Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Micrograph showing MDS

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan drug designation to DSP-7888, an investigational cancer peptide vaccine, for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

DSP-7888 contains peptides to induce Wilms’ tumor gene 1 (WT1)-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and helper T cells, which attack WT1-expressing cancerous cells found in various hematologic and solid tumor malignancies.

DSP-7888 is being developed by Boston Biomedical, Inc.

The first clinical data for DSP-7888, from a phase 1/2 study in patients with MDS who progressed on or after first-line azacitidine treatment, were presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

Results were reported in 12 patients—7 with higher-risk MDS and 5 with lower-risk disease.

DSP-7888 was given at doses of 3.5 mg/body (n=6) or 10.5 mg/body (n=6) by intradermal injections every 2 to 4 weeks.

There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The most common adverse event was injection site reactions. Six patients had grade 3 injection site reactions.

There were 5 serious adverse events—3 injection site reactions, 1 case of pyrexia, and 1 case of myocarditis.

Eight patients had stable disease, 2 with hematological improvements.

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte induction was observed in 6 patients, and delayed type hypersensitivity response was observed in 10 patients.

About orphan designation

The FDA grants orphan designation to products intended to treat, diagnose, or prevent diseases/disorders that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the US.

The designation provides incentives for sponsors to develop products for rare diseases. This may include tax credits toward the cost of clinical trials, prescription drug user fee waivers, and 7 years of market exclusivity if the product is approved. 

Micrograph showing MDS

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan drug designation to DSP-7888, an investigational cancer peptide vaccine, for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

DSP-7888 contains peptides to induce Wilms’ tumor gene 1 (WT1)-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and helper T cells, which attack WT1-expressing cancerous cells found in various hematologic and solid tumor malignancies.

DSP-7888 is being developed by Boston Biomedical, Inc.

The first clinical data for DSP-7888, from a phase 1/2 study in patients with MDS who progressed on or after first-line azacitidine treatment, were presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

Results were reported in 12 patients—7 with higher-risk MDS and 5 with lower-risk disease.

DSP-7888 was given at doses of 3.5 mg/body (n=6) or 10.5 mg/body (n=6) by intradermal injections every 2 to 4 weeks.

There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The most common adverse event was injection site reactions. Six patients had grade 3 injection site reactions.

There were 5 serious adverse events—3 injection site reactions, 1 case of pyrexia, and 1 case of myocarditis.

Eight patients had stable disease, 2 with hematological improvements.

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte induction was observed in 6 patients, and delayed type hypersensitivity response was observed in 10 patients.

About orphan designation

The FDA grants orphan designation to products intended to treat, diagnose, or prevent diseases/disorders that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the US.

The designation provides incentives for sponsors to develop products for rare diseases. This may include tax credits toward the cost of clinical trials, prescription drug user fee waivers, and 7 years of market exclusivity if the product is approved. 

Micrograph showing MDS

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan drug designation to DSP-7888, an investigational cancer peptide vaccine, for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

DSP-7888 contains peptides to induce Wilms’ tumor gene 1 (WT1)-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and helper T cells, which attack WT1-expressing cancerous cells found in various hematologic and solid tumor malignancies.

DSP-7888 is being developed by Boston Biomedical, Inc.

The first clinical data for DSP-7888, from a phase 1/2 study in patients with MDS who progressed on or after first-line azacitidine treatment, were presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

Results were reported in 12 patients—7 with higher-risk MDS and 5 with lower-risk disease.

DSP-7888 was given at doses of 3.5 mg/body (n=6) or 10.5 mg/body (n=6) by intradermal injections every 2 to 4 weeks.

There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The most common adverse event was injection site reactions. Six patients had grade 3 injection site reactions.

There were 5 serious adverse events—3 injection site reactions, 1 case of pyrexia, and 1 case of myocarditis.

Eight patients had stable disease, 2 with hematological improvements.

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte induction was observed in 6 patients, and delayed type hypersensitivity response was observed in 10 patients.

About orphan designation

The FDA grants orphan designation to products intended to treat, diagnose, or prevent diseases/disorders that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the US.

The designation provides incentives for sponsors to develop products for rare diseases. This may include tax credits toward the cost of clinical trials, prescription drug user fee waivers, and 7 years of market exclusivity if the product is approved. 

AML cells

Update as of June 21:  The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has placed the Investigational New Drug (IND) application for vadastuximab talirine on hold. No clinical trial may resume under the IND until the FDA lifts the clinical hold.

---

On the advice of the Independent Data Monitoring Committee, Seattle Genetics is discontinuing the phase 3 CASCADE clinical trial of vadastuximab talirine as frontline treatment in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The company is also suspending patient enrollment and treatment in all its vadastuximab trials, including the ongoing phase 1/2 trial in frontline high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

In December last year, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had placed the trials of vadastuximab on full and partial clinical holds due to the potential risk of hepatotoxicity.

The FDA lifted the hold in March of this year. However, concerns regarding a higher rate of deaths, including fatal infections but not liver toxicity, in the vadastuximab arm compared to control prompted the company to discontinue the phase 3 trial.

Vadastuximab talirene is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeted to CD33, which is expressed on most AML and MDS blasts. The ADC technology links anti-cancer compounds with targeting antibodies to precisely kill cancer cells and spare healthy ones.

Seattle Genetics’ ADC for Hodgkin lymphoma, brentuximab vedotin, was granted accelerated approval by the FDA in 2011.

The CASCADE trial was evaluating vadastuximab in combination with the hypomethylating agents (HMAs) azacytidine or decitabine compared to an HMA alone in older patients with newly diagnosed AML.

In addition to the MDS trial, the company is stopping enrollment onto the trial of vadastuximab in combination with 7+3 chemotherapy in newly diagnosed, younger AML patients and vadastuximab given prior to or after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in AML patients.

Calling the decision “disappointing and unexpected,” Clay Siegall, PhD, president and CEO of Seattle Genetics, said, “Patient safety is our highest priority, and we will closely review the data and evaluate next steps.” 

AML cells

Update as of June 21:  The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has placed the Investigational New Drug (IND) application for vadastuximab talirine on hold. No clinical trial may resume under the IND until the FDA lifts the clinical hold.

---

On the advice of the Independent Data Monitoring Committee, Seattle Genetics is discontinuing the phase 3 CASCADE clinical trial of vadastuximab talirine as frontline treatment in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The company is also suspending patient enrollment and treatment in all its vadastuximab trials, including the ongoing phase 1/2 trial in frontline high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

In December last year, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had placed the trials of vadastuximab on full and partial clinical holds due to the potential risk of hepatotoxicity.

The FDA lifted the hold in March of this year. However, concerns regarding a higher rate of deaths, including fatal infections but not liver toxicity, in the vadastuximab arm compared to control prompted the company to discontinue the phase 3 trial.

Vadastuximab talirene is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeted to CD33, which is expressed on most AML and MDS blasts. The ADC technology links anti-cancer compounds with targeting antibodies to precisely kill cancer cells and spare healthy ones.

Seattle Genetics’ ADC for Hodgkin lymphoma, brentuximab vedotin, was granted accelerated approval by the FDA in 2011.

The CASCADE trial was evaluating vadastuximab in combination with the hypomethylating agents (HMAs) azacytidine or decitabine compared to an HMA alone in older patients with newly diagnosed AML.

In addition to the MDS trial, the company is stopping enrollment onto the trial of vadastuximab in combination with 7+3 chemotherapy in newly diagnosed, younger AML patients and vadastuximab given prior to or after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in AML patients.

Calling the decision “disappointing and unexpected,” Clay Siegall, PhD, president and CEO of Seattle Genetics, said, “Patient safety is our highest priority, and we will closely review the data and evaluate next steps.” 

AML cells

Update as of June 21:  The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has placed the Investigational New Drug (IND) application for vadastuximab talirine on hold. No clinical trial may resume under the IND until the FDA lifts the clinical hold.

---

On the advice of the Independent Data Monitoring Committee, Seattle Genetics is discontinuing the phase 3 CASCADE clinical trial of vadastuximab talirine as frontline treatment in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The company is also suspending patient enrollment and treatment in all its vadastuximab trials, including the ongoing phase 1/2 trial in frontline high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

In December last year, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had placed the trials of vadastuximab on full and partial clinical holds due to the potential risk of hepatotoxicity.

The FDA lifted the hold in March of this year. However, concerns regarding a higher rate of deaths, including fatal infections but not liver toxicity, in the vadastuximab arm compared to control prompted the company to discontinue the phase 3 trial.

Vadastuximab talirene is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeted to CD33, which is expressed on most AML and MDS blasts. The ADC technology links anti-cancer compounds with targeting antibodies to precisely kill cancer cells and spare healthy ones.

Seattle Genetics’ ADC for Hodgkin lymphoma, brentuximab vedotin, was granted accelerated approval by the FDA in 2011.

The CASCADE trial was evaluating vadastuximab in combination with the hypomethylating agents (HMAs) azacytidine or decitabine compared to an HMA alone in older patients with newly diagnosed AML.

In addition to the MDS trial, the company is stopping enrollment onto the trial of vadastuximab in combination with 7+3 chemotherapy in newly diagnosed, younger AML patients and vadastuximab given prior to or after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in AML patients.

Calling the decision “disappointing and unexpected,” Clay Siegall, PhD, president and CEO of Seattle Genetics, said, “Patient safety is our highest priority, and we will closely review the data and evaluate next steps.” 

Micrograph showing MDS

A 3-arm phase 2 study of azacitidine alone or in combination with lenalidomide or vorinostat in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) has shown the combination therapies to have similar overall response rates (ORR) to azacitidine monotherapy. Based on these findings, investigators did not choose either combination arm for phase 3 testing of overall survival.

However, patients with CMML treated with the azacitidine-lenalidomide combination had twice the ORR compared with azacitidine monotherapy, they reported.

And patients with certain mutations, such as DNMT3A, BCOR, and NRAS, had higher overall response rates, although only those with the DNMT3A mutation were significant.

Mikkael A. Sekeres, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio, and colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology on behalf of the North American Intergroup Study SWOG S117.

Doses of azacitidine were the same for monotherapy and combination arms: 75 mg/m²/day intravenously or subcutaneously on days 1 to 7 of a 28-day cycle.

Patients in the lenalidomide arm received 10 mg/day orally of that drug on days 1 to 21, and patients in the vorinostat arm received 300 mg twice daily orally on days 3 to 9.

Patient characteristics

Patients had MDS of IPSS Intermediate-2 or higher or bone marrow blasts 5% or greater. Patients with CMML had fewer than 20% blasts.

The investigators randomized 277 patients to receive either azacitidine alone (n=92), azacitidine plus lenalidomide (n=93), or azacitidine plus vorinostat (n=92).

 Patients were a median age of 70 years (range, 28 to 93). Eighty-five patients (31%) were female, 53 (19%) had CMML, and 18 (6%) had treatment-related MDS. More than half the patients were transfusion-dependent at baseline.

Baseline characteristics were similar across the 3 arms. The investigators noted that the baseline characteristics were also similar across the 90 centers participating in the study, whether they were an MDS Center of Excellence or a high-volume center.

Adverse events

 For the most part, therapy-related adverse events were similar across the arms.

Rates of grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia and infection and infestations were similar for all 3 cohorts: 89% for azaciditine monotherapy, 91% for the lenalidomide combination, and 91% for the vorinostat combination.

However, the vorinostat arm had more grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal toxicities (14 patients, 15%) compared with the monotherapy arm (4 patients, 4%), P=0.02.

And patients receiving lenalidomide experienced more grade 3 or higher rash (14 patients, 16%) compared with patients receiving monotherapy (3 patients, 3%), P=0.005.

Patients in the combination arms stopped therapy at significantly higher rates than the monotherapy arm. Eight percent of patients receiving monotherapy stopped treatment compared with 20% in the lenalidomide arm and 21% in the vorinostat arm.

Patients in the combination arms also had more dose modifications not specified in the protocol than those in the monotherapy arm. Twenty-four percent receiving azacitidine monotherapy had non-protocol defined dose modifications, compared with 43% in the lenalidomide arm and 42% in the vorinostat arm.

Responses

The ORR for the entire study population was 38%.

Patients in the monotherapy arm had an ORR of 38%, those in the lenalidomide arm, 49%, and those in the vorinostate arm, 27%. Neither arm achieved significance compared with the monotherapy arm.

Patients who were treatment-naïve in the lenalidomide arm had a somewhat improved ORR compared with monotherapy, P=0.08.

The median duration of response for all cohorts was 15 months: 10 months for monotherapy, 14 months for lenalidomide, and 18 months for vorinostat.

Patients who were able to remain on therapy for 6 months or more in the lenalidomide arm achieved a higher ORR of 87% compared with monotherapy (62%, P=0.01). However, there was no difference in response duration with longer therapy.

 

The median overall survival (OS) was 17 months for all patients, 15 months for patients in the monotherapy group, 19 months for those in the lenalidomide arm, and 17 months for those in the vorinostat group.

CMML patients had similar OS across treatment arms, with the median not yet reached for patients in the monotherapy arm.

Subgroup responses

Patients with CMML in the lenalidomide arm had a significantly higher ORR than CMML patients in the monotherapy arm, 68% and 28%, respectively (P=0.02).

Median duration of response for CMML patients was 19 months, with no differences between the arms.

The investigators observed no differences in ORR for therapy-related MDS, IPSS subgroups, transfusion-dependent patients, or allogeneic transplant rates.

However, they noted ORR was better for patients with chromosome 5 abnormality regardless of treatment arm than for those without the abnormality (odds ratio, 2.17, P=0.008).

One hundred thirteen patients had mutational data available. They had a median number of 2 mutations (range, 0 to 7), with the most common being ASXL1 (n = 31), TET2 (n = 26), SRSF2 (n = 23), TP53 (n = 22), RUNX1 (n = 21), and U2AF1 (n = 19).

Patients with DNMT3A mutation had a significantly higher ORR than for patients without mutations, 67% and 34%, respectively P=0.025).

Patients with BCOR and NRAS mutations had numerically higher, but non-significant, ORR than non-mutated patients. Patients with BCOR mutation had a 57% ORR compared with 34% for non-mutated patients (P=0.23).  Patients with NRAS mutation had a 60% ORR compared with 36% for non-mutated patients (P=0.28).

Patients with mutations in TET2 (P = .046) and TP53 (P = .003) had a worse response duration than those without mutations.

Response duration was significantly better with fewer mutations. For 2 or more mutations, the hazard ration was 6.86 versus no mutations (P=0.01).

The investigators believed under-dosing may have compromised response and survival in the combination arms. They suggested that studies focused on the subgroups that seemed to benefit from the combinations should be conducted. 

Micrograph showing MDS

A 3-arm phase 2 study of azacitidine alone or in combination with lenalidomide or vorinostat in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) has shown the combination therapies to have similar overall response rates (ORR) to azacitidine monotherapy. Based on these findings, investigators did not choose either combination arm for phase 3 testing of overall survival.

However, patients with CMML treated with the azacitidine-lenalidomide combination had twice the ORR compared with azacitidine monotherapy, they reported.

And patients with certain mutations, such as DNMT3A, BCOR, and NRAS, had higher overall response rates, although only those with the DNMT3A mutation were significant.

Mikkael A. Sekeres, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio, and colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology on behalf of the North American Intergroup Study SWOG S117.

Doses of azacitidine were the same for monotherapy and combination arms: 75 mg/m²/day intravenously or subcutaneously on days 1 to 7 of a 28-day cycle.

Patients in the lenalidomide arm received 10 mg/day orally of that drug on days 1 to 21, and patients in the vorinostat arm received 300 mg twice daily orally on days 3 to 9.

Patient characteristics

Patients had MDS of IPSS Intermediate-2 or higher or bone marrow blasts 5% or greater. Patients with CMML had fewer than 20% blasts.

The investigators randomized 277 patients to receive either azacitidine alone (n=92), azacitidine plus lenalidomide (n=93), or azacitidine plus vorinostat (n=92).

 Patients were a median age of 70 years (range, 28 to 93). Eighty-five patients (31%) were female, 53 (19%) had CMML, and 18 (6%) had treatment-related MDS. More than half the patients were transfusion-dependent at baseline.

Baseline characteristics were similar across the 3 arms. The investigators noted that the baseline characteristics were also similar across the 90 centers participating in the study, whether they were an MDS Center of Excellence or a high-volume center.

Adverse events

 For the most part, therapy-related adverse events were similar across the arms.

Rates of grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia and infection and infestations were similar for all 3 cohorts: 89% for azaciditine monotherapy, 91% for the lenalidomide combination, and 91% for the vorinostat combination.

However, the vorinostat arm had more grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal toxicities (14 patients, 15%) compared with the monotherapy arm (4 patients, 4%), P=0.02.

And patients receiving lenalidomide experienced more grade 3 or higher rash (14 patients, 16%) compared with patients receiving monotherapy (3 patients, 3%), P=0.005.

Patients in the combination arms stopped therapy at significantly higher rates than the monotherapy arm. Eight percent of patients receiving monotherapy stopped treatment compared with 20% in the lenalidomide arm and 21% in the vorinostat arm.

Patients in the combination arms also had more dose modifications not specified in the protocol than those in the monotherapy arm. Twenty-four percent receiving azacitidine monotherapy had non-protocol defined dose modifications, compared with 43% in the lenalidomide arm and 42% in the vorinostat arm.

Responses

The ORR for the entire study population was 38%.

Patients in the monotherapy arm had an ORR of 38%, those in the lenalidomide arm, 49%, and those in the vorinostate arm, 27%. Neither arm achieved significance compared with the monotherapy arm.

Patients who were treatment-naïve in the lenalidomide arm had a somewhat improved ORR compared with monotherapy, P=0.08.

The median duration of response for all cohorts was 15 months: 10 months for monotherapy, 14 months for lenalidomide, and 18 months for vorinostat.

Patients who were able to remain on therapy for 6 months or more in the lenalidomide arm achieved a higher ORR of 87% compared with monotherapy (62%, P=0.01). However, there was no difference in response duration with longer therapy.

 

The median overall survival (OS) was 17 months for all patients, 15 months for patients in the monotherapy group, 19 months for those in the lenalidomide arm, and 17 months for those in the vorinostat group.

CMML patients had similar OS across treatment arms, with the median not yet reached for patients in the monotherapy arm.

Subgroup responses

Patients with CMML in the lenalidomide arm had a significantly higher ORR than CMML patients in the monotherapy arm, 68% and 28%, respectively (P=0.02).

Median duration of response for CMML patients was 19 months, with no differences between the arms.

The investigators observed no differences in ORR for therapy-related MDS, IPSS subgroups, transfusion-dependent patients, or allogeneic transplant rates.

However, they noted ORR was better for patients with chromosome 5 abnormality regardless of treatment arm than for those without the abnormality (odds ratio, 2.17, P=0.008).

One hundred thirteen patients had mutational data available. They had a median number of 2 mutations (range, 0 to 7), with the most common being ASXL1 (n = 31), TET2 (n = 26), SRSF2 (n = 23), TP53 (n = 22), RUNX1 (n = 21), and U2AF1 (n = 19).

Patients with DNMT3A mutation had a significantly higher ORR than for patients without mutations, 67% and 34%, respectively P=0.025).

Patients with BCOR and NRAS mutations had numerically higher, but non-significant, ORR than non-mutated patients. Patients with BCOR mutation had a 57% ORR compared with 34% for non-mutated patients (P=0.23).  Patients with NRAS mutation had a 60% ORR compared with 36% for non-mutated patients (P=0.28).

Patients with mutations in TET2 (P = .046) and TP53 (P = .003) had a worse response duration than those without mutations.

Response duration was significantly better with fewer mutations. For 2 or more mutations, the hazard ration was 6.86 versus no mutations (P=0.01).

The investigators believed under-dosing may have compromised response and survival in the combination arms. They suggested that studies focused on the subgroups that seemed to benefit from the combinations should be conducted. 

Micrograph showing MDS

A 3-arm phase 2 study of azacitidine alone or in combination with lenalidomide or vorinostat in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) has shown the combination therapies to have similar overall response rates (ORR) to azacitidine monotherapy. Based on these findings, investigators did not choose either combination arm for phase 3 testing of overall survival.

However, patients with CMML treated with the azacitidine-lenalidomide combination had twice the ORR compared with azacitidine monotherapy, they reported.

And patients with certain mutations, such as DNMT3A, BCOR, and NRAS, had higher overall response rates, although only those with the DNMT3A mutation were significant.

Mikkael A. Sekeres, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio, and colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology on behalf of the North American Intergroup Study SWOG S117.

Doses of azacitidine were the same for monotherapy and combination arms: 75 mg/m²/day intravenously or subcutaneously on days 1 to 7 of a 28-day cycle.

Patients in the lenalidomide arm received 10 mg/day orally of that drug on days 1 to 21, and patients in the vorinostat arm received 300 mg twice daily orally on days 3 to 9.

Patient characteristics

Patients had MDS of IPSS Intermediate-2 or higher or bone marrow blasts 5% or greater. Patients with CMML had fewer than 20% blasts.

The investigators randomized 277 patients to receive either azacitidine alone (n=92), azacitidine plus lenalidomide (n=93), or azacitidine plus vorinostat (n=92).

 Patients were a median age of 70 years (range, 28 to 93). Eighty-five patients (31%) were female, 53 (19%) had CMML, and 18 (6%) had treatment-related MDS. More than half the patients were transfusion-dependent at baseline.

Baseline characteristics were similar across the 3 arms. The investigators noted that the baseline characteristics were also similar across the 90 centers participating in the study, whether they were an MDS Center of Excellence or a high-volume center.

Adverse events

 For the most part, therapy-related adverse events were similar across the arms.

Rates of grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia and infection and infestations were similar for all 3 cohorts: 89% for azaciditine monotherapy, 91% for the lenalidomide combination, and 91% for the vorinostat combination.

However, the vorinostat arm had more grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal toxicities (14 patients, 15%) compared with the monotherapy arm (4 patients, 4%), P=0.02.

And patients receiving lenalidomide experienced more grade 3 or higher rash (14 patients, 16%) compared with patients receiving monotherapy (3 patients, 3%), P=0.005.

Patients in the combination arms stopped therapy at significantly higher rates than the monotherapy arm. Eight percent of patients receiving monotherapy stopped treatment compared with 20% in the lenalidomide arm and 21% in the vorinostat arm.

Patients in the combination arms also had more dose modifications not specified in the protocol than those in the monotherapy arm. Twenty-four percent receiving azacitidine monotherapy had non-protocol defined dose modifications, compared with 43% in the lenalidomide arm and 42% in the vorinostat arm.

Responses

The ORR for the entire study population was 38%.

Patients in the monotherapy arm had an ORR of 38%, those in the lenalidomide arm, 49%, and those in the vorinostate arm, 27%. Neither arm achieved significance compared with the monotherapy arm.

Patients who were treatment-naïve in the lenalidomide arm had a somewhat improved ORR compared with monotherapy, P=0.08.

The median duration of response for all cohorts was 15 months: 10 months for monotherapy, 14 months for lenalidomide, and 18 months for vorinostat.

Patients who were able to remain on therapy for 6 months or more in the lenalidomide arm achieved a higher ORR of 87% compared with monotherapy (62%, P=0.01). However, there was no difference in response duration with longer therapy.

 

The median overall survival (OS) was 17 months for all patients, 15 months for patients in the monotherapy group, 19 months for those in the lenalidomide arm, and 17 months for those in the vorinostat group.

CMML patients had similar OS across treatment arms, with the median not yet reached for patients in the monotherapy arm.

Subgroup responses

Patients with CMML in the lenalidomide arm had a significantly higher ORR than CMML patients in the monotherapy arm, 68% and 28%, respectively (P=0.02).

Median duration of response for CMML patients was 19 months, with no differences between the arms.

The investigators observed no differences in ORR for therapy-related MDS, IPSS subgroups, transfusion-dependent patients, or allogeneic transplant rates.

However, they noted ORR was better for patients with chromosome 5 abnormality regardless of treatment arm than for those without the abnormality (odds ratio, 2.17, P=0.008).

One hundred thirteen patients had mutational data available. They had a median number of 2 mutations (range, 0 to 7), with the most common being ASXL1 (n = 31), TET2 (n = 26), SRSF2 (n = 23), TP53 (n = 22), RUNX1 (n = 21), and U2AF1 (n = 19).

Patients with DNMT3A mutation had a significantly higher ORR than for patients without mutations, 67% and 34%, respectively P=0.025).

Patients with BCOR and NRAS mutations had numerically higher, but non-significant, ORR than non-mutated patients. Patients with BCOR mutation had a 57% ORR compared with 34% for non-mutated patients (P=0.23).  Patients with NRAS mutation had a 60% ORR compared with 36% for non-mutated patients (P=0.28).

Patients with mutations in TET2 (P = .046) and TP53 (P = .003) had a worse response duration than those without mutations.

Response duration was significantly better with fewer mutations. For 2 or more mutations, the hazard ration was 6.86 versus no mutations (P=0.01).

The investigators believed under-dosing may have compromised response and survival in the combination arms. They suggested that studies focused on the subgroups that seemed to benefit from the combinations should be conducted. 

Winship Cancer Institute

Physician, researcher, and educator H. Jean Khoury, MD, recently passed away.

He died on Monday, May 22, at the age of 50, after a year-long battle with esophageal cancer.

Dr Khoury led the division of hematology at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.

He was considered an authority on hematologic malignancies, particularly chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), acute leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Dr Khoury joined Winship Cancer Institute in 2004 as director of the Leukemia Service and associate professor in the Emory School of Medicine.

In 2009, he was promoted to professor and director of the Division of Hematology in the Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, and he was later named to the R. Randall Rollins Chair in Oncology.

“We are all deeply grieving the loss of this remarkable man who gave so much to Winship,” said Walter J. Curran, Jr, MD, Winship Cancer Institute’s executive director.

“His enthusiasm and love for his patients and his commitment to lessening the burden of cancer for all has been unwavering throughout his life.”

A native of Beirut, Lebanon, Dr Khoury came to the Winship Cancer Institute from Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, where he served on the faculty after completing a fellowship in hematology-oncology.

He earned his medical degree from the Université Catholique de Louvain in Brussels, Belgium, and completed a residency in internal medicine at Memorial Medical Center in Savannah, Georgia.

Dr Khoury was recruited to Winship Cancer Institute by Fadlo R. Khuri, MD, former deputy director of the institute and now president of the American University of Beirut. What he first saw in Dr Khoury was someone who was “in the best sense, a disruptive presence.”

“What you always want in a leader is someone who’s not afraid to be wrong, to take risks,” Dr Khuri said. “Being wrong disrupts the pattern, and Jean was very brave. He didn’t like business as usual, and that showed in the way he took about redeveloping the hematology division, the leukemia program, and his interactions with the transplant division, with faculty, and all across Winship.”

According to his colleagues, Dr Khoury’s guiding principle was how to improve his patients’ lives, whether through research discoveries or through compassionate care.

Even after being diagnosed with cancer himself, Dr Khoury continued to see patients and carry on his work in the clinic and his research.

Dr Khoury pioneered the development of personalized treatment for CML patients and better approaches to improve quality of life for survivors. His research focused on drug development in leukemia and MDS, genomic abnormalities in leukemia, development of cost-effective practice models, and outcome analysis of bone marrow transplant.

He conducted several leukemia and transplant clinical trials, including trials that led to the approval of drugs such as imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib.

Dr Khoury received the Georgia Cancer Coalition Distinguished Cancer Scholarship, which allowed for establishment of the Hematological Disorders Tissue Bank at Emory, which now contains annotated germline and somatic samples from more than 800 patients with various hematologic disorders.

Dr Khoury died at home with his family by his side. He is survived by his wife, Angela, and 3 children, Mikhail, Iman, and Alya.

In lieu of flowers, the family requests that contributions be made to a new fund at Winship Cancer Institute that will memorialize the life and work of Dr Khoury by supporting a fellowship program that was so meaningful to him.

Contributions, marked in Memory of Dr H. Jean Khoury, can be sent to Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Office of Gift Records, Emory University, 1762 Clifton Rd. NE, Suite 1400, Atlanta, GA 30322. Gifts can also be made online.

 

There will be a memorial service for Dr Khoury on Wednesday, May 31, at 4:30 pm at Glenn Memorial Church, 1652 North Decatur Road in Atlanta, Georgia. 

Winship Cancer Institute

Physician, researcher, and educator H. Jean Khoury, MD, recently passed away.

He died on Monday, May 22, at the age of 50, after a year-long battle with esophageal cancer.

Dr Khoury led the division of hematology at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.

He was considered an authority on hematologic malignancies, particularly chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), acute leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Dr Khoury joined Winship Cancer Institute in 2004 as director of the Leukemia Service and associate professor in the Emory School of Medicine.

In 2009, he was promoted to professor and director of the Division of Hematology in the Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, and he was later named to the R. Randall Rollins Chair in Oncology.

“We are all deeply grieving the loss of this remarkable man who gave so much to Winship,” said Walter J. Curran, Jr, MD, Winship Cancer Institute’s executive director.

“His enthusiasm and love for his patients and his commitment to lessening the burden of cancer for all has been unwavering throughout his life.”

A native of Beirut, Lebanon, Dr Khoury came to the Winship Cancer Institute from Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, where he served on the faculty after completing a fellowship in hematology-oncology.

He earned his medical degree from the Université Catholique de Louvain in Brussels, Belgium, and completed a residency in internal medicine at Memorial Medical Center in Savannah, Georgia.

Dr Khoury was recruited to Winship Cancer Institute by Fadlo R. Khuri, MD, former deputy director of the institute and now president of the American University of Beirut. What he first saw in Dr Khoury was someone who was “in the best sense, a disruptive presence.”

“What you always want in a leader is someone who’s not afraid to be wrong, to take risks,” Dr Khuri said. “Being wrong disrupts the pattern, and Jean was very brave. He didn’t like business as usual, and that showed in the way he took about redeveloping the hematology division, the leukemia program, and his interactions with the transplant division, with faculty, and all across Winship.”

According to his colleagues, Dr Khoury’s guiding principle was how to improve his patients’ lives, whether through research discoveries or through compassionate care.

Even after being diagnosed with cancer himself, Dr Khoury continued to see patients and carry on his work in the clinic and his research.

Dr Khoury pioneered the development of personalized treatment for CML patients and better approaches to improve quality of life for survivors. His research focused on drug development in leukemia and MDS, genomic abnormalities in leukemia, development of cost-effective practice models, and outcome analysis of bone marrow transplant.

He conducted several leukemia and transplant clinical trials, including trials that led to the approval of drugs such as imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib.

Dr Khoury received the Georgia Cancer Coalition Distinguished Cancer Scholarship, which allowed for establishment of the Hematological Disorders Tissue Bank at Emory, which now contains annotated germline and somatic samples from more than 800 patients with various hematologic disorders.

Dr Khoury died at home with his family by his side. He is survived by his wife, Angela, and 3 children, Mikhail, Iman, and Alya.

In lieu of flowers, the family requests that contributions be made to a new fund at Winship Cancer Institute that will memorialize the life and work of Dr Khoury by supporting a fellowship program that was so meaningful to him.

Contributions, marked in Memory of Dr H. Jean Khoury, can be sent to Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Office of Gift Records, Emory University, 1762 Clifton Rd. NE, Suite 1400, Atlanta, GA 30322. Gifts can also be made online.

 

There will be a memorial service for Dr Khoury on Wednesday, May 31, at 4:30 pm at Glenn Memorial Church, 1652 North Decatur Road in Atlanta, Georgia. 

Winship Cancer Institute

Physician, researcher, and educator H. Jean Khoury, MD, recently passed away.

He died on Monday, May 22, at the age of 50, after a year-long battle with esophageal cancer.

Dr Khoury led the division of hematology at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.

He was considered an authority on hematologic malignancies, particularly chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), acute leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Dr Khoury joined Winship Cancer Institute in 2004 as director of the Leukemia Service and associate professor in the Emory School of Medicine.

In 2009, he was promoted to professor and director of the Division of Hematology in the Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, and he was later named to the R. Randall Rollins Chair in Oncology.

“We are all deeply grieving the loss of this remarkable man who gave so much to Winship,” said Walter J. Curran, Jr, MD, Winship Cancer Institute’s executive director.

“His enthusiasm and love for his patients and his commitment to lessening the burden of cancer for all has been unwavering throughout his life.”

A native of Beirut, Lebanon, Dr Khoury came to the Winship Cancer Institute from Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, where he served on the faculty after completing a fellowship in hematology-oncology.

He earned his medical degree from the Université Catholique de Louvain in Brussels, Belgium, and completed a residency in internal medicine at Memorial Medical Center in Savannah, Georgia.

Dr Khoury was recruited to Winship Cancer Institute by Fadlo R. Khuri, MD, former deputy director of the institute and now president of the American University of Beirut. What he first saw in Dr Khoury was someone who was “in the best sense, a disruptive presence.”

“What you always want in a leader is someone who’s not afraid to be wrong, to take risks,” Dr Khuri said. “Being wrong disrupts the pattern, and Jean was very brave. He didn’t like business as usual, and that showed in the way he took about redeveloping the hematology division, the leukemia program, and his interactions with the transplant division, with faculty, and all across Winship.”

According to his colleagues, Dr Khoury’s guiding principle was how to improve his patients’ lives, whether through research discoveries or through compassionate care.

Even after being diagnosed with cancer himself, Dr Khoury continued to see patients and carry on his work in the clinic and his research.

Dr Khoury pioneered the development of personalized treatment for CML patients and better approaches to improve quality of life for survivors. His research focused on drug development in leukemia and MDS, genomic abnormalities in leukemia, development of cost-effective practice models, and outcome analysis of bone marrow transplant.

He conducted several leukemia and transplant clinical trials, including trials that led to the approval of drugs such as imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib.

Dr Khoury received the Georgia Cancer Coalition Distinguished Cancer Scholarship, which allowed for establishment of the Hematological Disorders Tissue Bank at Emory, which now contains annotated germline and somatic samples from more than 800 patients with various hematologic disorders.

Dr Khoury died at home with his family by his side. He is survived by his wife, Angela, and 3 children, Mikhail, Iman, and Alya.

In lieu of flowers, the family requests that contributions be made to a new fund at Winship Cancer Institute that will memorialize the life and work of Dr Khoury by supporting a fellowship program that was so meaningful to him.

Contributions, marked in Memory of Dr H. Jean Khoury, can be sent to Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Office of Gift Records, Emory University, 1762 Clifton Rd. NE, Suite 1400, Atlanta, GA 30322. Gifts can also be made online.

 

There will be a memorial service for Dr Khoury on Wednesday, May 31, at 4:30 pm at Glenn Memorial Church, 1652 North Decatur Road in Atlanta, Georgia. 

Micrograph showing MDS

VALENCIA, SPAIN—Phase 2 results suggest luspatercept can produce erythroid responses and enable transfusion independence in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Erythroid response rates were similar whether or not patients had received prior treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).

However, patients without prior ESA exposure were more likely to achieve transfusion independence.

Most adverse events (AEs) considered possibly or probably related to luspatercept were grade 1 or 2.

Uwe Platzbecker, MD, of Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus in Dresden, Germany, presented these results at the 14th International Symposium on MDS.

The research was sponsored by Acceleron Pharma Inc., the company developing luspatercept in collaboration with Celgene Corporation.

Dr Platzbecker explained that luspatercept, formerly ACE-536, is a modified activin receptor type IIB fusion protein that acts as a ligand trap for GDF11 and other TGF-βfamily ligands to suppress Smad2/3 signaling.

He presented data from a phase 2 base study and an extension study of luspatercept. The base study included 89 patients who received luspatercept for 3 months. The long-term extension study included 52 patients who may receive luspatercept for an additional 5 years.

The patients received luspatercept at doses ranging from 0.125 mg/kg to 1.75 mg/kg in the base study and 1.0 mg/kg to 1.75 mg/kg in the extension study. They received the drug subcutaneously every 3 weeks.

There were 82 patients evaluable for efficacy. They were a median of 2.3 years from diagnosis (range, 0-14). Their median age was 72 (range, 29-90), 63% were male, and 52% had prior treatment with ESAs.

The outcome measures used in these studies were clinically meaningful erythroid hematologic improvement per the International Working Group’s criteria (IWG HI-E) and red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI).

IWG HI-E was defined as hemoglobin increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL sustained for ≥ 8 weeks in patients with a transfusion burden at baseline of less than 4 RBC units every 8 weeks and baseline hemoglobin levels below 10 g/dL. For patients with a greater transfusion burden at baseline, erythroid response was defined as a reduction of ≥ 4 RBC units sustained for ≥ 8 weeks.

RBC-TI was defined as no RBC transfusions for ≥ 8 weeks in patients with a baseline transfusion burden of at least 2 RBC units every 8 weeks.

Response data

In ESA-naïve patients, 48% (11/23) achieved RBC-TI with luspatercept, and 51% (20/39) achieved an IWG HI-E response.

Among patients with prior ESA treatment, 33% (11/33) achieved RBC-TI with luspatercept, and 51% (22/43) achieved an IWG HI-E response.

In patients with baseline erythropoietin (EPO) levels ≤ 500 international units per liter (IU/L), RBC-TI and IWG HI-E response rates were positive in both ring sideroblast-positive (RS+) and RS-negative (RS-) patients, according to the researchers.

Baseline EPO (IU/L)	RS status	IWG HI-E, n=82 n (%)	RBC-TI, n=56 n (%)
≤ 500	RS+	30/46 (65%)	16/29 (55%)
	RS-	6/14 (43%)	4/7 (57%)
> 500	RS+	5/9 (56%)	2/9 (22%)
	RS-	1/11 (9%)	0/9 (0%)
	Unknown	0/2 (0%)	0/2 (0%)

*Table includes ESA-refractory and ESA-naïve patients. Patients treated at dose levels ≥ 0.75 mg/kg.

Safety data

All 89 patients were evaluable for safety. Common AEs (occurring in at least 3 patients) that were considered possibly or probably related to study drug were fatigue (6.7%), headache (6.7%), hypertension (5.6%), diarrhea (4.5%), arthralgia (3.4%), bone pain (3.4%), injection site erythema (3.4%), myalgia (3.4%), and peripheral edema (3.4%).

Grade 3 AEs possibly or probably related to study drug were ascites, blast cell count increase, blood bilirubin increase, hypertension, platelet count increase, and pleural effusion.

Grade 3 serious AEs possibly or probably related to study drug were general physical health deterioration and myalgia. 

Micrograph showing MDS

VALENCIA, SPAIN—Phase 2 results suggest luspatercept can produce erythroid responses and enable transfusion independence in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Erythroid response rates were similar whether or not patients had received prior treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).

However, patients without prior ESA exposure were more likely to achieve transfusion independence.

Most adverse events (AEs) considered possibly or probably related to luspatercept were grade 1 or 2.

Uwe Platzbecker, MD, of Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus in Dresden, Germany, presented these results at the 14th International Symposium on MDS.

The research was sponsored by Acceleron Pharma Inc., the company developing luspatercept in collaboration with Celgene Corporation.

Dr Platzbecker explained that luspatercept, formerly ACE-536, is a modified activin receptor type IIB fusion protein that acts as a ligand trap for GDF11 and other TGF-βfamily ligands to suppress Smad2/3 signaling.

He presented data from a phase 2 base study and an extension study of luspatercept. The base study included 89 patients who received luspatercept for 3 months. The long-term extension study included 52 patients who may receive luspatercept for an additional 5 years.

The patients received luspatercept at doses ranging from 0.125 mg/kg to 1.75 mg/kg in the base study and 1.0 mg/kg to 1.75 mg/kg in the extension study. They received the drug subcutaneously every 3 weeks.

There were 82 patients evaluable for efficacy. They were a median of 2.3 years from diagnosis (range, 0-14). Their median age was 72 (range, 29-90), 63% were male, and 52% had prior treatment with ESAs.

The outcome measures used in these studies were clinically meaningful erythroid hematologic improvement per the International Working Group’s criteria (IWG HI-E) and red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI).

IWG HI-E was defined as hemoglobin increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL sustained for ≥ 8 weeks in patients with a transfusion burden at baseline of less than 4 RBC units every 8 weeks and baseline hemoglobin levels below 10 g/dL. For patients with a greater transfusion burden at baseline, erythroid response was defined as a reduction of ≥ 4 RBC units sustained for ≥ 8 weeks.

RBC-TI was defined as no RBC transfusions for ≥ 8 weeks in patients with a baseline transfusion burden of at least 2 RBC units every 8 weeks.

Response data

In ESA-naïve patients, 48% (11/23) achieved RBC-TI with luspatercept, and 51% (20/39) achieved an IWG HI-E response.

Among patients with prior ESA treatment, 33% (11/33) achieved RBC-TI with luspatercept, and 51% (22/43) achieved an IWG HI-E response.

In patients with baseline erythropoietin (EPO) levels ≤ 500 international units per liter (IU/L), RBC-TI and IWG HI-E response rates were positive in both ring sideroblast-positive (RS+) and RS-negative (RS-) patients, according to the researchers.

Baseline EPO (IU/L)	RS status	IWG HI-E, n=82 n (%)	RBC-TI, n=56 n (%)
≤ 500	RS+	30/46 (65%)	16/29 (55%)
	RS-	6/14 (43%)	4/7 (57%)
> 500	RS+	5/9 (56%)	2/9 (22%)
	RS-	1/11 (9%)	0/9 (0%)
	Unknown	0/2 (0%)	0/2 (0%)

*Table includes ESA-refractory and ESA-naïve patients. Patients treated at dose levels ≥ 0.75 mg/kg.

Safety data

All 89 patients were evaluable for safety. Common AEs (occurring in at least 3 patients) that were considered possibly or probably related to study drug were fatigue (6.7%), headache (6.7%), hypertension (5.6%), diarrhea (4.5%), arthralgia (3.4%), bone pain (3.4%), injection site erythema (3.4%), myalgia (3.4%), and peripheral edema (3.4%).

Grade 3 AEs possibly or probably related to study drug were ascites, blast cell count increase, blood bilirubin increase, hypertension, platelet count increase, and pleural effusion.

Grade 3 serious AEs possibly or probably related to study drug were general physical health deterioration and myalgia. 

Micrograph showing MDS

VALENCIA, SPAIN—Phase 2 results suggest luspatercept can produce erythroid responses and enable transfusion independence in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Erythroid response rates were similar whether or not patients had received prior treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).

However, patients without prior ESA exposure were more likely to achieve transfusion independence.

Most adverse events (AEs) considered possibly or probably related to luspatercept were grade 1 or 2.

Uwe Platzbecker, MD, of Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus in Dresden, Germany, presented these results at the 14th International Symposium on MDS.

The research was sponsored by Acceleron Pharma Inc., the company developing luspatercept in collaboration with Celgene Corporation.

Dr Platzbecker explained that luspatercept, formerly ACE-536, is a modified activin receptor type IIB fusion protein that acts as a ligand trap for GDF11 and other TGF-βfamily ligands to suppress Smad2/3 signaling.

He presented data from a phase 2 base study and an extension study of luspatercept. The base study included 89 patients who received luspatercept for 3 months. The long-term extension study included 52 patients who may receive luspatercept for an additional 5 years.

The patients received luspatercept at doses ranging from 0.125 mg/kg to 1.75 mg/kg in the base study and 1.0 mg/kg to 1.75 mg/kg in the extension study. They received the drug subcutaneously every 3 weeks.

There were 82 patients evaluable for efficacy. They were a median of 2.3 years from diagnosis (range, 0-14). Their median age was 72 (range, 29-90), 63% were male, and 52% had prior treatment with ESAs.

The outcome measures used in these studies were clinically meaningful erythroid hematologic improvement per the International Working Group’s criteria (IWG HI-E) and red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI).

IWG HI-E was defined as hemoglobin increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL sustained for ≥ 8 weeks in patients with a transfusion burden at baseline of less than 4 RBC units every 8 weeks and baseline hemoglobin levels below 10 g/dL. For patients with a greater transfusion burden at baseline, erythroid response was defined as a reduction of ≥ 4 RBC units sustained for ≥ 8 weeks.

RBC-TI was defined as no RBC transfusions for ≥ 8 weeks in patients with a baseline transfusion burden of at least 2 RBC units every 8 weeks.

Response data

In ESA-naïve patients, 48% (11/23) achieved RBC-TI with luspatercept, and 51% (20/39) achieved an IWG HI-E response.

Among patients with prior ESA treatment, 33% (11/33) achieved RBC-TI with luspatercept, and 51% (22/43) achieved an IWG HI-E response.

In patients with baseline erythropoietin (EPO) levels ≤ 500 international units per liter (IU/L), RBC-TI and IWG HI-E response rates were positive in both ring sideroblast-positive (RS+) and RS-negative (RS-) patients, according to the researchers.

Baseline EPO (IU/L)	RS status	IWG HI-E, n=82 n (%)	RBC-TI, n=56 n (%)
≤ 500	RS+	30/46 (65%)	16/29 (55%)
	RS-	6/14 (43%)	4/7 (57%)
> 500	RS+	5/9 (56%)	2/9 (22%)
	RS-	1/11 (9%)	0/9 (0%)
	Unknown	0/2 (0%)	0/2 (0%)

*Table includes ESA-refractory and ESA-naïve patients. Patients treated at dose levels ≥ 0.75 mg/kg.

Safety data

All 89 patients were evaluable for safety. Common AEs (occurring in at least 3 patients) that were considered possibly or probably related to study drug were fatigue (6.7%), headache (6.7%), hypertension (5.6%), diarrhea (4.5%), arthralgia (3.4%), bone pain (3.4%), injection site erythema (3.4%), myalgia (3.4%), and peripheral edema (3.4%).

Grade 3 AEs possibly or probably related to study drug were ascites, blast cell count increase, blood bilirubin increase, hypertension, platelet count increase, and pleural effusion.

Grade 3 serious AEs possibly or probably related to study drug were general physical health deterioration and myalgia. 

Photo by Rhoda Baer

BOSTON—A pair of preclinical studies suggest the FLT3/BTK inhibitor CG’806 is active in a range of hematologic malignancies.

In one of the studies, CG’806 proved particularly effective against acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells harboring mutant forms of FLT3, and the compound was able to eradicate AML in mice.

In another study, researchers found CG’806 exhibited “broad potency” against leukemias, lymphomas, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).

Both studies were presented as posters at Hematologic Malignancies: Translating Discoveries to Novel Therapies (poster 25 and poster 44).

Both studies involved researchers from Aptose Biosciences, the company developing CG’806.

Poster 25

Weiguo Zhang, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and his colleagues presented poster 25, “CG’806, a first-in-class FLT3/BTK inhibitor, exerts superior potency against AML cells harboring ITD, TKD and gatekeeper mutated FLT3 or wild-type FLT3.”

The researchers tested CG’806 and other FLT3 inhibitors in human or murine leukemia cell lines with wild-type (WT) FLT3, FLT3-ITD mutations, FLT3 TKD domain mutations, or ITD plus TKD mutations.

Compared to second-generation FLT3 inhibitors (quizartinib, gilteritinib, or crenolanib), CG’806 showed more pronounced anti-proliferative effects in leukemia cells with ITD mutations, D835 mutations, ITD plus F691I/Y842D/D835 mutations, or in FLT3 WT cells.

With CG’086, the IC50s in human AML cell lines were 0.17 nM for MV4-11 (FLT3-ITD) and 0.82 nM for MOLM13 (FLT3-ITD).

The IC50s in the murine leukemia cell lines were 9.49 nM for Ba/F3 (FLT3-WT), 0.30 nM for Ba/F3 (FLT3-ITD), 8.26 nM for Ba/F3 (FLT3-D835Y), 9.72 nM for Ba/F3 (FLT3-ITD+D835Y), and 0.43 nM for Ba/F3 (FLT3-ITD+F691L).

The researchers also found that CG’806 “triggers marked apoptosis” in FLT3-ITD-mutated primary AML samples but minimal apoptosis in normal bone marrow cells.

Another finding was that once-daily oral dosing of CG’806 in a murine model of AML (MV4-11) resulted in sustained micromolar plasma concentration over a 24-hour period.

This was accompanied by complete elimination of AML FLT3-ITD tumors without toxicity, the researchers said.

Poster 44

Stephen E. Kurtz, PhD, of Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, and his colleagues presented poster 44, “CG’806, a First-in-Class FLT3/BTK Inhibitor, Exhibits Potent Activity against AML Patient Samples with Mutant or Wild-Type FLT3, as well as Other Hematologic Malignancy Subtypes.”

The researchers tested CG’806 in samples from patients with AML (n=82), MDS/MPNs (n=15), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, n=17), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL, n=58), and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n=4).

The team observed “broad sensitivity” to CG’806, with 59% (48/82) of AML, 53% (8/15) of MDS/MPN, 40% (23/58) of CLL, 29% (5/17) of ALL, and 25% (1/4) of CML cases exhibiting an IC50 of less than 100 nM.

Among the 38 tested AML samples with known FLT3 mutational status, the FLT3-ITD+ AML samples tended to have enhanced sensitivity to CG’806 (median IC50 = 20 nM, n=8) relative to the FLT3-WT samples (median IC50 = 120 nM, n=30).

The researchers also found that CG’806 exerted potent anti-proliferative activity against human AML, B-ALL, mantle cell lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cell lines.

“The analyses of CG’806 against primary hematologic malignancy patient samples and cultured cell lines show evidence of potent and broad drug activity in AML and other disease subtypes and support further development of this agent for hematologic malignancies,” Dr Kurtz said. 

Photo by Rhoda Baer

BOSTON—A pair of preclinical studies suggest the FLT3/BTK inhibitor CG’806 is active in a range of hematologic malignancies.

In one of the studies, CG’806 proved particularly effective against acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells harboring mutant forms of FLT3, and the compound was able to eradicate AML in mice.

In another study, researchers found CG’806 exhibited “broad potency” against leukemias, lymphomas, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).

Both studies were presented as posters at Hematologic Malignancies: Translating Discoveries to Novel Therapies (poster 25 and poster 44).

Both studies involved researchers from Aptose Biosciences, the company developing CG’806.

Poster 25

Weiguo Zhang, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and his colleagues presented poster 25, “CG’806, a first-in-class FLT3/BTK inhibitor, exerts superior potency against AML cells harboring ITD, TKD and gatekeeper mutated FLT3 or wild-type FLT3.”

The researchers tested CG’806 and other FLT3 inhibitors in human or murine leukemia cell lines with wild-type (WT) FLT3, FLT3-ITD mutations, FLT3 TKD domain mutations, or ITD plus TKD mutations.

Compared to second-generation FLT3 inhibitors (quizartinib, gilteritinib, or crenolanib), CG’806 showed more pronounced anti-proliferative effects in leukemia cells with ITD mutations, D835 mutations, ITD plus F691I/Y842D/D835 mutations, or in FLT3 WT cells.

With CG’086, the IC50s in human AML cell lines were 0.17 nM for MV4-11 (FLT3-ITD) and 0.82 nM for MOLM13 (FLT3-ITD).

The IC50s in the murine leukemia cell lines were 9.49 nM for Ba/F3 (FLT3-WT), 0.30 nM for Ba/F3 (FLT3-ITD), 8.26 nM for Ba/F3 (FLT3-D835Y), 9.72 nM for Ba/F3 (FLT3-ITD+D835Y), and 0.43 nM for Ba/F3 (FLT3-ITD+F691L).

The researchers also found that CG’806 “triggers marked apoptosis” in FLT3-ITD-mutated primary AML samples but minimal apoptosis in normal bone marrow cells.

Another finding was that once-daily oral dosing of CG’806 in a murine model of AML (MV4-11) resulted in sustained micromolar plasma concentration over a 24-hour period.

This was accompanied by complete elimination of AML FLT3-ITD tumors without toxicity, the researchers said.

Poster 44

Stephen E. Kurtz, PhD, of Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, and his colleagues presented poster 44, “CG’806, a First-in-Class FLT3/BTK Inhibitor, Exhibits Potent Activity against AML Patient Samples with Mutant or Wild-Type FLT3, as well as Other Hematologic Malignancy Subtypes.”

The researchers tested CG’806 in samples from patients with AML (n=82), MDS/MPNs (n=15), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, n=17), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL, n=58), and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n=4).

The team observed “broad sensitivity” to CG’806, with 59% (48/82) of AML, 53% (8/15) of MDS/MPN, 40% (23/58) of CLL, 29% (5/17) of ALL, and 25% (1/4) of CML cases exhibiting an IC50 of less than 100 nM.

Among the 38 tested AML samples with known FLT3 mutational status, the FLT3-ITD+ AML samples tended to have enhanced sensitivity to CG’806 (median IC50 = 20 nM, n=8) relative to the FLT3-WT samples (median IC50 = 120 nM, n=30).

The researchers also found that CG’806 exerted potent anti-proliferative activity against human AML, B-ALL, mantle cell lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cell lines.

“The analyses of CG’806 against primary hematologic malignancy patient samples and cultured cell lines show evidence of potent and broad drug activity in AML and other disease subtypes and support further development of this agent for hematologic malignancies,” Dr Kurtz said. 

Photo by Rhoda Baer

BOSTON—A pair of preclinical studies suggest the FLT3/BTK inhibitor CG’806 is active in a range of hematologic malignancies.

In one of the studies, CG’806 proved particularly effective against acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells harboring mutant forms of FLT3, and the compound was able to eradicate AML in mice.

In another study, researchers found CG’806 exhibited “broad potency” against leukemias, lymphomas, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).

Both studies were presented as posters at Hematologic Malignancies: Translating Discoveries to Novel Therapies (poster 25 and poster 44).

Both studies involved researchers from Aptose Biosciences, the company developing CG’806.

Poster 25

Weiguo Zhang, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and his colleagues presented poster 25, “CG’806, a first-in-class FLT3/BTK inhibitor, exerts superior potency against AML cells harboring ITD, TKD and gatekeeper mutated FLT3 or wild-type FLT3.”

The researchers tested CG’806 and other FLT3 inhibitors in human or murine leukemia cell lines with wild-type (WT) FLT3, FLT3-ITD mutations, FLT3 TKD domain mutations, or ITD plus TKD mutations.

Compared to second-generation FLT3 inhibitors (quizartinib, gilteritinib, or crenolanib), CG’806 showed more pronounced anti-proliferative effects in leukemia cells with ITD mutations, D835 mutations, ITD plus F691I/Y842D/D835 mutations, or in FLT3 WT cells.

With CG’086, the IC50s in human AML cell lines were 0.17 nM for MV4-11 (FLT3-ITD) and 0.82 nM for MOLM13 (FLT3-ITD).

The IC50s in the murine leukemia cell lines were 9.49 nM for Ba/F3 (FLT3-WT), 0.30 nM for Ba/F3 (FLT3-ITD), 8.26 nM for Ba/F3 (FLT3-D835Y), 9.72 nM for Ba/F3 (FLT3-ITD+D835Y), and 0.43 nM for Ba/F3 (FLT3-ITD+F691L).

The researchers also found that CG’806 “triggers marked apoptosis” in FLT3-ITD-mutated primary AML samples but minimal apoptosis in normal bone marrow cells.

Another finding was that once-daily oral dosing of CG’806 in a murine model of AML (MV4-11) resulted in sustained micromolar plasma concentration over a 24-hour period.

This was accompanied by complete elimination of AML FLT3-ITD tumors without toxicity, the researchers said.

Poster 44

Stephen E. Kurtz, PhD, of Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, and his colleagues presented poster 44, “CG’806, a First-in-Class FLT3/BTK Inhibitor, Exhibits Potent Activity against AML Patient Samples with Mutant or Wild-Type FLT3, as well as Other Hematologic Malignancy Subtypes.”

The researchers tested CG’806 in samples from patients with AML (n=82), MDS/MPNs (n=15), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, n=17), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL, n=58), and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n=4).

The team observed “broad sensitivity” to CG’806, with 59% (48/82) of AML, 53% (8/15) of MDS/MPN, 40% (23/58) of CLL, 29% (5/17) of ALL, and 25% (1/4) of CML cases exhibiting an IC50 of less than 100 nM.

Among the 38 tested AML samples with known FLT3 mutational status, the FLT3-ITD+ AML samples tended to have enhanced sensitivity to CG’806 (median IC50 = 20 nM, n=8) relative to the FLT3-WT samples (median IC50 = 120 nM, n=30).

The researchers also found that CG’806 exerted potent anti-proliferative activity against human AML, B-ALL, mantle cell lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cell lines.

“The analyses of CG’806 against primary hematologic malignancy patient samples and cultured cell lines show evidence of potent and broad drug activity in AML and other disease subtypes and support further development of this agent for hematologic malignancies,” Dr Kurtz said. 

Photo by Chad McNeeley

Results of a phase 3 trial revealed similar outcomes in patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) to treat myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), regardless of the conditioning regimen they received.

Rates of engraftment, graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), relapse, and survival were similar between patients who received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and those who received standard myeloablative conditioning (MAC) before HSCT.

Researchers reported these results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“Our study shed new light on expected benefits of a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen that can be offered as a curative treatment approach, especially in older patients with MDS,” said study author Nicolaus Kröger, MD, of University Hospital Eppendorf in Hamburg, Germany.

Patient characteristics

The study, known as RICMAC, involved 129 patients who underwent HSCT between May 2004 and December 2012 at 18 transplant units in 7 countries.

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to RIC (n=65) or MAC (n=64) and were stratified according to donor type, age, and blast count.

The median age was 50 (range, 19-64) in the MAC arm and 51 (range, 22-63) in the RIC arm. The median blast percentage was 4% (range, 0-18) and 5% (range, 0-18), respectively.

According to IPSS, most patients in both arms had intermediate-I-risk disease (28 MAC, 25 RIC) or intermediate-II-risk disease (18 MAC, 24 RIC).

Similar numbers of patients in each arm had low cytogenetic risk (24 MAC, 28 RIC), intermediate cytogenetic risk (17 MAC, 13 RIC), and high cytogenetic risk (17 MAC, 18 RIC).

Thirty-three patients in the MAC arm and 32 in the RIC arm received ATG as GVHD prophylaxis.

Patients received grafts from matched related donors (17 MAC, 16 RIC), matched unrelated donors (36 MAC, 38 RIC), or mismatched related/unrelated donors (11 in both arms).

Most patients received peripheral blood stem cell grafts—61 in the MAC arm and 59 in the RIC arm.

Results

The researchers said engraftment was comparable between the arms. There were 4 graft failures in the MAC arm and 3 in the RIC arm (P=0.72). The median time to leukocyte engraftment was 15 days in both arms. The median time to platelet engraftment was 15 days in the RIC arm and 16 in the MAC arm (P=0.33).

There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of GVHD between the RIC and MAC arms:

• Grade 2-4 acute GVHD—32.3% and 37.5%, respectively
• Grade 3-4 acute GVHD—15% and 14%, respectively (P=0.35 for between-arm difference for all acute GVHD)
• Chronic GVHD—61.6% and 64.7%, respectively (P=0.76).

Though the occurrence of infection was similar between the MAC and RIC arms (48 and 44, respectively), the rate of infection was higher in the MAC arm than the RIC arm.

The rate of infection in the first 100 days was 6.9 per 100 person-years in the MAC arm and 4.3 in the RIC arm (P=0.002). The rate of infection during the total follow-up was 2.0 per 100 person-years in the MAC arm and 1.4 in the RIC arm (P=0.002).

There was no significant difference between the RIC and MAC arms with regard to the cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality after 1 year—16.9% and 25.3%, respectively (P=0.29).

And there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years—17% and 14.8%, respectively (P=0.6).

The 2-year relapse-free survival rate was similar in the MAC and RIC arms—58.3% and 62.4% (P=0.58)—as was the 2-year overall survival rate—63.2% and 76.3%, respectively (P=0.08). 

Photo by Chad McNeeley

Results of a phase 3 trial revealed similar outcomes in patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) to treat myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), regardless of the conditioning regimen they received.

Rates of engraftment, graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), relapse, and survival were similar between patients who received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and those who received standard myeloablative conditioning (MAC) before HSCT.

Researchers reported these results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“Our study shed new light on expected benefits of a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen that can be offered as a curative treatment approach, especially in older patients with MDS,” said study author Nicolaus Kröger, MD, of University Hospital Eppendorf in Hamburg, Germany.

Patient characteristics

The study, known as RICMAC, involved 129 patients who underwent HSCT between May 2004 and December 2012 at 18 transplant units in 7 countries.

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to RIC (n=65) or MAC (n=64) and were stratified according to donor type, age, and blast count.

The median age was 50 (range, 19-64) in the MAC arm and 51 (range, 22-63) in the RIC arm. The median blast percentage was 4% (range, 0-18) and 5% (range, 0-18), respectively.

According to IPSS, most patients in both arms had intermediate-I-risk disease (28 MAC, 25 RIC) or intermediate-II-risk disease (18 MAC, 24 RIC).

Similar numbers of patients in each arm had low cytogenetic risk (24 MAC, 28 RIC), intermediate cytogenetic risk (17 MAC, 13 RIC), and high cytogenetic risk (17 MAC, 18 RIC).

Thirty-three patients in the MAC arm and 32 in the RIC arm received ATG as GVHD prophylaxis.

Patients received grafts from matched related donors (17 MAC, 16 RIC), matched unrelated donors (36 MAC, 38 RIC), or mismatched related/unrelated donors (11 in both arms).

Most patients received peripheral blood stem cell grafts—61 in the MAC arm and 59 in the RIC arm.

Results

The researchers said engraftment was comparable between the arms. There were 4 graft failures in the MAC arm and 3 in the RIC arm (P=0.72). The median time to leukocyte engraftment was 15 days in both arms. The median time to platelet engraftment was 15 days in the RIC arm and 16 in the MAC arm (P=0.33).

There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of GVHD between the RIC and MAC arms:

• Grade 2-4 acute GVHD—32.3% and 37.5%, respectively
• Grade 3-4 acute GVHD—15% and 14%, respectively (P=0.35 for between-arm difference for all acute GVHD)
• Chronic GVHD—61.6% and 64.7%, respectively (P=0.76).

Though the occurrence of infection was similar between the MAC and RIC arms (48 and 44, respectively), the rate of infection was higher in the MAC arm than the RIC arm.

The rate of infection in the first 100 days was 6.9 per 100 person-years in the MAC arm and 4.3 in the RIC arm (P=0.002). The rate of infection during the total follow-up was 2.0 per 100 person-years in the MAC arm and 1.4 in the RIC arm (P=0.002).

There was no significant difference between the RIC and MAC arms with regard to the cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality after 1 year—16.9% and 25.3%, respectively (P=0.29).

And there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years—17% and 14.8%, respectively (P=0.6).

The 2-year relapse-free survival rate was similar in the MAC and RIC arms—58.3% and 62.4% (P=0.58)—as was the 2-year overall survival rate—63.2% and 76.3%, respectively (P=0.08). 

Photo by Chad McNeeley

Results of a phase 3 trial revealed similar outcomes in patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) to treat myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), regardless of the conditioning regimen they received.

Rates of engraftment, graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), relapse, and survival were similar between patients who received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and those who received standard myeloablative conditioning (MAC) before HSCT.

Researchers reported these results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“Our study shed new light on expected benefits of a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen that can be offered as a curative treatment approach, especially in older patients with MDS,” said study author Nicolaus Kröger, MD, of University Hospital Eppendorf in Hamburg, Germany.

Patient characteristics

The study, known as RICMAC, involved 129 patients who underwent HSCT between May 2004 and December 2012 at 18 transplant units in 7 countries.

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to RIC (n=65) or MAC (n=64) and were stratified according to donor type, age, and blast count.

The median age was 50 (range, 19-64) in the MAC arm and 51 (range, 22-63) in the RIC arm. The median blast percentage was 4% (range, 0-18) and 5% (range, 0-18), respectively.

According to IPSS, most patients in both arms had intermediate-I-risk disease (28 MAC, 25 RIC) or intermediate-II-risk disease (18 MAC, 24 RIC).

Similar numbers of patients in each arm had low cytogenetic risk (24 MAC, 28 RIC), intermediate cytogenetic risk (17 MAC, 13 RIC), and high cytogenetic risk (17 MAC, 18 RIC).

Thirty-three patients in the MAC arm and 32 in the RIC arm received ATG as GVHD prophylaxis.

Patients received grafts from matched related donors (17 MAC, 16 RIC), matched unrelated donors (36 MAC, 38 RIC), or mismatched related/unrelated donors (11 in both arms).

Most patients received peripheral blood stem cell grafts—61 in the MAC arm and 59 in the RIC arm.

Results

The researchers said engraftment was comparable between the arms. There were 4 graft failures in the MAC arm and 3 in the RIC arm (P=0.72). The median time to leukocyte engraftment was 15 days in both arms. The median time to platelet engraftment was 15 days in the RIC arm and 16 in the MAC arm (P=0.33).

There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of GVHD between the RIC and MAC arms:

• Grade 2-4 acute GVHD—32.3% and 37.5%, respectively
• Grade 3-4 acute GVHD—15% and 14%, respectively (P=0.35 for between-arm difference for all acute GVHD)
• Chronic GVHD—61.6% and 64.7%, respectively (P=0.76).

Though the occurrence of infection was similar between the MAC and RIC arms (48 and 44, respectively), the rate of infection was higher in the MAC arm than the RIC arm.

The rate of infection in the first 100 days was 6.9 per 100 person-years in the MAC arm and 4.3 in the RIC arm (P=0.002). The rate of infection during the total follow-up was 2.0 per 100 person-years in the MAC arm and 1.4 in the RIC arm (P=0.002).

There was no significant difference between the RIC and MAC arms with regard to the cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality after 1 year—16.9% and 25.3%, respectively (P=0.29).

And there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years—17% and 14.8%, respectively (P=0.6).

The 2-year relapse-free survival rate was similar in the MAC and RIC arms—58.3% and 62.4% (P=0.58)—as was the 2-year overall survival rate—63.2% and 76.3%, respectively (P=0.08). 

The Food and Drug Administration’s 2007 “boxed warning” about serious adverse events associated with the use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) was followed by a substantial reduction in their use among patients recovering from colorectal, breast, or lung cancer, according to a new report.

Boxed warnings are considered one of the strongest mechanisms with which the FDA can communicate concerns about drug safety to the public. However, some critics have questioned the effectiveness of these warnings, and the available evidence “remains inconclusive, largely because almost all of [the data] were drawn from observational studies using pre-post designs without control groups,” said John Bian, PhD, of the University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy and Hollings Cancer Center, Columbia, and his associates.

They assessed the effectiveness of boxed warnings concerning ESAs such as epoetin and darbepoetin that are used to treat chemotherapy-induced anemia. These biologics have been tied to serious adverse events including venous thromboembolism and death in certain patients. The warning specifically targeted their use in colorectal, breast, and lung cancer.

The investigators analyzed data in the SEER cancer registry for the period immediately before and immediately after the 2007 boxed warning was issued. Their sample comprised 45,319 patients aged 66 years and older who were treated either in the “pre” warning period (January 2004-September 2006) or the “post” period (April 2007-September 2009). This included a control group of 3,375 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Use of ESAs in these patients was off-label and was not targeted by the boxed warning (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.6273).The use of ESAs declined sharply after the boxed warning was issued, except in the control group. The proportion of breast cancer patients receiving ESAs dropped from 49%-55% before 2007 to 30% in 2007, 16% in 2008, and 9% in 2009.

Similarly, the proportion of colorectal cancer patients receiving ESAs declined from about 35%-40% before 2007 to 18% in 2007, 11% in 2008, and 9% in 2009. The proportion of lung cancer patients receiving ESAs decreased from 56%-58% before 2007 to 40% in 2007, 29% in 2008, and 24% in 2009. In contrast, the proportion of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes receiving ESAs – the control group – remained relatively stable at 39%-42% before 2007, 35% in 2007, and 32% in 2008 and 2009.

This represents a reduction of approximately 40% overall in the use of ESAs among targeted patients after the warning was issued. However, this decrease appeared to have little effect on the incidence of hospitalization for venous thromboembolism in this patient population, Dr. Bian and his associates noted.

The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Bian reported having no relevant financial disclosures. His associates reported ties to Quincy Bioscience, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Mylan, Eli Lilly, Merck, Amgen, and BDI Pharma.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration’s 2007 “boxed warning” about serious adverse events associated with the use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) was followed by a substantial reduction in their use among patients recovering from colorectal, breast, or lung cancer, according to a new report.

Boxed warnings are considered one of the strongest mechanisms with which the FDA can communicate concerns about drug safety to the public. However, some critics have questioned the effectiveness of these warnings, and the available evidence “remains inconclusive, largely because almost all of [the data] were drawn from observational studies using pre-post designs without control groups,” said John Bian, PhD, of the University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy and Hollings Cancer Center, Columbia, and his associates.

They assessed the effectiveness of boxed warnings concerning ESAs such as epoetin and darbepoetin that are used to treat chemotherapy-induced anemia. These biologics have been tied to serious adverse events including venous thromboembolism and death in certain patients. The warning specifically targeted their use in colorectal, breast, and lung cancer.

The investigators analyzed data in the SEER cancer registry for the period immediately before and immediately after the 2007 boxed warning was issued. Their sample comprised 45,319 patients aged 66 years and older who were treated either in the “pre” warning period (January 2004-September 2006) or the “post” period (April 2007-September 2009). This included a control group of 3,375 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Use of ESAs in these patients was off-label and was not targeted by the boxed warning (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.6273).The use of ESAs declined sharply after the boxed warning was issued, except in the control group. The proportion of breast cancer patients receiving ESAs dropped from 49%-55% before 2007 to 30% in 2007, 16% in 2008, and 9% in 2009.

Similarly, the proportion of colorectal cancer patients receiving ESAs declined from about 35%-40% before 2007 to 18% in 2007, 11% in 2008, and 9% in 2009. The proportion of lung cancer patients receiving ESAs decreased from 56%-58% before 2007 to 40% in 2007, 29% in 2008, and 24% in 2009. In contrast, the proportion of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes receiving ESAs – the control group – remained relatively stable at 39%-42% before 2007, 35% in 2007, and 32% in 2008 and 2009.

This represents a reduction of approximately 40% overall in the use of ESAs among targeted patients after the warning was issued. However, this decrease appeared to have little effect on the incidence of hospitalization for venous thromboembolism in this patient population, Dr. Bian and his associates noted.

The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Bian reported having no relevant financial disclosures. His associates reported ties to Quincy Bioscience, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Mylan, Eli Lilly, Merck, Amgen, and BDI Pharma.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration’s 2007 “boxed warning” about serious adverse events associated with the use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) was followed by a substantial reduction in their use among patients recovering from colorectal, breast, or lung cancer, according to a new report.

Boxed warnings are considered one of the strongest mechanisms with which the FDA can communicate concerns about drug safety to the public. However, some critics have questioned the effectiveness of these warnings, and the available evidence “remains inconclusive, largely because almost all of [the data] were drawn from observational studies using pre-post designs without control groups,” said John Bian, PhD, of the University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy and Hollings Cancer Center, Columbia, and his associates.

They assessed the effectiveness of boxed warnings concerning ESAs such as epoetin and darbepoetin that are used to treat chemotherapy-induced anemia. These biologics have been tied to serious adverse events including venous thromboembolism and death in certain patients. The warning specifically targeted their use in colorectal, breast, and lung cancer.

The investigators analyzed data in the SEER cancer registry for the period immediately before and immediately after the 2007 boxed warning was issued. Their sample comprised 45,319 patients aged 66 years and older who were treated either in the “pre” warning period (January 2004-September 2006) or the “post” period (April 2007-September 2009). This included a control group of 3,375 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Use of ESAs in these patients was off-label and was not targeted by the boxed warning (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.6273).The use of ESAs declined sharply after the boxed warning was issued, except in the control group. The proportion of breast cancer patients receiving ESAs dropped from 49%-55% before 2007 to 30% in 2007, 16% in 2008, and 9% in 2009.

Similarly, the proportion of colorectal cancer patients receiving ESAs declined from about 35%-40% before 2007 to 18% in 2007, 11% in 2008, and 9% in 2009. The proportion of lung cancer patients receiving ESAs decreased from 56%-58% before 2007 to 40% in 2007, 29% in 2008, and 24% in 2009. In contrast, the proportion of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes receiving ESAs – the control group – remained relatively stable at 39%-42% before 2007, 35% in 2007, and 32% in 2008 and 2009.

This represents a reduction of approximately 40% overall in the use of ESAs among targeted patients after the warning was issued. However, this decrease appeared to have little effect on the incidence of hospitalization for venous thromboembolism in this patient population, Dr. Bian and his associates noted.

The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Bian reported having no relevant financial disclosures. His associates reported ties to Quincy Bioscience, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Mylan, Eli Lilly, Merck, Amgen, and BDI Pharma.

[email protected]

Comprehensive Cancer Center

New research appears to explain how TET2 mutations increase the risk of hematologic malignancies.

In studying mouse models and patient samples, researchers found evidence to suggest that loss of TET2 opens the door for mutations that drive lymphoid and myeloid malignancies.

The researchers said loss of TET2 leads to hypermutagenicity in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), and although TET2-deficient HSPCs are likely not malignant, the higher mutation rates in these cells may result in additional driver mutations in TET2 target genes over time.

“If you lose TET2, it’s not a malignant state per se,” said Mingjiang Xu, MD, PhD, of the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine in Florida.

“But it’s creating a situation for other mutations to happen, leading to all types of blood cancer.”

Dr Xu and his colleagues reported these findings in Nature Communications.

The researchers found that Tet2-knockout mice developed spontaneous, lethal hematologic malignancies. Most (92%) developed myeloid malignancies, but 3.5% developed T-cell malignancies, and 4.5% developed B-cell malignancies.

In sequencing tumor and non-tumor cells from the Tet2-knockout mice, the researchers observed that loss of Tet2 leads to hypermutagenicity in HSPCs.

The team identified 190 genes with recurrent single-nucleotide variants. This included genes that are recurrently altered in human hematologic malignancies—Apc, Nf1, Flt3, Cbl, Notch1, and Mll2.

The researchers also analyzed samples from patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myeloproliferative neoplasms, and myelodysplastic syndromes.

The team found that patients with TET2 mutations had “significantly more mutational events than patients with wild-type TET2.” And TET2 mutations were associated with subclonal events in APC, NF1, ASXL1, CBL, and ZRSR2, among other genes.

These findings suggest that targeting TET2 could potentially prevent the development of hematologic malignancies.

The researchers noted that TET2 mutations occur in healthy elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis, and these individuals would be ideal candidates for a preventive therapy targeting TET2.

“We are developing a method to target TET2,” Dr Xu said. “If we target that population [with TET2 mutations] for early therapy, we could potentially prevent those downstream mutations from happening.”

Comprehensive Cancer Center

New research appears to explain how TET2 mutations increase the risk of hematologic malignancies.

In studying mouse models and patient samples, researchers found evidence to suggest that loss of TET2 opens the door for mutations that drive lymphoid and myeloid malignancies.

The researchers said loss of TET2 leads to hypermutagenicity in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), and although TET2-deficient HSPCs are likely not malignant, the higher mutation rates in these cells may result in additional driver mutations in TET2 target genes over time.

“If you lose TET2, it’s not a malignant state per se,” said Mingjiang Xu, MD, PhD, of the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine in Florida.

“But it’s creating a situation for other mutations to happen, leading to all types of blood cancer.”

Dr Xu and his colleagues reported these findings in Nature Communications.

The researchers found that Tet2-knockout mice developed spontaneous, lethal hematologic malignancies. Most (92%) developed myeloid malignancies, but 3.5% developed T-cell malignancies, and 4.5% developed B-cell malignancies.

In sequencing tumor and non-tumor cells from the Tet2-knockout mice, the researchers observed that loss of Tet2 leads to hypermutagenicity in HSPCs.

The team identified 190 genes with recurrent single-nucleotide variants. This included genes that are recurrently altered in human hematologic malignancies—Apc, Nf1, Flt3, Cbl, Notch1, and Mll2.

The researchers also analyzed samples from patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myeloproliferative neoplasms, and myelodysplastic syndromes.

The team found that patients with TET2 mutations had “significantly more mutational events than patients with wild-type TET2.” And TET2 mutations were associated with subclonal events in APC, NF1, ASXL1, CBL, and ZRSR2, among other genes.

These findings suggest that targeting TET2 could potentially prevent the development of hematologic malignancies.

The researchers noted that TET2 mutations occur in healthy elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis, and these individuals would be ideal candidates for a preventive therapy targeting TET2.

“We are developing a method to target TET2,” Dr Xu said. “If we target that population [with TET2 mutations] for early therapy, we could potentially prevent those downstream mutations from happening.”

Comprehensive Cancer Center

New research appears to explain how TET2 mutations increase the risk of hematologic malignancies.

In studying mouse models and patient samples, researchers found evidence to suggest that loss of TET2 opens the door for mutations that drive lymphoid and myeloid malignancies.

The researchers said loss of TET2 leads to hypermutagenicity in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), and although TET2-deficient HSPCs are likely not malignant, the higher mutation rates in these cells may result in additional driver mutations in TET2 target genes over time.

“If you lose TET2, it’s not a malignant state per se,” said Mingjiang Xu, MD, PhD, of the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine in Florida.

“But it’s creating a situation for other mutations to happen, leading to all types of blood cancer.”

Dr Xu and his colleagues reported these findings in Nature Communications.

The researchers found that Tet2-knockout mice developed spontaneous, lethal hematologic malignancies. Most (92%) developed myeloid malignancies, but 3.5% developed T-cell malignancies, and 4.5% developed B-cell malignancies.

In sequencing tumor and non-tumor cells from the Tet2-knockout mice, the researchers observed that loss of Tet2 leads to hypermutagenicity in HSPCs.

The team identified 190 genes with recurrent single-nucleotide variants. This included genes that are recurrently altered in human hematologic malignancies—Apc, Nf1, Flt3, Cbl, Notch1, and Mll2.

The researchers also analyzed samples from patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myeloproliferative neoplasms, and myelodysplastic syndromes.

The team found that patients with TET2 mutations had “significantly more mutational events than patients with wild-type TET2.” And TET2 mutations were associated with subclonal events in APC, NF1, ASXL1, CBL, and ZRSR2, among other genes.

These findings suggest that targeting TET2 could potentially prevent the development of hematologic malignancies.

The researchers noted that TET2 mutations occur in healthy elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis, and these individuals would be ideal candidates for a preventive therapy targeting TET2.

“We are developing a method to target TET2,” Dr Xu said. “If we target that population [with TET2 mutations] for early therapy, we could potentially prevent those downstream mutations from happening.”

 

NEW YORK – Genetic mutation analysis of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) may have a useful role in routine practice based on recent reports that showed clear links between certain gene mutations and the outcomes of patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Two reports published in 2017 helped strengthen the case for routine mutation analysis in distinguishing patients with MDS or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDN) who are very likely to have just a brief response to allogeneic HSCT from similar patients who seem likely to have several years of overall survival following transplantation.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

When patients have markers for poor outcomes, “consider alternatives to allogeneic HSCT,” such as enrolling them in a trial, Amer M. Zeidan, MBBS, advised at a conference held by Imedex. “For other patients, allogeneic HSCT is reasonable, especially [for] younger patients,” those less than 40 years old, said Dr. Zeidan, a hematologist/oncologist at Yale University in New Haven, Conn.

Allogeneic HSCT is the only potentially curative procedure for patients with MDS or MDN. Although an increasing number of these patients undergo transplantation, clinicians need to choose the patients they select for the treatment carefully. “Molecular testing is playing an increasing role in selecting the best candidates,” Dr. Zeidan said.

The largest reported genetic study of allogeneic HSCT in MDS patients involved 1,514 patients entered into a U.S.-based dataset during 2005-2015. Testing identified at least one mutation in 1,196 (79%) of these patients.

Analysis of data from these patients found a disparate pattern of posttransplant survival that appeared to link with gene mutations and other risk factors. The highest risk patients were those with a mutation in their TP53 gene, found in 289 patients (19% of the 1,514 tested) who had a median overall survival (OS) of 0.7 years and a 3-year OS of 20% (New Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 9;376[6]:536-47).

Among patients without a TP53 mutation, OS depended on age, with the best survival seen among patients less than 40 years old. Patients in this subgroup who also had no other high-risk features – no therapy-related MDS, a platelet level of at least 30 x 10⁹ at the time of transplantation, and bone marrow blasts less than 15% at diagnosis – had the best OS, 82% at 3-years of follow-up. The studied cohort included 116 patients (8%) who fell into this low-risk, best-outcome category, the optimal population for receiving an allogeneic HSCT, Dr. Zeidan said. Another 98 patients (6%) who had at least one of these high risk feature had a median OS of 2.6 years and a 3-year OS of 49%.

Additional gene mutations further subdivided the older patients in the study, those at least 40 years old, into various risk subgroups. Older patients with a mutation in a ras-pathway gene had a 0.9 year median OS and a 3-year OS of 30%. This subgroup included 129 patients (9%). Among older patients with no mutation in the ras-pathway gene, mutations in the JAK2 gene also linked with worse survival, a median OS of 0.5 years and a 3-year OS of 28% of a subgroup with 28 patients (2%). The largest subgroup in the study was older patients with no mutations in the TP53, JAK2, or ras-pathway genes, a subgroup with 854 patients (56%), who had a median OS of 2.3 years and a 3-year OS of 46%.

The second recent report was a Japanese study of 797 MDS patients who underwent genetic testing and received an allogeneic HSCT through the Japan Marrow Donor Program. The investigators found identifiable mutations in 617 patients (77%) and documented that patients with a TP53 or ras-pathway mutation had a “dismal prognosis” when associated with a complex karyotype and myelodysplastic or myeloproliferative neoplasms. However, among patients with a mutated TP53 gene or complex karyotype alone, long-term survival following transplantation appeared possible (Blood. 2017. doi: org/10.1182/blood-2016-12-754796.

Two smaller, earlier studies (J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sept 1;32[25]:2691-8; J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 20;34[30]:2627-37) also implicated mutations in the TET2, DNMT3A, ASXL1, and RUNX1 genes as identifying MDS patients with worse OS following allogeneic HSCT, Dr. Zeidan noted, but the combination of a TP53 gene mutation and a complex karyotype appears to confer the worst prognosis of all. Patients with mutations in more than one of these genes fared much worse than those with single mutations.

Dr. Zeidan had no relevant disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

 

NEW YORK – Genetic mutation analysis of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) may have a useful role in routine practice based on recent reports that showed clear links between certain gene mutations and the outcomes of patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Two reports published in 2017 helped strengthen the case for routine mutation analysis in distinguishing patients with MDS or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDN) who are very likely to have just a brief response to allogeneic HSCT from similar patients who seem likely to have several years of overall survival following transplantation.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

When patients have markers for poor outcomes, “consider alternatives to allogeneic HSCT,” such as enrolling them in a trial, Amer M. Zeidan, MBBS, advised at a conference held by Imedex. “For other patients, allogeneic HSCT is reasonable, especially [for] younger patients,” those less than 40 years old, said Dr. Zeidan, a hematologist/oncologist at Yale University in New Haven, Conn.

Allogeneic HSCT is the only potentially curative procedure for patients with MDS or MDN. Although an increasing number of these patients undergo transplantation, clinicians need to choose the patients they select for the treatment carefully. “Molecular testing is playing an increasing role in selecting the best candidates,” Dr. Zeidan said.

The largest reported genetic study of allogeneic HSCT in MDS patients involved 1,514 patients entered into a U.S.-based dataset during 2005-2015. Testing identified at least one mutation in 1,196 (79%) of these patients.

Analysis of data from these patients found a disparate pattern of posttransplant survival that appeared to link with gene mutations and other risk factors. The highest risk patients were those with a mutation in their TP53 gene, found in 289 patients (19% of the 1,514 tested) who had a median overall survival (OS) of 0.7 years and a 3-year OS of 20% (New Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 9;376[6]:536-47).

Among patients without a TP53 mutation, OS depended on age, with the best survival seen among patients less than 40 years old. Patients in this subgroup who also had no other high-risk features – no therapy-related MDS, a platelet level of at least 30 x 10⁹ at the time of transplantation, and bone marrow blasts less than 15% at diagnosis – had the best OS, 82% at 3-years of follow-up. The studied cohort included 116 patients (8%) who fell into this low-risk, best-outcome category, the optimal population for receiving an allogeneic HSCT, Dr. Zeidan said. Another 98 patients (6%) who had at least one of these high risk feature had a median OS of 2.6 years and a 3-year OS of 49%.

Additional gene mutations further subdivided the older patients in the study, those at least 40 years old, into various risk subgroups. Older patients with a mutation in a ras-pathway gene had a 0.9 year median OS and a 3-year OS of 30%. This subgroup included 129 patients (9%). Among older patients with no mutation in the ras-pathway gene, mutations in the JAK2 gene also linked with worse survival, a median OS of 0.5 years and a 3-year OS of 28% of a subgroup with 28 patients (2%). The largest subgroup in the study was older patients with no mutations in the TP53, JAK2, or ras-pathway genes, a subgroup with 854 patients (56%), who had a median OS of 2.3 years and a 3-year OS of 46%.

The second recent report was a Japanese study of 797 MDS patients who underwent genetic testing and received an allogeneic HSCT through the Japan Marrow Donor Program. The investigators found identifiable mutations in 617 patients (77%) and documented that patients with a TP53 or ras-pathway mutation had a “dismal prognosis” when associated with a complex karyotype and myelodysplastic or myeloproliferative neoplasms. However, among patients with a mutated TP53 gene or complex karyotype alone, long-term survival following transplantation appeared possible (Blood. 2017. doi: org/10.1182/blood-2016-12-754796.

Two smaller, earlier studies (J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sept 1;32[25]:2691-8; J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 20;34[30]:2627-37) also implicated mutations in the TET2, DNMT3A, ASXL1, and RUNX1 genes as identifying MDS patients with worse OS following allogeneic HSCT, Dr. Zeidan noted, but the combination of a TP53 gene mutation and a complex karyotype appears to confer the worst prognosis of all. Patients with mutations in more than one of these genes fared much worse than those with single mutations.

Dr. Zeidan had no relevant disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

 

NEW YORK – Genetic mutation analysis of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) may have a useful role in routine practice based on recent reports that showed clear links between certain gene mutations and the outcomes of patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Two reports published in 2017 helped strengthen the case for routine mutation analysis in distinguishing patients with MDS or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDN) who are very likely to have just a brief response to allogeneic HSCT from similar patients who seem likely to have several years of overall survival following transplantation.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

When patients have markers for poor outcomes, “consider alternatives to allogeneic HSCT,” such as enrolling them in a trial, Amer M. Zeidan, MBBS, advised at a conference held by Imedex. “For other patients, allogeneic HSCT is reasonable, especially [for] younger patients,” those less than 40 years old, said Dr. Zeidan, a hematologist/oncologist at Yale University in New Haven, Conn.

Allogeneic HSCT is the only potentially curative procedure for patients with MDS or MDN. Although an increasing number of these patients undergo transplantation, clinicians need to choose the patients they select for the treatment carefully. “Molecular testing is playing an increasing role in selecting the best candidates,” Dr. Zeidan said.

The largest reported genetic study of allogeneic HSCT in MDS patients involved 1,514 patients entered into a U.S.-based dataset during 2005-2015. Testing identified at least one mutation in 1,196 (79%) of these patients.

Analysis of data from these patients found a disparate pattern of posttransplant survival that appeared to link with gene mutations and other risk factors. The highest risk patients were those with a mutation in their TP53 gene, found in 289 patients (19% of the 1,514 tested) who had a median overall survival (OS) of 0.7 years and a 3-year OS of 20% (New Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 9;376[6]:536-47).

Among patients without a TP53 mutation, OS depended on age, with the best survival seen among patients less than 40 years old. Patients in this subgroup who also had no other high-risk features – no therapy-related MDS, a platelet level of at least 30 x 10⁹ at the time of transplantation, and bone marrow blasts less than 15% at diagnosis – had the best OS, 82% at 3-years of follow-up. The studied cohort included 116 patients (8%) who fell into this low-risk, best-outcome category, the optimal population for receiving an allogeneic HSCT, Dr. Zeidan said. Another 98 patients (6%) who had at least one of these high risk feature had a median OS of 2.6 years and a 3-year OS of 49%.

Additional gene mutations further subdivided the older patients in the study, those at least 40 years old, into various risk subgroups. Older patients with a mutation in a ras-pathway gene had a 0.9 year median OS and a 3-year OS of 30%. This subgroup included 129 patients (9%). Among older patients with no mutation in the ras-pathway gene, mutations in the JAK2 gene also linked with worse survival, a median OS of 0.5 years and a 3-year OS of 28% of a subgroup with 28 patients (2%). The largest subgroup in the study was older patients with no mutations in the TP53, JAK2, or ras-pathway genes, a subgroup with 854 patients (56%), who had a median OS of 2.3 years and a 3-year OS of 46%.

The second recent report was a Japanese study of 797 MDS patients who underwent genetic testing and received an allogeneic HSCT through the Japan Marrow Donor Program. The investigators found identifiable mutations in 617 patients (77%) and documented that patients with a TP53 or ras-pathway mutation had a “dismal prognosis” when associated with a complex karyotype and myelodysplastic or myeloproliferative neoplasms. However, among patients with a mutated TP53 gene or complex karyotype alone, long-term survival following transplantation appeared possible (Blood. 2017. doi: org/10.1182/blood-2016-12-754796.

Two smaller, earlier studies (J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sept 1;32[25]:2691-8; J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 20;34[30]:2627-37) also implicated mutations in the TET2, DNMT3A, ASXL1, and RUNX1 genes as identifying MDS patients with worse OS following allogeneic HSCT, Dr. Zeidan noted, but the combination of a TP53 gene mutation and a complex karyotype appears to confer the worst prognosis of all. Patients with mutations in more than one of these genes fared much worse than those with single mutations.

Dr. Zeidan had no relevant disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler