User login
Key clinical point: Imaging can be dependably used for estimating the size of clinical T1 tumors to plan lumpectomy; however, overestimation by preoperative imaging size (PIS) should be considered for larger tumors.
Major finding: Significant correlation was observed between PIS and postoperative pathology size (PPS), highest when estimated with ultrasound (correlation coefficient [r] 0.628) followed by mammography (r 0.571; both P < .001). Although ultrasound underestimated T1 (mean difference between PIS and PPS [MD] −3.47 mm; 95% CI −4.02 to −2.91 mm) and T2 (MD −2.20 mm; 95% CI −3.39 to −1.02 mm) tumors, mammogram underestimated T1 tumors (MD −2.91; 95% CI −3.51 to −2.32) and overestimated T2 tumors (MD 0.90; 95% CI −0.44 to 2.24), all within the range of concordance.
Study details: This study identified 1512 tumors in 1502 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent their first surgery.
Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Source: Kapur H et al. Accuracy of preoperative imaging estimates: Opportunities to de-escalate surgery for early invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2022 (Mar 30). Doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.03.053
Key clinical point: Imaging can be dependably used for estimating the size of clinical T1 tumors to plan lumpectomy; however, overestimation by preoperative imaging size (PIS) should be considered for larger tumors.
Major finding: Significant correlation was observed between PIS and postoperative pathology size (PPS), highest when estimated with ultrasound (correlation coefficient [r] 0.628) followed by mammography (r 0.571; both P < .001). Although ultrasound underestimated T1 (mean difference between PIS and PPS [MD] −3.47 mm; 95% CI −4.02 to −2.91 mm) and T2 (MD −2.20 mm; 95% CI −3.39 to −1.02 mm) tumors, mammogram underestimated T1 tumors (MD −2.91; 95% CI −3.51 to −2.32) and overestimated T2 tumors (MD 0.90; 95% CI −0.44 to 2.24), all within the range of concordance.
Study details: This study identified 1512 tumors in 1502 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent their first surgery.
Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Source: Kapur H et al. Accuracy of preoperative imaging estimates: Opportunities to de-escalate surgery for early invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2022 (Mar 30). Doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.03.053
Key clinical point: Imaging can be dependably used for estimating the size of clinical T1 tumors to plan lumpectomy; however, overestimation by preoperative imaging size (PIS) should be considered for larger tumors.
Major finding: Significant correlation was observed between PIS and postoperative pathology size (PPS), highest when estimated with ultrasound (correlation coefficient [r] 0.628) followed by mammography (r 0.571; both P < .001). Although ultrasound underestimated T1 (mean difference between PIS and PPS [MD] −3.47 mm; 95% CI −4.02 to −2.91 mm) and T2 (MD −2.20 mm; 95% CI −3.39 to −1.02 mm) tumors, mammogram underestimated T1 tumors (MD −2.91; 95% CI −3.51 to −2.32) and overestimated T2 tumors (MD 0.90; 95% CI −0.44 to 2.24), all within the range of concordance.
Study details: This study identified 1512 tumors in 1502 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent their first surgery.
Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Source: Kapur H et al. Accuracy of preoperative imaging estimates: Opportunities to de-escalate surgery for early invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2022 (Mar 30). Doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.03.053