Hematology Times

Image from PLOS ONE

Preclinical research suggests that targeting JAK2 can reduce the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in transplant recipients.

Researchers found that genetic ablation of JAK2 on donor T cells or inhibition of JAK2 via treatment with pacritinib reduced GVHD in mice without compromising graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) activity.

“An effort to identify selective immune suppression whereby GVHD is reduced and the antitumor activity of the graft is preserved is key to improving the success of blood and marrow transplantation,” said Brian C. Betts, MD, of Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.

Dr Betts and his colleagues conducted this research and recounted their findings in PNAS.

In experiments with mice, the researchers found that donor T cells with JAK2 deletion were less likely than wild-type donor T cells to induce GVHD. However, JAK2 deletion did not impair the GVL effect.

Mice that received JAK2^−/− T cells had longer survival, higher body weights, and less GVHD than control mice.

The researchers said targeting JAK2 may reduce GVHD, in part, by limiting Th1 differentiation and the migratory capacity of alloreactive T cells. However, targeting JAK2 promotes beneficial regulatory-T-cell and Th2 differentiation as well.

The researchers also tested the effects of JAK2 inhibition with pacritinib. Mice received allografts and were treated with pacritinib or vehicle control for 3 weeks.

As before, JAK2 inhibition reduced acute GVHD mortality while preserving the GVL effect.

The team also discovered that pacritinib could protect mice from tissue graft rejection, suggesting the drug could be used to prevent kidney or liver transplant rejection.

Now, the researchers are working on a phase 1/2 trial designed to determine if pacritinib and standard immune suppression can prevent acute GVHD after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (NCT02891603).

Image from PLOS ONE

Preclinical research suggests that targeting JAK2 can reduce the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in transplant recipients.

Researchers found that genetic ablation of JAK2 on donor T cells or inhibition of JAK2 via treatment with pacritinib reduced GVHD in mice without compromising graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) activity.

“An effort to identify selective immune suppression whereby GVHD is reduced and the antitumor activity of the graft is preserved is key to improving the success of blood and marrow transplantation,” said Brian C. Betts, MD, of Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.

Dr Betts and his colleagues conducted this research and recounted their findings in PNAS.

In experiments with mice, the researchers found that donor T cells with JAK2 deletion were less likely than wild-type donor T cells to induce GVHD. However, JAK2 deletion did not impair the GVL effect.

Mice that received JAK2^−/− T cells had longer survival, higher body weights, and less GVHD than control mice.

The researchers said targeting JAK2 may reduce GVHD, in part, by limiting Th1 differentiation and the migratory capacity of alloreactive T cells. However, targeting JAK2 promotes beneficial regulatory-T-cell and Th2 differentiation as well.

The researchers also tested the effects of JAK2 inhibition with pacritinib. Mice received allografts and were treated with pacritinib or vehicle control for 3 weeks.

As before, JAK2 inhibition reduced acute GVHD mortality while preserving the GVL effect.

The team also discovered that pacritinib could protect mice from tissue graft rejection, suggesting the drug could be used to prevent kidney or liver transplant rejection.

Now, the researchers are working on a phase 1/2 trial designed to determine if pacritinib and standard immune suppression can prevent acute GVHD after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (NCT02891603).

Image from PLOS ONE

Preclinical research suggests that targeting JAK2 can reduce the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in transplant recipients.

Researchers found that genetic ablation of JAK2 on donor T cells or inhibition of JAK2 via treatment with pacritinib reduced GVHD in mice without compromising graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) activity.

“An effort to identify selective immune suppression whereby GVHD is reduced and the antitumor activity of the graft is preserved is key to improving the success of blood and marrow transplantation,” said Brian C. Betts, MD, of Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.

Dr Betts and his colleagues conducted this research and recounted their findings in PNAS.

In experiments with mice, the researchers found that donor T cells with JAK2 deletion were less likely than wild-type donor T cells to induce GVHD. However, JAK2 deletion did not impair the GVL effect.

Mice that received JAK2^−/− T cells had longer survival, higher body weights, and less GVHD than control mice.

The researchers said targeting JAK2 may reduce GVHD, in part, by limiting Th1 differentiation and the migratory capacity of alloreactive T cells. However, targeting JAK2 promotes beneficial regulatory-T-cell and Th2 differentiation as well.

The researchers also tested the effects of JAK2 inhibition with pacritinib. Mice received allografts and were treated with pacritinib or vehicle control for 3 weeks.

As before, JAK2 inhibition reduced acute GVHD mortality while preserving the GVL effect.

The team also discovered that pacritinib could protect mice from tissue graft rejection, suggesting the drug could be used to prevent kidney or liver transplant rejection.

Now, the researchers are working on a phase 1/2 trial designed to determine if pacritinib and standard immune suppression can prevent acute GVHD after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (NCT02891603).

Photo by Bill Branson

A study conducted in Sweden revealed that social benefits can ease financial burdens for parents of children recently diagnosed with cancer.

However, the study also showed that mothers experienced persistently lower income after benefits diminished.

Ayako Hiyoshi, PhD, of Örebro University in Örebro, Sweden, and her colleagues detailed these findings in Cancer.

The researchers gathered information from Swedish national registers and examined the trajectories of parents’ income from different sources.

Parents of children with cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2009 were identified and matched with parents of children without cancer (reference parents).

In total, 20,091 families were followed from the year before cancer diagnosis to a maximum of 8 years.

The researchers noted that, around the time of a child’s cancer diagnosis, total income (from all sources) was, on average, higher in mothers of children with cancer than in reference mothers.

The ratio of mean total income for mothers of children with cancer, compared to reference mothers, was 1.032 at 1 year prior to the child’s diagnosis and 1.064 the year of diagnosis.

For fathers of children with cancer, total income was slightly lower than reference fathers’ income. The ratios were 0.987 at 1 year prior to diagnosis and 0.995 the year of diagnosis.

The researchers also noted that parents’ income from work was at its lowest around the time of a child’s cancer diagnosis but increased with time.

At cancer diagnosis, the ratio of mean income from work was 0.642 for mothers and 0.858 for fathers. One year later, the ratios were 0.786 and 0.956, respectively. At 3 years, the ratios were 0.876 and 0.986, respectively. At 6 years, the ratios were 0.856 and 1.058, respectively.

The researchers pointed out that sickness and childcare-related benefits, which compensated for income loss, were greater for parents of children with cancer than for reference parents. However, social benefits diminished over time.

One year prior to cancer diagnosis, the ratio of sickness benefits was 3.495 for mothers and 5.213 for fathers. The year of diagnosis, the ratios were 4.785 and 5.795, respectively. At 3 years, the ratios were 1.404 and 1.339, respectively. And at 6 years, the ratios were 0.931 and 1.421, respectively.

One year prior to cancer diagnosis, the ratio of childcare-related benefits was 2.830 for mothers and 3.514 for fathers. The year of diagnosis, the ratios were 4.553 and 4.930, respectively. At 3 years, the ratios were 2.225 and 1.948, respectively. And at 6 years, the ratios were 1.272 and 1.095, respectively.

The decline of social benefits over time meant that cancer mothers’ total income became lower than that of reference mothers, and this difference persisted over the period studied. This was not the case for cancer fathers, however.

The ratio of income from all sources for cancer mothers compared to reference mothers was 1.064 the year of diagnosis, 0.985 at 2 years, 0.966 at 4 years, and 0.934 at 6 years.

The ratio of income from all sources for cancer fathers compared to reference fathers was 0.995 the year of diagnosis, 0.993 at 2 years, 0.998 at 4 years, and 1.029 at 6 years.

“A significant and unexpected finding was that, although income from employment stayed lower for several years for mothers, total income was higher for mothers of children with cancer around the time of the child’s cancer diagnosis when the compensation from social benefits were included,” Dr Hiyoshi said.

“The persistently lower income from employment for mothers of children with cancer compared with mothers of cancer-free children implies potential long-term consequences for the mothers of children with cancer, including their career and future pension in old age.”

Photo by Bill Branson

A study conducted in Sweden revealed that social benefits can ease financial burdens for parents of children recently diagnosed with cancer.

However, the study also showed that mothers experienced persistently lower income after benefits diminished.

Ayako Hiyoshi, PhD, of Örebro University in Örebro, Sweden, and her colleagues detailed these findings in Cancer.

The researchers gathered information from Swedish national registers and examined the trajectories of parents’ income from different sources.

Parents of children with cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2009 were identified and matched with parents of children without cancer (reference parents).

In total, 20,091 families were followed from the year before cancer diagnosis to a maximum of 8 years.

The researchers noted that, around the time of a child’s cancer diagnosis, total income (from all sources) was, on average, higher in mothers of children with cancer than in reference mothers.

The ratio of mean total income for mothers of children with cancer, compared to reference mothers, was 1.032 at 1 year prior to the child’s diagnosis and 1.064 the year of diagnosis.

For fathers of children with cancer, total income was slightly lower than reference fathers’ income. The ratios were 0.987 at 1 year prior to diagnosis and 0.995 the year of diagnosis.

The researchers also noted that parents’ income from work was at its lowest around the time of a child’s cancer diagnosis but increased with time.

At cancer diagnosis, the ratio of mean income from work was 0.642 for mothers and 0.858 for fathers. One year later, the ratios were 0.786 and 0.956, respectively. At 3 years, the ratios were 0.876 and 0.986, respectively. At 6 years, the ratios were 0.856 and 1.058, respectively.

The researchers pointed out that sickness and childcare-related benefits, which compensated for income loss, were greater for parents of children with cancer than for reference parents. However, social benefits diminished over time.

One year prior to cancer diagnosis, the ratio of sickness benefits was 3.495 for mothers and 5.213 for fathers. The year of diagnosis, the ratios were 4.785 and 5.795, respectively. At 3 years, the ratios were 1.404 and 1.339, respectively. And at 6 years, the ratios were 0.931 and 1.421, respectively.

One year prior to cancer diagnosis, the ratio of childcare-related benefits was 2.830 for mothers and 3.514 for fathers. The year of diagnosis, the ratios were 4.553 and 4.930, respectively. At 3 years, the ratios were 2.225 and 1.948, respectively. And at 6 years, the ratios were 1.272 and 1.095, respectively.

The decline of social benefits over time meant that cancer mothers’ total income became lower than that of reference mothers, and this difference persisted over the period studied. This was not the case for cancer fathers, however.

The ratio of income from all sources for cancer mothers compared to reference mothers was 1.064 the year of diagnosis, 0.985 at 2 years, 0.966 at 4 years, and 0.934 at 6 years.

The ratio of income from all sources for cancer fathers compared to reference fathers was 0.995 the year of diagnosis, 0.993 at 2 years, 0.998 at 4 years, and 1.029 at 6 years.

“A significant and unexpected finding was that, although income from employment stayed lower for several years for mothers, total income was higher for mothers of children with cancer around the time of the child’s cancer diagnosis when the compensation from social benefits were included,” Dr Hiyoshi said.

“The persistently lower income from employment for mothers of children with cancer compared with mothers of cancer-free children implies potential long-term consequences for the mothers of children with cancer, including their career and future pension in old age.”

Photo by Bill Branson

A study conducted in Sweden revealed that social benefits can ease financial burdens for parents of children recently diagnosed with cancer.

However, the study also showed that mothers experienced persistently lower income after benefits diminished.

Ayako Hiyoshi, PhD, of Örebro University in Örebro, Sweden, and her colleagues detailed these findings in Cancer.

The researchers gathered information from Swedish national registers and examined the trajectories of parents’ income from different sources.

Parents of children with cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2009 were identified and matched with parents of children without cancer (reference parents).

In total, 20,091 families were followed from the year before cancer diagnosis to a maximum of 8 years.

The researchers noted that, around the time of a child’s cancer diagnosis, total income (from all sources) was, on average, higher in mothers of children with cancer than in reference mothers.

The ratio of mean total income for mothers of children with cancer, compared to reference mothers, was 1.032 at 1 year prior to the child’s diagnosis and 1.064 the year of diagnosis.

For fathers of children with cancer, total income was slightly lower than reference fathers’ income. The ratios were 0.987 at 1 year prior to diagnosis and 0.995 the year of diagnosis.

The researchers also noted that parents’ income from work was at its lowest around the time of a child’s cancer diagnosis but increased with time.

At cancer diagnosis, the ratio of mean income from work was 0.642 for mothers and 0.858 for fathers. One year later, the ratios were 0.786 and 0.956, respectively. At 3 years, the ratios were 0.876 and 0.986, respectively. At 6 years, the ratios were 0.856 and 1.058, respectively.

The researchers pointed out that sickness and childcare-related benefits, which compensated for income loss, were greater for parents of children with cancer than for reference parents. However, social benefits diminished over time.

One year prior to cancer diagnosis, the ratio of sickness benefits was 3.495 for mothers and 5.213 for fathers. The year of diagnosis, the ratios were 4.785 and 5.795, respectively. At 3 years, the ratios were 1.404 and 1.339, respectively. And at 6 years, the ratios were 0.931 and 1.421, respectively.

One year prior to cancer diagnosis, the ratio of childcare-related benefits was 2.830 for mothers and 3.514 for fathers. The year of diagnosis, the ratios were 4.553 and 4.930, respectively. At 3 years, the ratios were 2.225 and 1.948, respectively. And at 6 years, the ratios were 1.272 and 1.095, respectively.

The decline of social benefits over time meant that cancer mothers’ total income became lower than that of reference mothers, and this difference persisted over the period studied. This was not the case for cancer fathers, however.

The ratio of income from all sources for cancer mothers compared to reference mothers was 1.064 the year of diagnosis, 0.985 at 2 years, 0.966 at 4 years, and 0.934 at 6 years.

The ratio of income from all sources for cancer fathers compared to reference fathers was 0.995 the year of diagnosis, 0.993 at 2 years, 0.998 at 4 years, and 1.029 at 6 years.

“A significant and unexpected finding was that, although income from employment stayed lower for several years for mothers, total income was higher for mothers of children with cancer around the time of the child’s cancer diagnosis when the compensation from social benefits were included,” Dr Hiyoshi said.

“The persistently lower income from employment for mothers of children with cancer compared with mothers of cancer-free children implies potential long-term consequences for the mothers of children with cancer, including their career and future pension in old age.”

Photo by Larry Young

LA JOLLA, CA—The dual PI3K δ/γ inhibitor tenalisib has demonstrated activity in a phase 1 trial of patients with relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphomas.

Tenalisib produced “encouraging” response rates of 44% in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and 50% in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), according to study investigator Bradley M. Haverkos, MD, of the University of Colorado School of Medicine in Aurora.

Dr Haverkos also said tenalisib had an acceptable safety profile.

The most common treatment-related adverse event (AE) in both patient groups was transaminitis.

Dr Haverkos and his colleagues presented these results in a pair of posters and an oral presentation at the 10th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

The trial was sponsored by Rhizen Pharmaceuticals, the company developing tenalisib (formerly RP6530).

The researchers have enrolled 55 patients in this trial—28 with CTCL and 27 with PTCL.

The study has a standard 3+3 design, starting with a 200 mg daily fasting dose of tenalisib and escalating to an 800 mg daily fasting dose, followed by an 800 mg daily fed cohort.

There were 3 dose-limiting toxicities in the 800 mg fed cohort—transaminitis, rash, and neutropenia. Therefore, the 800 mg fasting dose was considered the maximum-tolerated dose.

Patients in the PTCL and CTCL expansion cohorts received the maximum-tolerated dose.

Patients were scheduled to receive 8 cycles (28 days each) of tenalisib, but treatment could be extended to 24 months.

The data cutoff was January 10, 2018.

Efficacy in PTCL

Most PTCL patients (n=24) had PTCL not otherwise specified (NOS), 2 had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), and 1 had subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL).

The patients’ median age at baseline was 63 (range, 40-89), and 63% are male. Sixty-three percent of patients had relapsed disease at baseline, 37% were refractory, and 93% had stage 3 or 4 disease. Patients had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-7).

The median duration of treatment with tenalisib was 1.9 months.

Fourteen patients were evaluable for efficacy. Eleven patients had progressed prior to the first protocol-defined assessment, and 2 patients had not reached their first efficacy assessment at the data cutoff.

Seven of the 14 evaluable patients responded (50%). Three patients (21%) had a complete response (CR), 4 (29%) had a partial response (PR), 3 (21%) had stable disease, and 4 (29%) progressed.

“There were several patients with lengthy responses,” Dr Haverkos noted. “One patient had an ongoing response at 16 months, another at 11 months, and a number of patients had ongoing responses at 7 months.”

All 3 patients with a CR had PTCL NOS and received the 800 mg fasting dose of tenalisib.

Two patients with a PR had PTCL NOS, 1 had AITL, and 1 had SPTCL. The SPTCL patient received the 200 mg dose.

The AITL patient and 1 of the PTCL NOS patients received the 800 mg fasting dose. The other PTCL NOS patient received the 400 mg dose.

Efficacy in CTCL

Most CTCL patients (n=23) had mycosis fungoides, but 5 had Sézary syndrome. The patients’ median age at baseline was 68 (range, 39-84), and 57% are female.

Forty-three percent of patients had relapsed disease at baseline, 57% were refractory, and 46% had stage 3 or 4 disease. Patients had received a median of 6 prior therapies (range, 2-15).

The median duration of treatment with tenalisib was 3.4 months.

Eighteen patients were evaluable for efficacy. Eight patients had progressed prior to the first protocol-defined assessment, and 2 patients had not yet reached their first efficacy assessment.

Eight of the 18 evaluable patients responded (44%), all with PRs. Seven patients (39%) had stable disease, and 3 (17%) progressed.

Four patients were still in response beyond 8 months of follow-up, and 1 patient was still in PR beyond 11 months.

Five patients with a PR had received the 800 mg fasting dose of tenalisib. Two received the 800 mg fed dose, and 1 patient received the drug at 400 mg.

Overall safety

Treatment-related AEs included transaminitis (25%, 14/55), diarrhea (11%, n=6), fatigue (6%, n=11), headache (9%, n=5), rash (9%, n=5), nausea (5%, n=3), vomiting (5%, n=3), pyrexia (5%, n=3), and dizziness (5%, n=3). Dizziness was only observed in CTCL patients.

Treatment-related grade 3 or higher AEs included transaminitis (20%, n=11), rash (5%, n=3), neutropenia (2%, n=1), hypophosphatemia (2%, n=1), international normalized ratio increase (2%, n=1), sepsis (2%, n=1), pyrexia (2%, n=1), and diplopia secondary to neuropathy (2%, n=1).

Seventy-six percent (n=42) of patients discontinued treatment. Sixty-eight percent (n=29) stopped due to progression, 5% (n=2) stopped at investigators’ discretion, 9% (n=4) withdrew consent, 12% (n=5) had a treatment-related AE, and 5% (n=2) had an unrelated AE.

Seventeen PTCL patients stopped treatment due to progression, as did 12 CTCL patients. One patient in each group stopped treatment at investigators’ discretion, and all 4 patients who withdrew consent had CTCL.

Four CTCL patients stopped treatment due to a related AE—transaminitis, sepsis, diarrhea, and diplopia secondary to neuropathy. One PTCL patient stopped treatment due to a related AE, which was transaminitis.

“Tenalisib at the 800 mg fasting dose has demonstrated acceptable safety and tolerability,” Dr Haverkos concluded. “We’ve observed encouraging response rates thus far, which support further evaluation of tenalisib in these patients.”

Photo by Larry Young

LA JOLLA, CA—The dual PI3K δ/γ inhibitor tenalisib has demonstrated activity in a phase 1 trial of patients with relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphomas.

Tenalisib produced “encouraging” response rates of 44% in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and 50% in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), according to study investigator Bradley M. Haverkos, MD, of the University of Colorado School of Medicine in Aurora.

Dr Haverkos also said tenalisib had an acceptable safety profile.

The most common treatment-related adverse event (AE) in both patient groups was transaminitis.

Dr Haverkos and his colleagues presented these results in a pair of posters and an oral presentation at the 10th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

The trial was sponsored by Rhizen Pharmaceuticals, the company developing tenalisib (formerly RP6530).

The researchers have enrolled 55 patients in this trial—28 with CTCL and 27 with PTCL.

The study has a standard 3+3 design, starting with a 200 mg daily fasting dose of tenalisib and escalating to an 800 mg daily fasting dose, followed by an 800 mg daily fed cohort.

There were 3 dose-limiting toxicities in the 800 mg fed cohort—transaminitis, rash, and neutropenia. Therefore, the 800 mg fasting dose was considered the maximum-tolerated dose.

Patients in the PTCL and CTCL expansion cohorts received the maximum-tolerated dose.

Patients were scheduled to receive 8 cycles (28 days each) of tenalisib, but treatment could be extended to 24 months.

The data cutoff was January 10, 2018.

Efficacy in PTCL

Most PTCL patients (n=24) had PTCL not otherwise specified (NOS), 2 had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), and 1 had subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL).

The patients’ median age at baseline was 63 (range, 40-89), and 63% are male. Sixty-three percent of patients had relapsed disease at baseline, 37% were refractory, and 93% had stage 3 or 4 disease. Patients had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-7).

The median duration of treatment with tenalisib was 1.9 months.

Fourteen patients were evaluable for efficacy. Eleven patients had progressed prior to the first protocol-defined assessment, and 2 patients had not reached their first efficacy assessment at the data cutoff.

Seven of the 14 evaluable patients responded (50%). Three patients (21%) had a complete response (CR), 4 (29%) had a partial response (PR), 3 (21%) had stable disease, and 4 (29%) progressed.

“There were several patients with lengthy responses,” Dr Haverkos noted. “One patient had an ongoing response at 16 months, another at 11 months, and a number of patients had ongoing responses at 7 months.”

All 3 patients with a CR had PTCL NOS and received the 800 mg fasting dose of tenalisib.

Two patients with a PR had PTCL NOS, 1 had AITL, and 1 had SPTCL. The SPTCL patient received the 200 mg dose.

The AITL patient and 1 of the PTCL NOS patients received the 800 mg fasting dose. The other PTCL NOS patient received the 400 mg dose.

Efficacy in CTCL

Most CTCL patients (n=23) had mycosis fungoides, but 5 had Sézary syndrome. The patients’ median age at baseline was 68 (range, 39-84), and 57% are female.

Forty-three percent of patients had relapsed disease at baseline, 57% were refractory, and 46% had stage 3 or 4 disease. Patients had received a median of 6 prior therapies (range, 2-15).

The median duration of treatment with tenalisib was 3.4 months.

Eighteen patients were evaluable for efficacy. Eight patients had progressed prior to the first protocol-defined assessment, and 2 patients had not yet reached their first efficacy assessment.

Eight of the 18 evaluable patients responded (44%), all with PRs. Seven patients (39%) had stable disease, and 3 (17%) progressed.

Four patients were still in response beyond 8 months of follow-up, and 1 patient was still in PR beyond 11 months.

Five patients with a PR had received the 800 mg fasting dose of tenalisib. Two received the 800 mg fed dose, and 1 patient received the drug at 400 mg.

Overall safety

Treatment-related AEs included transaminitis (25%, 14/55), diarrhea (11%, n=6), fatigue (6%, n=11), headache (9%, n=5), rash (9%, n=5), nausea (5%, n=3), vomiting (5%, n=3), pyrexia (5%, n=3), and dizziness (5%, n=3). Dizziness was only observed in CTCL patients.

Treatment-related grade 3 or higher AEs included transaminitis (20%, n=11), rash (5%, n=3), neutropenia (2%, n=1), hypophosphatemia (2%, n=1), international normalized ratio increase (2%, n=1), sepsis (2%, n=1), pyrexia (2%, n=1), and diplopia secondary to neuropathy (2%, n=1).

Seventy-six percent (n=42) of patients discontinued treatment. Sixty-eight percent (n=29) stopped due to progression, 5% (n=2) stopped at investigators’ discretion, 9% (n=4) withdrew consent, 12% (n=5) had a treatment-related AE, and 5% (n=2) had an unrelated AE.

Seventeen PTCL patients stopped treatment due to progression, as did 12 CTCL patients. One patient in each group stopped treatment at investigators’ discretion, and all 4 patients who withdrew consent had CTCL.

Four CTCL patients stopped treatment due to a related AE—transaminitis, sepsis, diarrhea, and diplopia secondary to neuropathy. One PTCL patient stopped treatment due to a related AE, which was transaminitis.

“Tenalisib at the 800 mg fasting dose has demonstrated acceptable safety and tolerability,” Dr Haverkos concluded. “We’ve observed encouraging response rates thus far, which support further evaluation of tenalisib in these patients.”

Photo by Larry Young

LA JOLLA, CA—The dual PI3K δ/γ inhibitor tenalisib has demonstrated activity in a phase 1 trial of patients with relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphomas.

Tenalisib produced “encouraging” response rates of 44% in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and 50% in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), according to study investigator Bradley M. Haverkos, MD, of the University of Colorado School of Medicine in Aurora.

Dr Haverkos also said tenalisib had an acceptable safety profile.

The most common treatment-related adverse event (AE) in both patient groups was transaminitis.

Dr Haverkos and his colleagues presented these results in a pair of posters and an oral presentation at the 10th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

The trial was sponsored by Rhizen Pharmaceuticals, the company developing tenalisib (formerly RP6530).

The researchers have enrolled 55 patients in this trial—28 with CTCL and 27 with PTCL.

The study has a standard 3+3 design, starting with a 200 mg daily fasting dose of tenalisib and escalating to an 800 mg daily fasting dose, followed by an 800 mg daily fed cohort.

There were 3 dose-limiting toxicities in the 800 mg fed cohort—transaminitis, rash, and neutropenia. Therefore, the 800 mg fasting dose was considered the maximum-tolerated dose.

Patients in the PTCL and CTCL expansion cohorts received the maximum-tolerated dose.

Patients were scheduled to receive 8 cycles (28 days each) of tenalisib, but treatment could be extended to 24 months.

The data cutoff was January 10, 2018.

Efficacy in PTCL

Most PTCL patients (n=24) had PTCL not otherwise specified (NOS), 2 had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), and 1 had subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL).

The patients’ median age at baseline was 63 (range, 40-89), and 63% are male. Sixty-three percent of patients had relapsed disease at baseline, 37% were refractory, and 93% had stage 3 or 4 disease. Patients had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-7).

The median duration of treatment with tenalisib was 1.9 months.

Fourteen patients were evaluable for efficacy. Eleven patients had progressed prior to the first protocol-defined assessment, and 2 patients had not reached their first efficacy assessment at the data cutoff.

Seven of the 14 evaluable patients responded (50%). Three patients (21%) had a complete response (CR), 4 (29%) had a partial response (PR), 3 (21%) had stable disease, and 4 (29%) progressed.

“There were several patients with lengthy responses,” Dr Haverkos noted. “One patient had an ongoing response at 16 months, another at 11 months, and a number of patients had ongoing responses at 7 months.”

All 3 patients with a CR had PTCL NOS and received the 800 mg fasting dose of tenalisib.

Two patients with a PR had PTCL NOS, 1 had AITL, and 1 had SPTCL. The SPTCL patient received the 200 mg dose.

The AITL patient and 1 of the PTCL NOS patients received the 800 mg fasting dose. The other PTCL NOS patient received the 400 mg dose.

Efficacy in CTCL

Most CTCL patients (n=23) had mycosis fungoides, but 5 had Sézary syndrome. The patients’ median age at baseline was 68 (range, 39-84), and 57% are female.

Forty-three percent of patients had relapsed disease at baseline, 57% were refractory, and 46% had stage 3 or 4 disease. Patients had received a median of 6 prior therapies (range, 2-15).

The median duration of treatment with tenalisib was 3.4 months.

Eighteen patients were evaluable for efficacy. Eight patients had progressed prior to the first protocol-defined assessment, and 2 patients had not yet reached their first efficacy assessment.

Eight of the 18 evaluable patients responded (44%), all with PRs. Seven patients (39%) had stable disease, and 3 (17%) progressed.

Four patients were still in response beyond 8 months of follow-up, and 1 patient was still in PR beyond 11 months.

Five patients with a PR had received the 800 mg fasting dose of tenalisib. Two received the 800 mg fed dose, and 1 patient received the drug at 400 mg.

Overall safety

Treatment-related AEs included transaminitis (25%, 14/55), diarrhea (11%, n=6), fatigue (6%, n=11), headache (9%, n=5), rash (9%, n=5), nausea (5%, n=3), vomiting (5%, n=3), pyrexia (5%, n=3), and dizziness (5%, n=3). Dizziness was only observed in CTCL patients.

Treatment-related grade 3 or higher AEs included transaminitis (20%, n=11), rash (5%, n=3), neutropenia (2%, n=1), hypophosphatemia (2%, n=1), international normalized ratio increase (2%, n=1), sepsis (2%, n=1), pyrexia (2%, n=1), and diplopia secondary to neuropathy (2%, n=1).

Seventy-six percent (n=42) of patients discontinued treatment. Sixty-eight percent (n=29) stopped due to progression, 5% (n=2) stopped at investigators’ discretion, 9% (n=4) withdrew consent, 12% (n=5) had a treatment-related AE, and 5% (n=2) had an unrelated AE.

Seventeen PTCL patients stopped treatment due to progression, as did 12 CTCL patients. One patient in each group stopped treatment at investigators’ discretion, and all 4 patients who withdrew consent had CTCL.

Four CTCL patients stopped treatment due to a related AE—transaminitis, sepsis, diarrhea, and diplopia secondary to neuropathy. One PTCL patient stopped treatment due to a related AE, which was transaminitis.

“Tenalisib at the 800 mg fasting dose has demonstrated acceptable safety and tolerability,” Dr Haverkos concluded. “We’ve observed encouraging response rates thus far, which support further evaluation of tenalisib in these patients.”

Catalyst Biosciences

MADRID—The recombinant factor IX (FIX) product CB 2679d/ISU304 can increase FIX levels in patients with severe hemophilia B, according to a phase 1/2 trial.

Results showed a continuous linear increase in FIX activity levels following daily subcutaneous (SQ) dosing of CB 2679d for 6 days.

Adverse events were mild to moderate, and none of the patients have developed inhibitors to CB 2679d or FIX.

Howard Levy, MB ChB, PhD, chief medical officer of Catalyst Biosciences, Inc., presented these results at the 11th Annual Congress of The European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD).

The research was sponsored by Catalyst Biosciences, Inc.

This phase 1/2 trial was divided into 5 cohorts.

In cohort 1, researchers compared single doses of intravenous (IV) CB 2679d and IV BeneFIX (recombinant FIX). CB 2679d proved 22 times more potent than BeneFIX. The products’ half-lives were 27.0 hours and 21.0 hours, respectively.

In cohorts 2 and 3, researchers compared single, ascending doses of IV CB 2679d to SQ CB 2679d. The bioavailability of SQ CB 2679d was 18.5%, and the half-life was 98.7 hours.

Cohort 4 was dropped, as it was another comparison of IV and SQ CB 2679d, which was considered unnecessary.

Cohort 5 included 5 patients who received daily doses of SQ CB 2679d. For 6 days, patients received CB 2679d at a dose of 140 IU/kg SQ.

The patients’ FIX activity levels increased from a median of <1% at baseline to a median of 15.7% (interquartile range, 14.9% to 16.6%) after all 6 doses.

The increase in FIX activity levels after the daily dosing was linear, indicating that continued SQ dosing may increase FIX activity further.

The median half-life was 63.2 hours (interquartile range, 60.2 to 64 hours), with the result that activity levels were still at 4% to 6.4% five days after the last dose.

No inhibitors to CB 2679d or FIX were observed in any of the cohorts in this trial.

In cohort 5, adverse events included pain, erythema, redness, and bruising after injections. Bruising occurred only with initial injections, and the severity of pain, erythema, and redness decreased over time (from moderate to mild).

“Existing IV therapies have FIX trough levels that can drop as low as 1% to 3% before repeat dosing,” Dr Levey said. “Daily subcutaneous dosing of CB 2679d has the potential to minimize the variability in FIX activity levels observed between IV doses and maintain individuals in the mild or even normal hemophilia range. This study demonstrates that, even after just 6 days of treatment, CB 2679d compares favorably to currently approved therapies for hemophilia B, all of which are infused IV.”

Catalyst Biosciences

MADRID—The recombinant factor IX (FIX) product CB 2679d/ISU304 can increase FIX levels in patients with severe hemophilia B, according to a phase 1/2 trial.

Results showed a continuous linear increase in FIX activity levels following daily subcutaneous (SQ) dosing of CB 2679d for 6 days.

Adverse events were mild to moderate, and none of the patients have developed inhibitors to CB 2679d or FIX.

Howard Levy, MB ChB, PhD, chief medical officer of Catalyst Biosciences, Inc., presented these results at the 11th Annual Congress of The European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD).

The research was sponsored by Catalyst Biosciences, Inc.

This phase 1/2 trial was divided into 5 cohorts.

In cohort 1, researchers compared single doses of intravenous (IV) CB 2679d and IV BeneFIX (recombinant FIX). CB 2679d proved 22 times more potent than BeneFIX. The products’ half-lives were 27.0 hours and 21.0 hours, respectively.

In cohorts 2 and 3, researchers compared single, ascending doses of IV CB 2679d to SQ CB 2679d. The bioavailability of SQ CB 2679d was 18.5%, and the half-life was 98.7 hours.

Cohort 4 was dropped, as it was another comparison of IV and SQ CB 2679d, which was considered unnecessary.

Cohort 5 included 5 patients who received daily doses of SQ CB 2679d. For 6 days, patients received CB 2679d at a dose of 140 IU/kg SQ.

The patients’ FIX activity levels increased from a median of <1% at baseline to a median of 15.7% (interquartile range, 14.9% to 16.6%) after all 6 doses.

The increase in FIX activity levels after the daily dosing was linear, indicating that continued SQ dosing may increase FIX activity further.

The median half-life was 63.2 hours (interquartile range, 60.2 to 64 hours), with the result that activity levels were still at 4% to 6.4% five days after the last dose.

No inhibitors to CB 2679d or FIX were observed in any of the cohorts in this trial.

In cohort 5, adverse events included pain, erythema, redness, and bruising after injections. Bruising occurred only with initial injections, and the severity of pain, erythema, and redness decreased over time (from moderate to mild).

“Existing IV therapies have FIX trough levels that can drop as low as 1% to 3% before repeat dosing,” Dr Levey said. “Daily subcutaneous dosing of CB 2679d has the potential to minimize the variability in FIX activity levels observed between IV doses and maintain individuals in the mild or even normal hemophilia range. This study demonstrates that, even after just 6 days of treatment, CB 2679d compares favorably to currently approved therapies for hemophilia B, all of which are infused IV.”

Catalyst Biosciences

MADRID—The recombinant factor IX (FIX) product CB 2679d/ISU304 can increase FIX levels in patients with severe hemophilia B, according to a phase 1/2 trial.

Results showed a continuous linear increase in FIX activity levels following daily subcutaneous (SQ) dosing of CB 2679d for 6 days.

Adverse events were mild to moderate, and none of the patients have developed inhibitors to CB 2679d or FIX.

Howard Levy, MB ChB, PhD, chief medical officer of Catalyst Biosciences, Inc., presented these results at the 11th Annual Congress of The European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD).

The research was sponsored by Catalyst Biosciences, Inc.

This phase 1/2 trial was divided into 5 cohorts.

In cohort 1, researchers compared single doses of intravenous (IV) CB 2679d and IV BeneFIX (recombinant FIX). CB 2679d proved 22 times more potent than BeneFIX. The products’ half-lives were 27.0 hours and 21.0 hours, respectively.

In cohorts 2 and 3, researchers compared single, ascending doses of IV CB 2679d to SQ CB 2679d. The bioavailability of SQ CB 2679d was 18.5%, and the half-life was 98.7 hours.

Cohort 4 was dropped, as it was another comparison of IV and SQ CB 2679d, which was considered unnecessary.

Cohort 5 included 5 patients who received daily doses of SQ CB 2679d. For 6 days, patients received CB 2679d at a dose of 140 IU/kg SQ.

The patients’ FIX activity levels increased from a median of <1% at baseline to a median of 15.7% (interquartile range, 14.9% to 16.6%) after all 6 doses.

The increase in FIX activity levels after the daily dosing was linear, indicating that continued SQ dosing may increase FIX activity further.

The median half-life was 63.2 hours (interquartile range, 60.2 to 64 hours), with the result that activity levels were still at 4% to 6.4% five days after the last dose.

No inhibitors to CB 2679d or FIX were observed in any of the cohorts in this trial.

In cohort 5, adverse events included pain, erythema, redness, and bruising after injections. Bruising occurred only with initial injections, and the severity of pain, erythema, and redness decreased over time (from moderate to mild).

“Existing IV therapies have FIX trough levels that can drop as low as 1% to 3% before repeat dosing,” Dr Levey said. “Daily subcutaneous dosing of CB 2679d has the potential to minimize the variability in FIX activity levels observed between IV doses and maintain individuals in the mild or even normal hemophilia range. This study demonstrates that, even after just 6 days of treatment, CB 2679d compares favorably to currently approved therapies for hemophilia B, all of which are infused IV.”

Photo by Chad McNeeley

Results of a case-control study suggest a cytoprotective agent can reduce treatment-related gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

Use of this agent, amifostine, was associated with significantly lower rates of grade 2 or higher oral mucositis, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.

Additionally, amifostine did not appear to compromise the anti-myeloma activity of treatment, which consisted of high-dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT).

Ehsan Malek, MD, of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, and his colleagues reported these findings in Leukemia & Lymphoma.

The researchers compared HDM plus auto-HSCT, with or without pre-treatment amifostine, in previously treated MM patients.

There were 107 patients who received amifostine and 114 who did not. The 107 patients received amifostine at 740 mg/m², given as a bolus infusion at 24 hours and 15 minutes before HDM.

Baseline characteristics were largely similar in the amifostine and control groups. However, more patients in the amifostine group received a tandem HSCT (17 vs 0), and more patients in the control group had an ECOG performance status of 0 (64.3% vs 43%).

Patients in the amifostine group had a longer median time from diagnosis to first HSCT—10 months (range, 4-39) vs 7 months (range, 1-95).

A majority of patients in both groups were in partial response or better at baseline. However, more patients in the control group had stable disease (6.2% vs 1%) or progressive disease (8% vs 0%).

Results

For all-grade GI toxicities, there was largely no significant difference between the amifostine and control groups. However, patients in the amifostine group had significantly lower rates of grade 2 or higher GI toxicities.

Rates of all-grade GI toxicities in the amifostine and control groups, respectively, were:

• Oral mucositis—53.3% vs 64.0%, P=0.104
• Nausea—90.7% vs 95.6%, P=0.143
• Vomiting—65.4% vs 75.4%, P=0.102
• Diarrhea—93.5% vs 84.2%,P=0.030.

Rates of grade 2 or higher GI toxicities in the amifostine and control groups, respectively, were:

• Oral mucositis—27.1% vs 47.4%, P=0.002
• Nausea—31.8% vs 86.0%, P<0.0001
• Vomiting—18.7% vs 52.6%, P<0.0001
• Diarrhea—56.1% vs 73.7%, P=0.006.

The researchers said amifostine was well tolerated and produced no significant adverse effects.

They also said amifostine had “no discernable effect” on engraftment, progression-free survival, or overall survival.

The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 11 days (range, 9-16) in the control group and 10 days (range, 6-21) in the amifostine group (P=0.011). The median time to platelet engraftment was 18 days (range, 0-26) and 19 days (range, 8-71), respectively (P<0.21).

The median progression-free survival was 40 months in the amifostine group and 32 months in the control group (P=0.012). The median overall survival was 70 months and 67 months, respectively (P=0.84).

Photo by Chad McNeeley

Results of a case-control study suggest a cytoprotective agent can reduce treatment-related gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

Use of this agent, amifostine, was associated with significantly lower rates of grade 2 or higher oral mucositis, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.

Additionally, amifostine did not appear to compromise the anti-myeloma activity of treatment, which consisted of high-dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT).

Ehsan Malek, MD, of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, and his colleagues reported these findings in Leukemia & Lymphoma.

The researchers compared HDM plus auto-HSCT, with or without pre-treatment amifostine, in previously treated MM patients.

There were 107 patients who received amifostine and 114 who did not. The 107 patients received amifostine at 740 mg/m², given as a bolus infusion at 24 hours and 15 minutes before HDM.

Baseline characteristics were largely similar in the amifostine and control groups. However, more patients in the amifostine group received a tandem HSCT (17 vs 0), and more patients in the control group had an ECOG performance status of 0 (64.3% vs 43%).

Patients in the amifostine group had a longer median time from diagnosis to first HSCT—10 months (range, 4-39) vs 7 months (range, 1-95).

A majority of patients in both groups were in partial response or better at baseline. However, more patients in the control group had stable disease (6.2% vs 1%) or progressive disease (8% vs 0%).

Results

For all-grade GI toxicities, there was largely no significant difference between the amifostine and control groups. However, patients in the amifostine group had significantly lower rates of grade 2 or higher GI toxicities.

Rates of all-grade GI toxicities in the amifostine and control groups, respectively, were:

• Oral mucositis—53.3% vs 64.0%, P=0.104
• Nausea—90.7% vs 95.6%, P=0.143
• Vomiting—65.4% vs 75.4%, P=0.102
• Diarrhea—93.5% vs 84.2%,P=0.030.

Rates of grade 2 or higher GI toxicities in the amifostine and control groups, respectively, were:

• Oral mucositis—27.1% vs 47.4%, P=0.002
• Nausea—31.8% vs 86.0%, P<0.0001
• Vomiting—18.7% vs 52.6%, P<0.0001
• Diarrhea—56.1% vs 73.7%, P=0.006.

The researchers said amifostine was well tolerated and produced no significant adverse effects.

They also said amifostine had “no discernable effect” on engraftment, progression-free survival, or overall survival.

The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 11 days (range, 9-16) in the control group and 10 days (range, 6-21) in the amifostine group (P=0.011). The median time to platelet engraftment was 18 days (range, 0-26) and 19 days (range, 8-71), respectively (P<0.21).

The median progression-free survival was 40 months in the amifostine group and 32 months in the control group (P=0.012). The median overall survival was 70 months and 67 months, respectively (P=0.84).

Photo by Chad McNeeley

Results of a case-control study suggest a cytoprotective agent can reduce treatment-related gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

Use of this agent, amifostine, was associated with significantly lower rates of grade 2 or higher oral mucositis, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.

Additionally, amifostine did not appear to compromise the anti-myeloma activity of treatment, which consisted of high-dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT).

Ehsan Malek, MD, of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, and his colleagues reported these findings in Leukemia & Lymphoma.

The researchers compared HDM plus auto-HSCT, with or without pre-treatment amifostine, in previously treated MM patients.

There were 107 patients who received amifostine and 114 who did not. The 107 patients received amifostine at 740 mg/m², given as a bolus infusion at 24 hours and 15 minutes before HDM.

Baseline characteristics were largely similar in the amifostine and control groups. However, more patients in the amifostine group received a tandem HSCT (17 vs 0), and more patients in the control group had an ECOG performance status of 0 (64.3% vs 43%).

Patients in the amifostine group had a longer median time from diagnosis to first HSCT—10 months (range, 4-39) vs 7 months (range, 1-95).

A majority of patients in both groups were in partial response or better at baseline. However, more patients in the control group had stable disease (6.2% vs 1%) or progressive disease (8% vs 0%).

Results

For all-grade GI toxicities, there was largely no significant difference between the amifostine and control groups. However, patients in the amifostine group had significantly lower rates of grade 2 or higher GI toxicities.

Rates of all-grade GI toxicities in the amifostine and control groups, respectively, were:

• Oral mucositis—53.3% vs 64.0%, P=0.104
• Nausea—90.7% vs 95.6%, P=0.143
• Vomiting—65.4% vs 75.4%, P=0.102
• Diarrhea—93.5% vs 84.2%,P=0.030.

Rates of grade 2 or higher GI toxicities in the amifostine and control groups, respectively, were:

• Oral mucositis—27.1% vs 47.4%, P=0.002
• Nausea—31.8% vs 86.0%, P<0.0001
• Vomiting—18.7% vs 52.6%, P<0.0001
• Diarrhea—56.1% vs 73.7%, P=0.006.

The researchers said amifostine was well tolerated and produced no significant adverse effects.

They also said amifostine had “no discernable effect” on engraftment, progression-free survival, or overall survival.

The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 11 days (range, 9-16) in the control group and 10 days (range, 6-21) in the amifostine group (P=0.011). The median time to platelet engraftment was 18 days (range, 0-26) and 19 days (range, 8-71), respectively (P<0.21).

The median progression-free survival was 40 months in the amifostine group and 32 months in the control group (P=0.012). The median overall survival was 70 months and 67 months, respectively (P=0.84).

Photo by Larry Young

LA JOLLA, CA—Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) cannot replace bone marrow (BM) biopsy in T-cell lymphomas, according to a speaker at the 10th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

Researchers found that FDG PET results did not exactly correlate with BM biopsy results relating to tumor involvement in patients with T-cell lymphomas.

However, results from FDG PET were found to be an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Youngil Koh, MD, of Seoul National University Hospital in Seoul, South Korea, presented this research in a poster and oral presentation at this year’s T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

He and his colleagues set out to investigate the clinical value of FDG PET for evaluating BM tumor involvement and prognosis in T-cell lymphoma patients.

The team analyzed 109 patients who underwent staging with FDG PET and BM biopsy. Most patients had extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (NKTCL, n=46), or angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, n=41).

Patients also had peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (n=12), anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (n=4), enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (n=4), and subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (n=2).

Most patients (87.2%) received chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Fifty percent were CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) or CHOP-like regimens, 48.1% were IMEP (ifosphamide, methotrexate, etoposide, and prednisolone) or IMEP-like regimens, and 1.9% were “other” regimens.

Other first-line treatments included radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy (10.1%), excision (0.9%), and no treatment (1.8%).

The patients’ median OS was 60.03 months, and the median PFS was 15.7 months.

BM involvement

The researchers analyzed PET BM uptake both visually and quantitatively using the marrow-to-liver ratio (MLR), and they compared these results to BM biopsy results.

According to BM biopsy, 35.8% of patients had tumor involvement.

By visual analysis, the sensitivity of PET for diagnosing positive BM biopsy was 58.5%, and the specificity was 77.9%. By MLR, the sensitivity was 64.1%, and the specificity was 72.9%.

The diagnostic performance of PET for BM involvement was not different across the lymphoma subtypes, Dr Koh said.

Prognosis

“Although FDG PET did not correlate very well with bone marrow biopsy, it had prognostic value, especially MLR,” Dr Koh noted. “And most importantly, in bone marrow biopsy-negative patients, it [MLR] had prognostic value.”

MLR was a significant prognostic factor for PFS (P=0.005) and OS (P<0.001). The same was true for BM biopsy (P=0.009 for PFS and P<0.001 for OS), while visual PET analysis was a significant prognostic factor for OS (P=0.015) but not PFS (P=0.476).

In patients negative by BM biopsy, MLR was a significant prognostic factor for PFS (P=0.001) and OS (P=0.005).

Dr Koh and his colleagues also analyzed the prognostic value of PET and BM biopsy specifically in patients with NKTCL and AITL.

In AITL patients, BM biopsy was a significant prognostic factor for OS (P=0.002) but not PFS (P=0.246). Visual PET analysis was not significant for PFS (P=0.910) or OS (P=0.581), and neither was MLR (P=0.053 for PFS and P=0.156 for OS).

In patients with NKTCL, BM biopsy was a significant prognostic factor for PFS (P=0.008) and OS (P<0.001). Visual PET analysis was not significant for PFS (P=0.469) or OS (P=0.092). And MLR was significant for PFS (P=0.004) and OS (P=0.012).

“Bone marrow findings of FDG PET are an independent prognostic factor in these tumors,” Dr Koh said, “suggesting the biologic relevance of FDG PET findings for aggressiveness or covert bone marrow involvement of tumor cells.”

Photo by Larry Young

LA JOLLA, CA—Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) cannot replace bone marrow (BM) biopsy in T-cell lymphomas, according to a speaker at the 10th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

Researchers found that FDG PET results did not exactly correlate with BM biopsy results relating to tumor involvement in patients with T-cell lymphomas.

However, results from FDG PET were found to be an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Youngil Koh, MD, of Seoul National University Hospital in Seoul, South Korea, presented this research in a poster and oral presentation at this year’s T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

He and his colleagues set out to investigate the clinical value of FDG PET for evaluating BM tumor involvement and prognosis in T-cell lymphoma patients.

The team analyzed 109 patients who underwent staging with FDG PET and BM biopsy. Most patients had extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (NKTCL, n=46), or angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, n=41).

Patients also had peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (n=12), anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (n=4), enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (n=4), and subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (n=2).

Most patients (87.2%) received chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Fifty percent were CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) or CHOP-like regimens, 48.1% were IMEP (ifosphamide, methotrexate, etoposide, and prednisolone) or IMEP-like regimens, and 1.9% were “other” regimens.

Other first-line treatments included radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy (10.1%), excision (0.9%), and no treatment (1.8%).

The patients’ median OS was 60.03 months, and the median PFS was 15.7 months.

BM involvement

The researchers analyzed PET BM uptake both visually and quantitatively using the marrow-to-liver ratio (MLR), and they compared these results to BM biopsy results.

According to BM biopsy, 35.8% of patients had tumor involvement.

By visual analysis, the sensitivity of PET for diagnosing positive BM biopsy was 58.5%, and the specificity was 77.9%. By MLR, the sensitivity was 64.1%, and the specificity was 72.9%.

The diagnostic performance of PET for BM involvement was not different across the lymphoma subtypes, Dr Koh said.

Prognosis

“Although FDG PET did not correlate very well with bone marrow biopsy, it had prognostic value, especially MLR,” Dr Koh noted. “And most importantly, in bone marrow biopsy-negative patients, it [MLR] had prognostic value.”

MLR was a significant prognostic factor for PFS (P=0.005) and OS (P<0.001). The same was true for BM biopsy (P=0.009 for PFS and P<0.001 for OS), while visual PET analysis was a significant prognostic factor for OS (P=0.015) but not PFS (P=0.476).

In patients negative by BM biopsy, MLR was a significant prognostic factor for PFS (P=0.001) and OS (P=0.005).

Dr Koh and his colleagues also analyzed the prognostic value of PET and BM biopsy specifically in patients with NKTCL and AITL.

In AITL patients, BM biopsy was a significant prognostic factor for OS (P=0.002) but not PFS (P=0.246). Visual PET analysis was not significant for PFS (P=0.910) or OS (P=0.581), and neither was MLR (P=0.053 for PFS and P=0.156 for OS).

In patients with NKTCL, BM biopsy was a significant prognostic factor for PFS (P=0.008) and OS (P<0.001). Visual PET analysis was not significant for PFS (P=0.469) or OS (P=0.092). And MLR was significant for PFS (P=0.004) and OS (P=0.012).

“Bone marrow findings of FDG PET are an independent prognostic factor in these tumors,” Dr Koh said, “suggesting the biologic relevance of FDG PET findings for aggressiveness or covert bone marrow involvement of tumor cells.”

Photo by Larry Young

LA JOLLA, CA—Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) cannot replace bone marrow (BM) biopsy in T-cell lymphomas, according to a speaker at the 10th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

Researchers found that FDG PET results did not exactly correlate with BM biopsy results relating to tumor involvement in patients with T-cell lymphomas.

However, results from FDG PET were found to be an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Youngil Koh, MD, of Seoul National University Hospital in Seoul, South Korea, presented this research in a poster and oral presentation at this year’s T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

He and his colleagues set out to investigate the clinical value of FDG PET for evaluating BM tumor involvement and prognosis in T-cell lymphoma patients.

The team analyzed 109 patients who underwent staging with FDG PET and BM biopsy. Most patients had extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (NKTCL, n=46), or angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, n=41).

Patients also had peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (n=12), anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (n=4), enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (n=4), and subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (n=2).

Most patients (87.2%) received chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Fifty percent were CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) or CHOP-like regimens, 48.1% were IMEP (ifosphamide, methotrexate, etoposide, and prednisolone) or IMEP-like regimens, and 1.9% were “other” regimens.

Other first-line treatments included radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy (10.1%), excision (0.9%), and no treatment (1.8%).

The patients’ median OS was 60.03 months, and the median PFS was 15.7 months.

BM involvement

The researchers analyzed PET BM uptake both visually and quantitatively using the marrow-to-liver ratio (MLR), and they compared these results to BM biopsy results.

According to BM biopsy, 35.8% of patients had tumor involvement.

By visual analysis, the sensitivity of PET for diagnosing positive BM biopsy was 58.5%, and the specificity was 77.9%. By MLR, the sensitivity was 64.1%, and the specificity was 72.9%.

The diagnostic performance of PET for BM involvement was not different across the lymphoma subtypes, Dr Koh said.

Prognosis

“Although FDG PET did not correlate very well with bone marrow biopsy, it had prognostic value, especially MLR,” Dr Koh noted. “And most importantly, in bone marrow biopsy-negative patients, it [MLR] had prognostic value.”

MLR was a significant prognostic factor for PFS (P=0.005) and OS (P<0.001). The same was true for BM biopsy (P=0.009 for PFS and P<0.001 for OS), while visual PET analysis was a significant prognostic factor for OS (P=0.015) but not PFS (P=0.476).

In patients negative by BM biopsy, MLR was a significant prognostic factor for PFS (P=0.001) and OS (P=0.005).

Dr Koh and his colleagues also analyzed the prognostic value of PET and BM biopsy specifically in patients with NKTCL and AITL.

In AITL patients, BM biopsy was a significant prognostic factor for OS (P=0.002) but not PFS (P=0.246). Visual PET analysis was not significant for PFS (P=0.910) or OS (P=0.581), and neither was MLR (P=0.053 for PFS and P=0.156 for OS).

In patients with NKTCL, BM biopsy was a significant prognostic factor for PFS (P=0.008) and OS (P<0.001). Visual PET analysis was not significant for PFS (P=0.469) or OS (P=0.092). And MLR was significant for PFS (P=0.004) and OS (P=0.012).

“Bone marrow findings of FDG PET are an independent prognostic factor in these tumors,” Dr Koh said, “suggesting the biologic relevance of FDG PET findings for aggressiveness or covert bone marrow involvement of tumor cells.”

Photo by Larry Young

LA JOLLA, CA—Results of a phase 1 trial suggest MRG-106 can provide clinical improvement in patients with mycosis fungoides (MF), whether the drug is given alone or in conjunction with other therapies.

MRG-106 is an inhibitor of microRNA-155, which is upregulated in MF.

In this ongoing trial, 90% of patients who received MRG-106 have experienced an improvement in mSWAT score, and 59% of patients who received the drug for at least 1 month had a partial response.

The most common adverse events (AEs) attributed to MRG-106 were neutropenia, injection site pain, and fatigue.

Christiane Querfeld, MD, PhD, of the City of Hope in Duarte, California, presented these results at the 10th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum. The research is sponsored by miRagen Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing MRG-106.

The trial has enrolled 36 MF patients, 69% of whom are male. Their median age at enrollment was 63 (range, 21-85).

Patients had received a median of 4 prior systemic therapies (range, 1-13) and a median of 3 prior skin-directed therapies (range, 1-8).

At baseline, patients had a median mSWAT score of 43 (range, 2-180). The modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) measures the severity of skin disease over a patient’s body.

Part A

In part A of the study, 6 patients received MRG-106 via intralesional injection. A 75 mg dose of the drug was found to be well-tolerated, producing generally minor injection site reactions.

In addition, intralesional injection of MRG-106 produced improvements in CAILS score. The Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (CAILS) score is obtained by adding the severity score of erythema, scaling, plaque elevation, and surface area for up to 5 index lesions.

Part B

In part B, 30 patients received MRG-106 via subcutaneous (SQ) injection, intravenous (IV) infusion, or IV bolus injection.

Patients who received SQ injection or IV infusion received doses of 300 mg, 600 mg, or 900 mg. Those who received an IV bolus only received the 300 mg dose.

Twenty-nine of the 30 patients in part B were evaluable for efficacy. Twenty-six of these patients—90%—had an improvement in mSWAT score from baseline.

“Twenty-six patients had at least stable disease to partial response,” Dr Querfeld noted. “No complete responses yet, but we’re close.”

Twelve patients were still receiving MRG-106 at last follow-up.

Ten of the 17 patients (59%) who had received MRG-106 for more than 1 month had at least a 50% improvement in mSWAT score, or a partial response. Once this was achieved, responses were durable.

One patient was still in response at roughly 470 days of follow-up.

Concomitant therapies

Dr Querfeld and her colleagues looked at patient outcomes in the context of concomitant therapies as well. They analyzed data from 26 patients who had received at least 6 doses of MRG-106.

Half of these patients were receiving MRG-106 alone, and the other half were receiving concomitant therapies, including bexarotene (n=7), interferon-alfa (n=2), methotrexate (n=1), vorinostat (n=1), and “other” treatments (n=2). Patients had been receiving these therapies for anywhere from 4 months to 45 months.

Outcomes were similar in the monotherapy and combination treatment groups. Seven patients in each group had at least a 50% improvement in mSWAT score.

Dosing and administration

“It appears the infusion is superior to the subcutaneous administration,” Dr Querfeld said.

She noted that durable partial responses have been achieved at all dose levels, but the 300 mg and 600 mg IV infusions had the best efficacy and tolerability profiles.

With the 300 mg IV bolus, fewer patients remained on treatment for more than 1 cycle, as compared to the other dosing cohorts. Dr Querfeld said this may be a result of lower total exposure or tolerability due to higher plasma C_max.

She also noted that patients who received MRG-106 SQ at 600 mg or higher had a higher incidence of injection site reactions.

Safety

AEs of any grade that were attributed to MRG-106 include neutropenia (16%), injection site pain (16%), fatigue (14%), nausea (5%), pruritus (5%), and headache (5%).

Grade 3/4 AEs attributed to MRG-106 were neutropenia (5%) and pruritus (5%).

There were no serious AEs attributed to MRG-106, but there were 2 dose-limiting toxicities. One was a grade 3 tumor flare in a patient receiving the 300 mg IV bolus.

The other dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 worsening pruritus and possible tumor flare, which occurred twice in 1 patient—with the 900 mg SQ dose and with the 300 mg IV infusion.

The 300 mg IV infusion is the anticipated phase 2 dose.

Photo by Larry Young

LA JOLLA, CA—Results of a phase 1 trial suggest MRG-106 can provide clinical improvement in patients with mycosis fungoides (MF), whether the drug is given alone or in conjunction with other therapies.

MRG-106 is an inhibitor of microRNA-155, which is upregulated in MF.

In this ongoing trial, 90% of patients who received MRG-106 have experienced an improvement in mSWAT score, and 59% of patients who received the drug for at least 1 month had a partial response.

The most common adverse events (AEs) attributed to MRG-106 were neutropenia, injection site pain, and fatigue.

Christiane Querfeld, MD, PhD, of the City of Hope in Duarte, California, presented these results at the 10th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum. The research is sponsored by miRagen Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing MRG-106.

The trial has enrolled 36 MF patients, 69% of whom are male. Their median age at enrollment was 63 (range, 21-85).

Patients had received a median of 4 prior systemic therapies (range, 1-13) and a median of 3 prior skin-directed therapies (range, 1-8).

At baseline, patients had a median mSWAT score of 43 (range, 2-180). The modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) measures the severity of skin disease over a patient’s body.

Part A

In part A of the study, 6 patients received MRG-106 via intralesional injection. A 75 mg dose of the drug was found to be well-tolerated, producing generally minor injection site reactions.

In addition, intralesional injection of MRG-106 produced improvements in CAILS score. The Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (CAILS) score is obtained by adding the severity score of erythema, scaling, plaque elevation, and surface area for up to 5 index lesions.

Part B

In part B, 30 patients received MRG-106 via subcutaneous (SQ) injection, intravenous (IV) infusion, or IV bolus injection.

Patients who received SQ injection or IV infusion received doses of 300 mg, 600 mg, or 900 mg. Those who received an IV bolus only received the 300 mg dose.

Twenty-nine of the 30 patients in part B were evaluable for efficacy. Twenty-six of these patients—90%—had an improvement in mSWAT score from baseline.

“Twenty-six patients had at least stable disease to partial response,” Dr Querfeld noted. “No complete responses yet, but we’re close.”

Twelve patients were still receiving MRG-106 at last follow-up.

Ten of the 17 patients (59%) who had received MRG-106 for more than 1 month had at least a 50% improvement in mSWAT score, or a partial response. Once this was achieved, responses were durable.

One patient was still in response at roughly 470 days of follow-up.

Concomitant therapies

Dr Querfeld and her colleagues looked at patient outcomes in the context of concomitant therapies as well. They analyzed data from 26 patients who had received at least 6 doses of MRG-106.

Half of these patients were receiving MRG-106 alone, and the other half were receiving concomitant therapies, including bexarotene (n=7), interferon-alfa (n=2), methotrexate (n=1), vorinostat (n=1), and “other” treatments (n=2). Patients had been receiving these therapies for anywhere from 4 months to 45 months.

Outcomes were similar in the monotherapy and combination treatment groups. Seven patients in each group had at least a 50% improvement in mSWAT score.

Dosing and administration

“It appears the infusion is superior to the subcutaneous administration,” Dr Querfeld said.

She noted that durable partial responses have been achieved at all dose levels, but the 300 mg and 600 mg IV infusions had the best efficacy and tolerability profiles.

With the 300 mg IV bolus, fewer patients remained on treatment for more than 1 cycle, as compared to the other dosing cohorts. Dr Querfeld said this may be a result of lower total exposure or tolerability due to higher plasma C_max.

She also noted that patients who received MRG-106 SQ at 600 mg or higher had a higher incidence of injection site reactions.

Safety

AEs of any grade that were attributed to MRG-106 include neutropenia (16%), injection site pain (16%), fatigue (14%), nausea (5%), pruritus (5%), and headache (5%).

Grade 3/4 AEs attributed to MRG-106 were neutropenia (5%) and pruritus (5%).

There were no serious AEs attributed to MRG-106, but there were 2 dose-limiting toxicities. One was a grade 3 tumor flare in a patient receiving the 300 mg IV bolus.

The other dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 worsening pruritus and possible tumor flare, which occurred twice in 1 patient—with the 900 mg SQ dose and with the 300 mg IV infusion.

The 300 mg IV infusion is the anticipated phase 2 dose.

Photo by Larry Young

LA JOLLA, CA—Results of a phase 1 trial suggest MRG-106 can provide clinical improvement in patients with mycosis fungoides (MF), whether the drug is given alone or in conjunction with other therapies.

MRG-106 is an inhibitor of microRNA-155, which is upregulated in MF.

In this ongoing trial, 90% of patients who received MRG-106 have experienced an improvement in mSWAT score, and 59% of patients who received the drug for at least 1 month had a partial response.

The most common adverse events (AEs) attributed to MRG-106 were neutropenia, injection site pain, and fatigue.

Christiane Querfeld, MD, PhD, of the City of Hope in Duarte, California, presented these results at the 10th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum. The research is sponsored by miRagen Therapeutics, Inc., the company developing MRG-106.

The trial has enrolled 36 MF patients, 69% of whom are male. Their median age at enrollment was 63 (range, 21-85).

Patients had received a median of 4 prior systemic therapies (range, 1-13) and a median of 3 prior skin-directed therapies (range, 1-8).

At baseline, patients had a median mSWAT score of 43 (range, 2-180). The modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) measures the severity of skin disease over a patient’s body.

Part A

In part A of the study, 6 patients received MRG-106 via intralesional injection. A 75 mg dose of the drug was found to be well-tolerated, producing generally minor injection site reactions.

In addition, intralesional injection of MRG-106 produced improvements in CAILS score. The Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (CAILS) score is obtained by adding the severity score of erythema, scaling, plaque elevation, and surface area for up to 5 index lesions.

Part B

In part B, 30 patients received MRG-106 via subcutaneous (SQ) injection, intravenous (IV) infusion, or IV bolus injection.

Patients who received SQ injection or IV infusion received doses of 300 mg, 600 mg, or 900 mg. Those who received an IV bolus only received the 300 mg dose.

Twenty-nine of the 30 patients in part B were evaluable for efficacy. Twenty-six of these patients—90%—had an improvement in mSWAT score from baseline.

“Twenty-six patients had at least stable disease to partial response,” Dr Querfeld noted. “No complete responses yet, but we’re close.”

Twelve patients were still receiving MRG-106 at last follow-up.

Ten of the 17 patients (59%) who had received MRG-106 for more than 1 month had at least a 50% improvement in mSWAT score, or a partial response. Once this was achieved, responses were durable.

One patient was still in response at roughly 470 days of follow-up.

Concomitant therapies

Dr Querfeld and her colleagues looked at patient outcomes in the context of concomitant therapies as well. They analyzed data from 26 patients who had received at least 6 doses of MRG-106.

Half of these patients were receiving MRG-106 alone, and the other half were receiving concomitant therapies, including bexarotene (n=7), interferon-alfa (n=2), methotrexate (n=1), vorinostat (n=1), and “other” treatments (n=2). Patients had been receiving these therapies for anywhere from 4 months to 45 months.

Outcomes were similar in the monotherapy and combination treatment groups. Seven patients in each group had at least a 50% improvement in mSWAT score.

Dosing and administration

“It appears the infusion is superior to the subcutaneous administration,” Dr Querfeld said.

She noted that durable partial responses have been achieved at all dose levels, but the 300 mg and 600 mg IV infusions had the best efficacy and tolerability profiles.

With the 300 mg IV bolus, fewer patients remained on treatment for more than 1 cycle, as compared to the other dosing cohorts. Dr Querfeld said this may be a result of lower total exposure or tolerability due to higher plasma C_max.

She also noted that patients who received MRG-106 SQ at 600 mg or higher had a higher incidence of injection site reactions.

Safety

AEs of any grade that were attributed to MRG-106 include neutropenia (16%), injection site pain (16%), fatigue (14%), nausea (5%), pruritus (5%), and headache (5%).

Grade 3/4 AEs attributed to MRG-106 were neutropenia (5%) and pruritus (5%).

There were no serious AEs attributed to MRG-106, but there were 2 dose-limiting toxicities. One was a grade 3 tumor flare in a patient receiving the 300 mg IV bolus.

The other dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 worsening pruritus and possible tumor flare, which occurred twice in 1 patient—with the 900 mg SQ dose and with the 300 mg IV infusion.

The 300 mg IV infusion is the anticipated phase 2 dose.

osteoclast in cell culture

In a phase 3 trial, denosumab proved non-inferior to zoledronic acid for delaying skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

The median time to first on-study SRE was 23 months in the denosumab arm and 24 months in the zoledronic acid arm.

There were fewer renal adverse events (AEs) but more hypocalcemia AEs in the denosumab arm.

“Until recently, treatment options for the prevention of skeletal-related events in multiple myeloma were limited to bisphosphonates, which are cleared through the kidneys and can be associated with increased renal impairment,” said Noopur Raje, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center in Boston.

“Denosumab, which is not cleared through the kidneys, provides a new treatment option for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma.”

Dr Raje and her colleagues conducted this phase 3 trial of denosumab and reported the results in The Lancet Oncology. The trial was sponsored by Amgen, the company developing denosumab.

Denosumab is the first fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to and neutralizes RANK ligand—a protein essential for the formation, function, and survival of osteoclasts—thereby inhibiting osteoclast-mediated bone destruction.

In this trial, researchers compared denosumab to zoledronic acid for the prevention of SREs in adults with newly diagnosed MM and bone disease.

The team randomized 1718 patients to receive subcutaneous denosumab at 120 mg and intravenous placebo every 4 weeks (n=859) or intravenous zoledronic acid at 4 mg (adjusted for renal function at baseline) and subcutaneous placebo every 4 weeks (n=859). All patients also received investigators’ choice of first-line MM therapy.

Skeletal surveys using conventional radiography were obtained every 12 to 24 weeks per protocol. The primary endpoint of the study was non-inferiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for time to first on-study SRE (pathologic fracture, radiation to bone, surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression).

The primary endpoint was met. The median time to first on-study SRE was 22.8 months for patients in the denosumab arm and 24 months for those in the zoledronic acid arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-1.14; P non-inferiority=0.010).

Approximately 60% of all first SREs occurred within the first 3 months, and 81% occurred within the first 6 months.

Overall survival, a secondary endpoint, was similar between the denosumab and zoledronic acid arms (HR=0.90; 95% CI: 0.70-1.16; P=0.41).

There were fewer renal treatment-emergent AEs in the denosumab arm than the zoledronic acid arm—10% and 17%, respectively. There were more hypocalcemia AEs in the denosumab arm than the zoledronic acid arm—17% and 12%, respectively.

The incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw was 4% in the denosumab arm and 3% in the zoledronic acid arm.

The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs (in the denosumab and zoledronic acid arms, respectively) were neutropenia (15% in both arms), thrombocytopenia (14% and 12%), anemia (12% and 10%), febrile neutropenia (11% and 10%), and pneumonia (8% in both arms).

The most common serious AE was pneumonia (8% in both arms).

Treatment-emergent AEs led to study drug discontinuation in 13% of patients in the denosumab arm and 12% in the zoledronic acid arm.

One patient in the zoledronic acid arm died of cardiac arrest that was deemed treatment-related. No other deaths were considered treatment-related.

osteoclast in cell culture

In a phase 3 trial, denosumab proved non-inferior to zoledronic acid for delaying skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

The median time to first on-study SRE was 23 months in the denosumab arm and 24 months in the zoledronic acid arm.

There were fewer renal adverse events (AEs) but more hypocalcemia AEs in the denosumab arm.

“Until recently, treatment options for the prevention of skeletal-related events in multiple myeloma were limited to bisphosphonates, which are cleared through the kidneys and can be associated with increased renal impairment,” said Noopur Raje, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center in Boston.

“Denosumab, which is not cleared through the kidneys, provides a new treatment option for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma.”

Dr Raje and her colleagues conducted this phase 3 trial of denosumab and reported the results in The Lancet Oncology. The trial was sponsored by Amgen, the company developing denosumab.

Denosumab is the first fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to and neutralizes RANK ligand—a protein essential for the formation, function, and survival of osteoclasts—thereby inhibiting osteoclast-mediated bone destruction.

In this trial, researchers compared denosumab to zoledronic acid for the prevention of SREs in adults with newly diagnosed MM and bone disease.

The team randomized 1718 patients to receive subcutaneous denosumab at 120 mg and intravenous placebo every 4 weeks (n=859) or intravenous zoledronic acid at 4 mg (adjusted for renal function at baseline) and subcutaneous placebo every 4 weeks (n=859). All patients also received investigators’ choice of first-line MM therapy.

Skeletal surveys using conventional radiography were obtained every 12 to 24 weeks per protocol. The primary endpoint of the study was non-inferiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for time to first on-study SRE (pathologic fracture, radiation to bone, surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression).

The primary endpoint was met. The median time to first on-study SRE was 22.8 months for patients in the denosumab arm and 24 months for those in the zoledronic acid arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-1.14; P non-inferiority=0.010).

Approximately 60% of all first SREs occurred within the first 3 months, and 81% occurred within the first 6 months.

Overall survival, a secondary endpoint, was similar between the denosumab and zoledronic acid arms (HR=0.90; 95% CI: 0.70-1.16; P=0.41).

There were fewer renal treatment-emergent AEs in the denosumab arm than the zoledronic acid arm—10% and 17%, respectively. There were more hypocalcemia AEs in the denosumab arm than the zoledronic acid arm—17% and 12%, respectively.

The incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw was 4% in the denosumab arm and 3% in the zoledronic acid arm.

The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs (in the denosumab and zoledronic acid arms, respectively) were neutropenia (15% in both arms), thrombocytopenia (14% and 12%), anemia (12% and 10%), febrile neutropenia (11% and 10%), and pneumonia (8% in both arms).

The most common serious AE was pneumonia (8% in both arms).

Treatment-emergent AEs led to study drug discontinuation in 13% of patients in the denosumab arm and 12% in the zoledronic acid arm.

One patient in the zoledronic acid arm died of cardiac arrest that was deemed treatment-related. No other deaths were considered treatment-related.

osteoclast in cell culture

In a phase 3 trial, denosumab proved non-inferior to zoledronic acid for delaying skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

The median time to first on-study SRE was 23 months in the denosumab arm and 24 months in the zoledronic acid arm.

There were fewer renal adverse events (AEs) but more hypocalcemia AEs in the denosumab arm.

“Until recently, treatment options for the prevention of skeletal-related events in multiple myeloma were limited to bisphosphonates, which are cleared through the kidneys and can be associated with increased renal impairment,” said Noopur Raje, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center in Boston.

“Denosumab, which is not cleared through the kidneys, provides a new treatment option for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma.”

Dr Raje and her colleagues conducted this phase 3 trial of denosumab and reported the results in The Lancet Oncology. The trial was sponsored by Amgen, the company developing denosumab.

Denosumab is the first fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to and neutralizes RANK ligand—a protein essential for the formation, function, and survival of osteoclasts—thereby inhibiting osteoclast-mediated bone destruction.

In this trial, researchers compared denosumab to zoledronic acid for the prevention of SREs in adults with newly diagnosed MM and bone disease.

The team randomized 1718 patients to receive subcutaneous denosumab at 120 mg and intravenous placebo every 4 weeks (n=859) or intravenous zoledronic acid at 4 mg (adjusted for renal function at baseline) and subcutaneous placebo every 4 weeks (n=859). All patients also received investigators’ choice of first-line MM therapy.

Skeletal surveys using conventional radiography were obtained every 12 to 24 weeks per protocol. The primary endpoint of the study was non-inferiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for time to first on-study SRE (pathologic fracture, radiation to bone, surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression).

The primary endpoint was met. The median time to first on-study SRE was 22.8 months for patients in the denosumab arm and 24 months for those in the zoledronic acid arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-1.14; P non-inferiority=0.010).

Approximately 60% of all first SREs occurred within the first 3 months, and 81% occurred within the first 6 months.

Overall survival, a secondary endpoint, was similar between the denosumab and zoledronic acid arms (HR=0.90; 95% CI: 0.70-1.16; P=0.41).

There were fewer renal treatment-emergent AEs in the denosumab arm than the zoledronic acid arm—10% and 17%, respectively. There were more hypocalcemia AEs in the denosumab arm than the zoledronic acid arm—17% and 12%, respectively.

The incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw was 4% in the denosumab arm and 3% in the zoledronic acid arm.

The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs (in the denosumab and zoledronic acid arms, respectively) were neutropenia (15% in both arms), thrombocytopenia (14% and 12%), anemia (12% and 10%), febrile neutropenia (11% and 10%), and pneumonia (8% in both arms).

The most common serious AE was pneumonia (8% in both arms).

Treatment-emergent AEs led to study drug discontinuation in 13% of patients in the denosumab arm and 12% in the zoledronic acid arm.

One patient in the zoledronic acid arm died of cardiac arrest that was deemed treatment-related. No other deaths were considered treatment-related.

Photo by Larry Young

LA JOLLA, CA—The EZH1/2 inhibitor DS-3201b could be a novel therapeutic option for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to a speaker at the 10th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

DS-3201b was considered well tolerated in a phase 1 study of Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory NHL.

In addition, DS-3201b demonstrated activity against B- and T-cell lymphomas, producing an overall response rate of 59%.

Kunihiro Tsukasaki, MD, PhD, of Saitama Medical University in Moroyama, Saitama, Japan, presented these results at the meeting.

The trial was sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.

Dr Tsukasaki presented data on 18 patients with relapsed/refractory NHL.

The 12 B-cell lymphoma patients had follicular lymphoma (n=5), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=3), MALT lymphoma (n=2), nodal marginal zone lymphoma (n=1), and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n=1).

The 6 patients with T-cell lymphoma had peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (n=2), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (n=2), and adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (n=2).

The patients’ median age was 67 (range, 44-75), and 10 were female. All patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 (72%) or 1 (28%).

Patients had a median of 2 prior chemotherapy regimens (range, 1-8).

For this study, they received DS-3201b at 150 mg (n=7), 200 mg (n=9), or 300 mg (n=2). They received the drug once daily in 28-day cycles until they progressed or experienced unacceptable toxicity.

DLTs and AEs

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated in cycle 1. All 18 patients were evaluable for DLT assessment.

There were 4 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) that met the definition of DLTs:

• 3 cases of grade 4 platelet count decrease (n=1 at 200 mg, n=2 at 300 mg)
• 1 case of grade 3 anemia requiring blood transfusion (at 300 mg).

All 4 DLTs led to treatment interruption.

There were 5 serious AEs reported in 3 patients. Only one of these—pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia—was considered related to DS-3201b.

Hematologic AEs included decreases in platelets (grade 1-4), lymphocytes (grade 1-4), neutrophils (grade 2-4), and white blood cells (grade 2-3), as well as anemia (grade 1-3).

Other AEs (all grade 1/2) included dysgeusia, alopecia, diarrhea, decreased appetite, alanine aminotransferase increase, aspartate aminotransferase increase, nasopharyngitis, rash, and dry skin.

No deaths had been reported as of the data cutoff last November.

Responses

Seventeen patients were evaluable for response.

The overall response rate was 59%, with 1 patient achieving a complete response (CR) and 9 achieving a partial response (PR). Four patients had stable disease (SD), and 3 progressed.

Among the T-cell lymphoma patients, 1 had a CR, 4 had PRs, and 1 progressed. The complete responder had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, and the patient who progressed had adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma.

Among the B-cell lymphoma patients, 5 had PRs, 4 had SD, and 2 progressed.

Dr Tsukasaki said DS-3201b has demonstrated early clinical activity and therefore has the potential to be a novel therapeutic option for B-cell and T-cell lymphomas. However, further evaluation is warranted to determine the optimal dosing regimen and target diseases.

Photo by Larry Young

LA JOLLA, CA—The EZH1/2 inhibitor DS-3201b could be a novel therapeutic option for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to a speaker at the 10th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

DS-3201b was considered well tolerated in a phase 1 study of Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory NHL.

In addition, DS-3201b demonstrated activity against B- and T-cell lymphomas, producing an overall response rate of 59%.

Kunihiro Tsukasaki, MD, PhD, of Saitama Medical University in Moroyama, Saitama, Japan, presented these results at the meeting.

The trial was sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.

Dr Tsukasaki presented data on 18 patients with relapsed/refractory NHL.

The 12 B-cell lymphoma patients had follicular lymphoma (n=5), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=3), MALT lymphoma (n=2), nodal marginal zone lymphoma (n=1), and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n=1).

The 6 patients with T-cell lymphoma had peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (n=2), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (n=2), and adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (n=2).

The patients’ median age was 67 (range, 44-75), and 10 were female. All patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 (72%) or 1 (28%).

Patients had a median of 2 prior chemotherapy regimens (range, 1-8).

For this study, they received DS-3201b at 150 mg (n=7), 200 mg (n=9), or 300 mg (n=2). They received the drug once daily in 28-day cycles until they progressed or experienced unacceptable toxicity.

DLTs and AEs

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated in cycle 1. All 18 patients were evaluable for DLT assessment.

There were 4 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) that met the definition of DLTs:

• 3 cases of grade 4 platelet count decrease (n=1 at 200 mg, n=2 at 300 mg)
• 1 case of grade 3 anemia requiring blood transfusion (at 300 mg).

All 4 DLTs led to treatment interruption.

There were 5 serious AEs reported in 3 patients. Only one of these—pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia—was considered related to DS-3201b.

Hematologic AEs included decreases in platelets (grade 1-4), lymphocytes (grade 1-4), neutrophils (grade 2-4), and white blood cells (grade 2-3), as well as anemia (grade 1-3).

Other AEs (all grade 1/2) included dysgeusia, alopecia, diarrhea, decreased appetite, alanine aminotransferase increase, aspartate aminotransferase increase, nasopharyngitis, rash, and dry skin.

No deaths had been reported as of the data cutoff last November.

Responses

Seventeen patients were evaluable for response.

The overall response rate was 59%, with 1 patient achieving a complete response (CR) and 9 achieving a partial response (PR). Four patients had stable disease (SD), and 3 progressed.

Among the T-cell lymphoma patients, 1 had a CR, 4 had PRs, and 1 progressed. The complete responder had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, and the patient who progressed had adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma.

Among the B-cell lymphoma patients, 5 had PRs, 4 had SD, and 2 progressed.

Dr Tsukasaki said DS-3201b has demonstrated early clinical activity and therefore has the potential to be a novel therapeutic option for B-cell and T-cell lymphomas. However, further evaluation is warranted to determine the optimal dosing regimen and target diseases.

Photo by Larry Young

LA JOLLA, CA—The EZH1/2 inhibitor DS-3201b could be a novel therapeutic option for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to a speaker at the 10th Annual T-cell Lymphoma Forum.

DS-3201b was considered well tolerated in a phase 1 study of Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory NHL.

In addition, DS-3201b demonstrated activity against B- and T-cell lymphomas, producing an overall response rate of 59%.

Kunihiro Tsukasaki, MD, PhD, of Saitama Medical University in Moroyama, Saitama, Japan, presented these results at the meeting.

The trial was sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.

Dr Tsukasaki presented data on 18 patients with relapsed/refractory NHL.

The 12 B-cell lymphoma patients had follicular lymphoma (n=5), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=3), MALT lymphoma (n=2), nodal marginal zone lymphoma (n=1), and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n=1).

The 6 patients with T-cell lymphoma had peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (n=2), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (n=2), and adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (n=2).

The patients’ median age was 67 (range, 44-75), and 10 were female. All patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 (72%) or 1 (28%).

Patients had a median of 2 prior chemotherapy regimens (range, 1-8).

For this study, they received DS-3201b at 150 mg (n=7), 200 mg (n=9), or 300 mg (n=2). They received the drug once daily in 28-day cycles until they progressed or experienced unacceptable toxicity.

DLTs and AEs

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated in cycle 1. All 18 patients were evaluable for DLT assessment.

There were 4 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) that met the definition of DLTs:

• 3 cases of grade 4 platelet count decrease (n=1 at 200 mg, n=2 at 300 mg)
• 1 case of grade 3 anemia requiring blood transfusion (at 300 mg).

All 4 DLTs led to treatment interruption.

There were 5 serious AEs reported in 3 patients. Only one of these—pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia—was considered related to DS-3201b.

Hematologic AEs included decreases in platelets (grade 1-4), lymphocytes (grade 1-4), neutrophils (grade 2-4), and white blood cells (grade 2-3), as well as anemia (grade 1-3).

Other AEs (all grade 1/2) included dysgeusia, alopecia, diarrhea, decreased appetite, alanine aminotransferase increase, aspartate aminotransferase increase, nasopharyngitis, rash, and dry skin.

No deaths had been reported as of the data cutoff last November.

Responses

Seventeen patients were evaluable for response.

The overall response rate was 59%, with 1 patient achieving a complete response (CR) and 9 achieving a partial response (PR). Four patients had stable disease (SD), and 3 progressed.

Among the T-cell lymphoma patients, 1 had a CR, 4 had PRs, and 1 progressed. The complete responder had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, and the patient who progressed had adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma.

Among the B-cell lymphoma patients, 5 had PRs, 4 had SD, and 2 progressed.

Dr Tsukasaki said DS-3201b has demonstrated early clinical activity and therefore has the potential to be a novel therapeutic option for B-cell and T-cell lymphomas. However, further evaluation is warranted to determine the optimal dosing regimen and target diseases.

Photo from Novo Nordisk

The recombinant, GlycoPEGylated coagulation factor IX product Rebinyn® is now available in the US for the treatment of patients with hemophilia B.

Last May, Rebinyn was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for on-demand treatment and control of bleeding episodes as well as perioperative management of bleeding in adults and children with hemophilia B.

The product is not approved for routine prophylaxis or immune tolerance induction in hemophilia B patients.

The full prescribing information is available at www.Rebinyn.com.

Rebinyn is also approved for use in the European Union, where it is known as nonacog beta pegol or by the brand name Refixia.

There, the product is approved for use as prophylaxis, for on-demand treatment of bleeding, and for control of bleeding related to surgical procedures in adolescents (older than 12 years of age) and adults with hemophilia B.

Trial results

The US and European approvals of nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) were based on results from the paradigm™ clinical trials. Results from the paradigm 4 trial were published in Thrombosis Research in May 2016.

Paradigm 4 was an extension trial enrolling patients who had participated in the phase 3 trials paradigm 2 and paradigm 3.

In paradigm 2, researchers assessed N9-GP as treatment and prophylaxis in previously treated patients with hemophilia B. In paradigm 3, researchers assessed N9-GP in hemophilia B patients undergoing surgical procedures.

Paradigm 4 included 71 patients (ages 13 to 70) who continued to receive N9-GP as on-demand treatment (40 IU/kg for mild/moderate bleeds and 80 IU/kg for severe bleeds) or prophylaxis (10 IU/kg or 40 IU/kg once-weekly). Sixty-five patients completed treatment.

Safety

None of the patients developed factor IX inhibitors. Two patients had transient binding antibodies to N9-GP, but there was no sign that these antibodies had an inhibitory effect.

Four patients developed anti-CHO antibodies, but only 2 of these patients were still positive for these antibodies at the end of the trial.

There were a total of 155 adverse events. However, only 4 of these (in 3 patients) were considered possibly or probably related to N9-GP.

These events consisted of an injection site rash in 1 patient, 2 overdoses in 1 patient, and neutropenia in 1 patient. The rash and neutropenia resolved, and the patient who overdosed recovered without complications.

Efficacy

The researchers said the success rate for the treatment of reported bleeds was 94.6%. Most bleeds (87.9%) were resolved with a single injection of N9-GP, but 9.2% required 2 injections, and 2.9% required 3 or 4 injections.

The median annualized bleeding rate for patients on prophylaxis was 1.05 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.00–2.20) overall. It was 1.36 (IQR, 0.00-2.23) for the 10 IU/kg arm and 1.00 (IQR, 0.00-2.03) for the 40 IU/kg arm.

There were 14 patients on prophylaxis who underwent 23 minor surgical procedures.

The hemostatic response was considered “excellent” (better than expected/predicted for the procedure in question) in 19 procedures and “good” (as expected) in 2 procedures. In the remaining 2 procedures, hemostatic responses were not determined.

Photo from Novo Nordisk

The recombinant, GlycoPEGylated coagulation factor IX product Rebinyn® is now available in the US for the treatment of patients with hemophilia B.

Last May, Rebinyn was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for on-demand treatment and control of bleeding episodes as well as perioperative management of bleeding in adults and children with hemophilia B.

The product is not approved for routine prophylaxis or immune tolerance induction in hemophilia B patients.

The full prescribing information is available at www.Rebinyn.com.

Rebinyn is also approved for use in the European Union, where it is known as nonacog beta pegol or by the brand name Refixia.

There, the product is approved for use as prophylaxis, for on-demand treatment of bleeding, and for control of bleeding related to surgical procedures in adolescents (older than 12 years of age) and adults with hemophilia B.

Trial results

The US and European approvals of nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) were based on results from the paradigm™ clinical trials. Results from the paradigm 4 trial were published in Thrombosis Research in May 2016.

Paradigm 4 was an extension trial enrolling patients who had participated in the phase 3 trials paradigm 2 and paradigm 3.

In paradigm 2, researchers assessed N9-GP as treatment and prophylaxis in previously treated patients with hemophilia B. In paradigm 3, researchers assessed N9-GP in hemophilia B patients undergoing surgical procedures.

Paradigm 4 included 71 patients (ages 13 to 70) who continued to receive N9-GP as on-demand treatment (40 IU/kg for mild/moderate bleeds and 80 IU/kg for severe bleeds) or prophylaxis (10 IU/kg or 40 IU/kg once-weekly). Sixty-five patients completed treatment.

Safety

None of the patients developed factor IX inhibitors. Two patients had transient binding antibodies to N9-GP, but there was no sign that these antibodies had an inhibitory effect.

Four patients developed anti-CHO antibodies, but only 2 of these patients were still positive for these antibodies at the end of the trial.

There were a total of 155 adverse events. However, only 4 of these (in 3 patients) were considered possibly or probably related to N9-GP.

These events consisted of an injection site rash in 1 patient, 2 overdoses in 1 patient, and neutropenia in 1 patient. The rash and neutropenia resolved, and the patient who overdosed recovered without complications.

Efficacy

The researchers said the success rate for the treatment of reported bleeds was 94.6%. Most bleeds (87.9%) were resolved with a single injection of N9-GP, but 9.2% required 2 injections, and 2.9% required 3 or 4 injections.

The median annualized bleeding rate for patients on prophylaxis was 1.05 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.00–2.20) overall. It was 1.36 (IQR, 0.00-2.23) for the 10 IU/kg arm and 1.00 (IQR, 0.00-2.03) for the 40 IU/kg arm.

There were 14 patients on prophylaxis who underwent 23 minor surgical procedures.

The hemostatic response was considered “excellent” (better than expected/predicted for the procedure in question) in 19 procedures and “good” (as expected) in 2 procedures. In the remaining 2 procedures, hemostatic responses were not determined.

Photo from Novo Nordisk

The recombinant, GlycoPEGylated coagulation factor IX product Rebinyn® is now available in the US for the treatment of patients with hemophilia B.

Last May, Rebinyn was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for on-demand treatment and control of bleeding episodes as well as perioperative management of bleeding in adults and children with hemophilia B.

The product is not approved for routine prophylaxis or immune tolerance induction in hemophilia B patients.

The full prescribing information is available at www.Rebinyn.com.

Rebinyn is also approved for use in the European Union, where it is known as nonacog beta pegol or by the brand name Refixia.

There, the product is approved for use as prophylaxis, for on-demand treatment of bleeding, and for control of bleeding related to surgical procedures in adolescents (older than 12 years of age) and adults with hemophilia B.

Trial results

The US and European approvals of nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) were based on results from the paradigm™ clinical trials. Results from the paradigm 4 trial were published in Thrombosis Research in May 2016.

Paradigm 4 was an extension trial enrolling patients who had participated in the phase 3 trials paradigm 2 and paradigm 3.

In paradigm 2, researchers assessed N9-GP as treatment and prophylaxis in previously treated patients with hemophilia B. In paradigm 3, researchers assessed N9-GP in hemophilia B patients undergoing surgical procedures.

Paradigm 4 included 71 patients (ages 13 to 70) who continued to receive N9-GP as on-demand treatment (40 IU/kg for mild/moderate bleeds and 80 IU/kg for severe bleeds) or prophylaxis (10 IU/kg or 40 IU/kg once-weekly). Sixty-five patients completed treatment.

Safety

None of the patients developed factor IX inhibitors. Two patients had transient binding antibodies to N9-GP, but there was no sign that these antibodies had an inhibitory effect.

Four patients developed anti-CHO antibodies, but only 2 of these patients were still positive for these antibodies at the end of the trial.

There were a total of 155 adverse events. However, only 4 of these (in 3 patients) were considered possibly or probably related to N9-GP.

These events consisted of an injection site rash in 1 patient, 2 overdoses in 1 patient, and neutropenia in 1 patient. The rash and neutropenia resolved, and the patient who overdosed recovered without complications.

Efficacy

The researchers said the success rate for the treatment of reported bleeds was 94.6%. Most bleeds (87.9%) were resolved with a single injection of N9-GP, but 9.2% required 2 injections, and 2.9% required 3 or 4 injections.

The median annualized bleeding rate for patients on prophylaxis was 1.05 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.00–2.20) overall. It was 1.36 (IQR, 0.00-2.23) for the 10 IU/kg arm and 1.00 (IQR, 0.00-2.03) for the 40 IU/kg arm.

There were 14 patients on prophylaxis who underwent 23 minor surgical procedures.

The hemostatic response was considered “excellent” (better than expected/predicted for the procedure in question) in 19 procedures and “good” (as expected) in 2 procedures. In the remaining 2 procedures, hemostatic responses were not determined.