21-gene assay predicts survival in male and female breast cancer

 

A study of the molecular and genomic features of breast cancer in men, compared with those in women, highlights the prognostic value of a 21-gene breast recurrence score in both sexes, investigators say.

Men and women with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer who had recurrence scores (RS) of 0 to 30 on the 21-gene assay (Oncotype DX) had excellent breast cancer–specific survival rates, which suggests that such patients could be spared from more aggressive treatments, such as chemotherapy, according to Suleiman Alfred Massarweh, MD, of Stanford (Calif.) University and his colleagues.

“Future adjuvant trials in ER-positive breast cancer may need to focus on targeting endocrine resistance in those patients with RS greater than 31 and may need to consider the weight of competing mortality risk when investigating the value of any additional treatment beyond endocrine therapy,” they wrote in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In 2016, an estimated 2,600 men were diagnosed with breast cancer in the United States.

“Approximately 95% of breast cancers diagnosed in men express the estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor (PR), which is a higher percentage than in women and suggests a key role for ER in the biology of breast cancer in men,” the investigators noted.

Although treatment of men with breast cancer has traditionally been extrapolated from treatment of women with breast cancer, genomic studies have suggested some key differences, the investigators noted, citing a study of the genomic landscape of male breast cancers presented at the 2014 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

In that study, investigators from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York and other institutions found that all male breast cancers in their sample of 64 patients were ER+ and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative, predominantly of the luminal B subtype, and that the genetic alterations seen in male breast cancers frequently target DNA-repair fibroblast growth factor pathways. However, the pathways that are known to drive luminal cancers when mutated in women are seen less often among men, said Salvatore Piscuoglio, PhD, then a research fellow at MSKCC.

 

The current study helps to confirm and expand on the findings from that study, commented Steven J. Isakoff, MD, PhD, of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center in Boston, who was not involved in either study.

“I think it’s helpful to see in a larger dataset what the spectrum of oncotypes [Oncotype DX] looks like in men. In general, as the study described, we have a real lack of large-scale data in men and certainly no prospective data with oncotypes,” he said in an interview.

To get a better idea of the molecular characteristics of breast cancer in men and how they relate to breast cancer–specific mortality, Dr. Massarweh and his associates looked at deidentified 21-gene assay data from the Genomic Health Laboratory database on 3,806 men and 571,115 women with breast cancer with either no nodal involvement, micrometastases only, or one to three involved lymph nodes.

They also looked at survival data from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population of patients with breast cancer diagnosed during 2004-2012, which included data on 332 men and 55,842 women with ER-positive and/or PR-positive invasive breast cancer.

 

Among the entire 21-gene assay sample, they found that men were significantly older than women at the time of diagnosis, at a mean age of 64.2 vs. 59.1 years (P less than .001).

Both men and women had infiltrating ductal carcinoma as the most common histology; the prevalence was slightly higher among men at 87.6% versus 81.3% for women.

The average recurrence score in men was 16.8 versus 17.0 in women, a difference that was not statistically significant. A majority of both men and women had RS scores below 18 (65.8% and 58.2%, respectively), although significantly more men than women had RS scores of 31 or higher (12.4% vs. 7.4%; P less than .001).

“This relative predominance of high RS results in men was encountered across age groups but was most prominent in men younger than 40 years of age,” the investigators wrote.

 

At the other end of the scale, RS lower than 11, especially RS 0, were seen more frequently in men than in women, except among those younger than 40 years.

Looking at individual gene expression profiles, the authors found that mean gene expression was higher in men for genes associated with ER, proliferation, and invasion. ER expression was lowest and PR expression was highest in women younger than 50 years, but ER expression increased progressively with age.

Among men, those younger than 50 years had slightly lower ER and PR expression than did older men.

In the analysis of SEER survival data, they found that 5-year breast cancer severity score (BCSS) was 99% for men with RS below 18, 95.7% for those with RS between18 and 30, and 81% for those with RS of 31 or higher. Among women, 5-year BCSS was 99.5% for those with RS under 18, 98.6% for those with RS between 18 and 30, and 94.9% for those with RS of 31 or higher.

 

Five-year overall survival estimates were 92.6% for men with RS below 18, 86% for those with RS between 18 and 30, and 69% for those with RS of 31 or higher. Respective 5-year OS rates for women were 95%, 94.2%, and 89.9%.

“The 21-gene RS provided clear prognostic information in our cohort, with a significantly different 5-year BCSS determined by RS in both men and women,” the investigators wrote.

They noted that patients with low and intermediate RS have excellent prognoses regardless of nodal status, which suggests that these patients have more indolent disease and better outcomes than do patients with higher RS.

The more frequent use of adjuvant chemotherapy in the RS 31 and higher group indicates that “the prognostic utility of RS results is evident despite adjuvant chemotherapy use,” they wrote.

 

Dr. Isakoff pointed out, however, that the population in the study is from a registry of patients eligible for the 21-gene assay, which can only be used for patients with ER-positive and HER2-negative tumors.

“In other words, this is not a random sample. This is a sample of patients for whom the treating physician was on the fence about chemotherapy and in some way thought that getting an oncotype might be helpful,” he said.

He added that although the study findings “don’t change anything we have been doing, they provide reassurance that oncotype is a reasonable test to consider in patients with male breast cancer for whom we’re considering including or avoiding chemotherapy,” he said.

A funding source for the study was not reported. Dr. Massarweh disclosed stock or ownership in Radius Health, consulting for Novartis, and institutional research funding from multiple companies. Three coauthors are employees and stockholders of Genomic Health, maker of the Oncotype DX assay used in the study. Dr. Isakoff reported no conflicts of interest related to the study

SOURCE: Massarweh SA et al. 2018 Mar 27. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.8861.

 

A study of the molecular and genomic features of breast cancer in men, compared with those in women, highlights the prognostic value of a 21-gene breast recurrence score in both sexes, investigators say.

Men and women with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer who had recurrence scores (RS) of 0 to 30 on the 21-gene assay (Oncotype DX) had excellent breast cancer–specific survival rates, which suggests that such patients could be spared from more aggressive treatments, such as chemotherapy, according to Suleiman Alfred Massarweh, MD, of Stanford (Calif.) University and his colleagues.

“Future adjuvant trials in ER-positive breast cancer may need to focus on targeting endocrine resistance in those patients with RS greater than 31 and may need to consider the weight of competing mortality risk when investigating the value of any additional treatment beyond endocrine therapy,” they wrote in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In 2016, an estimated 2,600 men were diagnosed with breast cancer in the United States.

“Approximately 95% of breast cancers diagnosed in men express the estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor (PR), which is a higher percentage than in women and suggests a key role for ER in the biology of breast cancer in men,” the investigators noted.

Although treatment of men with breast cancer has traditionally been extrapolated from treatment of women with breast cancer, genomic studies have suggested some key differences, the investigators noted, citing a study of the genomic landscape of male breast cancers presented at the 2014 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

In that study, investigators from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York and other institutions found that all male breast cancers in their sample of 64 patients were ER+ and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative, predominantly of the luminal B subtype, and that the genetic alterations seen in male breast cancers frequently target DNA-repair fibroblast growth factor pathways. However, the pathways that are known to drive luminal cancers when mutated in women are seen less often among men, said Salvatore Piscuoglio, PhD, then a research fellow at MSKCC.

 

The current study helps to confirm and expand on the findings from that study, commented Steven J. Isakoff, MD, PhD, of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center in Boston, who was not involved in either study.

“I think it’s helpful to see in a larger dataset what the spectrum of oncotypes [Oncotype DX] looks like in men. In general, as the study described, we have a real lack of large-scale data in men and certainly no prospective data with oncotypes,” he said in an interview.

To get a better idea of the molecular characteristics of breast cancer in men and how they relate to breast cancer–specific mortality, Dr. Massarweh and his associates looked at deidentified 21-gene assay data from the Genomic Health Laboratory database on 3,806 men and 571,115 women with breast cancer with either no nodal involvement, micrometastases only, or one to three involved lymph nodes.

They also looked at survival data from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population of patients with breast cancer diagnosed during 2004-2012, which included data on 332 men and 55,842 women with ER-positive and/or PR-positive invasive breast cancer.

 

Among the entire 21-gene assay sample, they found that men were significantly older than women at the time of diagnosis, at a mean age of 64.2 vs. 59.1 years (P less than .001).

Both men and women had infiltrating ductal carcinoma as the most common histology; the prevalence was slightly higher among men at 87.6% versus 81.3% for women.

The average recurrence score in men was 16.8 versus 17.0 in women, a difference that was not statistically significant. A majority of both men and women had RS scores below 18 (65.8% and 58.2%, respectively), although significantly more men than women had RS scores of 31 or higher (12.4% vs. 7.4%; P less than .001).

“This relative predominance of high RS results in men was encountered across age groups but was most prominent in men younger than 40 years of age,” the investigators wrote.

 

At the other end of the scale, RS lower than 11, especially RS 0, were seen more frequently in men than in women, except among those younger than 40 years.

Looking at individual gene expression profiles, the authors found that mean gene expression was higher in men for genes associated with ER, proliferation, and invasion. ER expression was lowest and PR expression was highest in women younger than 50 years, but ER expression increased progressively with age.

Among men, those younger than 50 years had slightly lower ER and PR expression than did older men.

In the analysis of SEER survival data, they found that 5-year breast cancer severity score (BCSS) was 99% for men with RS below 18, 95.7% for those with RS between18 and 30, and 81% for those with RS of 31 or higher. Among women, 5-year BCSS was 99.5% for those with RS under 18, 98.6% for those with RS between 18 and 30, and 94.9% for those with RS of 31 or higher.

 

Five-year overall survival estimates were 92.6% for men with RS below 18, 86% for those with RS between 18 and 30, and 69% for those with RS of 31 or higher. Respective 5-year OS rates for women were 95%, 94.2%, and 89.9%.

“The 21-gene RS provided clear prognostic information in our cohort, with a significantly different 5-year BCSS determined by RS in both men and women,” the investigators wrote.

They noted that patients with low and intermediate RS have excellent prognoses regardless of nodal status, which suggests that these patients have more indolent disease and better outcomes than do patients with higher RS.

The more frequent use of adjuvant chemotherapy in the RS 31 and higher group indicates that “the prognostic utility of RS results is evident despite adjuvant chemotherapy use,” they wrote.

 

Dr. Isakoff pointed out, however, that the population in the study is from a registry of patients eligible for the 21-gene assay, which can only be used for patients with ER-positive and HER2-negative tumors.

“In other words, this is not a random sample. This is a sample of patients for whom the treating physician was on the fence about chemotherapy and in some way thought that getting an oncotype might be helpful,” he said.

He added that although the study findings “don’t change anything we have been doing, they provide reassurance that oncotype is a reasonable test to consider in patients with male breast cancer for whom we’re considering including or avoiding chemotherapy,” he said.

A funding source for the study was not reported. Dr. Massarweh disclosed stock or ownership in Radius Health, consulting for Novartis, and institutional research funding from multiple companies. Three coauthors are employees and stockholders of Genomic Health, maker of the Oncotype DX assay used in the study. Dr. Isakoff reported no conflicts of interest related to the study

SOURCE: Massarweh SA et al. 2018 Mar 27. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.8861.

 

A study of the molecular and genomic features of breast cancer in men, compared with those in women, highlights the prognostic value of a 21-gene breast recurrence score in both sexes, investigators say.

Men and women with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer who had recurrence scores (RS) of 0 to 30 on the 21-gene assay (Oncotype DX) had excellent breast cancer–specific survival rates, which suggests that such patients could be spared from more aggressive treatments, such as chemotherapy, according to Suleiman Alfred Massarweh, MD, of Stanford (Calif.) University and his colleagues.

“Future adjuvant trials in ER-positive breast cancer may need to focus on targeting endocrine resistance in those patients with RS greater than 31 and may need to consider the weight of competing mortality risk when investigating the value of any additional treatment beyond endocrine therapy,” they wrote in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In 2016, an estimated 2,600 men were diagnosed with breast cancer in the United States.

“Approximately 95% of breast cancers diagnosed in men express the estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor (PR), which is a higher percentage than in women and suggests a key role for ER in the biology of breast cancer in men,” the investigators noted.

Although treatment of men with breast cancer has traditionally been extrapolated from treatment of women with breast cancer, genomic studies have suggested some key differences, the investigators noted, citing a study of the genomic landscape of male breast cancers presented at the 2014 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

In that study, investigators from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York and other institutions found that all male breast cancers in their sample of 64 patients were ER+ and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative, predominantly of the luminal B subtype, and that the genetic alterations seen in male breast cancers frequently target DNA-repair fibroblast growth factor pathways. However, the pathways that are known to drive luminal cancers when mutated in women are seen less often among men, said Salvatore Piscuoglio, PhD, then a research fellow at MSKCC.

 

The current study helps to confirm and expand on the findings from that study, commented Steven J. Isakoff, MD, PhD, of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center in Boston, who was not involved in either study.

“I think it’s helpful to see in a larger dataset what the spectrum of oncotypes [Oncotype DX] looks like in men. In general, as the study described, we have a real lack of large-scale data in men and certainly no prospective data with oncotypes,” he said in an interview.

To get a better idea of the molecular characteristics of breast cancer in men and how they relate to breast cancer–specific mortality, Dr. Massarweh and his associates looked at deidentified 21-gene assay data from the Genomic Health Laboratory database on 3,806 men and 571,115 women with breast cancer with either no nodal involvement, micrometastases only, or one to three involved lymph nodes.

They also looked at survival data from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population of patients with breast cancer diagnosed during 2004-2012, which included data on 332 men and 55,842 women with ER-positive and/or PR-positive invasive breast cancer.

 

Among the entire 21-gene assay sample, they found that men were significantly older than women at the time of diagnosis, at a mean age of 64.2 vs. 59.1 years (P less than .001).

Both men and women had infiltrating ductal carcinoma as the most common histology; the prevalence was slightly higher among men at 87.6% versus 81.3% for women.

The average recurrence score in men was 16.8 versus 17.0 in women, a difference that was not statistically significant. A majority of both men and women had RS scores below 18 (65.8% and 58.2%, respectively), although significantly more men than women had RS scores of 31 or higher (12.4% vs. 7.4%; P less than .001).

“This relative predominance of high RS results in men was encountered across age groups but was most prominent in men younger than 40 years of age,” the investigators wrote.

 

At the other end of the scale, RS lower than 11, especially RS 0, were seen more frequently in men than in women, except among those younger than 40 years.

Looking at individual gene expression profiles, the authors found that mean gene expression was higher in men for genes associated with ER, proliferation, and invasion. ER expression was lowest and PR expression was highest in women younger than 50 years, but ER expression increased progressively with age.

Among men, those younger than 50 years had slightly lower ER and PR expression than did older men.

In the analysis of SEER survival data, they found that 5-year breast cancer severity score (BCSS) was 99% for men with RS below 18, 95.7% for those with RS between18 and 30, and 81% for those with RS of 31 or higher. Among women, 5-year BCSS was 99.5% for those with RS under 18, 98.6% for those with RS between 18 and 30, and 94.9% for those with RS of 31 or higher.

 

Five-year overall survival estimates were 92.6% for men with RS below 18, 86% for those with RS between 18 and 30, and 69% for those with RS of 31 or higher. Respective 5-year OS rates for women were 95%, 94.2%, and 89.9%.

“The 21-gene RS provided clear prognostic information in our cohort, with a significantly different 5-year BCSS determined by RS in both men and women,” the investigators wrote.

They noted that patients with low and intermediate RS have excellent prognoses regardless of nodal status, which suggests that these patients have more indolent disease and better outcomes than do patients with higher RS.

The more frequent use of adjuvant chemotherapy in the RS 31 and higher group indicates that “the prognostic utility of RS results is evident despite adjuvant chemotherapy use,” they wrote.

 

Dr. Isakoff pointed out, however, that the population in the study is from a registry of patients eligible for the 21-gene assay, which can only be used for patients with ER-positive and HER2-negative tumors.

“In other words, this is not a random sample. This is a sample of patients for whom the treating physician was on the fence about chemotherapy and in some way thought that getting an oncotype might be helpful,” he said.

He added that although the study findings “don’t change anything we have been doing, they provide reassurance that oncotype is a reasonable test to consider in patients with male breast cancer for whom we’re considering including or avoiding chemotherapy,” he said.

A funding source for the study was not reported. Dr. Massarweh disclosed stock or ownership in Radius Health, consulting for Novartis, and institutional research funding from multiple companies. Three coauthors are employees and stockholders of Genomic Health, maker of the Oncotype DX assay used in the study. Dr. Isakoff reported no conflicts of interest related to the study

SOURCE: Massarweh SA et al. 2018 Mar 27. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.8861.