Theme
medstat_icymi_bc
icymibc
Main menu
ICYMI Breast Cancer Featured Menu
Unpublish
Altmetric
Click for Credit Button Label
Click For Credit
DSM Affiliated
Display in offset block
Enable Disqus
Display Author and Disclosure Link
Publication Type
News
Slot System
Featured Buckets
Disable Sticky Ads
Disable Ad Block Mitigation
Featured Buckets Admin
Show Ads on this Publication's Homepage
Consolidated Pub
Show Article Page Numbers on TOC
Use larger logo size
Off
publication_blueconic_enabled
Off
Show More Destinations Menu
Disable Adhesion on Publication
Off
Restore Menu Label on Mobile Navigation
Disable Facebook Pixel from Publication
Exclude this publication from publication selection on articles and quiz
Challenge Center
Disable Inline Native ads
Supporter Name /ID
Verzenio [ 4734 ]
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
376356.57
Activity ID
97181
Product Name
ICYMI Expert Perspectives
Product ID
112

Pembrolizumab combo flops in pretreated HR-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/04/2023 - 17:28

Key clinical point: Pembrolizumab plus eribulin did not outperform eribulin alone among patients with heavily pretreated, HR-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Major finding: After a median of 10.5 months of follow-up, combination therapy did not improve PFS or OS in the intention-to-treat population or in the subgroup of PD-L1 positive patients.

Study details: Multicenter randomized trial of 88 patients with HR-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer who had received >2 lines of hormonal therapy and 0-2 lines of chemotherapy.

Disclosures: Merck & Co providing study funding and pembrolizumab. Eisai provided eribulin. Several investigators disclosed ties to Merck, Eisai, and other pharmaceutical companies.

Citation: Tolaney SM et al. Jama Oncol. 2020 Sep 3. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3524

 

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Pembrolizumab plus eribulin did not outperform eribulin alone among patients with heavily pretreated, HR-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Major finding: After a median of 10.5 months of follow-up, combination therapy did not improve PFS or OS in the intention-to-treat population or in the subgroup of PD-L1 positive patients.

Study details: Multicenter randomized trial of 88 patients with HR-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer who had received >2 lines of hormonal therapy and 0-2 lines of chemotherapy.

Disclosures: Merck & Co providing study funding and pembrolizumab. Eisai provided eribulin. Several investigators disclosed ties to Merck, Eisai, and other pharmaceutical companies.

Citation: Tolaney SM et al. Jama Oncol. 2020 Sep 3. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3524

 

 

Key clinical point: Pembrolizumab plus eribulin did not outperform eribulin alone among patients with heavily pretreated, HR-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Major finding: After a median of 10.5 months of follow-up, combination therapy did not improve PFS or OS in the intention-to-treat population or in the subgroup of PD-L1 positive patients.

Study details: Multicenter randomized trial of 88 patients with HR-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer who had received >2 lines of hormonal therapy and 0-2 lines of chemotherapy.

Disclosures: Merck & Co providing study funding and pembrolizumab. Eisai provided eribulin. Several investigators disclosed ties to Merck, Eisai, and other pharmaceutical companies.

Citation: Tolaney SM et al. Jama Oncol. 2020 Sep 3. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3524

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Breast Cancer Journal Scans (Sept 2020)
Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article

Breast Cancer: 9/22/20

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/04/2023 - 17:28
Display Headline
Dr. Erin Roesch: Immunotherapy demonstrates promising activity in some subtypes of breast cancer
Dr. Roesch scans the journals so you don't have to

Erin Roesch, MD
Breast cancer has been viewed as an immune quiescent malignancy; however, immunotherapy has demonstrated promising activity in certain scenarios. A meta-analysis of 27 metastatic breast cancer studies showed an ORR of 19% with immunotherapy, although benefit was greater in the first-line setting, and for tumors with PD-L1 positivity and higher TILs. Metastatic tumors are less immunologically responsive due to alterations in immune landscape and tumor microenvironment. Therefore, earlier immunotherapy use is a compelling strategy. The adaptive ISPY-2 clinical trial demonstrated pembrolizumab added to chemotherapy more than doubled estimated pCR rates in triple-negative and HR-positive/HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer subtypes. Furthermore, PD-L1 positive tumors derive greater benefit from immunotherapy, as seen in IMpassion 130, KEYNOTE 355 and the current meta-analysis. 


Efficacy of immunotherapy also depends on breast cancer subtype. Triple-negative and HER2-positive tumors have higher TMB and TILs compared to luminal subtype. A phase 2 study in 88 patients with metastatic HR-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer demonstrated no difference in PFS or ORR with pembrolizumab/eribulin versus eribulin alone, including the PD-L1 positive population. There was a trend towards greater immunotherapy benefit in the high TMB subgroup which is encouraging. Future research with novel agents that may augment immune response and/or alter tumor microenvironment are intriguing concepts. 


First-line endocrine therapy plus CDK 4/6 inhibitor is considered standard of care for HR-positive metastatic breast cancer. A retrospective chart review evaluating everolimus plus endocrine therapy post-CDK 4/6 inhibitor demonstrated PFS of 4.2 months and ORR of 17%. Although benefit appears modest, mTOR inhibitor combinations remain a valuable treatment option for select patients. Chemotherapy is often reserved for rapidly progressive disease or visceral crisis, however, it is crucial to evaluate for endocrine resistance. Furthermore, additional research is warranted to determine interactions between PI3K/Akt/mTOR and downstream Cyclin D/CDK 4/6/Rb pathways and implications on treatment sequencing. 


Trastuzumab therapy for 1 year is standard of care for early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. A meta-analysis of 5 trials with 11,376 patients showed noninferiority of shorter duration trastuzumab compared to 1 year for DFS and OS and lower congestive heart failure rates with the former. Trastuzumab is well-tolerated, and although cardiac toxicity is often reversible, it can carry more severe consequences in patients with cardiac conditions. Shorter duration may be an option in patients with clinically lower risk disease (ER-positive, node-negative tumors) and significant cardiac risk factors, and represents a method of therapy de-escalation for the appropriate patient.

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted oncology healthcare delivery models and cancer patients have poorer outcomes from COVID-19. A survey study of Brazilian breast cancer specialists demonstrated changing practices for early-stage breast cancer as the pandemic progressed. For HR-positive tumors with low ki-67, 48% would recommend NET for postmenopausal women, while 34% would recommend NET for those with high ki-67. There is limited data regarding NET for pre-menopausal women. Genomic assays may have an evolving role to identify patients who may be appropriate candidates for neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery. Strategies to decrease treatment complications and effectively utilize resources are essential during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Erin Roesch, MD
The Cleveland Clinic


References:
Zhu L, Narloch, JL, Onkar S, et al. Metastatic breast cancers have reduced immune cell recruitment but harbor increased macrophages relative to their matched primary tumors. J Immunother Cancer 2019; 7:265. 

Nanda R, Liu MC, Yau C, et al. Effect of pembrolizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic complete response in women with early-stage breast cancer: An analysis of the ongoing phase 2 adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020; 6(5):676–684.

Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS, et al. IMpassion130: updated overall survival (OS) from a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) + nab-paclitaxel (nP) in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). J Clin Oncol 2019; 37S:ASCO #1003. 

Cortes J, Cescon DW, Rugo HS, et al. KEYNOTE-355: Randomized, double-blind, phase III study of pembrolizumab + chemotherapy versus placebo + chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020;38S:ASCO #1000. 

Martinello R, Becco P, Vici P, et al. Trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity in patients with nonlimiting cardiac comorbidity. Breast J 2019; 25(3):444-449.

Liang W, Guan W, Chen R, et al. Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21(3):335-337.
Publications
Topics
Sections
Dr. Roesch scans the journals so you don't have to
Dr. Roesch scans the journals so you don't have to

Erin Roesch, MD
Breast cancer has been viewed as an immune quiescent malignancy; however, immunotherapy has demonstrated promising activity in certain scenarios. A meta-analysis of 27 metastatic breast cancer studies showed an ORR of 19% with immunotherapy, although benefit was greater in the first-line setting, and for tumors with PD-L1 positivity and higher TILs. Metastatic tumors are less immunologically responsive due to alterations in immune landscape and tumor microenvironment. Therefore, earlier immunotherapy use is a compelling strategy. The adaptive ISPY-2 clinical trial demonstrated pembrolizumab added to chemotherapy more than doubled estimated pCR rates in triple-negative and HR-positive/HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer subtypes. Furthermore, PD-L1 positive tumors derive greater benefit from immunotherapy, as seen in IMpassion 130, KEYNOTE 355 and the current meta-analysis. 


Efficacy of immunotherapy also depends on breast cancer subtype. Triple-negative and HER2-positive tumors have higher TMB and TILs compared to luminal subtype. A phase 2 study in 88 patients with metastatic HR-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer demonstrated no difference in PFS or ORR with pembrolizumab/eribulin versus eribulin alone, including the PD-L1 positive population. There was a trend towards greater immunotherapy benefit in the high TMB subgroup which is encouraging. Future research with novel agents that may augment immune response and/or alter tumor microenvironment are intriguing concepts. 


First-line endocrine therapy plus CDK 4/6 inhibitor is considered standard of care for HR-positive metastatic breast cancer. A retrospective chart review evaluating everolimus plus endocrine therapy post-CDK 4/6 inhibitor demonstrated PFS of 4.2 months and ORR of 17%. Although benefit appears modest, mTOR inhibitor combinations remain a valuable treatment option for select patients. Chemotherapy is often reserved for rapidly progressive disease or visceral crisis, however, it is crucial to evaluate for endocrine resistance. Furthermore, additional research is warranted to determine interactions between PI3K/Akt/mTOR and downstream Cyclin D/CDK 4/6/Rb pathways and implications on treatment sequencing. 


Trastuzumab therapy for 1 year is standard of care for early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. A meta-analysis of 5 trials with 11,376 patients showed noninferiority of shorter duration trastuzumab compared to 1 year for DFS and OS and lower congestive heart failure rates with the former. Trastuzumab is well-tolerated, and although cardiac toxicity is often reversible, it can carry more severe consequences in patients with cardiac conditions. Shorter duration may be an option in patients with clinically lower risk disease (ER-positive, node-negative tumors) and significant cardiac risk factors, and represents a method of therapy de-escalation for the appropriate patient.

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted oncology healthcare delivery models and cancer patients have poorer outcomes from COVID-19. A survey study of Brazilian breast cancer specialists demonstrated changing practices for early-stage breast cancer as the pandemic progressed. For HR-positive tumors with low ki-67, 48% would recommend NET for postmenopausal women, while 34% would recommend NET for those with high ki-67. There is limited data regarding NET for pre-menopausal women. Genomic assays may have an evolving role to identify patients who may be appropriate candidates for neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery. Strategies to decrease treatment complications and effectively utilize resources are essential during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Erin Roesch, MD
The Cleveland Clinic


References:
Zhu L, Narloch, JL, Onkar S, et al. Metastatic breast cancers have reduced immune cell recruitment but harbor increased macrophages relative to their matched primary tumors. J Immunother Cancer 2019; 7:265. 

Nanda R, Liu MC, Yau C, et al. Effect of pembrolizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic complete response in women with early-stage breast cancer: An analysis of the ongoing phase 2 adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020; 6(5):676–684.

Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS, et al. IMpassion130: updated overall survival (OS) from a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) + nab-paclitaxel (nP) in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). J Clin Oncol 2019; 37S:ASCO #1003. 

Cortes J, Cescon DW, Rugo HS, et al. KEYNOTE-355: Randomized, double-blind, phase III study of pembrolizumab + chemotherapy versus placebo + chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020;38S:ASCO #1000. 

Martinello R, Becco P, Vici P, et al. Trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity in patients with nonlimiting cardiac comorbidity. Breast J 2019; 25(3):444-449.

Liang W, Guan W, Chen R, et al. Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21(3):335-337.

Erin Roesch, MD
Breast cancer has been viewed as an immune quiescent malignancy; however, immunotherapy has demonstrated promising activity in certain scenarios. A meta-analysis of 27 metastatic breast cancer studies showed an ORR of 19% with immunotherapy, although benefit was greater in the first-line setting, and for tumors with PD-L1 positivity and higher TILs. Metastatic tumors are less immunologically responsive due to alterations in immune landscape and tumor microenvironment. Therefore, earlier immunotherapy use is a compelling strategy. The adaptive ISPY-2 clinical trial demonstrated pembrolizumab added to chemotherapy more than doubled estimated pCR rates in triple-negative and HR-positive/HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer subtypes. Furthermore, PD-L1 positive tumors derive greater benefit from immunotherapy, as seen in IMpassion 130, KEYNOTE 355 and the current meta-analysis. 


Efficacy of immunotherapy also depends on breast cancer subtype. Triple-negative and HER2-positive tumors have higher TMB and TILs compared to luminal subtype. A phase 2 study in 88 patients with metastatic HR-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer demonstrated no difference in PFS or ORR with pembrolizumab/eribulin versus eribulin alone, including the PD-L1 positive population. There was a trend towards greater immunotherapy benefit in the high TMB subgroup which is encouraging. Future research with novel agents that may augment immune response and/or alter tumor microenvironment are intriguing concepts. 


First-line endocrine therapy plus CDK 4/6 inhibitor is considered standard of care for HR-positive metastatic breast cancer. A retrospective chart review evaluating everolimus plus endocrine therapy post-CDK 4/6 inhibitor demonstrated PFS of 4.2 months and ORR of 17%. Although benefit appears modest, mTOR inhibitor combinations remain a valuable treatment option for select patients. Chemotherapy is often reserved for rapidly progressive disease or visceral crisis, however, it is crucial to evaluate for endocrine resistance. Furthermore, additional research is warranted to determine interactions between PI3K/Akt/mTOR and downstream Cyclin D/CDK 4/6/Rb pathways and implications on treatment sequencing. 


Trastuzumab therapy for 1 year is standard of care for early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. A meta-analysis of 5 trials with 11,376 patients showed noninferiority of shorter duration trastuzumab compared to 1 year for DFS and OS and lower congestive heart failure rates with the former. Trastuzumab is well-tolerated, and although cardiac toxicity is often reversible, it can carry more severe consequences in patients with cardiac conditions. Shorter duration may be an option in patients with clinically lower risk disease (ER-positive, node-negative tumors) and significant cardiac risk factors, and represents a method of therapy de-escalation for the appropriate patient.

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted oncology healthcare delivery models and cancer patients have poorer outcomes from COVID-19. A survey study of Brazilian breast cancer specialists demonstrated changing practices for early-stage breast cancer as the pandemic progressed. For HR-positive tumors with low ki-67, 48% would recommend NET for postmenopausal women, while 34% would recommend NET for those with high ki-67. There is limited data regarding NET for pre-menopausal women. Genomic assays may have an evolving role to identify patients who may be appropriate candidates for neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery. Strategies to decrease treatment complications and effectively utilize resources are essential during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Erin Roesch, MD
The Cleveland Clinic


References:
Zhu L, Narloch, JL, Onkar S, et al. Metastatic breast cancers have reduced immune cell recruitment but harbor increased macrophages relative to their matched primary tumors. J Immunother Cancer 2019; 7:265. 

Nanda R, Liu MC, Yau C, et al. Effect of pembrolizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic complete response in women with early-stage breast cancer: An analysis of the ongoing phase 2 adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020; 6(5):676–684.

Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS, et al. IMpassion130: updated overall survival (OS) from a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) + nab-paclitaxel (nP) in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). J Clin Oncol 2019; 37S:ASCO #1003. 

Cortes J, Cescon DW, Rugo HS, et al. KEYNOTE-355: Randomized, double-blind, phase III study of pembrolizumab + chemotherapy versus placebo + chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020;38S:ASCO #1000. 

Martinello R, Becco P, Vici P, et al. Trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity in patients with nonlimiting cardiac comorbidity. Breast J 2019; 25(3):444-449.

Liang W, Guan W, Chen R, et al. Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21(3):335-337.
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Dr. Erin Roesch: Immunotherapy demonstrates promising activity in some subtypes of breast cancer
Display Headline
Dr. Erin Roesch: Immunotherapy demonstrates promising activity in some subtypes of breast cancer
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Breast Cancer Journal Scans (Sept 2020)
Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 15:00
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 15:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 15:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article

Sarcoidosis can co-occur in older patients with breast cancer

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/04/2023 - 17:28

Key clinical point: Sarcoidosis can develop after breast cancer and requires histologic confirmation.

Major finding: Twenty of 429 (4.9%) women with sarcoidosis had breast cancer, which usually was diagnosed first. Sarcoidosis was diagnosed at a median age of 53.9 years, most often involved the lungs and central lymph nodes, and was asymptomatic in half of cases.

Study details: Single-center retrospective study of 1,000 sarcoidosis cases.

Disclosures: The study was not funded. The investigators reported having no conflicts.

Citation: Papanikolaou IC et al. Resp Med Case Rep. 2020 Aug 13.  doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2020.101190

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Sarcoidosis can develop after breast cancer and requires histologic confirmation.

Major finding: Twenty of 429 (4.9%) women with sarcoidosis had breast cancer, which usually was diagnosed first. Sarcoidosis was diagnosed at a median age of 53.9 years, most often involved the lungs and central lymph nodes, and was asymptomatic in half of cases.

Study details: Single-center retrospective study of 1,000 sarcoidosis cases.

Disclosures: The study was not funded. The investigators reported having no conflicts.

Citation: Papanikolaou IC et al. Resp Med Case Rep. 2020 Aug 13.  doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2020.101190

 

Key clinical point: Sarcoidosis can develop after breast cancer and requires histologic confirmation.

Major finding: Twenty of 429 (4.9%) women with sarcoidosis had breast cancer, which usually was diagnosed first. Sarcoidosis was diagnosed at a median age of 53.9 years, most often involved the lungs and central lymph nodes, and was asymptomatic in half of cases.

Study details: Single-center retrospective study of 1,000 sarcoidosis cases.

Disclosures: The study was not funded. The investigators reported having no conflicts.

Citation: Papanikolaou IC et al. Resp Med Case Rep. 2020 Aug 13.  doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2020.101190

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Breast Cancer Journal Scans (Sept 2020)
Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article

Everolimus after palbociclib of modest value in metastatic HR+ HER2- breast cancer

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/04/2023 - 17:28

Key clinical point: The mTOR inhibitor everolimus performed modestly when sequenced after palbociclib in metastatic HR+ HER2- breast cancer.

Major finding: Median PFS on everolimus was 4.2 months. ORR was 17.1% (all partial responses).

Study details: Two-center retrospective chart review of 41 patients who received everolimus combinations after their metastatic HR+ HER2- breast cancer progressed on palbociclib.

Disclosures: The National Cancer Institute provided funding. Four of the investigators disclosed ties to Novartis, Pfizer, and other pharmaceutical companies.

Citation: Dhakal A et al. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2020 Jul 23. doi: 10.1177/1178223420944864

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: The mTOR inhibitor everolimus performed modestly when sequenced after palbociclib in metastatic HR+ HER2- breast cancer.

Major finding: Median PFS on everolimus was 4.2 months. ORR was 17.1% (all partial responses).

Study details: Two-center retrospective chart review of 41 patients who received everolimus combinations after their metastatic HR+ HER2- breast cancer progressed on palbociclib.

Disclosures: The National Cancer Institute provided funding. Four of the investigators disclosed ties to Novartis, Pfizer, and other pharmaceutical companies.

Citation: Dhakal A et al. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2020 Jul 23. doi: 10.1177/1178223420944864

Key clinical point: The mTOR inhibitor everolimus performed modestly when sequenced after palbociclib in metastatic HR+ HER2- breast cancer.

Major finding: Median PFS on everolimus was 4.2 months. ORR was 17.1% (all partial responses).

Study details: Two-center retrospective chart review of 41 patients who received everolimus combinations after their metastatic HR+ HER2- breast cancer progressed on palbociclib.

Disclosures: The National Cancer Institute provided funding. Four of the investigators disclosed ties to Novartis, Pfizer, and other pharmaceutical companies.

Citation: Dhakal A et al. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2020 Jul 23. doi: 10.1177/1178223420944864

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Breast Cancer Journal Scans (Sept 2020)
Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article

COVID-19 changed early breast cancer management

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/04/2023 - 17:28

Key clinical point: In Brazil, the COVID-19 pandemic changed how specialists managed early breast cancer, especially HR-positive tumors.

Major finding: Nearly 70% of breast cancer specialists reported changing their management of early breast cancer. For more proliferative HR-positive tumors (Ki-67 >30%), 34% recommended neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) for postmenopausal patients, while 10.9% recommended NET for premenopausal patients.

Study details: Survey of 503 breast cancer specialists in Brazil.

Disclosures: The study was not funded. The researchers reported having no conflicts.

Citation: Cavalcante FP et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Aug 16. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05877-y

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: In Brazil, the COVID-19 pandemic changed how specialists managed early breast cancer, especially HR-positive tumors.

Major finding: Nearly 70% of breast cancer specialists reported changing their management of early breast cancer. For more proliferative HR-positive tumors (Ki-67 >30%), 34% recommended neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) for postmenopausal patients, while 10.9% recommended NET for premenopausal patients.

Study details: Survey of 503 breast cancer specialists in Brazil.

Disclosures: The study was not funded. The researchers reported having no conflicts.

Citation: Cavalcante FP et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Aug 16. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05877-y

 

Key clinical point: In Brazil, the COVID-19 pandemic changed how specialists managed early breast cancer, especially HR-positive tumors.

Major finding: Nearly 70% of breast cancer specialists reported changing their management of early breast cancer. For more proliferative HR-positive tumors (Ki-67 >30%), 34% recommended neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) for postmenopausal patients, while 10.9% recommended NET for premenopausal patients.

Study details: Survey of 503 breast cancer specialists in Brazil.

Disclosures: The study was not funded. The researchers reported having no conflicts.

Citation: Cavalcante FP et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Aug 16. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05877-y

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Breast Cancer Journal Scans (Sept 2020)
Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article

Shorter-duration trastuzumab noninferior in early breast cancer

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/04/2023 - 17:28

Key clinical point: For patients with early breast cancer, 6 months of adjuvant trastuzumab was noninferior to a 1-year course and appeared to be less cardiotoxic.

Major finding: 5-year DFS rates were 85.4% vs. 87.1%, respectively. Rates of congestive heart failure were 3.9% vs. 6.9%, respectively.

Study details: Meta-analysis of 5 randomized trials (11,376 patients).

Disclosures: Funding sources were not reported. Two coinvestigators disclosed ties to Roche, Eisai, Novartis, Sanofi, Kendle India, and several other pharmaceutical companies.

Citation: Gulia S et al. 2020 Aug 24. JAMA Netw Open. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11777

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: For patients with early breast cancer, 6 months of adjuvant trastuzumab was noninferior to a 1-year course and appeared to be less cardiotoxic.

Major finding: 5-year DFS rates were 85.4% vs. 87.1%, respectively. Rates of congestive heart failure were 3.9% vs. 6.9%, respectively.

Study details: Meta-analysis of 5 randomized trials (11,376 patients).

Disclosures: Funding sources were not reported. Two coinvestigators disclosed ties to Roche, Eisai, Novartis, Sanofi, Kendle India, and several other pharmaceutical companies.

Citation: Gulia S et al. 2020 Aug 24. JAMA Netw Open. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11777

Key clinical point: For patients with early breast cancer, 6 months of adjuvant trastuzumab was noninferior to a 1-year course and appeared to be less cardiotoxic.

Major finding: 5-year DFS rates were 85.4% vs. 87.1%, respectively. Rates of congestive heart failure were 3.9% vs. 6.9%, respectively.

Study details: Meta-analysis of 5 randomized trials (11,376 patients).

Disclosures: Funding sources were not reported. Two coinvestigators disclosed ties to Roche, Eisai, Novartis, Sanofi, Kendle India, and several other pharmaceutical companies.

Citation: Gulia S et al. 2020 Aug 24. JAMA Netw Open. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11777

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Breast Cancer Journal Scans (Sept 2020)
Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article

Checkpoint inhibitors of limited benefit in metastatic breast cancer

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/04/2023 - 17:28

Key clinical point: Despite showing efficacy in specific subgroups, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are unlikely to benefit most women with metastatic breast cancer.

Major finding: Objective response rates were 19% overall, 27% in PD-L1 positive patients, 18% in PD-L1 negative patients, 28% in HER2-positive breast cancer, 23% in triple-negative breast cancer, 35% when used in the first line, 26% when combined with systemic therapy, and 9% when used as monotherapy.

Study details: Meta-analysis of 27 studies of metastatic breast cancer (1,746 patients).

Disclosures: The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The investigators reported having no conflicts.

Citation: Zou Y et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020 Aug 17. doi: 10.1177/1758835920940928

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Despite showing efficacy in specific subgroups, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are unlikely to benefit most women with metastatic breast cancer.

Major finding: Objective response rates were 19% overall, 27% in PD-L1 positive patients, 18% in PD-L1 negative patients, 28% in HER2-positive breast cancer, 23% in triple-negative breast cancer, 35% when used in the first line, 26% when combined with systemic therapy, and 9% when used as monotherapy.

Study details: Meta-analysis of 27 studies of metastatic breast cancer (1,746 patients).

Disclosures: The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The investigators reported having no conflicts.

Citation: Zou Y et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020 Aug 17. doi: 10.1177/1758835920940928

 

Key clinical point: Despite showing efficacy in specific subgroups, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are unlikely to benefit most women with metastatic breast cancer.

Major finding: Objective response rates were 19% overall, 27% in PD-L1 positive patients, 18% in PD-L1 negative patients, 28% in HER2-positive breast cancer, 23% in triple-negative breast cancer, 35% when used in the first line, 26% when combined with systemic therapy, and 9% when used as monotherapy.

Study details: Meta-analysis of 27 studies of metastatic breast cancer (1,746 patients).

Disclosures: The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The investigators reported having no conflicts.

Citation: Zou Y et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020 Aug 17. doi: 10.1177/1758835920940928

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Breast Cancer Journal Scans (Sept 2020)
Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article

Study eyes breast cancer mortality in older women

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/04/2023 - 17:28

Key clinical point: Later uptake and less extensive use of screening mammography might explain a relatively high rate of deaths from breast cancer among older women in Germany.

Major finding: Women aged ≥ 70 years in Germany had a 19% lower incidence but a 45% higher rate of mortality from breast cancer compared with their peers in the United States.

Study details: Population-based study of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 9 registry in the United States, and the Saarland Cancer Registry and the German Centre for Cancer Registry Data in Germany. 

Disclosures: German Cancer Aid funded the study. The investigators reported having no conflicts.

Citation: Jansen L et al. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Aug 26. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092419

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Later uptake and less extensive use of screening mammography might explain a relatively high rate of deaths from breast cancer among older women in Germany.

Major finding: Women aged ≥ 70 years in Germany had a 19% lower incidence but a 45% higher rate of mortality from breast cancer compared with their peers in the United States.

Study details: Population-based study of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 9 registry in the United States, and the Saarland Cancer Registry and the German Centre for Cancer Registry Data in Germany. 

Disclosures: German Cancer Aid funded the study. The investigators reported having no conflicts.

Citation: Jansen L et al. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Aug 26. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092419

Key clinical point: Later uptake and less extensive use of screening mammography might explain a relatively high rate of deaths from breast cancer among older women in Germany.

Major finding: Women aged ≥ 70 years in Germany had a 19% lower incidence but a 45% higher rate of mortality from breast cancer compared with their peers in the United States.

Study details: Population-based study of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 9 registry in the United States, and the Saarland Cancer Registry and the German Centre for Cancer Registry Data in Germany. 

Disclosures: German Cancer Aid funded the study. The investigators reported having no conflicts.

Citation: Jansen L et al. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Aug 26. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092419

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Breast Cancer Journal Scans (Sept 2020)
Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article

Postmenopausal use of estrogen alone lowers breast cancer cases, deaths

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/04/2023 - 17:28

Key clinical point: Prior use of conjugated equine estrogen in women who had a hysterectomy was associated with lower breast cancer incidence and mortality.

Major finding: Conjugated equine estrogen alone was associated with lower mortality (30 deaths, annualized mortality rate 0.031%), compared with placebo (46 deaths, annualized mortality rate 0.046%); HR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.97; P = .04.

Study details: This was a long-term follow-up study of two Women’s Health Initiative clinical trials of postmenopausal women with no prior breast cancer.

Disclosures: The Women’s Health Initiative is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Health and Human Services. The authors reported numerous potential conflicts of interest, including receiving personal fees and grants from various government organizations, foundations, and pharmaceutical companies.

Citation: Chlebowski RT et al. JAMA. 2020 Jul 28. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.9482.

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Prior use of conjugated equine estrogen in women who had a hysterectomy was associated with lower breast cancer incidence and mortality.

Major finding: Conjugated equine estrogen alone was associated with lower mortality (30 deaths, annualized mortality rate 0.031%), compared with placebo (46 deaths, annualized mortality rate 0.046%); HR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.97; P = .04.

Study details: This was a long-term follow-up study of two Women’s Health Initiative clinical trials of postmenopausal women with no prior breast cancer.

Disclosures: The Women’s Health Initiative is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Health and Human Services. The authors reported numerous potential conflicts of interest, including receiving personal fees and grants from various government organizations, foundations, and pharmaceutical companies.

Citation: Chlebowski RT et al. JAMA. 2020 Jul 28. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.9482.

 

Key clinical point: Prior use of conjugated equine estrogen in women who had a hysterectomy was associated with lower breast cancer incidence and mortality.

Major finding: Conjugated equine estrogen alone was associated with lower mortality (30 deaths, annualized mortality rate 0.031%), compared with placebo (46 deaths, annualized mortality rate 0.046%); HR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.97; P = .04.

Study details: This was a long-term follow-up study of two Women’s Health Initiative clinical trials of postmenopausal women with no prior breast cancer.

Disclosures: The Women’s Health Initiative is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Health and Human Services. The authors reported numerous potential conflicts of interest, including receiving personal fees and grants from various government organizations, foundations, and pharmaceutical companies.

Citation: Chlebowski RT et al. JAMA. 2020 Jul 28. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.9482.

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Breast Cancer Journal Scans (Sept 2020)
Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article

System provides ‘faster, less invasive’ method for breast cancer detection

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/04/2023 - 17:28

Key clinical point: An automated image cytometry system called CytoPAN provides rapid cancer profiling and requires “scant” cellular specimens, according to researchers.

Major finding: In preclinical experiments, CytoPAN detected cancer in 1 hour using as few as 50 cells. In a patient cohort, CytoPAN detected breast cancer with 100% accuracy.

Study details: Preclinical research and a prospective study of 68 breast cancer patients.

Disclosures: The authors received funding from the National Institutes of Health, the MGH Scholar Fund, and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Some authors disclosed relationships with Akili, Accure Health, ModeRNA, Tarveda, Lumicell, and Noul.

Citation: Min J et al. Sci Transl Med. 2020 Aug 5. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz9746.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: An automated image cytometry system called CytoPAN provides rapid cancer profiling and requires “scant” cellular specimens, according to researchers.

Major finding: In preclinical experiments, CytoPAN detected cancer in 1 hour using as few as 50 cells. In a patient cohort, CytoPAN detected breast cancer with 100% accuracy.

Study details: Preclinical research and a prospective study of 68 breast cancer patients.

Disclosures: The authors received funding from the National Institutes of Health, the MGH Scholar Fund, and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Some authors disclosed relationships with Akili, Accure Health, ModeRNA, Tarveda, Lumicell, and Noul.

Citation: Min J et al. Sci Transl Med. 2020 Aug 5. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz9746.

Key clinical point: An automated image cytometry system called CytoPAN provides rapid cancer profiling and requires “scant” cellular specimens, according to researchers.

Major finding: In preclinical experiments, CytoPAN detected cancer in 1 hour using as few as 50 cells. In a patient cohort, CytoPAN detected breast cancer with 100% accuracy.

Study details: Preclinical research and a prospective study of 68 breast cancer patients.

Disclosures: The authors received funding from the National Institutes of Health, the MGH Scholar Fund, and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Some authors disclosed relationships with Akili, Accure Health, ModeRNA, Tarveda, Lumicell, and Noul.

Citation: Min J et al. Sci Transl Med. 2020 Aug 5. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz9746.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Breast Cancer Journal Scans (Sept 2020)
Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article