Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 11:31
Display Headline
PSA screening isn’t “nonsense”—it saved my life

I read Dr. Susman’s editorial on PSA screening (J Fam Pract. 2011;60:319) with great personal interest.

I am 43 years old; I have no family history of prostate cancer and had no symptoms. Yet my Gleason 7 prostate cancer was found by a PSA test. You can argue that statistically, it would be better that I be allowed to die so that 722 others could be spared the stress of testing, some subset of those could be spared a biopsy, and some still smaller subset could be spared overtreatment. But my PSA test wasn’t “screening nonsense,” as Dr. Susman laments. It was ordered by a wise and caring physician and it saved my life.

Go ahead and take a position based on statistics. But please don’t dismiss the judgment of other knowledgeable professionals as “nonsense.”

Scott Orwig
Saline, MI

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 60(8)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
453-453
Legacy Keywords
PSA screening; editorial; Gleason 7; statistics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

I read Dr. Susman’s editorial on PSA screening (J Fam Pract. 2011;60:319) with great personal interest.

I am 43 years old; I have no family history of prostate cancer and had no symptoms. Yet my Gleason 7 prostate cancer was found by a PSA test. You can argue that statistically, it would be better that I be allowed to die so that 722 others could be spared the stress of testing, some subset of those could be spared a biopsy, and some still smaller subset could be spared overtreatment. But my PSA test wasn’t “screening nonsense,” as Dr. Susman laments. It was ordered by a wise and caring physician and it saved my life.

Go ahead and take a position based on statistics. But please don’t dismiss the judgment of other knowledgeable professionals as “nonsense.”

Scott Orwig
Saline, MI

I read Dr. Susman’s editorial on PSA screening (J Fam Pract. 2011;60:319) with great personal interest.

I am 43 years old; I have no family history of prostate cancer and had no symptoms. Yet my Gleason 7 prostate cancer was found by a PSA test. You can argue that statistically, it would be better that I be allowed to die so that 722 others could be spared the stress of testing, some subset of those could be spared a biopsy, and some still smaller subset could be spared overtreatment. But my PSA test wasn’t “screening nonsense,” as Dr. Susman laments. It was ordered by a wise and caring physician and it saved my life.

Go ahead and take a position based on statistics. But please don’t dismiss the judgment of other knowledgeable professionals as “nonsense.”

Scott Orwig
Saline, MI

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 60(8)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 60(8)
Page Number
453-453
Page Number
453-453
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
PSA screening isn’t “nonsense”—it saved my life
Display Headline
PSA screening isn’t “nonsense”—it saved my life
Legacy Keywords
PSA screening; editorial; Gleason 7; statistics
Legacy Keywords
PSA screening; editorial; Gleason 7; statistics
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media