LayerRx Mapping ID
337
Slot System
Featured Buckets
Featured Buckets Admin
Reverse Chronological Sort
Medscape Lead Concept
1457

Ubrogepant may relieve migraine pain at 2 hours

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/03/2020 - 14:23

Ubrogepant, an oral calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP)–receptor antagonist, may relieve patients’ migraine pain and their most bothersome associated symptom, such as photophobia, phonophobia, or nausea, at 2 hours after acute treatment, according to phase 3 trial results published Nov. 19 in JAMA.

Dr. Richard B. Lipton

“Among adults with migraine, acute treatment with ubrogepant, compared with placebo, led to significantly greater rates of pain freedom at 2 hours with the 50-mg and 25-mg doses, and absence of the most bothersome migraine-associated symptom at 2 hours only with the 50-mg dose,” wrote first author Richard B. Lipton, MD, director of the Montefiore Headache Center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, and his colleagues. “Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness of ubrogepant against other acute treatments for migraine and to evaluate the long-term safety of ubrogepant among unselected patient populations.”

A researcher who commented on the results said that the drug appears “modestly better than placebo” and called for a trial comparing ubrogepant, aspirin, and oral sumatriptan.

The Food and Drug Administration is reviewing an application for ubrogepant. Allergan, the company developing the drug, has said it expects a regulatory decision in December.
 

ACHIEVE II

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ubrogepant versus placebo for the acute treatment of a migraine attack, investigators conducted ACHIEVE II, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-attack clinical trial. The study was conducted at 99 primary care and research clinics during 2016-2018.

The trial included adults with migraine with or without aura who experienced two to eight migraine attacks per month. Participants had a mean age of 41.5 years, and 90% were female. The safety analysis included data from 1,465 participants, and the efficacy analysis included data from 1,355 participants. The primary efficacy outcomes were pain freedom and the absence of participants’ most bothersome migraine-associated symptom at 2 hours after taking the medication. Patients received ubrogepant 50 mg, ubrogepant 25 mg, or placebo to treat a migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity.



At 2 hours, pain freedom was reported by 101 of 464 participants in the ubrogepant 50-mg group (21.8%), 90 of 435 in the ubrogepant 25-mg group (20.7%), and 65 of 456 in the placebo group (14.3%). Absence of the most bothersome symptom was reported by 180 of 463 participants in the ubrogepant 50-mg group (38.9%), 148 of 434 in the ubrogepant 25-mg group (34.1%), and 125 of 456 in the placebo group (27.4%).

The most common adverse events within 48 hours were nausea and dizziness. Nausea occurred in 2.0% of the 50-mg group, 2.5% of the 25-mg group, and 2.0% of the placebo group. Dizziness occurred in 1.4% of the 50-mg group, 2.1% of the 25-mg group, and 1.6% of the placebo group.

At conferences, researchers have presented results from the phase 3 ACHIEVE I trial as well as an analysis that suggests ubrogepant may be effective in patients for whom triptans have been ineffective. In addition, studies have supported the safety of “gepants” after earlier concerns about potential liver toxicity. Physicians have called the safety data reassuring.

The ACHIEVE II trial was sponsored by Allergan. Several authors are Allergan employees. Dr. Lipton is a consultant, advisory board member, or has received honoraria from Allergan and other companies.

 

 

 

Number needed to treat

“The study was large, appears to have been well conducted, is clearly reported, and used appropriate outcome measures,” said Elizabeth Loder, MD, commenting on the trial.

Dr. Elizabeth Loder

A year ago, Dr. Loder, chief of the division of headache at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School in Boston, coauthored a paper with Peer Tfelt-Hansen, MD, DMSc, of the University of Copenhagen, that said the phase 3 trials of gepants so far have found the drugs to have small effect sizes and low efficacy (Headache. 2019 Jan;59[1]:113-7. doi: 10.1111/head.13444).

Their publication included preliminary figures from ACHIEVE II, which are consistent with those published in JAMA. “The effect size for both doses of ubrogepant is small and of debatable clinical significance,” Dr. Loder said. “The therapeutic gain over placebo is 7.5% for the 50-mg dose and 6.4% for the 25-mg dose for the outcome of pain freedom at 2 hours. That corresponds to a number needed to treat of 13 and 15.6 people, respectively, in order to have one person achieve pain freedom at 2 hours that is attributable to the active treatment.”

For a secondary outcome of pain relief at 2 hours, defined as reduction of headache pain severity from moderate or severe to mild or none, the therapeutic gain versus placebo is 14.5% for the 50-mg dose and 12.3% for the 25-mg dose. “That corresponds to a number needed to treat of 6.8 and 8.1 people, respectively, to have one person achieve pain relief at 2 hours attributable to the drug,” Dr. Loder said.



“Although there are no head to head studies comparing ubrogepant to triptans, for reference the [number needed to treat] for a 100-mg oral dose of sumatriptan is on the order of 3.5 for pain relief at 2 hours, meaning that one needs to treat just 3.5 people with sumatriptan in order to have one person achieve pain relief at 2 hours attributable to the drug,” she said (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;5:CD009108. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009108.pub2).

“The bottom line is that in the ACHIEVE II study, ubrogepant appears, on average, to be modestly better than placebo to treat migraine. It does not appear to be in the same league as sumatriptan. Instead, as Dr. Tfelt-Hansen and I said in our article, the results look comparable to those likely to be achieved with inexpensive nonprescription medications such as NSAIDs.”

Dr. Loder called for a trial comparing ubrogepant and other therapies. “I challenge the authors and the company to conduct a large, placebo-controlled trial comparing ubrogepant to 100 mg of oral sumatriptan and to 650 mg of aspirin,” Dr. Loder said.

Dr. Loder has no financial connections with any pharmaceutical or device companies and is paid for her work as the head of research for the British Medical Journal.

SOURCE: Lipton RB et al. JAMA. 2019;322(19):1887-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.16711.

Issue
Neurology Reviews- 28(1)
Publications
Topics
Sections

Ubrogepant, an oral calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP)–receptor antagonist, may relieve patients’ migraine pain and their most bothersome associated symptom, such as photophobia, phonophobia, or nausea, at 2 hours after acute treatment, according to phase 3 trial results published Nov. 19 in JAMA.

Dr. Richard B. Lipton

“Among adults with migraine, acute treatment with ubrogepant, compared with placebo, led to significantly greater rates of pain freedom at 2 hours with the 50-mg and 25-mg doses, and absence of the most bothersome migraine-associated symptom at 2 hours only with the 50-mg dose,” wrote first author Richard B. Lipton, MD, director of the Montefiore Headache Center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, and his colleagues. “Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness of ubrogepant against other acute treatments for migraine and to evaluate the long-term safety of ubrogepant among unselected patient populations.”

A researcher who commented on the results said that the drug appears “modestly better than placebo” and called for a trial comparing ubrogepant, aspirin, and oral sumatriptan.

The Food and Drug Administration is reviewing an application for ubrogepant. Allergan, the company developing the drug, has said it expects a regulatory decision in December.
 

ACHIEVE II

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ubrogepant versus placebo for the acute treatment of a migraine attack, investigators conducted ACHIEVE II, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-attack clinical trial. The study was conducted at 99 primary care and research clinics during 2016-2018.

The trial included adults with migraine with or without aura who experienced two to eight migraine attacks per month. Participants had a mean age of 41.5 years, and 90% were female. The safety analysis included data from 1,465 participants, and the efficacy analysis included data from 1,355 participants. The primary efficacy outcomes were pain freedom and the absence of participants’ most bothersome migraine-associated symptom at 2 hours after taking the medication. Patients received ubrogepant 50 mg, ubrogepant 25 mg, or placebo to treat a migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity.



At 2 hours, pain freedom was reported by 101 of 464 participants in the ubrogepant 50-mg group (21.8%), 90 of 435 in the ubrogepant 25-mg group (20.7%), and 65 of 456 in the placebo group (14.3%). Absence of the most bothersome symptom was reported by 180 of 463 participants in the ubrogepant 50-mg group (38.9%), 148 of 434 in the ubrogepant 25-mg group (34.1%), and 125 of 456 in the placebo group (27.4%).

The most common adverse events within 48 hours were nausea and dizziness. Nausea occurred in 2.0% of the 50-mg group, 2.5% of the 25-mg group, and 2.0% of the placebo group. Dizziness occurred in 1.4% of the 50-mg group, 2.1% of the 25-mg group, and 1.6% of the placebo group.

At conferences, researchers have presented results from the phase 3 ACHIEVE I trial as well as an analysis that suggests ubrogepant may be effective in patients for whom triptans have been ineffective. In addition, studies have supported the safety of “gepants” after earlier concerns about potential liver toxicity. Physicians have called the safety data reassuring.

The ACHIEVE II trial was sponsored by Allergan. Several authors are Allergan employees. Dr. Lipton is a consultant, advisory board member, or has received honoraria from Allergan and other companies.

 

 

 

Number needed to treat

“The study was large, appears to have been well conducted, is clearly reported, and used appropriate outcome measures,” said Elizabeth Loder, MD, commenting on the trial.

Dr. Elizabeth Loder

A year ago, Dr. Loder, chief of the division of headache at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School in Boston, coauthored a paper with Peer Tfelt-Hansen, MD, DMSc, of the University of Copenhagen, that said the phase 3 trials of gepants so far have found the drugs to have small effect sizes and low efficacy (Headache. 2019 Jan;59[1]:113-7. doi: 10.1111/head.13444).

Their publication included preliminary figures from ACHIEVE II, which are consistent with those published in JAMA. “The effect size for both doses of ubrogepant is small and of debatable clinical significance,” Dr. Loder said. “The therapeutic gain over placebo is 7.5% for the 50-mg dose and 6.4% for the 25-mg dose for the outcome of pain freedom at 2 hours. That corresponds to a number needed to treat of 13 and 15.6 people, respectively, in order to have one person achieve pain freedom at 2 hours that is attributable to the active treatment.”

For a secondary outcome of pain relief at 2 hours, defined as reduction of headache pain severity from moderate or severe to mild or none, the therapeutic gain versus placebo is 14.5% for the 50-mg dose and 12.3% for the 25-mg dose. “That corresponds to a number needed to treat of 6.8 and 8.1 people, respectively, to have one person achieve pain relief at 2 hours attributable to the drug,” Dr. Loder said.



“Although there are no head to head studies comparing ubrogepant to triptans, for reference the [number needed to treat] for a 100-mg oral dose of sumatriptan is on the order of 3.5 for pain relief at 2 hours, meaning that one needs to treat just 3.5 people with sumatriptan in order to have one person achieve pain relief at 2 hours attributable to the drug,” she said (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;5:CD009108. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009108.pub2).

“The bottom line is that in the ACHIEVE II study, ubrogepant appears, on average, to be modestly better than placebo to treat migraine. It does not appear to be in the same league as sumatriptan. Instead, as Dr. Tfelt-Hansen and I said in our article, the results look comparable to those likely to be achieved with inexpensive nonprescription medications such as NSAIDs.”

Dr. Loder called for a trial comparing ubrogepant and other therapies. “I challenge the authors and the company to conduct a large, placebo-controlled trial comparing ubrogepant to 100 mg of oral sumatriptan and to 650 mg of aspirin,” Dr. Loder said.

Dr. Loder has no financial connections with any pharmaceutical or device companies and is paid for her work as the head of research for the British Medical Journal.

SOURCE: Lipton RB et al. JAMA. 2019;322(19):1887-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.16711.

Ubrogepant, an oral calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP)–receptor antagonist, may relieve patients’ migraine pain and their most bothersome associated symptom, such as photophobia, phonophobia, or nausea, at 2 hours after acute treatment, according to phase 3 trial results published Nov. 19 in JAMA.

Dr. Richard B. Lipton

“Among adults with migraine, acute treatment with ubrogepant, compared with placebo, led to significantly greater rates of pain freedom at 2 hours with the 50-mg and 25-mg doses, and absence of the most bothersome migraine-associated symptom at 2 hours only with the 50-mg dose,” wrote first author Richard B. Lipton, MD, director of the Montefiore Headache Center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, and his colleagues. “Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness of ubrogepant against other acute treatments for migraine and to evaluate the long-term safety of ubrogepant among unselected patient populations.”

A researcher who commented on the results said that the drug appears “modestly better than placebo” and called for a trial comparing ubrogepant, aspirin, and oral sumatriptan.

The Food and Drug Administration is reviewing an application for ubrogepant. Allergan, the company developing the drug, has said it expects a regulatory decision in December.
 

ACHIEVE II

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ubrogepant versus placebo for the acute treatment of a migraine attack, investigators conducted ACHIEVE II, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-attack clinical trial. The study was conducted at 99 primary care and research clinics during 2016-2018.

The trial included adults with migraine with or without aura who experienced two to eight migraine attacks per month. Participants had a mean age of 41.5 years, and 90% were female. The safety analysis included data from 1,465 participants, and the efficacy analysis included data from 1,355 participants. The primary efficacy outcomes were pain freedom and the absence of participants’ most bothersome migraine-associated symptom at 2 hours after taking the medication. Patients received ubrogepant 50 mg, ubrogepant 25 mg, or placebo to treat a migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity.



At 2 hours, pain freedom was reported by 101 of 464 participants in the ubrogepant 50-mg group (21.8%), 90 of 435 in the ubrogepant 25-mg group (20.7%), and 65 of 456 in the placebo group (14.3%). Absence of the most bothersome symptom was reported by 180 of 463 participants in the ubrogepant 50-mg group (38.9%), 148 of 434 in the ubrogepant 25-mg group (34.1%), and 125 of 456 in the placebo group (27.4%).

The most common adverse events within 48 hours were nausea and dizziness. Nausea occurred in 2.0% of the 50-mg group, 2.5% of the 25-mg group, and 2.0% of the placebo group. Dizziness occurred in 1.4% of the 50-mg group, 2.1% of the 25-mg group, and 1.6% of the placebo group.

At conferences, researchers have presented results from the phase 3 ACHIEVE I trial as well as an analysis that suggests ubrogepant may be effective in patients for whom triptans have been ineffective. In addition, studies have supported the safety of “gepants” after earlier concerns about potential liver toxicity. Physicians have called the safety data reassuring.

The ACHIEVE II trial was sponsored by Allergan. Several authors are Allergan employees. Dr. Lipton is a consultant, advisory board member, or has received honoraria from Allergan and other companies.

 

 

 

Number needed to treat

“The study was large, appears to have been well conducted, is clearly reported, and used appropriate outcome measures,” said Elizabeth Loder, MD, commenting on the trial.

Dr. Elizabeth Loder

A year ago, Dr. Loder, chief of the division of headache at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School in Boston, coauthored a paper with Peer Tfelt-Hansen, MD, DMSc, of the University of Copenhagen, that said the phase 3 trials of gepants so far have found the drugs to have small effect sizes and low efficacy (Headache. 2019 Jan;59[1]:113-7. doi: 10.1111/head.13444).

Their publication included preliminary figures from ACHIEVE II, which are consistent with those published in JAMA. “The effect size for both doses of ubrogepant is small and of debatable clinical significance,” Dr. Loder said. “The therapeutic gain over placebo is 7.5% for the 50-mg dose and 6.4% for the 25-mg dose for the outcome of pain freedom at 2 hours. That corresponds to a number needed to treat of 13 and 15.6 people, respectively, in order to have one person achieve pain freedom at 2 hours that is attributable to the active treatment.”

For a secondary outcome of pain relief at 2 hours, defined as reduction of headache pain severity from moderate or severe to mild or none, the therapeutic gain versus placebo is 14.5% for the 50-mg dose and 12.3% for the 25-mg dose. “That corresponds to a number needed to treat of 6.8 and 8.1 people, respectively, to have one person achieve pain relief at 2 hours attributable to the drug,” Dr. Loder said.



“Although there are no head to head studies comparing ubrogepant to triptans, for reference the [number needed to treat] for a 100-mg oral dose of sumatriptan is on the order of 3.5 for pain relief at 2 hours, meaning that one needs to treat just 3.5 people with sumatriptan in order to have one person achieve pain relief at 2 hours attributable to the drug,” she said (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;5:CD009108. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009108.pub2).

“The bottom line is that in the ACHIEVE II study, ubrogepant appears, on average, to be modestly better than placebo to treat migraine. It does not appear to be in the same league as sumatriptan. Instead, as Dr. Tfelt-Hansen and I said in our article, the results look comparable to those likely to be achieved with inexpensive nonprescription medications such as NSAIDs.”

Dr. Loder called for a trial comparing ubrogepant and other therapies. “I challenge the authors and the company to conduct a large, placebo-controlled trial comparing ubrogepant to 100 mg of oral sumatriptan and to 650 mg of aspirin,” Dr. Loder said.

Dr. Loder has no financial connections with any pharmaceutical or device companies and is paid for her work as the head of research for the British Medical Journal.

SOURCE: Lipton RB et al. JAMA. 2019;322(19):1887-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.16711.

Issue
Neurology Reviews- 28(1)
Issue
Neurology Reviews- 28(1)
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM JAMA

Citation Override
Publish date: November 19, 2019
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Children may develop prolonged headache after concussion

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/03/2020 - 14:43

Children and adolescents without a history of headache may develop prolonged headaches after sustaining a concussion, according to research presented at the annual meeting of the Child Neurology Society. The headache may be migraine, chronic daily headache, tension-type headache, or a combination of these headaches.

“We strongly recommend that individuals who develop persistent headache after a concussion be evaluated and treated by a neurologist with experience in administering treatment for headache,” said Marcus Barissi, Weller Scholar at the Cleveland Clinic, and colleagues. “Using this approach, we hope that their prolonged headaches will be lessened.”
 

Few studies have examined prolonged pediatric postconcussion headache

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that between 1.6 million and 3.8 million concussions occur annually during athletic and recreational activities in the United States. About 90% of concussions affect children or adolescents. The symptom most often reported after concussion is headache.

Few studies have focused on new persistent postconcussion headache (NPPCH) in children. Mr. Barissi and colleagues did not find any previous study that had examined prolonged headache following concussion in patients without prior chronic headache. They sought to ascertain the prognosis of patients with NPPCH and no history of prior headache, to describe this clinical entity, and to identify beneficial treatment methods.

The investigators retrospectively reviewed charts for approximately 2,000 patients who presented to the Cleveland Clinic pediatric neurology department between June 2017 and August 2018 for headaches. They identified 259 patients who received a diagnosis of concussion, 69 (27%) of whom had headaches for longer than 2 months after injury.

Mr. Barissi and colleagues emailed these patients, and 33 (48%) of them agreed to complete a questionnaire and participate in a 10-minute phone interview. Thirty-one patients (43%) could not be contacted, and eight (11%) declined to participate. All participants confirmed that they had not had consistent headache before the concussion and that chronic headache had arisen after concussion. To determine participants’ medical outcomes, the researchers compared participants’ initial assessment data with posttreatment data collected during the interview process.
 

Healthy behaviors increased after concussion

Of the 69 eligible participants, 38 (55%) were female. The population’s median age was 17. Twenty-eight (85%) of the 33 patients who completed the questionnaire considered the information and treatment that they had received to be beneficial. Twenty-five (78%) patients continued to have headache after several months, despite treatment.

Participants had withstood a mean of 1.72 concussions, and the mean age at first injury was 12.49 years. The most common cause of injury was a fall for males (36%) and an automobile accident for females (18%).

Forty-eight patients (70%) reported having two types of headache. Fifty-two patients (75%) had migraines, and 65 (94%) had chronic daily headache or tension-type headache. Forty-eight (70%) participants had a family history of headache.

In all, 64 patients (93%) had used a headache medication. The most common headache medications used were amitriptyline, topiramate, and cyproheptadine. Few patients were still taking these medications at several months after evaluation. The most common nonprescription medications used were Migravent (i.e., magnesium, riboflavin, coenzyme Q10, and butterbur), ondansetron, and melatonin. Furthermore, 61 patients (88%) participated in nonmedicinal therapy such as physical therapy, chiropractic therapy, and acupuncture.

After evaluation, patients engaged in several healthy behaviors (e.g., adequate exercise, proper use of over-the-counter medications, and drinking sufficient water) more frequently, but did not get adequate sleep. Sixty-five participants (94%) had undergone CT or MRI imaging, but the results did not improve understanding of headache etiology or treatment. Many patients missed several days of school, but average attendance improved after months of treatment.
 

Long-term outcomes

Thirty-one survey respondents (94%) reported that their emotional, cognitive, sleep, and somatic postconcussion symptoms had resolved. Nevertheless, a majority of participants still had headache. “The persistence of postconcussion symptoms is uncommon, but lasting headache is not,” said the researchers. “If patients are not properly educated, conditions may deteriorate, extending the duration of disability.” A longer study with a larger sample size could provide valuable information, said the researchers. Future work should examine objectively the efficacy of various medications used to treat NPPCH and determine the best methods of treatment for this syndrome, which “can cause prolonged pain, suffering, and lack of function,” they concluded.

The investigators did not report any study funding or disclosures.

SOURCE: Barissi M et al. CNS 2019, Abstract 95.

Meeting/Event
Issue
Neurology Reviews- 28(1)
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

Children and adolescents without a history of headache may develop prolonged headaches after sustaining a concussion, according to research presented at the annual meeting of the Child Neurology Society. The headache may be migraine, chronic daily headache, tension-type headache, or a combination of these headaches.

“We strongly recommend that individuals who develop persistent headache after a concussion be evaluated and treated by a neurologist with experience in administering treatment for headache,” said Marcus Barissi, Weller Scholar at the Cleveland Clinic, and colleagues. “Using this approach, we hope that their prolonged headaches will be lessened.”
 

Few studies have examined prolonged pediatric postconcussion headache

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that between 1.6 million and 3.8 million concussions occur annually during athletic and recreational activities in the United States. About 90% of concussions affect children or adolescents. The symptom most often reported after concussion is headache.

Few studies have focused on new persistent postconcussion headache (NPPCH) in children. Mr. Barissi and colleagues did not find any previous study that had examined prolonged headache following concussion in patients without prior chronic headache. They sought to ascertain the prognosis of patients with NPPCH and no history of prior headache, to describe this clinical entity, and to identify beneficial treatment methods.

The investigators retrospectively reviewed charts for approximately 2,000 patients who presented to the Cleveland Clinic pediatric neurology department between June 2017 and August 2018 for headaches. They identified 259 patients who received a diagnosis of concussion, 69 (27%) of whom had headaches for longer than 2 months after injury.

Mr. Barissi and colleagues emailed these patients, and 33 (48%) of them agreed to complete a questionnaire and participate in a 10-minute phone interview. Thirty-one patients (43%) could not be contacted, and eight (11%) declined to participate. All participants confirmed that they had not had consistent headache before the concussion and that chronic headache had arisen after concussion. To determine participants’ medical outcomes, the researchers compared participants’ initial assessment data with posttreatment data collected during the interview process.
 

Healthy behaviors increased after concussion

Of the 69 eligible participants, 38 (55%) were female. The population’s median age was 17. Twenty-eight (85%) of the 33 patients who completed the questionnaire considered the information and treatment that they had received to be beneficial. Twenty-five (78%) patients continued to have headache after several months, despite treatment.

Participants had withstood a mean of 1.72 concussions, and the mean age at first injury was 12.49 years. The most common cause of injury was a fall for males (36%) and an automobile accident for females (18%).

Forty-eight patients (70%) reported having two types of headache. Fifty-two patients (75%) had migraines, and 65 (94%) had chronic daily headache or tension-type headache. Forty-eight (70%) participants had a family history of headache.

In all, 64 patients (93%) had used a headache medication. The most common headache medications used were amitriptyline, topiramate, and cyproheptadine. Few patients were still taking these medications at several months after evaluation. The most common nonprescription medications used were Migravent (i.e., magnesium, riboflavin, coenzyme Q10, and butterbur), ondansetron, and melatonin. Furthermore, 61 patients (88%) participated in nonmedicinal therapy such as physical therapy, chiropractic therapy, and acupuncture.

After evaluation, patients engaged in several healthy behaviors (e.g., adequate exercise, proper use of over-the-counter medications, and drinking sufficient water) more frequently, but did not get adequate sleep. Sixty-five participants (94%) had undergone CT or MRI imaging, but the results did not improve understanding of headache etiology or treatment. Many patients missed several days of school, but average attendance improved after months of treatment.
 

Long-term outcomes

Thirty-one survey respondents (94%) reported that their emotional, cognitive, sleep, and somatic postconcussion symptoms had resolved. Nevertheless, a majority of participants still had headache. “The persistence of postconcussion symptoms is uncommon, but lasting headache is not,” said the researchers. “If patients are not properly educated, conditions may deteriorate, extending the duration of disability.” A longer study with a larger sample size could provide valuable information, said the researchers. Future work should examine objectively the efficacy of various medications used to treat NPPCH and determine the best methods of treatment for this syndrome, which “can cause prolonged pain, suffering, and lack of function,” they concluded.

The investigators did not report any study funding or disclosures.

SOURCE: Barissi M et al. CNS 2019, Abstract 95.

Children and adolescents without a history of headache may develop prolonged headaches after sustaining a concussion, according to research presented at the annual meeting of the Child Neurology Society. The headache may be migraine, chronic daily headache, tension-type headache, or a combination of these headaches.

“We strongly recommend that individuals who develop persistent headache after a concussion be evaluated and treated by a neurologist with experience in administering treatment for headache,” said Marcus Barissi, Weller Scholar at the Cleveland Clinic, and colleagues. “Using this approach, we hope that their prolonged headaches will be lessened.”
 

Few studies have examined prolonged pediatric postconcussion headache

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that between 1.6 million and 3.8 million concussions occur annually during athletic and recreational activities in the United States. About 90% of concussions affect children or adolescents. The symptom most often reported after concussion is headache.

Few studies have focused on new persistent postconcussion headache (NPPCH) in children. Mr. Barissi and colleagues did not find any previous study that had examined prolonged headache following concussion in patients without prior chronic headache. They sought to ascertain the prognosis of patients with NPPCH and no history of prior headache, to describe this clinical entity, and to identify beneficial treatment methods.

The investigators retrospectively reviewed charts for approximately 2,000 patients who presented to the Cleveland Clinic pediatric neurology department between June 2017 and August 2018 for headaches. They identified 259 patients who received a diagnosis of concussion, 69 (27%) of whom had headaches for longer than 2 months after injury.

Mr. Barissi and colleagues emailed these patients, and 33 (48%) of them agreed to complete a questionnaire and participate in a 10-minute phone interview. Thirty-one patients (43%) could not be contacted, and eight (11%) declined to participate. All participants confirmed that they had not had consistent headache before the concussion and that chronic headache had arisen after concussion. To determine participants’ medical outcomes, the researchers compared participants’ initial assessment data with posttreatment data collected during the interview process.
 

Healthy behaviors increased after concussion

Of the 69 eligible participants, 38 (55%) were female. The population’s median age was 17. Twenty-eight (85%) of the 33 patients who completed the questionnaire considered the information and treatment that they had received to be beneficial. Twenty-five (78%) patients continued to have headache after several months, despite treatment.

Participants had withstood a mean of 1.72 concussions, and the mean age at first injury was 12.49 years. The most common cause of injury was a fall for males (36%) and an automobile accident for females (18%).

Forty-eight patients (70%) reported having two types of headache. Fifty-two patients (75%) had migraines, and 65 (94%) had chronic daily headache or tension-type headache. Forty-eight (70%) participants had a family history of headache.

In all, 64 patients (93%) had used a headache medication. The most common headache medications used were amitriptyline, topiramate, and cyproheptadine. Few patients were still taking these medications at several months after evaluation. The most common nonprescription medications used were Migravent (i.e., magnesium, riboflavin, coenzyme Q10, and butterbur), ondansetron, and melatonin. Furthermore, 61 patients (88%) participated in nonmedicinal therapy such as physical therapy, chiropractic therapy, and acupuncture.

After evaluation, patients engaged in several healthy behaviors (e.g., adequate exercise, proper use of over-the-counter medications, and drinking sufficient water) more frequently, but did not get adequate sleep. Sixty-five participants (94%) had undergone CT or MRI imaging, but the results did not improve understanding of headache etiology or treatment. Many patients missed several days of school, but average attendance improved after months of treatment.
 

Long-term outcomes

Thirty-one survey respondents (94%) reported that their emotional, cognitive, sleep, and somatic postconcussion symptoms had resolved. Nevertheless, a majority of participants still had headache. “The persistence of postconcussion symptoms is uncommon, but lasting headache is not,” said the researchers. “If patients are not properly educated, conditions may deteriorate, extending the duration of disability.” A longer study with a larger sample size could provide valuable information, said the researchers. Future work should examine objectively the efficacy of various medications used to treat NPPCH and determine the best methods of treatment for this syndrome, which “can cause prolonged pain, suffering, and lack of function,” they concluded.

The investigators did not report any study funding or disclosures.

SOURCE: Barissi M et al. CNS 2019, Abstract 95.

Issue
Neurology Reviews- 28(1)
Issue
Neurology Reviews- 28(1)
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM CNS 2019

Citation Override
Publish date: November 18, 2019
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Telemedicine migraine consults effective for management

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 11/04/2019 - 14:51
Display Headline
Telemedicine migraine consults effective for management

Key clinical point: Follow-up consultations with migraine patients via telemedicine are effective and can increase physician productivity and patient convenience.

Major finding: Migraine disability assessment improved by an average of 24 points in the telemedicine patients and by 19 points in the control group.

Study details: A single-center, randomized study with 40 migraine patients.

Disclosures: The study received partial funding from Merck.

Citation: Friedman DI. Headache. 2019 June;59(S1):1-208, LBOR01

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Follow-up consultations with migraine patients via telemedicine are effective and can increase physician productivity and patient convenience.

Major finding: Migraine disability assessment improved by an average of 24 points in the telemedicine patients and by 19 points in the control group.

Study details: A single-center, randomized study with 40 migraine patients.

Disclosures: The study received partial funding from Merck.

Citation: Friedman DI. Headache. 2019 June;59(S1):1-208, LBOR01

Key clinical point: Follow-up consultations with migraine patients via telemedicine are effective and can increase physician productivity and patient convenience.

Major finding: Migraine disability assessment improved by an average of 24 points in the telemedicine patients and by 19 points in the control group.

Study details: A single-center, randomized study with 40 migraine patients.

Disclosures: The study received partial funding from Merck.

Citation: Friedman DI. Headache. 2019 June;59(S1):1-208, LBOR01

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Telemedicine migraine consults effective for management
Display Headline
Telemedicine migraine consults effective for management
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Fri, 11/01/2019 - 09:00
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 11/01/2019 - 09:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 11/01/2019 - 09:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Vestibular migraine: New study may help in diagnosis

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 11/04/2019 - 14:51
Display Headline
Vestibular migraine: New study may help in diagnosis

Key clinical point: Loudness discomfort levels and temporal auditory processing may help diagnosis patients with vestibular migraine (VM).

Major finding: VM patients experienced response latencies with longer frequencies and a lower noise tolerance, compared with patients without migraine. The statistically significant findings showed that “the frequency following response latencies were significantly longer in the patients with vestibular migraine than in the control group, suggesting altered pure tone temporal processing, which may also affect the processing of complex sounds,” noted the investigators. “The lower discomfort thresholds suggest the presence of mild hyperacusis, in concordance with other previous studies.”

Study details: Fifty-four women were split up into two groups: 29 women with VM and 25 healthy women without migraine.

Disclosures: The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Takeuti AA, et al. BMC Neurol. 2019 Jun 27;19(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1368-5.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Loudness discomfort levels and temporal auditory processing may help diagnosis patients with vestibular migraine (VM).

Major finding: VM patients experienced response latencies with longer frequencies and a lower noise tolerance, compared with patients without migraine. The statistically significant findings showed that “the frequency following response latencies were significantly longer in the patients with vestibular migraine than in the control group, suggesting altered pure tone temporal processing, which may also affect the processing of complex sounds,” noted the investigators. “The lower discomfort thresholds suggest the presence of mild hyperacusis, in concordance with other previous studies.”

Study details: Fifty-four women were split up into two groups: 29 women with VM and 25 healthy women without migraine.

Disclosures: The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Takeuti AA, et al. BMC Neurol. 2019 Jun 27;19(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1368-5.

Key clinical point: Loudness discomfort levels and temporal auditory processing may help diagnosis patients with vestibular migraine (VM).

Major finding: VM patients experienced response latencies with longer frequencies and a lower noise tolerance, compared with patients without migraine. The statistically significant findings showed that “the frequency following response latencies were significantly longer in the patients with vestibular migraine than in the control group, suggesting altered pure tone temporal processing, which may also affect the processing of complex sounds,” noted the investigators. “The lower discomfort thresholds suggest the presence of mild hyperacusis, in concordance with other previous studies.”

Study details: Fifty-four women were split up into two groups: 29 women with VM and 25 healthy women without migraine.

Disclosures: The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Takeuti AA, et al. BMC Neurol. 2019 Jun 27;19(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1368-5.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Vestibular migraine: New study may help in diagnosis
Display Headline
Vestibular migraine: New study may help in diagnosis
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Fri, 11/01/2019 - 09:00
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 11/01/2019 - 09:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 11/01/2019 - 09:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Economic burden of cycling through migraine preventive medications

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 11/04/2019 - 14:51
Display Headline
Economic burden of cycling through migraine preventive medications

Key clinical point: Patients that cycle through migraine preventive medications have a higher economic burden.

Major finding: Migraine patients cycling through more than two preventive migraine medications (PMMs) had an increased financial burden, compared with patients that received their initial medication class. “Mean all-cause total direct costs, including prescription costs, were significantly higher in PMM2 ($13,429) and PMM3 ($18,394) subgroups versus the persistent subgroup ($11,941),” noted the investigators

Study details: This was a retrospective observational study of 55,402 adult patients with migraine beginning their first PMM: antidepressants, antiepileptics, beta blockers, or neurotoxins. Patients had to have continuous medical and prescription enrollment for 12 months to be included in the study.

Disclosures: Eli Lilly and Company funded and designed the study. All study investigators reported being employees and stockholders of Eli Lily and Company.

Citation: Ford JH, et al. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jan;25(1):46-59. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.18058.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Patients that cycle through migraine preventive medications have a higher economic burden.

Major finding: Migraine patients cycling through more than two preventive migraine medications (PMMs) had an increased financial burden, compared with patients that received their initial medication class. “Mean all-cause total direct costs, including prescription costs, were significantly higher in PMM2 ($13,429) and PMM3 ($18,394) subgroups versus the persistent subgroup ($11,941),” noted the investigators

Study details: This was a retrospective observational study of 55,402 adult patients with migraine beginning their first PMM: antidepressants, antiepileptics, beta blockers, or neurotoxins. Patients had to have continuous medical and prescription enrollment for 12 months to be included in the study.

Disclosures: Eli Lilly and Company funded and designed the study. All study investigators reported being employees and stockholders of Eli Lily and Company.

Citation: Ford JH, et al. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jan;25(1):46-59. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.18058.

Key clinical point: Patients that cycle through migraine preventive medications have a higher economic burden.

Major finding: Migraine patients cycling through more than two preventive migraine medications (PMMs) had an increased financial burden, compared with patients that received their initial medication class. “Mean all-cause total direct costs, including prescription costs, were significantly higher in PMM2 ($13,429) and PMM3 ($18,394) subgroups versus the persistent subgroup ($11,941),” noted the investigators

Study details: This was a retrospective observational study of 55,402 adult patients with migraine beginning their first PMM: antidepressants, antiepileptics, beta blockers, or neurotoxins. Patients had to have continuous medical and prescription enrollment for 12 months to be included in the study.

Disclosures: Eli Lilly and Company funded and designed the study. All study investigators reported being employees and stockholders of Eli Lily and Company.

Citation: Ford JH, et al. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jan;25(1):46-59. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.18058.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Economic burden of cycling through migraine preventive medications
Display Headline
Economic burden of cycling through migraine preventive medications
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Fri, 11/01/2019 - 08:45
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 11/01/2019 - 08:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 11/01/2019 - 08:45
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Researchers seek to characterize pediatric new daily persistent headache

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 10/25/2019 - 11:38

 

New daily persistent headache (NDPH) is relatively common among pediatric patients presenting to a headache clinic, according to research presented at the 48th national meeting of the Child Neurology Society. Most children with NDPH fulfill criteria for its migraine subtype, and one-third of pediatric patients with NDPH have comorbid medication overuse headache (MOH).

NDPH is defined as a daily, unremitting headache that lasts for at least 3 months. “Not many studies on NDPH focus on pediatrics,” said Emily Pierce, from Children’s National Medical Center in Washington. NDPH “is considered to be one of the most intractable headaches in children. Children are able to tell that they’ve had this different type of headache because there’s some kind of onset that is very memorable.”

Ms. Pierce and colleagues conducted an observational study to describe the characteristics of NDPH in pediatric patients who presented to a headache program at a tertiary referral center. The researchers included pediatric patients who visited the headache clinic at Children’s National Medical Center between 2016 and 2018 in their analysis. All patients were enrolled in patient registry that had been approved by an independent review board. Ms. Pierce and colleagues queried the registry for NDPH and reviewed these records to examine participants’ clinical presentations.

The investigators identified 3,260 patient encounters during the study period. Of these encounters, 454 patients (13.9%) were identified as having NDPH. Patients with NDPH were predominantly female (78%) and white (72%). The median age of the sample was 14.8 years.

The frontal head region was the most common location of headache pain, which often had a throbbing quality and was associated with photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and decreased activity. The median pain intensity was 6 of 10. Approximately 72% of patients had tried abortive medication, and 56% of patients had failed at least one abortive medication. Excedrin, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen were among the common failed abortive medications.

Furthermore, 36% of patients were diagnosed with MOH. The most commonly overused medication was ibuprofen. MOH “is also considered to be intractable for patients with NDPH,” said Ms. Pierce. “Typically, if the patient stops overusing that medication, they’ll find relief from their headaches. However, with our NDPH patients, when they stop overusing that medication, they still are having headaches associated with NDPH.”

The data indicated “a strong difference between our male and female patients,” said Ms. Pierce. Female patients reported significantly more instances of photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and dizziness than did male patients. Overall, 78% of participants had a diagnosis of an additional comorbidity, such as head trauma (18%), anxiety (14%), depression (8%), or other (37%).

Observational studies of pediatric NDPH offer “a better way for our providers to diagnose these patients, and also to better understand them and help them figure out a treatment that may work,” said Ms. Pierce. In future research, she and her colleagues intend to examine blood work and potential genetic associations in pediatric patients with NDPH.

The study was not supported by funding, and the investigators had no disclosures.

SOURCE: Pierce E et al. CNS 2019, Abstract 100.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

New daily persistent headache (NDPH) is relatively common among pediatric patients presenting to a headache clinic, according to research presented at the 48th national meeting of the Child Neurology Society. Most children with NDPH fulfill criteria for its migraine subtype, and one-third of pediatric patients with NDPH have comorbid medication overuse headache (MOH).

NDPH is defined as a daily, unremitting headache that lasts for at least 3 months. “Not many studies on NDPH focus on pediatrics,” said Emily Pierce, from Children’s National Medical Center in Washington. NDPH “is considered to be one of the most intractable headaches in children. Children are able to tell that they’ve had this different type of headache because there’s some kind of onset that is very memorable.”

Ms. Pierce and colleagues conducted an observational study to describe the characteristics of NDPH in pediatric patients who presented to a headache program at a tertiary referral center. The researchers included pediatric patients who visited the headache clinic at Children’s National Medical Center between 2016 and 2018 in their analysis. All patients were enrolled in patient registry that had been approved by an independent review board. Ms. Pierce and colleagues queried the registry for NDPH and reviewed these records to examine participants’ clinical presentations.

The investigators identified 3,260 patient encounters during the study period. Of these encounters, 454 patients (13.9%) were identified as having NDPH. Patients with NDPH were predominantly female (78%) and white (72%). The median age of the sample was 14.8 years.

The frontal head region was the most common location of headache pain, which often had a throbbing quality and was associated with photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and decreased activity. The median pain intensity was 6 of 10. Approximately 72% of patients had tried abortive medication, and 56% of patients had failed at least one abortive medication. Excedrin, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen were among the common failed abortive medications.

Furthermore, 36% of patients were diagnosed with MOH. The most commonly overused medication was ibuprofen. MOH “is also considered to be intractable for patients with NDPH,” said Ms. Pierce. “Typically, if the patient stops overusing that medication, they’ll find relief from their headaches. However, with our NDPH patients, when they stop overusing that medication, they still are having headaches associated with NDPH.”

The data indicated “a strong difference between our male and female patients,” said Ms. Pierce. Female patients reported significantly more instances of photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and dizziness than did male patients. Overall, 78% of participants had a diagnosis of an additional comorbidity, such as head trauma (18%), anxiety (14%), depression (8%), or other (37%).

Observational studies of pediatric NDPH offer “a better way for our providers to diagnose these patients, and also to better understand them and help them figure out a treatment that may work,” said Ms. Pierce. In future research, she and her colleagues intend to examine blood work and potential genetic associations in pediatric patients with NDPH.

The study was not supported by funding, and the investigators had no disclosures.

SOURCE: Pierce E et al. CNS 2019, Abstract 100.

 

New daily persistent headache (NDPH) is relatively common among pediatric patients presenting to a headache clinic, according to research presented at the 48th national meeting of the Child Neurology Society. Most children with NDPH fulfill criteria for its migraine subtype, and one-third of pediatric patients with NDPH have comorbid medication overuse headache (MOH).

NDPH is defined as a daily, unremitting headache that lasts for at least 3 months. “Not many studies on NDPH focus on pediatrics,” said Emily Pierce, from Children’s National Medical Center in Washington. NDPH “is considered to be one of the most intractable headaches in children. Children are able to tell that they’ve had this different type of headache because there’s some kind of onset that is very memorable.”

Ms. Pierce and colleagues conducted an observational study to describe the characteristics of NDPH in pediatric patients who presented to a headache program at a tertiary referral center. The researchers included pediatric patients who visited the headache clinic at Children’s National Medical Center between 2016 and 2018 in their analysis. All patients were enrolled in patient registry that had been approved by an independent review board. Ms. Pierce and colleagues queried the registry for NDPH and reviewed these records to examine participants’ clinical presentations.

The investigators identified 3,260 patient encounters during the study period. Of these encounters, 454 patients (13.9%) were identified as having NDPH. Patients with NDPH were predominantly female (78%) and white (72%). The median age of the sample was 14.8 years.

The frontal head region was the most common location of headache pain, which often had a throbbing quality and was associated with photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and decreased activity. The median pain intensity was 6 of 10. Approximately 72% of patients had tried abortive medication, and 56% of patients had failed at least one abortive medication. Excedrin, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen were among the common failed abortive medications.

Furthermore, 36% of patients were diagnosed with MOH. The most commonly overused medication was ibuprofen. MOH “is also considered to be intractable for patients with NDPH,” said Ms. Pierce. “Typically, if the patient stops overusing that medication, they’ll find relief from their headaches. However, with our NDPH patients, when they stop overusing that medication, they still are having headaches associated with NDPH.”

The data indicated “a strong difference between our male and female patients,” said Ms. Pierce. Female patients reported significantly more instances of photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and dizziness than did male patients. Overall, 78% of participants had a diagnosis of an additional comorbidity, such as head trauma (18%), anxiety (14%), depression (8%), or other (37%).

Observational studies of pediatric NDPH offer “a better way for our providers to diagnose these patients, and also to better understand them and help them figure out a treatment that may work,” said Ms. Pierce. In future research, she and her colleagues intend to examine blood work and potential genetic associations in pediatric patients with NDPH.

The study was not supported by funding, and the investigators had no disclosures.

SOURCE: Pierce E et al. CNS 2019, Abstract 100.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM CNS 2019

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Many children who present to headache clinics have joint hypermobility

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 11/26/2019 - 16:38

 

A significant proportion of children who present to headache clinics have joint hypermobility, according to data presented at the 48th national meeting of the Child Neurology Society. Furthermore, patients with joint hypermobility have a high rate of headache disability, while patients without joint hypermobility have less headache disability, according to Dhwani Sahjwani, MD, a resident at Inova Fairfax Hospital in Falls Church, Va., and colleagues.

While conducting research in the headache clinic at Children’s National Hospital in Washington, D.C., Dr. Sahjwani saw several children with joint hypermobility and a diagnosis of a disorder such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. She and her colleagues began analyzing patients to evaluate the potential association between joint hypermobility and headache disability in children. The investigators included pediatric patients examined in the headache clinic at Children’s National Medical Center between October 2018 and January 2019 in their study. All headache clinic patients were enrolled in a patient registry that had been approved by an independent review board.

Dr. Sahjwani and colleagues measured patients’ headache disability with the Headache Impact Test–6 (HIT-6) questionnaire. Scores of 60 or greater on this questionnaire indicate severe headache disability. The researchers assessed joint hypermobility using the Beighton scoring system. In this system, scores greater than 4 indicate joint hypermobility.

Dr. Sahjwani’s group scored 76 patients using the Beighton system and HIT-6 questionnaire. Participants’ median age was 13.7 years. Approximately 26% of patients had Beighton scores that indicated joint hypermobility. About 65% of the patients with joint hypermobility had a diagnosis of migraine without aura. In addition, 80% of patients with joint hypermobility had severe headache disability, according to the HIT-6 disability criteria. The average pain intensity in patients with hypermobile joints was 6.1 out of 10. Among participants without significant joint hypermobility, 90% had mild headache disability.

Patients with joint hypermobility and increased tissue elasticity “tend to have a lower threshold for pain, in general, in all parts of their bodies,” said Dr. Sahjwani. Greater headache severity might be expected in this population, “because they have more pain if they have hypermobile joints or tissue.”

Headache treatments for this population are based solely on the type of headache that each patient has. Patients with joint hypermobility and migraine, for example, are candidates for rescue medication and long-term prophylactic medications. “I don’t think the joint hypermobility is going to change how you manage their headaches,” said Dr. Sahjwani.

The study results suggest that, when children present with severely debilitating headaches, a neurologist should consider examining them for joint hypermobility “to see if they have another diagnosis, such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome ... that has to be managed in addition to their headaches,” Dr. Sahjwani concluded.

The study was not supported by funding. The authors did not report any disclosures.

SOURCE: Sahjwani D et al. CNS 2019, Abstract 101.

Meeting/Event
Issue
Neurology Reviews- 27(12)
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

A significant proportion of children who present to headache clinics have joint hypermobility, according to data presented at the 48th national meeting of the Child Neurology Society. Furthermore, patients with joint hypermobility have a high rate of headache disability, while patients without joint hypermobility have less headache disability, according to Dhwani Sahjwani, MD, a resident at Inova Fairfax Hospital in Falls Church, Va., and colleagues.

While conducting research in the headache clinic at Children’s National Hospital in Washington, D.C., Dr. Sahjwani saw several children with joint hypermobility and a diagnosis of a disorder such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. She and her colleagues began analyzing patients to evaluate the potential association between joint hypermobility and headache disability in children. The investigators included pediatric patients examined in the headache clinic at Children’s National Medical Center between October 2018 and January 2019 in their study. All headache clinic patients were enrolled in a patient registry that had been approved by an independent review board.

Dr. Sahjwani and colleagues measured patients’ headache disability with the Headache Impact Test–6 (HIT-6) questionnaire. Scores of 60 or greater on this questionnaire indicate severe headache disability. The researchers assessed joint hypermobility using the Beighton scoring system. In this system, scores greater than 4 indicate joint hypermobility.

Dr. Sahjwani’s group scored 76 patients using the Beighton system and HIT-6 questionnaire. Participants’ median age was 13.7 years. Approximately 26% of patients had Beighton scores that indicated joint hypermobility. About 65% of the patients with joint hypermobility had a diagnosis of migraine without aura. In addition, 80% of patients with joint hypermobility had severe headache disability, according to the HIT-6 disability criteria. The average pain intensity in patients with hypermobile joints was 6.1 out of 10. Among participants without significant joint hypermobility, 90% had mild headache disability.

Patients with joint hypermobility and increased tissue elasticity “tend to have a lower threshold for pain, in general, in all parts of their bodies,” said Dr. Sahjwani. Greater headache severity might be expected in this population, “because they have more pain if they have hypermobile joints or tissue.”

Headache treatments for this population are based solely on the type of headache that each patient has. Patients with joint hypermobility and migraine, for example, are candidates for rescue medication and long-term prophylactic medications. “I don’t think the joint hypermobility is going to change how you manage their headaches,” said Dr. Sahjwani.

The study results suggest that, when children present with severely debilitating headaches, a neurologist should consider examining them for joint hypermobility “to see if they have another diagnosis, such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome ... that has to be managed in addition to their headaches,” Dr. Sahjwani concluded.

The study was not supported by funding. The authors did not report any disclosures.

SOURCE: Sahjwani D et al. CNS 2019, Abstract 101.

 

A significant proportion of children who present to headache clinics have joint hypermobility, according to data presented at the 48th national meeting of the Child Neurology Society. Furthermore, patients with joint hypermobility have a high rate of headache disability, while patients without joint hypermobility have less headache disability, according to Dhwani Sahjwani, MD, a resident at Inova Fairfax Hospital in Falls Church, Va., and colleagues.

While conducting research in the headache clinic at Children’s National Hospital in Washington, D.C., Dr. Sahjwani saw several children with joint hypermobility and a diagnosis of a disorder such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. She and her colleagues began analyzing patients to evaluate the potential association between joint hypermobility and headache disability in children. The investigators included pediatric patients examined in the headache clinic at Children’s National Medical Center between October 2018 and January 2019 in their study. All headache clinic patients were enrolled in a patient registry that had been approved by an independent review board.

Dr. Sahjwani and colleagues measured patients’ headache disability with the Headache Impact Test–6 (HIT-6) questionnaire. Scores of 60 or greater on this questionnaire indicate severe headache disability. The researchers assessed joint hypermobility using the Beighton scoring system. In this system, scores greater than 4 indicate joint hypermobility.

Dr. Sahjwani’s group scored 76 patients using the Beighton system and HIT-6 questionnaire. Participants’ median age was 13.7 years. Approximately 26% of patients had Beighton scores that indicated joint hypermobility. About 65% of the patients with joint hypermobility had a diagnosis of migraine without aura. In addition, 80% of patients with joint hypermobility had severe headache disability, according to the HIT-6 disability criteria. The average pain intensity in patients with hypermobile joints was 6.1 out of 10. Among participants without significant joint hypermobility, 90% had mild headache disability.

Patients with joint hypermobility and increased tissue elasticity “tend to have a lower threshold for pain, in general, in all parts of their bodies,” said Dr. Sahjwani. Greater headache severity might be expected in this population, “because they have more pain if they have hypermobile joints or tissue.”

Headache treatments for this population are based solely on the type of headache that each patient has. Patients with joint hypermobility and migraine, for example, are candidates for rescue medication and long-term prophylactic medications. “I don’t think the joint hypermobility is going to change how you manage their headaches,” said Dr. Sahjwani.

The study results suggest that, when children present with severely debilitating headaches, a neurologist should consider examining them for joint hypermobility “to see if they have another diagnosis, such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome ... that has to be managed in addition to their headaches,” Dr. Sahjwani concluded.

The study was not supported by funding. The authors did not report any disclosures.

SOURCE: Sahjwani D et al. CNS 2019, Abstract 101.

Issue
Neurology Reviews- 27(12)
Issue
Neurology Reviews- 27(12)
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM CNS 2019

Citation Override
Publish date: October 25, 2019
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Coronary Artery Calcification Scores in Migraine Patients

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 11/04/2019 - 14:51
Display Headline
Coronary Artery Calcification Scores in Migraine Patients

No significant differences were demonstrated in the amount of coronary calcifications in patients with and without migraine, a new study found. Researchers evaluated if the increased cardiovascular (CV) risk in migraineurs is attributed to an increased coronary artery calcification (CAC). They found:

  • The CAC score was assessed by computed tomography of the heart in 1,437 patients, of which 337 were migraineurs.
  • All patients had a similar CV risk profile, so that the risk for CAC could be considered similar between migraineurs and non-migraineurs.
  • There were no significant differences in the amount of CAC in patients with or without migraine.

 

Filippopulos FM, et al. Coronary artery calcification score in migraine patients. [Published online ahead of print October 1, 2019]. Sci Rep. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50660-9.

Publications
Topics
Sections

No significant differences were demonstrated in the amount of coronary calcifications in patients with and without migraine, a new study found. Researchers evaluated if the increased cardiovascular (CV) risk in migraineurs is attributed to an increased coronary artery calcification (CAC). They found:

  • The CAC score was assessed by computed tomography of the heart in 1,437 patients, of which 337 were migraineurs.
  • All patients had a similar CV risk profile, so that the risk for CAC could be considered similar between migraineurs and non-migraineurs.
  • There were no significant differences in the amount of CAC in patients with or without migraine.

 

Filippopulos FM, et al. Coronary artery calcification score in migraine patients. [Published online ahead of print October 1, 2019]. Sci Rep. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50660-9.

No significant differences were demonstrated in the amount of coronary calcifications in patients with and without migraine, a new study found. Researchers evaluated if the increased cardiovascular (CV) risk in migraineurs is attributed to an increased coronary artery calcification (CAC). They found:

  • The CAC score was assessed by computed tomography of the heart in 1,437 patients, of which 337 were migraineurs.
  • All patients had a similar CV risk profile, so that the risk for CAC could be considered similar between migraineurs and non-migraineurs.
  • There were no significant differences in the amount of CAC in patients with or without migraine.

 

Filippopulos FM, et al. Coronary artery calcification score in migraine patients. [Published online ahead of print October 1, 2019]. Sci Rep. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50660-9.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Coronary Artery Calcification Scores in Migraine Patients
Display Headline
Coronary Artery Calcification Scores in Migraine Patients
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Tue, 10/15/2019 - 14:15
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 10/15/2019 - 14:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 10/15/2019 - 14:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Abnormal CV Response to Nitroglycerin in Migraine

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 11/04/2019 - 14:51
Display Headline
Abnormal CV Response to Nitroglycerin in Migraine

Patients with migraine who developed a migraine-like attack in response to nitroglycerin demonstrated stronger systemic cardiovascular (CV) responses compared to non-headache controls, a new study found. In 16 women with migraine without aura and 10 age- and gender-matched controls, intravenous nitroglycerin was administered. Researchers found:

  • Nitroglycerin provoked a migraine-like attack in 81.2% of migraineurs but not in controls.
  • Migraineurs who later developed a migraine-like attack showed different responses in all parameters vs controls.
  • The decreases in cardiac output and stroke volume were more rapid and longer lasting, heart rate increased, mean arterial pressure and total peripheral resistance were higher and decreased after an initial increase.

 

van Oosterhout WPJ, et al. Abnormal cardiovascular response to nitroglycerin in migraine. [Published online ahead of print October 9, 2019]. Cephalalgia. doi: 10.1177/0333102419881657.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Patients with migraine who developed a migraine-like attack in response to nitroglycerin demonstrated stronger systemic cardiovascular (CV) responses compared to non-headache controls, a new study found. In 16 women with migraine without aura and 10 age- and gender-matched controls, intravenous nitroglycerin was administered. Researchers found:

  • Nitroglycerin provoked a migraine-like attack in 81.2% of migraineurs but not in controls.
  • Migraineurs who later developed a migraine-like attack showed different responses in all parameters vs controls.
  • The decreases in cardiac output and stroke volume were more rapid and longer lasting, heart rate increased, mean arterial pressure and total peripheral resistance were higher and decreased after an initial increase.

 

van Oosterhout WPJ, et al. Abnormal cardiovascular response to nitroglycerin in migraine. [Published online ahead of print October 9, 2019]. Cephalalgia. doi: 10.1177/0333102419881657.

Patients with migraine who developed a migraine-like attack in response to nitroglycerin demonstrated stronger systemic cardiovascular (CV) responses compared to non-headache controls, a new study found. In 16 women with migraine without aura and 10 age- and gender-matched controls, intravenous nitroglycerin was administered. Researchers found:

  • Nitroglycerin provoked a migraine-like attack in 81.2% of migraineurs but not in controls.
  • Migraineurs who later developed a migraine-like attack showed different responses in all parameters vs controls.
  • The decreases in cardiac output and stroke volume were more rapid and longer lasting, heart rate increased, mean arterial pressure and total peripheral resistance were higher and decreased after an initial increase.

 

van Oosterhout WPJ, et al. Abnormal cardiovascular response to nitroglycerin in migraine. [Published online ahead of print October 9, 2019]. Cephalalgia. doi: 10.1177/0333102419881657.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Abnormal CV Response to Nitroglycerin in Migraine
Display Headline
Abnormal CV Response to Nitroglycerin in Migraine
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Tue, 10/15/2019 - 14:00
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 10/15/2019 - 14:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 10/15/2019 - 14:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Poor Patient Awareness Common in Migraine

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 11/04/2019 - 14:51
Display Headline
Poor Patient Awareness Common in Migraine

Poor awareness of migraine is common among patients in several countries, a new study found. The multicenter study was conducted in 12 headache centers in 7 countries with each center recruiting 100 or less patients referred for a first visit and diagnosed with migraine. Participants were given a structured clinical questionnaire-based interview about perceptions of the type of headache they suffer from, its cause, previous diagnoses, investigations, and treatments. Researchers found:

  • Of the 1,161 patients who completed the study, 28% of participants were aware they suffer from migraine.
  • 64% of participants called their migraine “headache,” less commonly used terms such as “cervical pain,” “tension headache,” and “sinusitis.”
  • 8% of general practitioners and 35% of specialists consulted for migraine formulated the correct diagnosis.

 

Viana M, et al. Poor patient awareness and frequent misdiagnosis of migraine: findings from a large transcontinental cohort. [Published online ahead of print October 1, 2019]. Eur J Neurol. doi: 10.1111/ene.14098.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Poor awareness of migraine is common among patients in several countries, a new study found. The multicenter study was conducted in 12 headache centers in 7 countries with each center recruiting 100 or less patients referred for a first visit and diagnosed with migraine. Participants were given a structured clinical questionnaire-based interview about perceptions of the type of headache they suffer from, its cause, previous diagnoses, investigations, and treatments. Researchers found:

  • Of the 1,161 patients who completed the study, 28% of participants were aware they suffer from migraine.
  • 64% of participants called their migraine “headache,” less commonly used terms such as “cervical pain,” “tension headache,” and “sinusitis.”
  • 8% of general practitioners and 35% of specialists consulted for migraine formulated the correct diagnosis.

 

Viana M, et al. Poor patient awareness and frequent misdiagnosis of migraine: findings from a large transcontinental cohort. [Published online ahead of print October 1, 2019]. Eur J Neurol. doi: 10.1111/ene.14098.

Poor awareness of migraine is common among patients in several countries, a new study found. The multicenter study was conducted in 12 headache centers in 7 countries with each center recruiting 100 or less patients referred for a first visit and diagnosed with migraine. Participants were given a structured clinical questionnaire-based interview about perceptions of the type of headache they suffer from, its cause, previous diagnoses, investigations, and treatments. Researchers found:

  • Of the 1,161 patients who completed the study, 28% of participants were aware they suffer from migraine.
  • 64% of participants called their migraine “headache,” less commonly used terms such as “cervical pain,” “tension headache,” and “sinusitis.”
  • 8% of general practitioners and 35% of specialists consulted for migraine formulated the correct diagnosis.

 

Viana M, et al. Poor patient awareness and frequent misdiagnosis of migraine: findings from a large transcontinental cohort. [Published online ahead of print October 1, 2019]. Eur J Neurol. doi: 10.1111/ene.14098.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Poor Patient Awareness Common in Migraine
Display Headline
Poor Patient Awareness Common in Migraine
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Tue, 10/15/2019 - 13:45
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 10/15/2019 - 13:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 10/15/2019 - 13:45
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.