Aggressive Lymphomas

Photo courtesy of CDC

ORLANDO—Results of a retrospective study showed that survivors of lymphoma or breast cancer had a significantly greater risk of congestive heart failure (CHF) than patients who did not have cancer.

This increased risk was observed as early as a year after cancer diagnosis but was still present 20 years after diagnosis.

Overall, 1 in 10 cancer patients had CHF at the 20-year mark.

“The majority of patients do not develop heart failure, but our research helps us recognize the factors associated with it and the importance of appropriate heart care following cancer treatment,” said Carolyn Larsen, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

“Our research suggests that periodic cardiac imaging to monitor for heart damage may be needed for some cancer patients, even if they have no signs of heart damage initially after chemotherapy. Additionally, it emphasizes that working to live a heart-healthy lifestyle is important for cancer patients and survivors to reduce the overall risk of heart disease.”

Dr Larsen and her colleagues presented this research as a poster (abstract 1105-066) at the American College of Cardiology’s 67th Annual Scientific Session & Expo (ACC.18).

Patients

Using data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project, the researchers retrospectively tracked CHF cases in 900 cancer patients and 1550 non-cancer patients. Patients were treated in Olmsted County in Minnesota from 1985 to 2010.

For both patient groups, the median age at baseline was about 53, a little more than 90% of each group was white, and nearly 80% of each group was female.

Six to 7% of patients had diabetes, and about 30% of each group had hypertension. Thirty-eight percent of each group had hyperlipidemia, and 31% were obese.

Five percent of cancer patients and 2% of controls had coronary artery disease (P<0.001). This was the only significant difference in baseline characteristics.

Cancer patients had been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (28%), Hodgkin lymphoma (9%), or breast cancer (64%). Forty-seven percent had received radiation, including right chest (21%), left chest (23%), and mediastinal (4%).

Eighty-four percent of patients had received anthracycline therapy. The median doxorubicin isotoxic dose was 240 mg/m².

At baseline, 12% of cancer patients were on beta-blockers, 8% were on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, 4% were on angiotensin receptor blockers, and 11% were on statins.

Results

Cancer patients were more than 3 times as likely as controls to develop CHF. The hazard ratio (HR) was 3.6 (P<0.01) in an analysis adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, and obesity at baseline.

The increased CHF risk among cancer patients was evident after the first year from cancer diagnosis and persisted at 20 years of follow-up.

“The risk of heart failure doesn’t go away after a couple of years,” Dr Larsen said. “It’s a long-term issue that patients need to discuss with their doctors and use as motivation to stay heart healthy.”

The incidence of CHF—in cancer patients and controls, respectively—was as follows:

• 1 year—1.5% vs 0.1%
• 5 years—3.1% vs 0.9%
• 10 years—5.0% vs 2%
• 20 years—10.1% vs 5.8%.

A multivariable analysis in the cancer patients revealed a few independent risk factors for CHF, including:

• Doxorubicin isotoxic dose ≥ 300 mg/m² (HR=2.34, P=0.003)
• Age at diagnosis (HR=3.06 for age ≥ 80 vs 60-69, P=0.01)
• Coronary artery disease at diagnosis (HR=2.27, P=0.04)
• Diabetes mellitus at diagnosis (HR=2.39, P<0.01).

Dr Larsen said additional research is needed to determine why diabetes carries a greater risk than other traditional risk factors, such as high blood pressure, in this group.

Mitigating risk

These findings raise important questions about what the appropriate surveillance should be for heart problems post-cancer treatment, Dr Larsen said. She believes more frequent cardiac imaging may be warranted in some patients to detect signs of CHF earlier.

“It’s an area that needs to be better defined,” Dr Larsen said. “An echocardiogram is usually done 6 to 12 months after cancer treatment with an anthracycline, but how often should it be done after that? We need to be more vigilant in making sure we try to prevent or control heart issues post-cancer care, especially in light of the growing appreciation of the connection between some cancer treatments and heart disease.”

Dr Larsen also noted that patients themselves can play a role in decreasing their risk of CHF, even if they are starting at a disadvantage.

A heart-healthy lifestyle—maintaining a normal body weight, regular exercise, and controlling other risk factors such as high blood pressure, diabetes, and high cholesterol—can help lower the risk of heart disease and CHF.

“If patients know they have received a drug treatment that might increase their risk of heart failure, it’s even more important to take care of the aspects of their life that they can control to reduce their risk as much as possible and to work with their medical care team to detect issues as early as possible,” Dr Larsen said.

Photo courtesy of CDC

ORLANDO—Results of a retrospective study showed that survivors of lymphoma or breast cancer had a significantly greater risk of congestive heart failure (CHF) than patients who did not have cancer.

This increased risk was observed as early as a year after cancer diagnosis but was still present 20 years after diagnosis.

Overall, 1 in 10 cancer patients had CHF at the 20-year mark.

“The majority of patients do not develop heart failure, but our research helps us recognize the factors associated with it and the importance of appropriate heart care following cancer treatment,” said Carolyn Larsen, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

“Our research suggests that periodic cardiac imaging to monitor for heart damage may be needed for some cancer patients, even if they have no signs of heart damage initially after chemotherapy. Additionally, it emphasizes that working to live a heart-healthy lifestyle is important for cancer patients and survivors to reduce the overall risk of heart disease.”

Dr Larsen and her colleagues presented this research as a poster (abstract 1105-066) at the American College of Cardiology’s 67th Annual Scientific Session & Expo (ACC.18).

Patients

Using data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project, the researchers retrospectively tracked CHF cases in 900 cancer patients and 1550 non-cancer patients. Patients were treated in Olmsted County in Minnesota from 1985 to 2010.

For both patient groups, the median age at baseline was about 53, a little more than 90% of each group was white, and nearly 80% of each group was female.

Six to 7% of patients had diabetes, and about 30% of each group had hypertension. Thirty-eight percent of each group had hyperlipidemia, and 31% were obese.

Five percent of cancer patients and 2% of controls had coronary artery disease (P<0.001). This was the only significant difference in baseline characteristics.

Cancer patients had been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (28%), Hodgkin lymphoma (9%), or breast cancer (64%). Forty-seven percent had received radiation, including right chest (21%), left chest (23%), and mediastinal (4%).

Eighty-four percent of patients had received anthracycline therapy. The median doxorubicin isotoxic dose was 240 mg/m².

At baseline, 12% of cancer patients were on beta-blockers, 8% were on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, 4% were on angiotensin receptor blockers, and 11% were on statins.

Results

Cancer patients were more than 3 times as likely as controls to develop CHF. The hazard ratio (HR) was 3.6 (P<0.01) in an analysis adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, and obesity at baseline.

The increased CHF risk among cancer patients was evident after the first year from cancer diagnosis and persisted at 20 years of follow-up.

“The risk of heart failure doesn’t go away after a couple of years,” Dr Larsen said. “It’s a long-term issue that patients need to discuss with their doctors and use as motivation to stay heart healthy.”

The incidence of CHF—in cancer patients and controls, respectively—was as follows:

• 1 year—1.5% vs 0.1%
• 5 years—3.1% vs 0.9%
• 10 years—5.0% vs 2%
• 20 years—10.1% vs 5.8%.

A multivariable analysis in the cancer patients revealed a few independent risk factors for CHF, including:

• Doxorubicin isotoxic dose ≥ 300 mg/m² (HR=2.34, P=0.003)
• Age at diagnosis (HR=3.06 for age ≥ 80 vs 60-69, P=0.01)
• Coronary artery disease at diagnosis (HR=2.27, P=0.04)
• Diabetes mellitus at diagnosis (HR=2.39, P<0.01).

Dr Larsen said additional research is needed to determine why diabetes carries a greater risk than other traditional risk factors, such as high blood pressure, in this group.

Mitigating risk

These findings raise important questions about what the appropriate surveillance should be for heart problems post-cancer treatment, Dr Larsen said. She believes more frequent cardiac imaging may be warranted in some patients to detect signs of CHF earlier.

“It’s an area that needs to be better defined,” Dr Larsen said. “An echocardiogram is usually done 6 to 12 months after cancer treatment with an anthracycline, but how often should it be done after that? We need to be more vigilant in making sure we try to prevent or control heart issues post-cancer care, especially in light of the growing appreciation of the connection between some cancer treatments and heart disease.”

Dr Larsen also noted that patients themselves can play a role in decreasing their risk of CHF, even if they are starting at a disadvantage.

A heart-healthy lifestyle—maintaining a normal body weight, regular exercise, and controlling other risk factors such as high blood pressure, diabetes, and high cholesterol—can help lower the risk of heart disease and CHF.

“If patients know they have received a drug treatment that might increase their risk of heart failure, it’s even more important to take care of the aspects of their life that they can control to reduce their risk as much as possible and to work with their medical care team to detect issues as early as possible,” Dr Larsen said.

Photo courtesy of CDC

ORLANDO—Results of a retrospective study showed that survivors of lymphoma or breast cancer had a significantly greater risk of congestive heart failure (CHF) than patients who did not have cancer.

This increased risk was observed as early as a year after cancer diagnosis but was still present 20 years after diagnosis.

Overall, 1 in 10 cancer patients had CHF at the 20-year mark.

“The majority of patients do not develop heart failure, but our research helps us recognize the factors associated with it and the importance of appropriate heart care following cancer treatment,” said Carolyn Larsen, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

“Our research suggests that periodic cardiac imaging to monitor for heart damage may be needed for some cancer patients, even if they have no signs of heart damage initially after chemotherapy. Additionally, it emphasizes that working to live a heart-healthy lifestyle is important for cancer patients and survivors to reduce the overall risk of heart disease.”

Dr Larsen and her colleagues presented this research as a poster (abstract 1105-066) at the American College of Cardiology’s 67th Annual Scientific Session & Expo (ACC.18).

Patients

Using data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project, the researchers retrospectively tracked CHF cases in 900 cancer patients and 1550 non-cancer patients. Patients were treated in Olmsted County in Minnesota from 1985 to 2010.

For both patient groups, the median age at baseline was about 53, a little more than 90% of each group was white, and nearly 80% of each group was female.

Six to 7% of patients had diabetes, and about 30% of each group had hypertension. Thirty-eight percent of each group had hyperlipidemia, and 31% were obese.

Five percent of cancer patients and 2% of controls had coronary artery disease (P<0.001). This was the only significant difference in baseline characteristics.

Cancer patients had been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (28%), Hodgkin lymphoma (9%), or breast cancer (64%). Forty-seven percent had received radiation, including right chest (21%), left chest (23%), and mediastinal (4%).

Eighty-four percent of patients had received anthracycline therapy. The median doxorubicin isotoxic dose was 240 mg/m².

At baseline, 12% of cancer patients were on beta-blockers, 8% were on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, 4% were on angiotensin receptor blockers, and 11% were on statins.

Results

Cancer patients were more than 3 times as likely as controls to develop CHF. The hazard ratio (HR) was 3.6 (P<0.01) in an analysis adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, and obesity at baseline.

The increased CHF risk among cancer patients was evident after the first year from cancer diagnosis and persisted at 20 years of follow-up.

“The risk of heart failure doesn’t go away after a couple of years,” Dr Larsen said. “It’s a long-term issue that patients need to discuss with their doctors and use as motivation to stay heart healthy.”

The incidence of CHF—in cancer patients and controls, respectively—was as follows:

• 1 year—1.5% vs 0.1%
• 5 years—3.1% vs 0.9%
• 10 years—5.0% vs 2%
• 20 years—10.1% vs 5.8%.

A multivariable analysis in the cancer patients revealed a few independent risk factors for CHF, including:

• Doxorubicin isotoxic dose ≥ 300 mg/m² (HR=2.34, P=0.003)
• Age at diagnosis (HR=3.06 for age ≥ 80 vs 60-69, P=0.01)
• Coronary artery disease at diagnosis (HR=2.27, P=0.04)
• Diabetes mellitus at diagnosis (HR=2.39, P<0.01).

Dr Larsen said additional research is needed to determine why diabetes carries a greater risk than other traditional risk factors, such as high blood pressure, in this group.

Mitigating risk

These findings raise important questions about what the appropriate surveillance should be for heart problems post-cancer treatment, Dr Larsen said. She believes more frequent cardiac imaging may be warranted in some patients to detect signs of CHF earlier.

“It’s an area that needs to be better defined,” Dr Larsen said. “An echocardiogram is usually done 6 to 12 months after cancer treatment with an anthracycline, but how often should it be done after that? We need to be more vigilant in making sure we try to prevent or control heart issues post-cancer care, especially in light of the growing appreciation of the connection between some cancer treatments and heart disease.”

Dr Larsen also noted that patients themselves can play a role in decreasing their risk of CHF, even if they are starting at a disadvantage.

A heart-healthy lifestyle—maintaining a normal body weight, regular exercise, and controlling other risk factors such as high blood pressure, diabetes, and high cholesterol—can help lower the risk of heart disease and CHF.

“If patients know they have received a drug treatment that might increase their risk of heart failure, it’s even more important to take care of the aspects of their life that they can control to reduce their risk as much as possible and to work with their medical care team to detect issues as early as possible,” Dr Larsen said.

SALT LAKE CITY – A CD19-directed 4-1BB chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell product showed efficacy and a low rate of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity in patients with aggressive lymphomas and poor prognoses, raising the possibility of outpatient administration and fewer hospitalization days in this high-risk group.

A total of 86 patients who received inpatient infusions of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel, also known as JCAR017) had a mean 15.6 days of hospitalization, compared with 9.3 days for 8 outpatient recipients, said Jeremy Abramson, MD, speaking at a top abstracts session of the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Kari Oakes/Frontline Medical News

Although all but one required hospital admission, at a median of 5 days postinfusion (range, 4-22 days), there had been no intensive care unit admissions, and no outpatient recipients had experienced severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or neurotoxicity. All admitted patients presented with fever.

Among the study population, “Cytokine release syndrome was only seen in 35% of our entire dataset,” with neurologic toxicity seen in 19% of participants, Dr. Abramson said. “The majority of subjects had no CRS and no toxicity,” he said. Severe CRS occurred in 1% of the study population, and severe neurotoxicity in 12%. There were no deaths related to either complication.

Dr. Abramson reported these results from the TRANSCEND NHL 001 trial, a seamless design phase 1 pivotal trial of liso-cel enrolling patients with relapsed and refractory aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Liso-cel delivers CD19-directed CD4 and CD8 CAR T cells in a 1:1 ratio, said Dr. Abramson, director of the lymphoma program at the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston.

A total of 91 patients were randomized to one of the three dose-finding cohorts of the multicenter trial of liso-cel. One cohort received 5 x 10⁷ cells in a single dose; a second cohort received the same number of cells but in two doses administered 14 days apart; the third cohort received a single dose of 1 x 10⁸ cells.

The seamless trial design then moved to dose expansion, using the two single doses established in the dose-finding phase of the study. Ultimately, Dr. Abramson said, the third and pivotal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cohort received the higher single dose, since a dose-response relationship was seen in the earlier cohorts. No increase in cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity has been seen with the higher dose in patients evaluated to date.

Patients (median age, 61 years) were eligible to participate in the trial if they had relapsed or refractory DLBCL, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, grade 3B follicular lymphoma, or mantle cell lymphoma. Patients with a failed prior allogeneic stem cell transplant or secondary central nervous system involvement were eligible, but all patients had to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2.

As the trial moved to the core pivotal phase, eligibility requirements shifted slightly to include patients with ECOG status 0 or 1, and lymphoma diagnoses narrowed to include only DLBCL not otherwise specified (NOS), transformed follicular lymphoma, and high-grade B-cell lymphoma with double- and triple-hit cytogenetics. The core group was nearing completion of accrual at the time of the presentation, which presented preliminary results from this phase of the trial.

Among the 88 evaluable patients in the initial population with DLBCL receiving any of three dose levels, the best overall response rate (ORR) was 74% (95% confidence interval, 63%-83%); 52% of these patients achieved complete response (CR; 95% CI, 41%-63%).

For patients receiving the higher dose of liso-cel, the ORR was 81% (95% CI, 62%-94%), with a 63% CR rate (95% CI, 42%-81%), bearing out the dose-response rate that had been seen earlier in the trial, Dr. Abramson said.

The median duration of response in all TRANSCEND patients was 9.2 months; the median duration of remission has not been reached, he said. “We see evidence of durable response at 3 months in all our high-risk subsets, and that includes double- and triple-hit lymphomas, double-expresser lymphomas, patients who’ve never achieved prior complete remission, and patients with refractory disease.”

“The overall results are similarly encouraging,” Dr. Abramson said, with 86% of all patients alive at 6 months. Among the complete responders, 94% are alive at the 6-month mark. “The median duration of complete responders has not been reached in this cohort,” he said.

These results are notable, Dr. Abramson said, since about 90% of study participants have at least one disease risk factor that would predict median overall survival of 3-6 months.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Abramson J et al. Abstract 5.

SALT LAKE CITY – A CD19-directed 4-1BB chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell product showed efficacy and a low rate of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity in patients with aggressive lymphomas and poor prognoses, raising the possibility of outpatient administration and fewer hospitalization days in this high-risk group.

A total of 86 patients who received inpatient infusions of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel, also known as JCAR017) had a mean 15.6 days of hospitalization, compared with 9.3 days for 8 outpatient recipients, said Jeremy Abramson, MD, speaking at a top abstracts session of the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Kari Oakes/Frontline Medical News

Although all but one required hospital admission, at a median of 5 days postinfusion (range, 4-22 days), there had been no intensive care unit admissions, and no outpatient recipients had experienced severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or neurotoxicity. All admitted patients presented with fever.

Among the study population, “Cytokine release syndrome was only seen in 35% of our entire dataset,” with neurologic toxicity seen in 19% of participants, Dr. Abramson said. “The majority of subjects had no CRS and no toxicity,” he said. Severe CRS occurred in 1% of the study population, and severe neurotoxicity in 12%. There were no deaths related to either complication.

Dr. Abramson reported these results from the TRANSCEND NHL 001 trial, a seamless design phase 1 pivotal trial of liso-cel enrolling patients with relapsed and refractory aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Liso-cel delivers CD19-directed CD4 and CD8 CAR T cells in a 1:1 ratio, said Dr. Abramson, director of the lymphoma program at the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston.

A total of 91 patients were randomized to one of the three dose-finding cohorts of the multicenter trial of liso-cel. One cohort received 5 x 10⁷ cells in a single dose; a second cohort received the same number of cells but in two doses administered 14 days apart; the third cohort received a single dose of 1 x 10⁸ cells.

The seamless trial design then moved to dose expansion, using the two single doses established in the dose-finding phase of the study. Ultimately, Dr. Abramson said, the third and pivotal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cohort received the higher single dose, since a dose-response relationship was seen in the earlier cohorts. No increase in cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity has been seen with the higher dose in patients evaluated to date.

Patients (median age, 61 years) were eligible to participate in the trial if they had relapsed or refractory DLBCL, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, grade 3B follicular lymphoma, or mantle cell lymphoma. Patients with a failed prior allogeneic stem cell transplant or secondary central nervous system involvement were eligible, but all patients had to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2.

As the trial moved to the core pivotal phase, eligibility requirements shifted slightly to include patients with ECOG status 0 or 1, and lymphoma diagnoses narrowed to include only DLBCL not otherwise specified (NOS), transformed follicular lymphoma, and high-grade B-cell lymphoma with double- and triple-hit cytogenetics. The core group was nearing completion of accrual at the time of the presentation, which presented preliminary results from this phase of the trial.

Among the 88 evaluable patients in the initial population with DLBCL receiving any of three dose levels, the best overall response rate (ORR) was 74% (95% confidence interval, 63%-83%); 52% of these patients achieved complete response (CR; 95% CI, 41%-63%).

For patients receiving the higher dose of liso-cel, the ORR was 81% (95% CI, 62%-94%), with a 63% CR rate (95% CI, 42%-81%), bearing out the dose-response rate that had been seen earlier in the trial, Dr. Abramson said.

The median duration of response in all TRANSCEND patients was 9.2 months; the median duration of remission has not been reached, he said. “We see evidence of durable response at 3 months in all our high-risk subsets, and that includes double- and triple-hit lymphomas, double-expresser lymphomas, patients who’ve never achieved prior complete remission, and patients with refractory disease.”

“The overall results are similarly encouraging,” Dr. Abramson said, with 86% of all patients alive at 6 months. Among the complete responders, 94% are alive at the 6-month mark. “The median duration of complete responders has not been reached in this cohort,” he said.

These results are notable, Dr. Abramson said, since about 90% of study participants have at least one disease risk factor that would predict median overall survival of 3-6 months.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Abramson J et al. Abstract 5.

SALT LAKE CITY – A CD19-directed 4-1BB chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell product showed efficacy and a low rate of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity in patients with aggressive lymphomas and poor prognoses, raising the possibility of outpatient administration and fewer hospitalization days in this high-risk group.

A total of 86 patients who received inpatient infusions of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel, also known as JCAR017) had a mean 15.6 days of hospitalization, compared with 9.3 days for 8 outpatient recipients, said Jeremy Abramson, MD, speaking at a top abstracts session of the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Kari Oakes/Frontline Medical News

Although all but one required hospital admission, at a median of 5 days postinfusion (range, 4-22 days), there had been no intensive care unit admissions, and no outpatient recipients had experienced severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or neurotoxicity. All admitted patients presented with fever.

Among the study population, “Cytokine release syndrome was only seen in 35% of our entire dataset,” with neurologic toxicity seen in 19% of participants, Dr. Abramson said. “The majority of subjects had no CRS and no toxicity,” he said. Severe CRS occurred in 1% of the study population, and severe neurotoxicity in 12%. There were no deaths related to either complication.

Dr. Abramson reported these results from the TRANSCEND NHL 001 trial, a seamless design phase 1 pivotal trial of liso-cel enrolling patients with relapsed and refractory aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Liso-cel delivers CD19-directed CD4 and CD8 CAR T cells in a 1:1 ratio, said Dr. Abramson, director of the lymphoma program at the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston.

A total of 91 patients were randomized to one of the three dose-finding cohorts of the multicenter trial of liso-cel. One cohort received 5 x 10⁷ cells in a single dose; a second cohort received the same number of cells but in two doses administered 14 days apart; the third cohort received a single dose of 1 x 10⁸ cells.

The seamless trial design then moved to dose expansion, using the two single doses established in the dose-finding phase of the study. Ultimately, Dr. Abramson said, the third and pivotal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cohort received the higher single dose, since a dose-response relationship was seen in the earlier cohorts. No increase in cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity has been seen with the higher dose in patients evaluated to date.

Patients (median age, 61 years) were eligible to participate in the trial if they had relapsed or refractory DLBCL, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, grade 3B follicular lymphoma, or mantle cell lymphoma. Patients with a failed prior allogeneic stem cell transplant or secondary central nervous system involvement were eligible, but all patients had to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2.

As the trial moved to the core pivotal phase, eligibility requirements shifted slightly to include patients with ECOG status 0 or 1, and lymphoma diagnoses narrowed to include only DLBCL not otherwise specified (NOS), transformed follicular lymphoma, and high-grade B-cell lymphoma with double- and triple-hit cytogenetics. The core group was nearing completion of accrual at the time of the presentation, which presented preliminary results from this phase of the trial.

Among the 88 evaluable patients in the initial population with DLBCL receiving any of three dose levels, the best overall response rate (ORR) was 74% (95% confidence interval, 63%-83%); 52% of these patients achieved complete response (CR; 95% CI, 41%-63%).

For patients receiving the higher dose of liso-cel, the ORR was 81% (95% CI, 62%-94%), with a 63% CR rate (95% CI, 42%-81%), bearing out the dose-response rate that had been seen earlier in the trial, Dr. Abramson said.

The median duration of response in all TRANSCEND patients was 9.2 months; the median duration of remission has not been reached, he said. “We see evidence of durable response at 3 months in all our high-risk subsets, and that includes double- and triple-hit lymphomas, double-expresser lymphomas, patients who’ve never achieved prior complete remission, and patients with refractory disease.”

“The overall results are similarly encouraging,” Dr. Abramson said, with 86% of all patients alive at 6 months. Among the complete responders, 94% are alive at the 6-month mark. “The median duration of complete responders has not been reached in this cohort,” he said.

These results are notable, Dr. Abramson said, since about 90% of study participants have at least one disease risk factor that would predict median overall survival of 3-6 months.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Abramson J et al. Abstract 5.

LA JOLLA, CALIF. – When patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) experience relapse, consider an allogeneic stem cell transplant or clinical trial, investigators advised.

Patients with relapsed PTCL have generally dismal outcomes, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.7 months and a median overall survival (OS) of just 6.5 months, according to one study (J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jun 1;31[16]:1970-6).

Courtesy Larry Young

She outlined her center’s approach for treating patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL, following a case presentation by Royal Marsden fellow Matthew Cross, MD.

Complex disease, multiple therapies

The patient was a 71-year-old woman who in 2007 had a diagnosis of asymptomatic stage 4A follicular lymphoma managed with observation; in 2010, she was diagnosed with a CD30-positive PTCL not otherwise specified with ongoing low-level bone marrow involvement with follicular lymphoma.

She initially was treated elsewhere with R-CHOP chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone plus rituximab) and had a response after four cycles; however, she had progression with new intra-abdominal nodal sites by the sixth cycle and then was started on two cycles of ESHAP (etoposide, methylprednisolone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin), but she had further progression by May 2011 and opted to forgo additional treatment.

By July 2011, however, she became highly symptomatic with new pruritic rashes on her legs, abdominal pain, and distention. She was referred to the Royal Marsden Hospital, where she was eventually diagnosed with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) with an Epstein-Barr virus–negative clonal large B-cell proliferation in her bone marrow.

She was treated with gemcitabine plus methylprednisolone and prophylactic intrathecal methotrexate and had an “excellent clinical and radiological response,” Dr. Cross said.

A subsequent bone marrow biopsy showed marked hypocellularity but no evidence of either T-cell of B-cell lymphomas.

An autologous stem cell transplant was planned, but two attempts at harvesting peripheral blood stem cells – including one with plerixafor (Mozobil) – failed, and a PET scan within 3 months showed signs of early progression.

In April 2012, the patient was started on romidepsin (Istodax) and had a 1-year remission. But in April 2013, a repeat biopsy again showed CD30-positive AITL. Based on the CD30 positivity, the patient was started on brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) in May 2013. She was observed to have progression in inguinal nodes in January 2014; she was treated with local radiotherapy and continued on brentuximab but had further progression in June 2014. At that time, she had additional gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy and had stable disease for 10 months.

In March 2015, she received lenalidomide for further progression but could not tolerate the drug. She died in September 2015, 5 years after diagnosis and 4.5 years after frontline therapy failed.

Therapeutic rationale

Dr. Dearden walked through the choices that she, along with Dr. Cross and their colleagues, made in treating the patient. They chose gemcitabine-based regimens for salvage therapy because of the drug’s efficacy across various forms on non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma, she said.

However, a randomized, phase 3, noninferiority trial in the United Kingdom comparing GEM-P (gemcitabine, cisplatin, and methylprednisolone) with CHOP for first-line therapy of PTCL was halted at the interim analysis because GEM-P had not meet the primary endpoint, she said. Results of that trial have not been published to date.

“Clearly, if it’s the patients who do well, often it’s because they achieve a good enough remission to be able to proceed to some sort of consolidation therapy with autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplants, and I think auto-graft is probably accepted for the younger, fitter patients with relapsed chemo-sensitive disease,” she said.

Three-year survival rates for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation range from 36% to 58% and are better than those seen with chemotherapy alone, she said.

“The problem of course is that not many patients receive the planned auto-graft, even if that’s the intention, either because of failure to respond to salvage regimen or early disease progression, which happens before the transplant is able to take place,” she said,

A reasonable alternative for patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL is allogeneic transplantation, as shown in a 2008 study.

Among 77 patients – 57 of whom had received myeloablative conditioning, 31 of whom were in complete remission, and 26 of whom had partial response at the time of transplants – the 5-year treatment-related mortality rate was 33%. However, the 5-year event-free and overall survival rates were 53% and 57%, respectively. Patients with AITL had especially good outcomes (J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 10;26[14]:2264-71).

“In an ideal world, if our patient had been a suitable candidate for an allo-transplant, it’s what we would have tried to undertake,” Dr. Dearden said.

Dr. Dearden recommended that all patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL be considered for clinical trials. For fit patients in first relapse, combination platinum-based chemotherapy followed by autologous or allogeneic transplant may be effective.

For patients not eligible for transplant or with chemotherapy-refractory disease, she recommended trying the following monotherapy approaches: pralatrexate for patients with PTCL not otherwise specified, histone deacetylase inhibitors or 5-azacytidine for AITL, brentuximab vedotin for anaplastic large cell lymphoma, and pembrolizumab for natural killer/T-cell lymphomas.

Although two lines of intensive chemotherapy had failed the case patient within 6 months of diagnosis, she still survived for 5 years with sequential monotherapies, Dr. Dearden noted.

“I use to say to her, ‘You just need to stay one drug ahead of your disease.’ And she was well, she had a very good quality of life for a period of time, and if you can deliver a treatment that is effective for a patient, it will extend their survival,” Dr. Dearden said.

The T-cell Lymphoma Forum is held by Jonathan Wood & Associates, which is owned by the same company as this news organization. Dr. Dearden has consulted for MedImmune, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Gilead Sciences, and Roche, and has received honoraria from Janssen and Gilead. Dr. Cross reported no having no financial disclosures.

LA JOLLA, CALIF. – When patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) experience relapse, consider an allogeneic stem cell transplant or clinical trial, investigators advised.

Patients with relapsed PTCL have generally dismal outcomes, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.7 months and a median overall survival (OS) of just 6.5 months, according to one study (J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jun 1;31[16]:1970-6).

Courtesy Larry Young

She outlined her center’s approach for treating patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL, following a case presentation by Royal Marsden fellow Matthew Cross, MD.

Complex disease, multiple therapies

The patient was a 71-year-old woman who in 2007 had a diagnosis of asymptomatic stage 4A follicular lymphoma managed with observation; in 2010, she was diagnosed with a CD30-positive PTCL not otherwise specified with ongoing low-level bone marrow involvement with follicular lymphoma.

She initially was treated elsewhere with R-CHOP chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone plus rituximab) and had a response after four cycles; however, she had progression with new intra-abdominal nodal sites by the sixth cycle and then was started on two cycles of ESHAP (etoposide, methylprednisolone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin), but she had further progression by May 2011 and opted to forgo additional treatment.

By July 2011, however, she became highly symptomatic with new pruritic rashes on her legs, abdominal pain, and distention. She was referred to the Royal Marsden Hospital, where she was eventually diagnosed with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) with an Epstein-Barr virus–negative clonal large B-cell proliferation in her bone marrow.

She was treated with gemcitabine plus methylprednisolone and prophylactic intrathecal methotrexate and had an “excellent clinical and radiological response,” Dr. Cross said.

A subsequent bone marrow biopsy showed marked hypocellularity but no evidence of either T-cell of B-cell lymphomas.

An autologous stem cell transplant was planned, but two attempts at harvesting peripheral blood stem cells – including one with plerixafor (Mozobil) – failed, and a PET scan within 3 months showed signs of early progression.

In April 2012, the patient was started on romidepsin (Istodax) and had a 1-year remission. But in April 2013, a repeat biopsy again showed CD30-positive AITL. Based on the CD30 positivity, the patient was started on brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) in May 2013. She was observed to have progression in inguinal nodes in January 2014; she was treated with local radiotherapy and continued on brentuximab but had further progression in June 2014. At that time, she had additional gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy and had stable disease for 10 months.

In March 2015, she received lenalidomide for further progression but could not tolerate the drug. She died in September 2015, 5 years after diagnosis and 4.5 years after frontline therapy failed.

Therapeutic rationale

Dr. Dearden walked through the choices that she, along with Dr. Cross and their colleagues, made in treating the patient. They chose gemcitabine-based regimens for salvage therapy because of the drug’s efficacy across various forms on non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma, she said.

However, a randomized, phase 3, noninferiority trial in the United Kingdom comparing GEM-P (gemcitabine, cisplatin, and methylprednisolone) with CHOP for first-line therapy of PTCL was halted at the interim analysis because GEM-P had not meet the primary endpoint, she said. Results of that trial have not been published to date.

“Clearly, if it’s the patients who do well, often it’s because they achieve a good enough remission to be able to proceed to some sort of consolidation therapy with autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplants, and I think auto-graft is probably accepted for the younger, fitter patients with relapsed chemo-sensitive disease,” she said.

Three-year survival rates for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation range from 36% to 58% and are better than those seen with chemotherapy alone, she said.

“The problem of course is that not many patients receive the planned auto-graft, even if that’s the intention, either because of failure to respond to salvage regimen or early disease progression, which happens before the transplant is able to take place,” she said,

A reasonable alternative for patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL is allogeneic transplantation, as shown in a 2008 study.

Among 77 patients – 57 of whom had received myeloablative conditioning, 31 of whom were in complete remission, and 26 of whom had partial response at the time of transplants – the 5-year treatment-related mortality rate was 33%. However, the 5-year event-free and overall survival rates were 53% and 57%, respectively. Patients with AITL had especially good outcomes (J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 10;26[14]:2264-71).

“In an ideal world, if our patient had been a suitable candidate for an allo-transplant, it’s what we would have tried to undertake,” Dr. Dearden said.

Dr. Dearden recommended that all patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL be considered for clinical trials. For fit patients in first relapse, combination platinum-based chemotherapy followed by autologous or allogeneic transplant may be effective.

For patients not eligible for transplant or with chemotherapy-refractory disease, she recommended trying the following monotherapy approaches: pralatrexate for patients with PTCL not otherwise specified, histone deacetylase inhibitors or 5-azacytidine for AITL, brentuximab vedotin for anaplastic large cell lymphoma, and pembrolizumab for natural killer/T-cell lymphomas.

Although two lines of intensive chemotherapy had failed the case patient within 6 months of diagnosis, she still survived for 5 years with sequential monotherapies, Dr. Dearden noted.

“I use to say to her, ‘You just need to stay one drug ahead of your disease.’ And she was well, she had a very good quality of life for a period of time, and if you can deliver a treatment that is effective for a patient, it will extend their survival,” Dr. Dearden said.

The T-cell Lymphoma Forum is held by Jonathan Wood & Associates, which is owned by the same company as this news organization. Dr. Dearden has consulted for MedImmune, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Gilead Sciences, and Roche, and has received honoraria from Janssen and Gilead. Dr. Cross reported no having no financial disclosures.

LA JOLLA, CALIF. – When patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) experience relapse, consider an allogeneic stem cell transplant or clinical trial, investigators advised.

Patients with relapsed PTCL have generally dismal outcomes, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.7 months and a median overall survival (OS) of just 6.5 months, according to one study (J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jun 1;31[16]:1970-6).

Courtesy Larry Young

She outlined her center’s approach for treating patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL, following a case presentation by Royal Marsden fellow Matthew Cross, MD.

Complex disease, multiple therapies

The patient was a 71-year-old woman who in 2007 had a diagnosis of asymptomatic stage 4A follicular lymphoma managed with observation; in 2010, she was diagnosed with a CD30-positive PTCL not otherwise specified with ongoing low-level bone marrow involvement with follicular lymphoma.

She initially was treated elsewhere with R-CHOP chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone plus rituximab) and had a response after four cycles; however, she had progression with new intra-abdominal nodal sites by the sixth cycle and then was started on two cycles of ESHAP (etoposide, methylprednisolone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin), but she had further progression by May 2011 and opted to forgo additional treatment.

By July 2011, however, she became highly symptomatic with new pruritic rashes on her legs, abdominal pain, and distention. She was referred to the Royal Marsden Hospital, where she was eventually diagnosed with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) with an Epstein-Barr virus–negative clonal large B-cell proliferation in her bone marrow.

She was treated with gemcitabine plus methylprednisolone and prophylactic intrathecal methotrexate and had an “excellent clinical and radiological response,” Dr. Cross said.

A subsequent bone marrow biopsy showed marked hypocellularity but no evidence of either T-cell of B-cell lymphomas.

An autologous stem cell transplant was planned, but two attempts at harvesting peripheral blood stem cells – including one with plerixafor (Mozobil) – failed, and a PET scan within 3 months showed signs of early progression.

In April 2012, the patient was started on romidepsin (Istodax) and had a 1-year remission. But in April 2013, a repeat biopsy again showed CD30-positive AITL. Based on the CD30 positivity, the patient was started on brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) in May 2013. She was observed to have progression in inguinal nodes in January 2014; she was treated with local radiotherapy and continued on brentuximab but had further progression in June 2014. At that time, she had additional gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy and had stable disease for 10 months.

In March 2015, she received lenalidomide for further progression but could not tolerate the drug. She died in September 2015, 5 years after diagnosis and 4.5 years after frontline therapy failed.

Therapeutic rationale

Dr. Dearden walked through the choices that she, along with Dr. Cross and their colleagues, made in treating the patient. They chose gemcitabine-based regimens for salvage therapy because of the drug’s efficacy across various forms on non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma, she said.

However, a randomized, phase 3, noninferiority trial in the United Kingdom comparing GEM-P (gemcitabine, cisplatin, and methylprednisolone) with CHOP for first-line therapy of PTCL was halted at the interim analysis because GEM-P had not meet the primary endpoint, she said. Results of that trial have not been published to date.

“Clearly, if it’s the patients who do well, often it’s because they achieve a good enough remission to be able to proceed to some sort of consolidation therapy with autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplants, and I think auto-graft is probably accepted for the younger, fitter patients with relapsed chemo-sensitive disease,” she said.

Three-year survival rates for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation range from 36% to 58% and are better than those seen with chemotherapy alone, she said.

“The problem of course is that not many patients receive the planned auto-graft, even if that’s the intention, either because of failure to respond to salvage regimen or early disease progression, which happens before the transplant is able to take place,” she said,

A reasonable alternative for patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL is allogeneic transplantation, as shown in a 2008 study.

Among 77 patients – 57 of whom had received myeloablative conditioning, 31 of whom were in complete remission, and 26 of whom had partial response at the time of transplants – the 5-year treatment-related mortality rate was 33%. However, the 5-year event-free and overall survival rates were 53% and 57%, respectively. Patients with AITL had especially good outcomes (J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 10;26[14]:2264-71).

“In an ideal world, if our patient had been a suitable candidate for an allo-transplant, it’s what we would have tried to undertake,” Dr. Dearden said.

Dr. Dearden recommended that all patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL be considered for clinical trials. For fit patients in first relapse, combination platinum-based chemotherapy followed by autologous or allogeneic transplant may be effective.

For patients not eligible for transplant or with chemotherapy-refractory disease, she recommended trying the following monotherapy approaches: pralatrexate for patients with PTCL not otherwise specified, histone deacetylase inhibitors or 5-azacytidine for AITL, brentuximab vedotin for anaplastic large cell lymphoma, and pembrolizumab for natural killer/T-cell lymphomas.

Although two lines of intensive chemotherapy had failed the case patient within 6 months of diagnosis, she still survived for 5 years with sequential monotherapies, Dr. Dearden noted.

“I use to say to her, ‘You just need to stay one drug ahead of your disease.’ And she was well, she had a very good quality of life for a period of time, and if you can deliver a treatment that is effective for a patient, it will extend their survival,” Dr. Dearden said.

The T-cell Lymphoma Forum is held by Jonathan Wood & Associates, which is owned by the same company as this news organization. Dr. Dearden has consulted for MedImmune, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Gilead Sciences, and Roche, and has received honoraria from Janssen and Gilead. Dr. Cross reported no having no financial disclosures.

Variations in the clinical presentation of immunotherapy-induced inflammatory arthritis is partly explained by which treatment regimen was used to treat the cancer, a single-center study suggests.

While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the field of oncology, their use for an ever-widening range of indications had created an increasing population of patients referred to rheumatologists for the management of immune-related adverse events (IrAEs), according to Laura C. Cappelli, MD, and her colleagues at John Hopkins University, Baltimore. 

Well-established guidelines exist for managing adverse events such as colitis and pneumonitis, but there are only preliminary guidelines for evaluating and treating immunotherapy-induced inflammatory arthritis (IA). “This may stem from a lack of consistent reporting of rheumatologic IrAEs in clinical trials, the non–life threatening nature of [inflammatory arthritis], or lack of recognition of musculoskeletal symptoms by treating providers,” they wrote in Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism.

Clinical trials have reported ranges of arthralgia in 1%-43% of patients treated with ICIs, but no accurate estimate of the incidence of IA exists. 

The researchers noted that treating patients with ICI-induced IA is complicated by a history of active or recently treated cancer and concerns over using immunosuppression in the context of ICI therapy. 

They set out to evaluate the clinical presentations of 30 patients seen in their clinic with ICI-induced IA. Patients were a median of 59 years old and 12 (40%) were female. Tumor types included metastatic melanoma, non–small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma, cutaneous lymphoma, renal cell carcinoma, duodenal carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, cutaneous basal cell carcinoma, and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Sixteen patients were treated with anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 monotherapy, and 14 were treated with combination anti–CTLA-4/PD-1 therapy. 
Patients on combination therapy were significantly younger (7.5 years, P = 0.01) and were more likely to have metastatic melanoma as their underlying cancer.

Patients who received combination therapy were more likely to present first with knee IA (n = 10) and none had small joint involvement. In contrast, initial small joint involvement was more common in the monotherapy group (n = 6).

Most of the patients in the study had an additional IrAE, with colitis being the most common (n=10), followed by thyroid disease, pneumonitis, and rash. Patients on PD-1 or programmed death ligand 1 monotherapy were more likely to have IA as their first IrAE.

The research team noted that the median time to symptom onset was 5 months after ICI initiation.

Diagnosis of IA following patient-reported symptoms was an average of 5.2 months, with a significant difference in lag time to diagnosis depending on initial joint presentation. For example, patients with initial small joint involvement had a 10 month longer lag time to IA diagnosis than those with knees as the initial joint involved. 

In terms of treatment, 24 patients were treated with systemic corticosteroids and 10 required additional immunosuppression. The need for corticosteroids did not differ by ICI treatment regimen, but those treated with combination therapy were more likely to require additional immunosuppression (P = 0.02).

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors with or without methotrexate were prescribed for seven patients. All of the patients had a clinical improvement in their arthritis symptoms. Four had a complete tumor response at the time of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor initiation with none having tumor progression.

The three patients treated with methotrexate monotherapy had a complete or sustained partial tumor response to ICI therapy and their cancer did not develop during IA management follow-up.  

The authors went on to look at the persistence of IA after cessation of therapy in a subset of 21 patients. They found that 18 of these patients still had IA symptoms months after stopping treatment. They suggested that the delay in diagnosis and treatment seen in their study might explain the finding. 

The study provides “critical information, not just for rheumatologists as they try to recognize subgroups in ICI-induced IA and diagnose patients with this new entity, but also for oncology providers who are usually first to encounter patients with ICI-induced IA and subsequently refer patients to rheumatology,” Dr. Cappelli and colleagues wrote.

The experience so far with using immunosuppression in ICI-induced IA “has been reassuring in terms of cancer outcomes, but more studies are needed to confirm this finding,” they concluded.

SOURCE: Cappelli LC et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit. 2018.02.011.

Variations in the clinical presentation of immunotherapy-induced inflammatory arthritis is partly explained by which treatment regimen was used to treat the cancer, a single-center study suggests.

While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the field of oncology, their use for an ever-widening range of indications had created an increasing population of patients referred to rheumatologists for the management of immune-related adverse events (IrAEs), according to Laura C. Cappelli, MD, and her colleagues at John Hopkins University, Baltimore. 

Well-established guidelines exist for managing adverse events such as colitis and pneumonitis, but there are only preliminary guidelines for evaluating and treating immunotherapy-induced inflammatory arthritis (IA). “This may stem from a lack of consistent reporting of rheumatologic IrAEs in clinical trials, the non–life threatening nature of [inflammatory arthritis], or lack of recognition of musculoskeletal symptoms by treating providers,” they wrote in Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism.

Clinical trials have reported ranges of arthralgia in 1%-43% of patients treated with ICIs, but no accurate estimate of the incidence of IA exists. 

The researchers noted that treating patients with ICI-induced IA is complicated by a history of active or recently treated cancer and concerns over using immunosuppression in the context of ICI therapy. 

They set out to evaluate the clinical presentations of 30 patients seen in their clinic with ICI-induced IA. Patients were a median of 59 years old and 12 (40%) were female. Tumor types included metastatic melanoma, non–small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma, cutaneous lymphoma, renal cell carcinoma, duodenal carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, cutaneous basal cell carcinoma, and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Sixteen patients were treated with anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 monotherapy, and 14 were treated with combination anti–CTLA-4/PD-1 therapy. 
Patients on combination therapy were significantly younger (7.5 years, P = 0.01) and were more likely to have metastatic melanoma as their underlying cancer.

Patients who received combination therapy were more likely to present first with knee IA (n = 10) and none had small joint involvement. In contrast, initial small joint involvement was more common in the monotherapy group (n = 6).

Most of the patients in the study had an additional IrAE, with colitis being the most common (n=10), followed by thyroid disease, pneumonitis, and rash. Patients on PD-1 or programmed death ligand 1 monotherapy were more likely to have IA as their first IrAE.

The research team noted that the median time to symptom onset was 5 months after ICI initiation.

Diagnosis of IA following patient-reported symptoms was an average of 5.2 months, with a significant difference in lag time to diagnosis depending on initial joint presentation. For example, patients with initial small joint involvement had a 10 month longer lag time to IA diagnosis than those with knees as the initial joint involved. 

In terms of treatment, 24 patients were treated with systemic corticosteroids and 10 required additional immunosuppression. The need for corticosteroids did not differ by ICI treatment regimen, but those treated with combination therapy were more likely to require additional immunosuppression (P = 0.02).

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors with or without methotrexate were prescribed for seven patients. All of the patients had a clinical improvement in their arthritis symptoms. Four had a complete tumor response at the time of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor initiation with none having tumor progression.

The three patients treated with methotrexate monotherapy had a complete or sustained partial tumor response to ICI therapy and their cancer did not develop during IA management follow-up.  

The authors went on to look at the persistence of IA after cessation of therapy in a subset of 21 patients. They found that 18 of these patients still had IA symptoms months after stopping treatment. They suggested that the delay in diagnosis and treatment seen in their study might explain the finding. 

The study provides “critical information, not just for rheumatologists as they try to recognize subgroups in ICI-induced IA and diagnose patients with this new entity, but also for oncology providers who are usually first to encounter patients with ICI-induced IA and subsequently refer patients to rheumatology,” Dr. Cappelli and colleagues wrote.

The experience so far with using immunosuppression in ICI-induced IA “has been reassuring in terms of cancer outcomes, but more studies are needed to confirm this finding,” they concluded.

SOURCE: Cappelli LC et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit. 2018.02.011.

Variations in the clinical presentation of immunotherapy-induced inflammatory arthritis is partly explained by which treatment regimen was used to treat the cancer, a single-center study suggests.

While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the field of oncology, their use for an ever-widening range of indications had created an increasing population of patients referred to rheumatologists for the management of immune-related adverse events (IrAEs), according to Laura C. Cappelli, MD, and her colleagues at John Hopkins University, Baltimore. 

Well-established guidelines exist for managing adverse events such as colitis and pneumonitis, but there are only preliminary guidelines for evaluating and treating immunotherapy-induced inflammatory arthritis (IA). “This may stem from a lack of consistent reporting of rheumatologic IrAEs in clinical trials, the non–life threatening nature of [inflammatory arthritis], or lack of recognition of musculoskeletal symptoms by treating providers,” they wrote in Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism.

Clinical trials have reported ranges of arthralgia in 1%-43% of patients treated with ICIs, but no accurate estimate of the incidence of IA exists. 

The researchers noted that treating patients with ICI-induced IA is complicated by a history of active or recently treated cancer and concerns over using immunosuppression in the context of ICI therapy. 

They set out to evaluate the clinical presentations of 30 patients seen in their clinic with ICI-induced IA. Patients were a median of 59 years old and 12 (40%) were female. Tumor types included metastatic melanoma, non–small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma, cutaneous lymphoma, renal cell carcinoma, duodenal carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, cutaneous basal cell carcinoma, and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Sixteen patients were treated with anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 monotherapy, and 14 were treated with combination anti–CTLA-4/PD-1 therapy. 
Patients on combination therapy were significantly younger (7.5 years, P = 0.01) and were more likely to have metastatic melanoma as their underlying cancer.

Patients who received combination therapy were more likely to present first with knee IA (n = 10) and none had small joint involvement. In contrast, initial small joint involvement was more common in the monotherapy group (n = 6).

Most of the patients in the study had an additional IrAE, with colitis being the most common (n=10), followed by thyroid disease, pneumonitis, and rash. Patients on PD-1 or programmed death ligand 1 monotherapy were more likely to have IA as their first IrAE.

The research team noted that the median time to symptom onset was 5 months after ICI initiation.

Diagnosis of IA following patient-reported symptoms was an average of 5.2 months, with a significant difference in lag time to diagnosis depending on initial joint presentation. For example, patients with initial small joint involvement had a 10 month longer lag time to IA diagnosis than those with knees as the initial joint involved. 

In terms of treatment, 24 patients were treated with systemic corticosteroids and 10 required additional immunosuppression. The need for corticosteroids did not differ by ICI treatment regimen, but those treated with combination therapy were more likely to require additional immunosuppression (P = 0.02).

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors with or without methotrexate were prescribed for seven patients. All of the patients had a clinical improvement in their arthritis symptoms. Four had a complete tumor response at the time of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor initiation with none having tumor progression.

The three patients treated with methotrexate monotherapy had a complete or sustained partial tumor response to ICI therapy and their cancer did not develop during IA management follow-up.  

The authors went on to look at the persistence of IA after cessation of therapy in a subset of 21 patients. They found that 18 of these patients still had IA symptoms months after stopping treatment. They suggested that the delay in diagnosis and treatment seen in their study might explain the finding. 

The study provides “critical information, not just for rheumatologists as they try to recognize subgroups in ICI-induced IA and diagnose patients with this new entity, but also for oncology providers who are usually first to encounter patients with ICI-induced IA and subsequently refer patients to rheumatology,” Dr. Cappelli and colleagues wrote.

The experience so far with using immunosuppression in ICI-induced IA “has been reassuring in terms of cancer outcomes, but more studies are needed to confirm this finding,” they concluded.

SOURCE: Cappelli LC et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit. 2018.02.011.

A new Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor has shown a high response rate and favorable safety profile in the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma.

Researchers reported the results of an open-label, phase 2 study of oral acalabrutinib (100 mg, twice daily) in 124 patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma in The Lancet. Acalabrutinib (Calquence) received accelerated approval from the Food and Drug Administration in October 2017 for treatment of adults with mantle cell lymphoma who have received at least one prior therapy.

The Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib (Imbruvica), which was approved in 2013 for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma, has been associated with side effects including atrial fibrillation, infections and bleeding, likely due to its off-target activity against other kinases. But acalabrutinib (ACP-196) “is a highly selective, potent BTK inhibitor developed to minimise off-target activity,” wrote Michael Wang, MD, of the department of lymphoma and myeloma at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and his colleagues.

After a median follow-up of 15.2 months, 81% of patients in the study achieved an investigator-assessed overall response based on Lugano classification, with 40% achieving a complete response. The results were similar according to an independent review committee evaluation of responses based on CT and PET scans, bone-marrow biopsy specimens, endoscopy results, and clinical data.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Wang M et al., Lancet. 2018;391:659-67.

A new Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor has shown a high response rate and favorable safety profile in the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma.

Researchers reported the results of an open-label, phase 2 study of oral acalabrutinib (100 mg, twice daily) in 124 patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma in The Lancet. Acalabrutinib (Calquence) received accelerated approval from the Food and Drug Administration in October 2017 for treatment of adults with mantle cell lymphoma who have received at least one prior therapy.

The Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib (Imbruvica), which was approved in 2013 for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma, has been associated with side effects including atrial fibrillation, infections and bleeding, likely due to its off-target activity against other kinases. But acalabrutinib (ACP-196) “is a highly selective, potent BTK inhibitor developed to minimise off-target activity,” wrote Michael Wang, MD, of the department of lymphoma and myeloma at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and his colleagues.

After a median follow-up of 15.2 months, 81% of patients in the study achieved an investigator-assessed overall response based on Lugano classification, with 40% achieving a complete response. The results were similar according to an independent review committee evaluation of responses based on CT and PET scans, bone-marrow biopsy specimens, endoscopy results, and clinical data.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Wang M et al., Lancet. 2018;391:659-67.

A new Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor has shown a high response rate and favorable safety profile in the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma.

Researchers reported the results of an open-label, phase 2 study of oral acalabrutinib (100 mg, twice daily) in 124 patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma in The Lancet. Acalabrutinib (Calquence) received accelerated approval from the Food and Drug Administration in October 2017 for treatment of adults with mantle cell lymphoma who have received at least one prior therapy.

The Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib (Imbruvica), which was approved in 2013 for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma, has been associated with side effects including atrial fibrillation, infections and bleeding, likely due to its off-target activity against other kinases. But acalabrutinib (ACP-196) “is a highly selective, potent BTK inhibitor developed to minimise off-target activity,” wrote Michael Wang, MD, of the department of lymphoma and myeloma at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and his colleagues.

After a median follow-up of 15.2 months, 81% of patients in the study achieved an investigator-assessed overall response based on Lugano classification, with 40% achieving a complete response. The results were similar according to an independent review committee evaluation of responses based on CT and PET scans, bone-marrow biopsy specimens, endoscopy results, and clinical data.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Wang M et al., Lancet. 2018;391:659-67.

Amandeep Godara, MD

SALT LAKE CITY—Results of a large, retrospective analysis support the notion that patients who receive cord blood (CB) transplants have a higher risk of infection than other hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.

Investigators found that CB recipients had a significantly higher risk of bacterial, viral, and fungal infections in the early post-transplant period than patients who received peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) transplants.

In addition, CB recipients had longer hospital stays, higher inpatient costs, and greater inpatient mortality than PB and BM recipients.

Amandeep Godara, MD, of Tufts Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts, presented these results at the 2018 BMT Tandem Meetings (abstract 30*).

“Infections are considered more common in cord blood transplant recipients based on some prior retrospective analyses,” Dr Godara noted. “But there is limited data comparing these infectious complications between cord blood transplant and peripheral blood/bone marrow stem cell transplants during the inpatient stay for the stem cell transplant.”

With this in mind, Dr Godara and his colleagues analyzed data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample. This database covers 46 US states and contains data from more than 7 million hospital stays each year.

The investigators searched the database for hospital admissions for HSCT from 2002 to 2014. They identified 2979 CB transplants and 56,845 PB or BM transplants.

The CB recipients had a median age of 48, and 55% were male. Fifty-nine percent were white, 18% Hispanic, 13% black, 5% Asian, and 5% “other.” Sixty-six percent of patients had acute leukemia, 18% non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 5% Hodgkin lymphoma, and 11% “other” diseases.

The PB/BM recipients had a median age of 45, and 58% were male. Seventy-nine percent were white, 8% Hispanic, 6% black, 3% Asian, and 4% “other.” Sixty-one percent of patients had acute leukemia, 16% non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 4% Hodgkin lymphoma, and 19% “other” diseases.

Results

Dr Godara and his colleagues compared the rates and types of infection from the time of HSCT to hospital discharge in CB and PB/BM recipients. The team also compared early inpatient mortality, the cost of hospitalization, and the length of hospital stay.

“[W]e observed a higher risk for infections in cord blood transplant patients compared to peripheral blood and bone marrow stem cell transplant patients, and this risk for infection extended through a wide spectrum of pathogens,” Dr Godara said.

“We also observed a higher all-cause inpatient mortality in cord blood transplant compared to peripheral blood and bone marrow transplant, especially in patients who had bacterial sepsis or invasive fungal infection.”

The rate of bacterial sepsis was 34.87% in CB recipients and 20.20% in PB/BM recipients (P<0.0001). Rates of viral infection were 20.05% and 8.19%, respectively (P<0.0001). And rates of invasive fungal infection were 12.87% and 7.89% (P<0.0001).

There was a similar distribution of bacterial infections in CB and PB/BM recipients. The most common was pneumonia (47% and 41%, respectively), followed by abdominal infections (29% and 31%, respectively), urinary tract infections (17% and 21%, respectively), central line-associated bloodstream infections (4% and 6%, respectively), and acute sinusitis (3% and 1%, respectively).

The rate of Clostridium difficile infection was significantly higher in CB recipients than PB/BM recipients—11.75% and 8.90%, respectively (P=0.02). However, there was no significant difference in mortality related to C. difficile—14% and 10%, respectively (P=0.3).

On the other hand, all-cause inpatient mortality was significantly higher in CB recipients than PB/BM recipients—16% and 7%, respectively (P<0.0001).

Inpatient mortality rates were significantly higher for CB recipients with bacterial sepsis (33% vs 23%, P=0.001) and invasive fungal infections (29% vs 16%, P=0.0045) but not viral infections (19% vs 17%, P=0.5).

The median length of hospital stay was 36 days for CB recipients and 25 days for PB/BM recipients. The mean inpatient charges were $448,892 and $250,437 respectively.

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

Amandeep Godara, MD

SALT LAKE CITY—Results of a large, retrospective analysis support the notion that patients who receive cord blood (CB) transplants have a higher risk of infection than other hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.

Investigators found that CB recipients had a significantly higher risk of bacterial, viral, and fungal infections in the early post-transplant period than patients who received peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) transplants.

In addition, CB recipients had longer hospital stays, higher inpatient costs, and greater inpatient mortality than PB and BM recipients.

Amandeep Godara, MD, of Tufts Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts, presented these results at the 2018 BMT Tandem Meetings (abstract 30*).

“Infections are considered more common in cord blood transplant recipients based on some prior retrospective analyses,” Dr Godara noted. “But there is limited data comparing these infectious complications between cord blood transplant and peripheral blood/bone marrow stem cell transplants during the inpatient stay for the stem cell transplant.”

With this in mind, Dr Godara and his colleagues analyzed data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample. This database covers 46 US states and contains data from more than 7 million hospital stays each year.

The investigators searched the database for hospital admissions for HSCT from 2002 to 2014. They identified 2979 CB transplants and 56,845 PB or BM transplants.

The CB recipients had a median age of 48, and 55% were male. Fifty-nine percent were white, 18% Hispanic, 13% black, 5% Asian, and 5% “other.” Sixty-six percent of patients had acute leukemia, 18% non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 5% Hodgkin lymphoma, and 11% “other” diseases.

The PB/BM recipients had a median age of 45, and 58% were male. Seventy-nine percent were white, 8% Hispanic, 6% black, 3% Asian, and 4% “other.” Sixty-one percent of patients had acute leukemia, 16% non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 4% Hodgkin lymphoma, and 19% “other” diseases.

Results

Dr Godara and his colleagues compared the rates and types of infection from the time of HSCT to hospital discharge in CB and PB/BM recipients. The team also compared early inpatient mortality, the cost of hospitalization, and the length of hospital stay.

“[W]e observed a higher risk for infections in cord blood transplant patients compared to peripheral blood and bone marrow stem cell transplant patients, and this risk for infection extended through a wide spectrum of pathogens,” Dr Godara said.

“We also observed a higher all-cause inpatient mortality in cord blood transplant compared to peripheral blood and bone marrow transplant, especially in patients who had bacterial sepsis or invasive fungal infection.”

The rate of bacterial sepsis was 34.87% in CB recipients and 20.20% in PB/BM recipients (P<0.0001). Rates of viral infection were 20.05% and 8.19%, respectively (P<0.0001). And rates of invasive fungal infection were 12.87% and 7.89% (P<0.0001).

There was a similar distribution of bacterial infections in CB and PB/BM recipients. The most common was pneumonia (47% and 41%, respectively), followed by abdominal infections (29% and 31%, respectively), urinary tract infections (17% and 21%, respectively), central line-associated bloodstream infections (4% and 6%, respectively), and acute sinusitis (3% and 1%, respectively).

The rate of Clostridium difficile infection was significantly higher in CB recipients than PB/BM recipients—11.75% and 8.90%, respectively (P=0.02). However, there was no significant difference in mortality related to C. difficile—14% and 10%, respectively (P=0.3).

On the other hand, all-cause inpatient mortality was significantly higher in CB recipients than PB/BM recipients—16% and 7%, respectively (P<0.0001).

Inpatient mortality rates were significantly higher for CB recipients with bacterial sepsis (33% vs 23%, P=0.001) and invasive fungal infections (29% vs 16%, P=0.0045) but not viral infections (19% vs 17%, P=0.5).

The median length of hospital stay was 36 days for CB recipients and 25 days for PB/BM recipients. The mean inpatient charges were $448,892 and $250,437 respectively.

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

Amandeep Godara, MD

SALT LAKE CITY—Results of a large, retrospective analysis support the notion that patients who receive cord blood (CB) transplants have a higher risk of infection than other hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.

Investigators found that CB recipients had a significantly higher risk of bacterial, viral, and fungal infections in the early post-transplant period than patients who received peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) transplants.

In addition, CB recipients had longer hospital stays, higher inpatient costs, and greater inpatient mortality than PB and BM recipients.

Amandeep Godara, MD, of Tufts Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts, presented these results at the 2018 BMT Tandem Meetings (abstract 30*).

“Infections are considered more common in cord blood transplant recipients based on some prior retrospective analyses,” Dr Godara noted. “But there is limited data comparing these infectious complications between cord blood transplant and peripheral blood/bone marrow stem cell transplants during the inpatient stay for the stem cell transplant.”

With this in mind, Dr Godara and his colleagues analyzed data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample. This database covers 46 US states and contains data from more than 7 million hospital stays each year.

The investigators searched the database for hospital admissions for HSCT from 2002 to 2014. They identified 2979 CB transplants and 56,845 PB or BM transplants.

The CB recipients had a median age of 48, and 55% were male. Fifty-nine percent were white, 18% Hispanic, 13% black, 5% Asian, and 5% “other.” Sixty-six percent of patients had acute leukemia, 18% non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 5% Hodgkin lymphoma, and 11% “other” diseases.

The PB/BM recipients had a median age of 45, and 58% were male. Seventy-nine percent were white, 8% Hispanic, 6% black, 3% Asian, and 4% “other.” Sixty-one percent of patients had acute leukemia, 16% non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 4% Hodgkin lymphoma, and 19% “other” diseases.

Results

Dr Godara and his colleagues compared the rates and types of infection from the time of HSCT to hospital discharge in CB and PB/BM recipients. The team also compared early inpatient mortality, the cost of hospitalization, and the length of hospital stay.

“[W]e observed a higher risk for infections in cord blood transplant patients compared to peripheral blood and bone marrow stem cell transplant patients, and this risk for infection extended through a wide spectrum of pathogens,” Dr Godara said.

“We also observed a higher all-cause inpatient mortality in cord blood transplant compared to peripheral blood and bone marrow transplant, especially in patients who had bacterial sepsis or invasive fungal infection.”

The rate of bacterial sepsis was 34.87% in CB recipients and 20.20% in PB/BM recipients (P<0.0001). Rates of viral infection were 20.05% and 8.19%, respectively (P<0.0001). And rates of invasive fungal infection were 12.87% and 7.89% (P<0.0001).

There was a similar distribution of bacterial infections in CB and PB/BM recipients. The most common was pneumonia (47% and 41%, respectively), followed by abdominal infections (29% and 31%, respectively), urinary tract infections (17% and 21%, respectively), central line-associated bloodstream infections (4% and 6%, respectively), and acute sinusitis (3% and 1%, respectively).

The rate of Clostridium difficile infection was significantly higher in CB recipients than PB/BM recipients—11.75% and 8.90%, respectively (P=0.02). However, there was no significant difference in mortality related to C. difficile—14% and 10%, respectively (P=0.3).

On the other hand, all-cause inpatient mortality was significantly higher in CB recipients than PB/BM recipients—16% and 7%, respectively (P<0.0001).

Inpatient mortality rates were significantly higher for CB recipients with bacterial sepsis (33% vs 23%, P=0.001) and invasive fungal infections (29% vs 16%, P=0.0045) but not viral infections (19% vs 17%, P=0.5).

The median length of hospital stay was 36 days for CB recipients and 25 days for PB/BM recipients. The mean inpatient charges were $448,892 and $250,437 respectively.

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Gilead Sciences International Ltd. recently withdrew its application for European approval of idelalisib (Zydelig) in combination with rituximab and bendamustine for the treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Idelalisib is currently approved in the European Union for use in combination with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab or ofatumumab) to treat adults with CLL who have received at least 1 prior therapy or as first-line treatment of CLL in the presence of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation in patients who are not eligible for any other therapies.

Idelalisib is also approved as monotherapy for adults with follicular lymphoma that is refractory to 2 prior lines of treatment.

In seeking expanded approval for idelalisib, Gilead submitted data from a study (NCT01569295) comparing idelalisib plus bendamustine and rituximab to placebo plus bendamustine and rituximab.

Interim results from this study were published in The Lancet Oncology in March 2017.

Gilead withdrew the application for idelalisib after the European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) had evaluated documentation provided by the company and formulated lists of questions.

Gilead had not responded to the last round of questions at the time of the withdrawal.

At that point, the CHMP was of the provisional opinion that idelalisib should not be approved for use in combination with rituximab and bendamustine in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL.

The CHMP said additional, longer-term data are needed to show the benefits of idelalisib plus rituximab and bendamustine outweigh the risks.

Gilead said its withdrawal of the application was based on the CHMP’s opinion that there was insufficient evidence of a favorable benefit-risk profile.

The company also said the withdrawal does not impact ongoing trials of idelalisib.

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Gilead Sciences International Ltd. recently withdrew its application for European approval of idelalisib (Zydelig) in combination with rituximab and bendamustine for the treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Idelalisib is currently approved in the European Union for use in combination with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab or ofatumumab) to treat adults with CLL who have received at least 1 prior therapy or as first-line treatment of CLL in the presence of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation in patients who are not eligible for any other therapies.

Idelalisib is also approved as monotherapy for adults with follicular lymphoma that is refractory to 2 prior lines of treatment.

In seeking expanded approval for idelalisib, Gilead submitted data from a study (NCT01569295) comparing idelalisib plus bendamustine and rituximab to placebo plus bendamustine and rituximab.

Interim results from this study were published in The Lancet Oncology in March 2017.

Gilead withdrew the application for idelalisib after the European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) had evaluated documentation provided by the company and formulated lists of questions.

Gilead had not responded to the last round of questions at the time of the withdrawal.

At that point, the CHMP was of the provisional opinion that idelalisib should not be approved for use in combination with rituximab and bendamustine in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL.

The CHMP said additional, longer-term data are needed to show the benefits of idelalisib plus rituximab and bendamustine outweigh the risks.

Gilead said its withdrawal of the application was based on the CHMP’s opinion that there was insufficient evidence of a favorable benefit-risk profile.

The company also said the withdrawal does not impact ongoing trials of idelalisib.

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Gilead Sciences International Ltd. recently withdrew its application for European approval of idelalisib (Zydelig) in combination with rituximab and bendamustine for the treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Idelalisib is currently approved in the European Union for use in combination with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab or ofatumumab) to treat adults with CLL who have received at least 1 prior therapy or as first-line treatment of CLL in the presence of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation in patients who are not eligible for any other therapies.

Idelalisib is also approved as monotherapy for adults with follicular lymphoma that is refractory to 2 prior lines of treatment.

In seeking expanded approval for idelalisib, Gilead submitted data from a study (NCT01569295) comparing idelalisib plus bendamustine and rituximab to placebo plus bendamustine and rituximab.

Interim results from this study were published in The Lancet Oncology in March 2017.

Gilead withdrew the application for idelalisib after the European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) had evaluated documentation provided by the company and formulated lists of questions.

Gilead had not responded to the last round of questions at the time of the withdrawal.

At that point, the CHMP was of the provisional opinion that idelalisib should not be approved for use in combination with rituximab and bendamustine in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL.

The CHMP said additional, longer-term data are needed to show the benefits of idelalisib plus rituximab and bendamustine outweigh the risks.

Gilead said its withdrawal of the application was based on the CHMP’s opinion that there was insufficient evidence of a favorable benefit-risk profile.

The company also said the withdrawal does not impact ongoing trials of idelalisib.

SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH – An allogeneic off-the-shelf Epstein-Barr virus–targeted cytotoxic T lymphocyte–cell product known as ATA129 (tabelecleucel), is associated with a high response rate and a low rate of serious adverse events in patients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), according to interim findings from an ongoing multicenter study.

The objective response rate at a median of 3.3 months among patients who were treated with ATA129 and who had sufficient follow-up to assess response was 80% in six patients treated following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and 83% in six who were treated after solid organ transplant (SOT), Susan E. Prockop, MD, reported at the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Sharon Worcester/Frontline Medical News

Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 21 patients, including 17 who experienced grade 3 or greater adverse events or serious adverse events. Six were treatment related; one of those was grade 3 or greater, and five were considered serious adverse events. One patient had a grade 5 treatment-emergent adverse event (disease progression); two in the post-HCT group experienced graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), including one with grade 3 skin GVHD after sun exposure, which resolved with topical therapy; and one had grade 4 GVHD of the gastrointestinal tract and liver. One patient had a tumor flare that resolved, Dr. Prockop said.

“The most common safety events were GI disorders in seven patients, infections and infestations in five patients, and general disorders and administration site conditions in four,” she said. “No events have been categorized as drug reactions.”

PTLD, an EBV-driven lymphoproliferative disorder, is a life-threatening condition typically involving aggressive, clonal, diffuse large B cell lymphomas. Survival without therapy is a median of 31 days, she explained. Patients at high risk have a mortality rate of 72%, and these included those over age 30 years, those with GVHD at the time of diagnosis, and those with extranodal disease, three or more sites of disease involved, or central nervous system disease.

Although some patients respond to single-agent rituximab (Rituxan) therapy, those with rituximab-refractory disease have a median overall survival of 16-56 days, she said.

SOT recipients who develop indolent PTLD may respond to reduction of immunosuppression. Two-year risk-based survival in these patients is 88% with zero or one risk factors, and 0% with three or more risk factors, which include older age, poor performance status at diagnosis, high lactate dehydrogenase, CNS involvement, and short time from transplant to development of PTLD.

Rituximab monotherapy response rates are 76% in those with early lesions, and 47% in those with high-grade lesions, she said.

“Two-year overall survival in this patient population is 33%, reflecting their eligibility for multiagent chemotherapy, although this approach comes with significant morbidity,” she added, noting that patients failing rituximab experience increased chemotherapy-induced treatment-related mortality, compared with other lymphoma patients.

The benefit-risk profile observed in this multicenter trial is favorable with maximum response rates being reached after two cycles of therapy, and the findings confirm those from prior single-center studies, she said, noting that based on those earlier findings in patients treated with both primary and third-party donor EBV-cytotoxic T lymphocytes, the therapy is now an established National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline therapeutic alternative for PTLD.

“Further evaluation in rituximab-refractory PTLD is ongoing in phase 3 registration trials,” she said.

Atara Biotherapeutics sponsored the trial. Dr. Prockop reported having no disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Prockop S et al. BMT Tandem Meetings Abstract 21.

SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH – An allogeneic off-the-shelf Epstein-Barr virus–targeted cytotoxic T lymphocyte–cell product known as ATA129 (tabelecleucel), is associated with a high response rate and a low rate of serious adverse events in patients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), according to interim findings from an ongoing multicenter study.

The objective response rate at a median of 3.3 months among patients who were treated with ATA129 and who had sufficient follow-up to assess response was 80% in six patients treated following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and 83% in six who were treated after solid organ transplant (SOT), Susan E. Prockop, MD, reported at the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Sharon Worcester/Frontline Medical News

Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 21 patients, including 17 who experienced grade 3 or greater adverse events or serious adverse events. Six were treatment related; one of those was grade 3 or greater, and five were considered serious adverse events. One patient had a grade 5 treatment-emergent adverse event (disease progression); two in the post-HCT group experienced graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), including one with grade 3 skin GVHD after sun exposure, which resolved with topical therapy; and one had grade 4 GVHD of the gastrointestinal tract and liver. One patient had a tumor flare that resolved, Dr. Prockop said.

“The most common safety events were GI disorders in seven patients, infections and infestations in five patients, and general disorders and administration site conditions in four,” she said. “No events have been categorized as drug reactions.”

PTLD, an EBV-driven lymphoproliferative disorder, is a life-threatening condition typically involving aggressive, clonal, diffuse large B cell lymphomas. Survival without therapy is a median of 31 days, she explained. Patients at high risk have a mortality rate of 72%, and these included those over age 30 years, those with GVHD at the time of diagnosis, and those with extranodal disease, three or more sites of disease involved, or central nervous system disease.

Although some patients respond to single-agent rituximab (Rituxan) therapy, those with rituximab-refractory disease have a median overall survival of 16-56 days, she said.

SOT recipients who develop indolent PTLD may respond to reduction of immunosuppression. Two-year risk-based survival in these patients is 88% with zero or one risk factors, and 0% with three or more risk factors, which include older age, poor performance status at diagnosis, high lactate dehydrogenase, CNS involvement, and short time from transplant to development of PTLD.

Rituximab monotherapy response rates are 76% in those with early lesions, and 47% in those with high-grade lesions, she said.

“Two-year overall survival in this patient population is 33%, reflecting their eligibility for multiagent chemotherapy, although this approach comes with significant morbidity,” she added, noting that patients failing rituximab experience increased chemotherapy-induced treatment-related mortality, compared with other lymphoma patients.

The benefit-risk profile observed in this multicenter trial is favorable with maximum response rates being reached after two cycles of therapy, and the findings confirm those from prior single-center studies, she said, noting that based on those earlier findings in patients treated with both primary and third-party donor EBV-cytotoxic T lymphocytes, the therapy is now an established National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline therapeutic alternative for PTLD.

“Further evaluation in rituximab-refractory PTLD is ongoing in phase 3 registration trials,” she said.

Atara Biotherapeutics sponsored the trial. Dr. Prockop reported having no disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Prockop S et al. BMT Tandem Meetings Abstract 21.

SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH – An allogeneic off-the-shelf Epstein-Barr virus–targeted cytotoxic T lymphocyte–cell product known as ATA129 (tabelecleucel), is associated with a high response rate and a low rate of serious adverse events in patients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), according to interim findings from an ongoing multicenter study.

The objective response rate at a median of 3.3 months among patients who were treated with ATA129 and who had sufficient follow-up to assess response was 80% in six patients treated following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and 83% in six who were treated after solid organ transplant (SOT), Susan E. Prockop, MD, reported at the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Sharon Worcester/Frontline Medical News

Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 21 patients, including 17 who experienced grade 3 or greater adverse events or serious adverse events. Six were treatment related; one of those was grade 3 or greater, and five were considered serious adverse events. One patient had a grade 5 treatment-emergent adverse event (disease progression); two in the post-HCT group experienced graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), including one with grade 3 skin GVHD after sun exposure, which resolved with topical therapy; and one had grade 4 GVHD of the gastrointestinal tract and liver. One patient had a tumor flare that resolved, Dr. Prockop said.

“The most common safety events were GI disorders in seven patients, infections and infestations in five patients, and general disorders and administration site conditions in four,” she said. “No events have been categorized as drug reactions.”

PTLD, an EBV-driven lymphoproliferative disorder, is a life-threatening condition typically involving aggressive, clonal, diffuse large B cell lymphomas. Survival without therapy is a median of 31 days, she explained. Patients at high risk have a mortality rate of 72%, and these included those over age 30 years, those with GVHD at the time of diagnosis, and those with extranodal disease, three or more sites of disease involved, or central nervous system disease.

Although some patients respond to single-agent rituximab (Rituxan) therapy, those with rituximab-refractory disease have a median overall survival of 16-56 days, she said.

SOT recipients who develop indolent PTLD may respond to reduction of immunosuppression. Two-year risk-based survival in these patients is 88% with zero or one risk factors, and 0% with three or more risk factors, which include older age, poor performance status at diagnosis, high lactate dehydrogenase, CNS involvement, and short time from transplant to development of PTLD.

Rituximab monotherapy response rates are 76% in those with early lesions, and 47% in those with high-grade lesions, she said.

“Two-year overall survival in this patient population is 33%, reflecting their eligibility for multiagent chemotherapy, although this approach comes with significant morbidity,” she added, noting that patients failing rituximab experience increased chemotherapy-induced treatment-related mortality, compared with other lymphoma patients.

The benefit-risk profile observed in this multicenter trial is favorable with maximum response rates being reached after two cycles of therapy, and the findings confirm those from prior single-center studies, she said, noting that based on those earlier findings in patients treated with both primary and third-party donor EBV-cytotoxic T lymphocytes, the therapy is now an established National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline therapeutic alternative for PTLD.

“Further evaluation in rituximab-refractory PTLD is ongoing in phase 3 registration trials,” she said.

Atara Biotherapeutics sponsored the trial. Dr. Prockop reported having no disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Prockop S et al. BMT Tandem Meetings Abstract 21.

LA JOLLA, CALIF. – Combining a radio-labeled, anti-CD25, monoclonal antibody with BEAM chemotherapy appears to be an effective and safe conditioning regimen prior to autologous stem cell transplant in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), investigators report.

In a phase 1 trial, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.6 months for patients treated with the yttrium-90–labeled, chimeric, anti-CD25 antibody basiliximab (Simulect) at one of three dose levels plus standard dose BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan), said Jasmine Zain, MD, of the City of Hope Medical Center in Duarte, Calif.

There have been no significant cases of delayed transplant engraftment or unexpected increases in either mucositis or infectious complications, she said at the annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

Courtesy Larry Young

[email protected]

SOURCE: Zain J et al. TCLF 2018.

LA JOLLA, CALIF. – Combining a radio-labeled, anti-CD25, monoclonal antibody with BEAM chemotherapy appears to be an effective and safe conditioning regimen prior to autologous stem cell transplant in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), investigators report.

In a phase 1 trial, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.6 months for patients treated with the yttrium-90–labeled, chimeric, anti-CD25 antibody basiliximab (Simulect) at one of three dose levels plus standard dose BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan), said Jasmine Zain, MD, of the City of Hope Medical Center in Duarte, Calif.

There have been no significant cases of delayed transplant engraftment or unexpected increases in either mucositis or infectious complications, she said at the annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

Courtesy Larry Young

[email protected]

SOURCE: Zain J et al. TCLF 2018.

LA JOLLA, CALIF. – Combining a radio-labeled, anti-CD25, monoclonal antibody with BEAM chemotherapy appears to be an effective and safe conditioning regimen prior to autologous stem cell transplant in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), investigators report.

In a phase 1 trial, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.6 months for patients treated with the yttrium-90–labeled, chimeric, anti-CD25 antibody basiliximab (Simulect) at one of three dose levels plus standard dose BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan), said Jasmine Zain, MD, of the City of Hope Medical Center in Duarte, Calif.

There have been no significant cases of delayed transplant engraftment or unexpected increases in either mucositis or infectious complications, she said at the annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

Courtesy Larry Young

[email protected]

SOURCE: Zain J et al. TCLF 2018.

B-cell receptor (BCR) resistance is a significant treatment obstacle in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), but a new study highlights the potential protective role for cells expressing specific ligands.

Hilka Rauert-Wunderlich, of the University of Würzburg and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Germany, and her colleagues stimulated the REC-1, MAVER-1, and L-929 cell lines to show the role of the alternative nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappaB) pathway and the tumor necrosis factor ligand CD40L.

Viability assays showed a protective effect of CD40L prestimulation on BCR inhibitor treatment. The effect was detectable and significant in the REC-1 cell line for both ibrutinib and sotrastaurin at “clinically relevant concentrations” and in the resistant MAVER-1 cell line at “nonphysiologically high” sotrastaurin concentrations. CD40L stimulation also induced alternative NF-kappaB pathway signaling in both REC-1 and MAVER-1 cell lines.

“The data presented in this study argue for the protective potential of microenvironmentally mediated activation of the alternative [NF-kappaB] pathway in MCL cell against BCR signaling-associated drugs, which might represent a physiologic niche for MCL relapse. Additionally, these data provide evidence for the potential of the alternative [NF-kappaB] pathway as a possible therapeutic target in MCL,” the researchers wrote in Cell Death & Disease.

The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Rauert-Wunderlich H et al. Cell Death Dis. 2018 Jan 24. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0157-6.

B-cell receptor (BCR) resistance is a significant treatment obstacle in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), but a new study highlights the potential protective role for cells expressing specific ligands.

Hilka Rauert-Wunderlich, of the University of Würzburg and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Germany, and her colleagues stimulated the REC-1, MAVER-1, and L-929 cell lines to show the role of the alternative nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappaB) pathway and the tumor necrosis factor ligand CD40L.

Viability assays showed a protective effect of CD40L prestimulation on BCR inhibitor treatment. The effect was detectable and significant in the REC-1 cell line for both ibrutinib and sotrastaurin at “clinically relevant concentrations” and in the resistant MAVER-1 cell line at “nonphysiologically high” sotrastaurin concentrations. CD40L stimulation also induced alternative NF-kappaB pathway signaling in both REC-1 and MAVER-1 cell lines.

“The data presented in this study argue for the protective potential of microenvironmentally mediated activation of the alternative [NF-kappaB] pathway in MCL cell against BCR signaling-associated drugs, which might represent a physiologic niche for MCL relapse. Additionally, these data provide evidence for the potential of the alternative [NF-kappaB] pathway as a possible therapeutic target in MCL,” the researchers wrote in Cell Death & Disease.

The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Rauert-Wunderlich H et al. Cell Death Dis. 2018 Jan 24. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0157-6.

B-cell receptor (BCR) resistance is a significant treatment obstacle in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), but a new study highlights the potential protective role for cells expressing specific ligands.

Hilka Rauert-Wunderlich, of the University of Würzburg and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Germany, and her colleagues stimulated the REC-1, MAVER-1, and L-929 cell lines to show the role of the alternative nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappaB) pathway and the tumor necrosis factor ligand CD40L.

Viability assays showed a protective effect of CD40L prestimulation on BCR inhibitor treatment. The effect was detectable and significant in the REC-1 cell line for both ibrutinib and sotrastaurin at “clinically relevant concentrations” and in the resistant MAVER-1 cell line at “nonphysiologically high” sotrastaurin concentrations. CD40L stimulation also induced alternative NF-kappaB pathway signaling in both REC-1 and MAVER-1 cell lines.

“The data presented in this study argue for the protective potential of microenvironmentally mediated activation of the alternative [NF-kappaB] pathway in MCL cell against BCR signaling-associated drugs, which might represent a physiologic niche for MCL relapse. Additionally, these data provide evidence for the potential of the alternative [NF-kappaB] pathway as a possible therapeutic target in MCL,” the researchers wrote in Cell Death & Disease.

The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Rauert-Wunderlich H et al. Cell Death Dis. 2018 Jan 24. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0157-6.