User login
What behavioral interventions are safe and effective for treating obesity?
Interventions that include a combination of behavioral and lifestyle modifications—including decreased caloric intake, specific aids to changing diet, increased physical activity, and treatment of binge eating disorders—have modest benefit with appropriate use (strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, based on multiple randomized controlled trials). Hypnosis can be used as an adjunct to behavioral therapy for weight loss (SOR: A, based on systematic reviews).
More options for the patient is better: physician, dietician, counselor, trainer
Jon O. Neher, MD
Valley Medical Center, Renton, Wash
More options for the patient is better: physician, dietician, counselor, trainer Working against the cultural incentives that promote obesity is difficult, and doing so places physicians in the challenging position of trying to change culture one patient at a time. A good team is essential, and it seems the more options the better: physician, dietician, counselor (perhaps with hypnosis skills), and even a physical trainer. Funding for these services, as well as patient motivation for change, are often easier to obtain when the physician labels the patient as having a disease (such as diabetes or hyperlipidemia). Unfortunately, the rising prevalence of the metabolic syndrome is making this situation increasingly common.
Evidence summary
Obesity rates in the US have risen significantly in recent years: 30% of US adults (60 million people) and 16% of children 6 to 19 years old (more than 9 million), are obese,1 and trends suggest rates will continue to increase. Eating behaviors are learned and reinforced within families, peer groups, and other important social groups. Behavioral techniques to treat obesity attempt to reduce reinforcement for unhealthy eating behaviors and teach and reinforce healthy eating behaviors. Cue avoidance is a common behavioral intervention: the patient avoids situations in which he has overeaten in the past, such as “all-you-can-eat” buffets. Role play to practice restraint from overeating, or to resist social pressure to eat at an open buffet, uses cognitive therapy as a behavioral technique. Involving family members in an obesity treatment plan and using group therapy such as Overeaters Anonymous are other standard behavioral techniques.
A 1997 systematic review of 99 weight loss studies, including randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials of at least 1 year’s duration, found 21 behavioral intervention trials that included dietary, exercise, and behavioral approaches.2 The reviewers concluded that long-term behavioral techniques, dietary changes with very specific instructions to assist adherence, exercise, relapse prevention training, and social/community support were optimal for promoting weight loss.2
One of the RCTs3 involved 163 patients and compared behavioral therapy alone with behavioral therapy plus specific aids to changing diet: use of grocery lists, meal plans, and specific instructions to reduce total fat intake. The average weight loss after 1 year in the behavioral therapy with specific aids group, was statistically significantly greater than the weight loss in the behavioral therapy alone group (6.9 kg vs 3.3 kg).3
Another RCT4 in the review evaluated different types of maintenance programs to promote ongoing weight loss among 125 people randomized to 1 of 5 maintenance programs after an initial 20-week behavioral weight loss program: 1) control—no further contact with the behavioral therapists; 2) behavioral—ongoing problem-solving behavioral therapy sessions; 3) social—peer support and participant presentations, with some financial incentives; 4) exercise—therapy sessions, as in group 2, plus an aerobic exercise program; and 5) combined—using therapy sessions, social support and an exercise program. Mean weight loss at 1.8 months for the 4 intervention programs was significantly greater than for the control (group 2, 11.4 kg; group 3, 8.4 kg; group 4, 9.1 kg; group 5, 13.5 kg vs 3.6 kg).4 Two additional similar RCTs5,6 showed significant benefit from behavioral interventions combined with social support and relapse prevention training.
One RCT7 addressed both behavioral therapy and the importance of face-to-face interaction. The study randomized 122 subjects to either Internet video sessions biweekly with a therapist (which included behavioral therapy, access to an associated chat room and e-mail correspondence), or to biweekly face-to-face sessions with a therapist. The active intervention spanned 24 weeks, but the therapist met with the face-to-face group and interacted in the chat room and with e-mail for another 6 months. At 18 months, the mean weight loss in the Internet group was 5.7 kg compared with 10.4 kg in the face-to-face group.7 In a subsequent data analysis,4 regular attendance to follow-up group sessions for at least 1 year resulted in better maintenance of weight loss. Initial weight loss—ie, weight loss in the first few months of the behavioral intervention—was a good predictor of long-term adherence to behavioral interventions.8
Hypnosis has been used as an adjunct to behavioral therapy for weight loss in multiple small studies. Two meta-analyses9,10 concluded that behavioral therapy alone yielded an average weight loss of 6.05 kg; with the addition of hypnosis, the average weight loss rose to 14.88 kg.
Depression and binge-eating disorder commonly coexist with obesity. Obese patients seeking treatment have a lifetime prevalence of affective disorders over 30%. Depression is associated with higher dropout rates from treatment programs for obesity.11 However, there are no rigorous studies that indicate that treatment of depression is necessary to achieve optimal weight loss.12,13
Recommendations from others
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends behavior changes, including an increase in physical activity and in the intake of vegetables and fruits.1 The American Academy of Family Physicians recommends working to improve self-efficacy—the patient’s belief that they can succeed in the intervention.14
The US Preventive Services Task Force found insufficient evidence to recommend brief counseling for obese adults, nor any counseling for overweight adults. However, they did recommend high-intensity counseling for dietary change and exercise to obese adults; this counseling is likely to produce modest sustained weight loss.15
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [website]. Atlanta, Ga: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC. Available at: www.cdc.gov. Accessed November 28, 2005.
2. Glanville J, Glenny AM, Melville A, et al. The prevention and treatment of obesity. Effective Healthcare 1997;3:1-12.
3. Wing RR, Marcus MD, Epstein LH, et al. A “family based” approach to the treatment of obese type II diabetic patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;59:156-162.
4. Perri MG, McAllister DA, Gange JJ, et al. Effects of four maintenance programs on the long term management of obesity. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988;56:529-534.
5. Perri MG, McAdoo WG, Spevak PA, et al. Effect of a multicomponent maintenance program on long-term weight loss. J Consult Clin Psychol 1984;52:480-481.
6. Perri MG, Shapiro RM, Ludwig WW, et al. Maintenance strategies for the treatment of obesity: an evaluation of relapse prevention training and post-treatment contact by mail and telephone. J Consult Clin Psychol 1984;52:404-413.
7. Harvey-Berino J, Pintauro S, Buzzell P, et al. Does using the internet facilitate the maintenance of weight loss? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002;26:1254-1260.
8. Melchionda N, Besteghi S, Domizio D, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy for obesity: one year follow up in a clinical setting. Eat Weight Disord 2003;8:180-193.
9. Allison DB, Faith MS. Hypnosis as an adjunct to cognitive behavioral psychotherapy for obesity: a meta analytic reappraisal. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996;64:513-516.
10. Kirsch I. Hypnotic enhancement of cognitive behavioral weight loss treatments-another meta reanalysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996;64:517-519.
11. Clark MM, Niaura R, King TK, et al. Depression, smoking, activity level, and health status: pretreatment predictors of attrition in obesity treatment. Addict Behav 1996;21:509-513.
12. Weiss D. How to help your patients lose weight: current therapy for obesity. Cleve Clin J Med 2000;67:739-743-746749-754.
13. Wadden TA, Butryn ML. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2003;32:981-1003.
14. American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) [website]. Leawood, Kan: American Academy of Family Physicians; 2005. Available at www.aafp.org. Accessed on November 28, 2005.
15. McTigue KM, Harris R, Hemphill B, Lux L, Suttun S. Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Int Med 2003;139:933-966.
Interventions that include a combination of behavioral and lifestyle modifications—including decreased caloric intake, specific aids to changing diet, increased physical activity, and treatment of binge eating disorders—have modest benefit with appropriate use (strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, based on multiple randomized controlled trials). Hypnosis can be used as an adjunct to behavioral therapy for weight loss (SOR: A, based on systematic reviews).
More options for the patient is better: physician, dietician, counselor, trainer
Jon O. Neher, MD
Valley Medical Center, Renton, Wash
More options for the patient is better: physician, dietician, counselor, trainer Working against the cultural incentives that promote obesity is difficult, and doing so places physicians in the challenging position of trying to change culture one patient at a time. A good team is essential, and it seems the more options the better: physician, dietician, counselor (perhaps with hypnosis skills), and even a physical trainer. Funding for these services, as well as patient motivation for change, are often easier to obtain when the physician labels the patient as having a disease (such as diabetes or hyperlipidemia). Unfortunately, the rising prevalence of the metabolic syndrome is making this situation increasingly common.
Evidence summary
Obesity rates in the US have risen significantly in recent years: 30% of US adults (60 million people) and 16% of children 6 to 19 years old (more than 9 million), are obese,1 and trends suggest rates will continue to increase. Eating behaviors are learned and reinforced within families, peer groups, and other important social groups. Behavioral techniques to treat obesity attempt to reduce reinforcement for unhealthy eating behaviors and teach and reinforce healthy eating behaviors. Cue avoidance is a common behavioral intervention: the patient avoids situations in which he has overeaten in the past, such as “all-you-can-eat” buffets. Role play to practice restraint from overeating, or to resist social pressure to eat at an open buffet, uses cognitive therapy as a behavioral technique. Involving family members in an obesity treatment plan and using group therapy such as Overeaters Anonymous are other standard behavioral techniques.
A 1997 systematic review of 99 weight loss studies, including randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials of at least 1 year’s duration, found 21 behavioral intervention trials that included dietary, exercise, and behavioral approaches.2 The reviewers concluded that long-term behavioral techniques, dietary changes with very specific instructions to assist adherence, exercise, relapse prevention training, and social/community support were optimal for promoting weight loss.2
One of the RCTs3 involved 163 patients and compared behavioral therapy alone with behavioral therapy plus specific aids to changing diet: use of grocery lists, meal plans, and specific instructions to reduce total fat intake. The average weight loss after 1 year in the behavioral therapy with specific aids group, was statistically significantly greater than the weight loss in the behavioral therapy alone group (6.9 kg vs 3.3 kg).3
Another RCT4 in the review evaluated different types of maintenance programs to promote ongoing weight loss among 125 people randomized to 1 of 5 maintenance programs after an initial 20-week behavioral weight loss program: 1) control—no further contact with the behavioral therapists; 2) behavioral—ongoing problem-solving behavioral therapy sessions; 3) social—peer support and participant presentations, with some financial incentives; 4) exercise—therapy sessions, as in group 2, plus an aerobic exercise program; and 5) combined—using therapy sessions, social support and an exercise program. Mean weight loss at 1.8 months for the 4 intervention programs was significantly greater than for the control (group 2, 11.4 kg; group 3, 8.4 kg; group 4, 9.1 kg; group 5, 13.5 kg vs 3.6 kg).4 Two additional similar RCTs5,6 showed significant benefit from behavioral interventions combined with social support and relapse prevention training.
One RCT7 addressed both behavioral therapy and the importance of face-to-face interaction. The study randomized 122 subjects to either Internet video sessions biweekly with a therapist (which included behavioral therapy, access to an associated chat room and e-mail correspondence), or to biweekly face-to-face sessions with a therapist. The active intervention spanned 24 weeks, but the therapist met with the face-to-face group and interacted in the chat room and with e-mail for another 6 months. At 18 months, the mean weight loss in the Internet group was 5.7 kg compared with 10.4 kg in the face-to-face group.7 In a subsequent data analysis,4 regular attendance to follow-up group sessions for at least 1 year resulted in better maintenance of weight loss. Initial weight loss—ie, weight loss in the first few months of the behavioral intervention—was a good predictor of long-term adherence to behavioral interventions.8
Hypnosis has been used as an adjunct to behavioral therapy for weight loss in multiple small studies. Two meta-analyses9,10 concluded that behavioral therapy alone yielded an average weight loss of 6.05 kg; with the addition of hypnosis, the average weight loss rose to 14.88 kg.
Depression and binge-eating disorder commonly coexist with obesity. Obese patients seeking treatment have a lifetime prevalence of affective disorders over 30%. Depression is associated with higher dropout rates from treatment programs for obesity.11 However, there are no rigorous studies that indicate that treatment of depression is necessary to achieve optimal weight loss.12,13
Recommendations from others
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends behavior changes, including an increase in physical activity and in the intake of vegetables and fruits.1 The American Academy of Family Physicians recommends working to improve self-efficacy—the patient’s belief that they can succeed in the intervention.14
The US Preventive Services Task Force found insufficient evidence to recommend brief counseling for obese adults, nor any counseling for overweight adults. However, they did recommend high-intensity counseling for dietary change and exercise to obese adults; this counseling is likely to produce modest sustained weight loss.15
Interventions that include a combination of behavioral and lifestyle modifications—including decreased caloric intake, specific aids to changing diet, increased physical activity, and treatment of binge eating disorders—have modest benefit with appropriate use (strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, based on multiple randomized controlled trials). Hypnosis can be used as an adjunct to behavioral therapy for weight loss (SOR: A, based on systematic reviews).
More options for the patient is better: physician, dietician, counselor, trainer
Jon O. Neher, MD
Valley Medical Center, Renton, Wash
More options for the patient is better: physician, dietician, counselor, trainer Working against the cultural incentives that promote obesity is difficult, and doing so places physicians in the challenging position of trying to change culture one patient at a time. A good team is essential, and it seems the more options the better: physician, dietician, counselor (perhaps with hypnosis skills), and even a physical trainer. Funding for these services, as well as patient motivation for change, are often easier to obtain when the physician labels the patient as having a disease (such as diabetes or hyperlipidemia). Unfortunately, the rising prevalence of the metabolic syndrome is making this situation increasingly common.
Evidence summary
Obesity rates in the US have risen significantly in recent years: 30% of US adults (60 million people) and 16% of children 6 to 19 years old (more than 9 million), are obese,1 and trends suggest rates will continue to increase. Eating behaviors are learned and reinforced within families, peer groups, and other important social groups. Behavioral techniques to treat obesity attempt to reduce reinforcement for unhealthy eating behaviors and teach and reinforce healthy eating behaviors. Cue avoidance is a common behavioral intervention: the patient avoids situations in which he has overeaten in the past, such as “all-you-can-eat” buffets. Role play to practice restraint from overeating, or to resist social pressure to eat at an open buffet, uses cognitive therapy as a behavioral technique. Involving family members in an obesity treatment plan and using group therapy such as Overeaters Anonymous are other standard behavioral techniques.
A 1997 systematic review of 99 weight loss studies, including randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials of at least 1 year’s duration, found 21 behavioral intervention trials that included dietary, exercise, and behavioral approaches.2 The reviewers concluded that long-term behavioral techniques, dietary changes with very specific instructions to assist adherence, exercise, relapse prevention training, and social/community support were optimal for promoting weight loss.2
One of the RCTs3 involved 163 patients and compared behavioral therapy alone with behavioral therapy plus specific aids to changing diet: use of grocery lists, meal plans, and specific instructions to reduce total fat intake. The average weight loss after 1 year in the behavioral therapy with specific aids group, was statistically significantly greater than the weight loss in the behavioral therapy alone group (6.9 kg vs 3.3 kg).3
Another RCT4 in the review evaluated different types of maintenance programs to promote ongoing weight loss among 125 people randomized to 1 of 5 maintenance programs after an initial 20-week behavioral weight loss program: 1) control—no further contact with the behavioral therapists; 2) behavioral—ongoing problem-solving behavioral therapy sessions; 3) social—peer support and participant presentations, with some financial incentives; 4) exercise—therapy sessions, as in group 2, plus an aerobic exercise program; and 5) combined—using therapy sessions, social support and an exercise program. Mean weight loss at 1.8 months for the 4 intervention programs was significantly greater than for the control (group 2, 11.4 kg; group 3, 8.4 kg; group 4, 9.1 kg; group 5, 13.5 kg vs 3.6 kg).4 Two additional similar RCTs5,6 showed significant benefit from behavioral interventions combined with social support and relapse prevention training.
One RCT7 addressed both behavioral therapy and the importance of face-to-face interaction. The study randomized 122 subjects to either Internet video sessions biweekly with a therapist (which included behavioral therapy, access to an associated chat room and e-mail correspondence), or to biweekly face-to-face sessions with a therapist. The active intervention spanned 24 weeks, but the therapist met with the face-to-face group and interacted in the chat room and with e-mail for another 6 months. At 18 months, the mean weight loss in the Internet group was 5.7 kg compared with 10.4 kg in the face-to-face group.7 In a subsequent data analysis,4 regular attendance to follow-up group sessions for at least 1 year resulted in better maintenance of weight loss. Initial weight loss—ie, weight loss in the first few months of the behavioral intervention—was a good predictor of long-term adherence to behavioral interventions.8
Hypnosis has been used as an adjunct to behavioral therapy for weight loss in multiple small studies. Two meta-analyses9,10 concluded that behavioral therapy alone yielded an average weight loss of 6.05 kg; with the addition of hypnosis, the average weight loss rose to 14.88 kg.
Depression and binge-eating disorder commonly coexist with obesity. Obese patients seeking treatment have a lifetime prevalence of affective disorders over 30%. Depression is associated with higher dropout rates from treatment programs for obesity.11 However, there are no rigorous studies that indicate that treatment of depression is necessary to achieve optimal weight loss.12,13
Recommendations from others
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends behavior changes, including an increase in physical activity and in the intake of vegetables and fruits.1 The American Academy of Family Physicians recommends working to improve self-efficacy—the patient’s belief that they can succeed in the intervention.14
The US Preventive Services Task Force found insufficient evidence to recommend brief counseling for obese adults, nor any counseling for overweight adults. However, they did recommend high-intensity counseling for dietary change and exercise to obese adults; this counseling is likely to produce modest sustained weight loss.15
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [website]. Atlanta, Ga: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC. Available at: www.cdc.gov. Accessed November 28, 2005.
2. Glanville J, Glenny AM, Melville A, et al. The prevention and treatment of obesity. Effective Healthcare 1997;3:1-12.
3. Wing RR, Marcus MD, Epstein LH, et al. A “family based” approach to the treatment of obese type II diabetic patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;59:156-162.
4. Perri MG, McAllister DA, Gange JJ, et al. Effects of four maintenance programs on the long term management of obesity. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988;56:529-534.
5. Perri MG, McAdoo WG, Spevak PA, et al. Effect of a multicomponent maintenance program on long-term weight loss. J Consult Clin Psychol 1984;52:480-481.
6. Perri MG, Shapiro RM, Ludwig WW, et al. Maintenance strategies for the treatment of obesity: an evaluation of relapse prevention training and post-treatment contact by mail and telephone. J Consult Clin Psychol 1984;52:404-413.
7. Harvey-Berino J, Pintauro S, Buzzell P, et al. Does using the internet facilitate the maintenance of weight loss? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002;26:1254-1260.
8. Melchionda N, Besteghi S, Domizio D, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy for obesity: one year follow up in a clinical setting. Eat Weight Disord 2003;8:180-193.
9. Allison DB, Faith MS. Hypnosis as an adjunct to cognitive behavioral psychotherapy for obesity: a meta analytic reappraisal. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996;64:513-516.
10. Kirsch I. Hypnotic enhancement of cognitive behavioral weight loss treatments-another meta reanalysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996;64:517-519.
11. Clark MM, Niaura R, King TK, et al. Depression, smoking, activity level, and health status: pretreatment predictors of attrition in obesity treatment. Addict Behav 1996;21:509-513.
12. Weiss D. How to help your patients lose weight: current therapy for obesity. Cleve Clin J Med 2000;67:739-743-746749-754.
13. Wadden TA, Butryn ML. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2003;32:981-1003.
14. American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) [website]. Leawood, Kan: American Academy of Family Physicians; 2005. Available at www.aafp.org. Accessed on November 28, 2005.
15. McTigue KM, Harris R, Hemphill B, Lux L, Suttun S. Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Int Med 2003;139:933-966.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [website]. Atlanta, Ga: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC. Available at: www.cdc.gov. Accessed November 28, 2005.
2. Glanville J, Glenny AM, Melville A, et al. The prevention and treatment of obesity. Effective Healthcare 1997;3:1-12.
3. Wing RR, Marcus MD, Epstein LH, et al. A “family based” approach to the treatment of obese type II diabetic patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;59:156-162.
4. Perri MG, McAllister DA, Gange JJ, et al. Effects of four maintenance programs on the long term management of obesity. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988;56:529-534.
5. Perri MG, McAdoo WG, Spevak PA, et al. Effect of a multicomponent maintenance program on long-term weight loss. J Consult Clin Psychol 1984;52:480-481.
6. Perri MG, Shapiro RM, Ludwig WW, et al. Maintenance strategies for the treatment of obesity: an evaluation of relapse prevention training and post-treatment contact by mail and telephone. J Consult Clin Psychol 1984;52:404-413.
7. Harvey-Berino J, Pintauro S, Buzzell P, et al. Does using the internet facilitate the maintenance of weight loss? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002;26:1254-1260.
8. Melchionda N, Besteghi S, Domizio D, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy for obesity: one year follow up in a clinical setting. Eat Weight Disord 2003;8:180-193.
9. Allison DB, Faith MS. Hypnosis as an adjunct to cognitive behavioral psychotherapy for obesity: a meta analytic reappraisal. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996;64:513-516.
10. Kirsch I. Hypnotic enhancement of cognitive behavioral weight loss treatments-another meta reanalysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996;64:517-519.
11. Clark MM, Niaura R, King TK, et al. Depression, smoking, activity level, and health status: pretreatment predictors of attrition in obesity treatment. Addict Behav 1996;21:509-513.
12. Weiss D. How to help your patients lose weight: current therapy for obesity. Cleve Clin J Med 2000;67:739-743-746749-754.
13. Wadden TA, Butryn ML. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2003;32:981-1003.
14. American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) [website]. Leawood, Kan: American Academy of Family Physicians; 2005. Available at www.aafp.org. Accessed on November 28, 2005.
15. McTigue KM, Harris R, Hemphill B, Lux L, Suttun S. Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Int Med 2003;139:933-966.
Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network