User login
All adults, including pregnant and postpartum women, should be screened for depression, according to new recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
The recommendation also calls for screening to be coupled with “adequate systems” to ensure diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up (JAMA. 2016 Jan 26;315[4]:380-7).
The depression screening recommendation, authored by Dr. Albert L. Siu and the other members of the USPSTF, is a level B recommendation, meaning that it has either high certainty of moderate net benefit, or moderate certainty of moderate to substantial net benefit.
The new guidance in screening for depression helps address a disorder that is “the leading cause of disability among adults in high-income countries,” said Dr. Siu and his coauthors. Lost productivity attributable to depression cost $23 billion in the United States in 2011, and $22.8 billion was spent on treatments for depression in 2009, the last year for which figures are available.
Dr. Siu, chair of geriatrics and palliative medicine at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, and his coauthors cited “convincing evidence that screening improves the accurate identification of adult patients with depression in primary care settings, including pregnant and postpartum women.”
In addition, the task force found convincing evidence that for older adults as well as the general adult population, treatment of “depression identified through screening in primary care settings with antidepressants, psychotherapy, or both decreases clinical morbidity.”
For pregnant and postpartum women with depression, Dr. Siu and his coauthors found “adequate” evidence that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) improves outcomes.
The recommendation does not identify optimal timing and intervals for depression screening, citing a need for more research in this area. However, “a pragmatic approach might include screening all adults who have not been screened previously and using clinical judgment in consideration of risk factors, comorbid conditions, and life events to determine if additional screening of high-risk patients is warranted,” explained Dr. Siu and his coauthors.
The new depression screening recommendation from USPSTF updates the 2009 recommendation, which recommended universal screening if “staff-assisted depression care supports” were in place, and targeted screening based on clinical judgment and patient preference if such support were unavailable.
The rationale for the current recommendation of universal screening for those 18 years and older is the “recognition that such support is now much more widely available and accepted as part of mental health care,” the task force members said.
Any potential harms of screening, said Dr. Siu and his coauthors, were minimal to nonexistent.
Overall, the USPSTF assigned a small to moderate risk to the use of medication in depression. However, the use of “second-generation” antidepressants – mostly SSRIs – was associated with some harms, including increased risk of suicidal behavior in young adults and of gastrointestinal bleeding in older adults, as well as potential fetal harms in pregnant women taking antidepressants.
Using CBT to treat depression in pregnant and postpartum women was also associated with minimal to no harm.
The USPSTF screening recommendation is aligned with the American Academy of Family Physicians’ recommendation to screen the general adult population for depression, and with the American Academy of Pediatrics’ recommendation that pediatricians screen mothers for depression at their babies’ 1-, 2-, and 4-month office visits.
Released in draft form in July 2015, the depression screening recommendation was available for public comment for a period of 4 weeks. In response to public input, the final recommendation’s implementation section clarifies and characterizes an “adequate system” of screening, and gives more resources for evidence-based depression screening and treatment.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality supports the operations of the USPSTF, but the task force’s recommendations are independent of the federal government. Dr. Siu and the other task force members reported no conflicts of interest.
[email protected]
On Twitter @karioakes
Once the critical first steps of screening and diagnosis occurs, we are still left with the need to make sure that selected treatments are both appropriate and optimized for the individual, and this is where neurology can contribute. Given the roughly equal effectiveness of antidepressant- and psychotherapy-based treatments, their 30%-40% remission rate with the first treatment, and the consequences that may follow ineffective treatment, we are in need of ways to stratify patients to specific treatments. This is especially true for patients with neurologic diseases and other medical illnesses where disability may be magnified by depression.
Dr. Helen S. Mayberg |
Functional and structural neuroimaging techniques have found some promising candidates to predict remission or nonresponse to cognitive-behavioral therapy or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. But even if the widespread use of such imaging tests to select a treatment seems impractical, it would be a waste to forgo such assessments, especially if such tests could help to identify nonimaging surrogates.
Even if all depressions cannot be reduced to a neurologic common denominator, the evidence for a circuit-based strategy for tackling depression has received support from stimulation-induced depression syndromes in individuals without a history of depression, such as patients undergoing subthalamic deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease, and the alleviation of intractable symptoms in patients with primary depression via targeted stimulation of imaging-defined “nodes” within putative depression “circuits.”
The same systematic approach that has been successful in studying the motor system could be successful in improving diagnosis and treatment of depression.
Dr. Helen S. Mayberg is professor of psychiatry, neurology, and radiology and the Dorothy C. Fuqua Chair of Psychiatric Neuroimaging and Therapeutics at Emory University, Atlanta. The comments above were summarized from Dr. Mayberg’s editorial accompanying the USPSTF depression screening recommendation (JAMA. 2016 Jan 26. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.5048).
Once the critical first steps of screening and diagnosis occurs, we are still left with the need to make sure that selected treatments are both appropriate and optimized for the individual, and this is where neurology can contribute. Given the roughly equal effectiveness of antidepressant- and psychotherapy-based treatments, their 30%-40% remission rate with the first treatment, and the consequences that may follow ineffective treatment, we are in need of ways to stratify patients to specific treatments. This is especially true for patients with neurologic diseases and other medical illnesses where disability may be magnified by depression.
Dr. Helen S. Mayberg |
Functional and structural neuroimaging techniques have found some promising candidates to predict remission or nonresponse to cognitive-behavioral therapy or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. But even if the widespread use of such imaging tests to select a treatment seems impractical, it would be a waste to forgo such assessments, especially if such tests could help to identify nonimaging surrogates.
Even if all depressions cannot be reduced to a neurologic common denominator, the evidence for a circuit-based strategy for tackling depression has received support from stimulation-induced depression syndromes in individuals without a history of depression, such as patients undergoing subthalamic deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease, and the alleviation of intractable symptoms in patients with primary depression via targeted stimulation of imaging-defined “nodes” within putative depression “circuits.”
The same systematic approach that has been successful in studying the motor system could be successful in improving diagnosis and treatment of depression.
Dr. Helen S. Mayberg is professor of psychiatry, neurology, and radiology and the Dorothy C. Fuqua Chair of Psychiatric Neuroimaging and Therapeutics at Emory University, Atlanta. The comments above were summarized from Dr. Mayberg’s editorial accompanying the USPSTF depression screening recommendation (JAMA. 2016 Jan 26. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.5048).
Once the critical first steps of screening and diagnosis occurs, we are still left with the need to make sure that selected treatments are both appropriate and optimized for the individual, and this is where neurology can contribute. Given the roughly equal effectiveness of antidepressant- and psychotherapy-based treatments, their 30%-40% remission rate with the first treatment, and the consequences that may follow ineffective treatment, we are in need of ways to stratify patients to specific treatments. This is especially true for patients with neurologic diseases and other medical illnesses where disability may be magnified by depression.
Dr. Helen S. Mayberg |
Functional and structural neuroimaging techniques have found some promising candidates to predict remission or nonresponse to cognitive-behavioral therapy or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. But even if the widespread use of such imaging tests to select a treatment seems impractical, it would be a waste to forgo such assessments, especially if such tests could help to identify nonimaging surrogates.
Even if all depressions cannot be reduced to a neurologic common denominator, the evidence for a circuit-based strategy for tackling depression has received support from stimulation-induced depression syndromes in individuals without a history of depression, such as patients undergoing subthalamic deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease, and the alleviation of intractable symptoms in patients with primary depression via targeted stimulation of imaging-defined “nodes” within putative depression “circuits.”
The same systematic approach that has been successful in studying the motor system could be successful in improving diagnosis and treatment of depression.
Dr. Helen S. Mayberg is professor of psychiatry, neurology, and radiology and the Dorothy C. Fuqua Chair of Psychiatric Neuroimaging and Therapeutics at Emory University, Atlanta. The comments above were summarized from Dr. Mayberg’s editorial accompanying the USPSTF depression screening recommendation (JAMA. 2016 Jan 26. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.5048).
All adults, including pregnant and postpartum women, should be screened for depression, according to new recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
The recommendation also calls for screening to be coupled with “adequate systems” to ensure diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up (JAMA. 2016 Jan 26;315[4]:380-7).
The depression screening recommendation, authored by Dr. Albert L. Siu and the other members of the USPSTF, is a level B recommendation, meaning that it has either high certainty of moderate net benefit, or moderate certainty of moderate to substantial net benefit.
The new guidance in screening for depression helps address a disorder that is “the leading cause of disability among adults in high-income countries,” said Dr. Siu and his coauthors. Lost productivity attributable to depression cost $23 billion in the United States in 2011, and $22.8 billion was spent on treatments for depression in 2009, the last year for which figures are available.
Dr. Siu, chair of geriatrics and palliative medicine at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, and his coauthors cited “convincing evidence that screening improves the accurate identification of adult patients with depression in primary care settings, including pregnant and postpartum women.”
In addition, the task force found convincing evidence that for older adults as well as the general adult population, treatment of “depression identified through screening in primary care settings with antidepressants, psychotherapy, or both decreases clinical morbidity.”
For pregnant and postpartum women with depression, Dr. Siu and his coauthors found “adequate” evidence that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) improves outcomes.
The recommendation does not identify optimal timing and intervals for depression screening, citing a need for more research in this area. However, “a pragmatic approach might include screening all adults who have not been screened previously and using clinical judgment in consideration of risk factors, comorbid conditions, and life events to determine if additional screening of high-risk patients is warranted,” explained Dr. Siu and his coauthors.
The new depression screening recommendation from USPSTF updates the 2009 recommendation, which recommended universal screening if “staff-assisted depression care supports” were in place, and targeted screening based on clinical judgment and patient preference if such support were unavailable.
The rationale for the current recommendation of universal screening for those 18 years and older is the “recognition that such support is now much more widely available and accepted as part of mental health care,” the task force members said.
Any potential harms of screening, said Dr. Siu and his coauthors, were minimal to nonexistent.
Overall, the USPSTF assigned a small to moderate risk to the use of medication in depression. However, the use of “second-generation” antidepressants – mostly SSRIs – was associated with some harms, including increased risk of suicidal behavior in young adults and of gastrointestinal bleeding in older adults, as well as potential fetal harms in pregnant women taking antidepressants.
Using CBT to treat depression in pregnant and postpartum women was also associated with minimal to no harm.
The USPSTF screening recommendation is aligned with the American Academy of Family Physicians’ recommendation to screen the general adult population for depression, and with the American Academy of Pediatrics’ recommendation that pediatricians screen mothers for depression at their babies’ 1-, 2-, and 4-month office visits.
Released in draft form in July 2015, the depression screening recommendation was available for public comment for a period of 4 weeks. In response to public input, the final recommendation’s implementation section clarifies and characterizes an “adequate system” of screening, and gives more resources for evidence-based depression screening and treatment.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality supports the operations of the USPSTF, but the task force’s recommendations are independent of the federal government. Dr. Siu and the other task force members reported no conflicts of interest.
[email protected]
On Twitter @karioakes
All adults, including pregnant and postpartum women, should be screened for depression, according to new recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
The recommendation also calls for screening to be coupled with “adequate systems” to ensure diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up (JAMA. 2016 Jan 26;315[4]:380-7).
The depression screening recommendation, authored by Dr. Albert L. Siu and the other members of the USPSTF, is a level B recommendation, meaning that it has either high certainty of moderate net benefit, or moderate certainty of moderate to substantial net benefit.
The new guidance in screening for depression helps address a disorder that is “the leading cause of disability among adults in high-income countries,” said Dr. Siu and his coauthors. Lost productivity attributable to depression cost $23 billion in the United States in 2011, and $22.8 billion was spent on treatments for depression in 2009, the last year for which figures are available.
Dr. Siu, chair of geriatrics and palliative medicine at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, and his coauthors cited “convincing evidence that screening improves the accurate identification of adult patients with depression in primary care settings, including pregnant and postpartum women.”
In addition, the task force found convincing evidence that for older adults as well as the general adult population, treatment of “depression identified through screening in primary care settings with antidepressants, psychotherapy, or both decreases clinical morbidity.”
For pregnant and postpartum women with depression, Dr. Siu and his coauthors found “adequate” evidence that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) improves outcomes.
The recommendation does not identify optimal timing and intervals for depression screening, citing a need for more research in this area. However, “a pragmatic approach might include screening all adults who have not been screened previously and using clinical judgment in consideration of risk factors, comorbid conditions, and life events to determine if additional screening of high-risk patients is warranted,” explained Dr. Siu and his coauthors.
The new depression screening recommendation from USPSTF updates the 2009 recommendation, which recommended universal screening if “staff-assisted depression care supports” were in place, and targeted screening based on clinical judgment and patient preference if such support were unavailable.
The rationale for the current recommendation of universal screening for those 18 years and older is the “recognition that such support is now much more widely available and accepted as part of mental health care,” the task force members said.
Any potential harms of screening, said Dr. Siu and his coauthors, were minimal to nonexistent.
Overall, the USPSTF assigned a small to moderate risk to the use of medication in depression. However, the use of “second-generation” antidepressants – mostly SSRIs – was associated with some harms, including increased risk of suicidal behavior in young adults and of gastrointestinal bleeding in older adults, as well as potential fetal harms in pregnant women taking antidepressants.
Using CBT to treat depression in pregnant and postpartum women was also associated with minimal to no harm.
The USPSTF screening recommendation is aligned with the American Academy of Family Physicians’ recommendation to screen the general adult population for depression, and with the American Academy of Pediatrics’ recommendation that pediatricians screen mothers for depression at their babies’ 1-, 2-, and 4-month office visits.
Released in draft form in July 2015, the depression screening recommendation was available for public comment for a period of 4 weeks. In response to public input, the final recommendation’s implementation section clarifies and characterizes an “adequate system” of screening, and gives more resources for evidence-based depression screening and treatment.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality supports the operations of the USPSTF, but the task force’s recommendations are independent of the federal government. Dr. Siu and the other task force members reported no conflicts of interest.
[email protected]
On Twitter @karioakes
FROM JAMA
Key clinical point: Screen all adults for depression, including pregnant and postpartum women.
Major finding: All adults should be screened for depression, with adequate systems in place for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.
Data source: New recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Disclosures: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality supports the operations of the USPSTF, but the task force’s recommendations are independent of the federal government. Dr. Siu and the other task force members reported no conflicts of interest.