Pharmacy

Photo by Steven Harbour

New research has revealed shortcomings of post-approval studies for drugs granted accelerated approval in the US.

Researchers found that, for drugs granted accelerated approval from 2009 to 2013, both pre-approval and post-approval trials had limitations in their design and the endpoints used.

“One might expect accelerated approval confirmatory trials to be much more rigorous than the pre-approval trials,” said study author Aaron S. Kesselheim, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts.

“But we found that there were few differences in these key design features of the trials conducted before or after approval.”

Dr Kesselheim and his colleagues reported these findings in JAMA.

The researchers examined pre- and post-approval clinical trials of drugs granted accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2009 and 2013.

During that time, the FDA granted 22 drugs accelerated approval for 24 indications (15 of them for hematologic disorders).

Fourteen of the indications were approved on the basis of single-intervention-group studies that enrolled a median of 132 patients.

The FDA ordered 38 post-approval studies to confirm the safety and efficacy of the drugs.

Three years after the last drug’s approval, half of those studies (n=19) were not complete. Eight (42%) of the incomplete studies were either terminated or delayed by more than 1 year.

For 14 of the 24 indications (58%), results from the post-approval studies were not available after a median of 5 years of follow-up.

Study comparison

Published reports were available for 18 of the 19 completed post-approval studies. The characteristics of these studies did not differ much from the 30 pre-approval studies.

There were no statistically significant differences with regard to median patient enrollment (P=0.17), the use of randomized (P=0.31) or double-blind trials (P=0.17), the use of placebo as a comparator (P=0.17), or the lack of a comparator (P=0.21).

However, there was a significant difference in the use of an active comparator (P=0.02), with more post-approval studies using an active comparator.

The researchers also found that 17 of the 18 post-approval trials still used surrogate measures of effect as primary endpoints.

There was no significant difference between pre- and post-approval trials when it came to the use of disease response (P=0.17) or most other surrogate measures (P=0.21) as the trials’ primary endpoint.

The same was true for overall survival (P=0.20), although significantly more post-approval studies used progression-free survival (P=0.001) as a primary endpoint.

“It is important to use clinical endpoints in testing investigational drugs whenever possible because there are numerous cases of drugs approved on the basis of a surrogate measure that turn out to later not effect actual clinical outcomes—or even make them worse,” Dr Kesselheim said.

To address these issues and improve the quality of confirmatory studies, Dr Kesselheim suggested the FDA clearly describe the limitations in the pre-approval data that will need to be addressed in post-approval studies.

He also suggested the agency work with manufacturers to ensure that post-approval studies are conducted using design features that will be optimally useful for confirming the efficacy of the drug.

Photo by Steven Harbour

New research has revealed shortcomings of post-approval studies for drugs granted accelerated approval in the US.

Researchers found that, for drugs granted accelerated approval from 2009 to 2013, both pre-approval and post-approval trials had limitations in their design and the endpoints used.

“One might expect accelerated approval confirmatory trials to be much more rigorous than the pre-approval trials,” said study author Aaron S. Kesselheim, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts.

“But we found that there were few differences in these key design features of the trials conducted before or after approval.”

Dr Kesselheim and his colleagues reported these findings in JAMA.

The researchers examined pre- and post-approval clinical trials of drugs granted accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2009 and 2013.

During that time, the FDA granted 22 drugs accelerated approval for 24 indications (15 of them for hematologic disorders).

Fourteen of the indications were approved on the basis of single-intervention-group studies that enrolled a median of 132 patients.

The FDA ordered 38 post-approval studies to confirm the safety and efficacy of the drugs.

Three years after the last drug’s approval, half of those studies (n=19) were not complete. Eight (42%) of the incomplete studies were either terminated or delayed by more than 1 year.

For 14 of the 24 indications (58%), results from the post-approval studies were not available after a median of 5 years of follow-up.

Study comparison

Published reports were available for 18 of the 19 completed post-approval studies. The characteristics of these studies did not differ much from the 30 pre-approval studies.

There were no statistically significant differences with regard to median patient enrollment (P=0.17), the use of randomized (P=0.31) or double-blind trials (P=0.17), the use of placebo as a comparator (P=0.17), or the lack of a comparator (P=0.21).

However, there was a significant difference in the use of an active comparator (P=0.02), with more post-approval studies using an active comparator.

The researchers also found that 17 of the 18 post-approval trials still used surrogate measures of effect as primary endpoints.

There was no significant difference between pre- and post-approval trials when it came to the use of disease response (P=0.17) or most other surrogate measures (P=0.21) as the trials’ primary endpoint.

The same was true for overall survival (P=0.20), although significantly more post-approval studies used progression-free survival (P=0.001) as a primary endpoint.

“It is important to use clinical endpoints in testing investigational drugs whenever possible because there are numerous cases of drugs approved on the basis of a surrogate measure that turn out to later not effect actual clinical outcomes—or even make them worse,” Dr Kesselheim said.

To address these issues and improve the quality of confirmatory studies, Dr Kesselheim suggested the FDA clearly describe the limitations in the pre-approval data that will need to be addressed in post-approval studies.

He also suggested the agency work with manufacturers to ensure that post-approval studies are conducted using design features that will be optimally useful for confirming the efficacy of the drug.

Photo by Steven Harbour

New research has revealed shortcomings of post-approval studies for drugs granted accelerated approval in the US.

Researchers found that, for drugs granted accelerated approval from 2009 to 2013, both pre-approval and post-approval trials had limitations in their design and the endpoints used.

“One might expect accelerated approval confirmatory trials to be much more rigorous than the pre-approval trials,” said study author Aaron S. Kesselheim, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts.

“But we found that there were few differences in these key design features of the trials conducted before or after approval.”

Dr Kesselheim and his colleagues reported these findings in JAMA.

The researchers examined pre- and post-approval clinical trials of drugs granted accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2009 and 2013.

During that time, the FDA granted 22 drugs accelerated approval for 24 indications (15 of them for hematologic disorders).

Fourteen of the indications were approved on the basis of single-intervention-group studies that enrolled a median of 132 patients.

The FDA ordered 38 post-approval studies to confirm the safety and efficacy of the drugs.

Three years after the last drug’s approval, half of those studies (n=19) were not complete. Eight (42%) of the incomplete studies were either terminated or delayed by more than 1 year.

For 14 of the 24 indications (58%), results from the post-approval studies were not available after a median of 5 years of follow-up.

Study comparison

Published reports were available for 18 of the 19 completed post-approval studies. The characteristics of these studies did not differ much from the 30 pre-approval studies.

There were no statistically significant differences with regard to median patient enrollment (P=0.17), the use of randomized (P=0.31) or double-blind trials (P=0.17), the use of placebo as a comparator (P=0.17), or the lack of a comparator (P=0.21).

However, there was a significant difference in the use of an active comparator (P=0.02), with more post-approval studies using an active comparator.

The researchers also found that 17 of the 18 post-approval trials still used surrogate measures of effect as primary endpoints.

There was no significant difference between pre- and post-approval trials when it came to the use of disease response (P=0.17) or most other surrogate measures (P=0.21) as the trials’ primary endpoint.

The same was true for overall survival (P=0.20), although significantly more post-approval studies used progression-free survival (P=0.001) as a primary endpoint.

“It is important to use clinical endpoints in testing investigational drugs whenever possible because there are numerous cases of drugs approved on the basis of a surrogate measure that turn out to later not effect actual clinical outcomes—or even make them worse,” Dr Kesselheim said.

To address these issues and improve the quality of confirmatory studies, Dr Kesselheim suggested the FDA clearly describe the limitations in the pre-approval data that will need to be addressed in post-approval studies.

He also suggested the agency work with manufacturers to ensure that post-approval studies are conducted using design features that will be optimally useful for confirming the efficacy of the drug.

Image from Wikimedia

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted priority review and breakthrough therapy designation to vemurafenib (Zelboraf®) as a treatment for Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) with BRAF V600 mutation.

Vemurafenib is a kinase inhibitor designed to inhibit some mutated forms of BRAF.

The drug is already FDA-approved to treat patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation as detected by an FDA-approved test.

The FDA is expected to make a decision on the approval of vemurafenib in ECD by December 7, 2017.

The supplemental new drug application for vemurafenib in this indication is supported by data from the phase 2 VE-BASKET study.

VE-BASKET was designed to investigate the use of vemurafenib in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive diseases, including ECD.

Final results for the 22 people with ECD showed a best overall response rate of 54.5%. The median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were not reached at a median follow-up of 26.6 months.

The most common adverse events were joint pain, rash, hair loss, change in heart rhythm, fatigue, skin tags, diarrhea, and thickening of the skin. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were new skin cancers, high blood pressure, rash, and joint pain.

Initial results from this study were published in NEJM in August 2015.

About priority review

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

About breakthrough designation

The FDA’s breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of new treatments for serious or life-threatening conditions.

The designation entitles the company developing a therapy to more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient and accelerated development program, as well as eligibility for other actions to expedite FDA review, such as a rolling submission and priority review.

To earn breakthrough designation, a treatment must show encouraging early clinical results demonstrating substantial improvement over available therapies with regard to a clinically significant endpoint, or it must fulfill an unmet need.

Image from Wikimedia

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted priority review and breakthrough therapy designation to vemurafenib (Zelboraf®) as a treatment for Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) with BRAF V600 mutation.

Vemurafenib is a kinase inhibitor designed to inhibit some mutated forms of BRAF.

The drug is already FDA-approved to treat patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation as detected by an FDA-approved test.

The FDA is expected to make a decision on the approval of vemurafenib in ECD by December 7, 2017.

The supplemental new drug application for vemurafenib in this indication is supported by data from the phase 2 VE-BASKET study.

VE-BASKET was designed to investigate the use of vemurafenib in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive diseases, including ECD.

Final results for the 22 people with ECD showed a best overall response rate of 54.5%. The median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were not reached at a median follow-up of 26.6 months.

The most common adverse events were joint pain, rash, hair loss, change in heart rhythm, fatigue, skin tags, diarrhea, and thickening of the skin. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were new skin cancers, high blood pressure, rash, and joint pain.

Initial results from this study were published in NEJM in August 2015.

About priority review

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

About breakthrough designation

The FDA’s breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of new treatments for serious or life-threatening conditions.

The designation entitles the company developing a therapy to more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient and accelerated development program, as well as eligibility for other actions to expedite FDA review, such as a rolling submission and priority review.

To earn breakthrough designation, a treatment must show encouraging early clinical results demonstrating substantial improvement over available therapies with regard to a clinically significant endpoint, or it must fulfill an unmet need.

Image from Wikimedia

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted priority review and breakthrough therapy designation to vemurafenib (Zelboraf®) as a treatment for Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) with BRAF V600 mutation.

Vemurafenib is a kinase inhibitor designed to inhibit some mutated forms of BRAF.

The drug is already FDA-approved to treat patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation as detected by an FDA-approved test.

The FDA is expected to make a decision on the approval of vemurafenib in ECD by December 7, 2017.

The supplemental new drug application for vemurafenib in this indication is supported by data from the phase 2 VE-BASKET study.

VE-BASKET was designed to investigate the use of vemurafenib in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive diseases, including ECD.

Final results for the 22 people with ECD showed a best overall response rate of 54.5%. The median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were not reached at a median follow-up of 26.6 months.

The most common adverse events were joint pain, rash, hair loss, change in heart rhythm, fatigue, skin tags, diarrhea, and thickening of the skin. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were new skin cancers, high blood pressure, rash, and joint pain.

Initial results from this study were published in NEJM in August 2015.

About priority review

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

About breakthrough designation

The FDA’s breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of new treatments for serious or life-threatening conditions.

The designation entitles the company developing a therapy to more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient and accelerated development program, as well as eligibility for other actions to expedite FDA review, such as a rolling submission and priority review.

To earn breakthrough designation, a treatment must show encouraging early clinical results demonstrating substantial improvement over available therapies with regard to a clinically significant endpoint, or it must fulfill an unmet need.

Bristol Myers Squibb

Portola Pharmaceuticals Inc. has resubmitted its biologics license application (BLA) for andexanet alfa (AndexXa®) to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

With this BLA, Portola is seeking approval of andexanet alfa for reversal of the anticoagulant effects of apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients experiencing uncontrolled or life-threatening bleeding.

The resubmission includes supplemental information requested by the FDA in a complete response letter issued in August 2016.

At that time, Portola was seeking approval for andexanet alfa in patients treated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, or enoxaparin when reversal of anticoagulation is needed.

However, the FDA said it could not approve andexanet alfa for that indication. The FDA requested that Portola provide information related to manufacturing of andexanet alfa as well as additional data to support the inclusion of edoxaban and enoxaparin on andexanet alfa’s label.

The initial BLA for andexanet alfa included data from a pair of phase 3 studies—ANNEXA-A and ANNEXA-R—which were designed to assess andexanet alfa’s ability to reverse the effects of apixaban and rivaroxaban—but not edoxaban or enoxaparin—in healthy volunteers.

Results from ANNEXA-A and ANNEXA-R were published in NEJM in 2015.

The BLA also included limited adjudicated efficacy and safety data from patients enrolled in the phase 3b/4 ANNEXA-4 study. This ongoing study is enrolling patients receiving apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and enoxaparin who present with an acute major bleed.

Preliminary results from ANNEXA-4 were presented at ESC Congress 2016 and published in NEJM.

Bristol Myers Squibb

Portola Pharmaceuticals Inc. has resubmitted its biologics license application (BLA) for andexanet alfa (AndexXa®) to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

With this BLA, Portola is seeking approval of andexanet alfa for reversal of the anticoagulant effects of apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients experiencing uncontrolled or life-threatening bleeding.

The resubmission includes supplemental information requested by the FDA in a complete response letter issued in August 2016.

At that time, Portola was seeking approval for andexanet alfa in patients treated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, or enoxaparin when reversal of anticoagulation is needed.

However, the FDA said it could not approve andexanet alfa for that indication. The FDA requested that Portola provide information related to manufacturing of andexanet alfa as well as additional data to support the inclusion of edoxaban and enoxaparin on andexanet alfa’s label.

The initial BLA for andexanet alfa included data from a pair of phase 3 studies—ANNEXA-A and ANNEXA-R—which were designed to assess andexanet alfa’s ability to reverse the effects of apixaban and rivaroxaban—but not edoxaban or enoxaparin—in healthy volunteers.

Results from ANNEXA-A and ANNEXA-R were published in NEJM in 2015.

The BLA also included limited adjudicated efficacy and safety data from patients enrolled in the phase 3b/4 ANNEXA-4 study. This ongoing study is enrolling patients receiving apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and enoxaparin who present with an acute major bleed.

Preliminary results from ANNEXA-4 were presented at ESC Congress 2016 and published in NEJM.

Bristol Myers Squibb

Portola Pharmaceuticals Inc. has resubmitted its biologics license application (BLA) for andexanet alfa (AndexXa®) to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

With this BLA, Portola is seeking approval of andexanet alfa for reversal of the anticoagulant effects of apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients experiencing uncontrolled or life-threatening bleeding.

The resubmission includes supplemental information requested by the FDA in a complete response letter issued in August 2016.

At that time, Portola was seeking approval for andexanet alfa in patients treated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, or enoxaparin when reversal of anticoagulation is needed.

However, the FDA said it could not approve andexanet alfa for that indication. The FDA requested that Portola provide information related to manufacturing of andexanet alfa as well as additional data to support the inclusion of edoxaban and enoxaparin on andexanet alfa’s label.

The initial BLA for andexanet alfa included data from a pair of phase 3 studies—ANNEXA-A and ANNEXA-R—which were designed to assess andexanet alfa’s ability to reverse the effects of apixaban and rivaroxaban—but not edoxaban or enoxaparin—in healthy volunteers.

Results from ANNEXA-A and ANNEXA-R were published in NEJM in 2015.

The BLA also included limited adjudicated efficacy and safety data from patients enrolled in the phase 3b/4 ANNEXA-4 study. This ongoing study is enrolling patients receiving apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and enoxaparin who present with an acute major bleed.

Preliminary results from ANNEXA-4 were presented at ESC Congress 2016 and published in NEJM.

AML cells

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted approval for CPX-351 (Vyxeos™), a fixed-ratio combination of cytarabine and daunorubicin inside a lipid vesicle.

CPX-351 is approved to treat adults with 2 types of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)—AML with myelodysplasia-related changes and newly diagnosed, therapy-related AML.

The FDA granted the approval of CPX-351 to Jazz Pharmaceuticals.

The company says the drug will be commercially available within a week.

The FDA approval of CPX-351 is based on data from a phase 3 trial in which researchers compared CPX-351 to cytarabine and daunorubicin (7+3) in 309 patients, ages 60 to 75, with newly diagnosed, therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes.

The complete response rate was 38% in the CPX-351 arm and 26% in the 7+3 arm (P=0.036).

The rate of hematopoietic stem cell transplant was 34% in the CPX-351 arm and 25% in the 7+3 arm.

The median overall survival was 9.6 months in the CPX-351 arm and 5.9 months in the 7+3 arm (P=0.005).

All-cause 30-day mortality was 6% in the CPX-351 arm and 11% in the 7+3 arm. Sixty-day mortality was 14% and 21%, respectively.

Six percent of patients in both arms had a fatal adverse event (AE) on treatment or within 30 days of therapy that was not in the setting of progressive disease.

The rate of AEs that led to discontinuation was 18% in the CPX-351 arm and 13% in the 7+3 arm. AEs leading to discontinuation in the CPX-351 arm included prolonged cytopenias, infection, cardiotoxicity, respiratory failure, hemorrhage, renal insufficiency, colitis, and generalized medical deterioration.

The most common AEs (incidence ≥ 25%) in the CPX-351 arm were hemorrhagic events, febrile neutropenia, rash, edema, nausea, mucositis, diarrhea, constipation, musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, abdominal pain, dyspnea, headache, cough, decreased appetite, arrhythmia, pneumonia, bacteremia, chills, sleep disorders, and vomiting.

The most common serious AEs (incidence ≥ 5%) in the CPX-351 arm were dyspnea, myocardial toxicity, sepsis, pneumonia, febrile neutropenia, bacteremia, and hemorrhage.

For more information on CPX-351, visit http://www.vyxeos.com.

AML cells

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted approval for CPX-351 (Vyxeos™), a fixed-ratio combination of cytarabine and daunorubicin inside a lipid vesicle.

CPX-351 is approved to treat adults with 2 types of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)—AML with myelodysplasia-related changes and newly diagnosed, therapy-related AML.

The FDA granted the approval of CPX-351 to Jazz Pharmaceuticals.

The company says the drug will be commercially available within a week.

The FDA approval of CPX-351 is based on data from a phase 3 trial in which researchers compared CPX-351 to cytarabine and daunorubicin (7+3) in 309 patients, ages 60 to 75, with newly diagnosed, therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes.

The complete response rate was 38% in the CPX-351 arm and 26% in the 7+3 arm (P=0.036).

The rate of hematopoietic stem cell transplant was 34% in the CPX-351 arm and 25% in the 7+3 arm.

The median overall survival was 9.6 months in the CPX-351 arm and 5.9 months in the 7+3 arm (P=0.005).

All-cause 30-day mortality was 6% in the CPX-351 arm and 11% in the 7+3 arm. Sixty-day mortality was 14% and 21%, respectively.

Six percent of patients in both arms had a fatal adverse event (AE) on treatment or within 30 days of therapy that was not in the setting of progressive disease.

The rate of AEs that led to discontinuation was 18% in the CPX-351 arm and 13% in the 7+3 arm. AEs leading to discontinuation in the CPX-351 arm included prolonged cytopenias, infection, cardiotoxicity, respiratory failure, hemorrhage, renal insufficiency, colitis, and generalized medical deterioration.

The most common AEs (incidence ≥ 25%) in the CPX-351 arm were hemorrhagic events, febrile neutropenia, rash, edema, nausea, mucositis, diarrhea, constipation, musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, abdominal pain, dyspnea, headache, cough, decreased appetite, arrhythmia, pneumonia, bacteremia, chills, sleep disorders, and vomiting.

The most common serious AEs (incidence ≥ 5%) in the CPX-351 arm were dyspnea, myocardial toxicity, sepsis, pneumonia, febrile neutropenia, bacteremia, and hemorrhage.

For more information on CPX-351, visit http://www.vyxeos.com.

AML cells

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted approval for CPX-351 (Vyxeos™), a fixed-ratio combination of cytarabine and daunorubicin inside a lipid vesicle.

CPX-351 is approved to treat adults with 2 types of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)—AML with myelodysplasia-related changes and newly diagnosed, therapy-related AML.

The FDA granted the approval of CPX-351 to Jazz Pharmaceuticals.

The company says the drug will be commercially available within a week.

The FDA approval of CPX-351 is based on data from a phase 3 trial in which researchers compared CPX-351 to cytarabine and daunorubicin (7+3) in 309 patients, ages 60 to 75, with newly diagnosed, therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes.

The complete response rate was 38% in the CPX-351 arm and 26% in the 7+3 arm (P=0.036).

The rate of hematopoietic stem cell transplant was 34% in the CPX-351 arm and 25% in the 7+3 arm.

The median overall survival was 9.6 months in the CPX-351 arm and 5.9 months in the 7+3 arm (P=0.005).

All-cause 30-day mortality was 6% in the CPX-351 arm and 11% in the 7+3 arm. Sixty-day mortality was 14% and 21%, respectively.

Six percent of patients in both arms had a fatal adverse event (AE) on treatment or within 30 days of therapy that was not in the setting of progressive disease.

The rate of AEs that led to discontinuation was 18% in the CPX-351 arm and 13% in the 7+3 arm. AEs leading to discontinuation in the CPX-351 arm included prolonged cytopenias, infection, cardiotoxicity, respiratory failure, hemorrhage, renal insufficiency, colitis, and generalized medical deterioration.

The most common AEs (incidence ≥ 25%) in the CPX-351 arm were hemorrhagic events, febrile neutropenia, rash, edema, nausea, mucositis, diarrhea, constipation, musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, abdominal pain, dyspnea, headache, cough, decreased appetite, arrhythmia, pneumonia, bacteremia, chills, sleep disorders, and vomiting.

The most common serious AEs (incidence ≥ 5%) in the CPX-351 arm were dyspnea, myocardial toxicity, sepsis, pneumonia, febrile neutropenia, bacteremia, and hemorrhage.

For more information on CPX-351, visit http://www.vyxeos.com.

Photo courtesy of Janssen

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded the approved use of ibrutinib (Imbruvica) to include the treatment of adults with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) who have failed at least one prior treatment.

This makes ibrutinib the first FDA-approved therapy for cGVHD.

Ibrutinib was previously FDA-approved to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, marginal zone lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma.

“This approval highlights how a known treatment for cancer is finding a new use in treating a serious and life-threatening condition that may occur in patients with blood cancer who receive a stem cell transplant,” said Richard Pazdur, MD, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence and acting director of the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

The approval of ibrutinib to treat cGVHD is based on results of a phase 2 trial, which were presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

The trial included 42 patients with cGVHD whose symptoms persisted despite standard treatment with corticosteroids. Most patients’ symptoms included mouth ulcers and skin rashes, and more than 50% had 2 or more organs affected by cGVHD.

Sixty-seven percent of patients responded to treatment with ibrutinib, experiencing improvements in their cGVHD symptoms. In 48% of patients, this improvement lasted for 5 months or longer.

Common side effects of ibrutinib in this trial were fatigue, bruising, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, muscle spasms, swelling and stomatitis, nausea, hemorrhage, anemia, and pneumonia.

Photo courtesy of Janssen

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded the approved use of ibrutinib (Imbruvica) to include the treatment of adults with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) who have failed at least one prior treatment.

This makes ibrutinib the first FDA-approved therapy for cGVHD.

Ibrutinib was previously FDA-approved to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, marginal zone lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma.

“This approval highlights how a known treatment for cancer is finding a new use in treating a serious and life-threatening condition that may occur in patients with blood cancer who receive a stem cell transplant,” said Richard Pazdur, MD, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence and acting director of the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

The approval of ibrutinib to treat cGVHD is based on results of a phase 2 trial, which were presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

The trial included 42 patients with cGVHD whose symptoms persisted despite standard treatment with corticosteroids. Most patients’ symptoms included mouth ulcers and skin rashes, and more than 50% had 2 or more organs affected by cGVHD.

Sixty-seven percent of patients responded to treatment with ibrutinib, experiencing improvements in their cGVHD symptoms. In 48% of patients, this improvement lasted for 5 months or longer.

Common side effects of ibrutinib in this trial were fatigue, bruising, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, muscle spasms, swelling and stomatitis, nausea, hemorrhage, anemia, and pneumonia.

Photo courtesy of Janssen

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded the approved use of ibrutinib (Imbruvica) to include the treatment of adults with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) who have failed at least one prior treatment.

This makes ibrutinib the first FDA-approved therapy for cGVHD.

Ibrutinib was previously FDA-approved to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, marginal zone lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma.

“This approval highlights how a known treatment for cancer is finding a new use in treating a serious and life-threatening condition that may occur in patients with blood cancer who receive a stem cell transplant,” said Richard Pazdur, MD, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence and acting director of the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

The approval of ibrutinib to treat cGVHD is based on results of a phase 2 trial, which were presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

The trial included 42 patients with cGVHD whose symptoms persisted despite standard treatment with corticosteroids. Most patients’ symptoms included mouth ulcers and skin rashes, and more than 50% had 2 or more organs affected by cGVHD.

Sixty-seven percent of patients responded to treatment with ibrutinib, experiencing improvements in their cGVHD symptoms. In 48% of patients, this improvement lasted for 5 months or longer.

Common side effects of ibrutinib in this trial were fatigue, bruising, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, muscle spasms, swelling and stomatitis, nausea, hemorrhage, anemia, and pneumonia.

Red blood cells

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan drug designation to RA101495 for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH).

RA101495 is a synthetic, macrocyclic peptide being developed by Ra Pharmaceuticals.

The peptide binds complement component 5 (C5) with sub-nanomolar affinity and allosterically inhibits its cleavage into C5a and C5b upon activation of the classical, alternative, or lectin pathways.

By binding to a region of C5 corresponding to C5b, RA101495 also disrupts the interaction between C5b and C6 and prevents assembly of the membrane attack complex.

In phase 1 studies, dosing of RA101495 was well tolerated in healthy volunteers and demonstrated sustained and near complete suppression of hemolysis and complement activity.

The phase 1 results were presented at the 21st Congress of the European Hematology Association in June 2016 (abstracts LB2249 and P632).

RA101495 is currently under investigation in a phase 2 trial of patients with PNH.

“There is an urgent need for new treatment options for patients suffering from PNH,” said Doug Treco, PhD, president and chief executive officer of Ra Pharmaceuticals.

“The current standard of care requires biweekly intravenous infusions, a dosing regimen that imposes a severe burden on patients, providers, and caregivers. We have designed RA101495 for once-daily, subcutaneous self-administration, an approach which has the potential to ease this burden, improve convenience, and provide much-needed dosing flexibility.”

“We are encouraged by our initial phase 2 data in PNH patients, which showed near-complete inhibition of hemolysis and a favorable safety and tolerability profile. We look forward to advancing our PNH program and providing additional data updates around year-end.”

About orphan designation

The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs and biologics intended to treat, diagnose, or prevent diseases/disorders that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the US.

The designation provides incentives for sponsors to develop products for rare diseases. This may include tax credits toward the cost of clinical trials, prescription drug user fee waivers, and 7 years of market exclusivity if the product is approved.

Red blood cells

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan drug designation to RA101495 for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH).

RA101495 is a synthetic, macrocyclic peptide being developed by Ra Pharmaceuticals.

The peptide binds complement component 5 (C5) with sub-nanomolar affinity and allosterically inhibits its cleavage into C5a and C5b upon activation of the classical, alternative, or lectin pathways.

By binding to a region of C5 corresponding to C5b, RA101495 also disrupts the interaction between C5b and C6 and prevents assembly of the membrane attack complex.

In phase 1 studies, dosing of RA101495 was well tolerated in healthy volunteers and demonstrated sustained and near complete suppression of hemolysis and complement activity.

The phase 1 results were presented at the 21st Congress of the European Hematology Association in June 2016 (abstracts LB2249 and P632).

RA101495 is currently under investigation in a phase 2 trial of patients with PNH.

“There is an urgent need for new treatment options for patients suffering from PNH,” said Doug Treco, PhD, president and chief executive officer of Ra Pharmaceuticals.

“The current standard of care requires biweekly intravenous infusions, a dosing regimen that imposes a severe burden on patients, providers, and caregivers. We have designed RA101495 for once-daily, subcutaneous self-administration, an approach which has the potential to ease this burden, improve convenience, and provide much-needed dosing flexibility.”

“We are encouraged by our initial phase 2 data in PNH patients, which showed near-complete inhibition of hemolysis and a favorable safety and tolerability profile. We look forward to advancing our PNH program and providing additional data updates around year-end.”

About orphan designation

The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs and biologics intended to treat, diagnose, or prevent diseases/disorders that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the US.

The designation provides incentives for sponsors to develop products for rare diseases. This may include tax credits toward the cost of clinical trials, prescription drug user fee waivers, and 7 years of market exclusivity if the product is approved.

Red blood cells

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan drug designation to RA101495 for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH).

RA101495 is a synthetic, macrocyclic peptide being developed by Ra Pharmaceuticals.

The peptide binds complement component 5 (C5) with sub-nanomolar affinity and allosterically inhibits its cleavage into C5a and C5b upon activation of the classical, alternative, or lectin pathways.

By binding to a region of C5 corresponding to C5b, RA101495 also disrupts the interaction between C5b and C6 and prevents assembly of the membrane attack complex.

In phase 1 studies, dosing of RA101495 was well tolerated in healthy volunteers and demonstrated sustained and near complete suppression of hemolysis and complement activity.

The phase 1 results were presented at the 21st Congress of the European Hematology Association in June 2016 (abstracts LB2249 and P632).

RA101495 is currently under investigation in a phase 2 trial of patients with PNH.

“There is an urgent need for new treatment options for patients suffering from PNH,” said Doug Treco, PhD, president and chief executive officer of Ra Pharmaceuticals.

“The current standard of care requires biweekly intravenous infusions, a dosing regimen that imposes a severe burden on patients, providers, and caregivers. We have designed RA101495 for once-daily, subcutaneous self-administration, an approach which has the potential to ease this burden, improve convenience, and provide much-needed dosing flexibility.”

“We are encouraged by our initial phase 2 data in PNH patients, which showed near-complete inhibition of hemolysis and a favorable safety and tolerability profile. We look forward to advancing our PNH program and providing additional data updates around year-end.”

About orphan designation

The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs and biologics intended to treat, diagnose, or prevent diseases/disorders that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the US.

The designation provides incentives for sponsors to develop products for rare diseases. This may include tax credits toward the cost of clinical trials, prescription drug user fee waivers, and 7 years of market exclusivity if the product is approved.

Photo from Business Wire

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved marketing of the oral IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib (IDHIFA®).

The drug is now approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and an IDH2 mutation, as detected by an FDA-approved test.

Enasidenib is available in 50 mg and 100 mg tablets. The recommended dose is 100 mg once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The prescribing information for enasidenib includes a boxed warning that the drug may cause differentiation syndrome, and this adverse event (AE) can be fatal if not treated.

Signs and symptoms of differentiation syndrome may include fever, dyspnea, acute respiratory distress, radiographic pulmonary infiltrates, pleural or pericardial effusions, rapid weight gain, peripheral edema, and hepatic, renal, or multi-organ dysfunction. At first suspicion of symptoms, doctors should treat patients with corticosteroids and monitor patients closely until symptoms resolve.

Companion diagnostic

Enasidenib was approved concurrently with the Abbott RealTime™ IDH2 companion diagnostic test, which was approved as an aid in identifying AML patients for treatment with enasidenib.

The FDA granted approval of enasidenib to Celgene Corporation and approval of the RealTime IDH2 Assay to Abbott Laboratories.

Enasidenib is licensed from Agios Pharmaceuticals.

Trial results

The FDA’s approval of enasidenib and the companion diagnostic test was based on data from a phase 1/2 trial (Study AG221-C-001, NCT01915498).

Data from this trial were recently presented at the ASCO 2017 Annual Meeting. However, the definitive data are included in the prescribing information for enasidenib.

The prescribing information includes efficacy data for 199 adults with relapsed/refractory AML and an IDH2 mutation. IDH2 mutations were identified or confirmed by the Abbott RealTime™ IDH2 test.

The 199 patients received enasidenib at a starting dose of 100 mg daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Dose reductions were allowed to manage side effects.

The patients’ median age was 68 (range, 19 to 100). They received a median of 2 prior anticancer regimens (range, 1 to 6). More than half (52%) were refractory to previous therapy.

The rate of complete response (CR) or CR with partial hematologic improvement (CRh) was 23% (n=46). The median duration of CR/CRh was 8.2 months (range, 4.3 to 19.4).

For patients who achieved a CR/CRh, the median time to first response was 1.9 months (range, 0.5 to 7.5), and the median time to best response of CR/CRh was 3.7 months (range, 0.6 to 11.2).

Among the 157 patients who were dependent on red blood cell (RBC) and/or platelet transfusions at baseline, 53 (34%) became independent of RBC and platelet transfusions during any 56-day period post-baseline.

Of the 42 patients who were independent of both RBC and platelet transfusions at baseline, 32 (76%) remained transfusion independent during any 56-day post-baseline period.

Researchers evaluated the safety of enasidenib in 214 patients. The median duration of exposure to enasidenib was 4.3 months (range, 0.3 to 23.6).

The most common AEs of any grade (≥20%) were nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, elevated bilirubin, and decreased appetite.

Serious AEs were reported in 77.1% of patients. The most frequent serious AEs (≥2%) were leukocytosis, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite, tumor lysis syndrome, and differentiation syndrome.

The 30-day and 60-day mortality rates were 4.2% (9/214) and 11.7% (25/214), respectively.

Photo from Business Wire

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved marketing of the oral IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib (IDHIFA®).

The drug is now approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and an IDH2 mutation, as detected by an FDA-approved test.

Enasidenib is available in 50 mg and 100 mg tablets. The recommended dose is 100 mg once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The prescribing information for enasidenib includes a boxed warning that the drug may cause differentiation syndrome, and this adverse event (AE) can be fatal if not treated.

Signs and symptoms of differentiation syndrome may include fever, dyspnea, acute respiratory distress, radiographic pulmonary infiltrates, pleural or pericardial effusions, rapid weight gain, peripheral edema, and hepatic, renal, or multi-organ dysfunction. At first suspicion of symptoms, doctors should treat patients with corticosteroids and monitor patients closely until symptoms resolve.

Companion diagnostic

Enasidenib was approved concurrently with the Abbott RealTime™ IDH2 companion diagnostic test, which was approved as an aid in identifying AML patients for treatment with enasidenib.

The FDA granted approval of enasidenib to Celgene Corporation and approval of the RealTime IDH2 Assay to Abbott Laboratories.

Enasidenib is licensed from Agios Pharmaceuticals.

Trial results

The FDA’s approval of enasidenib and the companion diagnostic test was based on data from a phase 1/2 trial (Study AG221-C-001, NCT01915498).

Data from this trial were recently presented at the ASCO 2017 Annual Meeting. However, the definitive data are included in the prescribing information for enasidenib.

The prescribing information includes efficacy data for 199 adults with relapsed/refractory AML and an IDH2 mutation. IDH2 mutations were identified or confirmed by the Abbott RealTime™ IDH2 test.

The 199 patients received enasidenib at a starting dose of 100 mg daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Dose reductions were allowed to manage side effects.

The patients’ median age was 68 (range, 19 to 100). They received a median of 2 prior anticancer regimens (range, 1 to 6). More than half (52%) were refractory to previous therapy.

The rate of complete response (CR) or CR with partial hematologic improvement (CRh) was 23% (n=46). The median duration of CR/CRh was 8.2 months (range, 4.3 to 19.4).

For patients who achieved a CR/CRh, the median time to first response was 1.9 months (range, 0.5 to 7.5), and the median time to best response of CR/CRh was 3.7 months (range, 0.6 to 11.2).

Among the 157 patients who were dependent on red blood cell (RBC) and/or platelet transfusions at baseline, 53 (34%) became independent of RBC and platelet transfusions during any 56-day period post-baseline.

Of the 42 patients who were independent of both RBC and platelet transfusions at baseline, 32 (76%) remained transfusion independent during any 56-day post-baseline period.

Researchers evaluated the safety of enasidenib in 214 patients. The median duration of exposure to enasidenib was 4.3 months (range, 0.3 to 23.6).

The most common AEs of any grade (≥20%) were nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, elevated bilirubin, and decreased appetite.

Serious AEs were reported in 77.1% of patients. The most frequent serious AEs (≥2%) were leukocytosis, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite, tumor lysis syndrome, and differentiation syndrome.

The 30-day and 60-day mortality rates were 4.2% (9/214) and 11.7% (25/214), respectively.

Photo from Business Wire

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved marketing of the oral IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib (IDHIFA®).

The drug is now approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and an IDH2 mutation, as detected by an FDA-approved test.

Enasidenib is available in 50 mg and 100 mg tablets. The recommended dose is 100 mg once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The prescribing information for enasidenib includes a boxed warning that the drug may cause differentiation syndrome, and this adverse event (AE) can be fatal if not treated.

Signs and symptoms of differentiation syndrome may include fever, dyspnea, acute respiratory distress, radiographic pulmonary infiltrates, pleural or pericardial effusions, rapid weight gain, peripheral edema, and hepatic, renal, or multi-organ dysfunction. At first suspicion of symptoms, doctors should treat patients with corticosteroids and monitor patients closely until symptoms resolve.

Companion diagnostic

Enasidenib was approved concurrently with the Abbott RealTime™ IDH2 companion diagnostic test, which was approved as an aid in identifying AML patients for treatment with enasidenib.

The FDA granted approval of enasidenib to Celgene Corporation and approval of the RealTime IDH2 Assay to Abbott Laboratories.

Enasidenib is licensed from Agios Pharmaceuticals.

Trial results

The FDA’s approval of enasidenib and the companion diagnostic test was based on data from a phase 1/2 trial (Study AG221-C-001, NCT01915498).

Data from this trial were recently presented at the ASCO 2017 Annual Meeting. However, the definitive data are included in the prescribing information for enasidenib.

The prescribing information includes efficacy data for 199 adults with relapsed/refractory AML and an IDH2 mutation. IDH2 mutations were identified or confirmed by the Abbott RealTime™ IDH2 test.

The 199 patients received enasidenib at a starting dose of 100 mg daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Dose reductions were allowed to manage side effects.

The patients’ median age was 68 (range, 19 to 100). They received a median of 2 prior anticancer regimens (range, 1 to 6). More than half (52%) were refractory to previous therapy.

The rate of complete response (CR) or CR with partial hematologic improvement (CRh) was 23% (n=46). The median duration of CR/CRh was 8.2 months (range, 4.3 to 19.4).

For patients who achieved a CR/CRh, the median time to first response was 1.9 months (range, 0.5 to 7.5), and the median time to best response of CR/CRh was 3.7 months (range, 0.6 to 11.2).

Among the 157 patients who were dependent on red blood cell (RBC) and/or platelet transfusions at baseline, 53 (34%) became independent of RBC and platelet transfusions during any 56-day period post-baseline.

Of the 42 patients who were independent of both RBC and platelet transfusions at baseline, 32 (76%) remained transfusion independent during any 56-day post-baseline period.

Researchers evaluated the safety of enasidenib in 214 patients. The median duration of exposure to enasidenib was 4.3 months (range, 0.3 to 23.6).

The most common AEs of any grade (≥20%) were nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, elevated bilirubin, and decreased appetite.

Serious AEs were reported in 77.1% of patients. The most frequent serious AEs (≥2%) were leukocytosis, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite, tumor lysis syndrome, and differentiation syndrome.

The 30-day and 60-day mortality rates were 4.2% (9/214) and 11.7% (25/214), respectively.

Mantle cell lymphoma

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough therapy designation to acalabrutinib, a BTK inhibitor being developed to treat multiple B-cell malignancies.

The breakthrough designation applies to acalabrutinib as a treatment for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who have received at least 1 prior therapy.

The FDA’s breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of new treatments for serious or life-threatening conditions.

The designation entitles the company developing a therapy to more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient and accelerated development program, as well as eligibility for other actions to expedite FDA review, such as a rolling submission and priority review.

To earn breakthrough designation, a treatment must show encouraging early clinical results demonstrating substantial improvement over available therapies with regard to a clinically significant endpoint, or it must fulfill an unmet need.

The FDA granted acalabrutinib breakthrough designation based on data from the drug’s development program, which includes data from the phase 2 ACE-LY-004 trial in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL.

Data from this trial have not yet been released to the public but are expected to be presented at an upcoming medical meeting.

Mantle cell lymphoma

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough therapy designation to acalabrutinib, a BTK inhibitor being developed to treat multiple B-cell malignancies.

The breakthrough designation applies to acalabrutinib as a treatment for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who have received at least 1 prior therapy.

The FDA’s breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of new treatments for serious or life-threatening conditions.

The designation entitles the company developing a therapy to more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient and accelerated development program, as well as eligibility for other actions to expedite FDA review, such as a rolling submission and priority review.

To earn breakthrough designation, a treatment must show encouraging early clinical results demonstrating substantial improvement over available therapies with regard to a clinically significant endpoint, or it must fulfill an unmet need.

The FDA granted acalabrutinib breakthrough designation based on data from the drug’s development program, which includes data from the phase 2 ACE-LY-004 trial in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL.

Data from this trial have not yet been released to the public but are expected to be presented at an upcoming medical meeting.

Mantle cell lymphoma

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough therapy designation to acalabrutinib, a BTK inhibitor being developed to treat multiple B-cell malignancies.

The breakthrough designation applies to acalabrutinib as a treatment for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who have received at least 1 prior therapy.

The FDA’s breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of new treatments for serious or life-threatening conditions.

The designation entitles the company developing a therapy to more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient and accelerated development program, as well as eligibility for other actions to expedite FDA review, such as a rolling submission and priority review.

To earn breakthrough designation, a treatment must show encouraging early clinical results demonstrating substantial improvement over available therapies with regard to a clinically significant endpoint, or it must fulfill an unmet need.

The FDA granted acalabrutinib breakthrough designation based on data from the drug’s development program, which includes data from the phase 2 ACE-LY-004 trial in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL.

Data from this trial have not yet been released to the public but are expected to be presented at an upcoming medical meeting.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has updated its clinical practice guidelines on the use of antiemetics in cancer patients.

The update, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, provides new evidence-based information on the appropriate use of olanzapine, NK1 receptor antagonists, and dexamethasone.

“The adverse impact of inadequately controlled nausea and vomiting on patients’ quality of life is well documented,” said Paul J. Hesketh, MD, co-chair of the ASCO expert panel that updated the guidelines.

“By following the ASCO antiemetics guideline, clinicians have the opportunity to improve patients’ quality of life by minimizing treatment-induced emesis.”

To update ASCO’s guidelines on antiemetics, the expert panel conducted a systematic review of the medical literature published between November 2009 and June 2016. The panel included members with expertise in medical oncology, radiation oncology, nursing, pharmacy, and health services research, as well as a patient representative.

“Tremendous progress has been realized over the last 25 years in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with the introduction of new classes of antiemetic agents,” said Mark G. Kris, MD, co-chair of the expert panel that updated the guidelines.

“The full benefit of these treatment advances will only be realized, however, if evidence-based guidelines are fully implemented.”

Key recommendations in the updated guidelines include:

For adults receiving chemotherapy with a high risk for nausea and vomiting (eg, cisplatin or the combination of cyclophosphamide and an anthracycline), olanzapine should be added to standard antiemetic regimens (the combination of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, an NK1 receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone). Olanzapine also helps individuals who experience symptoms despite receiving medicines to prevent vomiting before chemotherapy is given.

For adults receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy or high-dose chemotherapy and children receiving chemotherapy with a high risk for nausea and vomiting, an NK1 receptor antagonist should be added to the standard antiemetic regimen (the combination of 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone).

Dexamethasone treatment can be limited to the day of chemotherapy administration in patients receiving an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide.

Dronabinol and nabilone, cannabinoids approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, can be used to treat nausea and vomiting that is resistant to standard antiemetic therapies. Evidence remains insufficient to recommend medical marijuana for either prevention or treatment of nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has updated its clinical practice guidelines on the use of antiemetics in cancer patients.

The update, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, provides new evidence-based information on the appropriate use of olanzapine, NK1 receptor antagonists, and dexamethasone.

“The adverse impact of inadequately controlled nausea and vomiting on patients’ quality of life is well documented,” said Paul J. Hesketh, MD, co-chair of the ASCO expert panel that updated the guidelines.

“By following the ASCO antiemetics guideline, clinicians have the opportunity to improve patients’ quality of life by minimizing treatment-induced emesis.”

To update ASCO’s guidelines on antiemetics, the expert panel conducted a systematic review of the medical literature published between November 2009 and June 2016. The panel included members with expertise in medical oncology, radiation oncology, nursing, pharmacy, and health services research, as well as a patient representative.

“Tremendous progress has been realized over the last 25 years in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with the introduction of new classes of antiemetic agents,” said Mark G. Kris, MD, co-chair of the expert panel that updated the guidelines.

“The full benefit of these treatment advances will only be realized, however, if evidence-based guidelines are fully implemented.”

Key recommendations in the updated guidelines include:

For adults receiving chemotherapy with a high risk for nausea and vomiting (eg, cisplatin or the combination of cyclophosphamide and an anthracycline), olanzapine should be added to standard antiemetic regimens (the combination of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, an NK1 receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone). Olanzapine also helps individuals who experience symptoms despite receiving medicines to prevent vomiting before chemotherapy is given.

For adults receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy or high-dose chemotherapy and children receiving chemotherapy with a high risk for nausea and vomiting, an NK1 receptor antagonist should be added to the standard antiemetic regimen (the combination of 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone).

Dexamethasone treatment can be limited to the day of chemotherapy administration in patients receiving an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide.

Dronabinol and nabilone, cannabinoids approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, can be used to treat nausea and vomiting that is resistant to standard antiemetic therapies. Evidence remains insufficient to recommend medical marijuana for either prevention or treatment of nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has updated its clinical practice guidelines on the use of antiemetics in cancer patients.

The update, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, provides new evidence-based information on the appropriate use of olanzapine, NK1 receptor antagonists, and dexamethasone.

“The adverse impact of inadequately controlled nausea and vomiting on patients’ quality of life is well documented,” said Paul J. Hesketh, MD, co-chair of the ASCO expert panel that updated the guidelines.

“By following the ASCO antiemetics guideline, clinicians have the opportunity to improve patients’ quality of life by minimizing treatment-induced emesis.”

To update ASCO’s guidelines on antiemetics, the expert panel conducted a systematic review of the medical literature published between November 2009 and June 2016. The panel included members with expertise in medical oncology, radiation oncology, nursing, pharmacy, and health services research, as well as a patient representative.

“Tremendous progress has been realized over the last 25 years in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with the introduction of new classes of antiemetic agents,” said Mark G. Kris, MD, co-chair of the expert panel that updated the guidelines.

“The full benefit of these treatment advances will only be realized, however, if evidence-based guidelines are fully implemented.”

Key recommendations in the updated guidelines include:

For adults receiving chemotherapy with a high risk for nausea and vomiting (eg, cisplatin or the combination of cyclophosphamide and an anthracycline), olanzapine should be added to standard antiemetic regimens (the combination of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, an NK1 receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone). Olanzapine also helps individuals who experience symptoms despite receiving medicines to prevent vomiting before chemotherapy is given.

For adults receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy or high-dose chemotherapy and children receiving chemotherapy with a high risk for nausea and vomiting, an NK1 receptor antagonist should be added to the standard antiemetic regimen (the combination of 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone).

Dexamethasone treatment can be limited to the day of chemotherapy administration in patients receiving an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide.

Dronabinol and nabilone, cannabinoids approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, can be used to treat nausea and vomiting that is resistant to standard antiemetic therapies. Evidence remains insufficient to recommend medical marijuana for either prevention or treatment of nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy.

Photo courtesy of Abbvie

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough therapy designation to venetoclax (Venclexta®).

The designation is for venetoclax in combination with low-dose cytarabine to treat elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

The FDA’s breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of new treatments for serious or life-threatening conditions.

Breakthrough designation entitles the company developing a therapy to more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient and accelerated development program, as well as eligibility for other actions to expedite FDA review, such as a rolling submission and priority review.

To earn breakthrough designation, a treatment must show encouraging early clinical results demonstrating substantial improvement over available therapies with regard to a clinically significant endpoint, or it must fulfill an unmet need.

About venetoclax

Venetoclax is a small molecule designed to selectively bind and inhibit the BCL-2 protein. The drug is being developed by AbbVie and Roche.

Last year, the FDA granted venetoclax accelerated approval to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia who have 17p deletion and have received at least one prior therapy. Continued approval of venetoclax for this indication may be contingent upon verification of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

The FDA granted venetoclax breakthrough therapy designation for the AML indication based on data from an ongoing phase 1/2 study. Preliminary data from the study were presented at the 22nd European Hematology Association (EHA) Annual Congress.

The presentation included data on 61 elderly patients (older than 65) with previously untreated AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

They received venetoclax in combination with low-dose cytarabine (as well as prophylaxis for tumor lysis syndrome). The patients’ median time on treatment was 6 months (range, <1 to 19 months), and 72% of patients discontinued treatment.

The overall response rate was 65%. Twenty-five percent of patients achieved a complete response, 38% had a complete response with incomplete blood count recovery, and 2% had a partial response.

The 30-day death rate was 3%, the 60-day death rate was 15%, and the median overall survival was approximately 12 months.

The most common adverse events of any grade (occurring in at least 30% of patients) were nausea (74%), hypokalemia (46%), diarrhea (46%), fatigue (44%), decreased appetite (41%), constipation (34%), hypomagnesemia (34%), vomiting (31%), thrombocytopenia (44%), febrile neutropenia (38%), and neutropenia (33%).

Grade 3/4 adverse events (occurring in at least 10% of patients) included thrombocytopenia (44%), febrile neutropenia (36%), neutropenia (33%), anemia (28%), hypokalemia (16%), hypophosphatemia (13%), and hypertension (12%).

Photo courtesy of Abbvie

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough therapy designation to venetoclax (Venclexta®).

The designation is for venetoclax in combination with low-dose cytarabine to treat elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

The FDA’s breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of new treatments for serious or life-threatening conditions.

Breakthrough designation entitles the company developing a therapy to more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient and accelerated development program, as well as eligibility for other actions to expedite FDA review, such as a rolling submission and priority review.

To earn breakthrough designation, a treatment must show encouraging early clinical results demonstrating substantial improvement over available therapies with regard to a clinically significant endpoint, or it must fulfill an unmet need.

About venetoclax

Venetoclax is a small molecule designed to selectively bind and inhibit the BCL-2 protein. The drug is being developed by AbbVie and Roche.

Last year, the FDA granted venetoclax accelerated approval to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia who have 17p deletion and have received at least one prior therapy. Continued approval of venetoclax for this indication may be contingent upon verification of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

The FDA granted venetoclax breakthrough therapy designation for the AML indication based on data from an ongoing phase 1/2 study. Preliminary data from the study were presented at the 22nd European Hematology Association (EHA) Annual Congress.

The presentation included data on 61 elderly patients (older than 65) with previously untreated AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

They received venetoclax in combination with low-dose cytarabine (as well as prophylaxis for tumor lysis syndrome). The patients’ median time on treatment was 6 months (range, <1 to 19 months), and 72% of patients discontinued treatment.

The overall response rate was 65%. Twenty-five percent of patients achieved a complete response, 38% had a complete response with incomplete blood count recovery, and 2% had a partial response.

The 30-day death rate was 3%, the 60-day death rate was 15%, and the median overall survival was approximately 12 months.

The most common adverse events of any grade (occurring in at least 30% of patients) were nausea (74%), hypokalemia (46%), diarrhea (46%), fatigue (44%), decreased appetite (41%), constipation (34%), hypomagnesemia (34%), vomiting (31%), thrombocytopenia (44%), febrile neutropenia (38%), and neutropenia (33%).

Grade 3/4 adverse events (occurring in at least 10% of patients) included thrombocytopenia (44%), febrile neutropenia (36%), neutropenia (33%), anemia (28%), hypokalemia (16%), hypophosphatemia (13%), and hypertension (12%).

Photo courtesy of Abbvie

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted breakthrough therapy designation to venetoclax (Venclexta®).

The designation is for venetoclax in combination with low-dose cytarabine to treat elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

The FDA’s breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of new treatments for serious or life-threatening conditions.

Breakthrough designation entitles the company developing a therapy to more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient and accelerated development program, as well as eligibility for other actions to expedite FDA review, such as a rolling submission and priority review.

To earn breakthrough designation, a treatment must show encouraging early clinical results demonstrating substantial improvement over available therapies with regard to a clinically significant endpoint, or it must fulfill an unmet need.

About venetoclax

Venetoclax is a small molecule designed to selectively bind and inhibit the BCL-2 protein. The drug is being developed by AbbVie and Roche.

Last year, the FDA granted venetoclax accelerated approval to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia who have 17p deletion and have received at least one prior therapy. Continued approval of venetoclax for this indication may be contingent upon verification of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

The FDA granted venetoclax breakthrough therapy designation for the AML indication based on data from an ongoing phase 1/2 study. Preliminary data from the study were presented at the 22nd European Hematology Association (EHA) Annual Congress.

The presentation included data on 61 elderly patients (older than 65) with previously untreated AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

They received venetoclax in combination with low-dose cytarabine (as well as prophylaxis for tumor lysis syndrome). The patients’ median time on treatment was 6 months (range, <1 to 19 months), and 72% of patients discontinued treatment.

The overall response rate was 65%. Twenty-five percent of patients achieved a complete response, 38% had a complete response with incomplete blood count recovery, and 2% had a partial response.

The 30-day death rate was 3%, the 60-day death rate was 15%, and the median overall survival was approximately 12 months.

The most common adverse events of any grade (occurring in at least 30% of patients) were nausea (74%), hypokalemia (46%), diarrhea (46%), fatigue (44%), decreased appetite (41%), constipation (34%), hypomagnesemia (34%), vomiting (31%), thrombocytopenia (44%), febrile neutropenia (38%), and neutropenia (33%).

Grade 3/4 adverse events (occurring in at least 10% of patients) included thrombocytopenia (44%), febrile neutropenia (36%), neutropenia (33%), anemia (28%), hypokalemia (16%), hypophosphatemia (13%), and hypertension (12%).