Low threshold for screening considered “reasonable”
Article Type
Changed
Fri, 05/05/2017 - 11:07

 

The current evidence is insufficient for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force to recommend either for or against routine screening of asymptomatic people for celiac disease, according to a Recommendation Statement published online March 28 in JAMA.

 
Body

 

Even though the current evidence on the effectiveness of screening for celiac disease is scarce or absent, it remains reasonable for clinicians to have a low threshold for testing patients, especially in high-risk populations such as those with an affected family member or a related autoimmune disorder.

This is because most celiac disease is unrecognized, and patients can present with diverse symptoms rather than the classic triad of abdominal pain, diarrhea, and weight loss.

Dr. Joseph A. Murray
As less-invasive testing becomes available and gluten-free diets become more accessible to patients, reducing the burden of diagnosis and treatment, the medical research community must come forward with the data to determine who should be screened and treated and when and how they should be screened.

Rok Seon Choung, MD, and Joseph A. Murray, MD , are in the division of gastroenterology and hepatology at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Dr. Murray reported ties to Alvine Pharmaceuticals, Alba Therapeutics, Celimmune, BioLineRx, and numerous others. Dr. Choung and Dr. Murray made these remarks in an editorial accompanying the USPSTF reports (JAMA. 2017 Mar 28;317:1221-3).

Publications
Topics
Sections
Body

 

Even though the current evidence on the effectiveness of screening for celiac disease is scarce or absent, it remains reasonable for clinicians to have a low threshold for testing patients, especially in high-risk populations such as those with an affected family member or a related autoimmune disorder.

This is because most celiac disease is unrecognized, and patients can present with diverse symptoms rather than the classic triad of abdominal pain, diarrhea, and weight loss.

Dr. Joseph A. Murray
As less-invasive testing becomes available and gluten-free diets become more accessible to patients, reducing the burden of diagnosis and treatment, the medical research community must come forward with the data to determine who should be screened and treated and when and how they should be screened.

Rok Seon Choung, MD, and Joseph A. Murray, MD , are in the division of gastroenterology and hepatology at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Dr. Murray reported ties to Alvine Pharmaceuticals, Alba Therapeutics, Celimmune, BioLineRx, and numerous others. Dr. Choung and Dr. Murray made these remarks in an editorial accompanying the USPSTF reports (JAMA. 2017 Mar 28;317:1221-3).

Body

 

Even though the current evidence on the effectiveness of screening for celiac disease is scarce or absent, it remains reasonable for clinicians to have a low threshold for testing patients, especially in high-risk populations such as those with an affected family member or a related autoimmune disorder.

This is because most celiac disease is unrecognized, and patients can present with diverse symptoms rather than the classic triad of abdominal pain, diarrhea, and weight loss.

Dr. Joseph A. Murray
As less-invasive testing becomes available and gluten-free diets become more accessible to patients, reducing the burden of diagnosis and treatment, the medical research community must come forward with the data to determine who should be screened and treated and when and how they should be screened.

Rok Seon Choung, MD, and Joseph A. Murray, MD , are in the division of gastroenterology and hepatology at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Dr. Murray reported ties to Alvine Pharmaceuticals, Alba Therapeutics, Celimmune, BioLineRx, and numerous others. Dr. Choung and Dr. Murray made these remarks in an editorial accompanying the USPSTF reports (JAMA. 2017 Mar 28;317:1221-3).

Title
Low threshold for screening considered “reasonable”
Low threshold for screening considered “reasonable”

 

The current evidence is insufficient for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force to recommend either for or against routine screening of asymptomatic people for celiac disease, according to a Recommendation Statement published online March 28 in JAMA.

 

 

The current evidence is insufficient for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force to recommend either for or against routine screening of asymptomatic people for celiac disease, according to a Recommendation Statement published online March 28 in JAMA.

 
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM JAMA

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: The current evidence is insufficient for the USPSTF to recommend either for or against routine screening of asymptomatic people for celiac disease.

Major finding: Only 4 studies out of the 3,036 that were examined addressed the question of screening adequately.

Data source: An assessment of the benefits and harms of screening based on a review of four studies.

Disclosures: The USPSTF’s work is supported by the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The authors’ financial disclosures are available at www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org.