Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 15:30
Display Headline
Surgical wound classification unreliable

Surgical wound classification is frequently unreliable, according to a multicenter review of 2,034 cases.

Overall concordance between surgical wound classification (SWC) from the electronic medical record and SWC from operative note review was only 56%, ranging from 47% to 66% across 11 participating institutions.

The degree of discordance also varied according to the specific operation, with inguinal hernia repair having the highest overall median concordance at 92% and appendectomy having the lowest at just 12%.

“Using unreliable measures, such as current SWC assignment methods, can lead to biased study results and misleading portrayals of hospital quality. Surgical wound classification should not be used for SSI [surgical site infection] risk stratification until a more consistent process can be developed and validated,” Dr. Shauna M. Levy, lead study author, concluded.

Read the full article: J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2015;220;323-9.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
surgical wound classification, swc
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Surgical wound classification is frequently unreliable, according to a multicenter review of 2,034 cases.

Overall concordance between surgical wound classification (SWC) from the electronic medical record and SWC from operative note review was only 56%, ranging from 47% to 66% across 11 participating institutions.

The degree of discordance also varied according to the specific operation, with inguinal hernia repair having the highest overall median concordance at 92% and appendectomy having the lowest at just 12%.

“Using unreliable measures, such as current SWC assignment methods, can lead to biased study results and misleading portrayals of hospital quality. Surgical wound classification should not be used for SSI [surgical site infection] risk stratification until a more consistent process can be developed and validated,” Dr. Shauna M. Levy, lead study author, concluded.

Read the full article: J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2015;220;323-9.

Surgical wound classification is frequently unreliable, according to a multicenter review of 2,034 cases.

Overall concordance between surgical wound classification (SWC) from the electronic medical record and SWC from operative note review was only 56%, ranging from 47% to 66% across 11 participating institutions.

The degree of discordance also varied according to the specific operation, with inguinal hernia repair having the highest overall median concordance at 92% and appendectomy having the lowest at just 12%.

“Using unreliable measures, such as current SWC assignment methods, can lead to biased study results and misleading portrayals of hospital quality. Surgical wound classification should not be used for SSI [surgical site infection] risk stratification until a more consistent process can be developed and validated,” Dr. Shauna M. Levy, lead study author, concluded.

Read the full article: J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2015;220;323-9.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Surgical wound classification unreliable
Display Headline
Surgical wound classification unreliable
Legacy Keywords
surgical wound classification, swc
Legacy Keywords
surgical wound classification, swc
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article