User login
The Residual Cancer Burden (RCB), a standardized measure of residual disease in pathologic resection specimens following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, was found to be prognostic of long-term survival across all three phenotypic subtypes when it was applied to five breast cancer cohorts totaling 1,158 patients from a single institution, investigators report in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
If the findings of this retrospective cohort analysis are validated in other cohorts, it would indicate that assessing patients’ RCB index could add “meaningful information to pretreatement clinical and pathologic information and posttreatment yp stage [American Joint Commission on Cancer stage],” said W. Fraser Symmans, MD, of the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and his associates.
Residual disease is categorized into four groups: an index of zero (RCB-0) reflects a complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment, RCB-I indicates minimal residual disease, RCB-II indicates moderate residual disease, and RCB-III indicates extensive residual disease. The investigators reviewed pathology specimens to determine the RCB index in a cohort of 219 patients followed for 13 years, a cohort of 262 patients followed for 9 years, a cohort of 342 patients followed for 7 years, a cohort of 132 patients followed for more than 16 years, and a cohort of 203 patients followed for 7 years.
They found that the RCB index predicted the risk of relapse or death across all five cohorts, regardless of other clinical and pathologic variables such as tumor stage or grade, patient age, and type of surgery (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.1010).
RCB also was predictive regardless of whether patients had triple-negative disease, HR-positive/HER2-negative disease, HER2-positive disease treated with paclitaxel plus combined fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide alone, or HER2-positive disease treated with paclitaxel plus combined fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide plus trastuzumab.
In two especially high-risk groups of patients – those with triple-negative breast cancer and those with HER2-positive breast cancer – RCB was the only or the most important predictor of survival. Approximately half of the patients with triple-negative disease had an index of RCB-0 or RCB-I and a good prognosis, while those with an RCB-II or RCB-III index had poor survival, Dr. Symmans and his associates said.
The authors use their main finding – that RCB index provides additional and independent prognostic information to yp stage and other clinical factors – to support their opinion that clinicians should be provided this information.
But from the clinician’s point of view, it hasn’t been established that achieving a more exact prognosis by means of RCB is necessary. At present, the impact of such information on clinical management is limited. That might change if new postneoadjuvant treatments become available, but for now, pCR (pathologic complete response) rate remains the standard for assessing patients’ response to treatment.
Sibylle Loibl, MD, is with the German Breast Group in Neu-Isenburg, Germany. Carsten Denkert, MD, is with the German Breast Group and with Charite University Hospital, Berlin. They reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Loibl and Dr. Denkert made these remarks in an editorial accompanying Dr. Symmans’ report (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.3503).
The authors use their main finding – that RCB index provides additional and independent prognostic information to yp stage and other clinical factors – to support their opinion that clinicians should be provided this information.
But from the clinician’s point of view, it hasn’t been established that achieving a more exact prognosis by means of RCB is necessary. At present, the impact of such information on clinical management is limited. That might change if new postneoadjuvant treatments become available, but for now, pCR (pathologic complete response) rate remains the standard for assessing patients’ response to treatment.
Sibylle Loibl, MD, is with the German Breast Group in Neu-Isenburg, Germany. Carsten Denkert, MD, is with the German Breast Group and with Charite University Hospital, Berlin. They reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Loibl and Dr. Denkert made these remarks in an editorial accompanying Dr. Symmans’ report (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.3503).
The authors use their main finding – that RCB index provides additional and independent prognostic information to yp stage and other clinical factors – to support their opinion that clinicians should be provided this information.
But from the clinician’s point of view, it hasn’t been established that achieving a more exact prognosis by means of RCB is necessary. At present, the impact of such information on clinical management is limited. That might change if new postneoadjuvant treatments become available, but for now, pCR (pathologic complete response) rate remains the standard for assessing patients’ response to treatment.
Sibylle Loibl, MD, is with the German Breast Group in Neu-Isenburg, Germany. Carsten Denkert, MD, is with the German Breast Group and with Charite University Hospital, Berlin. They reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Loibl and Dr. Denkert made these remarks in an editorial accompanying Dr. Symmans’ report (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.3503).
The Residual Cancer Burden (RCB), a standardized measure of residual disease in pathologic resection specimens following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, was found to be prognostic of long-term survival across all three phenotypic subtypes when it was applied to five breast cancer cohorts totaling 1,158 patients from a single institution, investigators report in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
If the findings of this retrospective cohort analysis are validated in other cohorts, it would indicate that assessing patients’ RCB index could add “meaningful information to pretreatement clinical and pathologic information and posttreatment yp stage [American Joint Commission on Cancer stage],” said W. Fraser Symmans, MD, of the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and his associates.
Residual disease is categorized into four groups: an index of zero (RCB-0) reflects a complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment, RCB-I indicates minimal residual disease, RCB-II indicates moderate residual disease, and RCB-III indicates extensive residual disease. The investigators reviewed pathology specimens to determine the RCB index in a cohort of 219 patients followed for 13 years, a cohort of 262 patients followed for 9 years, a cohort of 342 patients followed for 7 years, a cohort of 132 patients followed for more than 16 years, and a cohort of 203 patients followed for 7 years.
They found that the RCB index predicted the risk of relapse or death across all five cohorts, regardless of other clinical and pathologic variables such as tumor stage or grade, patient age, and type of surgery (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.1010).
RCB also was predictive regardless of whether patients had triple-negative disease, HR-positive/HER2-negative disease, HER2-positive disease treated with paclitaxel plus combined fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide alone, or HER2-positive disease treated with paclitaxel plus combined fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide plus trastuzumab.
In two especially high-risk groups of patients – those with triple-negative breast cancer and those with HER2-positive breast cancer – RCB was the only or the most important predictor of survival. Approximately half of the patients with triple-negative disease had an index of RCB-0 or RCB-I and a good prognosis, while those with an RCB-II or RCB-III index had poor survival, Dr. Symmans and his associates said.
The Residual Cancer Burden (RCB), a standardized measure of residual disease in pathologic resection specimens following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, was found to be prognostic of long-term survival across all three phenotypic subtypes when it was applied to five breast cancer cohorts totaling 1,158 patients from a single institution, investigators report in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
If the findings of this retrospective cohort analysis are validated in other cohorts, it would indicate that assessing patients’ RCB index could add “meaningful information to pretreatement clinical and pathologic information and posttreatment yp stage [American Joint Commission on Cancer stage],” said W. Fraser Symmans, MD, of the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and his associates.
Residual disease is categorized into four groups: an index of zero (RCB-0) reflects a complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment, RCB-I indicates minimal residual disease, RCB-II indicates moderate residual disease, and RCB-III indicates extensive residual disease. The investigators reviewed pathology specimens to determine the RCB index in a cohort of 219 patients followed for 13 years, a cohort of 262 patients followed for 9 years, a cohort of 342 patients followed for 7 years, a cohort of 132 patients followed for more than 16 years, and a cohort of 203 patients followed for 7 years.
They found that the RCB index predicted the risk of relapse or death across all five cohorts, regardless of other clinical and pathologic variables such as tumor stage or grade, patient age, and type of surgery (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.1010).
RCB also was predictive regardless of whether patients had triple-negative disease, HR-positive/HER2-negative disease, HER2-positive disease treated with paclitaxel plus combined fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide alone, or HER2-positive disease treated with paclitaxel plus combined fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide plus trastuzumab.
In two especially high-risk groups of patients – those with triple-negative breast cancer and those with HER2-positive breast cancer – RCB was the only or the most important predictor of survival. Approximately half of the patients with triple-negative disease had an index of RCB-0 or RCB-I and a good prognosis, while those with an RCB-II or RCB-III index had poor survival, Dr. Symmans and his associates said.
FROM THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Key clinical point: The RCB measure is prognostic of long-term survival across all three phenotypic subtypes of breast cancer.
Major finding: The RCB index predicted the risk of relapse or death across five cohorts at a single institution, regardless of other clinical and pathologic variables such as tumor stage or grade, patient age, and type of surgery.
Data source: A retrospective cohort study assessing the RCB’s ability to predict long-term survival using data from five breast cancer cohorts (1,158 patients) with 6-17 years of follow-up.
Disclosures: This study was supported by the Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Funds for Breast Cancer Research, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, and the Nellie B. Connally Breast Center at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Dr. Symmans reported ties to ISIS Pharmaceuticals, Nuvera Biosciences, Affymetrix, Celgene, Genentech, and AbbVie, and his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.