User login
When treatment spells trouble
HISTORY: ‘THEY’RE TRYING TO KILL ME’
For the past 7 months Ms. G, age 47, has had worsening paranoid thoughts and sleep disturbances. She sleeps 4 hours or less a night, and her appetite and energy are diminished.
Her mother reports that Ms. G, who lives in an extended-care facility, believes the staff has injected embalming fluid into her body and is plotting to kill her. She says her daughter also has “fits” during which she hears a deafening noise that sounds like a vacuum cleaner, followed by a feeling of being pushed to the ground. Ms. G tells us that someone or something invisible is trying to control her.
Ms. G was diagnosed 2 years ago as having Parkinson’s disease and has chronically high liver transaminase enzymes. She also has moderate mental retardation secondary to cerebral palsy. She fears she will be harmed if she stays at the extendedcare facility, but we find no evidence that she has been abused or mistreated there.
Three months before presenting to us, Ms. G was hospitalized for 3 days to treat symptoms that suggested neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) but were apparently caused by her inadvertently stopping her antiparkinson agents.
One month later, Ms. G was hospitalized again, this time for acute psychosis. Quetiapine, which she had been taking for antiparkinson medication-induced psychosis, was increased from 100 mg nightly to 75 mg bid, with reportedly good effect.
Shortly afterward, however, Ms. G’s paranoia worsened. At the facility, she has called 911 several times to report imagined threats from staff members. After referral from her primary care physician, we evaluate Ms. G and admit her to the adult inpatient psychiatric unit.
At intake, Ms. G is anxious and uncomfortable with notable muscle spasticity and twitching of her arms and legs. Mostly wheelchair-bound, she has longstanding physical abnormalities (shuffling gait; dystonia; drooling; slowed, dysarthric speech) secondary to comorbid Parkinson’s and cerebral palsy. She is agitated at first but grows calmer and cooperative.
Mental status examination shows a disorganized, tangential thought process and evidence of paranoid delusions and auditory hallucinations, but she denies visual hallucinations. She has poor insight into her illness but is oriented to time, place, and person. She can recall two of three objects after 3 minutes of distraction. Attention and concentration are intact.
Ms. G denies depressed mood, anhedonia, mania, or suicidal or homicidal thoughts. Her mother says no stressors other than the imagined threats to her life have affected her daughter.
The patient ’s temperature at admission is 98.0°F, her pulse is 108 beats per minute, and her blood pressure is 150/88 mm Hg. Laboratory workup shows a white blood cell count of 10,100/mm3 (normal range: 4,000 to 10,000/mm3), sodium level of 132 mEq/L (normal range: 135 to 145 mEq/L), and aspartate (AST) and alanine (ALT) transaminase levels of 611 U/L and 79 U/L, respectively (normal range for each: 0 to 35 U/L).
Aside from quetiapine, Ms. G also has been taking carbidopa/levodopa, seven 25/100-mg tablets daily, and pramipexole, 3 mg/d, for parkinsonism; citalopram, 20 mg/d, for depression; trazodone, 300 mg nightly, and lorazepam, 0.5 mg nightly, for insomnia; lopressor, 25 mg every 12 hours, for hypertension; and tolterodine, 1 mg bid, for urinary incontinence.
The authors’ observations
Parkinsonism typically responds to dopaminergic treatment. Excess dopamine agonism is believed to contribute to medication-induced psychosis, a common and often disabling complication of Parkinson’s disease1,2 that often necessitates nursing home placement and may increase mortality.2,3
Paranoia occurs in approximately 8% of patients treated for drug-induced Parkinson’s psychosis, and hallucinations (typically visual) may occur in as many as 30%.2 Quetiapine, 50 to 225 mg/d, is considered a good first-line treatment for psychosis in Parkinson’s, although the agent has been tested for this use only in open-label trials.2,3
Mental retardation and pre-existing parkinsonism, however, may increase Ms. G’s risk for NMS, a rare but potentially fatal reaction to antipsychotics believed to be caused by a sudden D2 dopamine receptor blockade.4,5 Signs include autonomic instability, extrapyramidal symptoms, hyperpyrexia, and altered mental status.
Of 68 patients with NMS studied by Ananth et al,4 13.2% were mentally retarded, and uncontrolled studies6 have proposed mental retardation as a potential risk factor (Table 1). A 2003 case control study6 found a higher incidence of NMS among mentally retarded patients than among nonretarded persons, but the difference was not statistically significant. There are no known links between specific causes of mental retardation and NMS.
Even so, Ms. G’s psychosis is compromising her already diminished quality of life. We will increase her quetiapine dosage slightly and watch for early signs of NMS, including fever, confusion, and increased muscle rigidity.
Table 1
Factors that increase risk of neuroleptic malignant syndrome*
Abrupt antipsychotic cessation |
Ambient heat |
Catatonia |
Dehydration |
Exhaustion |
Genetic predisposition |
Greater dosage increases |
Higher neuroleptic doses, especially with typical and atypical IM agents |
Low serum iron |
Malnutrition |
Mental retardation |
Pre-existing EPS or parkinsonism |
Previous NMS episode |
Psychomotor agitation |
* Infection or concurrent organic brain disease are predisposing factors, but their association with NMS is less clear. |
EPS: extrapyramidal symptoms |
Source: References: 4-7, 14-15. |
TREATMENT: MEDICATION CHANGE
Upon admission, quetiapine is increased to 75 mg in the morning and 125 mg at bedtime—still well below the dosage at which quetiapine increases the risk of NMS (Table 2). Trazodone is decreased to 100 mg/d because of quetiapine’s sedating properties. Citalopram and tolterodine are stopped for fear that either agent would aggravate her psychosis. We continue all other drugs as previously prescribed. Her paranoia begins to subside.
Three days later, Ms. G’s is increasingly confused and agitated, and her temperature rises to 101.3°F. Physical exam shows increased muscle rigidity. She is given lorazepam, 1 mg, and transferred to the emergency room for evaluation.
In the ER, Ms. G’s temperature rises to 102.3°F. Other vital signs include:
- heart rate, 112 to 120 beats per minute
- respiratory rate, 18 to 20 breaths per minute
- oxygen saturation, 98% in room air
- blood pressure, 131/61 mm Hg while seated and 92/58 mm Hg while standing.
CNS or systemic infection and myocardial infarction are considered less likely because of her reactive pupils, lack of nuchal rigidity, troponin 3. Additionally, CSF shows normal glucose and protein levels, ALT and AST are 217 and 261 U/L, respectively, and chest x-ray shows no acute cardiopulmonary abnormality.
Ms. G is admitted to the medical intensive care unit and given IV fluids. All psychotropic and antiparkinson medications are stopped for 12 hours. Ms. G is then transferred to the general medical service for continued observation and IV hydration.
Six hours later, lorazepam, 0.5 mg every 8 hours, is resumed to control Ms. G’s anxiety. Carbidopa/levodopa is resumed at the previous dosage; all other medications remain on hold.
Renal damage is not apparent, but repeat chest x-ray taken 2 days after admission to the ER shows right middle lobe pneumonia, which resolved with antibiotics.
Six days after entering the medical unit, Ms. G is no longer agitated or paranoid. She is discharged that day and continued on lorazepam, 1 mg every 8 hours as needed to control her anxiety and prevent paranoia, and carbidopa/levidopa 8-1/2 25/100-mg tablets daily for her parkinsonism. Trazodone, 100 mg nightly, is continued for 3 days to help her sleep, as is amoxicillin/clavulanate, 500 mg every 8 hours, in case an underlying infection exists. Quetiapine, citalopram, and tolterodine are discontinued; all other medications are resumed as previously prescribed.
Table 2
Antipsychotic-related NMS risk increases at these dosages
Agent | Dosage (mg/d) |
---|---|
Aripiprazole | >30 |
Chlorpromazine | >400 |
Clozapine | 318+/-299 |
Olanzapine | 9.7+/-2.3 |
Quetiapine | 412.5+/-317 |
Risperidone | 4.3+/-3.1 |
Ziprasidone | >20 |
Source: References 4, 6, and 15. |
The authors’ observations
Ms. G’s NMS symptoms surfaced 3 days after her quetiapine dosage was increased, suggesting that the antipsychotic may have caused this episode.
We ruled out antiparkinson agent withdrawal malignant syndrome—usually caused by abrupt cessation of Parkinson’s medications. Ms. G’s carbidopa/levodopa had not been adjusted before the symptoms emerged, and she did not worsen after the agent was stopped temporarily. Her brief pneumonia episode, however, could have caused symptoms that mimicked this withdrawal syndrome.
Antiparkinson agent withdrawal malignant syndrome symptoms resemble those of NMS.9,10 Worsening parkinsonism, dehydration, and infection increase the risk.10 Some research suggests that leukocytosis or elevated inflammation-related cytokines may accelerate withdrawal syndrome.10
The authors’ observations
Ms. G’s case illustrates the difficulty of treating psychosis in a patient at risk for NMS.
Of the 68 patients in the Ananth et al study with atypical antipsychotic-induced NMS, 11 were rechallenged after an NMS episode with the same agent and 8 were switched to another atypical. NMS recurred in 4 of these 19 patients.4
Ms. G was stable on lorazepam at discharge, but we would consider rechallenging with quetiapine or another antipsychotic if necessary. NMS recurs in 30% to 50%11 of patients after antipsychotic rechallenge, but waiting 2 weeks to resume antipsychotic therapy appears to reduce this risk.12 Benzodiazepines and electroconvulsive therapy are acceptable—though unproven—second-line therapies if antipsychotic rechallenge is deemed too risky,11,13 such as in some patients with a previous severe NMS episode; evidence of stroke, Parkinson’s or other neurodegenerative disease; or multiple acute medical problems.
CONTINUED TREATMENT: A RELAPSE
Three months later, Ms. G is readmitted to the neurology service for 3 weeks after being diagnosed with elevated CK, possibly caused by NMS or rhabdomyolysis secondary to persistent dyskinesia. We believe an inadvertent decrease in her carbidopa/levodopa caused the episode, as she had taken no neuroleptics between hospitalizations.
Ms. G is discharged on quetiapine, 25 mg nightly, along with her other medications. Her current psychiatric and neurologic status is unknown.
The authors’ observations
Detecting NMS symptoms early is critical to preventing mortality. Although NMS risk with atypical and typical antipsychotics is similar,4 fewer deaths from NMS have been reported after use of atypicals (3 deaths among 68 cases) than typical neuroleptics (30% mortality rate in the 1960s and 70s, and 10% mortality from 1980-87).14 Earlier recognition and treatment may be decreasing NMS-related mortality.4
Consider NMS in the differential diagnosis when the patient’s mental status changes.
Related resources
- Emedicine: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. www.emedicine.com/med/topic2614.htm.
- Bhanushali MJ, Tuite PJ. The evaluation and management of patients with neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Neurol Clin 2004;22:389-411.
- Susman VL. Clinical management of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Psychiatr Q 2001;72:325-36.
- Amoxicillin/clavulanate • Augmentin
- Aripiprazole • Abilify
- Carbidopa/levodopa • Sinemet
- Chlorpromazine • Thorazine
- Citalopram • Celexa
- Clozapine • Clozaril
- Lopressor • Toprol
- Lorazepam • Ativan
- Olanzapine • Zyprexa
- Pramipexole • Mirapex
- Quetiapine • Seroquel
- Risperidone • Risperdal
- Tolterodine • Detrol
- Trazodone • Desyrel
- Ziprasidone • Geodon
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Robert B. Milstein, MD, PhD, and Benjamin Zigun, MD, JD, for their help in preparing this article for publication.
This project is supported by funds from the Division of State, Community, and Public Health, Bureau of Health Professions (BHPr), Health Resources and Services Administration (HSRA), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) under grant number 1 K01 HP 00071-02 and Geriatric Academic Career Award ($58,009). The content and conclusion are those of Dr. Tampi and are not the official position or policy of, nor should be any endorsements be inferred by, the Bureau of Health Professions, HRSA, DHHS or the United States Government.
1. Samii A, Nutt JG, Ransom BR. Parkinson’s disease Lancet 2004;363(9423):1783-93.
2. Reddy S, Factor SA, Molho ES, Feustel PJ. The effect of quetiapine on psychosis and motor function in parkinsonian patients with and without dementia. Movement Disord 2002;17:676-81.
3. Kang GA, Bronstein JM. Psychosis in nursing home patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2004;5:167-73.
4. Ananth J, Parameswaran S, Gunatilake S, et al. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and atypical antipsychotic drugs. J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65:464-70.
5. Mann SC, Caroff SN, Keck PE, Jr, et al. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. In: Mann SC, Caroff SN, Keck PE Jr, et al. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and related conditions (2nd ed). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2003;1:44.-
6. Viejo LF, Morales V, Punal P, et al. Risk factors in neuroleptic malignant syndrome. A case-control study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2003;107:45-9.
7. Adnet P, Lestavel P, Krivosic-Horber R. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome Br J Anaesthesia 2000;85:129-35.
8. Takubo H, Shimoda-Matsubayashi S, Mizuno Y. Serum creatine kinase is elevated in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a case controlled study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2003;9 suppl 1:S43-S46.
9. Mizuno Y, Takubo H, Mizuta E, Kuno S. Malignant syndrome in Parkinson’s disease: concept and review of the literature. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2003;9 suppl 1:S3-S9.
10. Hashimoto T, Tokuda T, Hanyu N, et al. Withdrawal of levodopa and other risk factors for malignant syndrome in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2003;9 suppl 1:S25-S30.
11. Bhanushali MJ, Tuite PJ. The evaluation and management of patients with neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Neurol Clin 2004;22:389-411.
12. Rosebush P, Stewart T. A prospective analysis of 24 episodes of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am J Psychiatry 1989;146:717-25.
13. Susman VL. Clinical management of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Psychiatr Q 2001;72:325-36.
14. Caroff S, Mann SC. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Med Clin North Am 1993;77:185-202.
15. Woods SW. Chlorpromazine equivalent doses for the newer atypical antipsychotics. J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64:663-7.
HISTORY: ‘THEY’RE TRYING TO KILL ME’
For the past 7 months Ms. G, age 47, has had worsening paranoid thoughts and sleep disturbances. She sleeps 4 hours or less a night, and her appetite and energy are diminished.
Her mother reports that Ms. G, who lives in an extended-care facility, believes the staff has injected embalming fluid into her body and is plotting to kill her. She says her daughter also has “fits” during which she hears a deafening noise that sounds like a vacuum cleaner, followed by a feeling of being pushed to the ground. Ms. G tells us that someone or something invisible is trying to control her.
Ms. G was diagnosed 2 years ago as having Parkinson’s disease and has chronically high liver transaminase enzymes. She also has moderate mental retardation secondary to cerebral palsy. She fears she will be harmed if she stays at the extendedcare facility, but we find no evidence that she has been abused or mistreated there.
Three months before presenting to us, Ms. G was hospitalized for 3 days to treat symptoms that suggested neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) but were apparently caused by her inadvertently stopping her antiparkinson agents.
One month later, Ms. G was hospitalized again, this time for acute psychosis. Quetiapine, which she had been taking for antiparkinson medication-induced psychosis, was increased from 100 mg nightly to 75 mg bid, with reportedly good effect.
Shortly afterward, however, Ms. G’s paranoia worsened. At the facility, she has called 911 several times to report imagined threats from staff members. After referral from her primary care physician, we evaluate Ms. G and admit her to the adult inpatient psychiatric unit.
At intake, Ms. G is anxious and uncomfortable with notable muscle spasticity and twitching of her arms and legs. Mostly wheelchair-bound, she has longstanding physical abnormalities (shuffling gait; dystonia; drooling; slowed, dysarthric speech) secondary to comorbid Parkinson’s and cerebral palsy. She is agitated at first but grows calmer and cooperative.
Mental status examination shows a disorganized, tangential thought process and evidence of paranoid delusions and auditory hallucinations, but she denies visual hallucinations. She has poor insight into her illness but is oriented to time, place, and person. She can recall two of three objects after 3 minutes of distraction. Attention and concentration are intact.
Ms. G denies depressed mood, anhedonia, mania, or suicidal or homicidal thoughts. Her mother says no stressors other than the imagined threats to her life have affected her daughter.
The patient ’s temperature at admission is 98.0°F, her pulse is 108 beats per minute, and her blood pressure is 150/88 mm Hg. Laboratory workup shows a white blood cell count of 10,100/mm3 (normal range: 4,000 to 10,000/mm3), sodium level of 132 mEq/L (normal range: 135 to 145 mEq/L), and aspartate (AST) and alanine (ALT) transaminase levels of 611 U/L and 79 U/L, respectively (normal range for each: 0 to 35 U/L).
Aside from quetiapine, Ms. G also has been taking carbidopa/levodopa, seven 25/100-mg tablets daily, and pramipexole, 3 mg/d, for parkinsonism; citalopram, 20 mg/d, for depression; trazodone, 300 mg nightly, and lorazepam, 0.5 mg nightly, for insomnia; lopressor, 25 mg every 12 hours, for hypertension; and tolterodine, 1 mg bid, for urinary incontinence.
The authors’ observations
Parkinsonism typically responds to dopaminergic treatment. Excess dopamine agonism is believed to contribute to medication-induced psychosis, a common and often disabling complication of Parkinson’s disease1,2 that often necessitates nursing home placement and may increase mortality.2,3
Paranoia occurs in approximately 8% of patients treated for drug-induced Parkinson’s psychosis, and hallucinations (typically visual) may occur in as many as 30%.2 Quetiapine, 50 to 225 mg/d, is considered a good first-line treatment for psychosis in Parkinson’s, although the agent has been tested for this use only in open-label trials.2,3
Mental retardation and pre-existing parkinsonism, however, may increase Ms. G’s risk for NMS, a rare but potentially fatal reaction to antipsychotics believed to be caused by a sudden D2 dopamine receptor blockade.4,5 Signs include autonomic instability, extrapyramidal symptoms, hyperpyrexia, and altered mental status.
Of 68 patients with NMS studied by Ananth et al,4 13.2% were mentally retarded, and uncontrolled studies6 have proposed mental retardation as a potential risk factor (Table 1). A 2003 case control study6 found a higher incidence of NMS among mentally retarded patients than among nonretarded persons, but the difference was not statistically significant. There are no known links between specific causes of mental retardation and NMS.
Even so, Ms. G’s psychosis is compromising her already diminished quality of life. We will increase her quetiapine dosage slightly and watch for early signs of NMS, including fever, confusion, and increased muscle rigidity.
Table 1
Factors that increase risk of neuroleptic malignant syndrome*
Abrupt antipsychotic cessation |
Ambient heat |
Catatonia |
Dehydration |
Exhaustion |
Genetic predisposition |
Greater dosage increases |
Higher neuroleptic doses, especially with typical and atypical IM agents |
Low serum iron |
Malnutrition |
Mental retardation |
Pre-existing EPS or parkinsonism |
Previous NMS episode |
Psychomotor agitation |
* Infection or concurrent organic brain disease are predisposing factors, but their association with NMS is less clear. |
EPS: extrapyramidal symptoms |
Source: References: 4-7, 14-15. |
TREATMENT: MEDICATION CHANGE
Upon admission, quetiapine is increased to 75 mg in the morning and 125 mg at bedtime—still well below the dosage at which quetiapine increases the risk of NMS (Table 2). Trazodone is decreased to 100 mg/d because of quetiapine’s sedating properties. Citalopram and tolterodine are stopped for fear that either agent would aggravate her psychosis. We continue all other drugs as previously prescribed. Her paranoia begins to subside.
Three days later, Ms. G’s is increasingly confused and agitated, and her temperature rises to 101.3°F. Physical exam shows increased muscle rigidity. She is given lorazepam, 1 mg, and transferred to the emergency room for evaluation.
In the ER, Ms. G’s temperature rises to 102.3°F. Other vital signs include:
- heart rate, 112 to 120 beats per minute
- respiratory rate, 18 to 20 breaths per minute
- oxygen saturation, 98% in room air
- blood pressure, 131/61 mm Hg while seated and 92/58 mm Hg while standing.
CNS or systemic infection and myocardial infarction are considered less likely because of her reactive pupils, lack of nuchal rigidity, troponin 3. Additionally, CSF shows normal glucose and protein levels, ALT and AST are 217 and 261 U/L, respectively, and chest x-ray shows no acute cardiopulmonary abnormality.
Ms. G is admitted to the medical intensive care unit and given IV fluids. All psychotropic and antiparkinson medications are stopped for 12 hours. Ms. G is then transferred to the general medical service for continued observation and IV hydration.
Six hours later, lorazepam, 0.5 mg every 8 hours, is resumed to control Ms. G’s anxiety. Carbidopa/levodopa is resumed at the previous dosage; all other medications remain on hold.
Renal damage is not apparent, but repeat chest x-ray taken 2 days after admission to the ER shows right middle lobe pneumonia, which resolved with antibiotics.
Six days after entering the medical unit, Ms. G is no longer agitated or paranoid. She is discharged that day and continued on lorazepam, 1 mg every 8 hours as needed to control her anxiety and prevent paranoia, and carbidopa/levidopa 8-1/2 25/100-mg tablets daily for her parkinsonism. Trazodone, 100 mg nightly, is continued for 3 days to help her sleep, as is amoxicillin/clavulanate, 500 mg every 8 hours, in case an underlying infection exists. Quetiapine, citalopram, and tolterodine are discontinued; all other medications are resumed as previously prescribed.
Table 2
Antipsychotic-related NMS risk increases at these dosages
Agent | Dosage (mg/d) |
---|---|
Aripiprazole | >30 |
Chlorpromazine | >400 |
Clozapine | 318+/-299 |
Olanzapine | 9.7+/-2.3 |
Quetiapine | 412.5+/-317 |
Risperidone | 4.3+/-3.1 |
Ziprasidone | >20 |
Source: References 4, 6, and 15. |
The authors’ observations
Ms. G’s NMS symptoms surfaced 3 days after her quetiapine dosage was increased, suggesting that the antipsychotic may have caused this episode.
We ruled out antiparkinson agent withdrawal malignant syndrome—usually caused by abrupt cessation of Parkinson’s medications. Ms. G’s carbidopa/levodopa had not been adjusted before the symptoms emerged, and she did not worsen after the agent was stopped temporarily. Her brief pneumonia episode, however, could have caused symptoms that mimicked this withdrawal syndrome.
Antiparkinson agent withdrawal malignant syndrome symptoms resemble those of NMS.9,10 Worsening parkinsonism, dehydration, and infection increase the risk.10 Some research suggests that leukocytosis or elevated inflammation-related cytokines may accelerate withdrawal syndrome.10
The authors’ observations
Ms. G’s case illustrates the difficulty of treating psychosis in a patient at risk for NMS.
Of the 68 patients in the Ananth et al study with atypical antipsychotic-induced NMS, 11 were rechallenged after an NMS episode with the same agent and 8 were switched to another atypical. NMS recurred in 4 of these 19 patients.4
Ms. G was stable on lorazepam at discharge, but we would consider rechallenging with quetiapine or another antipsychotic if necessary. NMS recurs in 30% to 50%11 of patients after antipsychotic rechallenge, but waiting 2 weeks to resume antipsychotic therapy appears to reduce this risk.12 Benzodiazepines and electroconvulsive therapy are acceptable—though unproven—second-line therapies if antipsychotic rechallenge is deemed too risky,11,13 such as in some patients with a previous severe NMS episode; evidence of stroke, Parkinson’s or other neurodegenerative disease; or multiple acute medical problems.
CONTINUED TREATMENT: A RELAPSE
Three months later, Ms. G is readmitted to the neurology service for 3 weeks after being diagnosed with elevated CK, possibly caused by NMS or rhabdomyolysis secondary to persistent dyskinesia. We believe an inadvertent decrease in her carbidopa/levodopa caused the episode, as she had taken no neuroleptics between hospitalizations.
Ms. G is discharged on quetiapine, 25 mg nightly, along with her other medications. Her current psychiatric and neurologic status is unknown.
The authors’ observations
Detecting NMS symptoms early is critical to preventing mortality. Although NMS risk with atypical and typical antipsychotics is similar,4 fewer deaths from NMS have been reported after use of atypicals (3 deaths among 68 cases) than typical neuroleptics (30% mortality rate in the 1960s and 70s, and 10% mortality from 1980-87).14 Earlier recognition and treatment may be decreasing NMS-related mortality.4
Consider NMS in the differential diagnosis when the patient’s mental status changes.
Related resources
- Emedicine: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. www.emedicine.com/med/topic2614.htm.
- Bhanushali MJ, Tuite PJ. The evaluation and management of patients with neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Neurol Clin 2004;22:389-411.
- Susman VL. Clinical management of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Psychiatr Q 2001;72:325-36.
- Amoxicillin/clavulanate • Augmentin
- Aripiprazole • Abilify
- Carbidopa/levodopa • Sinemet
- Chlorpromazine • Thorazine
- Citalopram • Celexa
- Clozapine • Clozaril
- Lopressor • Toprol
- Lorazepam • Ativan
- Olanzapine • Zyprexa
- Pramipexole • Mirapex
- Quetiapine • Seroquel
- Risperidone • Risperdal
- Tolterodine • Detrol
- Trazodone • Desyrel
- Ziprasidone • Geodon
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Robert B. Milstein, MD, PhD, and Benjamin Zigun, MD, JD, for their help in preparing this article for publication.
This project is supported by funds from the Division of State, Community, and Public Health, Bureau of Health Professions (BHPr), Health Resources and Services Administration (HSRA), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) under grant number 1 K01 HP 00071-02 and Geriatric Academic Career Award ($58,009). The content and conclusion are those of Dr. Tampi and are not the official position or policy of, nor should be any endorsements be inferred by, the Bureau of Health Professions, HRSA, DHHS or the United States Government.
HISTORY: ‘THEY’RE TRYING TO KILL ME’
For the past 7 months Ms. G, age 47, has had worsening paranoid thoughts and sleep disturbances. She sleeps 4 hours or less a night, and her appetite and energy are diminished.
Her mother reports that Ms. G, who lives in an extended-care facility, believes the staff has injected embalming fluid into her body and is plotting to kill her. She says her daughter also has “fits” during which she hears a deafening noise that sounds like a vacuum cleaner, followed by a feeling of being pushed to the ground. Ms. G tells us that someone or something invisible is trying to control her.
Ms. G was diagnosed 2 years ago as having Parkinson’s disease and has chronically high liver transaminase enzymes. She also has moderate mental retardation secondary to cerebral palsy. She fears she will be harmed if she stays at the extendedcare facility, but we find no evidence that she has been abused or mistreated there.
Three months before presenting to us, Ms. G was hospitalized for 3 days to treat symptoms that suggested neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) but were apparently caused by her inadvertently stopping her antiparkinson agents.
One month later, Ms. G was hospitalized again, this time for acute psychosis. Quetiapine, which she had been taking for antiparkinson medication-induced psychosis, was increased from 100 mg nightly to 75 mg bid, with reportedly good effect.
Shortly afterward, however, Ms. G’s paranoia worsened. At the facility, she has called 911 several times to report imagined threats from staff members. After referral from her primary care physician, we evaluate Ms. G and admit her to the adult inpatient psychiatric unit.
At intake, Ms. G is anxious and uncomfortable with notable muscle spasticity and twitching of her arms and legs. Mostly wheelchair-bound, she has longstanding physical abnormalities (shuffling gait; dystonia; drooling; slowed, dysarthric speech) secondary to comorbid Parkinson’s and cerebral palsy. She is agitated at first but grows calmer and cooperative.
Mental status examination shows a disorganized, tangential thought process and evidence of paranoid delusions and auditory hallucinations, but she denies visual hallucinations. She has poor insight into her illness but is oriented to time, place, and person. She can recall two of three objects after 3 minutes of distraction. Attention and concentration are intact.
Ms. G denies depressed mood, anhedonia, mania, or suicidal or homicidal thoughts. Her mother says no stressors other than the imagined threats to her life have affected her daughter.
The patient ’s temperature at admission is 98.0°F, her pulse is 108 beats per minute, and her blood pressure is 150/88 mm Hg. Laboratory workup shows a white blood cell count of 10,100/mm3 (normal range: 4,000 to 10,000/mm3), sodium level of 132 mEq/L (normal range: 135 to 145 mEq/L), and aspartate (AST) and alanine (ALT) transaminase levels of 611 U/L and 79 U/L, respectively (normal range for each: 0 to 35 U/L).
Aside from quetiapine, Ms. G also has been taking carbidopa/levodopa, seven 25/100-mg tablets daily, and pramipexole, 3 mg/d, for parkinsonism; citalopram, 20 mg/d, for depression; trazodone, 300 mg nightly, and lorazepam, 0.5 mg nightly, for insomnia; lopressor, 25 mg every 12 hours, for hypertension; and tolterodine, 1 mg bid, for urinary incontinence.
The authors’ observations
Parkinsonism typically responds to dopaminergic treatment. Excess dopamine agonism is believed to contribute to medication-induced psychosis, a common and often disabling complication of Parkinson’s disease1,2 that often necessitates nursing home placement and may increase mortality.2,3
Paranoia occurs in approximately 8% of patients treated for drug-induced Parkinson’s psychosis, and hallucinations (typically visual) may occur in as many as 30%.2 Quetiapine, 50 to 225 mg/d, is considered a good first-line treatment for psychosis in Parkinson’s, although the agent has been tested for this use only in open-label trials.2,3
Mental retardation and pre-existing parkinsonism, however, may increase Ms. G’s risk for NMS, a rare but potentially fatal reaction to antipsychotics believed to be caused by a sudden D2 dopamine receptor blockade.4,5 Signs include autonomic instability, extrapyramidal symptoms, hyperpyrexia, and altered mental status.
Of 68 patients with NMS studied by Ananth et al,4 13.2% were mentally retarded, and uncontrolled studies6 have proposed mental retardation as a potential risk factor (Table 1). A 2003 case control study6 found a higher incidence of NMS among mentally retarded patients than among nonretarded persons, but the difference was not statistically significant. There are no known links between specific causes of mental retardation and NMS.
Even so, Ms. G’s psychosis is compromising her already diminished quality of life. We will increase her quetiapine dosage slightly and watch for early signs of NMS, including fever, confusion, and increased muscle rigidity.
Table 1
Factors that increase risk of neuroleptic malignant syndrome*
Abrupt antipsychotic cessation |
Ambient heat |
Catatonia |
Dehydration |
Exhaustion |
Genetic predisposition |
Greater dosage increases |
Higher neuroleptic doses, especially with typical and atypical IM agents |
Low serum iron |
Malnutrition |
Mental retardation |
Pre-existing EPS or parkinsonism |
Previous NMS episode |
Psychomotor agitation |
* Infection or concurrent organic brain disease are predisposing factors, but their association with NMS is less clear. |
EPS: extrapyramidal symptoms |
Source: References: 4-7, 14-15. |
TREATMENT: MEDICATION CHANGE
Upon admission, quetiapine is increased to 75 mg in the morning and 125 mg at bedtime—still well below the dosage at which quetiapine increases the risk of NMS (Table 2). Trazodone is decreased to 100 mg/d because of quetiapine’s sedating properties. Citalopram and tolterodine are stopped for fear that either agent would aggravate her psychosis. We continue all other drugs as previously prescribed. Her paranoia begins to subside.
Three days later, Ms. G’s is increasingly confused and agitated, and her temperature rises to 101.3°F. Physical exam shows increased muscle rigidity. She is given lorazepam, 1 mg, and transferred to the emergency room for evaluation.
In the ER, Ms. G’s temperature rises to 102.3°F. Other vital signs include:
- heart rate, 112 to 120 beats per minute
- respiratory rate, 18 to 20 breaths per minute
- oxygen saturation, 98% in room air
- blood pressure, 131/61 mm Hg while seated and 92/58 mm Hg while standing.
CNS or systemic infection and myocardial infarction are considered less likely because of her reactive pupils, lack of nuchal rigidity, troponin 3. Additionally, CSF shows normal glucose and protein levels, ALT and AST are 217 and 261 U/L, respectively, and chest x-ray shows no acute cardiopulmonary abnormality.
Ms. G is admitted to the medical intensive care unit and given IV fluids. All psychotropic and antiparkinson medications are stopped for 12 hours. Ms. G is then transferred to the general medical service for continued observation and IV hydration.
Six hours later, lorazepam, 0.5 mg every 8 hours, is resumed to control Ms. G’s anxiety. Carbidopa/levodopa is resumed at the previous dosage; all other medications remain on hold.
Renal damage is not apparent, but repeat chest x-ray taken 2 days after admission to the ER shows right middle lobe pneumonia, which resolved with antibiotics.
Six days after entering the medical unit, Ms. G is no longer agitated or paranoid. She is discharged that day and continued on lorazepam, 1 mg every 8 hours as needed to control her anxiety and prevent paranoia, and carbidopa/levidopa 8-1/2 25/100-mg tablets daily for her parkinsonism. Trazodone, 100 mg nightly, is continued for 3 days to help her sleep, as is amoxicillin/clavulanate, 500 mg every 8 hours, in case an underlying infection exists. Quetiapine, citalopram, and tolterodine are discontinued; all other medications are resumed as previously prescribed.
Table 2
Antipsychotic-related NMS risk increases at these dosages
Agent | Dosage (mg/d) |
---|---|
Aripiprazole | >30 |
Chlorpromazine | >400 |
Clozapine | 318+/-299 |
Olanzapine | 9.7+/-2.3 |
Quetiapine | 412.5+/-317 |
Risperidone | 4.3+/-3.1 |
Ziprasidone | >20 |
Source: References 4, 6, and 15. |
The authors’ observations
Ms. G’s NMS symptoms surfaced 3 days after her quetiapine dosage was increased, suggesting that the antipsychotic may have caused this episode.
We ruled out antiparkinson agent withdrawal malignant syndrome—usually caused by abrupt cessation of Parkinson’s medications. Ms. G’s carbidopa/levodopa had not been adjusted before the symptoms emerged, and she did not worsen after the agent was stopped temporarily. Her brief pneumonia episode, however, could have caused symptoms that mimicked this withdrawal syndrome.
Antiparkinson agent withdrawal malignant syndrome symptoms resemble those of NMS.9,10 Worsening parkinsonism, dehydration, and infection increase the risk.10 Some research suggests that leukocytosis or elevated inflammation-related cytokines may accelerate withdrawal syndrome.10
The authors’ observations
Ms. G’s case illustrates the difficulty of treating psychosis in a patient at risk for NMS.
Of the 68 patients in the Ananth et al study with atypical antipsychotic-induced NMS, 11 were rechallenged after an NMS episode with the same agent and 8 were switched to another atypical. NMS recurred in 4 of these 19 patients.4
Ms. G was stable on lorazepam at discharge, but we would consider rechallenging with quetiapine or another antipsychotic if necessary. NMS recurs in 30% to 50%11 of patients after antipsychotic rechallenge, but waiting 2 weeks to resume antipsychotic therapy appears to reduce this risk.12 Benzodiazepines and electroconvulsive therapy are acceptable—though unproven—second-line therapies if antipsychotic rechallenge is deemed too risky,11,13 such as in some patients with a previous severe NMS episode; evidence of stroke, Parkinson’s or other neurodegenerative disease; or multiple acute medical problems.
CONTINUED TREATMENT: A RELAPSE
Three months later, Ms. G is readmitted to the neurology service for 3 weeks after being diagnosed with elevated CK, possibly caused by NMS or rhabdomyolysis secondary to persistent dyskinesia. We believe an inadvertent decrease in her carbidopa/levodopa caused the episode, as she had taken no neuroleptics between hospitalizations.
Ms. G is discharged on quetiapine, 25 mg nightly, along with her other medications. Her current psychiatric and neurologic status is unknown.
The authors’ observations
Detecting NMS symptoms early is critical to preventing mortality. Although NMS risk with atypical and typical antipsychotics is similar,4 fewer deaths from NMS have been reported after use of atypicals (3 deaths among 68 cases) than typical neuroleptics (30% mortality rate in the 1960s and 70s, and 10% mortality from 1980-87).14 Earlier recognition and treatment may be decreasing NMS-related mortality.4
Consider NMS in the differential diagnosis when the patient’s mental status changes.
Related resources
- Emedicine: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. www.emedicine.com/med/topic2614.htm.
- Bhanushali MJ, Tuite PJ. The evaluation and management of patients with neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Neurol Clin 2004;22:389-411.
- Susman VL. Clinical management of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Psychiatr Q 2001;72:325-36.
- Amoxicillin/clavulanate • Augmentin
- Aripiprazole • Abilify
- Carbidopa/levodopa • Sinemet
- Chlorpromazine • Thorazine
- Citalopram • Celexa
- Clozapine • Clozaril
- Lopressor • Toprol
- Lorazepam • Ativan
- Olanzapine • Zyprexa
- Pramipexole • Mirapex
- Quetiapine • Seroquel
- Risperidone • Risperdal
- Tolterodine • Detrol
- Trazodone • Desyrel
- Ziprasidone • Geodon
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Robert B. Milstein, MD, PhD, and Benjamin Zigun, MD, JD, for their help in preparing this article for publication.
This project is supported by funds from the Division of State, Community, and Public Health, Bureau of Health Professions (BHPr), Health Resources and Services Administration (HSRA), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) under grant number 1 K01 HP 00071-02 and Geriatric Academic Career Award ($58,009). The content and conclusion are those of Dr. Tampi and are not the official position or policy of, nor should be any endorsements be inferred by, the Bureau of Health Professions, HRSA, DHHS or the United States Government.
1. Samii A, Nutt JG, Ransom BR. Parkinson’s disease Lancet 2004;363(9423):1783-93.
2. Reddy S, Factor SA, Molho ES, Feustel PJ. The effect of quetiapine on psychosis and motor function in parkinsonian patients with and without dementia. Movement Disord 2002;17:676-81.
3. Kang GA, Bronstein JM. Psychosis in nursing home patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2004;5:167-73.
4. Ananth J, Parameswaran S, Gunatilake S, et al. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and atypical antipsychotic drugs. J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65:464-70.
5. Mann SC, Caroff SN, Keck PE, Jr, et al. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. In: Mann SC, Caroff SN, Keck PE Jr, et al. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and related conditions (2nd ed). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2003;1:44.-
6. Viejo LF, Morales V, Punal P, et al. Risk factors in neuroleptic malignant syndrome. A case-control study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2003;107:45-9.
7. Adnet P, Lestavel P, Krivosic-Horber R. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome Br J Anaesthesia 2000;85:129-35.
8. Takubo H, Shimoda-Matsubayashi S, Mizuno Y. Serum creatine kinase is elevated in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a case controlled study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2003;9 suppl 1:S43-S46.
9. Mizuno Y, Takubo H, Mizuta E, Kuno S. Malignant syndrome in Parkinson’s disease: concept and review of the literature. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2003;9 suppl 1:S3-S9.
10. Hashimoto T, Tokuda T, Hanyu N, et al. Withdrawal of levodopa and other risk factors for malignant syndrome in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2003;9 suppl 1:S25-S30.
11. Bhanushali MJ, Tuite PJ. The evaluation and management of patients with neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Neurol Clin 2004;22:389-411.
12. Rosebush P, Stewart T. A prospective analysis of 24 episodes of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am J Psychiatry 1989;146:717-25.
13. Susman VL. Clinical management of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Psychiatr Q 2001;72:325-36.
14. Caroff S, Mann SC. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Med Clin North Am 1993;77:185-202.
15. Woods SW. Chlorpromazine equivalent doses for the newer atypical antipsychotics. J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64:663-7.
1. Samii A, Nutt JG, Ransom BR. Parkinson’s disease Lancet 2004;363(9423):1783-93.
2. Reddy S, Factor SA, Molho ES, Feustel PJ. The effect of quetiapine on psychosis and motor function in parkinsonian patients with and without dementia. Movement Disord 2002;17:676-81.
3. Kang GA, Bronstein JM. Psychosis in nursing home patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2004;5:167-73.
4. Ananth J, Parameswaran S, Gunatilake S, et al. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and atypical antipsychotic drugs. J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65:464-70.
5. Mann SC, Caroff SN, Keck PE, Jr, et al. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. In: Mann SC, Caroff SN, Keck PE Jr, et al. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and related conditions (2nd ed). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2003;1:44.-
6. Viejo LF, Morales V, Punal P, et al. Risk factors in neuroleptic malignant syndrome. A case-control study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2003;107:45-9.
7. Adnet P, Lestavel P, Krivosic-Horber R. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome Br J Anaesthesia 2000;85:129-35.
8. Takubo H, Shimoda-Matsubayashi S, Mizuno Y. Serum creatine kinase is elevated in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a case controlled study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2003;9 suppl 1:S43-S46.
9. Mizuno Y, Takubo H, Mizuta E, Kuno S. Malignant syndrome in Parkinson’s disease: concept and review of the literature. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2003;9 suppl 1:S3-S9.
10. Hashimoto T, Tokuda T, Hanyu N, et al. Withdrawal of levodopa and other risk factors for malignant syndrome in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2003;9 suppl 1:S25-S30.
11. Bhanushali MJ, Tuite PJ. The evaluation and management of patients with neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Neurol Clin 2004;22:389-411.
12. Rosebush P, Stewart T. A prospective analysis of 24 episodes of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am J Psychiatry 1989;146:717-25.
13. Susman VL. Clinical management of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Psychiatr Q 2001;72:325-36.
14. Caroff S, Mann SC. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Med Clin North Am 1993;77:185-202.
15. Woods SW. Chlorpromazine equivalent doses for the newer atypical antipsychotics. J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64:663-7.
From active to apathetic
Presentation: Strange change
Mr. A, age 66, has lived an active life but now just sits around most of the day. Once an early riser, he is sleeping until 11 AM or noon daily. His wife frequently must motivate him to get out of bed.
Mr. A’s wife describes him as good-natured and extroverted, but she says lately he has also become increasingly withdrawn and quiet. People often think he is angry with them.
His dining habits also have changed. He used to wait until everyone had been served before beginning his meal, but he now starts eating immediately. He often overeats and has gained 15 pounds over 1 year.
Mr. A has always driven manual-transmission vehicles but has trouble remembering how to shift gears on his new car. While visiting his daughter, he could not operate the bathroom faucets properly and scalded himself. His daughter also noticed he does not wash his hands before eating or after toileting.
Findings. Mr. A presents to our clinic at his wife’s and daughter’s insistence but says his memory is fine and he can perform all activities of daily living (ADL). He denies depressive, anxiety, or psychotic symptoms but has hypertension and probable benign prostatic hypertrophy. He is taking ramipril, 5 mg/d for hypertension, donepezil, 10 mg/d for cognitive deficits, and aspirin, 325 mg/d to prevent a heart attack. Physical exam shows no gross neurologic abnormalities. Organ systems are normal.
Mr. A’s Folstein Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score (22/30) indicates cognitive impairment. During his mental status exam, he is pleasant, cooperative, and makes good eye contact. He answers appropriately, but his speech lacks spontaneity. He smiles throughout the interview, even while discussing serious questions regarding his health. He is fully oriented but lacks insight into his deficits.
Brain MRI, ordered after he had presented to another hospital with similar complaints, is normal. PET scan shows frontal lobe hypometabolism, right greater than left, and mild underperfusion of the right basal ganglia and right temporal lobe.
Table 1
Frontotemporal dementia subtypes and their clinical features
Type | Clinical features |
---|---|
Corticobasal degeneration | Onset around age 60 |
Symptoms may be unilateral at first and progress slowly | |
Poor coordination, akinesia, rigidity, disequilibrium, limb dystonia | |
Cognitive and visual-spatial impairments, apraxia, hesitant/halting speech, myoclonus, dysphagia | |
Eventual inability to walk | |
Frontotemporal dementia with motor neuron disease | Behavioral changes, emotional lability |
Decreased spontaneous speech | |
Bulbar weakness with dysarthria and dysphagia, weakness, muscle wasting, fasciculations in hands and feet | |
Frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 | Behavioral disturbance, cognitive impairment, parkinsonism |
Neurologic symptoms usually arise in patients’ 30s to 50s | |
Progressive fluent aphasia (semantic dementia) | Trouble remembering words |
Loss of semantic memory, although episodic memory is good | |
Symmetric anterolateral temporal atrophy; hippocampal formation relatively intact | |
Atrophy usually more pronounced on the left side4 | |
Progressive nonfluent aphasia | Behavioral changes rare |
Global cognition declines over time | |
Speech dysfluency, difficulty finding words, phonologic errors in conversation; comprehension is preserved |
The authors’ observations
Mr. A’s clinical course suggests frontotemporal dementia (FTD), a spectrum of non-Alzheimer’s dementias characterized by focal atrophy of the brain’s frontal and anterior temporal regions (Table 1). These dementias loosely share clinicopathologic features, including:
- decline in social interpersonal conduct
- emotional blunting
- loss of insight
- disinhibition.1
FTD is the second most-common cause of dementia after AD in the years preceding old age but remains underdiagnosed. Onset is most common between ages 45 to 65 but can occur before age 30 and in the elderly.
FTD’s clinical presentation usually reflects distribution of pathologic changes rather than a precise histologic subtype. Major clinical presentations include a frontal or behavioral variant (frontal variant FTD associated with corticobasal degeneration or motor neuron disease), a progressive fluent aphasia (temporal lobe variant FTD), and a progressive nonfluent aphasia. Mr. A’s lack of initiative, emotional reactivity, and loss of social graces with normal speech pattern suggest frontal variant FTD.
Behavioral changes associated with FTD include:
- Decline in social conduct, including tactlessness and breaches of etiquette, associated with predominantly right-hemisphere pathology.3
- Apathy, which correlates with severity of medial frontal-anterior cingulate involvement.
- Dietary changes—typically overeating (hyperorality) with a preference for sweets.4
Cognitive changes in FTD—attentional deficits, poor abstraction, difficulty shifting mental set, and perseverative tendencies—point to frontal lobe involvement.3
Neurologic signs usually are absent early in the disease, although patients may display primitive reflexes. As FTD progresses, patients may develop parkinsonian signs of akinesia and rigidity, which can be marked. Some develop neurologic signs consistent with motor neuron disease.3
Differential diagnosis. FTD is most often mistaken for AD. In one study, FTD was found at autopsy in 18 of 21 patients who had been diagnosed with AD.5 Cerebrovascular dementia, Huntington’s disease, Lewy body dementia, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease are other differential diagnoses.
Suspect FTD if behavioral symptoms become more prominent than cognitive decline. In one study,6 patients with FTD exhibited:
- early loss of social awareness
- early loss of personal awareness
- progressive loss of speech
- stereotyped and perseverative behaviors
- and/or hyperorality.
The authors’ observations
Clinical evaluation for FTD should include a neuropsychiatric assessment, neuropsychological testing, and neuroimaging.
Neuropsychiatric assessment. Unlike AD, cholinergic acetyltransferase and acetylcholinesterase activity is well-preserved in FTD. Serotonergic disturbances are more common in FTD than in AD and are linked to impulsivity, irritability, and changes in affect and eating behavior.
On neuropsychological testing, memory is relatively intact. Orientation and recall of recent personal events is good, but anterograde memory test performance is variable. Patients with FTD often do poorly on recall-based tasks. Spontaneous conversation is often reduced, but patients perform well on semantic-based tasks and visuospatial tests when organizational aspects are minimized.
The MMSE is unreliable for detecting and monitoring patients with FTD. For example, some who require nursing home care have normal MMSE scores.4 Frontal executive tasks—such as the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Stroop Test, and verbal fluency examinations—can uncover dorsolateral dysfunction. Quantifiable decision-making and risk-taking exercises can reveal orbitobasal dysfunction.4
Neuroimaging. MRI shows left temporal lobe atrophy in patients with primary progressive aphasia; both frontal lobes are atrophic in frontal variant FTD. By contrast, the mesial temporal lobes are atrophic in AD.7 Frontal and anterior temporal lobe atrophy become more apparent in the latter stages of frontal variant FTD.4
Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using technetium and hexylmethylpropylene amineoxine can detect ventromedial frontal hypoperfusion before atrophy is evident. Order SPECT when the diagnosis is uncertain or the presentation or disease course is unusual.
Treatment: Taking aim at apathy
Donepezil, 10 mg/d, was continued to address Mr. A’s cognitive decline. Bupropion, 100 mg/d, was added to deal with his apathy and low energy. We saw him every 4 months.
Table 2
Medications shown beneficial for treating FTD
Drug | Targeted symptoms | Possible side effects |
---|---|---|
Donepezil | Cognition functions including memory | Nausea, anorexia, diarrhea, weight loss, sedation, confusion |
Dopamine agonist (bromocriptine) | Behavioral disturbances* | Confusion, agitation, hallucinations |
SSRIs (sertraline, fluoxetine) | Behavioral disturbances | Nausea, anorexia, diarrhea, weight loss, sexual dysfunction |
Stimulants (methylphenidate) | Behavioral disturbances, somnolence | Insomnia, increased irritability, poor appetite, weight loss |
Trazodone | Behavioral disturbances | Sedation, orthostasis, priapism |
* Apathy, carbohydrate craving, disinhibition, irritability | ||
SSRI: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor |
On follow-up, Mr. A’s gait is slower, and he has “shakiness” and mild finger clumsiness. Physical exam shows no problems and he is fully oriented, but his MMSE score (17/30) indicates further cognitive loss and he still lacks insight into his condition. Neuropsychological tests reveal:
- marked delays in processing and acting on information
- diminished working memory
- trouble understanding spatial functions
- decreased speech
- moderate to severe executive function impairments
- severe impairments in fine-motor dexterity, receptive and expressive language, and verbal and visual memory.
Bupropion alleviated Mr. A’s apathy at first, but an increase to 200 mg/d led to tremors and disrupted sleep. Bupropion was decreased to 150 mg/d; we would add a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) if apathy persisted. We advised his wife and daughter to take him to adult day care and to make sure he does not drive. Follow-up interval is reduced to 2 months.
Eight weeks later, Mr. A is confused and anxious and his affect is remarkably flat, but he behaves appropriately in day care. We stopped bupropion because it did not resolve his apathy.
The authors’ observations
Treat apathy, avolition, anhedonia, social withdrawal, irritability, and/or inappropriate behaviors if these symptoms compromise quality of life for the patient and caregiver. Also try to preserve cognitive function.
Few large-scale clinical trials have addressed FTD pharmacotherapy (Table 2). In an open-label trial, 11 patients with FTD took sertraline, 50 to 125 mg/d, paroxetine, 20 mg/d, or fluoxetine, 20 mg/d. After 3 months, no one’s symptoms worsened and nine patients (82%) had reduced disinhibition, depressive symptoms, carbohydrate craving, and/or compulsions.5
In another open-label, uncontrolled trial, behavioral symptoms improved in eight patients with FTD who took paroxetine, up to 20 mg/d for 14 months. Baseline global performance, cognition, and planning scores remained stable, but attention and abstract reasoning were decreased. Side effects were tolerable.8
In a 12-week crossover study, 26 patients with FTD received placebo or trazodone, 150 or 300 mg/d depending on dose tolerability. Irritability, agitation, depressive symptoms, and/or eating disorders improved significantly in 10 patients, and behavioral disturbances decreased >25% in 16 patients. Trazodone also was well tolerated.9
Dopamine use in FTD can contribute to behavioral dysregulation. D2 blockers occasionally are used to manage behavioral disturbances, but selective dopamine agonists might be more beneficial. Recent studies suggest that bromocriptine, a D1 and D2 dopaminergic agonist, may improve select frontal features and perseveration in dementia.10
In one case report, quantitative EEG correlated with SPECT showed that methylphenidate, dose unknown, helped improve behavior and normalize profoundly imbalanced bifrontotemporal slowing.11
Recommendation. Try sertraline, 50 to 125 mg/d, or fluoxetine, 20 mg/d, to address behavioral symptoms. Paroxetine is another option, but use it cautiously as its anticholinergic properties could cause confusion in older patients. If the patient does not respond to the SSRI after 6 to 8 weeks, try trazodone, 150 to 300 mg/d.
Conclusion: The 15-month mark
We started citalopram, 20 mg/d, to treat Mr. A’s apathy and anxiety; and memantine, 5 mg/d titrated to 10 mg bid, to try to slow his cognitive and functional decline. Donepezil, 10 mg/d, was continued.
We encouraged Mr. A’s wife and daughter to take him to adult day care as often as possible. Mr. A also was placed on a waiting list for a skilled nursing facility.
Mr. A continued to worsen. Fifteen months after initial presentation, he is incontinent of urine and feces and needs help performing most basic ADLs. He continues to overeat and has gained 6.3 pounds over 4 months. His MMSE score (12/30) indicates severe cognitive impairment.
The authors’ observations
Many patients with FTD eventually need long-term placement, a change in environment marked by unfamiliar faces and disrupted routines. Patients often react by becoming disorganized, irritable, and agitated.
No standard method exists to structure this transition for FTD patients. In rare cases, patients have been transferred to secure units for medication management until stabilized.12
Help calm the patient’s fears by describing the typical nursing home and the range of services it offers. Arrange a meeting with the patient, primary care physician, and the nursing home’s intake coordinator to review available services. Make sure the patient and caregiver receive brochures and other literature about the facility.
Related resources
- Association for Frontotemporal Dementias. www.ftd-picks.org.
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Pick’s Disease Information Page. Available at: www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/picks/picks.htm. Accessed Jan. 11, 2005.
- Family Caregiver Alliance. Frontotemporal Dementia. Available at: www.caregiver.org/caregiver/jsp/content_node.jsp?nodeid=573&expandnodeid=384. Accessed Jan. 11, 2005.
- Bromocriptine • Parlodel
- Bupropion • Wellbutrin
- Citalopram • Celexa
- Donepezil • Aricept
- Fluoxetine • Prozac
- Memantine • Namenda
- Methylphenidate • Concerta, Ritalin
- Paroxetine • Paxil
- Sertraline • Zoloft
- Trazodone • Desyrel
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Acknowledgment
This project is supported by the Division of State, Community, and Public Health, Bureau of Health Professions (BHPr), Health Resources and Services Administration (HSRA), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) under grant 1 K01 HP 00071-01 and Geriatric Academic Career Award. The information is that of Dr. Tampi and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by, the BPHr, HRSA, DHHS or the U.S. Government.”
1. The Lund and Manchester Groups: Clinical and neuropathological criteria for frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:416-18.
2. Kertesz A, Munoz DG. Frontotemporal dementia. Med Clin North Am 2002;86:501-18.
3. Snowden JS, Neary D, Mann DM. Frontotemporal dementia. Br J Psychiatry 2003;180:140-3.
4. Hodges JR. Frontotemporal dementia (Pick’s disease): clinical features and assessment. Neurology 2001;56(suppl 4):S6-S10.
5. Swartz JR, Miller BL, Lesser IM, Darby AL. Frontotemporal dementia: treatment response to serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors. J Clin Psychiatry 1997;58:212-16.
6. Miller BL, Ikonte C, Ponton M, et al. A study of the Lund-Manchester research criteria for frontotemporal dementia: clinical and single photon emission CT correlations. Neurology 1997;48:937-42.
7. Pasquier F, Fukui I, Sarazin M, et al. Laboratory investigations and treatment in frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol 2003;53(suppl 5):S32-S35.
8. Moretti R, Torre P, Antonello RM, et al. Frontotemporal dementia: paroxetine as a possible treatment of behavior symptoms. a randomized, controlled, open 14-month study. Eur Neurol 2003;49:13-19.
9. Lebert F, Stekke W, Hasenbroekx C, Pasquier F. Frontotemporal dementia: A randomized, controlled trial with trazodone. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004;17:355-9.
10. Imamura T, Takanashi M, Harroti N, et al. Bromocriptine treatment for perseveration in demented patients. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1998;12:109-13.
11. Goforth HW, Konopka L, Primeau M, et al. Quantitative electroencephalography in frontotemporal dementia with methylphenidate response: a case study. Clin EEG Neurosci 2004;35:108-11.
12. Merrilees JJ, Miller BL. Long-term care of patients with frontotemporal dementia. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2003;4(suppl6):S162-S164.
Presentation: Strange change
Mr. A, age 66, has lived an active life but now just sits around most of the day. Once an early riser, he is sleeping until 11 AM or noon daily. His wife frequently must motivate him to get out of bed.
Mr. A’s wife describes him as good-natured and extroverted, but she says lately he has also become increasingly withdrawn and quiet. People often think he is angry with them.
His dining habits also have changed. He used to wait until everyone had been served before beginning his meal, but he now starts eating immediately. He often overeats and has gained 15 pounds over 1 year.
Mr. A has always driven manual-transmission vehicles but has trouble remembering how to shift gears on his new car. While visiting his daughter, he could not operate the bathroom faucets properly and scalded himself. His daughter also noticed he does not wash his hands before eating or after toileting.
Findings. Mr. A presents to our clinic at his wife’s and daughter’s insistence but says his memory is fine and he can perform all activities of daily living (ADL). He denies depressive, anxiety, or psychotic symptoms but has hypertension and probable benign prostatic hypertrophy. He is taking ramipril, 5 mg/d for hypertension, donepezil, 10 mg/d for cognitive deficits, and aspirin, 325 mg/d to prevent a heart attack. Physical exam shows no gross neurologic abnormalities. Organ systems are normal.
Mr. A’s Folstein Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score (22/30) indicates cognitive impairment. During his mental status exam, he is pleasant, cooperative, and makes good eye contact. He answers appropriately, but his speech lacks spontaneity. He smiles throughout the interview, even while discussing serious questions regarding his health. He is fully oriented but lacks insight into his deficits.
Brain MRI, ordered after he had presented to another hospital with similar complaints, is normal. PET scan shows frontal lobe hypometabolism, right greater than left, and mild underperfusion of the right basal ganglia and right temporal lobe.
Table 1
Frontotemporal dementia subtypes and their clinical features
Type | Clinical features |
---|---|
Corticobasal degeneration | Onset around age 60 |
Symptoms may be unilateral at first and progress slowly | |
Poor coordination, akinesia, rigidity, disequilibrium, limb dystonia | |
Cognitive and visual-spatial impairments, apraxia, hesitant/halting speech, myoclonus, dysphagia | |
Eventual inability to walk | |
Frontotemporal dementia with motor neuron disease | Behavioral changes, emotional lability |
Decreased spontaneous speech | |
Bulbar weakness with dysarthria and dysphagia, weakness, muscle wasting, fasciculations in hands and feet | |
Frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 | Behavioral disturbance, cognitive impairment, parkinsonism |
Neurologic symptoms usually arise in patients’ 30s to 50s | |
Progressive fluent aphasia (semantic dementia) | Trouble remembering words |
Loss of semantic memory, although episodic memory is good | |
Symmetric anterolateral temporal atrophy; hippocampal formation relatively intact | |
Atrophy usually more pronounced on the left side4 | |
Progressive nonfluent aphasia | Behavioral changes rare |
Global cognition declines over time | |
Speech dysfluency, difficulty finding words, phonologic errors in conversation; comprehension is preserved |
The authors’ observations
Mr. A’s clinical course suggests frontotemporal dementia (FTD), a spectrum of non-Alzheimer’s dementias characterized by focal atrophy of the brain’s frontal and anterior temporal regions (Table 1). These dementias loosely share clinicopathologic features, including:
- decline in social interpersonal conduct
- emotional blunting
- loss of insight
- disinhibition.1
FTD is the second most-common cause of dementia after AD in the years preceding old age but remains underdiagnosed. Onset is most common between ages 45 to 65 but can occur before age 30 and in the elderly.
FTD’s clinical presentation usually reflects distribution of pathologic changes rather than a precise histologic subtype. Major clinical presentations include a frontal or behavioral variant (frontal variant FTD associated with corticobasal degeneration or motor neuron disease), a progressive fluent aphasia (temporal lobe variant FTD), and a progressive nonfluent aphasia. Mr. A’s lack of initiative, emotional reactivity, and loss of social graces with normal speech pattern suggest frontal variant FTD.
Behavioral changes associated with FTD include:
- Decline in social conduct, including tactlessness and breaches of etiquette, associated with predominantly right-hemisphere pathology.3
- Apathy, which correlates with severity of medial frontal-anterior cingulate involvement.
- Dietary changes—typically overeating (hyperorality) with a preference for sweets.4
Cognitive changes in FTD—attentional deficits, poor abstraction, difficulty shifting mental set, and perseverative tendencies—point to frontal lobe involvement.3
Neurologic signs usually are absent early in the disease, although patients may display primitive reflexes. As FTD progresses, patients may develop parkinsonian signs of akinesia and rigidity, which can be marked. Some develop neurologic signs consistent with motor neuron disease.3
Differential diagnosis. FTD is most often mistaken for AD. In one study, FTD was found at autopsy in 18 of 21 patients who had been diagnosed with AD.5 Cerebrovascular dementia, Huntington’s disease, Lewy body dementia, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease are other differential diagnoses.
Suspect FTD if behavioral symptoms become more prominent than cognitive decline. In one study,6 patients with FTD exhibited:
- early loss of social awareness
- early loss of personal awareness
- progressive loss of speech
- stereotyped and perseverative behaviors
- and/or hyperorality.
The authors’ observations
Clinical evaluation for FTD should include a neuropsychiatric assessment, neuropsychological testing, and neuroimaging.
Neuropsychiatric assessment. Unlike AD, cholinergic acetyltransferase and acetylcholinesterase activity is well-preserved in FTD. Serotonergic disturbances are more common in FTD than in AD and are linked to impulsivity, irritability, and changes in affect and eating behavior.
On neuropsychological testing, memory is relatively intact. Orientation and recall of recent personal events is good, but anterograde memory test performance is variable. Patients with FTD often do poorly on recall-based tasks. Spontaneous conversation is often reduced, but patients perform well on semantic-based tasks and visuospatial tests when organizational aspects are minimized.
The MMSE is unreliable for detecting and monitoring patients with FTD. For example, some who require nursing home care have normal MMSE scores.4 Frontal executive tasks—such as the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Stroop Test, and verbal fluency examinations—can uncover dorsolateral dysfunction. Quantifiable decision-making and risk-taking exercises can reveal orbitobasal dysfunction.4
Neuroimaging. MRI shows left temporal lobe atrophy in patients with primary progressive aphasia; both frontal lobes are atrophic in frontal variant FTD. By contrast, the mesial temporal lobes are atrophic in AD.7 Frontal and anterior temporal lobe atrophy become more apparent in the latter stages of frontal variant FTD.4
Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using technetium and hexylmethylpropylene amineoxine can detect ventromedial frontal hypoperfusion before atrophy is evident. Order SPECT when the diagnosis is uncertain or the presentation or disease course is unusual.
Treatment: Taking aim at apathy
Donepezil, 10 mg/d, was continued to address Mr. A’s cognitive decline. Bupropion, 100 mg/d, was added to deal with his apathy and low energy. We saw him every 4 months.
Table 2
Medications shown beneficial for treating FTD
Drug | Targeted symptoms | Possible side effects |
---|---|---|
Donepezil | Cognition functions including memory | Nausea, anorexia, diarrhea, weight loss, sedation, confusion |
Dopamine agonist (bromocriptine) | Behavioral disturbances* | Confusion, agitation, hallucinations |
SSRIs (sertraline, fluoxetine) | Behavioral disturbances | Nausea, anorexia, diarrhea, weight loss, sexual dysfunction |
Stimulants (methylphenidate) | Behavioral disturbances, somnolence | Insomnia, increased irritability, poor appetite, weight loss |
Trazodone | Behavioral disturbances | Sedation, orthostasis, priapism |
* Apathy, carbohydrate craving, disinhibition, irritability | ||
SSRI: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor |
On follow-up, Mr. A’s gait is slower, and he has “shakiness” and mild finger clumsiness. Physical exam shows no problems and he is fully oriented, but his MMSE score (17/30) indicates further cognitive loss and he still lacks insight into his condition. Neuropsychological tests reveal:
- marked delays in processing and acting on information
- diminished working memory
- trouble understanding spatial functions
- decreased speech
- moderate to severe executive function impairments
- severe impairments in fine-motor dexterity, receptive and expressive language, and verbal and visual memory.
Bupropion alleviated Mr. A’s apathy at first, but an increase to 200 mg/d led to tremors and disrupted sleep. Bupropion was decreased to 150 mg/d; we would add a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) if apathy persisted. We advised his wife and daughter to take him to adult day care and to make sure he does not drive. Follow-up interval is reduced to 2 months.
Eight weeks later, Mr. A is confused and anxious and his affect is remarkably flat, but he behaves appropriately in day care. We stopped bupropion because it did not resolve his apathy.
The authors’ observations
Treat apathy, avolition, anhedonia, social withdrawal, irritability, and/or inappropriate behaviors if these symptoms compromise quality of life for the patient and caregiver. Also try to preserve cognitive function.
Few large-scale clinical trials have addressed FTD pharmacotherapy (Table 2). In an open-label trial, 11 patients with FTD took sertraline, 50 to 125 mg/d, paroxetine, 20 mg/d, or fluoxetine, 20 mg/d. After 3 months, no one’s symptoms worsened and nine patients (82%) had reduced disinhibition, depressive symptoms, carbohydrate craving, and/or compulsions.5
In another open-label, uncontrolled trial, behavioral symptoms improved in eight patients with FTD who took paroxetine, up to 20 mg/d for 14 months. Baseline global performance, cognition, and planning scores remained stable, but attention and abstract reasoning were decreased. Side effects were tolerable.8
In a 12-week crossover study, 26 patients with FTD received placebo or trazodone, 150 or 300 mg/d depending on dose tolerability. Irritability, agitation, depressive symptoms, and/or eating disorders improved significantly in 10 patients, and behavioral disturbances decreased >25% in 16 patients. Trazodone also was well tolerated.9
Dopamine use in FTD can contribute to behavioral dysregulation. D2 blockers occasionally are used to manage behavioral disturbances, but selective dopamine agonists might be more beneficial. Recent studies suggest that bromocriptine, a D1 and D2 dopaminergic agonist, may improve select frontal features and perseveration in dementia.10
In one case report, quantitative EEG correlated with SPECT showed that methylphenidate, dose unknown, helped improve behavior and normalize profoundly imbalanced bifrontotemporal slowing.11
Recommendation. Try sertraline, 50 to 125 mg/d, or fluoxetine, 20 mg/d, to address behavioral symptoms. Paroxetine is another option, but use it cautiously as its anticholinergic properties could cause confusion in older patients. If the patient does not respond to the SSRI after 6 to 8 weeks, try trazodone, 150 to 300 mg/d.
Conclusion: The 15-month mark
We started citalopram, 20 mg/d, to treat Mr. A’s apathy and anxiety; and memantine, 5 mg/d titrated to 10 mg bid, to try to slow his cognitive and functional decline. Donepezil, 10 mg/d, was continued.
We encouraged Mr. A’s wife and daughter to take him to adult day care as often as possible. Mr. A also was placed on a waiting list for a skilled nursing facility.
Mr. A continued to worsen. Fifteen months after initial presentation, he is incontinent of urine and feces and needs help performing most basic ADLs. He continues to overeat and has gained 6.3 pounds over 4 months. His MMSE score (12/30) indicates severe cognitive impairment.
The authors’ observations
Many patients with FTD eventually need long-term placement, a change in environment marked by unfamiliar faces and disrupted routines. Patients often react by becoming disorganized, irritable, and agitated.
No standard method exists to structure this transition for FTD patients. In rare cases, patients have been transferred to secure units for medication management until stabilized.12
Help calm the patient’s fears by describing the typical nursing home and the range of services it offers. Arrange a meeting with the patient, primary care physician, and the nursing home’s intake coordinator to review available services. Make sure the patient and caregiver receive brochures and other literature about the facility.
Related resources
- Association for Frontotemporal Dementias. www.ftd-picks.org.
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Pick’s Disease Information Page. Available at: www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/picks/picks.htm. Accessed Jan. 11, 2005.
- Family Caregiver Alliance. Frontotemporal Dementia. Available at: www.caregiver.org/caregiver/jsp/content_node.jsp?nodeid=573&expandnodeid=384. Accessed Jan. 11, 2005.
- Bromocriptine • Parlodel
- Bupropion • Wellbutrin
- Citalopram • Celexa
- Donepezil • Aricept
- Fluoxetine • Prozac
- Memantine • Namenda
- Methylphenidate • Concerta, Ritalin
- Paroxetine • Paxil
- Sertraline • Zoloft
- Trazodone • Desyrel
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Acknowledgment
This project is supported by the Division of State, Community, and Public Health, Bureau of Health Professions (BHPr), Health Resources and Services Administration (HSRA), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) under grant 1 K01 HP 00071-01 and Geriatric Academic Career Award. The information is that of Dr. Tampi and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by, the BPHr, HRSA, DHHS or the U.S. Government.”
Presentation: Strange change
Mr. A, age 66, has lived an active life but now just sits around most of the day. Once an early riser, he is sleeping until 11 AM or noon daily. His wife frequently must motivate him to get out of bed.
Mr. A’s wife describes him as good-natured and extroverted, but she says lately he has also become increasingly withdrawn and quiet. People often think he is angry with them.
His dining habits also have changed. He used to wait until everyone had been served before beginning his meal, but he now starts eating immediately. He often overeats and has gained 15 pounds over 1 year.
Mr. A has always driven manual-transmission vehicles but has trouble remembering how to shift gears on his new car. While visiting his daughter, he could not operate the bathroom faucets properly and scalded himself. His daughter also noticed he does not wash his hands before eating or after toileting.
Findings. Mr. A presents to our clinic at his wife’s and daughter’s insistence but says his memory is fine and he can perform all activities of daily living (ADL). He denies depressive, anxiety, or psychotic symptoms but has hypertension and probable benign prostatic hypertrophy. He is taking ramipril, 5 mg/d for hypertension, donepezil, 10 mg/d for cognitive deficits, and aspirin, 325 mg/d to prevent a heart attack. Physical exam shows no gross neurologic abnormalities. Organ systems are normal.
Mr. A’s Folstein Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score (22/30) indicates cognitive impairment. During his mental status exam, he is pleasant, cooperative, and makes good eye contact. He answers appropriately, but his speech lacks spontaneity. He smiles throughout the interview, even while discussing serious questions regarding his health. He is fully oriented but lacks insight into his deficits.
Brain MRI, ordered after he had presented to another hospital with similar complaints, is normal. PET scan shows frontal lobe hypometabolism, right greater than left, and mild underperfusion of the right basal ganglia and right temporal lobe.
Table 1
Frontotemporal dementia subtypes and their clinical features
Type | Clinical features |
---|---|
Corticobasal degeneration | Onset around age 60 |
Symptoms may be unilateral at first and progress slowly | |
Poor coordination, akinesia, rigidity, disequilibrium, limb dystonia | |
Cognitive and visual-spatial impairments, apraxia, hesitant/halting speech, myoclonus, dysphagia | |
Eventual inability to walk | |
Frontotemporal dementia with motor neuron disease | Behavioral changes, emotional lability |
Decreased spontaneous speech | |
Bulbar weakness with dysarthria and dysphagia, weakness, muscle wasting, fasciculations in hands and feet | |
Frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 | Behavioral disturbance, cognitive impairment, parkinsonism |
Neurologic symptoms usually arise in patients’ 30s to 50s | |
Progressive fluent aphasia (semantic dementia) | Trouble remembering words |
Loss of semantic memory, although episodic memory is good | |
Symmetric anterolateral temporal atrophy; hippocampal formation relatively intact | |
Atrophy usually more pronounced on the left side4 | |
Progressive nonfluent aphasia | Behavioral changes rare |
Global cognition declines over time | |
Speech dysfluency, difficulty finding words, phonologic errors in conversation; comprehension is preserved |
The authors’ observations
Mr. A’s clinical course suggests frontotemporal dementia (FTD), a spectrum of non-Alzheimer’s dementias characterized by focal atrophy of the brain’s frontal and anterior temporal regions (Table 1). These dementias loosely share clinicopathologic features, including:
- decline in social interpersonal conduct
- emotional blunting
- loss of insight
- disinhibition.1
FTD is the second most-common cause of dementia after AD in the years preceding old age but remains underdiagnosed. Onset is most common between ages 45 to 65 but can occur before age 30 and in the elderly.
FTD’s clinical presentation usually reflects distribution of pathologic changes rather than a precise histologic subtype. Major clinical presentations include a frontal or behavioral variant (frontal variant FTD associated with corticobasal degeneration or motor neuron disease), a progressive fluent aphasia (temporal lobe variant FTD), and a progressive nonfluent aphasia. Mr. A’s lack of initiative, emotional reactivity, and loss of social graces with normal speech pattern suggest frontal variant FTD.
Behavioral changes associated with FTD include:
- Decline in social conduct, including tactlessness and breaches of etiquette, associated with predominantly right-hemisphere pathology.3
- Apathy, which correlates with severity of medial frontal-anterior cingulate involvement.
- Dietary changes—typically overeating (hyperorality) with a preference for sweets.4
Cognitive changes in FTD—attentional deficits, poor abstraction, difficulty shifting mental set, and perseverative tendencies—point to frontal lobe involvement.3
Neurologic signs usually are absent early in the disease, although patients may display primitive reflexes. As FTD progresses, patients may develop parkinsonian signs of akinesia and rigidity, which can be marked. Some develop neurologic signs consistent with motor neuron disease.3
Differential diagnosis. FTD is most often mistaken for AD. In one study, FTD was found at autopsy in 18 of 21 patients who had been diagnosed with AD.5 Cerebrovascular dementia, Huntington’s disease, Lewy body dementia, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease are other differential diagnoses.
Suspect FTD if behavioral symptoms become more prominent than cognitive decline. In one study,6 patients with FTD exhibited:
- early loss of social awareness
- early loss of personal awareness
- progressive loss of speech
- stereotyped and perseverative behaviors
- and/or hyperorality.
The authors’ observations
Clinical evaluation for FTD should include a neuropsychiatric assessment, neuropsychological testing, and neuroimaging.
Neuropsychiatric assessment. Unlike AD, cholinergic acetyltransferase and acetylcholinesterase activity is well-preserved in FTD. Serotonergic disturbances are more common in FTD than in AD and are linked to impulsivity, irritability, and changes in affect and eating behavior.
On neuropsychological testing, memory is relatively intact. Orientation and recall of recent personal events is good, but anterograde memory test performance is variable. Patients with FTD often do poorly on recall-based tasks. Spontaneous conversation is often reduced, but patients perform well on semantic-based tasks and visuospatial tests when organizational aspects are minimized.
The MMSE is unreliable for detecting and monitoring patients with FTD. For example, some who require nursing home care have normal MMSE scores.4 Frontal executive tasks—such as the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Stroop Test, and verbal fluency examinations—can uncover dorsolateral dysfunction. Quantifiable decision-making and risk-taking exercises can reveal orbitobasal dysfunction.4
Neuroimaging. MRI shows left temporal lobe atrophy in patients with primary progressive aphasia; both frontal lobes are atrophic in frontal variant FTD. By contrast, the mesial temporal lobes are atrophic in AD.7 Frontal and anterior temporal lobe atrophy become more apparent in the latter stages of frontal variant FTD.4
Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using technetium and hexylmethylpropylene amineoxine can detect ventromedial frontal hypoperfusion before atrophy is evident. Order SPECT when the diagnosis is uncertain or the presentation or disease course is unusual.
Treatment: Taking aim at apathy
Donepezil, 10 mg/d, was continued to address Mr. A’s cognitive decline. Bupropion, 100 mg/d, was added to deal with his apathy and low energy. We saw him every 4 months.
Table 2
Medications shown beneficial for treating FTD
Drug | Targeted symptoms | Possible side effects |
---|---|---|
Donepezil | Cognition functions including memory | Nausea, anorexia, diarrhea, weight loss, sedation, confusion |
Dopamine agonist (bromocriptine) | Behavioral disturbances* | Confusion, agitation, hallucinations |
SSRIs (sertraline, fluoxetine) | Behavioral disturbances | Nausea, anorexia, diarrhea, weight loss, sexual dysfunction |
Stimulants (methylphenidate) | Behavioral disturbances, somnolence | Insomnia, increased irritability, poor appetite, weight loss |
Trazodone | Behavioral disturbances | Sedation, orthostasis, priapism |
* Apathy, carbohydrate craving, disinhibition, irritability | ||
SSRI: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor |
On follow-up, Mr. A’s gait is slower, and he has “shakiness” and mild finger clumsiness. Physical exam shows no problems and he is fully oriented, but his MMSE score (17/30) indicates further cognitive loss and he still lacks insight into his condition. Neuropsychological tests reveal:
- marked delays in processing and acting on information
- diminished working memory
- trouble understanding spatial functions
- decreased speech
- moderate to severe executive function impairments
- severe impairments in fine-motor dexterity, receptive and expressive language, and verbal and visual memory.
Bupropion alleviated Mr. A’s apathy at first, but an increase to 200 mg/d led to tremors and disrupted sleep. Bupropion was decreased to 150 mg/d; we would add a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) if apathy persisted. We advised his wife and daughter to take him to adult day care and to make sure he does not drive. Follow-up interval is reduced to 2 months.
Eight weeks later, Mr. A is confused and anxious and his affect is remarkably flat, but he behaves appropriately in day care. We stopped bupropion because it did not resolve his apathy.
The authors’ observations
Treat apathy, avolition, anhedonia, social withdrawal, irritability, and/or inappropriate behaviors if these symptoms compromise quality of life for the patient and caregiver. Also try to preserve cognitive function.
Few large-scale clinical trials have addressed FTD pharmacotherapy (Table 2). In an open-label trial, 11 patients with FTD took sertraline, 50 to 125 mg/d, paroxetine, 20 mg/d, or fluoxetine, 20 mg/d. After 3 months, no one’s symptoms worsened and nine patients (82%) had reduced disinhibition, depressive symptoms, carbohydrate craving, and/or compulsions.5
In another open-label, uncontrolled trial, behavioral symptoms improved in eight patients with FTD who took paroxetine, up to 20 mg/d for 14 months. Baseline global performance, cognition, and planning scores remained stable, but attention and abstract reasoning were decreased. Side effects were tolerable.8
In a 12-week crossover study, 26 patients with FTD received placebo or trazodone, 150 or 300 mg/d depending on dose tolerability. Irritability, agitation, depressive symptoms, and/or eating disorders improved significantly in 10 patients, and behavioral disturbances decreased >25% in 16 patients. Trazodone also was well tolerated.9
Dopamine use in FTD can contribute to behavioral dysregulation. D2 blockers occasionally are used to manage behavioral disturbances, but selective dopamine agonists might be more beneficial. Recent studies suggest that bromocriptine, a D1 and D2 dopaminergic agonist, may improve select frontal features and perseveration in dementia.10
In one case report, quantitative EEG correlated with SPECT showed that methylphenidate, dose unknown, helped improve behavior and normalize profoundly imbalanced bifrontotemporal slowing.11
Recommendation. Try sertraline, 50 to 125 mg/d, or fluoxetine, 20 mg/d, to address behavioral symptoms. Paroxetine is another option, but use it cautiously as its anticholinergic properties could cause confusion in older patients. If the patient does not respond to the SSRI after 6 to 8 weeks, try trazodone, 150 to 300 mg/d.
Conclusion: The 15-month mark
We started citalopram, 20 mg/d, to treat Mr. A’s apathy and anxiety; and memantine, 5 mg/d titrated to 10 mg bid, to try to slow his cognitive and functional decline. Donepezil, 10 mg/d, was continued.
We encouraged Mr. A’s wife and daughter to take him to adult day care as often as possible. Mr. A also was placed on a waiting list for a skilled nursing facility.
Mr. A continued to worsen. Fifteen months after initial presentation, he is incontinent of urine and feces and needs help performing most basic ADLs. He continues to overeat and has gained 6.3 pounds over 4 months. His MMSE score (12/30) indicates severe cognitive impairment.
The authors’ observations
Many patients with FTD eventually need long-term placement, a change in environment marked by unfamiliar faces and disrupted routines. Patients often react by becoming disorganized, irritable, and agitated.
No standard method exists to structure this transition for FTD patients. In rare cases, patients have been transferred to secure units for medication management until stabilized.12
Help calm the patient’s fears by describing the typical nursing home and the range of services it offers. Arrange a meeting with the patient, primary care physician, and the nursing home’s intake coordinator to review available services. Make sure the patient and caregiver receive brochures and other literature about the facility.
Related resources
- Association for Frontotemporal Dementias. www.ftd-picks.org.
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Pick’s Disease Information Page. Available at: www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/picks/picks.htm. Accessed Jan. 11, 2005.
- Family Caregiver Alliance. Frontotemporal Dementia. Available at: www.caregiver.org/caregiver/jsp/content_node.jsp?nodeid=573&expandnodeid=384. Accessed Jan. 11, 2005.
- Bromocriptine • Parlodel
- Bupropion • Wellbutrin
- Citalopram • Celexa
- Donepezil • Aricept
- Fluoxetine • Prozac
- Memantine • Namenda
- Methylphenidate • Concerta, Ritalin
- Paroxetine • Paxil
- Sertraline • Zoloft
- Trazodone • Desyrel
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Acknowledgment
This project is supported by the Division of State, Community, and Public Health, Bureau of Health Professions (BHPr), Health Resources and Services Administration (HSRA), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) under grant 1 K01 HP 00071-01 and Geriatric Academic Career Award. The information is that of Dr. Tampi and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by, the BPHr, HRSA, DHHS or the U.S. Government.”
1. The Lund and Manchester Groups: Clinical and neuropathological criteria for frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:416-18.
2. Kertesz A, Munoz DG. Frontotemporal dementia. Med Clin North Am 2002;86:501-18.
3. Snowden JS, Neary D, Mann DM. Frontotemporal dementia. Br J Psychiatry 2003;180:140-3.
4. Hodges JR. Frontotemporal dementia (Pick’s disease): clinical features and assessment. Neurology 2001;56(suppl 4):S6-S10.
5. Swartz JR, Miller BL, Lesser IM, Darby AL. Frontotemporal dementia: treatment response to serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors. J Clin Psychiatry 1997;58:212-16.
6. Miller BL, Ikonte C, Ponton M, et al. A study of the Lund-Manchester research criteria for frontotemporal dementia: clinical and single photon emission CT correlations. Neurology 1997;48:937-42.
7. Pasquier F, Fukui I, Sarazin M, et al. Laboratory investigations and treatment in frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol 2003;53(suppl 5):S32-S35.
8. Moretti R, Torre P, Antonello RM, et al. Frontotemporal dementia: paroxetine as a possible treatment of behavior symptoms. a randomized, controlled, open 14-month study. Eur Neurol 2003;49:13-19.
9. Lebert F, Stekke W, Hasenbroekx C, Pasquier F. Frontotemporal dementia: A randomized, controlled trial with trazodone. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004;17:355-9.
10. Imamura T, Takanashi M, Harroti N, et al. Bromocriptine treatment for perseveration in demented patients. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1998;12:109-13.
11. Goforth HW, Konopka L, Primeau M, et al. Quantitative electroencephalography in frontotemporal dementia with methylphenidate response: a case study. Clin EEG Neurosci 2004;35:108-11.
12. Merrilees JJ, Miller BL. Long-term care of patients with frontotemporal dementia. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2003;4(suppl6):S162-S164.
1. The Lund and Manchester Groups: Clinical and neuropathological criteria for frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:416-18.
2. Kertesz A, Munoz DG. Frontotemporal dementia. Med Clin North Am 2002;86:501-18.
3. Snowden JS, Neary D, Mann DM. Frontotemporal dementia. Br J Psychiatry 2003;180:140-3.
4. Hodges JR. Frontotemporal dementia (Pick’s disease): clinical features and assessment. Neurology 2001;56(suppl 4):S6-S10.
5. Swartz JR, Miller BL, Lesser IM, Darby AL. Frontotemporal dementia: treatment response to serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors. J Clin Psychiatry 1997;58:212-16.
6. Miller BL, Ikonte C, Ponton M, et al. A study of the Lund-Manchester research criteria for frontotemporal dementia: clinical and single photon emission CT correlations. Neurology 1997;48:937-42.
7. Pasquier F, Fukui I, Sarazin M, et al. Laboratory investigations and treatment in frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol 2003;53(suppl 5):S32-S35.
8. Moretti R, Torre P, Antonello RM, et al. Frontotemporal dementia: paroxetine as a possible treatment of behavior symptoms. a randomized, controlled, open 14-month study. Eur Neurol 2003;49:13-19.
9. Lebert F, Stekke W, Hasenbroekx C, Pasquier F. Frontotemporal dementia: A randomized, controlled trial with trazodone. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004;17:355-9.
10. Imamura T, Takanashi M, Harroti N, et al. Bromocriptine treatment for perseveration in demented patients. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1998;12:109-13.
11. Goforth HW, Konopka L, Primeau M, et al. Quantitative electroencephalography in frontotemporal dementia with methylphenidate response: a case study. Clin EEG Neurosci 2004;35:108-11.
12. Merrilees JJ, Miller BL. Long-term care of patients with frontotemporal dementia. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2003;4(suppl6):S162-S164.
Sobering facts about a missed diagnosis
HISTORY: TOO MUCH FOR TOO LONG
Mrs. B, age 73, has been alcohol-dependent for 20 years. Since her husband’s death 5 years ago, she has been drinking 1 to 2 liters of vodka a week. At her family’s insistence, she checks into a tertiary-care hospital for worsening alcohol use, memory problems, and increasing confusion.
Mrs. B’s family removed her car because of her alcohol and cognitive problems, but she walks half a mile to buy alcohol. She lives alone in an assisted-living facility and has been hospitalized for detoxification 3 times within 2 years.
At intake, her judgment and abstract thinking are impaired. She has poor insight into her condition. Physical examination reveals fine hand tremors. Lab test results and vital signs are normal. Mrs. B was previously diagnosed with bipolar disorder and takes divalproex, 250 each morning and 500 mg at bedtime, and paroxetine, 20 mg/d.
Mrs. B’s Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 1 week after admission was 5/30, indicating severe cognitive deficits. Her mood was euthymic, speech and motor activity were normal, and thought process was logical with intact associations. She exhibited no delusions or hallucinations but was disoriented, with a short attention span and poor concentration.
The authors’ observations
Mrs. B’s confusion has increased in recent weeks. Hand tremors could signal a neurologic problem triggered by a vascular event or alcohol use. Include dementia in the differential diagnosis.
Distinguishing between vascular dementia and alcohol-induced persisting dementia requires a thorough history, neurologic exam, and lab testing.
Vascular dementia. Cognition deteriorates step by step. Patients with this dementia have multiple vascular risk factors and display evidence of cerebrovascular events on physical examination or imaging studies. Watch for high blood pressure, high cholesterol, or obesity; history of diabetes, cardiac arrythmias, or strokes; or other vascular changes in the brain.
Alcohol-induced persisting dementia. Patients usually have abused alcohol for years, and memory slowly deteriorates. Vascular events that would explain cognitive deficits are not found. Such patients usually do not have vascular and cerebrovascular risk factors, but may exhibit worsening cognition in the context of alcohol use. Watch for mean corpuscular volume >100 femtoliters, gamma glutamyl transferase >50 U/L, and elevated liver function tests.
For Mrs. B, both dementia types were ruled out. Her memory problems were mild, and she had been functioning independently at the assisted-living facility. Dementia is not characterized by clouding of consciousness, and her disorder’s progression was fast. Mrs. B’s bipolar disorder was not a factor because she did not have significant depressive or manic symptoms.
Amnestic disorder. Mrs. B’s worsening mental status and neurologic signs after admission suggest amnestic disorder. Patients with amnestic disorder have trouble learning or recalling new information and forming new memories, although they can talk coherently and appropriately.
Injury to the diencephalic and medial temporal lobe structures triggers amnestic disorder. Head trauma, cerebral infections, and infarctions can damage these structures, but alcoholism is the most common cause.
ADMISSION: INCREASING CONFUSION
Mrs. B was admitted to the dual diagnosis unit for patients with substance use and psychiatric disorders. Although confused, she could eat and walk.
For 2 days, Mrs. B received chlordiazepoxide, 200 mg/d, for detoxification; a multivitamin tablet; and oral vitamin B1 (thiamine), 100 mg once daily. She also continued her divalproex/paroxetine regimen. Chlordiazepoxide was tapered and discontinued over 4 days. Vital signs remained normal.
Two days after starting detox, Mrs. B’s condition began to worsen. She became incontinent of urine and feces, had trouble eating, and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living.
On examination by the geriatric psychiatry team, Mrs. B appeared very confused. She was confabulating, had hand tremors, and was ataxic, with nystagmus on lateral gaze. Coordination was poor. Because she reported visual hallucinations and appeared delirious, divalproex sodium and paroxetine—which can worsen delirium—were stopped.
Head MRI with contrast revealed sulcal space prominence in the cerebral and cerebellar hemispheres, suggesting minimal volume loss, and nonspecific bilateral periventricular punctuate flairs and T2 hypodensities, indicating small-vessel ischemic disease. EEG showed moderate rhythm slowing. Blood and urine tests showed no infectious disease or metabolic abnormalities.
Lesions associated with Wernicke’s encephalopathy (WE) usually are found in the third ventricle, cerebral aqueduct, fourth ventricle, mamillary bodies, periaqueductal gray matter, dorsomedial thalamus, septal region, and oculomotor nuclei.
In approximately 50% of cases, damage to the cerebellum also occurs. Such damage is usually symmetrical and shows diffuse, patchy endothelial prominence, proliferation of microglia, and petechial hemorrhage.
In chronic cases, demyelination and gliosis occur. Neuronal loss is prominent in the medial thalamus. Atrophy of the mamillary bodies indicates chronic WE.
Source: References 8-10.
The authors’ observations
Mrs. B’s presentation suggests Wernicke’s encephalopathy (WE), an acute amnestic disorder caused by thiamine deficiency.
WE lesions are seen on autopsy in approximately 12.5% of alcohol abusers.1 Although alcoholism is more prevalent in men age 65, women are more likely to develop WE and cognitive dysfunction secondary to alcohol use.2
Alcoholism accounts for 77% of WE cases,3 although malnutrition caused by infection, cancer, gastric surgery, hemodialysis, hyperemesis, or starvation is another cause.
Clinical features of WE include confusion and disorientation (80% of cases, with stupor in 5%), ataxia (23%), and ocular abnormalities (29%). Nystagmus, especially to lateral gaze but also in vertical and other forms, is most common.4 Because less than one-third of patients with WE exhibit all 3 symptoms,5 the diagnosis is often missed. In studies, 15% of WE cases were diagnosed antemortem.1,6
Imaging studies. Brain MRI is more sensitive than computed tomography (CT) in detecting diencephalic, periventricular, and periaqueductal lesions (Box).7 Because of costs, physicians tend to order CT more often than MRI. CT can help rule out gross structural and vascular defects but is less adequate for evaluating specific lesions. In detecting WE lesions, MRI’s sensitivity is 53% and its specificity is 93%.7
Thiamine deficiency can occur when the liver can no longer absorb or store thiamine. Enzyme systems involved in the citric acid cycle and pentose phosphate pathway malfunction, and lactic acid production is increased. The associated pH change damages the apoenzymes. Glutamate accumulates, leading to production of free radicals, which cause cellular damage.11
Circulating thiamine levels are low (<50 ng/mL) in 30% to 80% of persons with alcoholism, putting them at risk for WE.12 Malnutrition secondary to alcoholism reduces thiamine absorption from the gut by 70%. Alcohol alone can reduce thiamine absorption by nearly 50%.13
WE lesions usually shrink within 48 to 72 hours of treatment with parenteral thiamine. Lactate <3.3 mg/dL or >14.9 mg/dL, and pyruvate <0.37 mg/dL or >0.75 mg/dL, indicate abnormal thiamine levels.14
Mrs. B’s confusion, hallucinations, and clouding of consciousness suggested DT, but this was ruled out because she had normal vital signs, classic eye signs of WE, no autonomic instability, and had been adequately tapered off alcohol.
TREATMENT: SHAKING ALCOHOL’S GRIP
A consulting neurologist confirmed a tentative diagnosis of WE.
Mrs. B’s oral thiamine was increased to 100 mg tid. She also received IM thiamine, 100 mg once daily for 5 days; risperidone, 0.5 mg every 4 hours as needed; and trazodone, 50 mg at bedtime as needed for irritability, agitation, and poor sleep. Multivitamins and folic acid were continued.
One week after starting IM thiamine, Mrs. B’s gait steadied, her coordination improved, and tremors and nystagmus stopped. She became more adept at eating. Cognitive impairment continued, but she confabulated less frequently. Her insight into her condition was improving.
Over the next 10 days, Mrs. B continued to improve, although neuropsychological assessment revealed major deficits in visuospatial function, attention, concentration, and memory. Repeat EEG showed diffuse slowing with frontal intermittent rhythmic delta activity, consistent with diffuse toxic metabolic encephalopathy.
Three weeks after admission, Mrs. B was discharged to her assisted-living facility, where she receives follow-up medical and psychiatric care. Her MMSE score at discharge was 12/30, indicating moderately severe cognitive impairment. Motor function has improved, although Mrs. B remains confused and needs help with daily living.
One month after discharge, Mrs. B’s diet was much improved; thiamine was reduced to 100 mg once daily. She has stayed sober but has repeatedly tried to drink. She was referred to a 12-step program but has not complied.
Table 1
Clinical features of WE, Korsakoff’s psychosis
Wernicke’s encephalopathy | Korsakoff’s psychosis |
---|---|
Acute onset | Subacute or chronic onset |
Clouding of conciousness common | Consciousness usually clear |
Ataxia, nystagmus, ophthalmoplegiao usually present | Ataxia, nystagmus, ophthalmoplegia not common |
Impaired anterograde, retrograde memory; confabulation is rare | Impaired anterograde, retrograde memory with prominent confabulation |
Without adequate treatment, >80% progress to Korsakoff’s psychosis; death rate is 20% | >80% progress to alcohol induced persisting dementia; nursing home admission rate is 25% |
Source: Reference 14. |
The authors’ observations
Suspect WE in all patients with alcohol abuse disorder who are malnourished and/or elderly and whose dietary history is unclear. Early detection and treatment are crucial to preventing WE from becoming chronic. WE progresses to Korsakoff’s psychosis—a form of permanent short-term memory loss—in up to 80% of patients.5
Because Korsakoff’s psychosis carries an 8% death rate, consider the disorder in the differential diagnosis (Table). The disorder was ruled out in Mrs. B because of clouding of consciousness, ataxia, nystagmus, and shorter symptom duration.
Thiamine should be given IV, but can be given IM if unit nurses are not certified to give IV injections. Oral thiamine cannot generate the high thiamine blood concentrations (>50 ng/mL within the first 12 hours of treatment) needed to prevent irreversible damage.
Parenteral thiamine, 100 mg/d for 5 to 7 days, is given for acute WE. Some patients who are genetically predisposed to thiamine deficiency may need up to 1,000 mg/d. Continue oral thiamine, 100 mg/d, after parenteral dosing.
Although anaphylaxis risk during a 10-minute thiamine infusion is less than 1 in 1 million, make sure cardiopulmonary resuscitation is available during treatment. Glucose load can precipitate or worsen WE in a thiamine-deficient patient, so give thiamine before giving glucose in any form, including everyday foods.
Watch for other vitamin and magnesium deficiencies common to patients with alcoholism, as these might compromise response to IV/IM thiamine.15 Also rule out stroke in men age >65 who present with signs of hemiparesis.
Related resources
- Stern Y, Sackheim HA. Neuropsychiatric aspects of memory and amnesia. In: Yudofsky SC, Hales RE, (eds). Essentials of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2004:201-38.
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. http://www.ninds.nih.gov/health_and_medical/disorders/wernicke-korsakoff.htm
Drug brand names
- Chlordiazepoxide • Libritabs, Lithium
- Divalproex sodium • Depakote
- Paroxetine • Paxil
- Risperidone • Risperdal
- Trazodone • Desyrel
Disclosure
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Acknowledgment
Dr. Tampi’s efforts were supported by funds from the Division of State, Community, and Public Health, Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, under grant number 1 K01 HP 00071-01, and the Geriatric Academic Career Award ($57,007). The information is that of Dr. Tampi and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by, the aforementioned departments or the United States government.
1. Torvik A, Lindboe CF, Rodge S. Brain lesions in alcoholics. A neuropathological study with clinical correlations. J Neurol Sci 1982;56:233-48.
2. Grant BF. Prevalence and correlates of alcohol use and DSM IV dependence in the United States: results of the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiological Survey. J Stud Alcohol 1997;58:464-73.
3. Lindboe CF, Loberg EM. Wernicke’s encephalopathy in non-alcoholics. An autopsy study. J Neurol Sci 1989;90:125-9
4. Harper CG, Giles M, Finlay-Jones R. Clinical signs in the Wernicke-Korsakoff complex: a retrospective analysis of 131 cases diagnosed at necropsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986;49:341-5.
5. Thompson AD, Cook CCH, Touquet R, Henry JA. The Royal College of Physicians Report on Alcohol: guidelines for managing Wernicke’s encephalopathy in the accident and emergency department. Alcohol Alcohol 2002;37(6):513-21.
6. Blansjaar BA, Van Dijk JG. Korsakoff minus Wernicke syndrome. Alcohol Alcohol 1992;27:435-7.
7. Antunez E, Estruch R, Cardenal C, et al. Usefulness of CT and MR imaging in the diagnosis of acute Wernicke’s encephalopathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1131-7.
8. Charness ME. Intracranial voyeurism: revealing the mamillary bodies in alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999;23:1941-4.
9. Victor M, Adams RD, Collins GH. The Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome. A clinical and pathological study of 245 patients, 82 with post-mortem examinations. Contemp Neurol Ser 1971;7:1-206.
10. Weidauer S, Nichtweiss M, Lanfermann H, Zanella FE. Wernicke encephalopathy. MR findings and clinical presentation. Eur Radiol 2003;13(5):1001-9.
11. Hazell AS, Todd KG, Butterworth RF. Mechanism of neuronal cell death in Wernicke’s encephalopathy. Metab Brain Dis 1998;13(2):97-122.
12. Cook CC, Hallwood PM, Thomson AD. B vitamin deficiency and neuropsychiatric syndromes in alcohol misuse. Alcohol Alcohol 1998;33:317-36.
13. Thomson AD. Mechanisms of vitamin deficiency in chronic alcohol misusers and the development of the Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome. Alcohol Alcohol 2000;35(suppl 1):2-7.
14. Victor M, Adams RA, Collins GH. The Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome and related disorders due to alcoholism and malnutrition. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1989.
15. Traviesa DC. Magnesium deficiency: a possible cause of thiamine refractoriness in Wernicke-Korsakoff encephalopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1974;37:959-62.
HISTORY: TOO MUCH FOR TOO LONG
Mrs. B, age 73, has been alcohol-dependent for 20 years. Since her husband’s death 5 years ago, she has been drinking 1 to 2 liters of vodka a week. At her family’s insistence, she checks into a tertiary-care hospital for worsening alcohol use, memory problems, and increasing confusion.
Mrs. B’s family removed her car because of her alcohol and cognitive problems, but she walks half a mile to buy alcohol. She lives alone in an assisted-living facility and has been hospitalized for detoxification 3 times within 2 years.
At intake, her judgment and abstract thinking are impaired. She has poor insight into her condition. Physical examination reveals fine hand tremors. Lab test results and vital signs are normal. Mrs. B was previously diagnosed with bipolar disorder and takes divalproex, 250 each morning and 500 mg at bedtime, and paroxetine, 20 mg/d.
Mrs. B’s Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 1 week after admission was 5/30, indicating severe cognitive deficits. Her mood was euthymic, speech and motor activity were normal, and thought process was logical with intact associations. She exhibited no delusions or hallucinations but was disoriented, with a short attention span and poor concentration.
The authors’ observations
Mrs. B’s confusion has increased in recent weeks. Hand tremors could signal a neurologic problem triggered by a vascular event or alcohol use. Include dementia in the differential diagnosis.
Distinguishing between vascular dementia and alcohol-induced persisting dementia requires a thorough history, neurologic exam, and lab testing.
Vascular dementia. Cognition deteriorates step by step. Patients with this dementia have multiple vascular risk factors and display evidence of cerebrovascular events on physical examination or imaging studies. Watch for high blood pressure, high cholesterol, or obesity; history of diabetes, cardiac arrythmias, or strokes; or other vascular changes in the brain.
Alcohol-induced persisting dementia. Patients usually have abused alcohol for years, and memory slowly deteriorates. Vascular events that would explain cognitive deficits are not found. Such patients usually do not have vascular and cerebrovascular risk factors, but may exhibit worsening cognition in the context of alcohol use. Watch for mean corpuscular volume >100 femtoliters, gamma glutamyl transferase >50 U/L, and elevated liver function tests.
For Mrs. B, both dementia types were ruled out. Her memory problems were mild, and she had been functioning independently at the assisted-living facility. Dementia is not characterized by clouding of consciousness, and her disorder’s progression was fast. Mrs. B’s bipolar disorder was not a factor because she did not have significant depressive or manic symptoms.
Amnestic disorder. Mrs. B’s worsening mental status and neurologic signs after admission suggest amnestic disorder. Patients with amnestic disorder have trouble learning or recalling new information and forming new memories, although they can talk coherently and appropriately.
Injury to the diencephalic and medial temporal lobe structures triggers amnestic disorder. Head trauma, cerebral infections, and infarctions can damage these structures, but alcoholism is the most common cause.
ADMISSION: INCREASING CONFUSION
Mrs. B was admitted to the dual diagnosis unit for patients with substance use and psychiatric disorders. Although confused, she could eat and walk.
For 2 days, Mrs. B received chlordiazepoxide, 200 mg/d, for detoxification; a multivitamin tablet; and oral vitamin B1 (thiamine), 100 mg once daily. She also continued her divalproex/paroxetine regimen. Chlordiazepoxide was tapered and discontinued over 4 days. Vital signs remained normal.
Two days after starting detox, Mrs. B’s condition began to worsen. She became incontinent of urine and feces, had trouble eating, and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living.
On examination by the geriatric psychiatry team, Mrs. B appeared very confused. She was confabulating, had hand tremors, and was ataxic, with nystagmus on lateral gaze. Coordination was poor. Because she reported visual hallucinations and appeared delirious, divalproex sodium and paroxetine—which can worsen delirium—were stopped.
Head MRI with contrast revealed sulcal space prominence in the cerebral and cerebellar hemispheres, suggesting minimal volume loss, and nonspecific bilateral periventricular punctuate flairs and T2 hypodensities, indicating small-vessel ischemic disease. EEG showed moderate rhythm slowing. Blood and urine tests showed no infectious disease or metabolic abnormalities.
Lesions associated with Wernicke’s encephalopathy (WE) usually are found in the third ventricle, cerebral aqueduct, fourth ventricle, mamillary bodies, periaqueductal gray matter, dorsomedial thalamus, septal region, and oculomotor nuclei.
In approximately 50% of cases, damage to the cerebellum also occurs. Such damage is usually symmetrical and shows diffuse, patchy endothelial prominence, proliferation of microglia, and petechial hemorrhage.
In chronic cases, demyelination and gliosis occur. Neuronal loss is prominent in the medial thalamus. Atrophy of the mamillary bodies indicates chronic WE.
Source: References 8-10.
The authors’ observations
Mrs. B’s presentation suggests Wernicke’s encephalopathy (WE), an acute amnestic disorder caused by thiamine deficiency.
WE lesions are seen on autopsy in approximately 12.5% of alcohol abusers.1 Although alcoholism is more prevalent in men age 65, women are more likely to develop WE and cognitive dysfunction secondary to alcohol use.2
Alcoholism accounts for 77% of WE cases,3 although malnutrition caused by infection, cancer, gastric surgery, hemodialysis, hyperemesis, or starvation is another cause.
Clinical features of WE include confusion and disorientation (80% of cases, with stupor in 5%), ataxia (23%), and ocular abnormalities (29%). Nystagmus, especially to lateral gaze but also in vertical and other forms, is most common.4 Because less than one-third of patients with WE exhibit all 3 symptoms,5 the diagnosis is often missed. In studies, 15% of WE cases were diagnosed antemortem.1,6
Imaging studies. Brain MRI is more sensitive than computed tomography (CT) in detecting diencephalic, periventricular, and periaqueductal lesions (Box).7 Because of costs, physicians tend to order CT more often than MRI. CT can help rule out gross structural and vascular defects but is less adequate for evaluating specific lesions. In detecting WE lesions, MRI’s sensitivity is 53% and its specificity is 93%.7
Thiamine deficiency can occur when the liver can no longer absorb or store thiamine. Enzyme systems involved in the citric acid cycle and pentose phosphate pathway malfunction, and lactic acid production is increased. The associated pH change damages the apoenzymes. Glutamate accumulates, leading to production of free radicals, which cause cellular damage.11
Circulating thiamine levels are low (<50 ng/mL) in 30% to 80% of persons with alcoholism, putting them at risk for WE.12 Malnutrition secondary to alcoholism reduces thiamine absorption from the gut by 70%. Alcohol alone can reduce thiamine absorption by nearly 50%.13
WE lesions usually shrink within 48 to 72 hours of treatment with parenteral thiamine. Lactate <3.3 mg/dL or >14.9 mg/dL, and pyruvate <0.37 mg/dL or >0.75 mg/dL, indicate abnormal thiamine levels.14
Mrs. B’s confusion, hallucinations, and clouding of consciousness suggested DT, but this was ruled out because she had normal vital signs, classic eye signs of WE, no autonomic instability, and had been adequately tapered off alcohol.
TREATMENT: SHAKING ALCOHOL’S GRIP
A consulting neurologist confirmed a tentative diagnosis of WE.
Mrs. B’s oral thiamine was increased to 100 mg tid. She also received IM thiamine, 100 mg once daily for 5 days; risperidone, 0.5 mg every 4 hours as needed; and trazodone, 50 mg at bedtime as needed for irritability, agitation, and poor sleep. Multivitamins and folic acid were continued.
One week after starting IM thiamine, Mrs. B’s gait steadied, her coordination improved, and tremors and nystagmus stopped. She became more adept at eating. Cognitive impairment continued, but she confabulated less frequently. Her insight into her condition was improving.
Over the next 10 days, Mrs. B continued to improve, although neuropsychological assessment revealed major deficits in visuospatial function, attention, concentration, and memory. Repeat EEG showed diffuse slowing with frontal intermittent rhythmic delta activity, consistent with diffuse toxic metabolic encephalopathy.
Three weeks after admission, Mrs. B was discharged to her assisted-living facility, where she receives follow-up medical and psychiatric care. Her MMSE score at discharge was 12/30, indicating moderately severe cognitive impairment. Motor function has improved, although Mrs. B remains confused and needs help with daily living.
One month after discharge, Mrs. B’s diet was much improved; thiamine was reduced to 100 mg once daily. She has stayed sober but has repeatedly tried to drink. She was referred to a 12-step program but has not complied.
Table 1
Clinical features of WE, Korsakoff’s psychosis
Wernicke’s encephalopathy | Korsakoff’s psychosis |
---|---|
Acute onset | Subacute or chronic onset |
Clouding of conciousness common | Consciousness usually clear |
Ataxia, nystagmus, ophthalmoplegiao usually present | Ataxia, nystagmus, ophthalmoplegia not common |
Impaired anterograde, retrograde memory; confabulation is rare | Impaired anterograde, retrograde memory with prominent confabulation |
Without adequate treatment, >80% progress to Korsakoff’s psychosis; death rate is 20% | >80% progress to alcohol induced persisting dementia; nursing home admission rate is 25% |
Source: Reference 14. |
The authors’ observations
Suspect WE in all patients with alcohol abuse disorder who are malnourished and/or elderly and whose dietary history is unclear. Early detection and treatment are crucial to preventing WE from becoming chronic. WE progresses to Korsakoff’s psychosis—a form of permanent short-term memory loss—in up to 80% of patients.5
Because Korsakoff’s psychosis carries an 8% death rate, consider the disorder in the differential diagnosis (Table). The disorder was ruled out in Mrs. B because of clouding of consciousness, ataxia, nystagmus, and shorter symptom duration.
Thiamine should be given IV, but can be given IM if unit nurses are not certified to give IV injections. Oral thiamine cannot generate the high thiamine blood concentrations (>50 ng/mL within the first 12 hours of treatment) needed to prevent irreversible damage.
Parenteral thiamine, 100 mg/d for 5 to 7 days, is given for acute WE. Some patients who are genetically predisposed to thiamine deficiency may need up to 1,000 mg/d. Continue oral thiamine, 100 mg/d, after parenteral dosing.
Although anaphylaxis risk during a 10-minute thiamine infusion is less than 1 in 1 million, make sure cardiopulmonary resuscitation is available during treatment. Glucose load can precipitate or worsen WE in a thiamine-deficient patient, so give thiamine before giving glucose in any form, including everyday foods.
Watch for other vitamin and magnesium deficiencies common to patients with alcoholism, as these might compromise response to IV/IM thiamine.15 Also rule out stroke in men age >65 who present with signs of hemiparesis.
Related resources
- Stern Y, Sackheim HA. Neuropsychiatric aspects of memory and amnesia. In: Yudofsky SC, Hales RE, (eds). Essentials of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2004:201-38.
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. http://www.ninds.nih.gov/health_and_medical/disorders/wernicke-korsakoff.htm
Drug brand names
- Chlordiazepoxide • Libritabs, Lithium
- Divalproex sodium • Depakote
- Paroxetine • Paxil
- Risperidone • Risperdal
- Trazodone • Desyrel
Disclosure
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Acknowledgment
Dr. Tampi’s efforts were supported by funds from the Division of State, Community, and Public Health, Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, under grant number 1 K01 HP 00071-01, and the Geriatric Academic Career Award ($57,007). The information is that of Dr. Tampi and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by, the aforementioned departments or the United States government.
HISTORY: TOO MUCH FOR TOO LONG
Mrs. B, age 73, has been alcohol-dependent for 20 years. Since her husband’s death 5 years ago, she has been drinking 1 to 2 liters of vodka a week. At her family’s insistence, she checks into a tertiary-care hospital for worsening alcohol use, memory problems, and increasing confusion.
Mrs. B’s family removed her car because of her alcohol and cognitive problems, but she walks half a mile to buy alcohol. She lives alone in an assisted-living facility and has been hospitalized for detoxification 3 times within 2 years.
At intake, her judgment and abstract thinking are impaired. She has poor insight into her condition. Physical examination reveals fine hand tremors. Lab test results and vital signs are normal. Mrs. B was previously diagnosed with bipolar disorder and takes divalproex, 250 each morning and 500 mg at bedtime, and paroxetine, 20 mg/d.
Mrs. B’s Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 1 week after admission was 5/30, indicating severe cognitive deficits. Her mood was euthymic, speech and motor activity were normal, and thought process was logical with intact associations. She exhibited no delusions or hallucinations but was disoriented, with a short attention span and poor concentration.
The authors’ observations
Mrs. B’s confusion has increased in recent weeks. Hand tremors could signal a neurologic problem triggered by a vascular event or alcohol use. Include dementia in the differential diagnosis.
Distinguishing between vascular dementia and alcohol-induced persisting dementia requires a thorough history, neurologic exam, and lab testing.
Vascular dementia. Cognition deteriorates step by step. Patients with this dementia have multiple vascular risk factors and display evidence of cerebrovascular events on physical examination or imaging studies. Watch for high blood pressure, high cholesterol, or obesity; history of diabetes, cardiac arrythmias, or strokes; or other vascular changes in the brain.
Alcohol-induced persisting dementia. Patients usually have abused alcohol for years, and memory slowly deteriorates. Vascular events that would explain cognitive deficits are not found. Such patients usually do not have vascular and cerebrovascular risk factors, but may exhibit worsening cognition in the context of alcohol use. Watch for mean corpuscular volume >100 femtoliters, gamma glutamyl transferase >50 U/L, and elevated liver function tests.
For Mrs. B, both dementia types were ruled out. Her memory problems were mild, and she had been functioning independently at the assisted-living facility. Dementia is not characterized by clouding of consciousness, and her disorder’s progression was fast. Mrs. B’s bipolar disorder was not a factor because she did not have significant depressive or manic symptoms.
Amnestic disorder. Mrs. B’s worsening mental status and neurologic signs after admission suggest amnestic disorder. Patients with amnestic disorder have trouble learning or recalling new information and forming new memories, although they can talk coherently and appropriately.
Injury to the diencephalic and medial temporal lobe structures triggers amnestic disorder. Head trauma, cerebral infections, and infarctions can damage these structures, but alcoholism is the most common cause.
ADMISSION: INCREASING CONFUSION
Mrs. B was admitted to the dual diagnosis unit for patients with substance use and psychiatric disorders. Although confused, she could eat and walk.
For 2 days, Mrs. B received chlordiazepoxide, 200 mg/d, for detoxification; a multivitamin tablet; and oral vitamin B1 (thiamine), 100 mg once daily. She also continued her divalproex/paroxetine regimen. Chlordiazepoxide was tapered and discontinued over 4 days. Vital signs remained normal.
Two days after starting detox, Mrs. B’s condition began to worsen. She became incontinent of urine and feces, had trouble eating, and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living.
On examination by the geriatric psychiatry team, Mrs. B appeared very confused. She was confabulating, had hand tremors, and was ataxic, with nystagmus on lateral gaze. Coordination was poor. Because she reported visual hallucinations and appeared delirious, divalproex sodium and paroxetine—which can worsen delirium—were stopped.
Head MRI with contrast revealed sulcal space prominence in the cerebral and cerebellar hemispheres, suggesting minimal volume loss, and nonspecific bilateral periventricular punctuate flairs and T2 hypodensities, indicating small-vessel ischemic disease. EEG showed moderate rhythm slowing. Blood and urine tests showed no infectious disease or metabolic abnormalities.
Lesions associated with Wernicke’s encephalopathy (WE) usually are found in the third ventricle, cerebral aqueduct, fourth ventricle, mamillary bodies, periaqueductal gray matter, dorsomedial thalamus, septal region, and oculomotor nuclei.
In approximately 50% of cases, damage to the cerebellum also occurs. Such damage is usually symmetrical and shows diffuse, patchy endothelial prominence, proliferation of microglia, and petechial hemorrhage.
In chronic cases, demyelination and gliosis occur. Neuronal loss is prominent in the medial thalamus. Atrophy of the mamillary bodies indicates chronic WE.
Source: References 8-10.
The authors’ observations
Mrs. B’s presentation suggests Wernicke’s encephalopathy (WE), an acute amnestic disorder caused by thiamine deficiency.
WE lesions are seen on autopsy in approximately 12.5% of alcohol abusers.1 Although alcoholism is more prevalent in men age 65, women are more likely to develop WE and cognitive dysfunction secondary to alcohol use.2
Alcoholism accounts for 77% of WE cases,3 although malnutrition caused by infection, cancer, gastric surgery, hemodialysis, hyperemesis, or starvation is another cause.
Clinical features of WE include confusion and disorientation (80% of cases, with stupor in 5%), ataxia (23%), and ocular abnormalities (29%). Nystagmus, especially to lateral gaze but also in vertical and other forms, is most common.4 Because less than one-third of patients with WE exhibit all 3 symptoms,5 the diagnosis is often missed. In studies, 15% of WE cases were diagnosed antemortem.1,6
Imaging studies. Brain MRI is more sensitive than computed tomography (CT) in detecting diencephalic, periventricular, and periaqueductal lesions (Box).7 Because of costs, physicians tend to order CT more often than MRI. CT can help rule out gross structural and vascular defects but is less adequate for evaluating specific lesions. In detecting WE lesions, MRI’s sensitivity is 53% and its specificity is 93%.7
Thiamine deficiency can occur when the liver can no longer absorb or store thiamine. Enzyme systems involved in the citric acid cycle and pentose phosphate pathway malfunction, and lactic acid production is increased. The associated pH change damages the apoenzymes. Glutamate accumulates, leading to production of free radicals, which cause cellular damage.11
Circulating thiamine levels are low (<50 ng/mL) in 30% to 80% of persons with alcoholism, putting them at risk for WE.12 Malnutrition secondary to alcoholism reduces thiamine absorption from the gut by 70%. Alcohol alone can reduce thiamine absorption by nearly 50%.13
WE lesions usually shrink within 48 to 72 hours of treatment with parenteral thiamine. Lactate <3.3 mg/dL or >14.9 mg/dL, and pyruvate <0.37 mg/dL or >0.75 mg/dL, indicate abnormal thiamine levels.14
Mrs. B’s confusion, hallucinations, and clouding of consciousness suggested DT, but this was ruled out because she had normal vital signs, classic eye signs of WE, no autonomic instability, and had been adequately tapered off alcohol.
TREATMENT: SHAKING ALCOHOL’S GRIP
A consulting neurologist confirmed a tentative diagnosis of WE.
Mrs. B’s oral thiamine was increased to 100 mg tid. She also received IM thiamine, 100 mg once daily for 5 days; risperidone, 0.5 mg every 4 hours as needed; and trazodone, 50 mg at bedtime as needed for irritability, agitation, and poor sleep. Multivitamins and folic acid were continued.
One week after starting IM thiamine, Mrs. B’s gait steadied, her coordination improved, and tremors and nystagmus stopped. She became more adept at eating. Cognitive impairment continued, but she confabulated less frequently. Her insight into her condition was improving.
Over the next 10 days, Mrs. B continued to improve, although neuropsychological assessment revealed major deficits in visuospatial function, attention, concentration, and memory. Repeat EEG showed diffuse slowing with frontal intermittent rhythmic delta activity, consistent with diffuse toxic metabolic encephalopathy.
Three weeks after admission, Mrs. B was discharged to her assisted-living facility, where she receives follow-up medical and psychiatric care. Her MMSE score at discharge was 12/30, indicating moderately severe cognitive impairment. Motor function has improved, although Mrs. B remains confused and needs help with daily living.
One month after discharge, Mrs. B’s diet was much improved; thiamine was reduced to 100 mg once daily. She has stayed sober but has repeatedly tried to drink. She was referred to a 12-step program but has not complied.
Table 1
Clinical features of WE, Korsakoff’s psychosis
Wernicke’s encephalopathy | Korsakoff’s psychosis |
---|---|
Acute onset | Subacute or chronic onset |
Clouding of conciousness common | Consciousness usually clear |
Ataxia, nystagmus, ophthalmoplegiao usually present | Ataxia, nystagmus, ophthalmoplegia not common |
Impaired anterograde, retrograde memory; confabulation is rare | Impaired anterograde, retrograde memory with prominent confabulation |
Without adequate treatment, >80% progress to Korsakoff’s psychosis; death rate is 20% | >80% progress to alcohol induced persisting dementia; nursing home admission rate is 25% |
Source: Reference 14. |
The authors’ observations
Suspect WE in all patients with alcohol abuse disorder who are malnourished and/or elderly and whose dietary history is unclear. Early detection and treatment are crucial to preventing WE from becoming chronic. WE progresses to Korsakoff’s psychosis—a form of permanent short-term memory loss—in up to 80% of patients.5
Because Korsakoff’s psychosis carries an 8% death rate, consider the disorder in the differential diagnosis (Table). The disorder was ruled out in Mrs. B because of clouding of consciousness, ataxia, nystagmus, and shorter symptom duration.
Thiamine should be given IV, but can be given IM if unit nurses are not certified to give IV injections. Oral thiamine cannot generate the high thiamine blood concentrations (>50 ng/mL within the first 12 hours of treatment) needed to prevent irreversible damage.
Parenteral thiamine, 100 mg/d for 5 to 7 days, is given for acute WE. Some patients who are genetically predisposed to thiamine deficiency may need up to 1,000 mg/d. Continue oral thiamine, 100 mg/d, after parenteral dosing.
Although anaphylaxis risk during a 10-minute thiamine infusion is less than 1 in 1 million, make sure cardiopulmonary resuscitation is available during treatment. Glucose load can precipitate or worsen WE in a thiamine-deficient patient, so give thiamine before giving glucose in any form, including everyday foods.
Watch for other vitamin and magnesium deficiencies common to patients with alcoholism, as these might compromise response to IV/IM thiamine.15 Also rule out stroke in men age >65 who present with signs of hemiparesis.
Related resources
- Stern Y, Sackheim HA. Neuropsychiatric aspects of memory and amnesia. In: Yudofsky SC, Hales RE, (eds). Essentials of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2004:201-38.
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. http://www.ninds.nih.gov/health_and_medical/disorders/wernicke-korsakoff.htm
Drug brand names
- Chlordiazepoxide • Libritabs, Lithium
- Divalproex sodium • Depakote
- Paroxetine • Paxil
- Risperidone • Risperdal
- Trazodone • Desyrel
Disclosure
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Acknowledgment
Dr. Tampi’s efforts were supported by funds from the Division of State, Community, and Public Health, Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, under grant number 1 K01 HP 00071-01, and the Geriatric Academic Career Award ($57,007). The information is that of Dr. Tampi and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by, the aforementioned departments or the United States government.
1. Torvik A, Lindboe CF, Rodge S. Brain lesions in alcoholics. A neuropathological study with clinical correlations. J Neurol Sci 1982;56:233-48.
2. Grant BF. Prevalence and correlates of alcohol use and DSM IV dependence in the United States: results of the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiological Survey. J Stud Alcohol 1997;58:464-73.
3. Lindboe CF, Loberg EM. Wernicke’s encephalopathy in non-alcoholics. An autopsy study. J Neurol Sci 1989;90:125-9
4. Harper CG, Giles M, Finlay-Jones R. Clinical signs in the Wernicke-Korsakoff complex: a retrospective analysis of 131 cases diagnosed at necropsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986;49:341-5.
5. Thompson AD, Cook CCH, Touquet R, Henry JA. The Royal College of Physicians Report on Alcohol: guidelines for managing Wernicke’s encephalopathy in the accident and emergency department. Alcohol Alcohol 2002;37(6):513-21.
6. Blansjaar BA, Van Dijk JG. Korsakoff minus Wernicke syndrome. Alcohol Alcohol 1992;27:435-7.
7. Antunez E, Estruch R, Cardenal C, et al. Usefulness of CT and MR imaging in the diagnosis of acute Wernicke’s encephalopathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1131-7.
8. Charness ME. Intracranial voyeurism: revealing the mamillary bodies in alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999;23:1941-4.
9. Victor M, Adams RD, Collins GH. The Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome. A clinical and pathological study of 245 patients, 82 with post-mortem examinations. Contemp Neurol Ser 1971;7:1-206.
10. Weidauer S, Nichtweiss M, Lanfermann H, Zanella FE. Wernicke encephalopathy. MR findings and clinical presentation. Eur Radiol 2003;13(5):1001-9.
11. Hazell AS, Todd KG, Butterworth RF. Mechanism of neuronal cell death in Wernicke’s encephalopathy. Metab Brain Dis 1998;13(2):97-122.
12. Cook CC, Hallwood PM, Thomson AD. B vitamin deficiency and neuropsychiatric syndromes in alcohol misuse. Alcohol Alcohol 1998;33:317-36.
13. Thomson AD. Mechanisms of vitamin deficiency in chronic alcohol misusers and the development of the Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome. Alcohol Alcohol 2000;35(suppl 1):2-7.
14. Victor M, Adams RA, Collins GH. The Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome and related disorders due to alcoholism and malnutrition. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1989.
15. Traviesa DC. Magnesium deficiency: a possible cause of thiamine refractoriness in Wernicke-Korsakoff encephalopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1974;37:959-62.
1. Torvik A, Lindboe CF, Rodge S. Brain lesions in alcoholics. A neuropathological study with clinical correlations. J Neurol Sci 1982;56:233-48.
2. Grant BF. Prevalence and correlates of alcohol use and DSM IV dependence in the United States: results of the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiological Survey. J Stud Alcohol 1997;58:464-73.
3. Lindboe CF, Loberg EM. Wernicke’s encephalopathy in non-alcoholics. An autopsy study. J Neurol Sci 1989;90:125-9
4. Harper CG, Giles M, Finlay-Jones R. Clinical signs in the Wernicke-Korsakoff complex: a retrospective analysis of 131 cases diagnosed at necropsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986;49:341-5.
5. Thompson AD, Cook CCH, Touquet R, Henry JA. The Royal College of Physicians Report on Alcohol: guidelines for managing Wernicke’s encephalopathy in the accident and emergency department. Alcohol Alcohol 2002;37(6):513-21.
6. Blansjaar BA, Van Dijk JG. Korsakoff minus Wernicke syndrome. Alcohol Alcohol 1992;27:435-7.
7. Antunez E, Estruch R, Cardenal C, et al. Usefulness of CT and MR imaging in the diagnosis of acute Wernicke’s encephalopathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1131-7.
8. Charness ME. Intracranial voyeurism: revealing the mamillary bodies in alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999;23:1941-4.
9. Victor M, Adams RD, Collins GH. The Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome. A clinical and pathological study of 245 patients, 82 with post-mortem examinations. Contemp Neurol Ser 1971;7:1-206.
10. Weidauer S, Nichtweiss M, Lanfermann H, Zanella FE. Wernicke encephalopathy. MR findings and clinical presentation. Eur Radiol 2003;13(5):1001-9.
11. Hazell AS, Todd KG, Butterworth RF. Mechanism of neuronal cell death in Wernicke’s encephalopathy. Metab Brain Dis 1998;13(2):97-122.
12. Cook CC, Hallwood PM, Thomson AD. B vitamin deficiency and neuropsychiatric syndromes in alcohol misuse. Alcohol Alcohol 1998;33:317-36.
13. Thomson AD. Mechanisms of vitamin deficiency in chronic alcohol misusers and the development of the Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome. Alcohol Alcohol 2000;35(suppl 1):2-7.
14. Victor M, Adams RA, Collins GH. The Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome and related disorders due to alcoholism and malnutrition. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1989.
15. Traviesa DC. Magnesium deficiency: a possible cause of thiamine refractoriness in Wernicke-Korsakoff encephalopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1974;37:959-62.