Image Quizzes

Given the patient's diagnosis of stage IV MCL, the presentation of diffuse skin lesions, and the histopathologic and immunophenotyping results of those lesions, this patient is diagnosed with secondary cutaneous MCL. The hematologist-oncologist discusses the findings with the patient and presents potential next steps and treatment options. 

MCL is a type of B-cell neoplasm that, with advancements in the understanding of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in the past 30 years, has been defined as its own clinicopathologic entity by the Revised European-American Lymphoma and World Health Organization classifications. Up to 10% of all NHLs are MCL. Clinical presentation includes advanced disease with B symptoms (eg, night sweats, fever, weight loss), generalized lymphadenopathy, abdominal distention associated with hepatosplenomegaly, and fatigue. Skin manifestations are not as common as other extranodal manifestations. Primary cutaneous MCL occurs in up to 6% of patients with MCL; secondary cutaneous involvement is slightly more common, occurring in 17% of patients with MCL. Secondary cutaneous MCL usually presents in late-stage disease. Men are more likely to present with MCL than are women by a ratio of 3:1. Median age at presentation is 67 years. 
 
Diagnosing MCL is a multipronged approach. Physical examination may reveal lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly. Lymph node biopsy and aspiration with immunophenotyping in MCL reveals monoclonal B cells expressing surface immunoglobulin (Ig), IgM, or IgD, that are characteristically CD5+ and pan B-cell antigen–positive (eg, CD19, CD20, CD22) but lack expression of CD10 and CD23 and overexpress cyclin D1. Bone marrow aspirate/biopsy are used more for staging than for diagnosis. Blood studies, including anemia and cytopenias secondary to bone marrow infiltration (with up to 40% of cases showing lymphocytosis > 4000/μL), abnormal liver function tests, and a negative Coombs test also help diagnose MCL. Secondary cutaneous MCL is diagnosed on the basis of an MCL diagnosis along with diffuse infiltration of the skin, with multiple erythematous papules and nodules coalescing to form plaques; skin biopsy and immunohistopathology showing monotonous proliferation of small- to medium-sized lymphoid cells with scant cytoplasm; irregular cleaved nuclei with coarse chromatin; and inconspicuous nucleoli as well as a spared papillary dermis.

Pathogenesis of MCL involves disordered lymphoproliferation in a subset of naive pregerminal center cells in primary follicles or in the mantle region of secondary follicles. Most cases are linked with translocation of chromosome 14 and 11, which induces overexpression of protein cyclin D1. Viral infection (Epstein-Barr virus, HIV, human T-lymphotropic virus type 1, human herpes virus 6), environmental factors, and primary and secondary immunodeficiency are also associated with the development of NHL.

Patient education should include detailed information about clinical trials, available treatment options, and associated adverse events as well as psychosocial and nutrition counseling. 

Chemoimmunotherapy is standard initial treatment for MCL, but relapse is expected. Chemotherapy-free regimens with biologic targets, which were once used in second-line treatment, have increasingly become an important first-line treatment given their efficacy in the relapsed/refractory setting. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is also a second-line treatment option. In patients with MCL and a TP53 mutation, clinical trial participation is encouraged because of poor prognosis.

Timothy J. Voorhees, MD, MSCR, Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine - Clinical, Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.

Timothy J. Voorhees, MD, MSCR, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Received research grants from: AstraZeneca; Morphosys; Incyte; Recordati.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Given the patient's diagnosis of stage IV MCL, the presentation of diffuse skin lesions, and the histopathologic and immunophenotyping results of those lesions, this patient is diagnosed with secondary cutaneous MCL. The hematologist-oncologist discusses the findings with the patient and presents potential next steps and treatment options. 

MCL is a type of B-cell neoplasm that, with advancements in the understanding of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in the past 30 years, has been defined as its own clinicopathologic entity by the Revised European-American Lymphoma and World Health Organization classifications. Up to 10% of all NHLs are MCL. Clinical presentation includes advanced disease with B symptoms (eg, night sweats, fever, weight loss), generalized lymphadenopathy, abdominal distention associated with hepatosplenomegaly, and fatigue. Skin manifestations are not as common as other extranodal manifestations. Primary cutaneous MCL occurs in up to 6% of patients with MCL; secondary cutaneous involvement is slightly more common, occurring in 17% of patients with MCL. Secondary cutaneous MCL usually presents in late-stage disease. Men are more likely to present with MCL than are women by a ratio of 3:1. Median age at presentation is 67 years. 
 
Diagnosing MCL is a multipronged approach. Physical examination may reveal lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly. Lymph node biopsy and aspiration with immunophenotyping in MCL reveals monoclonal B cells expressing surface immunoglobulin (Ig), IgM, or IgD, that are characteristically CD5+ and pan B-cell antigen–positive (eg, CD19, CD20, CD22) but lack expression of CD10 and CD23 and overexpress cyclin D1. Bone marrow aspirate/biopsy are used more for staging than for diagnosis. Blood studies, including anemia and cytopenias secondary to bone marrow infiltration (with up to 40% of cases showing lymphocytosis > 4000/μL), abnormal liver function tests, and a negative Coombs test also help diagnose MCL. Secondary cutaneous MCL is diagnosed on the basis of an MCL diagnosis along with diffuse infiltration of the skin, with multiple erythematous papules and nodules coalescing to form plaques; skin biopsy and immunohistopathology showing monotonous proliferation of small- to medium-sized lymphoid cells with scant cytoplasm; irregular cleaved nuclei with coarse chromatin; and inconspicuous nucleoli as well as a spared papillary dermis.

Pathogenesis of MCL involves disordered lymphoproliferation in a subset of naive pregerminal center cells in primary follicles or in the mantle region of secondary follicles. Most cases are linked with translocation of chromosome 14 and 11, which induces overexpression of protein cyclin D1. Viral infection (Epstein-Barr virus, HIV, human T-lymphotropic virus type 1, human herpes virus 6), environmental factors, and primary and secondary immunodeficiency are also associated with the development of NHL.

Patient education should include detailed information about clinical trials, available treatment options, and associated adverse events as well as psychosocial and nutrition counseling. 

Chemoimmunotherapy is standard initial treatment for MCL, but relapse is expected. Chemotherapy-free regimens with biologic targets, which were once used in second-line treatment, have increasingly become an important first-line treatment given their efficacy in the relapsed/refractory setting. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is also a second-line treatment option. In patients with MCL and a TP53 mutation, clinical trial participation is encouraged because of poor prognosis.

Timothy J. Voorhees, MD, MSCR, Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine - Clinical, Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.

Timothy J. Voorhees, MD, MSCR, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Received research grants from: AstraZeneca; Morphosys; Incyte; Recordati.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Given the patient's diagnosis of stage IV MCL, the presentation of diffuse skin lesions, and the histopathologic and immunophenotyping results of those lesions, this patient is diagnosed with secondary cutaneous MCL. The hematologist-oncologist discusses the findings with the patient and presents potential next steps and treatment options. 

MCL is a type of B-cell neoplasm that, with advancements in the understanding of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in the past 30 years, has been defined as its own clinicopathologic entity by the Revised European-American Lymphoma and World Health Organization classifications. Up to 10% of all NHLs are MCL. Clinical presentation includes advanced disease with B symptoms (eg, night sweats, fever, weight loss), generalized lymphadenopathy, abdominal distention associated with hepatosplenomegaly, and fatigue. Skin manifestations are not as common as other extranodal manifestations. Primary cutaneous MCL occurs in up to 6% of patients with MCL; secondary cutaneous involvement is slightly more common, occurring in 17% of patients with MCL. Secondary cutaneous MCL usually presents in late-stage disease. Men are more likely to present with MCL than are women by a ratio of 3:1. Median age at presentation is 67 years. 
 
Diagnosing MCL is a multipronged approach. Physical examination may reveal lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly. Lymph node biopsy and aspiration with immunophenotyping in MCL reveals monoclonal B cells expressing surface immunoglobulin (Ig), IgM, or IgD, that are characteristically CD5+ and pan B-cell antigen–positive (eg, CD19, CD20, CD22) but lack expression of CD10 and CD23 and overexpress cyclin D1. Bone marrow aspirate/biopsy are used more for staging than for diagnosis. Blood studies, including anemia and cytopenias secondary to bone marrow infiltration (with up to 40% of cases showing lymphocytosis > 4000/μL), abnormal liver function tests, and a negative Coombs test also help diagnose MCL. Secondary cutaneous MCL is diagnosed on the basis of an MCL diagnosis along with diffuse infiltration of the skin, with multiple erythematous papules and nodules coalescing to form plaques; skin biopsy and immunohistopathology showing monotonous proliferation of small- to medium-sized lymphoid cells with scant cytoplasm; irregular cleaved nuclei with coarse chromatin; and inconspicuous nucleoli as well as a spared papillary dermis.

Pathogenesis of MCL involves disordered lymphoproliferation in a subset of naive pregerminal center cells in primary follicles or in the mantle region of secondary follicles. Most cases are linked with translocation of chromosome 14 and 11, which induces overexpression of protein cyclin D1. Viral infection (Epstein-Barr virus, HIV, human T-lymphotropic virus type 1, human herpes virus 6), environmental factors, and primary and secondary immunodeficiency are also associated with the development of NHL.

Patient education should include detailed information about clinical trials, available treatment options, and associated adverse events as well as psychosocial and nutrition counseling. 

Chemoimmunotherapy is standard initial treatment for MCL, but relapse is expected. Chemotherapy-free regimens with biologic targets, which were once used in second-line treatment, have increasingly become an important first-line treatment given their efficacy in the relapsed/refractory setting. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is also a second-line treatment option. In patients with MCL and a TP53 mutation, clinical trial participation is encouraged because of poor prognosis.

Timothy J. Voorhees, MD, MSCR, Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine - Clinical, Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.

Timothy J. Voorhees, MD, MSCR, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Received research grants from: AstraZeneca; Morphosys; Incyte; Recordati.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The patient's history, symptomatology, and assessments suggest a diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The primary care physician recommends referral to a hepatologist for evaluation and possible liver biopsy. 

NAFLD involves an accumulation of triglycerides and other fats in the liver (unrelated to alcohol consumption and other liver disease), with the presence of hepatic steatosis in more than 5% of hepatocytes. NAFLD affects 25% to 35% of the general population, making it the most common cause of chronic liver disease. The rate increases among patients with obesity, 80% of whom are affected by NAFLD. 

NAFLD should be considered in patients with unexplained elevations in serum aminotransferases (without positive viral markers or autoantibodies and no history of alcohol use) and a high risk for steatohepatitis, including obesity. The standard NAFLD assessment for biopsy specimens is the Brunt system, and disease stage is determined using the NAFLD activity score and the amount of fibrosis present.

A study of the natural history of NAFLD in patients who were followed for 3 years showed that without pharmacologic intervention, one third experienced disease progression, one third remained stable, and one third improved. An independent risk factor for progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis was abnormal glucose tolerance testing. In another natural history study, a 10% higher rate of mortality over 10 years was demonstrated among those with NAFLD vs controls, with the top three causes of death being cancer, heart disease, and liver-related disease. Prevalence of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis has been shown to be elevated in Latino and Japanese American populations.

Patients with NAFLD should be seen regularly to assess for disease progression and receive guidance on weight management interventions and exercise. A weight loss of more than 5% has been shown to reduce liver fat and provide cardiometabolic benefits; a weight reduction of more than 10% can help reverse steatohepatitis or liver fibrosis. In addition to weight loss management strategies, physicians should discuss the importance of controlling hyperlipidemia, insulin resistance, and T2D with their patients and share the importance of avoiding alcohol and other hepatotoxic substances.

According to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: "There are no U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for the treatment of NAFLD; however, some diabetes and anti-obesity medications can be beneficial. Bariatric surgery is also effective for weight loss and reducing liver fat in persons with severe obesity."

Courtney Whittle, MD, MSW, Diplomate of ABOM, Pediatric Lead, Obesity Champion, TSPMG, Weight A Minute Clinic, Atlanta, Georgia.

Courtney Whittle, MD, MSW, Diplomate of ABOM, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The patient's history, symptomatology, and assessments suggest a diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The primary care physician recommends referral to a hepatologist for evaluation and possible liver biopsy. 

NAFLD involves an accumulation of triglycerides and other fats in the liver (unrelated to alcohol consumption and other liver disease), with the presence of hepatic steatosis in more than 5% of hepatocytes. NAFLD affects 25% to 35% of the general population, making it the most common cause of chronic liver disease. The rate increases among patients with obesity, 80% of whom are affected by NAFLD. 

NAFLD should be considered in patients with unexplained elevations in serum aminotransferases (without positive viral markers or autoantibodies and no history of alcohol use) and a high risk for steatohepatitis, including obesity. The standard NAFLD assessment for biopsy specimens is the Brunt system, and disease stage is determined using the NAFLD activity score and the amount of fibrosis present.

A study of the natural history of NAFLD in patients who were followed for 3 years showed that without pharmacologic intervention, one third experienced disease progression, one third remained stable, and one third improved. An independent risk factor for progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis was abnormal glucose tolerance testing. In another natural history study, a 10% higher rate of mortality over 10 years was demonstrated among those with NAFLD vs controls, with the top three causes of death being cancer, heart disease, and liver-related disease. Prevalence of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis has been shown to be elevated in Latino and Japanese American populations.

Patients with NAFLD should be seen regularly to assess for disease progression and receive guidance on weight management interventions and exercise. A weight loss of more than 5% has been shown to reduce liver fat and provide cardiometabolic benefits; a weight reduction of more than 10% can help reverse steatohepatitis or liver fibrosis. In addition to weight loss management strategies, physicians should discuss the importance of controlling hyperlipidemia, insulin resistance, and T2D with their patients and share the importance of avoiding alcohol and other hepatotoxic substances.

According to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: "There are no U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for the treatment of NAFLD; however, some diabetes and anti-obesity medications can be beneficial. Bariatric surgery is also effective for weight loss and reducing liver fat in persons with severe obesity."

Courtney Whittle, MD, MSW, Diplomate of ABOM, Pediatric Lead, Obesity Champion, TSPMG, Weight A Minute Clinic, Atlanta, Georgia.

Courtney Whittle, MD, MSW, Diplomate of ABOM, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The patient's history, symptomatology, and assessments suggest a diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The primary care physician recommends referral to a hepatologist for evaluation and possible liver biopsy. 

NAFLD involves an accumulation of triglycerides and other fats in the liver (unrelated to alcohol consumption and other liver disease), with the presence of hepatic steatosis in more than 5% of hepatocytes. NAFLD affects 25% to 35% of the general population, making it the most common cause of chronic liver disease. The rate increases among patients with obesity, 80% of whom are affected by NAFLD. 

NAFLD should be considered in patients with unexplained elevations in serum aminotransferases (without positive viral markers or autoantibodies and no history of alcohol use) and a high risk for steatohepatitis, including obesity. The standard NAFLD assessment for biopsy specimens is the Brunt system, and disease stage is determined using the NAFLD activity score and the amount of fibrosis present.

A study of the natural history of NAFLD in patients who were followed for 3 years showed that without pharmacologic intervention, one third experienced disease progression, one third remained stable, and one third improved. An independent risk factor for progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis was abnormal glucose tolerance testing. In another natural history study, a 10% higher rate of mortality over 10 years was demonstrated among those with NAFLD vs controls, with the top three causes of death being cancer, heart disease, and liver-related disease. Prevalence of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis has been shown to be elevated in Latino and Japanese American populations.

Patients with NAFLD should be seen regularly to assess for disease progression and receive guidance on weight management interventions and exercise. A weight loss of more than 5% has been shown to reduce liver fat and provide cardiometabolic benefits; a weight reduction of more than 10% can help reverse steatohepatitis or liver fibrosis. In addition to weight loss management strategies, physicians should discuss the importance of controlling hyperlipidemia, insulin resistance, and T2D with their patients and share the importance of avoiding alcohol and other hepatotoxic substances.

According to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: "There are no U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for the treatment of NAFLD; however, some diabetes and anti-obesity medications can be beneficial. Bariatric surgery is also effective for weight loss and reducing liver fat in persons with severe obesity."

Courtney Whittle, MD, MSW, Diplomate of ABOM, Pediatric Lead, Obesity Champion, TSPMG, Weight A Minute Clinic, Atlanta, Georgia.

Courtney Whittle, MD, MSW, Diplomate of ABOM, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The history and findings in this case are consistent with atopic dermatitis (AD). 

AD is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that affects more than 200 million people worldwide, including as many as 30% of children and 10% of adults. Although it is more common in children (and may persist into adulthood), approximately 1 in 4 adults with AD have adult-onset disease.

The etiology of AD is complex and includes both genetic and environmental factors, including a weakened skin barrier, immune dysregulation, and abnormalities of the skin microbiome. AD is a member of the atopic triad (ie, AD, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and asthma), which may commence concurrently or in succession in what is referred to as the "atopic march."

The presentation of adult-onset AD may differ from that seen in children. For example, the most commonly reported body regions affected in adult-onset AD are the hands, eyelids, neck, and flexural surfaces of the upper limbs. In contrast, childhood-onset AD is less specific to body regions other than flexural areas. Xerosis is a prominent feature, and lichenification may be present. Some patients may have a rippled, brown macular ring around the neck, simulating the pigmentations seen in macular amyloid but due instead to postinflammatory melanin deposition. Pruritus is the most common and bothersome symptom associated with AD; patients may also experience anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances.

Diminished quality of life, reduced productivity at work and school, and increased healthcare costs (hospitalizations, emergency visits, outpatient visits, and medications) have all been reported in patients with AD. Triggers for flare-ups vary among individuals; commonly reported triggers include physical or emotional stress, changes in temperature or humidity, sweating, allergens, and irritants.

AD is typically diagnosed clinically given the characteristic distribution of lesions in various age groups (infancy, childhood, and adult). Associated findings such as keratosis pilaris may help to facilitate the diagnosis. No biomarker for the diagnosis of AD has been found and laboratory testing is rarely necessary. However, a swab of infected skin may help to isolate a specific involved organism (eg, Staphylococcus or Streptococcus) and antibiotic sensitivity. Allergy and radioallergosorbent testing are not necessary to make the diagnosis. A swab for viral polymerase chain reaction may be beneficial to help identify superinfection with herpes simplex virus and identify a diagnosis of eczema herpeticum. Testing for serum IgE level can also be helpful for supporting the diagnosis of AD.

The management of AD includes trigger avoidance, daily skin care with application of emollients, anti-inflammatory therapy, and other complementary modalities. For mild or moderate AD, first-line treatment consists of topical anti-inflammatory ointments and creams, including topical corticosteroids, which are available in a broad range of potencies. Other topical medications include topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and pimecrolimus for patients aged ≥ 2 years), which may be particularly appropriate when there is concern for adverse events secondary to corticosteroid use; topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor (crisaborole ointment for patients aged ≥ 3 months); and topical Janus kinase inhibitor (ruxolitinib cream for patients aged ≥ 12 years).

For patients with moderate to severe AD, or for those who are refractory to topical medications, treatment may include biologic therapy (dupilumab and tralokinumab for patients aged ≥ 6 months and ≥ 18 years, respectively), oral Janus kinase inhibitors (upadacitinib and abrocitinib for patients ages ≥ 12 and ≥ 18 years, respectively), phototherapy (commonly narrow-band ultraviolet light type B treatment), and oral immunomodulators (including methotrexate, mycophenolate, and azathioprine). Combination therapy may be required for the long-term management of more severe AD. 

William D. James, MD, Professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Disclosure: William D. James, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Elsevier.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The history and findings in this case are consistent with atopic dermatitis (AD). 

AD is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that affects more than 200 million people worldwide, including as many as 30% of children and 10% of adults. Although it is more common in children (and may persist into adulthood), approximately 1 in 4 adults with AD have adult-onset disease.

The etiology of AD is complex and includes both genetic and environmental factors, including a weakened skin barrier, immune dysregulation, and abnormalities of the skin microbiome. AD is a member of the atopic triad (ie, AD, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and asthma), which may commence concurrently or in succession in what is referred to as the "atopic march."

The presentation of adult-onset AD may differ from that seen in children. For example, the most commonly reported body regions affected in adult-onset AD are the hands, eyelids, neck, and flexural surfaces of the upper limbs. In contrast, childhood-onset AD is less specific to body regions other than flexural areas. Xerosis is a prominent feature, and lichenification may be present. Some patients may have a rippled, brown macular ring around the neck, simulating the pigmentations seen in macular amyloid but due instead to postinflammatory melanin deposition. Pruritus is the most common and bothersome symptom associated with AD; patients may also experience anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances.

Diminished quality of life, reduced productivity at work and school, and increased healthcare costs (hospitalizations, emergency visits, outpatient visits, and medications) have all been reported in patients with AD. Triggers for flare-ups vary among individuals; commonly reported triggers include physical or emotional stress, changes in temperature or humidity, sweating, allergens, and irritants.

AD is typically diagnosed clinically given the characteristic distribution of lesions in various age groups (infancy, childhood, and adult). Associated findings such as keratosis pilaris may help to facilitate the diagnosis. No biomarker for the diagnosis of AD has been found and laboratory testing is rarely necessary. However, a swab of infected skin may help to isolate a specific involved organism (eg, Staphylococcus or Streptococcus) and antibiotic sensitivity. Allergy and radioallergosorbent testing are not necessary to make the diagnosis. A swab for viral polymerase chain reaction may be beneficial to help identify superinfection with herpes simplex virus and identify a diagnosis of eczema herpeticum. Testing for serum IgE level can also be helpful for supporting the diagnosis of AD.

The management of AD includes trigger avoidance, daily skin care with application of emollients, anti-inflammatory therapy, and other complementary modalities. For mild or moderate AD, first-line treatment consists of topical anti-inflammatory ointments and creams, including topical corticosteroids, which are available in a broad range of potencies. Other topical medications include topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and pimecrolimus for patients aged ≥ 2 years), which may be particularly appropriate when there is concern for adverse events secondary to corticosteroid use; topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor (crisaborole ointment for patients aged ≥ 3 months); and topical Janus kinase inhibitor (ruxolitinib cream for patients aged ≥ 12 years).

For patients with moderate to severe AD, or for those who are refractory to topical medications, treatment may include biologic therapy (dupilumab and tralokinumab for patients aged ≥ 6 months and ≥ 18 years, respectively), oral Janus kinase inhibitors (upadacitinib and abrocitinib for patients ages ≥ 12 and ≥ 18 years, respectively), phototherapy (commonly narrow-band ultraviolet light type B treatment), and oral immunomodulators (including methotrexate, mycophenolate, and azathioprine). Combination therapy may be required for the long-term management of more severe AD. 

William D. James, MD, Professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Disclosure: William D. James, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Elsevier.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The history and findings in this case are consistent with atopic dermatitis (AD). 

AD is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that affects more than 200 million people worldwide, including as many as 30% of children and 10% of adults. Although it is more common in children (and may persist into adulthood), approximately 1 in 4 adults with AD have adult-onset disease.

The etiology of AD is complex and includes both genetic and environmental factors, including a weakened skin barrier, immune dysregulation, and abnormalities of the skin microbiome. AD is a member of the atopic triad (ie, AD, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and asthma), which may commence concurrently or in succession in what is referred to as the "atopic march."

The presentation of adult-onset AD may differ from that seen in children. For example, the most commonly reported body regions affected in adult-onset AD are the hands, eyelids, neck, and flexural surfaces of the upper limbs. In contrast, childhood-onset AD is less specific to body regions other than flexural areas. Xerosis is a prominent feature, and lichenification may be present. Some patients may have a rippled, brown macular ring around the neck, simulating the pigmentations seen in macular amyloid but due instead to postinflammatory melanin deposition. Pruritus is the most common and bothersome symptom associated with AD; patients may also experience anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances.

Diminished quality of life, reduced productivity at work and school, and increased healthcare costs (hospitalizations, emergency visits, outpatient visits, and medications) have all been reported in patients with AD. Triggers for flare-ups vary among individuals; commonly reported triggers include physical or emotional stress, changes in temperature or humidity, sweating, allergens, and irritants.

AD is typically diagnosed clinically given the characteristic distribution of lesions in various age groups (infancy, childhood, and adult). Associated findings such as keratosis pilaris may help to facilitate the diagnosis. No biomarker for the diagnosis of AD has been found and laboratory testing is rarely necessary. However, a swab of infected skin may help to isolate a specific involved organism (eg, Staphylococcus or Streptococcus) and antibiotic sensitivity. Allergy and radioallergosorbent testing are not necessary to make the diagnosis. A swab for viral polymerase chain reaction may be beneficial to help identify superinfection with herpes simplex virus and identify a diagnosis of eczema herpeticum. Testing for serum IgE level can also be helpful for supporting the diagnosis of AD.

The management of AD includes trigger avoidance, daily skin care with application of emollients, anti-inflammatory therapy, and other complementary modalities. For mild or moderate AD, first-line treatment consists of topical anti-inflammatory ointments and creams, including topical corticosteroids, which are available in a broad range of potencies. Other topical medications include topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and pimecrolimus for patients aged ≥ 2 years), which may be particularly appropriate when there is concern for adverse events secondary to corticosteroid use; topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor (crisaborole ointment for patients aged ≥ 3 months); and topical Janus kinase inhibitor (ruxolitinib cream for patients aged ≥ 12 years).

For patients with moderate to severe AD, or for those who are refractory to topical medications, treatment may include biologic therapy (dupilumab and tralokinumab for patients aged ≥ 6 months and ≥ 18 years, respectively), oral Janus kinase inhibitors (upadacitinib and abrocitinib for patients ages ≥ 12 and ≥ 18 years, respectively), phototherapy (commonly narrow-band ultraviolet light type B treatment), and oral immunomodulators (including methotrexate, mycophenolate, and azathioprine). Combination therapy may be required for the long-term management of more severe AD. 

William D. James, MD, Professor, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Disclosure: William D. James, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Elsevier.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The history and findings in this case are suggestive of combined small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Globally, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality, accounting for an estimated 2 million new diagnoses and 1.76 million deaths per year. It consists of two major subtypes: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and SCLC. SCLC is unique in its presentation, imaging appearances, treatment, and prognosis. SCLC accounts for approximately 15% of all lung cancers and is associated with an exceptionally high proliferative rate, strong predilection for early metastasis, and poor prognosis.

There are two subtypes of SCLC: oat cell carcinoma and combined SCLC. Combined SCLC is defined as SCLC with non-small cell components, such as squamous cell or adenocarcinoma. Men are affected more frequently than are women. Most presenting patients are older than 70 years and are either a current or former smoker. Patients frequently have multiple cardiovascular or pulmonary comorbidities.

In most cases, patients experience rapid onset of symptoms, normally beginning 8-12 weeks before presentation. Signs and symptoms vary depending on the location and bulk of the primary tumor, but may include cough, wheezing, and hemoptysis as well as weight loss, debility, and other signs of metastatic disease. Local intrathoracic tumor growth can affect the superior vena cava (leading to superior vena cava syndrome), chest wall, or esophagus. Neurologic problems, recurrent nerve pain, fatigue, and anorexia may result from extrapulmonary metastasis. Nearly 60% of patients present with metastatic disease, most commonly in the brain, liver, adrenal glands, bone, and bone marrow. If left untreated, SCLC tumors progress rapidly, with a median survival of 2-4 months.

All patients with SCLC require a thorough staging workup to evaluate the extent of disease because stage plays a central role in treatment selection. The initial imaging workup includes plain film radiography and contrast-enhanced CT of the chest and upper abdomen, brain MRI, and PET-CT. Laboratory studies to evaluate for the presence of neoplastic syndromes include complete blood count, electrolytes, calcium, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and creatinine. Biopsy is usually obtained via CT-guided biopsy or transbronchial biopsy, though this can vary depending on the location of the tumor.

According to 2023 guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), most patients with limited-stage SCLC are not eligible for surgery or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Surgery is only recommended for select patients with stage I–IIA SCLC (about 5% of patients). Concurrent chemoradiation or SABR is recommended for patients with limited stage I-IIA (T1-2,N0) SCLC who are ineligible for or do not want to pursue surgical resection. The majority of patients with SCLC have extensive-stage disease, and treatment with systemic therapy alone (with or without palliative radiotherapy) is recommended. Preferred cytotoxic and immunotherapeutic agents can be found in the NCCN guidelines. 

Karl J. D'Silva, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston; Medical Director, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Peabody, Massachusetts.

Karl J. D'Silva, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.
 

The history and findings in this case are suggestive of combined small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Globally, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality, accounting for an estimated 2 million new diagnoses and 1.76 million deaths per year. It consists of two major subtypes: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and SCLC. SCLC is unique in its presentation, imaging appearances, treatment, and prognosis. SCLC accounts for approximately 15% of all lung cancers and is associated with an exceptionally high proliferative rate, strong predilection for early metastasis, and poor prognosis.

There are two subtypes of SCLC: oat cell carcinoma and combined SCLC. Combined SCLC is defined as SCLC with non-small cell components, such as squamous cell or adenocarcinoma. Men are affected more frequently than are women. Most presenting patients are older than 70 years and are either a current or former smoker. Patients frequently have multiple cardiovascular or pulmonary comorbidities.

In most cases, patients experience rapid onset of symptoms, normally beginning 8-12 weeks before presentation. Signs and symptoms vary depending on the location and bulk of the primary tumor, but may include cough, wheezing, and hemoptysis as well as weight loss, debility, and other signs of metastatic disease. Local intrathoracic tumor growth can affect the superior vena cava (leading to superior vena cava syndrome), chest wall, or esophagus. Neurologic problems, recurrent nerve pain, fatigue, and anorexia may result from extrapulmonary metastasis. Nearly 60% of patients present with metastatic disease, most commonly in the brain, liver, adrenal glands, bone, and bone marrow. If left untreated, SCLC tumors progress rapidly, with a median survival of 2-4 months.

All patients with SCLC require a thorough staging workup to evaluate the extent of disease because stage plays a central role in treatment selection. The initial imaging workup includes plain film radiography and contrast-enhanced CT of the chest and upper abdomen, brain MRI, and PET-CT. Laboratory studies to evaluate for the presence of neoplastic syndromes include complete blood count, electrolytes, calcium, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and creatinine. Biopsy is usually obtained via CT-guided biopsy or transbronchial biopsy, though this can vary depending on the location of the tumor.

According to 2023 guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), most patients with limited-stage SCLC are not eligible for surgery or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Surgery is only recommended for select patients with stage I–IIA SCLC (about 5% of patients). Concurrent chemoradiation or SABR is recommended for patients with limited stage I-IIA (T1-2,N0) SCLC who are ineligible for or do not want to pursue surgical resection. The majority of patients with SCLC have extensive-stage disease, and treatment with systemic therapy alone (with or without palliative radiotherapy) is recommended. Preferred cytotoxic and immunotherapeutic agents can be found in the NCCN guidelines. 

Karl J. D'Silva, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston; Medical Director, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Peabody, Massachusetts.

Karl J. D'Silva, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.
 

The history and findings in this case are suggestive of combined small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Globally, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality, accounting for an estimated 2 million new diagnoses and 1.76 million deaths per year. It consists of two major subtypes: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and SCLC. SCLC is unique in its presentation, imaging appearances, treatment, and prognosis. SCLC accounts for approximately 15% of all lung cancers and is associated with an exceptionally high proliferative rate, strong predilection for early metastasis, and poor prognosis.

There are two subtypes of SCLC: oat cell carcinoma and combined SCLC. Combined SCLC is defined as SCLC with non-small cell components, such as squamous cell or adenocarcinoma. Men are affected more frequently than are women. Most presenting patients are older than 70 years and are either a current or former smoker. Patients frequently have multiple cardiovascular or pulmonary comorbidities.

In most cases, patients experience rapid onset of symptoms, normally beginning 8-12 weeks before presentation. Signs and symptoms vary depending on the location and bulk of the primary tumor, but may include cough, wheezing, and hemoptysis as well as weight loss, debility, and other signs of metastatic disease. Local intrathoracic tumor growth can affect the superior vena cava (leading to superior vena cava syndrome), chest wall, or esophagus. Neurologic problems, recurrent nerve pain, fatigue, and anorexia may result from extrapulmonary metastasis. Nearly 60% of patients present with metastatic disease, most commonly in the brain, liver, adrenal glands, bone, and bone marrow. If left untreated, SCLC tumors progress rapidly, with a median survival of 2-4 months.

All patients with SCLC require a thorough staging workup to evaluate the extent of disease because stage plays a central role in treatment selection. The initial imaging workup includes plain film radiography and contrast-enhanced CT of the chest and upper abdomen, brain MRI, and PET-CT. Laboratory studies to evaluate for the presence of neoplastic syndromes include complete blood count, electrolytes, calcium, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and creatinine. Biopsy is usually obtained via CT-guided biopsy or transbronchial biopsy, though this can vary depending on the location of the tumor.

According to 2023 guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), most patients with limited-stage SCLC are not eligible for surgery or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Surgery is only recommended for select patients with stage I–IIA SCLC (about 5% of patients). Concurrent chemoradiation or SABR is recommended for patients with limited stage I-IIA (T1-2,N0) SCLC who are ineligible for or do not want to pursue surgical resection. The majority of patients with SCLC have extensive-stage disease, and treatment with systemic therapy alone (with or without palliative radiotherapy) is recommended. Preferred cytotoxic and immunotherapeutic agents can be found in the NCCN guidelines. 

Karl J. D'Silva, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston; Medical Director, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Peabody, Massachusetts.

Karl J. D'Silva, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.
 

The history and findings in this case are suggestive of late-onset familial AD (onset after age 65 years).

AD is a common neurodegenerative disease associated with progressive impairment of behavioral and cognitive functions, including memory, comprehension, language, attention, reasoning, and judgment. In 2020, 5.8 million Americans were living with AD. By 2050, this number is projected to increase to 13.9 million people, or almost 3.3% of the US population. Globally, 152 million people are projected to have AD and other dementias by 2050. The worldwide increase in incidence and prevalence of AD is at least partially explained by an aging population and increased life expectancy. 

The cause of AD remains unclear, but there is substantial evidence that AD is a highly heritable disorder. Familial AD is characterized by having more than one member in more than one generation with AD. The autosomal-dominant form of AD is linked to mutations in three genes: AAP on chromosome 21, PSEN1 on chromosome 14, and PSEN2 on chromosome 1. APP mutations may cause increased generation and aggregation of beta-amyloid peptide, whereas PSEN1 and PSEN2 mutations result in aggregation of beta-amyloid by interfering with the processing of gamma-secretase.

APOE is another genetic marker that increases the risk for AD. Isoform e4 of the APOE gene (located on chromosome 19) has been associated with more sporadic and familial forms of AD that present after age 65 years. Approximately 50% of individuals carrying one APOEe4 develop AD, and 90% of individuals who have two alleles develop AD. Variants in the gene for the sortilin receptor, SORT1, have also been found in familial and sporadic forms of AD.

The cognitive and behavioral impairment associated with AD significantly affects a patient's social and occupational functioning. Insidiously progressive memory loss is a characteristic symptoms seen in patients presenting with AD. As the disease advances over the course of several years, other areas of cognition are impaired. Patients may develop language disorders (eg, anomic aphasia or anomia) and impairment in visuospatial skills and executive functions. A slow progression of behavioral changes may also occur in individuals with AD.

Clinical criteria for the diagnosis of AD (eg, insidious onset of cognitive impairment, clear history of worsening symptoms) have been developed and are often used to diagnose patients. In addition, biomarker evidence may help to increase the diagnostic certainty. Several cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers have shown excellent diagnostic ability by identifying tau pathology and cerebral amyloid-beta for AD.

Neuroimaging is becoming increasingly important for identifying the underlying causes of cognitive impairment. Currently, MRI is considered the preferred neuroimaging modality for AD because it allows for accurate measurement of the three-dimensional volume of brain structures, particularly the size of the hippocampus and related regions. CT can be used when MRI is not available or is contraindicated, such as in a patient with a pacemaker. PET is another noninvasive method for depicting tau pathology deposition and distribution in patients with cognitive impairment. In 2020, US Food and Drug Administration approved the first tau PET tracer, ¹⁸F-flortaucipir, which marked a significant achievement to improve AD diagnosis. 

At present, the only therapies available for AD are symptomatic therapies. Cholinesterase inhibitors and a partial N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist are the standard medical treatments for AD. Antiamyloid therapies are also available for patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia. These include aducanumab, a first-in-class amyloid-beta–directed antibody that was approved in 2021, and lecanemab, another amyloid-beta–directed antibody that was approved in 2023. Both aducanumab and lecanemab are recommended for the treatment of patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia stage of disease, the population in which the safety and efficacy of these newer agents were demonstrated in clinical trials. 

Secondary symptoms of AD, such as depression, agitation, aggression, hallucinations, delusions, and/or sleep disorders, can be treated with psychotropic agents. Behavioral interventions including patient-centered approaches and caregiver training can also be helpful for managing the cognitive and behavioral manifestations of AD, often in combination with pharmacologic interventions (eg, anxiolytics for anxiety and agitation, neuroleptics for delusions or hallucinations, and antidepressants or mood stabilizers for mood disorders). Regular physical activity and exercise may also play a role in delaying AD progression and possibly conferring a protective effect on brain health. 

Jasvinder Chawla, MD, Professor of Neurology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Director, Clinical Neurophysiology Lab, Department of Neurology, Hines VA Hospital, Hines, IL.

Jasvinder Chawla, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.
 

The history and findings in this case are suggestive of late-onset familial AD (onset after age 65 years).

AD is a common neurodegenerative disease associated with progressive impairment of behavioral and cognitive functions, including memory, comprehension, language, attention, reasoning, and judgment. In 2020, 5.8 million Americans were living with AD. By 2050, this number is projected to increase to 13.9 million people, or almost 3.3% of the US population. Globally, 152 million people are projected to have AD and other dementias by 2050. The worldwide increase in incidence and prevalence of AD is at least partially explained by an aging population and increased life expectancy. 

The cause of AD remains unclear, but there is substantial evidence that AD is a highly heritable disorder. Familial AD is characterized by having more than one member in more than one generation with AD. The autosomal-dominant form of AD is linked to mutations in three genes: AAP on chromosome 21, PSEN1 on chromosome 14, and PSEN2 on chromosome 1. APP mutations may cause increased generation and aggregation of beta-amyloid peptide, whereas PSEN1 and PSEN2 mutations result in aggregation of beta-amyloid by interfering with the processing of gamma-secretase.

APOE is another genetic marker that increases the risk for AD. Isoform e4 of the APOE gene (located on chromosome 19) has been associated with more sporadic and familial forms of AD that present after age 65 years. Approximately 50% of individuals carrying one APOEe4 develop AD, and 90% of individuals who have two alleles develop AD. Variants in the gene for the sortilin receptor, SORT1, have also been found in familial and sporadic forms of AD.

The cognitive and behavioral impairment associated with AD significantly affects a patient's social and occupational functioning. Insidiously progressive memory loss is a characteristic symptoms seen in patients presenting with AD. As the disease advances over the course of several years, other areas of cognition are impaired. Patients may develop language disorders (eg, anomic aphasia or anomia) and impairment in visuospatial skills and executive functions. A slow progression of behavioral changes may also occur in individuals with AD.

Clinical criteria for the diagnosis of AD (eg, insidious onset of cognitive impairment, clear history of worsening symptoms) have been developed and are often used to diagnose patients. In addition, biomarker evidence may help to increase the diagnostic certainty. Several cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers have shown excellent diagnostic ability by identifying tau pathology and cerebral amyloid-beta for AD.

Neuroimaging is becoming increasingly important for identifying the underlying causes of cognitive impairment. Currently, MRI is considered the preferred neuroimaging modality for AD because it allows for accurate measurement of the three-dimensional volume of brain structures, particularly the size of the hippocampus and related regions. CT can be used when MRI is not available or is contraindicated, such as in a patient with a pacemaker. PET is another noninvasive method for depicting tau pathology deposition and distribution in patients with cognitive impairment. In 2020, US Food and Drug Administration approved the first tau PET tracer, ¹⁸F-flortaucipir, which marked a significant achievement to improve AD diagnosis. 

At present, the only therapies available for AD are symptomatic therapies. Cholinesterase inhibitors and a partial N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist are the standard medical treatments for AD. Antiamyloid therapies are also available for patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia. These include aducanumab, a first-in-class amyloid-beta–directed antibody that was approved in 2021, and lecanemab, another amyloid-beta–directed antibody that was approved in 2023. Both aducanumab and lecanemab are recommended for the treatment of patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia stage of disease, the population in which the safety and efficacy of these newer agents were demonstrated in clinical trials. 

Secondary symptoms of AD, such as depression, agitation, aggression, hallucinations, delusions, and/or sleep disorders, can be treated with psychotropic agents. Behavioral interventions including patient-centered approaches and caregiver training can also be helpful for managing the cognitive and behavioral manifestations of AD, often in combination with pharmacologic interventions (eg, anxiolytics for anxiety and agitation, neuroleptics for delusions or hallucinations, and antidepressants or mood stabilizers for mood disorders). Regular physical activity and exercise may also play a role in delaying AD progression and possibly conferring a protective effect on brain health. 

Jasvinder Chawla, MD, Professor of Neurology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Director, Clinical Neurophysiology Lab, Department of Neurology, Hines VA Hospital, Hines, IL.

Jasvinder Chawla, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.
 

The history and findings in this case are suggestive of late-onset familial AD (onset after age 65 years).

AD is a common neurodegenerative disease associated with progressive impairment of behavioral and cognitive functions, including memory, comprehension, language, attention, reasoning, and judgment. In 2020, 5.8 million Americans were living with AD. By 2050, this number is projected to increase to 13.9 million people, or almost 3.3% of the US population. Globally, 152 million people are projected to have AD and other dementias by 2050. The worldwide increase in incidence and prevalence of AD is at least partially explained by an aging population and increased life expectancy. 

The cause of AD remains unclear, but there is substantial evidence that AD is a highly heritable disorder. Familial AD is characterized by having more than one member in more than one generation with AD. The autosomal-dominant form of AD is linked to mutations in three genes: AAP on chromosome 21, PSEN1 on chromosome 14, and PSEN2 on chromosome 1. APP mutations may cause increased generation and aggregation of beta-amyloid peptide, whereas PSEN1 and PSEN2 mutations result in aggregation of beta-amyloid by interfering with the processing of gamma-secretase.

APOE is another genetic marker that increases the risk for AD. Isoform e4 of the APOE gene (located on chromosome 19) has been associated with more sporadic and familial forms of AD that present after age 65 years. Approximately 50% of individuals carrying one APOEe4 develop AD, and 90% of individuals who have two alleles develop AD. Variants in the gene for the sortilin receptor, SORT1, have also been found in familial and sporadic forms of AD.

The cognitive and behavioral impairment associated with AD significantly affects a patient's social and occupational functioning. Insidiously progressive memory loss is a characteristic symptoms seen in patients presenting with AD. As the disease advances over the course of several years, other areas of cognition are impaired. Patients may develop language disorders (eg, anomic aphasia or anomia) and impairment in visuospatial skills and executive functions. A slow progression of behavioral changes may also occur in individuals with AD.

Clinical criteria for the diagnosis of AD (eg, insidious onset of cognitive impairment, clear history of worsening symptoms) have been developed and are often used to diagnose patients. In addition, biomarker evidence may help to increase the diagnostic certainty. Several cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers have shown excellent diagnostic ability by identifying tau pathology and cerebral amyloid-beta for AD.

Neuroimaging is becoming increasingly important for identifying the underlying causes of cognitive impairment. Currently, MRI is considered the preferred neuroimaging modality for AD because it allows for accurate measurement of the three-dimensional volume of brain structures, particularly the size of the hippocampus and related regions. CT can be used when MRI is not available or is contraindicated, such as in a patient with a pacemaker. PET is another noninvasive method for depicting tau pathology deposition and distribution in patients with cognitive impairment. In 2020, US Food and Drug Administration approved the first tau PET tracer, ¹⁸F-flortaucipir, which marked a significant achievement to improve AD diagnosis. 

At present, the only therapies available for AD are symptomatic therapies. Cholinesterase inhibitors and a partial N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist are the standard medical treatments for AD. Antiamyloid therapies are also available for patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia. These include aducanumab, a first-in-class amyloid-beta–directed antibody that was approved in 2021, and lecanemab, another amyloid-beta–directed antibody that was approved in 2023. Both aducanumab and lecanemab are recommended for the treatment of patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia stage of disease, the population in which the safety and efficacy of these newer agents were demonstrated in clinical trials. 

Secondary symptoms of AD, such as depression, agitation, aggression, hallucinations, delusions, and/or sleep disorders, can be treated with psychotropic agents. Behavioral interventions including patient-centered approaches and caregiver training can also be helpful for managing the cognitive and behavioral manifestations of AD, often in combination with pharmacologic interventions (eg, anxiolytics for anxiety and agitation, neuroleptics for delusions or hallucinations, and antidepressants or mood stabilizers for mood disorders). Regular physical activity and exercise may also play a role in delaying AD progression and possibly conferring a protective effect on brain health. 

Jasvinder Chawla, MD, Professor of Neurology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Director, Clinical Neurophysiology Lab, Department of Neurology, Hines VA Hospital, Hines, IL.

Jasvinder Chawla, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.
 

The findings in this case are suggestive of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC).

Globally, breast cancer remains the most common life-threatening cancer diagnosed and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. In the United States, approximately 287,850 new cases of invasive breast cancer were diagnosed in 2022 and 43,250 deaths were attributed to breast cancer in the same year. Worldwide, approximately 2.3 million new diagnoses and 685,000 breast cancer-related deaths were reported in 2020.

ILC is one of the leading histologic types of invasive carcinoma, second in incidence only to invasive carcinoma of no special type. ILC accounts for 5%-15% of all invasive breast cancers, and its incidence has been steadily increasing — particularly among postmenopausal women — over the past two decades. ILC has distinct molecular and histopathologic features, including the loss of cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin, resulting in small, discohesive cells proliferating in single-file strands; positivity for both the estrogen and progesterone receptor; and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negativity.

The diagnosis of ILC can be challenging, as it is difficult to detect both on physical examination and with standard imaging techniques. Patients are often diagnosed with late-stage disease, characterized by large tumors and lymph node involvement. The signs of ILC are often vague, such as skin thickening or dimpling. In addition, measuring the extent of ILC can be challenging, as traditional screening methods (eg, mammography and ultrasonography) have a low sensitivity for detecting ILC compared with other invasive breast tumors. This difficulty is usually ascribed to the diffuse infiltrative growth pattern of ILC. MRI has a greater sensitivity for detecting ILC.

Risk factors for the development of ILC have been identified and include:

•    Alcohol consumption
•    Use of combined hormone replacement therapy
•    Early menarche (menarche before the age of 12 years)
•    Late-onset menopause (menopause after the age of 55 years)
•    Nulliparity/low parity (defined by World Health Organization as fewer than five pregnancies with gestation periods of ≥ 20 weeks)
•    Late age at birth (> 30 years)
•    Family history (eg, hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome)
•    Genetics (eg, CDH1 mutations)

Treatment protocols for ILC align with those used in other breast cancer subtypes and typically involve a multidisciplinary approach comprising surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapies. Cancers that are deemed resectable will typically be managed surgically upfront, although some patients may require neoadjuvant therapy to reduce tumor burden and facilitate surgical intervention. Breast-conserving surgery using a wide local excision can frequently be performed; however, in up to 65% of cases, a second surgery will be required (re-excision or mastectomy). Axillary lymph node status is a crucial factor in the prognosis of all breast cancers and affects surgical planning. Sentinel node biopsy is the standard method of assessing the axilla. 

Systemic therapy is an integral part of the multidisciplinary approach to treating breast cancer and usually involves the use of chemotherapy. However, because of the unique molecular biology of ILC, treatment response to chemotherapy is often poor, resulting in lower rates of complete pathologic response and higher rates of mastectomy. Conversely, ILC has been shown to respond well to endocrine therapy, making it the optimal treatment choice. Novel therapeutic approaches are under investigation. 

Detailed guidance on the treatment of ILC is available from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Avan J. Armaghani, MD, Assistant Member, Department of Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.

Avan J. Armaghani, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
 

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The findings in this case are suggestive of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC).

Globally, breast cancer remains the most common life-threatening cancer diagnosed and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. In the United States, approximately 287,850 new cases of invasive breast cancer were diagnosed in 2022 and 43,250 deaths were attributed to breast cancer in the same year. Worldwide, approximately 2.3 million new diagnoses and 685,000 breast cancer-related deaths were reported in 2020.

ILC is one of the leading histologic types of invasive carcinoma, second in incidence only to invasive carcinoma of no special type. ILC accounts for 5%-15% of all invasive breast cancers, and its incidence has been steadily increasing — particularly among postmenopausal women — over the past two decades. ILC has distinct molecular and histopathologic features, including the loss of cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin, resulting in small, discohesive cells proliferating in single-file strands; positivity for both the estrogen and progesterone receptor; and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negativity.

The diagnosis of ILC can be challenging, as it is difficult to detect both on physical examination and with standard imaging techniques. Patients are often diagnosed with late-stage disease, characterized by large tumors and lymph node involvement. The signs of ILC are often vague, such as skin thickening or dimpling. In addition, measuring the extent of ILC can be challenging, as traditional screening methods (eg, mammography and ultrasonography) have a low sensitivity for detecting ILC compared with other invasive breast tumors. This difficulty is usually ascribed to the diffuse infiltrative growth pattern of ILC. MRI has a greater sensitivity for detecting ILC.

Risk factors for the development of ILC have been identified and include:

•    Alcohol consumption
•    Use of combined hormone replacement therapy
•    Early menarche (menarche before the age of 12 years)
•    Late-onset menopause (menopause after the age of 55 years)
•    Nulliparity/low parity (defined by World Health Organization as fewer than five pregnancies with gestation periods of ≥ 20 weeks)
•    Late age at birth (> 30 years)
•    Family history (eg, hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome)
•    Genetics (eg, CDH1 mutations)

Treatment protocols for ILC align with those used in other breast cancer subtypes and typically involve a multidisciplinary approach comprising surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapies. Cancers that are deemed resectable will typically be managed surgically upfront, although some patients may require neoadjuvant therapy to reduce tumor burden and facilitate surgical intervention. Breast-conserving surgery using a wide local excision can frequently be performed; however, in up to 65% of cases, a second surgery will be required (re-excision or mastectomy). Axillary lymph node status is a crucial factor in the prognosis of all breast cancers and affects surgical planning. Sentinel node biopsy is the standard method of assessing the axilla. 

Systemic therapy is an integral part of the multidisciplinary approach to treating breast cancer and usually involves the use of chemotherapy. However, because of the unique molecular biology of ILC, treatment response to chemotherapy is often poor, resulting in lower rates of complete pathologic response and higher rates of mastectomy. Conversely, ILC has been shown to respond well to endocrine therapy, making it the optimal treatment choice. Novel therapeutic approaches are under investigation. 

Detailed guidance on the treatment of ILC is available from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Avan J. Armaghani, MD, Assistant Member, Department of Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.

Avan J. Armaghani, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
 

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The findings in this case are suggestive of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC).

Globally, breast cancer remains the most common life-threatening cancer diagnosed and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. In the United States, approximately 287,850 new cases of invasive breast cancer were diagnosed in 2022 and 43,250 deaths were attributed to breast cancer in the same year. Worldwide, approximately 2.3 million new diagnoses and 685,000 breast cancer-related deaths were reported in 2020.

ILC is one of the leading histologic types of invasive carcinoma, second in incidence only to invasive carcinoma of no special type. ILC accounts for 5%-15% of all invasive breast cancers, and its incidence has been steadily increasing — particularly among postmenopausal women — over the past two decades. ILC has distinct molecular and histopathologic features, including the loss of cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin, resulting in small, discohesive cells proliferating in single-file strands; positivity for both the estrogen and progesterone receptor; and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negativity.

The diagnosis of ILC can be challenging, as it is difficult to detect both on physical examination and with standard imaging techniques. Patients are often diagnosed with late-stage disease, characterized by large tumors and lymph node involvement. The signs of ILC are often vague, such as skin thickening or dimpling. In addition, measuring the extent of ILC can be challenging, as traditional screening methods (eg, mammography and ultrasonography) have a low sensitivity for detecting ILC compared with other invasive breast tumors. This difficulty is usually ascribed to the diffuse infiltrative growth pattern of ILC. MRI has a greater sensitivity for detecting ILC.

Risk factors for the development of ILC have been identified and include:

•    Alcohol consumption
•    Use of combined hormone replacement therapy
•    Early menarche (menarche before the age of 12 years)
•    Late-onset menopause (menopause after the age of 55 years)
•    Nulliparity/low parity (defined by World Health Organization as fewer than five pregnancies with gestation periods of ≥ 20 weeks)
•    Late age at birth (> 30 years)
•    Family history (eg, hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome)
•    Genetics (eg, CDH1 mutations)

Treatment protocols for ILC align with those used in other breast cancer subtypes and typically involve a multidisciplinary approach comprising surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapies. Cancers that are deemed resectable will typically be managed surgically upfront, although some patients may require neoadjuvant therapy to reduce tumor burden and facilitate surgical intervention. Breast-conserving surgery using a wide local excision can frequently be performed; however, in up to 65% of cases, a second surgery will be required (re-excision or mastectomy). Axillary lymph node status is a crucial factor in the prognosis of all breast cancers and affects surgical planning. Sentinel node biopsy is the standard method of assessing the axilla. 

Systemic therapy is an integral part of the multidisciplinary approach to treating breast cancer and usually involves the use of chemotherapy. However, because of the unique molecular biology of ILC, treatment response to chemotherapy is often poor, resulting in lower rates of complete pathologic response and higher rates of mastectomy. Conversely, ILC has been shown to respond well to endocrine therapy, making it the optimal treatment choice. Novel therapeutic approaches are under investigation. 

Detailed guidance on the treatment of ILC is available from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Avan J. Armaghani, MD, Assistant Member, Department of Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.

Avan J. Armaghani, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
 

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The history and findings in this case are suggestive of leukemic non-nodal mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

MCL is a rare mature B-cell neoplasm characterized by t(11;14) (q13;q32) and cyclin D1 overexpression in more than 95% of cases. It accounts for approximately 5%-7% of all lymphomas, with an annual incidence of one case per 200,000 people. In North America and Europe, the incidence of MCL is like that of noncutaneous peripheral T-cell lymphomas. MCL occurs more frequently in men than in women (3:1), and the median age at diagnosis ranges from ages 60-70 years. 

In recent years, MCL has been categorized into two major subgroups that have distinct clinical presentation and molecular features: nodal MCL and leukemic non-nodal MCL. Nodal MCL is a common variant with an aggressive disease course. Unmutated IGHV gene rearrangement, SOX11 overexpression, a higher degree of genomic instability (eg, ATM, CDKN2A, chromatin modifier mutations), and other oncogenic mutations and epigenetic modifications are seen in patients with this variant. 

Leukemic non-nodal MCL is seen in 10%-20% of patients with MCL. Patients frequently present with lymphocytosis and splenomegaly. In most cases, it is associated with an indolent disease course and superior outcome. This subtype is largely IGHV mutated and mostly SOX11-negative, with positive expression of CD200, peripheral blood, bone marrow, and splenic involvement, low tumor burden, and a low Ki-67 index.

Recognition of the leukemic non-nodal MCL immunophenotype enables it to be differentiated from other CD5-positive B-cell cancers, particularly classical MCL and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The overexpression of cyclin D1, the presence of the t(11;14) translocation, and the absence of chromosomal markers typically present in CLL differentiate leukemic non-nodal MCL from CLL. Moreover, CLL has high expression of CD23 and is negative for SOX11 and CD200.

Pathologic features of MCL include small- to medium-size lymphocytes with scant cytoplasm, clumped chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, and prominent nuclear clefts. Observed growth patterns include diffuse, nodular (more vague and less discrete than that found in follicular lymphomas), mantle-zone lymphoma with expansion of mantle zones, and in situ mantle-cell neoplasia [typical cells with the characteristic t(11;14) translocation, scattered in the mantle zone of otherwise normal-appearing lymph nodes]. Cytologic subtypes include classic MCL, the blastoid subtype (large cells, dispersed chromatin, and a high mitotic rate), and the pleomorphic subtype (cells of variable sizes, although many are large, with pale cytoplasm, oval irregular nuclei, and prominent nucleoli). 

MCL is a challenging disease to treat. Despite treatment advances, it is largely incurable, with a median overall survival of 1.8-9.4 years, depending on whether it is aggressive or indolent MCL. The aggressiveness of the disease, the patient's performance status, age, and mantle cell international prognostic index score should all be considered when selecting treatment because there is no standard curative treatment. 

According to the 2023 guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), for patients with indolent disease (eg, IGHV mutated and mostly SOX11-negative with leukemic and non-nodal presentation), observation is reasonable when patients are asymptomatic and have no indications for treatment. For patients with symptomatic disease or other indications for treatment, induction therapy with aggressive regimens is recommended when patients do not have a TP53 mutation. The optimum approach for patients with TP53 mutation is not yet known; induction therapy followed by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant or less aggressive regimens could be an option for these patients.

Treatment options for relapsed/refractory MCL include radiotherapy; traditional chemotherapy regimens, with or without rituximab; and newer targeted therapies. These include Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ibrutinib, zanubrutinib, acalabrutinib, pirtobrutinib), lenalidomide, bortezomib, the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors temsirolimus and everolimus, the phosphatidylinositol 3–kinase inhibitors idelalisib and umbralisib, and the B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor venetoclax. These agents are frequently administered in combination with rituximab or another anti-CD20 antibody.

For comprehensive guidance on the treatment of MCL, consult the complete NCCN guidelines.

Timothy J. Voorhees, MD, MSCR, Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine - Clinical, Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.

Timothy J. Voorhees, MD, MSCR, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Received research grant from: AstraZeneca; Morphosys; Incyte; Recordati.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The history and findings in this case are suggestive of leukemic non-nodal mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

MCL is a rare mature B-cell neoplasm characterized by t(11;14) (q13;q32) and cyclin D1 overexpression in more than 95% of cases. It accounts for approximately 5%-7% of all lymphomas, with an annual incidence of one case per 200,000 people. In North America and Europe, the incidence of MCL is like that of noncutaneous peripheral T-cell lymphomas. MCL occurs more frequently in men than in women (3:1), and the median age at diagnosis ranges from ages 60-70 years. 

In recent years, MCL has been categorized into two major subgroups that have distinct clinical presentation and molecular features: nodal MCL and leukemic non-nodal MCL. Nodal MCL is a common variant with an aggressive disease course. Unmutated IGHV gene rearrangement, SOX11 overexpression, a higher degree of genomic instability (eg, ATM, CDKN2A, chromatin modifier mutations), and other oncogenic mutations and epigenetic modifications are seen in patients with this variant. 

Leukemic non-nodal MCL is seen in 10%-20% of patients with MCL. Patients frequently present with lymphocytosis and splenomegaly. In most cases, it is associated with an indolent disease course and superior outcome. This subtype is largely IGHV mutated and mostly SOX11-negative, with positive expression of CD200, peripheral blood, bone marrow, and splenic involvement, low tumor burden, and a low Ki-67 index.

Recognition of the leukemic non-nodal MCL immunophenotype enables it to be differentiated from other CD5-positive B-cell cancers, particularly classical MCL and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The overexpression of cyclin D1, the presence of the t(11;14) translocation, and the absence of chromosomal markers typically present in CLL differentiate leukemic non-nodal MCL from CLL. Moreover, CLL has high expression of CD23 and is negative for SOX11 and CD200.

Pathologic features of MCL include small- to medium-size lymphocytes with scant cytoplasm, clumped chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, and prominent nuclear clefts. Observed growth patterns include diffuse, nodular (more vague and less discrete than that found in follicular lymphomas), mantle-zone lymphoma with expansion of mantle zones, and in situ mantle-cell neoplasia [typical cells with the characteristic t(11;14) translocation, scattered in the mantle zone of otherwise normal-appearing lymph nodes]. Cytologic subtypes include classic MCL, the blastoid subtype (large cells, dispersed chromatin, and a high mitotic rate), and the pleomorphic subtype (cells of variable sizes, although many are large, with pale cytoplasm, oval irregular nuclei, and prominent nucleoli). 

MCL is a challenging disease to treat. Despite treatment advances, it is largely incurable, with a median overall survival of 1.8-9.4 years, depending on whether it is aggressive or indolent MCL. The aggressiveness of the disease, the patient's performance status, age, and mantle cell international prognostic index score should all be considered when selecting treatment because there is no standard curative treatment. 

According to the 2023 guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), for patients with indolent disease (eg, IGHV mutated and mostly SOX11-negative with leukemic and non-nodal presentation), observation is reasonable when patients are asymptomatic and have no indications for treatment. For patients with symptomatic disease or other indications for treatment, induction therapy with aggressive regimens is recommended when patients do not have a TP53 mutation. The optimum approach for patients with TP53 mutation is not yet known; induction therapy followed by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant or less aggressive regimens could be an option for these patients.

Treatment options for relapsed/refractory MCL include radiotherapy; traditional chemotherapy regimens, with or without rituximab; and newer targeted therapies. These include Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ibrutinib, zanubrutinib, acalabrutinib, pirtobrutinib), lenalidomide, bortezomib, the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors temsirolimus and everolimus, the phosphatidylinositol 3–kinase inhibitors idelalisib and umbralisib, and the B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor venetoclax. These agents are frequently administered in combination with rituximab or another anti-CD20 antibody.

For comprehensive guidance on the treatment of MCL, consult the complete NCCN guidelines.

Timothy J. Voorhees, MD, MSCR, Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine - Clinical, Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.

Timothy J. Voorhees, MD, MSCR, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Received research grant from: AstraZeneca; Morphosys; Incyte; Recordati.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The history and findings in this case are suggestive of leukemic non-nodal mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

MCL is a rare mature B-cell neoplasm characterized by t(11;14) (q13;q32) and cyclin D1 overexpression in more than 95% of cases. It accounts for approximately 5%-7% of all lymphomas, with an annual incidence of one case per 200,000 people. In North America and Europe, the incidence of MCL is like that of noncutaneous peripheral T-cell lymphomas. MCL occurs more frequently in men than in women (3:1), and the median age at diagnosis ranges from ages 60-70 years. 

In recent years, MCL has been categorized into two major subgroups that have distinct clinical presentation and molecular features: nodal MCL and leukemic non-nodal MCL. Nodal MCL is a common variant with an aggressive disease course. Unmutated IGHV gene rearrangement, SOX11 overexpression, a higher degree of genomic instability (eg, ATM, CDKN2A, chromatin modifier mutations), and other oncogenic mutations and epigenetic modifications are seen in patients with this variant. 

Leukemic non-nodal MCL is seen in 10%-20% of patients with MCL. Patients frequently present with lymphocytosis and splenomegaly. In most cases, it is associated with an indolent disease course and superior outcome. This subtype is largely IGHV mutated and mostly SOX11-negative, with positive expression of CD200, peripheral blood, bone marrow, and splenic involvement, low tumor burden, and a low Ki-67 index.

Recognition of the leukemic non-nodal MCL immunophenotype enables it to be differentiated from other CD5-positive B-cell cancers, particularly classical MCL and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The overexpression of cyclin D1, the presence of the t(11;14) translocation, and the absence of chromosomal markers typically present in CLL differentiate leukemic non-nodal MCL from CLL. Moreover, CLL has high expression of CD23 and is negative for SOX11 and CD200.

Pathologic features of MCL include small- to medium-size lymphocytes with scant cytoplasm, clumped chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, and prominent nuclear clefts. Observed growth patterns include diffuse, nodular (more vague and less discrete than that found in follicular lymphomas), mantle-zone lymphoma with expansion of mantle zones, and in situ mantle-cell neoplasia [typical cells with the characteristic t(11;14) translocation, scattered in the mantle zone of otherwise normal-appearing lymph nodes]. Cytologic subtypes include classic MCL, the blastoid subtype (large cells, dispersed chromatin, and a high mitotic rate), and the pleomorphic subtype (cells of variable sizes, although many are large, with pale cytoplasm, oval irregular nuclei, and prominent nucleoli). 

MCL is a challenging disease to treat. Despite treatment advances, it is largely incurable, with a median overall survival of 1.8-9.4 years, depending on whether it is aggressive or indolent MCL. The aggressiveness of the disease, the patient's performance status, age, and mantle cell international prognostic index score should all be considered when selecting treatment because there is no standard curative treatment. 

According to the 2023 guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), for patients with indolent disease (eg, IGHV mutated and mostly SOX11-negative with leukemic and non-nodal presentation), observation is reasonable when patients are asymptomatic and have no indications for treatment. For patients with symptomatic disease or other indications for treatment, induction therapy with aggressive regimens is recommended when patients do not have a TP53 mutation. The optimum approach for patients with TP53 mutation is not yet known; induction therapy followed by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant or less aggressive regimens could be an option for these patients.

Treatment options for relapsed/refractory MCL include radiotherapy; traditional chemotherapy regimens, with or without rituximab; and newer targeted therapies. These include Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ibrutinib, zanubrutinib, acalabrutinib, pirtobrutinib), lenalidomide, bortezomib, the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors temsirolimus and everolimus, the phosphatidylinositol 3–kinase inhibitors idelalisib and umbralisib, and the B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor venetoclax. These agents are frequently administered in combination with rituximab or another anti-CD20 antibody.

For comprehensive guidance on the treatment of MCL, consult the complete NCCN guidelines.

Timothy J. Voorhees, MD, MSCR, Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine - Clinical, Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.

Timothy J. Voorhees, MD, MSCR, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Received research grant from: AstraZeneca; Morphosys; Incyte; Recordati.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The history and findings in this case are consistent with a diagnosis of psoriatic spondylitis.

Psoriatic spondylitis is a form of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) that affects the spine and the joints in the pelvis (axial involvement). PsA is a chronic, heterogeneous condition that affects approximately 25%-30% of patients with psoriasis, particularly those with severe psoriasis or nail or scalp involvement. It is characterized by musculoskeletal inflammation (arthritis, enthesitis, spondylitis, and dactylitis). PsA is a spondyloarthritis that can be found either in the peripheral or axial skeleton. If not treated, it may result in permanent joint damage and loss of function. 

Patients with PsA may present with nail and skin changes, peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, and axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), either alone or in combination. Common symptoms of axial involvement in PsA include morning back/neck stiffness that lasts longer than 30 minutes, neck or back pain that improves with activity and worsens after prolonged inactivity, and diminished mobility. PsA affects men and women equally, and typically develops when patients are between 30 and 50 years of age. As with psoriasis, PsA is associated with numerous comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, obesity, diabetes, depression, uveitis, and anxiety.

The diagnosis of psoriatic spondylitis is confirmed by physical examination and imaging. Axial PsA characteristics, including sacroiliitis and spondylitis, are distinguished by the development of syndesmophytes (ie, ossification of the annulus fibrosus). Useful imaging tools for evaluating patients with PsA include plain radiography, CT, ultrasound, and MRI. Although MRI and ultrasound may be more sensitive than plain radiography for detecting early joint inflammation and damage and axial changes, including sacroiliitis, they are not mandatory for a diagnosis of PsA to be made.

International guidelines have been developed by the American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network, the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA), the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR), and the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society to guide the treatment of axial PsA. The goals of treatment include minimizing pain, stiffness, and fatigue; improving and preserving spinal flexibility and posture; improving functional capacity; and maintaining the ability to work, with a target of remission or minimal/low disease activity.

Treatment options for symptomatic relief include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glucocorticoids, and sacroiliac joint injections with glucocorticoids for mild disease; long-term treatment with systemic glucocorticoids is not recommended. If patients remain symptomatic or have erosive disease or other indications of high disease activity, guidelines recommend initiation of a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor (eg, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol). Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (eg, methotrexate) are not routinely prescribed for patients with axial disease because they have not been shown to be effective. In patients with significant skin involvement, treatment with interleukin-17A inhibitors may be preferred to TNF inhibitors. 

If patients have an inadequate response to a first trial of a TNF inhibitor, guidelines recommend trying a second TNF inhibitor before switching to a different class of biologic. For patients who do not respond to TNF inhibitors, a Janus kinase inhibitor (tofacitinib) may be considered. Additionally, nonpharmacologic therapies (eg, exercise, physical therapy, massage therapy, occupational therapy, acupuncture) are recommended for all patients with active PsA.

Herbert S. Diamond, MD, Professor of Medicine (retired), Temple University School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Chairman, Department of Medicine Emeritus, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.

Herbert S. Diamond, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The history and findings in this case are consistent with a diagnosis of psoriatic spondylitis.

Psoriatic spondylitis is a form of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) that affects the spine and the joints in the pelvis (axial involvement). PsA is a chronic, heterogeneous condition that affects approximately 25%-30% of patients with psoriasis, particularly those with severe psoriasis or nail or scalp involvement. It is characterized by musculoskeletal inflammation (arthritis, enthesitis, spondylitis, and dactylitis). PsA is a spondyloarthritis that can be found either in the peripheral or axial skeleton. If not treated, it may result in permanent joint damage and loss of function. 

Patients with PsA may present with nail and skin changes, peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, and axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), either alone or in combination. Common symptoms of axial involvement in PsA include morning back/neck stiffness that lasts longer than 30 minutes, neck or back pain that improves with activity and worsens after prolonged inactivity, and diminished mobility. PsA affects men and women equally, and typically develops when patients are between 30 and 50 years of age. As with psoriasis, PsA is associated with numerous comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, obesity, diabetes, depression, uveitis, and anxiety.

The diagnosis of psoriatic spondylitis is confirmed by physical examination and imaging. Axial PsA characteristics, including sacroiliitis and spondylitis, are distinguished by the development of syndesmophytes (ie, ossification of the annulus fibrosus). Useful imaging tools for evaluating patients with PsA include plain radiography, CT, ultrasound, and MRI. Although MRI and ultrasound may be more sensitive than plain radiography for detecting early joint inflammation and damage and axial changes, including sacroiliitis, they are not mandatory for a diagnosis of PsA to be made.

International guidelines have been developed by the American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network, the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA), the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR), and the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society to guide the treatment of axial PsA. The goals of treatment include minimizing pain, stiffness, and fatigue; improving and preserving spinal flexibility and posture; improving functional capacity; and maintaining the ability to work, with a target of remission or minimal/low disease activity.

Treatment options for symptomatic relief include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glucocorticoids, and sacroiliac joint injections with glucocorticoids for mild disease; long-term treatment with systemic glucocorticoids is not recommended. If patients remain symptomatic or have erosive disease or other indications of high disease activity, guidelines recommend initiation of a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor (eg, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol). Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (eg, methotrexate) are not routinely prescribed for patients with axial disease because they have not been shown to be effective. In patients with significant skin involvement, treatment with interleukin-17A inhibitors may be preferred to TNF inhibitors. 

If patients have an inadequate response to a first trial of a TNF inhibitor, guidelines recommend trying a second TNF inhibitor before switching to a different class of biologic. For patients who do not respond to TNF inhibitors, a Janus kinase inhibitor (tofacitinib) may be considered. Additionally, nonpharmacologic therapies (eg, exercise, physical therapy, massage therapy, occupational therapy, acupuncture) are recommended for all patients with active PsA.

Herbert S. Diamond, MD, Professor of Medicine (retired), Temple University School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Chairman, Department of Medicine Emeritus, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.

Herbert S. Diamond, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The history and findings in this case are consistent with a diagnosis of psoriatic spondylitis.

Psoriatic spondylitis is a form of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) that affects the spine and the joints in the pelvis (axial involvement). PsA is a chronic, heterogeneous condition that affects approximately 25%-30% of patients with psoriasis, particularly those with severe psoriasis or nail or scalp involvement. It is characterized by musculoskeletal inflammation (arthritis, enthesitis, spondylitis, and dactylitis). PsA is a spondyloarthritis that can be found either in the peripheral or axial skeleton. If not treated, it may result in permanent joint damage and loss of function. 

Patients with PsA may present with nail and skin changes, peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, and axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), either alone or in combination. Common symptoms of axial involvement in PsA include morning back/neck stiffness that lasts longer than 30 minutes, neck or back pain that improves with activity and worsens after prolonged inactivity, and diminished mobility. PsA affects men and women equally, and typically develops when patients are between 30 and 50 years of age. As with psoriasis, PsA is associated with numerous comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, obesity, diabetes, depression, uveitis, and anxiety.

The diagnosis of psoriatic spondylitis is confirmed by physical examination and imaging. Axial PsA characteristics, including sacroiliitis and spondylitis, are distinguished by the development of syndesmophytes (ie, ossification of the annulus fibrosus). Useful imaging tools for evaluating patients with PsA include plain radiography, CT, ultrasound, and MRI. Although MRI and ultrasound may be more sensitive than plain radiography for detecting early joint inflammation and damage and axial changes, including sacroiliitis, they are not mandatory for a diagnosis of PsA to be made.

International guidelines have been developed by the American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network, the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA), the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR), and the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society to guide the treatment of axial PsA. The goals of treatment include minimizing pain, stiffness, and fatigue; improving and preserving spinal flexibility and posture; improving functional capacity; and maintaining the ability to work, with a target of remission or minimal/low disease activity.

Treatment options for symptomatic relief include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glucocorticoids, and sacroiliac joint injections with glucocorticoids for mild disease; long-term treatment with systemic glucocorticoids is not recommended. If patients remain symptomatic or have erosive disease or other indications of high disease activity, guidelines recommend initiation of a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor (eg, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol). Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (eg, methotrexate) are not routinely prescribed for patients with axial disease because they have not been shown to be effective. In patients with significant skin involvement, treatment with interleukin-17A inhibitors may be preferred to TNF inhibitors. 

If patients have an inadequate response to a first trial of a TNF inhibitor, guidelines recommend trying a second TNF inhibitor before switching to a different class of biologic. For patients who do not respond to TNF inhibitors, a Janus kinase inhibitor (tofacitinib) may be considered. Additionally, nonpharmacologic therapies (eg, exercise, physical therapy, massage therapy, occupational therapy, acupuncture) are recommended for all patients with active PsA.

Herbert S. Diamond, MD, Professor of Medicine (retired), Temple University School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Chairman, Department of Medicine Emeritus, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.

Herbert S. Diamond, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The history and findings in this case are suggestive of inflammatory breast cancer.

Breast cancer is the leading life-threatening cancer diagnosed and the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. In the United States, estimates suggest that 287,850 new cases of invasive breast cancer were diagnosed in 2022 and 43,250 women died of the disease. Globally, approximately 2.3 million new diagnoses and 685,000 breast cancer–related deaths were reported in 2020.

Inflammatory breast cancer is a rare and highly aggressive subtype of locally advanced breast cancer. In the United States, inflammatory breast cancer accounts for approximately 2%-4% of breast cancer cases. Although its incidence is rare, 7% of breast cancer caused mortality is attributed to inflammatory breast cancer. Cases of inflammatory breast cancer tend to be diagnosed at a younger age compared with noninflammatory breast cancer cases. Risk factors include African-American race and obesity. 

The symptoms of inflammatory breast cancer can vary broadly, ranging from subtle skin erythema to diffuse breast involvement with skin dimpling and nipple inversion. Diagnostic criteria include erythema occupying at least one third of the breast, edema, peau d'orange, and/or warmth, with or without an underlying mass; rapid onset (< 3 months); and pathologic confirmation of invasive breast carcinoma. Histologic findings include florid tumor emboli that obstruct dermal lymphatics, which results in swelling and inflammation of the affected breast. 

Inflammatory breast cancer has been associated with a poor prognosis. However, treatment advances are helping to improve outcomes. Currently, 5-year survival rates are reported to be 40%-70%, with a median survival of 2-4 years. According to 2023 guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the first-line treatment of inflammatory breast cancer involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy, modified radical mastectomy, and adjuvant radiation to the chest wall and regional nodes. Endocrine treatment should also be given to patients who are ER-positive and/or PR-positive (sequential chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy). For patients who are HER2-positive, up to 1 year of HER2-targeted therapy should be given. HER2-targeted therapies can be administered concurrently with radiation and with endocrine therapy if indicated.

Delayed reconstruction after mastectomy remains the clinical standard for inflammatory breast cancer. This is because the need to resect involved skin negates the benefit of skin-sparing mastectomy for immediate reconstruction. Moreover, high rates of local and distant recurrence warrant comprehensive regional node irradiation in a timely fashion, which may be more challenging or subject to delay after immediate reconstruction. Rarely, the extent of skin excision at the time of mastectomy prohibits primary or local closure. In such cases, reconstruction of the chest wall defect with autologous tissue is required, and concomitant immediate reconstruction may be undertaken.

Detailed guidance on the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer, in the first line and beyond, are available from the NCCN.

Avan J. Armaghani, MD, Assistant Member, Department of Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.

Avan J. Armaghani, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The history and findings in this case are suggestive of inflammatory breast cancer.

Breast cancer is the leading life-threatening cancer diagnosed and the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. In the United States, estimates suggest that 287,850 new cases of invasive breast cancer were diagnosed in 2022 and 43,250 women died of the disease. Globally, approximately 2.3 million new diagnoses and 685,000 breast cancer–related deaths were reported in 2020.

Inflammatory breast cancer is a rare and highly aggressive subtype of locally advanced breast cancer. In the United States, inflammatory breast cancer accounts for approximately 2%-4% of breast cancer cases. Although its incidence is rare, 7% of breast cancer caused mortality is attributed to inflammatory breast cancer. Cases of inflammatory breast cancer tend to be diagnosed at a younger age compared with noninflammatory breast cancer cases. Risk factors include African-American race and obesity. 

The symptoms of inflammatory breast cancer can vary broadly, ranging from subtle skin erythema to diffuse breast involvement with skin dimpling and nipple inversion. Diagnostic criteria include erythema occupying at least one third of the breast, edema, peau d'orange, and/or warmth, with or without an underlying mass; rapid onset (< 3 months); and pathologic confirmation of invasive breast carcinoma. Histologic findings include florid tumor emboli that obstruct dermal lymphatics, which results in swelling and inflammation of the affected breast. 

Inflammatory breast cancer has been associated with a poor prognosis. However, treatment advances are helping to improve outcomes. Currently, 5-year survival rates are reported to be 40%-70%, with a median survival of 2-4 years. According to 2023 guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the first-line treatment of inflammatory breast cancer involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy, modified radical mastectomy, and adjuvant radiation to the chest wall and regional nodes. Endocrine treatment should also be given to patients who are ER-positive and/or PR-positive (sequential chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy). For patients who are HER2-positive, up to 1 year of HER2-targeted therapy should be given. HER2-targeted therapies can be administered concurrently with radiation and with endocrine therapy if indicated.

Delayed reconstruction after mastectomy remains the clinical standard for inflammatory breast cancer. This is because the need to resect involved skin negates the benefit of skin-sparing mastectomy for immediate reconstruction. Moreover, high rates of local and distant recurrence warrant comprehensive regional node irradiation in a timely fashion, which may be more challenging or subject to delay after immediate reconstruction. Rarely, the extent of skin excision at the time of mastectomy prohibits primary or local closure. In such cases, reconstruction of the chest wall defect with autologous tissue is required, and concomitant immediate reconstruction may be undertaken.

Detailed guidance on the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer, in the first line and beyond, are available from the NCCN.

Avan J. Armaghani, MD, Assistant Member, Department of Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.

Avan J. Armaghani, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The history and findings in this case are suggestive of inflammatory breast cancer.

Breast cancer is the leading life-threatening cancer diagnosed and the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. In the United States, estimates suggest that 287,850 new cases of invasive breast cancer were diagnosed in 2022 and 43,250 women died of the disease. Globally, approximately 2.3 million new diagnoses and 685,000 breast cancer–related deaths were reported in 2020.

Inflammatory breast cancer is a rare and highly aggressive subtype of locally advanced breast cancer. In the United States, inflammatory breast cancer accounts for approximately 2%-4% of breast cancer cases. Although its incidence is rare, 7% of breast cancer caused mortality is attributed to inflammatory breast cancer. Cases of inflammatory breast cancer tend to be diagnosed at a younger age compared with noninflammatory breast cancer cases. Risk factors include African-American race and obesity. 

The symptoms of inflammatory breast cancer can vary broadly, ranging from subtle skin erythema to diffuse breast involvement with skin dimpling and nipple inversion. Diagnostic criteria include erythema occupying at least one third of the breast, edema, peau d'orange, and/or warmth, with or without an underlying mass; rapid onset (< 3 months); and pathologic confirmation of invasive breast carcinoma. Histologic findings include florid tumor emboli that obstruct dermal lymphatics, which results in swelling and inflammation of the affected breast. 

Inflammatory breast cancer has been associated with a poor prognosis. However, treatment advances are helping to improve outcomes. Currently, 5-year survival rates are reported to be 40%-70%, with a median survival of 2-4 years. According to 2023 guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the first-line treatment of inflammatory breast cancer involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy, modified radical mastectomy, and adjuvant radiation to the chest wall and regional nodes. Endocrine treatment should also be given to patients who are ER-positive and/or PR-positive (sequential chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy). For patients who are HER2-positive, up to 1 year of HER2-targeted therapy should be given. HER2-targeted therapies can be administered concurrently with radiation and with endocrine therapy if indicated.

Delayed reconstruction after mastectomy remains the clinical standard for inflammatory breast cancer. This is because the need to resect involved skin negates the benefit of skin-sparing mastectomy for immediate reconstruction. Moreover, high rates of local and distant recurrence warrant comprehensive regional node irradiation in a timely fashion, which may be more challenging or subject to delay after immediate reconstruction. Rarely, the extent of skin excision at the time of mastectomy prohibits primary or local closure. In such cases, reconstruction of the chest wall defect with autologous tissue is required, and concomitant immediate reconstruction may be undertaken.

Detailed guidance on the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer, in the first line and beyond, are available from the NCCN.

Avan J. Armaghani, MD, Assistant Member, Department of Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.

Avan J. Armaghani, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The history and findings in this case are suggestive of chronic kidney disease (CKD).

CKD affects between 8% and 16% of the population worldwide. Risk factors for CKD are numerous and include T2D, hypertension, and prediabetes. Diabetes is the leading cause of CKD. Up to 40% of patients with diabetes develop diabetic kidney disease, which can progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis or kidney transplantation. In fact, diabetic kidney disease is the top cause of ESRD in the United States.

Diagnostic criteria for CKD include elevated urinary albumin excretion (albuminuria) and/or eGFR < 60 mL/1.73 m² that persists for more than 3 months. The normal presentation of diabetic kidney disease includes long-standing diabetes, retinopathy, albuminuria without gross hematuria, and gradually progressive decline of eGFR. However, signs of diabetic kidney disease may be present in patients at diagnosis or without retinopathy in T2D. Reduced eGFR without albuminuria has been frequently reported in both type 1 diabetes (T1D) and T2D and is becoming increasingly common as the prevalence of diabetes rises in the United States.

Chronic kidney disease is usually identified through routine screening with serum chemistry profile and urine studies or as an incidental finding. Less often, patients may present with symptoms, such as gross hematuria, "foamy urine" (a sign of albuminuria), nocturia, flank pain, or decreased urine output. In advanced cases, patients may report fatigue, poor appetite, nausea, vomiting, a metallic taste, unintentional weight loss, pruritus, changes in mental status, dyspnea, and/or peripheral edema.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) 2023 Standards of Care in Diabetes describes five stages of CKD. Stages 1-2 are defined by evidence of high albuminuria with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m², while stages 3-5 are defined by progressively lower ranges of eGFR. Of note, at any eGFR, the degree of albuminuria is associated with risk for cardiovascular disease, CKD progression, and mortality. Thus, as noted by the ADA Standards, both eGFR and albuminuria should be used to guide treatment decisions; additionally, eGFR levels are essential for modifying drug dosages or restrictions of use, and the degree of albuminuria should influence selection of antihypertensive agents and glucose-lowering medications.

According to the ADA 2023 Standards of Care in Diabetes, for people with non–dialysis-dependent CKD, dietary protein intake should be ∼0.8 g/kg body weight per day (the recommended daily allowance), as this level has been shown to slow GFR decline compared with higher levels of dietary protein intake, with evidence of a greater effect over time. Conversely, higher levels of dietary protein intake (> 20% of daily calories from protein or > 1.3 g/kg/d) have been associated with increased albuminuria, more rapid kidney function loss, and cardiovascular disease mortality. For patients on dialysis, higher levels of dietary protein intake should be considered, because malnutrition is a significant problem in some of these patients.

Urinary excretion of sodium and potassium may be impaired in patients with reduced eGFR. Thus, restriction of dietary sodium to < 2300 mg/d may help to control blood pressure and reduce cardiovascular risk, and restriction of dietary potassium may be necessary to control serum potassium concentration. 

Intensive glycemic control with the goal of achieving near-normoglycemia has been shown to delay the onset and progression of albuminuria and reduced eGFR in patients with diabetes. Insulin alone was used to lower blood glucose in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study of T1D while a variety of agents were used in clinical trials of T2D, supporting the conclusion that glycemic control itself helps prevent CKD and its progression. However, the presence of CKD affects the risks and benefits of intensive glycemic control and several glucose-lowering medications. In the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial of T2D, increased adverse effects of intensive glycemic control (hypoglycemia and mortality) were seen among patients with kidney disease at baseline. Moreover, it may take at least 2 years to see improved eGFR outcomes as an effect of intensive glycemic control. Therefore, in some patients with prevalent CKD and substantial comorbidity, target A1c levels may be less intensive.

According to guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration, eGFR should be monitored while taking metformin and metformin is contraindicated in patients with an eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m². Clinicians should assess the benefits and risks of continuing treatment when eGFR falls to < 45 mL/min/1.73 m². 

The ADA recommends that sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors be given to all patients with stage 3 CKD or higher and T2D, regardless of glycemic control, as they have been shown to delay CKD progression and reduce heart failure risk independent of glycemic control. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) also have direct effects on the kidney and have been reported to improve renal outcomes compared with placebo. In patients for whom cardiovascular risk is a predominant problem, the ADA suggests using GLP-1 RAs for cardiovascular risk reduction.

Comprehensive guidance on the management of CKD in patients with T2D is available in the ADA 2023 Standards of Care in Diabetes.

Romesh K. Khardori, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Endocrine, and Metabolic Disorders, Eastern Virginia Medical School; EVMS Medical Group, Norfolk, Virginia

Romesh K. Khardori, MD, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The history and findings in this case are suggestive of chronic kidney disease (CKD).

CKD affects between 8% and 16% of the population worldwide. Risk factors for CKD are numerous and include T2D, hypertension, and prediabetes. Diabetes is the leading cause of CKD. Up to 40% of patients with diabetes develop diabetic kidney disease, which can progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis or kidney transplantation. In fact, diabetic kidney disease is the top cause of ESRD in the United States.

Diagnostic criteria for CKD include elevated urinary albumin excretion (albuminuria) and/or eGFR < 60 mL/1.73 m² that persists for more than 3 months. The normal presentation of diabetic kidney disease includes long-standing diabetes, retinopathy, albuminuria without gross hematuria, and gradually progressive decline of eGFR. However, signs of diabetic kidney disease may be present in patients at diagnosis or without retinopathy in T2D. Reduced eGFR without albuminuria has been frequently reported in both type 1 diabetes (T1D) and T2D and is becoming increasingly common as the prevalence of diabetes rises in the United States.

Chronic kidney disease is usually identified through routine screening with serum chemistry profile and urine studies or as an incidental finding. Less often, patients may present with symptoms, such as gross hematuria, "foamy urine" (a sign of albuminuria), nocturia, flank pain, or decreased urine output. In advanced cases, patients may report fatigue, poor appetite, nausea, vomiting, a metallic taste, unintentional weight loss, pruritus, changes in mental status, dyspnea, and/or peripheral edema.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) 2023 Standards of Care in Diabetes describes five stages of CKD. Stages 1-2 are defined by evidence of high albuminuria with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m², while stages 3-5 are defined by progressively lower ranges of eGFR. Of note, at any eGFR, the degree of albuminuria is associated with risk for cardiovascular disease, CKD progression, and mortality. Thus, as noted by the ADA Standards, both eGFR and albuminuria should be used to guide treatment decisions; additionally, eGFR levels are essential for modifying drug dosages or restrictions of use, and the degree of albuminuria should influence selection of antihypertensive agents and glucose-lowering medications.

According to the ADA 2023 Standards of Care in Diabetes, for people with non–dialysis-dependent CKD, dietary protein intake should be ∼0.8 g/kg body weight per day (the recommended daily allowance), as this level has been shown to slow GFR decline compared with higher levels of dietary protein intake, with evidence of a greater effect over time. Conversely, higher levels of dietary protein intake (> 20% of daily calories from protein or > 1.3 g/kg/d) have been associated with increased albuminuria, more rapid kidney function loss, and cardiovascular disease mortality. For patients on dialysis, higher levels of dietary protein intake should be considered, because malnutrition is a significant problem in some of these patients.

Urinary excretion of sodium and potassium may be impaired in patients with reduced eGFR. Thus, restriction of dietary sodium to < 2300 mg/d may help to control blood pressure and reduce cardiovascular risk, and restriction of dietary potassium may be necessary to control serum potassium concentration. 

Intensive glycemic control with the goal of achieving near-normoglycemia has been shown to delay the onset and progression of albuminuria and reduced eGFR in patients with diabetes. Insulin alone was used to lower blood glucose in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study of T1D while a variety of agents were used in clinical trials of T2D, supporting the conclusion that glycemic control itself helps prevent CKD and its progression. However, the presence of CKD affects the risks and benefits of intensive glycemic control and several glucose-lowering medications. In the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial of T2D, increased adverse effects of intensive glycemic control (hypoglycemia and mortality) were seen among patients with kidney disease at baseline. Moreover, it may take at least 2 years to see improved eGFR outcomes as an effect of intensive glycemic control. Therefore, in some patients with prevalent CKD and substantial comorbidity, target A1c levels may be less intensive.

According to guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration, eGFR should be monitored while taking metformin and metformin is contraindicated in patients with an eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m². Clinicians should assess the benefits and risks of continuing treatment when eGFR falls to < 45 mL/min/1.73 m². 

The ADA recommends that sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors be given to all patients with stage 3 CKD or higher and T2D, regardless of glycemic control, as they have been shown to delay CKD progression and reduce heart failure risk independent of glycemic control. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) also have direct effects on the kidney and have been reported to improve renal outcomes compared with placebo. In patients for whom cardiovascular risk is a predominant problem, the ADA suggests using GLP-1 RAs for cardiovascular risk reduction.

Comprehensive guidance on the management of CKD in patients with T2D is available in the ADA 2023 Standards of Care in Diabetes.

Romesh K. Khardori, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Endocrine, and Metabolic Disorders, Eastern Virginia Medical School; EVMS Medical Group, Norfolk, Virginia

Romesh K. Khardori, MD, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

The history and findings in this case are suggestive of chronic kidney disease (CKD).

CKD affects between 8% and 16% of the population worldwide. Risk factors for CKD are numerous and include T2D, hypertension, and prediabetes. Diabetes is the leading cause of CKD. Up to 40% of patients with diabetes develop diabetic kidney disease, which can progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis or kidney transplantation. In fact, diabetic kidney disease is the top cause of ESRD in the United States.

Diagnostic criteria for CKD include elevated urinary albumin excretion (albuminuria) and/or eGFR < 60 mL/1.73 m² that persists for more than 3 months. The normal presentation of diabetic kidney disease includes long-standing diabetes, retinopathy, albuminuria without gross hematuria, and gradually progressive decline of eGFR. However, signs of diabetic kidney disease may be present in patients at diagnosis or without retinopathy in T2D. Reduced eGFR without albuminuria has been frequently reported in both type 1 diabetes (T1D) and T2D and is becoming increasingly common as the prevalence of diabetes rises in the United States.

Chronic kidney disease is usually identified through routine screening with serum chemistry profile and urine studies or as an incidental finding. Less often, patients may present with symptoms, such as gross hematuria, "foamy urine" (a sign of albuminuria), nocturia, flank pain, or decreased urine output. In advanced cases, patients may report fatigue, poor appetite, nausea, vomiting, a metallic taste, unintentional weight loss, pruritus, changes in mental status, dyspnea, and/or peripheral edema.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) 2023 Standards of Care in Diabetes describes five stages of CKD. Stages 1-2 are defined by evidence of high albuminuria with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m², while stages 3-5 are defined by progressively lower ranges of eGFR. Of note, at any eGFR, the degree of albuminuria is associated with risk for cardiovascular disease, CKD progression, and mortality. Thus, as noted by the ADA Standards, both eGFR and albuminuria should be used to guide treatment decisions; additionally, eGFR levels are essential for modifying drug dosages or restrictions of use, and the degree of albuminuria should influence selection of antihypertensive agents and glucose-lowering medications.

According to the ADA 2023 Standards of Care in Diabetes, for people with non–dialysis-dependent CKD, dietary protein intake should be ∼0.8 g/kg body weight per day (the recommended daily allowance), as this level has been shown to slow GFR decline compared with higher levels of dietary protein intake, with evidence of a greater effect over time. Conversely, higher levels of dietary protein intake (> 20% of daily calories from protein or > 1.3 g/kg/d) have been associated with increased albuminuria, more rapid kidney function loss, and cardiovascular disease mortality. For patients on dialysis, higher levels of dietary protein intake should be considered, because malnutrition is a significant problem in some of these patients.

Urinary excretion of sodium and potassium may be impaired in patients with reduced eGFR. Thus, restriction of dietary sodium to < 2300 mg/d may help to control blood pressure and reduce cardiovascular risk, and restriction of dietary potassium may be necessary to control serum potassium concentration. 

Intensive glycemic control with the goal of achieving near-normoglycemia has been shown to delay the onset and progression of albuminuria and reduced eGFR in patients with diabetes. Insulin alone was used to lower blood glucose in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study of T1D while a variety of agents were used in clinical trials of T2D, supporting the conclusion that glycemic control itself helps prevent CKD and its progression. However, the presence of CKD affects the risks and benefits of intensive glycemic control and several glucose-lowering medications. In the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial of T2D, increased adverse effects of intensive glycemic control (hypoglycemia and mortality) were seen among patients with kidney disease at baseline. Moreover, it may take at least 2 years to see improved eGFR outcomes as an effect of intensive glycemic control. Therefore, in some patients with prevalent CKD and substantial comorbidity, target A1c levels may be less intensive.

According to guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration, eGFR should be monitored while taking metformin and metformin is contraindicated in patients with an eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m². Clinicians should assess the benefits and risks of continuing treatment when eGFR falls to < 45 mL/min/1.73 m². 

The ADA recommends that sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors be given to all patients with stage 3 CKD or higher and T2D, regardless of glycemic control, as they have been shown to delay CKD progression and reduce heart failure risk independent of glycemic control. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) also have direct effects on the kidney and have been reported to improve renal outcomes compared with placebo. In patients for whom cardiovascular risk is a predominant problem, the ADA suggests using GLP-1 RAs for cardiovascular risk reduction.

Comprehensive guidance on the management of CKD in patients with T2D is available in the ADA 2023 Standards of Care in Diabetes.

Romesh K. Khardori, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Endocrine, and Metabolic Disorders, Eastern Virginia Medical School; EVMS Medical Group, Norfolk, Virginia

Romesh K. Khardori, MD, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.