Achalasia Remains a Challenging Disorder for the Community Gastroenterologist

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 11/09/2022 - 15:28
Display Headline
Achalasia Remains a Challenging Disorder for the Community Gastroenterologist

Click to view more from Gastroenterology Data Trends 2022. 

References
  1. Achalasia articles using keywords esophageal achalasia or cardiospasm or achalasia in PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=esophageal+achalasia+or+cardiospasm+or+achalasia&filter=years.2002-2022&timeline=expanded

  2. Patel DA, Yadlapati R, Vaezi MF. esophageal motility disorders: current approach to diagnostics and therapeutics. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(6):1617-1634. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.12.289

  3. Delshad SD, Almario CV, Chey WD, Spiegel BMR. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and proton pump inhibitor-refractory symptoms. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(5):1250-1261.e2. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.014

  4. van Hoeij FB, Ponds FA, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Incidence and costs of achalasia in The Netherlands. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30(2):e13195. doi:10.1111/nmo.13195

  5. Khan A, Yadlapati R, Gonlachanvit S, et al. Chicago Classification update (version 4.0): technical review on diagnostic criteria for achalasia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(7):e14182. doi:10.1111/nmo.14182

  6. Gaddam S, Reddy CA, Munigala, et al. The learning curve for interpretation of oesophageal high-resolution manometry: a prospective interventional cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45(2):291-299. doi:10.1111/apt.13855

  7. Yadlapati R, Keswani RN, Ciolino JD, et al. A system to assess the competency for interpretation of esophageal manometry identifies variation in learning curves. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(11):1708-1714.e3. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2016.07.024

  8. Saboori S, Jarvis M, Baker J, et al. Hard to swallow results. Dysphagia. 2022;37(4):863-867. doi:10.1007/s00455-021-10344-x

  9. Babaei A, Szabo A, Shad S, Massey BT. Chronic daily opioid exposure is associated with dysphagia, esophageal outflow obstruction, and disordered peristalsis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019;31(7):e13601. doi:10.1111/nmo.13601

  10. Babaei A, Shad S, Massey BT. Motility patterns following esophageal pharmacologic provocation with amyl nitrite or cholecystokinin during high-resolution manometry distinguish idiopathic vs opioid-induced type 3 achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(4):813-821.e1. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.014

  11. Babaei A, Shad S, Massey BT. Diagnostic differences in the pharmacologic response to cholecystokinin and amyl nitrite in patients with absent contractility vs type I achalasia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;32(8):e13857. doi:10.1111/nmo.13857

Publications

Click to view more from Gastroenterology Data Trends 2022. 

Click to view more from Gastroenterology Data Trends 2022. 

References
  1. Achalasia articles using keywords esophageal achalasia or cardiospasm or achalasia in PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=esophageal+achalasia+or+cardiospasm+or+achalasia&filter=years.2002-2022&timeline=expanded

  2. Patel DA, Yadlapati R, Vaezi MF. esophageal motility disorders: current approach to diagnostics and therapeutics. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(6):1617-1634. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.12.289

  3. Delshad SD, Almario CV, Chey WD, Spiegel BMR. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and proton pump inhibitor-refractory symptoms. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(5):1250-1261.e2. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.014

  4. van Hoeij FB, Ponds FA, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Incidence and costs of achalasia in The Netherlands. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30(2):e13195. doi:10.1111/nmo.13195

  5. Khan A, Yadlapati R, Gonlachanvit S, et al. Chicago Classification update (version 4.0): technical review on diagnostic criteria for achalasia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(7):e14182. doi:10.1111/nmo.14182

  6. Gaddam S, Reddy CA, Munigala, et al. The learning curve for interpretation of oesophageal high-resolution manometry: a prospective interventional cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45(2):291-299. doi:10.1111/apt.13855

  7. Yadlapati R, Keswani RN, Ciolino JD, et al. A system to assess the competency for interpretation of esophageal manometry identifies variation in learning curves. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(11):1708-1714.e3. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2016.07.024

  8. Saboori S, Jarvis M, Baker J, et al. Hard to swallow results. Dysphagia. 2022;37(4):863-867. doi:10.1007/s00455-021-10344-x

  9. Babaei A, Szabo A, Shad S, Massey BT. Chronic daily opioid exposure is associated with dysphagia, esophageal outflow obstruction, and disordered peristalsis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019;31(7):e13601. doi:10.1111/nmo.13601

  10. Babaei A, Shad S, Massey BT. Motility patterns following esophageal pharmacologic provocation with amyl nitrite or cholecystokinin during high-resolution manometry distinguish idiopathic vs opioid-induced type 3 achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(4):813-821.e1. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.014

  11. Babaei A, Shad S, Massey BT. Diagnostic differences in the pharmacologic response to cholecystokinin and amyl nitrite in patients with absent contractility vs type I achalasia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;32(8):e13857. doi:10.1111/nmo.13857

References
  1. Achalasia articles using keywords esophageal achalasia or cardiospasm or achalasia in PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=esophageal+achalasia+or+cardiospasm+or+achalasia&filter=years.2002-2022&timeline=expanded

  2. Patel DA, Yadlapati R, Vaezi MF. esophageal motility disorders: current approach to diagnostics and therapeutics. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(6):1617-1634. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.12.289

  3. Delshad SD, Almario CV, Chey WD, Spiegel BMR. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and proton pump inhibitor-refractory symptoms. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(5):1250-1261.e2. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.014

  4. van Hoeij FB, Ponds FA, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Incidence and costs of achalasia in The Netherlands. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30(2):e13195. doi:10.1111/nmo.13195

  5. Khan A, Yadlapati R, Gonlachanvit S, et al. Chicago Classification update (version 4.0): technical review on diagnostic criteria for achalasia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(7):e14182. doi:10.1111/nmo.14182

  6. Gaddam S, Reddy CA, Munigala, et al. The learning curve for interpretation of oesophageal high-resolution manometry: a prospective interventional cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45(2):291-299. doi:10.1111/apt.13855

  7. Yadlapati R, Keswani RN, Ciolino JD, et al. A system to assess the competency for interpretation of esophageal manometry identifies variation in learning curves. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(11):1708-1714.e3. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2016.07.024

  8. Saboori S, Jarvis M, Baker J, et al. Hard to swallow results. Dysphagia. 2022;37(4):863-867. doi:10.1007/s00455-021-10344-x

  9. Babaei A, Szabo A, Shad S, Massey BT. Chronic daily opioid exposure is associated with dysphagia, esophageal outflow obstruction, and disordered peristalsis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019;31(7):e13601. doi:10.1111/nmo.13601

  10. Babaei A, Shad S, Massey BT. Motility patterns following esophageal pharmacologic provocation with amyl nitrite or cholecystokinin during high-resolution manometry distinguish idiopathic vs opioid-induced type 3 achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(4):813-821.e1. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.014

  11. Babaei A, Shad S, Massey BT. Diagnostic differences in the pharmacologic response to cholecystokinin and amyl nitrite in patients with absent contractility vs type I achalasia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;32(8):e13857. doi:10.1111/nmo.13857

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Achalasia Remains a Challenging Disorder for the Community Gastroenterologist
Display Headline
Achalasia Remains a Challenging Disorder for the Community Gastroenterologist
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Mon, 10/31/2022 - 15:30
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 10/31/2022 - 15:30
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 10/31/2022 - 15:30
Hide sidebar & use full width
Do not render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Article Slideshow Optional Introduction

Considerable advances in our understanding of esophageal achalasia have been made in the 21st century, accompanied by new diagnostic and treatment modalities. Indeed, about half of the available citations for the term achalasia in PubMed have been published in the past 20 years.1 These developments have increased awareness of this condition among practicing gastroenterologists. But because achalasia is a rare disorder in which the available treatments are palliative, it continues to present a challenge for the community gastroenterologist to diagnose and manage.2

The first problem for diagnosis concerns the rarity of the condition combined with lack of specificity of the presenting symptoms, particularly early in the disease course. Because the prevalence of troublesome GERD (18,000/100,000) is easily 1,000-fold greater than that of achalasia (just 15/100,000), a patient presenting anew with any constellation of esophageal symptoms is far more likely to have them result from GERD than achalasia.3,4 Further, the classic features of achalasia—massive esophageal dilation with retained contents—are often absent on endoscopic or radiographic evaluation early in the disease.

When initial testing shows no findings confirming a GERD diagnosis and symptoms fail to respond to GERD therapy, or testing identifies late-stage morphologic features suggesting an achalasia diagnosis, the next step in evaluation is esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM). This test is currently the standard of care for an achalasia diagnosis.5 Community gastroenterologists are increasingly incorporating HRM into their practice, and likely discovering that the learning curve for generating high-quality studies and accurate interpretations of HRM findings is steep, particularly if they have had no training with this technology during their fellowship.6-8 

The findings on HRM are characterized into 3 different motor phenotypes, per the Chicago Classification, which have implications for treatment approach and prognosis. Manometric findings always must be considered within the context of the patient’s entire clinical picture, to avoid misdiagnosis of achalasia and subsequent inappropriate treatment decisions. Other diagnoses, such as opiate-induced dysmotility, “pseudoachalasia” due to cancers, and end-stage esophageal dysfunction in systemic sclerosis, can have findings on HRM that mimic those of idiopathic achalasia.9-11

All definitive treatments for idiopathic achalasia (pneumatic dilation, laparoscopic myotomy, peroral endoscopic myotomy [POEM]) have the goal of irreversibly disrupting abnormal smooth muscle function causing outflow obstruction at the esophageal outlet or spastic contractions in the esophageal body. When applied to the appropriate achalasia motor phenotype, all offer reasonable palliation of symptoms in most, but not all, patients, with a small but immediate risk of serious complications.2 The best choice often depends on the degree of locally available expertise for the different treatment options, which in the case of pneumatic dilation is unfortunately declining in the United States. While increasing percentages of patients are being treated with POEM, the high rate of postprocedure reflux has uncertain implications for these patients in the future.

Because no treatment can return esophagus function to normal, patients require ongoing follow-up to monito for signs and symptoms of disease progression or new complications. Patients need to be counseled regarding the risks of esophageal pill injury, imprudent eating habits (eg, excessive consumption), excessive weight gain, and neglecting new-onset GERD symptoms.

Slide
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Slide Media