Article Type
Changed
Thu, 01/06/2022 - 14:16

Key clinical point: The potential association between increased progression risk and active surveillance among Black men with prostate cancer is not strong enough to discourage active surveillance in this population.

Major finding: The overall relative risk of prostate cancer progression among Black men on active surveillance was 1.62; this effect decreased over time, with a relative risk of 1.29 for studies after 2019.

Study details: The data come from a meta-analysis of 8 prospective and 4 retrospective studies of men with Grade Group 1 or 2 prostate cancer.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Vigneswaran HT et al.  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Jul 8. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00425-1.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: The potential association between increased progression risk and active surveillance among Black men with prostate cancer is not strong enough to discourage active surveillance in this population.

Major finding: The overall relative risk of prostate cancer progression among Black men on active surveillance was 1.62; this effect decreased over time, with a relative risk of 1.29 for studies after 2019.

Study details: The data come from a meta-analysis of 8 prospective and 4 retrospective studies of men with Grade Group 1 or 2 prostate cancer.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Vigneswaran HT et al.  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Jul 8. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00425-1.

Key clinical point: The potential association between increased progression risk and active surveillance among Black men with prostate cancer is not strong enough to discourage active surveillance in this population.

Major finding: The overall relative risk of prostate cancer progression among Black men on active surveillance was 1.62; this effect decreased over time, with a relative risk of 1.29 for studies after 2019.

Study details: The data come from a meta-analysis of 8 prospective and 4 retrospective studies of men with Grade Group 1 or 2 prostate cancer.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Source: Vigneswaran HT et al.  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Jul 8. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00425-1.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Prostate Cancer August 2021
Gate On Date
Mon, 06/07/2021 - 10:30
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 06/07/2021 - 10:30
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 06/07/2021 - 10:30
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
sf322941.4
Activity ID
77695
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
xtandi [ 4408 ]