MDedge Rheumatology

Although the effects of vitamin K on blood coagulation are well-established, it is now clear that many extracellular proteins are carboxylated in a vitamin K-dependent manner, including bone matrix proteins such as osteocalcin and matrix gla protein. Previous studies have reported a relationship between vitamin K levels and bone density and fracture risk. However, optimal circulating vitamin K levels for skeletal health remain unknown. In this cross-sectional study of 374 women with post-menopausal osteoporosis, the authors assessed the relationship between vitamin K levels, vitamin K dependent bone-relevant circulating proteins, bone density, and fractures. In doing so, it was noted that women with prevalent fractures showed lower vitamin K levels than those without fractures. No relationship between vitamin K levels and bone density was noted. Interestingly, different serum levels of vitamin K were associated with optimal carboxylation of different vitamin K-dependent proteins: lower vitamin K levels are needed to support clotting factors than bone matrix proteins. Overall, this study suggests that higher intake is needed to obtain the full skeletal benefit of vitamin K versus its effects on coagulation. Future prospective studies are needed to test this intriguing hypothesis, and to further explore the relationship between vitamin K and bone quality.

For over 20 years, bisphosphonates have been first line therapy to increase bone density and reduce fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis. At present, multiple oral and intravenous bisphosphonates are approved for this indication by regulatory agencies worldwide. Several ‘next-generation’ bisphosphonates with optimized anti-resorptive and pharmacokinetic properties have been developed. Of these agents, minodronate is a particularly potent, third generation azaryl bisphosphonate that is currently approved for osteoporosis treatment in Japan. In this meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials, the effects of minodronate were assessed versus other commonly-used osteoporosis medications. Compared with other drugs (alendronate, risedronate, raloxifene, or eldecalcitol), minodronate more potently suppressed serum bone resorption markers (NTX and TRAcP-5b) and, because bone formation and resorption are coupled, more potently suppressed the bone formation marker bone-specific alkaline phosphatase. In addition to these effects on serum markers, minodronate reduced vertebral fractures more than other medications. Across studies, no differences were noted between minodronate and comparators at the level of bone mineral density. Minodronate treatment is associated with a high incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects than comparator medications. Taken together, these findings suggest that minodronate represents a potent, orally-available bisphosphonate for vertebral fracture reduction in patients with osteoporosis in Japan.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well-known to be a risk factor for osteoporosis and fragility fractures. However, the interplay between inhaled corticosteroid use in COPD and skeletal outcomes remains unclear. While systemic glucocorticoid therapy clearly impairs bone mass and increases fracture risk, whether inhaled steroids have similar effects remain unknown. Furthermore, since inhaled corticosteroids can reduce lung inflammation and COPD flares, it is possible that, by controlling pulmonary disease, these agents may actually promote bone health. In this real-world retrospective Swedish cohort study, 9,651 COPD patients and 59,454 reference controls were identified. Matching using propensity scoring was performed to identify two populations (COPD and control) with similar characteristics other than the presence of COPD. As expected, COPD patients showed an increased rate of osteoporosis-related events versus controls over approximately 5 years of subsequent follow-up. Amongst COPD patients, high-dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment also increased risk of osteoporosis-related events compared to COPD patients on no or low-dose inhaled steroids. These findings confirm the known relationship between COPD and fracture risk, and suggest that extra attention should be paid to fracture risk in COPD patients receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids.

Wrist fractures are common in patients with osteoporosis. In addition to causing pain and triggering functional decline, the presence of a wrist fracture indicates an increased risk of additional fragility fractures in the near future. Most wrist fractures occur in the ultradistal radius, a skeletal site rich in trabecular bone. In contrast, wrist bone density by DXA is most commonly reported in the distal 1/3 radius, a region of the radius with more cortical bone. Abaloparatide is a PTHrP analog that increases bone density and reduces fracture risk. In this sub-analysis of the ACTIVE and ACTIVExtend randomized clinical trial, the effects of abaloparatide on wrist fractures and BMD at various regions of the wrist were assessed. Compared to placebo, abaloparatide treatment significantly increased ultradistal wrist BMD after 18 months of therapy. These gains were preserved during the subsequent extension study when patients were maintained on alendronate. Very few wrist fractures were noted during this study thus precluding robust statistical analysis of the effects of abaloparatide on wrist fracture risk. However, numerically fewer wrist fractures were noted in abaloparatide-treated patients versus controls. Taken together, these results highlight the potential importance of measuring ultradistal radius BMD for patients undergoing therapy with bone anabolic agents. Future studies are needed to better standardize methods for obtaining ultradistal radius BMD measurements and to define least significant change thresholds at this potentially-important skeletal site.

Marc Wein, M.D., Ph.D
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Massachusetts General Hospital Endocrine Unit, Harvard Medical School

Although the effects of vitamin K on blood coagulation are well-established, it is now clear that many extracellular proteins are carboxylated in a vitamin K-dependent manner, including bone matrix proteins such as osteocalcin and matrix gla protein. Previous studies have reported a relationship between vitamin K levels and bone density and fracture risk. However, optimal circulating vitamin K levels for skeletal health remain unknown. In this cross-sectional study of 374 women with post-menopausal osteoporosis, the authors assessed the relationship between vitamin K levels, vitamin K dependent bone-relevant circulating proteins, bone density, and fractures. In doing so, it was noted that women with prevalent fractures showed lower vitamin K levels than those without fractures. No relationship between vitamin K levels and bone density was noted. Interestingly, different serum levels of vitamin K were associated with optimal carboxylation of different vitamin K-dependent proteins: lower vitamin K levels are needed to support clotting factors than bone matrix proteins. Overall, this study suggests that higher intake is needed to obtain the full skeletal benefit of vitamin K versus its effects on coagulation. Future prospective studies are needed to test this intriguing hypothesis, and to further explore the relationship between vitamin K and bone quality.

For over 20 years, bisphosphonates have been first line therapy to increase bone density and reduce fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis. At present, multiple oral and intravenous bisphosphonates are approved for this indication by regulatory agencies worldwide. Several ‘next-generation’ bisphosphonates with optimized anti-resorptive and pharmacokinetic properties have been developed. Of these agents, minodronate is a particularly potent, third generation azaryl bisphosphonate that is currently approved for osteoporosis treatment in Japan. In this meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials, the effects of minodronate were assessed versus other commonly-used osteoporosis medications. Compared with other drugs (alendronate, risedronate, raloxifene, or eldecalcitol), minodronate more potently suppressed serum bone resorption markers (NTX and TRAcP-5b) and, because bone formation and resorption are coupled, more potently suppressed the bone formation marker bone-specific alkaline phosphatase. In addition to these effects on serum markers, minodronate reduced vertebral fractures more than other medications. Across studies, no differences were noted between minodronate and comparators at the level of bone mineral density. Minodronate treatment is associated with a high incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects than comparator medications. Taken together, these findings suggest that minodronate represents a potent, orally-available bisphosphonate for vertebral fracture reduction in patients with osteoporosis in Japan.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well-known to be a risk factor for osteoporosis and fragility fractures. However, the interplay between inhaled corticosteroid use in COPD and skeletal outcomes remains unclear. While systemic glucocorticoid therapy clearly impairs bone mass and increases fracture risk, whether inhaled steroids have similar effects remain unknown. Furthermore, since inhaled corticosteroids can reduce lung inflammation and COPD flares, it is possible that, by controlling pulmonary disease, these agents may actually promote bone health. In this real-world retrospective Swedish cohort study, 9,651 COPD patients and 59,454 reference controls were identified. Matching using propensity scoring was performed to identify two populations (COPD and control) with similar characteristics other than the presence of COPD. As expected, COPD patients showed an increased rate of osteoporosis-related events versus controls over approximately 5 years of subsequent follow-up. Amongst COPD patients, high-dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment also increased risk of osteoporosis-related events compared to COPD patients on no or low-dose inhaled steroids. These findings confirm the known relationship between COPD and fracture risk, and suggest that extra attention should be paid to fracture risk in COPD patients receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids.

Wrist fractures are common in patients with osteoporosis. In addition to causing pain and triggering functional decline, the presence of a wrist fracture indicates an increased risk of additional fragility fractures in the near future. Most wrist fractures occur in the ultradistal radius, a skeletal site rich in trabecular bone. In contrast, wrist bone density by DXA is most commonly reported in the distal 1/3 radius, a region of the radius with more cortical bone. Abaloparatide is a PTHrP analog that increases bone density and reduces fracture risk. In this sub-analysis of the ACTIVE and ACTIVExtend randomized clinical trial, the effects of abaloparatide on wrist fractures and BMD at various regions of the wrist were assessed. Compared to placebo, abaloparatide treatment significantly increased ultradistal wrist BMD after 18 months of therapy. These gains were preserved during the subsequent extension study when patients were maintained on alendronate. Very few wrist fractures were noted during this study thus precluding robust statistical analysis of the effects of abaloparatide on wrist fracture risk. However, numerically fewer wrist fractures were noted in abaloparatide-treated patients versus controls. Taken together, these results highlight the potential importance of measuring ultradistal radius BMD for patients undergoing therapy with bone anabolic agents. Future studies are needed to better standardize methods for obtaining ultradistal radius BMD measurements and to define least significant change thresholds at this potentially-important skeletal site.

Marc Wein, M.D., Ph.D
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Massachusetts General Hospital Endocrine Unit, Harvard Medical School

Although the effects of vitamin K on blood coagulation are well-established, it is now clear that many extracellular proteins are carboxylated in a vitamin K-dependent manner, including bone matrix proteins such as osteocalcin and matrix gla protein. Previous studies have reported a relationship between vitamin K levels and bone density and fracture risk. However, optimal circulating vitamin K levels for skeletal health remain unknown. In this cross-sectional study of 374 women with post-menopausal osteoporosis, the authors assessed the relationship between vitamin K levels, vitamin K dependent bone-relevant circulating proteins, bone density, and fractures. In doing so, it was noted that women with prevalent fractures showed lower vitamin K levels than those without fractures. No relationship between vitamin K levels and bone density was noted. Interestingly, different serum levels of vitamin K were associated with optimal carboxylation of different vitamin K-dependent proteins: lower vitamin K levels are needed to support clotting factors than bone matrix proteins. Overall, this study suggests that higher intake is needed to obtain the full skeletal benefit of vitamin K versus its effects on coagulation. Future prospective studies are needed to test this intriguing hypothesis, and to further explore the relationship between vitamin K and bone quality.

For over 20 years, bisphosphonates have been first line therapy to increase bone density and reduce fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis. At present, multiple oral and intravenous bisphosphonates are approved for this indication by regulatory agencies worldwide. Several ‘next-generation’ bisphosphonates with optimized anti-resorptive and pharmacokinetic properties have been developed. Of these agents, minodronate is a particularly potent, third generation azaryl bisphosphonate that is currently approved for osteoporosis treatment in Japan. In this meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials, the effects of minodronate were assessed versus other commonly-used osteoporosis medications. Compared with other drugs (alendronate, risedronate, raloxifene, or eldecalcitol), minodronate more potently suppressed serum bone resorption markers (NTX and TRAcP-5b) and, because bone formation and resorption are coupled, more potently suppressed the bone formation marker bone-specific alkaline phosphatase. In addition to these effects on serum markers, minodronate reduced vertebral fractures more than other medications. Across studies, no differences were noted between minodronate and comparators at the level of bone mineral density. Minodronate treatment is associated with a high incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects than comparator medications. Taken together, these findings suggest that minodronate represents a potent, orally-available bisphosphonate for vertebral fracture reduction in patients with osteoporosis in Japan.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well-known to be a risk factor for osteoporosis and fragility fractures. However, the interplay between inhaled corticosteroid use in COPD and skeletal outcomes remains unclear. While systemic glucocorticoid therapy clearly impairs bone mass and increases fracture risk, whether inhaled steroids have similar effects remain unknown. Furthermore, since inhaled corticosteroids can reduce lung inflammation and COPD flares, it is possible that, by controlling pulmonary disease, these agents may actually promote bone health. In this real-world retrospective Swedish cohort study, 9,651 COPD patients and 59,454 reference controls were identified. Matching using propensity scoring was performed to identify two populations (COPD and control) with similar characteristics other than the presence of COPD. As expected, COPD patients showed an increased rate of osteoporosis-related events versus controls over approximately 5 years of subsequent follow-up. Amongst COPD patients, high-dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment also increased risk of osteoporosis-related events compared to COPD patients on no or low-dose inhaled steroids. These findings confirm the known relationship between COPD and fracture risk, and suggest that extra attention should be paid to fracture risk in COPD patients receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids.

Wrist fractures are common in patients with osteoporosis. In addition to causing pain and triggering functional decline, the presence of a wrist fracture indicates an increased risk of additional fragility fractures in the near future. Most wrist fractures occur in the ultradistal radius, a skeletal site rich in trabecular bone. In contrast, wrist bone density by DXA is most commonly reported in the distal 1/3 radius, a region of the radius with more cortical bone. Abaloparatide is a PTHrP analog that increases bone density and reduces fracture risk. In this sub-analysis of the ACTIVE and ACTIVExtend randomized clinical trial, the effects of abaloparatide on wrist fractures and BMD at various regions of the wrist were assessed. Compared to placebo, abaloparatide treatment significantly increased ultradistal wrist BMD after 18 months of therapy. These gains were preserved during the subsequent extension study when patients were maintained on alendronate. Very few wrist fractures were noted during this study thus precluding robust statistical analysis of the effects of abaloparatide on wrist fracture risk. However, numerically fewer wrist fractures were noted in abaloparatide-treated patients versus controls. Taken together, these results highlight the potential importance of measuring ultradistal radius BMD for patients undergoing therapy with bone anabolic agents. Future studies are needed to better standardize methods for obtaining ultradistal radius BMD measurements and to define least significant change thresholds at this potentially-important skeletal site.

Marc Wein, M.D., Ph.D
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Massachusetts General Hospital Endocrine Unit, Harvard Medical School

Key clinical point: Hypogonadism is a major risk factor for the development of fractures in men and women treated with glucocorticoid (GC).

Major finding: Major risk factors for vertebral fracture were hypogonadism (odds ratio [OR], 12.38; P = .01) and receiving GC boluses (OR 3.45; P = .01) and that for friability fracture were hypogonadism (OR, 7.03; P = .01) and a FRAX index greater than 20 (OR, 7.08; P = .02).

Study details: A cross-sectional study of 127 adults receiving chronic GC treatment for a rheumatological autoimmune disease.

Disclosures: This study was funded in part by the Societat Catalana de Reumatologia. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Florez H et al. RMD Open. 2020 Sep 10. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001355.

Key clinical point: Hypogonadism is a major risk factor for the development of fractures in men and women treated with glucocorticoid (GC).

Major finding: Major risk factors for vertebral fracture were hypogonadism (odds ratio [OR], 12.38; P = .01) and receiving GC boluses (OR 3.45; P = .01) and that for friability fracture were hypogonadism (OR, 7.03; P = .01) and a FRAX index greater than 20 (OR, 7.08; P = .02).

Study details: A cross-sectional study of 127 adults receiving chronic GC treatment for a rheumatological autoimmune disease.

Disclosures: This study was funded in part by the Societat Catalana de Reumatologia. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Florez H et al. RMD Open. 2020 Sep 10. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001355.

Key clinical point: Hypogonadism is a major risk factor for the development of fractures in men and women treated with glucocorticoid (GC).

Major finding: Major risk factors for vertebral fracture were hypogonadism (odds ratio [OR], 12.38; P = .01) and receiving GC boluses (OR 3.45; P = .01) and that for friability fracture were hypogonadism (OR, 7.03; P = .01) and a FRAX index greater than 20 (OR, 7.08; P = .02).

Study details: A cross-sectional study of 127 adults receiving chronic GC treatment for a rheumatological autoimmune disease.

Disclosures: This study was funded in part by the Societat Catalana de Reumatologia. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Florez H et al. RMD Open. 2020 Sep 10. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001355.

Key clinical point: Abaloparatide/alendronate treatment shows numerically lower risks for wrist fractures compared with placebo/alendronate, suggesting a potential correlation between ultradistal (UD) radius bone mineral density (BMD) and wrist fracture.

Major finding: BMD gains at the UD radius following treatment with abaloparatide in ACTIVE were maintained over the subsequent 24 months of treatment with alendronate in ACTIVExtend (cumulative month 43 treatment difference, 0.89%; P = .20). Conversely, UD radius BMD in the placebo group during ACTIVE decreased to below ACTIVE baseline.

Study details: The data come from a subanalysis of the phase 3 ACTIVExtend trial.

Disclosures: Funding for this study was provided by Radius Health, Inc. NB Watts, RK Dore, and MS LeBoff reported ties with various pharmaceutical companies. B Mitlak and Y Wang were employees of and own company stock in Radius Health, Inc. G Hattersley was a former employee of and a consultant to Radius Health, Inc. TD Rozental is the Editor in Chief of the Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. S Baim reported no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Watts NB et al. Osteoporos Int. 2020 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05555-1.

Key clinical point: Abaloparatide/alendronate treatment shows numerically lower risks for wrist fractures compared with placebo/alendronate, suggesting a potential correlation between ultradistal (UD) radius bone mineral density (BMD) and wrist fracture.

Major finding: BMD gains at the UD radius following treatment with abaloparatide in ACTIVE were maintained over the subsequent 24 months of treatment with alendronate in ACTIVExtend (cumulative month 43 treatment difference, 0.89%; P = .20). Conversely, UD radius BMD in the placebo group during ACTIVE decreased to below ACTIVE baseline.

Study details: The data come from a subanalysis of the phase 3 ACTIVExtend trial.

Disclosures: Funding for this study was provided by Radius Health, Inc. NB Watts, RK Dore, and MS LeBoff reported ties with various pharmaceutical companies. B Mitlak and Y Wang were employees of and own company stock in Radius Health, Inc. G Hattersley was a former employee of and a consultant to Radius Health, Inc. TD Rozental is the Editor in Chief of the Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. S Baim reported no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Watts NB et al. Osteoporos Int. 2020 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05555-1.

Key clinical point: Abaloparatide/alendronate treatment shows numerically lower risks for wrist fractures compared with placebo/alendronate, suggesting a potential correlation between ultradistal (UD) radius bone mineral density (BMD) and wrist fracture.

Major finding: BMD gains at the UD radius following treatment with abaloparatide in ACTIVE were maintained over the subsequent 24 months of treatment with alendronate in ACTIVExtend (cumulative month 43 treatment difference, 0.89%; P = .20). Conversely, UD radius BMD in the placebo group during ACTIVE decreased to below ACTIVE baseline.

Study details: The data come from a subanalysis of the phase 3 ACTIVExtend trial.

Disclosures: Funding for this study was provided by Radius Health, Inc. NB Watts, RK Dore, and MS LeBoff reported ties with various pharmaceutical companies. B Mitlak and Y Wang were employees of and own company stock in Radius Health, Inc. G Hattersley was a former employee of and a consultant to Radius Health, Inc. TD Rozental is the Editor in Chief of the Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. S Baim reported no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Watts NB et al. Osteoporos Int. 2020 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05555-1.

Key clinical point: Use of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) significantly increased the risk of osteoporosis and fracture in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Major finding: Patients with COPD using ICS were at an increased risk for any osteoporosis-related event (high dose: risk ratio [RR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.82] and low dose: RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.13-1.56) compared with those not using ICS.

Study details: The data come from ARCTIC study of 9,651 patients with COPD and 59,454 matched reference controls.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. C Janson, K Lisspers, B Ställberg, G Johansson, and K Larsson reported relationships with various pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis. FS Gutzwiller and K Mezzi are employees of Novartis. L Mindeholm is a consultant to Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research and holds stocks in Novartis. BK Bjerregaard and L Jorgensen are employees of IQVIA and have received remuneration in relation to statistical analyses.

Citation: Janson C et al. Eur Respir J. 2020 Sep 24. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00515-2020.

Key clinical point: Use of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) significantly increased the risk of osteoporosis and fracture in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Major finding: Patients with COPD using ICS were at an increased risk for any osteoporosis-related event (high dose: risk ratio [RR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.82] and low dose: RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.13-1.56) compared with those not using ICS.

Study details: The data come from ARCTIC study of 9,651 patients with COPD and 59,454 matched reference controls.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. C Janson, K Lisspers, B Ställberg, G Johansson, and K Larsson reported relationships with various pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis. FS Gutzwiller and K Mezzi are employees of Novartis. L Mindeholm is a consultant to Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research and holds stocks in Novartis. BK Bjerregaard and L Jorgensen are employees of IQVIA and have received remuneration in relation to statistical analyses.

Citation: Janson C et al. Eur Respir J. 2020 Sep 24. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00515-2020.

Key clinical point: Use of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) significantly increased the risk of osteoporosis and fracture in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Major finding: Patients with COPD using ICS were at an increased risk for any osteoporosis-related event (high dose: risk ratio [RR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.82] and low dose: RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.13-1.56) compared with those not using ICS.

Study details: The data come from ARCTIC study of 9,651 patients with COPD and 59,454 matched reference controls.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. C Janson, K Lisspers, B Ställberg, G Johansson, and K Larsson reported relationships with various pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis. FS Gutzwiller and K Mezzi are employees of Novartis. L Mindeholm is a consultant to Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research and holds stocks in Novartis. BK Bjerregaard and L Jorgensen are employees of IQVIA and have received remuneration in relation to statistical analyses.

Citation: Janson C et al. Eur Respir J. 2020 Sep 24. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00515-2020.

Key clinical point: Minodronate demonstrated better efficacy than alendronate, risedronate, raloxifene, or eldecalcitol in patients with osteoporosis.

Major finding: Compared with other drugs, minodronate significantly decreased N-telopeptide of type I collagen/creatinine (weighted mean difference [WMD], −13.669; 95% confidence interval [CI], −23.108 to −4.229), bone alkaline phosphatase (WMD, −1.26; 95% CI: −2.04 to −0.47), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (WMD, −154.11; 95% CI, −277.85 to −30.37).

Study details: A meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials including 3,740 patients with osteoporosis.

Disclosures: This study received no financial support. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Liu Q et al. 2020 Oct 2. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022542.

Key clinical point: Minodronate demonstrated better efficacy than alendronate, risedronate, raloxifene, or eldecalcitol in patients with osteoporosis.

Major finding: Compared with other drugs, minodronate significantly decreased N-telopeptide of type I collagen/creatinine (weighted mean difference [WMD], −13.669; 95% confidence interval [CI], −23.108 to −4.229), bone alkaline phosphatase (WMD, −1.26; 95% CI: −2.04 to −0.47), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (WMD, −154.11; 95% CI, −277.85 to −30.37).

Study details: A meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials including 3,740 patients with osteoporosis.

Disclosures: This study received no financial support. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Liu Q et al. 2020 Oct 2. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022542.

Key clinical point: Minodronate demonstrated better efficacy than alendronate, risedronate, raloxifene, or eldecalcitol in patients with osteoporosis.

Major finding: Compared with other drugs, minodronate significantly decreased N-telopeptide of type I collagen/creatinine (weighted mean difference [WMD], −13.669; 95% confidence interval [CI], −23.108 to −4.229), bone alkaline phosphatase (WMD, −1.26; 95% CI: −2.04 to −0.47), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (WMD, −154.11; 95% CI, −277.85 to −30.37).

Study details: A meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials including 3,740 patients with osteoporosis.

Disclosures: This study received no financial support. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Liu Q et al. 2020 Oct 2. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022542.

Key clinical point: The risk for moderate coronary artery calcification (CAC) is inversely and independently associated with bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine in adults with osteoporosis.

Major finding: After adjustments for significant factors of CAC, BMD of the lumbar spine was significantly and inversely associated with moderate CAC in patients with osteoporosis (odds ratio, 0.38; P = .035). However, no association between CAC and BMD was seen in patients with osteopenia.

Study details: The findings are based on a retrospective medical review study of 246 patients (osteoporosis group, n = 52; osteopenia group, n = 194).

Disclosures: The study was funded by Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Chuang TL et al. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Sep 16. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090699.

Key clinical point: The risk for moderate coronary artery calcification (CAC) is inversely and independently associated with bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine in adults with osteoporosis.

Major finding: After adjustments for significant factors of CAC, BMD of the lumbar spine was significantly and inversely associated with moderate CAC in patients with osteoporosis (odds ratio, 0.38; P = .035). However, no association between CAC and BMD was seen in patients with osteopenia.

Study details: The findings are based on a retrospective medical review study of 246 patients (osteoporosis group, n = 52; osteopenia group, n = 194).

Disclosures: The study was funded by Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Chuang TL et al. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Sep 16. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090699.

Key clinical point: The risk for moderate coronary artery calcification (CAC) is inversely and independently associated with bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine in adults with osteoporosis.

Major finding: After adjustments for significant factors of CAC, BMD of the lumbar spine was significantly and inversely associated with moderate CAC in patients with osteoporosis (odds ratio, 0.38; P = .035). However, no association between CAC and BMD was seen in patients with osteopenia.

Study details: The findings are based on a retrospective medical review study of 246 patients (osteoporosis group, n = 52; osteopenia group, n = 194).

Disclosures: The study was funded by Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Chuang TL et al. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Sep 16. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090699.

Key clinical point: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with an increased risk for low bone mineral density (BMD) in women examined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for suspected osteoporosis.

Major finding: MetS was associated with an increased risk for low BMD (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; P = .001). Among MetS components, hypertension significantly correlated with an increased risk for low BMD (OR, 1.23; P = .002), whereas high fasting glucose level/diabetes correlated with a reduced occurrence of low BMD (OR, 0.84; P = .003).

Study details: The data come from a cross-sectional study of 13,182 free-living Caucasian women in Italy (mean age, 62.8 years) who underwent diagnostic assessment of BMD by DXA and of all MetS constitutive elements.

Disclosures: This study received no external funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Rendina D et al. J Endocrinol Invest. 2020 Sep 22. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01428-w.

Key clinical point: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with an increased risk for low bone mineral density (BMD) in women examined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for suspected osteoporosis.

Major finding: MetS was associated with an increased risk for low BMD (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; P = .001). Among MetS components, hypertension significantly correlated with an increased risk for low BMD (OR, 1.23; P = .002), whereas high fasting glucose level/diabetes correlated with a reduced occurrence of low BMD (OR, 0.84; P = .003).

Study details: The data come from a cross-sectional study of 13,182 free-living Caucasian women in Italy (mean age, 62.8 years) who underwent diagnostic assessment of BMD by DXA and of all MetS constitutive elements.

Disclosures: This study received no external funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Rendina D et al. J Endocrinol Invest. 2020 Sep 22. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01428-w.

Key clinical point: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with an increased risk for low bone mineral density (BMD) in women examined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for suspected osteoporosis.

Major finding: MetS was associated with an increased risk for low BMD (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; P = .001). Among MetS components, hypertension significantly correlated with an increased risk for low BMD (OR, 1.23; P = .002), whereas high fasting glucose level/diabetes correlated with a reduced occurrence of low BMD (OR, 0.84; P = .003).

Study details: The data come from a cross-sectional study of 13,182 free-living Caucasian women in Italy (mean age, 62.8 years) who underwent diagnostic assessment of BMD by DXA and of all MetS constitutive elements.

Disclosures: This study received no external funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Rendina D et al. J Endocrinol Invest. 2020 Sep 22. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01428-w.

Key clinical point: Higher serum vitamin K1 (phylloquinone) concentration is associated with a reduced risk for fracture in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO).

Major finding: Serum vitamin K1 was significantly lower in women with prevalent fractures vs. those without (0.53 μg/L vs. 0.65 μg/L; P = .04). Vitamin K1 inversely correlated with fracture risk (adjusted odds ratio per μg/L increase in serum vitamin K1, 0.550; P = .042). Hip geometry and mechanical strength parameters including cross-sectional area, cross-sectional moment of inertia, and section modulus ‘Z’ at the narrow neck of femur were positively associated with vitamin K1.

Study details: The data come from a cross-sectional study of 374 women with PMO (mean age, 68.7 years).

Disclosures: The study was funded, in part, by the Royal Osteoporosis Society, U.K. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Moore AE et al. Bone. 2020 Sep 10. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115630.

Key clinical point: Higher serum vitamin K1 (phylloquinone) concentration is associated with a reduced risk for fracture in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO).

Major finding: Serum vitamin K1 was significantly lower in women with prevalent fractures vs. those without (0.53 μg/L vs. 0.65 μg/L; P = .04). Vitamin K1 inversely correlated with fracture risk (adjusted odds ratio per μg/L increase in serum vitamin K1, 0.550; P = .042). Hip geometry and mechanical strength parameters including cross-sectional area, cross-sectional moment of inertia, and section modulus ‘Z’ at the narrow neck of femur were positively associated with vitamin K1.

Study details: The data come from a cross-sectional study of 374 women with PMO (mean age, 68.7 years).

Disclosures: The study was funded, in part, by the Royal Osteoporosis Society, U.K. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Moore AE et al. Bone. 2020 Sep 10. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115630.

Key clinical point: Higher serum vitamin K1 (phylloquinone) concentration is associated with a reduced risk for fracture in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO).

Major finding: Serum vitamin K1 was significantly lower in women with prevalent fractures vs. those without (0.53 μg/L vs. 0.65 μg/L; P = .04). Vitamin K1 inversely correlated with fracture risk (adjusted odds ratio per μg/L increase in serum vitamin K1, 0.550; P = .042). Hip geometry and mechanical strength parameters including cross-sectional area, cross-sectional moment of inertia, and section modulus ‘Z’ at the narrow neck of femur were positively associated with vitamin K1.

Study details: The data come from a cross-sectional study of 374 women with PMO (mean age, 68.7 years).

Disclosures: The study was funded, in part, by the Royal Osteoporosis Society, U.K. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Moore AE et al. Bone. 2020 Sep 10. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115630.

Key clinical point: Patients with osteoporosis with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are at a significantly higher risk of developing spine and hip fractures.

Major finding: The AMD vs. non-AMD group had a significantly higher risk for spine and hip fractures (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; P less than .001 and HR, 1.18; P = .001; respectively). The risk for mortality was significantly higher in patients with osteoporosis with older age, male sex, and all types of comorbidities (P less than .05), except for hyperthyroidism (P = .200).

Study details: This Taiwanese nationwide study included 1,206,247 patients with osteoporosis using insurance claims data. After propensity score matching, 13,548 and 54,336 patients were analyzed in the AMD and non-AMD groups, respectively.

Disclosures: The study was supported by Chang Gung Medical Research Foundation. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Sun CC et al. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 17. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037028.

Key clinical point: Patients with osteoporosis with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are at a significantly higher risk of developing spine and hip fractures.

Major finding: The AMD vs. non-AMD group had a significantly higher risk for spine and hip fractures (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; P less than .001 and HR, 1.18; P = .001; respectively). The risk for mortality was significantly higher in patients with osteoporosis with older age, male sex, and all types of comorbidities (P less than .05), except for hyperthyroidism (P = .200).

Study details: This Taiwanese nationwide study included 1,206,247 patients with osteoporosis using insurance claims data. After propensity score matching, 13,548 and 54,336 patients were analyzed in the AMD and non-AMD groups, respectively.

Disclosures: The study was supported by Chang Gung Medical Research Foundation. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Sun CC et al. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 17. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037028.

Key clinical point: Patients with osteoporosis with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are at a significantly higher risk of developing spine and hip fractures.

Major finding: The AMD vs. non-AMD group had a significantly higher risk for spine and hip fractures (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; P less than .001 and HR, 1.18; P = .001; respectively). The risk for mortality was significantly higher in patients with osteoporosis with older age, male sex, and all types of comorbidities (P less than .05), except for hyperthyroidism (P = .200).

Study details: This Taiwanese nationwide study included 1,206,247 patients with osteoporosis using insurance claims data. After propensity score matching, 13,548 and 54,336 patients were analyzed in the AMD and non-AMD groups, respectively.

Disclosures: The study was supported by Chang Gung Medical Research Foundation. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation: Sun CC et al. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 17. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037028.

A novel randomized trial taking on a vexing issue around one of the world’s most commonly prescribed medications has concluded that frequently intolerable statin side effects, such as muscle weakness or pain, are almost entirely a nocebo effect, the placebo effect’s darker cousin.

The many patients who report such symptoms while taking statins are indeed probably feeling them, but they are a result of taking the pills rather than any pharmacologic effects, concluded researchers based on their 60-patient study, Self-Assessment Method for Statin Side-effects or Nocebo (SAMSON).

“SAMSON leaves no doubt that patients really do get side effects from statin tablets, but what it shows us is that 90% of this symptomatic burden is elicited by placebo tablets too,” said James P. Howard, MB, PhD, Imperial College London, when presenting the results Nov. 15 at the American Heart Association scientific sessions. They were published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Studies have shown that in practice “more than half of patients abandon statins completely within 2 years. And yet, in placebo-controlled trials, no more people stop statins than placebo,” Dr. Howard said.

“The most important message from SAMSON is that side effects from statin tablets are very real, but they are mainly caused by the act of taking the tablets, not by the statin that is contained within them.”
Patients in the trial, all of whom had a history of dropping statins because of side effects, each took atorvastatin 20 mg/day, a placebo, or neither pill for 1 month, alternating the regimens in randomized order over 1 year so that each was followed a total of 4 months. They used a smartphone app to record the severity of any side effects, not necessarily just pain, on a scale of 0-100.

Symptom intensity scores averaged 16.3 for atorvastatin and 15.4 for placebo, for a nonsignificant difference, but only 8.0 for no-pill months (P < .001 compared with the statin or placebo).
Because such symptoms seem to be based on patient expectations from statin therapy, positive communication about what the drugs can achieve and how the next treatment steps are described can play a big role in their continued use.

For example, “changing them to another statin is a very reasonable thing to do, but as soon as you start trying people on lower doses and working up, you’re sort of telling them that you’re expecting at some dose that they are going to get side effects,” cautioned Dr. Howard at a media briefing on SAMSON.

“The most important thing is to explain the evidence, and what our expectations are, maybe be a bit more optimistic about statins, and tell them they’re very unlikely to suffer from side effects,” he explained, “because the nocebo effect can only really rear its head if the patients are expecting to feel worse – just like the placebo effect will only work if people are expecting to feel better.”
Amit Khera, MD, who moderated the media briefing, said he always tells such patients: “Yes, 1 in 10 patients report having muscle ache. But first and foremost, 9 in 10 don’t. The vast majority of patients don’t get muscle aches. I think that’s really an important part of the communication.”

Now, after SAMSON, “I have an additional point that I’m going to tell them: out of the patients that get muscle aches, probably 90% of that is the anticipation of getting the statin, the nocebo effect,” said Dr. Khera, who directs the preventive cardiology program at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

In practice, however, many patients who report adverse statin effects do so later than 2 weeks after starting therapy, “so these findings cannot be generalized to them,” proposed Francine K. Welty, MD, PhD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, as the invited discussant after Dr. Howard’s presentation.

All 60 patients recruited for SAMSON had previously stopped taking a statin because of side effects that arose within 2 weeks of their first dose. That requirement was intended to boost chances that any further symptoms during the trial would arise within a month of starting each new round of pills, Dr. Howard said.

So the trial’s results, Dr. Welty said, “are limited to those subjects who develop symptoms within 2 weeks of starting a statin.”

Including only such patients may have created bias toward a nocebo effect, she said, because “non–drug-related side effects of medications are often greatest during the initial weeks of treatment and tend to abate over time.” For example, “metformin causes diarrhea and beta-blockers cause fatigue, but subjects do adapt and generally tolerate them very well.”

The patients, 25 women and 35 men, 90% of whom were white, received four pill bottles, each with a month’s supply of atorvastatin, four bottles each with 1 month of placebo, and four empty bottles each, to be used double blind for a month in randomized order.

Patients used the smartphone app to document their symptom scores, which ranged from 0 for no symptoms to 100 for symptoms that were the “worst imaginable,” the published report noted. Patients who experienced symptoms so severe as to be intolerable could stop the 1-month regimen they were then following, with instructions to resume the regimens in order starting the next month.

Eleven patients were unable to complete all 12 1-month segments of the trial.

The study’s overall “nocebo ratio” of 0.90 was calculated as the difference between symptom intensity scores on placebo and on no treatment divided by the difference between symptom intensity on the statin and on no treatment. The interpretation: 90% of the symptom burden felt by patients receiving atorvastatin was also felt during placebo use.

A total of 30 patients, contacted 6 months after the trial concluded, had resumed taking a statin, while “4 planned to do so and one could not be contacted,” the report noted. The 25 other patients weren’t receiving a statin and had no plans to take one.

In an important part of the trial, Dr. Howard said, at its conclusion the patients were shown their pattern of symptoms in relation to whether they were taking the statin, placebo, or neither. “Participants could see as clearly as we could the surprisingly powerful magnitude of the nocebo effect. And this led to half of our patients happily restarting statins.”

The implications of SAMSON, Dr. Welty said, “are very important, in that those developing symptoms within 2 weeks of starting a statin should be reassured that approximately half will be able to successful restart the statin.”

SAMSON was funded by the British Heart Foundation. Howard had no disclosures. Dr. Welty disclosed chairing the data safety monitoring committee for Empagliflozin International Clinical Trials, supported by Boehringer Ingelheim.

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com.
 

A novel randomized trial taking on a vexing issue around one of the world’s most commonly prescribed medications has concluded that frequently intolerable statin side effects, such as muscle weakness or pain, are almost entirely a nocebo effect, the placebo effect’s darker cousin.

The many patients who report such symptoms while taking statins are indeed probably feeling them, but they are a result of taking the pills rather than any pharmacologic effects, concluded researchers based on their 60-patient study, Self-Assessment Method for Statin Side-effects or Nocebo (SAMSON).

“SAMSON leaves no doubt that patients really do get side effects from statin tablets, but what it shows us is that 90% of this symptomatic burden is elicited by placebo tablets too,” said James P. Howard, MB, PhD, Imperial College London, when presenting the results Nov. 15 at the American Heart Association scientific sessions. They were published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Studies have shown that in practice “more than half of patients abandon statins completely within 2 years. And yet, in placebo-controlled trials, no more people stop statins than placebo,” Dr. Howard said.

“The most important message from SAMSON is that side effects from statin tablets are very real, but they are mainly caused by the act of taking the tablets, not by the statin that is contained within them.”
Patients in the trial, all of whom had a history of dropping statins because of side effects, each took atorvastatin 20 mg/day, a placebo, or neither pill for 1 month, alternating the regimens in randomized order over 1 year so that each was followed a total of 4 months. They used a smartphone app to record the severity of any side effects, not necessarily just pain, on a scale of 0-100.

Symptom intensity scores averaged 16.3 for atorvastatin and 15.4 for placebo, for a nonsignificant difference, but only 8.0 for no-pill months (P < .001 compared with the statin or placebo).
Because such symptoms seem to be based on patient expectations from statin therapy, positive communication about what the drugs can achieve and how the next treatment steps are described can play a big role in their continued use.

For example, “changing them to another statin is a very reasonable thing to do, but as soon as you start trying people on lower doses and working up, you’re sort of telling them that you’re expecting at some dose that they are going to get side effects,” cautioned Dr. Howard at a media briefing on SAMSON.

“The most important thing is to explain the evidence, and what our expectations are, maybe be a bit more optimistic about statins, and tell them they’re very unlikely to suffer from side effects,” he explained, “because the nocebo effect can only really rear its head if the patients are expecting to feel worse – just like the placebo effect will only work if people are expecting to feel better.”
Amit Khera, MD, who moderated the media briefing, said he always tells such patients: “Yes, 1 in 10 patients report having muscle ache. But first and foremost, 9 in 10 don’t. The vast majority of patients don’t get muscle aches. I think that’s really an important part of the communication.”

Now, after SAMSON, “I have an additional point that I’m going to tell them: out of the patients that get muscle aches, probably 90% of that is the anticipation of getting the statin, the nocebo effect,” said Dr. Khera, who directs the preventive cardiology program at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

In practice, however, many patients who report adverse statin effects do so later than 2 weeks after starting therapy, “so these findings cannot be generalized to them,” proposed Francine K. Welty, MD, PhD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, as the invited discussant after Dr. Howard’s presentation.

All 60 patients recruited for SAMSON had previously stopped taking a statin because of side effects that arose within 2 weeks of their first dose. That requirement was intended to boost chances that any further symptoms during the trial would arise within a month of starting each new round of pills, Dr. Howard said.

So the trial’s results, Dr. Welty said, “are limited to those subjects who develop symptoms within 2 weeks of starting a statin.”

Including only such patients may have created bias toward a nocebo effect, she said, because “non–drug-related side effects of medications are often greatest during the initial weeks of treatment and tend to abate over time.” For example, “metformin causes diarrhea and beta-blockers cause fatigue, but subjects do adapt and generally tolerate them very well.”

The patients, 25 women and 35 men, 90% of whom were white, received four pill bottles, each with a month’s supply of atorvastatin, four bottles each with 1 month of placebo, and four empty bottles each, to be used double blind for a month in randomized order.

Patients used the smartphone app to document their symptom scores, which ranged from 0 for no symptoms to 100 for symptoms that were the “worst imaginable,” the published report noted. Patients who experienced symptoms so severe as to be intolerable could stop the 1-month regimen they were then following, with instructions to resume the regimens in order starting the next month.

Eleven patients were unable to complete all 12 1-month segments of the trial.

The study’s overall “nocebo ratio” of 0.90 was calculated as the difference between symptom intensity scores on placebo and on no treatment divided by the difference between symptom intensity on the statin and on no treatment. The interpretation: 90% of the symptom burden felt by patients receiving atorvastatin was also felt during placebo use.

A total of 30 patients, contacted 6 months after the trial concluded, had resumed taking a statin, while “4 planned to do so and one could not be contacted,” the report noted. The 25 other patients weren’t receiving a statin and had no plans to take one.

In an important part of the trial, Dr. Howard said, at its conclusion the patients were shown their pattern of symptoms in relation to whether they were taking the statin, placebo, or neither. “Participants could see as clearly as we could the surprisingly powerful magnitude of the nocebo effect. And this led to half of our patients happily restarting statins.”

The implications of SAMSON, Dr. Welty said, “are very important, in that those developing symptoms within 2 weeks of starting a statin should be reassured that approximately half will be able to successful restart the statin.”

SAMSON was funded by the British Heart Foundation. Howard had no disclosures. Dr. Welty disclosed chairing the data safety monitoring committee for Empagliflozin International Clinical Trials, supported by Boehringer Ingelheim.

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com.
 

A novel randomized trial taking on a vexing issue around one of the world’s most commonly prescribed medications has concluded that frequently intolerable statin side effects, such as muscle weakness or pain, are almost entirely a nocebo effect, the placebo effect’s darker cousin.

The many patients who report such symptoms while taking statins are indeed probably feeling them, but they are a result of taking the pills rather than any pharmacologic effects, concluded researchers based on their 60-patient study, Self-Assessment Method for Statin Side-effects or Nocebo (SAMSON).

“SAMSON leaves no doubt that patients really do get side effects from statin tablets, but what it shows us is that 90% of this symptomatic burden is elicited by placebo tablets too,” said James P. Howard, MB, PhD, Imperial College London, when presenting the results Nov. 15 at the American Heart Association scientific sessions. They were published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Studies have shown that in practice “more than half of patients abandon statins completely within 2 years. And yet, in placebo-controlled trials, no more people stop statins than placebo,” Dr. Howard said.

“The most important message from SAMSON is that side effects from statin tablets are very real, but they are mainly caused by the act of taking the tablets, not by the statin that is contained within them.”
Patients in the trial, all of whom had a history of dropping statins because of side effects, each took atorvastatin 20 mg/day, a placebo, or neither pill for 1 month, alternating the regimens in randomized order over 1 year so that each was followed a total of 4 months. They used a smartphone app to record the severity of any side effects, not necessarily just pain, on a scale of 0-100.

Symptom intensity scores averaged 16.3 for atorvastatin and 15.4 for placebo, for a nonsignificant difference, but only 8.0 for no-pill months (P < .001 compared with the statin or placebo).
Because such symptoms seem to be based on patient expectations from statin therapy, positive communication about what the drugs can achieve and how the next treatment steps are described can play a big role in their continued use.

For example, “changing them to another statin is a very reasonable thing to do, but as soon as you start trying people on lower doses and working up, you’re sort of telling them that you’re expecting at some dose that they are going to get side effects,” cautioned Dr. Howard at a media briefing on SAMSON.

“The most important thing is to explain the evidence, and what our expectations are, maybe be a bit more optimistic about statins, and tell them they’re very unlikely to suffer from side effects,” he explained, “because the nocebo effect can only really rear its head if the patients are expecting to feel worse – just like the placebo effect will only work if people are expecting to feel better.”
Amit Khera, MD, who moderated the media briefing, said he always tells such patients: “Yes, 1 in 10 patients report having muscle ache. But first and foremost, 9 in 10 don’t. The vast majority of patients don’t get muscle aches. I think that’s really an important part of the communication.”

Now, after SAMSON, “I have an additional point that I’m going to tell them: out of the patients that get muscle aches, probably 90% of that is the anticipation of getting the statin, the nocebo effect,” said Dr. Khera, who directs the preventive cardiology program at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

In practice, however, many patients who report adverse statin effects do so later than 2 weeks after starting therapy, “so these findings cannot be generalized to them,” proposed Francine K. Welty, MD, PhD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, as the invited discussant after Dr. Howard’s presentation.

All 60 patients recruited for SAMSON had previously stopped taking a statin because of side effects that arose within 2 weeks of their first dose. That requirement was intended to boost chances that any further symptoms during the trial would arise within a month of starting each new round of pills, Dr. Howard said.

So the trial’s results, Dr. Welty said, “are limited to those subjects who develop symptoms within 2 weeks of starting a statin.”

Including only such patients may have created bias toward a nocebo effect, she said, because “non–drug-related side effects of medications are often greatest during the initial weeks of treatment and tend to abate over time.” For example, “metformin causes diarrhea and beta-blockers cause fatigue, but subjects do adapt and generally tolerate them very well.”

The patients, 25 women and 35 men, 90% of whom were white, received four pill bottles, each with a month’s supply of atorvastatin, four bottles each with 1 month of placebo, and four empty bottles each, to be used double blind for a month in randomized order.

Patients used the smartphone app to document their symptom scores, which ranged from 0 for no symptoms to 100 for symptoms that were the “worst imaginable,” the published report noted. Patients who experienced symptoms so severe as to be intolerable could stop the 1-month regimen they were then following, with instructions to resume the regimens in order starting the next month.

Eleven patients were unable to complete all 12 1-month segments of the trial.

The study’s overall “nocebo ratio” of 0.90 was calculated as the difference between symptom intensity scores on placebo and on no treatment divided by the difference between symptom intensity on the statin and on no treatment. The interpretation: 90% of the symptom burden felt by patients receiving atorvastatin was also felt during placebo use.

A total of 30 patients, contacted 6 months after the trial concluded, had resumed taking a statin, while “4 planned to do so and one could not be contacted,” the report noted. The 25 other patients weren’t receiving a statin and had no plans to take one.

In an important part of the trial, Dr. Howard said, at its conclusion the patients were shown their pattern of symptoms in relation to whether they were taking the statin, placebo, or neither. “Participants could see as clearly as we could the surprisingly powerful magnitude of the nocebo effect. And this led to half of our patients happily restarting statins.”

The implications of SAMSON, Dr. Welty said, “are very important, in that those developing symptoms within 2 weeks of starting a statin should be reassured that approximately half will be able to successful restart the statin.”

SAMSON was funded by the British Heart Foundation. Howard had no disclosures. Dr. Welty disclosed chairing the data safety monitoring committee for Empagliflozin International Clinical Trials, supported by Boehringer Ingelheim.

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com.