User login
It’s time to implement measurement-based care in psychiatric practice
In an editorial published in Current Psychiatry 10 years ago, I cited a stunning fact based on a readers’ survey: 98% of psychiatrists did not use any of the 4 clinical rating scales that are routinely used in the clinical trials required for FDA approval of medications for psychotic, mood, and anxiety disorders.1
As a follow-up, Ahmed Aboraya, MD, DrPH, and I would like to report on the state of measurement-based care (MBC), a term coined by Trivedi in 2006 and defined by Fortney as “the systematic administration of symptom rating scales and use of the results to drive clinical decision making at the level of the individual patient.”2
We will start with the creator of modern rating scales, Father Thomas Verner Moore (1877-1969), who is considered one of the most underrecognized legends in the history of modern psychiatry. Moore was a psychologist and psychiatrist who can lay claim to 3 major achievements in psychiatry: the creation of rating scales in psychiatry, the use of factor analysis to deconstruct psychosis, and the formulation of specific definitions for symptoms and signs of psychopathology. Moore’s 1933 book described the rating scales used in his research.3
Since that time, researchers have continued to invent clinician-rated scales, self-report scales, and other measures in psychiatry. The Handbook of Psychiatric Measures, which was published in 2000 by the American Psychiatric Association Task Force chaired by AJ Rush Jr., includes >240 measures covering adult and child psychiatric disorders.4
Recent research has shown the superiority of MBC compared with usual standard care (USC) in improving patient outcomes.2,5-7 A recent well-designed, blind-rater, randomized trial by Guo et al8 showed that MBC is more effective than USC both in achieving response and remission, and reducing the time to response and remission. Given the evidence of the benefits of MBC in improving patient outcomes, and the plethora of reliable and validated rating scales, an important question arises: Why has MBC not yet been established as the standard of care in psychiatric clinical practice? There are many barriers to implementing MBC,9 including:
- time constraints (most commonly cited reason by psychiatrists)
- mismatch between clinical needs and the content of the measure (ie, rating scales are designed for research and not for clinicians’ use)
- measurements produced by rating scales may not always be clinically relevant
- administering rating scales may interfere with establishing rapport with patients
- some measures, such as standardized diagnostic interviews, can be cumbersome, unwieldy, and complicated
- the lack of formal training for most clinicians (among the top barriers for residents and faculty)
- lack of availability of training manuals and protocols.
Clinician researchers have started to adapt and invent instruments that can be used in clinical settings. For more than 20 years, Mark Zimmerman, MD, has been the principal investigator of the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) Project, aimed at integrating the assessment methods of researchers into routine clinical practice.10 Zimmerman has developed self-report scales and outcome measures such as the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ), the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS), the Standardized Clinical Outcome Rating for Depression (SCOR-D), the Clinically Useful Anxiety Outcome Scale (CUXOS), the Remission from Depression Questionnaire (RDQ), and the Clinically Useful Patient Satisfaction Scale (CUPSS).11-18
We have been critical of the utility of the existing diagnostic interviews and rating scales. I (AA) developed the Standard for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP) as a MBC tool that addresses the most common barriers that clinicians face.9,19-23 The SCIP includes 18 clinician-rated scales for the following symptom domains: generalized anxiety, obsessions, compulsions, posttraumatic stress, depression, mania, delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, aggression, negative symptoms, alcohol use, drug use, attention deficit, hyperactivity, anorexia, binge-eating, and bulimia. The SCIP rating scales meet the criteria for MBC because they are efficient, reliable, and valid. They reflect how clinicians assess psychiatric disorders, and are relevant to decision-making. Both self-report and clinician-rated scales are important MBC tools and complementary to each other. The choice to use self-report scales, clinician-rated scales, or both depends on several factors, including the clinical setting (inpatient or outpatient), psychiatric diagnoses, and patient characteristics. No measure or scale will ever replace a seasoned and experienced clinician who has been evaluating and treating real-world patients for years. Just as thermometers, stethoscopes, and laboratories help other types of physicians to reach accurate diagnoses and provide appropriate management, the use of MBC by psychiatrists will enhance the accuracy of diagnoses and improve the outcomes of care.
Continue to: On a positive note...
On a positive note, I (AA) have completed a MBC curriculum for training psychiatry residents that includes 11 videotaped interviews with actual patients covering the major adult psychiatric disorders: generalized anxiety, panic, depressive, posttraumatic stress, bipolar, psychotic, eating, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity. The interviews show and teach how to rate psychopathology items, how to score the dimensions, and how to evaluate the severity of the disorder(s). All of the SCIP’s 18 scales have been uploaded into the Epic electronic health record (EHR) system at West Virginia University hospitals. A pilot project for implementing MBC in the treatment of adult psychiatric disorders at the West Virginia University residency program and other programs is underway. If we instruct residents in MBC during their psychiatric training, they will likely practice it for the rest of their clinical careers. Except for a minority of clinicians who are involved in clinical trials and who use rating scales in practice, most practicing clinicians were never trained to use scales. For more information about the MBC curriculum and videotapes, contact Dr. Aboraya at [email protected] or visit www.scip-psychiatry.com.
Today, some of the barriers that impede the implementation of MBC in psychiatric practice have been resolved, but much more work remains. Now is the time to implement MBC and provide an answer to AJ Rush, who asked, “Isn’t it about time to employ measurement-based care in practice?”24 The 3 main ingredients for MBC implementation—useful measures, integration of EHR, and health information technologies—exist today. We strongly encourage psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, and other mental health professionals to adopt MBC in their daily practice.
To comment on this editorial or other topics of interest: [email protected].
1. Nasrallah HA. Long overdue: measurement-based psychiatric practice. Current Psychiatry. 2009;8(4):14-16.
2. Fortney JC, Unutzer J, Wrenn G, et al. A tipping point for measurement-based care. Psychiatr Serv. 2016;68(2):179-188.
3. Moore TV. The essential psychoses and their fundamental syndromes. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1933.
4. Rush AJ. Handbook of psychiatric measures. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
5. Scott K, Lewis CC. Using measurement-based care to enhance any treatment. Cogn Behav Pract. 2015;22(1):49-59.
6. Trivedi MH, Daly EJ. Measurement-based care for refractory depression: a clinical decision support model for clinical research and practice. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;88(Suppl 2):S61-S71.
7. Harding KJ, Rush AJ, Arbuckle M, et al. Measurement-based care in psychiatric practice: a policy framework for implementation. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(8):1136-1143.
8. Guo T, Xiang YT, Xiao L, et al. Measurement-based care versus standard care for major depression: a randomized controlled trial with blind raters. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(10):1004-1013.
9. Aboraya A, Nasrallah HA, Elswick D, et al. Measurement-based care in psychiatry: past, present and future. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2018;15(11-12):13-26.
10. Zimmerman M. A review of 20 years of research on overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis in the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) Project. Can J Psychiatry. 2016;61(2):71-79.
11. Zimmerman M, Mattia JI. The reliability and validity of a screening questionnaire for 13 DSM-IV Axis I disorders (the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire) in psychiatric outpatients. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60(10):677-683.
12. Zimmerman M, Mattia JI. The Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire: development, reliability and validity. Compr Psychiatry. 2001;42(3):175-189.
13. Zimmerman M, Chelminski I, McGlinchey JB, et al. A clinically useful depression outcome scale. Compr Psychiatry. 2008;49(2):131-140.
14. Zimmerman M, Posternak MA, Chelminski I, et al. Standardized clinical outcome rating scale for depression for use in clinical practice. Depress Anxiety. 2005;22(1):36-40.
15. Zimmerman M, Chelminski I, Young D, et al. A clinically useful anxiety outcome scale. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71(5):534-542.
16. Zimmerman M, Galione JN, Attiullah N, et al. Depressed patients’ perspectives of 2 measures of outcome: the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) and the Remission from Depression Questionnaire (RDQ). Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2011;23(3):208-212.
17. Zimmerman M, Martinez JH, Attiullah N, et al. The remission from depression questionnaire as an outcome measure in the treatment of depression. Depress Anxiety. 2014;31(6):533-538.
18. Zimmerman M, Gazarian D, Multach M, et al. A clinically useful self-report measure of psychiatric patients’ satisfaction with the initial evaluation. Psychiatry Res. 2017;252:38-44.
19. Aboraya A. The validity results of the Standard for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP). Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2015;41(Suppl 1):S103-S104.
20. Aboraya A. Instruction manual for the Standard for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP). http://innovationscns.com/wp-content/uploads/SCIP_Instruction_Manual.pdf. Accessed April 29, 2019.
21. Aboraya A, El-Missiry A, Barlowe J, et al. The reliability of the Standard for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP): a clinician-administered tool with categorical, dimensional and numeric output. Schizophr Res. 2014;156(2-3):174-183.
22. Aboraya A, Nasrallah HA, Muvvala S, et al. The Standard for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP): a clinician-administered tool with categorical, dimensional, and numeric output-conceptual development, design, and description of the SCIP. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2016;13(5-6):31-77.
23. Aboraya A, Nasrallah HA. Perspectives on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): Use, misuse, drawbacks, and a new alternative for schizophrenia research. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2016;28(2):125-131.
24. Rush AJ. Isn’t it about time to employ measurement-based care in practice? Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(10):934-936.
In an editorial published in Current Psychiatry 10 years ago, I cited a stunning fact based on a readers’ survey: 98% of psychiatrists did not use any of the 4 clinical rating scales that are routinely used in the clinical trials required for FDA approval of medications for psychotic, mood, and anxiety disorders.1
As a follow-up, Ahmed Aboraya, MD, DrPH, and I would like to report on the state of measurement-based care (MBC), a term coined by Trivedi in 2006 and defined by Fortney as “the systematic administration of symptom rating scales and use of the results to drive clinical decision making at the level of the individual patient.”2
We will start with the creator of modern rating scales, Father Thomas Verner Moore (1877-1969), who is considered one of the most underrecognized legends in the history of modern psychiatry. Moore was a psychologist and psychiatrist who can lay claim to 3 major achievements in psychiatry: the creation of rating scales in psychiatry, the use of factor analysis to deconstruct psychosis, and the formulation of specific definitions for symptoms and signs of psychopathology. Moore’s 1933 book described the rating scales used in his research.3
Since that time, researchers have continued to invent clinician-rated scales, self-report scales, and other measures in psychiatry. The Handbook of Psychiatric Measures, which was published in 2000 by the American Psychiatric Association Task Force chaired by AJ Rush Jr., includes >240 measures covering adult and child psychiatric disorders.4
Recent research has shown the superiority of MBC compared with usual standard care (USC) in improving patient outcomes.2,5-7 A recent well-designed, blind-rater, randomized trial by Guo et al8 showed that MBC is more effective than USC both in achieving response and remission, and reducing the time to response and remission. Given the evidence of the benefits of MBC in improving patient outcomes, and the plethora of reliable and validated rating scales, an important question arises: Why has MBC not yet been established as the standard of care in psychiatric clinical practice? There are many barriers to implementing MBC,9 including:
- time constraints (most commonly cited reason by psychiatrists)
- mismatch between clinical needs and the content of the measure (ie, rating scales are designed for research and not for clinicians’ use)
- measurements produced by rating scales may not always be clinically relevant
- administering rating scales may interfere with establishing rapport with patients
- some measures, such as standardized diagnostic interviews, can be cumbersome, unwieldy, and complicated
- the lack of formal training for most clinicians (among the top barriers for residents and faculty)
- lack of availability of training manuals and protocols.
Clinician researchers have started to adapt and invent instruments that can be used in clinical settings. For more than 20 years, Mark Zimmerman, MD, has been the principal investigator of the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) Project, aimed at integrating the assessment methods of researchers into routine clinical practice.10 Zimmerman has developed self-report scales and outcome measures such as the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ), the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS), the Standardized Clinical Outcome Rating for Depression (SCOR-D), the Clinically Useful Anxiety Outcome Scale (CUXOS), the Remission from Depression Questionnaire (RDQ), and the Clinically Useful Patient Satisfaction Scale (CUPSS).11-18
We have been critical of the utility of the existing diagnostic interviews and rating scales. I (AA) developed the Standard for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP) as a MBC tool that addresses the most common barriers that clinicians face.9,19-23 The SCIP includes 18 clinician-rated scales for the following symptom domains: generalized anxiety, obsessions, compulsions, posttraumatic stress, depression, mania, delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, aggression, negative symptoms, alcohol use, drug use, attention deficit, hyperactivity, anorexia, binge-eating, and bulimia. The SCIP rating scales meet the criteria for MBC because they are efficient, reliable, and valid. They reflect how clinicians assess psychiatric disorders, and are relevant to decision-making. Both self-report and clinician-rated scales are important MBC tools and complementary to each other. The choice to use self-report scales, clinician-rated scales, or both depends on several factors, including the clinical setting (inpatient or outpatient), psychiatric diagnoses, and patient characteristics. No measure or scale will ever replace a seasoned and experienced clinician who has been evaluating and treating real-world patients for years. Just as thermometers, stethoscopes, and laboratories help other types of physicians to reach accurate diagnoses and provide appropriate management, the use of MBC by psychiatrists will enhance the accuracy of diagnoses and improve the outcomes of care.
Continue to: On a positive note...
On a positive note, I (AA) have completed a MBC curriculum for training psychiatry residents that includes 11 videotaped interviews with actual patients covering the major adult psychiatric disorders: generalized anxiety, panic, depressive, posttraumatic stress, bipolar, psychotic, eating, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity. The interviews show and teach how to rate psychopathology items, how to score the dimensions, and how to evaluate the severity of the disorder(s). All of the SCIP’s 18 scales have been uploaded into the Epic electronic health record (EHR) system at West Virginia University hospitals. A pilot project for implementing MBC in the treatment of adult psychiatric disorders at the West Virginia University residency program and other programs is underway. If we instruct residents in MBC during their psychiatric training, they will likely practice it for the rest of their clinical careers. Except for a minority of clinicians who are involved in clinical trials and who use rating scales in practice, most practicing clinicians were never trained to use scales. For more information about the MBC curriculum and videotapes, contact Dr. Aboraya at [email protected] or visit www.scip-psychiatry.com.
Today, some of the barriers that impede the implementation of MBC in psychiatric practice have been resolved, but much more work remains. Now is the time to implement MBC and provide an answer to AJ Rush, who asked, “Isn’t it about time to employ measurement-based care in practice?”24 The 3 main ingredients for MBC implementation—useful measures, integration of EHR, and health information technologies—exist today. We strongly encourage psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, and other mental health professionals to adopt MBC in their daily practice.
To comment on this editorial or other topics of interest: [email protected].
In an editorial published in Current Psychiatry 10 years ago, I cited a stunning fact based on a readers’ survey: 98% of psychiatrists did not use any of the 4 clinical rating scales that are routinely used in the clinical trials required for FDA approval of medications for psychotic, mood, and anxiety disorders.1
As a follow-up, Ahmed Aboraya, MD, DrPH, and I would like to report on the state of measurement-based care (MBC), a term coined by Trivedi in 2006 and defined by Fortney as “the systematic administration of symptom rating scales and use of the results to drive clinical decision making at the level of the individual patient.”2
We will start with the creator of modern rating scales, Father Thomas Verner Moore (1877-1969), who is considered one of the most underrecognized legends in the history of modern psychiatry. Moore was a psychologist and psychiatrist who can lay claim to 3 major achievements in psychiatry: the creation of rating scales in psychiatry, the use of factor analysis to deconstruct psychosis, and the formulation of specific definitions for symptoms and signs of psychopathology. Moore’s 1933 book described the rating scales used in his research.3
Since that time, researchers have continued to invent clinician-rated scales, self-report scales, and other measures in psychiatry. The Handbook of Psychiatric Measures, which was published in 2000 by the American Psychiatric Association Task Force chaired by AJ Rush Jr., includes >240 measures covering adult and child psychiatric disorders.4
Recent research has shown the superiority of MBC compared with usual standard care (USC) in improving patient outcomes.2,5-7 A recent well-designed, blind-rater, randomized trial by Guo et al8 showed that MBC is more effective than USC both in achieving response and remission, and reducing the time to response and remission. Given the evidence of the benefits of MBC in improving patient outcomes, and the plethora of reliable and validated rating scales, an important question arises: Why has MBC not yet been established as the standard of care in psychiatric clinical practice? There are many barriers to implementing MBC,9 including:
- time constraints (most commonly cited reason by psychiatrists)
- mismatch between clinical needs and the content of the measure (ie, rating scales are designed for research and not for clinicians’ use)
- measurements produced by rating scales may not always be clinically relevant
- administering rating scales may interfere with establishing rapport with patients
- some measures, such as standardized diagnostic interviews, can be cumbersome, unwieldy, and complicated
- the lack of formal training for most clinicians (among the top barriers for residents and faculty)
- lack of availability of training manuals and protocols.
Clinician researchers have started to adapt and invent instruments that can be used in clinical settings. For more than 20 years, Mark Zimmerman, MD, has been the principal investigator of the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) Project, aimed at integrating the assessment methods of researchers into routine clinical practice.10 Zimmerman has developed self-report scales and outcome measures such as the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ), the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS), the Standardized Clinical Outcome Rating for Depression (SCOR-D), the Clinically Useful Anxiety Outcome Scale (CUXOS), the Remission from Depression Questionnaire (RDQ), and the Clinically Useful Patient Satisfaction Scale (CUPSS).11-18
We have been critical of the utility of the existing diagnostic interviews and rating scales. I (AA) developed the Standard for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP) as a MBC tool that addresses the most common barriers that clinicians face.9,19-23 The SCIP includes 18 clinician-rated scales for the following symptom domains: generalized anxiety, obsessions, compulsions, posttraumatic stress, depression, mania, delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, aggression, negative symptoms, alcohol use, drug use, attention deficit, hyperactivity, anorexia, binge-eating, and bulimia. The SCIP rating scales meet the criteria for MBC because they are efficient, reliable, and valid. They reflect how clinicians assess psychiatric disorders, and are relevant to decision-making. Both self-report and clinician-rated scales are important MBC tools and complementary to each other. The choice to use self-report scales, clinician-rated scales, or both depends on several factors, including the clinical setting (inpatient or outpatient), psychiatric diagnoses, and patient characteristics. No measure or scale will ever replace a seasoned and experienced clinician who has been evaluating and treating real-world patients for years. Just as thermometers, stethoscopes, and laboratories help other types of physicians to reach accurate diagnoses and provide appropriate management, the use of MBC by psychiatrists will enhance the accuracy of diagnoses and improve the outcomes of care.
Continue to: On a positive note...
On a positive note, I (AA) have completed a MBC curriculum for training psychiatry residents that includes 11 videotaped interviews with actual patients covering the major adult psychiatric disorders: generalized anxiety, panic, depressive, posttraumatic stress, bipolar, psychotic, eating, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity. The interviews show and teach how to rate psychopathology items, how to score the dimensions, and how to evaluate the severity of the disorder(s). All of the SCIP’s 18 scales have been uploaded into the Epic electronic health record (EHR) system at West Virginia University hospitals. A pilot project for implementing MBC in the treatment of adult psychiatric disorders at the West Virginia University residency program and other programs is underway. If we instruct residents in MBC during their psychiatric training, they will likely practice it for the rest of their clinical careers. Except for a minority of clinicians who are involved in clinical trials and who use rating scales in practice, most practicing clinicians were never trained to use scales. For more information about the MBC curriculum and videotapes, contact Dr. Aboraya at [email protected] or visit www.scip-psychiatry.com.
Today, some of the barriers that impede the implementation of MBC in psychiatric practice have been resolved, but much more work remains. Now is the time to implement MBC and provide an answer to AJ Rush, who asked, “Isn’t it about time to employ measurement-based care in practice?”24 The 3 main ingredients for MBC implementation—useful measures, integration of EHR, and health information technologies—exist today. We strongly encourage psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, and other mental health professionals to adopt MBC in their daily practice.
To comment on this editorial or other topics of interest: [email protected].
1. Nasrallah HA. Long overdue: measurement-based psychiatric practice. Current Psychiatry. 2009;8(4):14-16.
2. Fortney JC, Unutzer J, Wrenn G, et al. A tipping point for measurement-based care. Psychiatr Serv. 2016;68(2):179-188.
3. Moore TV. The essential psychoses and their fundamental syndromes. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1933.
4. Rush AJ. Handbook of psychiatric measures. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
5. Scott K, Lewis CC. Using measurement-based care to enhance any treatment. Cogn Behav Pract. 2015;22(1):49-59.
6. Trivedi MH, Daly EJ. Measurement-based care for refractory depression: a clinical decision support model for clinical research and practice. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;88(Suppl 2):S61-S71.
7. Harding KJ, Rush AJ, Arbuckle M, et al. Measurement-based care in psychiatric practice: a policy framework for implementation. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(8):1136-1143.
8. Guo T, Xiang YT, Xiao L, et al. Measurement-based care versus standard care for major depression: a randomized controlled trial with blind raters. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(10):1004-1013.
9. Aboraya A, Nasrallah HA, Elswick D, et al. Measurement-based care in psychiatry: past, present and future. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2018;15(11-12):13-26.
10. Zimmerman M. A review of 20 years of research on overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis in the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) Project. Can J Psychiatry. 2016;61(2):71-79.
11. Zimmerman M, Mattia JI. The reliability and validity of a screening questionnaire for 13 DSM-IV Axis I disorders (the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire) in psychiatric outpatients. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60(10):677-683.
12. Zimmerman M, Mattia JI. The Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire: development, reliability and validity. Compr Psychiatry. 2001;42(3):175-189.
13. Zimmerman M, Chelminski I, McGlinchey JB, et al. A clinically useful depression outcome scale. Compr Psychiatry. 2008;49(2):131-140.
14. Zimmerman M, Posternak MA, Chelminski I, et al. Standardized clinical outcome rating scale for depression for use in clinical practice. Depress Anxiety. 2005;22(1):36-40.
15. Zimmerman M, Chelminski I, Young D, et al. A clinically useful anxiety outcome scale. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71(5):534-542.
16. Zimmerman M, Galione JN, Attiullah N, et al. Depressed patients’ perspectives of 2 measures of outcome: the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) and the Remission from Depression Questionnaire (RDQ). Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2011;23(3):208-212.
17. Zimmerman M, Martinez JH, Attiullah N, et al. The remission from depression questionnaire as an outcome measure in the treatment of depression. Depress Anxiety. 2014;31(6):533-538.
18. Zimmerman M, Gazarian D, Multach M, et al. A clinically useful self-report measure of psychiatric patients’ satisfaction with the initial evaluation. Psychiatry Res. 2017;252:38-44.
19. Aboraya A. The validity results of the Standard for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP). Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2015;41(Suppl 1):S103-S104.
20. Aboraya A. Instruction manual for the Standard for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP). http://innovationscns.com/wp-content/uploads/SCIP_Instruction_Manual.pdf. Accessed April 29, 2019.
21. Aboraya A, El-Missiry A, Barlowe J, et al. The reliability of the Standard for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP): a clinician-administered tool with categorical, dimensional and numeric output. Schizophr Res. 2014;156(2-3):174-183.
22. Aboraya A, Nasrallah HA, Muvvala S, et al. The Standard for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP): a clinician-administered tool with categorical, dimensional, and numeric output-conceptual development, design, and description of the SCIP. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2016;13(5-6):31-77.
23. Aboraya A, Nasrallah HA. Perspectives on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): Use, misuse, drawbacks, and a new alternative for schizophrenia research. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2016;28(2):125-131.
24. Rush AJ. Isn’t it about time to employ measurement-based care in practice? Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(10):934-936.
1. Nasrallah HA. Long overdue: measurement-based psychiatric practice. Current Psychiatry. 2009;8(4):14-16.
2. Fortney JC, Unutzer J, Wrenn G, et al. A tipping point for measurement-based care. Psychiatr Serv. 2016;68(2):179-188.
3. Moore TV. The essential psychoses and their fundamental syndromes. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1933.
4. Rush AJ. Handbook of psychiatric measures. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
5. Scott K, Lewis CC. Using measurement-based care to enhance any treatment. Cogn Behav Pract. 2015;22(1):49-59.
6. Trivedi MH, Daly EJ. Measurement-based care for refractory depression: a clinical decision support model for clinical research and practice. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;88(Suppl 2):S61-S71.
7. Harding KJ, Rush AJ, Arbuckle M, et al. Measurement-based care in psychiatric practice: a policy framework for implementation. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(8):1136-1143.
8. Guo T, Xiang YT, Xiao L, et al. Measurement-based care versus standard care for major depression: a randomized controlled trial with blind raters. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(10):1004-1013.
9. Aboraya A, Nasrallah HA, Elswick D, et al. Measurement-based care in psychiatry: past, present and future. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2018;15(11-12):13-26.
10. Zimmerman M. A review of 20 years of research on overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis in the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) Project. Can J Psychiatry. 2016;61(2):71-79.
11. Zimmerman M, Mattia JI. The reliability and validity of a screening questionnaire for 13 DSM-IV Axis I disorders (the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire) in psychiatric outpatients. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60(10):677-683.
12. Zimmerman M, Mattia JI. The Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire: development, reliability and validity. Compr Psychiatry. 2001;42(3):175-189.
13. Zimmerman M, Chelminski I, McGlinchey JB, et al. A clinically useful depression outcome scale. Compr Psychiatry. 2008;49(2):131-140.
14. Zimmerman M, Posternak MA, Chelminski I, et al. Standardized clinical outcome rating scale for depression for use in clinical practice. Depress Anxiety. 2005;22(1):36-40.
15. Zimmerman M, Chelminski I, Young D, et al. A clinically useful anxiety outcome scale. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71(5):534-542.
16. Zimmerman M, Galione JN, Attiullah N, et al. Depressed patients’ perspectives of 2 measures of outcome: the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) and the Remission from Depression Questionnaire (RDQ). Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2011;23(3):208-212.
17. Zimmerman M, Martinez JH, Attiullah N, et al. The remission from depression questionnaire as an outcome measure in the treatment of depression. Depress Anxiety. 2014;31(6):533-538.
18. Zimmerman M, Gazarian D, Multach M, et al. A clinically useful self-report measure of psychiatric patients’ satisfaction with the initial evaluation. Psychiatry Res. 2017;252:38-44.
19. Aboraya A. The validity results of the Standard for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP). Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2015;41(Suppl 1):S103-S104.
20. Aboraya A. Instruction manual for the Standard for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP). http://innovationscns.com/wp-content/uploads/SCIP_Instruction_Manual.pdf. Accessed April 29, 2019.
21. Aboraya A, El-Missiry A, Barlowe J, et al. The reliability of the Standard for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP): a clinician-administered tool with categorical, dimensional and numeric output. Schizophr Res. 2014;156(2-3):174-183.
22. Aboraya A, Nasrallah HA, Muvvala S, et al. The Standard for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP): a clinician-administered tool with categorical, dimensional, and numeric output-conceptual development, design, and description of the SCIP. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2016;13(5-6):31-77.
23. Aboraya A, Nasrallah HA. Perspectives on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): Use, misuse, drawbacks, and a new alternative for schizophrenia research. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2016;28(2):125-131.
24. Rush AJ. Isn’t it about time to employ measurement-based care in practice? Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(10):934-936.
The treatment-resistant catatonia patient
Case: Worsening psychosis
Ms. R, age 21, is admitted to our psychiatric facility while experiencing paranoid delusions and auditory hallucinations. Upon admission, she is agitated and her mood is labile.
Ms. R has 4 previous brief psychiatric admissions and was diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type and moderate mental retardation. Her family history is positive for psychiatric illness, as her mother was diagnosed with schizophrenia. Prior to admission, Ms. R was taking ziprasidone, 160 mg/d, and lithium, 450 mg/d, for 11 months. Both were discontinued during the first week of admission because Ms. R was not responding.
During this admission, the treating psychiatrist assesses Ms. R using the Schedules for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP), an instrument developed by the lead author (AA) for psychiatrists to use in conjunction with their routine clinical interviews in inpatient and outpatient settings (see Related Resources). The SCIP includes a 25-question screening section and a diagnostic section that consists of 7 modules that represent major psychiatric diagnoses defined by DSM and International Classification of Diseases criteria.1
During the first week of admission, we monitor Ms. R and administer haloperidol as needed, 10 mg total. Eight days after admission, she develops severe catatonia. On the catatonia scale of the SCIP, Ms. R scores the maximum on measures of immobility, catalepsy/waxy flexibility, and mutism (Table).
How would you treat Ms. R’s catatonia?
Table
Patient’s catatonia symptoms: Response to pharmacotherapy
Lorazepam only | Lorazepam + risperidone | Risperidone oral only | Risperidone long-acting injection only | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dosage(s) | 7 mg total over 7 days | Lorazepam: 4 mg/d Risperidone: 4 mg/d | 8 mg/d | 37.5 mg every 2 weeks |
Scores on SCIP catatonia scale:* | ||||
Immobility | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Catalepsy/waxy flexibility† | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Mutism | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total score | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
*Scale of 0 to 2, with 0=none, 1=less than half the time, and 2=more than half the time. Symptoms are evaluated over a 1-day period | ||||
†For this category, 0=none, 1=brief (usually 1 minute | ||||
SCIP: Schedules for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry |
The authors’ observations
DSM-IV-TR recognizes catatonia as a schizophrenia subtype, as a descriptor for mania and major depression, and as being caused by various medical conditions, such as neuroleptic malignant syndrome, encephalopathy, or renal failure.2 Kahlbaum initially described catatonia in 1873 as a brain disease characterized by motor abnormalities such as akinesia, rigidity, negativism, mutism, grimacing, posturing, catalepsy, waxy flexibility, and verbigerations.3 Catatonia is characterized by hypo- and hyperkinetic features. Catalepsy, stupor, rigidity, and catatonic posturing with waxy flexibility might alternate with violent catatonic excitement.4
Catatonia can be life-threatening; patients might not be able to eat or chew food, which puts them at risk for aspiration. Those with immobility might not move to urinate or defecate. During the first half of the 20th century, catatonia was documented in up to 50% of patients with schizophrenia.5 Since then, the incidence of catatonia has decreased, possibly the result of advances in psychopharmacology.6
Two days after Ms. R develops catatonia, we transfer her to a local hospital for evaluation to rule out a medical cause of her catatonic symptoms.
EVALUATION: No medical cause
At the hospital, physical examination, electroencephalography, drug screening, and liver and thyroid function tests are within normal limits, eliminating an organic cause of Ms. R’s catatonia. MRI of the head shows a 3-mm mass at the base of the infundibulum, which is unchanged from a prior MRI. Ms. R received 7 mg total of lorazepam over 4 days without relief of her catatonia. She is transferred back to our facility.
The authors’ observations
Benzodiazepines and ECT are effective treatments for catatonia.7 Benzodiazepines are considered first-line treatment because of their efficacy and favorable side-effect profile.7 Lorazepam frequently is used to treat catatonia in the short term.8 Long-term use of benzodiazepines, however, is associated with tolerance, addiction, and rebound phenomena.8,9
Patients with catatonia who do not respond to benzodiazepines may benefit from ECT.9 ECT can cause serious side effects, however, including memory impairment, confusion, delirium, and cardiac arrhythmias.10
Atypical antipsychotics may alleviate motor symptoms of catatonia by virtue of their 5-HT2A receptor antagonistic action.9 In 2 case reports, risperidone successfully treated catatonia.4,11 Kopala et al11 found risperidone, 4 mg/d, was effective in treating severe, first-episode catatonic schizophrenia in a neuroleptic-naive young man. This efficacy was sustained over a 3.5-year outpatient follow-up.
In another report, risperidone, 6 mg/d, effectively treated catatonia and prevented further episodes in a patient with schizophrenia who developed severe catatonia after receiving adequate treatment for Lyme disease with encephalitis.4 Two relapses of catatonic syndrome occurred when risperidone was reduced to 2 mg/d, and remission occurred after risperidone was increased to 6 mg/d. Risperidone’s antagonistic activity of the 5-HT2/D2 receptors may be relevant to its anticatatonic effect.12
Other atypical antipsychotics—ziprasidone and olanzapine—also have been shown to be effective in treating catatonia. Levy et al13 reported successful treatment of a catatonic state (with catalepsy, stupor, and mutism) using intramuscular ziprasidone followed by oral ziprasidone. A data analysis by Martenyi et al14 showed olanzapine to be effective in treating nonspecific signs and symptoms of catatonia, as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale.
TREATMENT: Trying risperidone
Based on case reports showing risperidone’s efficacy for catatonia, we start Ms. R on risperidone, 4 mg/d, and lorazepam, 4 mg/d. Eight days later, her catatonic symptoms decrease substantially—she scores 2/6 on the SCIP catatonia scale (Table)—and she starts to talk with the staff.
We continue this regimen for 30 days, then discontinue lorazepam to avoid long-term side effects—such as dependence—and titrate risperidone to 8 mg/d. Ms. R continues to improve while taking risperidone only. Twenty-three days after stopping lorazepam, she is free of catatonic symptoms, scoring 0/6 on the SCIP catatonia scale.
We discharge Ms. R on risperidone. Because she has a history of medication nonadherence, we prescribe risperidone long-acting injection, 37.5 mg every 2 weeks, while continuing oral risperidone for 3 weeks after the first injection. She does well on this medication, experiencing no catatonic symptoms or adverse effects over the next 15 months as measured by the SCIP assessment.
The authors’ observations
This is the third case report in the literature to show that risperidone is effective in short- and long-term treatment of catatonia.4,11 Although Ms. R’s initial response can be attributed at least partially to lorazepam—which is known to be effective in treating catatonia—she continued to show improvement while taking risperidone only and remained free from catatonic symptoms for 15 months, until she was readmitted for reasons unrelated to catatonia.
We recommend using risperidone to treat catatonia in patients who do not respond to a benzodiazepine, especially those with other psychotic symptoms such as delusions or hallucinations. While administering risperidone, watch for long-term side effects, such as hyperlipidemia, weight gain, and diabetes. For catatonia in patients who cannot tolerate risperidone, consider olanzapine or ziprasidone.
- Schedules for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP). Available from Ahmed Aboraya, [email protected].
- Valevski A, Loebl T, Keren T, et al. Response of catatonia to risperidone: two case reports. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2001;24(4):228-231.
- Van Den Eede F, Van Hecke J, Van Dalfsen A, et al. The use of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of catatonia. Eur Psychiatry. 2005;20(5-6):422-429.
- Haloperidol • Haldol
- Lithium • Eskalith, Lithobid
- Lorazepam • Ativan
- Olanzapine • Zyprexa
- Risperidone • Risperdal
- Risperidone long-acting injection • Risperdal Consta
- Ziprasidone • Geodon
The authors have no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
1. Aboraya A, Tien A. Schedules for Clinicians’ Interviews in Psychiatry (SCIP): work in progress. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. Available at: http://www.ijma-journal.com/pdf/c01a09.pdf. Accessed February 4, 2009.
2. Diagnostic and statistical manual of disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
3. Kahlbaum KL. In: Levi Y, Pridon T, trans. Catatonia. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1973.
4. Hesslinger B, Walden J, Normann C. Acute and long-term treatment of catatonia with risperidone. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2001;34(1):25-26.
5. Bleuler E. Dementia praecox. New York, NY: International University Press; 1950.
6. Blumer D. Catatonia and the neuroleptics: psychobiologic significance of remote and recent findings. Compr Psychiatry. 1997;38(4):193-201.
7. Bush G, Fink M, Petrides G, et al. Catatonia. II Treatment with lorazepam and electroconvulsive therapy. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996;93(2):137-143.
8. Duggal HS, Gandotra G. Risperidone treatment of periodic catatonia. Can J Psychiatry. 2005;50(4):241-242.
9. Duggal HS. Risperidone treatment of febrile catatonia in first-episode psychosis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2005;27(1):80-81.
10. Rudorfer M, Henry M, Sackeim H. Electroconvulsive therapy. In: Tasman A, Kay J, Lieberman JA, eds. Psychiatry: therapeutics. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2003:167-203.
11. Kopala LC, Caudle C. Acute and longer-term effects of risperidone in a case of first-episode catatonic schizophrenia. J Psychopharmacol. 1998;12(3):314-317.
12. Poyurousky M, Bergman J, Weizman A. Risperidone in the treatment of catatonia in a schizophrenic patient. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1997;34(4):323-324.
13. Levy WO, Nunez CY. Use of ziprasidone to treat bipolar-associated catatonia. Bipolar Disord. 2004;6(2):166-167.
14. Martenyi F, Metcalfe S, Schausberger B, et al. An efficacy analysis of olanzapine treatment data in schizophrenia patients with catatonic signs and symptoms. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(suppl 2):225-227.
Case: Worsening psychosis
Ms. R, age 21, is admitted to our psychiatric facility while experiencing paranoid delusions and auditory hallucinations. Upon admission, she is agitated and her mood is labile.
Ms. R has 4 previous brief psychiatric admissions and was diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type and moderate mental retardation. Her family history is positive for psychiatric illness, as her mother was diagnosed with schizophrenia. Prior to admission, Ms. R was taking ziprasidone, 160 mg/d, and lithium, 450 mg/d, for 11 months. Both were discontinued during the first week of admission because Ms. R was not responding.
During this admission, the treating psychiatrist assesses Ms. R using the Schedules for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP), an instrument developed by the lead author (AA) for psychiatrists to use in conjunction with their routine clinical interviews in inpatient and outpatient settings (see Related Resources). The SCIP includes a 25-question screening section and a diagnostic section that consists of 7 modules that represent major psychiatric diagnoses defined by DSM and International Classification of Diseases criteria.1
During the first week of admission, we monitor Ms. R and administer haloperidol as needed, 10 mg total. Eight days after admission, she develops severe catatonia. On the catatonia scale of the SCIP, Ms. R scores the maximum on measures of immobility, catalepsy/waxy flexibility, and mutism (Table).
How would you treat Ms. R’s catatonia?
Table
Patient’s catatonia symptoms: Response to pharmacotherapy
Lorazepam only | Lorazepam + risperidone | Risperidone oral only | Risperidone long-acting injection only | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dosage(s) | 7 mg total over 7 days | Lorazepam: 4 mg/d Risperidone: 4 mg/d | 8 mg/d | 37.5 mg every 2 weeks |
Scores on SCIP catatonia scale:* | ||||
Immobility | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Catalepsy/waxy flexibility† | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Mutism | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total score | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
*Scale of 0 to 2, with 0=none, 1=less than half the time, and 2=more than half the time. Symptoms are evaluated over a 1-day period | ||||
†For this category, 0=none, 1=brief (usually 1 minute | ||||
SCIP: Schedules for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry |
The authors’ observations
DSM-IV-TR recognizes catatonia as a schizophrenia subtype, as a descriptor for mania and major depression, and as being caused by various medical conditions, such as neuroleptic malignant syndrome, encephalopathy, or renal failure.2 Kahlbaum initially described catatonia in 1873 as a brain disease characterized by motor abnormalities such as akinesia, rigidity, negativism, mutism, grimacing, posturing, catalepsy, waxy flexibility, and verbigerations.3 Catatonia is characterized by hypo- and hyperkinetic features. Catalepsy, stupor, rigidity, and catatonic posturing with waxy flexibility might alternate with violent catatonic excitement.4
Catatonia can be life-threatening; patients might not be able to eat or chew food, which puts them at risk for aspiration. Those with immobility might not move to urinate or defecate. During the first half of the 20th century, catatonia was documented in up to 50% of patients with schizophrenia.5 Since then, the incidence of catatonia has decreased, possibly the result of advances in psychopharmacology.6
Two days after Ms. R develops catatonia, we transfer her to a local hospital for evaluation to rule out a medical cause of her catatonic symptoms.
EVALUATION: No medical cause
At the hospital, physical examination, electroencephalography, drug screening, and liver and thyroid function tests are within normal limits, eliminating an organic cause of Ms. R’s catatonia. MRI of the head shows a 3-mm mass at the base of the infundibulum, which is unchanged from a prior MRI. Ms. R received 7 mg total of lorazepam over 4 days without relief of her catatonia. She is transferred back to our facility.
The authors’ observations
Benzodiazepines and ECT are effective treatments for catatonia.7 Benzodiazepines are considered first-line treatment because of their efficacy and favorable side-effect profile.7 Lorazepam frequently is used to treat catatonia in the short term.8 Long-term use of benzodiazepines, however, is associated with tolerance, addiction, and rebound phenomena.8,9
Patients with catatonia who do not respond to benzodiazepines may benefit from ECT.9 ECT can cause serious side effects, however, including memory impairment, confusion, delirium, and cardiac arrhythmias.10
Atypical antipsychotics may alleviate motor symptoms of catatonia by virtue of their 5-HT2A receptor antagonistic action.9 In 2 case reports, risperidone successfully treated catatonia.4,11 Kopala et al11 found risperidone, 4 mg/d, was effective in treating severe, first-episode catatonic schizophrenia in a neuroleptic-naive young man. This efficacy was sustained over a 3.5-year outpatient follow-up.
In another report, risperidone, 6 mg/d, effectively treated catatonia and prevented further episodes in a patient with schizophrenia who developed severe catatonia after receiving adequate treatment for Lyme disease with encephalitis.4 Two relapses of catatonic syndrome occurred when risperidone was reduced to 2 mg/d, and remission occurred after risperidone was increased to 6 mg/d. Risperidone’s antagonistic activity of the 5-HT2/D2 receptors may be relevant to its anticatatonic effect.12
Other atypical antipsychotics—ziprasidone and olanzapine—also have been shown to be effective in treating catatonia. Levy et al13 reported successful treatment of a catatonic state (with catalepsy, stupor, and mutism) using intramuscular ziprasidone followed by oral ziprasidone. A data analysis by Martenyi et al14 showed olanzapine to be effective in treating nonspecific signs and symptoms of catatonia, as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale.
TREATMENT: Trying risperidone
Based on case reports showing risperidone’s efficacy for catatonia, we start Ms. R on risperidone, 4 mg/d, and lorazepam, 4 mg/d. Eight days later, her catatonic symptoms decrease substantially—she scores 2/6 on the SCIP catatonia scale (Table)—and she starts to talk with the staff.
We continue this regimen for 30 days, then discontinue lorazepam to avoid long-term side effects—such as dependence—and titrate risperidone to 8 mg/d. Ms. R continues to improve while taking risperidone only. Twenty-three days after stopping lorazepam, she is free of catatonic symptoms, scoring 0/6 on the SCIP catatonia scale.
We discharge Ms. R on risperidone. Because she has a history of medication nonadherence, we prescribe risperidone long-acting injection, 37.5 mg every 2 weeks, while continuing oral risperidone for 3 weeks after the first injection. She does well on this medication, experiencing no catatonic symptoms or adverse effects over the next 15 months as measured by the SCIP assessment.
The authors’ observations
This is the third case report in the literature to show that risperidone is effective in short- and long-term treatment of catatonia.4,11 Although Ms. R’s initial response can be attributed at least partially to lorazepam—which is known to be effective in treating catatonia—she continued to show improvement while taking risperidone only and remained free from catatonic symptoms for 15 months, until she was readmitted for reasons unrelated to catatonia.
We recommend using risperidone to treat catatonia in patients who do not respond to a benzodiazepine, especially those with other psychotic symptoms such as delusions or hallucinations. While administering risperidone, watch for long-term side effects, such as hyperlipidemia, weight gain, and diabetes. For catatonia in patients who cannot tolerate risperidone, consider olanzapine or ziprasidone.
- Schedules for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP). Available from Ahmed Aboraya, [email protected].
- Valevski A, Loebl T, Keren T, et al. Response of catatonia to risperidone: two case reports. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2001;24(4):228-231.
- Van Den Eede F, Van Hecke J, Van Dalfsen A, et al. The use of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of catatonia. Eur Psychiatry. 2005;20(5-6):422-429.
- Haloperidol • Haldol
- Lithium • Eskalith, Lithobid
- Lorazepam • Ativan
- Olanzapine • Zyprexa
- Risperidone • Risperdal
- Risperidone long-acting injection • Risperdal Consta
- Ziprasidone • Geodon
The authors have no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Case: Worsening psychosis
Ms. R, age 21, is admitted to our psychiatric facility while experiencing paranoid delusions and auditory hallucinations. Upon admission, she is agitated and her mood is labile.
Ms. R has 4 previous brief psychiatric admissions and was diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type and moderate mental retardation. Her family history is positive for psychiatric illness, as her mother was diagnosed with schizophrenia. Prior to admission, Ms. R was taking ziprasidone, 160 mg/d, and lithium, 450 mg/d, for 11 months. Both were discontinued during the first week of admission because Ms. R was not responding.
During this admission, the treating psychiatrist assesses Ms. R using the Schedules for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP), an instrument developed by the lead author (AA) for psychiatrists to use in conjunction with their routine clinical interviews in inpatient and outpatient settings (see Related Resources). The SCIP includes a 25-question screening section and a diagnostic section that consists of 7 modules that represent major psychiatric diagnoses defined by DSM and International Classification of Diseases criteria.1
During the first week of admission, we monitor Ms. R and administer haloperidol as needed, 10 mg total. Eight days after admission, she develops severe catatonia. On the catatonia scale of the SCIP, Ms. R scores the maximum on measures of immobility, catalepsy/waxy flexibility, and mutism (Table).
How would you treat Ms. R’s catatonia?
Table
Patient’s catatonia symptoms: Response to pharmacotherapy
Lorazepam only | Lorazepam + risperidone | Risperidone oral only | Risperidone long-acting injection only | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dosage(s) | 7 mg total over 7 days | Lorazepam: 4 mg/d Risperidone: 4 mg/d | 8 mg/d | 37.5 mg every 2 weeks |
Scores on SCIP catatonia scale:* | ||||
Immobility | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Catalepsy/waxy flexibility† | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Mutism | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total score | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
*Scale of 0 to 2, with 0=none, 1=less than half the time, and 2=more than half the time. Symptoms are evaluated over a 1-day period | ||||
†For this category, 0=none, 1=brief (usually 1 minute | ||||
SCIP: Schedules for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry |
The authors’ observations
DSM-IV-TR recognizes catatonia as a schizophrenia subtype, as a descriptor for mania and major depression, and as being caused by various medical conditions, such as neuroleptic malignant syndrome, encephalopathy, or renal failure.2 Kahlbaum initially described catatonia in 1873 as a brain disease characterized by motor abnormalities such as akinesia, rigidity, negativism, mutism, grimacing, posturing, catalepsy, waxy flexibility, and verbigerations.3 Catatonia is characterized by hypo- and hyperkinetic features. Catalepsy, stupor, rigidity, and catatonic posturing with waxy flexibility might alternate with violent catatonic excitement.4
Catatonia can be life-threatening; patients might not be able to eat or chew food, which puts them at risk for aspiration. Those with immobility might not move to urinate or defecate. During the first half of the 20th century, catatonia was documented in up to 50% of patients with schizophrenia.5 Since then, the incidence of catatonia has decreased, possibly the result of advances in psychopharmacology.6
Two days after Ms. R develops catatonia, we transfer her to a local hospital for evaluation to rule out a medical cause of her catatonic symptoms.
EVALUATION: No medical cause
At the hospital, physical examination, electroencephalography, drug screening, and liver and thyroid function tests are within normal limits, eliminating an organic cause of Ms. R’s catatonia. MRI of the head shows a 3-mm mass at the base of the infundibulum, which is unchanged from a prior MRI. Ms. R received 7 mg total of lorazepam over 4 days without relief of her catatonia. She is transferred back to our facility.
The authors’ observations
Benzodiazepines and ECT are effective treatments for catatonia.7 Benzodiazepines are considered first-line treatment because of their efficacy and favorable side-effect profile.7 Lorazepam frequently is used to treat catatonia in the short term.8 Long-term use of benzodiazepines, however, is associated with tolerance, addiction, and rebound phenomena.8,9
Patients with catatonia who do not respond to benzodiazepines may benefit from ECT.9 ECT can cause serious side effects, however, including memory impairment, confusion, delirium, and cardiac arrhythmias.10
Atypical antipsychotics may alleviate motor symptoms of catatonia by virtue of their 5-HT2A receptor antagonistic action.9 In 2 case reports, risperidone successfully treated catatonia.4,11 Kopala et al11 found risperidone, 4 mg/d, was effective in treating severe, first-episode catatonic schizophrenia in a neuroleptic-naive young man. This efficacy was sustained over a 3.5-year outpatient follow-up.
In another report, risperidone, 6 mg/d, effectively treated catatonia and prevented further episodes in a patient with schizophrenia who developed severe catatonia after receiving adequate treatment for Lyme disease with encephalitis.4 Two relapses of catatonic syndrome occurred when risperidone was reduced to 2 mg/d, and remission occurred after risperidone was increased to 6 mg/d. Risperidone’s antagonistic activity of the 5-HT2/D2 receptors may be relevant to its anticatatonic effect.12
Other atypical antipsychotics—ziprasidone and olanzapine—also have been shown to be effective in treating catatonia. Levy et al13 reported successful treatment of a catatonic state (with catalepsy, stupor, and mutism) using intramuscular ziprasidone followed by oral ziprasidone. A data analysis by Martenyi et al14 showed olanzapine to be effective in treating nonspecific signs and symptoms of catatonia, as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale.
TREATMENT: Trying risperidone
Based on case reports showing risperidone’s efficacy for catatonia, we start Ms. R on risperidone, 4 mg/d, and lorazepam, 4 mg/d. Eight days later, her catatonic symptoms decrease substantially—she scores 2/6 on the SCIP catatonia scale (Table)—and she starts to talk with the staff.
We continue this regimen for 30 days, then discontinue lorazepam to avoid long-term side effects—such as dependence—and titrate risperidone to 8 mg/d. Ms. R continues to improve while taking risperidone only. Twenty-three days after stopping lorazepam, she is free of catatonic symptoms, scoring 0/6 on the SCIP catatonia scale.
We discharge Ms. R on risperidone. Because she has a history of medication nonadherence, we prescribe risperidone long-acting injection, 37.5 mg every 2 weeks, while continuing oral risperidone for 3 weeks after the first injection. She does well on this medication, experiencing no catatonic symptoms or adverse effects over the next 15 months as measured by the SCIP assessment.
The authors’ observations
This is the third case report in the literature to show that risperidone is effective in short- and long-term treatment of catatonia.4,11 Although Ms. R’s initial response can be attributed at least partially to lorazepam—which is known to be effective in treating catatonia—she continued to show improvement while taking risperidone only and remained free from catatonic symptoms for 15 months, until she was readmitted for reasons unrelated to catatonia.
We recommend using risperidone to treat catatonia in patients who do not respond to a benzodiazepine, especially those with other psychotic symptoms such as delusions or hallucinations. While administering risperidone, watch for long-term side effects, such as hyperlipidemia, weight gain, and diabetes. For catatonia in patients who cannot tolerate risperidone, consider olanzapine or ziprasidone.
- Schedules for Clinicians’ Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP). Available from Ahmed Aboraya, [email protected].
- Valevski A, Loebl T, Keren T, et al. Response of catatonia to risperidone: two case reports. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2001;24(4):228-231.
- Van Den Eede F, Van Hecke J, Van Dalfsen A, et al. The use of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of catatonia. Eur Psychiatry. 2005;20(5-6):422-429.
- Haloperidol • Haldol
- Lithium • Eskalith, Lithobid
- Lorazepam • Ativan
- Olanzapine • Zyprexa
- Risperidone • Risperdal
- Risperidone long-acting injection • Risperdal Consta
- Ziprasidone • Geodon
The authors have no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
1. Aboraya A, Tien A. Schedules for Clinicians’ Interviews in Psychiatry (SCIP): work in progress. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. Available at: http://www.ijma-journal.com/pdf/c01a09.pdf. Accessed February 4, 2009.
2. Diagnostic and statistical manual of disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
3. Kahlbaum KL. In: Levi Y, Pridon T, trans. Catatonia. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1973.
4. Hesslinger B, Walden J, Normann C. Acute and long-term treatment of catatonia with risperidone. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2001;34(1):25-26.
5. Bleuler E. Dementia praecox. New York, NY: International University Press; 1950.
6. Blumer D. Catatonia and the neuroleptics: psychobiologic significance of remote and recent findings. Compr Psychiatry. 1997;38(4):193-201.
7. Bush G, Fink M, Petrides G, et al. Catatonia. II Treatment with lorazepam and electroconvulsive therapy. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996;93(2):137-143.
8. Duggal HS, Gandotra G. Risperidone treatment of periodic catatonia. Can J Psychiatry. 2005;50(4):241-242.
9. Duggal HS. Risperidone treatment of febrile catatonia in first-episode psychosis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2005;27(1):80-81.
10. Rudorfer M, Henry M, Sackeim H. Electroconvulsive therapy. In: Tasman A, Kay J, Lieberman JA, eds. Psychiatry: therapeutics. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2003:167-203.
11. Kopala LC, Caudle C. Acute and longer-term effects of risperidone in a case of first-episode catatonic schizophrenia. J Psychopharmacol. 1998;12(3):314-317.
12. Poyurousky M, Bergman J, Weizman A. Risperidone in the treatment of catatonia in a schizophrenic patient. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1997;34(4):323-324.
13. Levy WO, Nunez CY. Use of ziprasidone to treat bipolar-associated catatonia. Bipolar Disord. 2004;6(2):166-167.
14. Martenyi F, Metcalfe S, Schausberger B, et al. An efficacy analysis of olanzapine treatment data in schizophrenia patients with catatonic signs and symptoms. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(suppl 2):225-227.
1. Aboraya A, Tien A. Schedules for Clinicians’ Interviews in Psychiatry (SCIP): work in progress. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. Available at: http://www.ijma-journal.com/pdf/c01a09.pdf. Accessed February 4, 2009.
2. Diagnostic and statistical manual of disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
3. Kahlbaum KL. In: Levi Y, Pridon T, trans. Catatonia. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1973.
4. Hesslinger B, Walden J, Normann C. Acute and long-term treatment of catatonia with risperidone. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2001;34(1):25-26.
5. Bleuler E. Dementia praecox. New York, NY: International University Press; 1950.
6. Blumer D. Catatonia and the neuroleptics: psychobiologic significance of remote and recent findings. Compr Psychiatry. 1997;38(4):193-201.
7. Bush G, Fink M, Petrides G, et al. Catatonia. II Treatment with lorazepam and electroconvulsive therapy. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996;93(2):137-143.
8. Duggal HS, Gandotra G. Risperidone treatment of periodic catatonia. Can J Psychiatry. 2005;50(4):241-242.
9. Duggal HS. Risperidone treatment of febrile catatonia in first-episode psychosis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2005;27(1):80-81.
10. Rudorfer M, Henry M, Sackeim H. Electroconvulsive therapy. In: Tasman A, Kay J, Lieberman JA, eds. Psychiatry: therapeutics. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2003:167-203.
11. Kopala LC, Caudle C. Acute and longer-term effects of risperidone in a case of first-episode catatonic schizophrenia. J Psychopharmacol. 1998;12(3):314-317.
12. Poyurousky M, Bergman J, Weizman A. Risperidone in the treatment of catatonia in a schizophrenic patient. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1997;34(4):323-324.
13. Levy WO, Nunez CY. Use of ziprasidone to treat bipolar-associated catatonia. Bipolar Disord. 2004;6(2):166-167.
14. Martenyi F, Metcalfe S, Schausberger B, et al. An efficacy analysis of olanzapine treatment data in schizophrenia patients with catatonic signs and symptoms. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(suppl 2):225-227.