User login
Cesarean deliveries may reduce a woman’s risk for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse but may raise her risk of complications with future pregnancies, based on data from a literature review including nearly 30,000,000 women.
Rates of cesarean delivery in 2016, often without medical indication, were approximately 25%, 32%, and 41% in Western Europe, North America, and South America, respectively, wrote Oonagh E. Keag, MD, of the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and colleagues in a study published in PLOS Medicine.
The researchers reviewed data from 79 observational studies and 1 randomized, controlled trial for a study population of 29,928,274 individuals.
Overall, women who had cesarean deliveries had a significantly lower risk of urinary incontinence (odds ratio, 0.56) and pelvic organ prolapse (OR, 0.29), compared with women who had vaginal deliveries.
No significant association appeared between type of delivery and risk of perinatal death, but women with a history of cesarean delivery were significantly more likely to experience miscarriage or stillbirth on a subsequent pregnancy, as well as placenta previa, placenta accreta, and placental abruption.
In addition, children born via cesarean delivery were significantly more likely than those born via vaginal delivery to have asthma at age 12 years (OR, 1.21) and to be obese up to age 5 years (OR, 1.59).
The findings were limited by the observational nature of most of the data, which does not imply causation, the researchers said. In addition, the study was not designed for subanalysis of elective vs. emergency cesarean delivery.
Although women will attach varying degrees of significance to the risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery, “it is imperative that clinicians take care to ensure that women are made aware of any risk that they are likely to attach significance to,” the researchers said. “Women and clinicians thus should be aware of both the short- and long-term risks and benefits of cesarean delivery and discuss these when deciding on mode of delivery,” they noted.
The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.
SOURCE: Keag OE et al. PLoS Med. 2018 Jan 23. 15(1):e1002494.
As health care practitioners, ob.gyns. must continually evaluate potential consequences of a management strategy to our patients’ health and well-being. This is especially true when determining the best method of delivery – vaginal or cesarean section – because our approach can affect not only the mother but also the baby.
It is well known that vaginal deliveries can be associated with long-term complications for women, including pelvic floor disorders (that is, prolapse), pelvic injury, and incontinence. For women who have undergone a cesarean section, the uterine scars caused by the surgery can lead to increased risk for placenta previa or, more seriously, placenta accreta, as well as possible miscarriage or stillbirth.
Because the best possible care must also be informed care, every ob.gyn. should conduct periodic reviews of the scientific literature. Research continually advances our knowledge and our practice. For example, the recent work on the use of statins to prevent preeclampsia is an area of intense interest. Although we’ve known about hypertensive disorders of pregnancy for many years, management and prevention strategies are adequate at best. This new and exciting line of research has the potential to solve a conundrum we’ve grappled with for centuries.
The study by Keag et al. analyzes the findings from observational studies on the risks and benefits of cesarean versus vaginal delivery, within certain limitations. The study authors found that cesarean deliveries are associated with lower risk of urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse, but higher risk of placenta previa, miscarriage, and stillbirth. Additionally, the authors reported that babies delivered by cesarean section had a higher risk of developing asthma and obesity.
Although the results of the study are not surprising, the findings reinforce the idea that ob.gyns must make decisions on a case-by-case basis and on obstetrical indications. We cannot use a set of possible complications as a reason to choose one delivery route over another. Every patient is unique. Every circumstance is unique. Every delivery requires us to make an informed decision to achieve the best possible outcome. Otherwise, we run the great risk of doing a disservice to our patients and their families.
E. Albert Reece, MD , PhD, MBA, specializes in maternal-fetal medicine and is vice president for medical affairs at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, as well as the John Z. and Akiko K. Bowers Distinguished Professor and dean of the school of medicine. He has no relevant financial disclosures.
As health care practitioners, ob.gyns. must continually evaluate potential consequences of a management strategy to our patients’ health and well-being. This is especially true when determining the best method of delivery – vaginal or cesarean section – because our approach can affect not only the mother but also the baby.
It is well known that vaginal deliveries can be associated with long-term complications for women, including pelvic floor disorders (that is, prolapse), pelvic injury, and incontinence. For women who have undergone a cesarean section, the uterine scars caused by the surgery can lead to increased risk for placenta previa or, more seriously, placenta accreta, as well as possible miscarriage or stillbirth.
Because the best possible care must also be informed care, every ob.gyn. should conduct periodic reviews of the scientific literature. Research continually advances our knowledge and our practice. For example, the recent work on the use of statins to prevent preeclampsia is an area of intense interest. Although we’ve known about hypertensive disorders of pregnancy for many years, management and prevention strategies are adequate at best. This new and exciting line of research has the potential to solve a conundrum we’ve grappled with for centuries.
The study by Keag et al. analyzes the findings from observational studies on the risks and benefits of cesarean versus vaginal delivery, within certain limitations. The study authors found that cesarean deliveries are associated with lower risk of urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse, but higher risk of placenta previa, miscarriage, and stillbirth. Additionally, the authors reported that babies delivered by cesarean section had a higher risk of developing asthma and obesity.
Although the results of the study are not surprising, the findings reinforce the idea that ob.gyns must make decisions on a case-by-case basis and on obstetrical indications. We cannot use a set of possible complications as a reason to choose one delivery route over another. Every patient is unique. Every circumstance is unique. Every delivery requires us to make an informed decision to achieve the best possible outcome. Otherwise, we run the great risk of doing a disservice to our patients and their families.
E. Albert Reece, MD , PhD, MBA, specializes in maternal-fetal medicine and is vice president for medical affairs at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, as well as the John Z. and Akiko K. Bowers Distinguished Professor and dean of the school of medicine. He has no relevant financial disclosures.
As health care practitioners, ob.gyns. must continually evaluate potential consequences of a management strategy to our patients’ health and well-being. This is especially true when determining the best method of delivery – vaginal or cesarean section – because our approach can affect not only the mother but also the baby.
It is well known that vaginal deliveries can be associated with long-term complications for women, including pelvic floor disorders (that is, prolapse), pelvic injury, and incontinence. For women who have undergone a cesarean section, the uterine scars caused by the surgery can lead to increased risk for placenta previa or, more seriously, placenta accreta, as well as possible miscarriage or stillbirth.
Because the best possible care must also be informed care, every ob.gyn. should conduct periodic reviews of the scientific literature. Research continually advances our knowledge and our practice. For example, the recent work on the use of statins to prevent preeclampsia is an area of intense interest. Although we’ve known about hypertensive disorders of pregnancy for many years, management and prevention strategies are adequate at best. This new and exciting line of research has the potential to solve a conundrum we’ve grappled with for centuries.
The study by Keag et al. analyzes the findings from observational studies on the risks and benefits of cesarean versus vaginal delivery, within certain limitations. The study authors found that cesarean deliveries are associated with lower risk of urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse, but higher risk of placenta previa, miscarriage, and stillbirth. Additionally, the authors reported that babies delivered by cesarean section had a higher risk of developing asthma and obesity.
Although the results of the study are not surprising, the findings reinforce the idea that ob.gyns must make decisions on a case-by-case basis and on obstetrical indications. We cannot use a set of possible complications as a reason to choose one delivery route over another. Every patient is unique. Every circumstance is unique. Every delivery requires us to make an informed decision to achieve the best possible outcome. Otherwise, we run the great risk of doing a disservice to our patients and their families.
E. Albert Reece, MD , PhD, MBA, specializes in maternal-fetal medicine and is vice president for medical affairs at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, as well as the John Z. and Akiko K. Bowers Distinguished Professor and dean of the school of medicine. He has no relevant financial disclosures.
Cesarean deliveries may reduce a woman’s risk for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse but may raise her risk of complications with future pregnancies, based on data from a literature review including nearly 30,000,000 women.
Rates of cesarean delivery in 2016, often without medical indication, were approximately 25%, 32%, and 41% in Western Europe, North America, and South America, respectively, wrote Oonagh E. Keag, MD, of the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and colleagues in a study published in PLOS Medicine.
The researchers reviewed data from 79 observational studies and 1 randomized, controlled trial for a study population of 29,928,274 individuals.
Overall, women who had cesarean deliveries had a significantly lower risk of urinary incontinence (odds ratio, 0.56) and pelvic organ prolapse (OR, 0.29), compared with women who had vaginal deliveries.
No significant association appeared between type of delivery and risk of perinatal death, but women with a history of cesarean delivery were significantly more likely to experience miscarriage or stillbirth on a subsequent pregnancy, as well as placenta previa, placenta accreta, and placental abruption.
In addition, children born via cesarean delivery were significantly more likely than those born via vaginal delivery to have asthma at age 12 years (OR, 1.21) and to be obese up to age 5 years (OR, 1.59).
The findings were limited by the observational nature of most of the data, which does not imply causation, the researchers said. In addition, the study was not designed for subanalysis of elective vs. emergency cesarean delivery.
Although women will attach varying degrees of significance to the risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery, “it is imperative that clinicians take care to ensure that women are made aware of any risk that they are likely to attach significance to,” the researchers said. “Women and clinicians thus should be aware of both the short- and long-term risks and benefits of cesarean delivery and discuss these when deciding on mode of delivery,” they noted.
The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.
SOURCE: Keag OE et al. PLoS Med. 2018 Jan 23. 15(1):e1002494.
Cesarean deliveries may reduce a woman’s risk for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse but may raise her risk of complications with future pregnancies, based on data from a literature review including nearly 30,000,000 women.
Rates of cesarean delivery in 2016, often without medical indication, were approximately 25%, 32%, and 41% in Western Europe, North America, and South America, respectively, wrote Oonagh E. Keag, MD, of the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and colleagues in a study published in PLOS Medicine.
The researchers reviewed data from 79 observational studies and 1 randomized, controlled trial for a study population of 29,928,274 individuals.
Overall, women who had cesarean deliveries had a significantly lower risk of urinary incontinence (odds ratio, 0.56) and pelvic organ prolapse (OR, 0.29), compared with women who had vaginal deliveries.
No significant association appeared between type of delivery and risk of perinatal death, but women with a history of cesarean delivery were significantly more likely to experience miscarriage or stillbirth on a subsequent pregnancy, as well as placenta previa, placenta accreta, and placental abruption.
In addition, children born via cesarean delivery were significantly more likely than those born via vaginal delivery to have asthma at age 12 years (OR, 1.21) and to be obese up to age 5 years (OR, 1.59).
The findings were limited by the observational nature of most of the data, which does not imply causation, the researchers said. In addition, the study was not designed for subanalysis of elective vs. emergency cesarean delivery.
Although women will attach varying degrees of significance to the risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery, “it is imperative that clinicians take care to ensure that women are made aware of any risk that they are likely to attach significance to,” the researchers said. “Women and clinicians thus should be aware of both the short- and long-term risks and benefits of cesarean delivery and discuss these when deciding on mode of delivery,” they noted.
The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.
SOURCE: Keag OE et al. PLoS Med. 2018 Jan 23. 15(1):e1002494.
FROM PLOS MEDICINE
Key clinical point: Cesarean delivery was associated with a reduced risk for incontinence and prolapse.
Major finding: Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse were less likely after cesarean vs. vaginal deliveries (OR, 0.56 and 0.29, respectively).
Study details: The data come from a review of 80 studies.
Disclosures: The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.
Source: Keag OE et al. PLoS Med. 2018 Jan 23. 15(1):e1002494.