to find a safe dose of modified T cells for patients who have disease remaining after initial chemotherapy.

VashiDonsk/Wikimedia Commons/Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0

For the phase I dose escalation study (NCT01416974), Dr. Geyer and his associates enrolled eight CLL patients who had residual disease after upfront therapy consisting of six cycles of pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab.

Five patients had clearly enlarged lymph nodes prior to T cell infusion.

Patients received cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² followed 2 days later by escalating doses of 19-28z T cells. Four of the five patients who received at least a 1 × 10⁷ dose of 19-28z T cells/kg were admitted with fevers and mild cytokine release syndrome.

Maximal levels of CAR T cell persistence were detected at 8 weeks. With a median patient follow-up of 32 months, clinical complete response has been seen in two patients, partial response in two patients, and stable disease in one patient. Disease has progressed in three patients: one had a rising absolute lymphocyte count by the time of infusion and two had marrow response with progressive disease in lymph nodes. The median time to disease progression was 13.6 months, Dr. Geyer said.

Five of seven evaluable patients have received further CLL-directed therapy.

The researchers speculated that low-dose cyclophosphamide monotherapy, used before the CAR T-cell therapy, may be insufficient for lymphodepletion. Additionally, CAR T cell expansion and antitumor efficacy may be limited by a hostile CLL microenvironment. Strategies to enhance CAR T cell expansion and efficacy in patients with CLL are in preparation, Dr. Geyer reported.

Dr. Geyer had no financial disclosures. His colleagues reported various financial relationships with Juno Therapeutics, a developer of CAR technology.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Four of eight patients with residual chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) following initial chemotherapy had complete or partial responses to an outpatient therapy that used autologous T cells genetically targeted to the B cell–specific antigen CD19, Mark Blaine Geyer, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The therapy employing T cells genetically modified to express CD19-targeted 19-28z chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) was well tolerated but had limited observed efficacy, especially in patients with enlarged lymph nodes. The study goal was to find a safe dose of modified T cells for patients who have disease remaining after initial chemotherapy.

VashiDonsk/Wikimedia Commons/Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0

For the phase I dose escalation study (NCT01416974), Dr. Geyer and his associates enrolled eight CLL patients who had residual disease after upfront therapy consisting of six cycles of pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab.

Five patients had clearly enlarged lymph nodes prior to T cell infusion.

Patients received cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² followed 2 days later by escalating doses of 19-28z T cells. Four of the five patients who received at least a 1 × 10⁷ dose of 19-28z T cells/kg were admitted with fevers and mild cytokine release syndrome.

Maximal levels of CAR T cell persistence were detected at 8 weeks. With a median patient follow-up of 32 months, clinical complete response has been seen in two patients, partial response in two patients, and stable disease in one patient. Disease has progressed in three patients: one had a rising absolute lymphocyte count by the time of infusion and two had marrow response with progressive disease in lymph nodes. The median time to disease progression was 13.6 months, Dr. Geyer said.

Five of seven evaluable patients have received further CLL-directed therapy.

The researchers speculated that low-dose cyclophosphamide monotherapy, used before the CAR T-cell therapy, may be insufficient for lymphodepletion. Additionally, CAR T cell expansion and antitumor efficacy may be limited by a hostile CLL microenvironment. Strategies to enhance CAR T cell expansion and efficacy in patients with CLL are in preparation, Dr. Geyer reported.

Dr. Geyer had no financial disclosures. His colleagues reported various financial relationships with Juno Therapeutics, a developer of CAR technology.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Progression-free survival was improved for poor prognosis patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia when idelalisib was added to bendamustine and rituximab, based on the results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.

The findings support the three-drug approach as an important treatment option for patients with relapsed CLL and adverse prognostic features, but the regimen also was associated with more grade 3 or greater adverse events, primarily neutropenia and opportunistic infections, that led to more study drug discontinuation, Jacqueline Claudia Barrientos, M.D., and her colleagues reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The overall response rates were 68% in the three-drug group and 45% in the two-drug plus placebo group.

©Ed Uthman/Flickr Ed Uthman Ed Uthman © Ed Uthman/Flickr

For the study, 416 patients were stratified based on whether they had 17p deletions or TP53 mutations, their IGHV mutation status, and whether they had refractory or relapsed disease. The 207 patients who received idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab had consistently better progression-free survival than the 209 patients who received placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab. The median progression-free survival was 23 months in the group that received idelalisib and 11 months in the group that received placebo, with an overall hazard ratio of 0.33 at a median follow-up of 12 months.

For those with 17p deletions or TP53 mutations, the median progression-free survival was 11 months with the three-drug regimen and 8 months for the two-drug plus placebo regimen. For those with neither of these abnormalities, progression-free survival was more than 24 months for patients given the three active drugs and 11 months for patients given two drugs plus placebo.

For those with the 11q deletion, median progression-free survival was 23 months with idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab and 9 months with placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab, said Dr. Barrientos of Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y.

For those with IGHV mutations, the median progression-free survival has not been reached in the idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab group and was 11 months in the placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab group.

Among patients with tumor burdens exceeding 5 cm, median progression-free survival was 23 months with idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab and about 10 months with placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab.

Grade 3 or greater adverse events affected 97% of patients given the three active drugs and 76% of patients given bendamustine and rituximab plus placebo. Adverse events resulted in drug dose reductions in 11% of those given the three active drugs and in 6% of those given bendamustine and rituximab plus placebo. The study drug was discontinued in 26% of those in the idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab group and in 13% of the placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab group. Death occurred in 10% of the study patients given idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab and in 7% of the patients given placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab.

To be eligible for the study (NCT01569295), patients needed to have previously treated recurrent CLL, have measurable lymphadenopathy, require therapy for CLL, and have experienced CLL progression for less than 36 months since the completion of their last prior therapy.

The treatment regimen consisted of 6 cycles every 28 days of bendamustine (70 mg/m² on day 1 and day 2 of each cycle), rituximab (375 mg/m² in cycle 1 and 500 mg/m² in cycles 2-6), and idelalisib (150 mg twice daily) or placebo. Idelalisib or placebo was continued until an independent review committee confirmed disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

The study was sponsored by Gilead Sciences, the maker of idelalisib (Zydelig). Dr. Barrientos receives research funding from Gilead Sciences and Abbvie, and serves as a consultant or adviser to Celgene, Genentech, and Pharmacyclics.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Progression-free survival was improved for poor prognosis patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia when idelalisib was added to bendamustine and rituximab, based on the results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.

The findings support the three-drug approach as an important treatment option for patients with relapsed CLL and adverse prognostic features, but the regimen also was associated with more grade 3 or greater adverse events, primarily neutropenia and opportunistic infections, that led to more study drug discontinuation, Jacqueline Claudia Barrientos, M.D., and her colleagues reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The overall response rates were 68% in the three-drug group and 45% in the two-drug plus placebo group.

©Ed Uthman/Flickr Ed Uthman Ed Uthman © Ed Uthman/Flickr

For the study, 416 patients were stratified based on whether they had 17p deletions or TP53 mutations, their IGHV mutation status, and whether they had refractory or relapsed disease. The 207 patients who received idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab had consistently better progression-free survival than the 209 patients who received placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab. The median progression-free survival was 23 months in the group that received idelalisib and 11 months in the group that received placebo, with an overall hazard ratio of 0.33 at a median follow-up of 12 months.

For those with 17p deletions or TP53 mutations, the median progression-free survival was 11 months with the three-drug regimen and 8 months for the two-drug plus placebo regimen. For those with neither of these abnormalities, progression-free survival was more than 24 months for patients given the three active drugs and 11 months for patients given two drugs plus placebo.

For those with the 11q deletion, median progression-free survival was 23 months with idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab and 9 months with placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab, said Dr. Barrientos of Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y.

For those with IGHV mutations, the median progression-free survival has not been reached in the idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab group and was 11 months in the placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab group.

Among patients with tumor burdens exceeding 5 cm, median progression-free survival was 23 months with idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab and about 10 months with placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab.

Grade 3 or greater adverse events affected 97% of patients given the three active drugs and 76% of patients given bendamustine and rituximab plus placebo. Adverse events resulted in drug dose reductions in 11% of those given the three active drugs and in 6% of those given bendamustine and rituximab plus placebo. The study drug was discontinued in 26% of those in the idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab group and in 13% of the placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab group. Death occurred in 10% of the study patients given idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab and in 7% of the patients given placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab.

To be eligible for the study (NCT01569295), patients needed to have previously treated recurrent CLL, have measurable lymphadenopathy, require therapy for CLL, and have experienced CLL progression for less than 36 months since the completion of their last prior therapy.

The treatment regimen consisted of 6 cycles every 28 days of bendamustine (70 mg/m² on day 1 and day 2 of each cycle), rituximab (375 mg/m² in cycle 1 and 500 mg/m² in cycles 2-6), and idelalisib (150 mg twice daily) or placebo. Idelalisib or placebo was continued until an independent review committee confirmed disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

The study was sponsored by Gilead Sciences, the maker of idelalisib (Zydelig). Dr. Barrientos receives research funding from Gilead Sciences and Abbvie, and serves as a consultant or adviser to Celgene, Genentech, and Pharmacyclics.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Progression-free survival was improved for poor prognosis patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia when idelalisib was added to bendamustine and rituximab, based on the results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.

The findings support the three-drug approach as an important treatment option for patients with relapsed CLL and adverse prognostic features, but the regimen also was associated with more grade 3 or greater adverse events, primarily neutropenia and opportunistic infections, that led to more study drug discontinuation, Jacqueline Claudia Barrientos, M.D., and her colleagues reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The overall response rates were 68% in the three-drug group and 45% in the two-drug plus placebo group.

©Ed Uthman/Flickr Ed Uthman Ed Uthman © Ed Uthman/Flickr

For the study, 416 patients were stratified based on whether they had 17p deletions or TP53 mutations, their IGHV mutation status, and whether they had refractory or relapsed disease. The 207 patients who received idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab had consistently better progression-free survival than the 209 patients who received placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab. The median progression-free survival was 23 months in the group that received idelalisib and 11 months in the group that received placebo, with an overall hazard ratio of 0.33 at a median follow-up of 12 months.

For those with 17p deletions or TP53 mutations, the median progression-free survival was 11 months with the three-drug regimen and 8 months for the two-drug plus placebo regimen. For those with neither of these abnormalities, progression-free survival was more than 24 months for patients given the three active drugs and 11 months for patients given two drugs plus placebo.

For those with the 11q deletion, median progression-free survival was 23 months with idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab and 9 months with placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab, said Dr. Barrientos of Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y.

For those with IGHV mutations, the median progression-free survival has not been reached in the idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab group and was 11 months in the placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab group.

Among patients with tumor burdens exceeding 5 cm, median progression-free survival was 23 months with idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab and about 10 months with placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab.

Grade 3 or greater adverse events affected 97% of patients given the three active drugs and 76% of patients given bendamustine and rituximab plus placebo. Adverse events resulted in drug dose reductions in 11% of those given the three active drugs and in 6% of those given bendamustine and rituximab plus placebo. The study drug was discontinued in 26% of those in the idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab group and in 13% of the placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab group. Death occurred in 10% of the study patients given idelalisib, bendamustine, and rituximab and in 7% of the patients given placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab.

To be eligible for the study (NCT01569295), patients needed to have previously treated recurrent CLL, have measurable lymphadenopathy, require therapy for CLL, and have experienced CLL progression for less than 36 months since the completion of their last prior therapy.

The treatment regimen consisted of 6 cycles every 28 days of bendamustine (70 mg/m² on day 1 and day 2 of each cycle), rituximab (375 mg/m² in cycle 1 and 500 mg/m² in cycles 2-6), and idelalisib (150 mg twice daily) or placebo. Idelalisib or placebo was continued until an independent review committee confirmed disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

The study was sponsored by Gilead Sciences, the maker of idelalisib (Zydelig). Dr. Barrientos receives research funding from Gilead Sciences and Abbvie, and serves as a consultant or adviser to Celgene, Genentech, and Pharmacyclics.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

CHICAGO – Acalabrutinib, which has shown efficacy in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia, has now shown efficacy as a monotherapy for patients with previously untreated CLL, based on results from an ongoing phase I-II study presented as a poster at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

In a 74-patient study, best overall response rate was 96%, and median time to response was 2 months. CLL has not progressed in any of the patients, and none have experienced Richter’s transformation, Dr. John C. Byrd, the D. Warren Brown Chair of Leukemia Research at The Ohio State University, Columbus, and his colleagues reported. Based on its favorable safety profile and durable response rates, a phase III trialof acalabrutinib therapy has been initiated (NCT02475681).

Oral acalabrutinib was given at doses of 100 mg twice daily to 37 patients or 200 mg daily to 37 other patients. About half of the patients had bulky lymph nodes of at least 5 cm and 38 of 67 patients had an unmutated IGHV gene. Median time on the study was 11 months.

All patients had rapid declines in lymphadenopathy. Both dose schedules were associated with clinical activity, with Bruton’s tyrosine kinase occupancy highest at 98% with twice-daily dosing and 93% with once-daily dosing. Treatment-related lymphocytosis occurred in 39 of 74 patients and resolved in 38 of the 39. In general, lymphocytosis peaked at a median of 1 week and resolved by a median of 7 weeks.

Acalabrutinib was well tolerated with 72 of 74 patients continuing on the drug. Most adverse events were grade 2 or less, and included headache (42%), diarrhea (35%), arthralgia (22%), contusion (18%), nausea (18%) and increased weight (18%). Grade 3-4 adverse events that occurred in at least two patients included syncope (two patients) and hypertension (two patients). There was one grade 3 upper GI bleed from a gastric ulcer and aspirin use, and one grade 5 case of pneumonia. No atrial fibrillation was reported.

Dr. Byrd receives research funding from Acerta Pharma, the maker of acalabrutinib, as well as from Genentech and Pharmacyclics.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

CHICAGO – Acalabrutinib, which has shown efficacy in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia, has now shown efficacy as a monotherapy for patients with previously untreated CLL, based on results from an ongoing phase I-II study presented as a poster at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

In a 74-patient study, best overall response rate was 96%, and median time to response was 2 months. CLL has not progressed in any of the patients, and none have experienced Richter’s transformation, Dr. John C. Byrd, the D. Warren Brown Chair of Leukemia Research at The Ohio State University, Columbus, and his colleagues reported. Based on its favorable safety profile and durable response rates, a phase III trialof acalabrutinib therapy has been initiated (NCT02475681).

Oral acalabrutinib was given at doses of 100 mg twice daily to 37 patients or 200 mg daily to 37 other patients. About half of the patients had bulky lymph nodes of at least 5 cm and 38 of 67 patients had an unmutated IGHV gene. Median time on the study was 11 months.

All patients had rapid declines in lymphadenopathy. Both dose schedules were associated with clinical activity, with Bruton’s tyrosine kinase occupancy highest at 98% with twice-daily dosing and 93% with once-daily dosing. Treatment-related lymphocytosis occurred in 39 of 74 patients and resolved in 38 of the 39. In general, lymphocytosis peaked at a median of 1 week and resolved by a median of 7 weeks.

Acalabrutinib was well tolerated with 72 of 74 patients continuing on the drug. Most adverse events were grade 2 or less, and included headache (42%), diarrhea (35%), arthralgia (22%), contusion (18%), nausea (18%) and increased weight (18%). Grade 3-4 adverse events that occurred in at least two patients included syncope (two patients) and hypertension (two patients). There was one grade 3 upper GI bleed from a gastric ulcer and aspirin use, and one grade 5 case of pneumonia. No atrial fibrillation was reported.

Dr. Byrd receives research funding from Acerta Pharma, the maker of acalabrutinib, as well as from Genentech and Pharmacyclics.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

CHICAGO – Acalabrutinib, which has shown efficacy in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia, has now shown efficacy as a monotherapy for patients with previously untreated CLL, based on results from an ongoing phase I-II study presented as a poster at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

In a 74-patient study, best overall response rate was 96%, and median time to response was 2 months. CLL has not progressed in any of the patients, and none have experienced Richter’s transformation, Dr. John C. Byrd, the D. Warren Brown Chair of Leukemia Research at The Ohio State University, Columbus, and his colleagues reported. Based on its favorable safety profile and durable response rates, a phase III trialof acalabrutinib therapy has been initiated (NCT02475681).

Oral acalabrutinib was given at doses of 100 mg twice daily to 37 patients or 200 mg daily to 37 other patients. About half of the patients had bulky lymph nodes of at least 5 cm and 38 of 67 patients had an unmutated IGHV gene. Median time on the study was 11 months.

All patients had rapid declines in lymphadenopathy. Both dose schedules were associated with clinical activity, with Bruton’s tyrosine kinase occupancy highest at 98% with twice-daily dosing and 93% with once-daily dosing. Treatment-related lymphocytosis occurred in 39 of 74 patients and resolved in 38 of the 39. In general, lymphocytosis peaked at a median of 1 week and resolved by a median of 7 weeks.

Acalabrutinib was well tolerated with 72 of 74 patients continuing on the drug. Most adverse events were grade 2 or less, and included headache (42%), diarrhea (35%), arthralgia (22%), contusion (18%), nausea (18%) and increased weight (18%). Grade 3-4 adverse events that occurred in at least two patients included syncope (two patients) and hypertension (two patients). There was one grade 3 upper GI bleed from a gastric ulcer and aspirin use, and one grade 5 case of pneumonia. No atrial fibrillation was reported.

Dr. Byrd receives research funding from Acerta Pharma, the maker of acalabrutinib, as well as from Genentech and Pharmacyclics.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Ibrutinib given at doses lower than the standard dose of 420 mg/day was associated with comparable overall survival and progression-free survival as the standard dose in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), based on the results of a multicenter, retrospective study submitted as a poster at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The initial findings indicate patients who experience toxicity on the 420 mg/day dosage can still do well on a slightly lower dose of ibrutinib, reported Colleen Timlin, Pharm.D., of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and her associates.

At a median follow-up of 13.5 months, the median progression-free survival was 37.4 months in the standard dose group and the median progression-free survival had not been reached in the reduced-dose group. The median overall survival had not been reached in either group. The hazard ratio in the reduced-dose group was 1.2 for progression-free survival and 0.6 for overall survival; neither difference was statistically significant. Best overall response rate was 85% in the standard-dose group and 84% in the reduced-dose group.

The study included 197 patients, 37 of whom were shifted to reduced doses of ibrutinib within 3 months of initiating therapy at the recommended 420 mg/day dosage. For reduced-dose patients, the median ibrutinib dose was 4.3 mg/kg per day. The most common reasons for reducing the ibrutinib dose were gastrointestinal toxicity, bleeding, rash, cardiotoxicity, and renal insufficiency, the researchers said.

Most of the patients treated with doses less than 420 mg/day still maintained a dose of greater than 2.5 mg/kg per day, which assured adequate Bruton’s tyrosine kinase occupancy. The 420 mg/day dosage noted in the labeling was established, based on achievement of greater than 90% Bruton’s tyrosine kinase occupancy. Fewer patients achieve greater than 90% occupancy at lower doses, but lower doses may not translate into inferior outcomes.

Weight-based dosing should be considered in future studies and pharmacoeconomic analyses. Comparative analyses of toxicity profiles stratified by ibrutinib dose are underway, according to Dr. Timlin and her colleagues.

Dr. Timlin had no relevant disclosures. Several of her colleagues had multiple financial disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Ibrutinib given at doses lower than the standard dose of 420 mg/day was associated with comparable overall survival and progression-free survival as the standard dose in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), based on the results of a multicenter, retrospective study submitted as a poster at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The initial findings indicate patients who experience toxicity on the 420 mg/day dosage can still do well on a slightly lower dose of ibrutinib, reported Colleen Timlin, Pharm.D., of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and her associates.

At a median follow-up of 13.5 months, the median progression-free survival was 37.4 months in the standard dose group and the median progression-free survival had not been reached in the reduced-dose group. The median overall survival had not been reached in either group. The hazard ratio in the reduced-dose group was 1.2 for progression-free survival and 0.6 for overall survival; neither difference was statistically significant. Best overall response rate was 85% in the standard-dose group and 84% in the reduced-dose group.

The study included 197 patients, 37 of whom were shifted to reduced doses of ibrutinib within 3 months of initiating therapy at the recommended 420 mg/day dosage. For reduced-dose patients, the median ibrutinib dose was 4.3 mg/kg per day. The most common reasons for reducing the ibrutinib dose were gastrointestinal toxicity, bleeding, rash, cardiotoxicity, and renal insufficiency, the researchers said.

Most of the patients treated with doses less than 420 mg/day still maintained a dose of greater than 2.5 mg/kg per day, which assured adequate Bruton’s tyrosine kinase occupancy. The 420 mg/day dosage noted in the labeling was established, based on achievement of greater than 90% Bruton’s tyrosine kinase occupancy. Fewer patients achieve greater than 90% occupancy at lower doses, but lower doses may not translate into inferior outcomes.

Weight-based dosing should be considered in future studies and pharmacoeconomic analyses. Comparative analyses of toxicity profiles stratified by ibrutinib dose are underway, according to Dr. Timlin and her colleagues.

Dr. Timlin had no relevant disclosures. Several of her colleagues had multiple financial disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Ibrutinib given at doses lower than the standard dose of 420 mg/day was associated with comparable overall survival and progression-free survival as the standard dose in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), based on the results of a multicenter, retrospective study submitted as a poster at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The initial findings indicate patients who experience toxicity on the 420 mg/day dosage can still do well on a slightly lower dose of ibrutinib, reported Colleen Timlin, Pharm.D., of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and her associates.

At a median follow-up of 13.5 months, the median progression-free survival was 37.4 months in the standard dose group and the median progression-free survival had not been reached in the reduced-dose group. The median overall survival had not been reached in either group. The hazard ratio in the reduced-dose group was 1.2 for progression-free survival and 0.6 for overall survival; neither difference was statistically significant. Best overall response rate was 85% in the standard-dose group and 84% in the reduced-dose group.

The study included 197 patients, 37 of whom were shifted to reduced doses of ibrutinib within 3 months of initiating therapy at the recommended 420 mg/day dosage. For reduced-dose patients, the median ibrutinib dose was 4.3 mg/kg per day. The most common reasons for reducing the ibrutinib dose were gastrointestinal toxicity, bleeding, rash, cardiotoxicity, and renal insufficiency, the researchers said.

Most of the patients treated with doses less than 420 mg/day still maintained a dose of greater than 2.5 mg/kg per day, which assured adequate Bruton’s tyrosine kinase occupancy. The 420 mg/day dosage noted in the labeling was established, based on achievement of greater than 90% Bruton’s tyrosine kinase occupancy. Fewer patients achieve greater than 90% occupancy at lower doses, but lower doses may not translate into inferior outcomes.

Weight-based dosing should be considered in future studies and pharmacoeconomic analyses. Comparative analyses of toxicity profiles stratified by ibrutinib dose are underway, according to Dr. Timlin and her colleagues.

Dr. Timlin had no relevant disclosures. Several of her colleagues had multiple financial disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

CHICAGO – After 2 years of maintenance immunotherapy with rituximab, elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia had better rates of progression-free survival than did patients in an observation group, based on results of the CLL 2007 SA trial from the French FILO (French Innovative Leukemia Organisation) Group.

The two groups did not significantly differ in overall survival, however, with 92.6% estimated 3-year overall survival in the rituximab group and 87.2% in the observation group. Further, the patients given rituximab had more adverse events, based on data presented by Dr. Caroline Dartigeas of the University Hospital in Tours, France, at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Mary Jo Dales/Frontline Medical News

Given the cost and risk for events with rituximab, the findings raise the question of whether there are any meaningful benefits for maintenance rituximab after induction therapy, Dr. Jonathan W. Friedberg of the University of Rochester, N.Y., who was the discussant of the paper, remarked after the presentation. He asked whether there is any evidence that patients feel better if they’re in remission and, thus, their quality of life is improved.

The study included fit, treatment-naive patients aged 65 years and older with B-cell CLL who lacked del17p. Median patient age was 71.3 years, and two-thirds of the patients were men.

Patients received four cycles of induction therapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab on a shortened schedule chosen to reduce the risk of cumulative toxicity. At randomization, patients were stratified for immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) status (54.8% of patients had unmutated status) and del11q (21.3% of patients had the deletion). Patients who had complete (25.7% of patients) or partial (62.8% of patients) responses were randomly allocated to either maintenance rituximab (202 patients given 500 mg/m² twice per month for 2 years) or to observation (207 patients). Median follow-up from randomization was 43.6 months.

Median progression-free survival in the rituximab arm was 59.3 months (95% confidence interval, 49.6; not reached), compared with 49 months (95% CI, 40.9-60.5) in the observation group (hazard ratio, 0.597; 95% CI, 0.437-0.814; P = .0011), corresponding to 3-year progression-free survival of 83% and 64.2% in each arm, respectively.

Mary Jo Dales/Frontline Medical News

Estimated overall survival at 3 years was 92.6% with rituximab maintenance and 87.2% in the observation group. Rituximab maintenance significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with and without del11q and in those with unmutated IGHV.

Serious adverse events for hematologic toxicity were seen in 6.9% of rituximab-treated patients and 1.9% of patients in the observation group (P = .027). Serious adverse events for infectious toxicity occurred in 18.8% of rituximab-treated patients and 10.1% of the observation group (P = .036). There were 69 deaths post randomization: 32 in the rituximab-treated group and 37 in the observation group. Secondary cancers, excluding basal cell carcinomas of the skin, occurred in 15.3% of the rituximab arm, including five cases of myelodysplastic syndrome, and in 11.1% of the observation group, including three cases of myelodysplastic syndrome.

Dr. Dartigeas is a consultant to Gilead Sciences and has provided expert testimony for Roche/Genentech. Genentech and Biogen jointly market rituximab (Rituxan).

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

CHICAGO – After 2 years of maintenance immunotherapy with rituximab, elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia had better rates of progression-free survival than did patients in an observation group, based on results of the CLL 2007 SA trial from the French FILO (French Innovative Leukemia Organisation) Group.

The two groups did not significantly differ in overall survival, however, with 92.6% estimated 3-year overall survival in the rituximab group and 87.2% in the observation group. Further, the patients given rituximab had more adverse events, based on data presented by Dr. Caroline Dartigeas of the University Hospital in Tours, France, at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Mary Jo Dales/Frontline Medical News

Given the cost and risk for events with rituximab, the findings raise the question of whether there are any meaningful benefits for maintenance rituximab after induction therapy, Dr. Jonathan W. Friedberg of the University of Rochester, N.Y., who was the discussant of the paper, remarked after the presentation. He asked whether there is any evidence that patients feel better if they’re in remission and, thus, their quality of life is improved.

The study included fit, treatment-naive patients aged 65 years and older with B-cell CLL who lacked del17p. Median patient age was 71.3 years, and two-thirds of the patients were men.

Patients received four cycles of induction therapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab on a shortened schedule chosen to reduce the risk of cumulative toxicity. At randomization, patients were stratified for immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) status (54.8% of patients had unmutated status) and del11q (21.3% of patients had the deletion). Patients who had complete (25.7% of patients) or partial (62.8% of patients) responses were randomly allocated to either maintenance rituximab (202 patients given 500 mg/m² twice per month for 2 years) or to observation (207 patients). Median follow-up from randomization was 43.6 months.

Median progression-free survival in the rituximab arm was 59.3 months (95% confidence interval, 49.6; not reached), compared with 49 months (95% CI, 40.9-60.5) in the observation group (hazard ratio, 0.597; 95% CI, 0.437-0.814; P = .0011), corresponding to 3-year progression-free survival of 83% and 64.2% in each arm, respectively.

Mary Jo Dales/Frontline Medical News

Estimated overall survival at 3 years was 92.6% with rituximab maintenance and 87.2% in the observation group. Rituximab maintenance significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with and without del11q and in those with unmutated IGHV.

Serious adverse events for hematologic toxicity were seen in 6.9% of rituximab-treated patients and 1.9% of patients in the observation group (P = .027). Serious adverse events for infectious toxicity occurred in 18.8% of rituximab-treated patients and 10.1% of the observation group (P = .036). There were 69 deaths post randomization: 32 in the rituximab-treated group and 37 in the observation group. Secondary cancers, excluding basal cell carcinomas of the skin, occurred in 15.3% of the rituximab arm, including five cases of myelodysplastic syndrome, and in 11.1% of the observation group, including three cases of myelodysplastic syndrome.

Dr. Dartigeas is a consultant to Gilead Sciences and has provided expert testimony for Roche/Genentech. Genentech and Biogen jointly market rituximab (Rituxan).

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

CHICAGO – After 2 years of maintenance immunotherapy with rituximab, elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia had better rates of progression-free survival than did patients in an observation group, based on results of the CLL 2007 SA trial from the French FILO (French Innovative Leukemia Organisation) Group.

The two groups did not significantly differ in overall survival, however, with 92.6% estimated 3-year overall survival in the rituximab group and 87.2% in the observation group. Further, the patients given rituximab had more adverse events, based on data presented by Dr. Caroline Dartigeas of the University Hospital in Tours, France, at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Mary Jo Dales/Frontline Medical News

Given the cost and risk for events with rituximab, the findings raise the question of whether there are any meaningful benefits for maintenance rituximab after induction therapy, Dr. Jonathan W. Friedberg of the University of Rochester, N.Y., who was the discussant of the paper, remarked after the presentation. He asked whether there is any evidence that patients feel better if they’re in remission and, thus, their quality of life is improved.

The study included fit, treatment-naive patients aged 65 years and older with B-cell CLL who lacked del17p. Median patient age was 71.3 years, and two-thirds of the patients were men.

Patients received four cycles of induction therapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab on a shortened schedule chosen to reduce the risk of cumulative toxicity. At randomization, patients were stratified for immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) status (54.8% of patients had unmutated status) and del11q (21.3% of patients had the deletion). Patients who had complete (25.7% of patients) or partial (62.8% of patients) responses were randomly allocated to either maintenance rituximab (202 patients given 500 mg/m² twice per month for 2 years) or to observation (207 patients). Median follow-up from randomization was 43.6 months.

Median progression-free survival in the rituximab arm was 59.3 months (95% confidence interval, 49.6; not reached), compared with 49 months (95% CI, 40.9-60.5) in the observation group (hazard ratio, 0.597; 95% CI, 0.437-0.814; P = .0011), corresponding to 3-year progression-free survival of 83% and 64.2% in each arm, respectively.

Mary Jo Dales/Frontline Medical News

Estimated overall survival at 3 years was 92.6% with rituximab maintenance and 87.2% in the observation group. Rituximab maintenance significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with and without del11q and in those with unmutated IGHV.

Serious adverse events for hematologic toxicity were seen in 6.9% of rituximab-treated patients and 1.9% of patients in the observation group (P = .027). Serious adverse events for infectious toxicity occurred in 18.8% of rituximab-treated patients and 10.1% of the observation group (P = .036). There were 69 deaths post randomization: 32 in the rituximab-treated group and 37 in the observation group. Secondary cancers, excluding basal cell carcinomas of the skin, occurred in 15.3% of the rituximab arm, including five cases of myelodysplastic syndrome, and in 11.1% of the observation group, including three cases of myelodysplastic syndrome.

Dr. Dartigeas is a consultant to Gilead Sciences and has provided expert testimony for Roche/Genentech. Genentech and Biogen jointly market rituximab (Rituxan).

[email protected]

On Twitter @maryjodales

Hematology News’ Editor-in-Chief Matt Kalaycio selected the following as his “top 10” picks for hematologic oncology abstracts at ASCO 2016:

Abstract 7000: Final results of a phase III randomized trial of CPX-351 versus 7+3 in older patients with newly diagnosed high risk (secondary) AML

Comment: When any treatment appears to improve survival, compared with 7+3 for AML, all must take notice.

Link to abstract 7000

Abstract 7001: Treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with frontline nilotinib: Results from the ENESTFreedom study

Comment: About 50% of the CML patients treated with frontline nilotinib are eventually able to stop the drug and successfully stay off of it. That means more patients in treatment-free remission, compared with those initially treated with imatinib.

Link to abstract 7001

Abstract 7007: Phase Ib/2 study of venetoclax with low-dose cytarabine in treatment-naive patients age ≥ 65 with acute myelogenous leukemia

Abstract 7009: Results of a phase 1b study of venetoclax plus decitabine or azacitidine in untreated acute myeloid leukemia patients ≥ 65 years ineligible for standard induction therapy

Comment: The response rates in these older AML patients are remarkable and challenge results typically seen with 7+3 in a younger population.

Link to abstract 7007 and 7009

Abstract 7501: A prospective, multicenter, randomized study of anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody mogamulizumab (moga) vs investigator’s choice (IC) in the treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL)

Comment: The response rate to mogamulizumab was outstanding in the largest randomized clinical trial thus far conducted for this cancer. Although rare in the USA, ATL is more common in Asia.

Link to abstract 7501

Abstract 7507: Effect of bortezomib on complete remission (CR) rate when added to bendamustine-rituximab (BR) in previously untreated high-risk (HR) follicular lymphoma (FL): A randomized phase II trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E2408)

Comment: This interesting observation of improved complete remission needs longer follow-up.

Link to abstract 7507

Abstract 7519: Venetoclax activity in CLL patients who have relapsed after or are refractory to ibrutinib or idelalisib

Comment: This study has implications for practice. Venetoclax elicits a 50%-60% response rate after patients with CLL progress during treatment with B-cell receptor pathway inhibitors.

Link to abstract 7519

Abstract 7521: Acalabrutinib, a second-generation bruton tyrosine kinase (Btk) inhibitor, in previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)

Comment: This next-generation variation on ibrutinib was associated with a 96% overall response rate with fewer adverse effects such as atrial fibrillation.

Link to abstract 7521

Abstract 8000: Upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus novel agent-based therapy for multiple myeloma (MM): A randomized phase 3 study of the European Myeloma Network (EMN02/HO95 MM trial)

Comment: Other trials are underway to address the role of upfront ASCT for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. While the last word on this issue has yet to be written, ASCT remains the standard of care for MM patients after induction.

Link to abstract 8000

LBA4: Phase III randomized controlled study of daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): CASTOR study

Comment: As predicted by most, the addition of daratumumab to bortezomib-based therapy increases response rates, compared with bortezomib-based alone. Efficacy is becoming less of a concern with myeloma treatment than is economics..

Look for the full, final text of this abstract to be posted online at 7:30 AM (EDT) on Sunday, June 5.

Hematology News’ Editor-in-Chief Matt Kalaycio selected the following as his “top 10” picks for hematologic oncology abstracts at ASCO 2016:

Abstract 7000: Final results of a phase III randomized trial of CPX-351 versus 7+3 in older patients with newly diagnosed high risk (secondary) AML

Comment: When any treatment appears to improve survival, compared with 7+3 for AML, all must take notice.

Link to abstract 7000

Abstract 7001: Treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with frontline nilotinib: Results from the ENESTFreedom study

Comment: About 50% of the CML patients treated with frontline nilotinib are eventually able to stop the drug and successfully stay off of it. That means more patients in treatment-free remission, compared with those initially treated with imatinib.

Link to abstract 7001

Abstract 7007: Phase Ib/2 study of venetoclax with low-dose cytarabine in treatment-naive patients age ≥ 65 with acute myelogenous leukemia

Abstract 7009: Results of a phase 1b study of venetoclax plus decitabine or azacitidine in untreated acute myeloid leukemia patients ≥ 65 years ineligible for standard induction therapy

Comment: The response rates in these older AML patients are remarkable and challenge results typically seen with 7+3 in a younger population.

Link to abstract 7007 and 7009

Abstract 7501: A prospective, multicenter, randomized study of anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody mogamulizumab (moga) vs investigator’s choice (IC) in the treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL)

Comment: The response rate to mogamulizumab was outstanding in the largest randomized clinical trial thus far conducted for this cancer. Although rare in the USA, ATL is more common in Asia.

Link to abstract 7501

Abstract 7507: Effect of bortezomib on complete remission (CR) rate when added to bendamustine-rituximab (BR) in previously untreated high-risk (HR) follicular lymphoma (FL): A randomized phase II trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E2408)

Comment: This interesting observation of improved complete remission needs longer follow-up.

Link to abstract 7507

Abstract 7519: Venetoclax activity in CLL patients who have relapsed after or are refractory to ibrutinib or idelalisib

Comment: This study has implications for practice. Venetoclax elicits a 50%-60% response rate after patients with CLL progress during treatment with B-cell receptor pathway inhibitors.

Link to abstract 7519

Abstract 7521: Acalabrutinib, a second-generation bruton tyrosine kinase (Btk) inhibitor, in previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)

Comment: This next-generation variation on ibrutinib was associated with a 96% overall response rate with fewer adverse effects such as atrial fibrillation.

Link to abstract 7521

Abstract 8000: Upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus novel agent-based therapy for multiple myeloma (MM): A randomized phase 3 study of the European Myeloma Network (EMN02/HO95 MM trial)

Comment: Other trials are underway to address the role of upfront ASCT for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. While the last word on this issue has yet to be written, ASCT remains the standard of care for MM patients after induction.

Link to abstract 8000

LBA4: Phase III randomized controlled study of daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): CASTOR study

Comment: As predicted by most, the addition of daratumumab to bortezomib-based therapy increases response rates, compared with bortezomib-based alone. Efficacy is becoming less of a concern with myeloma treatment than is economics..

Look for the full, final text of this abstract to be posted online at 7:30 AM (EDT) on Sunday, June 5.

Hematology News’ Editor-in-Chief Matt Kalaycio selected the following as his “top 10” picks for hematologic oncology abstracts at ASCO 2016:

Abstract 7000: Final results of a phase III randomized trial of CPX-351 versus 7+3 in older patients with newly diagnosed high risk (secondary) AML

Comment: When any treatment appears to improve survival, compared with 7+3 for AML, all must take notice.

Link to abstract 7000

Abstract 7001: Treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with frontline nilotinib: Results from the ENESTFreedom study

Comment: About 50% of the CML patients treated with frontline nilotinib are eventually able to stop the drug and successfully stay off of it. That means more patients in treatment-free remission, compared with those initially treated with imatinib.

Link to abstract 7001

Abstract 7007: Phase Ib/2 study of venetoclax with low-dose cytarabine in treatment-naive patients age ≥ 65 with acute myelogenous leukemia

Abstract 7009: Results of a phase 1b study of venetoclax plus decitabine or azacitidine in untreated acute myeloid leukemia patients ≥ 65 years ineligible for standard induction therapy

Comment: The response rates in these older AML patients are remarkable and challenge results typically seen with 7+3 in a younger population.

Link to abstract 7007 and 7009

Abstract 7501: A prospective, multicenter, randomized study of anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody mogamulizumab (moga) vs investigator’s choice (IC) in the treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL)

Comment: The response rate to mogamulizumab was outstanding in the largest randomized clinical trial thus far conducted for this cancer. Although rare in the USA, ATL is more common in Asia.

Link to abstract 7501

Abstract 7507: Effect of bortezomib on complete remission (CR) rate when added to bendamustine-rituximab (BR) in previously untreated high-risk (HR) follicular lymphoma (FL): A randomized phase II trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E2408)

Comment: This interesting observation of improved complete remission needs longer follow-up.

Link to abstract 7507

Abstract 7519: Venetoclax activity in CLL patients who have relapsed after or are refractory to ibrutinib or idelalisib

Comment: This study has implications for practice. Venetoclax elicits a 50%-60% response rate after patients with CLL progress during treatment with B-cell receptor pathway inhibitors.

Link to abstract 7519

Abstract 7521: Acalabrutinib, a second-generation bruton tyrosine kinase (Btk) inhibitor, in previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)

Comment: This next-generation variation on ibrutinib was associated with a 96% overall response rate with fewer adverse effects such as atrial fibrillation.

Link to abstract 7521

Abstract 8000: Upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus novel agent-based therapy for multiple myeloma (MM): A randomized phase 3 study of the European Myeloma Network (EMN02/HO95 MM trial)

Comment: Other trials are underway to address the role of upfront ASCT for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. While the last word on this issue has yet to be written, ASCT remains the standard of care for MM patients after induction.

Link to abstract 8000

LBA4: Phase III randomized controlled study of daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): CASTOR study

Comment: As predicted by most, the addition of daratumumab to bortezomib-based therapy increases response rates, compared with bortezomib-based alone. Efficacy is becoming less of a concern with myeloma treatment than is economics..

Look for the full, final text of this abstract to be posted online at 7:30 AM (EDT) on Sunday, June 5.

Venetoclax monotherapy was active, and even elicited minimal residual disease negativity in a proportion of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) that was resistant or refractory to ibrutinib or idelalisib, Dr. Jeffrey Alan Jones of the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, and colleagues wrote in an abstract to be presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The findings from their ongoing phase II study are the first prospective results to demonstrate efficacy in this poor-prognosis population, the researchers wrote. Earlier results from the study were reported at the American Society of Hematology meeting.

The 54 patients in the study, 25 of them refractory to ibrutinib and 6 to idelalisib, received venetoclax 20 mg daily followed by a 5-week ramp up in dosage to 400 mg daily. Over half of the patients had received more than five prior therapies; 83% did not have IGHV mutations, 20% had absolute lymphocyte counts exceeding 100 x 10⁹, 35% had 17p deletions, and 24% had at least one node that was 10 cm or larger.

Of the patients who had previously received ibrutinib, four discontinued venetoclax because of progressive disease and four others had respiratory failure, multiorgan failure, death of unknown cause, or consent withdrawal. Of those who previously received idelalisib, four halted therapy because of progressive disease and failure to respond. Of 48 evaluable patients, 38 previously received ibrutinib, and 10 previously received idelalisib.

The overall response rate was 61% (23 of 38 patients) for patients refractory to ibrutinib and 50% (5 of 10 patients) for those refractory to idelalisib. A complete response was seen in three patients, all refractory to ibrutinib.

Grade 3/4 adverse events were seen in over 10% of patients and included neutropenia (39%), thrombocytopenia (22%), anemia (20%), leukopenia (13%), and pneumonia (13%). Significant adverse events seen in at least two patients included pneumonia (9%), febrile neutropenia (7%), increased potassium, multiorgan failure, and septic shock (4% each).

The study is sponsored by AbbVie.

Venetoclax monotherapy was active, and even elicited minimal residual disease negativity in a proportion of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) that was resistant or refractory to ibrutinib or idelalisib, Dr. Jeffrey Alan Jones of the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, and colleagues wrote in an abstract to be presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The findings from their ongoing phase II study are the first prospective results to demonstrate efficacy in this poor-prognosis population, the researchers wrote. Earlier results from the study were reported at the American Society of Hematology meeting.

The 54 patients in the study, 25 of them refractory to ibrutinib and 6 to idelalisib, received venetoclax 20 mg daily followed by a 5-week ramp up in dosage to 400 mg daily. Over half of the patients had received more than five prior therapies; 83% did not have IGHV mutations, 20% had absolute lymphocyte counts exceeding 100 x 10⁹, 35% had 17p deletions, and 24% had at least one node that was 10 cm or larger.

Of the patients who had previously received ibrutinib, four discontinued venetoclax because of progressive disease and four others had respiratory failure, multiorgan failure, death of unknown cause, or consent withdrawal. Of those who previously received idelalisib, four halted therapy because of progressive disease and failure to respond. Of 48 evaluable patients, 38 previously received ibrutinib, and 10 previously received idelalisib.

The overall response rate was 61% (23 of 38 patients) for patients refractory to ibrutinib and 50% (5 of 10 patients) for those refractory to idelalisib. A complete response was seen in three patients, all refractory to ibrutinib.

Grade 3/4 adverse events were seen in over 10% of patients and included neutropenia (39%), thrombocytopenia (22%), anemia (20%), leukopenia (13%), and pneumonia (13%). Significant adverse events seen in at least two patients included pneumonia (9%), febrile neutropenia (7%), increased potassium, multiorgan failure, and septic shock (4% each).

The study is sponsored by AbbVie.

Venetoclax monotherapy was active, and even elicited minimal residual disease negativity in a proportion of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) that was resistant or refractory to ibrutinib or idelalisib, Dr. Jeffrey Alan Jones of the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, and colleagues wrote in an abstract to be presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The findings from their ongoing phase II study are the first prospective results to demonstrate efficacy in this poor-prognosis population, the researchers wrote. Earlier results from the study were reported at the American Society of Hematology meeting.

The 54 patients in the study, 25 of them refractory to ibrutinib and 6 to idelalisib, received venetoclax 20 mg daily followed by a 5-week ramp up in dosage to 400 mg daily. Over half of the patients had received more than five prior therapies; 83% did not have IGHV mutations, 20% had absolute lymphocyte counts exceeding 100 x 10⁹, 35% had 17p deletions, and 24% had at least one node that was 10 cm or larger.

Of the patients who had previously received ibrutinib, four discontinued venetoclax because of progressive disease and four others had respiratory failure, multiorgan failure, death of unknown cause, or consent withdrawal. Of those who previously received idelalisib, four halted therapy because of progressive disease and failure to respond. Of 48 evaluable patients, 38 previously received ibrutinib, and 10 previously received idelalisib.

The overall response rate was 61% (23 of 38 patients) for patients refractory to ibrutinib and 50% (5 of 10 patients) for those refractory to idelalisib. A complete response was seen in three patients, all refractory to ibrutinib.

Grade 3/4 adverse events were seen in over 10% of patients and included neutropenia (39%), thrombocytopenia (22%), anemia (20%), leukopenia (13%), and pneumonia (13%). Significant adverse events seen in at least two patients included pneumonia (9%), febrile neutropenia (7%), increased potassium, multiorgan failure, and septic shock (4% each).

The study is sponsored by AbbVie.