Video

WASHINGTON – Patients who regularly accessed 30 minute, Internet-based behavioral counseling videos cut their systolic blood pressure, compared with baseline over 1 year by an average 4 mm Hg more than control patients in a randomized, phase II study with 264 patients.

Electronic counseling (e-counseling) “enhanced the efficacy of usual care for hypertension,” Robert P. Nolan, Ph.D., said at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

“We hope to optimize the efficacy of medical treatments with a behavioral intervention,” said Dr. Nolan, who added that the magnitude of the added benefit from the e-counseling program was “like adding an additional antihypertensive medication.”

“We know antihypertensive treatments work, but compliance is a huge challenge” for health care providers, commented E. Magnus Ohman, MBBS, a professor and cardiologist at Duke University in Durham, N.C. “Having a new way to enhance compliance would be fantastic,” he said.

The Internet-based counseling program devised by Dr. Nolan and his associates consisted of a year-long series of 28 videos, each about 30 minutes long, that participants in the active arm accessed over the Internet. During the study, participants received a series of emailed messages that sent links to the videos on a set schedule over 12 months: During the first 4 months they received an emailed link weekly, during the next 4 months they received an emailed link to a new video every other week, and during the final 4 months of the intervention participants received emailed links once a month. Patients could access each video more than once if they wished, and they were free to share the links with any family members or friends who helped the patients with lifestyle management of their hypertension.

Patients in the e-counseling intervention arm received links to videos that focused on motivational messages and teaching cognitive behavioral skills. Patients in the control arm received emails with generic messages on blood pressure management and without links to videos.

The REACH (E-Counseling Promotes Blood Pressure Reduction and Therapeutic Lifestyle Change in Hypertension) study ran at four Canadian sites. It sent invitations to participate to 609 patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension, with a blood pressure prior to treatment of 140/90-180/110 mm Hg. Among the invited patients, 264 elected to participate; 100 patients in the e-counseling arm and 97 control patients completed the 1-year program. Participants averaged 58 years of age, their average body mass index was 31 kg/m², and 9% smoked. Their blood pressure at entry averaged 141/87 mm Hg, their average pulse pressure was about 54 mm Hg, and their average 10-year risk for a cardiovascular disease event, measured by the Framingham Risk Score, was about 16%. At entry, patients in the study received an average of 1.5 antihypertensive drugs each.

At the end of the 1-year program, systolic blood pressure fell by an average of 6 mm Hg from baseline among patients who completed the control program, and by an average of 10.1 mm Hg among the patients who completed the e-counseling arm, a statistically significant difference for one of the study’s primary endpoints. Change in pulse pressure from baseline showed an average 1.5–mm Hg drop in the control patients and an average 4.3–mm Hg decline in the e-counseling patients, another statistically significant difference for a second primary endpoint, reported Dr. Nolan, a clinical psychologist and director of the cardiac eHealth program at the University of Toronto.

A third primary endpoint was change in the Framingham Risk Score, which fell by an average of 1.9% after 12 months in the e-counseling patients and rose by an average of 0.2% among the controls.

The final primary endpoint was the change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline, which showed a better than 4–mm Hg incremental decline in the men who received e-counseling, compared with controls, but among women in the study, the drop in diastolic blood pressure from baseline was nearly the same – about 6 mm Hg – in both the controls and e-counseling patients.

“This tells us that we need to better tailor the [e-counseling] intervention to men and to women,” Dr. Nolan said in a video interview. He also envisions better tailoring of the e-counseling videos to various socioeconomic and ethnic groups. He plans to continue testing of a revised version of the e-counseling intervention in a larger, phase III study, but he also hopes that the intervention videos can soon be available at no charge for use in routine practice.

REACH received no commercial funding. Dr. Nolan had no disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

WASHINGTON – Patients who regularly accessed 30 minute, Internet-based behavioral counseling videos cut their systolic blood pressure, compared with baseline over 1 year by an average 4 mm Hg more than control patients in a randomized, phase II study with 264 patients.

Electronic counseling (e-counseling) “enhanced the efficacy of usual care for hypertension,” Robert P. Nolan, Ph.D., said at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

“We hope to optimize the efficacy of medical treatments with a behavioral intervention,” said Dr. Nolan, who added that the magnitude of the added benefit from the e-counseling program was “like adding an additional antihypertensive medication.”

“We know antihypertensive treatments work, but compliance is a huge challenge” for health care providers, commented E. Magnus Ohman, MBBS, a professor and cardiologist at Duke University in Durham, N.C. “Having a new way to enhance compliance would be fantastic,” he said.

The Internet-based counseling program devised by Dr. Nolan and his associates consisted of a year-long series of 28 videos, each about 30 minutes long, that participants in the active arm accessed over the Internet. During the study, participants received a series of emailed messages that sent links to the videos on a set schedule over 12 months: During the first 4 months they received an emailed link weekly, during the next 4 months they received an emailed link to a new video every other week, and during the final 4 months of the intervention participants received emailed links once a month. Patients could access each video more than once if they wished, and they were free to share the links with any family members or friends who helped the patients with lifestyle management of their hypertension.

Patients in the e-counseling intervention arm received links to videos that focused on motivational messages and teaching cognitive behavioral skills. Patients in the control arm received emails with generic messages on blood pressure management and without links to videos.

The REACH (E-Counseling Promotes Blood Pressure Reduction and Therapeutic Lifestyle Change in Hypertension) study ran at four Canadian sites. It sent invitations to participate to 609 patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension, with a blood pressure prior to treatment of 140/90-180/110 mm Hg. Among the invited patients, 264 elected to participate; 100 patients in the e-counseling arm and 97 control patients completed the 1-year program. Participants averaged 58 years of age, their average body mass index was 31 kg/m², and 9% smoked. Their blood pressure at entry averaged 141/87 mm Hg, their average pulse pressure was about 54 mm Hg, and their average 10-year risk for a cardiovascular disease event, measured by the Framingham Risk Score, was about 16%. At entry, patients in the study received an average of 1.5 antihypertensive drugs each.

At the end of the 1-year program, systolic blood pressure fell by an average of 6 mm Hg from baseline among patients who completed the control program, and by an average of 10.1 mm Hg among the patients who completed the e-counseling arm, a statistically significant difference for one of the study’s primary endpoints. Change in pulse pressure from baseline showed an average 1.5–mm Hg drop in the control patients and an average 4.3–mm Hg decline in the e-counseling patients, another statistically significant difference for a second primary endpoint, reported Dr. Nolan, a clinical psychologist and director of the cardiac eHealth program at the University of Toronto.

A third primary endpoint was change in the Framingham Risk Score, which fell by an average of 1.9% after 12 months in the e-counseling patients and rose by an average of 0.2% among the controls.

The final primary endpoint was the change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline, which showed a better than 4–mm Hg incremental decline in the men who received e-counseling, compared with controls, but among women in the study, the drop in diastolic blood pressure from baseline was nearly the same – about 6 mm Hg – in both the controls and e-counseling patients.

“This tells us that we need to better tailor the [e-counseling] intervention to men and to women,” Dr. Nolan said in a video interview. He also envisions better tailoring of the e-counseling videos to various socioeconomic and ethnic groups. He plans to continue testing of a revised version of the e-counseling intervention in a larger, phase III study, but he also hopes that the intervention videos can soon be available at no charge for use in routine practice.

REACH received no commercial funding. Dr. Nolan had no disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

WASHINGTON – Patients who regularly accessed 30 minute, Internet-based behavioral counseling videos cut their systolic blood pressure, compared with baseline over 1 year by an average 4 mm Hg more than control patients in a randomized, phase II study with 264 patients.

Electronic counseling (e-counseling) “enhanced the efficacy of usual care for hypertension,” Robert P. Nolan, Ph.D., said at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

“We hope to optimize the efficacy of medical treatments with a behavioral intervention,” said Dr. Nolan, who added that the magnitude of the added benefit from the e-counseling program was “like adding an additional antihypertensive medication.”

“We know antihypertensive treatments work, but compliance is a huge challenge” for health care providers, commented E. Magnus Ohman, MBBS, a professor and cardiologist at Duke University in Durham, N.C. “Having a new way to enhance compliance would be fantastic,” he said.

The Internet-based counseling program devised by Dr. Nolan and his associates consisted of a year-long series of 28 videos, each about 30 minutes long, that participants in the active arm accessed over the Internet. During the study, participants received a series of emailed messages that sent links to the videos on a set schedule over 12 months: During the first 4 months they received an emailed link weekly, during the next 4 months they received an emailed link to a new video every other week, and during the final 4 months of the intervention participants received emailed links once a month. Patients could access each video more than once if they wished, and they were free to share the links with any family members or friends who helped the patients with lifestyle management of their hypertension.

Patients in the e-counseling intervention arm received links to videos that focused on motivational messages and teaching cognitive behavioral skills. Patients in the control arm received emails with generic messages on blood pressure management and without links to videos.

The REACH (E-Counseling Promotes Blood Pressure Reduction and Therapeutic Lifestyle Change in Hypertension) study ran at four Canadian sites. It sent invitations to participate to 609 patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension, with a blood pressure prior to treatment of 140/90-180/110 mm Hg. Among the invited patients, 264 elected to participate; 100 patients in the e-counseling arm and 97 control patients completed the 1-year program. Participants averaged 58 years of age, their average body mass index was 31 kg/m², and 9% smoked. Their blood pressure at entry averaged 141/87 mm Hg, their average pulse pressure was about 54 mm Hg, and their average 10-year risk for a cardiovascular disease event, measured by the Framingham Risk Score, was about 16%. At entry, patients in the study received an average of 1.5 antihypertensive drugs each.

At the end of the 1-year program, systolic blood pressure fell by an average of 6 mm Hg from baseline among patients who completed the control program, and by an average of 10.1 mm Hg among the patients who completed the e-counseling arm, a statistically significant difference for one of the study’s primary endpoints. Change in pulse pressure from baseline showed an average 1.5–mm Hg drop in the control patients and an average 4.3–mm Hg decline in the e-counseling patients, another statistically significant difference for a second primary endpoint, reported Dr. Nolan, a clinical psychologist and director of the cardiac eHealth program at the University of Toronto.

A third primary endpoint was change in the Framingham Risk Score, which fell by an average of 1.9% after 12 months in the e-counseling patients and rose by an average of 0.2% among the controls.

The final primary endpoint was the change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline, which showed a better than 4–mm Hg incremental decline in the men who received e-counseling, compared with controls, but among women in the study, the drop in diastolic blood pressure from baseline was nearly the same – about 6 mm Hg – in both the controls and e-counseling patients.

“This tells us that we need to better tailor the [e-counseling] intervention to men and to women,” Dr. Nolan said in a video interview. He also envisions better tailoring of the e-counseling videos to various socioeconomic and ethnic groups. He plans to continue testing of a revised version of the e-counseling intervention in a larger, phase III study, but he also hopes that the intervention videos can soon be available at no charge for use in routine practice.

REACH received no commercial funding. Dr. Nolan had no disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

Washington – Heart teams will have more options when making treatment decisions for patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at intermediate risk, now that the results of the SURTAVI (Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) trial have been presented.

Those results showed that transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis at intermediate risk was not only noninferior to surgical replacement, “but in my mind superior, because you don’t get your chest cracked, you get home earlier, and you have fewer strokes [in this trial], Roxana Mehran, MD, professor and director of interventional cardiovascular research at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

In SURTAVI, which used Medtronic’s self-expanding CoreValve and Evolut-R bioprostheses in 863 patients randomized to TAVR, 12.6% met the study’s primary endpoint – death from any cause or disabling stroke at 24 months – versus 14% of the 796 patients randomized to surgery, a statistically nonsignificant difference. Notably, the risk of any type of stroke at 30 days was statistically superior for TAVR, 3.4%, compared with 5.6% for surgical replacement.

“It’s tremendously important to see the change in how we’re going to be evaluating patients with aortic stenosis,” Dr. Mehran said.

[email protected]

Washington – Heart teams will have more options when making treatment decisions for patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at intermediate risk, now that the results of the SURTAVI (Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) trial have been presented.

Those results showed that transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis at intermediate risk was not only noninferior to surgical replacement, “but in my mind superior, because you don’t get your chest cracked, you get home earlier, and you have fewer strokes [in this trial], Roxana Mehran, MD, professor and director of interventional cardiovascular research at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

In SURTAVI, which used Medtronic’s self-expanding CoreValve and Evolut-R bioprostheses in 863 patients randomized to TAVR, 12.6% met the study’s primary endpoint – death from any cause or disabling stroke at 24 months – versus 14% of the 796 patients randomized to surgery, a statistically nonsignificant difference. Notably, the risk of any type of stroke at 30 days was statistically superior for TAVR, 3.4%, compared with 5.6% for surgical replacement.

“It’s tremendously important to see the change in how we’re going to be evaluating patients with aortic stenosis,” Dr. Mehran said.

[email protected]

Washington – Heart teams will have more options when making treatment decisions for patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at intermediate risk, now that the results of the SURTAVI (Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) trial have been presented.

Those results showed that transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis at intermediate risk was not only noninferior to surgical replacement, “but in my mind superior, because you don’t get your chest cracked, you get home earlier, and you have fewer strokes [in this trial], Roxana Mehran, MD, professor and director of interventional cardiovascular research at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

In SURTAVI, which used Medtronic’s self-expanding CoreValve and Evolut-R bioprostheses in 863 patients randomized to TAVR, 12.6% met the study’s primary endpoint – death from any cause or disabling stroke at 24 months – versus 14% of the 796 patients randomized to surgery, a statistically nonsignificant difference. Notably, the risk of any type of stroke at 30 days was statistically superior for TAVR, 3.4%, compared with 5.6% for surgical replacement.

“It’s tremendously important to see the change in how we’re going to be evaluating patients with aortic stenosis,” Dr. Mehran said.

[email protected]

HOUSTON – Use of endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for treating selected patients with acute ischemic stroke surged in U.S. practice following publication of several studies in early 2015 that documented the treatment’s efficacy, in data collected by a large U.S. hospital registry.

During April-June 2016, 3.5% of all acute ischemic stroke patients seen at the nearly 2,000 U.S. hospitals enrolled in the Get With the Guidelines-Stroke program underwent treatment with endovascular thrombectomy, up from the 2% rate at the end of 2014,The new data he reported also showed substantial increases for other measures of thrombectomy use during a roughly 18-month period that followed a flurry of reports in late 2014 and early 2015 that presented clear evidence of the safety and efficacy of thrombectomy for selected ischemic stroke patients. The percentage of hospitals participating in the Get With the Guidelines-Stroke program that performed thrombectomies increased from about a quarter of enrolled hospitals at the end of 2014 to almost a third by mid 2016, and the average quarterly number of endovascular thrombectomy cases at hospitals offering the procedure rose from about 7 during the final 3 months of 2014 to about 12 during July-September 2016, reported Dr. Smith, a neurologist and medical director of the Cognitive Neurosciences Clinic at the University of Calgary (Alta.).

“Before 2015, we saw a slow increase in the use of intra-arterial therapy, but after studies showed it was effective, there was an acceleration in the proportion of hospitals providing this therapy, the number of cases treated at each hospital, and the number of ischemic stroke patients treated,” Dr. Smith said in a video interview. “This shows rapid uptake of endovascular thrombectomy, but we still have a ways to go.”

He estimated that roughly 10%-15% of all U.S. acute ischemic stroke patients are eligible for endovascular thrombectomy based on location of the occluding clot in a large cerebral artery and the time frame when patients appear at a thrombectomy hospital relative to their stroke onset. This suggests that by mid-2016, roughly 20%-33% of U.S. ischemic stroke patients eligible for thrombectomy actually received the treatment.

“I don’t think we should be satisfied until we treat every eligible patient as quickly as we can. We need to move toward 100%,” he said.

The analyses he reported came from data collected on more than 2.4 million ischemic stroke patients treated at more than 2,200 U.S. hospitals participating in the Get With the Guidelines-Stroke program during 2003-2016.

The 2016 data also showed that, while the median thrombectomy annual case volume from mid-2015 to mid-2016 was 32 patients per year at thrombectomy hospitals, about 5% of these centers performed 100 or more cases during this 1-year period, and about 10% performed 10 or fewer thrombectomy cases. “There may be a relationship between case volume and the skill of performing the procedure, and a potential need for a volume minimum for thrombectomy certification to ensure that centers and operators maintain their skills,” Dr. Smith said.

He contrasted the recent pace of thrombectomy uptake with the first few years of routine thrombolytic treatment for the same disease during the mid-1990s, when little uptake occurred. Dr. Smith attributed the more robust penetration of thrombectomy to several factors: the impressive benefit of the treatment, the concurrent reporting of several confirmatory studies, and the stronger acute stroke–care infrastructure now in place, compared with what was available to stroke patients a generation ago.

“It’s encouraging to see such early growth in thrombectomy when thrombolysis lagged for so many years,” Dr. Smith said.

Dr. Smith had no disclosures. Get With the Guidelines-Stroke is a program of the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association using funding provided by several drug companies.

Eric E. Smith, MD, said at the International Stroke Conference, sponsored by the American Heart Association.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

HOUSTON – Use of endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for treating selected patients with acute ischemic stroke surged in U.S. practice following publication of several studies in early 2015 that documented the treatment’s efficacy, in data collected by a large U.S. hospital registry.

During April-June 2016, 3.5% of all acute ischemic stroke patients seen at the nearly 2,000 U.S. hospitals enrolled in the Get With the Guidelines-Stroke program underwent treatment with endovascular thrombectomy, up from the 2% rate at the end of 2014,The new data he reported also showed substantial increases for other measures of thrombectomy use during a roughly 18-month period that followed a flurry of reports in late 2014 and early 2015 that presented clear evidence of the safety and efficacy of thrombectomy for selected ischemic stroke patients. The percentage of hospitals participating in the Get With the Guidelines-Stroke program that performed thrombectomies increased from about a quarter of enrolled hospitals at the end of 2014 to almost a third by mid 2016, and the average quarterly number of endovascular thrombectomy cases at hospitals offering the procedure rose from about 7 during the final 3 months of 2014 to about 12 during July-September 2016, reported Dr. Smith, a neurologist and medical director of the Cognitive Neurosciences Clinic at the University of Calgary (Alta.).

“Before 2015, we saw a slow increase in the use of intra-arterial therapy, but after studies showed it was effective, there was an acceleration in the proportion of hospitals providing this therapy, the number of cases treated at each hospital, and the number of ischemic stroke patients treated,” Dr. Smith said in a video interview. “This shows rapid uptake of endovascular thrombectomy, but we still have a ways to go.”

He estimated that roughly 10%-15% of all U.S. acute ischemic stroke patients are eligible for endovascular thrombectomy based on location of the occluding clot in a large cerebral artery and the time frame when patients appear at a thrombectomy hospital relative to their stroke onset. This suggests that by mid-2016, roughly 20%-33% of U.S. ischemic stroke patients eligible for thrombectomy actually received the treatment.

“I don’t think we should be satisfied until we treat every eligible patient as quickly as we can. We need to move toward 100%,” he said.

The analyses he reported came from data collected on more than 2.4 million ischemic stroke patients treated at more than 2,200 U.S. hospitals participating in the Get With the Guidelines-Stroke program during 2003-2016.

The 2016 data also showed that, while the median thrombectomy annual case volume from mid-2015 to mid-2016 was 32 patients per year at thrombectomy hospitals, about 5% of these centers performed 100 or more cases during this 1-year period, and about 10% performed 10 or fewer thrombectomy cases. “There may be a relationship between case volume and the skill of performing the procedure, and a potential need for a volume minimum for thrombectomy certification to ensure that centers and operators maintain their skills,” Dr. Smith said.

He contrasted the recent pace of thrombectomy uptake with the first few years of routine thrombolytic treatment for the same disease during the mid-1990s, when little uptake occurred. Dr. Smith attributed the more robust penetration of thrombectomy to several factors: the impressive benefit of the treatment, the concurrent reporting of several confirmatory studies, and the stronger acute stroke–care infrastructure now in place, compared with what was available to stroke patients a generation ago.

“It’s encouraging to see such early growth in thrombectomy when thrombolysis lagged for so many years,” Dr. Smith said.

Dr. Smith had no disclosures. Get With the Guidelines-Stroke is a program of the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association using funding provided by several drug companies.

Eric E. Smith, MD, said at the International Stroke Conference, sponsored by the American Heart Association.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

HOUSTON – Use of endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for treating selected patients with acute ischemic stroke surged in U.S. practice following publication of several studies in early 2015 that documented the treatment’s efficacy, in data collected by a large U.S. hospital registry.

During April-June 2016, 3.5% of all acute ischemic stroke patients seen at the nearly 2,000 U.S. hospitals enrolled in the Get With the Guidelines-Stroke program underwent treatment with endovascular thrombectomy, up from the 2% rate at the end of 2014,The new data he reported also showed substantial increases for other measures of thrombectomy use during a roughly 18-month period that followed a flurry of reports in late 2014 and early 2015 that presented clear evidence of the safety and efficacy of thrombectomy for selected ischemic stroke patients. The percentage of hospitals participating in the Get With the Guidelines-Stroke program that performed thrombectomies increased from about a quarter of enrolled hospitals at the end of 2014 to almost a third by mid 2016, and the average quarterly number of endovascular thrombectomy cases at hospitals offering the procedure rose from about 7 during the final 3 months of 2014 to about 12 during July-September 2016, reported Dr. Smith, a neurologist and medical director of the Cognitive Neurosciences Clinic at the University of Calgary (Alta.).

“Before 2015, we saw a slow increase in the use of intra-arterial therapy, but after studies showed it was effective, there was an acceleration in the proportion of hospitals providing this therapy, the number of cases treated at each hospital, and the number of ischemic stroke patients treated,” Dr. Smith said in a video interview. “This shows rapid uptake of endovascular thrombectomy, but we still have a ways to go.”

He estimated that roughly 10%-15% of all U.S. acute ischemic stroke patients are eligible for endovascular thrombectomy based on location of the occluding clot in a large cerebral artery and the time frame when patients appear at a thrombectomy hospital relative to their stroke onset. This suggests that by mid-2016, roughly 20%-33% of U.S. ischemic stroke patients eligible for thrombectomy actually received the treatment.

“I don’t think we should be satisfied until we treat every eligible patient as quickly as we can. We need to move toward 100%,” he said.

The analyses he reported came from data collected on more than 2.4 million ischemic stroke patients treated at more than 2,200 U.S. hospitals participating in the Get With the Guidelines-Stroke program during 2003-2016.

The 2016 data also showed that, while the median thrombectomy annual case volume from mid-2015 to mid-2016 was 32 patients per year at thrombectomy hospitals, about 5% of these centers performed 100 or more cases during this 1-year period, and about 10% performed 10 or fewer thrombectomy cases. “There may be a relationship between case volume and the skill of performing the procedure, and a potential need for a volume minimum for thrombectomy certification to ensure that centers and operators maintain their skills,” Dr. Smith said.

He contrasted the recent pace of thrombectomy uptake with the first few years of routine thrombolytic treatment for the same disease during the mid-1990s, when little uptake occurred. Dr. Smith attributed the more robust penetration of thrombectomy to several factors: the impressive benefit of the treatment, the concurrent reporting of several confirmatory studies, and the stronger acute stroke–care infrastructure now in place, compared with what was available to stroke patients a generation ago.

“It’s encouraging to see such early growth in thrombectomy when thrombolysis lagged for so many years,” Dr. Smith said.

Dr. Smith had no disclosures. Get With the Guidelines-Stroke is a program of the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association using funding provided by several drug companies.

Eric E. Smith, MD, said at the International Stroke Conference, sponsored by the American Heart Association.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler