User login
Key clinical point: In patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had undergone radiofrequency ablation (RFA), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) performed better at protecting liver function and reducing HBV DNA loads than entecavir (ETV), without significant difference in recurrence or overall survival.
Major finding: Patients receiving TDF vs. ETV showed significantly faster serum HBV DNA reduction (2.75 vs. 9.13 months; P = .015) and a higher stabilization/improvement rate of the albumin-bilirubin grade (64% vs. 41%; P < .001), but similar 5-year recurrence (40.3% vs. 40.8%; P = .35) and overall survival (93.5% vs. 96.9%; P = .12) rates.
Study details: This single-center retrospective cohort study propensity score-matched patients receiving ETV (n = 130) with those receiving TDF (n = 77) for chronic HBV infection after undergoing RFA as a curative treatment for HCC.
Disclosures: The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center physician scientist funding. No conflicts of interest were reported.
Source: Hu Z et al. Tenofovir vs. entecavir on outcomes of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation. Viruses. 2022;14(4):656 (Mar 22). Doi: 10.3390/v14040656
Key clinical point: In patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had undergone radiofrequency ablation (RFA), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) performed better at protecting liver function and reducing HBV DNA loads than entecavir (ETV), without significant difference in recurrence or overall survival.
Major finding: Patients receiving TDF vs. ETV showed significantly faster serum HBV DNA reduction (2.75 vs. 9.13 months; P = .015) and a higher stabilization/improvement rate of the albumin-bilirubin grade (64% vs. 41%; P < .001), but similar 5-year recurrence (40.3% vs. 40.8%; P = .35) and overall survival (93.5% vs. 96.9%; P = .12) rates.
Study details: This single-center retrospective cohort study propensity score-matched patients receiving ETV (n = 130) with those receiving TDF (n = 77) for chronic HBV infection after undergoing RFA as a curative treatment for HCC.
Disclosures: The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center physician scientist funding. No conflicts of interest were reported.
Source: Hu Z et al. Tenofovir vs. entecavir on outcomes of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation. Viruses. 2022;14(4):656 (Mar 22). Doi: 10.3390/v14040656
Key clinical point: In patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had undergone radiofrequency ablation (RFA), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) performed better at protecting liver function and reducing HBV DNA loads than entecavir (ETV), without significant difference in recurrence or overall survival.
Major finding: Patients receiving TDF vs. ETV showed significantly faster serum HBV DNA reduction (2.75 vs. 9.13 months; P = .015) and a higher stabilization/improvement rate of the albumin-bilirubin grade (64% vs. 41%; P < .001), but similar 5-year recurrence (40.3% vs. 40.8%; P = .35) and overall survival (93.5% vs. 96.9%; P = .12) rates.
Study details: This single-center retrospective cohort study propensity score-matched patients receiving ETV (n = 130) with those receiving TDF (n = 77) for chronic HBV infection after undergoing RFA as a curative treatment for HCC.
Disclosures: The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center physician scientist funding. No conflicts of interest were reported.
Source: Hu Z et al. Tenofovir vs. entecavir on outcomes of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation. Viruses. 2022;14(4):656 (Mar 22). Doi: 10.3390/v14040656