Slot System
Featured Buckets
Featured Buckets Admin

CHEST to offer research matching service

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/11/2021 - 00:15

 

CHEST Analytics has announced its new resource for members interested in serving as investigators in industry-sponsored clinical trials.

The new program, CHEST Clinical Trials Solutions, will pair members who have indicated their interest in specific research topics with companies seeking investigators. According to CHEST President Steven Q. Simpson, MD, FCCP: “For members who would like to be involved in research and for companies that have defined distinct criteria for their studies, CHEST Analytics can pair qualifying parties to facilitate communication between researcher and sponsor. It’s a great way for young investigators to get started or accomplished members to share their experience while helping industry expedite introducing new products that improve patient care.” More information regarding enrollment will be available at info.chestnet.org/clinical-trials.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

CHEST Analytics has announced its new resource for members interested in serving as investigators in industry-sponsored clinical trials.

The new program, CHEST Clinical Trials Solutions, will pair members who have indicated their interest in specific research topics with companies seeking investigators. According to CHEST President Steven Q. Simpson, MD, FCCP: “For members who would like to be involved in research and for companies that have defined distinct criteria for their studies, CHEST Analytics can pair qualifying parties to facilitate communication between researcher and sponsor. It’s a great way for young investigators to get started or accomplished members to share their experience while helping industry expedite introducing new products that improve patient care.” More information regarding enrollment will be available at info.chestnet.org/clinical-trials.

 

CHEST Analytics has announced its new resource for members interested in serving as investigators in industry-sponsored clinical trials.

The new program, CHEST Clinical Trials Solutions, will pair members who have indicated their interest in specific research topics with companies seeking investigators. According to CHEST President Steven Q. Simpson, MD, FCCP: “For members who would like to be involved in research and for companies that have defined distinct criteria for their studies, CHEST Analytics can pair qualifying parties to facilitate communication between researcher and sponsor. It’s a great way for young investigators to get started or accomplished members to share their experience while helping industry expedite introducing new products that improve patient care.” More information regarding enrollment will be available at info.chestnet.org/clinical-trials.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer

President-Designate: Doreen J. Addrizzo-Harris, MD, FCCP

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/11/2021 - 00:15

Doreen J. Addrizzo-Harris, MD, FCCP, is a pulmonary/critical care physician with an extensive background in bronchiectasis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection and medical education. 

Dr. Doreen J. Addrizzo-Harris

 
Dr. Addrizzo-Harris is currently a Professor of Medicine at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine. She serves as the Associate Division Director for Clinical and Faculty Affairs, is the Director of the NYU Bronchiectasis and NTM Program, and is Co-Director of the NYU Pulmonary Faculty Practice. She is now serving in her 20th year as the Program Director of NYU's Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Fellowship. Dr. Addrizzo-Harris received her medical degree and completed her residency and fellowship training at New York University School of Medicine. Since completing her training, she was recruited to stay as a faculty member at NYU, where she has been a critical presence over the past 25 years. She has been instrumental in educating the next generation of pulmonary/critical care physicians and has won a number of awards for her teaching skills, most recently, the 2021 Outstanding Educator Award from the APCCMPD. Dr. Addrizzo-Harris has served on the board of the Association of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Program Directors (APCCMPD), including serving as President from 2006-2007. Academically, she authored 44 peer-reviewed publications and 57 scientific abstracts presented at international conferences. She has participated in numerous clinical trials, many as PI. Dr. Addrizzo-Harris has been recognized as a Distinguished CHEST Educator each year since its inception in 2017 and received the Distinguished Service Award in 2019. 
During her leadership tenure with CHEST, Dr. Addrizzo-Harris has served on the Marketing Committee, the Health and Science Policy Committee (Chair from 2007-2009), Government Relations Committee, Scientific Program Committee, Education Committee, Governance Committee, Editorial Board for CHEST Physician, Professional Standards Committee (Chair 2016-2018), Board of Regents, and CHEST Foundation Board of Trustees. Most recently, Dr. Addrizzo-Harris served as the President of the CHEST Foundation from 2018-2019 and Co-Chair of the Foundation Awards Committee from 2015-2020. She will serve as the sixth woman to lead the American College of Chest Physicians. 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Doreen J. Addrizzo-Harris, MD, FCCP, is a pulmonary/critical care physician with an extensive background in bronchiectasis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection and medical education. 

Dr. Doreen J. Addrizzo-Harris

 
Dr. Addrizzo-Harris is currently a Professor of Medicine at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine. She serves as the Associate Division Director for Clinical and Faculty Affairs, is the Director of the NYU Bronchiectasis and NTM Program, and is Co-Director of the NYU Pulmonary Faculty Practice. She is now serving in her 20th year as the Program Director of NYU's Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Fellowship. Dr. Addrizzo-Harris received her medical degree and completed her residency and fellowship training at New York University School of Medicine. Since completing her training, she was recruited to stay as a faculty member at NYU, where she has been a critical presence over the past 25 years. She has been instrumental in educating the next generation of pulmonary/critical care physicians and has won a number of awards for her teaching skills, most recently, the 2021 Outstanding Educator Award from the APCCMPD. Dr. Addrizzo-Harris has served on the board of the Association of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Program Directors (APCCMPD), including serving as President from 2006-2007. Academically, she authored 44 peer-reviewed publications and 57 scientific abstracts presented at international conferences. She has participated in numerous clinical trials, many as PI. Dr. Addrizzo-Harris has been recognized as a Distinguished CHEST Educator each year since its inception in 2017 and received the Distinguished Service Award in 2019. 
During her leadership tenure with CHEST, Dr. Addrizzo-Harris has served on the Marketing Committee, the Health and Science Policy Committee (Chair from 2007-2009), Government Relations Committee, Scientific Program Committee, Education Committee, Governance Committee, Editorial Board for CHEST Physician, Professional Standards Committee (Chair 2016-2018), Board of Regents, and CHEST Foundation Board of Trustees. Most recently, Dr. Addrizzo-Harris served as the President of the CHEST Foundation from 2018-2019 and Co-Chair of the Foundation Awards Committee from 2015-2020. She will serve as the sixth woman to lead the American College of Chest Physicians. 

Doreen J. Addrizzo-Harris, MD, FCCP, is a pulmonary/critical care physician with an extensive background in bronchiectasis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection and medical education. 

Dr. Doreen J. Addrizzo-Harris

 
Dr. Addrizzo-Harris is currently a Professor of Medicine at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine. She serves as the Associate Division Director for Clinical and Faculty Affairs, is the Director of the NYU Bronchiectasis and NTM Program, and is Co-Director of the NYU Pulmonary Faculty Practice. She is now serving in her 20th year as the Program Director of NYU's Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Fellowship. Dr. Addrizzo-Harris received her medical degree and completed her residency and fellowship training at New York University School of Medicine. Since completing her training, she was recruited to stay as a faculty member at NYU, where she has been a critical presence over the past 25 years. She has been instrumental in educating the next generation of pulmonary/critical care physicians and has won a number of awards for her teaching skills, most recently, the 2021 Outstanding Educator Award from the APCCMPD. Dr. Addrizzo-Harris has served on the board of the Association of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Program Directors (APCCMPD), including serving as President from 2006-2007. Academically, she authored 44 peer-reviewed publications and 57 scientific abstracts presented at international conferences. She has participated in numerous clinical trials, many as PI. Dr. Addrizzo-Harris has been recognized as a Distinguished CHEST Educator each year since its inception in 2017 and received the Distinguished Service Award in 2019. 
During her leadership tenure with CHEST, Dr. Addrizzo-Harris has served on the Marketing Committee, the Health and Science Policy Committee (Chair from 2007-2009), Government Relations Committee, Scientific Program Committee, Education Committee, Governance Committee, Editorial Board for CHEST Physician, Professional Standards Committee (Chair 2016-2018), Board of Regents, and CHEST Foundation Board of Trustees. Most recently, Dr. Addrizzo-Harris served as the President of the CHEST Foundation from 2018-2019 and Co-Chair of the Foundation Awards Committee from 2015-2020. She will serve as the sixth woman to lead the American College of Chest Physicians. 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer

Introducing this year’s Recognition Prize recipients

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 02/22/2021 - 16:45

The American Gastroenterological Association has announced the 2021 recipients of its annual recognition prizes, given in honor of outstanding contributions and achievements in gastroenterology.

“AGA Recognition Prizes allow members to honor their contemporaries for their exceptional contributions to the field of gastroenterology and hepatology,” said Hashem B. El-Serag, MD, MPH, AGAF, chair of AGA. “The 2021 AGA Recognition Prize winners represent only a small group of our widely distinguished and exceptional members who help make AGA such an accomplished organization. We are honored that such esteemed individuals are representatives of AGA.”

This year the AGA Recognition Prizes will be presented virtually in May 2021.

  • Michael Camilleri, MD, AGAF, Julius Friedenwald Medal
  • Byron Cryer, MD, Distinguished Service Award in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Sandra Quezada, MD, MS, Distinguished Service Award in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Kim Barrett, Distinguished Achievement Award in Basic Science
  • David Y. Graham, William Beaumont Prize
  • Griffin Rodgers, MD, MACP, Research Service Award
  • Lin Chang, Distinguished Educator Award
  • Nimish Vakil, MD, AGAF, FASGE, Distinguished Clinician Award in Private Practice
  • Peter H.R. Green, Distinguished Clinician Award in Academic Practice
  • Vay Liang “Bill” Go, MD, AGAF, Distinguished Mentor Award
  • Shahnaz Sultan, MD, MHSc, AGAF, Outstanding Service Award
  • Osama Altayar, MD, Outstanding Service Award
  • Perica Davitkov, MD, Outstanding Service Award
  • Joseph D. Feuerstein, MD, Outstanding Service Award
  • Shazia M. Siddique, MD, MSHP, Outstanding Service Award
  • Yngve T. Falck-Ytter, MD, AGAF, Outstanding Service Award
  • Joseph K. Lim, MD, AGAF, Outstanding Service Award


To learn more about our 2021 AGA recognition prize recipients, visit https://gastro.org/2021awards.
 

Publications
Topics
Sections

The American Gastroenterological Association has announced the 2021 recipients of its annual recognition prizes, given in honor of outstanding contributions and achievements in gastroenterology.

“AGA Recognition Prizes allow members to honor their contemporaries for their exceptional contributions to the field of gastroenterology and hepatology,” said Hashem B. El-Serag, MD, MPH, AGAF, chair of AGA. “The 2021 AGA Recognition Prize winners represent only a small group of our widely distinguished and exceptional members who help make AGA such an accomplished organization. We are honored that such esteemed individuals are representatives of AGA.”

This year the AGA Recognition Prizes will be presented virtually in May 2021.

  • Michael Camilleri, MD, AGAF, Julius Friedenwald Medal
  • Byron Cryer, MD, Distinguished Service Award in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Sandra Quezada, MD, MS, Distinguished Service Award in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Kim Barrett, Distinguished Achievement Award in Basic Science
  • David Y. Graham, William Beaumont Prize
  • Griffin Rodgers, MD, MACP, Research Service Award
  • Lin Chang, Distinguished Educator Award
  • Nimish Vakil, MD, AGAF, FASGE, Distinguished Clinician Award in Private Practice
  • Peter H.R. Green, Distinguished Clinician Award in Academic Practice
  • Vay Liang “Bill” Go, MD, AGAF, Distinguished Mentor Award
  • Shahnaz Sultan, MD, MHSc, AGAF, Outstanding Service Award
  • Osama Altayar, MD, Outstanding Service Award
  • Perica Davitkov, MD, Outstanding Service Award
  • Joseph D. Feuerstein, MD, Outstanding Service Award
  • Shazia M. Siddique, MD, MSHP, Outstanding Service Award
  • Yngve T. Falck-Ytter, MD, AGAF, Outstanding Service Award
  • Joseph K. Lim, MD, AGAF, Outstanding Service Award


To learn more about our 2021 AGA recognition prize recipients, visit https://gastro.org/2021awards.
 

The American Gastroenterological Association has announced the 2021 recipients of its annual recognition prizes, given in honor of outstanding contributions and achievements in gastroenterology.

“AGA Recognition Prizes allow members to honor their contemporaries for their exceptional contributions to the field of gastroenterology and hepatology,” said Hashem B. El-Serag, MD, MPH, AGAF, chair of AGA. “The 2021 AGA Recognition Prize winners represent only a small group of our widely distinguished and exceptional members who help make AGA such an accomplished organization. We are honored that such esteemed individuals are representatives of AGA.”

This year the AGA Recognition Prizes will be presented virtually in May 2021.

  • Michael Camilleri, MD, AGAF, Julius Friedenwald Medal
  • Byron Cryer, MD, Distinguished Service Award in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Sandra Quezada, MD, MS, Distinguished Service Award in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Kim Barrett, Distinguished Achievement Award in Basic Science
  • David Y. Graham, William Beaumont Prize
  • Griffin Rodgers, MD, MACP, Research Service Award
  • Lin Chang, Distinguished Educator Award
  • Nimish Vakil, MD, AGAF, FASGE, Distinguished Clinician Award in Private Practice
  • Peter H.R. Green, Distinguished Clinician Award in Academic Practice
  • Vay Liang “Bill” Go, MD, AGAF, Distinguished Mentor Award
  • Shahnaz Sultan, MD, MHSc, AGAF, Outstanding Service Award
  • Osama Altayar, MD, Outstanding Service Award
  • Perica Davitkov, MD, Outstanding Service Award
  • Joseph D. Feuerstein, MD, Outstanding Service Award
  • Shazia M. Siddique, MD, MSHP, Outstanding Service Award
  • Yngve T. Falck-Ytter, MD, AGAF, Outstanding Service Award
  • Joseph K. Lim, MD, AGAF, Outstanding Service Award


To learn more about our 2021 AGA recognition prize recipients, visit https://gastro.org/2021awards.
 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer

How a gift of stock to the AGA Research Foundation can be a win-win

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 02/21/2021 - 17:57

If you own stock that’s increased in value since you purchased it (and you’ve owned it for at least 1 year), you have a unique opportunity for philanthropy. When you donate securities to the AGA Research Foundation, you receive the same income tax savings (if you itemize) that you would if you wrote the AGA Research Foundation a check, but with the added benefit of eliminating capital gains taxes on the transfer, which can be as high as 20%.

Making a gift of securities to support the AGA Research Foundation’s mission to raise funds to support young researchers in gastroenterology and hepatology is as easy as instructing your broker to transfer the shares. Using assets other than cash also allows you more flexibility when planning your gift.



Benefits:

  • Receive an income tax deduction for gifts of securities if you itemize.
  • Provide relief from capital gains tax with gifts of securities.
  • Help fulfill our mission with your contribution.

Take the next step:

The AGA Research Foundation can help clarify and document the steps to donate stock to us. Contact us at [email protected] to make your donation.


 

Publications
Topics
Sections

If you own stock that’s increased in value since you purchased it (and you’ve owned it for at least 1 year), you have a unique opportunity for philanthropy. When you donate securities to the AGA Research Foundation, you receive the same income tax savings (if you itemize) that you would if you wrote the AGA Research Foundation a check, but with the added benefit of eliminating capital gains taxes on the transfer, which can be as high as 20%.

Making a gift of securities to support the AGA Research Foundation’s mission to raise funds to support young researchers in gastroenterology and hepatology is as easy as instructing your broker to transfer the shares. Using assets other than cash also allows you more flexibility when planning your gift.



Benefits:

  • Receive an income tax deduction for gifts of securities if you itemize.
  • Provide relief from capital gains tax with gifts of securities.
  • Help fulfill our mission with your contribution.

Take the next step:

The AGA Research Foundation can help clarify and document the steps to donate stock to us. Contact us at [email protected] to make your donation.


 

If you own stock that’s increased in value since you purchased it (and you’ve owned it for at least 1 year), you have a unique opportunity for philanthropy. When you donate securities to the AGA Research Foundation, you receive the same income tax savings (if you itemize) that you would if you wrote the AGA Research Foundation a check, but with the added benefit of eliminating capital gains taxes on the transfer, which can be as high as 20%.

Making a gift of securities to support the AGA Research Foundation’s mission to raise funds to support young researchers in gastroenterology and hepatology is as easy as instructing your broker to transfer the shares. Using assets other than cash also allows you more flexibility when planning your gift.



Benefits:

  • Receive an income tax deduction for gifts of securities if you itemize.
  • Provide relief from capital gains tax with gifts of securities.
  • Help fulfill our mission with your contribution.

Take the next step:

The AGA Research Foundation can help clarify and document the steps to donate stock to us. Contact us at [email protected] to make your donation.


 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer

Registration for DDW® 2021 is now open

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 02/21/2021 - 16:54

 

Join your colleagues in the digestive disease community at the most prestigious meeting for GI professionals. Registration for Digestive Disease Week® (DDW) 2021 is now open. Register on or before March 31 to receive a discounted rate. AGA member trainees, postdoctoral fellows, medical residents and students also receive complimentary registration during this early bird period.

In 2021, DDW moves online as a fully virtual meeting, taking place May 21–23, 2021. While DDW Virtual™ will look a little different, we’re excited by opportunities the new format provides to learn, share, and connect, such as the following:

  • Explore today’s most pressing topics and new developments, shared in oral abstract and ePoster presentations.
  • Gain the kind of insight that you can’t get out of a textbook, presented in sessions led by top GI and hepatology experts.
  • Network and build connections with your colleagues in an engaging, interactive setting.

Learn more and register at ddw.org.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Join your colleagues in the digestive disease community at the most prestigious meeting for GI professionals. Registration for Digestive Disease Week® (DDW) 2021 is now open. Register on or before March 31 to receive a discounted rate. AGA member trainees, postdoctoral fellows, medical residents and students also receive complimentary registration during this early bird period.

In 2021, DDW moves online as a fully virtual meeting, taking place May 21–23, 2021. While DDW Virtual™ will look a little different, we’re excited by opportunities the new format provides to learn, share, and connect, such as the following:

  • Explore today’s most pressing topics and new developments, shared in oral abstract and ePoster presentations.
  • Gain the kind of insight that you can’t get out of a textbook, presented in sessions led by top GI and hepatology experts.
  • Network and build connections with your colleagues in an engaging, interactive setting.

Learn more and register at ddw.org.

 

Join your colleagues in the digestive disease community at the most prestigious meeting for GI professionals. Registration for Digestive Disease Week® (DDW) 2021 is now open. Register on or before March 31 to receive a discounted rate. AGA member trainees, postdoctoral fellows, medical residents and students also receive complimentary registration during this early bird period.

In 2021, DDW moves online as a fully virtual meeting, taking place May 21–23, 2021. While DDW Virtual™ will look a little different, we’re excited by opportunities the new format provides to learn, share, and connect, such as the following:

  • Explore today’s most pressing topics and new developments, shared in oral abstract and ePoster presentations.
  • Gain the kind of insight that you can’t get out of a textbook, presented in sessions led by top GI and hepatology experts.
  • Network and build connections with your colleagues in an engaging, interactive setting.

Learn more and register at ddw.org.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer

Meet the 2021 AGA Fellowship inductees

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 02/21/2021 - 16:49

 

Join the GI community in a round of applause for the 120 members adding the designation “AGAF” in their professional activities. Along with a recognition pin and certificate of acceptance, American Gastroenterological Association President Bishr Omary commends the group in the AGA Community for their superior professional achievements and contributions to the field of gastroenterology. See the full list and join the discussion at https://community.gastro.org.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Join the GI community in a round of applause for the 120 members adding the designation “AGAF” in their professional activities. Along with a recognition pin and certificate of acceptance, American Gastroenterological Association President Bishr Omary commends the group in the AGA Community for their superior professional achievements and contributions to the field of gastroenterology. See the full list and join the discussion at https://community.gastro.org.

 

Join the GI community in a round of applause for the 120 members adding the designation “AGAF” in their professional activities. Along with a recognition pin and certificate of acceptance, American Gastroenterological Association President Bishr Omary commends the group in the AGA Community for their superior professional achievements and contributions to the field of gastroenterology. See the full list and join the discussion at https://community.gastro.org.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer

Advocacy in gastroenterology: Advancing health policies for our patients and our profession

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 02/23/2021 - 10:11

Physician advocacy is an important tool for health care professionals to protect patients and the vitality of the profession. Medical associations across the spectrum participate in advocacy because of its value in preserving the beneficial role of physicians in health care policy decision making. This is especially true for specialty physician associations, like the American Gastroenterological Association, which represents more than 9,000 U.S. GI physicians and researchers. Advocacy allows for the voice of GIs and their patients to be heard on Capitol Hill, in the White House, and among various regulatory agencies. When we advocate as a profession, we help ensure good policies gain momentum and halt harmful legislative or regulatory efforts from enactment.

What is physician advocacy?

Physicians are advocating every day for their patients by helping patients make the right decisions about their care. This naturally translates into advocacy at the health policy level. Advocacy is lobbying. While that word may take on a negative meaning for some, it also means being a persuasive communicator, passionate educator, and a leader. National associations, like AGA, often call on members to do just that: educate lawmakers on policies affecting GI, communicate how policies could affect lawmakers’ constituencies back in their respective districts, and lead others to support GI policy agendas.

Physician advocacy works. AGA had its busiest year for policy work, but this was coupled with a large uptick in GI advocacy engagement. The public health emergency placed many burdens on the health care community and our profession. However, through our advocacy work, we also saw many changes, including increased federal research funding for digestive diseases and GI cancers, passage of legislation to remove patients’ barriers to colorectal cancer screening, increased regulatory and reimbursement flexibilities incorporated to ensure physicians could continue to deliver timely care, and creation of federal financial and small business relief programs to support gastroenterology practices.

Physician advocacy in GI is especially critical because specialty care is often viewed as having a smaller voice when compared with those of the larger bodies, such as primary care, surgery, or emergency physicians. As a health care specialty with a known shortage across the United States, we need all the help we can get to inform policy makers of our position on controversial policies. In many cases, non–health care professionals are informing policy makers on how to address issues that impact our profession. Additionally, there is a lack of knowledge about health care complexities and needs among decision makers who are ultimately determining how health care is delivered. As health care experts, we are best suited to educate lawmakers on the true impact of health policies. If we do not engage and educate policy makers, our profession and patients will suffer the consequences.

 

 

GI policy priorities for 2021

AGA will continue its advocacy work in 2021 on the following issues and encourage you and your colleagues to get involved:

Administrative burden relief

Utilization management protocols, like prior authorizations and step therapy, continue to increase and force physicians and their staff to spend hours of extra work time each week to process the paperwork. Prior authorizations are especially troublesome because they have increased for upper GI procedures and other common procedures. Step therapy protocols have also increased for IBD patients on biologics or other high-cost therapies, resulting in patients not receiving effective therapies as determined by their physician in a timely manner.

Patient access and protections

Coverage
Coverage for patients includes the following two areas:

COVID-19 relief: The public health emergency has weakened the health care workforce with physician practices and researchers facing financial instability and threatened patient access to specialty care. To support the health care community and to combat the pandemic, the following is necessary: Increased access to personal protective equipment and medical supplies for testing and vaccination distribution and increased rapid tests, testing sites, and health care workers. The public health emergency response also requires a stronger emphasis on health equity given the disproportionate impact it has had on communities of color.

  • Preserving Affordable Care Act patient protections: The Supreme Court will rule on the Affordable Care Act, a decision which threatens to dismantle the law, including provisions that require insurers to cover preexisting conditions and preventive services. With patients delaying screenings because of the COVID-19 pandemic and the increased incidence among minority and younger populations, it is imperative that preventative screening services – like colorectal cancer screenings – remain fully covered by payers. Moreover, because of the nature of GI diseases, patients often develop multiple conditions throughout their lifetime. The preexisting conditions protections in the ACA ensure that GI patients can gain the insurance coverage they need to obtain quality treatment.

Choice
Health plans and pharmacy benefit managers are using burdensome practices, such as step therapy, to limit patient access to drugs and biologics. These practices disrupt treatment and restrict individuals with digestive diseases from the medicines that work best for them.


Affordability
High out-of-pocket drug and biologics costs limit access to necessary therapies for people with digestive diseases, such as Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. High out-of-pocket costs contribute to noncompliance, which in turn results in disease progression and complications and increases in overall health care costs.

Research funding

Sustainable long-term funding for federal research is critical to ensure the United States remains a leading contributor to innovative research breakthroughs. Under the current appropriations process in Congress, federal research funding can vary dramatically from year to year. Often enough, research funding for the next fiscal year is delayed by politics in Congress that result in continuing resolutions to fund the government and U.S. research institutions. Unstable funding causes a turbulent environment for investigators and is a deterrent for new investigators entering the field.

Member engagement

GIs need to engage in the policymaking process as there are too many threats and opportunities in today’s policy arena. The effectiveness of AGA’s advocacy work in the federal government is contingent upon members’ engagement in public policy. To increase physician advocacy and AGA member engagement, AGA offers the following avenues for members:

AGA political action committee
Political engagement is a powerful tool physician advocates can use to increase the visibility of GI on Capitol Hill. Political action committees (PACs) help provide access to lawmakers and their staff so that our advocates can educate them on the rationale for supporting our clinical and research priorities. Although PACs do not guarantee successes in Congress, it is important to note that contributions to legislators’ campaigns help them to be run more smoothly and effectively and allow the legislators to continue to serve their constituents. AGA PAC is a bipartisan political arm of AGA and is the only PAC dedicated to gastroenterology. Learn more at gastro.org/AGA-PAC.

Grassroots engagement
Build a relationship with your elected officials and their health policy staff by communicating with them often and offering to serve as a resource to the office on issues related to specialty medicine. AGA makes this easy with its online advocacy action center: gastro.quorum.us. Find out who your lawmakers are and research their background, engage them by email or Twitter on priority policy issues, and share stories with AGA staff about your interactions with congressional offices.

Congressional Advocates Program
This program creates a national grassroots network of engaged gastroenterologists interested in advocating for our profession and patients. Congressional Advocates are mentored and receive year-round advocacy training by AGA leadership and staff. Learn more at gastro.org/advocacy-and-policy/congressional-advocates-program.

 

 

Start advocating for gastroenterology

A new session of Congress has just begun, a new administration with a heavy health care agenda was elected into office, and gastroenterology needs your voice more than ever as we advocate for what really matters to us and our patients.

Join your colleagues at AGA’s spring virtual Advocacy Day on April 22, 2021. The event allows AGA members to meet with lawmakers and health policy staff virtually to educate them on the priority issues affecting our profession.

AGA staff makes it easy for you to participate. Webinar trainings, meeting schedules, and talking points will be provided to you ahead of time. For this event, we will speak to lawmakers about increasing federal research funding, addressing regulatory burdens like prior authorizations and step therapy protocols, and ensuring gastroenterologists and investigators have continued support during the COVID-19 pandemic.

For more information, visit gastro.org/aga-advocacy-day or contact AGA’s senior public policy coordinator, Jonathan Sollish, at [email protected].

Publications
Topics
Sections

Physician advocacy is an important tool for health care professionals to protect patients and the vitality of the profession. Medical associations across the spectrum participate in advocacy because of its value in preserving the beneficial role of physicians in health care policy decision making. This is especially true for specialty physician associations, like the American Gastroenterological Association, which represents more than 9,000 U.S. GI physicians and researchers. Advocacy allows for the voice of GIs and their patients to be heard on Capitol Hill, in the White House, and among various regulatory agencies. When we advocate as a profession, we help ensure good policies gain momentum and halt harmful legislative or regulatory efforts from enactment.

What is physician advocacy?

Physicians are advocating every day for their patients by helping patients make the right decisions about their care. This naturally translates into advocacy at the health policy level. Advocacy is lobbying. While that word may take on a negative meaning for some, it also means being a persuasive communicator, passionate educator, and a leader. National associations, like AGA, often call on members to do just that: educate lawmakers on policies affecting GI, communicate how policies could affect lawmakers’ constituencies back in their respective districts, and lead others to support GI policy agendas.

Physician advocacy works. AGA had its busiest year for policy work, but this was coupled with a large uptick in GI advocacy engagement. The public health emergency placed many burdens on the health care community and our profession. However, through our advocacy work, we also saw many changes, including increased federal research funding for digestive diseases and GI cancers, passage of legislation to remove patients’ barriers to colorectal cancer screening, increased regulatory and reimbursement flexibilities incorporated to ensure physicians could continue to deliver timely care, and creation of federal financial and small business relief programs to support gastroenterology practices.

Physician advocacy in GI is especially critical because specialty care is often viewed as having a smaller voice when compared with those of the larger bodies, such as primary care, surgery, or emergency physicians. As a health care specialty with a known shortage across the United States, we need all the help we can get to inform policy makers of our position on controversial policies. In many cases, non–health care professionals are informing policy makers on how to address issues that impact our profession. Additionally, there is a lack of knowledge about health care complexities and needs among decision makers who are ultimately determining how health care is delivered. As health care experts, we are best suited to educate lawmakers on the true impact of health policies. If we do not engage and educate policy makers, our profession and patients will suffer the consequences.

 

 

GI policy priorities for 2021

AGA will continue its advocacy work in 2021 on the following issues and encourage you and your colleagues to get involved:

Administrative burden relief

Utilization management protocols, like prior authorizations and step therapy, continue to increase and force physicians and their staff to spend hours of extra work time each week to process the paperwork. Prior authorizations are especially troublesome because they have increased for upper GI procedures and other common procedures. Step therapy protocols have also increased for IBD patients on biologics or other high-cost therapies, resulting in patients not receiving effective therapies as determined by their physician in a timely manner.

Patient access and protections

Coverage
Coverage for patients includes the following two areas:

COVID-19 relief: The public health emergency has weakened the health care workforce with physician practices and researchers facing financial instability and threatened patient access to specialty care. To support the health care community and to combat the pandemic, the following is necessary: Increased access to personal protective equipment and medical supplies for testing and vaccination distribution and increased rapid tests, testing sites, and health care workers. The public health emergency response also requires a stronger emphasis on health equity given the disproportionate impact it has had on communities of color.

  • Preserving Affordable Care Act patient protections: The Supreme Court will rule on the Affordable Care Act, a decision which threatens to dismantle the law, including provisions that require insurers to cover preexisting conditions and preventive services. With patients delaying screenings because of the COVID-19 pandemic and the increased incidence among minority and younger populations, it is imperative that preventative screening services – like colorectal cancer screenings – remain fully covered by payers. Moreover, because of the nature of GI diseases, patients often develop multiple conditions throughout their lifetime. The preexisting conditions protections in the ACA ensure that GI patients can gain the insurance coverage they need to obtain quality treatment.

Choice
Health plans and pharmacy benefit managers are using burdensome practices, such as step therapy, to limit patient access to drugs and biologics. These practices disrupt treatment and restrict individuals with digestive diseases from the medicines that work best for them.


Affordability
High out-of-pocket drug and biologics costs limit access to necessary therapies for people with digestive diseases, such as Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. High out-of-pocket costs contribute to noncompliance, which in turn results in disease progression and complications and increases in overall health care costs.

Research funding

Sustainable long-term funding for federal research is critical to ensure the United States remains a leading contributor to innovative research breakthroughs. Under the current appropriations process in Congress, federal research funding can vary dramatically from year to year. Often enough, research funding for the next fiscal year is delayed by politics in Congress that result in continuing resolutions to fund the government and U.S. research institutions. Unstable funding causes a turbulent environment for investigators and is a deterrent for new investigators entering the field.

Member engagement

GIs need to engage in the policymaking process as there are too many threats and opportunities in today’s policy arena. The effectiveness of AGA’s advocacy work in the federal government is contingent upon members’ engagement in public policy. To increase physician advocacy and AGA member engagement, AGA offers the following avenues for members:

AGA political action committee
Political engagement is a powerful tool physician advocates can use to increase the visibility of GI on Capitol Hill. Political action committees (PACs) help provide access to lawmakers and their staff so that our advocates can educate them on the rationale for supporting our clinical and research priorities. Although PACs do not guarantee successes in Congress, it is important to note that contributions to legislators’ campaigns help them to be run more smoothly and effectively and allow the legislators to continue to serve their constituents. AGA PAC is a bipartisan political arm of AGA and is the only PAC dedicated to gastroenterology. Learn more at gastro.org/AGA-PAC.

Grassroots engagement
Build a relationship with your elected officials and their health policy staff by communicating with them often and offering to serve as a resource to the office on issues related to specialty medicine. AGA makes this easy with its online advocacy action center: gastro.quorum.us. Find out who your lawmakers are and research their background, engage them by email or Twitter on priority policy issues, and share stories with AGA staff about your interactions with congressional offices.

Congressional Advocates Program
This program creates a national grassroots network of engaged gastroenterologists interested in advocating for our profession and patients. Congressional Advocates are mentored and receive year-round advocacy training by AGA leadership and staff. Learn more at gastro.org/advocacy-and-policy/congressional-advocates-program.

 

 

Start advocating for gastroenterology

A new session of Congress has just begun, a new administration with a heavy health care agenda was elected into office, and gastroenterology needs your voice more than ever as we advocate for what really matters to us and our patients.

Join your colleagues at AGA’s spring virtual Advocacy Day on April 22, 2021. The event allows AGA members to meet with lawmakers and health policy staff virtually to educate them on the priority issues affecting our profession.

AGA staff makes it easy for you to participate. Webinar trainings, meeting schedules, and talking points will be provided to you ahead of time. For this event, we will speak to lawmakers about increasing federal research funding, addressing regulatory burdens like prior authorizations and step therapy protocols, and ensuring gastroenterologists and investigators have continued support during the COVID-19 pandemic.

For more information, visit gastro.org/aga-advocacy-day or contact AGA’s senior public policy coordinator, Jonathan Sollish, at [email protected].

Physician advocacy is an important tool for health care professionals to protect patients and the vitality of the profession. Medical associations across the spectrum participate in advocacy because of its value in preserving the beneficial role of physicians in health care policy decision making. This is especially true for specialty physician associations, like the American Gastroenterological Association, which represents more than 9,000 U.S. GI physicians and researchers. Advocacy allows for the voice of GIs and their patients to be heard on Capitol Hill, in the White House, and among various regulatory agencies. When we advocate as a profession, we help ensure good policies gain momentum and halt harmful legislative or regulatory efforts from enactment.

What is physician advocacy?

Physicians are advocating every day for their patients by helping patients make the right decisions about their care. This naturally translates into advocacy at the health policy level. Advocacy is lobbying. While that word may take on a negative meaning for some, it also means being a persuasive communicator, passionate educator, and a leader. National associations, like AGA, often call on members to do just that: educate lawmakers on policies affecting GI, communicate how policies could affect lawmakers’ constituencies back in their respective districts, and lead others to support GI policy agendas.

Physician advocacy works. AGA had its busiest year for policy work, but this was coupled with a large uptick in GI advocacy engagement. The public health emergency placed many burdens on the health care community and our profession. However, through our advocacy work, we also saw many changes, including increased federal research funding for digestive diseases and GI cancers, passage of legislation to remove patients’ barriers to colorectal cancer screening, increased regulatory and reimbursement flexibilities incorporated to ensure physicians could continue to deliver timely care, and creation of federal financial and small business relief programs to support gastroenterology practices.

Physician advocacy in GI is especially critical because specialty care is often viewed as having a smaller voice when compared with those of the larger bodies, such as primary care, surgery, or emergency physicians. As a health care specialty with a known shortage across the United States, we need all the help we can get to inform policy makers of our position on controversial policies. In many cases, non–health care professionals are informing policy makers on how to address issues that impact our profession. Additionally, there is a lack of knowledge about health care complexities and needs among decision makers who are ultimately determining how health care is delivered. As health care experts, we are best suited to educate lawmakers on the true impact of health policies. If we do not engage and educate policy makers, our profession and patients will suffer the consequences.

 

 

GI policy priorities for 2021

AGA will continue its advocacy work in 2021 on the following issues and encourage you and your colleagues to get involved:

Administrative burden relief

Utilization management protocols, like prior authorizations and step therapy, continue to increase and force physicians and their staff to spend hours of extra work time each week to process the paperwork. Prior authorizations are especially troublesome because they have increased for upper GI procedures and other common procedures. Step therapy protocols have also increased for IBD patients on biologics or other high-cost therapies, resulting in patients not receiving effective therapies as determined by their physician in a timely manner.

Patient access and protections

Coverage
Coverage for patients includes the following two areas:

COVID-19 relief: The public health emergency has weakened the health care workforce with physician practices and researchers facing financial instability and threatened patient access to specialty care. To support the health care community and to combat the pandemic, the following is necessary: Increased access to personal protective equipment and medical supplies for testing and vaccination distribution and increased rapid tests, testing sites, and health care workers. The public health emergency response also requires a stronger emphasis on health equity given the disproportionate impact it has had on communities of color.

  • Preserving Affordable Care Act patient protections: The Supreme Court will rule on the Affordable Care Act, a decision which threatens to dismantle the law, including provisions that require insurers to cover preexisting conditions and preventive services. With patients delaying screenings because of the COVID-19 pandemic and the increased incidence among minority and younger populations, it is imperative that preventative screening services – like colorectal cancer screenings – remain fully covered by payers. Moreover, because of the nature of GI diseases, patients often develop multiple conditions throughout their lifetime. The preexisting conditions protections in the ACA ensure that GI patients can gain the insurance coverage they need to obtain quality treatment.

Choice
Health plans and pharmacy benefit managers are using burdensome practices, such as step therapy, to limit patient access to drugs and biologics. These practices disrupt treatment and restrict individuals with digestive diseases from the medicines that work best for them.


Affordability
High out-of-pocket drug and biologics costs limit access to necessary therapies for people with digestive diseases, such as Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. High out-of-pocket costs contribute to noncompliance, which in turn results in disease progression and complications and increases in overall health care costs.

Research funding

Sustainable long-term funding for federal research is critical to ensure the United States remains a leading contributor to innovative research breakthroughs. Under the current appropriations process in Congress, federal research funding can vary dramatically from year to year. Often enough, research funding for the next fiscal year is delayed by politics in Congress that result in continuing resolutions to fund the government and U.S. research institutions. Unstable funding causes a turbulent environment for investigators and is a deterrent for new investigators entering the field.

Member engagement

GIs need to engage in the policymaking process as there are too many threats and opportunities in today’s policy arena. The effectiveness of AGA’s advocacy work in the federal government is contingent upon members’ engagement in public policy. To increase physician advocacy and AGA member engagement, AGA offers the following avenues for members:

AGA political action committee
Political engagement is a powerful tool physician advocates can use to increase the visibility of GI on Capitol Hill. Political action committees (PACs) help provide access to lawmakers and their staff so that our advocates can educate them on the rationale for supporting our clinical and research priorities. Although PACs do not guarantee successes in Congress, it is important to note that contributions to legislators’ campaigns help them to be run more smoothly and effectively and allow the legislators to continue to serve their constituents. AGA PAC is a bipartisan political arm of AGA and is the only PAC dedicated to gastroenterology. Learn more at gastro.org/AGA-PAC.

Grassroots engagement
Build a relationship with your elected officials and their health policy staff by communicating with them often and offering to serve as a resource to the office on issues related to specialty medicine. AGA makes this easy with its online advocacy action center: gastro.quorum.us. Find out who your lawmakers are and research their background, engage them by email or Twitter on priority policy issues, and share stories with AGA staff about your interactions with congressional offices.

Congressional Advocates Program
This program creates a national grassroots network of engaged gastroenterologists interested in advocating for our profession and patients. Congressional Advocates are mentored and receive year-round advocacy training by AGA leadership and staff. Learn more at gastro.org/advocacy-and-policy/congressional-advocates-program.

 

 

Start advocating for gastroenterology

A new session of Congress has just begun, a new administration with a heavy health care agenda was elected into office, and gastroenterology needs your voice more than ever as we advocate for what really matters to us and our patients.

Join your colleagues at AGA’s spring virtual Advocacy Day on April 22, 2021. The event allows AGA members to meet with lawmakers and health policy staff virtually to educate them on the priority issues affecting our profession.

AGA staff makes it easy for you to participate. Webinar trainings, meeting schedules, and talking points will be provided to you ahead of time. For this event, we will speak to lawmakers about increasing federal research funding, addressing regulatory burdens like prior authorizations and step therapy protocols, and ensuring gastroenterologists and investigators have continued support during the COVID-19 pandemic.

For more information, visit gastro.org/aga-advocacy-day or contact AGA’s senior public policy coordinator, Jonathan Sollish, at [email protected].

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer

Home O2 in COPD. Eradicating COVID-19. mRNA and beyond. COVID-19 treatment, so far. Awake proning in COVID-19. Home ventilation. Interprofessional team approach to palliative extubation.

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 02/12/2021 - 15:32

 

Airways disorders


Updated guidelines on the use of home O2 in COPD: A much-needed respite

Dr. Kadambari Vijaykumar

The use of long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT, oxygen prescribed for at least 15 h/day) in patients with COPD and chronic hypoxemia has been standard of care based on trials from the 1980s that conferred a survival benefit with the use of continuous oxygen (Ann Internal Med. 1980;93[3]:391-8). More recently, LTOT has not shown to improve survival or delay time to the hospitalization in patients with stable COPD and resting or exercise-induced moderate desaturation (N Engl J Med. 2016;375[17]:1617-27). Thus far, existing recommendations had been semi-inclusive in patient selection. A fundamental lack of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines prompted additional research into patient selection, portable oxygen technology, advocacy for improved oxygen therapy financing, and updating of policies (Jacobs et al., Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15[12]:1369-81). With over a million patients in the United States being prescribed home oxygen and reported disconnect in-home oxygen needs/experiences across disease processes, lifestyles, and oxygen supply requirements, the 2020 American Thoracic Society (ATS) workshop on optimizing home oxygen therapy sought to answer critical questions in the use of LTOT for COPD patients (AlMutairi, et al. Respir Care. 2018;63[11]:1321-30; Jacobs, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202[10]:e121-e141).

Dr. Dharani Kumari Narendra
Based on a thorough systematic review of available literature, the committee made strong recommendations (moderate-quality evidence) for LTOT use in COPD with severe chronic resting hypoxemia (PaO2 ≤ 55 mm Hg or SpO2 ≤ 88%), conditional recommendations for the following: (1) Against LTOT use in COPD with moderate chronic resting hypoxemia [SpO2 89%-93% (low-quality evidence)]; (2) Ambulatory oxygen use in adults with COPD with severe exertional hypoxemia (moderate-quality evidence); and (3) Liquid oxygen use in patients who are mobile outside the home and require >3 L/min of continuous-flow oxygen during exertion (very-low-quality evidence). The review identified a dire need to develop a more robust evidence-based practice and incorporate shared decision-making while highlighting the deficit of conclusive data supporting supplemental oxygen for patients with exertional desaturation.

Kadambari Vijaykumar, MD
Fellow-in-Training Member

Dharani Kumari Narendra, MBBS, FCCP
Steering Committee Member

 

 

Chest infections


Eradicating COVID-19 scourge: It is up to all of us— get vaccinated!

Dr. Marcus I. Restrepo

2021 brings hope, spurred by the availability of several effective COVID-19 vaccines – unprecedented scientific advances, considering that these vaccines were developed in record time. We have stark choices: while some individuals ignore scientific evidence and refuse to take the vaccine, we from the Chest Infections NetWork urge an alternative and imperative choice. As health providers caring for COVID-19 patients, we first-hand witness the horrors of dying alone in a hospital bed – far away from beloved ones. I have a sticker on my car that says: If you do not like your mask, you will not like my ventilator. With the advent of vaccines, I plan on replacing this sticker: If you do not want to get vaccinated, you will not like my ventilator. When the vaccine became available at my institution, I was the first to roll up my sleeve and feel the pinch in my upper arm. I urge you all to do the same. Make a difference, do your part – get vaccinated.

Marcos I. Restrepo, MD, MSc, PhD
Chair

 

Clinical pulmonary medicine


COVID-19 vaccines – mRNA and beyond

We currently have two COVID-19 mRNA vaccines with US FDA emergency use authorization (EUA) for use in individuals less than or equal to age 18 years – Pfizer and Moderna. They work by introducing mRNA into a muscle cell that instructs the host cell ribosomes to express Sars-CoV-2 spike proteins, thereby triggering a systemic immune response.

Dr. Mary Jo Farmer
Phase 3 trial demonstrated vaccine efficacy of 95% with both vaccines. Besides injection site pain, common side effects were fatigue, headache, chills, and myalgias, more frequent after dose two.

Both are two-dose regimens, with Pfizer’s 21 days apart and requires storage at -75 C, and Moderna’s 28 days apart, requiring storage at -20 C.
Dr. Shyam Subramanian
With reports of anaphylaxis reactions, CDC has issued a warning with a contraindication to the vaccine if there is severe allergic reaction after the first dose or a history of allergy to any of its components, including polyethylene glycol (PEG), or polysorbate, due to potential cross-reactive hypersensitivity with PEG.

Presently in development are three more vaccines. AstraZeneca (AZ) and Johnson & Johnson (JnJ) use an adenovirus vector. Both vaccines are stable at standard refrigerator temperatures. AZ’s results were mixed – with two, full-size doses efficacy at 62% effective, but with a half-dose followed by a full dose, efficacy was 90%. Novavax candidate works differently - it’s a protein subunit vaccine and uses a lab-made version of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, mixed with an adjuvant to help trigger the immune system. Results from all trials are eagerly awaited.

Mary Jo S. Farmer, MD, PhD, FCCP
Steering Committee Member


Shyam Subramanian, MD, FCCP
Chair

 

 

Clinical research and quality improvement
 

COVID-19 treatment, so far!

COVID-19 has turned rapidly into a fatal illness, causing over 1.8 million deaths worldwide so far. The pandemic has also showed us the power of adaptive trials, multi-arm trials, and the role for collaboration across the global scientific community. A few significant studies are worth mentioning.

Dr. Muhammad Hayat Syed
Initial therapies were with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, but showed no clinical improvement (Cavalcanti AB. N Engl J Med. 2020;383[21]:2041). Remdesivir, now standard of care, is based on the ACTT-1 trial, a double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT), showing improved recovery time (Beigel JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020;383[19]:1813). The RECOVERY trial, a large clinical trial in the United Kingdom, demonstrated a mortality benefit (rate ratio 0.83) with dexamethasone at 28 days in those with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Lopinavir-ritonavir combination failed to show benefit in the same trial (Horby P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436). Baricitinib has been shown to decrease recovery time, especially in patients with high oxygen need (Kalil AC, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2031994).

Possible future therapies include antiviral monoclonal antibodies, bamlanivimab (Chen P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020; online ahead of print); early convalescent plasma (Libster R, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2033700); and casirivimab-imdevimab (Baum A, et al. Science. 2020 Nov 27 doi: 10.1126/science.abe2402). Development of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can help with primary prevention and herd immunity (Polack FP, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020;383[27]:2603; Baden LR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020; Dec 30; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389).

We are starting to understand why COVID-19 infection is more pathogenic in some, how to predict development of severe disease, and how to best treat respiratory failure. Defeating the pandemic will require ongoing international collaboration in research, development, and resource allocation.

Muhammad Hayat Syed, MBBS

Ankita Agarwal, MD
Fellows-in-Training Members

 

 

Critical care

Awake proning in COVID-19

Prone positioning has been shown to improve pulmonary mechanics in intubated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Proposed mechanisms for these benefits include shape matching, reversing the pleural pressure gradient, homogenizing distribution of pleural pressures, reducing the impact of the heart and abdomen on the lungs, and maintaining distribution of perfusion. Application of prone positioning has also been shown to reduce mortality in severe ARDS (Guérin, et al. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(23):2159-68). With the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians have extrapolated that nonintubated patients with severe hypoxia may benefit from awake proning in the hopes of improving oxygenation and decreasing need for intubation. But, what’s the evidence so far?

Dr. Kathryn Pendleton
In small studies, awake proning has been shown to improve oxygenation (PaO2/FIO2 ratio) and work of breathing in patients with COVID-19 who were severely hypoxic and could tolerate proning receiving high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) or noninvasive ventilation (Weatherald, et al. J Crit Care. 2021;61:63-70). However, other studies were less conclusive. In a study by Elharrar, et al (JAMA. 2020;323(22):2336-2338), oxygenation only improved in 25% of those who were proned, and this improvement was not sustained in half of patients after they were re-supined. Additionally, a recent prospective, observational study from Spain did not show benefit to awake proning in patients receiving HFNO with respect to need for intubation or risk of mortality (Ferrando, et al. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):597).
Dr. Viren Kaul
It remains unclear whether these physiologic and short-term clinical benefits will prevent the need for mechanical ventilation and/or improve long-term outcomes, including mortality. The other nuances of application of prone positioning in spontaneously breathing patients, such as the optimal duration, positioning, clinical setting, termination criteria, and adverse effects will only become clearer with time and more robust studies. Currently, more than 60 studies examining the role of prone positioning in COVID-19 were enrolling or recently completed. Hopefully, more robust trials will provide evidence about the effectiveness of this therapy in this population. Finally, head over to CHEST’s COVID-19 Resource Center to access a downloadable infographic describing the application of prone positioning.

Kathryn Pendleton, MD

Viren Kaul, MD
Steering Committee Members

 

Home-Based Mechanical Ventilation and Neuromuscular Disease


New horizons in home ventilation

Phasing out a particular ventilator (Philips Respironics Trilogy 100 ventilator) has everyone on a steep learning curve with the replacement (Trilogy EVO). Most features are replicated in the EVO, including volume/pressure control and pressure-supported modes, mouthpiece ventilation, active/passive circuit capability, and portability (11.5 lb). Upgrades include longer battery life (15 hours; 7.5 hours internal/7.5 hours detachable) and use in pediatric patients now greater than or equal to 2.5 kg.

Dr. Janet Hilbert
A significant improvement in the workhorse AVAPS-AE mode is the addition of inspiratory time control on patient-initiated breaths. In AVAPS-AE (without PC-enabled), patient-initiated breaths remain flow-cycled; however, the inspiratory time control can be achieved using Timax/Timin setting for patients with neuromuscular respiratory failure and COPD (Coleman et al. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(9):1091-98; Nicholson, et al. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(7):1139-46).Pressure control (PC) can now be enabled in AVAPS-AE to allow fixed Ti for both patient-initiated and device-initiated breaths, advantageous in neuromuscular disease and obesity-hypoventilation syndrome(Nicholson, et al., Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(7):1139-46; Selim, et al.,Chest. 2018;153(1):251-65).

Other significant improvements include lower flow trigger sensitivity to accommodate patients with severe respiratory muscle weakness, a fast start AVAPS with rapid breath-to-breath 3 cm H20 increases for the first minute to rapidly reach target tidal volume, and breath-to-breath auto-EPAP sensing of upper airway resistance to maintain airway patency for patients with upper airway obstruction.

Internal bluetooth transmission to cloud-based monitoring (Care OrchestratorTM) expands access to patients without wi-fi or cellular service. New monitoring modules, SpO2 and EtCO2, and transcutaneous CO2 monitoring (Sentec), transmit to cloud-based monitoring (EVO EtCs2 spring 2021).

These welcome improvements allow clinicians to better match ventilator settings to the patients’ evolving physiology and provide flexibility and connectivity to optimize long-term care.

Karin Provost, DO, PhD
Steering Committee Member

Janet Hilbert, MD
NetWork Member


Online resources
EVO e-learning curriculum

 

 

Interprofessional team


Interprofessional team approach to palliative extubation

The emotional burden of caring for patients at the end of life affects all members of the care team. Palliative (or compassionate) extubation consists of the withdrawal of mechanical ventilation when the absolute priority in care delivery is to afford comfort and allow for natural death to occur. Rapid withdrawal of ventilatory support may lead to significant respiratory distress, and the critical care team has an obligation to ensure patient comfort during the dying process (Truog RD, et al. Crit Care Med. 2008;36[3]:953). Registered nurses (RN) are primarily responsible for the titration of sedation/analgesia and should be included in discussions regarding medication selection. It is imperative that neuromuscular blockade is absent, and benzodiazepines and/or opioids should be initiated prior to palliative extubation (Lanken PN, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:912). Respiratory therapists (RT) are responsible for endotracheal tube removal despite rare participation in end-of-life discussions (Grandhige AP, et al. Respir Care. 2016;61[7]:891). It is recommended that an experienced physician, RN, and RT be readily available to respond quickly to any signs of distress (Downar J, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1003). Regular debriefing sessions exploring team actions and communication dynamics are advised following end-of-life care (Ho A, et al. J Interprof Care. 2016;30[6]:795-803). Palliative extubation demands meticulous planning and clear communication among all team members (physician, RN, RT) and the patient’s family. Poor planning may result in physical and emotional suffering for the patient and difficult bereavement for the family (Coradazi A, et al. Hos Pal Med Int J. 2019;3[1]:10-14). Interprofessional team-based care results from intentional teams that exhibit collective identity and shared responsibility for the patients they serve (Core Competencies for Interprofessional Education Collaborative Practice, 2016). An inclusive and interprofessional approach to withdrawal of mechanical ventilation is key to both quality patient care and provider wellbeing.

Rebecca Anna Gersten, MD
Steering Committee Member

Samantha Davis, MS, RRT
Steering Committee Member

Munish Luthra, MD, FCCP
Vice-Chair Committee

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Airways disorders


Updated guidelines on the use of home O2 in COPD: A much-needed respite

Dr. Kadambari Vijaykumar

The use of long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT, oxygen prescribed for at least 15 h/day) in patients with COPD and chronic hypoxemia has been standard of care based on trials from the 1980s that conferred a survival benefit with the use of continuous oxygen (Ann Internal Med. 1980;93[3]:391-8). More recently, LTOT has not shown to improve survival or delay time to the hospitalization in patients with stable COPD and resting or exercise-induced moderate desaturation (N Engl J Med. 2016;375[17]:1617-27). Thus far, existing recommendations had been semi-inclusive in patient selection. A fundamental lack of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines prompted additional research into patient selection, portable oxygen technology, advocacy for improved oxygen therapy financing, and updating of policies (Jacobs et al., Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15[12]:1369-81). With over a million patients in the United States being prescribed home oxygen and reported disconnect in-home oxygen needs/experiences across disease processes, lifestyles, and oxygen supply requirements, the 2020 American Thoracic Society (ATS) workshop on optimizing home oxygen therapy sought to answer critical questions in the use of LTOT for COPD patients (AlMutairi, et al. Respir Care. 2018;63[11]:1321-30; Jacobs, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202[10]:e121-e141).

Dr. Dharani Kumari Narendra
Based on a thorough systematic review of available literature, the committee made strong recommendations (moderate-quality evidence) for LTOT use in COPD with severe chronic resting hypoxemia (PaO2 ≤ 55 mm Hg or SpO2 ≤ 88%), conditional recommendations for the following: (1) Against LTOT use in COPD with moderate chronic resting hypoxemia [SpO2 89%-93% (low-quality evidence)]; (2) Ambulatory oxygen use in adults with COPD with severe exertional hypoxemia (moderate-quality evidence); and (3) Liquid oxygen use in patients who are mobile outside the home and require >3 L/min of continuous-flow oxygen during exertion (very-low-quality evidence). The review identified a dire need to develop a more robust evidence-based practice and incorporate shared decision-making while highlighting the deficit of conclusive data supporting supplemental oxygen for patients with exertional desaturation.

Kadambari Vijaykumar, MD
Fellow-in-Training Member

Dharani Kumari Narendra, MBBS, FCCP
Steering Committee Member

 

 

Chest infections


Eradicating COVID-19 scourge: It is up to all of us— get vaccinated!

Dr. Marcus I. Restrepo

2021 brings hope, spurred by the availability of several effective COVID-19 vaccines – unprecedented scientific advances, considering that these vaccines were developed in record time. We have stark choices: while some individuals ignore scientific evidence and refuse to take the vaccine, we from the Chest Infections NetWork urge an alternative and imperative choice. As health providers caring for COVID-19 patients, we first-hand witness the horrors of dying alone in a hospital bed – far away from beloved ones. I have a sticker on my car that says: If you do not like your mask, you will not like my ventilator. With the advent of vaccines, I plan on replacing this sticker: If you do not want to get vaccinated, you will not like my ventilator. When the vaccine became available at my institution, I was the first to roll up my sleeve and feel the pinch in my upper arm. I urge you all to do the same. Make a difference, do your part – get vaccinated.

Marcos I. Restrepo, MD, MSc, PhD
Chair

 

Clinical pulmonary medicine


COVID-19 vaccines – mRNA and beyond

We currently have two COVID-19 mRNA vaccines with US FDA emergency use authorization (EUA) for use in individuals less than or equal to age 18 years – Pfizer and Moderna. They work by introducing mRNA into a muscle cell that instructs the host cell ribosomes to express Sars-CoV-2 spike proteins, thereby triggering a systemic immune response.

Dr. Mary Jo Farmer
Phase 3 trial demonstrated vaccine efficacy of 95% with both vaccines. Besides injection site pain, common side effects were fatigue, headache, chills, and myalgias, more frequent after dose two.

Both are two-dose regimens, with Pfizer’s 21 days apart and requires storage at -75 C, and Moderna’s 28 days apart, requiring storage at -20 C.
Dr. Shyam Subramanian
With reports of anaphylaxis reactions, CDC has issued a warning with a contraindication to the vaccine if there is severe allergic reaction after the first dose or a history of allergy to any of its components, including polyethylene glycol (PEG), or polysorbate, due to potential cross-reactive hypersensitivity with PEG.

Presently in development are three more vaccines. AstraZeneca (AZ) and Johnson & Johnson (JnJ) use an adenovirus vector. Both vaccines are stable at standard refrigerator temperatures. AZ’s results were mixed – with two, full-size doses efficacy at 62% effective, but with a half-dose followed by a full dose, efficacy was 90%. Novavax candidate works differently - it’s a protein subunit vaccine and uses a lab-made version of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, mixed with an adjuvant to help trigger the immune system. Results from all trials are eagerly awaited.

Mary Jo S. Farmer, MD, PhD, FCCP
Steering Committee Member


Shyam Subramanian, MD, FCCP
Chair

 

 

Clinical research and quality improvement
 

COVID-19 treatment, so far!

COVID-19 has turned rapidly into a fatal illness, causing over 1.8 million deaths worldwide so far. The pandemic has also showed us the power of adaptive trials, multi-arm trials, and the role for collaboration across the global scientific community. A few significant studies are worth mentioning.

Dr. Muhammad Hayat Syed
Initial therapies were with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, but showed no clinical improvement (Cavalcanti AB. N Engl J Med. 2020;383[21]:2041). Remdesivir, now standard of care, is based on the ACTT-1 trial, a double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT), showing improved recovery time (Beigel JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020;383[19]:1813). The RECOVERY trial, a large clinical trial in the United Kingdom, demonstrated a mortality benefit (rate ratio 0.83) with dexamethasone at 28 days in those with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Lopinavir-ritonavir combination failed to show benefit in the same trial (Horby P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436). Baricitinib has been shown to decrease recovery time, especially in patients with high oxygen need (Kalil AC, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2031994).

Possible future therapies include antiviral monoclonal antibodies, bamlanivimab (Chen P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020; online ahead of print); early convalescent plasma (Libster R, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2033700); and casirivimab-imdevimab (Baum A, et al. Science. 2020 Nov 27 doi: 10.1126/science.abe2402). Development of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can help with primary prevention and herd immunity (Polack FP, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020;383[27]:2603; Baden LR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020; Dec 30; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389).

We are starting to understand why COVID-19 infection is more pathogenic in some, how to predict development of severe disease, and how to best treat respiratory failure. Defeating the pandemic will require ongoing international collaboration in research, development, and resource allocation.

Muhammad Hayat Syed, MBBS

Ankita Agarwal, MD
Fellows-in-Training Members

 

 

Critical care

Awake proning in COVID-19

Prone positioning has been shown to improve pulmonary mechanics in intubated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Proposed mechanisms for these benefits include shape matching, reversing the pleural pressure gradient, homogenizing distribution of pleural pressures, reducing the impact of the heart and abdomen on the lungs, and maintaining distribution of perfusion. Application of prone positioning has also been shown to reduce mortality in severe ARDS (Guérin, et al. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(23):2159-68). With the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians have extrapolated that nonintubated patients with severe hypoxia may benefit from awake proning in the hopes of improving oxygenation and decreasing need for intubation. But, what’s the evidence so far?

Dr. Kathryn Pendleton
In small studies, awake proning has been shown to improve oxygenation (PaO2/FIO2 ratio) and work of breathing in patients with COVID-19 who were severely hypoxic and could tolerate proning receiving high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) or noninvasive ventilation (Weatherald, et al. J Crit Care. 2021;61:63-70). However, other studies were less conclusive. In a study by Elharrar, et al (JAMA. 2020;323(22):2336-2338), oxygenation only improved in 25% of those who were proned, and this improvement was not sustained in half of patients after they were re-supined. Additionally, a recent prospective, observational study from Spain did not show benefit to awake proning in patients receiving HFNO with respect to need for intubation or risk of mortality (Ferrando, et al. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):597).
Dr. Viren Kaul
It remains unclear whether these physiologic and short-term clinical benefits will prevent the need for mechanical ventilation and/or improve long-term outcomes, including mortality. The other nuances of application of prone positioning in spontaneously breathing patients, such as the optimal duration, positioning, clinical setting, termination criteria, and adverse effects will only become clearer with time and more robust studies. Currently, more than 60 studies examining the role of prone positioning in COVID-19 were enrolling or recently completed. Hopefully, more robust trials will provide evidence about the effectiveness of this therapy in this population. Finally, head over to CHEST’s COVID-19 Resource Center to access a downloadable infographic describing the application of prone positioning.

Kathryn Pendleton, MD

Viren Kaul, MD
Steering Committee Members

 

Home-Based Mechanical Ventilation and Neuromuscular Disease


New horizons in home ventilation

Phasing out a particular ventilator (Philips Respironics Trilogy 100 ventilator) has everyone on a steep learning curve with the replacement (Trilogy EVO). Most features are replicated in the EVO, including volume/pressure control and pressure-supported modes, mouthpiece ventilation, active/passive circuit capability, and portability (11.5 lb). Upgrades include longer battery life (15 hours; 7.5 hours internal/7.5 hours detachable) and use in pediatric patients now greater than or equal to 2.5 kg.

Dr. Janet Hilbert
A significant improvement in the workhorse AVAPS-AE mode is the addition of inspiratory time control on patient-initiated breaths. In AVAPS-AE (without PC-enabled), patient-initiated breaths remain flow-cycled; however, the inspiratory time control can be achieved using Timax/Timin setting for patients with neuromuscular respiratory failure and COPD (Coleman et al. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(9):1091-98; Nicholson, et al. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(7):1139-46).Pressure control (PC) can now be enabled in AVAPS-AE to allow fixed Ti for both patient-initiated and device-initiated breaths, advantageous in neuromuscular disease and obesity-hypoventilation syndrome(Nicholson, et al., Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(7):1139-46; Selim, et al.,Chest. 2018;153(1):251-65).

Other significant improvements include lower flow trigger sensitivity to accommodate patients with severe respiratory muscle weakness, a fast start AVAPS with rapid breath-to-breath 3 cm H20 increases for the first minute to rapidly reach target tidal volume, and breath-to-breath auto-EPAP sensing of upper airway resistance to maintain airway patency for patients with upper airway obstruction.

Internal bluetooth transmission to cloud-based monitoring (Care OrchestratorTM) expands access to patients without wi-fi or cellular service. New monitoring modules, SpO2 and EtCO2, and transcutaneous CO2 monitoring (Sentec), transmit to cloud-based monitoring (EVO EtCs2 spring 2021).

These welcome improvements allow clinicians to better match ventilator settings to the patients’ evolving physiology and provide flexibility and connectivity to optimize long-term care.

Karin Provost, DO, PhD
Steering Committee Member

Janet Hilbert, MD
NetWork Member


Online resources
EVO e-learning curriculum

 

 

Interprofessional team


Interprofessional team approach to palliative extubation

The emotional burden of caring for patients at the end of life affects all members of the care team. Palliative (or compassionate) extubation consists of the withdrawal of mechanical ventilation when the absolute priority in care delivery is to afford comfort and allow for natural death to occur. Rapid withdrawal of ventilatory support may lead to significant respiratory distress, and the critical care team has an obligation to ensure patient comfort during the dying process (Truog RD, et al. Crit Care Med. 2008;36[3]:953). Registered nurses (RN) are primarily responsible for the titration of sedation/analgesia and should be included in discussions regarding medication selection. It is imperative that neuromuscular blockade is absent, and benzodiazepines and/or opioids should be initiated prior to palliative extubation (Lanken PN, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:912). Respiratory therapists (RT) are responsible for endotracheal tube removal despite rare participation in end-of-life discussions (Grandhige AP, et al. Respir Care. 2016;61[7]:891). It is recommended that an experienced physician, RN, and RT be readily available to respond quickly to any signs of distress (Downar J, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1003). Regular debriefing sessions exploring team actions and communication dynamics are advised following end-of-life care (Ho A, et al. J Interprof Care. 2016;30[6]:795-803). Palliative extubation demands meticulous planning and clear communication among all team members (physician, RN, RT) and the patient’s family. Poor planning may result in physical and emotional suffering for the patient and difficult bereavement for the family (Coradazi A, et al. Hos Pal Med Int J. 2019;3[1]:10-14). Interprofessional team-based care results from intentional teams that exhibit collective identity and shared responsibility for the patients they serve (Core Competencies for Interprofessional Education Collaborative Practice, 2016). An inclusive and interprofessional approach to withdrawal of mechanical ventilation is key to both quality patient care and provider wellbeing.

Rebecca Anna Gersten, MD
Steering Committee Member

Samantha Davis, MS, RRT
Steering Committee Member

Munish Luthra, MD, FCCP
Vice-Chair Committee

 

Airways disorders


Updated guidelines on the use of home O2 in COPD: A much-needed respite

Dr. Kadambari Vijaykumar

The use of long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT, oxygen prescribed for at least 15 h/day) in patients with COPD and chronic hypoxemia has been standard of care based on trials from the 1980s that conferred a survival benefit with the use of continuous oxygen (Ann Internal Med. 1980;93[3]:391-8). More recently, LTOT has not shown to improve survival or delay time to the hospitalization in patients with stable COPD and resting or exercise-induced moderate desaturation (N Engl J Med. 2016;375[17]:1617-27). Thus far, existing recommendations had been semi-inclusive in patient selection. A fundamental lack of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines prompted additional research into patient selection, portable oxygen technology, advocacy for improved oxygen therapy financing, and updating of policies (Jacobs et al., Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15[12]:1369-81). With over a million patients in the United States being prescribed home oxygen and reported disconnect in-home oxygen needs/experiences across disease processes, lifestyles, and oxygen supply requirements, the 2020 American Thoracic Society (ATS) workshop on optimizing home oxygen therapy sought to answer critical questions in the use of LTOT for COPD patients (AlMutairi, et al. Respir Care. 2018;63[11]:1321-30; Jacobs, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202[10]:e121-e141).

Dr. Dharani Kumari Narendra
Based on a thorough systematic review of available literature, the committee made strong recommendations (moderate-quality evidence) for LTOT use in COPD with severe chronic resting hypoxemia (PaO2 ≤ 55 mm Hg or SpO2 ≤ 88%), conditional recommendations for the following: (1) Against LTOT use in COPD with moderate chronic resting hypoxemia [SpO2 89%-93% (low-quality evidence)]; (2) Ambulatory oxygen use in adults with COPD with severe exertional hypoxemia (moderate-quality evidence); and (3) Liquid oxygen use in patients who are mobile outside the home and require >3 L/min of continuous-flow oxygen during exertion (very-low-quality evidence). The review identified a dire need to develop a more robust evidence-based practice and incorporate shared decision-making while highlighting the deficit of conclusive data supporting supplemental oxygen for patients with exertional desaturation.

Kadambari Vijaykumar, MD
Fellow-in-Training Member

Dharani Kumari Narendra, MBBS, FCCP
Steering Committee Member

 

 

Chest infections


Eradicating COVID-19 scourge: It is up to all of us— get vaccinated!

Dr. Marcus I. Restrepo

2021 brings hope, spurred by the availability of several effective COVID-19 vaccines – unprecedented scientific advances, considering that these vaccines were developed in record time. We have stark choices: while some individuals ignore scientific evidence and refuse to take the vaccine, we from the Chest Infections NetWork urge an alternative and imperative choice. As health providers caring for COVID-19 patients, we first-hand witness the horrors of dying alone in a hospital bed – far away from beloved ones. I have a sticker on my car that says: If you do not like your mask, you will not like my ventilator. With the advent of vaccines, I plan on replacing this sticker: If you do not want to get vaccinated, you will not like my ventilator. When the vaccine became available at my institution, I was the first to roll up my sleeve and feel the pinch in my upper arm. I urge you all to do the same. Make a difference, do your part – get vaccinated.

Marcos I. Restrepo, MD, MSc, PhD
Chair

 

Clinical pulmonary medicine


COVID-19 vaccines – mRNA and beyond

We currently have two COVID-19 mRNA vaccines with US FDA emergency use authorization (EUA) for use in individuals less than or equal to age 18 years – Pfizer and Moderna. They work by introducing mRNA into a muscle cell that instructs the host cell ribosomes to express Sars-CoV-2 spike proteins, thereby triggering a systemic immune response.

Dr. Mary Jo Farmer
Phase 3 trial demonstrated vaccine efficacy of 95% with both vaccines. Besides injection site pain, common side effects were fatigue, headache, chills, and myalgias, more frequent after dose two.

Both are two-dose regimens, with Pfizer’s 21 days apart and requires storage at -75 C, and Moderna’s 28 days apart, requiring storage at -20 C.
Dr. Shyam Subramanian
With reports of anaphylaxis reactions, CDC has issued a warning with a contraindication to the vaccine if there is severe allergic reaction after the first dose or a history of allergy to any of its components, including polyethylene glycol (PEG), or polysorbate, due to potential cross-reactive hypersensitivity with PEG.

Presently in development are three more vaccines. AstraZeneca (AZ) and Johnson & Johnson (JnJ) use an adenovirus vector. Both vaccines are stable at standard refrigerator temperatures. AZ’s results were mixed – with two, full-size doses efficacy at 62% effective, but with a half-dose followed by a full dose, efficacy was 90%. Novavax candidate works differently - it’s a protein subunit vaccine and uses a lab-made version of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, mixed with an adjuvant to help trigger the immune system. Results from all trials are eagerly awaited.

Mary Jo S. Farmer, MD, PhD, FCCP
Steering Committee Member


Shyam Subramanian, MD, FCCP
Chair

 

 

Clinical research and quality improvement
 

COVID-19 treatment, so far!

COVID-19 has turned rapidly into a fatal illness, causing over 1.8 million deaths worldwide so far. The pandemic has also showed us the power of adaptive trials, multi-arm trials, and the role for collaboration across the global scientific community. A few significant studies are worth mentioning.

Dr. Muhammad Hayat Syed
Initial therapies were with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, but showed no clinical improvement (Cavalcanti AB. N Engl J Med. 2020;383[21]:2041). Remdesivir, now standard of care, is based on the ACTT-1 trial, a double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT), showing improved recovery time (Beigel JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020;383[19]:1813). The RECOVERY trial, a large clinical trial in the United Kingdom, demonstrated a mortality benefit (rate ratio 0.83) with dexamethasone at 28 days in those with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Lopinavir-ritonavir combination failed to show benefit in the same trial (Horby P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436). Baricitinib has been shown to decrease recovery time, especially in patients with high oxygen need (Kalil AC, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2031994).

Possible future therapies include antiviral monoclonal antibodies, bamlanivimab (Chen P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020; online ahead of print); early convalescent plasma (Libster R, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2033700); and casirivimab-imdevimab (Baum A, et al. Science. 2020 Nov 27 doi: 10.1126/science.abe2402). Development of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can help with primary prevention and herd immunity (Polack FP, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020;383[27]:2603; Baden LR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020; Dec 30; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389).

We are starting to understand why COVID-19 infection is more pathogenic in some, how to predict development of severe disease, and how to best treat respiratory failure. Defeating the pandemic will require ongoing international collaboration in research, development, and resource allocation.

Muhammad Hayat Syed, MBBS

Ankita Agarwal, MD
Fellows-in-Training Members

 

 

Critical care

Awake proning in COVID-19

Prone positioning has been shown to improve pulmonary mechanics in intubated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Proposed mechanisms for these benefits include shape matching, reversing the pleural pressure gradient, homogenizing distribution of pleural pressures, reducing the impact of the heart and abdomen on the lungs, and maintaining distribution of perfusion. Application of prone positioning has also been shown to reduce mortality in severe ARDS (Guérin, et al. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(23):2159-68). With the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians have extrapolated that nonintubated patients with severe hypoxia may benefit from awake proning in the hopes of improving oxygenation and decreasing need for intubation. But, what’s the evidence so far?

Dr. Kathryn Pendleton
In small studies, awake proning has been shown to improve oxygenation (PaO2/FIO2 ratio) and work of breathing in patients with COVID-19 who were severely hypoxic and could tolerate proning receiving high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) or noninvasive ventilation (Weatherald, et al. J Crit Care. 2021;61:63-70). However, other studies were less conclusive. In a study by Elharrar, et al (JAMA. 2020;323(22):2336-2338), oxygenation only improved in 25% of those who were proned, and this improvement was not sustained in half of patients after they were re-supined. Additionally, a recent prospective, observational study from Spain did not show benefit to awake proning in patients receiving HFNO with respect to need for intubation or risk of mortality (Ferrando, et al. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):597).
Dr. Viren Kaul
It remains unclear whether these physiologic and short-term clinical benefits will prevent the need for mechanical ventilation and/or improve long-term outcomes, including mortality. The other nuances of application of prone positioning in spontaneously breathing patients, such as the optimal duration, positioning, clinical setting, termination criteria, and adverse effects will only become clearer with time and more robust studies. Currently, more than 60 studies examining the role of prone positioning in COVID-19 were enrolling or recently completed. Hopefully, more robust trials will provide evidence about the effectiveness of this therapy in this population. Finally, head over to CHEST’s COVID-19 Resource Center to access a downloadable infographic describing the application of prone positioning.

Kathryn Pendleton, MD

Viren Kaul, MD
Steering Committee Members

 

Home-Based Mechanical Ventilation and Neuromuscular Disease


New horizons in home ventilation

Phasing out a particular ventilator (Philips Respironics Trilogy 100 ventilator) has everyone on a steep learning curve with the replacement (Trilogy EVO). Most features are replicated in the EVO, including volume/pressure control and pressure-supported modes, mouthpiece ventilation, active/passive circuit capability, and portability (11.5 lb). Upgrades include longer battery life (15 hours; 7.5 hours internal/7.5 hours detachable) and use in pediatric patients now greater than or equal to 2.5 kg.

Dr. Janet Hilbert
A significant improvement in the workhorse AVAPS-AE mode is the addition of inspiratory time control on patient-initiated breaths. In AVAPS-AE (without PC-enabled), patient-initiated breaths remain flow-cycled; however, the inspiratory time control can be achieved using Timax/Timin setting for patients with neuromuscular respiratory failure and COPD (Coleman et al. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(9):1091-98; Nicholson, et al. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(7):1139-46).Pressure control (PC) can now be enabled in AVAPS-AE to allow fixed Ti for both patient-initiated and device-initiated breaths, advantageous in neuromuscular disease and obesity-hypoventilation syndrome(Nicholson, et al., Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(7):1139-46; Selim, et al.,Chest. 2018;153(1):251-65).

Other significant improvements include lower flow trigger sensitivity to accommodate patients with severe respiratory muscle weakness, a fast start AVAPS with rapid breath-to-breath 3 cm H20 increases for the first minute to rapidly reach target tidal volume, and breath-to-breath auto-EPAP sensing of upper airway resistance to maintain airway patency for patients with upper airway obstruction.

Internal bluetooth transmission to cloud-based monitoring (Care OrchestratorTM) expands access to patients without wi-fi or cellular service. New monitoring modules, SpO2 and EtCO2, and transcutaneous CO2 monitoring (Sentec), transmit to cloud-based monitoring (EVO EtCs2 spring 2021).

These welcome improvements allow clinicians to better match ventilator settings to the patients’ evolving physiology and provide flexibility and connectivity to optimize long-term care.

Karin Provost, DO, PhD
Steering Committee Member

Janet Hilbert, MD
NetWork Member


Online resources
EVO e-learning curriculum

 

 

Interprofessional team


Interprofessional team approach to palliative extubation

The emotional burden of caring for patients at the end of life affects all members of the care team. Palliative (or compassionate) extubation consists of the withdrawal of mechanical ventilation when the absolute priority in care delivery is to afford comfort and allow for natural death to occur. Rapid withdrawal of ventilatory support may lead to significant respiratory distress, and the critical care team has an obligation to ensure patient comfort during the dying process (Truog RD, et al. Crit Care Med. 2008;36[3]:953). Registered nurses (RN) are primarily responsible for the titration of sedation/analgesia and should be included in discussions regarding medication selection. It is imperative that neuromuscular blockade is absent, and benzodiazepines and/or opioids should be initiated prior to palliative extubation (Lanken PN, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:912). Respiratory therapists (RT) are responsible for endotracheal tube removal despite rare participation in end-of-life discussions (Grandhige AP, et al. Respir Care. 2016;61[7]:891). It is recommended that an experienced physician, RN, and RT be readily available to respond quickly to any signs of distress (Downar J, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1003). Regular debriefing sessions exploring team actions and communication dynamics are advised following end-of-life care (Ho A, et al. J Interprof Care. 2016;30[6]:795-803). Palliative extubation demands meticulous planning and clear communication among all team members (physician, RN, RT) and the patient’s family. Poor planning may result in physical and emotional suffering for the patient and difficult bereavement for the family (Coradazi A, et al. Hos Pal Med Int J. 2019;3[1]:10-14). Interprofessional team-based care results from intentional teams that exhibit collective identity and shared responsibility for the patients they serve (Core Competencies for Interprofessional Education Collaborative Practice, 2016). An inclusive and interprofessional approach to withdrawal of mechanical ventilation is key to both quality patient care and provider wellbeing.

Rebecca Anna Gersten, MD
Steering Committee Member

Samantha Davis, MS, RRT
Steering Committee Member

Munish Luthra, MD, FCCP
Vice-Chair Committee

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer

In case you missed it ...CHEST Annual Meeting 2020 Award Recipients

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 02/11/2021 - 00:15

 

ANNUAL AWARDS

Master FCCP

Nancy A. Collop MD, Master FCCP



College Medalist Award

Neil R. MacIntyre, MD, FCCP



Distinguished Service Award

Lisa K. Moores, MD, FCCP



Master Clinician Educator

William F. Kelly, MD, FCCP

David A. Schulman, MD, MPH, FCCP



Early Career Clinician Educator

Subani Chandra, MD, FCCP



Alfred Soffer Award for Editorial Excellence

Barbara Anderson, CHEST Staff

Laura Lipsey, CHEST Staff



Presidential Citation

Mangala Narasimhan, DO, FCCP

Renli Qiao, MD, PhD, FCCP
 

HONOR LECTURE AND MEMORIAL AWARDS

Edward C. Rosenow III, MD, Master FCCP/Master Teacher Endowed Honor Lecture Evolving Therapies in ANCA-Associated Vasculitides

Joseph P. Lynch, III, MD, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.Distinguished Scientist Honor Lecture in Cardiopulmonary PhysiologyHelping the Dyspneic Patient: Clinical Physiology Matters!

Denis E. O’Donnell, MD, MBBCh, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.Presidential Honor LectureCOPD Management: We’ve Come So Far

Darcy D. Marciniuk, MD, Master FCCP



Thomas L. Petty, MD, Master FCCP Memorial LectureReal World Research - What Would Dr. Petty Say?

Mary Hart, RRT, MS, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.Margaret Pfrommer Endowed Memorial Lecture in Home-Based Mechanical VentilationNavigating to Home NIV Nirvana: What Would Margaret Do?

Peter C. Gay, MD, MS, FCCP

The Margaret Pfrommer Endowed Memorial Lecture in Home-Based Mechanical Ventilation is generously supported by International Ventilator Users Network of Post-Polio Health International and the CHEST Foundation.Pasquale Ciaglia Memorial Lecture in Interventional MedicineRaising the Bar: The Interventional Pulmonary Outcomes Group

Lonny B. Yarmus, DO, MBA, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.

Roger C. Bone Memorial Lecture in Critical CareTo SIRS with Love: Dr. Roger Bone’s Continued Influence on Early Sepsis Care

Emanuel P. Rivers, MD, MPH, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.Murray Kornfeld Memorial Founders LectureOur Pneumonia Journey: The Lungs and Beyond

Marcos I. Restrepo, MD, PhD, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.

CHEST FOUNDATION GRANT AWARDS

The GlaxoSmithKline Distinguished Scholar in Respiratory Health

Deepa Gotur, MD, FCCP

Cytokine Release in SARS COV2 Viral Illness and Trends of Inflammasome Expression in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Manifestations and ManagementThis grant is supported by an endowed fund from GlaxoSmithKline.CHEST Foundation and the Alpha-1 Foundation Research Grant in Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency

Paul R. Ellis, MBChB

Cardiovascular Outcomes and Phenotypes in Pulmonary Exacerbations of Alpha-1 AntitrypsinThis grant is jointly supported by the CHEST Foundation and the Alpha-1 Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Women’s Lung Health

Shannon E. Kay, MD

Sex-specific Gene Expression in AsthmaThis grant is supported by the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Davide Biondini, MD, PhD

Role of the Immune Check Points (CTLA-4 and PD-1) in the Development or Evasion of Smoking-Induced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease



Andrew J. Gangemi, MD

Are Sleep Health, Nicotine Metabolism, and Airway Inflammation Mechanisms for Differences in Lung Function between African American and Non-Hispanic White Smokers? A Proof-of-Concept ExaminationThese grants are supported by AstraZeneca LP.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Critical Care

Mounica Vallurupalli, MD

Evaluating the Impact of Clonal Hematopoiesis on Host Immune Response During Sepsis

This grant is supported by the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Lung Cancer

Stefanie Mason, MD

Implications of Longitudinal Muscle-Mass Trajectories in Lung CancerThis grant is supported by the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Venous Thromboembolism

Jansen N. Seheult, MD, MBBCh

Untangling the NET: Neutrophil Activation as the Driver of Venous Thromboembolism in Coronavirus Disease 2019This grant is supported by the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Diseases

Bryan A. Garcia, MD

Longitudinal Proteomic Endotyping of Patients with Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung InfectionsThis grant is supported by Insmed Incorporated.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Cystic Fibrosis

Jeffrey Barry, MD

Eosinophilia as a Biomarker for Worse Outcomes in Cystic Fibrosis



Kristina Montemayor, MD

The Association of Sex Hormones and Respiratory Morbidity in Individuals with Cystic FibrosisThese grants are supported by Vertex Pharmaceuticals.John R. Addrizzo, MD, FCCP Research Grant in Sarcoidosis

 

 

Changwan Ryu, MD

Extracellular Matrix Proteins as a Biomarker for Stage IV SarcoidosisThis grant is in honor of John R. Addrizzo, MD, FCCP and is jointly supported by the Addrizzo family and the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Severe Asthma

Isaretta L. Riley, MD, MPH

Coping with Asthma through Life Management (CALM)This grant is funded by AstraZeneca LP.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Pulmonary Fibrosis

Sarah Beshay, MD

COPA Syndrome-Associated Mutations in Lung Transplant Recipients for Pulmonary Fibrosis



Erica D. Farrand, MD

The Future of Telehealth in Interstitial Lung DiseaseThese grants are supported by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals and Genentech, Inc.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Sleep Medicine

Tetyana Kendzerska, MD, PhD

The Role of Sleep and Circadian Disturbances in Cancer Development and Progression: A Historical Multicenter Clinical Cohort Study



Nancy Stewart, DO

Improving COPD/OSA Overlap Syndrome Pre-Discharge Care DeliveryThese grants are funded by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CHEST Foundation and Association of Critical Care Medicine Program Directors Award Research Grant in Medical Education

Ilana R. Krumm, MD

What’s good about Soul Food? Discovering and Analyzing Elements of an ICU Team Group Discussion Which Improve Provider WellnessThis grant is jointly supported by the CHEST Foundation and APCCMPD.CHEST Foundation and American Thoracic Society Research Grant in Diversity

Thomas S. Valley, MD, MSc

Understanding Differences in Delivery of Care Processes for Respiratory Failure by Race/EthnicityThis grant is jointly supported by the CHEST Foundation and ATS.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in COVID-19

David Furfaro, MD

Subphenotypes, Inflammatory Profiles, and Antibody Response in COVID-19 ARDSThis grant is supported by the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation and American Thoracic Society Grant in COVID-19 and Diversity

Peter D. Jackson, MD

The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Tuberculosis Care in UgandaThis grant is jointly supported by the CHEST Foundation and ATS.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Ultrasonography and COVID-19

Marjan M. Islam, MD

Thoracic Ultrasound in COVID-19: A Prospective Study Using Lung and Diaphragm Ultrasound in Evaluating Dyspnea in ICU Survivors with COVID-19 in a Post-ICU Clinic



Siddharth Dugar, MBBS

Spontaneous Echo Contrast in Lower Extremity and Correlation with Venous Velocity and Subsequent Deep Venous Thrombosis in Critically Ill COVID-19 PatientsThis grant is jointly supported by the CHEST Foundation and FUJIFILM SonoSite.

CHEST Foundation Community Service Grant Honoring D. Robert McCaffree, MD, Master FCCP



Ivan Nemorin, MBA, MS, RRT

Healthier Homes for Children-Community Asthma Prevention Program



Joseph Huang, MD

East Africa Training Initiative (EATI)



Aninda Das, MD, MBBS

Screening for Childhood Tuberculosis in Children 0-4 years of Age with Moderate to Severe Malnutrition in a Rural District of West Bengal, India



Trishual Siddharthan, MD

Establishing a Pulmonary and Critical Care Training Program in Uganda



Marina Lima, MD, MSc

Asmaland: The First Gamified Pediatric Asthma Educational Program in Portuguese



Roberta M. Kato, MD

Lung Power



These grants are supported by the CHEST Foundation.Alfred Soffer Research Award Winners

Mazen O. Al-Qadi, MD: RESPIRATORY VARIATION IN RIGHT ATRIAL PRESSURE PREDICTS RIGHT VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH PRE-CAPILLARY PULMONARY HYPERTENSION

Valerie G. Press, MD: COST SAVING SIMULATION FOR THE TRANSITION FROM NEBULIZER TO COMBINATION OF NEBULIZER AND METERED-DOSE INHALERS (MD)



Young Investigator Award Winners

Gabriel E. Ortiz Jaimes, MD: CORRELATION OF CARDIAC OUTPUT MEASUREMENT BY GOAL-DIRECTED ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY PERFORMED BY INTENSIVISTS VS PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER

Palakkumar Patel, MD: IMPACT OF HAVING PULMONARY HYPERTENSION IN PATIENTS ADMITTED WITH ACUTE EXACERBATION OF COPD IN THEIR HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION AND READMISSION: A US POPULATION COHORT STUDY

 

 

Top 5 Abstract Posters

Winner: Amr Alwakeel, MD: IMPACT OF A PLEURAL CARE PROGRAM ON THE PATHWAY TO DEFINITIVE PALLIATION OF MALIGNANT PLEURAL EFFUSIONS: A PRE-AND POST STUDY

Winner: Konstantinos Zorbas, MD: A SIMPLE PREDICTION SCORE FOR POSTOPERATIVE DEATH AFTER DECORTICATION

Winner: Yichen Wang, MD, MSc: CORONAVIRUS-RELATED HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS IN THE UNITED STATES IN 2016-2017

Runner up: Daniel Ospina-Delgado, MD: CHARACTERIZATION OF LARYNGEAL DISORDERS IN PATIENTS WITH EXCESSIVE CENTRAL AIRWAY COLLAPSE

Runner up: Vishal Vashistha, MD: TREATMENT PATTERNS AMONG LOWER-INCOME INDIAN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER HARBORING EGFR MUTATIONS OR ALK REARRANGEMENTS



Case Report Poster Winners

Faiza Khalid, MD: FORME FUSTE OF INTERMEDIATE SYNDROME (IMS) IN ORGANOPHOSPHATE POISOING (OPP): EXPERT OPINION GUIDELINE WITHOUT CLEAR END-POINT.

William Meng, MD: VINGT MILLE LIEUES SOUS LES MERS: A POISONOUS GUEST FROM THE BLUE SEA TOXIC INHALATION OF CORAL PALYTOXIN

Dhruv Amratia, MD: PULMONARY BLASTOMA: A RARE FORM OF LUNG CANCER

Melinda Becker, MD: ECMO-ASSISTED BRONCHOSCOPY FOR NEAR-COMPLETE TRACHEAL OBSTRUCTION

Brittany Blass, PA-C: A CASE OF AUTOIMMUNE PULMONARY ALVEOLAR PROTEINOSIS WITH UNDERLYING MONOCLONAL B-CELL LYMPHOCYTOSIS

Abigayle Sullivan, MD: BIRD FANCIER’S LUNG: AN UNDERDIAGNOSED CAUSE OF SHORTNESS OF BREATH

Nitin Gupta, DO: SUCCESSFUL EMERGENT CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS IN A WOMAN WITH POSTPARTUM SPONTANEOUS CORONARY ARTERY DISSECTION

Michelle Miles, DO: GI VARIANT OF LEMIERRE SYNDROME: COMPLETE OCCLUSION OF SUPERIOR MESENTERIC VEIN IN A 30-YEAR-OLD WITH APPENDICEAL ABSCESS

Adarsha Ojha, MD: BLEEDING LUNG AND BLOATING GUT: LANE HAMILTON SYNDROME

Abdul Siddiqui, MD: A CASE OF E-CIGARETTE OR VAPING PRODUCT USE-ASSOCIATED LUNG INJURY IN AN INFREQUENT VAPE USER

James Dugan, MD: EMPHYSEMA WITH PLACENTAL TRANSMOGRIFICATION AND LIPOMATOUS CHANGE

Daniel Condit, MD: DUPLICATE INFERIOR VENA CAVA AS A POTENTIAL PATHWAY FOR RECURRENT PULMONARY EMBOLISM


 

CHEST 2020 CHEST Challenge

1st Place



Case Western Reserve University (MetroHealth)



Enambir Josan, MD

Ishan Lalani, MD, MPH

Faisal Qadir, MD



Program Director: Ziad Shaman, MD, FCCP







2nd Place





SUNY Downstate



Suchit Khanijao, MD

Chetana Pendkar, MBBS

Ayla Zubair, MBBS



Program Director: Robert Foronjy, MD



3rd Place



NYP Brooklyn Methodist Hospital



John Gorski, MD

Sandi Khin, MD

Kinjal Patel, MD


 

Program Director: Anthony Saleh, MD, FCCP

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

ANNUAL AWARDS

Master FCCP

Nancy A. Collop MD, Master FCCP



College Medalist Award

Neil R. MacIntyre, MD, FCCP



Distinguished Service Award

Lisa K. Moores, MD, FCCP



Master Clinician Educator

William F. Kelly, MD, FCCP

David A. Schulman, MD, MPH, FCCP



Early Career Clinician Educator

Subani Chandra, MD, FCCP



Alfred Soffer Award for Editorial Excellence

Barbara Anderson, CHEST Staff

Laura Lipsey, CHEST Staff



Presidential Citation

Mangala Narasimhan, DO, FCCP

Renli Qiao, MD, PhD, FCCP
 

HONOR LECTURE AND MEMORIAL AWARDS

Edward C. Rosenow III, MD, Master FCCP/Master Teacher Endowed Honor Lecture Evolving Therapies in ANCA-Associated Vasculitides

Joseph P. Lynch, III, MD, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.Distinguished Scientist Honor Lecture in Cardiopulmonary PhysiologyHelping the Dyspneic Patient: Clinical Physiology Matters!

Denis E. O’Donnell, MD, MBBCh, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.Presidential Honor LectureCOPD Management: We’ve Come So Far

Darcy D. Marciniuk, MD, Master FCCP



Thomas L. Petty, MD, Master FCCP Memorial LectureReal World Research - What Would Dr. Petty Say?

Mary Hart, RRT, MS, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.Margaret Pfrommer Endowed Memorial Lecture in Home-Based Mechanical VentilationNavigating to Home NIV Nirvana: What Would Margaret Do?

Peter C. Gay, MD, MS, FCCP

The Margaret Pfrommer Endowed Memorial Lecture in Home-Based Mechanical Ventilation is generously supported by International Ventilator Users Network of Post-Polio Health International and the CHEST Foundation.Pasquale Ciaglia Memorial Lecture in Interventional MedicineRaising the Bar: The Interventional Pulmonary Outcomes Group

Lonny B. Yarmus, DO, MBA, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.

Roger C. Bone Memorial Lecture in Critical CareTo SIRS with Love: Dr. Roger Bone’s Continued Influence on Early Sepsis Care

Emanuel P. Rivers, MD, MPH, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.Murray Kornfeld Memorial Founders LectureOur Pneumonia Journey: The Lungs and Beyond

Marcos I. Restrepo, MD, PhD, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.

CHEST FOUNDATION GRANT AWARDS

The GlaxoSmithKline Distinguished Scholar in Respiratory Health

Deepa Gotur, MD, FCCP

Cytokine Release in SARS COV2 Viral Illness and Trends of Inflammasome Expression in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Manifestations and ManagementThis grant is supported by an endowed fund from GlaxoSmithKline.CHEST Foundation and the Alpha-1 Foundation Research Grant in Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency

Paul R. Ellis, MBChB

Cardiovascular Outcomes and Phenotypes in Pulmonary Exacerbations of Alpha-1 AntitrypsinThis grant is jointly supported by the CHEST Foundation and the Alpha-1 Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Women’s Lung Health

Shannon E. Kay, MD

Sex-specific Gene Expression in AsthmaThis grant is supported by the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Davide Biondini, MD, PhD

Role of the Immune Check Points (CTLA-4 and PD-1) in the Development or Evasion of Smoking-Induced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease



Andrew J. Gangemi, MD

Are Sleep Health, Nicotine Metabolism, and Airway Inflammation Mechanisms for Differences in Lung Function between African American and Non-Hispanic White Smokers? A Proof-of-Concept ExaminationThese grants are supported by AstraZeneca LP.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Critical Care

Mounica Vallurupalli, MD

Evaluating the Impact of Clonal Hematopoiesis on Host Immune Response During Sepsis

This grant is supported by the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Lung Cancer

Stefanie Mason, MD

Implications of Longitudinal Muscle-Mass Trajectories in Lung CancerThis grant is supported by the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Venous Thromboembolism

Jansen N. Seheult, MD, MBBCh

Untangling the NET: Neutrophil Activation as the Driver of Venous Thromboembolism in Coronavirus Disease 2019This grant is supported by the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Diseases

Bryan A. Garcia, MD

Longitudinal Proteomic Endotyping of Patients with Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung InfectionsThis grant is supported by Insmed Incorporated.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Cystic Fibrosis

Jeffrey Barry, MD

Eosinophilia as a Biomarker for Worse Outcomes in Cystic Fibrosis



Kristina Montemayor, MD

The Association of Sex Hormones and Respiratory Morbidity in Individuals with Cystic FibrosisThese grants are supported by Vertex Pharmaceuticals.John R. Addrizzo, MD, FCCP Research Grant in Sarcoidosis

 

 

Changwan Ryu, MD

Extracellular Matrix Proteins as a Biomarker for Stage IV SarcoidosisThis grant is in honor of John R. Addrizzo, MD, FCCP and is jointly supported by the Addrizzo family and the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Severe Asthma

Isaretta L. Riley, MD, MPH

Coping with Asthma through Life Management (CALM)This grant is funded by AstraZeneca LP.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Pulmonary Fibrosis

Sarah Beshay, MD

COPA Syndrome-Associated Mutations in Lung Transplant Recipients for Pulmonary Fibrosis



Erica D. Farrand, MD

The Future of Telehealth in Interstitial Lung DiseaseThese grants are supported by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals and Genentech, Inc.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Sleep Medicine

Tetyana Kendzerska, MD, PhD

The Role of Sleep and Circadian Disturbances in Cancer Development and Progression: A Historical Multicenter Clinical Cohort Study



Nancy Stewart, DO

Improving COPD/OSA Overlap Syndrome Pre-Discharge Care DeliveryThese grants are funded by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CHEST Foundation and Association of Critical Care Medicine Program Directors Award Research Grant in Medical Education

Ilana R. Krumm, MD

What’s good about Soul Food? Discovering and Analyzing Elements of an ICU Team Group Discussion Which Improve Provider WellnessThis grant is jointly supported by the CHEST Foundation and APCCMPD.CHEST Foundation and American Thoracic Society Research Grant in Diversity

Thomas S. Valley, MD, MSc

Understanding Differences in Delivery of Care Processes for Respiratory Failure by Race/EthnicityThis grant is jointly supported by the CHEST Foundation and ATS.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in COVID-19

David Furfaro, MD

Subphenotypes, Inflammatory Profiles, and Antibody Response in COVID-19 ARDSThis grant is supported by the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation and American Thoracic Society Grant in COVID-19 and Diversity

Peter D. Jackson, MD

The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Tuberculosis Care in UgandaThis grant is jointly supported by the CHEST Foundation and ATS.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Ultrasonography and COVID-19

Marjan M. Islam, MD

Thoracic Ultrasound in COVID-19: A Prospective Study Using Lung and Diaphragm Ultrasound in Evaluating Dyspnea in ICU Survivors with COVID-19 in a Post-ICU Clinic



Siddharth Dugar, MBBS

Spontaneous Echo Contrast in Lower Extremity and Correlation with Venous Velocity and Subsequent Deep Venous Thrombosis in Critically Ill COVID-19 PatientsThis grant is jointly supported by the CHEST Foundation and FUJIFILM SonoSite.

CHEST Foundation Community Service Grant Honoring D. Robert McCaffree, MD, Master FCCP



Ivan Nemorin, MBA, MS, RRT

Healthier Homes for Children-Community Asthma Prevention Program



Joseph Huang, MD

East Africa Training Initiative (EATI)



Aninda Das, MD, MBBS

Screening for Childhood Tuberculosis in Children 0-4 years of Age with Moderate to Severe Malnutrition in a Rural District of West Bengal, India



Trishual Siddharthan, MD

Establishing a Pulmonary and Critical Care Training Program in Uganda



Marina Lima, MD, MSc

Asmaland: The First Gamified Pediatric Asthma Educational Program in Portuguese



Roberta M. Kato, MD

Lung Power



These grants are supported by the CHEST Foundation.Alfred Soffer Research Award Winners

Mazen O. Al-Qadi, MD: RESPIRATORY VARIATION IN RIGHT ATRIAL PRESSURE PREDICTS RIGHT VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH PRE-CAPILLARY PULMONARY HYPERTENSION

Valerie G. Press, MD: COST SAVING SIMULATION FOR THE TRANSITION FROM NEBULIZER TO COMBINATION OF NEBULIZER AND METERED-DOSE INHALERS (MD)



Young Investigator Award Winners

Gabriel E. Ortiz Jaimes, MD: CORRELATION OF CARDIAC OUTPUT MEASUREMENT BY GOAL-DIRECTED ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY PERFORMED BY INTENSIVISTS VS PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER

Palakkumar Patel, MD: IMPACT OF HAVING PULMONARY HYPERTENSION IN PATIENTS ADMITTED WITH ACUTE EXACERBATION OF COPD IN THEIR HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION AND READMISSION: A US POPULATION COHORT STUDY

 

 

Top 5 Abstract Posters

Winner: Amr Alwakeel, MD: IMPACT OF A PLEURAL CARE PROGRAM ON THE PATHWAY TO DEFINITIVE PALLIATION OF MALIGNANT PLEURAL EFFUSIONS: A PRE-AND POST STUDY

Winner: Konstantinos Zorbas, MD: A SIMPLE PREDICTION SCORE FOR POSTOPERATIVE DEATH AFTER DECORTICATION

Winner: Yichen Wang, MD, MSc: CORONAVIRUS-RELATED HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS IN THE UNITED STATES IN 2016-2017

Runner up: Daniel Ospina-Delgado, MD: CHARACTERIZATION OF LARYNGEAL DISORDERS IN PATIENTS WITH EXCESSIVE CENTRAL AIRWAY COLLAPSE

Runner up: Vishal Vashistha, MD: TREATMENT PATTERNS AMONG LOWER-INCOME INDIAN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER HARBORING EGFR MUTATIONS OR ALK REARRANGEMENTS



Case Report Poster Winners

Faiza Khalid, MD: FORME FUSTE OF INTERMEDIATE SYNDROME (IMS) IN ORGANOPHOSPHATE POISOING (OPP): EXPERT OPINION GUIDELINE WITHOUT CLEAR END-POINT.

William Meng, MD: VINGT MILLE LIEUES SOUS LES MERS: A POISONOUS GUEST FROM THE BLUE SEA TOXIC INHALATION OF CORAL PALYTOXIN

Dhruv Amratia, MD: PULMONARY BLASTOMA: A RARE FORM OF LUNG CANCER

Melinda Becker, MD: ECMO-ASSISTED BRONCHOSCOPY FOR NEAR-COMPLETE TRACHEAL OBSTRUCTION

Brittany Blass, PA-C: A CASE OF AUTOIMMUNE PULMONARY ALVEOLAR PROTEINOSIS WITH UNDERLYING MONOCLONAL B-CELL LYMPHOCYTOSIS

Abigayle Sullivan, MD: BIRD FANCIER’S LUNG: AN UNDERDIAGNOSED CAUSE OF SHORTNESS OF BREATH

Nitin Gupta, DO: SUCCESSFUL EMERGENT CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS IN A WOMAN WITH POSTPARTUM SPONTANEOUS CORONARY ARTERY DISSECTION

Michelle Miles, DO: GI VARIANT OF LEMIERRE SYNDROME: COMPLETE OCCLUSION OF SUPERIOR MESENTERIC VEIN IN A 30-YEAR-OLD WITH APPENDICEAL ABSCESS

Adarsha Ojha, MD: BLEEDING LUNG AND BLOATING GUT: LANE HAMILTON SYNDROME

Abdul Siddiqui, MD: A CASE OF E-CIGARETTE OR VAPING PRODUCT USE-ASSOCIATED LUNG INJURY IN AN INFREQUENT VAPE USER

James Dugan, MD: EMPHYSEMA WITH PLACENTAL TRANSMOGRIFICATION AND LIPOMATOUS CHANGE

Daniel Condit, MD: DUPLICATE INFERIOR VENA CAVA AS A POTENTIAL PATHWAY FOR RECURRENT PULMONARY EMBOLISM


 

CHEST 2020 CHEST Challenge

1st Place



Case Western Reserve University (MetroHealth)



Enambir Josan, MD

Ishan Lalani, MD, MPH

Faisal Qadir, MD



Program Director: Ziad Shaman, MD, FCCP







2nd Place





SUNY Downstate



Suchit Khanijao, MD

Chetana Pendkar, MBBS

Ayla Zubair, MBBS



Program Director: Robert Foronjy, MD



3rd Place



NYP Brooklyn Methodist Hospital



John Gorski, MD

Sandi Khin, MD

Kinjal Patel, MD


 

Program Director: Anthony Saleh, MD, FCCP

 

ANNUAL AWARDS

Master FCCP

Nancy A. Collop MD, Master FCCP



College Medalist Award

Neil R. MacIntyre, MD, FCCP



Distinguished Service Award

Lisa K. Moores, MD, FCCP



Master Clinician Educator

William F. Kelly, MD, FCCP

David A. Schulman, MD, MPH, FCCP



Early Career Clinician Educator

Subani Chandra, MD, FCCP



Alfred Soffer Award for Editorial Excellence

Barbara Anderson, CHEST Staff

Laura Lipsey, CHEST Staff



Presidential Citation

Mangala Narasimhan, DO, FCCP

Renli Qiao, MD, PhD, FCCP
 

HONOR LECTURE AND MEMORIAL AWARDS

Edward C. Rosenow III, MD, Master FCCP/Master Teacher Endowed Honor Lecture Evolving Therapies in ANCA-Associated Vasculitides

Joseph P. Lynch, III, MD, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.Distinguished Scientist Honor Lecture in Cardiopulmonary PhysiologyHelping the Dyspneic Patient: Clinical Physiology Matters!

Denis E. O’Donnell, MD, MBBCh, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.Presidential Honor LectureCOPD Management: We’ve Come So Far

Darcy D. Marciniuk, MD, Master FCCP



Thomas L. Petty, MD, Master FCCP Memorial LectureReal World Research - What Would Dr. Petty Say?

Mary Hart, RRT, MS, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.Margaret Pfrommer Endowed Memorial Lecture in Home-Based Mechanical VentilationNavigating to Home NIV Nirvana: What Would Margaret Do?

Peter C. Gay, MD, MS, FCCP

The Margaret Pfrommer Endowed Memorial Lecture in Home-Based Mechanical Ventilation is generously supported by International Ventilator Users Network of Post-Polio Health International and the CHEST Foundation.Pasquale Ciaglia Memorial Lecture in Interventional MedicineRaising the Bar: The Interventional Pulmonary Outcomes Group

Lonny B. Yarmus, DO, MBA, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.

Roger C. Bone Memorial Lecture in Critical CareTo SIRS with Love: Dr. Roger Bone’s Continued Influence on Early Sepsis Care

Emanuel P. Rivers, MD, MPH, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.Murray Kornfeld Memorial Founders LectureOur Pneumonia Journey: The Lungs and Beyond

Marcos I. Restrepo, MD, PhD, FCCP

The lecture is generously funded by the CHEST Foundation.

CHEST FOUNDATION GRANT AWARDS

The GlaxoSmithKline Distinguished Scholar in Respiratory Health

Deepa Gotur, MD, FCCP

Cytokine Release in SARS COV2 Viral Illness and Trends of Inflammasome Expression in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Manifestations and ManagementThis grant is supported by an endowed fund from GlaxoSmithKline.CHEST Foundation and the Alpha-1 Foundation Research Grant in Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency

Paul R. Ellis, MBChB

Cardiovascular Outcomes and Phenotypes in Pulmonary Exacerbations of Alpha-1 AntitrypsinThis grant is jointly supported by the CHEST Foundation and the Alpha-1 Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Women’s Lung Health

Shannon E. Kay, MD

Sex-specific Gene Expression in AsthmaThis grant is supported by the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Davide Biondini, MD, PhD

Role of the Immune Check Points (CTLA-4 and PD-1) in the Development or Evasion of Smoking-Induced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease



Andrew J. Gangemi, MD

Are Sleep Health, Nicotine Metabolism, and Airway Inflammation Mechanisms for Differences in Lung Function between African American and Non-Hispanic White Smokers? A Proof-of-Concept ExaminationThese grants are supported by AstraZeneca LP.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Critical Care

Mounica Vallurupalli, MD

Evaluating the Impact of Clonal Hematopoiesis on Host Immune Response During Sepsis

This grant is supported by the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Lung Cancer

Stefanie Mason, MD

Implications of Longitudinal Muscle-Mass Trajectories in Lung CancerThis grant is supported by the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Venous Thromboembolism

Jansen N. Seheult, MD, MBBCh

Untangling the NET: Neutrophil Activation as the Driver of Venous Thromboembolism in Coronavirus Disease 2019This grant is supported by the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Diseases

Bryan A. Garcia, MD

Longitudinal Proteomic Endotyping of Patients with Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung InfectionsThis grant is supported by Insmed Incorporated.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Cystic Fibrosis

Jeffrey Barry, MD

Eosinophilia as a Biomarker for Worse Outcomes in Cystic Fibrosis



Kristina Montemayor, MD

The Association of Sex Hormones and Respiratory Morbidity in Individuals with Cystic FibrosisThese grants are supported by Vertex Pharmaceuticals.John R. Addrizzo, MD, FCCP Research Grant in Sarcoidosis

 

 

Changwan Ryu, MD

Extracellular Matrix Proteins as a Biomarker for Stage IV SarcoidosisThis grant is in honor of John R. Addrizzo, MD, FCCP and is jointly supported by the Addrizzo family and the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Severe Asthma

Isaretta L. Riley, MD, MPH

Coping with Asthma through Life Management (CALM)This grant is funded by AstraZeneca LP.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Pulmonary Fibrosis

Sarah Beshay, MD

COPA Syndrome-Associated Mutations in Lung Transplant Recipients for Pulmonary Fibrosis



Erica D. Farrand, MD

The Future of Telehealth in Interstitial Lung DiseaseThese grants are supported by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals and Genentech, Inc.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Sleep Medicine

Tetyana Kendzerska, MD, PhD

The Role of Sleep and Circadian Disturbances in Cancer Development and Progression: A Historical Multicenter Clinical Cohort Study



Nancy Stewart, DO

Improving COPD/OSA Overlap Syndrome Pre-Discharge Care DeliveryThese grants are funded by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CHEST Foundation and Association of Critical Care Medicine Program Directors Award Research Grant in Medical Education

Ilana R. Krumm, MD

What’s good about Soul Food? Discovering and Analyzing Elements of an ICU Team Group Discussion Which Improve Provider WellnessThis grant is jointly supported by the CHEST Foundation and APCCMPD.CHEST Foundation and American Thoracic Society Research Grant in Diversity

Thomas S. Valley, MD, MSc

Understanding Differences in Delivery of Care Processes for Respiratory Failure by Race/EthnicityThis grant is jointly supported by the CHEST Foundation and ATS.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in COVID-19

David Furfaro, MD

Subphenotypes, Inflammatory Profiles, and Antibody Response in COVID-19 ARDSThis grant is supported by the CHEST Foundation.CHEST Foundation and American Thoracic Society Grant in COVID-19 and Diversity

Peter D. Jackson, MD

The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Tuberculosis Care in UgandaThis grant is jointly supported by the CHEST Foundation and ATS.CHEST Foundation Research Grant in Ultrasonography and COVID-19

Marjan M. Islam, MD

Thoracic Ultrasound in COVID-19: A Prospective Study Using Lung and Diaphragm Ultrasound in Evaluating Dyspnea in ICU Survivors with COVID-19 in a Post-ICU Clinic



Siddharth Dugar, MBBS

Spontaneous Echo Contrast in Lower Extremity and Correlation with Venous Velocity and Subsequent Deep Venous Thrombosis in Critically Ill COVID-19 PatientsThis grant is jointly supported by the CHEST Foundation and FUJIFILM SonoSite.

CHEST Foundation Community Service Grant Honoring D. Robert McCaffree, MD, Master FCCP



Ivan Nemorin, MBA, MS, RRT

Healthier Homes for Children-Community Asthma Prevention Program



Joseph Huang, MD

East Africa Training Initiative (EATI)



Aninda Das, MD, MBBS

Screening for Childhood Tuberculosis in Children 0-4 years of Age with Moderate to Severe Malnutrition in a Rural District of West Bengal, India



Trishual Siddharthan, MD

Establishing a Pulmonary and Critical Care Training Program in Uganda



Marina Lima, MD, MSc

Asmaland: The First Gamified Pediatric Asthma Educational Program in Portuguese



Roberta M. Kato, MD

Lung Power



These grants are supported by the CHEST Foundation.Alfred Soffer Research Award Winners

Mazen O. Al-Qadi, MD: RESPIRATORY VARIATION IN RIGHT ATRIAL PRESSURE PREDICTS RIGHT VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH PRE-CAPILLARY PULMONARY HYPERTENSION

Valerie G. Press, MD: COST SAVING SIMULATION FOR THE TRANSITION FROM NEBULIZER TO COMBINATION OF NEBULIZER AND METERED-DOSE INHALERS (MD)



Young Investigator Award Winners

Gabriel E. Ortiz Jaimes, MD: CORRELATION OF CARDIAC OUTPUT MEASUREMENT BY GOAL-DIRECTED ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY PERFORMED BY INTENSIVISTS VS PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER

Palakkumar Patel, MD: IMPACT OF HAVING PULMONARY HYPERTENSION IN PATIENTS ADMITTED WITH ACUTE EXACERBATION OF COPD IN THEIR HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION AND READMISSION: A US POPULATION COHORT STUDY

 

 

Top 5 Abstract Posters

Winner: Amr Alwakeel, MD: IMPACT OF A PLEURAL CARE PROGRAM ON THE PATHWAY TO DEFINITIVE PALLIATION OF MALIGNANT PLEURAL EFFUSIONS: A PRE-AND POST STUDY

Winner: Konstantinos Zorbas, MD: A SIMPLE PREDICTION SCORE FOR POSTOPERATIVE DEATH AFTER DECORTICATION

Winner: Yichen Wang, MD, MSc: CORONAVIRUS-RELATED HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS IN THE UNITED STATES IN 2016-2017

Runner up: Daniel Ospina-Delgado, MD: CHARACTERIZATION OF LARYNGEAL DISORDERS IN PATIENTS WITH EXCESSIVE CENTRAL AIRWAY COLLAPSE

Runner up: Vishal Vashistha, MD: TREATMENT PATTERNS AMONG LOWER-INCOME INDIAN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER HARBORING EGFR MUTATIONS OR ALK REARRANGEMENTS



Case Report Poster Winners

Faiza Khalid, MD: FORME FUSTE OF INTERMEDIATE SYNDROME (IMS) IN ORGANOPHOSPHATE POISOING (OPP): EXPERT OPINION GUIDELINE WITHOUT CLEAR END-POINT.

William Meng, MD: VINGT MILLE LIEUES SOUS LES MERS: A POISONOUS GUEST FROM THE BLUE SEA TOXIC INHALATION OF CORAL PALYTOXIN

Dhruv Amratia, MD: PULMONARY BLASTOMA: A RARE FORM OF LUNG CANCER

Melinda Becker, MD: ECMO-ASSISTED BRONCHOSCOPY FOR NEAR-COMPLETE TRACHEAL OBSTRUCTION

Brittany Blass, PA-C: A CASE OF AUTOIMMUNE PULMONARY ALVEOLAR PROTEINOSIS WITH UNDERLYING MONOCLONAL B-CELL LYMPHOCYTOSIS

Abigayle Sullivan, MD: BIRD FANCIER’S LUNG: AN UNDERDIAGNOSED CAUSE OF SHORTNESS OF BREATH

Nitin Gupta, DO: SUCCESSFUL EMERGENT CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS IN A WOMAN WITH POSTPARTUM SPONTANEOUS CORONARY ARTERY DISSECTION

Michelle Miles, DO: GI VARIANT OF LEMIERRE SYNDROME: COMPLETE OCCLUSION OF SUPERIOR MESENTERIC VEIN IN A 30-YEAR-OLD WITH APPENDICEAL ABSCESS

Adarsha Ojha, MD: BLEEDING LUNG AND BLOATING GUT: LANE HAMILTON SYNDROME

Abdul Siddiqui, MD: A CASE OF E-CIGARETTE OR VAPING PRODUCT USE-ASSOCIATED LUNG INJURY IN AN INFREQUENT VAPE USER

James Dugan, MD: EMPHYSEMA WITH PLACENTAL TRANSMOGRIFICATION AND LIPOMATOUS CHANGE

Daniel Condit, MD: DUPLICATE INFERIOR VENA CAVA AS A POTENTIAL PATHWAY FOR RECURRENT PULMONARY EMBOLISM


 

CHEST 2020 CHEST Challenge

1st Place



Case Western Reserve University (MetroHealth)



Enambir Josan, MD

Ishan Lalani, MD, MPH

Faisal Qadir, MD



Program Director: Ziad Shaman, MD, FCCP







2nd Place





SUNY Downstate



Suchit Khanijao, MD

Chetana Pendkar, MBBS

Ayla Zubair, MBBS



Program Director: Robert Foronjy, MD



3rd Place



NYP Brooklyn Methodist Hospital



John Gorski, MD

Sandi Khin, MD

Kinjal Patel, MD


 

Program Director: Anthony Saleh, MD, FCCP

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article

CHEST Foundation vision for 2021 and beyond

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 02/11/2021 - 00:15

In the year of COVID-19, we saw unprecedented changes in our environment and social interactions. Almost nothing was as it should be—sports championships in a “bubble,” social distancing, limited travel, economic hardships, and, of course, the devastating effects on the health of people all over the world. CHEST did not shy away from the challenges of COVID-19. Instead, we accelerated our focus on education, patient care, research, and advocacy to assist clinicians caring for affected patients. The CHEST Foundation, the philanthropic arm of CHEST, contributed to this effort by funding research and community service grants and distributing over 14,000 pieces of PPE to health workers and the public.

Amid social protests, CHEST issued statements supporting inclusion and diversity and called for improving health care disparities. To better understand how these important issues interact, the CHEST Foundation began conducting listening tours across the country

to learn what is important to patients and what barriers they face. These lessons will influence how the foundation implements its current programs and designs future programs. Over the next few months, the CHEST Foundation will set in motion a course of action to support valuable programs in these areas. We will focus on three main themes.

First, we will utilize the strength of CHEST by inviting fellows to participate in CHEST Foundation activities and serve on our committees. By creating an atmosphere of inclusion and collegiality, we believe that fellows will better understand the CHEST Foundation’s goals and commit themselves to strengthening the foundation for years to come.

Second, we want to establish relationships with organizations outside of CHEST. Although our partnerships with health care industry organizations are strong, we have few robust alliances in the non-endemic space. Corporations espouse wellness, and we have experts all over the world who can address the needs and concerns of these companies. Preliminary exploration tells us that non-endemic corporations have an interest in what we can offer.

Third, we want to grow the corpus of the CHEST Foundation. Dreams without funding become only aspirations, but dreams with funding become reality. Without a solid corpus, we operate on a short-term plan. CHEST has some of the most influential leaders in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Together, we can develop programs that can significantly impact the lives of the people we serve.

The CHEST Foundation looks forward to building on past successes and tackling new challenges. On behalf of CHEST’s Board of Trustees and the gifted staff, I invite you to join us to reach these goals.

Publications
Topics
Sections

In the year of COVID-19, we saw unprecedented changes in our environment and social interactions. Almost nothing was as it should be—sports championships in a “bubble,” social distancing, limited travel, economic hardships, and, of course, the devastating effects on the health of people all over the world. CHEST did not shy away from the challenges of COVID-19. Instead, we accelerated our focus on education, patient care, research, and advocacy to assist clinicians caring for affected patients. The CHEST Foundation, the philanthropic arm of CHEST, contributed to this effort by funding research and community service grants and distributing over 14,000 pieces of PPE to health workers and the public.

Amid social protests, CHEST issued statements supporting inclusion and diversity and called for improving health care disparities. To better understand how these important issues interact, the CHEST Foundation began conducting listening tours across the country

to learn what is important to patients and what barriers they face. These lessons will influence how the foundation implements its current programs and designs future programs. Over the next few months, the CHEST Foundation will set in motion a course of action to support valuable programs in these areas. We will focus on three main themes.

First, we will utilize the strength of CHEST by inviting fellows to participate in CHEST Foundation activities and serve on our committees. By creating an atmosphere of inclusion and collegiality, we believe that fellows will better understand the CHEST Foundation’s goals and commit themselves to strengthening the foundation for years to come.

Second, we want to establish relationships with organizations outside of CHEST. Although our partnerships with health care industry organizations are strong, we have few robust alliances in the non-endemic space. Corporations espouse wellness, and we have experts all over the world who can address the needs and concerns of these companies. Preliminary exploration tells us that non-endemic corporations have an interest in what we can offer.

Third, we want to grow the corpus of the CHEST Foundation. Dreams without funding become only aspirations, but dreams with funding become reality. Without a solid corpus, we operate on a short-term plan. CHEST has some of the most influential leaders in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Together, we can develop programs that can significantly impact the lives of the people we serve.

The CHEST Foundation looks forward to building on past successes and tackling new challenges. On behalf of CHEST’s Board of Trustees and the gifted staff, I invite you to join us to reach these goals.

In the year of COVID-19, we saw unprecedented changes in our environment and social interactions. Almost nothing was as it should be—sports championships in a “bubble,” social distancing, limited travel, economic hardships, and, of course, the devastating effects on the health of people all over the world. CHEST did not shy away from the challenges of COVID-19. Instead, we accelerated our focus on education, patient care, research, and advocacy to assist clinicians caring for affected patients. The CHEST Foundation, the philanthropic arm of CHEST, contributed to this effort by funding research and community service grants and distributing over 14,000 pieces of PPE to health workers and the public.

Amid social protests, CHEST issued statements supporting inclusion and diversity and called for improving health care disparities. To better understand how these important issues interact, the CHEST Foundation began conducting listening tours across the country

to learn what is important to patients and what barriers they face. These lessons will influence how the foundation implements its current programs and designs future programs. Over the next few months, the CHEST Foundation will set in motion a course of action to support valuable programs in these areas. We will focus on three main themes.

First, we will utilize the strength of CHEST by inviting fellows to participate in CHEST Foundation activities and serve on our committees. By creating an atmosphere of inclusion and collegiality, we believe that fellows will better understand the CHEST Foundation’s goals and commit themselves to strengthening the foundation for years to come.

Second, we want to establish relationships with organizations outside of CHEST. Although our partnerships with health care industry organizations are strong, we have few robust alliances in the non-endemic space. Corporations espouse wellness, and we have experts all over the world who can address the needs and concerns of these companies. Preliminary exploration tells us that non-endemic corporations have an interest in what we can offer.

Third, we want to grow the corpus of the CHEST Foundation. Dreams without funding become only aspirations, but dreams with funding become reality. Without a solid corpus, we operate on a short-term plan. CHEST has some of the most influential leaders in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Together, we can develop programs that can significantly impact the lives of the people we serve.

The CHEST Foundation looks forward to building on past successes and tackling new challenges. On behalf of CHEST’s Board of Trustees and the gifted staff, I invite you to join us to reach these goals.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article